Viva & Barnes - Daily Mirror's Misleading Headline & an "Unmatched" Bullet? Live w/ Gariepy; Brandon Straka & More!
Aired: 2026-03-31
Duration: 38:51


=== High Energy Tumbling Rounds (07:34) ===

[00:00:00]  Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs did an absolutely outrageous and unprecedented move.
[00:00:04]  I started about 30.
[00:00:06]  No, we're at 3 o'clock now.
[00:00:07]  Let's play the intro video.
[00:00:08]  Behold.
[00:00:09]  Barrel.
[00:00:09]  Basically, you're shooting a musket.
[00:00:11]  That's not at the beginning.
[00:00:12]  How about a high-energy tumbling round?
[00:00:14]  I appreciate that the higher the energy, the less likely it is to tumble.
[00:00:17]  But if it is a high-energy tumbling round, that might explain something more of this type of internal catastrophic injury that you would have.
[00:00:24]  I don't know how that, I don't even know how it would happen, but I would imagine it's within the realm of possibility to have a clearly high velocity, clearly supersonic.
[00:00:34]  And if itself is, if it doesn't fragment into a number of pieces and go in various directions in the body, if it's tumbling, that could account for it.
[00:00:41]  So what would happen?
[00:00:44]  One way that can happen is if grandpa shot the rifle for like 50 years and never cleaned it.
[00:00:49]  So it doesn't have a rifled barrel anymore because it's fouled with lead, with copper jacketing, with gunpowder.
[00:00:55]  If it's a fully fouled barrel, basically you're shooting a musket, right?
[00:00:59]  Just shove this bullet out and it's going to do whatever.
[00:01:03]  That's a possibility.
[00:01:04]  I know everybody in the crowd is much more gun savvy than I am.
[00:01:07]  And I took the course in Canada, and that is the difference between a rifle and the musket is that it's a ball going down and once it gets out, it's like a fastball going anywhere versus a rifle, which is which has a spiral on the inside.
[00:01:18]  It twists the bullet so that it has more accuracy and more distance.
[00:01:22]  So, I mean, Chris, that's a big, I don't want to, it's not a question of proving right or wrong.
[00:01:27]  That's a big concession to that, that could be married with the official narrative.
[00:01:30]  A poorly cleaned 100-year-old rifle that caused this high projectile velocity, high-velocity projectile to tumble, hits the neck, goes in various areas, obliterates the heart, and severs the spinal cord, however close to the brain is required for the immediate contraction.
[00:01:45]  And that seems to be something that could be paired with the information being given by the FBI.
[00:01:51]  We'll pause it right there because we don't need to go over the full interview with Chris Martinson, which was a very interesting one to deal with.
[00:01:57]  The news of the day, good afternoon, everybody.
[00:02:00]  Viva Fry, former Montreal litigator turned current Florida Rumbler, my three o'clock Rumble time slot.
[00:02:05]  We've got a guest on, and we're going to have to deal with an elephant in the room for the first few minutes of the interview because I knew this guy on the internet from the Charlie Kirk, Tyler Robinson discussion.
[00:02:16]  And then we were talking before and it's like, oh shit, there's a lot more to this.
[00:02:19]  We'll get to that in a second.
[00:02:20]  The news that is breaking today is Daily Mail ran what arguably, but might arguably be one of the most misleading headlines ever.
[00:02:30]  And as you can tell, people, I look at baseball cards, as you can see by all the pop-in ads.
[00:02:34]  What the hell is that?
[00:02:36]  That the bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did not match rifle allegedly used by suspect.
[00:02:42]  And the misleading nature of this headline is grotesque in that the substance of the article is not that the bullet did not match the rifle.
[00:02:51]  It's that the bullet portion that projects out could not be or has not been traced to the rifle in that you can't identify state that that whatever shards of metal are left that they have in evidence came from that shell from that round from that rifle.
[00:03:09]  Not that it does not match, but that they cannot match it.
[00:03:12]  We're going to get into the article in a second because there has been an individual, a gentleman on Twitter, X, who has been in this debate, going back and forth.
[00:03:22]  And I've seen his analysis and I've seen the debates surrounding it, whether or not a 30-odd six would necessarily, without exception, go through the body.
[00:03:30]  There's no way that the bullet that hit Charlie Kirk could be a 30-odd six or come from the Mauser rifle.
[00:03:35]  And this man is putting forward compelling arguments that it could.
[00:03:39]  We started, I saw that he replied to my tweet yesterday, and then I replied to him.
[00:03:43]  I said, you want to come on today to talk about it?
[00:03:45]  And if you don't know who this individual is, it's Jean-François Gavrier P. JF, you can come on now and we're going to get into breaking down this, call it a fake news story or at least a grotesquely misleading headline.
[00:03:59]  But before we do that, JF, so the internet's a big place and you don't know everybody for everything.
[00:04:07]  And when I thought we were going to come on here and talk about, you know, the research that you're doing or the analysis that you're doing on the Tyler Robinson murder trial, I asked, I made a joke, because your name is J.F. Garrieti, Jean-François.
[00:04:21]  And I was like, oh, you're French Canadian.
[00:04:22]  We're from the same neck of the woods.
[00:04:24]  And then you said, oh, no, I'm living out in Alberta.
[00:04:28]  I said, oh, why are you living out in Alberta?
[00:04:29]  And they said, oh, because the DJP, I had my issues with them.
[00:04:32]  That is the Drois La Jeune DiPJ.
[00:04:35]  It's the Department de la Protection Legionnis, the Department of Youth Protection.
[00:04:39]  And I said, oh, why did they have something to do with you?
[00:04:42]  And then you said, because my wife went missing in 2023, everyone thought I had something to do with it.
[00:04:48]  I was getting harassed and harangued by the DPG in Quebec.
[00:04:52]  And so I went to Alberta.
[00:04:55]  And then I pulled up an article in the Yahoo news, which I've got to show it.
[00:05:02]  I know you're used to it.
[00:05:03]  At least you have to be.
[00:05:04]  And if you're not, you have to at least laugh at it.
[00:05:07]  It's from the Daily Beast and it says, white supremacist vlogger Jean-François Garriepi's partner has been missing since June.
[00:05:12]  This is an article from October 12, 2023.
[00:05:15]  We're now in 2026, your missing partner has not turned up.
[00:05:20]  I imagine everyone on earth, not everyone, a lot of people probably think he had something to do with it.
[00:05:26]  I know nothing.
[00:05:26]  I knew nothing about this until five minutes ago.
[00:05:28]  So just let's get that elephant out of the room before we get into the Daily Mail article.
[00:05:32]  Yeah.
[00:05:33]  My ex, who is known as Elora now, we had a relationship and eventually she left.
[00:05:42]  She was a party girl and she was also a government resistance person, you know, someone with strong paranoid convictions about the government.
[00:05:52]  And she, at some point, after making two children with me, which I'm still raising, she left the home and two days after leaving the home sent me a message on the cell phone saying, this is the last time you'll ever hear about me.
[00:06:08]  I'm about to disappear in 30 minutes.
[00:06:10]  And if you have something to tell me, tell it to me now, because in 30 minutes, I disappear.
[00:06:17]  And she did disappear.
[00:06:19]  And the police never found her.
[00:06:21]  We don't know what happened to her.
[00:06:23]  But there's these, of course, these wine aunts and these people who believe that I killed her when, in fact, the police has been able to establish that she was in a separate province from me when she sent me that message.
[00:06:40]  I mean, and we're not going into all of this because it's not even what I want to do.
[00:06:45]  But so you have that text message.
[00:06:47]  Police saw that text message.
[00:06:48]  You received this and you have not heard or seen from it, nor has anybody.
[00:06:54]  In Quebec, they call them conjoins de fait.
[00:06:56]  You're not married.
[00:06:57]  You're not legally unionized.
[00:06:59]  But Quebecers are known for hooking up and not getting married, but having kids out of wedlock.
[00:07:02]  So that is the zeitgeist in Quebec.
[00:07:06]  You haven't heard from her.
[00:07:07]  Nobody's heard from her in two and a half years.
[00:07:09]  Nobody.
[00:07:09]  No sign.
[00:07:10]  She is a disappeared person with no sign of existence.
[00:07:16]  Well, I can understand why some people are going to look at you in a way that even when you see the way they're looking at Erica Kirk in the context of the Charlie Kirk case, I can understand why some people are going to look at you and have suspicions and probably never believe anything that doesn't confirm what they already believe.
[00:07:31]  All right, well, that's one hell of a big elephant.
[00:07:32]  I don't care to get into it any more than that.

=== The Jewish Threat Argument (03:32) ===

[00:07:34]  The other thing is you're a white nationalist.
[00:07:36]  And I asked you before we went live.
[00:07:39]  I asked you, what is the most anti-Semitic sentiment to which you expose?
[00:07:43]  And you gave an answer, which I, you know, if you want to call that anti-Semitism, you can go ahead and call it.
[00:07:48]  What is the most anti-Semitic sentiment that you have been accused of esposing, sir?
[00:07:52]  For 10 years, I've been pushing the idea and I'm one of the mentors behind people like Nick Ferrentes.
[00:07:58]  I knew him as a young streamer with 100 viewers on his videos.
[00:08:03]  And for more than 10 years now, I've been pushing the idea that Jewish power in the US is dangerously disbalanced and too high, and that it will get us into trouble first because we have an intellectual class in the US that has blind spots,
[00:08:21]  that doesn't have a skin in the game in the demographics of the white population, and that will lead us into wars and into pro-Israeli dangerous situations like the Iran war that we're seeing right now.
[00:08:36]  The standard rebuttal to that is that whether or not there's truth to that, because I don't think anybody can deny that there's truth to the influence of the lobby, the statistical overrepresentation of a population that represents, what, 10 to 15% of government, but is 2% of the population.
[00:08:53]  The standard, and it's a legitimate point, is that there are other entities that exercise an influence disproportionate, like Middle Eastern money in the U.S., like Chinese money and influence in the U.S.
[00:09:05]  And so the argument is going to be: if you focus only on the Jewish threat and not the Chinese spy students, that is what would make someone an anti-Semite to focus on the one thing that they care about while ignoring other equally great threats that I think do, in fact, exist.
[00:09:19]  Do you also think that's the same thing?
[00:09:20]  I think it's reasonable.
[00:09:21]  I don't deny the facts you've laid out.
[00:09:23]  There are other campaigns of influence in the U.S.
[00:09:26]  But the reason we have to focus on the Israeli one is none of these parallel streams have been able to drag the U.S. into 30 years of war.
[00:09:36]  We haven't gone to 30 years of wars for China.
[00:09:40]  We haven't gone for 30 years of war for Russia.
[00:09:44]  But we've been through 30 years of war for Israel.
[00:09:47]  And that is why it's an important focus.
[00:09:50]  That's interesting.
[00:09:51]  I think some people would push back and say that it's not for Israel, but it's for oil.
[00:09:54]  It might be for American financial interests, military-industrial complex interests, in which there might be a statistical overrepresentation, but by a factor of whatever five or seven.
[00:10:05]  Anyhow, okay, fair enough.
[00:10:06]  I'm not offended because I've heard these things for a very long time, and you can't deny the statistical overrepresentation when you don't like it while celebrating it when you do.
[00:10:14]  Like, oh, 25% of all Nobel laureates are Jewish.
[00:10:17]  And I think it might even be more.
[00:10:18]  But I find it offensive that you should suggest there's an overrepresentation in government.
[00:10:22]  All right, two elephants out of the room, JP.
[00:10:25]  You seem like a nice guy.
[00:10:26]  We don't have to agree with everything on anything.
[00:10:28]  But what I find amazing is: A, living with that shadow of a missing spouse over your shoulders.
[00:10:34]  I mean, that's something to the extent you didn't have anything to do with it.
[00:10:38]  And I presume that's the case until evidence of the contrary, because people are.
[00:10:41]  This is what I like about you.
[00:10:42]  And I want to commend you.
[00:10:44]  I mean, you're one of the great guys in terms of true adherence to principles of liberty, of respect, and of presumption of innocence.
[00:10:55]  You're one of the true, the only, in fact, Jewish intellectual that I know of who is consistent.
[00:11:03]  Well, I don't tout identity issues as defining issues, even though I should.

=== Bullet Fragment Limits of Science (14:58) ===

[00:11:07]  And I'm told I'm bad for not doing that.
[00:11:09]  I think the individual over everything.
[00:11:13]  And okay, well, that's good.
[00:11:15]  Now, we're not, you might come back home.
[00:11:18]  We'll do full shows on the disappearance, and we'll do full shows on the politics.
[00:11:22]  The story that you saw, the same story that I saw the other day, and I'll bring it back up right now, which is Daily Mail running what is arguably, but not arguably, a very misleading headline.
[00:11:31]  It says, bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did not match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims.
[00:11:38]  You have to go into the article because this is how it always works, is I don't know if it's bearing the lead, but it's misleading from the title.
[00:11:45]  That the bullet that killed conservative commentator Charlie Kirk may not match the rifle used by the suspect in a bombshell new report, facing murder, yada, yada.
[00:11:54]  His defense attorneys now argue that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives was unable to identify the bullet recovered at autopsy to the rifle allegedly tied to Mr. Robinson.
[00:12:05]  I think we can take it out there because that's all that's really relevant.
[00:12:10]  You've been following this story and doing some good analysis.
[00:12:13]  For those who want to write you off or celebrate your authority, what is your area of expertise that has allowed you to even dip your toe into analyzing this situation?
[00:12:24]  I'm a doctor of biology with experience in very advanced surgery, brain surgery on monkeys.
[00:12:31]  So I know about biological tissues.
[00:12:33]  And I worked as a researcher at Duke University doing surgery.
[00:12:38]  So I know that biological tissues are an extremely complex, an extremely complex set of matters and enters pierced together, weave together in a very special way that leads to different reactions in what we call terminal ballistics.
[00:12:55]  So terminal ballistics is the science of when the bullet hits.
[00:13:00]  What happens after?
[00:13:01]  And what is the tumbling?
[00:13:03]  What is the rotatory action?
[00:13:05]  How do bullets that are well aligned or not well aligned will pierce tissue or not pierce tissue?
[00:13:11]  And ultimately, I have an understanding of the solidity and the thickness of skin and various biological tissues below the skin.
[00:13:22]  Now, the running, and I call it a conspiracy theory not to demean or degrade it, because even if you think it's untenable, you still have to refute it.
[00:13:30]  The running theory, and you hear people saying it all the time, that was never a 30-odd six because that would necessarily have gone through him like a hot knife through butter.
[00:13:40]  You have, it's funny, you have anecdotal evidence on both sides.
[00:13:44]  People saying, I'm a hunter, I've hunted all the time.
[00:13:45]  You shoot a deer, it sometimes hits the clavicle, spins, and goes down.
[00:13:49]  Then you have others saying, absolutely not, it would necessarily penetrate through the body.
[00:13:52]  Then you say, oh, well, Martin Luther King was shot with a 30-odd six in the chin.
[00:13:57]  It didn't penetrate the body.
[00:13:58]  But then they say, oh, well, the chin bone is strong enough to stop the bullet, but the spinal cord would not be.
[00:14:04]  And the reason why I started with the Chris Martinson clip is because one of the things I'd been positing from the beginning is maybe they misidentified the round.
[00:14:14]  And I've since been corrected by people saying, if you have the casing, you can't misidentify it, but you don't know the quality or the state of the gunpowder or of the projectile itself, which is where Chris Martinson, in all of his analysis, and he was the one who believes that it couldn't have been a 30-odd 6, concedes that if it started tumbling for whatever the reason, that could explain its trajectory once it hits the skin.
[00:14:38]  And how could it have been tumbling?
[00:14:39]  Well, if the rifle was old enough, improperly maintained, which I presume this was, given it's a 100-year-old rifle, that's a possibility.
[00:14:47]  I mean, how do you make sense of that?
[00:14:49]  And to the extent that this article says they can't match what's remaining of the fragment to the bullet, it's because it's been fragmented.
[00:14:58]  What's your explanation, or how do you analyze the fragmentation that we're doing?
[00:15:04]  Your understanding is excellent.
[00:15:05]  And the concession that you've obtained from Chris Martyrson is extremely important because I've been on a debate with him many months ago on Twitter and he was refusing to make that concession.
[00:15:16]  So you really got a step of advance here because he was stubbornly pursuing the theory that I tested everything, I tested with ham hocks and pork hox, and it doesn't, it passes all the time.
[00:15:30]  But I had pushed a theory for many months that there are various things that happen in terminal ballistics that explain why it doesn't pass the second layer of skin.
[00:15:40]  Let's not forget that a bullet is designed to travel through air.
[00:15:45]  It is not designed to travel inside the tissue in a straight way.
[00:15:49]  So, what happens inside the tissue is the bullet as it arrives, and especially if you're shooting at an elevation, the bullet arrives like this in the tissue.
[00:15:58]  Now, what happens when you and when you that would be the straight bullet entry, but the bullet actually arrives like this because of various factors, including the initial elevation and the wind and the aerodynamic effects.
[00:16:15]  So, when the bullet arrives like this, it encounters more tissue on the top and less tissue on the bottom.
[00:16:22]  And that's like the plane wings.
[00:16:26]  It's a differential pressure system.
[00:16:29]  Now, what happens in a differential pressure system is the same thing that happens if you're a Canadian driving a car and your car starts sliding onto the ice.
[00:16:38]  What's happening is that there's a part of your car that is receiving more pressure from the front and less pressure from the back.
[00:16:46]  What happens?
[00:16:46]  The back starts rotating and your car starts losing control.
[00:16:50]  The same thing is true in the differential pressure situation in an arriving bullet.
[00:16:55]  So, what we have inside the bodies of animals that are shot are humans, it is that the entry point is straight or quasi-straight, but the exit point is not straight, which is why all injuries that are that are piercing bullets are all clean entry with a small injury at the entry point, but a big injury at the back point.
[00:17:19]  That's because the bullet has tumbled, it has mushroomed, it has changed shape, it has fragmented.
[00:17:25]  There's more damage in the back than at the entry point.
[00:17:28]  Now, this fact that there's more damage is what happens when the bullet does succeed at piercing.
[00:17:34]  However, in this case, in the case of Charlie Kirk and in the case of multiple hunter testimonies that I've reviewed with 30 out 6 specifically, they don't always pierce the back of the skin because if the bullet has mushroomed, it is no more a tip.
[00:17:50]  And if it has rotated, the tip is no more aligned.
[00:17:53]  And at the back of the skin, what happens is you have a flat bullet entering collision with a very stretchy tissue, which is the human skin or the animal's skin, very hard to pierce, which is why many hunters keep finding bullets on the other side of the animal that they shot.
[00:18:12]  It's interesting.
[00:18:12]  You seem to have pissed off someone named 60 Designs who says you block people on Twitter as if you're the only one.
[00:18:19]  And an almost immeasurable curve, that bullet would have gone straight through at double the distance.
[00:18:24]  This is what drives me nuts: people just shut off their ears.
[00:18:27]  Like Chris Martinson is the one who supports this theory the most.
[00:18:31]  Literally conceded that if it were tumbling at the moment of impact, then that might explain how it does catastrophic injury internally but doesn't penetrate.
[00:18:41]  If it starts tumbling once it makes entry, that is also how it, you know, if a bullet starts tumbling like that, I mean, it turns into a saw.
[00:18:48]  If it's on a downward angle, hits a bone.
[00:18:51]  You've had the Martin Luther King example there.
[00:18:54]  Going back to this article, because of the misleading nature of it, some people are saying, what was left of the bullet?
[00:19:00]  And so this article Article saying the defense team may now offer the ATM's firearms analysts testimony as exculpatory.
[00:19:06]  Of course, they would.
[00:19:06]  It's the defense.
[00:19:08]  They said in the motion.
[00:19:09]  It also notes that DNA reports filed by the FBI and ATF will take some time that, okay, they need some time to analyze all of this.
[00:19:16]  The issue as it stands now, and just to really highlight why this headline was so misleading, there's fragments of that bullet left now.
[00:19:24]  So they don't have a purely intact, I call it a projectile, but I've since been corrected.
[00:19:28]  It's just the bullet.
[00:19:29]  They don't have the intact piece.
[00:19:31]  And this article basically said nothing more than the defense is saying it can't match what's left of the projectile to the casing, which, from what I understand, between 20 and 60, 65% of cases, they can't do that anyhow because what's left at the end of the bullet, the projectile, is a mangled or splintered, you know, multiple shreds of metal.
[00:19:52]  Is that give or take accurate?
[00:19:55]  Absolutely accurate.
[00:19:56]  And this is a case of liars trying to take non-knowledge and transform it into a positive, affirmative claim of knowledge.
[00:20:06]  So we don't know.
[00:20:08]  We don't know that the bullet doesn't match or match because we never got a chance to extract a bullet that would be recognizable.
[00:20:16]  And so from there, what you have to develop is agnosticism.
[00:20:20]  But here, the liars have been trying to push, well, this is exculpatory evidence.
[00:20:27]  Well, it is not really.
[00:20:28]  And it is not because absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
[00:20:32]  That is, the fact that we couldn't know the nature of the bullet from its recovery because there was no recovery and it was irrecoverable doesn't tell us anything about whether it's Tyler Robertson or not.
[00:20:46]  It just tells us about the limits of science in a post-shooting scenario.
[00:20:53]  I'm again reading the chat and people are saying that it does not match versus cannot match or has not been matched.
[00:21:00]  It was when, do you remember when Candace Owens made the sort of ridiculous statement after Tim Poole's place was shot?
[00:21:06]  And they said, she said, did you find the bullet so they can trace it to the manual, trace it to the sale of the bullet?
[00:21:12]  As if you could identify the owner of the gun if you were to find the projectile of the bullet.
[00:21:16]  The point here is that in the, let's just say not the majority of situations, in roughly half, give or take, you can never definitively say that projectile came from that casing because there would only be so many ways to literally match it like a fingerprint.
[00:21:31]  What you're looking at here would be tire marks.
[00:21:34]  You can say, okay, it came from a certain tire made by a certain manufacturer, but they make a lot of tire.
[00:21:41]  So you haven't singled it to a vehicle.
[00:21:43]  You've singled it to a tire.
[00:21:44]  I don't know that what they said right now is that this, what's left of the fragments is not a 30-odd 6, but what the defense is saying is that it has not been definitively matched to that casing.
[00:21:54]  But from what I understand, that's not done or that is unable to be done in at least half of the, give or take, half of cases in which there's a shooting.
[00:22:02]  Absolutely.
[00:22:03]  And the 30-odd 6, as one of the most popular bullets for the 30-odds in the 30-odd 6 form, is designed to be fragmenting.
[00:22:13]  So it is designed that once it enters the first layer of skin, it will shatter 85, 90% of the time.
[00:22:21]  So it's not even a rare occurrence that we would have this form of this outcome in a 30-odd 6.
[00:22:29]  Of course, the things that you violated before, the points about could be a bad bullet, could have been subject to corrosion, could have been poorly handled, poorly stored.
[00:22:39]  All of this adds to the possibilities.
[00:22:41]  But at base, we don't even need those explanations.
[00:22:45]  It is very regular for the 30 odd 6 bullet to be of the core locked type that is designed for fragmentation.
[00:22:53]  So it is actually an expected outcome.
[00:22:56]  It's called frangible, from what I understand.
[00:22:58]  Again, I'm not an expert at all.
[00:23:01]  I have two friends who I consider to be experts, Kyle Serafin being one, and Jinja Ninja.
[00:23:07]  I don't know if his name is public, but Jinja Ninja, who made me this bullet bell and who knows about everything about guns.
[00:23:15]  And he said, you know, there are some that are intended to fragment upon entry.
[00:23:19]  And the reason being, if you're for training exercises, if you're firing in areas where there's other people, and if the bullet goes into somebody, you don't want it to go through them through a wall and hit somebody else.
[00:23:30]  There was also a whole, I want to get it.
[00:23:31]  This was from Ginger Ninja, who also informed me of another option of a very rare type of bullet called the Sabbath round, where I said, you know, when I said, you don't know what type of bullet it is, or maybe they misidentified the bullet.
[00:23:45]  The projectile could have been a different type of projectile fitted, and that's called the sabbat round, which is exceedingly less likely than a frangible bullet.
[00:23:56]  I mean, that's, I mean, people call you a conspiracy theorist, but what's your, I mean, how do you account for the stubbornness?
[00:24:05]  And I'm looking in the chat of people who just refuse to 3006 always behaves exactly the same.
[00:24:11]  I don't need to know how old the bullet is.
[00:24:12]  I don't even know how it was kept.
[00:24:13]  I don't even know if the guy did the thing.
[00:24:15]  And like, have you seen the movie Taxi Driver?
[00:24:18]  Yes.
[00:24:18]  Yeah, you remember when Robert Denier was putting the X in the bullets so that it splits on contact?
[00:24:24]  Nobody knows the condition of the bullet, the charge, the age, and yet they want to come to a definitive hard and fast rule.
[00:24:30]  A 3006 would always do X, and this therefore could not have been a 30 odd six.
[00:24:34]  And let's not forget that it is known that Tyler Robinson was marking those casings.
[00:24:39]  And when you mark casings, you can put some fat lipids that you carry on your fingers.
[00:24:44]  Maybe you've just eaten.
[00:24:46]  So he spent a lot of time with these bullets around his computer, perhaps eating Cheetos or whatever.
[00:24:52]  Clearly, these bullets have not been given the top storage possibility in terms of cleanliness.
[00:24:59]  Now, what you mentioned is extremely important.
[00:25:02]  What's happening with the conspiracy theory?
[00:25:04]  And I'm a conspiracy theorist to the extent that there's a provable conspiracy.
[00:25:09]  I love to find the truth about things.
[00:25:12]  But the problem is we have no mechanism for the search for truth in the public sphere.
[00:25:18]  And so the only mechanism we have is influencers propping themselves up and getting views and getting rewarded with reposts and likes on Twitter.
[00:25:29]  So this is what I've been working for 10 years.
[00:25:33]  We have to develop a process of self-critique, of examination, of people even within the right wing criticizing each other so that we have a more healthy public conversation about the search for truth.
[00:25:46]  Because the people that are currently handling it is just basically an influencer system of AI videos, fake claims, exaggerated videos.
[00:25:57]  We need the scientific method applied on the everyday to everyday questions that matter in the news.

=== Revolutionary Phenotype and AI (03:44) ===

[00:26:06]  I don't want to bring it back to the beginning.
[00:26:08]  Do you think Israel was involved, JF?
[00:26:11]  Well, I think we need to talk about it cleanly.
[00:26:16]  Is there direct evidence that Israel was involved?
[00:26:20]  Not yet satisfactory, in my view.
[00:26:24]  But is there circumstantial evidence that Israel was awfully well positioned to want that murder to happen?
[00:26:33]  Yes.
[00:26:34]  Circumstantial evidence is not enough for me to reach a conclusion.
[00:26:38]  But I believe we should have a proper investigation.
[00:26:41]  And when Joe Kent comes out on Tucker and says we weren't given the chance to study the proper counter-terrorism route of investigation, I'm like, well, so we have circumstantial evidence and I would like the investigation to happen.
[00:26:57]  And it seems to have been blocked to some degree.
[00:27:00]  This is the current state.
[00:27:01]  And I'm not saying Israel did it, but it certainly doesn't look good.
[00:27:07]  My issue is that I can easily conceive of a foreign influence.
[00:27:12]  And I'm not even necessarily looking at Israel.
[00:27:13]  I'm looking more China in terms of infiltrating these chat rooms and brainwashing young, mentally ill Americans because destability for America is necessarily good for China.
[00:27:25]  And incidentally, Joe Kent is coming on tomorrow at three o'clock.
[00:27:29]  And I'm going to ask some follow-up questions that we did not, or that I did not hear in what I heard from the Tucker Carlson interview, because I would like to know the concrete steps that were undertaken by the FBI to not follow up on.
[00:27:43]  I doubt he'll be able to specify what the indications or suspicions, what were the facts that led to his suspicions, but I'd like to know what the concrete steps were in terms of them actively not following up on it, or maybe they did.
[00:27:54]  So that's tomorrow, people, as at the time of today, which is three o'clock.
[00:27:58]  It's going to be great.
[00:27:58]  I just hope we have to.
[00:27:59]  I'll be watching for sure.
[00:28:01]  Well, JF, I know you wrote a book.
[00:28:02]  And I mean, I say plug it not in a cynical way.
[00:28:05]  What's your book about?
[00:28:06]  My book is The Revolutionary Phenotype, The Amazing Story of How Life Begins and How It Turts and How It Ends.
[00:28:15]  And it is a dire warning to humanity about how life forms develop libraries of genes and start modifying themselves genetically and they die from it.
[00:28:26]  They eventually get concured by the machines that they've created.
[00:28:30]  It happened 4 billion years ago right here on Earth and it led to the emergence of DNA.
[00:28:35]  And we're about to do it again with AI.
[00:28:38]  So never let AI modify your genes.
[00:28:41]  That is the message of the revolutionary phenotype.
[00:28:44]  AI as in the technology actually integrating with biologics?
[00:28:49]  Absolutely.
[00:28:50]  So what we'll have very soon is AI starting to decide what should you want in the genes of your babies.
[00:28:58]  What should you want to modify with CRISPR?
[00:29:01]  Do you want blonde hair?
[00:29:02]  Do you want blue eyes?
[00:29:03]  Those are the aesthetic aspects.
[00:29:06]  But there will be an absolute change of society as AI gets more and more influence on farming human beings.
[00:29:12]  And it will eventually enslave us in this process over 100,000 years, which is why we need to say no to any modifications by AI, even if you think it's good for your health or for your children's health.
[00:29:25]  We need to say no to maintain a continued evolution in line with Darwinian evolution rather than engineered sculpting.
[00:29:35]  Well, that is actually very interesting, JF.
[00:29:38]  Is it on audiobook?
[00:29:39]  Absolutely.
[00:29:40]  Audiobook on Adibal, the revolutionary phenotype.
[00:29:44]  All right.
[00:29:44]  Well, it looks short enough.
[00:29:46]  How many hours is the audiobook?
[00:29:47]  140 pages.
[00:29:49]  You can read this in an afternoon.

=== Rumble Wallet and Audiobook (04:55) ===

[00:29:51]  No, not me.
[00:29:51]  I can listen to it on a long, long run.
[00:29:54]  JF, first of all, it was very great.
[00:29:57]  It's great finally meeting you.
[00:29:58]  I had no idea of the other backstories.
[00:30:01]  Maybe you come back on and we'll go over those and spend an entire show on you.
[00:30:04]  Absolutely.
[00:30:04]  Anytime.
[00:30:05]  All right, man.
[00:30:05]  Well, thank you very much.
[00:30:06]  It was fantastic.
[00:30:08]  Send me your link.
[00:30:08]  I'll put it in the pinned comment and people can go harass you on Twitter.
[00:30:11]  JFG.world.
[00:30:13]  JFG tonight on YouTube.
[00:30:15]  Amazing, man.
[00:30:16]  Thank you very much.
[00:30:17]  Bye-bye.
[00:30:17]  All right.
[00:30:17]  Godspeed.
[00:30:19]  Let me bring up one chat here.
[00:30:20]  Vivi, you don't think Israel infiltrates chat rooms?
[00:30:22]  I have no doubt that they do.
[00:30:24]  I mean, that wasn't to say, I'm not saying one country could not possibly have been involved in some sort of manipulation of the youth.
[00:30:30]  Just that when it comes to, I mean, transgender ideology is also not going to be the best example because the proponents of that theory, there's also some statistical overrepresentation in that movement.
[00:30:43]  But when it comes to TikTok and the brain rot that that causes on American society in particular and of fighting age youth, I think there is an active attempt to subvert, to poison the fighting age youth of America.
[00:31:01]  And I think that does come largely from China.
[00:31:03]  I don't think if America falls, it doesn't benefit.
[00:31:09]  If America falls, it doesn't benefit Israel.
[00:31:11]  So the need to undermine and destroy America, if you think Israel's doing that, I would argue that that's a very short-sighted plan because America is probably the greatest defender of Israel.
[00:31:23]  And if anybody wants to do harm to Israel, you would want to undermine America.
[00:31:26]  And I think China is leading the charge on that.
[00:31:31]  All right.
[00:31:31]  Now, hold on before we, I see Brendan Strzok, who hasn't been on the channel in a while.
[00:31:36]  Bill Tong says it was not Tyler.
[00:31:38]  It was the intentional kabool of baby eaters sponsored by Israeli.
[00:31:41]  Anything else are lies, says King of Biltong.
[00:31:44]  That's sarcasm, by the way, people.
[00:31:47]  Now, part two of today's show.
[00:31:50]  Brendan, hit the activate mic and activate camera, and then you can pop on in here.
[00:31:58]  Let me see if he's texting me that he's having difficulty coming on here.
[00:32:01]  No, nothing here.
[00:32:02]  Okay.
[00:32:04]  No.
[00:32:05]  Okay.
[00:32:05]  He'll come on in a second.
[00:32:07]  Let's, until he comes in, let us go over to Viva.
[00:32:12]  By the way, if you're watching on the landing page of Crumble, like such, let me see here.
[00:32:17]  Go here, go here.
[00:32:18]  If you're watching here, click on the link and make sure you give a thumbs up.
[00:32:23]  Oh, I got eight thumbs down.
[00:32:24]  I don't care about that anyhow.
[00:32:25]  And if you want to support the channel, all of the links are there.
[00:32:27]  You can send me stuff.
[00:32:28]  I got a series of books today, which I will show shortly.
[00:32:32]  If you want to support financially, you can join viva barnslaw.locals.com.
[00:32:37]  10 bucks a month, 100 bucks for the whole year.
[00:32:38]  It's amazing community.
[00:32:39]  Lots of exclusive stuff, but a lot of stuff that is just for non-paying supporters or members, as we call them.
[00:32:45]  And if you want to tip with crypto using Rumble Wallet, you go there.
[00:32:50]  If you have a Rumble wallet already, or if you have any crypto, you can go here, scan the QR code, and you can tip with Bitcoin, gold-backed XAUT.
[00:33:00]  It's a crypto that is backed to gold, tether to gold, courtesy of Tether and their stake in Rumble right now in making it amazing.
[00:33:08]  Go to rumble.wallet or wallet.rumble.
[00:33:11]  Go to the app store, download the Rumble wallet, and you can tip and support the channel like such.
[00:33:16]  Or the way King of Bill Tong does it, which is with Crumble Rance.
[00:33:21]  And if I can bring it up here, it says, this isn't just Bill Tong.
[00:33:23]  It's premium meat, real craftsmanship, and clean ingredients, all made in-house and sold direct.
[00:33:28]  Go to Billtongusa.com.
[00:33:31]  Use code Viva for 10% off.
[00:33:33]  And the quartering has raided the stream, people.
[00:33:36]  This is turning into quite the party.
[00:33:38]  Brendan, let me make sure that Brendan can hear me.
[00:33:41]  You can come in when you're ready, Smileyface.
[00:33:44]  Okay, let's see this.
[00:33:46]  And I'm going to go thank the quartering.
[00:33:48]  And this is the action here.
[00:33:50]  Booyah, thank you at the quartering.
[00:33:55]  Okay.
[00:33:56]  And by the way, speaking of the innovations on Rumble, Rampage Jackson has announced that he's going exclusive with, or he's not going exclusive, but he's joining Rumble.
[00:34:06]  And I would like to have an interview with Rampage Jackson.
[00:34:10]  I mean, Rampage Jackson, for those of you who don't know, UFC, what's the word?
[00:34:16]  UFC great.
[00:34:18]  And here he's joining.
[00:34:21]  I just signed with Rumble.
[00:34:22]  New chapter, more content, me taking a bet on myself, to my family on kick.
[00:34:26]  I'm not leaving y'all behind.
[00:34:27]  We're multi-streaming.
[00:34:28]  I would love to have an interview with Rampage.
[00:34:30]  We would also, you know, the elephant in the room would be the current situation with His son, who uh had the incident with the incident, who violently assaulted um in a fit of uncontrollable rage uh psycho stew on stage.

=== Patriotism and Leader Worship (04:04) ===

[00:34:46]  And we all followed that legal story and took long enough for the you know LAPD to arrest the son.
[00:34:52]  But anyways, I would love to have a discussion with Rampage Jackson just about the his career and whatnot.
[00:34:56]  So he's now on Rumble.
[00:34:58]  See if we can make that happen.
[00:34:59]  Now, Brandon seems to be um having difficulty here.
[00:35:03]  Hold on one second.
[00:35:04]  Are you having difficulty clicking in?
[00:35:07]  Question mark.
[00:35:09]  Let's see what's going on.
[00:35:11]  While Brandon does this, by the way, also, I want to play a portion of his video because he was just at CPAC and he gave a pretty compelling speech.
[00:35:23]  And it might piss some people off, but tough noogies, if it does.
[00:35:28]  And his question was: when did we become the left?
[00:35:33]  And I'll just play a minute of this.
[00:35:35]  When I was going through my hell, only two members, elected members of Congress, took my phone calls.
[00:35:41]  Two.
[00:35:42]  That was Lauren Boebert and Marjorie Taylor Greene.
[00:35:49]  Marjorie was one of the only elected members of Congress to visit Jay Sixers in prison.
[00:35:55]  She was the only member of Congress to sponsor the Matthew Lawrence Perna Bill, named after one of the J Sixers who committed suicide due to the brutality he endured at the hands of the United States government.
[00:36:06]  And a few years ago, she came to the walkaway booth at CPAC.
[00:36:11]  Oopsie, Jill, sorry about that.
[00:36:12]  Ah, crap.
[00:36:14]  We're having.
[00:36:15]  Hold up, hold up, hold up, sorry.
[00:36:16]  And now a directive has gone out that Marjorie Taylor Greene is a traitor.
[00:36:20]  And if you want to be a part of the in crowd, it is mandatory that you must hate her too.
[00:36:26]  If I were to ask, probably at least half the people in this room would say that they didn't like her anymore.
[00:36:30]  And if I were to ask why, I bet the majority wouldn't even know themselves.
[00:36:35]  When did we become the left?
[00:36:38]  When did we become hive-minded, mean, and tribal?
[00:36:42]  When did we decide that not only must we cancel those we disagree with, but we must control the people around us with intimidation, demanding that they think the way we think and join the cancel mob too, or be branded themselves?
[00:36:55]  And when did we allow some of the most toxic, nasty, and vicious people on the planet to become the spokespeople for MAGA and the arbiters of purity tests, deciding who is and isn't worthy enough to continue to call themselves MAGA?
[00:37:10]  But perhaps most importantly, when did we decide that it was off-limits to question our own government or the government of any other country?
[00:37:23]  That's the gist of his speech.
[00:37:25]  Let me tell you something.
[00:37:27]  If you call yourself a patriot, but you believe that it is your obligation to only praise and only worship your president, then you must not be a patriot of this country because leader worship is how citizens behave in nations that aren't free.
[00:37:42]  You can love your president and you should, but it is your duty and your obligation as a free citizen of the United States of America to challenge and question your government every day, regardless of who the president of the United States is.
[00:37:59]  We're going to try something, by the way.
[00:38:00]  This is going to be, let me see if I can get this to work here.
[00:38:04]  Let me see if we can share the screen on StreamYard.
[00:38:08]  And we'll see if we can make this work, people.
[00:38:10]  That was Brandon at CPAC.
[00:38:12]  And quite obviously talking accept, accept.
[00:38:15]  Okay, here we go.
[00:38:16]  Oh, maybe he's coming in now.
[00:38:18]  Maybe it was.
[00:38:20]  Give it one more try.
[00:38:22]  You guys know Brandon Strzok is the founder of the walk away movement.
[00:38:26]  And I think he's noticing what a lot of us have been noticing, which is Unless there's ideological intellectual unanimity on what's going on in Iran, if anybody dares voice any concerns about how Pam Bondi has still not charged, let alone arrested, Arrested, let alone convicted anyone who was