Ep. 304: Trump Tariffs STRUCK DOWN! Facebook, Amazon & Musk ON TRIAL! Trans Madness in Canada & MORE
Dan Dix reports cartel chaos in Mexico, targeting infrastructure and conference attendees with violence, while speculating on U.S. involvement under Trump’s policies—despite denials—amid airport shutdowns and threats. The episode dissects SCOTUS striking down Trump tariffs, exposing potential corruption ties to figures like Mike Davis (unregistered lobbyist) and Pam Bondi, who allegedly shielded corporate clients while prosecuting political opponents. Meanwhile, Tucker Carlson warns of Christian Zionism’s extremist roots and risks of U.S. war with Iran, citing congressional disapproval and geopolitical fallout, while questioning why Prince Andrew escaped charges despite Epstein links. Amazon faces lawsuits for selling suicide chemicals, ICE church raids are blocked by courts, and Canada’s $750K anti-trans fine sparks outrage, all framing broader critiques of corporate power, judicial bias, and Trump’s shifting alliances—undermining public trust in his administration. [Automatically generated summary]
seconds because sometimes there's a bit of a delay before we go live there's no viva golf voice for this episode and there's no uh intro video because we've got dan dix live from can i make jokes about Like you're live in Cartel Warfareland in Mexico.
Some of my audience, they should know who you are, but in case they don't, Dan, tell them who you are, what you're doing, and how the hell you ended up in the middle of a war zone.
Sure.
My name is Dan Dix.
I run Press4Truth at pressfortruth.ca.
I am in Puerto Vallerta, Mexico right now because I was in town to speak at a conference.
I've been here working for the last five days attending the Anarchipoco conference.
And this was my one day where I was supposed to have time to relax on the beach with my wife and to enjoy myself in the sun.
But as soon as I got out on the beach, I looked around and I saw plumes of smoke everywhere, left, right, and center surrounding our hotel.
And I realized something is happening.
Something major is going on in the world.
And as it turns out, we got this high cartel member involved in the drug trade here in Mexico, El Menchio or something like that, who was targeted and taken out.
And now it's an all-out war here in Puerto Vallerta.
They've been going around, this cartel members blockading the streets, setting cars on fire all over the place, setting buses on fire, going into hospitals, going into grocery stores.
There was a Costco that was burnt down.
There was an OXO, the classic convenience store here in Mexico, set on fire and bombed.
There was the Guadalajara airport taken over, you know, people running for their lives.
The Puerto Vallerta airport has also been shut down.
No flights right now coming in or out.
It's a scary scene right here, right now.
In fact, I was just outside not that long ago to shoot a quick video report.
And it was a desolate wasteland out there.
Everybody is pretty much, you can see from the footage now, burning cars smoldering all over the place and everybody gone.
And at this moment, right before I hit record, some military men drove by and they right there on the road, they slowed right down.
They got ski masks on and big guns and they're staring at me, shooting my little video with my phone.
And I got to tell you, man, I got a little concerned at that moment because it's either the military or it's, you know, it's the cartel, you know, dressed up as military.
And even if it is the military, these are the targets of the cartel right now.
So I was actually kind of fearful for my life for a good 10 to 15 seconds there as the military drove by while I was filming.
Well, the amazing thing is, like you say, you don't know if it's the police or the cartel.
And not to be mean, you can't trust the police in Mexico on an ordinary day.
So you don't know if it's the police.
You don't know if it's the cartel.
If it's the police, they're the target of the cartel.
And if it's the cartel, they are militarized.
Like we're seeing the same videos.
I'm reluctant to share and retweet because, again, you don't know what's an old video.
You don't know what's taken out of context.
And I'm not wrong in that the videos that show the cartel militarized, uniformed, armored vehicles, armed like up the wazoo.
That's in fact accurate in terms of the cartel's level of military sophistication.
Absolutely.
If you go to Twitter account on X.com, it's Dan DixPFT.
Most of the footage you saw there was either shot by me, myself, or by other attendees of the conference of where I was speaking at a conference for the last five days.
Some of whom, there was attendees at this conference who had their cab driver pulled over, shot in the head, murdered right in front of them, had the taxi set on fire and all of their luggage burned, their passports burned.
So some people who I've just spent the last five days with, their lives have been completely flipped upside down as a result of this event.
And people are dead.
I mean, it's absolutely horrific what's happening right now.
And I'm not so sure it's about to slow down.
They've already said that they are potentially going to be coming into private homes and hotels and resorts at 5 p.m. this time if their demands are not met.
5 p.m. today.
Yes.
It is now 4.56.
So we're talking potentially in four minutes from now, they may be storming private homes and hotels and resorts as they said, if their demands are not met.
So, I mean, I don't think this thing is about to slow down anytime soon.
I'm supposed to fly out tomorrow, and I don't know if I'll be able to.
They're going to storm private residences for what?
Looking for people responsible for the killing of men showing?
The cartel is going to.
So is it just to take hostages?
Is it to kill people?
And what are their demands?
Have they made those demands known?
Not from what I've seen so far.
But as I understand it, they are very, very upset about what happened earlier.
This is something I'm pretty sure Trump has been saying he's going to do for a while is to go after some of these kingpins of the cartel in Mexico.
And it happened today.
And so it's almost like a declaration of war.
So these guys are serious.
They're not playing around.
I mean, there's military helicopters flying around in Mexico right now.
And I understand it, when this happened a few years back, some of them were shot out of the sky.
These cartels have rocket launchers at their disposal.
Like these guys are not messing around.
So I should also mention that it's very possible that power might be cut off at some point as well.
So people are very wary of that.
But we're essentially on lockdown right now in our hotels.
I needed to go to a store.
My wife got a bad sunburn.
I had to run out and get some aloe vera for her.
And they would not essentially let us go outside.
They strongly advised us to stay inside at all costs.
Dude, I would have stayed inside when there wasn't a cartel war.
This is, I try to make light of it.
But so now, I don't know if you saw Laura Loomer's post.
She said, you know, this was in conjunction with or with strong U.S. support.
Apparently, the Mexican embassy in America said, no, it's fake news.
Was this a joint operation involving U.S. forces to take out this cartel leader?
As far as you know, as far as I'm not sure, as far as I know, I mean, I've been on the ground running around getting footage of burning cars.
So I haven't had a whole lot of time to kind of delve into really what's going on behind the scenes.
But from what I can tell, this is, yeah, a like basically military grade attack on the cartel.
And they're firing back in kind.
And as I said, it's going all out.
Airports shut down, cars set on fire, checkpoints with buses being set on fire.
I don't even know what the death toll is going to end up being, but I would assume it's already starting to get scary because, like I said, these guys mean business.
And so I'm going to ask some stupid questions, and you're living it in the moment now.
Any military presence, like Mexico military presence in the streets in strong force, or is it like, does it seem to be roughly equal to the cartel presence?
Well, I only stepped outside the, you know, not the beach side, but the other side of the hotel for five minutes, maybe 10 minutes at the most, to shoot a quick video.
And within that small period of time, I had a military, what appeared to be a Puerto Vallerta Mexican military roll up to me extremely slowly with about seven guys on the back of a truck with large guns and ski masks.
It was the ski masks that set me off as well, that had me a little bit concerned.
I was like, is this the military?
Is this or is this cartel?
I really don't know.
They slowed right down going by me.
So I didn't, I would have loved to have captured that on film, but I wasn't about to take a chance.
You know, so I basically did not film that.
I put my camera down, let them drive by, and then continued with my video report, which is now on pressfortruth.ca.
I've done a number of videos already right now on my Twitter, my exit count, Dan Dix PFT.
But, you know, I guess maybe, oh, you know what?
I haven't even, I can see right now.
I haven't had time to post any of the breaking news on my website.
So as soon as I'm done, you know, this live show, I'm going to go there.
I'm going to update the website, make sure all the latest breaking videos are there.
But yeah, what an intense last day of my visit.
No, well, I mean, I say, and if you can't get out, like the airport, the airport was apparently under attack.
There were some, there's a video of what sounds like gunfire erupting, people being evacuated onto the tarmac.
Terrifying is not the understatement.
Like you're stuck there and you're going to be under effective hotel arrest until they can reign in security.
But from what we know about the cartel, it's on par in terms of force with the Mexican authorities.
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
On par or maybe even with some more might.
I mean, just looking at around here, it looks like they clearly run the show.
And if you tick them off, there's going to be hell to pay.
Like that footage of me on the beach shooting multiple plumes of smoke going up left of me, right of me, behind me.
Like my resort was surrounded by cars on fire.
Like, like I said, these guys are not messing around.
So I don't know how long this thing is going to last.
I don't know if it's going to escalate to the power actually being cut and military, you know, like trying to take out more of these guys.
But right now, it doesn't look good.
I'm supposed to fly out tomorrow, but I mean, the airport is currently shut down.
There's no flying out of there today.
So it's really tough to say if this is going to be the same situation tomorrow.
And only time will tell, I suppose.
But, you know, I guess it's not the worst thing in the world if I have to stay in the tropical place instead of going back to cold Canada.
You know what I'm saying?
Circumstances would be nice.
No, but Dan, you know, when I had a mild, you know, not even a mild issue, there was a hiccup and I felt like I might miss my flight coming out of El Salvador.
You know, that's being stuck in a country in the peacetime.
This is, I mean, obviously, how far from the embassy are you if you had to get there, the Canadian or U.S. embassy?
Have you looked?
No, I haven't, but that's probably something I should look into at this point because they're not just targeting random things.
They're going after like a grocery store was just targeted.
You know, hospitals have been targeted.
Convenience stores have been targeted.
So they're just trying to raise as much hell as possible right now.
Let the world know that they're pissed off.
And if you mess with them, they're going to come back hard.
So, you know, it's nowhere is safe right now in Mexico.
As I understand it, Guadalajara, Puerto Vallerta, other areas of Mexico, I probably can't even pronounce.
Like the whole country right now is going through this situation.
And it just so happens to be this is the last day I'm going to be here.
Who knows?
This may continue for a couple of days.
But we really need people watching this to pray for the people of Puerto Vallerta.
I mean, like I said, lives have been flipped up, turned upside down right now.
People are dead.
People are supposed to be flying home today.
People I know, people who are attending this conference.
And there's also people who are still at this conference.
It's the TDV summit right now is going on, it's called.
And they've had to switch to doing their presentations virtually because it's just too risky to stay at the convention center.
So so many lives have been just flipped upside down right now.
It's absolutely terrifying.
But I'm just going to hunker down in this hotel.
We seem to be safe right now for how long?
I don't know.
But only time will tell.
But I'm here to get the reports from the grounds as best as I can, as safely as I can.
But I'm going to continue to do that because that's what I do.
And I just happen to be in the right place at the right time when all the action is going down.
So I went down to film.
I went outside to document.
I got footage of the burning cars and the smoldering vehicles and the military driving around in the streets.
And it's absolutely intense.
I'm sure you're not going to get the truth from the mainstream media.
This is why I really appreciate you having me on here on a Rumble live show to let people know that the situation is pretty bad in Puerto Vallerta.
We're live across all platforms.
And I'm going to go live with Robert now for the rest of our ordinary program.
What is it called?
Ordinary scheduled Sunday night show.
I know that there's a part of you that probably will feel a little bit more in control by documenting and assessing it objectively from the outside.
You need someone to tell you, don't do anything stupid at all.
And a lower profile than not, probably better to keep.
So, Dan, pressfortruth.ca.
You are Dan Hicks.
Let me just get the exact handle.
At Dan Dix, PFT, Pressfortruth, on Twitter.
Stay Safe and Document00:04:21
And where else can people follow you?
What can they do to support you?
You know, I'm on all the major platforms.
I'm on Odyssey.
I'm on band.
I'm on BitChute.
Go to BitChute.
BitShoot's a great one.
I'm on Rumble.
I am on YouTube, but as you know, I'm heavily censored there.
They've terminated my channel and then gave it back and then terminated again and then gave it back.
But at this stage in the game, the best place to go is pressfortruth.ca.
And there you could find links for all of my channels.
Or you could go to pressfortruth.ca slash subscribe.
And there you could find all the various platforms that I'm uploaded to.
And really, the best thing to do is just to share the content right now.
Obviously, if anybody wants to, you know, support my efforts to do this kind of journalism, pressfortruth.ca/slash donate is greatly appreciated.
But the most important thing right now is to get the information out there.
So if you're not a subscriber to any of my channels, please go to pressfortruth.ca slash subscribe.
Join me on Rumble, BitChute, Odyssey, Minds, Hive, Band, whatever it is.
I think I'm on eight or nine video platforms that I've had to diversify into after being so heavily shadow banned and censored.
But yeah, you can find it all at pressfortruth.ca.
All right, man.
Dan, thank you very much for coming on on such short notice.
Stay safe, stay in your hotel, and hunker down.
I say have a place to hide.
And if they, I'm not to even be too cynical, if they're setting fire to things, then have a place, know where the exits are.
And I'm not trying to be funny.
So, Dan, stay safe and we'll keep in touch.
And Hopefully, you get out tomorrow, uh, but just stay safe.
I appreciate that, man.
Thank you so much for having me on.
All right, godspeed.
Talk to you soon.
Okay, so that's Dan.
Do I look?
I look crazy.
Hold on one second.
Lightning is light is blown out here.
That's Dan Dix.
If you don't know, I mean, I've known him for a while, and I saw the news breaking, and then I saw him tweeting.
And it seems Mike Benz just got down there as well.
And he says, probably not getting out of here soon.
And he's, did the CIA really have to murder El Mencho and set off a drug lord civil war the day I arrive?
It's wild.
All right, before Barnes gets into here, I want to thank our sponsor of the evening, which is Rumble Wallet, which is speaking of Rumble and everything and crazy tyrannical governments, people.
You may have seen the conversations happening online lately.
Censorship is back.
It's happening everywhere.
It's 2X on Commitube.
I can tell you from experience, platforms are controlling narratives and pushing the stuff they want us to see.
And we need to fight back.
Rumble is the only company that has stood the test of time and deserves our full support.
On the one side, Rumble is challenging big tech censorship, but now on the other, they've introduced something that will give us protection from big banks shutting us off.
Banks can cancel our accounts and freeze our cards overnight.
Anybody in Canada already knows that.
That's why Rumble launched Rumble Wallet, a wallet that nobody can cancel and a wallet that supporters can use to instantly tip creators like myself, like Dan Dix, with no middlemen, no cut.
Nobody can touch it, not even Rumble.
It's yours, only yours, yours to protect your future and your family.
You can buy, save digital assets like Bitcoin, Tether Gold in one place.
Tether Gold, for those of you who don't know, it's a crypto that's tethered to actual, real gold on the back end so that every crypto XAUT coin you have is tethered to that amount of gold in real life real actual, physical ownership of gold bars.
It's not only a wallet to buy and save, but it also allows you to support your favorite creators by easily tipping with the click of a button.
Show you that in a second.
It's amazing.
Support my show and other creators by clicking on the tip button on the rumble channel on the rumble.
I'll show you how to do it.
Go to wallet.rumble.com.
You can also get it on the app store for both Android and Um Iphone.
But I want to show you how to do it because it's actually kind of amazing.
By the way, for those of you who are watching on the landing page now, make sure to click through to the street apps and then go to tip right here.
You see that thing and then you can go tip with another wallet.
You got Usat, which is uh crypto, back to the, the American dollar.
That's Usdt.
Sorry, then you've got Xaut crypto backed to the gold.
You scan that qr code if you want to tip with that and if you want to tip with crypto bitcoin, this is how it works.
You go here, right there, you got your qr code, you can invest.
Do not lose your 12 word password thing, and um, that's that.
Holy sweet, merciful goodness, can you?
Martial Law Realities00:10:57
This is like when I went to El Salvador for the conference and El Salvador is under effectively um, what's it called martial law, ongoing martial law, and it's absolutely safe.
It's it's it's uber safe.
Pun intended yeah, I actually took UBER out there.
The the flip side, the reality of martial, Is you don't break the law when you're there because you might end up in jail.
And then the flip side or the other side of the coin of martial law and extreme safety is sometimes innocent people get wrapped up, get locked up, and are in the most notorious prison system in the world.
And so people say, well, look, you know, martial law is good.
It makes everybody safe except for the innocents who get locked up.
And my revelation was that, you know, one way or the other, innocent people get caught up.
And if it's not innocent people, and I'll put them in quotes, everybody in jail is innocent, getting caught up and locked up in jail under martial law, it's innocents in the street when your murder rate is 75 per 100,000, the highest in the world.
That's what El Salvador was back in the day.
Lots of innocents are getting locked up or caught up because the absence of martial law.
So you'll have innocents getting caught up in the existence of martial law.
But you realize when you go to a country where you don't speak the language, you're at a significant disadvantage and a significant vulnerability.
But you realize, even in El Salvador, where it's under martial law, and we just watched what was the movie?
That's right, Seven Days in May.
And you plan a military coup and overthrow a president.
Well, shit can go down south real fast.
And right now, what you basically had in Mexico was something, I call it not a truce, but an understanding between cartel and Mexican authorities.
And now their leader, Menchos, got killed.
And you realize how quickly things can go sideways.
Mexico, it's not a country that I would have ever visited in the first place.
And I jokingly, but not jokingly, said on Twitter: you know, when Canadian politicians were telling Canadians, don't go to America, don't go to Florida.
It's too anti-2S LGBTQIA plus.
Go to Mexico.
Well, when you have Canadians saying, I'm going to boycott America and go to Mexico, now you sort of understand what is a country where the underlying infrastructure is itself corrupt on a good day, but corrupt and susceptible to cartel violence on a bad day is much different than what you think is anti-2S LGBTQIA plus coming out of Florida.
And anybody who thinks that is an idiot, spend a day in Miami.
So Mike Benz is down there for this.
I don't know which conference he was down there for, but Benz is down there.
Dan Dix is down there.
You know, I know everybody says prayers are you can feel them.
It's always good to put positive vibe, positive energy out in the universe.
And they know that you're thinking about them.
And whether or not it does anything, it doesn't hurt.
So do it anyhow.
Now, with that said, Barnes is going to come in in a few seconds.
I'm going to see what we've got going on by way of, should have made sure we're live across all platforms.
This is the Sunday night show.
I'm live daily at three o'clock on Rumble.
Viva Fry.
My real name is David Fryhate, former Montreal litigator, turned current Florida Rumbler.
I ran for the People's Party of Canada in Canada in the federal election in 2022.
I got 1,300 and some odd votes.
And if that doesn't sound impressive to you, you should understand that was three times as many as the PPC in the prior election.
I ran for the country, and then I felt comfortable running from the country because we see what the hell is going on in Canada these days.
We have a Sunday show with Robert Barnes and me, me and Robert Barnes, I and Robert Barnes.
Viva and Barnes Law for the People.
We have the best above-average law community out there on locals.
It's one of the best communities in locals, if I dare say so myself.
I think I'm allowed saying that.
I am allowed saying that because it's true.
And we got here, Viva.
Mike Benz is in Mexico.
Oh, what the heck is that?
Viva, Mike Benz in Mexico today is part of a speaking engagement at SPN Society for the Preservation of Nation, where he is scheduled to discuss free speech and digital freedom.
His visit coincides with growing attention on his role in shaping anti-USAID narratives, particularly through his appearances on podcasts like the Joe Rogan experience and his influence on figures like Elon Musk.
Yeah.
And we've got good memes here.
I'm visiting Canada and wanted to embrace the culture.
Hold on, I'm not sure that I get this.
Bread and butter.
In our tipped questions on locals, 1776, America First sent two bucks.
He says, What about the embarrassing interview of Tucker with the Israeli ambassador?
I haven't seen that yet, but I've seen he's been getting ribbed for it.
KRJ5 says, It appears that the release of the additional Epstein documents, the abuse of young women, could be considered ancillary to the hidden web of old guard elites, financial, political, and social corruption.
Can you comment on any possibility of accountability for any of these people after 66 years on this earth?
I'm hopeless, hopelessly pessimistic.
And then we got Cass McGraw.
What do you know about the Invest America?
I just saw this commercial for Trump accounts.
Wondering if I should sign my daughter up for this.
Well, I'll defer to Robert on that when Robert gets in.
And then over on Commitube, I'll get to some crumble rants.
Over on Commitube, Did you see the Canadian hockey team?
Hold on.
Wearing red, white, and black jersey.
Kind of reminds me of a flag of another country that no longer exists.
I think they were wearing that jersey to commemorate, I forget his name now, Goudreau, Jonathan Goudreau, and another hockey player who were killed in a car accident, hit by a drunk driver.
Finger pushes the bread button.
My wife just, my wife just, it's a curling joke.
Oh, finger pushes the bread button.
My wife just texted me to explain the joke to me.
Well, that's embarrassing.
I don't get jokes when I'm reading them live, people.
I don't know what the deal is about that.
I call it a brain defect.
And that's it.
All right, let me make sure that Barnes is still alive.
Did the FBI get him?
Ready when you are, Smiley Face.
And we've got one heck of a show tonight.
There is, what was I going to talk about?
The Canadian side of things.
I was on with PragerU.
So now I'm officially a Massad agent, I guess.
That's the rationale of all of this.
Talking about medical assistance in dying in Canada.
It's the, you know, we won't belabor it, but we're going to highlight what the hell is going on.
Twitter is a ridiculous place because you don't know if you're dealing with real people or robots.
And someone, I forget who it was.
He says, I've stopped trying to talk sense into communists because they don't want to actually talk sense.
They want to waste your time and they want to distract you.
And that's what the bots on X want to do.
It's a useful place for breaking news and breaking information, like we're getting on the road, on the street, reporting from Dan Dix.
But when it comes to some of the accounts, you just don't know if they're real or not.
And then, even if they're not real and they're bot accounts, you wonder how the hell do they get such massive followings?
There was this tweet.
And again, you know, Elon, thank you.
You're putting in my feed that which you know I do not have the restraints to not respond to.
I see a tweet from Marlene4719 that says, for all the dumbass MAGA in the back, made, that is medical assistance in dying, is a voluntary, regulated medical procedure with very strict eligibility rules.
It applies to those over 18 and who are mentally competent.
It's an option when you have a grievous and incurable medical condition that is causing insufferable, intolerable suffering and pain.
And you read this and you're like, I don't know if this is parody or not.
And then you go to the account, which I did.
This is the actual description of the account.
A secular humanist defending who will never obey in advance.
I have severe TDS and proud of it.
The only good Nazi is a dead Nazis, sick typo.
Woke as F, no DMs.
And I had to make this person understand in Canada right now, set aside the fact that pretty much everything this woman, have I gendered the person properly?
This woman wrote, you know, it's great.
That's the selling point of MAIDS.
It's all wrong.
MAIDS is a voluntary.
We now know of three, at least one person who was put to death after having revoked her request authorization to do so because her husband was burnt out and didn't want to take care of her anymore.
We know of one, at least.
And if it's happened once, it's happened more than once.
Regulated.
What the hell does that mean?
Medical procedure with very strict eligibility rules.
They literally just euthanized a 26-year-old man who had diabetes and was blind in an eye who was depressed, which brings us to the next point.
It applies to those who are 18 and over, not when they start doing it to mature minors, Marlene, and mentally competent.
They literally just put to death somebody with depression.
That is someone who's mentally incapable of consenting.
It's an option when you have a serious, when you have a grievous incurable medical, not anymore.
I don't know what year you're in.
You sound like you're in 2016 with the Supreme Court.
That's causing insufferable, intolerable suffering and pain.
There was a person who was put to death for vaccine injury, another one for multiple chemical sensitivity.
They are offering it to, say, not mentally incompetent, but veterans suffering from mental illness, post-traumatic stress disorder.
What was the other part of this?
Oh, yeah, so I just had to say, you know, it's amazing.
You know, the Nazis in their mercy killings, they called it mercy killings.
Canada calls it, youth, medical assistance and dying.
They killed, they murdered approximately 275,000 to 300,000 people with physical and mental disabilities between 1939 and 1945.
While the initial phase recorded over 70,000 deaths, we're already on paper at 76,000 deaths.
Total victims included children and adults killed in hospitals, asylums via special children's force.
Total 270.
You know what Canada's at right now?
Maid legalization, since the legalization of medical assistance in dying in 2016, over 76,000 people have died, have died.
I love it.
The Nazis murdered them, but under Canadian, when they pressure people into doing it, the vulnerable, the people who they can't treat so they can kill because it's cheaper, they just died.
Reached 76,000, with 16,499 reported in 2024 alone.
Maid deaths have risen annually, accounting for 4.7% of all deaths in Canada in 2023.
It's more now, with over 60,000 total cumulative deaths recorded by the year's end.
Maid Legalization Tragedy00:03:13
And then I just had to remind everybody from Forbes.
So, you know, Canada's new euthanasia laws carry upsetting Nazi era echoes.
Warrens expert.
So the woman who says the only good Nazi is a dead Nazis.
I was like, just wait until you wait until you realize that you're the Nazis.
Madam.
That's that.
All right.
What else?
Let's go see what's going on over on Rumble when I got the Rumble rants coming up.
And oh, do I see Barnes?
Robert Bumps is in the house.
Oh, is it looking dapper?
Robert, it'll be mandatory assistance in dying mandatory by 23.
That's not funny.
Force name change, but that's funny.
Honorable Anita Anand, Minister of Foreign Affairs, posted a website for Canadians in Mexico to register.
Canadians in the area responding, saying the link doesn't work in Mexico.
Robert, sir, no, I say, I'm never leaving Florida, man.
For all the foibles, whatever, you know, the traffic, the unsafe bicycling, you know, there's some areas with some crime in Florida.
Stay, you know, avoid Jacksonville if you can.
I'm never, I'm never going.
I'm never leaving.
It's, can you believe it?
Yeah, no doubt about it.
You know, the Canadians really should be wearing ashcloth today.
I don't know if you saw the humiliating defeat in the Olympics to the United States.
You lost to the United States.
Russia's not even there.
Is there a chance to win the gold?
You can't even win the gold.
Now, Kash Patel was using the FBI plane as his private plane to fly over there.
And his press spokesperson was lying about while he was there.
And then you see the footage of people hanging out in the locker room.
And there's Kash Patel going, woo!
So he was supposedly there for business purposes.
But congrats to the U.S. hockey team for whooping up on the Canucks and embarrassing them once again.
It was, look, I was listening to it.
I was actually going to put a small wager on Calci, but I didn't want to do it because it would have messed up the Juju of the universe.
At one point, when the Canadians were down, one nothing, it was like 30% odds for the Canadians.
And then when they was 50-50 heading into overtime, but I didn't want to screw anything up.
Although, Robert, if you followed my tips for yesterday's fight night, eight of 12 last night, including the underdog Strickland.
Wow, oh, Strickland won.
Strickland won.
And oh, I said, you know, you bet on her name was Lucinda in the early days, Lucito.
I was like, but for at 15% odds, you know, I put $70 down on Miller, and she nearly choked her off.
I mean, that would have been, it would have been glorious.
But yeah, 8 for 12 yesterday.
So that's much better than my 5 for 13 the last time.
Robert, what do we have on that one?
Say it again.
So the Juju was good on that one.
The Juju was good.
Oh, Strickland.
I went with the underdog.
Strickland was, he was, he was spiritually high, having had a great press conference, Dana White backing him, and he TKO'd the heavy favorite in the third round.
It was amazing.
Sweet.
Robert, what do we have on the menu for tonight?
So tonight, we've got the SCOTUS tariff decision, the 1776 Law Center, did a nationwide survey.
SCOTUS Tariff Decision00:02:52
Richard Barris, People's Punt It Daily, through the big data poll company that he runs.
We've got some of the policy responses from the American people, including a potential solution to now Trump's tariff problem.
We've got the war in Iran, what the risks of that are and what the legality of that may be.
Mike Cernovich apparently thinks that bombing somebody is not a war.
I didn't know that, Mike.
I must have learned that in special law school class.
The Mike Davis corruption will be detailing the scale and scope of that.
Apparently, the Attorney General personally hates me on a regular basis.
So, you know, maybe I should not say anything in reflection of that.
The corporate hoe has got to go.
That's my view of Pambody.
Paper plate pam.
Glyceophate back in the news.
Thomas Massey is trying to reverse Trump's effort.
This was the buyer bill that we were talking about in the Tennessee context that Pam Body is trying to create special immunity at the Supreme Court for.
This is the Roundup scandal.
Now President Trump is busy trying to help those corporate lobbyists be able to have special immunity from the dangers that their product creates.
Thomas Massey is trying to overturn it in the House.
Elon Musk running into jury trouble as his political forays have now contaminated the San Francisco jury pool against him.
The Amazon finally held accountable for, or at least potentially accountable, for selling and encouraging people, Canada style, to commit suicide.
The Virginia redistricting faces another judicial hiccup as the Voting Rights Act big case is probably going to come down.
My prediction, I predicted tariffs would come down last week or this week, and it came down as predicted on Friday.
I'm predicting the Voting Rights Act decision comes down this week.
The Prince Andrew, everybody except in America is getting arrested or getting fired or demoted connected to or criminal investigations open now in three different countries concerning the Epstein files.
The former prince known as Andrew, instead of the man formerly known as Prince, is arrested and is under investigation in the UK.
What about a monopoly on fire trucks?
Well, the city of Milwaukee has brought suit exposing that particular monopolistic industry.
ICE wanted to invade churches because Grifty Christie, who's usually too busy making sure the plane, government plane, she flies around had a nice big bed in the back for her to bang Corey Lewandowski.
Both of them are married, to my knowledge, on the government dime, thought it was a genius idea to have ICE raid churches.
We'll talk about what that looked like in court.
Tina Peters, bail denied.
FBI Director Controversy00:04:08
They used a procedural technique to do so, though maybe her counsel is not.
I have some doubts there, but we'll get to that a little bit later.
Slushy fraud, the founders of the great slushy.
Have you ever had a slushy?
Yeah, I try not to eat toxic crap with red dye number five in it and whatnot.
Well, the company decided to try to solve their problem when they had sold off the rights years before by just creating a fake contract and then actually bringing a lawsuit based on that fake contract.
We'll talk about what happened there.
I assume you mentioned the trans sanity in Canada.
Yeah, we're going to get all of that.
We're going to get to that.
But actually, Robert, let me start off with this because, I mean, it's stuff like you can't criticize the administration anymore without being called all sorts of names.
And ordinarily, I wouldn't give a sweet bugger all that the director of the FBI is using an FBI jet to fly to Italy, ostensibly for FBI business security, whatever, and then ends up in the backdrop of the hockey team here.
But check this out.
So then apparently, right now, I mean, I wouldn't have noticed it.
Right there, that's Kash Patel.
I don't know why it has to be so long.
And apparently, this has now been.
Dude, that's annoying.
Apparently, this has now been the leader.
Congratulations.
Unless it's his Indian look-alike who just happens to be there.
Sure looks like cash.
It looks like cash.
I would never, like, the reality is once you become the FBI director, you need to use a private jet.
Well, whatever the jet is to travel securely.
I don't think he could just fly even business class.
I would never have made an issue about it.
It was Kyle Seraphin who posted it.
I'll give everybody the link.
And he's making an issue of it because, as I noticed, I said, ordinarily, I wouldn't care, except we remember back in the day.
And we remember the big issue that it was when Christopher Ray was using his private jet or using the FBI jet as a private jet.
And Kash Patel was railing hard on it.
And maybe now he realizes that once you become the FBI director, you do want to travel places and that's how you have to do it securely.
And so maybe you realize you were wrong, but it certainly looks like hypocrisy.
And now other people are saying, if people back in the day were saying this is a waste of taxpayer dollars, it's an abusive position of power.
If it was true for Christopher Wray for what he did, I'll be hard pressed to not understand how it's not equally a problem for what Kash Patel seems to be doing.
Is it making a mountain of a molehill, Robert, or is this, I say, par for the course for this DOJ?
He's on tape joking about how he couldn't afford a private plane, but now that he was the director of the FBI, he had his own.
I mean, to donors.
So, I mean, that gives you where his mindset is that you've got this Mexico issue that breaks out over the weekend that the U.S. was involved with trying to take out a major cartel leader that was going to unleash all kinds of unrest given the nature of that cartel.
Every cartel we take out gets replaced by a more violent and more dangerous cartel.
We should think about our drug war policies, but that's another issue for another day.
And apparently, someone tried to break into Mar-a-Lago with a shotgun, presumably to cause harm to the president.
And our FBI director has his press spokesman running around talking about he's got very important business in Europe.
And it's a totally fake story that he's going there for the Olympics.
And he shows up in the room.
It's just, hey, hey, everybody.
I mean, the guy's a joke.
The guy's a joke.
Not that leave it up to Kyle, who is a public enemy number one of this FBI calling out what he sees.
This is the video.
The only reason I took this shot was because my business academy sucks.
So the only way I was going to get home was becoming the director of the FBI.
Isn't that funny?
There's an expression called symbolic of the corruption that is just rife and rampant through the Justice Department of President Trump, unfortunately.
It's called Truth in Jest, people.
And when I was in high school, we made a crappy band for about two weeks called Truth in Jest.
No, hold on.
It was called Kidney Punch.
There was another one called Truth in Jest.
It means you make the jokes because they're reeling your head.
Emergency Tariffs Debate00:15:12
The Mar-a-Lago guy, but we'll just add it real quick.
Dude was shot dead.
A 21-year-old from North Carolina.
I immediately put, you know, connected him being from North Carolina to Ryan Ruth, who was also originally from North Carolina.
Thus far, there doesn't seem to be a connection about it.
Dude seems like obviously an unhinged person showing up with a shotgun and a canister of gasoline, not a sophisticated assassin shot dead.
Do you know anything?
Do we know anything more as of now?
Not yet.
Okay.
Robert, what do we start with?
What's the best one to see?
The top topic was real close.
So no favorite was the big win.
Always.
And then we had about a quartet of topics are about even the 1776 Law Center survey, the tariff decision, the Iran war, Mike Davis's corruption.
They will all dovetail into each other.
Let's just start with the most breakingest of the ones, which was Robert.
Oh, hold on.
Where was it here?
Hold up.
Hold up.
30 bucks from Chris Kraft for the Barnes was right again, Jar.
I don't know if it was about this, but Barnes was right.
Look, I can't pretend to be smarter than you when it comes to this.
I listen to you.
I listen to others, and I make my best assessment.
You are right.
In fact, what we've been saying since Trump started using the tariff as more of a political cudgel than an emergency measures business was he's undermining his own argument for invoking the IEEPA as the basis for imposing tariffs.
Supreme Court came down six to three.
I haven't really heard any, I would say, reputable, I haven't really heard any lawyers disagree with the decision.
As much as they don't like it, they don't disagree with it in law.
Six to three, they said this was never intended to be the purpose of the IEEPA for basically the same reasons we've been talking about for a while.
They did not specifically empower or specifically nudge Congress to go remedy this, but they did send one of the cases back for remand.
They didn't specify what the remedy should be, but Trump has already started bypassing this particular decision, which prohibits using the IEE, which is the, what was it, emergencies?
Oh, cripe, I always forget the name.
International Emergencies Act, basically.
It was an economic emergency.
He says, going forward, you can't use this anymore.
So the question is going to be, what do you do to ratify all of the tariffs already imposed and collected?
And he's using other methods to bypass it going forward, whether or not he ends up in front of the courts.
We'll see.
Your take on the decision and your take on what Trump is doing now to continue with the tariffs, adding another 10%, invoking other provisions of law to justify it.
Yeah, I mean, what we predicted became true because it became clear by summer that Trump was not sticking to the original script.
The original script was that he was acting pursuant to, it was anchored and tethered his tariff policy to industrial policy for the U.S. related to the economic emergency as well.
There was a separate set of tariffs on the drug trade, but principally and primarily on the economic emergency created by trade deficits leading to the deindustrialization of the United States, which was not only having economic and social and community harm throughout what used to be the industrial heartland, which we now call the Rust Belt for a reason, and that these policies were designed and had a nexus to that.
Excuse me.
So that's how he started out, and then he abandoned it by summer with the advice of Commerce Secretary Howard Luttnick.
There's various stories out there.
The Canter Fitzgerald has denied that they were, Luttnick's company and his kids were allegedly trade.
What's known is that they were out there saying that they were going to be buying up the tariff refunds for dimes on the dollar and that they could make billions of dollars if the Supreme Court invalidated the tariffs.
They claim they didn't do it.
All we have is their claim they didn't do it because we know that they were pitching it to clients in the summer.
No, I pulled up at least a couple of articles confirming that they had at least issued one market, which was $10 million give or take.
But let's just answer this one question because people are going to say this is corruption.
It's Luttnick's family.
It's his kids who are now the directors of Canto Fitzgerald.
Luttnick is no longer involved, whatever blind, blind trust, whatever he set up.
Who cares?
They were buying up from companies who paid the tariffs.
They said, look, you might get them back if they invalidate the tariffs.
We'll buy it up for 20% or 30%.
And here's, if you've spent $10 million on tariffs, here's $2 million.
My apologies.
And take that money and run, and we'll worry about getting the refund if and when.
Now that the Supreme Court said it's invalid, in theory, they get to claim this refund.
But from what Trump's done, first of all, I'd say that doesn't smell like corruption because it smells like they're betting against the administration because of a policy decision.
But from what Trump's done, they're not getting the refunds anyhow.
So they would have lost on that.
No, they are.
Those refunds are coming.
They can drag it out in litigation a little while, a year or two, but those refunds are coming.
And what he's done is really a very temporary fix and the law he's using doesn't quite fit what he's trying to do either.
But basically, Luttnick advised him and Besant advised him and Rubio advised him to use tariffs like substitute sanctions policies.
And what we said at the time, and I said there was a legal argument to defend his use of the statute until he started doing this.
And I pointed out at the time here, we pointed out on the Duran with others that this would backfire with the Supreme Court.
And they use the words, quote, Trump claims under the statute that he can unilaterally impose unbounded change in tariffs at will.
They said that a half dozen times.
What we predicted is exactly what they did and why they did it.
This was a monumental mistake by the president because he continued to take the advice of rogue actors like Lutnick, who I have no doubt was at some level his family profiting from this.
It was imagined you're sitting there giving advice to the president saying, yeah, go for it.
Yeah, you should do it for this and that.
You know, use it because Canada ran an ad you don't like.
Use it because we want to take down Russia and help Ukraine.
Use it because we want to take down Iran and help Israel.
Use it for all these reasons that have nothing at all to do with industrial policy, nothing at all to do with the statutes authorizing it.
And while telling his kids, hey, go out there and buy those refunds for 10 cents of the dollar because you're going to cash in big.
Family's going to get rich.
This is the man who, you know, miraculously managed to not show up at his offices on 9-11 in the World Trade Center building.
This is the man who lied repeatedly, flagrantly, about being in the Epstein files and his relationship to Jeffrey Epstein.
You know, Ludnick was a guy who raised money for Hillary Rotten Clinton in 2016.
So, you know, the idea that this guy should have the influence he had, I mean, this should have been the last straw.
His bad advice led to Trump's signature tariff policy being scrapped.
And now the federal government being on the, being, you know, having to owe anywhere from $175 to $200 billion in refunds this next year, creating a budgetary crisis for the president.
So all because he ignored the advice that those of us who have long championed this trade, Ludnick's never been a protectionist.
Lutnick's never been an industrial policy guy.
He comes from Wall Street.
Those of us that have been in this for a long, long time knew what statutes and authority he could use, knew how to go about it, and pitched it.
And he ignored us in exchange because he just loved the power.
I don't like what you said.
5% tariff.
I don't like what you said.
22% tariff.
That was going to destroy his credibility in the court.
And that's exactly what happened.
Let me not to people are going to say it's not Lutnik's fault because if Trump picked him and Trump relies on him, it's Trump's fault.
It was Lutnick's economic advice to impose, to use these tariffs in the way Trump was doing it.
I don't know about that.
He's out there.
He's bragged about this as a commerce secretary.
And as soon as the story broke that his kids were betting the other way, that should have been a massive red flag.
To my knowledge, nothing was done about that because everybody around the president is just cashing in.
They're treating it like a personal self-enrichment scheme.
The Trump administration is going to go down as more corrupt than the Grant second term if he doesn't reverse course quickly.
So now to get into the legal issues, how they decided, it was a 3-3-3 split.
Three justices, the three Liberal Democrats said the statute didn't authorize it.
The three Roberts, Gorsuch, and Barrett, Barrett was always probably going to go along with whatever Roberts did.
They said that in addition, not only did the statute not authorize it, the statute couldn't because of the major questions doctrine.
This is what struck down the Chevron doctrine.
I'm a big fan of their use of it.
The three, Kavanaugh, Thomas, and Alito dissented because they believe the statute did authorize it.
And it was within the delegatory power of Congress.
So for those that don't, you know, the fundamentals, there's zero doubt that tariff power constitutionally is only given to Congress.
It's not given to anybody else.
Nobody disputes that.
The question became whether or not Congress had and constitutionally could delegate that authority to the president.
And there were past Supreme Court cases going back a century where the Supreme Court had said, yes, you could constitutionally delegate tariff power to the president.
And then the question was, did they?
And he used the most aggressive statute that had the broadest range of authority.
So there was always risk.
This statute, the emergency statute, had never been, doesn't have the word tariff in it and had never been used for tariffs ever.
So those were the hurdles.
That's why he had to strictly hew and anchor and tether his entire tariff policy to the policy intentions of that statute because he was already a reach to try to get Supreme Court approval for it under those terms.
The argument is that the emergency statute is so broad, it says he can completely ban the importation and he can regulate the importation.
And if you can ban something, if you can regulate it, why couldn't you tariff it?
That's the argument Thomas made.
That's the argument I said they could make as long as they tethered it to that policy.
Trump abandoned that.
Now he called in his John Barron to C-SPAN apparently on the day of the decision, pretending to be John Barron again.
It's like, there's John Barron from Virginia.
And it's so obviously Trump.
Oh, it was a terrible decision.
You know, what does it people?
Board, Mr. President Trump.
You know, he did that whole thing, which is funny as a dickens.
But that's why this happened.
And so at this point, my view is Congress did effectively delegate to the president broad authority over tariffs through the Emergencies Act, as long as it was the economic emergency being used to justify the tariff.
If it was untethered, then I agree with the decision.
Those aspects of the decision that reference him not tethering, not anchoring his tariff policy to the specific statutory delegation did make it unconstitutional for what he did.
And some of us kept warning and warning and warning.
Just ignore it.
Keeps taking the wrong advice from the wrong people.
It's his own fault for taking that advice.
But at some point, you'd think the Epstein files blows up in your face.
These foreign policy adventures are blowing up in your face.
Now the tariff policy blows up in your face.
At what point do you wake up that maybe you're getting bad advice, Mr. President?
Or do you just want to go down with that ship?
Now, we have already, we were already in the field.
1776 Law Center already had a survey out on this topic, and it provides some positive policy prescriptions that he can utilize.
And there was someone on our locals board that was on X kept telling me, Massey's got to do this.
Massey's got to do this.
It's not Massey's policy.
This is Trump's policy.
He has to go through Congress, right?
I mean, Kavanaugh said his dissent.
There's other statutes.
Those statutes are very limited, very restricted.
You have to go through administrative fining.
There's 150-day durations on it.
It's not even clear whether you can use the balance of payments one, given the current currency structuring that we have.
So you look at all those issues.
Those don't provide the solution.
What does provide a potential solution is something we poll tested and has a plus 20 approval rating with.
And amongst key swing voters, a plus 30 approval rating with.
Broad approval amongst everybody that's not a boomer for the most part.
And the simple policy is continue your tariff policy, which has primarily as its objective national security and industrial policy to rebuild American manufacturing to be independently sourced in the United States.
It also provides good paying jobs that help support strong families and strong communities.
So the Rust Belt is no longer the Rust Belt, but is the building belt of the American economy.
But you need to offer a sweetener to get it through Congress.
And the sweetener that we propose is one Trump himself has flirted with because we've been proposing it now to him for two years.
But this time we went out and poll tested it to show its support, which is you eliminate entirely the individual income tax on households that make less than a quarter of a million a year.
You basically take 95% of American households and remove them entirely from the income, individual income tax system.
People have this mistake.
I had people saying, oh, that couldn't possibly be funded by tariffs.
Yes, a 20% tariff would bring in about $750 billion because of how much global imports.
People don't understand how many foreign imports we get.
And the Trump's tariffs were hit or miss all over the place.
The reason why they haven't raised anywhere near that amount of revenue is because they were this rate, this rate, this time, this time.
I mean, it was all over.
If you just have a, our original industrial policy, what was called the American plan by Alexander Hamilton, was that you need to have universal, uniform tariffs, because otherwise you get into all the reason why we tariff Penguin Island is because you hop over here and you bring it up.
You need to avoid all those problems by, if it's coming in from a foreign producer, cross the board, flat, 20%.
Pat Buchanan recommended a 25% rate.
And the way you get American buy-in, the way you make this popular, you should announce it to the state of the Union on Tuesday, is you come in and say, see, the dog even loves it.
Is you come in and you say that all Americans are no longer going to pay the individual income tax.
You don't have to worry about the no tax on tips and then the limitations of that, the no tax on retirement.
So many of those no tax on tips overtime and social security got watered down by the Senate.
It's going to agitate a bunch of voters coming up when they start filling out returns and they don't see the refunds they think are coming.
Well, the best way around all of that, they also try to tax gamblers that create a whole bunch of problems by not letting them take their losses as deductions and all that kind of thing.
You could solve all that in one clean swoop.
Just eliminate the individual income tax for 95% of American households and pay for it with tariffs, like we have been doing since the founding of the country until the 1920s.
When they originally passed the income tax, they said, don't worry, this tax will not tax the hair on a working man's head.
Retroactive Tariffs And Tax Burden00:06:17
This is what working men's heads look like now.
So my advice is, and we looked at it, it's plus 20 approval rating.
And amongst people that are swing voters, plus 30.
Amongst anybody under the age of 65, plus 30.
Under black and Hispanic voters, plus 25, plus 30, plus 35.
Independent swing voters, plus 30, plus 35.
This is massively popular.
So this is his solution.
Put Congress in a position where they have to love foreign imports so much that they're willing to stick 95% of Americans with a tax bill next year.
That's going to be a very difficult, the turning it down from those in the House and the Senate.
Now, they may do it anyway, but then Trump's got an issue he's running on.
He's reunited back to his political base.
Basically, it would shift the income tax burden in America to foreign goods, millionaires, and billionaires.
It takes away the whole Democratic argument that he's just doing favoritism for the rich people, that he's the Epstein-class representative.
There's nobody in the Epstein class that makes less than a quarter million a year.
So this is a political winner.
It's a policy winner.
It protects his industrial policy.
It protects the national security ramifications of that industrial policy.
And it's the one that can work given that this strategy by Bondi, also, they advocated poorly for it, frankly, before the Supreme Court.
That was the other reason why I knew it was going to go nowhere.
Because down deep, Bondi doesn't support this either.
I pulled up your tweet from the day of the hearings.
You said it's dead in the water.
Bet no against, well, bet yes that they're going to strike it down.
But they didn't order the reimbursement in the order.
They didn't issue that as one of the directives.
They said it would be a mess.
But they didn't say no and they didn't give the carve out.
So the option was they could have said Congress can retroactively do that.
They didn't.
What that means is they afforded some time for the administration to contest it, the refund litigation, but they're going to owe that 200 billion sometime over the next, not to play devil's advocate, just ask the obvious question.
Congress doesn't need that blessing from the Supreme Court.
They can just go out and retroactively ratify those tariffs.
Anyhow, the question is going to be, I don't know what.
Well, first of all, that's the first question.
They don't need the blessing from the Supreme Court.
Congress can retroactively ratify those tariffs, correct?
In all likelihood, it's a little bit tricky, but if they imposed a 20% tariff across the board, that would be, and they even made it retroactive to some degree, whether they could or not, that part's up in the air.
But that would solve a lot of the problems.
It would immediately solve the funding issue.
Without a problem.
The question is this.
I don't know what the balance of power is that would allow that to go through.
Assume Democrats want this to sink the economy.
They want it to hurt Trump.
And so would Democrats not support retroactive ratification?
And they may not support it at all, but then they're the ones out there saying they want to protect foreign goods that are undermining American producers and they want to tax 95% of Americans at the current income tax rates.
That's a political winner for the midterms for Republicans.
That's not a winner for Democrats.
So you put them in a position.
I mean, by the way overwhelmingly, Democrats support this bill or independents who lean Democratic and Democratic demographics.
So the idea that, I mean, there's very few people that are sitting around other than you're like, you know, millionaires, I guess, that they complain that they're not part of this.
Well, you know, sorry.
Tom Woods pointed out, Barnes, I'm in the top 10%.
Well, if you do this right, you get only the top 5%.
But right now, the top 1% own more American wealth than the entire middle class combined, than the middle 60% of the country combined.
That's not a good position to be in long term.
If you're super wealthy, you do not want to be in an out-of-whack economy that's going to encourage a lot of people to take away that wealth in ways that you don't want to happen.
So, I mean, this would be a massive, and again, you can avoid paying the tariff.
I mean, I think there's issues with claiming that there's a dollar-for-dollar transfer between tariffs and the price of the goods.
Most of the time, the foreign producer eats a good portion of it.
The importer eats a good portion of it.
The retailer eats a good portion of it.
But even if it was dollar-for-dollar, you can avoid this, unlike the income tax.
You can avoid this by not buying foreign goods.
Well, that's why.
Buy America.
It creates an incentive.
And now at some point, that may have revenue impact, but you can adjust accordingly.
Again, folks, we did that.
People are like, oh, this can't be done, Barnes.
It's how we founded our country for over 100 years.
This is how we did it for almost a quarter, a century and a half.
And I'll be like, oh, no, it's not possible.
Yes, it is possible.
But let me ask you this.
So Congress doesn't, they don't need the Supreme Court's blessing to retroactively ratify the tariffs.
If they push for that, Democrats oppose it because they want to burn the whole ship down.
Then the Republicans can use that as a political talking point for the midterms.
If the administration readily and without coercion reimburses these tariffs, can we then assume that there's a certain degree of tacit corruption, I mean, overt corruption with acting in a way that would seemingly benefit Cantor Fitzgerald and Lutnick's two kids?
Yeah, it'll be something to watch.
I mean, it's just, you can't bring in a bunch of Wall Street bros and not expect them to be corporate hoes.
It's that simple.
Okay, so that's the tariff.
Now, speaking of corporate hoes and Wall Street bros, it's like a country song, except of Wall Street corruption.
The other element of the corruption that you've been railing against, you know, pay for play Pam Bonte.
Your name was in the Epstein files six times, and I think it was only articles referencing you as an attorney or cases in which you were a lawyer.
But someone thought that was funny.
I guess we get to the, let's, let's start with the lobbying element of all of this, which seems to be going on and seems to be rampant, undisclosed lobbying and corrupt exploitation of access and know-how.
Mike Davis is out there.
Decision Makers' Influence Risks00:03:17
I've never seen anybody defend this administration so vocally and so, I would say, with expletives and crass and language that's unfitting of a member of the administration, but luckily he's not.
So where are you at now in terms of what you perceive to be Mike Davis's corruption of undisclosed lobbying and taking advantage of his connections within the administration to procure favors to his undisclosed clients?
So the lobbyist acts, one of the things that Gingrich's reform of the reform Congress in 1994 did deliver on.
There are plenty of things they didn't deliver on in their contract with America, but one they did deliver on is the Lobbyist Disclosure Act of 1996, which is at 2 USC 1601.
It's codified there.
The laws are not passed in that codified form.
Later, people that codify the laws put them together in that way for easy citation and reference purposes.
And so that law provides that if you are trying to influence key decision makers, and those are decision makers within the Congress or decision makers within the federal executive branch, and it's at higher ups.
It's not everybody.
So, you know, if you're in a negotiation with your local regulator, your local EPA, low-level person, that they probably aren't covered.
So, but the covered people are people at the top, the political decision makers in these agencies, and the ones in Congress and certain staff members, but not most.
And if you are trying to influence their decision on behalf of a client who has paid you a certain amount of money, usually it's like $5,000, $10,000, depending on the circumstances, or if it's contingency and its valuation is worth that, then that can trigger the disclosure and registration requirements and reporting requirements concerning the formation of any federal government policy program or position in the executive branch,
or the execution of any federal program or policy, or the nomination or confirmation of any official appointed to the executive branch.
Then you have to disclose that very quickly from the beginning of the coverage with quarterly obligations, and you have to disclose a range of information concerning it.
The key is: are you trying to influence a decision maker about federal policy?
That's kind of it.
It is undisputed because it's been previously, they've brought criminal prosecutions related to this.
Now, it's enforceable with a civil fine, $200,000 per failure to register or provide information.
That can accumulate for each quarterly failure.
But in addition, it's a five-year felony, federal criminal felony, to fail to register, to knowingly, willfully fail to register, and knowingly, willfully fail to report.
Then you have the Tunney Act, which was passed in the early 1970s after it appeared President Nixon's people had taken what looked kind of like bribes to shut down an antitrust case against ITT, which said if there's going to be any consent decree out of the antitrust division, then there's a judicial review component, a public comment component, and a range of disclosures.
And this is at 15 U.S.C. 15, Title 15, Section 16 of the United States Code, Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act.
He Starts the Article 3 Group00:15:15
It requires, and it was the reform Congress that passed it, that there be a public interest determination by an independent judge if there's any questions.
And one of the things that the Justice Department has to disclose and the company has to disclose is all determinative communications, including anybody that influenced the decision or attempted to influence the decision of the Justice Department on behalf of those subject to it, requires a competitive impact statement by the DOJ and a separate statement by Hewlett-Packer, or by whoever the company is.
So the HPE and Juniper buys up the, they're going to merge.
Mike Davis himself, who is, you know, basically graduated from the University of Iowa, Iowa Law School, goes to work for the Bush administration.
That's where he befriends, to his great luck, a young future Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, who was working in the Bush administration as well.
He works there briefly.
Gorsuch gets appointed to the 10th Circuit.
Davis goes and clerks for him.
He cashes in on that with working with a big corporate firm in Colorado.
Apparently, it didn't work out because then he's off to another corporate firm a year or two later.
Then apparently that didn't work out.
So he goes out to a small corporate litigation firm, though nobody knows, nobody remembers him.
Nobody I know knows of any significant case the guy was ever a part of.
Then Trump wins and Gorsuch gets nominated.
And that's his parlay back into DC.
And he shepherds the support for Gorsuch's nomination.
From that, he gets a gig with Senator Grassley, coordinating all the judicial confirmations and nominations for Trump, many of which have controversially backfired, Amy Coney, Barrett being one, some others.
He goes out and starts this Article 3 group.
And I think he was already planning then to cash in.
Though, again, he has no cachet in the litigation world that I know of, no cache in the antitrust world or any particular expertise in it.
He starts campaigning as he's an antitrust expert.
He gets the confidence of people like me and you and Richard Barris and others, Steve Bannon, and others, who start to platform him.
And he uses that platforming to portray himself as a true mega antitrust lawyer who's going to take down the deep stick.
He would basically take whatever we say and mimic it and pretend he originated and invented it.
He's never, I never saw him in any January 6th case, never saw him in any COVID cases, never saw him any vaccine mandate cases, never saw any real political risk or professional risk him ever taking.
He starts back up as a law firm as soon as Trump gets back in in 2024.
And he's out there campaigning for the Justice Department to block this particular merger between HP and Juniper.
What nobody knew, because he didn't disclose, is he got paid big bucks by HP to actually secretly lobby for the deal to be shuttered and for it to be for the deal to be approved and the antitrust investigation and case to be shuttered.
And he went over, he used pay-for-play Pampandi, who's basically using the Department of Justice as a cash register for all of her lobbyist pals.
Same as Swampy Susie Wiles, chief of staff, who was busy trying to exclude Tucker Carlson from the White House because of how effective Tucker has been at getting the president to second guess going into another Mideast war.
She's been doing that this past week after Mike Huckabee's embarrassing interview, which because he can't, he doesn't even understand his own positions.
God bless the guy.
So he starts parlinging this into a private lobbyist with Arthur Schwartz, with a range of other people that are connected in Trump world because of his ties to pay-for-play Pambondi, Todd Blanche, and Dubois, and the Stanley Woodward.
He says that he can help them get confirmed.
He uses his appearances on Steve Bannon to create this image that he's a true MAGA lawyer.
Out in the court of public opinion, he's gaslighting everybody, saying, lawyer up.
Justice is coming.
He said this about, I think, 22 people by last count.
Not one of those 22 people currently faces federal indictment.
He's been lying to people all the way through.
Well, I have to check in real time.
If I looked, I'm never distracted because I'm listening to everything you're saying.
I had to find the tweet.
It says, Obama, Biden, Hillary, Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Andrew Weissman, Jay Bratt, Jack Smith, Alvin Bragg, Big Tish, Big Fenny, Nathan Wade, Chris Mays, and so many more.
Lawyer up.
Law, fair Democrats.
Justice is coming.
Nobody's above the ball.
This is November 16, 2025.
I had to juxtapose it.
I had to juxtapose it to the other latest tweets where he comes out and he's on with the Charlie Kirk show, and he says, want accountability for lawfare against Trump and his allies, then stop demanding every good person at the Justice Department sit through months of Epstein document review.
There is no accountability on lawfare right now because Massey and his Democrat buddies have Trump's Justice Department buried in Epstein up to their eyeballs.
The Justice Department has only finite resources.
I don't know how many lawyers they have, but I think they have enough.
They have had to focus on Massey's political nonsense instead of holding criminals accountable.
Why wasn't Massey pushing for?
So in November, it's lawyer up.
In February, there's no lawyering up, and it's Massey's fault that Bondi's.
Why is he the de facto unelected spokesperson for Pam Bondi?
Because that's the quid pro quo.
I run interference with MAGA.
I convince MAGA that the Justice Department's taken apart the deep state with secret plans and snooker them into believing that when in fact Pay-4Play Pam has cut a deal with the deep state to not prosecute any of them meaningfully.
That's why she slow walks or sabotages every single serious deep state case.
That's why there's been no, that's why she's framing an innocent autistic black kid for the CIA employee that planned it, in my opinion, planning the bombs and the good reporting of Steve Baker, Kyle Serifin, and others that likely was the planner of the pipe bombs on Daniel.
Instead, she's going out of her way to cover up for the deep state.
Not only not prosecuting them, covering up.
There's been no prosecutions of anybody connected to whether it's J6, whether it's COVID, whether it's the election 2020, whether it's lawfare, whether it's the censorship efforts, whether it's RussiaGate, whether it's UkraineGate, whether it's any of these deep state scandals, whether it's the Hunter Biden cover-up scandal, any of them, nobody, nobody has faced accountability under Pay-4-Play Pam.
Indeed, the 1776 Law Center is going to have some of its survey results out later this week.
The most hated person in any public official in the entire country is Pam Bondi.
I mean, and yet Trump is sticking by her and Luttnick.
Lutnik sabotages them with the Epstein files, sabotages them with the tariffs, still there standing right behind him, laughing whenever he talks about the Epstein files.
While Pay-for-Play Pam is still running the show and they're purging the few good people that were left there.
And Harmee Dylan has clearly decided to play ball.
We'll get to that with the Tina Peters case later and shut her mouth about real civil rights reform and instead is covering up for these rogue, corrupt actors.
And so the so you go through the Tunney, the Toney Act requires all these disclosures.
When they do the Tunney Act disclosure, HP admits Mike Davis was working for them to communicate to influence a decision.
That means he had to register as a lobbyist.
To my knowledge, to this day, he has not.
When somebody asked him about it, he said, F you, this is a federal crime, Mikey boy, and you've been committing multiple federal crimes, Mikey boy.
With your complicit aid, Will Chamberlain.
And that's what they've been doing.
So they've been gaslighting MAGA, lying to MAGA about what's happening in the Justice Department to run cover for the corrupt Justice Department.
That's why he has to say absurd and asinine things like Pam Bonnie's performance in front of the house was so amazing.
Woo!
Come on, Steel Clappers.
Let's get together.
Q, the plan is coming for you, coming for everybody.
That's the kind of nonsense while he's lining his pockets with corporate cash, betraying MAGA at every single level.
1776 magazine fell down because it's so outraged.
I'm going to, I'm going to, you take it for what it's worth.
I just want people to understand you are not.
I love it here.
I said, did HP admit that Mike Davis was representing them?
No, they didn't admit it.
HPE, HP is running.
They're not publicly admitted in the sense of voluntary confession or explicit statement, acknowledging Mike Davis as their representative in a controversial way.
However, HPE did disclose in official court filings under the Tunney Act, Section 16G, that they retained Mike Davis, along with others like Will Levy, as consultant lobbyists to advocate for the settlement of the DOJ's antitrust challenge against their $14 billion acquisition of Juniper Networks.
And then also...
He's been doing this over and over in case after case after case.
Right now that they're trying to, there's the big Warner Brothers deal that most people in the antitrust world don't think Warner Brothers should be able to merge with anybody because it would just create a natural monopoly that would have all these anti-competitive effects.
Netflix is trying to buy him.
And in some cases, Netflix and Paramount has hired both sides.
Though there is a rumor about that Paramount is planning on getting around its Tony Act disclosures if they're able to buy it instead of Netflix by Warner Brothers by instead having Papa Ellison, who, by the way, son Ellison that owns Paramount, that now owns Skydance, that owns TikTok, that owns CBS, that's now trying to buy CNN and all of Warner Brothers.
Guess who's in the Epstein files?
The kid got undisclosed, unexplained money connected to Jeffrey Epstein.
Shock, shock.
If you understand, Larry Ellison's a huge Israeli pro-Israel guy, obsessive pro-Israel guy.
That's how he's turned TikTok into a new censorship platform, turned CBS into a new propaganda platform.
The out there pushing all, I mean, yeah, Mike, poor Cernovich, he must be watching CBS all the time because he also thought, oh, yeah, the Iranians just mass murdered 50,000.
Well, this is 50,000 people in the streets.
That's complete nonsense, Mikey.
Quit watching Barry Weiss on CBS.
You look like.
What are you going to tell me next, Mike?
That really there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, Mike?
Come on.
It's a joke.
That's a joke.
I saw him say that, and I respect Mike's opinion and his knowledge.
And I just like, we're living in a world where two people who for whom I have a great degree of respect of their insights are saying not diametrically, they're saying mutually incompatible assessments of fact.
And I don't even know what the, what, you know, where to, where to base anything in.
But I do just want to bring this back.
The Dow, the Dow right now is over.
The Dow is over $50,000.
I don't know why you're laughing.
You're a great stock trader, as I hear, Raskin.
The Dow is over $50,000.
She thought she had, she thought she had the own on Rats.
And that's what Mike Davis said was a fantastic, great performance, right?
I mean, the guy's a joke.
He's a complete liar.
He's a fraudster.
He's a federal felon criminal engaged in a federal ongoing conspiracy to violate the lobbyist disclosure laws of the United States in order to corrupt the Justice Department.
And the people that are implicated are Pam Bondi, Todd Blanche, and you, Stanley Woodward.
Oh, guess who else is implicated?
Chad Mizell.
He was the chief of staff that helped orchestrate it for Pam Blondie.
Then he suddenly left.
Why is he doing this?
He wants his wife to get up, who's, I think, a federal judge currently to be nominated for a higher federal court office because that's what Mike Davis goes around promising.
And so the, I mean, it is just extraordinary corruption that is embarrassing to the administration, that will embarrass key members of the administration that is utterly sabotaging the Justice Department and betraying the Justice Department.
And they should jettison any connection to the guy at all, any jettison.
I mean, Mike Davis runs around saying he's a proud cuck for Israel.
That gives you an idea.
And Will Chamberlain's off running off with to Israel to do the I forget that guy's name, Yaram, whatever his name is, that was out there libeling Tucker Carlson this past week.
This guy said, you know, the mainstream of American nationalism is deeply pro-Israel.
No, it ain't.
American nationalism is American nationalism, not Israeli nationalism.
I understand our ambassador, Mike Huckabee, can't quite process that as he's in deep with his heresy of Christian Zionism.
But the sorry, Yarim or whatever, however you say his name is.
But that's what Will Chamberlain's running off to in the summer, right?
I mean, they're all part of this rogue deep state operation to completely scuttle the MAGA agenda, to completely scuttle America first, to undermine it in terms of policy, to undermine it in terms of public opinion.
He is one of the greatest saboteurs and traitors to MAGA of anybody is Mike Davis.
Yeah, I'll find I'll find the tweet where he says, uh, he, I'm a cuck for Israel.
Um, it's a big, it's a big problem, Robert.
It's, I mean, it's like people get mad at you and me to a lesser degree because you're certainly more vocal about it.
But oh, yeah, you can't criticize the administration because the alternative would be Kamala Harris.
And I'm like, well, you're going to get somebody like Kamala Harris or worse if you allow this administration to continue to make terrible decisions that are going to sink it in the midterms and in 2028.
You don't help somebody by seal clapping while they jump off a cliff while they're walking right towards a cliff.
They're thinking, oh, I'll be able to jump right off this and no problem.
And that's what the and Mike Davis doesn't care because he's lining his pockets with it.
The uh, and Will Chamberlain because he's working for Mike Davis.
So this is an embarrassment.
It would continue to be an embarrassment.
The judge in the HPE case has ordered discovery, has ordered depositions.
It appears Stanley Woodard Woodward tried to hide information from there because he's compelling the judge having to compel more disclosures and more discovery.
Then they wanted to try to hide.
So it's just a disgrace that this bum, this scum, this traitor, this seditious act saboteur of MAGA is Steve Bannon.
You'll be embarrassed.
If you keep putting him on there, people are going to think there's something else connected with Epstein with you, Steve, other than your half-assed nitwit, midwit ideas to get totally totally suckered and cucked by them.
So, you know, we'll see what happens.
But it's a serious weak point and vulnerability in the administration that is going to be easy impeachable actions, easy future indictment actions.
And it's probably going to blow up sometime over the spring and summer because there's a bunch of state attorney generals sniffed out a rat, and that judge is going to be holding hearings.
And what happens when that judge says this was not done in the public interest?
This was done by corruption.
And that's just the tip of the iceberg.
Suckered and Cucked?00:04:39
That's one of the smaller mergers.
There's Live Nation, they're trying to derail right now and try to get a sweetheart deal there.
There's a whole bunch of other ones.
We'll talk about some monopoly cases later.
Why haven't these cases been brought by the Justice Department?
Because everybody there has been fired.
Everybody that was a political appointee is gone for the most part.
They just eliminated everybody because those are people who actually were going to follow up on their oath to affirm the law and the Constitution and enforce antitrust laws as Trump was elected to do.
Indeed, here is from the 1776 Law Center poll.
Do you, what are your, what's your opinion on the use of antitrust laws to break up corporate monopolies to lower prices for consumers?
Strongly agree, 34%.
Somewhat agree, 36%.
5% strongly disagree.
10% somewhat disagree.
So you've got massive, I mean, that's a plus.
What is that?
That's a 70, 70-20 issue.
70-20 issue, 70-15 issue.
It's one of the most popular issues they could run on.
They could campaign on.
They need to unleash the antitrust division, not lock it up, and definitely not sell it to pay-for-play Pam Bondi's buddies.
By the way, the Ballard partners are all over here.
Her former lobbying firm, Ballard Partners, of her and Swampy Susie Wiles, the corrupt Roger Stone was also running cover for, because he's lining his pockets with this administration as well, because all they see it is as a personal cash grab rather than an opportunity to actually deliver for the American people.
So if you see weird claims, why is Roger Stone defending Swampy Susie Wiles?
It's because he's a notoriously corrupt lobbyist himself.
That's why.
Let me bring up some of the Rumble rants over on Rumble and some of the tip questions before we get into the glyphosate.
Is it glyphosate?
It's glyphosate, not glyphosate.
Hold on a second.
I wrote it down.
It's glyphosate because it's phosphorus.
I have no idea.
We're going to get into the glyphosate.
I heard you talk about it on the bourbon with Barnes, but we're going to talk about that in a second after we go through these.
Karen Booth, Barnes, please tell me where I can get a never-in-writing cup.
Robert, are those on 1776 or are those on Viva Fry?
We are going to.
This is a gift of one of our great board members.
So I've got to recreate it.
But yes, it was a great.
They've got one that's never in writing, got another one that's always in cash.
Well, that's a beautiful, like handmade ceramic with nice lacquer finish.
That's not one of our great board members.
They sent some pens this week and some other stuff.
That was awesome.
Well, let's see if we can get those ready for commercial scale.
Dominant one says NeuroDivergent one, 8 p.m. Central Dad, Sunday evening blues, February 22nd, simulcast.
All right, thank you.
Gaylord Fokker says Trump calling into C-SPAN in disguise as an ordinary citizen to complain about the SCOTUS ruling was pretty funny.
I'm half waiting for the Democrats to like, I don't know, go after him for doing that.
King of Bill Tong says, We are the lowest priced to direct consumer Bill Tong brand in the U.S. Bill Tong USA does not overcharge for junk.
They don't overcharge at all and they don't make junk.
We make real Bill Tongue.
Go to Bill Tongusa.com, code Barnes for 10% off.
Go do it.
It's flipping delicious.
NeuroDivergent one, do you still have to admit you are gay and put Anton's Fermi juice beat in your mouth?
MK Telephone Man says, too long in the tooth to play crypto.
I'll keep my gold silver.
You can't go wrong with gold, silver, filler.
MK Telephone Man says, follow the money, find the truth.
Puck you, Bob.
Kidding, says Porst Ford's name change.
It will be mad.
Okay, I got those other two there.
Over in Viva Barnes Law.
And I'm screenshotting the Rumble, the Committee Tube brand.
So I'll get to those in a bit as well.
Over on Locals, we'll get to these afterwards.
I think we got that one.
Yeah, I got that one.
What do you know about Invest America?
I just saw the commercial.
For the Barnes was right again from Chris Kraft.
Hello, Ellen.
Missed you, says Chris Kraft.
Robert, I hope you caught Lex Wesner's deposition to congressional members.
It sure sounds to be his statement should trigger a tax audit for all his tax records, possibly money laundering, fraud on how he structured his foundations and other items.
Who was it that he said that he trusted as to why he got involved with Epstein?
It might have been the same person as Alan Dershowitz.
The Rothschilds, Robert.
I had to go back.
I had to clip that because I did not pick up on the importance of that at the time.
Thank you for doing it in retrospect.
By the way, this was AI, so don't fall for it.
Although I never even thought the woman who looked like her allegedly even looked like her.
It's fake.
Don't fall for it.
There's tons of AI photos of everything these days.
Yeah, no, it was a video of like, oh, are you Ghelene Maxwell in Quebec City?
But first of all, I didn't think it looked like her to begin with, but it's fake.
Pam Bondi is honest.
It's an AI fake.
Chris Kraft says, for Viva's overly gracious Dan Bongino re-education jar, Jameson 2012, I think the states should sue the companies that don't get the tariffs.
Monsanto's Immunity Controversy00:15:18
I think the states should sue so that companies don't get the tariffs, but the states do.
The people are the ones not paying the tax according to their own court records.
Dr. I've never seen this name before.
Robert, what, in your opinion, is the best way to keep the data centers out of one's communities before the AI bubble bursts?
It's a massive spike in energy costs, but they're trying to use, and there's a Trump administration efforts, by the way, to be so in the pocket of big tech, no less.
That they are basically going to provide subsidies and backstops for the AI work, but also facilitate them using eminent domain to steal people's land and farms and destroy communities for what is probably going to be a bubble anyway.
But we are looking at at 1776 Law Center ways people can effectively protect their privacy and property interests and keep their electric bills down from these vultures in the AI data center world.
I hate death says now that we caught cash in the men's locker room, maybe he can be upgraded for counterfeit cash to, I won't be reading that.
All right, no.
I hate death, which also is the word is thanatophobia, which is a fear of death.
Speaking of hard to pronounce words, Robert, I mean, I only stumbled back across the RFK doing this podcast on glyphosates five years ago, where he talked about glyphosates, cancer-causing, terrible, genetically modified Monsanto wheat, which is there's multiple layers to the GMO modification of this wheat that they have.
They use glyphosates on everything.
There was a type of wheat that could grow despite the glyphosates.
It causes cancer.
It's bad for you.
RFK Jr. had to sue Monsanto on a number of issues, the Roundup in particular.
Fast forward five years, you've got Trump.
And again, you said it, you know, an executive order cannot grant immunity to a company.
I had to independently verify it.
And lo and behold, it seems to check out by way of legally correct analyses.
Five years later, you have Trump signing an executive order, which purports to do what is not permissible or not legal to grant immunity to glyphosate manufacturers, Monsanto.
He does it anyhow.
And I can't think of anything that is more politically unpopular, above and beyond legally unenforceable.
And I ask myself, what in the name of sweet holy hell is going on?
Thomas Massey comes out and says he's going to pass a bill to basically ban glyphosates or I don't know if it was to oppose the executive order.
And then people are saying, why is Massey making Trump look stupid about this?
I was like, Trump, what the hell was the rationale to sign an executive order granting immunity to big ag, big, big, big ag toxic companies for glyphosates, which we have all been fighting against or at least knew are toxic for a very long time.
What's the rationale?
I mean, I said the only thing more unpopular than granting immunity to Monsanto for glyphosate is granting immunity to Pfizer for their toxic jabs.
What the hell is the thought process going on?
Yeah, I mean, you've got Trump trying to overturn fluoride in the water by keeping fluoride in the water.
And this is being done through pay-for-play Pam Bondi and POWs at the EPA, despite what Lee Zeldon is claiming.
You've got the continued vaccine immunity for big pharma and pharmaceutical companies and a slowing down of the withholding or withdrawal of various mRNA vaccine approvals that Swampy Susie interjected last week to try to prevent Robert Kennedy from moving forward on that front.
And now you've got after Pay-for-Play Pam jumped into the Supreme Court and asked the Supreme Court to grant Bayer slash Monsanto complete immunity on the dangers caused, the cancer caused, amongst other things, caused by the use of glyphosate and things like Roundup, but also a bunch of other products.
Apparently unsatisfied that maybe the Supreme Court would not buy into their preemption argument that would grant them effective immunity, Trump jumps in to grant them immunity overnight by issuing an executive order that I think is beyond his lawful authority anyway.
And it's why?
It's because the people advising that the person that they picked for an advisor on these issues is a lifelong lobbyist and connected party to these people and these industry.
Won awards for how much they've advocated for the industry.
There you have Robert Kennedy as Secretary of Health and Human Services, the only person in your entire cabinet that is actually very popular with independent voters.
Hint, Narco Marco Rubio is not.
Your fake conservatives, oh, May and Rubio is really good.
I mean, you got to be kidding me.
Goes over to Europe and makes a speech about how great imperial colonialism is.
I mean, come on.
But the only person that's truly popular in a wide cross-section of the country is Robert Kennedy.
And what does Robert Kennedy spend most of his professional career on?
Taking, exposing Roundup and glyphosate and how dangerous it is.
Now, I'm sure Julie Kelly's happy because her husband makes a lot of money lobbying.
There's another person, right?
Remember, I'm going to expose January 6th.
I'm going to be a rogue champion.
And all she's done is run cover for these rogue, corrupt actors, flip-flopping routinely and regularly in a flagrantly obvious way to cover for these rogue actors in the Justice Department, the FBI.
Is it because her husband is lining his pocket as a lobbyist connected to some of these activities, Julie?
No, you know, Robert, you make it.
You start to understand who's connected to all these people and participants.
You start to put the puzzles, piece of the puzzle together, and it paints an ugly picture, unfortunately.
You make it very difficult for me to maintain friends.
I think you already destroyed that with her anyway.
All you did was ask her a nice, it wasn't like you did Tucker Carlson on Mike Huckabee.
You know, you just exposed her a little bit and she couldn't handle it and fell apart and dissolved.
The funny thing is, it's when you start needling or nosing your way into where people make their money and in a way that might frustrate it, people get very defensive and very aggressive, in addition to being defensive.
I don't know how people know these things, and I don't know how people think these things are going to be kept secret to the extent that they're true, but it's freaking dirty.
I mean, some people are going to say it's corruption.
Other people are going to say it's good business and good politics.
But I have no knowledge of that.
Good for their bank account.
Just not good for what they claim to be advocating for.
And so Thomas Massey is taking up the legislation to reverse this.
Thank God.
I mean, this is one of the most popular issues in the states across the country.
It's the number one Maha agenda item in this legislative session in many states in the country.
I went up and worked, helped them out, defeat the effort to give special immunity in Tennessee.
The, you know, tons of good, great people are right on the front end of this.
And you have Trump sabotaging them overnight with probably no idea that's what he did.
It's not clear he has full cognizant awareness of what this is and what the ramifications and implications are, because that's why Swampy Susie uses her gatekeeping control to make sure he doesn't get accurate intel and information.
That's why she's trying to shut out Tucker Carlson, as has been publicly reported ever since he outed Mike Huckabee, whose words were so embarrassing.
This was one of the more popular topics that people asked that we cover was Tucker's interview of Mike Huckabee.
It looked to me, by the way, this nonsense, oh, what happened at the airport is totally normal.
No, it's not.
I've traveled all around the world.
You don't get dragged into a separate special session for hours of someone trying to interrogate you.
What were you doing here?
Why were you here?
Especially when you didn't even really enter the country.
He just went to the airport and left.
Did the interview at the airport?
There was all kinds of shenanigans.
They didn't want to take his airplane information coming in.
They wouldn't provide security for him getting to the embassy.
I mean, you can't put anything past BB Netanyahu.
This is a man who I increasingly believe deliberately stood down or helped sabotage their security so that October 7th could happen in the first place because that's how nasty BB is.
And so you don't, people don't think you sound too crazy.
I've had discussions.
Well, incidentally, I had a discussion with Gaddy Taub, who had no good explanation for how it took as long as it did to respond.
So whether or not you call that a stand down or just grotesque criminal incompetence, but I've had discussions with Israelis who are, I wouldn't say insiders, but born and bred, live in Israel.
And they believe that there was something of an inexplicable stand down in the country.
So that nobody thinks you're just a crazy.
Oh, yeah.
Well, I mean, you said from day one, it made no sense.
It made no sense.
It's a six-hour drive across the country, and some of those villages were ransacked for 12 hours, if not more.
And then when I had, you know, a pro-Netanyahu, Israeli intellectual, there was no possible answer.
Yeah, well, they were looking at high-tech over low-tech.
You know, I live in Florida.
There's a guy who goes power gliding around here.
Dude, my neighbors could have taken the guy out faster than what happened in Israel.
So there's nothing that's going to make sense about that.
And do you see the consequences?
And now, anybody that had any doubts.
So, the big news item that came out from that interview, aside from Mahuckabee's incapacity to explain how Christian Zionism even works, because Christian Zionism is a heresy taught by televangelists in the 1970s after a bunch of them got caught banging the secretary.
Their idea of being a missionary was to give the secretary a missionary position.
That was what they were up to.
Like, you know, a lot of the biggest, the founder of Christian Zionism, that's what happened.
He got ran off from his church because he got banging parishioners and they needed a new excuse.
And the Likud Party decided, hey, this is a good opportunity to unite with this new politicized religious right that's emerging in the country in response to all of the cultural insanity of the late 60s, early 70s.
And the Carter administration accelerating that by treating every Christian school as racist because the people in his administration didn't understand the deep south was not where all the evangelical schools were taking place.
Many of these were taking place in the most racially liberal areas of the country, Kansas, places like Hillsdale and Michigan, etc.
But they basically use that as an opportunity to create Christian Zionism.
Didn't exist before the 1970s in any meaningful form, which is the, and you got Newsmax, Chris Ruddy, who parlayed being the real tough independent investigative journalist back in the 90s against the Clintons, getting paid a lot of money from the Mellons and some others that he then cashed in, befriended the Clintons, creates Newsmax, and it's been a propaganda organization aiding and enabling the deep state all along ever since, masquerading as a conservative, independent publication when it's not.
It's out there telling everybody that the political country of Israel is the essential predicate of the entire religion of Christianity, which is insane.
So, of course, Huckabee couldn't defend any of this.
None of it made much sense.
None of it ever has because it's a bastardized ideology by people wanting to preach a heresy to line their pockets and for political convenience back in the 80s for the AIPAC and religious right to align.
That alignment no longer serves the Christian cause purpose.
But the biggest news was he sat there and not only confirmed the Greater Israel Project, because it goes back to, you know, one of the reasons why I've come to be skeptical of Bibi Netanyahu about October 7th is because his critics,
the Scott Hortons of the world, said here that their real goal is a greater Israel, and they're going to use this as a pretext to ethnically cleanse the Palestinian population of Gaza and to expand Israel's influence in Lebanon and Syria and other parts and ultimately Jordan and Egypt and Saudi Arabia.
I mean, the Greater Israel Project is nuts.
And there's our U.S. ambassador, one, confusing Israel's borders with our borders, like using our, saying, well, we got to worry about our border on Lebanon.
And Tucker was like, I live in Maine.
I don't think we're anywhere near the border in Lebanon.
What do you mean, our?
And then, but the other one was, Mike Huckabee was, yeah, greater Israel.
Israel's religiously entitled to whatever they want to take.
However big that is, they want it.
They have a right to it.
And people around the Arab world were like, what?
I mean, Saudi Arabia's like, oh, no, This is insane.
This is insane.
Everybody in the Arab Muslim world was like, now we understand what the war with Iran is all about.
It's about the greater Israel project to take over large parts of the Middle East.
This is not what anybody in America signed on for other than the Mark Levins of the world.
And we, for the sake of humanity, we need to deport Mark Levin to Israel.
We got to deport that fat ass to Israel.
Let him go on the front lines.
Put that in all caps, Marky boy, Tel Aviv Levin with Tel Aviv Ted Cruz and the rest of them.
Just deport him too over at it.
Not, you know, only a first generation American anyhow.
But that's the background of it.
And the risk of war with Iran is real.
It's not only elite.
I mean, now you got Witkoff.
Didn't Trump say it was obliterated?
Didn't Trump say he obliterated their nuclear program?
Didn't he say anybody who said that we didn't obliterate the nuclear program was fake news?
Didn't Steven Crowder and other people who justified it say, oh, we were only there for the nuclear program?
And now Witkoff is saying, maybe in a week, maybe in a week, they'll have nukes again.
I mean, come on, quit lying, Witkoff.
I mean, it's an embarrassment already that this guy is our global representative for diplomacy.
But that's a real reason is we just want regime change.
And it's not even clear we can accomplish it.
So there's all kinds of risk.
You can listen to Colonel McGregor, you can listen to Larry Johnson, you can listen to Daniel Davis, you can listen to the Duran, you can listen to a wide range of people from a wide range of places who have a wide range of commentary.
And almost all of them are saying this screams risk, risk, risk with very little reward.
Well, I'm just fact-checking you in real time.
Mark Levin is not a dual citizenship.
Therefore, there is no legal basis to Israel, right?
Yeah.
Just send him out of there.
Let's get him out of here.
Put his low ass in there and boom, get him out.
Fact check number two.
Mark Levin's Twitter feed is unhinged.
If everybody wants to go see Psychosis on Twitter, I think I look sane by comparison, and that's saying something.
Hold on.
It was about the Greater Israel Project.
Robert, for people who at one point were saying, no, Trump is joking about developing the land that has now been raised.
And now it's literally going to be under some sort of board, the Board of Peace.
Oh, it turns out Board of Peace is meant to spell B-O-R-E-D.
That's why he had his inaugural Board of Peace meeting.
He's talking about war.
See, as a concept, it's not the worst idea on earth because clearly the status quo, I see not the worst idea, not in terms of the raising, but having an international community govern what was being done.
The Palestinian police and independent of Hamas and all that I was on board for.
Yeah, but now they're talking about something that's like they're going to make it into mini Dubai.
Well, it's like, where are the Palestinians going to live?
Act of War?00:12:53
It was something that people said was the conspiracy theory concern from the beginning.
They're going to raise it, depopulate it, and then build over it and develop it.
And the Palestinians that were displaced are going to have no place to go home or go back to.
And then people say, well, too bad that's what happens.
FFAFO, you start a war, whatever.
When it comes to Iran, and we live this together in real time, it's not a war.
It's just a strike.
Okay, it's a 12-day war, but it's not really a war.
It's just a strike.
Amazing success.
No need to go back.
Now we're what, eight months later?
And now the pretext is really, if you've noticed, it's not that they didn't take out the nuclear portion.
It's that now 50,000 people have been killed.
I looked up the figures.
Even Grok doesn't give an estimate up of 50,000.
It says at most, according to some high estimates, 25 to 35,000, if you believe those, more likely 3,000 to 5,000, depending on where you live.
And most of those 3,000 to 5,000 were police and civilian and military.
They were Iranian authority figures who got killed.
This was a violent insurrection by crazy terrorist groups that we decided to arm in the aim of an insurrection.
And people running around pretending that wasn't the case.
It was just the Iranian regime, which I'm no fan of, to be absolutely clear, went out and did a bunch of mass murdering.
That isn't what happened.
There's a wide range of independent sources around the world that have debunked that.
But even, and even if that were the case, now the argument is we have to go do it.
It's still not our business.
Not our business.
I'm not in Tehran.
It's up to the people of Tehran how they decide to govern.
Our military is not for lease or for sale to the Israeli government or to the Iranian protest government or to the fake ex-Shah of Iran.
The bots are so busy on X that they now raid any poll on this topic.
I originally put up the poll on our locals board.
How do you support?
Do you support a war in Iran?
It's about 90% strongly disapprove.
The same was true on X initially.
And then the Shah's people, I know because the son of the Shah was in my comment section, was sick in all of his Mossad.
And I think somebody tracked it, like almost 75% of the people who voted in the poll, they tracked their VPN to Israel.
You know, it's that kind of operation.
So it's a Mossad operation.
But this illusion that there's this mass domestic movement in Iran to overthrow the government and more importantly, to bring in the United States and have the United States bomb them back into oblivion is all hogwash.
It is hogwash.
Even if it were true, let's say this is a lose-lose proposition.
So let's talk about the risks or let's talk about the so-called reward.
The so-called reward is regime change in Iran.
Do you think that's really a reward?
How's that worked out in Libya?
How's that worked out in Syria?
Who are back?
We're back releasing ISIS soldiers.
We're back in bed with ISIS.
Trump is, the Trump administration is.
He invited Mr. Hedgehopper to the White House to show off his Trump cologne.
Now they got released from a bunch of prisons in Syria, and they're sending him to try to wage war in Iran because they're sending him into Iraq.
We're back in bed with friggin ISIS, who Trump promised to eliminate in his first term.
For those that don't know, the main opponent of ISIS was Iran, by the way.
Salome is the guy we took out, is the guy who took out ISIS.
You know, the conservatives don't like to hear honest information, but that's the reality.
I don't know if you dig in.
So that's who we're back in bed in business with.
But even if we succeed at regime change, you've got Libya, Iraq, and Syria on steroids where there's open slave markets that led to the rise of ISIS.
If this regime in Iran falls, we are far more likely to have a more dangerous condition of situation in Iran than as it relates to America, relates to the United States.
Now, maybe Israel's okay with it, but not for America's best interest because we would be blamed for it.
Now, let's say we murdered the Ayatollah and his kid.
Now we've murdered the leader or assassinated him.
We've now taken out the leader of a huge sect of Islam.
How do you think that's going to work?
If somebody went and assassinated the Pope, do you think all Catholics around the world would go, woohoo?
I don't think so.
And that is the logic of what they're talking about.
So even a win is likely a loss.
And then there's the possibility we don't achieve regime change at all, for which would mean the whole effort was a total waste of money and lives.
And people are saying, hey, Barnes, there's nobody out there.
I said the White House is calculating up to 10,000 casualties.
Like, oh, that's hogwash.
That can't be true.
They polled on it, folks.
They went out and polled on it.
They polled, would you support this invasion and war with Iran, even if it caused 10,000 plus casualties?
Because that's how many they think they can have happen.
And this is because we've got a bunch of soldiers on the ground and bases we can't adequately protect that are easily within the reach of Iran, that are easily with, we could have, what they're talking about, if you listen to the Iranian side, hear what they're talking about.
They're talking about they may go in and depose the government of Azerbaijan.
They may leash Shia political rebellions around the entire region.
Not to mention the various missiles and counter weapons that they have to hit our bases, to hit Israel, to hit our ships.
This screams, risk, risk, risk.
For what?
For what?
So B.B. Netanyahu finally gets his dream, regime change in Iran.
I don't think that's worth the risk.
And the American people agree with me.
Right now, more Americans believe the Democratic Party will keep them out of war than the Republican Party, than Donald Trump, by an eight-point margin.
Guess what it parallels to?
The exact margin of the number of people who think you're more likely to keep us out of war has been the identical to the number, to the margin of victory in presidential elections dating back to 1948.
And the same is true now.
The advantage for Democrats on the House ballot, eight points.
Exactly the same as the number of people who think we're going to get us out of war.
This is why it's now public.
Vice President Vance, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, have been begging the president, do not do this, because this will be a disaster.
It can kill your presidency.
It can wreck their ambitions and aspirations.
And from a geopolitical, so domestically, politically, it will be a complete disaster no matter what happens.
Geopolitically, it could be an even bigger disaster.
They are going to shut down the streets of Hormuz.
Iran's going to do it right away.
They're not going to wait.
And what's going to be the effect of that?
Doubling or tripling oil and gas prices around the globe as they take a third of our oil and natural gas off of global supply.
This is disaster, disaster, disaster written all over it.
And those boomer con slop at Fox are encouraging, incentivizing the president to do it.
Swampy Susie, who is one of those Christian Zionist churches where they built their own fake Western wall inside, that's how nuts she is from her boomer con world, deeply embedded with that deep state apparatus, are all encouraging the president to do this.
And this is politically disaster.
I think geopolitically, I think it'd be a disaster.
I don't think there's any.
Now, from a legal constitutional perspective, Iran presents no imminent risk to the United States of America.
Period.
End of story.
The all you combine, all of even if you blame Iran for who's labeled as their proxy, you can argue about how much these people are proxies because they often haven't come to bat for Iran.
That's just not really that proxy.
But putting that aside, all their deaths of Americans combined, it's less than the number of people that certain of our allies in the region have caused the death of.
So they are no imminent risk constitutionally.
Mike Cernovich, for the love of God, you can't completely bitch out like this.
He's out there saying it's not a war.
It's not a declaration of war to bomb a country.
What?
This is Rand Paul's point.
If Americans would call it an act of war, if it happened to us, then constitutionally, by golly, it's an act of war that requires congressional authorization and approval under our Constitution.
I consider kidnapping a foreign leader an act of war because that's what we would do if someone kidnapped President Trump.
But by golly, it sure is the case that bombing somebody is war.
Pretending it's not war is stupid.
It's not only just dumb at a level that makes you look like a moron, that makes Mike Cernovich look like a joke.
Looks like he's become an Israeli little bitch.
But on top of all that, by the way, that's how they rated even Massey's poll.
So it's all these bots on X are just rating the polls now.
First of all, this is just, I mean, set aside your description.
First of all, I want to highlight one thing before I keep going here.
Thank you for adding another freaking wrinkle to my face, Robert.
See, I had the grimmest wrinkle here.
Now I got another one I just noticed.
It's like right there.
That right there.
That's another wrinkle of distress of the state of the world that we're in.
Cernovich said, as usual, I hold the least popular and most accurate opinion.
Bombing the Moolahs isn't war.
I disagree.
Call it least accurate, Mike Covid.
Least accurate.
I like Mike Cernovich.
A good guy.
I like him in many capacities.
Don't be confused.
This opinion is his dumbest opinion he's ever given.
Well, who knows if he's being bombastic?
Whatever.
It is, I mean, in my view, bombing a country is the act of war.
It's like, it's not genocide.
It's an act of genocide.
All right.
Thank you.
It's the splitting of a hair distinction without a difference.
Even with this, with some people say, oh, how long until Thomas Massey takes this pull down?
That shows you that half of America or half of the respondents, because I don't think a lot of these people live in America, still don't think that they don't really, they don't want a U.S.-led war.
So they think it's not a war, but we don't want a war.
That's half of the respondents.
So it's not an own that 52% say, yeah, we want it.
Especially all of the, it was clearly all bots.
There's a wide range of surveys.
This was one of the other highlights.
I mean, you know, I mean, credit Tucker.
He was just asking straightforward questions, frankly.
All these attacks on Tucker, like that Yaram, whatever his weird name is.
I mean, well, why does a guy like that pretend to even be an American?
Your name is not American enough to call yourself an American.
But he's out there bashing, they say, Tucker's anti-Semitic and part of this.
Folks, this has nothing to do with anti-Semitism.
I follow a lot of people in the Orthodox Jewish community.
They have long considered Israel itself a heresy from an Orthodox perspective.
The idea that this has anything to do with being Jewish is nonsense.
This has to do with a particular country and its lunatic leadership class led by B.B. Netanyahu, who really belongs in an Israeli jail from his corruption.
That's what this is about.
This is not about Jewish people.
The Jewish voters are completely split on this.
I mean, Jewish voters are going to vote Democrat again, by the way.
You can back Israel all you want.
Ain't going to change that.
The many Jewish people are some of the most anti-Israel on the planet.
Were you talking about the Orthodox or the Jewish left, like we talked with Max Blumenthal?
Well, you know, Noam Chomsky, like a lot of the big names are vehemently anti-Israel.
This goes back to being anti-Zionist for a good number of them.
For others, it's their siding with the U.S. rather than the Soviet Union.
But this is about this particular Greater Israel project.
This isn't about Israel's security or safety.
This is about their ambitions to destabilize the entire Middle East so they are the dominant political player in the Middle East.
This is how they are sabotaging the Abraham Accords on a daily basis.
This is why Saudi Arabia is walking back, not walking forward, to the Abraham Accords, because increasingly throughout the Middle East, they think Israel is the greatest threat to Middle East security and safety.
But at a minimum, it is not in our geopolitical best interest to be there.
It is clearly an act of war to do what we're talking about doing.
So don't pretend otherwise.
Constitutionally, that requires the president to get congressional approval.
The War Powers Resolution Act is not so broad that it can possibly authorize this action.
There is no imminent security risk to the country that requires as a proportionate response a mass bombing campaign and regime change in Iran.
And it is an absolute betrayal by President Trump of a decade-long set of promises, including ones he just made less than a year ago in Saudi Arabia, that he was no longer going to be in the regime change business.
There's large parts of his base that would never forgive him if he were to cross this line of the Iranian war.
So this is a warning.
So take it or suffer the consequences.
I would rather we, the American people, the people of Iran, the people of the Middle East, or President Trump suffer such consequences.
But, you know, let's hope the better angels of our nature and the better voices like Tulsi Gabbard and JD Vance get through to the president.
We got our circulated poll that shows right now they're way under, if they could reverse the war question, they could hold the Senate just by itself.
But they have no chance of reversing that if we go to war in Iran.
Robert, let me read a bunch of the CommeTube chats before I lose them.
Price Discovery Phenomenon00:06:43
We got, if companies passed the cost of the tariffs onto their customers, how can they be harmed?
They have already been compensated.
Would not the citizens have been the one harmed and get the tax rebates?
It says Quatt 1996.
You can argue that, but effectively, they really didn't.
This is mostly a myth.
It's due to the price discovery phenomenon that most of them did not, in fact, like when you see these headlines that say it's the U.S. that paid the tariff, what they're referencing is the company, the retailer, the importer.
But even then, frequently what happens is the exporter takes a haircut or there's fewer goods sold.
So the price transfer is not easy if you understand the theory of price discovery of free market economics.
The theory of price discovery is that you're charging the most you can right now to be able to sell at the supply you want to sell at.
You either have to reduce your supply, if you're going to increase the cost, you're likely going to have, you're going to have reduced purchases.
So there's a balance there.
So for the most part, imported goods, you can find the cost of living, track the inflationary gauges on imported goods, and they did not go up substantially during Trump's tariff era.
Like those predictions were mistaken and misguided.
But the company that actually pays it is the one legally entitled to the refund, even if they really recoup that by increasing prices.
But there's not a lot of evidence they actually did increase the prices.
And I actually do want to get to this one.
What do you think of the South Korean politician getting sentenced to life for allegedly starting a coup when enacting martial law?
That's a tradition in South Korea.
You get elected president, you go to jail.
Well, it's the one that hopefully we do not start in America, but we're on our way to that when Trump is no longer in office.
Let me not fall too far behind here.
We're going to get a couple more of these.
Lost in West Virginia says your show is turning into a two-hour rant against Trump for months now, and I still can't buy raw dairy products for my Amish neighbors in Pennsylvania.
Fix that, sir, if you still kill.
Well, why might you not be able to buy raw milk from your Amish neighbors in Pennsylvania, Mr. Lost in Western Virginia?
Robert, do you have an answer to that question?
And who might be?
I mean, it would be nice if the Trump administration would step up to the plate and help as they promised to do.
So far, they've not delivered for the Amish.
Now, we're going to be, I continue to represent them.
I mean, anybody's a two-month rant against Trump, you're selectively, if you want to hear seal clapping, go somewhere else.
But the warnings of the risks to Trump is a good idea, not a bad idea.
There are a bunch of people early during COVID that are like, oh, this is genius.
Yes, go along with Anthony Fauci.
This is so, this is fine.
One of them was Will Chamberlain was doing that nonsense, saying, lock down more, lock down harder.
So was Steve Bannon.
So was Jack Pesovic.
So, by the way, was Mike Cernovich.
He was on the wrong side of COVID at the very beginning.
So a lot of these, did that help Trump?
Did it help Trump to shut down the country?
Did it help Trump to turn the country over to Fauci for a month, month and a half?
Did it help Trump to have mass mail-in voting in the 2020 election?
All of you that cheerlead, do you think that was a smart decision or do you think that was a stupid decision?
Do you think it was better to have warned him rather than seal clap for him?
What's happening with the Amish is that they are still harassing the Amish.
The Pennsylvania Republican Attorney General got elected to be attorney general, promising not to continue to harass the Amish is continuing to harass the Amish.
The Trump Treasury Department is still of the IRS still harassing the Amish.
I'm defending Amos in multiple cases, defending the Amish in multiple cases to this day.
And have been doing so effectively pro bono now for years.
Now, we're going to, 1776 Law Center is going to have a special fundraiser at Amos Miller's farm on the to, you know, it's going to be a combination birthday party, Amish picnic, Amish outing.
So the, to, to help raise funds to continue that fight.
But if you want to know why is it that that's the case, because Republicans can't keep their word, my friend.
That's why we're here.
Oh, Robert, I love fact-checking you in real time.
It's actually phenomenal that I Tony's foul.
Tony Fauci's, this is Will Chamberlain, April 13, 2020.
Tony Fauci's approval numbers, 78 approve, only 7% disapprove.
If Trump were to fire Fauci, that would be immensely damaging to his presidency and to his reelection chances.
Twitter is not real life.
Twitter's forever.
I'll tell you one thing.
That's what he's worth.
It's who Mike Davis is partners with is that guy.
That tells you the quality of their legal advice.
Let me do this one.
It says, Robert, is God a...
I'm not going to entertain with an answer, but thank you for the support.
This is theological beyond the scope of the show.
Is God a Christian Zionist?
He's the original Christian.
He's the original Zionist, and his word is all about Christ logically then God.
He's not delivering Zionists.
There's nothing about the Zionism emerged in the mid-1800s.
I don't think people are using the term Zionism in any coherent concept in Manners.
It's only the propagandized boomer cons that have taken in all the slop from the televangelist preachers in their day that buy into this stuff.
My young, anybody under 60 who's evangelical, grew up in the evangelical community, for the most part, get outraged and insulted when they hear Mike Huckabee's nonsense.
I heard glyphosate is also used to dry the wheat.
Is that true?
I'm not sure.
Yeah, it's using all kinds of stuff that contaminates our food supply.
It's on everything.
It's in everything.
It's why people have trouble eating American wheat, but don't have trouble eating European wheat.
Tip via Rumble Wallet, Annie P13.
Thank you.
I'm going to read this with neither approval nor disapproval.
Yo, Barnes, Serovich's wife is from Families from Iran.
He's not watching CBS.
He's watching his chances of getting late.
All right.
Thank you for the support.
Barnes, please tell us where I can get.
Okay.
All right.
So that's good there.
That's a fair enough point on the maybe.
You can't listen to Patrick Bet David and the expats that live outside a country for what's going on inside the country.
Well, that's almost all these Iranians have been here since the 70s, early 80s.
So, you know, I mean, it's not like they got a lot of tight ties.
God bless Patrick Beth David, but I don't think he's got any real intel on what's happening in Iran.
No, but I have a lot of Iranian friends who, I say a lot, a number of Iranian friends that work with my wife.
And yes, they're very anti-the Iranian regime, of course.
Of course, that's why they're an exile.
That's why they're here and not there.
Let's do a few on here, and then we're going to get into the other stuff here.
Now that we caught down, okay, man, if you stop paying income tax, then how would you violate your Fifth Amendment rights to tattle on yourself to the government?
Wouldn't they let this happen?
Says eight help for me.
Dictum, Robert, what those disclosure laws apply to lawyers who represents clients like Amos Miller or Brooke Jackson, the former regional director of Ventavia, et cetera.
If her lawyer meets with a member of Congress, the DOJ FDA, to advocate for executive branch decisions that will benefit his law clients.
Howard the Duke says, adding a tip.
Rothschild and Banking Scandals00:15:09
Andrew Piscadlo says, I'm increasingly worried about the businesses that are taking only card.
It's a 3% processing fee in general, and it's never the person's responsibility who's handling the transaction.
Look at these banks, can cut people off with ease.
The removal of the penny has created a genuine problem with these small businesses don't want to handle what the F.
They just add that 3% onto the consumer.
Everywhere here, it says if you pay with credit card, you're paying 3% more on their behalf.
Chris Kraft says, I got this image from hyphen.
He says this is Mike.
This is Viva's Mike Davis was wrong.
Jargon.
Well, those are fake gold.
I can tell you that much.
Pescadlo.
Oh, it went all the way down to the bottom.
Okay.
Okay, right here right here.
It's, can we start a pool of sports picks on the number of nasty grams on X or otherwise?
What is this?
You have TDS if you want pedophiles arrested, sir.
Have you not seen the stock market?
All right.
Okay, let's get out of here.
Let's get to some of the, I guess, non-Trump law stuffs.
What do we want?
Well, hold on a second.
Hold up.
Wait a minute.
Let me get my list up here.
What was the one that I wanted to get into before?
Did we talk about Prince Andrew being arrested?
We sort of tangentially talked about it.
Okay, let's just.
The former Prince Andrew, whose name is Mount Button Windsor, has been, he was arrested.
Where does he come from?
Where does his family come from?
Mount Button?
But it's originally German.
And they anglicized it in 1917 because the UK was about to be part of World War I against Germany.
Not only that, if you track back the family lines even further, it's connected to a part of Germany that was also that helped originally fund and put into power the beginnings of the Rothschild banking empire, by the way.
So that's part of the reasons why for all those royal connections, if you knew that Epstein was connected to the Rothschilds, it explains everything because the Rothschild, like you look at where Epstein's connections, you could kind of get Israel and certainly in Wall Street, but it's like, why all these European royalty?
But that's who the Rothschilds built their entire banking empire was their cozy relationship with the various royal families of Europe, including in particular the UK, but not limited to it.
That's why he anglicized the name.
And you're now seeing that name come back rather than Windsor because he's no longer the prince.
Mount Batten.
Well, he got arrested, or he got arrested, but not charged.
It was something in office.
What's it called?
Improprieties in office.
Misconduct in office.
Yeah, abuse of office, basically.
Abuse of office, yeah.
For disclosing things to Jeffrey Epstein back in the day.
Now, when I was first reading it, I'm like, okay, so he forwarded an emails of tips and whatever insider information 2010 or earlier.
And I was wondering what the statute of limitations was.
He didn't get charged with anything.
So he got arrested, detained, investigated a little bit.
They're still continuing the investigation, but no charges.
I mean, it is a little ironic or embarrassing that yet another foreigner, and this time a former prince, gets arrested in the UK because of the disclosures.
People say nothing to do with sex-related crimes, only to do with whatever.
Well, people like Mike Benz of the world have been saying the sex trafficking underage sex exploitation is one element of this.
The other element, and the one that Mike Benz is most interested in, is the forest gump of this world, Jeffrey Epstein, somehow having a hand in every element of geopolitics, going to the Rothschilds and whatever.
Bottom line, Prince Andrew, former Prince Andrew, arrested, released.
What do you make of it?
Where does it go?
And I mean, what the hell is going on that nobody of any meaningful position of power or whatever in the States, even on non-sex trafficking issues, has managed to be arrested for their involvement with Epstein.
Well, you kind of know why Les Wexner was allowed to walk.
He does a deposition.
Apparently no Republican shows up for it.
I don't understand why that was the case.
And then they say they're shutting it all down afterwards.
And as you pointed out, his lawyer made the joke of telling him that he's going to effing kill him if he keeps answering questions in a certain way.
It wasn't long after he read it out that the Rothschilds were the reason why he went to bed with Epstein.
Just so everybody knows, that was not AI.
That was confirmed.
His lawyer whispered and says, haha, I'm going to fucking kill you if you answer a question with more than five words.
And it wasn't like a violent, it was like shut your stupid mouth.
And I don't know how they could even, how a lawyer could, that's coaching a witness while he's under oath.
I don't know how the hell he got away with it, but there were no Republicans there apparently to raise a flag.
Sorry, I cut you off and I just want to check on him while you're talking about it.
It turns out Wexner gave a bunch of money to the Republican candidate for the Senate in Ohio, Hoosted.
It was always kind of a rhino anyway.
And now he's done.
I mean, if Republicans had any political IQ at all, they would sack him now, tell him to step down and put somebody else in.
But so once you understand the Rothschild connection, it all makes sense.
I mean, the first time I got a wind of it was when you were interviewing Professor Alan Dershowitz, and he said the reason why he believed in Epstein and got connected to Epstein was because Lady Rothschild recommended him.
But okay, what the hell?
First of all, it's true.
Yes, no Republicans showed up.
Stop there, Robert.
Why the hell would no Republican member of Congress show up for Les Wexner's deposition?
Very good question.
I mean, the reality is Wexner donates to both sides, and Wexner's got deep ties to the Ohio political establishment on both sides, Republican and Democrat.
And he's deeply embedded within Israel.
I mean, the reality is, you know, the Epstein file disclosure, in my view, is 95% about Israel.
The Trump's bumbling, bungling of the Epstein files that is politically crushing him right now as we speak.
It was for Israel.
It's Israel connected.
Howard Luttnick, huge Israel firster.
Wexner, huge Israel guy.
Almost everybody that's negatively implicated is connected to Israel.
Not a surprise once you understand the, and then you see the European royalty connections that it's all about the Rothschilds.
People that don't know this, Israel probably doesn't exist as a nation, but for the Rothschild family.
That the Balfour Declaration wasn't written to the Israeli Zionist Association.
It was written to Mr. Rothschild himself, Lionel Rothschild, who was then in charge, I believe, of the London branch and would become the ultimate branch.
I can go back in a little history.
I'm going to do a little hush-hush this week at VivaBarn's Law.logals.com on the family of the Red Shield, the Rothschilds, and all their history.
Some interesting little tidbits that are not commonly known about them.
We'll get into some of those details.
There's some conspiracy theories out there that are totally AWOL, but there's more than a few that are quite not.
And it's not a surprise, the number one family referenced in the entire Epstein files is the Rothschild family.
And so once you understand that, you understand that this is one of the most politically powerful, at one point, the wealthiest family in the world that helped create modern international banking.
That within the Jewish community, you can go back to the early 19th century, and they were portraying Meyer Rothschild as literally the second coming of the Messiah.
You know, the Jacob Schiff, who was connected to the Rothschilds, who then became prominent here in the United States with his connection to the various financial and banking operations of Loeb and the rest, helped sink the Russian Empire because of their treatment of the Jewish people.
So it's not, I can see Andrew's kind of complaint.
He's like, hey, you know, being a pervert is a family tradition of British royalty.
And, you know, the, and I'm in bed with a guy who's in bed with the Rothschilds, who, you know, helped the reason why the Brits own the Suez or did for a period of time own the Suez Canal.
So the, but I have no doubt he misused his access to office because that's what it's all about.
I mean, that was the Rothschild brand was getting inside intel and information and front running it.
That's how, that's how the original founder of the Rothschild banking operation got he frontran his own prince's orders for for certain coins.
You know, the, I mean, he's a genius frontrunner.
Famous story about what happened at Waterloo, them knowing in advance.
You know, they've always denied it, but there's plenty of inferential evidence that it's not so deniable what they did in terms of profiting off of war, particularly the Napoleonic Wars when their wealth exploded.
So I think, you know, that's good, but how, but Prince Andrew can't really use those defenses.
Now, I think what is probably true is the Duran were talking about it, Alexander McCorris, now it's Christopher, is that this may be cover for the utterly unpopular Starmer government, labor government of the United Kingdom.
That you got Rupert Lowe out there talking about he's going to create his own unique party that's restore London.
You have Nigel Farage, who's leading in the Reform Party ticket.
But Starmer, Lord Mandelson, was the one who clearly misused and abused his office in the UK to profit the Epstein class.
By the way, now Iranian advocates, that's how they're referring to the whole West now.
Oh, well, this is the Epstein class.
We're up against the Epstein class.
That is going to stick for a while, folks.
That's why you do not want to be affiliated with the Epstein class.
You don't want to be protecting the Epstein class.
You don't want to be enabling and empowering the Epstein class.
Bad idea politically.
You can live in whatever denial you want, but just understand that's what's coming.
So, clearly, Prince Andrew was one of the most notorious rogue actors, but I think the UK government is doing this because Starmer should have already resigned.
Because Lord Mandelson, who was key to the entire neoliberal order of the Labor Party, dating back to even before Tony Blair, who has been one of the critical middlemen of the power structure of the Labor Party in the neoliberal global EU style order for forever, is the one that was actually providing real inside intel and information and abusing and misusing his office for the enrichment of Jeffrey Epstein and his pals and buddies.
And they may think, hey, we'll throw the prince to the wolves.
In the name of throwing the prince to the wolves, we'll protect the rest of the royal family, protect Lord Mandelson, and protect the Rothschild banking operation.
That may be what's really going on, because if there's an honest inquiry, that's where it's going to go.
But we now have investigations, criminal investigations in the UK, criminal investigations in Norway, criminal investigations in France.
How on God's green earth do we not have a criminal investigation in the United States of America?
Well, Robert, if you ask Mike Tracy, they just don't have the elements of a crime there.
He's going to really go down with that ship.
He was a petarash, not a pedophile.
He was a petaras.
It's incredible.
And I'd love to, you know, I don't know that he'll come on.
I want to know what they would qualify as evidence.
Like, what is evidence in their mind that would justify an investigation?
You had Mike Davis coming out and saying, you know, based on this file, there's nothing they can do about it.
Then don't tell us nothing happened if the file is so corrupt because of the people before you destroyed the evidence that would have allowed you to do something.
And then tell us where, you know.
There's tons of leads.
There's clear abuse of office.
There's clear money laundering.
There's clear arms trafficking.
There's clear human trafficking.
And then they should do further investigation to what all these code words are.
What does jerky mean?
What does pizza mean?
Why do you need seven people to decide how we're going to divvy up one piece of pizza?
How does that make any sense?
I mean, there's things in this that scream even worse sickening, disturbing.
I mean, allegations that there are bodies buried out on the New Mexico Zoro Ranch.
I mean, put us away.
If they really thought there was nothing there, why didn't they like ever raid the Zoro Ranch?
Why had Les Wexner admitted that no one from the Justice Department had ever officially or formally interviewed?
They went out of their way to bury this case.
And corrupt Mike Davis, cuck, self-described cuck for Israel, corporate whore, lobbyist, saboteur of MAGA Mike Davis, is not someone whose word you can trust on anything.
And continuing to cover up the Epstein files and the Epstein, all you're going to get is people like Sean Ryan.
Like, people think I'm being rough on Trump.
Listen to what Sean Ryan, the podcaster, says.
Look at what Tim Dylan says.
Look at what Joe Rogan does.
Look at what these other people are saying.
They're becoming, they're 10 times harsher than what I'm saying.
And that's where the normie voter is going.
They're increasingly, the Republican Party and Donald Trump are being perceived as the pedo protectors.
You don't want that to be your reputation?
Do something about it by investigating the Epstein list and put the Epstein class in prison where they belong.
No, but it's an amazing thing.
It's a double-edged sword.
If there's nothing in the files that can justify or warrant further criminal investigation, it should have been released then a long time ago and the whole fight about it was an unnecessary black eye for the administration, which it was.
Here in Oregon, they're trying to pass a proposition that will ban all hunt and fishing and make it criminal offense if you harm an animal.
I just want Robert's opinion on how likely it is that it will pass.
And is it even constitutional, says junkman?
I hadn't heard about that.
Robert, in Oregon.
Look at that.
I haven't seen that.
Belucie W. Sota says, making a donation to Viva's home for special needs dogs in honor of our 11-year-old golden retriever Libby, who passed away from, oh, well, that's a beautiful dog.
The dog that we have locked under contract, the video doesn't seem to want to get up on locals.
He's not special needs that we know of yet.
We're going to find out.
Apparently, his testicles also didn't descend, just like Winston's.
So it's a match made in heaven.
We got Slim Shagan.
Okay.
All right.
Okay.
Then we got Jonathan 094 Barnes.
Percent odds that there's a total turnaround in the Trump administration sometime in the next couple of months and utilize the 1776 law center poll.
By the way, Barris is going to come up.
We got tons of survey evidence that we're spoon feeding them.
Got him the stuff about where they are on war, on the Iran war, got him the stuff about what to do on the tariff policy, use it as an opportunity, not an obstacle.
Got him stuff on food freedom, medical freedom, political freedom.
There's a bunch of really popular policies like defending and protecting the Amish.
Why not do an Amish town hall with Robert Kennedy and Brooke Rollins?
And why not announce that there's going to be ways they're going to protect herd share provisions so people can get food directly from the farmer?
We pulled that.
Once again, one of the most popular issues in the country is the right to buy food directly from the farmer without requiring government permission or inspection first.
That is one of the most popular issues in the nation across the board politically.
There's all these things.
We're spoon feeding them.
Petition for Bond Pending Appeal00:06:32
And then you've got to unleash the antitrust division.
But in order to do that, you've got to cut Mike Davis off completely.
Cut Arthur Schwartz off completely.
And if you and put somebody like Gail Slater back in that position.
Otherwise, it's going to be a disaster.
The person that's there has like four months' experience in antitrust and they're running the antitrust division.
It's a joke.
And they're about to implicate the Ellisons in a much broader criminal conspiracy if they shut down the Netflix deal and green light the Paramount deal without proper disclosures because it appears a lot of people aren't registering as lobbyists that are working that deal.
I mean, it's just, I mean, then you bring down, you know how much the Democrats would love to pay back Ellison and Papa with a big criminal conspiracy so that they would have to give up ownership of CBS, CNN, everything TikTok and all the rest are taking over and take down Trump in the process, even potentially take down Vice President Vance in the process.
I mean, we're warning them of these massive risks.
And they, dude, was it really smart of them to ignore what we told them for six months about the Epstein files?
Didn't almost everything we predicted come true?
If you want President Trump to be successful, you should be joining the warning, not joining the seal clapping.
Testify, Robert, and I don't take the victory lap.
It's pure vindication, as we will see with the other injustice that is the most probably, I don't say, relatively popular among ordinary Americans.
One of the biggest failures of Pay for Play Pam Bondi and Harmee Dylan, the civil rights division.
Oh, I tagged.
Ooh, now I feel bad.
I tagged her personal account and not her attorney.
No, no, that's attorney.
No, no.
You tagged my office.
So this we can't block you from that one because I'm not that First Amendment violation.
I'm not a citizen yet, Robert.
But no, so look, we've been talking about Tina Peters from the beginning.
No, not from the beginning.
It took me a while to get aware of it.
People were like, get on Tina Peters' story.
Get on Tina Peter's story.
I'm been talking about it now for a while.
I go on her channel very often with Apollo to talk about it.
I mean, her channel is now being taken over or it's being curated.
What's the word I'm looking for?
Caretaken for while she's in jail.
While she rots away in jail, she's now entering her second year.
A woman who, arguably, but not arguably, could be qualified as a whistleblower, if not for election fraud, at the very least for state prison abuse.
Nothing.
I've had Stuart Rhodes on, laid out the blueprint, the groundwork for how to do it.
You've talked about it at length.
She filed a petition for, what is the term for what we had here?
A petition for review.
Basically, a petition for bond pending appeal because she's appealing her decision and it should get overturned.
And we had that court of appeal hearing where a viral moment went viral.
I wasn't the key person to make it go viral, but I certainly helped amplify it, where the court of appeal is like, you sentenced her on a felony that she wasn't even charged with.
Does that not create a bit of a problem?
And now she's appealing the decision pending the appeal.
That jackass activist scumbag of a judge sentenced her to serve her time.
She's been in solitary.
She's been assaulted three times.
And I've been politely needling Attorney, sorry, what's her face?
Harmee Dylan Civil Rights Division to do something.
It would be very popular.
They haven't done anything.
Her petition was dismissed.
And nobody's done anything yet.
Correct.
They didn't join it.
They didn't bring their own habeas petition.
They've done some lame random emailing.
That's about all.
Trump has actually tried to use his veto power to try to motivate them, but only Trump has tried to do something.
Harmee Dylan came in talking a big, big game, Civil Rights Division.
Now she's willing to sell out for pay-for-play Pam Bondi, Todd Blanche Dubois, Stanley Woodward, and these corrupt actors who are selling out and sabotaging MAGA on a daily basis.
And there's no better example of that than the utter failure.
Civil Rights Division is busy running around, making sure people don't get into fights in Florida State's campus over Israeli t-shirts.
Or even further, Harmee Dylan was bragging, a bunch of Israeli donors, how she's using the civil rights division to make sure people don't do anti-Semitic graffiti.
But she can't even lift a finger to help Tina Peters or Kurt Benjoof or Emos Miller or Dexter Taylor or any of the victims of lawfare across this country.
We defended Harmeen a long time.
Enough is enough, Harmee.
You have failed to do your job.
And instead, you're aligning yourself with some of the most corrupt actors in the history of the Justice Department.
Get off your end and do your job.
Tina's Peters' civil rights are being violated every single minute of every single day.
She rots in that prison as a whistleblower disclosing a federal election fraud that happened in Colorado.
That's what she got prosecuted for.
So do your job, Harmee.
Do something and get her released, get her freedom, or sue the state of Colorado for violating her civil rights.
Maybe instead of worrying about, oh, golly, gee, I wonder if Mark Levin's pals were offended by somebody on the internet.
I mean, for example, take all the people that got swatted like Owen Schroyer.
The only people, they will only pay attention to your swatting case is if you're an Israel First Curt.
So if you're a Laura Loomer, they're all over it.
They got 50 agents on it.
But if you're Owen Schroer, nothing.
Zero.
Zilch, Zunka.
Harmee Dylan's becoming an embarrassment to the MAGA cause and the civil rights.
So she's going to do her job.
Start doing it.
Start doing it now.
Well, okay, so I'm just looking it up as we talk.
In December, Dylan announced and led a civil rights investigation into the entire Colorado prison system.
Great.
Earlier in the year, the DOJ under Dylan's division filed a statement of interest in Peters' federal habeas corpus petition.
Did they not intervene?
They never intervened.
They haven't brought their own petition.
They haven't done anything really effective or creative to get her out.
If they were serious, they would, I mean, when it comes to a big corporation making a big donation to the lobbyist pals of pay-per-play Pam, by golly, they're quick to act.
If it's an Israel first issue, they are quick to act.
But when it's Tina Peters, they are slow to act.
And so what they could do, we've said it a number of times.
Anybody can snip and clip.
They can.
material witness in a federal criminal conspiracy to deny us all all of us our constitutional rights to a fair election in 2020.
Mobsters and Inaction00:02:08
So she should be really they do this.
I mean for the love of the good Lord they the feds helped get mobsters some of the biggest mobsters like Lucky Lil Luciano released from state prison.
I mean we can get mobsters out but we can't get Tina Peters out.
What a joke.
Guess your great interference for it said it was all fine.
Mike Davis.
You're adding to the grimace wrinkle, Robert.
Divine comedy or just comedy?
DC sewage couldn't handle all their shit and it spilled into the Potomac causing the largest sewage disaster in U.S. history.
It has been over a month and no fix.
Trump finally made it a national disaster.
Well, I think we outdid you up in Montreal where when we were redoing the sewers, they literally diverted all of the city's waste into the St. Lawrence River.
And I went to look at it and the amount of condoms I saw floating around in the river was shockingly high.
I don't know who flushes.
Anyways, at least people are using protection, I guess.
All right.
Glyphosate is an ingredient in a roundup.
That is what we are told is the cause of his cancer, Cesare syndrome, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, says Saka.
We are watching from the ICU right now.
Sadaka, everyone's wishing as the best under the circumstances.
It's everywhere.
Barnes said you would unblock me a few weeks ago.
This is quo vatis.
I'm still blocked.
I can't all have a look at that because, okay, we'll see.
Thanks for listening more and not interrupting.
Okay.
Now you make me want to interrupt more.
We need to know, says Cat, not Cat Turtle, it says Chris Kraft.
Okay, see the veil.
Can we ask all the viewers to call the White House and their members of Congress to remove the Trump's executive order that gives glyphosate companies a shield and right to bypass state laws, as well as allow it to be sprayed on or near elementary schools, knowing this violates the full reason the people of the USA voted him into office because Trump knows it 100% causes illness in our nation and direct nutrition deficit in farm-produced food.
Do it.
Stay polite.
Don't make any threats, people.
We got to the kid.
We got to understand malevolence.
Call Congress Now00:15:25
The Dow's overthrew that.
and Bondi as a vampire.
I think that's from...
Oh, that's not from the movie Malevolent.
Or it looks like maybe the alien or something.
Restore Britain, Amelia and Amelia's video are major culture events that JD should embrace.
Plus, he is in the video.
I saw those.
They're quite funny.
Dr. Hoover says it's an old Steve Martin movie bit.
Check it out from the YouTubes.
It makes me chuckle every time.
I have a great suggestion for the next meetup.
Yeah, the Quality Learning Center.
That's from Pasha Moyer.
We will be, oh, it's Glyphos Fate.
Come on, says Howard the Duck, but that's a joke.
We will be able to break the gatekeeping.
Will we be able to break the gatekeeping of Susie?
It's bound to break down sooner or later.
Sooner being preferable.
One would hope so, yes.
Okay, so let's get to something.
It's identifying where the problems are, where the bottlenecks are.
Now, this is the president's bad choice to put the donors first by putting her there in the first place.
But the way we know that Trump is back to being loyal to the voter base, not the donor base, is when Swampy Susie and Paper Play Pam are gone.
I guess, look, we'll cover the trans sanity in Canada, which is something that's not.
We got the transanity.
We got Amazon suicide.
We got Facebook on trial for addicting and destroying the mental health of our young children.
We've got Virginia redistricting.
We got the Voting Rights Act coming up connected to that.
We got ICE wanting to raid churches and a fire truck monopoly in Wisconsin.
So the, I'm going to read one more Comic Tube.
No, that's not the one.
I had another, there was a chat up in ComicTube.
Okay, hold on.
Hold on.
Hold on.
I can't get them there.
There's too many.
I'll try to get to them afterwards.
Let's do Trans Sanity in Canada, which is a ridiculous decision of the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal.
Hold on one second.
Oh, that's right.
This was, I mean, I'm getting mixed up between the barber, the barbershop, which was fined $500 for not offering a other between male and female when booking online for a haircut.
And that was that was held up by the courts.
British Columbia, this was not held up by the courts of British Columbia yet, but the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal, it's BCHRT, which is ironic because it's really involved in the hormone replacement therapy affirmation.
They fined a guy.
He was a trustee of the school for the five years relevant question where he was putting out anti-trans.
They call it Soji, sexual orientation, gender identification.
That's the acronym.
They give all of the most horrific stuff, beautiful acronyms.
You got MAIDS for medical assistance and dying.
You got Soji for sexual orientation, gender identification, discrimination.
He was putting out posts saying it's, you know, transgenderism is an ideology.
It's grooming children.
It's mutilation.
And he got sued.
He got taken to the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal because they said it was anti-trans rhetoric.
I do need to find the exact citation from this order.
He was ordered to pay $750,000 because he is deemed to have violated the members of the class human rights.
Hold on.
I got it.
You will not believe the actual part of the ruling.
You have to read it five times in order to actually believe this.
It says, this is from the ruling says, if a person elects not to, quote, believe that gender identity is separate from sex assigned at birth, then they do not, quote, believe in trans people.
This is a form of existential denial.
If it is not, as Mr. Neuvold argues, akin to religious beliefs, a person does not need to believe in Christianity to accept another person as Christian.
However, to accept the person, that a person is transgender, one must accept that their gender identity is different than their sex assigned at birth.
And later in the next paragraph, people can and do decide that they were assigned the incorrect gender at birth.
And if you disagree with that, it means you're denying their existence.
And this British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal ordered him to pay $750,000 to the members of the teachers union, the class.
They estimate $1,000 here, $500 there.
And we'll see if this goes up to the courts for review and if it gets ratified.
But it's not John Cleese, the jackass of all anti-Trump TDS afflicted jackasses, says, I guess it's not safe for me to go up to Canada to do my jokes anymore.
I didn't know that the guy was still into humor or touring.
But at least even now, the most lefty TDS afflicted idiots in America understand it's not safe to speak logic in Canada.
That's the trans madness in Canada.
Just true trans sanity.
Trans sanity.
After the trans person was shooting up, I think shot up something here in the States.
And then didn't they just shoot up something in Canada?
Yeah.
Oh, yeah.
There was the Tumblr Ridge shooting where seven school kids were killed.
The trans the person's mother and brother-in-law or stepbrother.
In America, it was this guy who had a neo-Nazi, apparently the SS tattoo on his arm, was transgender, whatever, into the transing, was bodybuilding and shot up his wife, killed his wife, his kid.
It's just, it's horrendous.
But it's what happens when you have institutionalized mental illness and instead of treating it, you affirm it.
Absolutely.
And now say you're denying their existence.
No, they're crazy.
No, it's not that.
If I walk around and say I'm a rabbit, now someone can't is denying my existence.
If they say, no, no, you're not a rabbit.
But when are we going to say, well, I was assigned the wrong species at birth?
I'm not a human.
I'm actually a canine.
Do you have to cater to that?
You can feel free to do it.
Yeah, do we barking like dogs?
Hold on.
Not far off there yet, Robert.
Oh, wait.
No, it was Amazon.
The Amazon suic death case is shocking.
We've talked about it before.
And this is the case.
I think the last time we talked about it, this was the.
It got dismissed.
And this got reinstated now.
Did it get reinstated?
It's now going to trial.
It gets to go to trial.
This is a case where Amazon was selling literally do-it-yourself.
And I'm not trying to be glib or minimizing here.
And I'm not going to use self-censorship so that YouTube doesn't screw with this.
Do-it-yourself suicide kits at home.
It's nothing less than that.
They were selling it as it.
They were connecting to it.
They were using algorithms to get people vulnerable to it.
So this was not just some rando using Amazon to sell it.
This was Amazon itself encouraging and incentivizing and then giving people the means to kill themselves.
Because it's a product which has, at least according to the ruling, no home use.
It's a concentration of some, I want to say it's a preservative.
I think you use it to like preserve meat.
Sodium nitrate, I believe, right?
Sodium nitrate.
Yeah.
And so there is no, there's no use for this level of concentration for home use.
Now, that's not to say regulate everything.
They're not the combination that they were selling it.
Like they would, here's the book to teach you how to do it.
And they would recommend as a people often buy this item with this, the book on how to use it.
They would send reminders if you didn't do it.
They were deleting one-star reviews that mentioned the fact that people are using this to commit suicide.
And they originally got the lawsuit tossed, and now it got reinstated so they can have their day in court.
I mean, I guess there's one question here.
It's so obvious.
I'm shocked in America how many cases get dismissed before their day in court.
In Quebec, it's like they call it the ultimate sanction because everybody's entitled to their day in court.
You have a shitty case, you'll have a shitty day in court.
I've never seen so many cases get dismissed on the merits, not on the merits, before the merits by what I believe to be activist judges.
How the hell does this one get dismissed?
And more importantly, how the hell do they justify it on the merits when they have to go say, yeah, we were deleting one-star reviews because they were illegitimate reviews?
Yeah, we were coupling that product with the book on how to use it to kill yourself, not requiring age verification.
How do they defend on the merits to this?
In order to defend Amazon, it's got great influence in the political sectors in Washington, one of the most notoriously corrupt states in our country.
That's why I have the Kurt Benshuf case, another case the Justice Department has done nothing to pick up on the violations of his rights because this is someone who just opposed his mother of their child, who became a prostitute and involved with a lesbian relationship, turning their son trans.
And for it, he's serving 10 plus years in state prison.
That's up on appeals.
We're fighting it right now.
Outrageous case, but it's because of how openly political the Washington courts are.
And this court went so far, the trial court did, went so far as to say that you could never sue for suicide.
It was an attempt to kind of create the Canadian system and recreate it legally here by saying, if you go out there as a doctor, you go out there as a corporation, you go out there as an NGO and encourage, incentivize, and provide the means for people to kill themselves, we, the legal system, will make it impossible to sue you because we'll say every act of suicide is a superseding cause.
And by law, can never be the proximate cause of anybody's negligence, recklessness, or intentional bad behavior.
That's what they were doing.
That's how frightening and terrifying this decision was.
And even as political as the Washington Supreme Court is, they're not as bad as the lower courts.
They recognized that's nuts.
That's not the law.
It's never been the law.
And they were citing cases where somebody committed suicide like three steps removed from the underlying negligence or recklessness.
They're like, okay, somebody got into an accident.
The accident didn't go well.
Two years later, they commit suicide.
The court's like, well, there, there's not a proximate cause.
They were interpreting that case to mean there could never be proximate cause in suicide cases.
So it was a horrendous, terrifying decision.
What people also emphasize, people forget, foreseeable misuse is something you can be held liable for.
And the here, it was more than foreseeable misuse because they were getting people to buy it with the foreseeable use of it in this manner, sodium nitrate.
And so thankfully, the Washington Supreme Court wasn't as insane as the rest of the state.
And they were able to pursue their action against Amazon.
And hopefully this causes Amazon to take this down and stop doing this.
Yeah, no, it's wild.
By the way, John Neeson, welcome to VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
You got the Ginger Ninja bullet bell.
Welcome to the community, sir.
All right.
So we've got a bunch left.
We should take the party on over to VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
Slushy fraud.
We've got Facebook on trial.
We've got Virginia redistricting.
We've got ICE raiding churches and a court decision on that.
And the fire truck monopoly of Wisconsin.
Do we want to do one last one here while ICE churches, if you want?
Yeah, you want to save the redistricting, the ever-enthralling cases of redistricting for Viva Barnes Law.
The ICE raiding churches.
Okay.
This was a ruling enjoining, preventing ICE from carrying out raids barring, what was the word that was a legal term in there?
You know, if it's necessary for exigent circumstances, whether or not they could raid and deport or round up people at churches.
It seems like a no-brainer.
I mean, I don't agree with the fact that you can't do certain things at certain religious institutions because what ends up happening is they end up abusing those institutions to hide stuff, knowing that they can't be raided.
But when it comes to nabbing people, maybe I'm just a bleeding hard Canadian.
The best place is probably not to invade religious spaces for the purposes of doing it.
Was that the directive that was enjoined from application?
Yes, so what happens is Grifty Christie no bid gnome for her sabotage of the Trump administration to enrich her pal and her adulterous affair with Corey Lewandowski.
This is almost all gone public now.
You can find Wall Street Journal pieces, all these pieces about how broad scale this was.
And one of the points we made back in the Minneapolis shooting, the second shooting, was that Noam was sabotaging ICE enforcement because her corporate pals and allies, the same ones that she went to bat for and said men could compete in women's sports and vetoed legislation in South Dakota for, that those people did not really want actual immigration enforcement.
They wanted the theater of immigration enforcement.
So the theater would get the normies to think everything is on par with what the Trump promised to get elected, which was meaningful enforcement of immigration laws.
And even though people like Richard Barris went out and did over 100,000 interviews for the White House to get them information and intel months ago, said, look, here's how you should do immigration enforcement.
The country's still on board with complete deportation, but don't do it the way ICE is doing it.
Don't show up as Stasi-style masked military fatigued officers on the street grabbing people out of things like churches.
So why did Noam do this?
Noam did it because it's great theater, gets lots of attention.
She looks tough on immigration when she's actually sabotaging and undermining the immigration enforcement agenda by triggering backlashes across the country due to the method and mechanism she chose to use.
So this now goes to court.
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act restricts the federal government.
It goes beyond what the First Amendment requires.
If there's any substantial interference with the exercise of religious freedom due to a federal government action, then the Religious Freedom Restoration Act requires that it meet strict scrutiny, that it be narrowly tailored to a compelling government interest.
Court recognized enforcing illegal immigration is indeed a compelling interest, but raiding churches in live time outside of exigent circumstances is not narrowly tailored to it.
Indeed, it's counterproductive from a political perspective.
And so the federal court enjoined it.
But what it really represents to me is the continued embarrassing disaster, aside from her corruption, that is Christy No.
The sooner he gets rid of Grifty Christie and pay-for-play Pam and counterfeit Kash Patel, the better off the administration can be and take Swampy Susie with him.
I was, am I going to bring up this tweet?
Yeah, I'm almost reluctant to bring it up.
I don't know if it's real because they might take an element that is real and then make it into an AI thing like this.
Republicans against Trump, they're not Republicans.
This is a fake bullshit account.
But if that video is real, I don't think there's anything wrong with it.
This is the embarrassment.
He's having fun, but he's having fun, but in the exact same way that he railed against Christopher Ray.
Correct.
If he didn't take the government jet to get there, and he wasn't out laughing and bragging about donors, how he now has his own private jet, if he hadn't ever been criticized for Christopher Wray for using the jet a lot less than he has, it would be different.
But when you're partying on the government dime, well, according to Mike Davis, he's so busy with the Epstein files, he can't get around to actually investigating any real deep state criminals.
Doesn't look like it to me.
Was this part of, well, was partying with the Olympic team part of the investigating the Epstein files?
So he's an embarrassment.
He's a joke.
He was on with Dan Ballas Fongino this past week, and they're both saying, oh, you're so wonderful.
Oh, no, you were so wonderful.
Oh, no, you are so wonderful.
Go Raid Nerd Roddick00:03:47
I reissued the same questions I had about the Charlie Kirk assassination, about the Butler assassination.
And, you know, the questions that they're not answering because it's an ongoing investigation.
We can't answer that, but let's talk about it's a real video, apparently, from analysis.
So amazing.
Robert, what do you have coming up this week while we're still on Rumble?
Tell everybody what's your schedule coming up.
I've got Richard Barris coming on tomorrow at three to talk about his latest poll because he's taking shit for it.
I got my own legit questions and we're going to have a discussion.
But what do you got coming up?
There's tons of great data in there.
It was a commission by the 1776 Law Center to get tons of accurate information and intel.
Most popular influencer on the right.
Actually surprised me.
I mean, number two is no surprise, Tucker Carlson.
But number one was interesting.
It's Joe Rogan.
Joe Rogan is now the most popular person amongst influencers on the right.
That shows you how much the podcasting world took over a large part of it.
That's why you got to pay attention to what him and Tim Dylan, Andrew Stein, and Theo Vaughn and those guys are saying, even if you don't agree with them.
But so I got to, I'll have a hush hush on the Rothschilds this week up at vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
As always, off the record and on the QT.
But otherwise, I got to travel Monday down to Texas, have a hearing in the afternoon and Tuesday in Texas business court where a rogue hedge fund and hard money lender is trying to steal a great Nashville business.
Just rob it old-fashioned way.
And they're trying to use the Texas business courts to facilitate that.
We got a suit pending in Tennessee, which is where the case should be heard, but we got to deal with all this in the interim.
And it will be back at some point Wednesday night.
So probably the only bourbon this week will be on Thursday.
But we'll have a hush-hush up at VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
You can go back and read the, watch the Epstein trilogy that's there, see how prescient and predictive it was.
But we got all kinds of hush-hushes up there along with other videos.
So just join the VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com community.
And if you're one of those people, one of like the three people that's ever been blocked, if you have been behaving, then you will get unblocked.
But remember that there are only limited rules.
You got to be civil with everybody else on the board.
Can't lie about other people on the board.
That's it.
There's really literally no other rules.
Just be civil, be decent to one another.
You can be as crude and rude as you want about people that are not members of the board, but not about other members of the board.
You're in our bar, if you will, our cafe, if you will, and you will get tossed if you'll break the rules.
But if you, you know, the, and, but, you know, we'll often reinstate you.
Just be good.
That's all you gotta do.
Be a good boy.
Don't be a bad boy.
I can't raid Salty Cracker.
So everyone, you have the link for that.
We're gonna go raid Nerd Roddick.
It's about UFO files to be released.
You know, I'm sure a lot of people are gonna be interested in that.
So go raid Nerd Roddick and let them know from whence you came.
Tomorrow, I'll be live with my standard schedule at three o'clock, Barris, for a portion of the show.
I think I've got some good guests coming up.
I was just on with Prague Rue.
Check it out.
I think I shared the link over on Locals, but if I didn't, I'll do it after the show.
So the stream cannot be targeted stream cannot be raided.
Hold on a second.
Did I not give the right one here?
Link.
Let's go here.
Let's go raid.
There you go.
That one I had a salty cracker.
I'm going to call Salty Cracker and have him take the raid.
Go raid NerdRoddick.
If you're not coming over to VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
We got a bunch of stuff.
We're going to talk about the Facebook trial.
And what am I doing here?
Here's Locals.
Meet us there.
I'm going to go over the tip questions right now.
And if you're not coming, it'll be on podcast format tomorrow.