All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 26, 2026 - Viva & Barnes
01:15:19
Tom Homan to the Rescue? Wolves of Finance TPUSA "Hit-Piece"? Aaron Spencer INJUSTICE & More!

Sponsor! Download Rumble Wallet now and step away from the big banks — for good! https://rumblewallet.onelink.me/bJsX/vivafrei

|

Time Text
China-Canada Trade Tensions 00:03:13
Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, I'm actually just delaying time before going live today because I'm on the road at the Rumble studio and I needed to make sure that my audio was working.
And then I'm going to have to make sure that my audio is balanced with the intro video, which I haven't watched yet, but I know the rough idea of what's going on behind.
Apparently, China and Canada are no longer besties.
Well, they might still be, but apparently Canada has pulled out of a deal because of the threats from Donald John Trump.
Behold.
So now, President Trump over the weekend threatening massive tariffs on Canada.
The president imposing this, if Canada makes a deal with China, it will immediately be hit with 100% tariff against all Canadian goods and products coming into the USA.
Now, the Canadian Prime Minister Carney now pushing back saying this on Sunday, we have no intention of doing that with China or any other non-market economy.
What we have done with China is to rectify some issues that developed in the last couple of years.
So where does this stand?
So now, President Trump over the weekend threatening massive tariffs on Canada.
The president posting this, if Canada makes a deal with China, it will immediately be hit with 100% tariff against all Canadian goods and products coming into the USA.
Now, the Canadian, you know, maybe as they're waiting for the adjudication from the Supreme Court on the lawfulness of the retaliatory tariffs, maybe, who cares?
It's a done deal.
We know what we presume what the court is going to rule.
But whether or not you like the tactic, you cannot blame a man, a president, for putting his country first.
And whether or not you think it achieves the goal, you can't deny the underlying intention.
Prime Minister Carney now pushing back, saying this on Sunday, we have no intention of doing that with China or any other non-market economy.
Non-market economy.
You know what I read over the weekend?
That one of the reasons for which people were freaking out that they're going to reduce, eliminate, or, you know, reduce tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles is that it would put the Canadian automotive industry.
I don't know if it can be further in the grave, but it would be one more nail in the coffin of that automotive industry.
When you see, like, I've heard rumors and we've heard the stories and read the stories of the Chinese EVs spontaneously catching fire.
You know, why on earth anyone in their right mind, although three passport-carrying globalist who are Mark J. Carney is not in his right mind.
He's in his left mind, left like communism, would want to import Chinese electric vehicles instead of doing everything you can to make amends and, you know, get Tesla, get American-made electric vehicles, get quality electric vehicles.
That being said, one of the critiques was that this deal that Carney just made with China, sleeping with the devil, laying with dogs, waking up with fleas, is that it would kill the Canadian automotive industry.
China EV go boom boom.
Chinese EV Go Boom Boom 00:03:18
That's Bill Brown from our viva bardslaw.locals.com community.
Chinese EV go boom boom a lot.
They have a reputation for catching fire.
Now, they might look good.
They might superficially look good.
Everything that's made in China superficially looks good and it's crap.
If it's not scotch, it's crap.
Anyhow, I didn't really want to start with that video, but I wanted to make sure that everything is good.
Because as you can see, I'm not in my home studio.
I am now on the road.
I'm going to be doing Tincast.
I will be on with Tim Cast.
I'm not doing Tim Cast.
I'm going to be on with Tim Poole and Cast this evening at the Sarasota offices studios of Rumble.
So I get up in the morning.
It's a cool four-hour drive.
I mean, I can drive four hours.
I took Alligator Alley.
And for those of you who might not know what Alligator Alley is, well, you see, it's an alley of a road that crosses the Wang that is the peninsula of Florida right through the Everglades.
And I'm not joking.
You can see the alligators basking on the canal.
There's a fence that runs, the fence that runs the, let's say, about 90 miles section through the, I think it's the Semino Reserve, Cypress, the Cypress National Reserve.
And it's amazing because you're driving through the Everglades, you get to a section where it's nothing but beautiful cypress trees.
And there's a fence, and you can see gators sunbathing behind the fence that separates the glades from the highway.
There's underpasses and canals so they can get, you know, to and from the north and south part of the Everglades.
But can you imagine anything more of a biblical, godly type juxtaposition than a prehistoric dinosaur that has basically not evolved or dates back 100 and some odd million years, doing what it's been doing, an apex predator, doing what it's been doing for 100 and some odd million years while I'm sitting there listening to a podcast driving a vehicle on pavement that this animal could never have conceived of?
And I'm listening to Yuval Harari.
What's this guy's name?
You know, the transhumanist, Yuval Harari.
You always see him at these WEF, you know, whatever talks.
He wrote a book called Sapiens, and I'm listening to it because Rogan constantly references the book.
And I've been looking for something interesting to listen to.
I got a substantial part of the way through Jordan Peterson's We Who Wrestle with God.
I think I got the gist of it.
And I still wrestle with wrestling with God.
But I'm listening to Stream of Consciousness is right.
Yuval Harari talking about how when whatever our species of version of man is hit Australia some, you know, 40,000 years ago, the animals there didn't even know to be afraid of the thinking man.
And within short order, they were all basically eradicated.
And yet somehow these prehistoric dinosaurs are sunbathing beside the highway as I drive from the east coast of Florida to the west coast to do this.
All right.
All that to say, people, how goes the battle?
Viva Fry, David Freihead, former Montreal litigator, current Florida Rumbler, waiting for my other intro video to upload.
Give Us the Criminals 00:15:17
We always say it, how much is going to happen in the news between the Sunday show, which was a barn burner, and the Monday show?
Well, we've got some news.
Apparently, Tom Holman has been dispatched to Minnesota, Minneapolis.
And then the question is, why?
Is it because of some disappointment with the performance of Christy Noam?
We've got other news.
Yesterday, during the evening show, right before the show, I got a link to a video by Wolves and Finance.
And I noticed a lot of really annoying people.
I mean, you might not be annoying people, but you were definitely behaving annoying, thinking that I somehow now had to immediately respond to a video that I just became aware of its existence, in which Robert Barnes is called out by Wolves of Finance because Barnes called Wolves of Finance a liar and a fraud because Wolves of Finance is basically calling the people at TPUSA liars and frauds.
I listened to the entire video and we're going to talk about it a little bit.
And then we're going to take today's opportunity of an episode to raise everyone's awareness about a guy named Aaron Spencer out of Arkansas.
And before we get too far into it, have you all heard of the Aaron Spencer story?
Reading some of the chat.
By yes or no, and let me make sure that we're actually good across all platforms.
Have you heard about the Aaron Spencer story?
Everybody's talking about no clue on Spencer.
Okay, amazing.
We got a yes, we got a no.
It's gonna be 50-50.
The story is gonna blow your mind.
It's a man, 37-year-old man, veteran who killed the man, 67-year-old man, who raped his 13-year-old daughter, groomed and raped, killed him, faces charges for it now, and an outrageous scandal brewing in that trial, which is sort of now in limbo, but we're going to get into it.
Okay, amazing.
The majority of you have not heard it.
We're going to do a dedicated segment on that to raise awareness for it.
The man is now running for, I believe, sheriff, and it's going to be you.
You just won't believe it.
This is a corrupt system that protects itself.
Before we get into anything, Minnesota, everybody's following what's going on there.
Not going to make fun of Pan Bondi for the strongly worded letter that she sent to Tim Walz and Tim Walz' response to that strongly worded letter.
But I will bring up a clip today.
I listened to Caroline Levitt's press conference talking about primarily Minnesota and then taking questions.
I think it's not an exaggeration.
Caroline Levitt, I think, is the best press secretary in my memory.
I like Sean Spicer as well.
And I could acknowledge that Jen Circleback Pasaki, that's not how you pronounce her name, it's Saki, but I could acknowledge that Jen Pasaki was a good press secretary insofar as she really lied with ease.
And I have no doubt that people look at Caroline Levitt with the same degree of disdain, you know, just based on their political prejudice or their political bias.
Jen Saki could lie like it was water on a duck's back.
She had an ability of never answering a question and always circling back to it, but never ever really circling back to the question.
What's her face?
Jean-Pierre, Jean-Carin.
You know I'm talking about Jean-Carin-Pierre.
Pierre Jean-Cari, whatever her name is, was the worst press secretary of all time because in addition to being a bad liar, she was painfully stupid and could just not even do the propaganda role that she was hired to do.
Caroline Levitt is objectively good.
I think she's direct.
She's, I do believe that she is as transparent as you can ever expect anyone to be in government.
And even in today's press conference, was not peddling lies in order to cover for arguably some missteps when it comes to the responses to the shooting in Minnesota.
Now, I'll play this one real quick because this is getting into the breaking news of the day, which is Trump is deploying Tom Homan to Minnesota.
And then the question is, should people take that as an indication that he's frustrated with maybe some of the off-the-cuff, inaccurate statements coming from Christy Noam?
Before we even get there, in her intro monologue, which I'm still, oh, did it upload?
It might have uploaded.
Yeah, it's up there now.
In her intro, she gave a six and a half minute intro.
And, you know, people were asking, I think it was in response to a question.
It might have been in her intro statement.
But, you know, like people said things which were not entirely accurate of the description of the events.
And now she's saying that Trump wants to take a step back.
And his statement is we're going to assess the evidence.
And the question was, you know, why did some people seemingly speak before any sort of investigation or say things which might be more or less tenable as relates to an actual factual observance of what went down in Minnesota?
And her answer was, Trump, his statements, and I speak for him.
I don't speak for Christy Noam.
I don't speak for Stephen Miller.
He's going to await an investigation before commenting and assess what's going on.
But bottom line, it's a tragedy that nobody wants to see.
And that should be the talking point.
Not FAFO, not haha, not we're in charge now.
It's a tragedy that nobody wants to see.
Trump doesn't want to see people dying in Russia any more than in Ukraine.
He doesn't want to see people dying on the streets.
And even if they are putting themselves in situations where that likelihood becomes extremely more enhanced, nobody should be relishing in this.
Now, with respect to Homan being called up now, this was her answer.
Diplomatic, and you can read into it how you want.
With regards to the deployment of Tom Homan to Minneapolis, should the deployment of Mr. Homan to Minneapolis be seen as a sign that the president is dissatisfied with how the officials on the ground had handled the incident?
No, Mr. Holman is doing an exceptional job, and he has been working with Secretary Noam and President Trump over the course of the last year.
Secretary Noam still has the utmost confidence and trust of the President of the United States, and she's continuing to oversee the entire Department of Homeland Security and all of the immigration enforcement that's taking place across the whole entire country.
Of course, Secretary Noam is also in charge of FEMA, and we are in the wake of a brutal winter storm where hundreds of thousands of Americans have been impacted by that.
So Borders Art Homan is in a unique position to drop everything and go to Minnesota to continue having these productive conversations with state and local officials.
And I know that he's catching a plane in just a few hours to do just that at the request of the president.
Jennifer.
That's diplomatic.
Why is Homan going?
Well, Christy Noam is also in charge of FEMA and she's needed for this storm.
We talked about this yesterday during the show.
Robert Barnes, what's amazing is I'm doing various polls on various platforms.
Barnes' take on the shooting is that it's unjustified.
My take on the shooting is that it's predictable under those circumstances.
And it's what happens when idiot activists think that they're going to play street cop in the face of what they perceive to be an injustice by the actual cops, intervene carrying a gun.
Within three seconds, things escalate to someone being shot dead on the streets.
That's not to say FAFO.
It's to say you make certain decisions and you increase the likelihood of unI wouldn't even say unforeseeable, disproportionately severe consequences, but that are nonetheless foreseeable.
Now, one of the things that Robert and I talked about last night is that this was not the strategy that Tom Homan even wanted in the first place.
Go after criminals, go after convicts, don't go door to door.
I'm being a little bit hyperbolic in the description.
Don't go through the streets, especially in hostile territory where you're getting local state law enforcement support.
By all means, go ahead.
But apparently, Homan wasn't really down with this method of doing it precisely because it can lead to these outcomes, which then frustrate your ability to continue arresting and deporting illegal criminal aliens.
And people are saying, you know, the response to this cannot be stop with the deportations.
And, you know, nor is anybody really saying that.
The question is, how do you go about achieving that end goal, that end objective, without giving the PR to the left that they have gotten, that they're going to run with, and that frustrate your ability to follow through with that election promise.
So now, with all that said, Homan is heading up to Minnesota.
And Caroline Levin, I want to bring up actually the statement that she made in her intro statement, which basically said, you know, Trump spoke with Walls and had Productive conversation and Trump laid out certain demands.
Like, look, nobody wants to be in the streets having these escalations.
Nobody wants to be fanning the flames of division to use the cliché.
But one thing is for certain: let's start with the basics.
You're going to give us the people that you have in custody.
You're going to give us the people that you have in jail currently in state police, and you're going to cooperate with us and give us people that you've detained and continues to detain who are illegal aliens, especially the violent criminals.
And if you don't do that, we don't have much to talk about.
As a result of that defiance, two Minnesotans have now tragically lost their lives on the streets of Tim Waltz's state.
And then, thirdly, over all criminal this morning, and he has outlined a clear and simple path to restoring law and order in Minnesota.
Number one, Governor Waltz, Mayor Fry, and all Democrat leaders should turn over all criminal, illegal aliens currently incarcerated in their prisons and jails to federal authorities.
I want to just point out the obvious.
I have no relation to Jacob Fry that I know of.
I think if we go back 5,000 years, we might have some common ancestry.
My last name is Fry Heights, not Fry.
And now I can barely say Viva Fry without hearing Jacob Fry.
Give us all of your criminals, period.
That's not even too much of an ask.
How you don't have state cooperation with federal law enforcement for state criminals who also happen to be federal criminals, how that is not just a rule, not just for immigration issues, for all crimes makes no sense.
You want to talk about insurrection.
It would be protecting federal criminals in state custody from the feds.
That would be insurrection.
And I'm going to give you my punchline after all of this.
So, the number one: you don't need a strongly worded letter from Pan Bondi.
You need a telephone call from the president of these United States of America, Donald John Trump.
Hey, Timmy Boy, Tampon Tim, go get those criminals, even the ones that are in the male prison cells that have tampons in there, and give us your inmates convicted on state crimes who are also illegal aliens, period.
Criminals by definition.
Along with any illegal aliens with active warrants or known criminal histories for immediate deportation.
Number two, state and local law enforcement must agree to turn over all illegal aliens who are arrested by local police.
Can you believe that this is the discussion that we have to be having, not just in 2026, in any realm of a functioning society?
That state law enforcement, if they pull someone over for DUI, rape, assault, if they arrest somebody and they find out that they're an illegal alien, they're going to refuse to comply and collaborate with the feds.
They will also make sure not to even ask these questions because don't ask, don't tell.
If we don't know, we don't have to comply.
We live in an era where Democrats are actually saying, at least some.
Kathy Hochl, Gretchen Whitmer.
I'm not sure about Whitmer.
I don't want to put words in her mouth.
If we arrest people, we're not going to try to find out if they're illegal aliens either because we want to protect criminals.
Period.
Full stop.
There's no other explanation to it.
So two pretty reasonable demands.
Give us the criminals you have in jail.
And on a going forward basis, when you pull people over, if you arrest further people who are criminals, you'll turn them over to us.
What's the third one?
And then thirdly, local police must assist federal law enforcement in apprehending and detaining illegal aliens who are wanted for crimes, especially violent crimes.
If Governor Walsh and Mayor Fry implement these common sense cooperative measures that I will add have already been implemented in nearly every single other state across the country, Customs and Border Patrol will not be needed to support ICE on the ground in Minnesota.
ICE and local law enforcement can peacefully work together as they are effectively doing in so many other states and jurisdictions.
You can pause it here.
I don't think we need to play the rest of that.
This seems pretty reasonable.
It seems pretty logical, but logic and reason have never been the hallmark traits of the left.
I mean, sure, you want to say there's some people, there's some conservatives who are just as dogmatic.
Fine.
This is basic common sense.
And the funny thing is, you know, we play PR wars, sounds bites, and audio clip, whatever the heck the expression is.
It's a game of words.
And if you control the meaning of words, you control the conversation.
There is no such thing as a sanctuary city or a sanctuary state.
Call it what it is, an insurrectionary city and an insurrectionary state, and treat them as such.
If you have state law enforcement, local law enforcement, saying we are a sanctuary city or a sanctuary state for illegal criminal aliens, because they might not be violent criminals, but they are by definition criminals.
You can only argue the degree to which.
If you have states and cities saying we provide sanctuary to criminals, especially the violent criminals, that's not a sanctuary city.
That is an insurrectionist city.
That is an insurrectionist governor who is basically saying to the feds, We're at war with you now.
And the boots on the ground in our war against you are going to be the illegal criminal aliens that we not only don't facilitate you arresting and taking out of here, but that we actively protect.
And if you come in here to try to do it yourself, well, we're going to give the dog whistles to the activists and the radicals and the Antifa and the heavily financed, I'd say mildly organized activists.
And we're going to empower them to go out in the streets, interfere with your law enforcement.
And then, if and when they get bullets in them, we're going to parade them like the martyrs that we need them to be so that we can continue with this PR battle that is lubricated with the blood of people who are also sufficiently radical that they can be radicalized and used as useful idiots.
Hochul's Offered Assistance Fails 00:11:56
So that's it.
Insurrectionist states and insurrectionist cities, call it what it is.
And speaking of which, did you hear this?
It was, was it.
Yeah, it was Kathy Hochul.
This is, by the way, just bear in mind also what happened on January 6th when Capitol Police never turned down the National Guard that they were never offered.
And it was Donald Trump's fault for the Fed surrection because he didn't bring in the National Guard, even though he offered it and they never accepted it.
But it was his fault.
Bring in the National Guard, authoritarian, declaring martial law.
Don't bring in the National Guard.
You never brought in the National Guard, even though it was offered and they said no.
Kathy Hochul, a woman who belongs in jail, like she's a Dr. Mengele with an uglier smile.
A woman who promotes that toxic COVID shot on babies six months and older.
She came out and effectively denied assistance for this storm that they're going through because of politics.
From Fox News, New York County exec blasts Governor Hochul for rejecting federal storm aid over ICE enforcement concerns.
That's right.
We don't need help with our ICE until you eliminate the ICE.
I mean, this, this is the, I don't know.
Nassau County's Bruce Blakeman calls governance move foolish as now as snow and freezing rain create dangerous conditions.
They don't care.
They do not care if they kill you.
Like Tom McDonald said, and I say it all the time, they will kill you, then they'll broadcast it and make it the news.
Oh my goodness, we didn't get any federal assistance.
We offered it, Pharma Kathy.
We offered it, Hacky Hochul, and you said no.
Nassau County exec Bruce Blakeman blasted New York Governor Kathy Hochul for rejecting federal assistance.
By the way, is she the favorite in New York right now?
For our refusing, rejecting federal assistance over the weekend, arguing that unhelpful politics are interfering with public safety.
No shit, Sherlock.
We need the federal government's help when we have a major emergency event like we do now.
Blakeman said Sunday, referring to the winter blast.
I think it's foolish part of Governor Hoko.
She doesn't care.
She gets everything that she needs and she won't have a problem.
What does she write on X?
Here, I'll show you what she wrote on X.
We don't need the help.
And when people die, then we'll still find a way to blame it on Trump.
Here, this is what she wrote on X. Secretary Noam offered assistance to New York ahead of the impending snowstorm.
I shared that the fastest way to help ICE, help is for ICE to back off so people feel safe accessing warmer centers, shelters.
How many does she think everybody who needs to hit a shelter is it illegal?
Thanks for the glib, flippant response, you stupid idiot who's supposed to represent a state.
And if New Yorkers die as a result of the storm due to lack of assistance that was offered, Kathy Hochle will turn around and blame Trump.
Democrats love causing death and misery, then exploiting that death and misery for their own political profit.
Like they did with Predty, the guy who just got killed, like they did with Renee Goode, the woman who just got killed, like they did with the events of January 6th, blaming Brian Sicknick's death initially on a mob of Trump supporters.
They lie about it also.
And then they exploit the lies.
The lies linger, especially with the vulnerable, brain-dead base that still supports that monster, Kathy Hochul.
And they'll use it as political fodder.
People died because we didn't get any federal assistance.
Oh, when I said no, when I was being glib, you were supposed to give it anyhow.
Because, like a spoiled child that I am, I get to shit all over you, the feds, and still get the assistance that I said no to because I know you're a good father.
And I get to, like a spoiled teenager, yell at you and swear at you, but I still expect you to come take care of me when I drink too much, despite having been, you know, told not to drink too much.
Like the people who supported Andrew Cuomo, mass murder, which kind of made the endorsement of Cuomo against Mom Daddy a little bit, a little bit of a problem.
That is what's going on now.
Homan is going up.
Whether or not you think it's because Trump is losing faith in Christy Noam, you know, what's good to see is Homan coming back into the fore.
Tough but fair is the only way you can describe Homan.
If it's true that Christy Noam had sidelined Homan or disregarded his strategic advice on how to go about catching illegals and arresting them, detaining them and deporting them, we've seen the consequences of that right now.
Maybe it's time to bring Homan back up.
Start listening to the people who show good judgment, both in life strategically and as relates to anecdotes they share about killing their dogs.
I don't, you know, I defended Christy Noam at the time when that story broke.
I was like, look, we got our dog from a farmer.
It was an old English mastiff.
And the farmer told us, like, you know, when his parents got too big, his father got too old.
It's like, you're not going to haul a 240-pound dog around.
The farmer dug a hole, brought the dog over, shot the dog, and rolled him into a pit.
That's how it works in some places, but you don't brag about it.
I mean, it's one thing to do that, which is necessary.
It's another thing to have the bad judgment and to brag about it.
Not everybody's going to go and drive two hours to a vet, do the whole euthanasia thing, cremate their dog, keep their ashes in a bag.
I do it only because I don't think I could bring myself to shoot a dog, even if it needed to get shot.
So, maybe it's time to bring someone in with a bit better judgment and a bit better tactical strategy as to how to tackle this problem, which is now causing more problems than it should and is now causing more political strife than it ought to have ever done.
Because this was a very politically popular plan of action, it was a politically popular policy, arguably the one that got Trump elected in the first place: secure the border and find a way to deport the 10 to 20 plus million American illegal aliens, especially the ones who have committed violent crimes that have taken the lives, killed Americans.
Trump to send Borders Art Tom Homan to Minneapolis as outrage over petty shooting.
You can tell this is from ABC News.
The framing of depending which outlet you're reading is fantastic.
And you don't read this crap for anything closely related to accuracy.
You read this to see how the enemy is describing the situation.
President Donald Trump announced Monday he is dispatching his borders, Tom Homan, to Minnesota amid outrage over the fatal shooting of Alex Predty by federal agents.
I'm sending Tom Homan.
He has not been involved in that area, but knows and likes many of the people there.
Tom is tough but fair, will report directly to me, not directly to Christy, directly to Trump.
He wrote in the social media post.
Trump in another social media post, called him a request to work together.
Yeah, yada, yada, yada.
Trump said he would have Homan call Walls and that Walls was happy that Homan was going to Minnesota.
White House press secretary, she held the briefing today.
We covered a little bit of that.
By putting Homan in charge of ICE operations in Minneapolis, Trump is bypassing the normal chain of command, where Homeland Security Secretary Christy Noam and Border Patrol Commander Greg Bavino have been overseeing ICE operations.
Trump said Homan would report directly to him.
Later on, he says, I don't like any shooting.
I don't like it.
Trump told the Wall Street Journal, but I don't like it when somebody goes into a protest and he's got a very powerful, fully loaded gun with two magazines up with bullets.
That doesn't play good either.
The administration is facing criticism from both Democrats and some Republicans for blaming the victim of the shooting, with some Republican lawmakers calling for an independent investigation.
Go ahead and investigate it, by the way.
I don't know what the details are with Alex Predi, whether or not he's part of this resistance infrastructure.
I wouldn't be surprised to find out that he is, but until there's definitive evidence that he is, I won't jump to any conclusions.
But anybody going to a protest with a loaded firearm, I mean, you don't go to a protest with an unloaded firearm because that would even get you into more trouble.
You go to a protest with a loaded firearm, you're exercising your God-given Second Amendment rights.
You still have something of a proactive obligation to exercise that with a little more caution, which is to say, when dealing with police officers, you're going to tell them I'm carrying a firearm.
You might not want to get involved in altercations with police officers, even if you think you're being a hero to a woman who you think is being unjustly pepper sprayed.
It's not victim blaming to state the obvious of what happens when situations escalate from zero to dead in three seconds.
But it's interesting to see Trump bypassing the ordinary chain of command, although Caroline Levin wouldn't describe it that way.
There's an emergency, there's a national weather emergency.
So get her out of there.
Bring up Tom Homan, who has been damn good from day one, and see what he can do in Minnesota.
By the way, he had a phone cut.
I didn't say he had the gun in his hands.
He had the gun on his body.
I think a lot of people are embarrassed about some of the news that they were reporting about him having pulled the gun, not identifying that the guy holding the guy's gun was actually the ICE agent who had disarmed him.
But, you know, there have been a number, it's a known thing among concealed carries.
If you're concealed carrying, your interactions with police officers need to be different.
You may not like it.
Athabasca, go watch, go watch yesterday's show.
There's a difference between blaming him and saying these are reasonably foreseeable consequences, which is why you don't do things like that in the first place.
It's like, don't blame the victim.
You know, she was just walking the streets at night.
It's like, okay, good.
You don't need to blame the victim to say it's reasonably foreseeable that if you dress in a certain way and you go out in certain parts of the neighborhood, you are inviting problems that you would not otherwise invite.
So while it will be a tragedy if something happens and it might not be your fault, you are maximizing or at least increasing the odds of something terrible happening.
The man had a concealed carry firearm.
He got involved, whether you think righteously or not.
And in those moments, it's nice to, as far as I'm concerned, it's nice to have the luxury of, you know, watching in slow motion, going back frame by frame and saying, oh, you see, as of this moment, he didn't have the firearm in his holster anymore, as if you could even know that he only had one gun on him.
And one and a half seconds later, in a moment of stress, the shit hits the fan.
But that's it.
Tom Homan's going up there, and I think things will start getting a little bit better.
I do think that even Minnesotans, in as much as they don't want to see even activists getting shot in the streets, they don't want to see their cities turning into insurrectionist cities.
And that's where Minneapolis, Minnesota have gone.
Declare them as such, come in and prosecute Governor Walls and Mayor Fry if they insist on defiantly, effectively, openly fighting against enforcement of federal law and actively participating in protecting criminals.
Period.
Now, with that said, people, let me see.
Erica Kirk's Demand 00:14:44
I spammed, I paid, you didn't address wolves.
Hold on a second.
Let me bring it back up so that people can think, I paid you a dollar, therefore I own you.
Here, do me a favor, Il Sartro.
Don't ever give another super chat again.
If you think paying a dollar means I have to, what, address your spamming?
It's an amazing thing.
Thank you for admitting that you spammed.
That's the only thing that gets you, you know, blocked from the chat.
I didn't even do it because I've seen you before and I didn't want to be a jerk.
I muted you.
You think paying a dollar allows you to.
I'd love to see what happens when you think you give a waitress a tip.
How do you think you get to treat the waitress?
I fucking tipped you.
My goodness.
I would suggest you go and check your abusive mentality.
But don't worry.
I'm going to get into talking about wolves and finance.
And despite you, not because of you.
Because I got a text message from a member of our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community.
And it was a, it's interesting.
I watched a full 45-minute video of wolves and finance.
And if you like wolves and finance, you might not like my assessment.
Dude's free to say what he wants to say.
Let's see what we've got here.
We got Seo, my friend says there is a Tom, past tense, attending Davos, who berated Trump.
Who might this Tom be?
Oh, insightful one.
Cham visage.
A Tom.
Tom Petty.
And this is why New York needs Larry Sharp.
Yep, well, that would be good.
Now, let me see what's going on in the chat over on Viva Barn on Rumble.
Viva, you're going to block someone from chat over this.
No, and I didn't.
But spamming yesterday, Wolves and Finance, Wolves of Finance, spam, you get blood.
That's that is the one rule.
Say what you want, don't spam.
Because you take advantage of the fact that I don't put slow mode on the chat in order to, oh, quartering just rated.
You take advantage of the fact that I'm a good-natured man that doesn't put on slow mode so you can spam with your crap.
Viva, what will you do for me if I give you $100?
Welcome to the quartering.
And thank you, Jeremy.
Just in time.
Does everybody know who Wolves and Finance is?
And this would be a yes or no.
I suspect most people won't.
And the funny thing is, so Wolves and Finance, I don't know him from a hole in the wall.
I've never watched his channel until, I've never, I say until, I've never watched his channel, actually until that video of him going over the letter of demand he got from TPUSA for allegedly false and defamatory statements because he accused TPUSA of committing fraud and more fraud.
And Robert brought it up on one of the streams because he called Wolves of Finance, I forget what the guy's name is, you know, basically not my words, and I'm paraphrasing.
He said he's an incompetent accountant who doesn't understand the structure of 501c3s, not-for-profits versus for-profits, and that his analysis was, I'll even be friendlier than Robert, was either misunderstanding what was going on or overtly dishonest.
And I went back since the letter of demand that he got from TPUSA demanding a retraction and a correction because of allegedly false and defamatory statements of alleged fraud at TPUSA.
And I went back and I looked over some of his analysis.
He's entitled to think what he thinks.
And we'll get into a bit of his video today.
Wolves of Finance put out a video in the title of the video saying more fraud at TPUSA.
In the one before the more fraud, it said fraud at TPUSA question mark and alleged that TPUSA was involved in concealing or having ghost employees, was involved in violating tax laws such that all of the principals should be arrested.
At least that's what the last part of his current video.
And then he got a letter of demand and then went back and changed some of the headers of his videos to putting allegedly in parentheses after the more fraud at TPUSA.
I didn't even know about this video until yesterday's show where a lot of people coming from, I guess, Reddit chat boards were like, piece of shit.
He mentioned me at the beginning by clipping the segment when Robert called him a liar and a fraud and then clipped another section where Robert was on with Paramount Tactical talking about the same thing.
And Robert says TPUSA has done nothing wrong.
They've committed no fraud.
Wolves and Finance doesn't understand how not-for-profit and profit organizations can have various entities or various elements within one big umbrella.
And I don't understand it, which is why I don't take a position on it.
But one thing I sure as shit I'm not doing is in the wake of the Charlie Kirk assassination, exploiting the opportunity now to claim fraud at TPUSA.
You want to go ahead and do that.
And Wolves of Finance seems hell-bent on doing it.
Go ahead and do it.
And let me tell you the gist of Wolves and Finance.
Wolves and Finance alleged for this way.
He will go through it.
He says, I've done an audit from public documents and based on posts from employees, entities within TPUSA.
It's got TPUSA, it's got a 501c3, it's got a 501c4.
You've got some profit elements to this.
And if it's a 501c3, it can't do overt partisan politics, which it's clearly doing because these employees are going around.
He called it ballot harvesting and he called it voter intimidation.
And I've listened to his analysis.
It's fine.
He's entitled to it.
Where I have difficulty placing a great degree of credibility in the individual is when he suggests, as he has, that Donald Trump is in on the fraud.
When he comments on the pants that Erica Kirk is wearing, when he talks about the persecution of Steve Bannon and Brian Colfaj for abuse of 501c3 rules to prosecute Steve Bannon and Brian Colfaj for fraud,
and then to rely on that persecution to say, using similar rationale, everyone involved at TPUSA should be in jail, to suggest, as he does, the guy's name is Tyler Bowden, Bowie?
I forget his name, Tyler, to suggest that they were stealing money from the 501c3 portion of the TPUSA that couldn't get involved in partisan politics and siphoning it over to the part that could, and that Charlie Kirk discovered that, which is when he talked about the Doge reform, and that he discovered that around the time that he got murdered to ostensibly suggest that Charlie Kirk was murdered because he had discovered alleged fraud at TPUSA.
Sorry, you can espouse those views.
I'm not getting involved in that.
And that is effectively what the guy has done and is doing.
Just to show you a certain element of this, let's play this part of it.
And he's entitled to his views.
This letter has been floating around and reported on by mainstream news outlets like CBS.
This is a letter that came from Scotty Besant confirming that TPUSA was not under IRS investigation.
And wait until you see what you could even believe it.
Except the letter itself has never been shown until Paramount Tactical's podcast.
In fact, I'm guessing he was not supposed to show this to his audience because it is quite shocking.
It is a two-page letter on Department of the Treasury Letterhead.
It says it is responding to a request from Erica Kirk.
It says, one, there is no IRS investigation currently underway on Turning Point.
Two, all four 990 forms were filed by May 15, 2025.
Three, the next year's forms will be filed by May 15th, 2026.
The letter is signed by Treasury Secretary Scott Besant.
Paramount Tactical is presenting this letter as some kind of evidence that there is no fraud at Turning Point.
That is ridiculous for a number of reasons.
We all know this because all of us deal with the IRS.
We all know this is not normal behavior.
He's not wrong about that.
As far as my limited understanding goes, the IRS does not issue letters of good standing.
These are also not ordinary circumstances.
And so I don't know why or wonder what circumstances Scotty Besant might confirm that there is no current ongoing IRS investigation into the financials of TPUSA.
But wait, there's more.
Have any of you ever received a letter from the IRS saying, just letting you know, we're not doing an investigation on you.
Have any of us ever been in the circumstances where there's been a massive public assassination followed by basically non-stop conspiracy theories as to the fact that this assassination might have had something to do with the fact that Charlie Kirk might have discovered the alleged fraud being carried out by the other half of TPUSA.
Sorry, have any of you trying to reduce the abnormality of this particular situation to do any of us ask for letters of compliance from the IRS?
First of all, I wouldn't be surprised if under certain investigations, you wouldn't be able to ask for exceptional circumstances to confirm that, no, you've never been investigated or are not currently under investigation by the IRS.
No, of course you have not because the IRS does not do this.
And it's not coming from the IRS.
The letter is signed by the Treasury Secretary, Scott Besant.
To me, this looks more like a political favor to Donald Trump's personal friends than a legitimate IRS communication.
Second, the wording in this letter does not mean anything.
Just because the IRS is not investigating does not mean there is no fraud going on.
Just because the IRS confirms they are not investigating does not mean there is no fraud going on.
In other words, positing a hypothetical that can literally never be disproven.
That's fine.
And that's all fair game.
And by the way, in a realm of the universe, one can make sense of this.
Oh, yeah, the fraud that's going on at TPUSA for ballot harvesting, and this is effectively Wolves and Finance's theory, is for the benefit of Trump for the upcoming midterm.
So he has a vested interest to cover up the fraud because if it's for ballot harvesting and it's for his benefit at 2026, well, he wouldn't want to out the fraud and he would want to get his IRS to cover it up.
And therefore, he is going to allegedly have written Erica himself and cover this up so that it doesn't deny him or deprive him of the fruits of this fraud come 2026.
That is effectively the theory that Wolves and Finance is putting forward.
Does not mean that donors cannot sue Turning Point to get their money back.
This does not mean that state attorney generals cannot file criminal charges against Turning Point executives.
Oh, and by the way, he goes on to implore the governor of the state of Arizona to file criminal charges against the executives at Turning Point USA.
This letter does not disprove my concerns about their finances.
And what is this?
What is this?
At the top of the page, someone has crossed out Mrs. Kirk and wrote in Erica.
It looks like someone is proofreading Scott Besant's letter.
Who could that be?
I have reviewed so many White House documents, and in my opinion, that handwriting looks like it was written by Donald Trump.
If you compare it to other samples of his writing, he does a consistent method where he writes a name dash, name dash, name dash.
The K is very much like this K.
The E is written the same way as this W.
This handwriting looks like it belongs to Donald Trump.
This letter does not look like it came from the IRS.
It looks like it came from the president of the United States.
Now, the interesting thing is, and you could make what you want of this theory.
The essence of Wolves of finance theory is that TPUSA was fraudulently misappropriating funds from one entity to another for ballot harvesting, voter intimidation, not declaring employees.
And now Trump is getting involved to aid in the cover-up by writing Erica on a letter from his uh.
Scott Bassette at the time was um involved in the IRS forget exactly how this is from December 2025 and goes on to suggest that, you know, because all of the biggest criminals, you know, Al Capone, et cetera, they got convicted on tax, you know, tax fraud stuff, never because of the actual crimes they committed, as though he sort of tends to ignore the fact that maybe tax law is abused to convict where they can't actually convict on anything else.
That Charlie Kirk was murdered around the time that he allegedly discovered this, but just asking questions, and that Trump is in on it.
And by the way, his criticism at the end of the video goes back to Barnes because Barnes says, look, if there were any improprieties going on with any aspect of TPUSA, you would have Democrat governors going after TPUSA left, right, and center.
And the fact that even Democrats are not going after this highly effective conservative organization, that's an indication that they're probably not doing any fraud there, because if they were, some Democrat operatives would definitely get in on that.
And that's the gist of it.
He puts some interesting pieces of a puzzle together.
He connects his dots.
But if he's going to go out there and call TPUSA criminal frauds who should be locked up, and while he implores the Arizona governor to do it, he should be prepared to be called a fraud by someone like Robert Barnes, who might understand the corporate structure of these not-for-profit and for-profit entities and deal with it.
Locking Up Fraudsters? 00:04:08
Of course, now we've got a letter of demand, which he went over in his last video.
And he has now not only doubled down, I would say tripled down and quadrupled down by calling for the arrest or effectively saying they should all be locked up.
I mean, if Brian Kolfaj and Steve Bannon were locked up or pleaded guilty for We Build the Wall scandal where they allegedly took funds for their own personal use that were intended to be, you know, to go towards Build the Wall, which they which they did and nobody complained about.
And by the way, Democrats went after them.
You see how that kind of works?
That if there were any actual fraud going on here, Democrats would have jumped all over it.
And, you know, whether or not Trump is now in on the cover-up of the alleged fraud that Wolves of Finance thinks he's found at TPUSA.
And to suggest that it, oh, he didn't say it, but, you know, Charlie was murdered around the same time that he discovered allegedly of this alleged fraud.
Okay.
You live with the reputation you build for yourself.
But he started off the video saying he liked me and he liked Robert.
Well, there's no reason not to like me.
I never said a word about this individual, but it was brought to my attention yesterday and I've watched it.
And okay, that's his theory.
I think it's, you know, until more evidence to support any element of it, he can throw in there, it's my opinion, they've committed fraud and belong to go to jail and have committed actual crimes.
And there might be some case law that's saying, it's my opinion that you are a convicted pedophile or it's my opinion that you are in fact a pedophile can still be defamatory.
And that's that.
And I'm going to use the pedophile to segue into our next story.
But before we do that, let me see what's going on at viva barnsrawlaw.locals.com.
Roostek says, Viva, you are right.
If you dress up with gold chains around your neck and a Rolex on your wrist, expect trouble when you go out for a night on the town during your visit to San Salvador for a bid conference.
Well, first of all, yeah.
Don't wear, I don't wear gold chains and I don't wear Rolexes precisely for that reason.
First of all, I don't know that I'm not the type that I would ever wear those things, even if I had the means to purchase them.
But I mean, like, like my father says, don't trust people with more than you can have them steal from you and don't tempt people with theft either.
But I can't even tell if you're being sarcastic or not, because at first you sounded like you were being reasonable.
And then by the end of it, by the way, you might also not want to go out at night.
It's not the heart.
But I am allowed to go.
You're allowed to go out at night.
I'm allowed to go swimming in the freaking Gulf Coast at night, you know, drenched in mackerel juice.
Don't complain if you get eaten by a shark.
That's right.
And because there are predators among humans, we are animals.
And there are predator animals among the human race.
And in as much as they say, well, humans aren't sharks.
Some humans are even worse than sharks because at least sharks eat what they kill.
Nah.
On that note, let's get to Aaron Spencer.
What was I going to say?
Yeah, Aaron Spencer.
Okay, fine.
Actually, let me just go to the chat on Rumble and see what's going on.
I want to see if there's anybody hating on me for my analysis of, let's see what we got here.
He can disclaimer all he wants, but I always taught the only part that matters is after but.
So we should be more like sharks.
As a long time, as long as someone doesn't give you dissolving a conference for people who talk about non-existent coins, well, I mean, if you go to a financial conference where they're going to talk about non-existent fiat currency, where's where Viva, where's a gold star of David?
Viva, I think you meant to typo there, but I do not wear a gold star of David either.
I don't wear jewelry.
Okay, no jewelry.
The only guns I walk around with are these.
Bada bing, bada boom.
Bond Release Controversy 00:15:02
Oh, a quartering's in here.
Hold on a second.
Let me bring this one up.
Dude, it's 100%.
Let's see here.
Jeremy from the quartering says, this guy is a total moron.
He's getting sued 100%, grifted too close to the sun.
Then he's like talking about Candace Owens.
It's the, it's, I mean, it's crazy, but look, um, you want to call someone an actual criminal IRS fraudster.
I mean, A, have your receipts.
And B, I mean, you're, you're, you're walking a very, very risky line because you want to get involved in law enforcement, go work for the IRS.
But anyhow, that was it.
Okay.
Aaron Spencer, if you haven't heard this story, it's going to blow your mind.
Now, lay the initial, say, groundwork, lay the base facts of this story.
This is a 37-year-old Arkansas man whose 13-year-old daughter was groomed and allegedly raped by a 67-year-old man.
The 67-year-old man was subsequently arrested and released on a $50,000 bond by a judge whose name is going to be relevant because that same judge somehow gets a hold of this case when Aaron Spencer is arrested and going to be tried for manslaughter because backing it up to the beginning part of the story,
the 67-year-old man who allegedly raped Aaron Spencer's 13-year-old daughter at the time was released from prison or released from custody on $50,000 bond, which means he only had to post $5,000 because you post 10% of the bond total.
Was released with a no contact order as if a pedophile is going to abide by a no contact order with the underage girl that he is grooming and having a pedophile rape with.
And some people like, you know, they're saying, well, okay, you know, the circumstances, I wonder the circumstances, is it grooming like X, Y, and Z?
Does the girl at an age of 13 think that she's in love with a 67 year old?
There are no questions like that that get to be asked under these circumstances.
Children cannot consent to sex, period.
And I want to say, let alone with a 67-year-old man, because the obvious retort is, well, children have sex with, you know, underage kids have sex.
Not all kids wait until the age of majority before losing their virginity.
Is it bilateral rape or is nobody getting raped if a 14-year-old boy has sex with a 14-year-old girl?
Set that aside.
There is an adult having sex with a 13-year-old girl, allegedly.
There's no like talk about it's rape, period.
The man faces something like 49 charges, but is released on a $50,000 bond where he posts $5,000.
He had a no contact order, which didn't seem to prevent him from doing anything because the parents wake up one night and their then 14-year-old daughter is no longer in her bed.
And the father goes out looking to find where she is, sees her in the passenger seat of the pickup truck of the 67-year-old man who was let out on his 40-some audit charges, including rape.
And he kills the guy.
And his argument is not even blind rage.
It's I need to save my daughter from being abducted by the man that raped her, the man that was awaiting trial for having raped her.
Now, you got, I'm going to play this clip.
This is a little bit old.
It's two months ago.
This was before the injustice in the trial happened.
Listen to the fact pattern, even as THV 11, as local stations have to report.
Listen to this.
And in the case of Aaron Spencer, hello, and thanks for joining us here at six.
I'm Faith Woodard.
And I'm Brooke Buckner.
The case has received national attention since his arrest last year, and that continued after he announced he would be running for sheriff in Loanoke County last month.
Spencer is accused of killing a man who at the time faced more than 40 child sex crime charges involving his 14-year-old daughter.
Just pause that.
40-plus sex charges involving his daughter released from jail on ridiculous no bond.
The man should not, I mean, people believe in a right to, you know, reasonable bail.
I don't know what reasonable bail is given those charges.
He argues he was protecting her and pleaded not guilty.
He has the support of more than 360,000 in a petition backing his actions.
He's going to have a lot more support now.
There's mainstream and then there's main mainstream, Mainstream, and this is going to hit the main mainstream.
Now, according to his attorney, he is running in hopes of bringing to light the failures in the system.
But if he's convicted, he won't be able to serve.
Tonight, THP 11's Carter Tweet gets us up to speed on how the case is unfolding.
By the way, this is a case.
This is a case for jury nullification.
I even hate to do the thought experiment.
How would I react?
And I'm not a tough guy.
I don't think any other father armed with a gun at that point would have done anything differently.
And I don't think any reasonable person, mother, father, whatever, could sit on that jury and say, Yeah, I'm going to convict this guy when his daughter was in a pickup truck defying a no contact order at 1:15 in the morning with the man who was grooming and raping his 13, 14-year-old daughter.
Prosecutors attempting to paint a picture that Aaron Spencer planned to kill 67-year-old Michael Fossler even before he found Fosler with his 14-year-old daughter on October 8th, 2024.
That theory emerged in a legal brief late last week.
His defense says his actions before the shooting aren't relevant.
The state says they are and included several new details in their reasoning.
Prosecutors highlighted Spencer's conduct three months before the killing.
They highlighted his conduct three months before the killing, three months before the man with a no contact order abducted his daughter.
And what they are using against him, he was entertaining the idea of, you know, what would happen if I killed this guy who might defy justice?
Can you imagine like any parent on earth who wouldn't have similar thoughts of killing anybody who did that to their child?
And then he talked about it three months earlier.
And so that when the man abducted his daughter three months later, that somehow indicates premeditation.
Prior to Fosler's arrest in July on more than 40 charges and counts, the state says Spencer asked an acquaintance of Fossler's for the man's address.
He allegedly told that person, quote, don't call anyone, don't call the police.
But word did get out.
And as investigators looked into the rape, two Loanoke County sheriff's officers showed up to Spencer's home.
A transcript of their conversation recorded by Body Cam in July is in the state's filing.
Spencer questions how much prison time Fossler might face.
He asks the officers, what's going to happen?
Three to five, he's rolling around, cruising, grooming.
He then refers to another child abuser and says, quote, he's going to get back out, isn't he?
Indicating his belief that the same would happen with Fosler.
One of the deputies warned Spencer, saying, we don't live in a country where you can take the law into your own hands.
Spencer responds with an expletive.
The prosecution saying all of this proves Spencer had an intent to kill, saying, quote, his understandable rage did not give him the legal right to kill Fossler.
Ultimately, that'll be up to a jury in a trial for second-degree murder set for January 26th of next year.
So you imagine the man, he's entertaining the idea of, you know, doing harm to the person who allegedly raped his daughter.
The man who allegedly raped his daughter gets arrested, gets charged, and then gets let out.
And as this man was going to trial, it just so happened to be the same judge who released the alleged rapist on ridiculous bail that happens to be the judge in the case and then imposes a gag order on his trial that was upcoming, something that was so egregious that that judge has since been removed from the case.
This was last week.
Removed from the case by the Arkansas, I think it's the Arkansas Court of Appeals.
Aaron Spencer trial on hold after state Supreme Court removes judge from case.
In a docket entry filed just afternoon on Friday, a divided Arkansas Supreme Court removed circuit judge Barbara Elmore from the case of Aaron Spencer from Lanoke, the Lanoke man county man accused of murdering the man who had been charged with sexually assaulting Spencer's teenage daughter.
The high court also rescinded an order issued by the very same judge Elmore that would have essentially closed the courtroom to most members of the public and media during Spencer's trial.
No written opinion explaining the order.
The order says the court granted Spencer's request for expedited consideration, which was necessary because Spencer's trial was scheduled to begin in just three days today, Monday, January 26th.
And his petition asked the court to undo Elmore's courtroom closure.
It also says, Honorable Barbara Elmore removed from Spencer's case to be reassigned to a special circuit judge appointed by this court.
Three of the court's seven justices disagreed.
Wow.
It's the same judge that allowed the guy to be back out on the street to defy the no contact order.
As for the scheduled Monday, as for the scheduled Monday start, Supreme Court's docket entry says the case is immediately stayed pending this court's appointment of a special judge.
Background, facts around his case have drawn attention from outside inside and outside Arkansas.
The man allegedly killed Michael Fossler.
Yada, yada, yada, we got that.
He was arrested in July, charged with 43 counts, including sexual assault of a minor, internet stalking of a child, possession of child pornography, some or all of which related to Fossler's alleged assault of Spencer's then 13-year-old daughter.
Who was the guy that it was Guy Reffin?
Was it Guy Raffin?
Who's the guy that shot the man who raped his son waiting at a phone booth?
Acquitted.
Talk about jury nullification.
This is, it's even amazing that he could be charged.
It wasn't as though he stalked the man and killed him as he was grocery shopping.
We'll get there.
Foster's case landed before Judge Elmore and he was released on a $5,000 bond.
It had been assumed until recently that it was Elmore who made the decision and set the bond amount, but according to the filings and the courts, Spencer's attorneys have since learned that District Court Judge Teresa Smith had set Foster's bond at his first court appearance before the case was assigned to Elmore.
So it wasn't Elmore that set the bond, but she got the case afterwards.
And that'll be the defense in terms of the potential three judges dissenting from removing her from the case.
Late one night in October, Spencer told police he heard his dogs barking, went to his daughter's room to check on her.
She wasn't there.
Spencer called 911 to report her missing, then went looking for her in his truck.
A short time later, he found his daughter and Fossler in Fosler's truck, and Spencer forced the truck off the road.
The affidavit of Spencer's subsequent arrest gives the account of what happened next.
Spencer then stated he exited the vehicle with his firearm in hand and ordered Fossler out of his vehicle and lay down in the ditch.
Spencer stated that he observed his daughter trying to exit the vehicle side of the vehicle, but it appeared that Fossler had grabbed her and stopped her from getting out.
Spencer then stated that Fossler exited his vehicle and had something in his hand, but Spencer did not know what it was.
Spencer stated that Foster then lunged towards him, saying, Fuck you.
Spencer stated that he opened, then he then opened fire on Fossler, emptying his weapon before jumping on top of Foster, pistol whipping him.
Spencer then stated that he got his daughter out of the vehicle, returned to his truck, where he reloaded his weapon and called 911.
Fosler died at the scene.
The state charged Spencer with second-degree murder, plus a firearm enhancement in November 2024.
Then we got Spencer's case, like Fossil's was assigned to Judge Elmore, due perhaps to the vigilante nature of the killing.
Spencer's case quickly drew.
You call that vigilante nature?
That's not vigilante nature.
Vigilante is going out and looking for the guy.
It's not killing the guy after he's kidnapped your daughter at one in the morning.
Any chance that the case might proceed quietly after the Supreme Court's ruling was dashed in October when Spencer announced he was running for Lanoke County Sheriff.
His appointment in the March 3 Republican primary election is his opponent in the March 3 Republican primary election is incumbent Sheriff John Staley.
Though whether Spencer will even be eligible to hold office will depend on whether he is acquitted of the felony he currently faces.
Supreme Court steps in.
Again, Elmore's removed from the case is not too surprising giving the proceedings to this point.
In December, citing media coverage throughout the state and beyond, as well as statements from Spencer's attorney calling him a heroic father, the state requested a gag order.
They asked Judge Elmore to prohibit Spencer and his attorney from discussing any facts of the case in public, as well as any state or local agencies connected with the case, any judicial employees, any public officials, etc.
It's amazing.
Gagging the defendant can't even fight in the court of public opinion.
Spencer objected to the gag order.
He argued that it would violate both his due process rights to a fair and public trial and his First Amendment right to speak.
Requested a hearing in open court on the state's motion.
Immediately after Spencer filed his response, Judge Elmore granted the state's request for a gag order without holding a hearing on the question.
She also, without a request from either party, can't do that, ordered the entire record of the case sealed.
Spencer filed a petition to the Supreme Court asking the high court to lift Elmore's odor.
Order.
Odor.
The odor also.
It's unbelievable.
Now, by the way, I've reached out to Aaron through a publicly accessible website, email address.
If he wants to talk, he's got my platform any day of the week, every day of the week.
Vigilante is not actively intervening in an immediate kidnapping of your daughter.
And then charges should never have been brought.
And you have this judicial corruption, whether or not it was the judge who issued the ridiculous bond or the judge who just covered up for the ridiculous bond issued by her predecessor and then tries to gag the case, gag the defendant so that he can't even go out in the court of public opinion.
Oh, no, yeah, don't, you don't want to, you don't want to taint the jury pool.
So we're going to gag the defendant while he faces whatever decades that this charge faces.
Ginger Ninja, who is the one that brought this to my attention, said the judge gagged the defense immediately.
It had to be reversed by the Arkansas Supreme Court.
Street Thuggery Gag Order 00:02:07
Then she blocked an expert from testifying on child psychological grooming, not to mention the cops losing video evidence.
Now, but can you imagine that they try to hold against him the fact that after the man was charged for raping his daughter, I think it was even before Ginger, I wanted to get clear on that, whether or not he was trying to get the guy's address, was that before or after he was arrested?
Immaterial, except to determine whether or not law enforcement only acted after the man said, I'm going to take this guy out if you don't do something.
You imagine, is there a parent on earth who wouldn't openly contemplate killing a person who raped or harmed their children?
And that he did it three months earlier.
And then after the guy gets out on $5,000 bills and kidnaps his daughter, he catches him and he's expected to just sit there and let the man sit in the vehicle with his daughter and hope that the cops get there in time.
Holy crap.
So no, this man is, it's, and it's not a question of being, you know, a tough talker and saying, I, oh, yeah.
I remember watching, it was a scene from a courtroom, and it was a father lunging over the bench in the courtroom to attack the guy who killed his son for like 100 bucks.
You know, it's street thuggery for no better reason.
And the reporter said, my goodness, if that, if I were that father, it would have taken more than two bailsmen to hold me back.
It's like, that's such a stupid thing to say.
That being said, there's no parent on earth who wouldn't have those thoughts, probably utter those words.
And I don't think there's very many people on earth who, if they had caught the man who had kidnapped their daughter and had them in the car after he seemingly raped her and certainly violated a no contact order and had another man's minor daughter in his vehicle, I don't think there's many people on earth who are not unloading that magazine into the individual.
Go Raid the Hot Seat 00:05:29
And Ginger Ninja says, Aaron Spencer had a dash cam that caught it all.
Then the cops lost the SD card and the judge wasn't even going to allow a negative inference instructing the jury.
Well, I hope we put this on sufficient blast.
I'm going to snip this clip and post it on CommiTube and tell everybody over there, if you like what I do, be sure to like, share, subscribe.
In fact, do it here as well before we go take this party over to viva barnslaw.locals.com for the after party.
And we're going to go raid.
I don't know who, redacted, 6.30 tonight.
I don't know.
I'm on with Tim Pooh.
I don't know what time it starts, but it's tonight.
And it's going to be a good one.
But right now, we're going to go see.
So, oh, hold on a second.
Before we even get there, if you want to support the channel, you can give these Rumble grants.
They do not give you the right to talk to me like I'm trash.
Il Sartaro.
But if you want to support the channel also, and I almost forgot to do the sponsor for today's show, which is Rumble Wallet, but that's the time we're going to do it, is Rumble Wallet, people.
Download Rumble Wallet so that you can go and tip with crypto, so that you can invest with crypto.
You can go click on this, you go Bitcoin, you go to tip, you scan that QR code, and you can tip with crypto.
Now you're going to see the ever-cascading thing.
So Rumble Wallet, it's an amazing feature that Rumble has now unleashed as innovation on the world that's going to benefit all of us.
And it's only a matter of time before the other, you know, Rumble is now certifiably and absolutely leading the way in innovation in financial freedom.
You can tip with crypto.
You can tip with XAUT, which is gold tethered to the gold value crypto.
You can actually redeem your XAUT for actual gold.
Scan the code and you can tip me.
But more importantly, go over to the Rumble app, the app store.
And let me show you what it looks like because I have the link here.
Is this it?
No, that's not it.
Come on.
Where is it?
It's the Rumble.
Hold on.
Hold up.
Wait a minute.
It's a blue icon.
Here it is.
Rumble Wallet, people.
Why?
Because they can freeze your bank accounts.
They can shut off your cards.
They can lock you out of your own money overnight.
They've done it.
And they'll do it again.
And if you get this, you can protect yourself and they will not be able to control you.
Real financial freedom starts with ownership.
And that's why we have introduced Rumble Wallet, a non-custodial wallet, which means that nobody has custody over your wallet to freeze it and give access to anybody else.
Built for people who refuse to give up control.
With Rumble Wallet, you don't just buy digital currency like Bitcoin and Tether.
You can own Tether real gold on the blockchain.
Through Tether Gold, you get direct ownership of physical gold bars, each one fully allocated, verifiable by serial number, purity, and weight.
It isn't paper gold.
It isn't an IOU.
It's real gold without bank vaults, storage fees, or gatekeepers.
You can buy, sell, or move it 24 hours a day, seven days a week, even when the markets are closed.
And if you want, you can redeem your tether gold for actual real physical gold.
That is power.
And when you support Rumble creators like myself, you can tip them using Rumble Wallet directly, peer-to-peer, no outside banking system, no permission, no middlemen, no cancel button.
The wallet is yours forever.
Go get it.
Wallet.rumble.com.
The link is in the description.
Thank you, Rumble.
And now, our civic duty, duty, to go raid.
I believe redacted.
It's the commentary you've missed.
Here we go.
We're going to go raid.
What is that?
Hold up a second.
Oi, I wait down.
Check separate.
Here, raid.
Go raid if you want.
The target video can't be raided.
What?
Well, who do we raid?
Let's see here.
We're going to go the hot seat.
Yeah, let's go raid the hot seat.
Oh, he's got a rumble thing on his mic.
Okay, go raid the hot seat and let him know from whence you came.
Boom.
Confirm raid.
And that is it.
Now we're going to go over to vivabarnslaw.locals.com for our afterparty.
And I'm going to show locals the view that I see from here.
Oh, I have to make sure I don't catch anything confidential because I'm at Rumble Studio and they've given me a.
Oh, Ginger Ninja says, I'm so glad you looked into the case.
It's crazy that the state is trying to crush this family when their child has already been through all of this.
We must always act as if the government is evil because it is.
Ginger, what's amazing is I think more than 50%, like 80% of the respondents in our chat have never heard of the case.
And I hadn't heard about it.
So go raid.
Go raid the hot seat with Todd Spears.
Viva Raid Booyah.
And now we're going to go to vivabarnslaw.locals.com.
I'm going to find a place to get an energy drink out here.
Locals, I'm coming.
Rumble, tomorrow we're going to be live.
Wednesday, we're going to be live.
Thursday, I'm probably going to be on the road or in the air.
And then Friday, we'll be live Saturday morning, live from San Salvador.
And then I don't know if I'm getting back in time for the Sunday show, but we'll have all week to talk about that.
So, Rumble, thank you for being here.
Like, share, subscribe.
Viva Fry for merch and all that other stuff.
Oh, hold on a second.
Hold up.
Viva Fry.
Is the new merch up yet?
It is not yet up.
New merch should be getting up soon.
But right now, you know what to do if you want to support the channel.
Export Selection