All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 22, 2026 - Viva & Barnes
01:08:45
Arrests Made in Church Storming! Harmeet Dhillon Blocks Me on X? Don Lemon Walks Free & MORE!

Support Viva: GET MERCH! www.vivafrei.com BUY A BOOK! https://amzn.to/4qBXikS SEND ME SOMETHING! David Freiheit 20423 SR 7 Ste F6319 Boca Raton 33498 TIP WITH CRYPTO! bc1qt0umnqna63pyw5j8uesphsfz0dyrtmqcq5ugwm THAT IS ALL!

|

Time Text
Ministry of Industrial Confusion 00:04:22
Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, for those of you who might be wondering who or what you are looking at, if you are standing there with the same look of bewilderment as the subject of today's intro video, I present to you Melanie Jolie, the minister of industrial something or other foreign industry out of Canada at Davos, scratching her head like someone who looks confused about pretty much everything and then goes on to open her mouth and remove all doubt.
I present to you, Melanie Jolie, behold.
Press play.
Darn it, where's the point button here?
Well, I think, you know, as a government, for us, we look at everything, all the levers I've talked to you about, diversification.
I've talked to you about like real industrial policy on, you know, we're coming up with things on auto, on the defense and industrial strategy.
We're looking at a new AI strategy, et cetera.
But fundamentally, when we, you know, develop all these policies, we have to govern a nation and we have to bring people along.
And we have that responsibility in a very turbulent and chaotic world right now with a lot of anxiety, with a lot of frustration, where people think things are costing too much.
And so, and they're fearful and are not necessarily trusting people, you know, necessarily at this forum.
There's a real issue of people being preoccupied whether they're becoming powerless.
So my point is, is it's giving this idea to people that we are in control, that we're dealing with things that in this chaos, we have a plan, that we have all the levers that will have an impact on their lives.
And fundamentally, all the policies that I've talked to you about will create jobs, will be helping them to have access to better services, and ultimately also to a promise of themselves and their children to have access to a better life.
It comes back to basics, but I think that's what we need to show concretely back home.
Don't you love it, by the way?
Like they say people feel that things are too expensive.
Not that people find that things are too expensive.
It's all a question of perception, right?
They're not actually, you know, price is not actually an issue in Canada globally.
It's people's perception of prices, don't you see?
What I can't get over is that she seems to have caught the Gavin Newsome ninja hands.
Now, I appreciate I'm not blind to my own idiosyncrasies, idiosyncratic, idiosyncratic, what the heck's the word?
Idiosyncrasies.
I know I got a bunch of things that drive me crazy about myself, one of which is touching my face.
It's very gross.
Your hands are dirty.
It's a way to pass germs.
Another one is swallowing in between words.
It drives me crazy.
I'm going to come up with a device that's going to automatically either swallow for me or dry the saliva in my mouth.
I'm just joking.
I talk with my hands as well.
I know it.
I've been called manic, frantic, obsessive, compulsive, ADHD, whatever the hell you want to call.
I can identify ninja hands when I see them.
Melanie Jolie.
For us, we look at everything, all the levers I've talked to you about, diversification.
I've talked to you about like real industrial policy on, you know, we're coming up with things on auto.
I'll put on pots.
I don't want to watch it again.
Set aside the ninja hands.
And just to refresh all y'all's memory, here's ninja hands.
This wasn't even the best example of ninja hands.
She might have been too tired.
Say one thing on a text or tweet, another publicly.
Shoots do with home principles.
It's time to stand tall and strong.
Forget it, we're not going to get ninja hands out of Gavin Newsome.
Just appreciate what Melanie Jolie said right there.
Government is about giving the impression that you're dealing with problems.
It's about convincing, it's getting people to think you are addressing their concerns, all the while misdirecting them into whatever direction you choose to misdirect them.
Operation Warp Speed Controversy 00:03:23
Davos is still going on, people.
Rebel News is out there doing the Lord's work.
Vox Populi is out there doing the Lord's work.
We watched Trump's speech yesterday.
It was good, pulled some highlights, went over it yesterday.
I did know that people were going to get angry at his comments on Operation Warp Speed, his continuing to praise Operation Warp Speed.
And I can appreciate people's frustration on that, where they are still angry at Trump over his defense of Operation Warp Speed and what they consider to be a failed jab that has caused an immense amount of suffering and harm in people who have been injured.
And that is one where I have laid out my blueprint as to how Trump could navigate Operation Warp Speed, what he perceives to be the successes of it.
I want to bring up the clip, actually, so everybody, if you haven't seen it, for the naysayers, it was circulated.
Is it this one?
No, that's just a screenshot.
It was the one where he touted the success of the vaccine, the jab, where he said it was the greatest military success in modern times.
And I put out a clip a long time ago about how one can navigate Operation Warp Speed, what it produced, what it was intended to be, and what it was weaponized into.
And Operation Warp Speed, cutting red tape and allowing for increased trials without regulatory red tape to allow for innovation in and of itself is a success.
Whatever they came up with by the first iteration of the Jibby Jab for COVID might have been a success.
Using the same one to treat variants, Omicron, Delta, whatever, two years down the line, arguably, but not arguably, maybe not so successful.
It was supposed to be Operation Warp Speed, an operation through which therapeutics would be explored, alternative methods of treatment would be explored, and red tape would be cut to facilitate innovation of a potential jab shot therapeutic, whatever you want to call it, that would be available to the most vulnerable of society for their decision to use or to not use.
It was never intended to be turned into and weaponized into a mandate, one size fits all.
Keep getting yourself jabbed up until you get myocarditis and die prematurely.
And so I can acknowledge or even, you know, offer some, laid it out in a tweet once upon a time.
You say, yeah, Operation Warp Speed, in theory, was great.
It cut the red tape.
It allowed pharmaceutical companies to innovate.
It created something of a product that in theory would have been beneficial, all risks considered for those most vulnerable for nefarious side effects from COVID itself.
It was never intended to be turned into something that would not only not explore other therapeutics, but outlaw other therapeutics.
It got weaponized.
It got turned into a mandate.
And it did, in fact, kill people.
Go back to India, Viva.
Alex Jones Deposition Analysis 00:03:31
That's a new one to me.
So that is the Davos is still going on.
That was the latest out of there.
Melanie Jolie got to where she is by failing upwards, like most people do in government.
Oh, now, hold on one second.
What I wanted to do, if you don't know who I am, by the way, Viva Fry, former Montreal Canadian litigator, former Montreal litigator, turned current Florida Rumbler.
For those of you who didn't know that I'm Canadian, I'm Canadian.
For those of you who think my name is Viva Fry, it is not.
It is David Freiheit.
No, you say go back to China.
That would be funnier.
Go back to China, Viva.
Daily show on Rumble at three o'clock, where we talk about all of the news that's fit to report on, all of the law that's fit to explore.
I used to be a litigator 13 plus years, civil litigator.
You may remember the analyses I did back in 2018 of the Alex Jones deposition back during the Sandy Hook cases, where Alex Jones was being deposed in the context of his intentional infliction of emotional distress lawsuits out of Connecticut and Texas because of statements he made over the course of 10 years.
And it was really the beginning, I'd say the beginning of, it was partially into the red pill.
The red pill started in 2015, 2016.
But it was at that moment that I realized that even offering what I think to be mildly helpful assessments of the law and all law stuffs can get you into trouble.
When people want to vilify and villainize or vilify an individual, they don't want people explaining that individual so that maybe people understand that he's not the villain that everybody thought he was.
You may recall during that deposition with Alex Jones, where famous sound clip, I was going through a form of psychosis.
And that was the only thing you ever heard of that deposition.
Alex Jones admits that he was suffering from psychosis.
And then I went and listened to that full three and a half hour deposition.
I'm like, the entire deposition did not make Alex Jones look bad at all.
It actually made him look very good.
Then I put out that analysis, gets a quarter of a million views on Commitube, and then it gets removed from the platform for hate speech.
A schnook, cringy lawyer on the roof of his house wearing sunglasses, analyzing a deposition, doing nothing more than analyzing the questions, asked the answers, provided why lawyers should not splice together evidence and then ask a witness about it.
Removed for hate speech.
Then it gets put back on the platform, gets remonetized.
And then I discovered there are certain questions and topics that are off limits on YouTube.
What I never thought is that we would get to a realm where legitimate questions and legitimate concerns would be met with similar scorn and disdain.
We'll get into it.
We'll get into it.
For those of you who don't know, I got blocked by Harmee Dylan from her personal account, not from her government account, but it was the account to which I was responding with what we're going to get into.
Legitimate concerns, legitimate questions about action and inaction that we're seeing from Pam Bondi's DOJ blocked.
Viva doesn't shut people out and he gets his feels hurt.
Viva doesn't shut people out and get his feels hurt.
I'm not sure what that means.
We'll get into it.
So we're going to get into that.
We're going to get into the latest developments out of the Texas, not the Texas, I'm sorry, the Minneapolis church storming and those arrests that have been made and those that have not been made, by the way, and not out of inaction.
Chris Cuomo's Self-Awareness Crisis 00:15:36
If you haven't heard, an activist judge, magistrate, it would seem, refused to order the arrest of Don Lemon.
We're going to get into that in a second.
And before we get into anything, by the way, speaking of the ultimate lack of self-awareness, it's an interesting thing.
You know, you remember Chris Cuomo?
So there's Chris Cuomo.
There's his father was Andrew Cuomo and his brother.
What's his brother's name?
The other one who's Chris Cuomo, Fred Cuomo, and Andrew Cuomo.
I covered a clip yesterday on the show.
I'll play just a bit of it because it's going to be contextually appropriate to understand the absolute lunacy of Chris Cuomo's subsequent post white knighting like you've never seen anybody white knighting before.
This is Scott Jennings and that kid that he was talking to on CNN.
I've reached out to the kid to see if he wants to come on and talk about the statements that he made that were arguably, but not arguably defamatory about Donald Trump suggesting that he was in charge of a pedophile, globalist elitist pedophile ring.
He's since retracted and I say, come on, we'll talk about it.
I'm curious to know where you got the information in the first place from.
This is what happened on the show to which Chris Cuomo decided he needed to go out and white knight for this young lass over here, the young victim lass, who thinks he gets to dictate what people can and cannot say on public arenas.
You don't have to say the word illegals anymore.
You have the choice, the percentage.
Who are you to tell me what I can and can't?
I've never met you, brother.
I can say whatever I want.
They're illegal aliens, and that's what the law calls them, illegal aliens.
That's what I'm going to call them.
Listen, you can't say illegals anymore because ICE is directly targeting legal citizens of this country.
And I are going to enforce your edict on me just out of curiosity.
Listen, I understand.
Just listen to his point about illegal.
I want to know why he gets to.
It's not, you're changing the topic.
Hang on, you're right.
No, no, I want to know my new point.
I understand that your job is predicated on just getting increasingly more demented every single week and that the audience comes back to see if perhaps make your point.
My point is that you're saying the word illegals, but you don't even really know what's happening.
Or actually, I think you do.
They're targeting legals.
They're not, period.
But I want the law enforced.
They are not just targeting illegal immigrants.
They are targeting natural-born U.S. citizens.
They are not.
That is a fact.
You cannot deny that.
I mean, you can on national television.
They deny facts all the time.
They've done it a couple of times in this very episode.
The guy who just, you know, libelously said that Donald Trump was in charge of globalist elitist pedophile sex rings is now lecturing Scott Jennings on making up facts in the public arena on television.
Can you imagine the projection?
Talking about him losing touch with reality.
Still want to know how you're going to enforce your lawyer.
Want to know how you're going to force your edicts on me.
Now, if you don't know who Chris Cuomo is, it's a man who, for a certain period of time, purported, gave the impression that he had been red-pilled, that he saw the light.
He saw the errors of his ways.
Goes on with Patrick Bett David, goes on with the unusual suspects, comes over to what is the logical side of things, which is somewhere right of left.
And talking the talk, he admits that they made some mistakes.
The media needs to salvage its reputation, its credibility.
Never apologized for any of the things that he said during COVID, never apologized for covering for his brother and his brother's lies and his brother's mass murder, as far as I'm concerned, of New York elderly.
Never apologized for it.
Never really did any sort of actual repenting.
So it's sort of the superficial, I've seen the light.
Have me in on your side because now I'm persona non grata on the left, but I don't actually want to apologize and repent for the damage that I've actually caused.
Okay, fine.
And I would say, look, it's nice that he's seen the light, but it would be great for him to actually apologize for the proactive things that he said and did that contributed to the problems.
Demonizing of Iver Mecton, covering for his brother's lies when he was allegedly in quarantine, one of the two of them.
Look at this face.
He puts this post out yesterday in response to Scott Jennings.
And you want to know the iron law of woke projection.
It's a, I would say, a leftist, it's a human, it's a human tendency that tends to materialize and metastasize far more on the far left, left, progressive left, Democrat, liberal side of things.
It is imputing on your adversary that which is true of yourself.
It is telling others, accusing others of what you are yourself doing.
Chris Cuomo is going to accuse Scott Jennings of being a bully for telling some young punk that that young punk doesn't get to tell him what words he gets to use.
You see this clip of Scott Jennings saying, how are you going to enforce it?
How are you going to enforce me not saying the word illegals anymore?
How are you going to do that?
I don't say illegals anymore because ICE is directly targeting legal citizens of this country.
And I how are you going to enforce your edict on me just out of curiosity?
Listen, I understand.
Just listen to his point about illegal.
What are you bully now?
What are you, tough guy?
You're talking to this kid who happens to be right, calling people illegals.
They're called illegal aliens in the law.
And you know what?
A long time ago, Republicans and Democrats switched to undocumented.
By the way, I'm old enough to remember that transition in real time.
I don't know that all Republicans transitioned, pun intended, to undocumented.
Control language and you can control thought itself.
I lived through this.
It went from illegal aliens to aliens to, oh, I want to say, then I went to migrants.
The undocumented, I think, is only like maybe five years old, undocumented.
As if doing something illegally is not illegal.
It's just not documented in the law.
I digress.
Why?
Because it seemed inhuman.
That's why.
It seemed human.
Do you call people criminals if they break the law?
Convicts if they've actually been convicted?
Felons if they've been convicted of a felony?
I mean, I know they want to call homeless people unsheltered or unhomed, whatever it is, as if there's something insulting about the word homeless.
We're not talking about calling people with mental disabilities, you know, the R word.
I'm not self-censoring.
I say, like, you can call someone who's not mentally challenged retarded because it's just a figure of speech to illustrate someone who thinks like an idiot.
But the term idiot is just as much offensive in a clinical sense as retarded, moron, imbecile.
Well, you know, we decided to change the terminology because accurate assessments under the law were dehumanizing.
They changed the vernacular and you know it, but that's not the point.
And you know it.
The point is, how are you going to do it?
What are you going to do?
What are you?
You're a tough guy now, huh?
I thought you were just supposed to be the simpering, but, you know, open to conversation Trump defender.
Of course, I remember you when you said he was like the worst thing in the world, but everything's convenience these days, right?
It's getting you paid.
But be careful.
If you want to be a tough guy, there are plenty of tough guys out there.
You want to see how somebody can make you stop saying illegal?
And then what are you going to do?
Sue?
Tough guy.
Okay, so you want to see how someone can stop, get you to stop saying illegal.
Yeah, someone can punch you in the face.
Someone can physically assault you.
Someone can do physical harm to you.
Doing physical harm to someone for using a word and you're accusing him of being the bully?
Are you suggesting you're going to do it, Cuomo?
I'm going to punch you in the mouth if you use the word illegal.
Oh, great.
You're the bully, though, because you want to use a legally correct word to address a legal situation.
How are you going to enforce that?
So if somebody beats your ass because you're being rude and disrespectful and causing division in this country, that's causing distress.
Someone's going to beat your ass because you're causing division in this country.
You're causing a distress.
You know what this sounds like?
This sounds like terrorist talk.
If you cause division, we get to beat your ass.
If you cause distress, whatever the hell that means, we get to beat your ass.
Holy crap.
You know, I started watching the movie One Battle After Another.
I'm not going to say a thing about it because it's going to be the first movie that we review with Mark Grobert on Viva and Lord Buckley go to the movies.
But this type of rhetoric appeals to the left.
You know, Six and Stones can break my bones, but words can never harm me.
When I was six years old, it has transitioned into words can hurt me.
And it's transitioned into silence is violence.
Not only, so if your silence causes distress and your silence causes division, we get to beat your ass also.
And pain all over the streets and making people want to hurt one another.
You really want to be a part of that, as the expression goes.
You want to hurt me?
You want to hurt me?
If you cause distress, I get to beat your ass.
Congratulations, Joe Biden.
Oh, I'm sorry, Chris Cuomo.
You're a tough guy, eh?
If I see you, I'm going to punch you in the face.
Don't be a bully or I'll punch you in the face.
F-A-F-O.
Don't be a tough guy.
Make tough points.
But remember, remember to be decent.
You're not a tough guy.
Okay?
You're a guy with slick to the side hair, a slick tongue, and everybody knows what you're doing.
Don't be a tough guy.
What the hell?
What the hell does that mean?
We'll make strong points.
Chris, if someone is having crossing a country into a country without authorization of that government, what do you call it?
Undocumented?
So doing something that is against the law without the authorization of the government just is undocumented.
So if you drive a car without a license, you're an undocumented driver.
If you're driving the car above the speed limit in a reckless manner, you're just an unauthorized, undocumented, oh gosh, what do they call the people who do this?
You're an undocumented stuntman.
If you take something from a store without permission, are you an undocumented possessor?
If you grab someone's ass without their permission, are you an undocumented proctologist?
If you fornicate with someone, is a rapist just an undocumented fornicator?
You don't want to cause division by identifying things by their legal concepts.
And then you don't want to be a bully.
And if you make people feel distressed, I'm a FAFO.
This is in the wake of, you know, Charlie Kirk, a man who did nothing but ever speak with his words, who got shot by people who said his words caused me distress and therefore I get to shoot him.
Holy crap, Chris, look in the frickin' mirror.
But congratulations on confirming to everybody who ever had a doubt that your red pill transition was purely illusory or maybe opportunistic.
But it's sure as shit, I swore, it's sure as sugar was not authentic.
And that video that you put out, that diatribe, hypocrisy, confession through projection, removes all doubt.
Chris Cuomo is a, I will not read that word because then there'll be the soundbite of it.
That was that.
Now, all right, people, before we get any further into today's show, let me see what's going on here.
Let's go see what's going on at our viva barnslaw.locals.com community.
You're the assman, undocumented delivery driver, undocumented migrants, undocumented proctologists, gold.
It's gold, Jerry.
It's no fun being an odd document.
I'm an illegal alien in New York.
Now, it's true the legal definition of illegal alien is under certain circumstances, but it's the perpetual fudging of words that actually makes discourse subsequently impossible.
Undocumented migrant.
How about it?
Is it an undocumented citizen then?
I mean, when does it go into undocumented citizen?
Well, you're not a citizen.
Well, that's only because I don't have the documentation, right?
Not like visa holders, not illegal, not even unlawful.
An undocumented citizen.
Now we can get into the law of the day.
The people who are both the dumb and the criminals, who don't just break the law, but then they go and post the evidence of their law breaking to the internet are, in fact, you're getting a FAFO in the actual legal sense.
Mess around, find out.
We'll do a mafo because I'm trying not to swear, although I'm not succeeding at it very well.
Do a mafo.
The people who overtly break the law, post the evidence to the internet for an eternity, then go on the internet afterwards and say, what are you going to do about it, are now finding out what can be done about it.
This is the man who's wearing an F asterisk CK Trump hat.
Why even put the asterisks in there?
Why don't you say it?
And the shirt that says no kings, I guess, put up a post.
This is one of the guys who was involved.
This guy went through the church, had his, I think he was, I forget what he was chanting.
Idiocy is what he was chanting, but he put up a video that said this.
Yesterday, I went into a church with Nakima Armstrong and I protested these white supremacists.
The pastor of the church is a fucking ICE leader in the city.
As you can see, all these pretend Christians, all these comfortable white people who are living lavish, comfortable lives while children are dragged into concentration camps.
I wonder why this guy thinks children are being dragged into concentration camps, Fredo.
Cuomo.
What did he say here?
So, you know, Pam Bondi, you want to come and arrest me?
You want to come and give me charges?
So be it.
Yesterday.
Dudes facing charges.
This is a tweet from Pam Bonte.
Okay, charges have been filed.
There was the other woman who was also facing charges, and we'll get to it.
So two people have been arrested thus far in connection with the church protest.
I love how they say it's, it's, it wasn't, we weren't disrupting.
We were invited.
We didn't break the law, but it was a protest.
We're doing it to fight Whitey.
And, but we, you know, we were, we were actually praying there.
We were actually protesting there.
Hold on before we get there.
Let me, I got to play this clip because it's just absolutely glorious.
Like it's, it's as though it's gaslighting of the highest order where they forget that the internet is forever and they think people are stupid.
They think people are as stupid as they are.
To deny reality that we all saw with our own eyes as though the internet is not forever and as though they didn't willingly post evidence of their own criminality on the internet.
And then they come and tell you that what you saw never actually happened and you're crazy for thinking it happened.
And I do want to correct something that was said in the beginning.
We did not rush into that church.
We actually went and sat down and participated in the service.
And after the pastor prayed, that is when I stood up and asked him a question in response to his prayer.
And then I, and he responded to me.
And then I proceeded to ask him about Pastor David Easterwood and how is it possible for him to serve as both the pastor and the director of ICE for Minnesota.
Pause it right there.
Mentioning the guy's name, like I love it when people mention my name, they think on Twitter, like it's a gotcha.
They say, what do you mean, David Freiheit?
I ran for the government.
I ran for People's Party of Canada in Montreal, in Canada.
Dog Whistle Diplomacy 00:07:11
It's sort of like, I call it a constitutionalist party of Canada.
Hold up.
And people think like somehow, it's somehow an act of intimidation to say somebody's name as if they're not proud of their name.
My last name literally means freedom in German.
That being said, when this woman, after the protests, after the attacks on ICE agents, goes on CNN and mentions the guy's name and which church that he is allegedly a pastor at, you know damn well what they're doing.
That is the dog whistle of all dog whistles.
That is bona fide doxing for the purposes of letting people know who he is, what his name is, and where he can be found.
Possible for him to serve as both the pastor and the director of ICE for Minnesota.
And instead of responding to me, as soon as I said the name David Easterwood, the pastor says, shame, shame.
And that is when I led us and chants justice for Renee Good and Hands Up, Don't Shoot.
Hands up, don't shoot.
They're still repeating that lie.
Never happened, hands up, don't shoot.
It was a lie, a lie perpetrated.
Which panel was it?
Was it on CNN or MSNBC?
One of those two propagandist organizations.
She said the guy's name now three times, the church in which he works and repeated a lie that never happened for the purposes of fanning their two minutes of hatred.
And they know damn well with the attacks on ICE agents exactly what they're doing.
Clarify that.
We didn't rush in.
We didn't bust in.
We were a part of the service until I got up and posed that question to the pastor.
We were a part of the service after we, even if what she's saying is true, surreptitiously snuck in and discussed, you know, hid ourselves until we started protesting.
We were part of the service until we disrupted the service.
All right.
And obviously, I'm not going to pose that question to the pastor.
All right.
And obviously, I'm not going to dispute your, your, you know, saying what happened.
Of course, you wouldn't.
Why would you?
It's not like this video about it.
What's her, what's her name again?
Oh, gosh, what's this woman's name on the top?
I'll get it in a second.
I'm not going to dispute your side of things because it's not like there's not ample video posted by your soon-to-be co-defendant showing exactly what happened.
I'm not here to fact-check you.
I'm not here to call you a liar or at the very least, even to say, yeah, but there's a lot of video out there that seems to show you guys actively disrupting the services, including video of Don Lamon interrogating the pastor after the services had been disrupted, interrogating church congregants who fled in fear.
There's a lot of evidence of those that suggest what you just told me is a big, fat, bold-faced lie, but I'm not here to do that.
It's CNN.
Aaron Burnett out in front with Aaron Burnett.
I'm not here to actually do that.
It's CNN, a new standard for propaganda.
So merely describing how CNN is describing it.
I obviously wasn't in the room.
But that moment that you're talking about, and obviously the way you lay it out could dramatically affect things.
But the moment you talk about justice.
I mean, obviously, your lie, if it were true, would radically change reality.
Unfortunately, your lie is a lie and it isn't true and it won't change reality.
Now we get into the charges, people.
That's the we've seen all the evidence.
It's out there for an eternity.
They've lined up their exhibits.
They got their arrests.
Three people involved in a Minnesota church protests are arrested as judge refuses to charge Don Lamon.
Well, darn it, I was trying to save that punchline for the last part of the show, the last part of the segment, but Minneapolis, a prominent civil rights attorney and at least two other people involved in the anti-immigration enforcement protest that disrupted a service at Minnesota church have been arrested.
Trump administration said Thursday, even as a judge rebuffed, even a judge rebuffed related charges against journalist Don Lemon.
I mean, why I would put so-called journalists.
Developments unfolded as Vice President JD Vance arrived in the state.
Attorney General Pam Bondi announced the arrest of Nakima Levy Armstrong in a post on X. On Sunday, protest, we always saw that part.
Justice Department quickly opened civil rights investigation after the group interrupted services by chanting ICE, justice for Renee Good.
Listing out loud, we do not tolerate attacks on places of worship, the Attorney General wrote on X. City's church belongs to the Southern Baptist Convention and lists one of its pastors as David Easterwood, who leads the local ICE field office.
Many Baptist churches have pastors who also work other jobs.
Attorneys representing the church hailed the arrests.
U.S. This is what you call FAFOA.
The U.S. Department of Justice acted decisively by arresting those who coordinated and carried out the terrible crime, said Doug Wardlow.
Good.
Vance threatens the protesters with prison terms.
Okay.
You cannot lead a congregation while directing an agency whose actions have cost lives and inflicted fear in our communities.
She said she's well, it's a she's entitled to her opinion.
When officials protect armed agents, repeatedly refuse meaningful investigations into killings like Renee Goods and signal they may pursue peaceful protests.
This is not justice as intimidation.
Well, speaking of intimidation, is you know doing exactly what they just did.
Arrests follow DOJ civil rights investigation.
Longtime activist in the Twin Cities, Levy Armstrong has helped lead local protests.
Yada yada yada.
Homeland Security Christy Noam posted a photo on X of Levy Armstrong with her arms behind her back.
FBI Director Cash Pratelle posted on X that Chantil Louisa Allen, the second person Bondi said was arrested, is charged under the Freedom of Acts of the Face Act, which prohibits physically obstructing or using the force to intimidate, interfere with people with productive productive health or places of worship.
Now let's get to Don Lemon.
Let's get to the Don Lemon part.
Judge rejects.
I don't want to do that at all.
The judge rejects charges against a journalist.
Magistrate judge rejected federal prosecutors' bid to charge journalist Don Lemon related to the church process.
A person familiar with the matter said Thursday.
Person spoke on a condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly discuss the ongoing investigation.
Lemon was among those who entered the church.
Yeah, yeah.
It's it.
Once the protests started in the church, we did an act of journalism.
We saw all that.
It wasn't immediately clear what the Justice Department would do after the judge's decision.
Authorities could return to a magistrate judge to again seek a criminal complaint or an indictment against Lamon before a grand jury.
So it's interesting.
I mean, look, you got some swift action there, and understandably and righteously so.
You don't get to interrupt church services without outraging the better part of America.
Had this been, like I said, yes, had this been a synagogue, it would have been a hate crime.
There would have been people up in arms throughout the world.
Seems that the only group of people you can seemingly attack with impunity, I won't say, are white Christians, is basically what it looks like.
And so it's high time, but a matter of necessity that they have to come down hard on this because if people have the political permission slip that they think they obviously have to storm church services to exact their form of street justice, it's only a matter of time before it escalates into something far more serious.
Potential Church Escalations 00:05:36
There are a lot of people, I don't know about Minnesota, who attend church armed.
And if people come in looking like they're going to cause harm to people in the congregation, you might have a severe escalation real quick.
There have been quite a few shootings at churches.
And if people don't know who's coming in under what pretexts and what they're going to do once they start disrupting services, which is already next level, you might have a massive escalation among citizens.
And so they came down hard and it's good.
And they get the credit that they deserve for doing this.
I want to highlight one thing.
You know, Glenn Beck put out a 13-minute video earlier today, and I reshared.
I said, Glenn is, in my view, 100% right on a lot of this.
That doing the job that they are appointed to do is it's good and you deserve credit where credit is due.
Period.
Full stop.
Addressing like contemporaneous problems, addressing contemporaneous acts of criminality is what you would call administering justice.
It's what you call managing the country that you are appointed to manage.
There is a difference between management or administration and I don't want to say revolution because that's not the right word.
Reform is the word I'm looking for.
There's a difference between managing, administering, and reforming.
And in as much as the current DOJ is managing and administering current acts of criminality, good.
It's what needs to be done.
It's what the DOJ is there for.
What has been not just promised, because promises are one thing, what is necessary, what is absolutely needed at this point, above and beyond administering current contemporaneous acts of criminality, is reforming the institutions that allowed for the weaponization of the DOJ under the prior administration.
And so in as much as an administration deserves credit for properly administering justice under their current administration, this administration, beyond managing, needs to reform the corrupt DOJ, the corrupt FBI, that led to four years of persecution of American citizens.
And it's that level of frustration that Glenn Beck was highlighting earlier today, where it's very nice.
You can come out and arrest two, three people.
I won't give them heck for not getting Don Lamont because you are dealing with judicial activists who frustrate the administration of justice.
So it's good.
They can come down in the most public, egregious acts of anti-Christian hatred.
I won't say violence.
Some might say that's a little too hyperbolic.
That they arrest people and make it known that it is not fair game to interrupt church services, even if you've been given that political permission slip by your governor, Tampon Tim, or your mayor, Jacob Fry.
That it's not going to be tolerated, and that's fine.
Where the frustration is, is that these institutions and the deep state that is at the core of the rot of the swamp needs reform and not just dealing with problems as they arise in real time.
You want to go after Bill Clinton for his thumbing his nose at the subpoena?
That's fine.
These are things that occurred contemporaneously.
These are things that occurred after promises of drain the swamp and root out the deep state corruption within the DOJ and the FBI.
So you deal with those problems and that's good.
Reform is not just needed.
It's essential.
It's existential.
And you can't blame people for saying it's very good.
Fine.
You got these people.
I mean, this was in everybody's faces, but we need the institutional reform that Trump knows is required as a matter of existential seriousness for his administration and for these United States of America.
So those are the arrests.
And it's good.
What did Nick Sorator have to say about this?
He has a good clip here.
Check this out.
Still playing the entire time.
So, you know, Pam Bondi, you want to come and arrest me?
You want to come and give me charges?
So be it.
And for all the people getting, you know, giving me death threats, threatening my life, kill me.
Go ahead.
Kill me.
Because you know what?
As Fred Hampton said, you can kill the revolutionary, but you can't kill the revolution.
Still wearing the hat.
Still playing.
Still wearing the hat.
So that's what's going on there.
And it's good.
Now, before we get into the next part of the show, which is, I say, the headlined, the thing that I found, it was actually very disappointing for me.
I don't like, despite what, despite what people think, I don't like drama and I don't like petty fighting.
Certainly not among people that I like.
And yet that seems to be what occurred today.
Let me go to the Rumble rants and the tipped questions, and then we're going to get into it.
I want it all taken down and rebuilt, says Quinn, 1971.
Dominant One says, Merlin, it's only.
Okay, I'm not doing it.
Dominant One says, don't you love it when Viva Fry slurs the words, sex?
It's a Satan.
Dominant One's got his own channel, I think.
9 p.m. Central, DAD, so long ago, picture show.
The driver 1970.
I'm not actually sure what you mean.
What is this?
But Dominant One, thank you very much.
We got King of Bill Tong in the house who says premium all-natural Bill Tong.
High quality meat, crafted properly, sold direct, no shortcuts.
Ivan's Testimony 00:05:14
Check out BilltongUSA.com.
Use code Viva for 10% off.
Thank you, Bill Tong.
And now let's go see what's going on over on vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Jump to recent messages.
Put the nupjog in an octagon with Jake Lam.
What a self-absorbed.
He reminds me of the Capitol Cop on the January 6th hearing.
Can he spell revolution?
Swamp creatures are getting more swampy.
Well, oddly enough, let me just play one thing, which is funny.
I was going to start the show off with it, but it's, you know, when you start the show off with something that might not be clear or audible for the podcast format, it might make things a little difficult.
Ivan Rayklin had a run-in with, speaking of self-righteous, Fanon.
Ivan Rakelin, he posted, he says, should I sue for defamation?
Where is it?
I want.
Oh, here it is.
This is here.
There was nearly a physical altercation.
Oh, yeah.
All right, check this out.
Fanone is one of the Jan 6, you know, arguably part of the Rot, arguably part of the persecution of innocent Americans based on political persuasion.
I'm going to play the perspective from Ivan Rayklin in a second.
I'm not even sure who I would put my money on in this fight.
I think I would go with Ivan.
Ivan looks pretty ripped.
These men are, these men are not small men, like Ivan, now that I know he weighs 180 pounds.
Don't do it.
Don't do it.
It's not worth it, man.
Okay, let's just go get, get, let's get the other perspective of this.
This is the other perspective.
Is this it?
Jeez, I have to get.
No, hold on a second.
I got to get the, I got to get.
Here we go here.
No, no, no.
Let's get the clip where he says, Who thinks I should sue Fanon for defamation?
Here we go.
So, Ivan Rayklin, who's been on the channel many times, what does he call himself?
Something of retribution.
Hey, Michael.
Hey, what's up, buddy?
Ivan Rayland.
Why do you have to swear at me?
Fighting Nazis.
What do you have to swear at me?
Fanon's shirt.
Fanone is the guy with tattoos up the neck who was like the star Jan 6 witness has got a shirt that says fighting the Nazis since what 1986?
I don't think you did pretend like we're not mortal enemies.
You're gonna fuck yourself.
Well, why do you have to lose your cool like that?
I've been always professional with you.
This is my cool as someone tries to restrain me.
You're a traitor.
Always professional with you.
And it requires other people to contain your Tourette's syndrome.
Okay?
I'm not going to get to that.
You threaten my family and you've threatened my life.
We'll have our traitor this fucking country.
Why are you so spasmodic?
Am I spasmodic?
Absolutely.
Look behind you.
Do something.
Why should I?
I'm communicating with you.
I'm trying to calm you down.
Right?
Look at your face or something.
You can't even control yourself.
There's a part of me that feels bad for me.
Trust me.
I'm losing a lot.
See how many people are constraining you?
Come get me.
Look at me.
Total control over my mind and body.
Totally control over, sir.
And I'm totally dominating you right now.
Totally dominating.
Sir, sir.
Let's step aside.
I'm not.
This guy is just my family threatened.
Threatened to rape my children.
Rape my children.
Look, I um admit, I've known Ivan for a little while.
I'm not sure that we've ever met in real life.
I don't think Ivan threatened to rape his children.
I'm not even sure why that would be a thought that anybody would have.
But I digress.
Rape my children.
More people need to contain him because I'm completely damaged, sir.
Always.
Listen.
And that's that.
Yeah.
So, I, but there's a part of me that call me a sissy Canadian all you want.
There's a part of me that actually feels bad for Fanon.
I mean, it's everybody's the hero in their own story.
I have no doubt that Fanon, who's wearing a shirt about fighting Nazis, believes that he's the hero in his own story.
I have zero doubt he has gone through a lot of shit, which a lot of you might say is self-inflicted, deserved.
Him testifying and trying to lock up Jan Sixers for decades.
He's probably gone through some stuff and certainly has met some backlash, some threats from people who maybe are mortal enemies of his because of what they not even gonna say they believe what he tried to do to them.
But he's quite clearly fragile, despite the feigning of strength, and quite clearly something's going on.
They're but for the grace of God, go alive.
And in as much as they don't do anything irreparable, you forgive them, except it's arguable that the testimony, the participation in the prosecution, persecution of the Jan Sixers is unforgivable for those who are the victims of it.
Why Reply to Personal Accounts? 00:15:23
Which brings us into the next segment, people.
It should even be a segment.
Where do I even start?
So we've had some arrests coming out of Minnesota.
We've had the arrests of three people, not of Don Lemon.
And I won't even fault Pam Bondi for what sounds like it was a failed attempt to get charges against Don Lamond because you've got activist judges everywhere.
Maybe go find another method.
I don't know how you go about it with a grand jury, but they tried by the sounds of it.
It has not yet succeeded for the time being by the sounds of it.
But they've arrested three individuals who partook in an egregious, in-your-face act of criminality against the holiest of holy institutions, a church.
And Pam Bondi posted her post about it, said, you know, this is okay.
We've arrested that guy.
If there's a whole bunch of people fatal, we got him.
We got him.
We're going to go down the rabbit hole on this.
I'm not sure that I'm going to be able to because of the nature of it.
Hold up one second.
You got Pam Bondi, who's posting the W. Harmee Dylan reposted and said, you know, let me see.
Am I going to be able to get to this?
Yeah, here we go.
Harmeet Dylan posted.
And first of all, not only have I, I don't think I've ever said anything bad about Harmeet Dylan, insulting, denigrating.
I never jumped on the bandwagon of people making fun of her for the prayer that she did at the RNC.
I'm fairly certain I had no problem with that and thought it was wrong to go after her for identity politic issues such as that.
I appreciate other people, you know, don't have the same courtesy, never did that.
And we have always been actually very appreciative and acknowledging of the work that Harmeet Dylan has been doing at the Civil Rights Division.
Although I have been politely nudging and reminding of Tina Peters, who could be taken into federal martial custody, as explained by a great many lawyers, American lawyers, and that has yet happened, has yet to happen.
Maybe they're waiting for the Colorado Court of Appeal to adjudicate on the appeal and dismiss the charges or set her free, or they're waiting for the Colorado governor to set her free.
Maybe there's strategizing in the backdrop and they just hope that Tina Peters doesn't die in jail or get beaten to death in jail because she was recently assaulted again.
So in as much as we have always been appreciative and acknowledging of Harmeet Dylan's advances in the civil rights division, a remind of Tina Peters, because time is of the essence.
And bad things happen in jail.
So that's, there's that.
Harmeed comes out and tweets: ululating doubters/slash black pillars and pannikins, get out the hot sauce because you're about to eat your words.
So proud to work with A.G. Pambonte, the whole civil rights crew, and our law enforcement partners.
A ton of work and steps went into these rapid arrests.
Now, I'll pause it there for one second and just say, I was not one of them saying, you know, arrest these MFers right now.
People were saying that.
They arrest them.
The evidence is there.
Just go do it now.
And then the replies at the time were: this isn't the movies.
You don't go in overnight.
It takes time.
You got to go through the procedure.
All right.
That's a totally agreed.
I said, you know, a week, two weeks before anybody can really start complaining that nothing's been done.
They did it within Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, four or five days.
Good.
They showed that it can be done in four or five days.
And so you'll tell me, like, maybe I'm, maybe I've lost track of what qualifies as an asshole response.
This was my response to Harmee Dylan, the use of the black pillars pannikins.
I said, using the term black pillars to dismiss legitimate concerns, criticisms is getting old.
And you have to appreciate what a double-edged sword your post is.
Yes, you got the arrests that can indeed, yes, you have confirmed that arrests can indeed come within a week.
Great.
That makes it all the more questionable why Bondi waited until the eve of the statute of limitations to bring weak sauce charges against James Comey.
Weak sauce is a bit of a cliche term, so maybe I shouldn't have used that, but that's not insulting.
It makes it all the more questionable why people are being dismissed as black pillars for observing that Bondi has made zero deep state arrests after one full year.
I presume the argument is going to be that harder cases take more time to build, but that wouldn't explain the tardiness of Comey's weak sauce charges now dismissed and potentially barred by the statute of limitations.
You remember I had another, it wasn't even a back and forth because she wouldn't respond to my question, which was a legitimate question.
It's like, I appreciate RICO and conspiracy control the statute of limitations or ongoing conspiracy.
You know, the statute of limitations starts from every act of an ongoing conspiracy.
I was like, well, that's an additional level of argumentation.
Why would you want to have that argument to raise instead of just bringing the charges within the statute of limitations?
And instead of replying to my post, she replies to Kyle Serafin's joke about her microphone not working.
Not even something I did.
And I said, don't reply to his sass.
Reply to my question.
Legitimate question.
Like, okay, fine.
I appreciate RICO conspiracy, but would it not be strategically best to not have to worry about making arguments that are exceptions to the ordinary running of the statute of limitations?
I never got a response.
So the facts behind that indictment, that of James Comey, had been known for years, and they had.
It cannot explain the absence of charges against Adam Schiff.
The facts behind that scumbag have been known for years.
So I did use an insult.
It was to Adam Schiff, needless shifty eyes make shift for brains.
And I remorselessly needled that man, who oddly enough hasn't blocked me.
Adam Schiff, the lying about the Russia collusion, the lies that he said to the public.
He's seen smoking gun evidence of Russia collusion.
It was a lie.
It was the most mischievous, deceitful of lies because he made a lie that he knew nobody could contradict without violating the confidentiality provisions of those hearings.
He is among the worst men, people in America known for years.
Now, we're getting close to a decade.
And then the argument is going to be: well, okay, it's part of an ongoing conspiracy, so we're going to go prosecute him for lying, I don't know, under oath.
Criminal, I don't know what to go after for making overtly false statements that you knew were false because of your privileged access to documentation and you knew that nobody could contradict your lie without violating confidentiality provisions.
So there's no excuse for that.
The fact that charges can be brought within a week severely undermines the argument we have been hearing as Nauseum typo that one year is not enough time to bring meaningful charges against deep state targets.
Please appreciate that before calling people black pillars for stating the obvious.
Respectfully submitted.
And again, I reiterate my open invitation for you to come on my show.
Come on anytime.
And then this is where, you know, there's that old joke, like, and that's when the fight broke out, or that's when the fight started.
She, she, I mean, I say it's disappointing.
I'm not, I'm not sensitive.
It is, it's just disappointing when behavior that you would not accept, expect from, I don't, I don't use the word allies.
I wouldn't use the word friend.
People who you respect when they behave in a way that is absolutely not just unbecoming.
It's unfair.
Unfair in not like the emotional sense.
That was a legitimate question, a legitimate query.
I've asked Harmee to come on many times to have this discussion publicly because, hey, look, I'm not a criminal lawyer, never have been, not an American lawyer, probably never will be.
I don't ever want to practice law again because it's a game of disgusting nastiness, politics, corruption, pushing paper.
And then all that you have to do is end up in front of a corrupt judge who says, Yeah, thank you for all your hard work and tolling.
But no.
And the judge is the god of the courtroom.
This was the response.
What's getting old is your complete ignorance of federal criminal procedure, Canadian podcaster.
Go grift elsewhere.
Sick of it.
Like, what's what's what's I what's fundamentally ridiculous, I mean, for lack of a better word, is it's from her personal account.
Now, I posted this in our locals community and someone said, well, why did you reply to her personal account and not her government account?
I was just replying from the account from which she put her post.
Didn't actually realize it was her personal account at the time.
And it doesn't even matter.
This was the discussion, a reply to a post that she put on Twitter.
And I'm getting like Canadian podcaster.
How original?
How freaking original?
You know what other names the people who call me Canadian podcasters also call me?
Jew.
Hey, nice opinion, Jew.
Nobody asked you.
Go back to Israel.
Nobody ever says go back to Israel.
They say go back to Canada.
But the same people who reduce me to my country of origin are the same people who reduce me to my ethnicity, religion.
It's so childish.
And to be coming from the civil rights, the head of civil rights from her personal account, fine.
And then she blocks me.
And I say, it's just, it's unbelievable.
This is like, this is, I don't know, if it's a tough question to answer, maybe reflect on the question.
Maybe reflect on like, we're being told on the one hand, you know, it doesn't happen overnight.
And nobody's, you know, nobody says bust in there and do it.
It's not like a type of felony that requires busting in and arresting somebody for murder.
It doesn't happen overnight, but it happened within the week.
Simultaneously being told, it's a year.
It's one year since Trump was elected by the grace of God.
And then maybe the answer, maybe the explanation is there's ongoing investigations.
We can't talk about them.
You have Trump at the WEF saying arrests for the deep state are coming.
Some people take that to mean Trump is summarizing what's going on behind the scenes.
I might view that as Trump putting Pam Bondi in a position now where she has to arrest some deep face.
So somebody say, oh, he's telling you what's going on behind the scenes.
And I might say he's making what's going on behind the scenes happen.
In as much as the Comey charges came, what, a few days a week after Trump's accidental truth post, what was apparently supposed to be a tweet, a text to Pam Bondi.
Why isn't anybody getting arrested?
And then James Comey gets arrested.
And then the charges get dismissed by an activist judge who says Halligan wasn't properly appointed.
Okay, one thing is predictable.
You're going to deal with activist judges.
You're going to deal with corrupt judges.
And so don't wait until the last day to file charges that if they get dismissed by a corrupt judge, you're going to have to argue statute of limitations to bring them back in.
You didn't need to wait nine months or six months or five months to bring those two lying under oath or what was it, the charged against Comey.
Two lying, two charges for that.
It had been known for how many years?
And so instead, you get backed into a corner where the president accidentally puts you on blast.
You then have to act at the last minute with two weak sauce charges.
Sorry for the cliche that get dismissed.
Now you got to appeal them because you can't refile them because the statute of limitations has passed, despite assurances of the statute of limitations is not issued.
This is not blackpilling.
This is not hating.
The best part is, and we're going to do this.
Like, they say don't read replies on Twitter, but I'm a glutton for punishment.
You go read the replies.
I love you, Viva, but you're kind of blackpilling.
Please stop attacking people who are doing their best fighting all this inside pushback from Biden.
Barack, I've been reading a lot of posts in the less because of negative attacks.
I said, oh, was that because of the negative attacks on our own people?
There was no negative attack on our own people.
This is reality.
You're fighting the deep state.
It's nice that you can arrest people who interfere at a church.
But the deep state, it's the difference between administering the justice system and reforming it.
And reform is needed.
Otherwise, all of these Trump administrators get impeached, get convicted, get lawfared into jail, lawfared into bankruptcy.
And then people say, you're Canadian, go back, go back to that.
First of all, I pay taxes in America.
The idea that I have no right to air legitimate grievances or questions, but the idea that you address the concerns by writing off the individuals, just calling them names, black pill pannikins.
Everything we do is good enough.
And don't worry.
It takes time.
Although we can do it in a week sometimes, it takes time and nothing's happened in a year.
It's all going to happen.
And then, look, hopefully, fingers crossed, it does happen.
And then the question is always going to be: was it always going to happen despite the pressure of people who want the administration to succeed?
I see people saying, it's a good thing you can't vote.
One person said it's a good thing you can't vote.
I say, I would have voted for Trump three times if I could.
Oh, sorry.
What's that?
No, that's just that's just that's just that's exactly what you do with people that you hate.
Oh, what's that?
This is exactly what you do.
You associate yourself with organizations that you hate.
It's a miracle by the grace of capital G God that Trump won that election.
A year into the administration, if you cannot handle the legitimate questions of the people who have been the most vocal supporters and not guardians, but people who want to see the administration succeed, and you go and you block and you call reduce a Canadian podcaster.
Oh, how original.
Well, I've never heard that before.
Call me a short Jew next time.
Like, let's just, let's just go all aspects of identity politics.
And so it's very, very disappointing.
I remember when I had Win Kyle Serafin, who is a very proud troll, like a reply guy, but not in the good reply, guys.
And he makes fun of Harmeet for not having had a mic when she was making the statement about statute limitations, RICO, conspiracy charges.
Don't worry about the statute limitations.
I was like, don't reply to Kyle.
If it's true and what you're saying is true, and we do not have reason or, you know, there's not good reason to be concerned that things are not happening fast enough because you're nine months, not even eight months away now from a potential shift in power, then have the discussion, explain it.
Yeah, I'm not an American lawyer.
I'm a Canadian podcaster, proudly living in the free state of Florida and grateful for the freedom that this administration, you know, when I moved down, it was under the Kamala Harris administration.
There were, yeah, had she won, you know, my future here might have been, you know, in a little bit more state, a precarious state.
If, you know, Kamala Harris comes down and says, yeah, the guy that was actively supporting and defending the Jan 6 is, yeah, we don't really like that guy.
Gavin Newsom Overreacted 00:04:18
You imagine the degree to which I say defend like they needed my defense stood up for the Jan 6 victims of persecution.
And why were they persecuted?
Because of inherent weaponized corruption, that if it doesn't get reformed between now and the results of November, you might have big problems ever reforming it.
And everyone now saying more times, just stop being a black pillar pannikin will face impeachment, will face the weaponization on steroids of the very same DOJ that might change hands in 2028.
It was just, it was fundamentally very, very disappointing.
I've never been, I can be rude.
I can be an asshole and I can acknowledge it.
I'm shocked that Gavin Newsom might not know who I am.
Who the hell am I?
Gavin Newsom hasn't blocked me.
Shifty Shift for Brains makeshift face has not blocked me.
Ratskin Raskin has not blocked me.
And by the way, if they were to call me an asshole, I would absolutely acknowledge yes.
I don't think I'm an asshole without substance, but I'm definitely an asshole when it comes to them.
This question, absolutely legitimate.
Okay, so things can be done within a week.
When there's a will, there's a way.
It's been a year.
And now Trump has to go in front of the world at Davos and say, yep, there will be deep state arrests.
They can't not happen now.
And then the question is only, is Trump saying what's going on behind the scenes or is Trump putting the pressure on Bondi right now to finally, after a year, it's good to arrest the whack jobs with a fuck Trump hat and a beard who thinks he's got a messiah complex.
It's easy to go after the low-hanging fruits and then say, look what we can do.
And then block.
That's what you can do.
There's what you can do, what's being done, and what needs to be done.
And what needs to be done for the time being doesn't look like it has been done.
And whether or not things are going on behind the scenes, my goodness, just some public assurances would be great.
Well, that's all I have to say about that.
And I would even take it personally.
Yeah, you know, I overreacted.
Nobody apologizes anymore.
I mean, I still do apologize.
But even, yeah, I overreacted.
Shouldn't have said it.
I'm sorry.
Sorry.
I'm sorry.
Just, you know, hey, let's have the discussion, Hermit.
Come on to the channel.
Whatever you can discuss, but it's not your DOJ.
I appreciate you're in the civil rights division and you're doing great work there.
I do think that the Tina Peters case is a dire emergency, a life and death emergency.
I had on Stuart Rhodes of the Oath Keepers, who had his map to freeing Tina Peters, or at least taking her into federal custody.
Taking a corpse into federal custody is not as good as taking a woman, gold star grandmother, gold star mom, sorry, into federal custody.
So you get credit for the great work that's being done at the civil rights division, and you get pressure for Tina Peters because it's time sensitive.
And Pam Bondi can get credit.
Reduction in crime is very nice.
That is administration.
The DOJ and the FBI need reform.
And that reform comes from going after the people who tried to take a hot steaming dump on democracy in order to preserve it in 2020.
That justice needs to come for the people who participated in the January 6th persecution, the weaponization of all aspects of the federal government for four years.
And I would also say that has to be full justice for the people who had a hand, actively or passively, in what in any realm of the alternative universe that we live in would have seen Trump dead that day.
And by the grace of God, a butterfly flapping its wings in Japan, Trump survived.
And it's been a year.
And it's getting critical.
And blocking, calling black pillars.
I'm Canadian.
Can't help where I was born.
Go Raid Redacted 00:06:21
I'm short.
Too late for taking growth hormones.
And that's that.
Now, I've got to end the show relatively early because I'm going to go on with Owen Schroer in a bit.
So there might not be a viva barneslaw.locals.com after party.
But let me see what's going on with Lucy the dog.
Thank you very much.
I'm not looking for flattery.
NeuroDivergent says, hey, David, Rumble is acting weird.
Just in case that didn't show up in your Rumble rants, I'll drop it here.
And it says from NeuroDivergent, thank you, Neuro is the moderator here, does amazing work.
David wanted to get a shout out for the Jack Show being hosted by Cecil Says tonight at 10 p.m. on Rumble.
He was booted from Commitube.
Check it out.
What Rumble, what Rumble is doing is revolutionary.
It's reform.
And I'll be in El Salvador on stage with Paolo Ardorino, the CEO of Tether, and Chris Pavlovsky.
I think, Chris, actually, I'm going to be on stage with the CEO of Tether for sure.
We're going to be talking about the innovations, what Tether is doing for Rumble, and what Rumble is doing for the world.
Reform, not just administration.
And, oh, hold on a second.
Why did I take that out?
I wanted to see what we got here.
Sorry, this.
And then what do we got up here?
Viva, brace yourself, bro, Bongino.
Maybe he hasn't.
Bongino hasn't blocked me.
I don't think I've been.
Look, I've never called Bongino a Natan.
And some people don't like that.
I've been not just, I don't want to say sympathetic, it's almost condescending.
I've been understanding and giving the benefit of the doubt.
And I think based on Bongino's one of his more recent posts, that's sort of indication that what I've been saying from the beginning is accurate.
It's just up to you to decide whether or not that's sufficient for your palate.
That was Roosting.
Then we got Joe Maskey, who says, It has always been a mistake to let the left own the streets.
They are emboldened, storming the church, sit-ins at corporate offices and government buildings.
This is done as a matter of course on the left, Viva.
It has always been a mistake to let them bully us with the heckler's vote.
No, you're not going to get me to disagree with that.
Team Blue needs tragedies for the B-roll.
Okay, that's not what we got there.
So, what we're going to do, let me just make sure that I didn't miss another one, is we are going to go raid.
I believe it's going to be redacted.
Before you go, everybody, subscribe.
If you want to support the channel, you can join us at vivabarnslaw.locals.com.
Confirm resubmission.
You can support us at vivabarnslaw.locals.com.
If you want to tip with crypto, download the rumble wallet.
Here, check this out.
Is this me?
Download the rumble.
Oh, why did I just pause?
Want to tip with crypto?
Download the rumble wallet.
How did I know he was going to say that?
You can go here, download the rumble wallet from what's it called?
The Google Play or Apple.
You can go to tip, you go scan that QR code.
Not only, don't necessarily do it only to tip.
You can invest and you can hold crypto at your own risks and peril, people.
This is not financial advice.
Scan the QR code.
You can transfer, tip in crypto.
You can transfer or tip in gold.
And if you want to redeem your gold and you want to justify a massive vacation to Switzerland, you can go and redeem your actual tether X-A-U-T for physical gold in the vault in Switzerland where they hold it.
And why doesn't it look like it's this?
No, not that one.
This one right here.
What did I do?
I think I just yeted it out.
Anyhow, that's it.
And I'll get to the chat in a bit.
Jinja Ninja says, she showed a major character shortcoming with that response.
It would have been better if she just blocked you.
And we could assume she misunderstood.
All things come to mind are worse than all the things that come to mind are worse than Canadian podcasts.
Podcaster.
I mean, first, what a silly thing to say, considering Bongino's coming back to the podcasting world.
So it's either not something to be ashamed of and something to be proud of, or it's something to be ashamed of.
It's like, he's just a Canadian podcaster.
Anyhow, that's it.
I don't hold grudges because it requires having a good memory and I don't remember who to hold grudges against, but that's what's going on in the news today.
Now, let me go see who is on.
We're going to raid.
What day is it?
Thursday.
Do I have it?
Well, maybe I'll just go raid Owen Schroyer.
No, I'm, I want to raid redacted, but I don't know that they're live yet.
Redacted news.
Okay, hold on.
Redacted news.
And they are live.
Okay, we're going to go raid redacted.
They were not yet on the spot.
So go raid redacted.
Let them know from whence he came.
Come on over to vivabarnslaw.locals.com.
No, That's not going to raid.
I don't want to raid in their chat.
I want to raid in ours.
I'm going to get myself blocked by redacted again.
I'm joking.
Some people don't like some people don't like people posting links in the chat.
So let's go raid redacted and say hi for me.
Bada bing, bada boom.
And come over to vivabarnslaw.locals.com is going to be a short one because I'm going to go live with Schroyer, Owen Schroyer, at 4:15.
Give or take.
And let me see where Owen is right now.
And I can give everybody the link that we're raiding redacted.
Owen Schroyer.
Live.
Here we go.
Boom, boom.
And here.
He's doing an ad and link to Owen with the typo.
Boom.
I just spelled own.
So that's actually even better.
All right, guys, thank you for being here.
Godspeed.
Don't lose faith.
Don't lose hope.
Don't think that you're being a good custodian by not keeping pressure on and not demanding accountability and transparency for that matter.
Most transparent administration.
Let's not forget it.
That means you can block trolls, but it means answering people with a track record of proven sincerity and legitimate questions.
And that's that.
All right.
So go forth and I'll see you on Owen Schroyer.
For those who are coming, we'll have a five-minute after-party on locals.
Export Selection