All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 26, 2025 - Viva & Barnes
01:17:09
Better Late Than Never! Free Tina Peters! Mark Levin is a Nutbag! Nick Shirley is a LEGEND & MORE!

Support Viva: GET MERCH! www.vivafrei.com BUY A BOOK! https://amzn.to/4qBXikS SEND ME SOMETHING! David Freiheit 20423 SR 7 Ste F6319 Boca Raton 33498 TIP WITH CTYPTO! bc1qt0umnqna63pyw5j8uesphsfz0dyrtmqcq5ugwm THAT IS ALL!

|

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, in this throwback, we're going to watch a judge sentence Tina Peters in her state election interference conviction in the commie hellhole of Colorado.
You will look at this judge and you will listen to this judge and you will think you are listening to a screeching teenager throwing a hissy fit that he or she was not allowed to get the new Game Boy.
Yes, I said Game Boy.
That's how old I am.
This judge shows you the risks of judicial activism from the bench.
We watched this back in the day, but we're going to refresh our memories before covering the Tina Peters latest developments.
Behold!
Dramatic pause.
You have- You have no qualms with violating the court's orders because you're innocent, because you didn't do anything wrong.
You were just doing your job.
You have no problem trying to kick an officer.
Your explanation about what happened is preposterous.
It's on video.
You have no problem lying to officers.
It's happened multiple times.
They're recorded conversations.
Just so we remember the context here, this is the judge talking to Tina Peters right before sentencing her to nine years for so-called election interference.
The kicking of the judge was apparently when she was being dragged out of some restaurant.
I forget even the context.
It's outlandish how the judge characterizes what was allegedly caught on video.
You have no problem lying.
Dramatic pauses.
This judge is an activist and a reckless, dangerous judicial activist at that.
Let's keep playing.
It's just more lies.
No objective person believes them.
No, at the end of the day, you cared about the Jets, the podcast, and the people finding over you.
You abdicated your position as a servant to the Constitution, and you chose you over all else.
Yes, you are a charlatan, and you cannot help but lie as easy it is for you to breathe.
Does everybody remember this back in the day?
This is the judge referring to the defendant as a charlatan.
You can't help but lie as casually as you breathe.
This is a gold star mother.
This woman, no criminal record.
Her son died.
It was either in service or in training.
A gold star mom.
And this charlatan on the bench berates her because he has the monopoly of the mic.
You betrayed your oath for no one other than you.
And this is what makes Miss Peters such a danger to our community.
Miss Peters, Tina Peters, Gold Star mother, grandmother, a danger to the community.
In this wacko judge's eyes, this woman, no criminal record, she was, I think, late 60s at the time, is a danger to the community.
How?
It's the position she held that has provided her the pulpit from which she can preach these lies.
The undermining of our democratic process, the undermining of the belief and confidence in our election systems.
It's not about questioning it.
No one says you can't question, you can't ask.
It's completely different.
And if you don't understand that distinction, then there's nothing I can say or do here today that will change your mind.
By the way, the classic argument of a loser lefty, you know, what you said was a lie.
And if I can't explain it to you, there's nothing I can do.
You know.
It's the classic, you know, I'm not explaining it.
This guy is an absolute nutbag, but not the only nutbag that we're going to talk about today.
So the damage that has caused and continue to be caused is just as bad, if not worse, than the physical violence that this court sees on an all too regular basis.
Understand what that sack of shit.
I'm sorry, I'm doing it.
I've been biting my tongue.
That sack of shit just said, what she did in terms of questioning the election, trying to preserve evidence of what she believed to be election fornification was worse than the violence that the court sees on a daily basis.
Why did he have to say that?
Because he sentenced Tina Peters to longer than some rapists get sentenced to at the state level in Colorado.
He sentenced Tina Peters, a gold star mom, late 60s, no criminal record, to longer than violent criminals in that commie hellhole state, Colorado.
That's what he just said.
And it's particularly damaging when those words come from someone who holds a position of influence like you.
It's such performative rubbish.
I hope you don't mind me pausing and talking because I get yelled at when I talk over it.
Performative rubbish.
This is a man with, I won't say immeasurable power, but more power than he deserves and more power than a corrupt sack of shit like him should ever have.
You know, the old expression, absolute power corrupts absolutely.
It's not true because you give good people power and it won't necessarily corrupt them.
In fact, the only way to test whether or not someone is corrupt is to give them power.
Nobody's corrupt or prove that they're not corrupt until they've had the power to do something corrupt and choose not to.
This judge had the power and chose to exercise it in a corrupt, abusive manner that might cost a woman the rest of her life.
And I say the rest of her life because she's only sentenced to nine years.
At 60, someone, I think she's 70.
Health issues.
I think she suffered from cancer.
Two years could be the rest of this woman's life.
Six months could be the rest of this woman's life.
And so while the rest of us clamor to free Tina Peters, to implore the Trump administration to do something, anything, and they have things within their power that they can do, this judge basically sentenced a gold star mom to a death sentence.
And he was very happy to do it because she's a risk to society.
And she is actually worse than some of the violent criminals that the Colorado state courts see on a daily basis.
Every effort to undermine the integrity of our elections and public's trust in our institutions has been made by you.
You've done it from that lectern the voting public provided you with.
Everything you've done has been done to retain control, influence.
The damage is immeasurable.
Everything you've done is to retain control, influence.
Confession through projection from a typical leftist whack job.
And every time it gets refuted, every time it's shown to be false, just another tale is weaved.
Dramatically.
So I'll begin by saying I've considered all of those purposes of staying of an execution of a sentence.
I've mentioned all of them here generally in my comments already.
And I find that a stay of any sentence I impose would be wholly unwarranted.
All cases have a possibility of reversal on appeal, no doubt.
I'm at peace with all the decisions I've made here.
He's at peace with the fact that he's going to sentence her notwithstanding the appeal at the time.
He's at peace with the fact that he's not going to sentence her to no time or probation.
He's at peace with the fact that he might kill a woman.
That is dangerous.
That is worse than the crime that you see on the streets.
Because at least those guys, the criminals on the streets, never swore an oath.
They didn't swear to uphold justice.
He's at peace with issuing a potential death sentence to a gold star mom because he doesn't like her politics.
If anything, I gave you and your counsel far too much leeway at times, but the rulings I made came after much consideration, incredible amounts of internal debate, and I trust in accordance with the applicable law.
I'm going to stop at this point.
I consider the sentence here in this case would be available to me.
Okay, so we go into probation, we go into short criminal sentences, yada, yada, yada.
He goes on for another two and a half minutes and then says, no, you've got to go to jail.
And you've got to go to jail for a long time.
It duly meets the purposes of sentencing in this matter.
And therefore, the sentence and judgment of the court.
Zero needs that would be met by probation is the very definition of unduly depreciating the significance of what it is that you've done here.
Sit through all that two minutes of rambling.
I'm not going to sentence you to probation because you will not have learnt anything because you didn't say I love Big Brother and lick the boot.
So I'm sentencing you to long, hard prison or whatever, state jail, whatever you want to call it.
The harm that you've caused our community and continue to cause.
Continue to cause.
Community corrections is the same.
So prison is the only place that duly meets the purposes of sentencing in this matter.
And therefore, the sentence and judgment of the court is as follows.
As to counts one and four, the judgment and sentence of the court is three and a half years in the Department of Corrections.
Those sentences will be concurrent to each other.
As to count two, the judgment and sentence of the court is three and a half years, consecutive to counts one and four.
As it relates to the misdemeanor charges, count eight is 120 days in the Mesa County detention facility, concurrent to count nine and ten, which will be six months in the Mesa County detention facility.
Consecutive to consecutive, not concurrent, consecutive, one after the other.
Just stealing a woman's life.
By the way, you remember what happened in Colorado?
Investigation finds Colorado election passwords were posted unintentionally.
Denver-based law firm recommends updates to computer and password policies.
Found no ill will in Secretary of State's office leaks.
This is the same state where they just sentenced Tina Peters and where she's rotting away in a prison cell.
Why did I bring that up?
Because I didn't get to it yesterday, and I very much meant to.
Tina Peters posted a Christmas Day post on X.
And, you know, the news cycle is what it is, where people sometimes tend to forget what's going on in the world once you move on to the next news cycle.
Let me bring it up here because we need to read through it.
And you forget that there's a woman languishing in some commie hellhole jail.
And people just move on.
Hold on a second.
I had it in the backdrop here.
I'm going to have to go to my Twitter feed.
All right.
Hold on.
Let me see.
It's high time.
Here we go.
Message from Tina Peters.
It's time.
You know, the administration knows about it, but it wouldn't hurt to remind.
I have too many windows open in the backdrop.
That's the problem here.
Tina Peters.
Tweet.
This is very annoying.
Give me one second here.
Okay.
Hold up.
Bringing it up.
And then I'll explain why it looks like I might be in a scene of Dexter behind me.
Message from Tina Peters in prison on Christmas Day.
As I sit here alone in my cell on Christmas Eve, I'm reminded of the wonderful past holidays with friends and family.
I mean, that is the most tragic, depressing first sentence of, you know, a book.
This is a woman languishing in jail now, just remembering the joys of freedom, remembering the joys and beauty of family.
Like most, I was totally unaware of so many like me who live in the reality of prison away from their loved ones in a harsh environment like this.
Some people live safe, hoping to avoid the pain of loss and hardship.
They never learn to truly live and don't value freedom and liberty.
This prison and those in it. are becoming hopeful.
They see the courage only God can give me and come up to introduce themselves or yell my name across the yard or chow hall.
I blush and tap my heart.
There lives matter as a business owner for 32 years when I decided to run for Mesa Kanek clerk.
My experience told me that I can fix those wait times at the DMV.
I never expected that as an elected official, because I said yes to God, he would use me to reveal the most egregious secret of all time, the theft of your voice and your vote.
I'm here because I had to be punished and made an example of.
They couldn't scare me to retract what I said and forget what I saw.
I wouldn't give in, back down, or give up, even here and now through you.
I continue to speak out, call out those who do wrong.
You must continue to stand strong.
Now is the time.
All these criminals, all these criminals, as these criminals, continue to be exposed.
We will need good and honest Americans ready to stand up and take their places in government.
Get prepared and study up to be ready to run your own government, strive to become the next leaders this country will surely need as the dominoes continue to fall.
Thank you, Mr. President, real Donald Trump, for my pardon.
We all love and admire you for your bravery and willingness to stand up to the evil regardless of the cost.
The cost of doing so is great, but the reward of doing what is honorable and right far outweighs the pain.
Today, we are grateful, most of us, most of all, for the birth of our Lord Jesus Christ, for God choosing a man like our great president to run this country, and for people like all of you who are willing to step up and fill the gaps.
Pray the Lord will seek fit to have me complete this mission and leave this awesome, leave this place very soon.
I want to move on to restoring our elections before the midterms.
Please remember those that are incarcerated.
There is a plan to fix this corrupt system and bring freedom, lasting freedom to the captives.
God bless you all.
Treasure your family.
Protect liberty and freedom.
Live life on purpose.
The time is short.
Everyone can do something.
They can't get us all Merry Christmas.
And love always, Tina Peters.
Support Tina at tinapeters.us.
So for those of you who didn't know, Trump issued a pardon to Tina Peters, a federal pardon.
And for those of you, there's some lessons of law that I've, you know, that we've all learned over the years.
And we sort of repeat reflexively, like, oh, yeah, that's right.
Federal pardons only pardon federal crimes.
They don't pardon state crimes.
We all know this.
It's a tenet of law.
Doesn't mean you can't try to raise the argument.
It doesn't mean you can't hope that there might be trickle-down consequences of a federal pardon, which we are all hoping there will be.
But as the basics of law goes, a federal pardon only pardons federal crimes, not state convictions.
That's why Dexter Taylor is sitting there rotting away in his gulag in New York.
Tina Peters as well, because these are state convictions.
And they say, you know, you get a federal pardon.
You can no longer plead the fifth.
That's not true necessarily because you can still face state charges.
And so you can plead the fifth for self-incrimination at the state level.
Well, her attorneys are asking for her sentence to be tossed because of the federal pardon.
I don't see it going anywhere, but that's not the only remedy that Tina Peters can have.
And that might not be where the administration, the Trump administration is going after having issued the federal pardon.
This is from Colorado Newsline.
Tina Peter asks Colorado Appeals Court to order her release after Trump pardon.
Chase Woodruff, attorneys for Tina Peters this week asked the Colorado Court of Appeals to order that former Mesa County clerk must be released from custody for it with following the signing of a pardon document by President Donald Trump earlier this month.
Trump does not have the power to pardon Peters, who was convicted in state court and is now serving a nine-year sentence in state prison for her role in a breach of her office's election systems, part of an attempt to find evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election.
But her attorneys pursued a presidential pardon anyway, expressing hope that the conservative majority of the U.S. Supreme Court will rewrite the centuries-old legal doctrine of dual sovereignty in criminal proceedings.
Peters' motion, the latest in a series of attempts by her attorneys and allies in the election conspiracy theory movement to force her release from state custody, was filed on December 23rd in her pending case before Colorado Second Highest Court, where she appealed her August 24 conviction, arguing that her imprisonment violates her First Amendment rights of free speech.
But that's, you know, you heard the judge say, no, no, I'm going to sentence you anyhow, notwithstanding your appeal.
Sure, it might get overturned on appeal, but fuck you, basically, is what he said.
The new filing asked the Court of Appeals to enter an order indicating that it has lost jurisdiction and finding that the pardon, which was issued on December 5th, was effective and visciated the convictions against Tina Peters in the state, Colorado, in the state of Colorado.
I haven't been able to get a copy of the, not of the, of the pardon, of the motion.
I would have very much liked to have seen what the motion said before going live, but couldn't find it.
I'm not convinced it's been made publicly accessible yet.
But that's what's going on.
The judge sentenced her anyway, notwithstanding appeal.
She's appealing.
She gets a pardon.
There are other remedies that we're hoping the Trump administration employs in order to free Tina Peters.
And one is to declare her a whistleblower witness and take her into federal custody on the basis that she is a whistleblower of federal election crimes.
I don't know how that's going to work.
I know the limitations of my own expertise, acquired knowledge.
I will definitely, we've discussed it before with Barnes, Robert Barnes, during our Sunday show, Viva and Barnes, Law for the People.
But we have fleshed this out: that one of the ways to get Tina Peters out of that Colorado state prison hellho, where she's been violently attacked, apparently, multiple times, is to declare her a whistleblower.
Federal marshals come and take her into custody for federal whistleblower protection.
It can be done.
It should be done.
And if enough people with a bullhorn, even if it's out of a bathroom, implore the Trump administration and implore people out there to not forget about Tina Peters on the one hand and to implore the Trump administration to be not just proactive.
What do you think Democrats would be doing right now?
Now, I don't say break the law and abuse of the law to get people out of jail because they're your political allies.
This is an absolute injustice.
It's time to, you know, play proactive and play for keeps because that's what's at stake here.
They locked up a woman, an older gold star mom, for nine years because they didn't like her politics.
You sure as hell can fight tooth and nail to free her.
And it's about time that we start doing that.
Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, how goes the battle?
Viva Fry.
So we had a bit of an issue, nothing too serious.
You know, weather, dust, allergies, and all that together resulted in having to go see a doctor, which left me.
You're not supposed to say babysitting your own kids, but there was a, yeah, we, so we had that of a hiccup today.
I am telling you, Once you realize that you don't have to live through these winters, that there's an alternative.
You say, like, holy crap, did I do that my entire life and convinced myself that I loved winter because it's so nice and beautiful and the snow's making like beautiful crystals in the sky?
Oh, it's so beautiful.
Yeah, it's like we were biking by a lake where we had actually just cleared a little bit of snow to make an ice rink.
The water was not particularly thick.
I had a pickaxe, two solid strikes with a pickaxe that I could put a hole in the ice.
But I said, I saw kids, they made a little skating rink and they were like, you know, shooting a pucker on.
The skating rink was so small, they couldn't actually skate, but they had skates on.
They're just tossing a puck like 10 feet.
I'm like, holy crap, this is like, it's a winter prison.
I'm being glib.
Actually, winter is beautiful.
Flipping freezing.
So we went out onto the lake.
I call it Sisyphian work.
Like you shovel the snow, you know the ice is going to be pretty crappy underneath.
Like you're not going to be able to skate on it.
You're not going to make it big enough to be able to skate on.
And then, you know, you do the work, even though you know there's zero purpose for the work.
And it's just fun to be outside and breaking ice.
And we smashed a hole in the ice and then we pull up the water and try to spread it across the area that we just cleared to make it smooth, but you never make it smooth.
And then the more you walk in it, you end up getting your frozen treads in the ice.
And then it sucks, but it's a way to keep yourself busy and distracted during the blistering cold, four hours of sunlight, you know, in Canada.
Winter is good.
It builds character.
You know, that's true, but so do hurricanes.
Like, everyone's like, oh, well, we don't have hurricanes.
Like, dude, I'm not sure if I'm going to take six months of guaranteed winter, six hours of light, no vitamin D, guaranteed six months of that a year versus the potential for a hurricane that might destroy everything you have.
Maybe I, you know, maybe I'm talking too soon.
Touch wood.
I think if I didn't have family that I had to visit, wanted to visit, came back to visit, my goodness, I'd be on a beach somewhere in Florida right now.
So what's going on, everybody?
It is what day is it today?
Oh, by the way, okay, so we're going to have our Sunday show, Viva and Barnes, Law for the People.
We're going to have, I forget what, what's the date?
Hold on, get this.
Hold on one second.
Internet also seems to be relatively.
Can I not get this chat?
Hold on.
What if I go here?
I have to refresh.
Give me one second.
There you
go.
My goodness.
All right, there we go.
Disconnect.
Okay, does it now?
There you go.
Now I can get the thing off.
Excuse me.
The internet also is wildly slow.
Now I forgot.
We just got raided.
Who did we get raided by?
Did someone just say, did someone just say something bad about me?
No sound black screen.
Yeah, no, I know because I took Viva fixing something.
Be right back.
Thank you, Jacob Casser.
Did someone just say Viva Oopsie?
Oh, yeah, we got raided by Angry Conservative 1981.
All right.
Well, speaking of angry conservatives, people, we're going to go into something that's been there's been a lot of, I won't say infighting.
It's surprising.
It feels a little bit like Operation Cointel Pro.
It feels a little bit like people are picking unnecessary fights that might be productive in the long run, entertaining in the short term, but destructive in the short term.
Do you notice that everybody is fighting with everybody, literally?
And that includes me just, you know, fighting with whoever I think is in the wrong on that particular day.
You got Candace Owens fighting with everybody, virtually everybody.
She's not fighting with Tucker that I know of.
She's not fighting with Megan Kelly that I know of.
I'm not saying that to be glib.
Candace put out a tweet earlier today that says the French government, the Israeli government, Alex Jones, everybody, all fighting against me.
And I was half tempted just to like state the obvious that if everybody is fighting with you, it's not necessarily a sign that you are all the more right.
It's sort of that old expression: if you know, before noon on your way to work, you pass one bad driver, that's the bad driver.
If you know, before noon, everybody on the road is a bad driver, you're the bad driver.
But I don't want to jump in on the frame, like again, like I don't have that much of an issue with Candace.
I think she crossed the line a couple of times, at least specifically mine was when she said Tim Poo was acting like a man who loses $100,000 and then comes home and beats his wife because he's having financial difficulties.
That's why he had his meltdown on Candace.
And then she goes on a week later to have her meltdown with Ben Shapiro.
And I actually had people in response to that where I said, like, Candace, you just called, when she goes out and Ben Shapiro is like, fuck you, Ben, and that midget horse you came in on.
And I'm like, didn't you just shit all over Tim Poole?
Because he called you an effing psycho.
See you next Tuesday, which he shouldn't have done, but whatever.
It's like, didn't you just call him a psycho for that?
And then I actually had someone, one of her followers say, well, she said F off very calmly and, you know, like charismatically.
Tim Poole was just having a girlish meltdown.
I'm like, oh my goodness.
So anyway, bottom line, you know, if you're on the road and there's one asshole driver, that person's the asshole.
But if you look around there, 10 asshole drivers around you, you might be the asshole driver.
The fact that so many people are fighting with Candace, seemingly right now, I don't know.
It's good for business, for I guess for everybody.
There's that.
Alex Jones has said, I've had enough.
Now I'm calling out Candace on all of this.
And I think Alex Jones is fighting the righteous fight.
You know, Candace could stand to learn a bit of the lessons that Alex Jones had to learn the hard way, Sandy Hook in particular.
It's not because we've been lied to about everything, that everything we're told is a lie.
I mean, you should healthily question everything, but you should also appreciate that just because they have lied to us about pretty much everything doesn't mean the earth is flat.
They've lied to you about everything, but if they tell you the earth is round, it doesn't mean that the earth is flat.
Then who's been the more recent infantry?
So you have then Ben Shapiro coming out and calling out Megan Kelly and Candace Owens.
And these are like kind of big voices on the right.
They're meaningful audiences.
They have meaningful influence in the political intellectual sphere.
Then you've got Mark Levin fighting with Jack Pasobic, the Certoviches of the world.
Like there's a fracture that need not exist that is starting to resemble something of an Operation Co-Intel Pro.
Just get everybody fighting among each other and nothing can get done.
And who benefits?
Key bueno?
Well, you know, a few people, depending on what your metric of benefit is.
Mark Levin, this is bringing this one up.
Mark Levin, look, I knew what I thought of people before I got into this sphere.
And it's funny, like the people who are on Fox News or the people who have their, you know, the people who present themselves with a certain air of intellectual superiority, it's good.
Images are important.
And maybe some people do better at managing images and do better at managing brand in terms of being taken seriously.
And the best one I can think of, and I actually, I think it's great and I think he works hard at it, is Michael Knowles.
Like there is something to be said about being clean-shaven, well-dressed, and airing a certain gravitas.
And Michael Knowles is amazing at it.
And no, but Mark Levin used to be good at it until he went off a Keith Olbermann batshit level whack job.
And you like, I was once going through his Twitter feed, Mark Levin's Twitter feed.
I'm like, this guy's, this is, this is, and maybe I'm not the, you know, the best person on earth to point these fingers at someone unless there'll be three pointing back at me.
He's batshit crazy.
And I can appreciate that some people would look at my Twitter feed and say, Viva's pretty crazy too.
Maybe.
But now the infighting of the everyone's accusing everyone of being fake shill grifters, not real Jews, not real Christians, not real blacks, not real Somali.
Like everyone is on the right engaging in what is just inherent.
I should not say everybody.
A lot of people on the right are engaging in what is nothing more than bona fide identity politics on steroids.
So-called Christians judging other Christians because of how they pray.
Someone say, I'm a Catholic and you shouldn't be holding your rosaries like that.
I'm a Catholic and this is performative fake nonsense.
I always say this.
If you start your sentence with as a or I am a blank, in order to say, therefore what I'm saying is even more true because I'm a blank.
As a Jew, I can tell you that this is offensive, horse crap.
When you have people lecturing other people on how to practice religion, I don't think the person lecturing the other is in the right.
And you had, what's his face here?
Mark Levin come out the other day.
Is this it?
Crackpot.
It's funny why I can't see these things when I put them on incognito.
You had Mark Levin come out the other day and call Jack Pesobic a crackpot.
And some people say, oh, you didn't call him a crackpot.
And I'm like, all right.
Oh, he blocked me.
Well, I say, you're unable to believe this because he lived at the pool.
And now I can't see it.
Well, we're going to have to go into, oh my goodness.
George wept.
How do I get down?
Go see.
Hold on.
I can't see this.
Did he get?
George wept.
Dude, I got blocked in the time that I went live because I dared come out and criticize a man who criticized Jack Pesobic.
This is so flipping cool.
Don't have to go.
That's funny.
I opened that.
When I opened it up before going live, I didn't have a problem seeing that tweet.
George, maybe he doesn't exist on the internet anymore.
Okay, hold on.
Give me one second.
I'm going to go to another browser and see what's going on here.
Hmm, this page doesn't exist.
Did he delete it?
Okay, chat, you're going to have to help me out here because I can't seem to find this now.
Hold on, hold up.
Wait a minute.
Did he block me or does the tweet no longer exist?
I'm going to give it to you.
You had someone calling Jack Pesobic, referring to him as holding the rosary when he came out at Anfest, like he was a vampire or Dracula.
Hold on a second.
Someone fighting off Dracula, something along those lines.
There was some stupid stupid tweet, like Jack Pesobic is holding his rosaries like someone who's fighting off vampires.
And then Mark Levin comes out and says, crackpot.
And then I said to Mark Levin, I think, isn't there a bit of a double standard here?
Like, Ben Shapiro and, you know, religious Jews will wear a keep up.
And that's like, that is a, it's basically, it's an outwardly visible method or practice of religion.
Now, the reality of it is it has to be bigger.
I think I remember this.
It has to be bigger than the palm of your hand, and it's to cover you from God to show subservience and respect to God.
It's like basically why all religions have something similar in terms of showing reverence to a higher power.
And I think it's a good thing to constantly remind yourself that there is something greater than you out there and that you are but a speck of stardust.
Oh, no links in the chat in the live chat.
Well, I'm going to go see if we can get it in vivabarnslaw.locals.com.
Guys, does everybody see that?
If I open it up again, you are unable to view this post because his account owners limit who can view the post.
Well, maybe he caught some flack for judging the way another man practices religion.
Mark Levin came out and said, crackpot in respect of Jack Pesobic.
And I said, that's amazing.
So Ben Shapiro wears a keepo.
That's fine.
Jack Pesobic comes out and shows his rosaries in what is obviously an outward display of religion to show his faith.
And he's a crackpot.
And then I just started going through, what's his face?
Mark Levin's Twitter feed.
And it's the stuff of nightmares.
Like, I thought I was crazy.
And if you go to Mark Levin's Twitter feed, but you have to go to the replies because it's in his replies where he truly shows what a psychopath he is.
Declaring war on Jack Pesobic.
But I want to go to some of these.
I want to go to some of the replies.
The replies at one point, I was looking at them and I was like, oh my God, did someone hack Mark Levin's accounts?
Because they were all like, your mom, your mom.
They were literally your mom replies.
Hey, Jack Pesobic, send me your address offline.
I want to send you a new big, beautiful rosary.
I believe in prayer.
I want you to pray and pray and do so as your beautiful faith teaches.
This sounds very, you don't argue religion and you sure as hell don't argue between religions.
It's all right, whatever.
I'm all for it.
I encourage God bless you for it.
Now, as for your actual conduct that I and others find so appalling, you will own up to your embrace of a self-identifying Islamist Nazi with whom you took the photo.
He's referring to Myron Gaines with his shirt that was a Holocaust.
I'm not even going to put the words in joke.
It's Edgelord shit posting.
Jack Pesobic took a picture.
There was a video there for 30 seconds.
Haha, shaking hands, taking the picture.
Now, now, Levin's lucky.
Like, I went to see, like, does Levin have any pictures with him and Harvey Weinstein?
Are there any pictures with him and Jeffrey Epstein?
You've said nothing about that.
That wasn't right, was it, Jack?
Will you reject him and stop promoting Jew hatred for which you have a significant record?
Oh, it shouldn't be that tough, should it, Jack?
By the way, repeating someone's name unnecessarily in a post online is a form of sociopathy narcissism.
I seriously doubt that TPUSA and Human Events, both of which you work for, now he's trying to get the guy fired, of people of faith in Goodwill Everywhere, think you should be conducting yourself in this way.
This is a man trying to get someone fired right now, trying to ruin his life economically after having religion shamed him.
This is crazy.
It's time to get this behind you and join the civilized world.
If you pray a little harder, I think you'll see that.
I certainly hope so.
God is very forgiving.
He loves all of his children.
And if you do, and if you do, I, for one, will then happily shake your hand.
You can do this, Jack.
This is crazy.
Here we go.
Here we go.
This is what I'm talking about.
Deport Mark Levin.
Low IQ nut.
I'm surprised Mark Levin thinks people listen to him.
I haven't cared to hear his opinion on anything at least 10 years.
Yet, here you are, Bob, his account.
Get lost, dummy.
Mark Levin is a traitor.
You're a slob, the enemy, moron.
This is crazy.
And I'm sorry to put you through this punishment to actually see this.
Mark Levin then went after Matt Gates.
Because, you know, if you want to, you know, ensure that you win the midterms and ensure that you win the next 2028 election, what you want to do is fight with alienate and try to religion, shame, and defame Matt Gates, Jack Visobic.
I won't name other names that I'm not sure have been involved in this fight yet.
But now, was it?
Let me see one thing here.
Ah, yes, here we go.
Here we go.
This was the one that where he's picking a fight with Megan Kelly.
It's a clip of Dan Bongino and Megan Kelly talking about how they love Mark Levin.
He loves that.
Oh, thanks, Meg, but I have standards.
You don't.
To which I did remember, like, I'm not going crazy.
I remember Mark Levin once being acutely interested in the Epstein files back when he thought he could use it to go after Ehud Barak, because, you know, politics is everything.
Put on the political blinders.
The Epstein files are useful to Mark Levin when he can use it to go after Ehud Baraka Lefty in the realm of Israeli politics.
Mark Levin, what is this?
2019.
Left-wing Daily Beast defends left-wing Ehud Barak, who visited left-wing serial sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's Island in an attack on Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu.
Then he writes, when was this one from?
I don't know where this one's from.
Recently.
Ehud Barak, radical leftist who has spent years trying to destroy Benjamin Netanyahu and embraced by America's media, is reportedly and allegedly among the Epstein sex pigs.
And then, because Mark Levin seemingly only has double standards, Mark Levin, Republicans can't waste our time on Epstein.
Hmm.
Interesting.
Why?
Not exactly.
I mean, is that intellectual and ideological consistency?
And the best one of the day is when he went after Matt Gates.
Let me just see something.
Is this right here?
Oh, no, no.
That's the other talking point in Epstein.
We're going to get to this one in a second.
Goes after Matt Gates using objectively defamatory terminology that doesn't, that he doesn't appreciate is exactly what the leftists attempt to use by way of rhetoric to go after Donald John Trump.
Where was it?
Well, okay, by the way, here, I can at least see the post now.
I forgot that I took a screenshot of it earlier.
George wept.
For the life of me, I cannot figure out how anyone falls for POS.
Oh, that's very funny.
Poso's shtick.
He comes out on stage with rosaries aloft as if he was fending off Dracula.
This guy is such a phony and a chaos agent.
He's among the worst grifters.
That was the tweet.
I'm glad I remember that.
Now, where was the one that I was interested in?
Mark Levinson going after going after Matt Gates.
How would we do?
Where is it?
It's here we go.
Here we go.
This is now Mark Levin going after Matt Gaetz, where Matt Gaetz says, I wonder what Fox News will do about the recent anti-Christian statements of Mark Levin.
Mark Levin says, I have Christian family members, you disgusting sexual predator.
Do you register with your local police department?
Do you have a monk shop like your buddy, Lowlife?
And like your buddy, I thought for a second that Mark had really lost his mind, but he didn't.
He's lost his mind so much.
He doesn't even understand that that's the connection.
I thought he was talking about Trump for a second.
I'm like, holy shit, is he really throwing Trump under the bus now?
And I had to bring it up.
It's like, I took 15 minutes to go through his feet.
It was just the craziest thing on earth, resorting to the same tactics that they used to go after Donald Trump.
It's actually astonishing you don't appreciate the abject stupidity and hypocrisy and defamatory nature of your libel of Matt Gates.
Now, mugshots, which Matt Gates doesn't have, but I can tell you who does have one because that's what the lefty idiots love to use in order to impugn Trump.
They're sign of guilt.
You haven't thought this through, but congratulations on proving that you are indeed a raging lunatic.
So I don't know what the hell is going on.
I don't know what people think they're going to get out of this.
Even when I, you know, disagree with people, and someone says, you know, you got to write off a person entirely.
And everything they say has got to be wrong and null and void from that point on.
Even when it comes to Candace, she will, I think, have a, you know, she'll come to a point in her life where she'll look back on this TPUSA Charlie Kirk stuff and she'll either say, depending on if you think she's just evil and beyond redemption, she'll say, yeah, I went a little too far there, got a little too caught up in my own stuff.
Much like Alex Jones did with respect to the very minimal sentences that he ever uttered about crisis actors at Sandy Hook.
I mean, first of all, he admitted it was wrong, apologized for it, and part of his screw job was not being allowed to say to the court that he apologized for it and taking 16 minutes out of 10 years of footage and making it sound like all he did was ever deny that it even happened, which he didn't, but entertain some ideas.
He looked back and said, yeah, I had seen too many situations where there were crisis actors.
I was in some, oh, a psychotic episode, you know, conspiracy.
I was a little psychotic, psychosis.
But when you realize that there are crisis actors, you might start to see them everywhere, even where they don't exist.
Candace might get there, or she might sincerely only be doing this disingenuously.
That we'll never know.
But even with Candace, you can argue on specific issues.
But for this to become something of a battle that is tearing, not even a movement, but tearing political unity apart.
I don't know who gains what out of this.
And so you got Levin fighting with Pesobic.
Jones now finally calling out, and some people are going to say, well, he's fighting with her.
He should just leave her alone.
You got people that are acting in a way that is maybe, maybe beneficial to the individual.
I say maybe, and I'm not accusing anyone of grifting, but that is objectively harmful politically.
And then some of you might say, well, the truth, if it's harmful, so be it.
That's fine.
That's if it's the truth.
If it's just drama for the sake of drama and fighting for the sake of fighting, which this feels like under certain circumstances, you got to ask yourself, what the hell is going on and why is it going on?
But then, you know, getting to the truth for the sake of truth, even if it's politically damaging, the Trump files, the Trump files, the Epstein files, which now the left is trying to use to implicate Trump, despite all evidence to the contrary, what's incredible is as you live through this in real time, and you can see the talking points emerge in real time.
You know, I have, back when people started saying, no, the Epstein files are irrelevant right now, just the Mark Levins of the world.
And I won't mention other names because though I think they were wrong on that particular issue, I wouldn't write them off as entities or humans or accounts, even though if I might, you know, approach what they say with a certain degree of skepticism, more so going forward.
Everybody who had ever had an interest pursued the release of the Epstein files, full disclosure, didn't believe the official narrative and not just to the, you know, disbelieve what we were told, but didn't believe it because it didn't even match up with the available evidence.
It defied credibility.
Every one of those who pulled a full 180 and said, well, now I'm no longer interested in it because the pursuit of truth is now secondary to the pursuit of politics.
Well, life will teach you a lot of lessons if you can, you know, live through a lot live through enough of it.
I lived through that since 2019 when Epstein took his own life.
And I remember exactly, I say, allegedly took his own life.
And I remember exactly where I was.
I was on a road trip in New Brunswick.
I go down to the water to do a vlog.
And I was like, I didn't believe it then.
I don't believe it now.
Or at least even if he did take his own life, it was a facilitated suicide.
He was given the materials to do it and given the opportunity to do it.
And that in and of itself is a conspiracy that is not just an organic, he took his own life.
A lot of people went after Thomas Massey and said, for the last five years, you haven't had, how many times have you tweeted about the Epstein files in the last five years?
Well, the answer was a couple of times, may have spoken about it a few times, but it wasn't a political issue until Trump made it one or brought it back to the political fore.
And so you had people saying, well, how many times have you tweeted about it?
Oh, you're never now you're tweeting about it?
So I get to disregard what might otherwise be a righteous pursuit of the truth because I've written off your motivation, your intention for pursuing it.
Well, one thing I don't remember hearing is that the reason for which the documents couldn't be disclosed, the reason for which we couldn't pursue answers in the Epstein case was because of the Ghelaine Maxwell trial.
There was a certain element where we said, yeah, Glene Maxwell's trial is coming up.
Some stuff as relates to her prosecution can't be disclosed.
That much we all understood.
It was never the blanket excuse for why some people never showed any interest in the Epstein files.
And for someone who's remained consistent on the issue, me, there are many, many others, but I'm a stubborn little son of a bitch.
Consistent.
Yeah.
Full disclosure.
If it takes down governments, it takes down governments.
Because if you have a government that is built, as many say, if you have a government that is built on protecting or enabling sex trafficking, child sex trafficking, child sex abuse, because hypothetically intelligence was using this individual as a whatever tool, as whatever asset.
And in order to have him as an asset, they had to satisfy his sexually repulsive needs.
Well, if you have a government that will be prejudiced by that becoming public, that's the price to pay.
But one thing I remember never hearing Democrats say is we weren't interested in it because we couldn't reveal any of the information because it was under investigation.
And I started noticing these accounts, just I would post something.
And one of the, did I shoot this?
I got the screenshots of them.
Oh my goodness.
I posted their accounts and not the actual.
I noticed a bunch of accounts in real time now, out of the blue saying that the reason why the Democrats were never interested in it, because I said, like, I posted something and said, appreciate the fact that for the last four years when the Democrats were in power, the people now accusing Trump of covering up the disclosure of the Epstein files never revealed or released anything when they had four years in power to do it.
And I noticed a few people that come out saying, oh, that's idiot because they were under investigation and the DOJ was investigating.
They couldn't release anything.
I was like, that's interesting.
I don't even remember hearing Democrats say that.
I think Debbie Wasserman Schultz might have said it once upon a time.
And another one said like a year ago as like an afterthought of an excuse.
The people accusing Trump of covering up the Epstein files had those files, had those prosecutions, had those grand jury statements from Epstein's situation, had them for years and did nothing.
And now they're saying, oh, we couldn't have done anything because of these ongoing investigations.
And now they're all over and now we want the truth.
And we're living with this new narrative being seeded, what is it called, astroturfed in real time, so that in a few weeks, and I'm predicting it now, you're going to hear this as the reflexive talking point of Democrats who had the reins of power for four years and did nothing on the Epstein files.
And other people out there, even the ones who say, you want to know the retort when they say this?
Well, we couldn't have done anything because it was under investigation.
It's like, oh, so you had in your possession documentation, information that incriminated Trump, but you couldn't release it under Merrick Garland's DOJ.
Bullshit.
But that's where it's at right now.
There's a lot of infighting.
There's a lot of stuff that's distractions, but there's a lot of stuff that's, you know, it's distracting, but it's fun on its own.
And, you know, people who say that's a distraction are basically saying, I can't multitask.
I can't think of three things at the same time.
I can't pursue two different issues, two different truths at the same time.
So you're lazy, and that's fine.
There's nothing wrong with it.
But some things are bona fide distractions, but distractions are not always bad.
It can't be 24/7 focusing on one issue.
The fighting is bizarre.
And it's almost like you get into the position where you can actually meaningfully enact change, start tearing shit down.
And instead, you're like, well, cripe, that's hard.
It's a lot easier just to start fighting among ourselves right now.
And when you're the underdog, you play as a team to get back into power.
And then when you get back into power, you realize, oh, shit, we all had diverging politics.
So let's go and cannibalize this movement right now and destroy everything, the potential that we have to do right now.
Because someone else put out there, it's like, it was with Tina Peters.
When was it?
I said, oh, it was Mike Davis put out a tweet in response to someone.
Let me see what it was.
I forget now.
It was Mike Davis put out a tweet that said, Pam Bondi is doing a great job.
And here it is.
I got it right here.
And I, for a second, thought maybe he was trolling.
Like maybe he's like, it was sarcastic.
So Kathleen Winchell, I don't know who these people are, and I'm not trying to put anyone on blast here.
America the Beautiful.
All right.
Says, my choice would be Mike Davis for attorney general, any other candidates.
And it's a meme.
It says, do you believe President Trump should replace Pam Bondi and look for a new attorney general that will actually go after corrupt politicians?
To which Mike Davis says, no way.
Pam Bondi is a savage.
She is bold and fearless.
She makes consequential decisions her GOP male predecessors never had the balls to make.
Identity politics is always a bad sign.
She has a long string of monumental victories at the Supreme Court for the presidency, and lawfare Democrats will go to prison.
So some people thought this might have been a total troll, especially the pandering to identity politics, you know, and gender, as though she's got whatever.
All right.
And I just said, I want everyone to do this so we can see if it's actually, you know, what people think.
I said, let's just do a respectful poll so Mike can have additional information of the voice of the people.
Do you agree with his assessment?
It's a lame ass results for the poll here.
Give it to everybody so you can go check it out.
Check it out.
For those who thought Mike Davis was being was trolling Pam Bonte, so he's not.
And I said, no, not enough has been done just yet.
And someone said in response to that tweet discussion on the antenna says, no, no, well, you know, it's still too early to tell if she's a bad attorney general.
You know, give it more time.
Give it more time.
Like, you don't have more time.
We don't have more time.
There is not an indefinite, you don't get the four full years to do all your change when you have midterms two years after your term starts.
You don't, it's not indefinite.
You don't have until the last day of your presidency.
You can have a lame duck presidency where you are unable to get anything done because of the shift of power.
When Trump came in, it was to, you know, drain the swamp.
Ha ha, that's so 2016.
It was to dismantle the deep state.
It was to go after the corrupt criminals of the former FBI to purge that former corrupt FBI, that former corrupt criminal FBI.
You don't have four years to do that.
You might have two years to do that if you're lucky, but more likely than not, you have about a year and a half to do that.
And right now we are about a year in.
And other than a shitty two-charge indictment against James Comey for the weakest possible charges you could get, what appears to be a Patsy for the Jan 6 pipe bomber and the statute of limitations coming up in 10 days.
What's been done?
Like when you, when people thought that, what's his face?
When people thought that Mike Davis's post might have been satire, I mean, the long string of victories, what have they been?
She's got more balls.
What has she done?
I mean, there's been some good stuff.
The border, except, you know, deportations are not at the number that anybody, they're not even at the number that they were under Obama, but set that aside.
What?
Long string of successes.
Yeah, hold on, listen.
Let me bring this back up.
Here.
Bold and fearless, fluff.
Savage, fluff.
She makes consequential decisions.
Her GOP mail, such as, she has a string of monumental victories at the Supreme Court, such as, and lawfare Democrats will go to prison.
Hasn't happened yet.
So you got a lot of such as, such as, such as hasn't happened.
And just wait a little longer until what?
After the midterms?
Jacob Castro says, we don't have time to be wrong.
It was Bannon, basically, came out yesterday.
Where was it?
It wasn't Dead Anfest's, but he's like, you know, we've got to start moving.
Otherwise, many of us in this room, myself included, speaking of himself, Steve Bannon, are going to jail if the Democrats ever get back into power.
And he's not wrong.
Sleeping giant, everything is going to plan.
It's just a game.
Don't fool yourself.
Okay, I think that was sarcasm.
Sarcasm, sarcasm.
And so, I mean, that's one meandering, meandering diatribe people, miscoozey.
Pierran says, Viva, is anyone at Rumble working on the chat problem in locals?
It's been going on for a week now.
I've looked everywhere, but I can't find any way to get in touch with Rumble.
Well, what's the problem with the chat?
I'm not asking for this for another Rumble rant.
I'm going to ask our chat on locals, what issues with.
Sorry, I know some of you don't like the way I tap too hard.
What issues with chat?
Gonna touch the keyboard like it's a delicate bird, and then we got King of Bill Tong, who's in the house, who says, Check out Bill Tong USA for a great selection of imported candies, cookies, groceries, and of course, Bill Tong Bill Tong USA, code 10 for 10% off.
Go to Bill Tong USA, peeps, Bill Tong USA.
Um, and I want to show everybody the website because I think everybody needs to see the delicious Bill Tong support American product.
Anton is South African, but he's chosen to make these United States of America his home.
And that is when you can say, I'm proud.
I was thinking about this the other day.
Someone put up some like shit posting for me, like, oh, Viva's a Canadian hiding in Florida as if I'm hiding.
I was like, It's funny.
When someone says, Are you proud to be Canadian or are you proud to be whatever?
And I say, like, you can't be proud, by the way.
So, hold on a second.
That's that's Anton's Bill Tong.
And look at it, it's delicious.
Go get some.
All this was this, you know, my ADHD tangent.
Someone says, Viva, are you proud to be Canadian?
Well, I'd say I could tell you this at this point in time, the answer would be no, because I've made a decision, a life decision, to depart from a country because of my dislike of its politics and dislike of its tyranny.
But as a born Canadian, someone says, Are you proud to be Canadian?
Well, I was born Canadian.
I didn't make that decision.
And anybody asks you if you're proud of something that wasn't a decision, it's a little weird to say, Yeah, I'm proud of something that was not a decision, something that was beyond my control, and something that I, you know, that I didn't choose.
It's weird to be proud of something that's not a choice.
And that's when I realized, like, am I proud to say that I'm a Florida man?
Yeah, I am.
Because I, and I realize, what's the distinction?
I wasn't born in Florida.
No, I made a decision to move to Florida.
I made a decision to move to Florida because of ideological congruence, because of ideological admiration for the free state of Florida.
You take there's a lot of, there's some pitfalls to not unchecked freedom, but there's some pitfalls to actual freedom.
But, you know, you could live a long, a long life in a prison cell.
It's the old fable of the dog that is a domesticated dog and it's got the collar mark around its neck and the wild dog beautiful mane of fur because it doesn't have the collar.
Yeah, freedom is risk.
And, you know, risk is freedom to some extent.
But when you make a decision, then you can say, yes, I'm proud of the decision I've made.
Anton, all that to say, moved to America is in Texas and makes a damn good Bill Tong.
That's one of the things you say, are you proud to be of a certain race, religion, or creed?
Well, you're born into it.
Now, if you were born into one religion and actively choose to convert to another, then you'd say, well, I made an active decision in my life and I'm proud of that decision.
I wouldn't have made that decision if I weren't proud of it.
So that was that.
Now, gosh, what I was going to say here, let's go to the chat.
An excellent choice, says one of the people.
Sleep.
Okay, hold on a second.
That's not what I wanted to bring up.
Where is it?
It said, there we fat fingers, an excellent choice.
It's the best choice.
And not just because you don't freeze your nips off when you go outside in the middle of winter.
But proudly stand up to make all drugs free.
No?
So that's what's going on there.
What was the other thing that was speaking?
Speaking of the risks, it's so terrible.
I think I talked about this one.
I did talk about this one where they released.
Okay, forget to cover that story again anyhow.
A woman got stabbed to death in a Palm Beach, Barnes and Noble by a mentally ill man with a knife.
And we'll see what the we'll see what comes out of it.
Now, there was one story that I absolutely wanted to.
Oh my goodness.
Yeah, yeah.
All right.
Let me just clear my thoughts.
Talking about being proud.
There is a man on this earth right now who should be proud of doing true, true journalism.
What journalism was meant to be?
If you haven't seen this, I mean, if you haven't seen this, it's only because you're not on Twitter.
Nick Shirley is a man who has been going around revealing like boots on the ground.
And there's a little bit of a risk to what he's doing, not just in terms of the actual risk of going and busting people's fraud.
You know, when you start interfering with people's livelihoods in a malicious sense, you're asking for trouble.
If you start interfering with people's corruption and their fraudulent business ventures, well, you're screwing with people's livelihoods, but not because of what they've worked hard to earn, but because of what they've actually managed to steal.
Anecdote.
When I lived in Paris in 1999 to 2000, and I was at the base of Montmartre.
There's this place called Montmartre.
It's like a beautiful church on top of the mountain.
And the base of the, it's like, I don't want to say Sodom and Gomorrah.
It's more like, I don't know.
I'm not particularly good with biblical references.
It's degeneracy, gambling, and all this like, it's like a bad place on the bottom.
They say, don't go there at night.
And you walk there, people are selling stuff.
There's got like, there's people doing three card Monty, all sorts of scams and whatever.
And I saw this German kid doing a three-card Monty.
Like the kid must have been 19 years old at the time, maybe.
Not dumb, but naive, and was doing three card Monty with these guys.
And like, I don't know why he had a roll of cash on him, but he did.
And these guys there, I don't know if they were Russian, Eastern European, wherever, were like getting him to do the three-card Monty.
And he would win, win, and then he'd lose, and then he'd lose.
And they basically took him for all his money.
I'm like, at one point, I'm looking at the kids, like, what are you doing, man?
Don't do this.
And one of the guys in the group, because they were clearly all working together, elbows me in the gut and shoves me out of the circle and then gives me this scowl, like, you fuck with our, with our money, and, you know, next won't be an elbow to your gut.
So this guy, Nick Shirley, is going around busting or exposing the multi-billion dollar fraud in Minnesota.
Now, he put out a 42-minute, I'm not going to play the, obviously, the 42 minutes at all.
This is Nick Shirley saying, here is a full 42 minutes of my crew and I exposing Minnesota fraud.
This might be one of the most important work yet.
We uncovered over $110 million in one day.
Like it and share, yada, yada.
We all work way too hard and pay too much in taxes for this to be happening.
The fraud must be stopped.
So I'll just play a couple of things.
Hello, we'd like to ask where the money's going.
What do you guys think about the fraud that's taking place here in Minnesota?
I don't think anybody is enabling fraud to happen.
I'm going to hold Governor Walls accountable for this.
What was this money spent on?
I thought that $1.26 million.
What was that money spent?
Answer the question.
Are there children?
There's no children inside this building.
Potentially the.
We'll put it on pause there.
If that teaser doesn't make you go watch the whole thing, nothing will.
So Nick Shirley has been posting these clips.
It's a 42-minute video.
There was a clip where there was some, not that it matters, it was a white woman yelling at Nick, calling him ICE, telling the Somalians inside this non-existent daycare to stay inside because ICE is there.
And Nick Shirley's like, I'm not ICE.
I'm Nick Shirley.
I'm a YouTuber.
It's wild what he's exposing.
And you know that you've, you know, you've hit the mark and done the work of legacy media when legacy media picks up on your hard work.
This is from Fox News.
So Nick, first of all, hats off.
And it's amazing.
Like Nick, he's a non-assuming, unassuming-looking gentleman, like just a young behind the years guy.
Like Nick Sortor, what's going to happen is he's going to get too popular and he won't be able to pull off this type of journalism anymore.
But Fox News, Misspelled Learning Center, no children inside.
Emmer presses walls over Minnesota daycare tied to $4 million.
House Majority Whip Todd Emmer.
Tom Emmer demands answers after viral video shows Quality Learing Center with no activity.
This is how you know you've done it.
Third ranking leader in the House Representatives, who also happens to hail from Minnesota, demanded answers from Governor Walls after a YouTuber tried to confront employees of an alleged daycare center that had misspelled signage.
We covered that video the other day.
Video went viral this week amid the burgeoning scandal enveloping Tim Walz' administration.
At least $1 billion, $9 billion, $10 billion, more than the GDP of Somalia itself.
And this is Nick Shirley's work here.
Responding to the video, Republican House Majority, Tom Emmer, who represents Twin Cities, lashed out of the governor.
$4 million going to this, yada, yada, yada.
The Quality Learning Center also recently made news for collecting 95 violations from the state human services between 2019 and 2023.
Well, that might show that at least it was operational.
Such violations range from failure to keep hazardous items away from kids, at least they had kids, to daycare not having whatever doesn't children here.
Last week, YouTuber Nick Shirley, and another man approached a building labeled the Quality Learing Center on Nicolay Street, with Shirley noting that learing was spelled incorrectly.
Almost immediately, a woman appears and yells ostensibly to anyone inside the building, don't open up ice.
That was the one.
So it's amazing, but it's what happens when you get your feet on the ground and actually go to see it, go to document it.
And then sure enough, people are saying, Nick, you know, be careful.
This is a holiday season.
Maybe that's why there's no kids there.
What they're exposing is pretty rampant.
And it's good to start from the point where you know that there's actual fraud there.
But he's been doing amazing work covering it.
I'm going to try to get him on.
I want to ask him about his MO, you know, about whether or not he thinks he's going to be able to do this for much longer before he starts becoming too recognizable.
But the fraud, you know, Tim Walz, the man who wants to lecture Donald Trump for having had six bankruptcies, is now potentially the biggest fraud scandal in the history of the United States of America under Tampon Tim Noble's walls, exposed by a mere YouTuber who has now done more work to expose it, to bring it to life so that you can actually see it, touch it, listen to it, feel it.
And that's it.
Viva sees the fraud too.
I think, dude, it's hard.
I don't know if that was intended to be an insult to me now, but whatever.
Common sense, watch Die Hard on Christmas Eve.
And yes, it's a Christmas movie.
I'm going to watch The Running Man with the family.
Maybe not with the girl.
The girls might not like The Running Man.
It's The Running Man.
I just rewatched it.
Thank goodness it was like I had an option on a treadmill to watch The Running Man or Fox News.
I should say I had the option to watch The Running Man instead of Fox News, these stupid.
Anyway, the 80s action genre, truly amazing.
And the running man, yes, the running man with Arnold.
I won't ruin it for anybody.
It's a classic.
Some of the ineptitude of the villains, you know, like they're just running and shooting and always missing is whatever, but you know, it was the unapologetic violence of the 80s, those stupid one-liners after each kill as a sorry you had to split.
Uh-uh.
Classic.
And it aged very, very well in terms of the media and the quest for ratings.
Yeah, great movie.
Let me just see something here because I think it might be time to go see what the family is doing.
Oh, crap.
Thank you very much, exclamation point.
Let me see this.
Might go for a war.
Okay.
Okay.
That was texting my wife, and all I reply is: okay, Arnold, let's see here.
If you are complaining about Somali blowback from previous wars, but support the invasion of Venezuela, you are the mark.
Yeah, I don't think many people watching here are really supporting what's going on in Venezuela.
I think most people said no new wars should have meant no new wars.
You have the strike on ISIS in Somalia?
The other no, hold on.
Where did Trump just strike?
Trump strikes ISIS.
Where was it?
Nigeria.
Sorry.
It's striking ISIS in Nigeria who are killing Christians.
And it's an amazing thing.
Like you read the headlines and you start to read everything with a not with a, I don't believe anything, but with just a healthy dose of skepticism where you say, look, okay, fine.
Administration elected on a no-new war policy and they want new wars.
So how do they frame it?
Well, it's a war on terrorism.
We've got to go, you know, regime change in Venezuela because it's narco-terrorism.
We're going to go bomb ISIS in Nigeria if we want people to accept potentially new wars, especially on Christmas.
Well, frame it as killing ISIS who are killing Christians.
And then the problem is it's true.
And then the only question is: if you do nothing when Christians are being killed by Islamic ISIS terrorists, people are going to rail on you.
And as they were after Syria fell and you had Christians getting slaughtered and nobody doing anything.
And so you're in a realm, unfortunately, now where there's so much skepticism and cynicism that even doing the right thing, like bombing ISIS in Nigeria, who are slaughtering Christians, well, some people will qualify that as not religious war, but another war, another foreign conflict, internal conflict that we should not be getting involved in.
But when you read it, you said, okay, no new wars and yet floating regime change in Venezuela and you have to cloak it under narco-terrorism, no new wars, and now you're bombing ISIS again in Nigeria.
That being said, what's going on is going on in there.
And then the question is, how do you deal with it in a way that doesn't exacerbate certain situations or result in yet another mass migration of migrants who are fleeing conflict and have to come to the West who are bombing their countries and saying, well, you bombed Syria, so now open your borders Europe.
You bombed Somalia, now open your borders, Minnesota.
So that's that.
Now, there was one last thing what I think we're going to do.
We're going to do a bit of an after-show party on our viva barnslaw.locals.com.
Yeah, we're going to do that now.
20,000 killed in one month in Nigeria.
And then you get, well, then you get into the problem.
It's like, you don't know what numbers you can ever trust anymore.
But you have to get as much information as you can from as many sources as you can, and then just hope to get it right.
Hope to come to the best, relatively speaking, best conclusion you can come to.
NeuroDivergent, who is a moderator on the channel, Neuro, thank you very much, and Merry Christmas and happy holidays.
Although we texted yesterday, hey, David, about the guy you raided yesterday, KLW Radio, his mods didn't really understand raiding.
So there was a bit of a confusion.
He said he went in himself and unmuted anyone that was muted yesterday.
Yeah, so.
Apparently the guy that we raided yesterday, I don't know who it was, but was muting people who came in and we're going into the chat.
Don't be harsh on him.
I guess he didn't know what was going on and might not have reacted properly.
Pierran says, Viva, is anyone in Rumble working?
Okay, I got that.
Now, I felt like there were more tipped questions than that.
If we go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
What do we got here from F. Chartrend?
Tipped question.
Viva, the locals chat has been an issue for the whole week.
Maybe post the legacy link in addition to the normal one.
Anyone sorting this out?
Well, I'm going to go double check that now.
And what we're going to do is we're going to go and have a brief locals after party.
Let me just put this link over on Rumble.
So everybody, thank you very much.
Sorry, it was a short random one.
I just wanted to make sure that I got the Tina Peters story out there for the aggregate knowledge of the interwebs to pontificate on.
R.B. Ham says, Jake Sullivan, then Deputy Chief of Staff to Hillary Clinton in 2012, Al-Qaeda is on our side in Syria.
Yeah, Osama bin Laden was on our side when CIA was arming and training to fight the Russians because, you know, all good, good things happen when you get involved in foreign, you know, manipulation of foreign governments, foreign wars.
Do not travel abroad looking for monsters to defeat.
That was what the founding fathers said.
And it would be great for the bloated federal government of the United States of America to remember that.
But whenever you want to go fight monsters, all you have to do is convince yourself, make an excuse for why it's an existential threat to do so.
All right, Pete's, we're going to go over to Rumble for a quick after party.
Let's just see who we can raid tonight.
Nerd Roddick is still live.
I think we got Nerd Roddick.
Is he still alive?
How long does that guy go live for?
Let me see here.
If Nerd Roddick is still up there, is he still alive?
Yeah, he is.
All right, well, let's go.
And we got Chrissy Mayer in the house.
All right.
Let's go raid Nerd Roddick.
It'll be non-political, but it's, I guess it might be political just because it's the way things are.
Come over to locals if you're not going to do that.
Forward slash raid.
Sunday night, Viva Barnes Law.
A Viva.
Oops.
Oh, no, that's all the way back down.
So let's go raid Nerd Roddick.
Say hi and wish them Merry Christmas.
Sunday night, it's going to be a banger of a show.
So make sure to tune in six o'clock.
Just hope that the internet's fine.
We're going to see where we are.
And that's it.
Go raid Nerd Roddick.
Rumble, thank you for being here.
Spread the word on Tina Peters.
If I can be an agent of change or the force multiplier that it was once called, it was the greatest compliment ever.
Force multiply this.
Tina Peters, get her into federal custody as a whistleblower.
If you think she broke the law, I mean, I dare say you didn't pay attention to that trial.
Viva Raid.
Viva Raid Booyah.
So there's no realm of the universe where Tina Peters or A. Tina Peters should be in jail, period.
And that activist jackass of a judge, what was his name?
I forget what his name was.
It doesn't matter.
Should be disbarred and jailed.
He should have to suffer the punishment that he unjustly inflicted on another person.
Okay, so we're going to do it.
Oh, yeah, that was good.
Thank you for being here, Rumble.
Godspeed, locals.
We're going to do this and see you all Sunday night.
Viva and Barnes Lafayette.
People.
If you want to support the channel, you know how to do it.
Links are in the description.
Go.
▲
Export Selection