All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 23, 2025 - Viva & Barnes
01:09:37
Epstein Document Drop Confirms It WAS a "Hoax" - Breaking Down the Most Important Documents & MORE!

Support Viva: GET MERCH! www.vivafrei.com BUY A BOOK! https://amzn.to/4qBXikS SEND ME SOMETHING! David Freiheit 20423 SR 7 Ste F6319 Boca Raton 33498 TIP WITH CTYPTO! bc1qt0umnqna63pyw5j8uesphsfz0dyrtmqcq5ugwm THAT IS ALL!

|

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, in today's episodes, the theme is going to be something along the lines of too stupid and or dishonest for words.
The and slash or is the operative conjunction because they are both stupid and dishonest, and you don't know if they are being both at the same time.
For today's intro video, I present to you Hakeem Jeffries being stupid and or dishonest.
Behold.
Well, life is too expensive in the United States of America, and things have actually gotten worse under Donald Trump's presidency.
He promised to lower costs on day one.
Republicans promised to lower costs on day one.
Costs aren't going down.
They're going up.
That's healthcare costs.
That's housing costs that are out of control.
Childcare costs are out of control.
Utility bills, electricity costs are out of control, of course, and grocery costs are out of control.
So there are a variety of different things that need to be done.
As Democrats, we're promising to focus relentlessly on driving down the high cost of living to make life more affordable for everyday Americans and to fix our broken health care system, which Republicans have been damaging in an extraordinary way throughout the year, including by enacting the largest cut to Medicaid in American history.
And because of Republican policies in their one big ugly bill, we know hospitals, nursing homes, and community-based health centers are closing all across the country, including in rural America.
Working class Americans are being hurt.
Black and brown Americans are being hurt.
Small town America is being hurt.
The heartland of America is being hurt.
And yes, we need to fix our broken health care system.
I just want, if I could zoom in on the eyes, can I?
I can't.
Those are, where am I looking here?
Those are dead eyes.
If my eyes ever look so dead, so emotionless, so I am fatigued by the verbal diarrhea that just came out of my mouth for the last minute and 10 seconds, I would like the audience to tell me.
Appreciate what Hakeem Jeffries is saying right here.
Some of the criticism might be right, and some of the criticism might be righteous if it weren't the Democrats who were responsible for the last four years of creating the problem that they are now saying Trump has not yet succeeded in resolving in the first nine months of his presidency.
Oh, he said we would have, it would be cheaper on day one after we drove up the prices for four years.
He didn't do it on day one.
He hasn't succeeded in reversing the damage in his first nine months.
So put us back in power, the people who broke the system in the first place.
Look at his awful, ugly face.
Well, life is too expensive in the United States of America.
And things have actually gotten worse under Donald Trump's presidency.
They haven't gotten sufficiently better.
They've certainly stopped getting worse, or at least stopped getting worse at the rate it was getting worse before.
He promised to lower the cost on day one.
He promised to lower costs on day one.
Republicans promised to lower costs on day one.
Costs aren't going down.
They're going up.
I got to tell you, when people are too stupid to understand figures of speech, or when they take what are clearly intended to be not hyperbolic, but figurative phrases and they pretend to understand them literally, it's because they're being dishonest or stupid and or both.
They are faulting Trump for not having yet succeeded in stopping the bleeding that they, the Democrats, in a four-year term of a stolen election.
And we're going to get to this in a bit.
The damage that they managed to do.
Stupid and or dishonest.
And I would dare say when it comes to Hakeem Jeffries and when it comes to a number of the people we're going to talk about today, it is a perfect combination of both a little bit from column A and a little bit from column B to quote, what's his face?
Abraham Simpson.
Everybody, Godspeed.
How's it going?
Good afternoon.
Oh, I would show you my setup here, but you might think I'm crazy.
I've got a little LED light with a homemade diffuser, that being a Kleenex.
So I don't need to rely on natural light because in the great white north behind the Iron Rainbow in the Maple Gulag, it's 3.05.
Sun is basically starting to get ready to go down, but you wouldn't know it because it's been behind a cloud gray wall the entire day.
Yeah, I got my pink shirt.
Bring back God, people.
I've been doing my push-ups to try to strengthen my way out of my shoulder bursitis.
Everything still hurts a little bit, but at least, you know, when you, I haven't done push-ups in a little while because I was trying to give it a rest and my doctor said, don't do push-ups and your bursitis will get better.
Well, it isn't.
And I'm going to go follow some advice that I got, which is you got to strengthen your way out of muscles that are in pain and stretch the muscles that are functioning.
You know, when you start doing push-ups or you start doing, you get, you're sort of like things start, you get sore and it sort of feels like a constant itch in all of your muscles.
And excuse me, guitar guy125.
Shoulder bursitis is very painful.
It makes it very difficult for me to bowl my 200 average.
And it's very embarrassing.
Elijah Fire says it works for you.
So anyways, I've gotten back to doing about 100 some on push-ups a day after I do my jogging.
So it feels good.
Got that tingling.
And oh, what are we going to talk about today?
You know what we're going to talk about today.
I say it's a slow news day.
All that we've got is to talk about the Epstein files.
And they have broken.
And they are interesting.
We're going to get into a lot of this.
I'm trying to keep up and trying to piece it together.
And it's not the easiest thing to do on earth because you have to filter through bullshit and you have to make sure that you're not going crazy because you think you remember things and then information comes out that makes you feel like you're going crazy, which you might very well be.
Can't watch Hakeem or any of them, says Maddie G.
We are live across various platforms.
Hold on.
I think you all heard that.
I remember that.
I have to turn my phone off.
There we go.
Do not disturb.
We're going to go through the latest breaking disclosures, fact from fiction.
And I'm going to explain now.
Why is that still doing that, despite the fact that I clearly asked it not to?
We're going to explain what was meant now, what Trump clearly meant by way of the term hoax.
Hold on a second.
Let me just do one more thing here with this.
Bada bing, bada boom.
You know, Trump took a little flack for referring to the Epstein document release or the bungled release as a hoax.
It was the wrong word to use, but now we're starting to get a glimpse of exactly the nature of that.
Put it in quote, hoax, because it's not to say that Epstein wasn't a sex trafficking pedo themed.
It's to say that what the Democrats are doing right now and what their talking heads on Twitter are doing right now is confirming that it was going to be weaponized as a hoax from the get-go to try to throw Trump under a bus that he clearly is not riding on, walking next to, or has anything to do with.
Before we get there, Francis Charton over in our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community writes, I haven't confirmed, but it appears to be true the redacted Epstein files can be copied and pasted and some of the redactions disappear.
Pan Bondi is useless if true.
So I did actually see a short video to that effect on Twitter.
I couldn't quote tweet it because the dude has me blocked.
And then, when I saw that he's got a Ukrainian flag in his bio, I sort of said, okay, at least he's saving me for some stupidity.
But I did see reports that you could cut and paste from the Adobe because they blocked them with Adobe Premiere.
I don't know exactly how it works, or Adobe Acrobat, whatever.
You could cut and paste the documents, and some of them will reveal what is redacted in the documents uploaded to the interwebs.
People are saying it's abject incompetence.
Some others might be saying they did that.
If you want to say they're playing 4D chess, oh, they did that on purpose.
I don't think they would make that type of mistake on purpose because that could be legally incriminating.
If they were legally required to redact the names of the victims and they wanted to redact it, make it look like they tried to redact it, but make it look like they screwed up so that people could see what was redacted, unless it doesn't pertain to anything that was legally required to be redacted.
Well, you might want them to see what was redacted because it might exonerate Trump, and that might be the 4D chess way of doing it.
Make it look like you complied, but because of an error, allow people to view what ought to have been redacted.
That creates exposure that I don't think anyone would do on purpose.
I haven't been able to verify it either, but to the extent that it's true, it reveals even more incompetence.
That being said, I've looked up what is the most incriminating documentation of the latest Epstein document dump, and it is nothing.
And people are too stupid and/or dishonest to understand that, and they are spewing a whole hell of a lot of dishonest propaganda that we're going to go through today.
Free SC01.
Viva, you're getting old when you start all your shows with ailments at the moment.
All right, I'm done.
No more.
Actually, I was just trying to show off that I started doing my push-ups again.
Okay, but you're right.
Dapper Dave says incoming Venezuela war or false flag operation incoming for distraction.
Yeah, well, or multiple things happen at once because we live in a wild world of geopolitics and international war.
All right, the latest Epstein document dump.
We're going to go through it.
And the most incriminating documents that everyone is hanging their hat on right now.
First of all, just to get back to something that I covered yesterday, and I now have it on pretty good intelligence, pretty good sources, that the individual in this photograph is either Ivanka, his daughter, or the other one, Tiffany, because we always forget that Trump has another daughter who would be more about this age when Trump was that age on this plane.
My understanding, and it's based on my own past is prologue, understanding of how they have unnecessarily redacted photographs like this in the past.
This is in fact a family member, something along those innocuous lines.
And they have yet again done exactly what they've done now on at least two different occasions, which is unnecessarily redact something to make it look more sinister than it is, because there's nothing sinister about it in the first place.
So just wanted to cover that one because I touched on it yesterday.
And I believe the intel that I've got right now confirms that my suspicions were accurate.
That, you know, they try the same bloody tactics over and over again.
Recall, it's what they did here, redacted the faces of adult women to make it look like it was something nefarious when it wasn't.
And in the case of that photograph and the dishonest and stupid, and I'm calling Keith Edwards both, jackasses of the internet, post that picture knowing damn well what they're doing.
And it takes the likes of me to suspect, independently attempt to investigate, and confirm to the best of my abilities that, yes, the explanation for that photo is something along the line that was either Ivanka or Tiffany on that plane with Trump and nothing nefarious.
The biggest bombshells of the day that people are running with as relates to the Epstein disclosures.
A letter that Jeffrey Epstein wrote to, I forget his first name, Nasser, the guy who was convicted of pedophile molestation, that he sent before he was killed, or sorry, before he took his own life in jail or was allowed, facilitated to take his own life in prison.
He sent this letter before he died, and it was post-marked after his death.
Christopher Hale, don't know who he is, so I'm not going to call him names.
Oh, DNC delegate.
All right, I can call him dumb and/dishonest.
Bada bing, bada boom.
Let me see what he said in the tweet.
Oh, yeah.
Jeffrey Epstein's final letter was to convicted sex abuser Larry Nasser.
He complained that life was unfair because president liked the president liked, quote, young, nubile girls and faced no consequences.
Dumb and dishonest, Mr. Christopher Hale.
So we read this letter, and I, this is going to go back to the hoax concept.
It's going to go back to Michael Wolf in 2015 trying to suborn blackmail material on Trump via Epstein.
We'll get there in a second.
This is what the letter had to say.
Jeffrey Epstein, Manhattan Correctional, New York City.
All right.
And then I think we see a date, August 2019.
So here you can see that right there.
The three August, I think it looks like August 3rd, 2019.
And Jeffrey, when did Epstein kill himself?
I won't put it in quotes in the search engine.
August 10, 2019.
So now, depending on the date here, I'm going to get close to my computer.
Hold on.
Oh, that looks like August 13th.
That's right.
So this is post-dated three days after he's dead.
Dead men tell no tales.
But when they last leave a self-serving, potentially incriminating letter, well, you might say they might have learned the right lessons from Michael Wolf's attempt to suborn extortion material.
It says, Dear L.M. Larry Nasser, as you know by now, I have taken the quote short route end quote home.
Good luck.
We shared one thing: our love and caring for young ladies and the hope they'd reach their full potential.
What the fudge does that even mean?
Our president also shares our love of yours.
Hold on a second.
Our president also shares our love of young, nubile girls.
It's on the left side now.
When a young beauty walked by, he loved to say, grab, snatch.
Whereas we ended up snatching grab in the mess hall of the system.
Life is unfair.
Yours, Jeffrey Epstein.
Now, anybody who has the slightest degree of skepticism would say, what an odd thing, A, to do.
I mean, I don't know how many letters Epstein was writing Larry Nasser in his final days.
He didn't know they were his final days, but maybe he didn't.
If he's going to take his own life, he knew they were his final days.
If he knew that he's going to take his life if given the opportunity, and this is the letter that he wants to put out to Larry Nasser, a mere few days sent before he takes his own life.
All of it is suspicious.
But anybody who has a half a brain, which might not include Christopher Hale, you might be saying, what an odd thing to throw in a letter.
Just throw Trump in there.
Just mention Trump unsolicited for whatever the reason.
Who the hell knows?
Our president also shares our love of young and nubile girls.
That sounds like someone is deliberately trying to set somebody up without them even being there.
As we say in French, les absent en toutor.
Those who are not there are always wrong.
So he throws Trump in there.
This is a self-serving, other incriminating statement.
But do remember what Michael Wolf said to Jeffrey Epstein back in 2015.
And in case any of you forgot, I'll refresh your memories.
It was one of the documents that I found particularly interesting.
And I'll be gosh darn, damn incriminating of a man who later would go on to have access to the White House.
When these documents started dumping, and I'm saying, holy crap, everything in these Epstein document dumps only incriminates Democrats, Democrat left-leaning journalists, New York Times.
It only incriminates them.
Why the hell was Bondi dragging her feet to release all of this?
Why the hell was she seemingly convincing Trump that was going to incriminate him?
Well, she was probably told that there are letters like the self-serving, highly suspicious letter from Epstein to Nasser saying that, you know, Trump did not Trump liked little girls.
Remember what Michael Wolf said.
Let me read you this one.
This is from December 16, 2015.
Michael Wolf, a journalist who later went on to have access to the White House, write a book, a tell-all book about what goes on in the White House, sends an email to Jeffrey Epstein, j-e-evacation at gmail.com.
And the reason why that email address, from what I understand now, is called Jeffrey Epstein.
I don't know if E is his middle name, vacation, because he set that email up when he got the slap on the wrist, basically vacation sentence for his sex crimes.
And that was the email that he created, like all narcissists do to rub in the face of the system that they are beating the system.
Okay.
Wolf sends to Jeffrey Epstein, I think you should let him hang himself in respect of Trump.
If he says he hasn't been on the plane or to the House, then he gives that, then that gives you a valuable PR and political currency.
I mean, that's not extortion.
That is basically just saying you'll have some political play to use against Trump should he say something that, as we'll see in a bit, is not true because he was on the planes eight times between 93 and 96.
Okay.
You can hang him in a way that potentially generates a positive benefit for you.
Or if it really looks like he could win, you could save him generating a debt.
That's basically saying throw him under the bus, get some political goodwill with Democrats, because quite clearly he had that.
Or if it actually looks like Trump's going to win, you could save him and ask for favor from him in the future.
Of course, it is possible that when asked, he'll say Jeffrey Epstein is Jeff's a great guy, gotten a raw deal, and is a victim of political correctness, which is to be outlawed in a Trump regime.
All right.
So Michael Wolf is effectively suborning perjury, not perjury, sorry, suborning extortion from Jeffrey Epstein.
And it seems that later on, Jeffrey Epstein would go on to learn that lesson.
And when you understand also who's involved in this in terms of players, you will understand the degree to which this multi-layered set it up for Trump in the event that we ever need it could come into play.
Another document from the dump here.
This is from the Southern District of New York.
And it's from January 8th, 2020.
The Southern District of New York, SDNY, for those of you who don't watch the show very often, is arguably, but not arguably, the most corrupt judicial district in all of these United States of America.
Tied up there with the District of Corruption, DC.
So in 2020, we don't know who drafted the memo.
I would love to know who drafted this.
Oh my goodness, would it not be glorious if it were Maureen Comey?
I don't even know if that could be U.S. Attorney, U.S. assistant U.S. attorney.
Hold on, let me just do some real time.
Real time, who was assistant?
There are probably more than one U.S. attorney for SDNY in 2020.
Probably more than one.
In 2020, the Southern Districts, let's just show the results so that people don't think I'm making this up.
Who was the Southern District?
The Southern District of New York had Jeffrey Berman as its confirmed U.S. attorney for much of the year, with Craig Carpenito serving as acting U.S. attorney in mid-2020 before Jay Clayton was dominated, though Clayton's confirmation faced hurdles, and many career U.S. attorneys, whatever, like Danielle Sassoon, involved in major cases, worked key figures in 2020.
Okay, so I guess it can't be Maureen Comey.
So the Southern District of New York puts out this memo.
For your situational awareness, wanted to let you know that the flight records we received yesterday reflect that Donald Trump traveled on Epstein's private jet many more times than previously has been reported or that we were aware, including during the period we would expect to charge in a Maxwell case.
In particular, he is listed as a passenger on at least eight flights between 1993 and 1996, including at least four flights on which Maxwell was also present.
He is listed as having traveled with, among others and at various times, Marla Maples, his daughter Tiffany, and his son, Eric.
On one flight in 1993, he and Epstein are the only two listed passengers.
On another, the only three passengers are Epstein, Trump, and then 20-year-old Redacted.
On two other flights, two of the passengers respectively were women who would be possible witnesses in a Maxwell case.
We've just finished reviewing the full records, more than 100 pages, a very small script, and don't want any of this to be a surprise.
Now, I am well aware of certain things here.
I just say, as far as I'm concerned, this is the most relevant document in the most recent Epstein disclosures.
The long play was clearly being set up as of 2020.
Southern District of New York, the most corrupt judicial district, laying the groundwork for a deliberately opaque, clear and deliberate setup for political weaponization in drafting of this email.
It adds nothing of substance other than casting aspersions through deliberate omission, i.e. that the flights were all domestic between Washington, New York, and Florida, from what I understand.
Now being weaponized exactly as initially intended by those corrupt scoundrels within the SDNY.
It was worded.
It was the wrong word to describe the Epstein files, but it is not, but it is not.
Oh, it's now clear that Trump was right.
Oh, cripe.
That the hoax was, and it had been set up a long time ago, Blanche and Bonnie playing right into it, strock insurance policy 2.0.
I like to see this.
Then why did Trump deny being on the plane himself if he was wrong?
As far as I recollect, Trump put out a truth post, so truth social post, where he said, I was never on the plane or at Epstein's island in respect of an AI-generated image showing him on a plane and suggesting he had been to the Epstein Island.
As far as I remember, that was the context of the truth post, which I'm fairly certain, even at the time, people were saying, no, dude, there's logs of you taking domestic flights.
So maybe what you mean to say is you were not on the Lolita Express to go to the island and you were not on the island, although you use the word or.
So my understanding is that he was on the flight.
He flew eight times with family between 93 and 96 domestically, between areas where, lest we also forget that Epstein had planes that flew in various locations domestically, that there was nothing suspicious about this because, I don't know, lifestyle of the rich and famous, you hop on a friend's flight if they have the ability to fly between New York, Washington, and Florida, where you have businesses and residences.
And going back and understanding everything here, lest we forget, and I think it just came up the other day when Mike Benz was doing a podcast on this.
Wall Street Apes posts December 22nd.
This is insane.
Mike Benz does through Jeff.
Mike Benz, I guess he means goes through Jeffrey Epstein documents.
Jeff, well, I don't need to read it because I'll just play the clip and I'm going to read the chat and see what people think about this.
Jeffrey Epstein negotiated the fucking contract to move the CIA's proprietary airliner, Southern Air Transport, which was busted running drugs and guns during Iran-Contra.
He personally was the authorized signatory on the deal with Southern Air Transport to move it to a military base in Columbus, Ohio to service the limited.
Hey, any of you guys got any bright ideas about how you would go about in 1994 convincing the Central Intelligence Agency to move its proprietary CIA airline used for covert operations,
based in Miami, to fucking up and move its entire operation to fucking Columbus, Ohio, just to service your personal company instead of the CIA?
What do you think he cold called the CIA?
You think he just smooths the CIA?
Or is it because he was handling Adan Khashoggi's money during Iran-Contra that purchased the guns that Southern Air Transport a decade earlier was moving?
Pretty wild, pretty wild interpretation with some of the wild receipts in here.
Mike Benz has been for a while now focusing on the Iran-Contra guns running CIA asset angle of Jeffrey Epstein.
He's the one, you can only acquire the knowledge of people who are more knowledgeable than you.
You can try your hardest to try to figure things out on your own, but knowledge is the gift that once given, you can't take back.
And when, you know, when I say, hey, has the CIA yet done a name search or shown us the results for Jeffrey Epstein in their files?
You know, that's Mike Benz asking these questions and going down these rabbit holes.
And so an interesting thing as well, by the way, Columbus, Ohio, upping and moving this CIA plane company to Columbus, Ohio.
I do remember, and I hope it comes back up at some point during this stream, one of the names of the elect of the unelected trafficker was from Ohio.
And I don't know if it was from Columbus, but I hope we're going to get back to that.
So just put that, bookmark that in the back of your minds.
So what we've seen right now, a 2020 memo from the SDNY.
And I know some people are going to say, and I'm asking the question actually as we're live, who's selecting the assistant attorneys for that district at the time?
This is in Trump's presidency.
Drafting this memo, which is deliberately opaque, saying basically he was on many more times than we previously, many.
It was eight times in three years domestically.
And as far as I'm concerned, I wouldn't have thought there's anything nefarious or suspicious about that.
It was, if not prior to, but, you know, Lord knows when Epstein started his sex stuff.
It was certainly before it was publicly known and obviously before the sweetheart deal where it was judicially known.
So the rich are flying with the rich domestically between New York, Washington, and Florida.
This 2020 memo from the SDNY says, many more times, and, you know, for your situational awareness.
And then nothing comes of it until now, when if you're in Bondi's shoes and someone tells you, oh my goodness, we can't release this documentation because Trump's name is all over it like that.
And Bondi, who may or may not be doing the requisite degree of homework to fully understand what's going on, says, all right, I'm going to protect Trump by saying we no longer have anything to disclose six months ago, which nobody believes.
And now they're disclosing this.
You know, maybe Bondi got convinced by the fact that if this information came out, people would think it incriminates Trump.
And maybe Trump got convinced that this was the hoax that the Democrats were planning.
And if he says it's, you know, a hoax enough times, his base will say, forgive and forget and move on, which they haven't and they won't and they shouldn't.
And the more that comes out, the more it actually exonerates Trump, but might incriminate the whole damn system.
New York Post, Trump flew on Epstein's private jet at least eight times.
Future President Donald Trump traveled on a notorious pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's plane at least eight times during the 90s, according to flight records reviewed by Manhattan federal prosecutors.
January 8 memo says a thing.
In the email, the unidentified assistant U.S. attorney, Southern District writes, we read the email.
Okay, all right, let's go down here.
A response that was included in the document dumped did not mention Trump's name, instead asking, who are the two potential Maxwell witnesses?
The email provides no evidence that Trump was aware of Epstein's sex crimes against women and girls as young as 14, nor does it indicate wrongdoing on the part of the president.
Following the release, the Justice Department issued a remarkable pre-buttle.
I like that.
You got a rebuttal, which responds to an argument made, and then a pre-buttle, which anticipates an argument to be made.
Writing on X, the Department of Justice has officially released nearly 30,000 more pages.
Late, but whatever.
You know, it'll be for the scoundrels who want to say, well, we're not going to hold you in contempt or whatever because you didn't do it by Friday.
I'm happy they're doing it.
Finally.
And what it's revealing is not showing what I think they think it's revealing.
And I don't think it's showing what they wanted it to reveal.
But my goodness, is that not going to stop them from twisting, turning, redacting to make it look like it is.
30,000 more pages of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Some of those documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims made against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election.
To be clear, the claims are unfounded and false.
And if they had a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already.
Nevertheless, out of our commitments to the law and transparency, the DOJ is releasing these documents with the legally required redactions.
President himself has dismissed the ongoing Epstein cases, yada, yada, yada.
What?
This whole thing is with Epstein as a way of trying to deflect from the tremendous success the Republican Party has had, he told reporters.
Like, for instance, today we are building one of the biggest ships in the world, most powerful ships.
Yada, yada, yada.
Okay, let's get to the end here.
Pre-buttle.
Sensational claims.
Anonymous tips to the FBI.
Ted Liu.
Ted Liu is a man who is dumb and dishonest.
And he's proven it time and time again.
Maybe some people are going to say, no, Viva, you're being too generous and dismissive.
He's actually not dumb.
He's actually quite disturbingly intelligent and is using that intelligence for nefarious purposes.
Maybe.
But I think he's pretty dumb because to think that you're going to get away with it is wild.
We've got to go down the Twitter rabbit hole here.
There we go.
We got Ted Liu says this document in the Epstein files is highly disturbing.
Okay.
Then we've got Melanie Dorigo, who is both dumb and incompetent.
Let me see her.
Dumb and dumb and dishonest.
What does she write?
She just quotes from the document.
He raped me.
Donald J. Trump had raped her along with Jeffrey Epstein.
She was found with her head blown off.
There was no way it was suicide.
End quote.
Now we're starting to see why Trump was hiding the Epstein files, and it probably gets much worse.
Only, ma'am, if you are an absolute idiot.
Let me pull up the document.
Probably could have pulled it up from that one there, but let me pull up the document in its entirety.
And whether or not we're going to go through here, look at this.
So let's just go through this here.
This is, I won't tell you what this is yet because we want to read it.
Redacted here says, during blank time, the driver met Donald Trump.
Oh, no, hold on a second.
I do want to show the date of this document.
Yeah, hold on, hold on.
Let's actually find the full document because you need to see the date, which is very relevant and the content of it.
And maybe we're not going to be able to, maybe we're not going to be able to do that.
Okay, let's just go down to this document.
It says here, let's see.
Blank reported some of the things President Trump had spoken about during a ride while on his cell phone were very concerning.
Blank reported he was, quote, a few seconds from pulling the limousine over on the medium within a few.
Yada, yada, yada, yada.
Let's get to this here.
Blank was unsure who he was talking to, nor who he referenced.
As Blank talked about his time meeting Donald Trump, Blank immediately, Blank demeanor went stone cold, as stated, quote, as Blank stated, quote, he raped me.
Blank said, quote, what?
As Blank replied, Donald Trump had raped her along with Jeffrey Epstein.
Noted some girl with a funny name took me into a fancy hotel or building.
That's how it happened.
Blank advised Blank to call the police regarding the incident.
As Blank stated, I can't.
They will kill me.
On Christmas Day, Blank contacted Blank, stated she had, in fact, called the police about what they had talked about.
Blank told Blank she had done good.
Blank did not hear from Blank on until Blank.
Blank reached out to Blank, stating Blank was dead, and noticed she was found with her head, quote, blown off, end quote, in Kiefer, Oklahoma.
Officers on the scene stated there was no way it was a suicide.
Coroner or corner stated it was a suicide.
Later said blah, blah, blah.
If you don't understand what that document was, you might think it's disturbing.
That was an anonymous tip to the FBI in 2020 when Trump was running for office unverified and anonymous of some lunatic who has fantastical imaginings.
Like once upon a time, for those who are new to the channel, and when Barnes talks about Wesley Snipes, there was a woman who claimed to that Wesley Snipes fathered her child.
This is this is I want to say you're well, thank you.
Welcome to the channel.
This is an anonymous tip that is worth absolutely nothing.
And unless you know that it's an anonymous tip, called it to the FBI at the election.
How many anonymous tips do you think they got that Trump did X, Y, and Z?
And you have Melanie Darrigo republished.
Oh my goodness.
Now I know why they didn't want because anonymous crazy people called into the FBI and said crazy things.
And then you get Ted Liu in their remember Nancy Pelosi's information or disinformation laundering.
Well, this is disturbing.
Retweeting it.
That's what we're dealing with right now.
This is the most damning stuff to have come out.
Why the hell it took so long?
Why they fought tooth and nail.
I would argue is, you know, just having played exactly into the sabotage that this was always intended to be.
And who's promoting this disinformation?
The usual players.
The Lincoln Project from newly released Epstein files, a letter allegedly from Epstein to convicted sex offender Larry Nasser.
Our president shares our love of young Nubile girls.
Wow, it's almost like people knew what to do in order to set things up in order for future clemency, which quite clearly Jeffrey Epstein never got.
It's almost like people were laying this out for the if and when.
If Trump were to have won the 2021 election, 2020 election, which was stolen, then they might have broken this setup of a trap earlier.
And so those are the among the biggest documents.
Now, I'm just going to pick the brains of the fake news just to see what they think are the biggest documents of today's release.
Let's go down here.
New York Times.
Where is this one from?
They're having their fireworks.
Epstein files live updates.
Trump referenced in some newly released documents.
Justice Department releases another batch.
Yada, yada, yada.
Here's the latest.
Justice Department late Monday released nearly 30,000 more pages.
Let's see what we got here.
This one's a stupid, stupid review.
There was another one that reviewed what they thought were the most incriminating, which is where you can know what to go look at for one of the most fake hoaxes.
And I'm using that word now in the proper sense in an attempt to set Trump up, implicate him where he had quite clearly no incriminating implication or participation.
Epstein, this is from CNBC, so you know it's got to be bullshit.
Epstein files latest batch includes a personal letter, emails, and heavily redacted documents.
What do they go with here?
Department of Justice released another batch, latest document, yada, yada.
Okay, we got all this crap.
Some of these documents contain untrue sensationalist claims.
Trump, who was largely unmentioned in the initial batch of files released Friday, is a former friend of Epstein's and has long denied any wrongdoing, included in the latest batch the handwritten letter to convicted sex offender Nasser.
Now they get not now because of the way algorithms work and they know it and the disinformation laundering.
Now when you search up Trump's name, you're going to get Trump Epstein Nasser.
Congrats.
This is the drive-by smear.
This is the ricochet smear.
What else do we have?
We got the SDNY memo.
I would like to know who the district attorney was, who appointed that district attorney, who it was to, who is in CC, and if you can see that by copying and pasting in Adobe, I'm sure we're going to find that out sooner than later.
And the flight records, and that's it.
Oh, listen to this.
In another email thread released with redactions in the latest batch, a person from the Human Trafficking Division of the DOJ and an unnamed recipient appeared to discuss possible Epstein co-conspirators.
The email exchange, July 9, 2019, states that, here we go, three of 10 co-conspirators had been located in Boston, New York City, and Connecticut and were served with grand jury subpoenas.
I think this is where we're going to see it.
So this is from whom to we don't know when, July 2019.
When does Epstein kill himself?
Shortly thereafter.
Epstein's bail argument is due on the judge.
Okay, fine.
July 19th.
Of the 10 co-conspirators, three have been located in Florida and served grand jury subpoenas.
One in Boston, one in New York, and one in Connecticut.
We're located and served.
Four of the 10 outstanding with attempts have been made.
One is a wealthy businessman in Ohio.
I'm not going crazy.
This is the state, I was going to say province, to which Epstein moved the CIA plane thingy thing.
So one is a wealthy businessman in Ohio.
A lead is being sent to CV.
The remaining three are currently out of pocket.
The team, whatever, yeah, is flying out tonight, tomorrow, various locations in Florida to interview possibly 25 victims.
Yada, yada, yada.
Okay, fine.
So there we have the Ohio connection coming back to end this all up.
And those are the documents today that the media is doing their best to run with to make it look like Trump has something to do with all of this.
See, the only thing that Trump has to do with all of this is I think he's being advised by incompetence in the DOJ or sabotage.
And he has caused a lot of unnecessary damage that could have easily been avoided over the last nine months.
But heck, I am not one to say, why didn't you do this then?
I was saying do it now, but now I'm not going to be the one to say you could have done this earlier.
I'm going to say better late than never.
And certainly better now before the next midterms, because as far as I can tell, and maybe I'm just totally blind and I'll go to the chat to see, this does nothing but further confirm an absence of implication of Trump and further incriminate other players within the Democrat side of the aisle.
Now let's see this here.
It's hilarious.
I mean, I guess I say I'll take it as flattery.
I guess I'm doing something right.
Reading some of the chat, B cancel A068084.
Sort of rhetorical.
Victims said they want names released.
Why don't they make them public themselves?
They have legal reps.
My understanding might be NDAs, might be the threat of defamation lawsuits.
Look, I don't know.
God willing, none of us should have to make those decisions.
You would say in their shoes, would they not accept the consequences willingly of going forward?
But if there are NDAs and if they don't have the evidence to substantiate their claims, and maybe they've made some calculations that are theirs and only theirs to make.
Let me pull this out and go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
I want to say now I'm thinking out loud, is my assessment on the memo of the 2020 SDNY memo possibly superficial or having holes in it because of who would have appointed the attorneys at the time.
I want to know what people say about this.
Here we go.
Dapper Dave 2021 says, Wexner lives in Ohio.
One of the conspirators to include Iran-Contra.
Very interesting.
Dapper Dave says, incoming Venezuela war, we got that.
Viva, you're getting old and you start all these shows.
Okay, we got that too.
So what does everyone say?
At the risk of going to the chat, which we're going to do anyhow, let's go to the chat and see what everyone has to say at Viva.
this is in rumble why didn't okay let me not read them quietly before i before i read them out loud Victims go on TV.
I wouldn't go on TV if you're scared to get sued, LOL, or worse.
Let's see what we got here.
Okay.
All right.
This looks funny.
They want you to believe this crap, but not ask questions.
LOL.
Okay.
Common sense.
Okay.
This is it.
All right.
Well, that's what's going on with the Epstein files.
Now, I wanted to start the show off with something from Kyle Serafin, which I'm going to bring up now anyhow.
Because I want him to, I want to play his words and not mine.
And I don't seem to have it here, actually.
Let's go with this one, right?
A slight change.
Well, we're going to just talk about something else right now.
Let me see what's going on in the chat.
Viva, your chat has become full retard.
Get moderators already.
I had moderators, but I doesn't mean that.
So American remains.
Who do you think I should mute from the chat?
Anybody who says anything with the word Jew in it?
And then I'll just, you know, then I'll just legitimize the idea that all they have to do is criticize Jews and then they get blocked from the chat.
Unfortunately, it's the internet.
So both you and I have to deal with that.
And that's the small price to pay for freedom of speech.
And every now and again, even a blind squirrel finds a nut and even a rapidly, oh, they're only anti-Israel, right?
People calling me the Jew.
Even they might make some good points that might actually contribute to something.
I have no idea.
But then again, anything spamming will get banned.
The spam is what you should do to see.
You should ban Imar Keith for enjoying bass to Trump.
I don't even know what this means.
Viva, just answer the question.
If they made all this up, why didn't they bring it up during the last three election cycles?
Okay, I can answer this question.
I'm not sure if it's supposed to be an attack of a question.
I don't think they expected to lose 2016.
Epstein wasn't really a big issue back then.
I mean, Trump had mentioned it.
Their insurance policy for undermining Trump's first presidency was the Russia hoax, then the impeachment and whatever.
Whether or not they were setting this up in the back burner to be used in the future.
I mean, it is interesting that stuff was going on prior to the 2020 election where you have that memo from the SDNY.
Maybe they were setting it up in the event that Trump won.
They would use this as one of many angles to go after Trump.
They're using it now to go after Trump.
So quite clearly, they're using it at a time when they think it's politically opportune to do so when they had had prior opportunities to do it regardless.
They went with Russia Gate back in 2016.
They went with the insurrection in 2021 after they had stolen that election.
They went with the insurrection in 2021 after they had already won the election.
So they didn't really need to bring this up back then.
They were going to try to get Trump impeached and convicted so he couldn't run again.
Then they were going to try to bankrupt him and jail him so he couldn't run again.
Then they were going to try to kill him so he couldn't run again.
And they have it now.
So better late than never, I guess.
Epstein started being mainstream in 2007.
You're not going back far enough.
Epstein was definitely not mainstream in 2007.
In fact, arguably was conspirator, conspiracy lore back in 2007 and conspiracy lore until I would say, I would argue until 2010s, maybe 2015.
I mean, you know, the likes of Alex Jones were on it far earlier, but I don't think it was mainstream.
I mean, it was so not mainstream that people didn't really appreciate that he was jailed.
They had no idea of the sweetheart deal that he got until later.
So I'd say it was mainstreamed around 2014, 2015.
He went mainstream when Trump appointed Alex Acosta in 2017.
That's a decent point.
That's when people discovered the full extent of the sweetheart plea deal because it was Alex Acosta, his pick at the time, who later got totally humiliated, and so did Trump.
And that's what I think people really understood what had happened.
Now, so I think we're good on that.
I don't think we need to do much more to cover that.
That's the latest.
I want to see if people are picking apart my analysis to see if I did get it wrong.
And what I did want to bring up was this.
Did I play this?
I think I played this yesterday, but hold up.
If I didn't play, this is Kyle Seraphin talking about, we briefly mentioned it yesterday, but talking about this.
It's going to be his words because this was not my information.
Second.
And we're running a little bit late here on the program.
So I appreciate your patience.
If you're watching live and if you're listening in the replay, you didn't know any better, but we're about 20 minutes late.
And the fact of the matter is, I woke up this morning and had a message from about 4 a.m. local time, my time, that was from my friend out on the East Coast, my buddy Steve Baker, who's been investigating the pipe bomber case and trying to get to the truth about January 6th, which we do believe was a real and it was a real serious conspiracy.
And there were a lot of people in play in various different parts of it.
And he's now in the hospital.
He called me on Friday afternoon.
I don't even know if he wants me saying this, but I'm saying it anyway because this is the deal.
He called me on Friday.
He was worried about his own safety, said he was heading home to his family, and he got some disconcerting news, which I won't be real specific about for now.
But Steve knows things.
Steve has information that is going to rattle, has rattled people that have been trying to keep a story quiet for the last five years.
The FBI has been complicit in covering it up.
The people that are so loved at the top of the FBI are complicit in covering this thing up.
They've been aggressive and actively going out there to silence voices, including mine, including Steve Baker's, including Steve Friends.
And I want you to consider something.
They hired and fired my friend specifically because we think we interviewed in a joint interview, the American Radical Podcast and the Kyle Seraphin Show joint interview with Joe Hanneman, talking about the inability of the federal government to go and try to pin this all on a training exercise after all these years, and then coming out with a real suspect who's now worked for the second federal agency, now moved into the intelligence community.
If you think this stuff is not related, that's on you.
That's fine.
I don't believe in coincidences.
I don't think they happen.
Certainly not at this.
I don't think my friend calls me up and says that he's concerned about safety and then turns around and a day and a half later, two days later, is in the hospital for something that he didn't have a pre-existing condition that has never been diagnosed.
It's never come up in his 60s.
So pray for Steve Baker, please.
And pray for our nation right now.
Because while people are getting ready to celebrate, I don't remember if I played this yesterday.
And if I did, I apologize.
I'm playing it again anyhow.
So Steve Baker, the journalist, hold on.
Did I play this?
I'm going to go to locals who's going to answer it faster.
Steve Baker is the man who broke the story, identifying his suspected Jan 6 pipe bomber, who was a member of the Capitol Police.
And the story went viral.
The story went crazy.
And the FBI, allegedly, according to a CBS News article, said, yeah, the person has been cleared because of an alibi of the person playing with his or her puppies at the time the bombs were being placed, except for the fact that the person that Steve Baker identified only had one dog at that time and it wasn't a puppy.
We never saw the video, never heard anything about that.
And then the FBI, about a month later, comes out with Brian Cole Jr., autistic 30-year-old black man.
And I say black only because of the ease through which that factual element could be verified if we had appropriate video surveillance, or if there's a way to confirm that it isn't a 30-year-old autistic black man, black man as well.
They come up with that suspect and Steve Baker, who I said, I can only imagine the immeasurable, immense amount of stress that he's under.
Blaze News retracts that story with a sort of, I say not a half-assed retraction, but sort of a retraction that you can't insist that the story is accurate when the FBI is telling you we've arrested someone who's different than the person your article identified.
So they retract and say, look, hey, they've arrested somebody, so we have to retract that part of the story.
But our sources affirm and reaffirm the accuracy of their opinions, et cetera.
To have a news outlet do that to you as a journalist has got to be immensely stressful.
And I don't care what your constitution is, it will be stressful to you.
So I can't imagine the stress that Baker's been under for the last however many months since having published that story.
And that's going to take a toll on you.
That being said, by the way, just not for nothing, the person that Steve Baker identified in his story has not yet issued a demand for a retraction above and beyond.
Oh, now they got whatever retraction that was.
Some people say it's a half-assed bullshit retraction.
Well, there hasn't been a demand for a formal retraction and apology.
There hasn't been a letter of demand threatening a lawsuit, and there hasn't been a lawsuit from what I understand.
So take that for what it's worth.
Steve Baker, according to Kyle Seraphin, says, I feel like my life is at risk.
I feel like I'm under risk, under threat, which anybody on earth who has done what Steve Baker has done by way of investigative journalism would feel like.
And so you have that feeling.
It's only normal.
I mean, we always joke.
Anybody who says anything bad about Hillary Clinton, you know, I'm not feeling suicidal.
And he said that apparently to Kyle Seraphin on Friday.
And then he was hospitalized yesterday with a sudden, spontaneous emergency for which there was no prior underlying medical condition.
Apparently he's doing okay.
Hold on.
Tickling my throat.
Apparently he's doing okay.
So touchwood, Godspeed and speedy recovery and prays up.
Prayers up for it for Steve Baker, as they say.
But then the question is going to be: is this just an absolutely untimely and outrageous coincidence, or is there something far more nefarious at play here?
And when you say something like that, you're going to think what the implication is, is that someone's trying to kill Steve Baker.
Someone has made an attempt to kill Steve Baker.
As if it's never, as if it's never happened before, that journalists who break stories that embarrass or incriminate powerful people, bad things happen to them, as if it never happens.
Now, Kyle Serafin has his issues with the FBI.
There could be a whole many number of people that would be interested in bringing harm to Steve Baker for the story that he broke.
Any member of the Capitol Police, anyone who has a hand in that conspiracy.
How do you cause certain medical conditions like this if it's intended to be an attack to silence?
I don't know.
I mean, people post pictures of the FBI or the CIA's heart attack guns, which they unveiled in what in the 70s?
It's one hell of a wild coincidence that a man who had never had any underlying conditions suddenly has this out of the blue three days after saying, I think people are out to get me, but people are certainly out to get Steve Baker.
Julian Assange, is it probably?
That's right.
You had people talking about killing Julian Assange.
Steve Baker is right up there.
And now the problem is also, you do this type of work, it can make you paranoid.
But just because you're paranoid doesn't mean people aren't following you.
So we're going to see.
And when anything can be made public, I like Kyle because you don't.
First of all, I like Kyle because he sometimes, you know, he discloses what he wants to and he's a good follow.
So check out Kyle Seraphin.
But that's what's going on with Steve.
So in as much as you believe in prayer, do it.
Jarhead over in our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community says, just a coincidence, nothing is at play.
Viva is in love with Kyle.
Can't tell if that's sarcasm.
That's as if to say nothing is in play.
Did Baker have any of the jabs?
I don't know.
I don't think so.
But I don't know.
And if I'm allowed, if I can ask and I'm allowed to confirm these questions, I would.
And I know that's where everybody's mind immediately goes.
That's where my mind first goes.
Well, that and just tremendous life stress.
You know, like people say, like, well, Donald Trump could have a heart attack any day of the week.
You know, when they were suing him, trying to bankrupt him, trying to jail him.
And you had that effing jackass, I forget his name, saying, you know, this type of stress is hard on anybody, let alone an 80-year-old man.
I was like, thanks for confirming, you know, saying the quiet part out loud.
You're trying to kill him through the stress of lawfare, through the stress of, you know, throwing him in jail.
So yeah, even, you know, I don't say it's sort of an indirect way to kill somebody through the stress, having a heart attack because of the stress you put them under, but my goodness, certainly something they do.
Cough button works.
Okay, Sammy.
Now, I asked if there was CIA got him, Trump's CIA let that sink in.
Well, I mean, I would wait a bit.
Viva, did anyone suggest asking Acosta who told you Epstein is intelligence?
Well, we haven't yet gotten the Acosta transcript where he allegedly said that, but then, you know, allegedly later on, I guess, denied having said that he was told to back off Epstein because Epstein's intelligence.
Love to get our hands on that.
And Trekkie says, What a coincidence.
I don't believe in them either.
There is, I mean, the thing is, it's not even just to explain away.
That was not sarcasm.
Coincidences happen.
A conspiracy, not around every tree.
All right, fine.
But then, hold on.
Let me see here.
Let me see if that was intended to be serious, Jarhead.
What was the part about nothing at play?
If you think nothing's at nothing at play in terms of his health, it should be fine.
You might be right.
Certainly the odds are more in your favor, but I give you sufficient odds.
I might say that, you know, some people, there have been wild attempts to take people out by putting poison under door handles, poison tips in umbrellas, drone striking facilities where Julian Assange might be.
Yeah, those are the days, people.
How it started versus how it's going.
I got to get my, my beard is much grayer than it was in that picture.
Anyhow, so there's that.
All right, good.
Let's get this out of here.
I think we got, oh, I want to do one more thing here while we were in the vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
All believe the Epstein file release when they tell us who in the CIA managed the pedophile blackmail for the last 20 plus years and how much taxpayer money was spent.
Protection, protection.
Is that my computer?
That's a little piece of dirt on my computer.
No, that's an apostrophe in your message.
Okay, protection, sources, and methods.
Pedophile and blackmail are CIA sources and methods.
All right, let's go over to Viva to Rumble and just see what's going on there for a second.
Kyle is the man version of Candace Owens.
Only if you're a total buffoon.
Sorry, respectfully submitted.
I mean, it's nice to say things.
You show me where, as far as I'm starting, it's not even worth entertaining.
I've had Kyle on enough, and I can tell you why he's, for one clear reason, not the male version of Candace Owens.
He comes on and has discussions, even with people who have publicly disagreed with him, and he defends his ideas quite publicly.
And I would say with quite good documentation to receive to back them up.
So that's already a material difference between the two.
Kyle's cool, says Elijah Fire.
All right, now what we're going to do, am I fat thing?
Oh, I see.
Okay, give me one second to refresh.
I got to come back into the room to this disconnect and.
And I'm back.
Okay, disconnect.
Piece of crap.
Okay, and I'm back.
You can still hear me.
What do we do now?
I think we're getting ready to raid the next show.
Oh, let's see here.
There's a chat just came in.
Bronze and I says, late to the party.
Did you mention anything?
The Epstein Doc redaction stumbles.
Supposedly, you are able to copy and paste and see the text.
Hey, I don't know how to do it.
I'll see if I can do it, but I will expect our locals community to be very good, at least some members, to do it if it's true.
We did cover that in today's show already.
I guess we'll finish with one last story before we head over to the vivabarneslaw.locals.com community for the after party.
A follow-up on that professor who graded the Christian girl a zero because of her religious leanings in her document has been fired.
You remember the story?
Well, I'm sure they're going to resolve it.
The Oklahoma teacher teaching assistant fired after uproar over flunking Christian student who referenced Bible and essay.
Samantha Fulnicky filed a discrimination claim after receiving a zero on an assignment about gender norms.
Weeks, this is just the activist who gave a student zero because she referenced the Bible when talking about gender norms.
She didn't realize the memo, the project was to regurgitate what the teacher said or wanted to hear.
Weeks after a University of Oklahoma student story about being flunked on her paper that touted her Christian faith caused a viral uproar, the teacher has been fired based on an examination of the graduate teaching assistant's prior grading standards and patterns, as well as the graduate teaching assistant's own statements related to this matter.
It was determined that the graduate teaching assistant was arbitrary in the grading of this specific paper.
The graduate teaching assistant will no longer have instructional duties, duties at the university.
Samantha Fulnicky, a junior, received a zero out of 25 on an assignment in which she referenced the Bible after graduate teaching assistant William Mel Kurth.
Who uses she, they?
So she's not, he's not just a whack dog.
He's also schizophrenic because he's more than one person.
Teaching assistant tasked Fulnicki and her classmates with writing a response to a scholarly article titled Relations Among Gender Typicality Peer Relations, whatever.
So, you know, the story.
Reference the Bible, she got a zero, and now the teacher is fired.
She later described the societal pushback towards non-binary gender identification as demonic.
Kurt took exception, gave her a zero.
Please note that I'm not deducting points because you have certain beliefs, but instead, I am deducting point sick for you posting a reaction paper that does not answer the questions for this assignment, contradicts itself, heavily uses personal ideology over empirical evidence and is all bullshit.
Samantha Fulnicki with her Bible, November 24th, 2025.
Anyway, that's the story.
So a little bit of a happy ending.
Although that person, the she they, they're going to be very angry that they got fired.
He got fired.
So that's that.
Oh, you see, it's already dark now.
It's four o'clock, people.
It's 4:05.
It's pitch black outside.
Who do we go rumble raid on the rumble?
Who's doing rumble today?
Well, I'm not sure that anybody's live after me.
Let's go for a few more minutes.
See what's going on in the chat and see what's going on.
If I have any more we got that.
Oh, well, we got one last word.
Let's go to the chat anyhow and just have some fun and see what's going on in the chat.
Over on Rumble, Ben Shapiro's evil.
Okay, the queer does not accept academic arguments.
Candace produced the clearest photo of Tyler Robinson.
If you don't find that strange, that she did what the FBI did not, you're in a cult.
The devil is the hero of the Bible.
All right, everyone's on vacation besides you, Viva.
I'm not getting any more.
I'm fed up talking about the people who are enjoying certain things.
Come back, Viva.
Your transformation to Florida, man, is almost complete.
I can't wait to get back, people.
Viva, Culture of Discrimination, Dinesh D'Souza podcast.
You could raid Owen Schroyer.
Is he live?
Merry Christmas, Viva, with your family.
Thank you very much, Ned Toons.
Merry Christmas to all of you out there.
Yeah, let's go.
If Owen's, if Owen's live, let's go raid.
Let's go raid Owens.
Thanks, Viva.
You were the only show on the internet today.
Yes.
Well, we went to my favorite place in Montreal, Landzao Noodles, with the family.
We had some noodles.
And that's it.
Am I on tomorrow?
I will be on tomorrow.
Of course, I'm going to be.
I love this.
I'm lucky.
He who loves what they do never works a day in their life.
Let me go down here.
Merry Christmas to everybody.
Viva has amazing family.
Thank you, Veris.
Stop it.
Come back, Viva.
We want you here with us.
No, Kiss McGroin.
Well, unfortunately, say, I don't know, in addition to it being the holidays, the news is a little bit slow, I guess.
But no, I think that's it.
Oh, look, I just did it just to see one last piece of breaking news, and we're going to take it over to Viva Barnes Law.
She's violent, chaotic.
This is Chicago.
That scared the living baj.
The Supreme Court rejected the Trump administration's request to allow the president to proceed with immediately deploying National Guard troops in Chicago, delivering a blow if temporary.
So, what's it going to be?
Is this going to be this?
This is going to be like the stay on the injunction, if I remember correctly.
The justices declined the Trump administration's emergency request to overturn a ruling by U.S. District Judge yada yada yada that had blocked the deployment.
An appeals court had also refused to step in.
The Supreme Court took more than two months to ask.
Act Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch publicly dissented.
So it's a temporary stay on the order on the order pending a full adjudication.
I guess.
The update comes after the Trump administration asked the higher court last week to stay a lower court order blocking Trump from immediately deploying federalized National Guard troops in Chicago.
Well, congratulations, Chicago.
To the victor, go the spoils.
And that is what you call cutting off your nose to spite your face.
You don't get the National Guard.
Enjoy your crime-ridden hellhole that has a higher crime rate than Iraq.
Let's go see where Owen Schroyer is.
Owen Schroyer is live and he's wearing a Christmas hat.
Let's go raid Owen Schroyer.
Say hi to him for me.
Are we still on the am I still sharing the tip?
No, I'm not.
Yeah, I'm going to go do a couple of things on my end.
Amen, double dog, amen.
When the Epstein arrests happening, we'll see.
Chicago is infested with crime.
I used to live in Cicero.
It's crazy.
This is what you call suicidal empathy or suicidal stubbornness at this point.
But let's go raid Owen Schoyer and wish him a Merry Christmas and let him know from whence he came.
Raid.
Boom.
Shakalaka.
Go.
Now, what we're going to do is we're going to go look at Owen Schroyer's chat and we're going to see this.
Boo, yeah.
Viva raid.
What's up, Owen?
Mary Chris Mass.
Boom.
Yeah.
And that's very loud.
Sell when you're on Suicide Watch.
Oh, crap.
I forgot that part of the story.
You know what?
We have our after party story.
I forgot I have that in the backdrop.
We're going to talk about the other breaking thing, which I thought was relevant.
Epstein's inmate allegedly tried to kill him.
All right, go raid.
Go raid Owen Schroyer.
We're going to have our locals only or locals after party.
I'll give everybody the link to that.
Yeah, I forgot about that angle.
Damn it.
I have it in the backdrop, people.
Locals, if you want to come.
And that's it.
Everybody, I'll see you tomorrow.
Christmas is the day after.
So happy day before, the day before Christmas.
Happy day before Christmas Eve.
And locals, we're going to go have the after party there now.
Godspeed.
God bless.
And locals, updating.
Oh, by the way, if you want to support the channel, you know what to do.
All the stuff is down there.
You can crypto tip.
You can get a book.
You can join at vivabarnslaw.locals.com.
Yada, yada, yada.
You know what to do.
▲
Export Selection