Viva & Barnes - Jan. 6 Suspect ADMITS to Planting Bombs, Claims to be Trump SUPPORTER? The Blaze RETRACTS? & MORE!

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 5, 2025 - Viva & Barnes

01:24:50

Jan. 6 Suspect ADMITS to Planting Bombs, Claims to be Trump SUPPORTER? The Blaze RETRACTS? & MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Just so that we can periodically return to the land of communism and maple syrup, Canada, to remind you all of how crazy things can be, in addition to the weather, which I see in the chat already, I present to you a video of a pastor being arrested for not writing an apology letter to someone who felt threatened by his protest.
	Behold.
	Do you have the feelings, police?
	No, just the regular.
	So you're under arrest for your breach of CSO.
	Can you come inside with us, please?
	Okay.
	Sounds good.
	Are you able to drop that for me or pass it off the library?
	You know why you're arresting this man for?
	He refused to apologize for his religious beliefs.
	I am not aware of this.
	He's protecting your children and your grandchildren.
	Do you guys understand how absurd this is?
	This is so sad.
	If you guys really understood what you're doing, you probably wouldn't be doing it.
	This is not a prideful thing to do.
	Shyland, can you watch that?
	A shameful.
	It's okay, buddy.
	We'll turn the volume down and I'll just explain to everybody who's listening on podcast what we're witnessing.
	A man getting arrested because he refused to issue to write an apology to someone who felt intimidated, threatened by his protests.
	I'll put that on pause now.
	You might not have heard it.
	CSO is a conditional sentence order.
	Basically, not probation, but from what I'm, you know, it's sort of like you can avoid jail time if you agree to something.
	You might not have heard about this story, not for lack of coverage.
	You know, we've been a little bit distracted by things in these United States of America, which are interesting these days, given what's going on with the pipe bomber situation.
	But if you didn't hear about this, this is reported in Western Standard.
	And, you know, just as bad as you think it is in the States, it could be worse, people.
	You could be living in Canada.
	In addition to the rampant communism and authoritarian statism, government overreach, you also have sub-zero temperatures and no sun for six months a year.
	Calgary pastor arrested after refusing to apologize to librarian.
	You didn't read that wrong, but I'll get you on.
	It's always the contempt.
	They get you on the contempt when you don't abide by a court order that itself is absolute tyrannical hogwash.
	Think back to Arthur Pavlovsky, who had a court order requiring that when he exercised his First Amendment rights, or in Canada, they call them freedom of speech, eh?
	When the government allows it, eh?
	Whenever he was exercising his freedom of speech, he was compelled to issue a statement written by the judge as relates to COVID, medical consensus, vaccination safety, et cetera, quarantine requirements.
	He could exercise his free speech, but whenever he was criticizing the government, he was compelled to issue a PSA, public service announcement, for and on behalf of the government.
	And when he didn't do that, it would have been contemptuous.
	It was overturned in appeal, as I suspect this will be if it gets there.
	A Calgary pastor was again arrested for refusing to apologize to a librarian under a court order.
	Derek Reimer, who was arrested Wednesday, was on a year-long house arrest that would have ended this month.
	At a court hearing last week to discuss the conditions of his sentence, Reimer was ordered to write an apology letter to the library manager, Shannon Slater, which he had until the end of the week to write.
	I'm not swearing yet.
	It's still too early in the show.
	What in the ever-loving name of sweet, merciful hell is going on?
	This is like when the bullies in elementary school become the government when you're an adult.
	You're going to write an apology letter, sir.
	And if you don't do that, you're going to have detention.
	Except in Canada, as an adult, detention is jail time.
	The pastor first appeared in court in 2023 incident at a Calgary, after an incident at a Calgary Public Library in Saddletown, where the library was hosting Reading with Royalty event, in which adults dressed in drag read stories to children.
	Makes total sense.
	Oh, I thought it was going to be adults that don't dress like the king and the queen.
	No, perverts, cross-dressers who want to read to children.
	There's nothing wrong with being a pervert if you're an adult, you know, so long as it's with other adults.
	You might not be a pervert then.
	Dressed in gice or drags, you can read to kids.
	Reimer had asked Slater why the library was hosting the event, which often discusses sexual content with children, like their sexual identity.
	Slater declined to answer Reimer, asked him to leave, which Reimer did, saying he'd come back and protest.
	He then published the interaction with Slater on his social media, encouraging others to voice their disapproval, yada, yada, yada.
	Since Reimer did not follow court orders and submit an apology letter to Slater by the deadline, he is now back in custody.
	On the apology letter, Reimer previously spoke to the Western Standard.
	To be sorry, you have to admit fault that you're wrong.
	You made a mistake.
	I will not apologize based on fabricated narrative the judges made up based off her discretion that I intimidated the librarian.
	Librarian was, can you imagine a court order that you apologize, that you bear false witness to yourself?
	Apparently, the librarian said she felt anxious, upset, and threatened because she interpreted me referring to the program as pervert grooming sessions.
	She interpreted it as though I had called her a pedophile protector.
	My lawyer came up and said, well, you had mentioned this three times, and basically I never said the word pedophile once ever.
	She interpreted it as me calling her a pedophile protector.
	Therefore, she was upset and she was worried about reputational harm, about a lie that was going to be spread on what I said, Reimer said.
	I don't even think he called her a pedophile protector, but she felt that he did.
	And a court comes in and says, you'd better apologize.
	And if you don't, well, because it's in a court order now, we get to arrest you, not because you didn't apologize, but because you did not respect and abide by the almighty dictates of an unconstitutional, tyrannical court order.
	Why are we starting with that?
	That was the perfect transition, pun intended, when you hear the story that we're going to get into with a story from Jeff Evelyn.
	Now, Jeff Evelyn, you may remember from such Canadian tyrannical situations as you can't go in the forest lest you get a $25,000 fine during the traveling through the forest fireban of Nova Scotia, the great scare of 2025, which they did in 2022 as well.
	Jeff Evelyn was on talking about that.
	We've all been trying to get Jeff Evelyn on the Rogan show.
	That would be amazing if it could happen.
	But Evelyn and I, you know, we've been talking.
	He's like, I've got to talk to you about the story of how the government tried to trans my kid when she hit the age of sufficient adulthood in Canada, 16 years of age, where Dr. Mengelees of the Canadian gender affirming care environment can reach out to the child without having to go through the father first.
	Jeff, if you can hear me, come on in here.
	Tell the world what the hell is going on that they did this to his daughter, tried to contact her without his permission.
	And then he had a discussion with mouse fart opposition leader, so-called Pierre Poiliev.
	Jeff, how goes the battle?
	Oh, it's it's going.
	We're hanging in there, buddy.
	Yeah, so this, I guess I'll try to give you the calls notes, the short version of this, but this was something that cropped up during my posting to Ottawa, the gender dysphoria, that is.
	I don't believe it to be gender, you know, genuine gender dysphoria.
	I think it was the schools.
	There was never, ever a peep about this prior to my posting to my last military posting, which was NDHQ in Ottawa.
	And Basically, things had kind of calmed down and I wasn't dealing so much with the madness of the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, booking appointments with the gender clinic for my daughter that I wasn't aware of.
	I initially took her to, you know, to get some counseling at the adolescent mental health clinic.
	I was a single dad for the last 10 years of my career, by the way.
	So I expected that maybe she had some, you know, she needed some counseling to help her cope with some of the issues around my separation from her mother.
	But anyway, they referred her to the gender clinic without my knowledge.
	And then I went through a bit of an ordeal with that, but things kind of calmed down for a while.
	And I hadn't heard from them in about a year and a half at the time that I deployed to Iraq in 2019.
	And while I was there, she turned 16.
	So I started calling her phone directly and telling her that, you know, you don't need your daddy's permission anymore, sweetheart.
	You can come on in for your sex change.
	Jeff, let me ask you a question.
	These are not things that I have any experience with.
	Single father, you're off to Iraq.
	Who does your daughter stay with when you're off serving the country?
	My mother is retired and she came to Ottawa to stay with the kids.
	They were both teenagers by the time that that deployment came up.
	So yeah, I had my mother there to support me.
	That's got to be wildly difficult.
	So you find out when you're in Iraq that degenerate perverts in the so-called medical care system, it's a social contagion.
	There's just no other way to look about it.
	You know, like the virgin suicides, there are social contagions, even for things as self-destructive as suicide.
	It's a social contagion run by people who profit off of it, who derive either moral superiority or who enjoy being in control of a living creature, try to impose this on them.
	So you find this out, you're in Iraq, and your daughter tells you they're calling me directly and they want to basically transition me.
	Trans.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	So I had actually just redeployed to another location within Iraq.
	I was in a pretty remote location and I got a message from my mother, you know, telling me what was happening.
	So I called and, well, she was pretty upset.
	She was crying.
	And I kind of devised this scheme to take my leave from theater early so I could attend the appointment at the gender clinic with her.
	And that's what I did as I traveled back.
	And it was everything that, you know, you've heard basically it was just a lot of browbeating.
	It was a lot of, would you rather have a living son or a dead daughter, this kind of thing.
	And the entire time, all I ever did was just ask them for evidence.
	I was like, these are pretty, I mean, I was pretty hip to the ideological component of it already.
	But I started asking them for things like evidence to support these claims that there's this risk of suicide and that people are actually better off after they've transitioned.
	Of course, I've seen all the studies myself and I know that not to be the case.
	And they never did.
	They never did provide anything.
	They just continued to browbeat and shame.
	And, you know, they're very incredibly aggressive.
	My mother said as much.
	And, well, what ended up happening is I contacted my MPP and my MP, Goldie Gamari and Pierre Polyev, respectively.
	I sent an email to both of those offices detailing the whole harrowing experience.
	Then that went on for quite a while.
	These are members of the conservative, the federal conservative party.
	Yes.
	So Goldie Gamari would have been a provincial conservative and Pierre Polyev was the federal conservative.
	And initially they told Goldie Gamari's office to run with it.
	And they just sent it back to the healthcare system and said, like, you know, is this supposed to happen?
	And the healthcare system was like, yes, absolutely.
	This is the way that we conduct our business.
	And I went back to Pierre Polyev's office and I said, you have a vote coming up on this conversion therapy bill that would have any parent who doesn't want to give their child a sex change or who intervenes in this process to avoid having a sex change inflicted on their child to impose a five-year jail sentence on them.
	It was Jordan Peterson has since said it effectively criminalizes, I say, psychotherapy, any form of therapy, because what the psychologists, psychiatrists, counselors are required to do is affirm mental disorders and not treat via therapy those very same mental disorders, like telling an anorexic girl she's too fat because you have to affirm it because to tell her she's sick, which with no judgment would violate the essence of that conversion therapy ban.
	I've talked about it a bunch of times, and I often bring it up to show what a bunch of liberals the conservatives are, that they voted unanimously in favor of this conversion therapy ban, which really is just a one-way street.
	You can convert a straight kid to gay or trans, but you can't convert or even attempt to a trans confused kid to straight or gay.
	Yeah, to cisgender.
	You may not seek counseling that gives preference to the cisgender identity, which is just a Marxist way of saying helping the child to feel comfortable in their natural body.
	You may not do that.
	And no counselor in Canada will do that.
	They have to refer your child to the gender clinic where the biomedical transition begins, puberty blockers, hormones, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries.
	And as you're aware, I mean, there are probably well over a thousand adolescent girls who've had their breasts removed already.
	Now, my daughter, she's 22 and she just had her breasts removed a couple of months ago.
	But I mean, I kept her safe as long as she was under my roof.
	And I think the real story here is not only did the conservatives vote unanimously to jail any parent who tries to protect their child, but Pierre Polyev did so knowingly because I personally told him my story.
	He refused to read a letter out on the floor of the House of Commons that I offered to write for him.
	Then he went on.
	He also refused to listen to the recordings that I made of the appointments that I attended.
	And these people are absolute maniacs.
	Anybody listening to these recordings would know that he refused to listen to those.
	And then he went ahead and he voted to effectively to put me in jail because I did seek counseling before the law went into effect through Dr. Shoot.
	I'm forgetting his name.
	He wrote the definition for gender dysphoria down at the University of Toronto.
	And that would be illegal for any parents to do that this day and age, thanks to Bill C4.
	Let's see if I can find the doctor.
	Jeff, I didn't know that.
	So your daughter, and I feel bad asking this because it's your family and she's an adult.
	She went through with the double mastectomy.
	Yeah, as far as I know, you see, like they cut off contact.
	So I haven't been able to follow up or see her or anything like that.
	It was just that her mother had texted me to let me know that it was happening, probably just to make me suffer.
	At the risk of asking a question that's not intended to put lemon juice on a wound, that's got to be the most enraging, the most soul-crushing, but enraging thing, hurtful thing imaginable.
	Yeah, it is absolutely hands down the most painful thing that I have ever had to endure personally.
	And perhaps any generation of fathers has ever had to endure for that matter.
	Okay.
	So you meet with Pierre, you have this discussion, and this is 2021, Pierre and the Conservatives unanimously.
	Not one so-called Conservative votes against this piece of tyrannical child abuse legislation.
	You meet up with him again later on?
	Yeah, I did.
	He had a campaign event in Truro, Nova Scotia.
	So I drove down to that campaign event to do the grip and grin with him.
	And my intent was to confront him on camera.
	So I waited in line to go shake his hand and I had my camera ready.
	And as I was approaching him, as it was my turn, his staffers couldn't keep their hands to themselves and started like grabbing at my phone.
	And they must have hit the record button without me knowing because I did put him on the spot and I didn't get it on camera.
	Not only that, but I left the venue, I changed my clothes and came back in looking completely different.
	All I have to do is take my hat off and I look like a totally different person.
	So, you know, I went back in the line again.
	And this time I just tried to record the audio because what they were doing is they're saying, no, sir, I insist.
	I will take the picture for you.
	And they'll take the camera from you.
	So I just said, here's my phone.
	Go ahead and take the picture.
	And I was recording audio in the background.
	They hit the volume button and muted the audio.
	So I still didn't get me putting him on the spot.
	And he is one slippery son of a bitch.
	I will say that much, because, you know, I asked him, is it legal, you know, to refuse a sex change for your child?
	And he will say things like, well, are there any parents in jail for refusing that in Canada?
	How about you answer the fucking question?
	It hasn't happened yet, but the check is in the mail.
	And especially now in Quebec, where if the government says it's in the child's best interest to lop off their titties or their genitals, the parent doesn't get to intervene because now the state gets to decide what's the best interest for the kid and how to proceed.
	Vaccination, gender-affirming care.
	It's how they're so far behind or so ahead of the UK where even there they're starting to pull this stuff back.
	So you didn't, well, you ran for the People's Party of Canada, right?
	Yeah, now you know why.
	It's the only party in Canada that's against this butchery.
	I asked you this the last time.
	Are you making any steps to get the hell out of there?
	Out of Canada, no, no concrete steps.
	I think that this winter I'll probably be looking at a plan B, but that's more related to things like the censorship bills that are coming down the pike right now.
	It's just one thing after another.
	I mean, it's one thing after another.
	They take your kids away.
	They take your rights away.
	They take your freedom of thought away.
	And too many Canadians are still okay with it.
	Not just okay with it.
	You wouldn't believe the response that I've gotten from the CPC since I came forward with this.
	Now, mind you, I've been telling this story for a couple of years, but it's news now because I said it on the James O'Keefe interview a couple of months ago.
	And that's viral.
	And so like the CPC has been witch hunting me, you know, the CPC bros, the guys who are really in the cult.
	And, you know, I've been dragged by Trantifa, Di Fagalon, the woke right, and now the CPC.
	And I got to say, like the CPC may actually be the worst.
	I mean, it's unbelievable.
	What I do find amazing that the amount of infighting of what you would think would be ideological allies.
	I mean, with Diagalon and, you know, everybody finds something eventually to fight over when things get sufficiently fractured.
	No, but the Conservative Party of Canada, it's the reason why Canada is where it is and it's going where it's going.
	You know, I almost to some extent think Carney is going to be a better leader for Canada than Pierre because Pierre is effectively useless.
	At least Carney is directional in his intentions.
	Yeah, and a lot of people are saying that he's basically a progressive conservative.
	Carney, that is.
	Now, I said on stage on the CBC during the election that Carney is evil.
	And, you know, I still believe that he plans to get rich off the demise of Canada.
	No question.
	But at least he's open to making deals to keep Alberta in so that he can get richer when he gets rich off the demise of Canada.
	You know, it doesn't have that type of strife or not make that type of deal with Alberta would be bad for his own political future.
	So got to make it make it happen.
	And the thing is, you know, when it comes to the liberals and the left more broadly, like that's the totalitarian end of the spectrum.
	So I expect them to do totalitarian things and they're going to try to advance this totalitarian agenda.
	But I also expect the conservatives who are supposed to be on the individualist liberal side of the spectrum to hold that back.
	Like they're the ones who are supposed to be countering that agenda and they don't do it.
	So that's why I agree with you when you say like the Conservative Party of Canada is the reason that we're in this mess right now.
	It's because they've been so complicit and such good little lap doggies and doormats for the left ever since Harper left.
	No, and they set the standard for conservative supporters.
	And if Pierre had said something about the ostriches, conservative supporters might have felt compelled to say something about the ostriches.
	As it was, they say if he doesn't say anything, why should I say anything?
	And congratulations, that's the hell you're going to inherit up in Canada.
	Dude, I didn't know that about your daughter.
	That's enraging.
	Yeah, yeah, I know.
	Like I said, it is definitely the hardest thing that I've ever had to go through.
	But, you know, what am I supposed to do?
	Like, just give in to at some point, you know, God gave man free will so they can make their own mistakes.
	And parents raise children.
	They become adults and they're, you know, tattoos, drugs, they can make their own mistakes.
	And there's very little a loving parent, a loving father can do to prevent someone from hurting themselves when they're hell-bent on it.
	Well, that's true, but it is also true that, like I said, no generation of fathers has ever had to deal with this.
	And the reason that we're having to deal with this is because of the legal climate.
	It's because, you know, they're forcing this stuff into the schools and into the hospitals.
	You know, like I said, like there was never a peep about any of this before I moved to Ottawa.
	Before that, we were actually posted to the United States at Tyndall Air Force Base in Florida.
	And I mean, I coached her cheerleading for three years.
	She was a girly girl who wanted to do girly things.
	And even right up all through high school and stuff like that, like her brother and I would be, you know, her brother would kind of say, does that look like something that a boy does?
	No, it doesn't.
	Like she still did very girly things.
	But like you said, it's a social contagion.
	And they've made it very cool and trendy to do this kind of thing while at the same time, you know, just psychologically abusing kids for being born white.
	You know, and you need a diversity card if you want to be in the club.
	It's a very exclusive club.
	It's not about inclusivity.
	It's about exclusivity.
	And if you don't have a diversity card, then you're not in it.
	And so this, I think, is a way for a lot of girls who really value social acceptance.
	There's plenty of anthropological data on this.
	It has everything to do with survival in the ancestral environment.
	Banishment for a man is not necessarily certain death, but banishment for a female pretty much is.
	So yeah, they really value that kind of being in the club.
	And so that's why we see the statistics have been flipped, whereas gender dysphoria used to be something that manifested in young boys and almost always had something to do with mommy issues.
	But now we see it manifesting in adolescent girls.
	And the definition of gender dysphoria written by Dr. Zucker, I just remembered his name.
	It's so broad that it actually captures normal puberty.
	Like if you feel extreme discomfort in your gender for six months or longer, that's what it says.
	That's puberty.
	It's madness.
	Yeah, Dr. Kenneth Zucker seems to be the doc.
	Yeah.
	Jeff, I say we're going to try to keep, we're going to keep trying to get you on Rogan because I think you need a man on the inside of the madness in Canada to really flesh it out for Rogan.
	And he's had Gad sad on enough and he's had Peterson on enough.
	Let's see him.
	He can have all.
	Oh, no, I could tell him stuff that I think would blow his socks off way beyond anything Peterson or Gad sad.
	And by the way, Peterson was the guy who did the puff piece with Pierre going into the last election.
	You don't even ask him about any of the gender dysphoria stuff, about the gender ideology stuff that he's been railing about for years.
	It was a softball interview.
	Jeff, this is your Twitter handle.
	It's at Jeff Evely, E-V-E-L-Y.
	Where else can people find you and where else can people go to support the work that you're doing?
	I'm also on Facebook.
	It's Jeff Evely, hashtag PPC.
	And you can find under the same name on Instagram and TikTok and YouTube.
	I don't really check on those platforms a whole lot.
	I just kind of post to them.
	Most of my engagement is through X and Facebook.
	Okay, amazing.
	Jeff, we will continue to touch base.
	I have to come up to Commie Canada for Christmas.
	So it's a very commie Christmas Canada.
	I'll see how that goes.
	But Jeff, we'll be in touch.
	Let me, if there's anything ever, like updates and whatnot, you'll come back on and talk about the updates on your $25,000 ticket when you get to court.
	We'll be in touch, Fiva.
	Thanks so much.
	Have a good one.
	Okay, take care.
	Godspeed.
	All right, people.
	That's what's going on in Canada.
	It's that expression.
	As bad as it is, it could be worse.
	And that story, if you thought your day was bad, just imagine that guy who was at the bottom of the ocean drilling and he had been pumping hot water into his dry suit or wetsuit.
	And then they pumped in a jellyfish and he felt a little itch on his butt and he scratched it and like mushed up the jellyfish.
	And as bad as your day is going, it could be worse and as bad as your country's going, could be Canada.
	Let me just see something here.
	I think we've got Breanna Morello might be coming on right now to talk about the Jan 6 pipe bomber story.
	Well, well, well.
	Well at you, well at you, well at you.
	Okay, we're getting back into the stuff in America, people.
	I said, if we don't talk about the Jan 6 pipe bombing stuff, you guys might go crazy.
	I might go crazy because I got to talk about it.
	I don't know what to think of it just yet.
	I watched my, we're going to get into all of this actually.
	I think Brianna has a short amount of time here.
	Let me just send this out here.
	Hold on.
	Okay, there we go.
	Bada bing, bada boom.
	Let's start with one thing actually before Brianna gets in here.
	Got to highlight it, put it on blast that whether you like it or not, whether you agree with the move or not, the Blaze has updated.
	I say retracted and or updated because what's funny is people use this retraction against Blaze to say they're admitting they made a mistake while simultaneously saying it's not a retraction because they didn't retract the story.
	They retracted or updated, depending on your perspective, the Steve Baker expose from a month ago in light of the arrest of now the alleged suspect, which would in theory mean that there could only be one suspect or a person involved in this plot, whatever.
	Update, former Capitol Police officer, a forensic match for Jan 6 pipe bomber sources say, and the update, which came yesterday, the day of the arrest of Brian Cole, the suspect.
	December 4th, 2025, Blaze News considers fairness and accuracy to be the defining goals of any news organization.
	A report posted on November 8, 2025 about Jan 6 pipe bombs was based on sourcing from individuals in a position of know, in a position to know this type of sensitive law enforcement information who have a demonstrated record of reliability and accuracy.
	Of North, the sources continued to stand by the information they provided to Blaze News.
	At all times, the reporting adhered to professional journalistic standards and was published with a good faith belief in its truth.
	Even so, in light of Thursday's developments and the FBI's arrest of another individual, Virginia resident Brian Cole Jr., in connection with the Capitol pipe bombing incident, we consider the values of fairness and accuracy to require a retraction of this article.
	After publication, Steve Bunnell, whom the Washington Post identified as an attorney for the Capitol Police Officer, told the Post his client, quote, categorically denies, end quote, that she planted the pipe bombs.
	The featured image on the article was changed December 4, 2025.
	So that's the retraction.
	Whether or not you think it's a sufficient retraction.
	Oh, Brianna, you're Brianna, Brianna.
	Sorry.
	You're in the stream right now.
	Wait, no.
	Okay, your audio might be a bit delayed.
	How goes the battle?
	Oh, my friend.
	It's going well.
	It's going well.
	I'm like trying to figure all of this out right now.
	Sadly, I don't have much credibility and faith in our FBI.
	So you have no faith in the FBI and you might be on the outs with them.
	I don't know if I'm on the outs with them, but like we're probably going through the same sort of internal conflict.
	I can't have that be a guiding factor, a determining element in what I think, what I say.
	Because if you're saying, oh, I don't want any, I don't want disfavor.
	I don't want people disliking me if I say what I genuinely think, you're self-censoring, but also no longer being honest with your viewers.
	What's your take on what we have now heard over the last 24 to 36 hours?
	So far, I've read through the criminal complaint.
	Although it sounds like that'd be great additional information to be kind of convincing, to kind of push someone somewhere.
	I don't think it's strong enough.
	I don't think you're going to get a DC jury to convict on just that.
	Keep in mind, too, I did reach out to the FBI yesterday, someone on their team, very close to the investigation, who told me that there's going to be more evidence coming out very, very soon because I told them I'm not buying any of this right now.
	I said it's good, but it's not great.
	And I just wonder how they even got to this person, right?
	Because they're talking about going through credit card records.
	They're talking about going through phone records.
	Like, how do they know to funnel in on this one issue, this one person, I should say?
	And now we're seeing reports that he is somehow confessing.
	I saw the New York Post say that.
	He apparently does have autism.
	So for everyone to keep in mind, you know, I have family members who are autistic.
	I literally put a note on their IDs where if they're ever caught by police or ever if police stop them for anything, that they are just not allowed to speak to them and they must contact me or one of my other family relatives with our numbers in the back, just because they do have a habit of saying things that they didn't actually do.
	So just keep that in the back of your mind that this kid or 30 years old is not really a kid, but he may have not actually admitted to it because he did it.
	He might have admitted to it because he's autistic and he's maybe falling victim to peer pressure.
	So this is a few things.
	How they got to this individual, because apparently this was not a known individual to anybody who's been involved in this story for a long time.
	One of my questions, I don't know when they're going to be able to answer it, is when did this name become on the radar of the FBI?
	If the name had not been there until after Steve Baker's expose, you're going to have people rightly or wrongly, and most people would say rightly, very suspicious about the timing of this breaking story.
	The rush to put this all together.
	Not that we can learn from the past, but it's prologue.
	In the James Comey indictment, the theory is that they rushed together to slap that indictment together on the eve of the statute of limitations, and it was very weak.
	It got dismissed for other reasons, but it was very weak to begin with.
	That was my reaction as well.
	This seems very thin as well.
	So, barring additional evidence, you know, this might be enough to arrest, but certainly not enough to convict beyond a reasonable doubt.
	What inklings or what are indications of additional evidence are you getting from your sources, if I may ask?
	Specifically, what they just said, because I told them that I want to know how you got to this person, they said that will be coming out during his first court appearance.
	That's expected to be later today.
	So, we might see something very shortly that indicates that.
	Also, you mentioned when was this person named as a suspect?
	Now, Steve Baker, great friend of mine, I truly do love and support him, went to the courthouse when he was arrested, was one of the only journalists there besides the Blaze, his employer.
	So, this is something personal for me, but I did want to kind of go around and ask people close that I knew in the Intel world, friends of ours who before they, you know, before they went into the government, they were friends of ours before they did take on these jobs.
	And I trust them dearly.
	And one of them did tell me that they received a briefing prior to Steve making this person's name public, and that the person's name that they were given is not the same person that Steve named.
	So, if it is, I did reach out to this person for a follow-up, I haven't heard back yet.
	But if it is the person that they've now apprehended, that means they've had the suspect's name for weeks now.
	So, keep that in mind that they possibly could have had this for weeks.
	Now, the timing of it is quite strange because two people we know that this FBI does not like at all: Steve Baker, which, under obviously the last administration, they had arrested for his January 6th coverage, and Kyle Seraf and the FBI whistleblower, who has really ticked off all the right people, which has resulted in a civil lawsuit with the FBI director's girlfriend.
	So, there's a lot here.
	So, I truly think, and I know, you know, Don Jr. did a great job at asking Kash Patel, the FBI director, yesterday when he had him on his show, asking him, Hey, like, was the Blaze reporting having anything to do with you making this arrest a little bit faster?
	Because it's, you know, the timeline is quite strange.
	And he denied it, of course.
	Yeah, the timeline is stunning.
	It's almost beyond coincidence that they have to come up with this.
	And not to say that they threw it together quickly, but the affidavit was arguably thin.
	I mean, Benz gave it his thumbs up, and that's worth what it's worth because I think Benz is a smart guy, and I'll factor that into my equation.
	But it was relatively thin.
	You know, they're talking about purchases a year to two years old, which Benz put the timeline together is very interesting, actually.
	Relatively thin, and putting it on this kid who we now know is his grandmother saying he's autistic.
	I don't know if we see a diagnosis, but allegedly not all there in the head with no that we know of yet criminal record.
	And there's a few things that I've been seeing reported about him having an account called I Am Hot for COCK or something, which leads me to question what this kid might have been doing on the internet in terms of trying to find another angle to this.
	But a guy who's autistic, who allegedly prepared, planted these bombs, and then evaded authorities for five years itself requires explanation.
	That doesn't really seem to add up either.
	I mean, I'm going through all this information.
	I'm wondering, well, obviously, the FBI must have known who he was.
	I mean, the investigation quickly stalled out probably when they realized it wasn't going to add up.
	I don't know if you saw, too, the reports that are coming out from MSNBC when they're trying to claim now that this kid is a Trump supporter.
	Go figure, right?
	He was once Jake Tapper said he was white.
	Now, MSNBC, which is MS Now, saying that he is a Trump supporter and he's voiced his support for the president.
	It doesn't make any sense to me.
	Nothing's really adding up right now.
	I wish they would have kind of released all of this together.
	Now, here's also the other issue here, and this is what happens when you wait too long to investigate this stuff.
	I would have loved to see his face making the actual purchases on his credit card, the camera footage from that, because I know if somebody wants to set you up, they could possibly charge things for your credit card and make it look like this was your credit card.
	They could take out a credit card and purchase things online and make it seem like it's you.
	I know they're also saying that his phone records are pretty telling because it's bouncing off the towers that are in the area.
	But again, how is it?
	How can we prove that that phone is present on you and you're walking around?
	That's something they'd have to also prove.
	So there needs to be more physical evidence here.
	I need to see more footage.
	I need to see something that is a clear, clear image of him.
	Now, they said that his car was driving down certain streets and they did tap his plates.
	I would like to see if he was wearing a face mask during that because that would be telling as well.
	They definitely then have the camera footage.
	But again, how do they have all this information and not have any surveillance footage to release with the criminal complaint?
	Normally, criminal complaints are very detailed, and this was quite brief.
	What I want to know, I will not, I'll have great difficulty believing that there's no video of his face.
	I mean, the fact that he's a black man would make it at least that element very easily identifiable at some point in his, what was it, 37,000 hours of video footage of him walking around.
	If he's wearing corrective glasses, they're not sunglasses, you'll be able to see through and see that he's a black man and not a white alternative.
	And in the affidavit, I still thought this was curious, that there's no allegation of him purchasing any of the substances with which to make homemade gunpowder.
	They got all the other stuff, the clock timer, the pipes, the caps, the wires, the battery, but no sulfur, no carbon.
	Like, I don't know if you've asked anybody that question.
	I haven't asked anyone that question, but it's a great question worth asking.
	I think if probably was that the case, they would have included that in the criminal complaint itself.
	So they had some proof of that.
	I think that would be something they would tell you about.
	I haven't, I could follow up with that.
	Again, Cecile will give us any information on that, though.
	That's definitely a good question to follow up on.
	And also, if he didn't buy it, then where did he get it?
	And if someone gave it to him, are we dealing with another Gretchen Whitmer fednapping plot?
	Like, are we dealing with handlers who take a mentally vulnerable kid who's easy to use as Apache?
	And then five years later, when I don't know, five years, like I just, yeah, I'm going to get to the other stuff when you took over the article not to do that with you.
	But so you've not heard anything from the FBI or any of your no one's giving you a direct answer to anything.
	Usual, though.
	They just keep telling me to hold off and wait.
	There's more coming on the way.
	So that's why I haven't gotten too aggressive on the front of saying that I don't believe this as of yet, but it just doesn't make any sense.
	It's not adding up.
	And I'm so tired of these teasers we get from this FBI when they're telling us, like, it's as if we're watching a drama unfold in novella.
	Like, hold on, there's more to come next.
	I mean, it's just give us all the information and stop doing this.
	This is why people don't trust the government.
	This is why people aren't believing your stories because you slowly let the information drip out rather than just saying, hey, this is all the information we have.
	And yesterday's press conference, too, it was too much a pat on their backs.
	Just give us the information.
	I didn't learn really much from the presser besides the fact that they all think that they did a great job at solving this.
	I see, that's where I said that was my reflex.
	I did a podcast with, do you know a guy named Pisco Liddy?
	He's a lefty guy and not quite as bad as Destiny.
	But like I said, if I'm not politically aligned and if I don't like these people, I watch that conference and I see 20 minutes of everybody saying what a great job everybody else did.
	And the only evidence they mentioned was him purchasing some materials and some cell tower paintings.
	And other than that, I could see how people watched that and might have been repulsed by it.
	He's scheduled in court.
	I'm just refreshing now.
	It appears he was in court.
	Do we not have any news of what happened?
	It said later this afternoon, so it didn't give me exact time.
	So I've been refreshing and waiting to see.
	I have not seen anything, though, on my end yet.
	No.
	All right, amazing.
	And so you're skeptical.
	I feel a little bit less guilty for being skeptical.
	What do you make of the retraction?
	I don't know.
	I don't know.
	I'm praying for my guys.
	I know that they have the best intentions when they report on this stuff.
	And so I'm just kind of holding off right now.
	I'm going to see how it all plays out.
	Amazing, Brianna.
	So now you're going on with Bannon at four o'clock at five o'clock.
	Yeah, 5 p.m. Eastern time.
	She's taken over for War Room.
	So I'll be on with her in a little bit.
	We've got a lot to discuss in regards to the Pentagon.
	As you know, I was there this week.
	It was very interesting.
	And now the New York Times is suing.
	How was it actually being in the Pentagon?
	So it's definitely a really cool experience.
	It's a massive building.
	I don't think people realize how much is in that building.
	There's like a CVS, several fast food restaurants in there.
	I mean, it's a big, big building.
	So I was getting lost everywhere.
	But ultimately, it was a great experience to take on.
	I did try, you know, asking some questions.
	Although I do appreciate the comms team for allowing us access.
	I did not get direct answers to those questions.
	Sadly, even today, asking things about the narco, the narco-terrorists that are being, that are on the vessels, then they're getting hit with strikes.
	Specifically, I want to know if we are going to find out the names of these people, if we know that they are high-up cartel members.
	Are they just innocent civilians being blackmailed into getting onto these boats and to bring these drugs into the country since they know it's so high risk?
	The Pentagon's not giving me a strong statement in that front telling me anything as if we're going to find out any information about these people.
	Now, the only reason why I ask that is I think that the mainstream media is usually full of garbage, but I think they do have a valid point in all of this saying, you know, people on those boats, we should at least know their names.
	We should at least know their information.
	And sadly, we're not getting that.
	And I think it's fair to say that that should be taking place.
	We should be able to hear from the families to see if they're actually what they're accused of doing.
	I mean, there's no really, I get it that it's international waters and that these people allegedly have fentanyl and fatal drugs that kill thousands of Americans.
	But I'm not sure if just nuking them is the best way to go about it at this point, since we don't really know who these people are on the boats.
	And we know that the cartels have a long history of using civilians, blackmailing them and threatening to kill their families into doing things like drug smuggling.
	Brianna, people are complaining about the static, but when you come back home, we're going to have a better one.
	Where can people find you to support your work?
	Yeah.
	So just at Breanna Morello.
	It's amazing.
	I saw you in, I'm not jealous.
	There's no but to that.
	I'm actually not even sure I would want to go to the Pentagon, but it is amazing to see someone you know and know well in the Pentagon having that access and getting to ask those questions.
	Brianna, keep up the good work.
	All right.
	Have a good one.
	You too.
	Bye-bye.
	All right.
	Bye-bye.
	So that is Brianna, people.
	That's from the inside, literally of the Pentagon.
	Brianna's there sitting next to Laura Loomer, sitting in front of Matt Gates.
	And I feel a little, not vindicated.
	I feel a little less unfair.
	I don't think I'm being unfair.
	And you always have to have that in the back of your mind.
	I don't think I'm being unfair, but then you also don't want to feel that you're being unduly forgiving where you would not have been had they been adversaries.
	We're going to get into the latest breaking stuff of the arrest of Brian Cole and some of my thoughts because I got some stuff on the backdrop.
	I don't want to read articles when Brianna's here.
	Let me bring up for a second Chet Chisholm up in Canada.
	We're going to start.
	Don't go backwards.
	Don't go backwards.
	I'll start with Chet.
	I was at the same Poilievre event.
	That's when I and another vaccine-injured paramedic told him about all the vaccine injuries we were aware of at the time.
	Yeah, well, I'm convinced that Pia Polyv is bought and uncontrolled by a big pharma, which is why he didn't say anything about the ostrich slaughter.
	That's my own personal theory.
	Ginger Ninja says, I try to check myself to see if I'm one of the, quote, easier to fool than convinced that I've been fooled on the Jan 6 bomber.
	But why does Baker's story seem three times as convincing than Patel's story?
	Let's get into it.
	You've heard the latest now.
	So we know who this kid is.
	His name is Brian Cole Jr.
	Everyone in the chat, I'm not calling him a kid to say that he's not responsible for his actions.
	I'm not calling him a kid either because I've gotten so old that anybody who's under 40 is a kid.
	I'm calling him a kid colloquially.
	Plus, to the extent that he is, in fact, as autistic, or I should say autistic, the degree of autism that we're hearing from his grandmother, you know, you would not, you would, you might view him on a different level of culpability from a criminal perspective than you would someone who might not suffer from some cognitive impairment.
	The man, his name is Brian Cole Jr., 30 years old, formally arrested, formally identified, in court today.
	His family was cheering out in support.
	And I'm waiting for the internet to determine who this kid is, what his social media footprint history is.
	Thus far, we don't know very much.
	We know that he's not the white dude with the beard that everyone identified as Brian Cole.
	And we do know a few things about him.
	The first thing is it's an amazing thing.
	The news of the day is that he's a Trump supporter.
	And I shit you not like the ultimate irony.
	And go, by the way, see the lefties have got their talking point.
	Oh, so when does Trump pardon him?
	Allegedly, they have him talking without a lawyer, which is questionable if the kid is in fact autistic to not allow him to make that decision, or at least to exploit of what might otherwise be a decision that is compromised by mental faculties to not have an attorney.
	Allegedly, he's talking, and allegedly, he is claiming to be a Trump supporter.
	Natasha Bertrand, you may remember her from such, oh, go Google the other bullshit stories.
	I forget which ones she was responsible for, and I don't want to misremember.
	All that I know is I didn't see this originally on Twitter because she has me blocked and because she restricted replies, because that's what journalists at CNN do.
	They restrict replies on their bullshit propaganda and they block people who are their most vocal callers out of their bullshit propaganda.
	She says during interviews with the FBI, the DC pipe bomb suspect told investigators that he believed the 2020 election was stolen, providing perhaps the first indication of a possible motive.
	People briefed on the matter said via who are these people?
	Evan Perez, CNN Justice, and Hannah Rabinowitz, CNN covering justice.
	So according to a CNN propagandist, two other sources are CNN propagandists.
	He says he's a Trump supporter.
	Susan Crabtree, who's done impeccable work and should always be followed.
	And I, no, I was trying to think like, if I ever have a fight with Susan, am I going to come back and say, you know what, I regret ever having endorsed her work?
	No, she does great work.
	She's done great work and she will continue to do great work.
	She might make some mistakes every now and again.
	I don't know.
	Everybody does, but they will not be the result of negligent methodology.
	Anyhow, Susan Crabtree did amazing work on Butler.
	She says, really, the suspected pipe bomber whose father owned a bail bonds company that tried to get illegal immigrants out of ICE facilities and sued Trump's DHS was a MAGA right-winger.
	This reeks of the Biden FBI's Thomas Crookes lies.
	Now, I'm going to leave that in the backdrop for one second because I had my own hot, spicy take on Natasha's bullshit.
	Where was it?
	Viva Fry.
	I want to get my take before we go any further.
	I'm going to have to go to my Twitter feed.
	The fact that this guy claims to be a Trump supporter, or that you have reports of it.
	And it's quite funny.
	Like, you have to know the facts of the case in order to understand why that is such a patently absurd load of hot steaming dung in order to call it out.
	I wrote, he believed the election was stolen.
	So he bought the materials for the pipe bomb to protest the stolen election before the election occurred.
	You can't fix stupid Natasha Berton.
	And then I also had this to say.
	Like, it's an amazing thing where they, where they, where they block replies and they block people because I'm blocked by Natasha Berchon.
	So I don't get to see first-hand notifications of her stupidity.
	All right.
	So Susan Crabtree says the father is in a bond company that bails out illegals and they sued the Trump DOJ or they were involved in a suit.
	It's like, okay, that I saw someone reply to her say, that's totally, that doesn't make any sense.
	First of all, you know, his father could be whatever.
	That doesn't mean the son is whatever.
	But I wanted to just check the allegation that they lost recently, relatively recently, lost a lawsuit to Trump's government.
	Now, I've done this before.
	I'll do it again.
	And it's important that we do the exercise together so that you can understand when you're being lied to and the fact that so-called fact checkers are the wordsmiths of the devil.
	They deny in the headline what they substantively confirm in the body.
	Fact check, alleged DC pipe bomber Brian Cole Jr. did not sue Trump's DHS over illegal immigration.
	Everyone in there, you are all, I hope, smarter as a result of having been around this channel for a little bit.
	What do you notice in that headline?
	Do you notice a bit of a potential steal, a straw man framing?
	Because if you do, you might know where I'm going with this.
	The claim they've debunked might be a claim that nobody's making.
	That the son, the suspect, sued the DHS.
	What might be the reality?
	Well, let's just go ahead and read a little further into there.
	Did the man charged with planting pipe bombs found near, did the man charged with planting pipe bombs found near the Republican and Democratic headquarters in Washington, D.C. on January 6, 2021, sue the Trump administration's Department of Homeland Security over illegal immigration?
	No, that's not true, you dumbass.
	Why would you even think such a stupid thing?
	Oh, the legal disputes referenced in a Daily Wire article making that claim confused the suspect, Brian Cole Jr., with his father, Brian Cole Sr.
	Oh, so you dumbass conspiracy theorist, Republicans, far-right MAGA extremists, he didn't sue Trump's DHS.
	His father did.
	His father, on behalf of the company for which the son allegedly worked while he was living in his parents' home.
	Oh, yeah, and they misrepresented what the suit was about.
	They misrepresented the nature of the legal disputes, which did not involve illegal immigration policies and were separated by several years from the pipe bomb discovery.
	Oh, okay, that's totally irrelevant then.
	It listen to this.
	A claim originated in an article published by the Daily Wire on December 4 titled, Alleged DC Pipe Bomber Sued the DHS over Illegal Immigration.
	All right, it wasn't him, it was his father.
	This is what the article looked like at the time of the writing it.
	They made a mistake.
	It wasn't him, it was his father.
	A distinction without a difference when we're talking about potential motive and a potential contradiction to the fact that this kid was a Trump supporter.
	While the headline claimed Cole had sued DHS over, quote, illegal immigration, end quote, the claim is not repeated in the body of the story.
	The only reference to immigration in the story beyond the headline was a one-sentence quote from one of Cole's business websites that said, quote, an immigration bond will secure the release of an undocumented alien from an immigration facility with the guarantee that conditions of the immigration bond requirements are met.
	Well, that sounds like we have a bit of a political leaning of a family.
	I mean, if you're against illegal immigration, typically you're not going to bail them out of jail.
	Maybe you will if you're just a capitalist over a principled individual.
	But I think we've got some pretty clear indications that could serve as a rebuttal to the argument that the kid was a Trump supporter.
	The article falsely claimed that Brian Cole Jr., age 30, ran the family bonds company.
	It is his father, Brian Cole Sr., who managed the business.
	Cole Sr. is listed in the corporate records as an officer of statewide bonding, which is one of three companies listed as plaintiffs in three cases filed against DHS in late 2018.
	Late 2018.
	When did he start buying his bomb supplies?
	Allegedly.
	2019.
	They're closer in date to him buying some of the materials than him buying the materials was to planting the freaking bombs.
	These cases were combined for an appeal that was decided by the U.S. appellate court in November 2020.
	What else was happening in November 2020?
	I dare say he was also continuing to buy supplies then, too.
	The case was an administrative law dispute about whether DHS followed proper procedures when collecting on bond on breached bonds and whether the bond companies received constitutionally adequate due process to challenge those breach determinations.
	It was not about illegal immigration.
	It was just about administrative processes surrounding bonding out of illegal immigrants.
	Dumbass.
	It wasn't him that did it.
	It was his daddy.
	The appeals court ruled entirely on the side of DHS.
	And then you have a link to the decision.
	The article continued.
	The reference to President Trump's Justice Department and Tennessee is also muddled and misleading.
	Cole Sr., not his son, did participate in a news conference with civil rights lawyer Benjamin Crump in November 2021.
	Cole Sr. was one of several black business owners in Murfreesboro, Tennessee, who spoke out about their belief that a prosecutor in that area targeted minority-owned businesses.
	Crump, well known for being a race-baiting hustler, represented Trayvon, Breonna Taylor, George Floyd, called the Justice Department, yada, yada.
	It had nothing to do with immigration.
	It came 10 months after the pipe bombs were found in Washington.
	Well, it certainly still shows a bit of indications, but do you understand what they do?
	I mean, they are wordsmiths of the devil.
	The headline utterly eviscerates the allegation while the body basically goes on to substantiate it.
	Yeah, the father's company where the kid worked of the family whose house he was living in involved in bailing out undocumented, because it referred to them as undocumented, not illegal.
	That in and of itself is a political tell.
	And gosh, it's totally debunked.
	It's totally debunked.
	Yeah, it was a father involved in it lost across the board by alleging that the DHS wasn't following proper protocol.
	That could leave some sour tastes in people's mouths as it relates to an administration, especially when talking about a family that refers to illegal criminal aliens as undocumented.
	So we know that now.
	What else do we know about the son?
	He's autistic, according to the grandmother.
	He walks his chihuahua around the block.
	I would love to see, and I presume the FBI is going to get it, ring camera footage of the neighbors with him walking through to determine gates, to determine whether or not this guy looks anything like the hoodie person that we saw in the video walking around.
	We'll see.
	I had a question for Cash.
	So Travis Hawley, and I'm reluctant to put too much, to put any weight on this, to be honest.
	I'm not trying to insult Travis Hawley.
	Apparently, it's a legit account, National Security, Cyber Intelligence, former U.S. Air Force, NSAGov, and CENTCOM.
	Travis put out a very lengthy thread about what he found out about Brian Cole Jr., et cetera, et cetera.
	When I had Kyle Serafin on, and he had mentioned, if you're going to find a Patsy, find a Patsy who you're going to lock away for life, who's going to be what they call a homo, a chomo, child molester, or potential, you know, pedo in jail, get them on CSAM,
	child sex abuse material, and then use him as a patsy to plead down to something that would get him maybe five years in jail if it if it ever gets there, maybe not even a conviction, except if you please, and uh, you know, might even make him a celebrity to 50% of the country.
	So, Travis Hawley said, I am hot, I underscore am underscore hot underscore for underscore cock appears to have been his username.
	This is his being the kid, not the father.
	Appears to have been his username associated to his Cole Brian whatever at gmail.com that was involved in the 2016 hacking of the adult friend finder sex and swingers hook site, hookup site.
	Now, I mean, some are going to say, well, this just means he's heterosexual and looking for adults on websites.
	This is questionable behavior that opens the door to, you know, what else was this kid looking for on his computer that might have put him on a radar to the FBI, that might have made him a good patsy for manipulation, especially if the kid's autistic, or might give them some serious leverage to say, you'll work with us or we'll lock you away for this.
	And if we want to get totally conspiratorial, all right, they found him despite the former FBI's best efforts to not look into this.
	A former FBI that is the still the new FBI, save it except for Cash and Dan.
	And maybe who else was working on this case when they discovered the new break?
	Understand that.
	I mean, this is what people really are not potentially putting together.
	The very same FBI rank and file staff that were utterly incompetent or neglected to pursue these leads are the same FBI staff that are currently working under Cash and Dan.
	And this is no shade on Cash or Dan.
	Maybe they took the old team off this case, put a new one on who are dedicated, loyal patriots, and they broke the case within whatever, you know, however many months.
	The same FBI, rank and file, good cops, let good cops be good cops that neglected to pursue this case for the last five years are still employed at the FBI.
	So I had asked Cash because I'm curious and I'd like to know, is there any truth to this?
	Can you confirm this particular allegation or fact?
	If this guy's, you know, on swinger sites and his name is I am hot for cock, which maybe is he playing a woman or is he a homosexual man?
	Not that there's anything wrong with that.
	That name for a man is, if you're not in gay, it's kind of a weird name.
	And if this guy had other stuff on his computer, which I'm sure we'll find out sooner than later, that could make him a very, very useful Patsy.
	So those are the latest developments now.
	Also, just in terms of what happened at court today, Fox News reporting.
	I have to see if we have any news here.
	Pipe Bomb suspect makes first court appearance, family yells, and support.
	From what I understand of what family and neighbors are saying, not that you'd expect anything else.
	Yeah, potential furry, which would certainly fit the trifecta of people who've been weaponized for political assassinations.
	You expect the family to defend him, much like you expect Rampage Jackson to defend his son, although he didn't have to do it publicly because his son, basically an animal that doesn't deserve to be supported even by his father.
	But you expect family to say he's innocent.
	He's a good boy.
	He would have never done anything wrong.
	You expect neighbors to say, I would have never had any idea because you don't know what goes on behind people's closed doors.
	But he had his first court appearance.
	And I don't know that, let me see if there's been any news about this.
	December 5th, 155.
	So this is two hours old, updated 228.
	Let's see what the update was.
	Cole Jr., the man accusing place bombs, pipe bombs outside the RNC and the DNC.
	Because after all, if you're a Trump supporter, I guess I could make that square peg fit in the circle hole.
	If he's if he believes the election was stolen, he'll place one outside the RNC to punish the traitorous rhinos who allowed the election fortification to go on and didn't challenge the electoral delegates things.
	I can make that work.
	He made his first appearance.
	Cole informed of the charges against him.
	Government prosecutors told magistrate and judge Moxilla Moxilla.
	I got to see who that is.
	That name looks mildly familiar.
	Cole spoke to law enforcement for over four hours Thursday, and they would provide a transcript of the conversation to Cole's defense attorney, his Don Sherman over the weekend.
	It's interesting.
	So was Shoreman there when they had this conversation?
	Cole was wearing a tan jumpsuit, not shackled.
	Members of the Sami said, We love you.
	We're here for you, baby.
	Next step is detention, is a detention hearing on December 15th.
	He'll remain in federal custody pending the next court hearing.
	10 days.
	He was arrested Thursday after he purchased items.
	Oh, during 2019, 2020.
	You know, right, right, right after his father started suing the Trump administration, he purchased multiple items consistent with components that were used to manufacture the pipe bombs that were placed at the RNC.
	Surveillance footage released showed the suspect, it showed a person, we're led to believe it's the same one, placing the devices.
	The explosives were found a few hours later.
	We all know the case here.
	Cole was charged with transporting explosive devices.
	Cash criticized the Biden administration's handling over the case.
	This case should have been solved by the previous administration.
	Five years later, justice is finally being served under the very same FBI of the last five years, rank and file.
	It still wasn't easy, details of which we will share more about at the appropriate time.
	But when you let good cops be good cops, this is what happened.
	Say the lion, Cash.
	The same good cops that for the last five years in the FBI didn't solve this case.
	Investigators use cell phone geolocation data to track the suspect in the case, he said.
	Okay, so that's the latest updates.
	I'm not sure that we have anything more on that.
	All right.
	Now, I listened to Mike Benz.
	Mike Benz says, you know, he's satisfied with the affidavit.
	He actually had better words than that.
	Let me see what he had to say here.
	He actually had much stronger words of support for Dan Bongino, which some people took umbrage with.
	It was just coming down here.
	Come on, where I said here, listening to it.
	It's fascinating.
	Okay, so it was a little bit after this.
	My words were: this is one heck of a good endorsement.
	Here we go.
	Mike Benz says, fat fingers.
	Mike Benz says, charging docs in the Jan 6 pipe bomber arrest look solid.
	That's a qualified statement.
	It looks solid, subject to greater detail.
	FBI seems to have his personal cell phone literally walking the pipe bomber's path.
	I didn't understand that from my reading of the alley.
	I mean, they've geolocated.
	They said, you know, the rough area and they pinpointed him based on the towers.
	If, if, and I said it literally yesterday, like, if they overlaid the map and I could see where the pings were and it's right where the path was, I could be convinced.
	I didn't understand that, but if that's what Mike Benz is saying, he understood from it.
	Sometimes I do defer to people who I think have a better understanding of things.
	Ray's FBI simply, oh, yeah, here you go.
	Ray's FBI simply lied, insinuating the phone data was corrupted, which the carriers denied.
	Absolutely historic day for FBI DiBongo.
	Now, Armitas, who also seems to be a very big brain on the interweb, says the problem is that the first cell phone ping from tower 59323, which is 59323.
	I saw the numbers and I don't remember where they are now.
	Bottom left, sorry, right there, is in the wrong section compared to where the pipe bomber actually was.
	Tower 59323 and tower 126187 at the stamp place him south of the DNC, not north of it.
	And then someone says you should explore the possibility that he was the driver.
	Cell phone pings don't necessarily correlate to the nearest cell phone perfectly.
	That's true, but then you wouldn't get a perfect overlay regardless.
	Now, I said that's a solid endorsement because I think Mike Benz is a very smart guy.
	So I want to see this.
	And someone says, so this is the funny part.
	Here, he can't pause.
	He posted this today as well and said, I'm glad I got to know Dan Bongino before he got famous.
	Now, I said, you got him.
	It's kind of funny because, you know, I took a picture of him.
	Then he says, look, he's never said anything negative about him.
	I asked Grok myself if Grok would say that I've ever said anything negative about Dan Bongino.
	Did I get an answer?
	Hey, Grok, has the Viva fry.
	Why doesn't it answer me when I asked that question?
	I hate doing this.
	I feel stupid.
	I don't like asking Grok things because Grok is stupid.
	All that to say, Mike Benz is a smart guy.
	And if he says, you know, the indictment looks solid, qualified, that's something to factor into my analysis.
	I thought it looked a little thin, but I appreciate I might lack the requisite expertise to even rely on my own opinion.
	I don't think I do, but whatever.
	Take that with a grain of salt.
	Okay.
	One of my issues with the affidavit was the timeframe.
	I made the joke earlier that nothing screams.
	I'm objecting to the fraudulent election, like buying the materials a year and then some before the election even occurs.
	When I was watching Mike Benz and his three, the dude went on for three hours and 38 minutes, and he went into like a parentheses that itself was a 30-minute parentheses, but that was the one that I found the most interesting.
	The timeframe, he immediately picked up on it.
	Or, I mean, you know, he's got recall that's just beyond normal recall, where the timeframe was he's buying these things, give or take, around November-ish 2019, 2020.
	And at about the two-hour mark, let me see if I can get there.
	I don't want to, here we go.
	At about the two-hour mark, Mike Benz has this observation: run by Rosa Brooks, the Pentagon senior official who openly called for organizing a military coup.
	Who was a part of this that I'm about to read you?
	Michael Steele, the former head of the RNC, the former head of the Republican Party.
	John Podesta, Hillary Clinton's campaign manager, the White House chief of staff, and the guy who would be promoted to running a $375 billion slush fund to hand out $375 billion in taxpayer money to DNC friends and cronies.
	We'll put it on pause.
	The bottom line of what Mike Benz goes into, a 30-minute open parentheses breaking down the timeline, was this was the time when you had operatives talking about how to secure the 2021 election, how to ensure violence in the streets in order to create chaos, how to have basically something of a color revolution in America should Trump actually win the election.
	And then, subsidiarily and without prejudice to the foregoing, if Trump were to lose the election, how to ensure that the MAGA movement goes down with Trump.
	If he were to lose the election, because he would undoubtedly, and I didn't really appreciate this either as part of the entire malicious, devious scheme.
	If he loses the election, he remains with his 100 million followers on Twitter and he can sow Discord.
	He can rally the troops, so to speak, with his social media presence.
	Well, how do they silence him if he loses the election so that he can't do that?
	Deplatform him.
	So, right about the time when Brian Cole starts purchasing these materials, you have Democrat operatives basically planning a color revolution, coup, insurrection, election fornification, whatever you want to call it, while they're talking about how to ensure that Trump doesn't win the election.
	And if he loses the election, how he can't use his social media voice to rally political support.
	And they did all of it.
	They did all of it.
	They kicked him off Twitter, Facebook, all of social media so that he could not rally the troops after that stolen election because it was a stolen election, not for the reasons some people think, but objectively fortified with fornification, fuckery.
	And so Mike Benz immediately put that timeline together.
	It's worth what it's worth.
	It's an interesting observation.
	I can think of some reasons why it might not make total sense.
	Like the plans that they were putting into effect that they were discussing in November, they had been, you know, probably plotting for months, years before, and it might have always been plans on the back burner.
	And so it might be totally coincidental if you even believe that Brian Cole is the dude who bought those materials at that time.
	But it's an interesting timeframe to keep in mind that this plot to steal the 2020 election started well before.
	It started with the Election Integrity Project or partnership.
	And the pipe bombs would have been the perfect way to create the chaos that would have delayed certification of the vote.
	Amazing thing that Mike Benz goes into that, you know, Robert Barnes and I talked about throughout the years is the alternative slate of electors for which Republicans were prosecuted, for which attorneys were prosecuted, had their bar licenses revoked, was the exact same plan that Democrats were discussing, discussing, were discussing in November-ish 2020.
	They were the ones who floated that idea of an alternate slate of electors.
	They had also implemented it, you know, back with JFK Nixon back in Hawaii.
	They were floating that as a method of contesting the election should Trump actually win.
	And then they go on, excuse me, to prosecute Republicans for having implemented the very same method, lawful, constitutionally protected method of challenging an election that they were themselves floating around prior to the election.
	So basically, they did put into effect everything that they wanted to do in order to fortify the elections and in order to ensure sufficient chaos on the day of to create the Fed surrection.
	And so whether or not Brian Cole was the dude who put the pipe bombs there himself, whether or not he had handlers, whether or not he was an easily manipulated, mentally deficient individual who could be used, abused, and exploited, much like they used, abused, and exploited of those Patsies in the Gretchen Whitmer fed napping plot.
	Because do recall, they were also mentally vulnerable people in financially vulnerable situations who were groomed and trained and financed by FBI agents to carry out a kidnapping explosion plot that they never would have been able to do, thought of doing, or implemented on their own, but for the active and proactive involvement of the FBI.
	And now I just totally forgot my thought on that.
	Oh, that's right.
	So the pipe bombs.
	So once the insurrection, the Fed surrection has reached sufficient force now that they've got the violence in the streets that they needed to cry foul, cry stolen election, impeach Trump, persecute, prosecute, investigate half of the country.
	They no longer needed those pipe bombs.
	And so they go and collect them and literally sweep them under the rug, which is why they never discovered who plotted them for the five years that, you know, four years that Biden was in office.
	So that's an interesting, it's an interesting thought there.
	But now we're in a day where the individual is claiming to be a Trump supporter, and you've got to wonder if there are the same moles within the FBI who failed to adequately investigate this case, negligently and corruptly so, are now in there saying, yeah, we're going to, we're going to, what's the word I'm looking for?
	We're going to implement Patsy on steroids now.
	And yeah, oh, they got him, but we're going to make this guy now say that he's a Trump supporter.
	Maybe he's doing it strategically.
	Say, I'm part of the part in the Trump issued.
	Maybe he's doing it strategically because he hates Trump so much, he knows that this would actually be destructive to Trump to claim it.
	Maybe he's just mentally vulnerable and saying what he thinks they want him to say, which is kind of a known element of autism to give the answers that you think they want and not necessarily the answers that you even know to be true to the extent you're capable of answering these questions, to give the information that you think they want.
	Lydia says that makes Bondi, Patel, and Bongino Patsies too.
	I said this on Benny Johnson earlier today.
	Go back to what I said about the Epstein debacle.
	If the Epstein signed memo that nobody signed that said Epstein killed himself and shut your traps and everyone on the FBI is on board with this bullshit explanation that nobody believes.
	A bullshit explanation that utterly contradicts the years of righteous and I would dare say patriotic investigative journalism that was carried out by Bongino and Patel.
	You want to discredit those men in the eyes of their most ardent supporters?
	You force them to be a part of that.
	If you wanted to sabotage the FBI with the Epstein debacle, you would have done nothing differently than the way that debacle unfolded.
	You want to put a nail in it?
	You want to really end it?
	You have them come out with this story and have it get, I don't say easily, but swiftly debunked or swiftly discredited after that press conference yesterday.
	At this point, everyone's invested in this.
	Because if this case falls apart, even on acquittal, well, I mean, that'll come later, but they've gotten to do the victory lap in the short term.
	If this gets quickly and swiftly debunked by like demonstrable evidence, it would be the most sinister of deep state sabotage of the two most trusted people in the FBI that the FBI has ever seen in its history, arguably.
	So we'll see.
	That's all I have to say about that.
	I think.
	Let me see something here.
	Make sure I got everything.
	Fact check.
	My goodness.
	Which one was this?
	CNN?
	Accused DC pipe bomber told FBI he believed the 2020 election was stolen.
	Sources say when is this picture from?
	This is a graduation photo, so this is probably 12 years old.
	We've got to see the, I think we've seen rough dimensions of the guy.
	You know, in my limited analysis, just from pure visual, I would never assume the frames were the same frames.
	But yeah, he was wearing a hoodie.
	He was wearing a sweater.
	It was cold, whatever.
	This caught my eye, and I don't know why.
	Viva, I would pay big bucks to see how you act if you had Cash and Bongino on your show in person.
	I don't think they're allowed to do it, but I mean, they both know they have an open-ended invitation.
	I mean, we can even do it at the local studio.
	It wouldn't be adversarial or controversial at all.
	I would ask the exact same questions, and I've got lots of them.
	When was the first time this kid's name, Brian Cole Jr., came up on their radar?
	From what Brianna suggested, it was before the Baker story dropped, but not necessarily before they were apprised or got wind of the Baker story investigation.
	Understand that Baker's story.
	Baker didn't come up with his story in five days.
	It was the result of in-depth investigative journalism, expert gate analysis, and they would have known that people were sniffing around and looking to point the finger at capital police involvement.
	So when did this guy's name first come up on the radar?
	And this might be one of the lose-lose questions because if the guy's name came up in March, a lot of people are going to say, and so cross-checking credit cards and ping and self-pinging took eight months.
	The timing is just suspicious, period.
	That would be one question.
	Is there any indication of CSAM on the kid's computer?
	Do we know that now?
	What's the additional evidence?
	You got it.
	What's the additional evidence coming out?
	How did they know that he paid cash for something?
	That I still don't understand.
	And then the question is going to be, do we get to see the puppy, the petting puppies alibi video?
	Like, we're just going to forget about that.
	Can we see that?
	Okay, they made a, someone allegedly made a positive assertion.
	If the person has been exonerated and they've issued the retraction, can we see the exonerating video in the metadata?
	I mean, I still, if they, hypothetically, just assume they lied about that.
	Okay.
	But assume that they have the right guy now.
	Well, if they lied about that, I'd like to know why they would have lied about that.
	I would like to test that statement.
	But I would love to have either or both of them on.
	I just don't think there's a snowball's chance in hell that they will.
	I think I obviously would ask more questions than Catherine Herridge asked, and I would ask them, and they would, you know, Kash Patel is the master of saying, you'll get it in the due legal process.
	And we can't comment now, but big stuff is coming, but just keep waiting.
	And I'm just going to keep saying it's going to keep coming in the due legal process.
	But big stuff is coming.
	Okay, let me see what's going on in the chat because I haven't been there in a while.
	And we're going to get some of the questions here over on Hrumble.
	Tiffanol says, Viva, when you get some time, please watch this most important video I've seen in 50 years, the setup, How America's Domestic Enemies Plan to Get Away with Sedition, Lara Logan.
	I've definitely watched that.
	Tiffanol, thank you.
	And then we've got King of Bill Tong in the house, premium Bill Tong from Bill Tong USA, high protein, keto-friendly, no additives, U.S. source beef, authentic South African flavor.
	Get some now at BilltongUSA.com.
	Go get some guys and show some love and support a guy who makes good food.
	Like you can't go wrong by buying food.
	You can go wrong by wasting food.
	So if you're not going to eat it, don't buy it.
	But buy food.
	It's healthy.
	It's delicious.
	You're supporting a great man who has moved from South Africa to these United States of America for freedom and a better life.
	He's making quality beef with American sourced beef, and it's flipping delicious.
	Now, let me see what's going on on vivabarnslaw.locals.com.
	I want to see what's going on.
	There's a whole test available that helps you identify PSYOP.
	Yes, I posted a video on how Walmart tracks you, even if you have not know electronic devices on your person.
	They've been using facial recognition previous purchase history.
	Well, that's another thing.
	Then let's see the faces of him actually purchasing this stuff.
	Lesson says Bongino's default action is to protect any cop regardless of actions.
	He's compromised just because he's absolute bias.
	We'll see if they're regurgitating bad intel, bad info that's intended to sabotage them.
	We'll find out sooner than later.
	I don't think cell companies keep data for years.
	If that is part of the problem, then I'm really confused.
	We were told the data was corrupted.
	Now we're being told they lied about it.
	We're being told the cell companies always had it.
	When did they know that?
	When do they know that?
	Let's keep going up here.
	Grizzly Adams did have a beard.
	We are a year in, and it's already failed enterprise brutal outcome.
	Trump fucked up.
	He thought he could play nice with these people.
	He can't, says Bill Brown.
	I agree with that.
	Like you get in and you get into the you get into the ring with the line.
	You're like, okay, well, now I'll pet the line and make friends with it.
	You have to, you have to destroy the line.
	Okay, so that is what the latest of the day is.
	Let me just make sure that I didn't forget anything on the backdrop here.
	The fact check, Susan Crabtree, Benny Johnson.
	Let me bring this one up.
	What will happen next?
	I know that you're very, very close with Cash.
	You were one of the people.
	You were the guy who actually led Cash's nomination process in the Senate.
	You know, a lot of these victories, and I view this as a victory, I look at the affidavit and I'm like, man, you know, this is demonstrable.
	How are you ever going to be able to defend this in court?
	I mean, if they have all this evidence on the guy, and apparently we're only seeing like 5%, 2% of what they actually have, then you're going to have a tough time.
	This is the individual in the backpack.
	This is it.
	And so let them prove that case.
	What else is what will happen next?
	I mean, what else they keep teasing that there's so much more?
	There is.
	But the American people and probably you and I both kind of get impatient because they're like, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go.
	We got to remember it's been 10 months.
	Look at what they've done in 10 months.
	But they also got to keep the credibility of the agency, of the attorney general, and the FBI.
	They got to keep the credibility out there so they don't want to go out there and be Adam Schiff or Mr. Fane thing and say, we got the smoking gun and make a bunch of promises that they never follow up on.
	So what you're seeing is a very methodical approach.
	I'll pause it there, but that was one of the complaints about the affirmation that there was video confirming that Jeffrey Epstein took his own life when that's not, you know, nobody felt that way from the video.
	And so that might have been one mistake that they might have learned from.
	To the way they roll out information, they keep it pretty close held, which I get people get upset by that, but they have, they're running an investigation.
	And then once they do it, they drop it.
	And then everybody's like, holy smokes.
	We've seen this three times already in the last 10 months.
	And there is more coming.
	I was in a briefing yesterday that you and I spoke about offline, which we, you know, will be more to come.
	And I learned something new on that.
	And I have been working on this for two plus years.
	Actually, it's almost been three years.
	And so, but I don't know the timeframe on that when that comes out.
	We know we want to have something.
	And I know I'm being deceptive here.
	So give me a little bit of credit on your audience.
	You might have wanted to say opaque, not deceptive, because those are two very different things.
	Not being able to reveal is not the same thing as deceiving, but okay, leave it alone.
	Yes, but Benny does know what I'm talking about.
	But we're being very methodical on how we roll that out, but we'd love to have something out on that.
	You know, early spring, if we're ready to go, but it's a very big been covered up by the previous administration.
	Early spring.
	I've got to tell you, the only thing that I can that I would justify that is if they ultimately determined, if they're going after internally the people who covered this up and the people who participated in potentially participated in the preparation of a Patsy.
	If they have FBI communications, but this would have had to have occurred under a Trump presidency.
	If they have evidence of FBI manipulation of these individuals, coercing, coaxing, whatever, maybe extorting them into extorting Brian Cole into this, and they've got to go now and actually, they're discovering this evidence in real time for the first time, and they're building cases against all of them.
	Fine.
	You know what I fear is going to happen?
	Spring's going to come around.
	Nothing's going to have happened.
	Or you'll have two piddley charges like James Comey that get tossed for other technical reasons.
	But yeah, continuing to promise and just keep pushing it down the line is not going to work for much longer.
	Okay, so what I've got to do, we're going to run over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	We're going to go raid, who's on the front here?
	We're going to go raid Russell Brand.
	He looks like he's talking with Candace Owens.
	So some of you might get mad at me for sending me there, but others might be happy.
	And either way, that's where I'm sending you.
	But if you want to come to locals, come over to locals, bada bing, bada boom.
	If you want to get some merch, let's see if vivafry.com is back up and running, people.
	And if you want to get some merch, I don't know that you'll get it for Christmas, so don't get mad if you don't get it in time for Christmas, but it's worth a try.
	You got your merch here: Freedom to Fa, Freedom to Foe, Conspiracy Theorist.
	Thank you for your attention to this matter.
	I am Alex Jones.
	Friends Don't Let Friends vote Democrat, fight, and a bunch of other great stuff.
	Viva Barnes 2024.
	You can go to get some merch.
	And what's the other stuff you can do to support the channel?
	Louis the Lobster returns to the sea on Amazon.
	Go raid.
	Go raid Russell Brand and say it that I say hi.
	Bada bing, bada boom.
	Do it.
	Confirmed.
	Godspeed.
	Sunday night show is going to be a banger, obviously, for good reason.
	Barnes is picking fights with Candace, picking fights with the FBI, getting me in trouble with everybody.
	I'm joking.
	Russell is wearing a shirt, I think.
	Come on over to Viva Barnes Law.
	It's going to be a bit of a short after party because I got a first cousin once removed to entertain.
	And I think we're going to take him biking down Alligator Alley.
	So with that said, everybody, thank you all for being here.
	As always, Godspeed, locals.
	I will see you right now for a few minutes.

▲