Viva & Barnes - Miranda Divine & Dan Bongino Go Fisticuffs! Jillian Michaels & Crowder Go Fisticuffs! AND MORE!

Dec. 2, 2025 - Viva & Barnes

01:14:51

Miranda Divine & Dan Bongino Go Fisticuffs! Jillian Michaels & Crowder Go Fisticuffs! AND MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, there's the old maxim, never attribute to malice what can be attributed to incompetence.
	There's also the other maxim, never see evil where there's just stupidity.
	But occasionally those overlap and you can see both stupidity and the face of evil.
	And that person's name is Chuck Schumer.
	Behold this throwback to the past.
	To take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.
	So even for a practical, supposedly hard-nosed businessman, he's being really dumb to do this.
	What do you think the intelligence community would do if they were moving?
	I don't know, but from what I am told, they are very upset with how he has treated them and talked about them.
	I don't know what they might do.
	Maybe they'll try to change the laws and then put him in jail.
	Maybe they'll try to bankrupt him.
	And who knows?
	Maybe they'll have a Pac-Man perimeter at Butler, Pennsylvania, and try to take his life after having tried to take his money and his freedom.
	And we need the intelligence community.
	We don't know what's going on.
	Look at the Russian hacking.
	Without the intelligence community, we wouldn't have discovered it.
	Do you appreciate how much sense this all makes in Backwards Now?
	But I just want to go back to the beginning in a second.
	Think he has an agenda to try to dismantle parts of the intelligence community.
	I mean, this form of whether you're a super liberal Democrat or a very conservative Republican, you should be against dismantling the intelligence community.
	The way he touches his face, I look at this man and I actually see calculated evil, but just remind everybody.
	Take on the intelligence community.
	They have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.
	Getting back at you.
	You know, there's another expression in the industry.
	You know, when it's when fundraising goes dry, throw a brick through your window and claim to be a victim.
	Well, if you haven't heard the news, let me bring up this tweet from evil man who puts cheese on an uncooked burger, Chuck Schumer, yesterday saying, oh my goodness, someone threw a brick through my window and now I need to fundraise off of it.
	Senator Chuck Schumer, I'm going to get in trouble.
	You know, I can do a much better Bernie Sanders.
	This is Bernie.
	When I talk like Chuck Schumer, I don't, I sound pretty bad as well.
	This morning, I was informed by law enforcement entities, titties, throughout New York of multiple bomb threats that were made in my offices in Rochester, Binghamton, and Long Island with the email subject line, MAGA.
	I'm sorry, this just reeks of MAGA country.
	A la Justice Mollette.
	With the subject line, quote, MAGA, end quote, and from an email address alleging the, quote, 2020 election was rigged, end quote.
	Local and federal law enforcement responded immediately and are conducting full security sweeps.
	Everyone is safe and I'm grateful for their quick response and professional response.
	Their quick and professional response to ensure these offices remain safe and secure for all New Yorkers.
	As I have said many times, these kind of violent threats have absolutely no place in our political system.
	No one.
	No public servant, no staff, no member, no constituent, no citizen should ever be targeted for simply doing the job.
	Senator says three of his New York offices have been targeted with bomb threats.
	The first question you might be asking yourself is, why in the name of sweet holy hell does Chuck Schumer have three offices in one state?
	Set that aside.
	Set that aside.
	Chuck Schumer, the man who knows all of the dirtiest plays in the playbook, the man who knows that intelligence has six ways from Sunday to get back at you if you do something they don't like.
	The man who knows that you put raw cheese on a raw burger patty because that's what the Satan devil overlord himself would do, also knows the oldest trick in the book, throw a brick through your own window and claim to be a victim.
	For those of you who don't know, and this is why I say, like, don't do violence, don't do stupid things, because it gives the Cretan of the earth the moral justification to say that they are the victims now.
	Do I believe this?
	I believe this based on the evidence right now, about as much as I believe Jussie Smollett was attacked by two MAGA-wearing white men wearing MAGA hats in Chicago during a snow blizzard.
	This is from the AP, Associated Press.
	Or as I like to call it, American propaganda.
	That's pretty good, actually.
	Schumer says three of his New York offices were targeted with bomb threats.
	Washington, Senate Democrat literature said three of his offices were targeted with the email, bomb threats from an email alleging the 2020 election was rigged.
	Do you know who's not complaining about the 2020 election being rigged at this current point in time?
	Pretty much most Republicans.
	It was rigged.
	Set it as, let's just agree on that.
	It was, depending on how and when and through what methods it was rigged, it was rigged through the pre-bunking of the Russia Gate hoax, which, you know, allowed Democrats to say that Trump was a Russian agent.
	It was rigged through the suppression of the laptop from hell, the Hunter Biden laptop story.
	It was rigged through intelligence infiltrating and manipulating social media via Facebook, Twitter.
	It was rigged.
	Was it the servers in Germany and the ghost of Hugo Chavez?
	I don't think so, but it was rigged based on the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story in and of itself.
	It was rigged based on indefinite confinement because of COVID.
	It was rigged.
	Do you know who's not complaining about it right now?
	Republicans, because they got 2024.
	And but for the rigging of 2020, Trump wouldn't be president right now.
	So nobody's really complaining about that.
	In fact, many people are probably celebrating it, saying it was some sort of divine plan to have Trump lose 2020 so that he can come back in in 2024, 2025, and really stir shit up.
	There's still time for that.
	Getting a little impatient.
	We're ending year one and there's been some progress on the border, but there hasn't been meaningful progress on punishing those who were behind the insurrection, the Fed surrection that warranted 1,400 pardons for Jan 6 defendants who were persecuted by the Biden administration.
	It was an injustice warranting pardons, and yet somehow nobody's in jail yet or even charged yet.
	Okay, so set that aside.
	Schumer said in the statement, local law enforcement received bomb threats referencing his offices, his three offices, with the email subject line, MAGA.
	Yeah, that's what you typically do.
	Holy shit, it's almost as bad as having the cursor in the screenshot of the alleged threat you got.
	Was that Scott Wiener or was that Bang Bang McFang Fang Swolo?
	It was one of the two.
	I think it was Weiner.
	One of those two idiots had the cursor in the screenshot of an alleged threat that he got.
	Law enforcement source confirmed that Suffolk County Police responded to Schumer's Long Island office, but could not confirm the details of the threat.
	The person requested anonymity because the investigation is ongoing.
	The U.S. Capitol Police declined to comment.
	Let's put this on.
	Do not disturb.
	Saying they do not discuss member security for safety reasons.
	Schumer said in the statement, these kinds of violence have a yada yada yada.
	President Donald Trump lost the 2020 election to former President Joe Biden, but has falsely claimed that it was rigged.
	Bullshit, it was rigged.
	If you don't think it was rigged, you are an idiot.
	If you don't understand that it was rigged, you're an idiot.
	And you might also be a Democrat because the Venn diagram of overlapping between idiots and Democrats is striking.
	Ladies and gentlemen, how goes the battle?
	Viva Fry, former Montreal litigator, current Florida Rumbler.
	My wife might be popping on this stream a little later on to talk about mitochondrial function.
	I've been listening to a podcast, and as I'm jogging, listening to mitochondrial function with the guy's name is Master John on Rogan.
	I'm like, I'm jogging, I'm smiling.
	He's like, I have no idea what the hell I'm listening to.
	I come back and say, honey, what is mitochondrial function?
	It's like, we should do the Marion Mondays on a Tuesday.
	So let's do it.
	We have a throwback Thursday on a Tuesday with Chuck Schumer.
	We'll have a Marion Monday later on.
	We might save it for the viva barnslaw.locals.com after party.
	But if you're new to the channel, David Freihate, former Montreal litigator, 13 years of practice, ran for federal office for the People's Party of Canada.
	When I saw Canada going to hell in a handbasket, I said, sorry, selling everything and getting the fuck out of Dodge.
	I apologize for swearing.
	Getting the hell out of this sinking commie hellhole of a country.
	Such a commie hellhole of a country.
	Holy shit, there's so much here.
	There's so much.
	Just, you know, throwback Thursdays on a Tuesday.
	This was the moment when conservatives, liberals, and conservatives alike, standing ovation for someone who fought with the Nazis.
	Zelensky's speech received at least a dozen standing ovations.
	There was also one for this man, a 98-year-old Ukrainian Canadian who fought for Ukrainian independence against the Russians during the Second World War.
	That's CBC news.
	That's the moment liberals and conservatives alike, because they're both pretty much idiots, historically illiterate idiots, gave a standing ovation to, we don't need to say, some old man who fought with, I forget the unit in the Ukrainian army that was, you know, more Nazis than the Nazis, because those who fought the Russians during World War II were the Nazis.
	And then another throwback, I did a podcast with Elizabeth Lane.
	I'll give everybody the link so you can go check that out, listen to it.
	There was that time in Canada during COVID where they were talking about the joys of snitching on your neighbors during a pandemic.
	But the only problem is, you know, go get your white neighbor.
	But the problem of snitching on your neighbor during a pandemic, it adversely affects minorities.
	Other than that, the communist hellhole that Canada has become with its communist mouthpieces at the CBC, the Communist Broadcasting Corporation, were brainwashing their citizens into thinking there's power.
	It's empowering to snitch on your neighbors during a pandemic.
	It's empowering to shit on the freedoms that our forefathers, who fought the Nazis, died to give us so that we could wake up one day and say, yeah, you know what?
	I don't really need these rights.
	Just give them back to the government.
	And when the government decides to give them back to me, they'll be privileges instead of rights.
	Say, boss.
	All right.
	Bad segue into you want freedom?
	Health freedom.
	The wellness company, people.
	This is Cyber Monday, but we're going to do Cyber Monday on a Tuesday.
	The Wellness Company's Cyber Monday sale is live for 48 hours only.
	It's a once-a-year chance to outsmart big pharma and stock up on doctor-formulated wellness at great prices.
	You can save up to 25% site-wide, including 20% on all emergency kits and memberships.
	It's the perfect time for holiday shopping and gifting health to people you care most about.
	The wellness company only drops deals this deep once a year.
	Give your body the regimen it needs to maintain optimal health as you complete another grateful year of life while sliding into 2026 with an even better future.
	Stay prepared with emergency kits.
	Stock up your cabinet with premium nutraceuticals.
	Check out the memberships and you can plan 2026 health costs accordingly.
	The wellness company has everything you need to shop on the internet and get healthy habits.
	Sale ends Tuesday night, tonight, December 2nd.
	Head over to TWC.health forward slash Viva for serious cybermonate savings.
	The link is in the description.
	Check it out.
	Thank you very much.
	The Wellness Company doing great work.
	TWC.health forward slash Viva.
	Give yourself the gift of well care for 2026.
	Booyah.
	Now, what do we start the show with in terms of stories above and beyond Chuck Schumer?
	We'll start with one thing talking about Canada communism and the hellhole that that country has become.
	Politically speaking, there are wonderful Canadians who are there.
	There are wonderful Canadians who are fighting to try to save that country.
	There are wonderful Canadians who want to get out but can't.
	And to them I say, I will be your bullhorn.
	I will be your, what's the word?
	Attack dog on the internet.
	And the person I'm speaking to directly now is Katie from the ostrich farm, Universal Ostrich Farm, where for the better part of the year, shook my fist and screamed, bloody hell.
	And, you know, it happened anyhow.
	They killed those ostriches.
	The news of the day, and this is the details that I'm getting.
	I'm not a gun aficionado.
	When the news of the slaughter broke and they were talking about having fired 900 to 1,000 rounds to kill upwards of 300 ostriches, if you believe they were all there, the news I got that this is a picture of the rounds that the family has been picking up off their killing fields in British Columbia.
	And we should refer to it as what it is, literal killing fields.
	You had your killing fields in Cambodia.
	You have your killing fields in Canada.
	Oh, they're not killing humans.
	Don't be hyperbolic, Viva.
	Well, first of all, it doesn't need to be the same length to be in the same direction.
	We are heading in that direction in Canada if we're not already there.
	They're not putting people on trains.
	And so maybe it's not the same length as World War II atrocities.
	But they're euthanizing Canadians at record numbers, including the mentally ill and veterans.
	And that's pretty much what Hitler and the Nazis did during World War II.
	So yeah, not the same distance, but bloody hell in the same direction.
	So I get this picture.
	These are the rounds that the family is now picking up.
	You know, they come in, they occupy their property for 40 plus days.
	They bankrupt them with judicial proceedings and judicial costs.
	They slaughter their animals, and then they let them go pick up the remnants.
	Here's a memento, Universal.
	This is a care of the government, care of the Royal Canadian Mounted Gestapo, care of the CFIA, the terrorist organization that is the CFIA.
	Care of your terrorist government, the liberal government.
	So they're picking up the rounds.
	And this is a drawing of the back end of the round.
	Apparently, another, I forget who it was.
	Let me just make sure that I can give credit where credit is necessary.
	Hold up.
	Hold up.
	Wait a minute.
	This, oh, apparently from BC Rising.
	So I don't know what that is, but this is apparently the drawing on the back of the round.
	I don't know what kind of rounds these are.
	I was told 22.
	Some people are saying a 22 long rifle.
	Others are saying 223.
	Based on the bag, the bag, based on the bag of rounds, it looks like rifle ammunition.
	The question is whether or not this was the right round with which to kill 300, 300 plus pound animals.
	Oh, is my thing going this way?
	Did my camera just all of a sudden start?
	Yeah, whatever.
	So that's the question.
	I don't have the answer.
	I'm not a gun aficionado.
	I know that Ginger Ninja over in our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community will have an answer for that.
	I know that Bill Brown, also of our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community, would have an answer for that.
	And I look to the aggregate knowledge of the interwebs to determine if that's the right round to kill a very big beast.
	It might explain why they had to shoot 900 to 1,000 rounds over six hours and then go off and finish the job the next morning for the ones that were sitting there writhing in pain and misery all night.
	But that's what's going on in Canada.
	Let me just see one thing here because I want to get over here.
	Okay, good.
	And vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	So let me pick the aggregate brains of our above-average community.
	And we're going to see here, Jameson John.
	How do I do this?
	Jamison John, we're going to go to tip questions.
	It says, check your text group fighting for freedom.
	Check your text.
	A group fighting for freedom and small ranchers is being built, says Jamison 2012.
	I'll definitely check that out in a second.
	Let me see what's going on here in the chat.
	Okay.
	Now, the question is this.
	There's a lot of infighting going on right now.
	I've been meaning to start the show with this clip for a very long time.
	I've had it on the backdrop since when did James Woods post this?
	November 28th is when I've had this on the backdrop and I wanted to start a show with this, but we're just going to play it now.
	Because it's someone said, someone posited that much of the positive influence that led to Trump's election and effectiveness in the early stages of his presidency could be attributed to Charlie Kirk.
	Many, many people hypothesize that the cohesion, the unification, and the coalition could have been attributed to Charlie Kirk, and that when he was shot and killed, that cohesion, that coalition evaporated.
	And now we see a lot of infighting that we shouldn't necessarily be seeing.
	But let me play this.
	Read what James Woods said.
	No wonder they murdered Charlie Kirk.
	He was destined for the presidency because he recognized with laser clarity the enemy within.
	And I tweeted out, I said, there's no question it was a preemptive presidential assassination.
	And I'm not blaming it on Israel.
	They, whenever you say they, people think you mean the Jews.
	I say they could be the furry movement, the transgender radicals.
	Anybody who was, you know, I believe that that entity is behind this until evidence to the contrary or until evidence that another element was involved.
	But people who disagreed with Charlie Kirk's politics, this man would have been president.
	And you can't really say that about everybody.
	I'm not American.
	I would never be prime minister.
	I think my Twitter timeline is too foul now for anyone to say that man would have been prime.
	No, I can appreciate it.
	There's not very many people on earth.
	And there's not many people in America you can look at and say they would have been the next president of these United States of America.
	Charlie Kirk was that exceptional, unique human being.
	President Joe Biden's Department of Defense will accept 30,000 Afghan refugees into military installations following the collapse of Kabul.
	Boom.
	Political transformation.
	Let the country crumble.
	Do you know there's 5 million displaced people in Afghanistan now?
	This was all intentional.
	Joe Biden let it fall apart to now say, oh, I'm so sorry.
	I guarantee you Joe Biden's speech this afternoon will talk about refugee assistance and relocation support.
	Now Joe Biden's going to be scrambling to make good on it and the liberal media will love it.
	They'll say, oh, yes, okay, now I get it.
	Joe Biden is now fixing his own problem.
	Joe Biden is stepping up and he's allowing a flow of people from the Middle East into America.
	Thank you, Joe Biden.
	You're such a hero.
	You're so benevolent.
	You're so respectful.
	You're so compassionate.
	Do you see what's going on here?
	What's going on here is Joe Biden wants a couple hundred thousand more Elon Omars to come into America to change the body politic permanently.
	We're playing checkers and they're playing chess.
	I mean, how can anybody disagree with anything of what Charlie Kirk just said?
	Demographics is destiny.
	See, it's the catchphrase as old as the Democrat Party, or at least old enough.
	We're witnessing it not just in America, in Canada as well, in the UK, in Europe.
	It's the Angela Merkel.
	There's a word for it, and the chat's going to remember what I'm talking about.
	The type of project.
	I wish I could get it before other people in the chat get it.
	The chat's going to get the word.
	This project by design of replacement, the great replacement theory.
	They want to double the population of Canada by the end of the century.
	That's called great replacement.
	Angela Merkel let in however many million plus Syrian refugees in 2015 because of a crisis that was a crisis of the West's making.
	Go in, destabilize, regime change, have the new regime or the ones that fill the void start killing people.
	Claim there's a humanitarian catastrophe and that you need to take in millions of people from countries that are incompatible with the values of the West.
	I'd say people hear that and they'll say that's racist and that's what no, it's just a matter of fact.
	You could take it the other way around.
	It is non-judgmental incompatibility.
	And there's nothing wrong with incompatibility.
	You know, the square peg doesn't fit into the circle hole.
	Neither the square nor the circle are necessarily wrong.
	Now, some people are going to say they're incompatible because they don't fit with Western values, which are superior values based on human rights, et cetera, et cetera.
	We can have that argument.
	But incompatibility in and of itself is a matter of fact, not a matter of judgment.
	So destabilize Syria, let in however many millions of people under the, you know, what they call the guilt of the Holocaust.
	That was one of the rationales why Angela Merkel was letting in all these people.
	They're living in the shadow of the guilt of their actions during the Holocaust.
	So they let in million plus people from Syria, oddly enough, countries that exacerbate the very same problem that they have guilt about from World War II.
	Joe Biden was doing the exact same thing.
	And we're seeing the consequences of it throughout the West, throughout Europe, throughout Canada, and now throughout America.
	Charlie Kirk, the clergy, something syllogy.
	I didn't see it yet in the chat.
	The killer just, I'm going to go to the locals.
	They always get it faster than everybody else.
	Something planned.
	Oh, come on.
	You guys know what I'm talking about.
	I haven't seen it yet.
	Oh, because I'm not at recent messages.
	The syllergy plan.
	I'm not seeing it in the chat.
	It sounds like that.
	Charlie Kirk gets assassinated.
	You know, we're still lacking in answers on that.
	I'm not jumping on conspiracy theories.
	You know, Candace put out a post the other day.
	I was going to respond to it, but it's not the type of discussion you can have on Twitter.
	Candace puts out another one of her tweets.
	And, you know, it's, my comment on it was going to be something to the effect that this is sort of, what's the word?
	It's sort of like what those hypnotists do or the or the mind readers, where they put out a statement that's sort of quasi-opaque that can always be interpreted in a manner that would allow the person who said it to frame it, reframe it, reposition it as saying, oh, I was right when I said it.
	This was her tweet.
	Candace Owens, real Candace O.
	I received information last night that put the final pieces together for me.
	Okay.
	That could mean anything.
	No matter what happens, that statement will be adapted to whatever information there is or isn't.
	I now can say with full confidence that I believe Charlie Kirk was betrayed by the leadership of Turning Point USA and some of the very people who eulogized him on stage.
	Yes, I will be naming names and providing evidence for my claims.
	And I'm making a personal plea to every well-meaning person who donated to this Godforsaken organization to request a refund.
	You were lied to and leadership knew.
	Now, this could be, and it could turn out to be, as innocuous as his security was lacking.
	His security betrayed him in the security that was supposed to be there for him, that they warranted was there for him.
	And at the end of the day, clearly wasn't there.
	Then you can say, well, whose fault is it?
	But the betrayal could be that, lack of security where there ought to have been.
	And that's going to be true, I think.
	And so in that sense, Candace is going to be right with her opaque, broad statement, which could mean betrayal like Judas-level betrayal or betrayal like Secret Service Butler, Pennsylvania level betrayal, which is how the hell do you let the president take the stage when a person of interest has gone missing in the crowd?
	How the hell do you let the president take the stage when the Pac-Man perimeter left the only rooftop exposed and unsupervised?
	How the hell do you, that's a betrayal.
	But it's the type of statement that will necessarily be true only because it can be interpreted whichever way you want to go with it.
	And one of the ways is the most basic level, which is the betrayal was inadequate security, patently.
	They're going to have to live with that.
	And then the question is going to be whether or not it was a reasonable lapse of security or whether or not it was an incompetent lapse of security.
	Whether or not when they were told that that roof was being surveilled, was being taken care of by state police or by the university, not checking it, they'll live with that guilt forever.
	And then you can decide whether not checking it and relying on the assurances of others is a forgivable element of betrayal or an unforgivable level of betrayal for security.
	Okay, set that aside.
	Charlie Kirk gets assassinated.
	It seems like everybody's fighting now.
	And one of the fights is involving, what's his face?
	The guy, Nick Fuentes.
	And this is one of the ones where like, I'm sort of, I'm on the fence about these things.
	I want to get to the Jillian Michaels statement about this, but I'll play a portion of what Steven Crowder said, and then I'm going to read what Jillian Michaels responded to it.
	And I'm curious as to the take of everybody out there, but let's hear a little bit.
	Jillian Michaels told Donald Trump Jr., she gave her opinion on why Nick Fuentes, to be clear, just think this is asinine.
	Nick Fuentes needs to be disavowed if you're going to keep broads like her.
	I'm here to tell you, it's a big deal.
	And I think it's a big deal because all of those people that your dad invited in, Tulsi, Kennedy, myself, inadvertently, right?
	All of these more, Rogan, all of these more moderate people who flee the crazy on the left are alarmed if the right doesn't disavow the Nick Fuentes's.
	And it doesn't mean, I'm not saying cancel Tucker Carlson.
	That is not what I'm saying.
	We should leave the prescriptions to actual conservatives.
	I have no problem saying that.
	But I do think it's going to be a problem.
	I'm sort of a free speech absolutist, but that doesn't mean there's not consequences to that speech.
	And if you hear some people speak and you don't like, you know, like, man, I sort of feel like they almost cancel themselves and not with censorship, but by people being like, okay, that's not even a reasonable decision.
	We're just not going to listen to this person anymore.
	See, this is where I agree wholeheartedly with Don Jr.
	And it's the same thing.
	Like every time there's an act of violence and the left says, are you going to condemn it?
	Are you going to condemn someone who says women, this was the phrase from, what's his face?
	Nick Fuentes.
	What did he say about women and rape?
	Let me see.
	It's in here somewhere.
	Where did he say it?
	Oh, here we go.
	Women want to be raped.
	I don't know.
	I presume that Nick Fuentes probably said that or something close enough to it that it's not an inaccurate formulation.
	Praising Hitler, praising Stalin, yada, yada, yada.
	There are things out there that are just obviously bad on their face that I don't need to publicly disavow them.
	Nobody on earth needs to publicly disavow them.
	And when people come out and say, are you going to condemn that act of violence?
	I mean, first of all, the only reason that anyone would need to condemn an act of violence is if they've ostensibly supported the rhetoric that led up to it.
	And so when people look at the left and they say, are you going to condemn that act of violence that was, you know, potentially the consequence of your speech to defy unlawful orders, potentially the result of your speech that someone's an existential threat, they're going to come and they're going to take your daughter's rights away.
	They're going to start opening fire on citizens on the streets.
	When someone then carries out an act of violence against the very people who are the object of the rhetoric, yeah, you can say like, okay, are you going to condemn it?
	And if you don't, then I'll draw some conclusions.
	When the Democrats did not come out and overtly and categorically condemn Jay Jones' text messages, yeah, that, especially the Democrats who had already endorsed him, you can draw some conclusions to that.
	But reasonably and of most reasonable people, you don't need people to publicly disavow, publicly condemn that which is obviously objectionable on its face.
	And the self-cancellation comes by letting them speak.
	Jillian Michaels writes, if you'd spend five minutes on Google, crowdy at CII was never claimed to be conservative.
	I've always been moderate, who happens to enjoy the company of conservatives and prefers the way they govern over progressives.
	That sounds like conservative to me, but it doesn't matter.
	And if you only trust the concerns of established conservatives, Charlie Kirk was fairly adamant that there's no place for Fuentes in conservatism.
	That might be true, but I'm not sure that Charlie Kirk would have said everybody needs to go around and disavow people who say idiotic, stupid things.
	To address the rest of your clip montage, my early vote was for Kennedy because Americans' health has always been my priority, but that's not the point.
	This isn't ideological.
	It's about basic decency.
	So let me ask you plainly.
	You're comfortable with the claim that women want to be raped.
	There's no statistic, moral framework, or political philosophy that validates that.
	None.
	As I told Don Jr. in part of the conversation you didn't show, if conservatives can't immediately and unequivocally reject this as not conservatism, progressivism will own the midterms beyond 2028, 2028 and beyond.
	That's not partisan.
	It's obvious.
	She might be correct about that.
	When conservatism fails, progressivism reigns in.
	If you can't denounce something this vile, it tells us more about you than you realize.
	And look, you strike me as a guy who's not afraid of confrontation.
	So if you take umbrage with me voting Republican and asking your party to clearly denounce racism, sexual violence, and anti-Semitism, we always have that conversation face to face, yada, yada, yada.
	So this is the real issue is, I said this before, the debate around Nick Fuentes has mainstreamed him.
	And everybody out there who thought they were like, by demanding, there are two consequences here.
	By demanding that people address Nick Fuentes and his idiotic statements, edgelord statements, you are forcing Nick Fuentes to be mainstreamed and normalized.
	So whether or not that was the plan, that is the outcome.
	From a practical perspective, I don't think there's many people who look at Fuentes or at least some statements that Fuentes makes and say this represents conservatism.
	But I don't think people need to be demanded to condemn idiotic statements because they're idiotic on their face and everybody knows it.
	And when you do those types of things, that's how you mainstream people.
	That's how Nick Fuentes got mainstreamed, not by the quality of much of his ideas, but by the attention and the demands of other people to condemn, to silence, to disavow Nick Fuentes as though there was any alliance in the first place.
	But one thing that I've noticed is that there is a lot of infighting right now and public infighting.
	And it's not good.
	It's not healthy.
	I say like to some extent, constructive criticism is necessary.
	It's warranted and it should never be shun.
	But relentless infighting is Operation COINTELPRO.
	And if you don't know what it is, look it up.
	I think we're living through a number of iterations of prior operations.
	I think we're living through an iteration of MKUltra.
	In fact, I'm thoroughly convinced now.
	Mark Grobert, America's Untold Stories, a show with Eric Hundley.
	If these names are new to you, welcome to the channel.
	Go check them out.
	Mark Grobert blew my mind one time.
	He said, you know, the entire 2015, 2016 demonization of Donald John Trump was an iteration or a continuation of MKUltra.
	Mass brainwashing.
	And when you understand how they do it, you can't unsee it.
	Operation Mockingbird never ended.
	It just became voluntary.
	I mean, when you have elements of the CIA in the media, when you have the media proudly toting deep state narratives and deep state talking points, I mean, it's like it's no longer infiltration.
	It's voluntary participation.
	And we're having an iteration of Operation COINTEL PRO.
	I firmly and thoroughly believe that there are forces that are coming from other countries that are coming from intelligence operations, deep state intelligence operations that are not aligned with Donald John Trump, that are sowing discord among conservatives right now.
	Now, when it happens, when you're not in power, it doesn't have the same impact as when you are in power.
	And that's what I believe we're seeing right now.
	And disagreement is great.
	And I think you have to criticize those you love or politically respect.
	But we're seeing a lot of unnecessary and fruitless infighting, which I think might be good for some, but bad for all in the long run.
	Now, with that said, collergy plan is what I was looking for.
	Oh, why can't I?
	You must be.
	Oh, I can't bring up.
	Give me one second to refresh, and I'm going to come back into the screen.
	And I'm back.
	Now, can I bring up?
	Oh, I'm back and I can't bring up the chat.
	Seems to have logged me.
	Let me go here.
	It was the collergy plan.
	And thank you.
	We're a little late to that one here.
	Callergy Plan, Viva.
	Thank you very much.
	Mighty Megatron.
	And there was a tipped question over on vivabarnslaw.locals.com, which I think is the one we already got to.
	So the question is, it's one that I struggle with: is how do you have constructive criticism with people that you like and respect and want to succeed without that constructive criticism being viewed as infighting for the purposes of destabilizing the movement by your ideological adversaries?
	Because that's what they do.
	That's what they will do.
	That's fair game.
	Kids are interrupting the stream.
	I don't have my on-air sign outside.
	I have a little piece of paper that I put on the handle.
	How do you do it?
	We're going to take a lesson of how not to do it.
	We'll take a lesson in how not to have the infighting that will not be exploited by your ideological adversaries to their benefit and to your detriment based on the reporting of Miranda Devine, the story we covered yesterday, and the response from someone who you know that I like, someone who I will defend, and I will steal men, even when I disagree.
	And I might even steal men, even though I disagree.
	Dan Vongino.
	Yesterday, you know that we were talking about the article that Miranda Devine wrote in, is it the New York Post or the it's the New York Post?
	We went over the article.
	It was an article basically, you know what?
	Let me let me just bring up the article to refresh everybody's memory, referring to the FBI as a rudderless ship based on anonymous insiders or at least unidentified insiders.
	Yeah, here we go.
	New York Post.
	And Miranda Devine, who used to be, you know, Whose work used to be celebrated when people were on the outside of power is now being condemned once the people get into power.
	And once you like, once you realize, whether you like it or not, when you're in a position of power, people are going to criticize.
	People are going to criticize to try to take you down.
	And others are going to strengthen you to keep you there.
	The article by Miranda Devine, Damning Report, labels FBI rudderless ship under Kash Patel, with him and Dan Bongino more concerned with building their personal resumes.
	I went through this yesterday to share some of my cynicism about it and some of my agreement with it.
	People are saying, you know, I can't believe Dan Bondino.
	I can't believe we have two podcasters in the White House right now, two podcasters behind the FBI.
	You stupid jackasses.
	Do you not know what Dan Bongino's credentials are?
	Dan Bongino is secret service, law enforcement, service to the country.
	He had accomplished a lot more for the country before becoming a podcaster.
	And anybody using the word podcaster as a pejorative insult, demeaning, and degrading, you're idiots.
	A podcaster.
	Do you refer to like, these are the same people who then look at the journalists, Leslie Stahl, and 60 Minutes and say, these are award-winning journalists.
	If you are a successful podcaster, it's because you put out good information, insightful observations, and you are reliable and trustworthy.
	You get to be successful if you're a filthy liar, hyperbolic, disinformation spreader, but for different reasons.
	So Dan Bongino has an amazing resume before getting into the FBI.
	I'm not sure that he really needed the deputy director of the FBI as a notch on his resume.
	Kash Patel, Kash Patel, I could understand the argument a little bit more for in that, you know, Kash Patel, in the grand scheme of his life, will profit more from this position than Dan Bongino will profit from this position.
	Some people say, well, they're going to write their books.
	They're going to be, others, are going to say, well, Dan Bongino won't need money for the rest of his life.
	And so this is, you know, the stature that he's after.
	Okay, I don't think so.
	I think Dan would probably, especially in retrospect, love being in the podcaster analyst side of the world, though I'm very certain that he's very happy with and proud of the accomplishments in law enforcement that he's undertaking for the FBI.
	That being said, there are obvious problems going on with the FBI right now.
	And this internal report, which comes from allegedly Trump supporters within the FBI.
	So I just want to get to the troubling report card for the six months.
	He's in over his head.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	The FBI, the Patel-led FBI is described in the 115 page report as Sohuda.
	Patel is described by multiple internal sources as inexperienced.
	Okay.
	Another source, self-professed Trump supporters.
	Patel is not very good.
	The people here, they're anonymized.
	I think they're, it started with the word A, alpha, and then they have numbers.
	Some of them are Trump supporters.
	I can appreciate some of you won't believe it.
	Fine.
	It's like, appreciate that.
	You may not believe this report.
	You might not believe your own eyes because some of the mistakes that the FBI has made, and I attribute them more to Pam Bondi than to Kash Patel, but certainly more to Kash Patel than Dan Bongino.
	Some of the mistakes have been, you know, novice, rookie, inexplicable, inexcusable mistakes, specifically Kash Patel putting out public statements about prominent investigations that are factually incorrect that confuse the hell out of everybody.
	But Miranda Devine had been something of a, I don't want to say something of a darling.
	She had been highly respected by Bongino because of the quality of her work back in the day when he agreed with it.
	Now that he's the subject or object of it, obviously no one's going to like it and people are going to try to find a way to discredit it.
	And so the infighting that occurred yesterday was Dan Bongino from his personal account saying Deep State Divine strikes again.
	Miranda loves attacking our reform agenda with gossipy anecdotes from a disgruntled former, from disgruntled former employees because she's upset that her quote reporting end quote keeps falling apart under scrutiny.
	You can always count on Miranda for a timed hit piece when the director and I make big changes.
	Miranda prefers the old guard.
	I don't full steam ahead, tagging her.
	There's some legitimacy in this.
	I'll tell you straight off the bat, from an optics perspective, I don't, even if Dan is right, I don't think he should be as a deputy director of the FBI tweeting at a journalist, even from his personal account, because I just say, if this were the, if the shoe were on the other foot and this were, I don't know who the deputy director was under Comey, but if it was Biden's FBI tweeting at a right-wing OAN journalist,
	people would potentially and potentially rightly take that the wrong way.
	Take that as something of, be intimidated by that.
	If you're Miranda Devine and you got the deputy director of the FBI tweeting at you, even if it's from his personal account, you might feel threatened by that.
	Maybe wrongly, but again, just imagine what you would be thinking if this were a Biden FBI tweeting at an OAN journalist or an independent journalist.
	Now, that being said, Dan makes good points and maybe he wants people to appreciate those points.
	The people who might have been the anonymous sources for this article might be disgruntled.
	First of all, they might be, I'm going to not use that word because it's meant it colloquially, but they might be backstabbers, TDS turncoats.
	They might be people lying about their support for Trump and still being part of the deep state that I certainly believe is part of the FBI.
	That's part of the problem.
	To the extent you have disgruntled former employees or disgruntled current employees or TDS current employees, they need to be purged.
	They need to be purged because even if Dan is right right now, this is part and parcel of the problem of having not purged the FBI's rank and file of people who will stab Dan and Patel in the back at the first opportunity that they get.
	So yeah, it might be gossipy.
	It certainly will feel gossipy to the objects of it.
	And if it's inaccurate, it's coming from people within that are there to sabotage Bongino and Patel.
	They need to be purged.
	If it is accurate, these problems need to be remedied.
	Miranda writes back, I've learned that Dan Bongino has been claiming he published my, this would not be the angle that I would have gone replied with.
	There's a clip of Bongino saying he published Miranda Devine's book.
	It was the laptop from hell back in the day when Bongino was celebrating the quality of Miranda Devine's work.
	He says, I published it.
	It's an 11-second clip.
	I'll see if I cannot find it in response to one of these things.
	I've learned that Bongino has been claiming he, quote, published, end quote, my bestseller, laptop from hell.
	This is false.
	My contract was with the courageous Anthony Zicardi of Post Hill.
	Anthony later offloaded risk by selling Dan a portion of the book.
	Dan benefited financially from my accurate reporting on the deep state.
	Now that he's inside the FBI, he attacks me for my accurate reporting and accuses me of being part of the deep state.
	Shaking my face emoji thing.
	The good news is that you can still buy laptop from hell in hardcover, makes a great Christmas present, and you will put a few pennies in Dan's pocket.
	That's kind of funny.
	I would have taken a different angle and said, yeah, he published it.
	And the semantics here is that people are going to say, yes, he did still publish it.
	If he bought the rights and then sold the book, that's basically publishing.
	And so you've made a distinction without a difference.
	Yeah, Dan published the book.
	It's technically correct what he said.
	I would have just kept it simpler.
	Yeah, he did.
	He did publish my book because it was great.
	It was great reporting and nothing's changed in me.
	But this is not the type of fighting that should be happening.
	And you have to appreciate that when you get into the positions of power, people are going to come at you rightly and wrongly.
	And if there's any element in truth to that report in the New York Post and that 115-page document, the better move would be silence and maybe make some changes.
	And when it's coming out now and it looks like, I don't know if Kash Patel is on borrow time as the director of the FBI, you know, it feels good to defend yourself.
	And sometimes, especially when you're the object of what you feel to be unfair criticism, you feel obliged to defend yourself.
	That doesn't always mean it's the ethical and best course of action to do.
	Because if I look, if I'm a lefty, if I'm a lefty, disingenuous hack of a journalist, you can predict, in as much as, you know, every time Trump closes his eyes during a press conference, they're going to accuse him of falling asleep.
	You know that there's going to be some lefty journalist hacks out there who are going to say that it's inappropriate for the deputy director to be tweeting at a journalist because he doesn't like her journalism, even if it's from his personal account.
	And even if he's right.
	And so none of this should be happening.
	That being said, we need some answers from the FBI sooner than later on the biggest issues of the day and transparency.
	Being told that there's nothing more to see here and demonizing Tucker Carlson for exposing the fact that the FBI at the time seemingly lied about Thomas Crooks' social media footprint.
	And we're told that there's nothing to see here.
	He acted alone.
	Move along.
	Nobody's buying it.
	And if nobody's buying it, even if it's true, it's a problem.
	So you got Butler.
	You got the Kirk assassination.
	You've got the January 6th, where we still don't have any meaningful progress.
	We still don't have a response to Steve Baker.
	And again, strategically, why it's a bad move to respond to Miranda Devine, but not respond to Steve Baker.
	Some people are going to say, well, what Steve Baker's saying has to be even more true if the FBI has not responded to his reporting of having allegedly identified the potential January 6th pipe bomber suspect based on a gate analysis.
	Why respond to some journalists and not others?
	People will draw conclusions.
	So apply the same brushstroke to all so that nobody can read anything into it, accurate or inaccurate.
	It's the same thing in poker.
	Like if you make the same face every time, nobody's going to know when you're bluffing when you have the best hand.
	But if you do something different, people are going to read into it rightly or wrongly.
	So that's where it stands.
	The success of the current administration is an existential issue for the future of these United States of America.
	And if anybody thinks I'm being unfair, opportunistic, clickbaity, rest assured, I'm not.
	And my family didn't sell everything that we had on earth to get the hell out of Canada to come down here investing in what I foresaw to be the future of these United States of America, which was a Trump victory the second time around because it was rigged in 2020, Chucky boy.
	You know, it's not an investment you make, or I should say a sacrifice that you make so that you can come in and exploit the downfall.
	This is a question of preventing it.
	And if this infighting continues, if the lack of faith in the institutions continue, and if the lack of reform that is quite clearly needed within these institutions does not occur, 2026 is going to be a shit show.
	2028 is going to be a shit show.
	And then the Democrats are going to come in and do everything on steroids that they did in 2020.
	That is that.
	Now, Viva, you need to get a mod.
	The chat sucks.
	First of all, I have a mod.
	NeuroDivergent helps out quite a lot.
	I don't like moderating in the sense of banning or whatever.
	Invariably, it ends up happening.
	You're going to get accused of banning people for ideological reasons, which I don't do.
	it's spam links and uh just read a roosting says you think bongino was smart for tweeting at a journalist calling her deep state Rustang, you've been listening to the show, right?
	I will not repeat.
	King of Biltong says, agreed, Viva Fry, we did the exact same.
	This is Biltong, who came from South Africa to come to these United States of America.
	The last bastion of freedom on this earth.
	And if they don't say fight tooth and nail to keep it, and if they don't take the proper precautions to make sure that they maintain it, congrats.
	I mean, some states are going to fare better than others.
	It'll be the fall of the Roman Empire.
	I mean, ultimately, Italy came out of the fall of the Roman Empire.
	So, you know, it's not all bad.
	Ultimately, Italy now is one of the collapsing countries in the collapsing Europe.
	Some states will fare better than others.
	And I think Florida will fare better than most.
	But if you don't fight for this freedom, and if you don't make sure that you don't make mistakes that sacrifice it or compromise it, you know, America can look like Canada in 10 short years if it doesn't already look like Canada in certain select states.
	And that's all I have to say about that.
	I think.
	Probably have a little bit more in a second.
	Chet Chiza.
	Oh, hold on a second.
	Let's just do this now.
	I can actually bring it up here on V. By the way, everyone, make sure you're subscribed.
	If you're watching on Rumble, hit the subscribe, turn on notifications, download the Rumble app.
	That's free.
	And then you can get immediate notifications when people go live, your favorite creators like myself.
	Hopefully I'm one of your favorite.
	If I'm one of your most detested, you definitely need to know when I go live.
	Download the app, Rumble app.
	If you can get Rumble Premium, get Rumble Premium.
	And let's see here.
	We got Callergy Plan Viva.
	Yes.
	Now, King of Bill Tong in the house says premium Bill Tong from Bill Tong USA.
	High protein, keto-friendly, no additives.
	U.S. source beef, authentic South African flavor.
	Get some now at billtongusa.com, code Viva for 10% off.
	It's flipping delicious.
	I'll have to show everybody what it looks like after I read Chet Chisholm's chat in the house.
	And Chet says, you see the same infighting in Canada.
	Conservative pundits clutch their pearls and gasp what anyone talks to, likes, or is friends with Jeremy McKenzie.
	Well, I've got a different take on Canada.
	You have no conservatives in Canada.
	I should say we have no conservatives in Canada.
	Conservatives are a bunch of feckless pussies.
	Yes, I said it.
	I would say Godforsaken pussies, cowards.
	The conservatives, put it in Canada, put it in quotes, in Canada are more progressive than the Democrats in the States.
	You got maybe, and I say maybe, three to six good conservatives in Canada.
	Do I name them?
	I don't want to name them.
	I might get some people in trouble.
	You got maybe three to six good conservatives in Canada.
	Roman Baber is one.
	Other than that, you got a shit party of conservatives in Canada, more content with pussyfooting and placating to the Canadian sensitivities instead of giving Canadians what they desperately need and what they actually desperately crave, which is real leadership, not liberal light.
	So that's it.
	What did Pierre have to say about the slaughter of the ostriches?
	Oh, nothing?
	What did conservatives have to say about it?
	Oh, not much?
	Well, great.
	So you got conservatives up in Canada who don't care about government overreach, don't care about animal rights, don't care about brutal tyranny.
	And they're supposed to be the savior of Canada.
	You can't save someone who doesn't want to save themselves.
	You can't help a drug addict who doesn't understand they have a problem.
	And you sure as hell can't save a drowning person when all they're going to do is take you down with them.
	And I say this all with deep respect and a history.
	I like Dan.
	And I can appreciate how frustrating it must be for Dan to actually be there, be the target of a thousand arrows, and to ultimately not be able to defend himself because he's in a position now where, unfortunately, he needs to just take it because it's otherwise just not appropriate to respond.
	I appreciate how frustrating that is.
	Probably the most frustrating thing on earth to not be able to defend yourself when you think you're right, when you might be right, and when you desperately want to.
	And that is all we have to say about that.
	In other news, do you remember the Des Moines superintendent who was arrested by ICE?
	And there were a bunch of questions as to how the hell this guy, an illegal alien, got to be the superintendent at a school.
	Where was it?
	In Iowa?
	Just to refresh everybody's memory before the news of the day, now you understand why the news wouldn't want to cover this story.
	Now you understand why they lie when they say the 2020 election wasn't rigged.
	Now you understand why they lie when they say only legal citizens can vote in elections.
	We're just making it illegal to be forced to show ID.
	The same motherfuckers who made you show ID to buy a coffee in New York City during COVID don't want to make you show an ID to vote.
	The same people who supported COVID tyranny, vaccine passports, proof of medical intervention against your will, don't support the idea of making people show voter ID or any form of ID to vote.
	And why?
	Because they think black people and minorities don't know how to get ID.
	Bunch of goddamn racists is what they are.
	Oh, and by the way, illegals are voting.
	And now you're going to find out why at the end of this story.
	Des Moines School, just to refresh everybody's memory, puts Superintendent Ian Roberts on unpaid leave.
	The day this story broke, disinformation abounded.
	How could they, he's a prime citizen.
	This is ICE overreach.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	Des Moines School Board put Superintendent Dr. Ian Roberts.
	They got to call him Doctor.
	If it were Charlie Kirk, they'd call him far-right activist.
	If it were Jeremy McKenzie up in Canada, they'd call him far-right extremist.
	But when it's an illegal alien who they like and they want to support and they don't want to be too, you know, call him doctor.
	Watch how many, I think I remember this article.
	They refer to doctor many, many times.
	He was detained last week by federal immigration authorities on unpaid administrative leave following the Iowa Board of Examiners move to revoke his state license.
	A news release published Monday from Des Moines Public School District said the action to place Roberts on unpaid leave under this is required by law.
	What was that?
	What is this?
	B-O-E-E?
	Whatever.
	The school board meeting is one of the latest actions in response to Roberts' detainment by U.S. Customs and Immigration.
	ICE.
	He was approached by ICE agents in a vehicle during a targeted enforcement operation Friday.
	The agency reported Roberts was found in possession of a handgun, which he wasn't allowed to have, a hunting knife, and $3,000 cash.
	I'll take a weekend of fun in Vegas, Alex, for $300.
	He then allegedly attempted to evade arrest.
	ICE press release stated, and Iowa State Patrol's officers assisted the federal agents in locating Roberts after his vehicle was found abandoned.
	School board meant, yada, yada, yada.
	So then the question at the time was, how the hell did an illegal alien, he had a criminal record and it was for something related to a firearm while he was hunting, where he had a loaded firearm in the car when he was allegedly hunting.
	And his excuse for why the loaded firearm was in the car was because he didn't want to make the game warden feel unsafe by having the firearm outside of the car, something along those lines.
	But this time he had a handgun, illegally.
	Illegal alien in possession of an illegal firearm or in illegal possession of a firearm with $3,000 cash.
	Yep, that's he's taken the Fannie Willis approach of you always got to have $15,000 cash in your home.
	All right.
	News broke the other day.
	After a bit of a legal threat or legal battle.
	This is from Fox News.
	Legal threat cracks open voter records for illegal school superintendent nabbed by ICE.
	Ian Andre Roberts checked yes when asked about citizenship status on voter application.
	Records show.
	Oh, illegals don't vote.
	Illegals can't vote unless they say they're legal.
	A Maryland board of elections backed down in the face of a legal threat from conservative groups and released unredacted voter registration records belonging to an illegal immigrant who served as the superintendent of Iowa's largest school system, Fox Digital has learned.
	The records show illegal immigrant Ian Andre Roberts, who is originally from Ghana, Guyana, claimed to be a U.S. citizen.
	Quote, the records show us what we all know.
	Maryland is not serious about keeping non-citizens off the voter rules.
	American Accountability Foundation, AAF chief Tom Jones, a conservative research group that advocated for a voter, said in the press conference, sadly, there are likely thousands more non-citizens on Maryland's voter rules.
	Prince George Board of Elections provided conservative legal group restoring integrity, trust, elections, right?
	And AF with unredacted versions of Ian's documents.
	After initially releasing heavily redacted versions of the documents that blacked out Roberts' sex, because now I got questions, whether he checked the citizen box, his date of birth, and other information.
	Fresh documents, Wright said in the press release, yada, yada, yada, showed Roberts affirmatively claimed U.S. citizenship on his voter registration application and that Maryland elections officials took his word for it.
	And then we can get into the rest of this.
	He came in from Guyana.
	Apparently, he was in the Olympics.
	Now you understand why the dishonest media would want to make this story disappear.
	This is a man who was here illegally, in unlawful, in unlawful possession of a firearm.
	I'm phrasing it that way specifically because firearms are not inherently unlawful, but your possession of them, if you're an illegal alien, could be, who claimed to be a U.S. citizen on voter records.
	And I wonder if he voted.
	I mean, look, do I want to see, hold on a second, actually, let me go back there.
	Did he, in fact, vote is going to be the question.
	I don't know that we're going to have that.
	Here, let's just see here.
	Did he, in fact, vote?
	Let's just do control F vote.
	That noise is very annoying to me.
	Vote.
	Okay, let's hear.
	Vote, All right.
	They claim to be USA.
	Okay, fine.
	The Maryland Board of Elections said he, Roberts did not vote in the elections.
	The Maryland State Board of Elections previously said Roberts did not vote in the elections.
	The revelations that Robert checked in the affirmative that he was a U.S. citizen on voter registration documents further opens the door to scrutiny over illegal immigrants potentially voting in elections.
	Well, I do have questions about this now, but unless there's evidence to support it, I'll just have skepticism.
	Wright pointed to the Maryland Board of Elections previously stating that non-citizens are canceled from registration records after the state board of elections or local board receive information regarding their citizenship by voter self-report by the voter, self-report or a report to the jury commissions as a cause for the current removal process.
	This case demonstrates exactly why Congress enacted the NVRA's public disclosure mandate.
	Yada yada yada.
	When election officials attempt to hide eligibility records, the public loses the ability to verify that the law is being followed.
	Once the records were produced, we saw just how weak Maryland's safeguards really are.
	This is unfortunately all too common around the country, and federal laws do little to help stop non-citizen from registering to vote.
	Let's see here.
	Okay, fine.
	We got that.
	And then the rest of this is sort of.
	Fox News reached out to the county state board's election Tuesday for additional comment on Roberts' records.
	The state's vetting process for non-citizens on voter rolls and response to rights released, but did not immediately receive replies.
	Well, that's the story.
	And now you'll understand why they don't want anyone talking about it.
	Non-illegal citizens, illegal immigrants, undoubtedly have cast votes.
	The only question is to what extent.
	Here, remember, it was the perpetual moving target, safe and effective against COVID to prevent serious symptoms and hospitalizations.
	And then it goes from no election fraud to no meaningful election fraud to no meaningful election fraud that could have altered the outcome of the election, as if anybody can possibly know that.
	Translation: election fraud.
	The coal train is in the house.
	Welcome to the channel, Coal Train.
	Ginger Ninja, Bell.
	Do you not see that I am live, young lady?
	I got my phone back.
	All right.
	Welcome to the channel, the Coal Train.
	We got F. Charton in the house.
	Prospectively, what do you make of the retesting of the peacocks and them surviving?
	I actually didn't hear about that.
	This is the critter, the critter, the critter reserve in British Columbia.
	I'm going to put that on blast.
	Well, they're going to say that this is the whole argument that was made about the ostriches, that this critter rescue, I guess, the peacocks, apparently, if they were able to be retested and survived.
	Well, that was exactly the argument about testing the ostriches in universal, but they'll just make the argument that they weren't complying.
	The farm wasn't cooperating, so we had no other choice.
	I'll check that out.
	Thank you very much, Francis, for letting me know.
	Ginger Ninja says, To be fair to Rustang, most of what you said has been the infighting is not productive, so people can be aimed at either end.
	But usually, that phrase has been used to shut up and blindly support.
	No, I think I'm pretty clear about my criticism of the response.
	Criticism of the response and criticism of the substance, not criticism of the substance, but rather the need to address the substance of Miranda's reporting and not try to write it off as now deep state.
	Because it's an amazing thing, like Miranda Devine was, I don't know if she was on with Blanche.
	I mean, I know that he celebrated the quality of her work.
	I mean, he celebrated it to the point where he published her book.
	And so it doesn't, the reporting doesn't become garbage because it's directed at you.
	So there's that.
	All right.
	Now, let me just see one other thing here.
	What do we got in the back?
	So we covered pretty much everything.
	We got that.
	I was going to read some more of the responses to.
	We fleshed it.
	Oh, yeah.
	Oh, yes.
	Hold on.
	Okay.
	Stick around for this.
	Also, oh, is my wife coming on today?
	Let me see something here.
	My wife got to see two things.
	Oh, let me see what let me see if anyone responded to the type of cartridges.
	All right, I just got a lot of text.
	What I was going to say is this: I think my wife is coming onto the show sooner than later.
	Before my wife comes onto the show, I'm going to get a bunch of swear words out of my system.
	Everyone, head on over to vivabarnslaw.locals.com for the afterparty.
	If you want to support the channel, you know how to do it.
	Oh, the tips.
	Hold on.
	Let me show you everybody.
	Geez, Louise, that's what I haven't done in a while.
	And we need to remind everybody as to the amazing way that you can now support the work that I do.
	And when this is available to everybody, the work that your favorite content creators do on Crumble.
	Let me share my double face.
	See you're gonna be seeing double four Vivas.
	There we go.
	That's a.
	I don't like that face.
	There we go.
	That's a little better.
	All right, if you go down to the tip part here, you will notice that you can tip with rumble wallet.
	You can download rumble wallet if you have Android, so you go to google play or whatever the hell the Google app store is.
	You can download the app rumble wallet for android if you already have an account on Rumble.
	You can link the the accounts together and you'll have or be linked to your rumble wallet.
	And you can tip via cryptocurrencies.
	You can inject cryptocurrencies into your wallet, keep them there, transfer them there from other crypto wallets and if you want to tip with other, you can tip with usdt, which is tether backed, a United States Uh, digital dollar, whatever the Usdt, United States Dollar.
	On tether x aut, which is tethered to gold.
	If you want to invest in that or you can in, you can send with bitcoin.
	Click on whatever one you want, look at the, you know go, scan the qr code and um you can donate cryptocurrency to support your favorite creators that way.
	It's an amazing, amazing system.
	They're troubleshooting, not troubleshooting.
	They're beta testing it right now.
	I think i'm the first.
	I was the first, if not the only one right now, to actually have this access um on the platform.
	But download the Android app and uh, troubleshoot it and if you want to support, that's how you can do it, and if there are any issues, go to the Rumble website and let them know what the issues are with the app and then they're going to make it available on uh, that other place there, Apple.
	Now I did see something that looked like flattery, so i'm gonna have to bring this up immediately before we go raid redacted.
	Have the last story here.
	Uh, Mighty Megatron says, viva, vive.
	You've been on fire today, but we need some levity.
	A Jew and a black man jumps off a building.
	Who will land first?
	that might be a little bit too edgy for the channel sir i don't even think that would be in uh in blanche knott's dirty joke book i'll give you uh a funny joke Let me think about this.
	Yeah well, we'll pick on the, we'll pick on the Polex.
	I'm half, i'm also, i'm a.
	I'm not even a quarter.
	I think i'm half Polish.
	My grandfather was Polish.
	Um okay, so a Polish scientist is doing an experiment on a frog and his experiment is to see um, you know, to see the effects of removing a limb from a frog.
	I should preface this, the jokes about the pole Acts and the Newfies is based on their uh intelligence, so that if you, if you don't know that uh stereotype, you won't get the joke.
	So the Polish scientist is testing to see how high a frog can jump as you remove a limb from the frog.
	So he removes one limb from the frog and says jump froggy jump, and the frog manages to jump.
	It's like oh, then he takes and writes, rights the nose that he cuts off another limb and he says jump froggy jump, and the frog manages to get you know, a bit of a jump off the ground.
	It's like hmm, very interesting.
	Goes and writes it down in his notebook, cuts off the third leg and he says jump froggy jump, and the frog just struggles and barely gets off the ground.
	He's like, very interesting, goes back and writes that.
	Then he cuts off the fourth leg and he says, jump froggy, jump.
	And the frog just sits there in a pool of blood.
	He says jump froggy jump, frog does nothing.
	So he goes back to his notepad and he says, when all limbs removed from frog, frog tends to go deaf.
	Come on, that's pretty funny.
	You can do with noofies too.
	All right, that's the levity of the show.
	Your joke, Megatron, is going to get me in trouble and is not levity.
	Thank you.
	That's a good joke, by the way.
	You can use that.
	And you can use that.
	I don't know who the local stereotypes for, you know, noobs are or boobs.
	It works with Polaks.
	It works with noofies.
	And it works with, I don't know, the Dutch.
	All right.
	On a side note, not going to leave you with a good taste in your mouth.
	You got to see this awful evil woman's face.
	And everyone's like, Viva, stop giving her attention.
	She thrives off the rage bait.
	She thrives off the, what do they call it?
	Shit posting.
	I'm sorry.
	I believe in attention sometimes.
	She wants the attention.
	She'll get the attention.
	You know, be careful of what you wish for.
	You're going to get the attention for the wrong reasons.
	And you can't walk this level of ugliness back.
	And I do say ugliness, and I will make fun of her.
	I'm going to make fun of her not for the way she looks physically, but spiritually.
	This woman shall forever be known as Botox Megatron.
	No, wait a minute.
	Oh, crap.
	What's the guy's name?
	Skeletor.
	Botox skeletor.
	Megatron's on in my Botox Skeletor.
	Behold.
	For the permanent record, I just want to make sure everybody knows that I believe Stephen Miller is a white nationalist.
	He reminds me of a Nazi.
	He sounds like a Nazi.
	His wife is the exact same thing.
	And I was just shocked as shit the other morning when I woke up and she's on CNN and she brings up yours truly.
	You have people on your show all the time who my husband and myself are Nazi.
	So how is that anything different from Tucker Carlson going on?
	Hold on, I mean, Tucker Fuentes is not your admirer.
	Excuse me.
	You have Jennifer Welch on your show very often.
	My husband, a white nationalist.
	Hold on.
	That is no different than Nick Fuentes going on Tucker Carlson.
	It's not, and you should admit it.
	If you think that my opinion that you and your husband are Nazi white nationalists is hateful, good.
	Good.
	Because I will stand with every American, immigrants, people with brown and black skin, and LGBTQ plus.
	And I will stand with them because I believe in universal human rights.
	I do not believe in any way, shape, or form in the cruelty that your husband is launching.
	I mean, this could be the dumbest woman on the internet.
	People were actually trying to suggest that she's the left's Joe Rogan.
	She is ugly and nasty inside and out.
	The irony is that if she were a spiritually beautiful person, you know, she might appear totally differently physically.
	I look at her and I see Botox Skeletor.
	And if you think I'm exaggerating, I'm not exaggerating.
	I won't use the B word except to say Botox Skeletor.
	She is the face of what happens when you get consumed by hatred.
	And I'm not consumed by hatred right now.
	I'm just observing.
	By the way, I don't listen to those words of her calling Stephen Miller a white supremacist Nazi.
	I don't get offended by that.
	I just say, holy shit, the Botox has paralyzed your brain, Botox Skeletor.
	When you are calling, it's such gaslighting.
	I was like, isn't Stephen Miller Jewish?
	No, I appreciate some people could say, oh, Jews can be Nazis too.
	Like back in World War II, there were many part Jews who were registered members of the Nazi party.
	If we're talking about a Jew who's a registered Nazi, fine, you can call them a Nazi.
	But we're talking about Jews who were not even sperm in the balls of their grandparents during the time of the Holocaust.
	You can't call them Nazis.
	And then some people say, well, what about George Soros?
	Like, first of all, don't confound Nazis or Jew, don't confound the accusation of Jewish Nazis with Nazi collaborators.
	Yeah, George Soros certainly collaborated with the Nazis, whatever you want to make of that level of collaboration of a 13-year-old child, you know, doing whatever they think at the time or doing whatever they need to do to survive.
	You wouldn't call George Soros a Nazi necessarily, although you're getting kind of close when someone actively collaborated with seizing Jewish property for the benefit of their Nazi overlords.
	But I wouldn't even call George Soros a Nazi.
	I'd call him maybe a Nazi collaborator.
	Not even maybe.
	I'd call him a Nazi collaborator.
	The only question is whether or not you impugn any moral responsibility to the actions of the 13-year-old during the Holocaust.
	Okay.
	So nobody's offended by your stupidity, you ugly, awful Botox guy there, Skeletor.
	You're just an idiot.
	You're calling a Jewish guy a Nazi.
	Congratulations.
	You're retarded.
	Like that's what the term was created for.
	Not because you're actually mentally deficient and people are making fun of things that are beyond your control, but because you seemingly have a brain and you've gone full retard calling Stephen Miller, a Jewish man, a Nazi.
	Some might even say you're being an idiot by not even referring to him as a pigmentation that's slightly darker.
	I don't know if you're Semitic or if you, depending on the origins of his family as Jews, if they're not Eastern European, they might be, I don't know if they come from Syria, Lebanon.
	There's a lot of Sephardic Jews are darker skinned.
	Idiot.
	Idiot.
	You want that attention?
	I forget.
	I don't even know what her name is.
	The podcast is I've had it podcast.
	Dude, you never had it to lose in the first place, but you lost it.
	The Botox has paralyzed your shriveled, atrophied, disgusting, stupid brain.
	Enjoy the attention.
	Let us now go and raid Redacted.
	Let him know from whence you came.
	And thank you, everyone.
	I guess if everyone came from the quartering, welcome and thank you.
	Sorry, Jeremy, I always do forget to thank those who raid into the Viva.
	But now we're going to go raid into Redacted and let him know from whence you came and say hi for me.
	And let's do this now.
	So for and come over to VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
	Confirm raid.
	Go.
	And now I'm going to go into their chat and I'm going to go spam it with a bunch of links.
	I'm joking.
	Viva Raid Booyah.
	And now we're going to go over to VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
	Let me see if my her name is.
	Hey, Bill, can I share that?
	When I say that we've got the best above-average community out there, I got a text message from.
	No, I don't.
	Bill, okay, hold on a second.
	Hold on a second.
	Can I share that?
	Can I share that question mark?
	Give me a second.
	It's quite hilarious.
	Let me just see here.
	Okay.
	So with that said, Tizal.
	Hold on, hold on.
	Of course, he says, Bill Brown says her name is Skeletor.
	Or he said Skeletor.
	I would just Skeletor.
	See, like, I'm still, I'm still a baby.
	I'm still.
	He says, take credit for it.
	Too late, Bill.
	I'm still a baby, wet behind the ears.
	I couldn't even think of that.
	And, you know, that's it.
	Okay.
	So let's go to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Tomorrow is Wednesday.
	Yeah, tomorrow's Wednesday.
	Oh, cripe.
	Okay, I got to do something sort of on an urgent basis.
	I might have to do that while we're on viva barnslaw.locals.com.
	Come on over, people.
	We'll have a good show tomorrow.
	And thank you all for being here, Rumble.
	Twitter, Raid Redacted.
	Get a Louis the Lobster book on Amazon.
	Louie the Lobster returns to the sea.
	Let me get the link and share it if everybody wants a good Christmas gift.
	It's a kids' book.
	I have 10 that I was trying to do like a cameo thing with on eBay.
	Here, link.
	Go get Louie the Lobster there.
	And if you want to get a custom message from a Louis the Lobster, I'm selling them on eBay as well because I have 10 copies left that I didn't manage to give away at the last conferences I was at.
	Go to selling.
	And if you want to get one, I'm going to go right here and give everyone the link to that.
	If you want a custom message, it's a hundred bucks and it's more than the book and with the shipping and everything.
	But it's like a cameo for books.
	So if you want one of those, here, link there.
	Otherwise, see you tomorrow.

▲