Viva & Barnes - Elissa Slotkin Has Blood on Her Hands! Steve Baker Continues to Pull the Jan. 6 Thread! & MORE!

Nov. 27, 2025 - Viva & Barnes

01:06:11

Elissa Slotkin Has Blood on Her Hands! Steve Baker Continues to Pull the Jan. 6 Thread! & MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, on this day of Thanksgiving, we shall all give thanks for the things for which we have thankfulness to give, and even for the things for which we do not have thankfulness to give.
	But first, we shall remind everyone that Michael Knowles is not just a pretty face.
	He actually has a pretty good, good sense of humor.
	Behold, a video he posted last year on Thanksgiving.
	So, what's everybody thankful for?
	No, I'm just you.
	Let's have a nice dinner.
	Can you pass the map?
	Well, I forgot.
	I kind of forgot to set that up.
	It said, point of view, you're the conservative uncle at Thanksgiving.
	Happy Thanksgiving, everyone in America.
	Thanksgiving is a big holiday in America.
	Like everything closes down.
	The cars are lining the streets.
	Stores are closed.
	It's wild.
	That was Michael Knowles.
	Oh, I should probably share the link with everybody.
	And I don't know if it's a sacrilege to be live on Thanksgiving, but I wasn't going to let everybody have nothing to watch today.
	I'm joking.
	There's a ton of stuff to watch.
	Not everybody is American, and not all Americans are celebrating Thanksgiving, given some of the posts I see out there.
	Thanksgiving shaming.
	There are literally posts telling people to be ashamed of celebrating Thanksgiving, that it is celebrating genocide if you celebrate Thanksgiving.
	To all those people, I say, thank goodness you have a platform to spew your stupidity.
	Thank goodness, and you should be grateful as well that you have freedom of speech to suggest that anyone celebrating Thanksgiving is celebrating genocide.
	Michael Knowles is a kind of a funny guy, but I don't know if anybody had not yet seen that.
	Go check it out.
	And good afternoon, party peoples of the interwebs.
	How goes the battle?
	What up, Viva?
	I am thankful for your show, says Swag Swagscale.
	We're live on Rumble.
	Rumble, Twitter, and VivabarnsLaw.locals.com, where I guess people are watching football.
	Is there football today?
	Hold on one second.
	Is there a...
	This is going to be my Canadian side.
	Is there a football game on tonight?
	There's a football game on tonight.
	Yes, there is.
	Okay, well, whatever.
	We're not going to be watching that.
	I've got a Thanksgiving dinner, which seemingly started at one o'clock at a friend's place, and the family's there.
	I'm going to join them afterwards.
	I said I have to do the show because we have to cover some news and talk about what happened yesterday.
	I've been sort of on a bit of a tear.
	Many of you may or may not know that I may or may not be afflicted with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
	And what that means is that I will obsess and be compulsive about things that I decide to put my attention into.
	One of which is the precursors to what we witnessed yesterday, what the world went through yesterday.
	Washington, D.C. National Guardsmen, one was a woman, one was a man, shot by an individual who, it turns out, has now been identified as an Afghan national with ties to the CIA.
	We won't get ahead of that particular story.
	But Alyssa Slotkin, the woman who was one of the six featured in the 60 second, what was it called?
	60 Seconds of Sedition?
	I don't know.
	It was more than 60 seconds.
	Has blood on her hands.
	And I'm not saying that hyperbolically.
	I've been going through the interweb so that you don't have to, aggregating the infinite collective knowledge of the internet.
	And after, we'll get into it.
	Before we get into anything, you know, I woke up this morning, I said, you know, I haven't talked about the ostrich story in a while now.
	And I'll back it up even more.
	You know, my deep thoughts on Thanksgiving are when you have, let's just say you have fears and people tend to obsess over fears and concerns.
	And, you know, being thankful is one thing.
	Saying you're thankful is another thing.
	And truly feeling the gratitude for as bad as people, you know, you think you might have it and as many irritations that you have in your life to be thankful for what you have because it could be worse, pretty much always by definition.
	And so one of my issues is truly internalizing gratitude in that on the one hand, not just saying it, not just, you know, going through the motion, appreciating the gratitude.
	Like you have kids and they're loud, they're obnoxious, they, you know, they mess up the house.
	If you have the health of your kids and your family, everything else is secondary.
	You have a paralyzed dog with a tumor the size of a freaking football in her shoulder who pisses and craps all over the house.
	And like, it's tedious to clean it up, but you have the capability of cleaning it up and you have a beautiful dog that I hope she loves me.
	The flip side of gratitude as well is an element of guilt where it's very difficult.
	And I've always found it difficult to say, you know, for everything that I have to be thankful for, there are people out there who are going through immense, immeasurable suffering.
	You know, the National Guardsmen yesterday, their family, their friends, people who serve in battle are veterans, people who lose loved ones through tragedy.
	As when one says, here are the things I'm thankful for, in my obsessive, compulsive, neurotic mind, it's always in comparison to those who are going through immense suffering.
	And there's a certain element of guilt that comes with the thanks that you give for having your health, for example.
	So with all of that said, these are internal conflicts to resolve.
	Meditation could probably help.
	Bottom line, it's Thanksgiving.
	If you have a roof over your head that has a leak in it, be thankful you have a roof over your head.
	If you have a car with a, I don't know, tires need to be replaced, be thankful you have a car.
	And above and beyond everything else, if you have your health, then you have everything you need to resolve pretty much every other problem that you might come across in your life.
	Now, with that said, also, it was a precursor to the ostrich farm.
	I had been covering that for the better part of a year and did everything that I could with my big mouth and whatever bullhorn I have on social media.
	That ended in abject disaster, horror.
	I mean, there's no other word to describe it.
	It ended in horror, traumatizing horror, you know, to varying degrees for all involved, but the highest level of trauma for Katie, her mother, her business partner, who have owned that farm for 35 years and who literally had to sit there and live through a goddamn horror movie inflicted by the Canadian government.
	And in the aftermath of the slaughter, I did as much call it media.
	I put it on blast.
	You hope that out of the tragedy, that'll be the catalyst for change.
	And then you realize, unfortunately, and it's a bit of a black pill to swallow, out of the tragedy comes when you get acclimated.
	What is the word I'm looking for?
	Acclimated.
	Yes, you get acclimated to the horrors of a tyrannical government.
	You get acclimated to the horrors of modern society.
	You get acclimated to violence.
	You get acclimated to degeneracy on the internet.
	And society is now thoroughly acclimated to government tyranny to the point that a few weeks after the incident, there's a little flare up in the pan of outrage.
	And then that energy, that exhaust burns up, and everybody else goes on with their lives, except for the people who have had to endure that government abuse and government tyranny.
	You know, I don't know how you get over something like that.
	I don't know that Katie and her family ever will.
	And the reality is, however, their trauma, their suffering is not over.
	David Cryden put out a tweet, which has, I'm sorry, this is the, I won't play the whole thing because it's rather long, where he's reminding everybody to support Katie and support the ostrich farm as much as you can.
	So why do you need to support Katie in this venture?
	Because this farm was ordered by the Supreme Court of Canada when it denied its appeal of this execution of their ostriches.
	The Supreme Court of Canada ordered the farm to pay the entire legal expenses of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency.
	That's about 11 months potentially.
	Could be millions of dollars.
	The farm could also potentially be on the hook for the costs of the RCMP CFIA occupation of their farm.
	That includes everything from the salaries of the officers to the bales of hay and the fencing that was purchased.
	They might even charge them for the bullets.
	Who the hell knows?
	Those bullets aren't free.
	You know, they fire a thousand rounds to kill those ostriches.
	Who's going to pay for that?
	Taxpayers?
	No, we're going to recoup the price of the bullets.
	Charging the victims for the abuse.
	That could also be a very hefty bill.
	And this farm has no guarantee that they're going to receive any compensation from the Mark Carney government because the farm was not compliant through this process.
	Well, and I would add, even if it were compliant, what they're going to do is offset whatever compensation the government would have owed them for slaughtering their ostriches as though they were chickens.
	They're going to offset it for the court costs, the legal fees, and all the other stuff.
	So they're like, all right, fine.
	You were compliant.
	Here's whatever, couple hundred thousand dollars, if that for the slaughter of your ostriches.
	Oh, but we've got to take that back because you owe us a bit of money for the legal fees, expert costs, court costs, et cetera.
	So give today.
	Donate today.
	Go to justice for our ostriches.
	That's the new site.
	That's the new website that Katie will be running the fundraising and the association from.
	You can still go to save our ostriches, which is still up and running.
	So I encourage you to do that today.
	Give generously today.
	This is about helping a farm and farmers in distress and helping Katie move on to her next objective.
	Well, my wife also tells me that I don't know if it's a, I guess it's a compliment.
	She says that I'm the energy of the family and that when I'm in a bad mood or stressed or depressed, everybody else can feel it.
	And which is why I'm sort of reluctant to talk about this.
	In my view, Katie and her family need to sell the farm and get the hell out of Canada.
	The idea they're going to raise money so the government can steal their money for the abuse.
	They're going to move on to the next venture in a tyrannical, from a government perspective, not a people perspective, from a government perspective, hellhole that Canada has become.
	My advice would be sell it and get the hell out of that country, maybe come to Florida, maybe start another ostrich farm as though that can possibly remedy the horror and the trauma that they have endured.
	So I don't have any good advice.
	I don't have any optimistic advice.
	And maybe I'm better off not saying anything so I'm not the black pill in the next chapter of what they have to deal with.
	But I would get the hell out of Canada.
	What we've just witnessed from the Canadian government should turn everybody's stomach.
	And what we've witnessed from a substantial, meaningful portion of the population should turn everybody's stomach.
	The amount of apologists out there, boot-licking sycophants of a tyrannical government apologist who think that they're good citizens for agreeing with this tyranny, the amount of that is far too much to have any chance of having a happy life in that country.
	They rat out their neighbors, cheer on government abuse, and make you fundraise so that you can pay your abusers the cost of your medical treatment from their abuse.
	But if you want to help, the link to Creighton's tweet is there.
	And yeah, I'll continue promoting the ideas.
	So whether or not they get the hell out, raise some money, start a give, send, go, raise $2 million, buy an ostrich farm in the free state of Florida, and try to enjoy what is left of life.
	All right.
	Okay, well, now, back to the January 6th pipe bomb.
	Just to shift things slightly, Steve Baker and the Blaze are putting out bombshell journalism.
	This would be award-winning journalism in any realm of the universe where journalism was still valued for what it's supposed to be, journalism.
	Yesterday, I played the clip of Thomas Massey claiming, alleging, because I don't, it's not like I take Thomas Massey at his word because he says something that might fit with the narrative that I already believe as relates to something of a cover-up of January 6th.
	Thomas Massey yesterday put out, or it was an interview he did with Steve Baker.
	And so you can all, you know, claim whatever vested interest he might have to say what he said to Steve Baker.
	They both have the same sort of agenda potentially when it comes to the government and the situation with January 6th.
	Thomas Massey claimed in an interview to Steve Baker that a member of Kash Patel's FBI came up to him and threatened to criminally investigate members of his administration, members of his cabinet, whatever you want to call it, members of his team, if they continue to pursue the matter of the January 6th pipe bombs.
	This is subsequent to the whistleblowers.
	Some people out there said that the two individuals who were, or at least the one individual, the individual who was the object of the threat of criminal investigation, well, the person within the Kash Patel administration who allegedly confronted Thomas Massey used to work with Thomas Massey, and that there might be fraud that this individual is now saying, lay up or we'll look into this legitimate fraud that I'm aware of because I used to be in the Thomas Massey team.
	Maybe.
	Not to say that you take Thomas Massey at his word or take Kash Patel at his word.
	You're going to have people who have more or less made consistently accurate statements, held consistently principled positions, and you might trust one more than the other, but it doesn't mean you trust one at all costs.
	I had asked the question whether or not the FBI had put out a statement responding to the rather serious accusation from Thomas Massey.
	They haven't.
	So Thomas Massey has alleged that a member of Kash Patel's team threatened, basically unrelated to the whistleblowing on January 6th, threatened to investigate criminal fraud of members of Thomas Massey's team.
	Some people might say, well, that might be because they committed fraud.
	And others might say, it's retaliation.
	To those who say maybe they did commit fraud, well, you don't then threaten prosecution in order to compel compliance because that in and of itself, incidentally, is a crime.
	People don't know this.
	To threaten to sue someone civilly, to say, you'd better take back that statement or stop doing what you're doing, or I'm going to sue you for damages, that's not illegal.
	To say to someone, you better stop doing what you're doing, or I'm going to file a criminal complaint against you, that is illegal.
	At least in Canada, maybe it's not here.
	It's extortion.
	You say, you better pay me some civil settlement, or I'm going to file criminal proceedings against you.
	That is not lawful.
	So arguably to come and say, yeah, we know you did something criminal.
	We're going to use that as a sort of Democles to coerce you to stop doing what you're doing here, totally unrelated, arguably unlawful.
	If he did something wrong, you investigate.
	That's it, period.
	But what's clear about this is that in as much as there's supposed to be transparency, and everyone's going to say, well, the FBI doesn't need to respond to any comment from every Tom, Dick, and Harry.
	Okay, maybe not.
	But depending on the seriousness of the statement, it might warrant a response, much like, you know, the Steve Baker article.
	Depending on the seriousness of the accusation, when a member of Congress, Thomas Massey, comes out and says a member of the FBI came out and threatened to criminally investigate members of my team as a result of our blowing the whistle on January 6th.
	You may not want to respond to that.
	You may think it's undignified of a response, but it's sufficiently serious that it warrants a response nonetheless if we are to believe that the government is functioning properly without undue corruption.
	Now, Steve Baker's journalism.
	It's bombshell material.
	Whether or not you are thoroughly convinced by his expose, where he claims to have identified the identity of the suspected pipe bomber within, you know, 92 degree, 92% accuracy based on a gate analysis.
	Whether or not you choose to believe that, you cannot argue with the methods.
	You might say, I haven't seen the evidence.
	I want to see everything.
	I want them to break it down.
	I want to have a voir d'Ir.
	I want to have a public hearing to assess the reliability of the expert upon which they relied for their expertise.
	You could say that.
	But when you understand what they did in order to go through the investigative journalism, which is what it used to be, and now it seems to be renegade journalism, you could disagree with the findings, but you have to appreciate the work that went into it.
	Well, the latest bombshell coming from Baker and Joseph Hanneman, November 26, the eve of Thanksgiving.
	Assistant Capitol Police Chief accused by Rep Massey of thwarting Congressional Jan 6 pipe bomb investigation retires.
	Ashen Benedict allegedly blocked two United States Capitol Police officers tied to the DNC discovery from testifying before the U.S. House panel rep Massey charges.
	These are serious accusations that warrant a serious response, even if you don't think you have to.
	And we can't comment on it.
	It's not the transparency that's going to instill confidence in people who you may not like it.
	You may think it's unfair and unjust, but who are losing confidence in core elements of this administration.
	You can only blame people for losing confidence for so long before you still have to address it.
	So listen to this.
	Ashon M. Benedict, the assistant U.S. Capitol Police Chief, who a congressman alleges prevented two special agents involved in the discovery of a pipe bomb at the Democrat, the DNC building from testifying before the U.S. House panel, has retired from the department.
	Blaze News has learned.
	Rumors of Benedict's retirement came one day after Blaze News published an investigation showing unexplained activity by the Capitol Police officers who discovered that bomb, who were overseen by Benedict.
	When you understand what's a little bit, everybody thinks there's something suspicious going on here, and yet we're told to shut up and move on.
	Just wait a few more weeks.
	Something's coming.
	Kash Patel said it to Catherine Herridge.
	Just wait a few more weeks.
	And January 7th comes around and whoopsie doodle, all those charges have lapsed.
	Five-year statute of limitations.
	The announcement surprised some of the Capitol Police because his contract with the department was set to expire at the end of December.
	Benedict came to the police, whatever here.
	Before he joined the United States Capitol Police, Benedict was the DNC pipe bomb incident commander for the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms.
	In that post, he oversaw ATS's response to the Jan 6 pipe bomb threat.
	Capitol Police Chief Michael Sullivan distributed a bulletin Monday announcing Benedict's retirement after two years, yada, yada, yada.
	Word of Benedict's retirement started percolating a day after the Blaze News published an investigation showing that two United States Capitol Police counter surveillance agents who discovered the DNC bomb on January 6, 2021, seemingly acting in a suspicious manner.
	Something's funny here.
	Where was it?
	Here.
	They never looked for a third or fourth or fifth pipe bomb, almost like they knew that there were only two and exactly where they were, roughly.
	Here, hold on a second.
	Where was it?
	The cops parked their car that afternoon and walked straight past a pipe bomb to another location, which Blaze News investigation discovered that the pipe bomb suspect visited the night before.
	Then the officers returned to the DNC building where one of them discovered the device.
	I went from about 90% certain Capitol Police were involved to 95%.
	Now it's 99%, said Rep Massey told the Blaze in an interview with Matt Gibbies.
	I'm doing this on probability that probably may be even higher than that.
	99.999.
	The officers were not seen searching any other areas for explosives in any of the extensive video available and reviewed by Blaze, and they did not continue searching after the DNC device was found at 1.05 p.m.
	Now, Steelman It.
	I don't believe this Steelman for the life of me, but Steelman it nonetheless.
	The argument is that they knew where the two bombs were because they had reviewed surveillance.
	They somehow used AI, scrubbed hours and hours of footage, and knew exactly where to go.
	And only because they had already seen the video footage of the suspected pipe bomber planting these bombs.
	So they knew that there were only two.
	They knew where they were, and they went to the third area because the pipe bomber had sat down there, I think, or something like that.
	All right.
	That was within what, 25 minutes of being notified of the existence of the bomb.
	I mean, if you believe that, how long does it take for a police?
	How long does it take for the police to arrive on call on average?
	What does it say?
	If you can believe they did all that.
	Well, we don't.
	If you believe you'll get a pizza faster than you'll get some police arriving.
	If you believe they did all that in 15 to 25 minutes, I've got some, I've got a, I got a nice Shohei Otani autograph rookie one-of-one relic game worn that I've got to sell you.
	Nice.
	I'll make you a nice price.
	The USCP has since confirmed that one of its agents found the pipe bomb near the DNC park bench, but there's no video showing that because key cameras were turned away from the DNC building at the time.
	The fact that the DNC bomb was discovered by plainclothes Capitol Police officers and not merely a pair of passerbys was not made public until Blaze News broke that story in January 24.
	Following that story, Massey told Blaze he was determined to interview the agents, but did not get much cooperation from Capitol Police.
	Massey referred to the agents as man-bun guy and backpack guy.
	By this time, the agents were under Benedict's command.
	Capitol Police never made Backpack Guy available to Massey, but on January 30th, 2024, they did eventually send his partner.
	Two congressional investigators sat in on the meeting alongside Benedict, the police officer and Massey.
	In the conversation with the counter surveillance officer in my office, Ash and Benedict would frequently interrupt the officer, answer before the officer could reply, and qualify the office answers.
	There was an effort by our committee staff to get Benedict to sit for a transcribed interview, but he successfully evaded that effort.
	Goes on a little bit.
	I won't read the entire thing because that just won't be fair to Baker.
	I'm going to give everybody the article.
	And everyone should go read it.
	What the Blaze has done is arguably, not arguably, definitively more than what the prior administration's FBI did in five years.
	We're told that stuff is coming from the FBI, Kash Patel with Catherine Harris.
	Just wait.
	We expect big bombshells to come, but even that statement was heavily qualified.
	We'll see if and when.
	But there hasn't been a statement on Baker's article.
	There hasn't been a statement on CBS's news articles debunking Baker's article.
	The petting my puppies alibi to allegedly clear the individual identified by Steve Baker and the Blaze as potentially to a 92 to 98% degree certainty being the person that placed the pipe bomb.
	The alibi that I have video from the period in question of the person petting his or her puppies as the alibi.
	No comment from the FBI.
	No comment from the FBI on Thomas Massey's charges, accusations.
	You cannot, you can criticize people for pushing these questions, but you can't blame them.
	And these are issues that need to be addressed sooner than later if people are to absolutely not only lose faith, but just abandon all hope entirely.
	Not QAnon says, Michael Knowles is looking mighty prescient these days.
	One must ask what he might know.
	Pun intended.
	That video was from last year anyhow, so maybe he's looking a little less prescient.
	808 Scotty says, Katie and her mother should get asylum in the U.S. for government terrorism by the Canadian authorities.
	See, the only practical reality to that is that the Canadian government's going to steal their money one way or the other.
	They sell that farm.
	I don't know what they can get for it.
	The government's going to seize the process.
	I mean, the problem is probably going to seize the property anyhow, sell it under judicial authority, take all the money from it, and say, this is what you owe us for all of our hassle and slaughtering your animals.
	Destitute.
	They'll be destitute.
	They should claim asylum, move to the States, start a fundraiser, and start anew in the land of the free, home of the brave, and the free state of Florida.
	I would not move to New York State.
	QAnon says, Google will not let you search justice for our ostriches.
	Give them hell for this.
	Hold on one second.
	Why justice for our ostriches?
	Well, I mean, I don't know.
	It's.
	This is what I get.
	I mean, you imagine what it's like in Canada.
	Justice for our ostriches likely refers to the recent legal battle.
	Okay, but and then the websites do not come up.
	Change.org.
	Okay.
	Well, let's see what happens if I put it in quotation marks.
	It goes to, well, I don't know if that's what you meant, as in it doesn't come up with the website.
	And then what if I do this?
	Justice for our ostriches.com.
	Was it.com or.ca?
	I see.
	So the website exists and Google doesn't populate it as one of the results.
	Yeah, it's interesting.
	All right.
	In the much darker news of the day, yesterday a man shot, and thus far one of the two National Guards persons has passed away, a woman.
	Initially, it was reported that both were killed by the mayor of DC, I think, which was kind of an odd detail to get wrong while making a statement like that.
	One has now, her family has said she's not going to survive.
	These are not injuries that are susceptible of surviving.
	And the other man who was shot is in critical, apparently critical, but stable condition.
	We're going to go over the details summarily, and then we're going to get into the video evidence, in my humble view, of those who instigated this and those who gave the political permission slip to the Afghan national to shoot two National Guardsmen in the streets.
	This is from Fox News archived.
	I'll give everybody the link so you can keep this.
	Details emerge on CIA unit, alleged National Guard shooter served within Afghanistan.
	Now, why the CIA unit that he allegedly served with is critical.
	We're going to go back to Alyssa Slotgen, former, I don't know, whatever her position was at the CIA, because that's the connection that people have to understand when they put out their 74 seconds of sedition.
	They're scripted, and that is their word, public service announcement imploring people to just defy unlawful orders.
	Well, there's a whole hell of a lot more in Alyssa Slotgen's database of not only fear-mongering to the highest degree, but basically predicting what is going to happen and what in fact happened.
	The individual at first was identified as, we saw the picture yesterday when we were live, and I said, you know, based on the facial here, you can come to some conclusions, but hold off and wait for the details.
	The details are out right now.
	The man's name was Ramanullah Lekanwal, worked in CIA's NDS-03 counterterrorism unit before entering the U.S. in 2021.
	You're going to get into a point now where people are going to, in an attempt to pass the political buck, blame the other side.
	Everyone's going to say, well, this man came in under Biden.
	We were told that, you know, everyone coming in from Afghanistan was safe and had been properly vetted.
	Others are going to say his asylum claim was granted earlier this year under the Trump administration.
	So Trump has ratified everything and it's all on Trump.
	You'll argue whichever one you find more plausible, more reasonable, but right now we'll just get some facts out and I'm going to provide the inventory of Alyssa Slotkin's responsibility for what transpired, in my humble view.
	The Afghan national accused of shooting two National Guardsmen just blocks from the White House on the day before Thanksgiving served in an elite CIA counterterrorism unit in Afghanistan, according to new details that emerged Thursday about the suspect's background.
	Ramanullah Lakanwal, 29, served in Afghanistan, in Afghanistan with the NDS-03, an elite unit operated by the CIA with direct U.S. intelligence and military support, according to Afghan EVAC, a nonprofit that works with Afghans on special immigrant visas.
	His unit operated in Afghanistan's southern region, Kandahar, Helmand, and Uruzgan, one of the former compound of the late Taliban leader Mullah Omar, commonly referred to as Mullah Occupy.
	NDS-03 was one of about five paramilitary groups working with the CIA.
	They were commonly called zero units due to the number, the numbers following their National Directorate and Security, NDS, or Afghan intelligence.
	Okay.
	Afghan members of the unit were highly vetted and trained by the CIA and carried out some of the toughest counterterrorism missions against the Taliban, al-Qaeda, and others.
	They were very trusted and brave, according to those who worked with them.
	This might explain why the individual got asylum under the Trump administration.
	It might also explain, based on the inventory of stuff that we're going to go through with Alyssa Slotkin, how this individual became radicalized against the very administration that granted his asylum and why he went out and shot National Guardsmen in particular.
	He entered the U.S. legally in 2021 under humanitarian parole as part of the Biden administration's Operation Allies Welcome that followed the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan.
	The operation aimed to support and resettle vulnerable Afghans because they would have faced persecution and retribution had they stayed in Afghanistan, including those that had helped U.S. troops in the past.
	He had his asylum application approved in April 2025 under the Trump administration.
	U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Janine Pirro, FBI director, criticized the vetting process during a press conference on Thursday.
	Piro said the shooting was an example of what happens in this country when people are allowed in who are not properly vetted.
	Patel said the Biden administration allowed thousands of people into this country without doing a single piece of background checking or vetting.
	He began working with the CIA in 2011 when he was 15 years old.
	You're getting confirmation of the MO of the CIA using children as assets, who added that the CIA would have kept the identities of those they worked with secret.
	Officials noted it was common at the time for Afghans to forge their birth certificates to appear 18 before working with the U.S. government.
	Few official records.
	It's normal for them to forge birth certificates, whatever.
	But when people are coming en masse from foreign countries, you then rely on those same documents in order to admit them at the southern border.
	This is the whole argument that you can't take people in from countries where you can't properly vet their background, even if they're claiming asylum.
	Oh, well, I mean, in Haiti, the documentation system is all crappy, so you can't penalize them.
	Take them in and whatever they show you.
	NCTC vet, okay, whatever.
	In terms of vetting, nothing came up, senior official.
	He was clean on all checks.
	The senior official added that the U.S. government had been doing continuous annual vetting since the Afghans' arrival in the U.S., especially in the wake of the FOIL terror plot in Oklahoma before last year's elections, which involved an Afghan evacuee.
	He's accused of shooting National Guardsman Sarah Bextram.
	She's the one who I believe is now going to pass if she's not brain dead because I believe unsustainable injuries.
	And Andrew Wolfe, who from last I understood was critical but stable.
	Piro said the suspect ambushed the pair in a targeted attack.
	The suspect was then shot by a responding guardsman and subdued.
	He was hospitalized and placed under heavy guard.
	What I understand also from what happened is that a National Guardsman armed with a knife, this is what I understood, and maybe the details have changed, but charged at the man, apparently stabbed him and assisted in subduing him.
	That is what you call an absolute hero.
	Who is not the hero in all of this is the person who, in my humble view, basically instigated this, if not outright planned it.
	Let's just go back all the way to the beginning, you know, back in the day when there were concerns that this would happen.
	This is from The Hill, September 1st, 2021.
	That is four years ago.
	Press sec Gen Saki on Afghan refugees.
	I can absolutely assure you that no one is coming into the United States of America who has not been through a thorough screening and background check process.
	And let's hear Madam Circleback Saki say it in her own words.
	You've talked about this a little bit other time as well, but there are, of course, concerns among lawmakers, experts who've tracked this.
	They're saying previous arrivals of large numbers of refugees from different parts of the world, inevitably there may be a handful, small handful, who are eventually deemed a security risk of some kind.
	What reassurances can you make about the screening process and the attempts to make sure that somebody like that doesn't make his or her way here?
	I can absolutely assure you that no one is coming into the United States of America who has not been through a thorough screening and background check process.
	And there are many individuals, as you noted, who have not been through that process.
	And they have gone to lily pad countries as that process has been completed.
	It doesn't mean that that's because there's a flag.
	It means they have not completed their paperwork and we were working to save tens of thousands of people.
	Hence, we evacuated them to these third countries.
	You've talked about this a little bit other time as well, but there are, of course, concerns among lawmakers, experts, and I'm not sure.
	I want to get this off.
	How do I find her?
	Get away again.
	We don't want to see this again.
	So, yeah, it's a thorough vetting process.
	I mean, that's all subjective.
	And the reality is that the individual might have gone through a thorough vetting process.
	He might have been very thankful to the Biden administration.
	He might have been actually indebted to the Biden administration.
	He might have actually been so indebted to the Biden administration that when one of Biden's useful idiots, Alyssa Slotkin, basically mobilizes people with their public service announcement, he feels sufficiently indebted to act on what I said at the time was a thinly veiled dog whistle call to disobedience.
	We're going to go through pretty much a number of these statements that Alyssa made.
	Alyssa was one of the many, one of the six, the seditious six.
	That's actually much better, but I don't think I made that one up.
	She was one of the seditious six in that public service announcement.
	Well, we were just telling people to defy that they don't have to abide by lawful orders.
	They know damn well what they were doing.
	They know damn well what they did.
	And they knew damn well what the likely outcome of it was.
	But if you had any questions about that, any doubts, this is Alyssa Slotkin days ago.
	National Guardsmen will start shooting at American civilians.
	Listen to this.
	I put together a bit of a montage after this.
	We'll play that.
	But this is Alyssa Slotkin.
	Fairly certain.
	Yeah, this was actually after the seditious, the two minutes of sedition that I made up, and that one's good.
	This is her trying to justify it.
	Well, we're just telling them to defy unlawful orders because I'm fairly certain.
	I'm very fearful that soon National Guardsmen, the ones that we claim are illegally deployed across cities in America, they're going to start shooting civilians.
	Look at these videos coming out of places like Chicago.
	It makes me incredibly nervous that we're about to see people in law enforcement, people in uniformed military get nervous, get stressed, shoot at American civilians.
	It is very, a very, very stressful situation for these law enforcement and for the communities on the ground.
	So it was basically a warning to say, like, if you're asked to do something, particularly against American citizens, look at these videos coming out of places.
	Listen to what she says, by the way.
	That it's going to happen.
	Not it might.
	I'm concerned that places like Chicago.
	It makes me incredibly nervous that we're about to see people in law enforcement.
	It makes me incredibly nervous that we are about to see law enforcement shoot at civilians.
	That's why they put out the national, you know, that seditious call to action.
	Here's the link to the tweet.
	So that was in an attempt to justify the two minutes of sedition.
	Well, we had to do it because we're going to start seeing National Guardsmen and law enforcement shooting at civilians.
	Well, holy crap.
	Holy crap.
	Someone who might be sufficiently indebted to the Biden administration, sufficiently easily manipulated.
	I mean, imagine the CIA got him when he was 15 years old.
	They've been using him under the Biden administration.
	They brought him in under the Biden administration.
	They then brainwashed him and tell him that the Trump administration is going to start deporting all Afghans.
	They're going to start deporting.
	They're going to bring in ICE, start shooting people on the streets.
	I made a meme.
	I'll show you the meme.
	But listen to this one.
	When was this one from?
	Yeah, I'm going to play it anyhow.
	Let's get this here.
	A lot of people got upset about the video.
	And let me just say, they are trying to wield fear.
	Look at these videos coming out of places like Chicago.
	It makes me incredibly nervous that we're about to see people in law enforcement, people in uniformed military get nervous, get stressed, shoot at American civilians.
	It is very, a very, very stressful situation for these law enforcement and for the communities on the ground.
	So it was basically a warning.
	They are trying to wield fear.
	I don't, I mean, look, if you're going back to Nuremberg, right?
	This is about who we are as Americans and how we're going to engage with people who we disagree with.
	They don't want to be talking about the deployment of the military in our streets, the deployment of federal law enforcement in our streets.
	We're about to see people in law enforcement, people in uniformed military get nervous, get stressed, shoot at American civilians.
	They don't want to have that public conversation because they know it goes to the heart of who we are as Americans, as a democracy.
	Senator Alyssa Slotkin, former CIA officer.
	Want to speak directly to members of the military and the intelligence community can refuse illegal orders.
	But whether you're serving in the CIA, know that we have your back.
	We need you to stand up for our laws.
	Don't give up the ship.
	That was obviously my montage of clips from Alyssa Slotkin.
	I mean, you imagine you're a vulnerable person.
	We are not a democracy.
	It's a constitutional republic.
	In the terminology, we know what we're saying.
	You imagine that you're someone who's brainwashed, thoroughly brainwashed by the Biden administration.
	You believe it's an existential threat to yourself.
	You believe it's an existential threat to the civilians around you.
	And you see Alyssa Slotkin of the CIA invoking her status within the CIA, appealing to the intelligence community with basically two minutes of hate public service announcement that if you don't do something, they're going to start killing you in the streets.
	And then what do you do?
	I'll tell you what you do.
	Exactly what they knew that was going to happen.
	This was the meme that I made.
	It's a television.
	You can refuse illegal orders and know that we've got your back.
	This one was a little bit small.
	I hope people can still read it.
	But whether you're the serving in the CIA, oh, hashtag mobilize.
	What's truly amazing is that as you start to dig into these things and really like go into the weeds and everything makes much more sense backwards, it's the old Kier Gregardian expression: life can only be understood backwards, yet it must be lived forwards.
	I'm going to play you this clip.
	This was from a speech that Alyssa Slotkin gave before the Brookings Institute barely a month ago.
	Like, like, understand it.
	It's barely a month ago that this is what Alyssa Slotkin said in a speech that's available on her YouTube page.
	You can go look at it, at least for now.
	I don't think they're going to take it down.
	Listen to this.
	And just I'll preface it by saying that once you understand that what they are expressing is not their fears of what their adversaries are going to do, but rather their intentions of what they are going to do and are in the process of doing and have done.
	Once you understand that, that it's confession through projection.
	They're not telling you what they actually fear their adversary is going to do.
	They're telling you what they're in the process of trying to do.
	When you understand that, it makes a whole hell of a lot more sense.
	Listen to this.
	As a CIA officer, the idea that intelligence officers could be asked to target Americans turns my stomach.
	And it would shift us into a modern-day surveillance state.
	Turning the federal government against Trump's enemies goes hand in hand with his use of force in American cities, both federal law enforcement and the military.
	As of today, the president has attempted to deploy more than 7,000 National Guard members across five cities, including right here in Washington.
	In August, the administration ordered the creation of two new National Guard units, a standing quick reaction force that can deploy anywhere in the country, and then separately, National Guard units in all 50 states focused on quelling so-called civil disturbances.
	She's suggesting that this is illegal.
	Just understand that.
	At this point, Trump has been very clear about his intent.
	At Quantico, speaking as commander-in-chief, he instructed his military brass to use cities as, quote, training grounds.
	And many times, he's floated the idea of invoking the Insurrection Act so that military units can raid, detain, and arrest Americans.
	Do you remember who actually floated using the Insurrection Act?
	Jamie Ratzkin Raskin.
	We're going to have civil war conditions.
	They're not going to like it after we tell them that despite having won the election, we're annulling those results.
	They said that.
	The president has already deployed ICE and other federal law enforcement to these same cities across America.
	In some cases, these federal officers are playing fast and loose with their tactics, which sooner or later could lead to a deadly escalation.
	Listen to this.
	The videos out of Chicago are shocking.
	Federal agents pulling their weapons on highways, firing tear gas into neighborhoods right before a Halloween parade, injuring and even killing civilians.
	Injuring and killing civilians.
	Many are masked, not wearing uniforms, and driving unmarked cars.
	For those of us who served abroad, it feels like another country.
	And it's only a matter of time before things get worse.
	It's almost like she's talking directly to the alleged shooter.
	By my estimation, we're about two weeks away from a bloody incident that spirals out of control.
	And this is just the kind of incident that Trump wants to justify more force coming in.
	Can you appreciate that?
	This was about a month ago.
	It feels like another country.
	And it's only a matter of time before things get worse.
	A month ago.
	By my estimation, we're about two weeks away from a bloody incident that spirals out of control.
	And this is just the kind of incident that Trump wants to justify more force coming in.
	Well, if you wanted to make Trump do things that would allow you to call him an authoritarian, well, then what you'd want to do is mobilize some of your folks to kill National Guardsmen who you've suggested are in the streets illegally on the cusp of killing innocent civilians.
	You'd want someone to do that.
	And then Trump would have to then respond.
	And then you could say, look at what an authoritarian Trump is, the way he's responding to a terrorist attack that just killed two National Guardsmen after we spent the last month suggesting and overtly stating that National Guardsmen are going to kill civilians because of how out of control they are.
	She actually said that a month ago.
	She's CIA, puts out that public service announcement appealing to members of the intelligence community.
	And lo and behold, an Afghan national who worked with the CIA in Afghanistan does what he does yesterday.
	I mean, if that doesn't raise some hackles, and if that doesn't make you appreciate what is potentially going on, nothing will.
	And then, by the way, after they carry out this attack, I'm going to end it by highlighting some of the most repulsive responses to it, some of the most terroristic responses to the murder and shooting yesterday.
	I legit, first of all, it's not legal eagle, the legal ego, so don't give legal egal any flack for this.
	This is another legal ego.
	Hot takes on the law, the military, my dogs, and lunch.
	Now, I'm also sometimes skeptical that some of these accounts are fake accounts intended to create further divide, and which is why I'm almost reluctant to put these on blast, but too late legal legal.
	For everybody who can't read Hebrew, that says, Am Yisrael Chai, and then something in Russian.
	Fascism disguised as patriotism is still fascism.
	Listen to this take.
	If you're the governor of the state that sent this soldier to DC, you should meet with his family face to face and explain why you sent him here for this.
	Let me give everybody that tweet.
	Let me rephrase that one in the way that it's actually to be understood.
	If you're the father of a young woman who gets brutally assaulted in a bar, you should look at your daughter and ask her why she went to that bar.
	I mean, this is the terrorism ideology.
	Don't put your people in a place where we're going to kill them because when we kill them, it's going to be their fault.
	That is terrorism.
	You know who has to look into the eyes of the family?
	It's Alyssa Slotkin.
	It's everyone else of the seditious six.
	And you think it's just like a one-off.
	There can't be more than one actual filthy endorser of terrorism out there.
	Look what you made me do.
	Just keep your National Guardsmen out of our cities and we'll stop shooting them.
	We'll stop deploying our rogue agents to kill them.
	We'll stop using our brown shirts to sniper them.
	Stop doing it and you'll save yourself.
	Terrorism.
	Here's another one.
	Adam Cochran.
	I mean, the amazing thing is I've seen this guy, investor, professor, policy consultant, independent investigative journalist, the father.
	He says that in response to legal eagle, that is perhaps the most tragic moment in all of this.
	No matter why this shooting happened, these National Guard members were unnecessarily in DC.
	Two people shot dead, serving their country in the line of duty that their governor shouldn't have placed them in in the first place.
	Can you imagine the balls and the lack of insight that it takes to say such a thing?
	Don't put them there, and that way they won't get killed by terrorists.
	Everyone's happy.
	We've successfully deterred you from bringing in National Guards despite our wishes by claiming that they're illegally there.
	And we won't kill you.
	Just stay away from us and we won't kill you.
	And that's how federal law works.
	Scum of the earth.
	Who think that they're righteous and who think that they're justified?
	Anyhow, that's what we know as of now.
	I don't think I've missed anything.
	That's where things stand as of now.
	There will be answers to questions that will need to be provided.
	At this point, you know, it's not beyond the pale to suggest that people should be held legally accountable for their seditious words that arguably, but less than arguably, contributed to this event.
	And we'll find out more as it comes through.
	Who this guy was in communications with in the lead up to this?
	There was a report from, what's his name?
	From, oh, I want to get, I want to, I want to, I need to get it.
	There was a claim on Twitter that search results or Google trans Google search for the individual's name had an unexpected uptick in the hours before the shooting.
	I'm not running on this.
	If it's true, it's very, very bizarre.
	And I'm looking for a logical, plausible explanation that doesn't involve even deeper conspiracy theories.
	Louis Montoya says, breaking thread.
	The DC guardsman shooting isn't adding up.
	Shooter Rahmanullah, CIA-backed Kandahar Strike Force vet per leaked ID and Ratcliffe in a Fox News interview confirmed his ties to the CIA as part of our partner force in Kandahar based on declassified intel briefings.
	Ambushed two unarmed guardsmen at 2.15 yesterday, yelling, Allah Uakbar.
	Critical, but alive.
	But Google Trends, his name spiked in D.C. at 224 a.m., 84 interest, 328 a.m., 100, 8 a.m., 22, hours before shots fired.
	For knowledge, we need to subpoena the IPs.
	Now, I'll go through the evidence.
	I don't know how Google trends, Google Analytics works.
	I don't know how they aggregate data.
	I don't know how they lump data together.
	I can read what this says.
	November 25th, and you've got the name in quotes, and then you got the name not in quotes.
	And I suspect because this is going to be the exact match, and this is going to be one or the other.
	And then after this is the attack in the afternoon.
	Okay, then we got another one here.
	Same type of trend.
	Oh, the line.
	Okay, so the lines I get are different.
	So the orange line here is when it's not the exact match, and then the blue line is with the exact match.
	And then we've got 8 a.m. and these are the three.
	So the question that I have publicly, and I've asked Louis Montoya, A, did you account for time zone changes?
	And apparently, yes, time zone changes have been accounted for.
	The question that I'm not sure about is whether or not there is, if they lump together the data, say like anyone who searched between X hours, I don't know, it gets lumped at a time that might actually predate the actual time of the search results.
	I'm curious to know if anybody out there who understands how this works, period, but certainly better than me, has a non-conspiratorial explanation for that.
	The logical explanation that I can come up with, not based on any technological knowledge, is the man might have gone AWOL.
	From what I understand, he might have been living with family, sleeping at a cousin's house.
	And if he might have been suspicious, AWOL, and the family disclosed it to authorities, then you could, in theory, imagine some form of law enforcement looking up the guy's name, trying to find his whereabouts, trying to find some intel on him.
	So there might have been a tip that this individual was on the verge, said something suspicious, and then took off.
	And so you have law enforcement or family or friends Googling to see if they can find some results.
	That's what I can think of by way of a logical explanation if the data is accurate.
	But I don't even know if the data is accurate.
	That's what we know as of now.
	If I've missed anything, by the way, let me know in the chat.
	I'm going to go over to Rumble and see what's going on here.
	Not a QAnon says, now, how is no one connecting the dots that the shooting of the National Guard is part of an operation to incite National Guard into shooting civilians?
	False flag doesn't mean it didn't happen.
	I don't disagree with you.
	I feel like I'm taking Alex Jones.
	Alex Jones has got to make another supplement called Crazy Pills.
	Okay, I might actually be stealing that idea that I just made up for myself.
	But I feel like I'm taking Alex Jones crazy pills.
	And I'm saying that sort of tongue in cheek because Alex Jones is a very smart man and has been right on material issues a whole hell of a lot more than he's been wrong.
	Yeah, a false flag doesn't mean it didn't happen.
	And this is what people don't seem to understand.
	A false flag means that it's just being orchestrated by the other players or that it's not exactly as it seems to be.
	You want to incite or induce or provoke the National Guard to be more impatient, more suspicious of civilians, sort of like V for Vendetta type stuff, like, you know, more trigger happy.
	You do things like this.
	Now anybody who approaches them, even if they don't, you know, do it involuntarily or unknowingly, hey, incident might happen.
	Oh, look what happened.
	National Guard just shot a civilian.
	Look, everything that Alyssa Slotkin said came true.
	Not a QAnon, not a bad observation.
	How has no one connected the dots that the Jan 6 pipe bomber was not the actual pipe bomber, but part of an operation to frame a MAGA supporter for the pipe bomb?
	Well, hold on a second.
	The actual pipe bomber might have been trying to do just that.
	Like the actual person who planted it there, you know, might have been going after the National Black Caucus, for example, to make it look like a far-right, racist, Trump-supporting extremist who planted the bombs at a racially motivated target.
	Not a QAN.
	Google will not let you search justice for ostriches.
	Okay, and we got that and we got that.
	All right, now let's see what's going on in our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community.
	Take some of the chat there.
	There we've got, I won't say the smartest community.
	It's definitely above average.
	What do we got here?
	Who was in control of the items I indicated?
	Governments is Dan Sundon.
	They are taking his snap.
	Okay, I'm going to see here.
	A leftist is by definition.
	Okay, so I'm not reading that.
	At this point, I think the right should start viewing anyone.
	Okay, let's not.
	Stephen, we're not doing that.
	No one catching the ball now.
	Okay, let's just go up here.
	Anyhow, so that's what we know as of now on that.
	Let me take this back.
	Let me refresh and just see what's going on on the right because you get the comments.
	Are you using us to get out of helping Cook says hope for better?
	Well, so I won't tell you what I was organizing some of those Shohei Otani base cards 50-50 in numerical order.
	And as I was listening to Slotkin talking in that 16-minute interview, so my wife comes in and the interview, I promise you, the interview had just ended.
	Like that, that speech, that clip that I played from the Brookings Institute speech, it was like a 17-minute presentation.
	And I screen recorded the whole thing and I'm listening to it.
	And my wife comes in after it ends, just a couple of minutes, and sees me playing with baseball cards.
	And she's like, well, you don't look very stressed.
	And I was like, I was doing work, but it just literally ended.
	But no, I'm not cooking anything anyhow.
	I'll get to the, I'll get over there.
	We're going to play some poker.
	I've may have created a monster with one of my kids in terms of the love of poker, which is actually not a bad thing.
	Set aside the whole gambling aspect of it.
	If you don't play for money and you play for pride, poker is amazing in terms of teaching you math, the ability to count, the ability to assess probabilities, odds, risk, and make calculated decisions as a result.
	If nothing else, it teaches basic math, and that's good enough for a nine-year-old kid.
	So yeah, there's that.
	All right.
	Now, let's go back.
	Do I have any?
	I think I had some other stuff in the backdrop.
	Let me see here.
	There was a number of things.
	There were a number of things that I couldn't bring up because they wouldn't let me play them in incognito because they had.
	Oh, this was the Witkoff leaks.
	This was, I wanted to play this.
	What was this?
	Yesterday.
	Yeah, this was talking about Witkoff leaking the Russian peace plan.
	This is what I intended to talk about yesterday, but forgot to bring it up.
	Let's hear this out.
	Speaking this out, because it's very simple.
	They're trying to blow up these peace talks.
	And people are saying, oh, well, he said this about Trump and he said this about.
	It's just stop, right?
	Stop.
	They're having a conversation.
	He's building rapport.
	Obviously, he's doing his job.
	And Dan, what are you hearing inside this system?
	Because I know you still have your ear to the ground in DC regarding these talks.
	Why does it seem like this town, the town of DC, is trying to blow them up?
	I wonder.
	Well, they want them to fail for a number of reasons.
	So let's just say you've nailed it.
	The timing of this is just too perfect.
	Is that President Trump truthed out that Dan Driscoll and Steve Witkoff were going to go Driscoll to Kiev, Witkoff to Moscow, and that that was a sign that these talks were making actual progress.
	So surprise, surprise, somebody, I have my suspicions of who it is, but I'm not going to say it here, but I'll just say it's somebody who doesn't want to see these talks succeed because they have a vested interest in the war continuing.
	And within Washington, D.C. The war was not meant to be won.
	It was meant to be perpetual.
	There's probably more than one person who has a vested interest in seeing these conflicts continue forever for military-industrial complex profit reasons, for national globalist aspirations, NATO globalist aspirations.
	I mean, it goes without saying, but when you have members of the Trump administration leaking the potential police plan in order to sabotage the potential police plan, the idea that there are moles and saboteurs within the administration is not a far-fetched thought.
	It is exactly a reality that warrants everyone being very skeptical and very critical for in terms of weeding it out.
	But let's just play this out.
	There are obviously a lot of entities, you know, obviously certain parts of the government, but also the think tank community, the media.
	They invested in this narrative for years that Ukraine could achieve a total victory, reclaim all the land it lost from 2014 to 2022, and ultimately deal decisive defeat to Putin.
	And we all knew at the time, those of us that understand these things, that can do basic math, understood that Russia had key advantages that the Ukrainians couldn't overcome even with American and NATO support, and that the war was always going to end at the negotiating table.
	And they denied that for years.
	So their credibility is on the line.
	And there's also people involved that have a financial interest in the war continuing.
	So what they're trying to do is they're trying to take down people like Steve Witcoff, who, by the way, I just have to say, I think is a patriot.
	He could be sitting on a beach in Miami right now, but instead is flying around the world trying to end wars for President Trump.
	And they're also trying to divide the Trump team.
	They're trying to pit them against each other.
	And it's absolutely disgusting.
	But I think that the silver lining is it is a sign that these talks are making actual progress.
	And that's what this is really about.
	It's interesting because it's interesting that there have been leaks from the Witkoff, you know, leaks from Witkoff's calls.
	And then the question is, who's leaking them?
	This is an interesting theory to give Witkoff the benefit of the doubt that it's not him, but rather someone in the administration, some saboteurs trying to make Witkoff look bad.
	Certainly trying to sabotage the peace deal, the prospect of peace.
	But now I think we've understood that Ukraine has agreed to the provisions and it looks like it's going to go through, God willing.
	But interesting to give Witkoff the benefit of the doubt that he might be the collateral damage, or at least he might be the intended target of the public humiliation.
	I'll give everybody that link as well right there.
	All right, peeps.
	We're going to call it a short today because I do know if I don't get to where I'm supposed to be by the time I told my wife I would be there.
	It won't be the last Thanksgiving.
	I'll go here.
	Let me see what's going on in the chat.
	During Trump's first term, he made a lot of not-friends by instigating and carrying out a lot of conflicts on this planet.
	Has anything changed?
	During the first administration, he made a number of bad picks who sabotaged his efforts.
	And the question is, he's learned a lesson, but nobody is perfect.
	And some of those mistakes might be in the process of being repeated right now.
	It's really sad to imagine the day before a holiday.
	I imagine they're broken.
	I can't imagine.
	It's the worst part about the worst thing.
	Like listening to these scumbags who I believe morally, spiritually, political permission slipped this to happen, offering their thoughts and prayers and offering their condolences.
	I mean, it's the Tom McDonald's song.
	Like, you know, they kill you and they make it the news.
	They have the balls, the audacity, and the gull after they spent a month whipping people up into a frenzied state of terror, panic.
	And then when someone lashes out based on their fear-mongering, they're, oh, our thoughts and prayers are with the family.
	You have blood on your hands, Alyssa.
	You have blood on your hands, Mark Kelly.
	I don't name, remember the names of the other four.
	I'm not even sure who's live to go raid, but we're going to pick.
	Oh, Badlands Media.
	No, Badlands.
	They're not live.
	I think it seems to me like I might be the only, I won't say loser who's live streaming.
	But there's not many people live streaming today.
	Yeah, there's the Thanksgiving Day Yule log.
	What's his face?
	Jeremy the Quartering has a log.
	Yeah, it's in the featured spot on Rob.
	So you can go watch the Jeremy the Quarterings log.
	I'll see if there's anybody that I can find who's live right now.
	See, I'm going to the live panel.
	Let me see here.
	The log.
	We've got Grace Wave.
	Is she live?
	Okay, that's Christian Radio.
	That doesn't look like it's going to be.
	Not if there's anything wrong with Christian Radio, but in terms of it's gaming.
	We're going to go to Texas News.
	Dude, okay, well, there's a bunch of channels.
	What are we going to do?
	I'm just going to have to pick somebody.
	I'll be live tomorrow, peeps.
	Here, Pete Santilli looks like a real.
	Okay, good.
	We've got a real person.
	So at least we're going to do this and go raid.
	I don't know what he's.
	He's done with the Pete Danny Show live broadcast Monday, one to five.
	All right, let's go do this.
	Share.
	And I hope it's good, people.
	Let him know from whence he came.
	Happy Thanksgiving, everyone.
	I'm going to give everyone the proper Thanksgiving as we lead raid.
	Boom.
	And here we go.
	Confirm raid.
	Enjoy it, Pete.
	Now, for everyone else out there, serenity.
	Lord, give me the courage to change the things I can.
	The wisdom.
	Screwed it up.
	Hold on.
	Serenity prayer.
	Serenity.
	Prayer.
	Here we go.
	God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.
	Living one day at a time, enjoying one moment at a time, accepting hardship as a pathway to peace, taking, as Jesus did, the sinful world as it is, not as I would have it.
	Trusting that you, capital Y, will make all things right if I surrender to your will so that I may be reasonably happy in this life and supremely happy with you forever in the next.
	Amen.
	I actually didn't realize that that was, I realized someone sent me the second half of that prayer a while back and didn't fully read it the way that I just read it right now.
	So serenity now, people.
	Godspeed.
	God bless.
	Happy Thanksgiving.
	Locals, I'll send some pictures, but I got to take off and go join the family.
	So Godspeed.
	God bless.
	Happy Thanksgiving.
	I will see you tomorrow.
	And Viva is out for the day.

▲