Viva & Barnes - Ep. 287: Bolton INDICTED! Gaza Ceasefire BREACHED? Alex Jones Injustice Continues, ANTIFA & MORE!

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 19, 2025 - Viva & Barnes

02:23:36

Ep. 287: Bolton INDICTED! Gaza Ceasefire BREACHED? Alex Jones Injustice Continues, ANTIFA & MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	That's the help of it actually was.
	How does this go on for that?
	Now hold on, but there has to be a plan here.
	Don't just keep feeding it.
	I'm talking to my kid.
	Here's the plan.
	The man with the net.
	Yeah, it's gonna come back.
	Don't worry.
	Unsure if he could trust the human.
	Comes back.
	This guy, this guy had bigger cojones than me.
	I would have just screened.
	Managed to get a hold of the Brighton bird.
	Okay, we got by the way.
	I did look this up.
	They can kill me.
	Okay, okay.
	Okay, I gotta do it.
	Okay.
	There you go.
	Okay, now go for it.
	You gotta leave the mouth open a little bit.
	You got players?
	I know.
	Oh yes.
	We reverse.
	Maybe push it through and then pull it off from the barbed quick.
	No, no, not just slap it up.
	So push it out.
	Push it all the way through the screen.
	Spoiler, we save the food.
	Right.
	Okay, go for it.
	With a hook, you gotta push down so the barb doesn't catch him coming back.
	We just try to support uh throat are just a little bit of a errands are big birds, and they can all make puncture or heart.
	Oh Lord, it's gonna be good.
	Can I get the big release?
	Yeah, okay.
	One, two, three, and he's gone.
	There you go.
	Hallelujah.
	All right.
	Well, that's it.
	That's a long time.
	Nice work, guys.
	That's a long short.
	How long have they got to run shorts for on CommieTube?
	Good evening, everybody.
	I guess it's better than starting with something that would only annoy you, which we have plenty of.
	Why is my camera so low?
	I'll fix that in a second.
	Uh, how goes the battle?
	Sunday night, Viva and Barnes, Law for the People.
	Let me make sure I'm I'm on the right mic and I'm on the right camera.
	Everything looks good here.
	We are live in Humble.
	We are live in Viva Barnes Law.locals.com.
	And we are live on Commie Tube, which is behaving the way you'd think commy tubes should commie.
	By being commie tube.
	Okay, we're live everywhere.
	I was gonna start the show with something that would make you very irritated, but I think we'll get to it anyhow.
	Because we still need to talk about Tommy Robinson, who's had his trial talking about George Soros, and yet you're still gonna have people not understanding where Tommy lies on the political ideological spectrum.
	Listen to this.
	I need to finish George Soros.
	That man and his ideas and his foundations are responsible for the destruction of the West.
	And someone has to know.
	He has to he has to pay for it.
	Why has George Soros done so much to try to dismantle?
	But his worldview for the globalist plan, they want to destroy the West.
	They don't want America to be a superpower.
	They want to bring America down.
	They want China to be the superpower.
	And America nearly were losing all of these battles until you elected Trump.
	With Antifa, with these uh domestic terrorist groups in the United States now.
	Uh we always hear the word George Soros.
	Yes, what involvement does he really have in what's going on and he poses in all of it?
	And even if he dies, he sorted out so that his corporations and his movement and all of the policies and all of the where he wants his agendas will continue.
	Yeah, with his son.
	We don't need to play the whole thing.
	I'll give you all the clip.
	Uh open society, funding of Antifa, funding of these radical uh No King's Day rallies.
	Did you guys see the coverage of it?
	It's it's almost uh comedic.
	And it's annoying to be on Twitter when that is all you see in your algorithm.
	Today, all I saw in my algorithm were a bunch of whiny snowflake Lib Tards complaining about the meme of Donald John Trump flying a fighter jet dumping raw sewage on Harry Sisson's ugly face.
	That's all that I saw on my feed today.
	And then yesterday, all I saw on my feed, no King's rally.
	Look how many people are here.
	Hundreds of thousands, yada yada yada.
	Those things don't happen organically, they happen through funding and funding that comes from billionaire George Soros, who literally sees himself like a god, uh funding these events.
	And it's not organic.
	And now that uh Trump, the best president in my lifetime, despite some foibles that will continue to um constructively criticize.
	Uh, now that he's designated them uh international and domestic terrorist groups, well, that um uh unleashes a great much potential of the law in terms of how you can go after these terrorist organizations.
	Rico, people, not just Rico La, Rico and more.
	We're gonna talk about it tonight.
	We are they use the photo, so okay, be careful.
	They used a photo from the 2017 rally and claimed it was yesterday.
	I I look, I still haven't been able to definitively figure that out because I did notice people were saying that.
	I did notice that the trees looked awful green for October.
	What the heck?
	Uh, but then I also wasn't sufficiently confident to make that statement publicly, and I heard conflicting reports on it.
	But it doesn't really matter.
	They can have lots of people turn up because they're a bunch of effing lunatics.
	It's a it's an asylum.
	I was looking at George Conway's feed.
	Uh, George Conway?
	Yeah, George Conway.
	Kellyanne Conway's ex-husband, uh, the father of that daughter.
	It's you are watching a mental institution that has been unleashed on the public, or at least that has gathered in the public.
	I I want to double check that no, the 2017 photo before I say it because I don't want to, you know, positively assert something that's irrelevant in any case.
	You make a mistake on something that's absolutely immaterial, they'll still use it to go after your credibility, even though it's absolutely immaterial.
	But before we get into tonight's show, we do have to thank both of our sponsors, and they are kick-ass sponsors.
	Uh, one is crypto.com.
	Now, I should uh make sure we're clear.
	This is not financial advice, people.
	First of all, crypto.com is an exchange.
	Uh in its the bestest exchange out there.
	You invest in crypto, you're investing at your own risks and peril.
	But if you're going to invest in crypto, you might want to use crypto.com because they're awesome.
	Can you hear this?
	I don't think you can hear this.
	Every once in a while, something happens.
	In a defining moment for crypto, Trump Media Group and crypto are joining forces.
	Now, if you don't know what's going on with that, I'm gonna put the volume down here because I don't think anybody can hear the volume on that.
	Um crypto.com has partnered up with Rumble, and it's it's absolutely amazing.
	Cryptocurrency is no longer emerging.
	It is here, by the way.
	The latest move cements that reality in a very big way.
	Trump media just inked a $6.4 billion deal with Yorkville acquisition and crypto.com, the crypto platform trusted by millions of users worldwide.
	They're teaming up to scoop up 6.4 billion in CRO, the powerhouse token that fuels fast, low-fee, defy staking rewards, and real world, real world perks like cashback on your spends to establish America's first CRO treasury, Trump Media Group CRO strategy.
	When it's done, this new company will be the biggest publicly traded CRO holder out there.
	By the way, if you invest in the public stock market, also do it at your own risks and peril.
	If you want in on the action, go to crypto.com today.
	We can make crypto great again.
	And I was having a discussion with someone today who was actually telling me it's like you gotta think of crypto not in terms of how much crypto you have in dollar value, but just how much crypto you have, period.
	And because I'm gonna be in the units of Satoshis at least for a little while, I did not realize Satoshi is the smallest unit of crypto.
	I will measure the amount of crypto I have in Satoshis, but it is the uh it's the it's the realm of the future, and it's where you're gonna have parallel economies that are actually going to allow people to protect themselves from tyrannical governments, which we're gonna talk about tonight.
	It's a plot, it's a trading platform, it's a uh, what do they call it?
	A um an exchange.
	And they've partnered up with Rumble, Trump, and you know it's here to stay.
	Uh now the second sponsor for tonight's show, and uh by the way, it's like it's crypto and gold.
	I mean, this is where you basically have to go now to make sure that you have what you need to be not uncancelable because when they lock you up like uh Bonkel up in France, when they try to jail you like uh or bankrupt you like Trump or Elon, you never have enough FU money when they can take your freedom away.
	But you want to hedge your bets.
	Central banks hedge funds, even politicians, the very same ones who smile on camera while running up record high debt, they're all turning to the same thing right now, quietly moving out of The dollar and into gold and silver.
	Who's left holding the bag when the dollar keeps slipping?
	Everyday Americans, you leave 100 bucks in your bank account.
	It's not worth 100 bucks next year.
	It's worth less with the mere act of inflation.
	You buy 100 bucks worth of gold, it's worth more.
	Traditionally speaking, not investment advice.
	People invested your old risks and perils, but I'm old enough now to remember I had to look it up when gold was 400 bucks an ounce.
	Families who work hard, who save responsibility, who do everything right but still watch their paychecks shrink, their retirement accounts lose value, and their trust in the system gets tested again and again.
	The elites know better.
	They know hard assets, gold and silver are the lifeboats when the dollar takes on water.
	That's why they're loading up, and that's why you should too.
	Head over to the folks at Gold Safe Exchange.
	They're a great sponsor of the show.
	I had an interview with the uh founder last week.
	You can get uh hard hard silver, hard gold.
	There's uh they want to deal with uh larger amounts than individual coins.
	Uh but give them a call, see what they can do for you.
	Gold and silver have been the most time-tested and true, but I'm told that crypto is going to be the next one, which is digital, undestructible, and uh gold has just been time-tested and true for the last 5,000 years.
	Links are in the description.
	Thank you all very much.
	Sponsors, thank you all for being here.
	And now we can get on with the next show, but we can get on with tonight's show.
	Old man Toby says, Have you ever listened to the new episode of Darrell Cooper's podcast about Germany?
	Wondered your thoughts.
	I didn't listen to the new one.
	Um, and I know Barnes is gonna have some choice words when he comes in about that.
	Some guy with cancer says, Did you hear the SCOTUS oral arguments of the Louisiana redistricting case?
	KBJ was stepping on race like sideshow Bob on meth.
	I didn't hear that either.
	Uh, I wonder, I was wondering if you knew Canadians who were able to use Calci asking for a friend.
	I don't know, DTQC.
	I don't know if Cal she is not available in Canada.
	I can tell you one thing, I'm gonna need a Calci until they honor that damn bet that they have to honor.
	Uh Barnes, it'll we'll talk about it when he gets in here, but uh it I was, you know, look, I as far as I'm concerned, it's the uh not investment advice.
	Uh I I bought into James Comey being arrested, uh, a marginal amount because I don't like losing money.
	But it's a done deal, and I don't understand how they're not honoring the market.
	And I'll just pull up the wording because it it seems that they've forgotten what their own wording was on the market that they have yet to honor.
	And here's the wording on the market for James Comey getting arrested.
	And remember, it says here, they put this clarification in.
	Cal she put this clarification in to the contract.
	The contract states that if an individual, quote, surrenders at a public station or courthouse with their attorney, end quote, the payout criterion is satisfied.
	This is my highlighting it, but this is verbatim.
	This is from their website.
	To be clear, voluntarily surrendering to law enforcement pursuant to an indictment without an arrest warrant is sufficient to resolve a market to yes.
	Like I don't want to start fights with Cal Shig.
	I like them.
	We got a great thing there, but this is going to cause people to say, what the F if I can't rely on them to respect their own clarifications to honor the contracts that have clearly, by their own terminology, resolved to yes.
	Uh, who's going to use it in the future?
	Well, once upon a time, I forget what it was with, where there were I discovered a term.
	Oh, yeah, it was the Canadian election.
	And to as whether or not they were going to resolve it finally to a minority uh Canadian government.
	And I'm like, they haven't done it yet.
	And then I start hearing a term called rule suck, which is sucks to be you type thing.
	Where we know what the rules are, but we're just going to declare this market to not be what reality is.
	So Calci have to fix it.
	I don't know how they don't, but um, all that to say uh who put that in there?
	DTQC from our Viva Barnes Law dot locals.com community.
	I saw it.
	It makes no sense.
	Uh, over on CommyTube, Doug Doug Gardner says, Viva, did you cut out the part where you chest fed the heroin?
	Like the end of grapes of wrath.
	I'm ashamed to admit that I have never seen Grapes of Wrath, so I don't get the reference.
	But uh look, we'll talk about chest feeding tonight.
	I'll just get centered here.
	So, oh yeah, right under Trump.
	Uh Robert, whenever you are ready to come in, we can get the show started.
	And if uh if we got a few more seconds, I'm just gonna bring this one up.
	First of all, I put out a vlog today, which I'll ask everyone to share the link on Com YouTube because those SOBs really have an interesting way of suppressing uh growth so that you don't reach new markets to drive them over to Rumble.
	But um, I uh I saw a viral tweet, which was the uh courts in British Columbia basically stating that there was a decision that came down from the Supreme Court of British Columbia, which is actually the lowest level.
	It's like Supreme Court of British Columbia, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court, that um they are now recognizing indigenous rights of unceded land, unceded UN CEDED, as in it was never ceded to the crown by virtue of any treaty, and therefore Aboriginals still have rights over the unceded land.
	The only problem is now people have built up private property on unceded land.
	And um the argument is now that as these uh courts recognize aboriginal rights on unceded land, and now you understand the impact of these statements from government officials.
	We recognize that we are on the unceded land of the Mi'maq tribe of whatever.
	I'm not trying to make fun of anybody, I'm making fun of the idiots doing these virtue signaling things, now highlighting the legal consequences that can flow from it.
	The court in British Columbia came out and said, yes, we're recognizing it's a specific case.
	Uh um Chihuahua, it has a CHWIP in the in the name of the tribe, um in the greater area outside of Vancouver, recognizing the rights of indigenous tribes on unceded land, which might include private property.
	And the only problem with that is let me pull up the tweet so that we can actually see it in all its glory, that there's there's people who have built houses on this.
	There's people who have bought the land from the crown on these properties.
	And then the question's gonna be what of what of those rights of those people now?
	And the reality is gonna be who the hell knows until this works its way through the court system.
	But uh a video went of uh a screenshot went viral, which was from the city of Richmond saying basically advising residents of this supreme BC Supreme Courts of the lower level, uh Cowichan.
	There was no P in it, tribes.
	And it says if you look at the draft map attached to the briefing, the ones that says this is unceded land, your properties are located within the claim area outlined in green.
	For those whose property is in the out the area outlined in black, the court has declared aboriginal title to your property, which may compromise your status and validity of your ownership.
	This was meant, this was mandated without any prior notice of landowners, the entire area outlined, whatever.
	And so, bottom line, you have the city of Richmond, I think deliberately trying to uh agitate the general population for the purposes of creating political pressure to overturn this decision at the court of appeal.
	But you have the city of Richmond saying your private property has been recognized as uh having aboriginal rights over it, and it might affect your title, your land ownership, how it affects your mortgage, how it affects the taxes you've been paying for the last however many years.
	We don't know.
	We'll find out when this works its way through the court system.
	And um, then you can sort of imagine why it is that the government would be ceding pun intended, this uh level of uncertainty in the general population.
	When the government comes out and makes it a policy to recognize that you are on unceded land, what the hell precedent do you think that creates for aboriginals who are then going to claim this is unceded land?
	It own it belongs to us.
	There were some funny memes up there, none of which I'm going to bring up because they could be arguably uh misconstrued as promoting non-peaceful methods of uh resolution of disputes.
	Uh but this is this is madness.
	This is almost by design, you know, heading to the 2030, you will own nothing and be happy, because you've had a government that for the last 10, 15 plus years has made it a policy to pander to the aboriginal rights of unceded lands and how the white folk, the Europeans, although I guess it involves it includes also the black folk, the immigrants in Canada have no right to that unceded land.
	We should be thankful that they let us have it.
	And now you have the court saying, we'll we'll judicially give it back to them.
	Figure it out with your uh government, with your landowners, with your uh banks.
	And then you're gonna have the government, you know, conveniently enough coming to, well, we got it, we gotta take it back over now federally, so that we can renegotiate title rights, usage rights, et cetera, with the aboriginals.
	And so great for the government.
	Uh, great for the aboriginals if you can say that.
	They've never had anything great uh happen to them in the Canadian government.
	And um tough nuggies for everybody who thought they had private property.
	You will own nothing and be happy.
	All right.
	Uh, I don't know if Robert hears me in the back, but Robert pop on in if you want to now.
	There we go.
	You do him.
	Okay, awesome.
	Well, uh, sir, how goes the battle?
	Good, good.
	I'm gonna apologize in advance.
	My picks last night were at were were equal.
	I mean, 50-50.
	Holy crap, I got okay.
	The upset for DeRitter versus I forget the other guy's name.
	Who could have seen that coming?
	I was four for five or five for six on the main card.
	But I I think I I mean I couldn't have gotten it more wrong if I tried on the undercards.
	So I don't know if I was net positive for you yesterday, Robert.
	I uh hang my head in shame.
	Did you play the uh Heron video?
	Yeah, I played it coming in.
	It's it's it's nice.
	I love the way they they produce these things.
	I didn't make the joke.
	We're probably I'm gonna get a copy strike for having replayed my own content that's licensed out to other agencies.
	You should see another one coming soon.
	I did a just a short video of the iguana infestation in Florida.
	They're like, it's it's so cool.
	It's like you're running through a valley in Jurassic Park.
	These iguanas, they're all like just they run towards the uh the trees where they hide, but they literally look like like sperm going towards an egg or dinosaurs going through the you know, the Savannah Plains back in whatever, 50 million years ago.
	Robert, what's the hat?
	What's up with that hat?
	Uh yeah, it's got a little red, white, and blue in it.
	That's the Russian flag.
	You're trying to get us all.
	Yeah, yeah, exactly.
	Exactly.
	Uh all right.
	What do we have on the menu for tonight?
	We've got the uh Trump Putin upcoming summit in Budapest.
	Uh, we've got SCOTUS, red flag searches, racial redistricting, restitution, habeas corpus, supreme court jurisdiction, the exceptions clause, Alex Jones not getting any relief at SCOTUS.
	Uh John Bolton indicted.
	Uh that has some promise for a man who's a true criminal.
	The uh the right to prayer, uh using at in public platforms, in this case, uh you know, a school that wanted to do so is a case that's up at SCOTUS.
	Uh New York City, uh, dear Judge Kaplan, uh long notorious corrupt hack of a judge.
	Uh, the decided that New York City's sanctuary city status means that the government must, must write big checks.
	And he issued a patently illegal injunction.
	Kaplan has been doing this for decades uh in getting away with it.
	Well, actually, we'll talk also we'll mention who Kaplan is when we when we touch that story.
	Sorry, go ahead.
	Uh, Dr. Bowden against the Texas Medical Board.
	Uh, that case is uh likely to reach go to Texas courts and do federal courts for civil rights purposes.
	We'll describe what's going on there.
	Uh jury nullification in DC in another case, thanks to judicial nullification by watering down and rewriting the self-defense uh laws as it relates to federal law enforcement.
	Uh the Seventh Circus decision about the National Guard, uh imitating some of the other lunatic decisions that have been coming out from federal judges who are busy gaslighting America as they join the insurrection itself.
	Uh the indictment of Antifa for domestic terror.
	Uh, the we got the first one out of that, out of Texas.
	Uh, in a, by the way, a case that uh mimics and imitates the facts being celebrated in the Oscar favorite movie, uh uh one battle after another, by the way.
	Uh Pentagon media rule that's been misconstrued by a wide range of so-called First Amendment uh analysts about what exactly the Pentagon was requiring the media agreed to.
	Uh JFK Russia files uh disclosed, thanks to the good work of Congresswoman Luna, uh, who got that directly from the Russians.
	Take a while, guess uh, who they figured out was complicit uh in the assassination of President John Kennedy.
	The uh in a couple of bonus cases, Ukraine caught violating the law.
	Uh Washington loses their efforts to suppress religious rights, and uh the and there's an attempt of taking over an entire town and county in Texas being stopped by attorney general Ken Paxton.
	So a pact docket tonight.
	Well, let's start with the one that I I again I get sucked into these stupid rabbit, they're not rabbit holes, they're um uh uh shadow boxing, chasing windmills on Twitter.
	The talking point yesterday, there was so many, as I'm at uh a baseball game with my kid, is that I I didn't I didn't even understand it.
	One guy tweets out, give me five minutes in a room with Heg Seth, that effing coward.
	I'm like, what the hell is he talking about?
	I go to his bio, he's got a Ukrainian flag in his bio, so I know he's an idiot, but then I understand.
	He was, I believe, pardoned by Putin for various crimes he committed as a mercenary in Ukraine.
	Oh, the guy that I was fighting with?
	I believe it's the same guy.
	Oh shit, I didn't know that.
	Okay.
	Well, so, but then I read through the chat, and then I find out he thinks this is a Russian flag.
	Now I've highlighted this, and I had fought with everybody.
	Yes.
	Oh, I just tried to clarify that he's got Pete Hexeth has got an American flag handkerchief in his pocket and red, white, and blue.
	Now, uh, today, I mean, it was endless.
	Angry Staffer puts uh his pocket square is an American flag, his tie is a Russian one.
	I hope this helps in response to JD Vance, who says it's just the red, white, and blue.
	And I said, Yeah, because it makes total sense, you moron.
	I mean, why not the French flag?
	I mean, Le Trigolor, why not the French flag?
	Robert, it's all we're gonna get into it with the Antifa thing, but it's almost like they are uh I won't say paid, because they don't have to be paid.
	I don't even think they have to receive a specific talking point.
	It's an organic thing like birds, those types of birds that follow each other as they all turn.
	And that's what we're witnessing in terms of misinformation and disinformation.
	And I get sucked into just screaming into the void, you effing idiots.
	That could be Russian, Croatian, French, British, and then someone's like, why would it be French or British?
	I was like, because quite clearly Pete Heggseth wants to thank the Brits and the French for their ardent support of a Ukraine.
	That's why he did it.
	That's how stupid it is to think it was Russian.
	Serenity now.
	Um, let's speak of war whore uh people who deserve to go to jail.
	Robert, so John Bolton uh got indicted.
	It was a more elaborate indictment than what we got from uh James Comey.
	James Comey was a two, was James Comey's the two-pager or the two-paragrapher, and yeah, was the two pages much longer, and then this one obviously much longer as well.
	This one was amazing because it goes into amazing detail.
	And the timeline is I didn't realize or appreciate at first how damning the damn timeline was that it's like Bolton started this idea of writing a book the the day after he got appointed, or he took took his position, and um uh and writing a book and also you know, plotting to humiliate the president.
	And so the indictment we've covered it.
	I think you talked about it during a burden with Barnes.
	I put out a vlog on it, but the bottom line, uh we've documentation.
	I don't know how they got it, I guess when they raided Bolton's house of communications, text messages, what's up chat, whatever, with individuals one and two who it's accepted it's his wife and daughter, like there's not really any ambiguity about that.
	Oh uh well, it's not in the indictment, but that's what's been reported in the press.
	Okay.
	And so he's basically collaborating with his wife and daughter, individuals one and two.
	And it's not me that said this, by the way, CBS News said it.
	I wouldn't have said it because I it is they're not identified, and I just you know don't know how anyone knows that, but they know that.
	And basically he's he's he's handwriting, transcribing minutes from meetings that he has under classification, uh classified meetings.
	He his uh his home office, which was approved as a skiff, is revoked so he can no longer retain any classified information after he is fired.
	He does.
	He communicates clearly detailed information to individuals one and two, wife and daughter, presumably.
	The day he gets out uh or fired, the day after he's reaching out to uh, I think it's Simon and Schuster publishers to publish this book in the room where it happened.
	The book, in fact, contains classified information and a lot of it that the NSC overviews has cut it out and um and uh you know rework it, which he does, but it's evidence that he communicated classified info.
	And um he had been on record saying that Julian Assange should get 170 years in prison and uh Bradley Manning should be uh killed for treason for doing the same with Ed Snowden.
	So, Rob, I mean, again, it's it's and the same with Donald Trump.
	So the same thing about President Donald Trump.
	He also recently said as the indictment details that anybody that would share things on an unsecure communication, by the way, signal is much more secure than AOL, uh, should you know that he couldn't imagine somebody doing something so horrendous and illicit and then they should be sacked and uh criminally prosecuted uh in the when the signal leaks came out.
	So the yeah, so he's said this across the board in multiple contexts.
	There's no better person to condemn the actions of John Bolton than John Bolton.
	Uh so my question was um, do they get to they're gonna get to bring in all these uh out-of-court statements?
	I guess at some point during the trial.
	Um, do you think that they're going to strong arm Bolton into a plea deal by virtue of the fact that I think individuals one and two committed crimes, and if they are his wife and and daughter, he's gonna want to sing so that they don't go to jail.
	That's a possibility, yes.
	The uh, I mean, well, for those that you know, he 18 count indictment, nine counts of retaining national security information, national defense information, and nine counts of transmitting it over an unsecure channel.
	And that's what he did.
	Uh, he retained a bunch of information that was designated not only classified, designated top secret.
	You're talking about war plans, he was sharing, ongoing covert operations he was sharing.
	You know, who the informants and intelligence apparatus by name.
	By name this is the most egregious public list of stolen national security secrets since I don't know, Israel did it.
	So the uh, but I mean, that's how how how uh uh extraordinary this is.
	Yeah, I mean, even the lefties and commies on MSNBC who are ready to say this is part of Trump's enemies list prosecution, were like, uh, after they read the indictment, they're like, uh uh, this is really bad.
	This is really bad.
	He's he's completely guilty.
	So he has he has no legal defense, and the his intent is all over his public statements over when he wanted Julian Assange, uh, the in prison for life, when he wanted Ed Snowden executed, Bradley Manning executed, President Trump in prison for life.
	Uh the for things that don't compare to this at all.
	Nowhere near as uh the egregious nature of what he did.
	The and he put his own family at risk, his own wife at risk, his own daughter at risk.
	And then the, I mean, and they all know what they're doing because they're like, shh, uh, we'll keep it shh, let's keep it on the on the download.
	The I mean, it was a joke.
	And so the this gives you a sense of how the deep state operates.
	This guy's been one of the most corrupt rogue, destructive actors in the in the history of the United States and the world.
	Uh, responsible for more blood on his hands than any leader in the last, I don't know, 70 years since Mao.
	I mean, I mean, that's how uh a horrible and horrendous this human being was.
	If anybody belongs in prison for life, it is John Bolton.
	And again, you all have to do is listen to John Bolton.
	John Bolton said this exact kind of conduct at a much lesser scale required life in prison or the death penalty.
	So John Bolton has already condemned himself.
	Now, I get being generous and letting himself report, but that this uh undermines the credibility of these uh uh investigations and indictments in terms of public opinion, who democrats set the standard?
	They said if it's a high profile political case, you got a purpose.
	Once they set that stand, you got to do the search warrant raid and you gotta have the cameras ready to roll.
	And when that doesn't happen, the liberal democratic judges assign these cases, see that as a sign of weakness, not as a sign of generosity, a sign of weakness.
	So that that's already happening in the Comey case.
	Uh uh, so is somebody gonna can tell me that it is random assignment that all three of these cases drew liberal democratic appointees?
	James Comey magically gets a liberal democratic judge.
	Uh, then uh Tish James gets a liberal democratic judge.
	Now uh Bolton gets a liberal democratic judge, all of them in liberal democratic jurisdictions, not as bad as the district of corruption, but still by no means uh guaranteed to get any kind of uh true justice.
	And we have a bunch of insurrectionary judges all across the country.
	I mean, as we speak.
	Uh, does anyone think they won't try to be insurrectionary as to these cases?
	Rediscover selective prosecution out of the blue, rediscover vindictive prosecution out of the blue, even though it's apparent Bolton was under investigation.
	Trump never asked for the investigation.
	So he was under investigation in the Biden admin, and they decided to be friendly with him and and let it slide.
	Exactly.
	I mean, so the investigation started all the way back from his book when the people clearing his book who are career professionals, not Trump appointees, said this guy is disclosing a bunch of national security information as lunatic.
	And that's what led to the lawsuit, and then the move and the court was like, what you're doing is high risk, by the way.
	Warned Bolton and Bolton was still doing it anyway.
	And then bragging to everyone else about everybody else should go to prison for things that are one-tenth of what he did.
	So this is gonna test can our judicial system be impartial, uh, or will they be as political and prejudicial and partisan as they've been to Bit Did it?
	Effing he got two million bucks for that book.
	Yeah, does anyone really think two million people read that book?
	No, I mean I don't know.
	like how many copies would he have to sell in order to let's say it's gross two million from the sales.
	Uh they give him an advance, but for that book to be worth two million to Bolton.
	It's like a dollar to two dollars a book.
	Most of the rest goes to the publisher and the publishing cost.
	Now the digital era kind of slightly does change that math, but basically you would be looking at at least six figures plus at book sales.
	He never got anywhere near that.
	My guess he likely sold 5,000 copies, maybe 10,000 copies.
	So it was a payoff.
	It was a complete payoff.
	That's what these book deals are.
	They're open uh bribery.
	You know, the if we had a real justice department, you know, and we didn't have some loser like Todd Blanch running interference for the deep state on a daily basis, uh, then they would be looking at this as much as anything else because it will rat out and smoke out, smoke out all the corrupt rogue actors.
	Let me add Robert.
	I'm trying to understand because I do believe this is money laundering.
	What would Simon and Schuster's, unless they are assets or on the payroll of intelligence or deep state uh that's a short answer.
	The the book deal, the book.
	If you dig into a lot of these book publishers' histories and connections, it's all over the place.
	So now there's other scams they run, like they buy a bunch of the books themselves to try to boost the appearance of the book sales, stuff like that.
	The I mean, remember that uh what's her name?
	That lo uh Angela Merkel, the loser from Germany.
	Uh, because the they're part of the whole coalition of losers that are walking around.
	Remember her book Freedom?
	Uh, and it was all over U.S. airports.
	It was like, who in U.S. airports wants to read about Angela Merkel in Germany?
	Nobody.
	So that it's part of the money laundering scam.
	You get it.
	And here's how you know.
	Watch when populist uh or independent people retire from office or leave office.
	They don't get 10 million dollar book deals.
	None of them.
	I mean, Trump didn't even get a 10 million dollar book deal when he was out of office.
	It's it's Obama, it's Biden, it's Bolton, it's these corrupt Democrats.
	Certain almost every Supreme Court justice gets big fat book deals.
	Who wants to read the ramblings of of you know Justice Amy Coney Barrett?
	Pretty much nobody.
	Robert, I have to see my name, my last name on a book.
	Super copyright infringement, aside from being a horrible human being.
	You can say how damaged the mere association of your name with her faces in the court of brand damaging and diminishing your brand.
	Um okay, so that's amazing.
	So he, I mean, uh, and it's in Maryland, so I don't know what the uh although people very liberal democratic jury pool, not an impossible jury pool, but a difficult one.
	And it's got to be unanimous.
	So you can have one activist juror who gets on who does not apply the law or jury nullification.
	You could have his practical defense.
	He doesn't have a substantive defense.
	It will be I was against Trump, uh, let me go.
	Even though he was deeply associated with Republican neocons, because a lot of them these days are themselves neocons.
	Uh the key will be the judge facilitating.
	Like this recent DC case with this woman attacked an ice officer and got and the jury let her walk entirely.
	Part of what helped was the the judge giving a completely bogus jury instruction on self-defense.
	She watered it down and changed its language in ways that was I've never seen that kind of instruction given in any self-defense case ever.
	The uh why because the judge wanted to make sure there was an acquittal.
	So you can do it also with what evidence you allow in, what evidence you don't allow in, what what in jurors you allow to be provide certain information during the voider process, uh, and then what instructions you give the juror.
	The combination of those three things, a judge can absolutely corrupt and steer a case.
	The movie we watched uh this Saturday, uh uh the Viva Barnes Lot dot locals.com board was the great uh the verdict with Paul Newman.
	And people get to see in live time how corrupt and rogue judges constantly interfere in cases and try to rig the outcome.
	The and there are several people that were while asking the life chat, they're like, this is all like dramatic, right?
	This kind of thing doesn't happen.
	It's like, no, it happens literally every day in America.
	It happens more often than not in most cases in most courts.
	I'm in front of.
	The uh the there's nobody more corrupt in our government than those who wear black robes on the federal bench.
	And so, and people are witnessing that in live time as they make up interpretations of the insurrection act and the president's power to declare a rebellion or to enforce the law to you know create new rights out of the out of the blue for illegals that never existed before in history for suddenly saying for taking over the federal government's personnel decision making and and per spending power.
	I mean, they this is an insurrectionary body.
	What people are just discovering is the Democratic candidate for uh Virginia for the attorney general of Virginia to be top cop in Virginia, who who told other Republicans how he couldn't wait to see uh his political opponent murdered and his children murdered uh in front of his mother.
	That after that came out, guess what his approval rating did with Democratic voters in Virginia?
	I presume it went up, but Robert, I'm always up, it went up.
	This tells you how insane this is.
	Richard Barrett is doing a massive survey on politicized violence, and he is finding that most professional class Democrats support politicised violence.
	They support ends to the means.
	There were people all through these No Kings protests wearing shirts of the of Tyler Robinson, the Charlie Kirk assassin, proudly.
	There was a school teacher in Chicago pointing to people going like this, being shot in the throat and laughing about it.
	She's teaching your kids, folks.
	This is who it is.
	We have an entire insurrectionary class that is the Democratic professional managerial class.
	The mayor of New York, on the eve of the election, or the soon-to-be mayor of New York, on the Eve, Mamdami, on the eve of the New York City mayor's election, went and took a photo and then broadcast it and bragged about it to the world with an imam tied to the bombing of the World Trade Center.
	This is how insane these this is.
	These people and their core seats of power is the bureaucratic administrative deep state in the Pentagon and the State Department and the CIA.
	That's why President Trump has been getting false intel on Ukraine now for the last three months, is because the CIE director Ratcliffe delegates and defers to MI6 on U.S. intelligence.
	Rubio delegates to the EU about what's happening in the Russian economy.
	The uh people at the Pentagon delegate to Ukraine what's happening on the battlefield.
	All they do in Ukraine is make stuff up.
	The beginning of the war.
	I mean, some of the dumbest claims ever made.
	Ghost of Kiev and all that nonsense.
	The it's systematic.
	And then it's in the in the judicial branch, is the other place.
	They have a lot of instant, they have the most power.
	And they're engaging in everyday insurrectionary behavior.
	And at uh some point the president's gonna have to decide whether to go along with it or not.
	Uh because it poses imminent risk to the rest of us.
	Um, I had a number of questions in there.
	Jay Jones, this is Jay Jones, he's running for the AG of Virginia.
	He's the one who had those text messages.
	And when I was watching at least the highlights of the debate, um I I thought for a second that these text messages were revealed earlier, as in before October of this year.
	And I'm not sure that they were publicly, but I think the issue is that on the one hand, he never apologized even privately to the people who he sent these text messages to.
	And now that they've come out, Spanberger refuses to withdraw her endorsement of Jay Jones, says it's in the hands of the voters now, which presumably means if they elect this guy to be attorney general, um, they support what he said.
	I mean, I I try not to be seen this since the Klan.
	These are people running on Clan Tifa tickets, and they're getting endorsed, not by you know, uh just a few wackos in their basement.
	They're being endorsed by people that have key power at the CIA, key power at the State Department.
	Where do you think they live?
	Virginia, overwhelmingly, Northern Virginia.
	It's these voters who are the most enthusiastic about the attorney general once they found out he was for murdering his political opponents, children.
	This is a referendum on where we are in this country.
	And it shows you the dangers of where it is.
	And that these are people who are in the key positions in the State Department, key positions in the Pentagon.
	That's where they live.
	That's who these people are.
	So these people are not nobodies.
	These are people with real power who want to see you murdered for your political beliefs and want to see your children murdered for your political beliefs.
	That's how insane this has become.
	And so and how dangerous it is.
	And the judges are busy pretending that uh gaslighting everybody about oh, that there's no insurrection here.
	Well, what are you talking about?
	Insurrection, assuming they have the power to override the president's determination on that in the first place.
	But that gives you an idea of how dangerous it is.
	The Virginia Attorney General's election will tell us whether everybody in that state has lost their mind, uh, or it's just the professional class Democrats.
	But I was shocked they didn't withdraw Jones' candidacy, but now I see why.
	They don't see a problem with what he did.
	They like what he did, they cheer what he did.
	And this is like people supporting the Klan, 1920s, the last time we saw this at this low.
	I I was just not that I fact-check here.
	I want to see these things also in real time.
	It says favorability statistics.
	Among all surveyed groups, only about 12% of voters said their opinion of Jones became more positive.
	I'm sorry.
	When we talk about Islamic extremism, that 10% figure of 1.8 billion is exactly what people cite as the as the risk.
	Uh, you know, in terms of not condemning the other 90%, but in terms of highlighting the real only 12% of voters suggested said that they're they were more favorable to James Jones now.
	That's only one in eight people give her to rounding up.
	Okay, Robert.
	Yeah, I mean, it's insanity.
	It's the kind of insanity that would subsume the world if they got their druthers.
	These are people who would eagerly and happily uh have us go walk into a nuclear war with Russia uh because of their mindset, their rusophobic mindset.
	And to give you an idea, like I'm increasingly of the conclusion AI is an artificial uh uh uh intelligence, it's artificial information.
	Go you go to almost any uh AI site and ask them.
	Oh, I was doing it this weekend on a range of topics, and they'd feed you worse propaganda than CNN.
	The and it's like, in fact, when you ask them, well, look at this source, they often could continue to deny that that source says what it says.
	Anyone that's a lawyer knows they just make stuff up regularly.
	You cannot trust AI at all.
	I've had you know the people within the firm structure occasionally, oh, here's what the answer is.
	And I'm like, mm-mm, nope, go look again.
	That's AI giving you fake intel again.
	They give fake information all the time.
	AI is gonna like right now, they're doing studies.
	When companies use AI, they often have to go back and fix all their screw ups.
	Like AI can't even do coding correctly.
	When AI does coding, it makes so many errors.
	It they're in fact, here's what they found in the study.
	How much time did using AI save the company versus uh versus how much time did it cost?
	You might say, how did it cost time?
	Fixing AI's mistakes.
	It turned out fixing AI's mistakes cost them twice as much time as AI supposedly saved.
	I think Sam Altman is another Sam Bankman freed, pushing a massive fraud on the world to enrich himself.
	The company's worth 500 billion and makes no money, makes no money or whatever.
	It's like gonna be worth trillion.
	I mean, the I think it's a massive bubble that puts us all at political risk, driving up energy costs all over the place.
	And nobody lies more than AI does, and it's all predicated on them stealing other people's copyrighted materials that hasn't yet reached full adjudication that could completely eviscerate the entire foundation of AI.
	It's just a computer algorithm, and it's no better than the intel or input that goes into it.
	The and that intel input is clearly garbage.
	The uh it's the kind of garbage that the Pentagon, the CIA and the State Department like to feed the Trump administration about things like Ukraine.
	But that the peace summit in Budapest with Viktor Orban, the the only reasonable substantial leader other than Slovakian president in all of Europe.
	The uh he is uh he helped organize uh this, and you know, thank God the president went back to his instincts in dealing with that coked up midget.
	There was a great little video going around of what Zelensky really said it.
	That Trump, you know, Trump was so couldn't stand Zelensky so much.
	He wouldn't even let him do the press conference on White House grounds.
	Robert, so well, actually, one question here.
	First of all, Trump was complimenting him on his suit this time around, which is the most political.
	I mean, it's it's it's deliberately condescending, but it's deservedly so there was so like there was some big discussion as to who called who between Trump and Putin on the eve of Zelensky, the meeting with Zelensky.
	I just gotta say, this has been ongoing conversations through Victor Will.
	Yeah, but and what difference is they just kept it under the hood that they because there's all these efforts of these corrupt deep state lunatics, this professional managerial class, this globalist class that uh gets rich off war, and and you know, they like Lindsay Graham,
	Lady Lindsay, uh, the queen of the war whores, a queen, maybe in more ways than one, you know, J. Edgar Hoover style, the uh who invites us all into his uh brothels of blood on a daily basis, the who's who is crying all week because there's no more war in Israel and maybe no war with Iran, and now he thinks maybe no war with Ukraine.
	I mean, he's gonna be depressed, he's gonna need a couple extra dose of pro sack each night.
	The But the mindset of these people is to try to drag us into war by lying about the conflict, lying about what Russia's military success is on the battleground, lying as to what Russia's military strategy is, lying about what Russia's uh up to at what Russia's economy is doing.
	And so I just put out some basic data, though you have to dig deep to find it, because the AI, what it exposes is how propagandized the Western mind is on rusophobic insanity.
	So like you dig in, dig in, and you find all this nonsense on the Russian economy.
	And I even asked AI.
	I was like, well, what does the World Bank say?
	And then begrudgingly had to say, well, even the World Bank says their economy is just fine.
	And it was like, why didn't you just lie to me for the last six last six inquiries?
	The but the uh if you go to the Russian economy, Russian real guess which country and all if you compare all of Europe, the United States, Canada, and uh and Russia, uh, which economy has produced the highest real wage growth, real disposable income growth for its working middle class since the war started.
	Overwhelmingly, Russia.
	On average, Russia's wages and incomes of working class people, which is the number one metric ordinary Russians care about economically.
	They don't care about stock markets, they don't care about the value of the ruble.
	They don't care when they get that new Louis Vuitton bag.
	They they're happy that Netflix is no longer bombarding their kids with a bunch of garbage, like all the training stuff they're trying to feed kids as further disclosures came out this week has been deliberate and intentional, corrupt our young children's minds while we're not watching and not paying attention.
	The uh the is it has gone up six-fold compared, six-fold rate of increase compared to the rest of the West.
	And and Russia's the economy that's falling apart.
	There is no oil problem, there's our no gas shortages, all that is garbage, all that is hogwash.
	They're a country that can feed itself, they're a country that can fuel itself, and increasingly they're redomesticating their industry, which is what Trump is trying to do here in the United States.
	And they're doing it to great success.
	They can build militarily in one year what it takes all the NATO countries combined, five years to do, according to NATO owned source, NATO's own sources.
	A British general came out this week and said, Ukraine has no chance.
	They don't have the more manpower.
	They're gonna lose.
	The only question is where they lose everything.
	So President Trump brought Zelensky and said, Look, here's the lay of the land.
	You're gonna lose everything.
	So why don't you take this reason very reasonable deal that's on the table that you don't lose everything?
	And Zelensky was like, as it usually is.
	And Trump finally figured out.
	Zelensky doesn't want peace, he wants war.
	He needs war.
	Well, I mean, the moment there's peace, he's gone.
	They hang him in Kiev.
	And it's arguably the same thought process that people had for the war in the Middle East that Netanyahu needs to keep that war going in order to avoid his criminal trial, or at least to focus on that in order to avoid the political turmoil.
	And everybody knows this is not unique to Israel or Ukraine.
	Never let a good crisis go to waste.
	Um, wartime presidents tend to get re-elected and tend to stay in power, especially when they uh declare martial law and annul elections.
	Um lock up uh press, lock up uh torture and imprison and murder uh uh dissident journalists, dissident politicians, dissident religious members.
	This guy is closing down the various churches, churches, most anti-Christian leader in the world is Zelensky in Ukraine.
	Uh, he just recently sacked the long-standing mayor of Russia, I'm sorry, of Odessa on the grounds that he was secretly Russian.
	And then they produced an obviously fabricated passport.
	And then because the lunacy of this is on steroids, they said, oh, the Russians created the fake passport.
	Well, with the Russians, don't they need to create a fake passport?
	They can print it right off the off the mill, off the printer in the back.
	So this is how insane these people are.
	Putin understands the opportunity for peace and a tent and rapprochement with Trump because he sees Trump as very unique in the West.
	Trump is smart, Trump is rational, Trump puts America's interests first.
	That's not true of any other European leader.
	They hate Starmer in the UK, they hate Macron and France, they hate Mertz, the big E3 in Germany.
	They want nothing to do with these people.
	The uh even the Poles, who are you know over the top of their rusophobic rhetoric, know not to escalate this conflict either.
	The now, of course, this week the Poles and the Italians were conspiring to keep uh a you two Ukrainians from being extradited to Germany for that fake case about what happened to Nord Stream.
	So the the Nord Stream pipeline got blown up, hint hint by the Biden administration and the and the Brits.
	If I may just pause you there, because during the meeting with Zelensky and Trump, Zelensky actually referenced Russia destroying Ukrainian or European infrastructure.
	And I was like, it's like you you can't make I don't want anything.
	I have nothing, I have nothing specifically for Russia and nothing specifically against Ukraine.
	Uh so I'm like, I'm not supporting Russia by highlighting the the audacity of the lie in front of the White House to come on and say, yeah, it was Russia, which we all know did not bomb the North Stream pipeline.
	The only question is which of the Allied forces did.
	Was it uh the US alone, or was it US with some deep sea diver Ukrainians?
	Yeah, and maybe that's some uh patzy Ukrainians.
	Why so somebody might wonder why the Germans even going through this show?
	Because big German uh insurance companies that insured the Nord Stream pipeline don't want to pay out to the to the people who got screwed by it.
	So they needed to not be accidental and be intentional.
	So that's why the Germans are like, how do we go through an investigation and set somebody up as patsies because we can't blame the real culprits because of who is involved?
	And so they came up with a couple of low-level Ukrainian patsies with one of the dumbest cover stories in the history of man.
	You know, they're out in their little boat, and we went down and did this diving, and somehow we got it at the tax.
	I mean, stuff that nobody takes seriously.
	Seymour Hirsch's story is far more likely to be accurate.
	The US and the Brits conspire to blow it up.
	These were the convenient patsies.
	They're in Poland, they're in uh in Italy.
	But in order for the Germans to satiate their insurance companies and help them get off the hook, they had to go through the motions of trying to extradite these guys.
	But now the Polish and Italian courts both came out and said terrorism good.
	The leaders of Poland, terrorism good, woo-hoo.
	Uh, because they said it's okay to commit domestic terrorism if you think you're in doing it in defense against another country.
	That's every terrorist definition in the history of man.
	Every terrorist says that's why they're doing it.
	Well, of course, Jay Jones would have said, you know, killing uh killing his political adversaries is in the best interest of the country because it will change political views and bring people over to the side of the Democrat uh terrorist attorney general.
	Well, I mean, it's just a laughable disgrace.
	And we're gonna lecture the rest of the world on democracy, on the rule of law, on human rights.
	The even the European Court of Human Rights this week, uh, as further back background of this summit, uh, that they had to recognize first, you have to get through all the crap because European courts are always crap, but they have to get through all the crap of the propagandized version of the facts concerning the conflict.
	Uh, which it's a European leaders were shocked when they met with the Chinese, and the Chinese were like everything you guys are saying about the Ukraine conflict is BS.
	Like, huh?
	Huh?
	How can you possibly say that?
	Because you're all a bunch of frauds and liars.
	Quit lying to everybody, you morons.
	Everybody who's been a part of this is gonna be humiliated down the road.
	I might have gotten a little trouble with a few folks because I put out a tweet that said you can find better information from an autist on Telegram than the president, the vice president can get from the Pentagon.
	The uh, and some people thought I was being sarcastic.
	That's the God's honest truth.
	That the crowdsourcing, what COVID should have taught everybody is you cannot trust institutional sources.
	You you you go to Telegram, you get these hundred nerds that all they do is study this war obsessively, and you'll get it, you'll get accurate intel.
	And how do you know it's accurate?
	Because it's predictability is off the charts.
	Short to medium-term predictability is much better than anybody in the Pentagon.
	Definitely better than that Nimrod General Kellogg.
	Robert, may I read this in uh voice?
	It's increasingly apparent.
	Some autist on Telegram knows more of what's happening in the Ukraine war than our own president, vice president, and pentagon.
	And I don't blame the president or vice president for that.
	I blame the Pentagon and the State Department of City for it's it's a it's a known demonstrable proven fact that when when they get it wrong every now and again, I'm saying 4chan and whatever, they get the shooters faster than the FBI, at least identify them.
	They get the social media accounts before the FBI can take them down.
	They located the he will not divide us flag by Shia LaBeouf planted in the mountains based on the overhead patterns of flight in conjunction with the overall lay of the land.
	They are autists, I suspect literally, but certainly followed.
	And they are it it's it's true.
	So it's it's only good the least.
	The accuracy is very, very good.
	And what's amazing, like I was fascinating, AI completely suppresses all of that.
	Like I was curious, like, tell me what's happening in the Russia-Ukraine war.
	And all they gave me was Western propaganda that has been discredited, Even from some Western sources, if you studied them and followed them long enough.
	And the I was like, well, what about according to Telegram?
	They're not uh they're not aggregating that data information.
	So they're not crowdsourcing it.
	I mean, you can go to AI and ask AI, okay, who do these like eight political leaders all follow?
	Is there some, so who are the social media accounts that all eight of these people really seem to follow?
	They can't even calculate it.
	Not even Groc AI can calculate.
	Not even super groc AI can not grok for Rock 5, beta, whatever.
	Can't calculate.
	The I mean, there's these there's some, they have somehow built into the algorithms, deliberately memory hauling.
	They have made AI into an Orwellian tool.
	There's zero question about it, and I and I believe it does it with uh the whatever the opposite of crawlers are is that they're not crawling to fine, they're crawling to suppress and hide.
	There's zero question that it's happening because my fear is that key people in the administration don't realize they're being systematically lied to.
	Because anywhere they turn, they're getting this fake intel.
	And now I think Victor Orban was a conduit to get accurate information to President Trump because Trump trusts Orban.
	So he might not trust the Russians.
	Uh, but when Orban's saying, trust me, their economy's just fine.
	Trust me, the Russians are winning this and will win this.
	Uh, trust me, you are better off.
	We are better off, the world is better off if we force Ukraine, Ukraine to fold, not try to force Russia to fold because that's never gonna happen.
	The Russians would rather eat dirt, even if their economy was in the tank, even if they could make no headway in the battleground, they would rather eat dirt than surrender.
	So that's never gonna happen.
	And it's not for I'm not a master of history by any means.
	It's just a known fact that Russia wins these wars of attrition, which with much larger, uh much more capable armies.
	Ukraine is not one of them.
	And I was reading through the replies on your tweet.
	Some people said, I thought you said Russia was going to win two years ago.
	Like, they've won.
	It's not Russia that is not bringing this war to an end.
	Um, and I'm not sure what anyone thinks uh victory would look like, other than Putin's self-restraint.
	That's what Trump made clear to Zelensky on Friday.
	He said, Look, the only reason your whole country isn't wiped out is because Putin has chosen not to wipe you out.
	And the reality is Putin sees an opportunity with Trump to make the world a safer, better, and richer place for both the United States and Russia.
	Anybody that looks at this data economically independently will come to that same conclusion.
	That's why Russia Gate started.
	Donald Trump said in 2015, wouldn't America be better off if we got along with Putin, if we got along with Russia.
	He was exactly right.
	From that moment, they launched Russia Gate.
	That was when Russia Gate began.
	And then what it was the second impeachment?
	Or well, that was the first investigation.
	What was the first big impeachment?
	Ukraine gate.
	All about the same thing.
	Because the globalists know that a US Russia reproachment sinks the globalist empire, all of its war whoring, all of its concentration of economic and political power goes bye-bye.
	When two conservative Christian nations that can feed themselves, fuel themselves, and have the greatest nuclear arsenals in the world are aligned, the globalists are done for and finished.
	We can convert Paris into the tourist destination it was always meant to be.
	Nobody's going to Paris anymore, Robert, I'll tell you that much.
	They're not going to like it.
	You got to practice a la Akbar.
	Uh, you know, that's gonna be the new European for us.
	It was bad enough when it was just Frenchmen who were rude and snobby and overcharged and smoked in your face, but it's uh it's not a it's not the same city, it's not the same country anymore, but everybody knows that.
	Robert, let me do one thing before I lose it.
	Yes, sorry, Bob, we got Saint Jonesy in the house.
	Uh this was a uh a bell made from bullets from Ginger Ninja.
	It's beautiful.
	Welcome to the community.
	Saint Jonesy.
	So they're having the um, they're having the summit, Robert.
	Uh what is it over, is it over two days?
	What are the expectations?
	What do they hope to uh what do we expect to see out of this?
	Well, it's really the last opportunity for the US to achieve this.
	Uh and because the the problem with all the the bluster and and bluffing about Tomahawks and 500% sanctions and all that kind of stuff, uh, even though I think Trump had other reasons for doing it, and I think he maybe thought the Russians knew it was a bluff so that it wouldn't cause problems, but it did.
	There's a large part of Russian public opinion that is turned against uh Trump that thinks he's untrustworthy, that thinks he's unreliable, that thinks the Americans lie, that thinks the Americans can push everybody around, including Russia.
	Russia's a very proud nation.
	And so you had, I mean, you had people that there's a there's a uh uh a person who's Russian born, but grew up in America, was actually served in the American military, then went back to Russia.
	The uh that travels the globe.
	He has a YouTube channel and other things.
	He was on RT to give you an idea of how severe the mindset guy.
	So there's a guy that's more for reproach, likes Trump, et cetera, by nature.
	He was like, if we hear Trump say one more word about Tomahawks, we should just nuke the District of Columbia.
	That's the kind of language that was starting to come out.
	And I think Americans were not, I don't think Trump administration was processing that this over-the-top belligerence, this bellicose belligerent language, even if Trump didn't intend it to have this impact, was.
	And I think that's why the back channel between Trump and Victor Orban, the president of Hungary, helped create this.
	Because Orban was like, whoa, you know, you this is this is not working out the way you think.
	It's causing all kinds of destabilization.
	And right now, when we have a huge fight with China over rare earths, Russia has a whole bunch of rare earths.
	Russia has a whole bunch of fuel.
	Russia has Arctic development, as came up with the the uh Russian economic uh sovereign fund investor who's real active and very funny, actually, on X. The uh because he was making he was talking about the tie, the tie as well.
	He goes, the Russian Americans have the same colors because we got the same values.
	What are you crying about?
	The uh uh talking to all the Ukraine Nazis, the uh nutjobs.
	But the is that there's all the I mean we can build a tunnel in the middle of tunnel between by the way, that was the Khrushchev Kennedy idea.
	So I mean Khrushchev Kennedy had to maintain back channels to Khrushchev through uh Robert Kennedy's talked about this through Bobby Kennedy through the Russian ambassador visiting Bobby Kennedy's dad's home, uh the you know, Bobby Kennedy, Robert Kennedy Sr.'s home.
	The be and they had because why?
	Because Kennedy figured out the entire deep state apparatus around him that it built up, would what would nuke the world if they could.
	They wanted it to see what a nuclear conflict.
	Khrushchev recognized that about the hardliners in Russia.
	What people don't know is there are still a bunch of hardliners in Russia that think we should they should take all of Ukraine, humiliate Ukraine, and teach everybody a lesson.
	That's what that's where their mindset is.
	So I think this has been underappreciated in aspects of the Trump administration.
	So the, but I think Orban working with Trump got him to recognize the reality of what was happening.
	He also figured out that Ukraine was lying and Europe is lying when they say they want peace.
	They don't want they don't want peace at all.
	I mean, ask yourself.
	Uh, I mean, Trump put him right on full display.
	He asked uh Zelensky, the he goes, hey, well, what do you think about this idea of a bridge between Russia and Alaska?
	What has it had to do with Ukraine?
	That's nothing to do with Ukraine.
	Does Mr. I want peace, Zelensky have a problem?
	He shouldn't have, right?
	Oh, sounds good.
	Sounds like we're working for peace.
	He goes, I don't like it.
	I don't like it.
	Now where's Michael can't?
	You know, that's that's Zelensky.
	So the uh, so I mean, the guy's a fake and a phony and a fraud, and thank God Trump finally has put that all back together again.
	Uh despite the false advice and false intel and false information he's getting from his own State Department, his own CIA, his own uh Pentagon.
	They have not been able to purge the bad actors yet.
	General Flynn was complaining about that today, saying, when the heck are some of these bad actors gonna be removed?
	The so uh I hope that this the reason why it's in Budapest is because this is all being organized by Orban.
	Now the Germans and other like, we demand you arrest Putin when he comes to Hungary on an ICC warrant.
	Uh that's never gonna happen.
	Uh the the the by the way, that would completely backfire on Europeans.
	If something like that ever happened, that there would be no more talk and Russia would go full scale.
	And then you'd see what the bear looks like.
	And you don't want to see what the bear looks like.
	And so the uh that's it, so this is all being organized by Orban.
	Orban's goal is to get Trump to go act on his instincts, which is we would be better off if we got along with Russia, and no more money pit in Ukraine, as Trump also made the point of.
	This has been a military pit because of how many weapons we're short of right now for our own self-defense because of how much we've given to those idiot Ukrainians.
	The so uh so preserving our own military stockpiles, saving money out of our own budget when things are tight.
	We're in a shutdown as we speak.
	The uh restoring relations with a country that can be a huge boost for fuel cost, energy stabilizing energy cost, access to rare earths, other essential minerals and and goods, uh things like uranium, we still depend on Russia for that as an example, makes eminent and absolute sense.
	Uh, and there would be no better, if he could pull it off, it would be it would be more consequential than Nixon going to China.
	Remember, all the every all the hardliners didn't want Nixon to go to China.
	It was the most brilliant move to isolate and create a gap between Sino-Soviet relations in in the history of the Cold War.
	Most Cold War observers would say Nixon going to China was one of the most brilliant political coups ever done.
	If Trump gets reproach with Russia, in my opinion, it will exceed what Nixon achieved in going to China.
	So let's uh let's hope that's what happens.
	Time will tell.
	Robert, I'm gonna bring up a bunch of chats right now so I don't fall too far behind.
	Plant nerd for a hundred bucks over in locals, says, Barnes, I sent an email.
	When you have some time, I would love, I would covet your advice.
	Do not covet, it's a biblical sin, but uh that's a joke.
	Uh we'll resend with my username and subject.
	I screenshotted it, I'll remember this for afterwards.
	Uh, what I was going to do is this, take that one down, and just burn through on Humble all the way to the bottom.
	Have I of you listened to the new episode of Daryl Cooper?
	I can't got that.
	Did you hear SCOTUS oral argument in the Louisiana redistrict?
	We're gonna get to that.
	We're getting to that.
	Four North American airport PA systems were hacked and broadcast Hamas propaganda.
	Shouldn't this be a bigger story?
	Uh yeah, I hadn't heard about that.
	Let me just go screenshot that.
	Bolton is the worst national security brief since Robert Hansen.
	I'm not old enough to remember who that is, the engaged few.
	Book deals are second only to modern art auctions in the number of bribes laundry.
	Absolutely.
	King of Biltong, craving a snack that's bold, like Viva and authentic, like Barnes.
	Get some bill tong packed with testosterone boosting protein and many other good stuff.
	Bill Tong USA.com code Barnes for 10% off.
	Thank you, Bill Funk.
	It's delicious.
	Do it.
	You both should dedicate a Sunday stream to the danger of Islam and Sharia law taking over in North America and the West.
	It is a bigger problem than any of us can conceive, says Candy Zero 8.
	And Mark Peterson says PM Mark Carney played five minutes of college of hockey, college hockey at Harvard.
	I asked AI where he played prior.
	AI said a team that did not exist yet, high school with no team, and he was 6'3.
	Wild and dangerous and scary.
	I'll get to the locals' chat tips in a question in a second.
	Um Robert, there was something else.
	Yeah, we got a lot uh scotus.
	Yeah, but there was something else about international stuff, France.
	Oh, yeah, it was sort of off topic.
	Um, you saw the mild victory that uh Rumble, Chris Pavlovsky got over in France, where a court declared that that email directing Rumble to suppress and remove uh specific accounts or videos was unlawful.
	Am I wrong?
	Am I overly cynical in thinking that that's you know it's it's a it's a W for now, but what that basically was was uh the court guiding the legislature as to how they have to do it lawfully.
	I think it's because now that Rumble is has a friend in the White House that various foreign governments are reconsidering their hostility.
	I think that that's a little bit well I'm it's good to have friends in powerful places.
	Absolutely.
	Uh the uh but like on that front, like Ukraine sanctions, this is like a lot of European sanctions.
	The even the European Court of Human Rights, which is usually a joke, uh the had this conclusion.
	They said, quote, none of the uh decisions at issue contained any individualized justifications.
	This was stealing a bunch of people's property and see all the rest.
	This was by Ukraine.
	This is talking about Ukraine.
	They they mechanically reproduced all the grounds for applying the various restrictions provided for in the relevant section of the sanctions act without even explaining how they applied it to this particular company.
	The courts of the of Ukraine had to exercise sufficient scrutiny in order to ensure that at least the listing wasn't arbitrary.
	But the court didn't even do that.
	There was no meaningful judicial assessment at all.
	Like somebody just says you're sanctioned, we're stealing all your stuff.
	Well, why?
	Not gonna tell you.
	How?
	Not gonna tell you.
	Can we protest it somewhere?
	Nope.
	Screw off.
	Even the European Court of Human Rights, like, you know, this kind of looks bad.
	Uh so if you're losing the Ukrainian court of human rights at Ukraine, uh, you know, a woke uh neoliberal neocon court, then that tells you how what a joke uh Ukraine uh government is when any kind of discipline analysis is applied.
	Robert, let me read two over on Cometube real quick.
	Like one said, You're so off base here, Russia is the aggressor.
	That's from Austin, and JS says.
	That person meant propaganda.
	Yeah, no, I mean, if you gave that person a test on just basic literacy on any aspect of Russia-Ukrainian relationships, they would fail every time.
	Well, I mean, it's basic stuff they wouldn't know.
	In In real time, if you placed nukes in Mexico or Canada, the U.S. would view that as aggression.
	Oh, but we have, but but Canada's got armed a Mexican army, sent your Russian military supervisors to supervise them, gave them all the weapons to do it, funded their entire government.
	You would probably think you were at war with that with Russia, wouldn't you?
	That's what we have done in Ukraine, stupidly and foolishly, to the profit of not anybody in America, but to the detriment of our military supplies, to the detriment of our budget, and for what?
	To be in an antagonized near new World War III relationship with Russia and pushing Russia into the loving arms of the big panda.
	And there's no reason uh for that.
	China is still our economic competitor, not Russia, and we should be aligned with Russia because Trump was right in 2015.
	Wouldn't we be better off if we got along with Putin?
	Now, before we get into SCOTUS, let's read a few of the tipped questions over in our viva barnes law.locals.com community, tipping here for my comment.
	Thanks, Howard the Duke.
	I'll go see if I missed a comment there.
	I was wondering if you knew Canadians who were able to use Calci K got that.
	Luckily, most Alberta is ceded land for when we declare independence as a Toshi ape.
	F. Shots Hall, how about Canada declares we own everything the indigenous get a job instead of freeloading based on history?
	Every penny we give them goes to some chief's pocket.
	This is no question, this corruption in terms of the tribal system in Canada.
	Junkman 611 says, Is there any possibility that KJB is helping the constitutionalist of the Supreme Court by making such asinine arguments that there's no way that they could possibly agree with her argument?
	She looks so incredibly stupid in her oral arguments, nobody other than liberals will agree with her.
	Okay, let's get to that.
	Now we're on the SCOTUS.
	And I'll come back to the other tip questions afterwards.
	Robert, I did get it.
	Uh, what what what happened with uh KJB?
	KBJ.
	Oh, so this was the case I think we've previewed three times.
	Uh the but they they had the oral argument this week on the racial redistricting question.
	In the context of that case, Justice Jackson tried to compare the voting rights act to the Americans with disabilities act.
	And she even kept extending it.
	People are like, Where is she going with this?
	She's not gonna say black people are retarded, is she?
	Yes, she is.
	She would say, you understand, we're disabled.
	She even said this from the bench.
	We're disabled.
	Black people are disabled.
	And that's what led to the Babylon B headline.
	Justice Thomas to Justice Jackson.
	Black people are not disabled.
	Only you are.
	No, not black people in general.
	The uh so uh, but here's the so the key it was known that Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas have always been have long been skeptical of these laws.
	That the sep the second section of the voting rights act, as interpreted and applied, is constituting a race-based discriminatory mechanism of governmental action for purposes of congressional representation in direct contravention to the constitutional amendment it's supposed to be enforcing, which is the 14th and 15th amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
	Which by the 15th Amendment was all about we don't discriminate based on race, by the way, in matters of redistricting in power and voting.
	And this law was turned on its head in the Orwellian world that we live in in our federal courts.
	And so finally the question was where was Kavanaugh, Robert, and Barrett gonna be.
	Kavanaugh, Roberts, and Barrett all expressed skepticism about the law.
	And we're saying, eh, yeah, at some point, doesn't this run out of bandwidth?
	And some of us have been saying the courts would ultimately go here because for the last 20 years, they've been hinting at this.
	They've been saying at some point all the affirmative action stuff, which is what this effectively is, has got to end.
	You know, doing it for one generation, maybe two generations, not three generations.
	Enough is enough.
	It's causing more controversy, and it was always a legal fiction that was in violation of the Constitution.
	But here was the consequence that Andrew Bronka figured out.
	The is if you strike down the second section of the voting rights act, and based on some of Justice Roberts' questions sound like they would.
	Guess what else you get rid of?
	The excuse to limit uh various voter registration mechanisms by ID.
	The like Texas strict voter ID law got knocked down because of the same section of the law.
	That section goes out the door.
	Not only does racial redistricting go out the door, that Democrats lose a 15 to 20 seat cushion it's given them for 40 years, but on top of that, all the different laws meant to allow illegals and others not qualified to vote to vote, also go out the door because now strict identity requirements,
	strict requirements to make sure you're actually a qualified U.S. citizen, qualified to vote under the laws of that state, which is constitutionally determined by the legislature of each state when it concerns presidential elections, for example.
	All of a sudden, those laws can now be enforced.
	And a lot of voter fraud goes out.
	It looks, and I think this decision is coming.
	I think it's coming sooner rather than later.
	And I think it will impact the 2026 elections.
	So prediction market people plan accordingly.
	Robert, let me bring it up because I uh I don't think I heard it.
	I guess I'm thinking of it uh of the fact that I got I gotta just pause.
	She sounds like AOC with a little more vocal fry, but okay, let's let this go.
	Remedial action, absent discriminatory intent is really not a new idea in the civil rights laws.
	And and my kind of paradigmatic example of this is something like the ADA.
	Congress passed the Americans with disabilities.
	Against it just gets worse.
	It doesn't get used to the world.
	Paradigmatic people with disabilities.
	She said and so it was discriminatory in effect because these folks were not able to access these buildings.
	And it didn't matter whether the person who built the building or the person who owned the building intended for them to be exclusionary.
	That's irrelevant.
	Congress said the facilities have to be made equally open to people with disabilities, if readily possible.
	I I guess I don't understand why that's not what's happening here.
	I gotta hear that.
	The idea in section two is that we are responding to current day manifestations of past and present decisions that disadvantage minorities and make it so that they don't have equal access to the voting uh uh system, right?
	They're they're disabled.
	In fact, we use the word disabled.
	They're disabled.
	They're disabled.
	That's a way people are disabled, according to Justice Jackson.
	I mean, uh it's it's it is such an amazing way to intellectualize uh verbal diarrhea.
	Like it's an amazing thing if you could if you could just say it with a nice and a different inflection.
	Well, so you get the contempt, the contempt because what Justice Jackson represents is the quid pro quo that was taken in the 1980s between, by the way, the old corrupt country club Republicans and the uh the black professional managerial class to betray the working class, both white and black.
	That if you could, what happens if you really do integration?
	This was what Martha the King was figured out very fast.
	You do integration, all of a sudden the black doctor, the black professional, the black lawyer, the the black mechanic, the black businessman, no longer needs to service the black community, can now service the white community.
	What did a whole bunch of them start to do?
	They started to abandon the black community.
	All of a sudden, these stable working class neighborhoods started to collapse into crime and chaos because the glue of a lot of their community was disappearing into the white suburbs they got to live in now.
	The way I used to put it is what happens if you give Nat Turner a scholarship to Harvard?
	For those that don't know, Nat Turner led one of the great slave rebellions in the history of America.
	He ain't going to lead no slave rebellion, is he?
	So that what you do is you buy off the smart and the best and the brightest, if you will.
	Now you didn't have what happened over time is something a little different.
	It became purely class privilege.
	That's how you have justices like of like Jackson, who do not represent the best and the brightest in the black community, period.
	There I've been in front of a lot of highly skilled, very capable, very competent black jurists and black lawyers.
	They just don't get promoted and protected in the system because they're too connected to their roots.
	It was the giveaway with BLM.
	I was like, where are the black preachers?
	Where are the black businessmen?
	Well, you know, the people I grew up with that that I was like, why are they all gone?
	There's like none of them in here.
	I just see gangbangers and a bunch of professional class lefty losers.
	And that's because BLM was an astroturf movement meant to divide the community, not meant to unify the community.
	The uh, you know, yeah, with the eight enabled by big tech and the big donors like Soros, et cetera.
	So they could go by eight houses and you know, bang their three lesbian wives.
	The uh so that the that's the truth of it.
	And she represents that corruption.
	She's somebody who knows she wouldn't be where She was at, but for this quid pro quo, this deal that was reached.
	Instead, it would have been a much more it would have been a Clarence Thomas, capable, competent, skilled, independent, black intellectual rooted in the black community, unlike her, who isn't.
	And so, unlike Obama, who isn't, unlike Kamala Harris, who isn't.
	That's all these black leaders who are extraordinarily have very little tie and connection to the actual black community.
	So the that that's what this deal was done.
	And it was done to screw over the populist Democrat at the time that represented both working class groups and had to continually deliver for them or they would get thrown out.
	And so people like me back in the 1990s were screaming about it then.
	But it was to deaf ears.
	But now what would happen is now that it's Republicans who represent the working class in the South, And consequently, the uh they are the biggest political partisan beneficiaries of this.
	But what really is the is the ideology, ideological strain of populism is the big beneficiary out of this.
	Uh, because that's the history of who benefits from biracial working class coalitions in the South and across the country.
	So the uh and this will empower working class black voters by giving them back their political capital that was stripped from them by these fake majority minority districts.
	And I say fake because it promoted the professional managerial class who didn't care about them, but was controlled by the donor class to sabotage their own economic interests.
	Indeed, it was in their interest that the black community remain suppressed because that's how they got their votes.
	If you want to, if you want to make sure certain benefits keep happening, if you want to see certain symbolic wave the bloody flag, BLM style things happening, then you gotta keep voting for me.
	If on the and and that means I've got to keep you poor, I've got to keep you, I've got to keep your community divided, I've got to keep your schools to be crap, I've got to keep your church leaders and business leaders suppressed.
	And that's what they did.
	Only get rid of these uh these barriers, the the these couriers to power in the in the in the clown world of the Democratic Party that it currently is, and in and you will unleash black entrepreneurialism, black intellectualism, black academic skill and strength rooted in a very conservative traditional values community.
	The you know, there ain't a whole lot of difference between the ordinary working class white guy in the South and the ordinary working class uh black person in the South, just like there ain't a whole lot of different difference between rural middle America and rural Russia, as the Russians with attitude explained.
	They ain't commies, they're good Christian boys.
	Uh that you know they love the same thing middle America love.
	They want guns and trucks, and the only difference is instead of having you know, still saving parents like Viva, or having a pet dog in the back, their pet is a bear.
	You know, it's a little bit different.
	The uh uh, but otherwise, this is a revolutionary ruling that can not only drastically change the fate of Congress, but really the fate of these communities and their political empowerment going forward, and on top of it, get rid of voter fraud through real identity laws because the VRA section two has been the key to uphold to suppressing voter fraud changes and reforms now for decades.
	But we've always said that the the argument that blacks somehow are incapable of getting identification is the most racist, insulting thing you can see.
	Like calling him disabled, like she just did.
	Well, I mean, I was gonna say she holds contempt for the ordinary working class black person.
	That's the reality of who she is.
	She represents the WEB Du Bois tradition, which was snobbish towards its own black working class.
	That's who and what they are all about.
	Uh it would be fantastic if she says in her ruling.
	Yeah, I'm on the side of the other side.
	I realize how stupid my questions were, and shame on me, but probably not gonna happen.
	Uh, all right.
	So the other ones that are currently before SCOTUS, there was one that I know that we talked about a while back, which was um got a quintet plus one that's not before SCOTUS that should be.
	Uh the one before SCOTUS, at least one of them is the unreasonable uh surge and seizure when uh uh a disgruntled ex calls in and says, My husband is suicidal, cops show up.
	This is this is this is one of them, right?
	I'm not I'm not getting confused.
	Yeah, yeah, that's absolutely right.
	And people didn't people are like, Boy, who's up dude with red flag laws, read the decision.
	The decision is about green lighting, red flag laws, so they can raid your house without probable cause of any crime or without any exigent emergent circumstances even being present.
	So the probable cause uh threshold was the was the sticking point before the court where they say this is not someone who's showing up to arrest someone, it's uh a community service call.
	It's like, oh, we think there's a problem here.
	Cops show up for those who don't remember the case, uh, they look through the window, they see what appears to be an empty gun holster and a notepad, from which they presume I guess he was writing a suicide.
	Like It's so wild.
	It's like it's like the orgy of evidence that we saw in um uh minority report.
	So they see that.
	So I don't know why it took 45 minutes, but they for 45 minutes they're scoping around, and then they see the guy who appears to have a gun in his waist pocket, and then they shoot him in the in the abdomen.
	Now he doesn't die.
	Just listen to that.
	In order to stop you from shooting yourself, we're gonna shoot you.
	Welcome to genius police work in America.
	And so the question is what is the threshold for the requirements to enter, basically, because they weren't there to arrest, they didn't need probable cause.
	They were there on a wellness check, and so the threshold shouldn't be probable cause because then you'll impede cops from doing their jobs.
	So he presented no imminent risk of threat to them, and they shot him.
	I mean, it's it's funny, but it's not funny because the whole thing about this is they went to try to prevent somebody from killing themselves, apparently, then shoot them.
	There was to kill yourself, we're gonna shoot you first.
	We're gonna kill you first.
	Woo!
	Uh, and so, and then the bottom line was you know, whatever the exigent uh community wellness check was, they're saying the threshold, if it's to be probable cause for these wellness checks, well, cops are going to be impeded from doing their job, which apparently in this case consists of shooting somebody who they thought was suicidal, good for them.
	So uh, where do you think they have not issued the ruling, right?
	They're the oral argument was disturbing.
	So the used to be you had to have probable cause of a crime to go into a house.
	Then they started uh carving that up.
	Well, if exigent circumstances, emergency circumstances can justify you going into the house.
	Now, in this case, they didn't say there were exigent or emergency circumstances, nor did they just said it was reasonable to possibly prevent a threat of injury.
	The government can come in our house anytime they want now if this decision gets affirmed.
	And that is what our Supreme Court, including our so-called constitutional conservatives on the court, are considering doing because so many of them skip past the constitution and they see that beautiful, you know, back the blue beautiful little government badge, and they just start bowing and bowling and bowing.
	The uh, and that's what we're witnessing here.
	It is a horrendous decision about to come down from the Supreme Court on this, it would appear.
	And um, no, it is it is amazing.
	Like there's uh get off my property is gonna turn into no, we have uh not even probable reasonable suspicion, or we're we're concerned that we're gonna enter now for your own good.
	It's just a reasonable concern.
	We have a reasonable concern that something bad might happen if we don't come in and raid your house.
	And in this case, we might have to shoot you, just shoot you right out of the blue to for your own good.
	Robert, your birthday's April 11th, right?
	Your birthday's not today.
	Yeah, yeah, no.
	April 11th.
	Why does someone have a good birthday, Robert?
	Okay, first of all, do you want to know what's funny?
	This is how I use this is why I use comet now and no longer uh Google.
	Check this out.
	Robert Barnes, born April 11, 1974, and it shows a picture of Alex Jones.
	Well, at least he's got me in there, Robert.
	Um that's wild.
	Okay, that's uh and it has Charlie Kirk in there and Tim Poole.
	Okay, so that was the one of the SCOTUS ones.
	The other SCOTUS one, yeah, a uh the habeas one and the ex post facto and then the prayer one.
	Do the do the habeas one because that one's I'm less familiar with the uh the ex post factual.
	I don't care about, but you'll tell me why I should care about it.
	But what's the habeas?
	So the habeas is like a guy was convicted and he filed his first habeas, it was denied after his first habeas was denied.
	The Supreme Court came in and said, you know what?
	That law that this guy was convicted under was unconstitutional, how it was applied.
	So he's like, heck, why am I still in prison then?
	So he files a second habeas, and like, nah, you can't do it.
	Or it was already rejected under the I think I remember this when we talked about that.
	They create all these ridiculous rules.
	So the question became could the Supreme Court hear the case?
	And the government was effectively arguing the guy the government the Supreme Court couldn't hear the case.
	This is uh so while you people might think it's about the procedural technicalities of habeas, it's really about the meaning of the exceptions clause under the constitution.
	And to be honest, I'm I'm of conflicted opinion on the subject.
	The uh because I don't like the way they play games with locking people in prison for unconstitutional indictment convictions, but uh in terms of the individual case.
	On the other hand, I would all I would be all for the Supreme Court determining that Congress could strip them of all power, uh, because I am not sold that the judicial branch has held up its end of the uh constitutional bargain uh since the beginning of our country.
	So the exceptions clause is this Article 3 gives the Supreme Court appellate jurisdiction.
	They have limited original jurisdiction in certain cases, but they've done a good job of eviscerating their own original jurisdiction because they're a bunch of pontiest pilot cowards who don't want to handle cases like the election case of 2020, that was a perfect case for their original jurisdiction.
	The uh if the if if it the Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction over any lower court ruling if the case arises under the constitution or arises under the law of the United States.
	However, the same constitutional provision in Article 3 says that Congress can make exceptions to the appellate jurisdiction as they see fit.
	The question has long been what does that mean?
	Could Congress take away the first part?
	Could Congress say yes, you have jurisdiction in cases of the Constitution, but not anymore.
	We say no, right?
	That's always been the question.
	It's like there's so that the broad scholastic uh uh interpretation over a long period of time has been that this exceptions clause can't take away constitutional challenges, and probably can't take away challenges that arise under federal law, except under unique sort of they can do procedural protocols as to how you do things, but not substantive ones, because otherwise the exceptions clause swallows the first part of it.
	But from a policy perspective, I'd be all for the exceptions clause, swallowing the rest of it, because these lazy bums have proven themselves incapable of keeping up their end of the constitutional bargain.
	And let's just say the Supreme Court and get rid of all courts, all federal courts, give them all of them, and the until the Supreme Court, you get to handle dispute, but when the next time Macron smacks his uh Macron's wife smacks him around on the plane and they got to sue each other, they can go to the Supreme Court for original jurisdiction.
	That's one of the public consuls uh areas of original jurisdiction, but that's it, uh, not for anything else.
	And so the uh uh, but I think the probably the better constitutional argument is that the exceptions clause can't swallow the other part, otherwise it's kind of contradictory.
	Over on Commutube 200 Watts Studio says whoever sent that wellness check should have sent him DoorDash instead in retrospect.
	No, it she might have it was his ex, she might have done it specifically to get revenge on him, which she probably did.
	Um, very interesting.
	And that's the problem it's a green light.
	What the decision they're about to issue is a green light for the worst version of red flag laws across the country.
	And swatting that you mean it's vindictive swatting from exposes and whatever.
	It's uh he he's scared.
	Another case where Scolito, Alito was uh, you know, acting like his old prosecutorial self was the ex post facto clause.
	Okay, so this one was um restitution restitution for criminal acts for those who are convicted of criminal, and then they can't decide if it's a civil remedy or a criminal remedy.
	But in this particular case, what makes it unique is that the restitution provision came into effect after the individual was convicted of their crime, and then it's sort of retroactive application.
	You can't have retroactive criminal law.
	What's the word for it?
	Um, crap, Robert.
	Well, it's ex post facto, okay.
	Sorry, you can't have ex post facto application of criminal law.
	You can have ex post facto application of taxes, civil stuff, uh, but the fundamental rule is that you can't criminally penalize someone for that which wasn't a crime when they did it.
	In this case, they're questioning whether or not they can impose the criminal victim compensation on someone who committed the crime before the provision of law came into effect.
	I mean, at the risk of asking the stupid question, I didn't really care about the decision.
	Why is it important?
	So it's really about what is the ex post facto clause mean in general.
	So the expose the Constitution says Congress shall pass no ex post facto law.
	And the it, but the way the courts have done that is they've decided to limit the definition of an ex post facto law.
	To most people, an ex post facto law is any law that attempts to change legal remedy or consequence for behavior that is already happened, right?
	That's the point of ex post facto.
	But not according to our Supreme Court.
	Like, nah, that's only when it's criminal punishment.
	When it's civil, you can get away with all this stuff.
	So the uh, so that's why restitution became, is it civil or is it criminal?
	There's no dispute that the law was passed as a criminal statute.
	So what was it?
	So what was the LEDO doing?
	Legal saying, well, private citizens can enforce it, so let's pretend it's civil so that we can continue keep this incredible power of restitution for the government to steal your Stuff, uh, in the case of a criminal case, even though they're stealing your stuff for when you engage in behavior that was not illegal at the time, right?
	That's what they're doing.
	Uh, in effect.
	And so to me, it's clear it's criminal since it's in a criminal statute, applied in the criminal process, enforced by criminal means.
	Sounds kind of criminal to me.
	The uh, since it's punishment, that used to be the standard.
	Now, whether somebody could enforce a judgment against you, like Alito's lame claim.
	It used to be very simple.
	Is it punishment or is it deterrence or is it remedy, compensatory remedy?
	This is not designed as compensatory remedy.
	It is designed as punishment.
	So, as such, and it's inflicted as such.
	It should be seen as such.
	But who knows?
	They may further eviscerate ex post facto law by telling everybody, hey, it's fine as long as you somehow call it remedial or you somehow allow individuals to enforce it.
	It magically is no longer a criminal law, and thus you can make up the law after the fact to steal people's money and property.
	Yeah, and don't worry, I'll never go to jail for an unpaid civil fine.
	You'll go to jail for contempt for not paying it when they order you to, but a bing bada boom.
	Here, let me bring up a few more in locals, Robert.
	Pasha Moyer says, here is what I envisioned when you mentioned the grapes of wrath, Vivo.
	We are the grapes of wrath, we never take a bath.
	It is our style to seldom smile and never laugh.
	We are the grapes.
	What is this, Pasha Moyer?
	That's I mean, it's a good, it's a good rhyme, uh, but I don't know what the reference is.
	Uh Shofar says, wouldn't this be considered treason, Robert?
	Military tribunal.
	Uh, that was about uh, what's his face there?
	Bolton.
	Oh, here we go.
	Bender is great, now back in stock.
	Want a flag like Viva and Barnes.
	I'll show you mine in a second.
	I have made a small batch of our wooden woven, waving wooden American flags, and would like to offer a discount to the locals community.
	Well, I hope you're ready to offer it to everybody.
	Renix working my shopify.com.
	Use the code Locals50 for $50 off.
	This is going to everybody, so I hope you can handle the bandwidth.
	Those are beautiful.
	They're amazing.
	They're amazing.
	Here I'm going to share everybody the link.
	And uh, this is a locals member.
	Support the work that he does.
	I hope if he gets, I hope you get too many orders to fulfill.
	Uh, I don't hope that, but uh, you know what I'm getting at.
	Okay.
	Then we got Kimmy Hunt, Congressman Eugene Vinman, Alexander Vinman's twin, was the NSA person that cleared Bolton's book.
	Oh, shut up.
	That makes sense, actually.
	Eugene Vinman.
	That's wild.
	Okay, Kimmy Hunt, thank you.
	Shot on Grok thinks China thinks China's the greatest country on earth.
	Uh Ithaca 37 Cato.
	That was uh Tiffany Fong.
	If your friends in if your boyfriend is at a no king's rally, that's your girlfriend.
	Uh, Las Vegas Barnes reporting for duty says Chris Craft II, Plant Nerd, I got that.
	Now we all went down to the bottom, so I'm gonna have to go back up.
	In order to stop you from shooting yourself, we're gonna shoot you.
	Welcome to a genius police work in America.
	Robert Barnes is a national treasure.
	And then we got, sorry, I looked up the wrong date.
	I'm sick, I play Nike.
	Well, okay.
	Well, you also got Alex Jones' birthday on April 11th.
	Uh, have a good birthday.
	Okay, yeah, we got that door.
	All right, I'll get back to more of those afterwards.
	Robert, the other one was the religious prayer.
	This one was one that I found particularly interesting.
	Is that a um 2050?
	It goes back 10 effing years, is how quickly the uh wheels of justice turn in America.
	It was in Florida.
	I uh high school, whatever, I don't know what it was.
	It was a sporting event.
	One of the teams wanted to say a prayer before the sporting event, and the school uh or university, whatever it was, prohibited them from saying a prayer on the basis that um it's a government that it was government and they're not they're they're not imposing prayer or something along those lines.
	And they sued for first amendment, or they sued for first amendment violations, and then the question became whether or not uh it was a government entity that was expressing the opinion, or if it was a government entity expressing a private opinion, the bottom line, they were not allowed to say a prayer before a sporting match and sued.
	Now the question is gonna be whether or not it was wrongful suppression of their saying a prayer.
	It doesn't make any sense because you say God bless America before uh everything, and nobody bats an eye.
	Uh okay, flesh it out because I might have done a terrible job summarizing that.
	I mean, the what the core of the case, no, that that's exactly precisely the facts.
	And what the core of the constitutional issue is this old uh uh decision, uh Lemon, kind of like Don Le Mon, uh, the uh whose uh yeah, I think he was advocating for Antifa arming or something in the guise of Second Amendment things.
	It was like some one of his crazy latest lunarist rant.
	The but basically uh they confused the obligation to protect religious expression with the religious establish the establishment of a church.
	And liberal judges did this in order to try to Purge religion and to openly and overtly discriminate against religion in the public square by saying any expression of religion in the public square is now the establishment of religion.
	When it's not the government issuing the prayer, it's private uh people, part of a Christian group who wanted to use the government platform in the public square to communicate their personal beliefs, to uh petition the Lord for prayer.
	Now, the lead singer of the doors didn't think that was possible, but you do as many drugs as he does, and that's how you get lost.
	The uh you can indeed uh sorry, Mr. Morrison petition the Lord with prayer, and that's what they wanted to do before a contest.
	Uh Tennessee needed to petition the Lord for prayer many times this past Saturday.
	Uh I wish they would have before getting their rears whipped by Alabama.
	Uh the but so this is this lemon case is constantly confused.
	Expression.
	In fact, I had this debate with William Kunstler at Yale as a student.
	And I was like, you keep confusing establishment of religion with expression of religion.
	That was like a permitting the public square to allow for the expression of religion is constitutionally protected because nobody confuses it with the government establishing a church.
	It's like that's nonsense.
	The uh the concern over the establishment of religion was, you know, God bless them, was worried about the Catholics taking over, uh, or some of the Anglicans, you know, and some others, but was an actual state church.
	That's what they were concerned with.
	They were not concerned with the expression of religion.
	Indeed, they knew we had a very religiously diverse country compared to many other countries in the world, precisely because we did not have a state church, and they wanted to keep it that way.
	But you keep it that way by protecting expression of religion.
	Using a state platform to express religious belief does not convert that into state expression of belief.
	And that's the mistake they're making.
	And I think the Supreme Court's gonna fix it, not only to fix the right to pray in these public settings and to use the public platform to do so for personal purposes, but also across the board.
	This is a chance for them finally to say lemon was bad law, time to get rid of it.
	I think uh this will be one of the better decisions that comes out of the Supreme Court this term.
	But now I I I try to view it from the other side if it were any other religion, and I I won't even use uh Islam as the comparable, the comparable, but if it were like a Jewish prayer, I I would I'd be able to imagine people being uncomfortable or not appreciated.
	Oh, we have a Deerboard is the example of this right now.
	So the everybody's complaining about the nuisance because Dearborn, which is basically mostly Islamic community in Dearborn, Michigan, where Rashid Talib is from, is blasting out more 6 a.m. morning.
	Allah Akbar, a la Akbar.
	I mean, let's be honest.
	Most people hear a la Akbar like, where's the bomb?
	Where's the mom?
	That's the main honest.
	I I I happen to know all it is only the Islamic Arabic expression for oh my god, which is you know, when when everyone, where was it where something happened, and then was like, oh my god, he was screaming Al Akbar.
	It's like it was someone screaming in shock at something.
	It was it was a it was an event, and people were accusing the guy being a terrorist.
	I'm like, that just means oh my god.
	Yeah, it is very common in their club.
	Uh, but now I have to think about what the event was because this was another this was one of the cases where like the Reddit's of the world got the wrong guy because like he was saying Al-Akbar is like, that just means oh my goodness, it didn't mean he's involved in it.
	But sitting on that side, but no, but Robert people have to say complaining about that in Dearborn.
	Yeah, but expression of religion, unless it becomes a nuisance, right?
	And that has nothing to do with their religious content of it.
	If somebody's screaming at you at 6 a.m., that's a nuisance, even if they're screaming, go Tennessee, you know, doesn't matter what they're screaming.
	Come on, 6 a.m., dude, turn that turn that speaker down.
	Uh the so I understand people, and then uh and there's an underlying concern that it's an attempt to Islamicize more and more of society.
	Uh the and and you know, Darren Dearborn, they've tried to impose various forms of Sharia law in certain instances.
	Uh, you know, uh female genital meet me mutilation has become an issue there.
	So I understand where the concern is.
	I I'm more protective of their rights, unless it's really uh if the content of them making the prayer is it has nothing to do with it, then you have a legitimate objection.
	If you're objecting to the content of their prayer, then I mean you can object in your personal rights, but that's protecting religious expression.
	I'm just I'm just trying to think of an analogous situation where someone would say, Yeah, it's not because they're saying uh uh uh a Muslim prayer before a game.
	If it's like, I don't know, the teams are based on on countries of origins, nobody would say they're the government is making me believe this.
	They're saying it's it's it's the airwaves, and uh we're not endorsing or codifying the message, but we're allowing them to say a prayer before they get started.
	I mean, I can appreciate it.
	Um so we'll see how it you know translates into that context.
	The other two cases is a case the Supreme Court now uh has to take, which is the National Guard case.
	Uh and then the other is the Supreme Court case they should have taken, but did not.
	Which one was the one they should have taken?
	Uh, the one and only Alexander.
	Oh, yeah, that's right.
	Okay, well, we'll get to that one afterwards.
	The National Guard, Robert.
	I mean, we're we're we're we're witnessing what it is, basically a judicial insurrection.
	Hey, the the irony is the No Kings parade, the no Kings, whatever the fuck they want to call it yesterday.
	Isn't there like Burger King hats walking around?
	I did.
	Did you see the JD Vance meme?
	He he did the meme on Blue Sky on on Kami Blue Sky.
	He put up Trump getting it getting getting throned, pulling out the sword, and then he took the BLM people.
	Remember when all the Congress members, you know, bowed for BLM.
	He had them bowing to King Trump.
	Candy Vance's account is now the number one blocked account on Blue Sky.
	What's amazing is they have no sense of humor.
	They're like, I don't know why all the Republicans think this is an own, it just makes them look it the people who can't take the joker and that's what it's there for.
	And the flip side is this no kings, it's not about no kings, it's about no president.
	They do not they want to have something of a system where the kings are the judges and the kings are the bureaucracy, and the kings are the parliamentary powers, and they effectively strip the president of his executive powers.
	So the National Guard.
	Uh now, which which states was it?
	It was uh California, which other states have basically uh restrained Trump's ability to bring in the National Guard.
	They tried in California, but the Ninth Circuit overturned it.
	They tried in Portland, Oregon, but even the Ninth Circuit overturned it.
	Now it's in Memphis, Tennessee.
	Ain't no court trying to block it.
	The place where they are doing did block it is Chicago.
	The the commie district court blocked it, and then the Seventh Circuit joined in thanks to one of the Trump idiot uh appointees, uh, Eve or whatever her name is.
	She and Barrett were like peas in a pot on the Seventh Circuit, always a disaster.
	She was somebody else they were trying to put on the spring court.
	I was going nuts about the uh luckily with this decision.
	Bye-bye.
	That didn't ever happen in the sweetheart.
	Uh, you can uh thank God.
	That's the only upside to this decision, is she's exposed her idiocy in ways that anybody can see, uh, along with a poppy uh Bush appointee and then an Obama appointee.
	And what they said is that the president of the United States cannot use the National Guard in Chicago, cannot use the insurrection act in Chicago.
	The uh with some of the nuttiest decision language and logic I've ever seen.
	Yeah, that's Amy saying either.
	I mean, any kind of weird name like that, you gotta be skeptical to be honest with you.
	The uh, but uh I've been in front of her.
	Not bright, not bright.
	No, no other no other way to put it.
	Just slow as slow goes.
	The but I mean the here's what the law provides.
	That the if you if there is simply the danger, if the president determines there is a danger of a rebellion against the authority of the government, or the president determines that the current law enforcement forces in place are unable with regular forces to simply execute the laws, then he can invoke the uh the National Guard.
	That's about as broad as it gets.
	To give you the idea of the different presidents that have used this in some form or fashion, it goes back to George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, Eisenhower, Johnson, Kennedy, uh Bush.
	I'm almost everybody has done this at one time or another.
	Half the presidents have used it at one time or another.
	And now they're saying the president of the United States can't use it to allow ice to protect themselves from not getting firebombed, from not getting shot at, from not and and what did they say about the protests?
	They said these are simply sporadic and isolated violence.
	And then they went further.
	They said basically they said it must be deliberate violence, it must be organized violence.
	Check, check, it must be pervasive violence, it must Be persistent violence.
	It must be systemic violence.
	And it must be intended to overthrow the government of the United States, not just obstruct the laws and the rest.
	And it must be something that the military couldn't fix.
	Even though the Kami Pasi Kamitatis Act limits the military.
	But under the insurrection act, he could use that as well to do that.
	This was a separate set section that he used.
	But this is just insanity by these judges who are gaslighting the world to protect Antifa's consistent assaults on only.
	Well, basically, what it does is it basically means that the president, the executive could never deploy the National Guard unless it's specifically requested by the state governor.
	Exactly.
	And he couldn't bring in the military even under the insurrection act, under the logic applied here.
	There are a bunch of people like, oh, don't worry, you can just do the insurrection act.
	Not the logic applies both ways here.
	The logic would also apply to the insurrection act.
	Even though they're supposed to defer more discretion to the president in the insurrection, they're not defording a mini.
	They're not affording.
	They said that none of the uh the declarations of the federal government mattered.
	Wouldn't matter to what the protest group said.
	That was it.
	I mean, it was I was like, you gotta be kidding me.
	The I mean, it's just a joke of a decision based on false facts that the federal court, now four different federal judges have signed on to gaslighting the world about and is attempting to overturn the president's power.
	This is the federal judiciary.
	We have an insurrectionary judiciary, is what we have.
	Well, we said we've got the leader, the leader of the insurrection is wearing black robes.
	Yep.
	No, well, we've seen it from everything.
	Can't fire, can't direct payments, can't control the military, uh, can't reign in crime, can't deport illegals, can't deport criminals.
	Um, it's a it's amazing.
	I've it's I feel like I've taken a very thorough black pill uh suppository over the last two years.
	I say, even since Trump came back in, because you didn't realize how pervasive the problem was among those who actually control the levers of power at the lower levels, which makes it a little harder to get to.
	Okay, so that's the um that was the insurrection one.
	And then we get to the one where they don't get involved, which is with Alex Jones.
	Now, I I didn't want to not jump on it, I just didn't want to overreact catastrophically too early because I wasn't sure if there were any remaining uh remedies.
	Like I like I texted you privately, not privately.
	I texted you, I said, uh, is it possible they didn't want to get involved and in the Connecticut decision because they're awaiting sort of final adjudication on the Texas outcome.
	I'm just trying to think of some silver lining for why they didn't, what door might be left open.
	But uh, like you told me, and you'll explain now, the Connecticut 1.4 billion dollar judgment is is uh rest judica.
	There's there's nothing more that's happening now.
	That that decision and that quantum and that procedure stands and has been ratified by the Supreme Court tuck tailing and running.
	That's the I'm not this I'm not blackpilled.
	That's that's the reality.
	It's now final.
	Now, I wish his lawyers would have raised the constitutional colloquium argument.
	This was an ongoing debate I had with his lawyers throughout different now, these are different group of lawyers, not ones I dealt with at the beginning.
	But they never, I thought they underappreciated that in order to get the Supreme Court's attention, you need to make this beyond Alex Jones and you need to make it about the a big constitutional discrete issue and the colloquium requirement for those that don't remember, it's the second part of the New York Times case.
	Everybody remembers the malice part, they forget this part.
	They said that you have to make a false statement about a specifically identifiable individual.
	And if it's not a specifically, and if it's about a group, the group has to be so small that everybody knows it's about that individual.
	And they completely eviscerated that in the Alex Jones cases.
	They were overturning New York Times in those cases.
	And I wanted them to get focused that point.
	Instead, there tends to be a tendency of Supreme Court advocates to get super technical.
	And they think the best argument is some like six, yeah, yeah, you have to like read it for 33 times to figure out what the argument is.
	Supreme Court's eyes glaze over when they see things like that.
	You got to make it simple, you got to make it straightforward, you got to make it sound as legal and as obvious as possible.
	So I I, you know, the I I thought they, you know, I would have preferred they go a different path, but it is what it is.
	The bottom line is a decision that was a horrendous decision.
	And by the way, but it is a reminder learning lesson to young lawyers out there.
	You're often going to be told water it down, oh, you know, to be polite, be diplomatic, don't upset or offend anybody, make it real technical.
	I have been told this From day one as a law student.
	They're all wrong.
	You go in and scream at him and say you're a rotten SOB, da-da-da-da-da-da.
	You be as dramatic as possible.
	It was the way they described me in the Wesley Snipes case.
	He said, Now, most lawyers come in, Barnes comes in, and the grenades start going off in five seconds.
	That's the only way to get their attention.
	Otherwise, you just can't get their attention.
	There are a bunch of corrupt, lazy hacks who love to go to their little cocktail parties in the Hamptons when they're not vacationing in Europe with their corrupt buddies, like Justice Roberts and Norm Isen like to do, along with others over there in France.
	God knows what they're doing over there.
	You know, just draw your own conclusions.
	But the uh you need to smack them in the face to get their attention.
	That's just a reality.
	And yeah, is it a risky?
	Yeah, but you're otherwise you've got no shot.
	So you go from zero to five percent.
	Yeah, still five percent, it's better than zero.
	So that's just word wise for people out there.
	However, that cannot excuse the inexcusable actions by these rogue courts that have allowed one of the most wayward cases of rogue lawfare in violation and visceration of every First and Fifth Amendment freedom we have, but it's an enforcer of the 14th Amendment against the state of Connecticut.
	Because what Connecticut did here was they denied Alex Jones, based on his out of court speech, the right to even bring a motion to dismiss.
	Then they said, hey, we want you to produce evidence that Jones explained he doesn't have.
	He doesn't have because the theory of the case was always garbage.
	Well, they they were asking people don't remember, and I you were on Alex Jones after I was on on Thursday, I think.
	But you know, they're asking for a detailed breakdown of the profits that you made from reporting on the Sandy Hook stories as if anybody has that.
	Then they were asking for you lost money by talking about Sandy Hook.
	No, yet a couple of things.
	One 99.9% of everything Alex Jones or InfoWars published, printed, or broadcast about Sandy Hook, said Sandy Hook happened.
	The number one complaint Jones had was at the at the you can go back and watch in live time on the night of Sandy Hook what Jones said.
	He said they're gonna blame the gun, and then they'll go out of their, so they'll go out of their way to suppress evidence about SSRI problems, about the psychological treatment of young men, about the lack of security at schools, about the celebration of public violence by the media in these mass shootings, about the celebration of this kind of violence in the gaming in Hollywood culture.
	He goes, That he goes, they're gonna suppress all of that because they're manipulating these young kids to do these horrible things, and they're gonna instead blame the inanimate object.
	And that's what he said, and that put Jones on a target list.
	Uh, he was on a target list for many other reasons, too.
	What Jones has found out, and we'll get to this part a second, what Jones found out since the case about who was orchestrating and organizing.
	We know that it was the FBI, which you know, it also paid dividends to the FBI guy who got 90 million bucks for despite not being named and despite you know not having any family members there that day, 90 million dollars in this Connecticut decision.
	Uh I cut you off.
	Sorry, it was that's where you were going.
	No, exactly.
	So what happened in the court level, or those that don't understand, Jones was sued on novel legal theories that on their very face violated his First Amendment right, rights.
	His first right of speech, his right of expression, his right of assembly, his right of association, and most importantly, his right of free press.
	It also violated the way in which they handled the case, violated his due process rights independent of that.
	So the lawsuit itself violated his rights.
	They had ridiculous theories.
	They they they brought the case in state court, even though it belonged in federal court, because Jones is not a Connecticut resident, but the federal court was too scared to handle it, so would never so kept kicking it back to state court, even though everybody knew it was completely fraudulent, the manner in which they got control in the civil court.
	What does that make it?
	It makes it a violation of his civil rights, including violations by the Connecticut judge.
	The Connecticut judge was complicit in the civil and criminal violations of Alex Jones' rights.
	And an honest DOJ would have that state court judge under criminal investigation, as well as her husband, who has political and financial ties to this, as well as a United States senator who has ties to this, as well as a prominent personal injury law firm that prosecuted the case that is deeply embedded within the Democratic Party political machine.
	And you tie it back further, you find CIA bad faith actors, FBI bad faith actors, DOJ bad faith actors implicated at various points, including tracking and tracing the money and other organized efforts to.
	I mean, Jones was put on a bunch of surveillance, secret surveillance list, secret uh list to limit his ability to fly under certain circumstances, a whole bunch of things.
	He was a the target of the Obama administration that continued under the Biden administration.
	So these cases, bogus on their face, violate his rights on their face, but he's denied to point that out because the court said you've criticized these lawyers outside of court.
	So I'm gonna deny you the right to bring your motion to dismiss any of the claims.
	Then subjected him to fake discovery.
	The claim of a lot of of all these people, and the broad claim against them in the court of public opinion, has been Alex Jones got rich, popularizing the idea Sandy Hook never happened.
	Problem one 99.9% of what Alex Jones in InfoWars published printed and broadcast, said Sandy Hook happened.
	So oops, their whole theory is wrong from the get-go.
	Second, he made no money off of it.
	They knew he know made no money off of it from a whole bunch of their tracking.
	So what did they do?
	How do they get rid of their how do they get their fake case through?
	They pretend he has evidence uh that they know he doesn't have of his guilt.
	Can you imagine?
	I demand you give me evidence of your guilt, but I'm innocent.
	Judge, he did not he won't give me evidence of his guilt.
	Declare him guilty.
	And that's what they did.
	Because he asserted his innocence, they declared him guilty.
	That's how insane this was.
	Complete evisceration of every constitutional right of due process under law.
	And so they were violating his First Amendment rights, but the best way to get that was to violate his Fifth Amendment rights uh through the 14th Amendment and forced through it.
	So the uh then they held a literal show trial in both of these cases, literal show trial, broadcast TV.
	Remember all these courts that don't like a whole bunch of cases to be broadcast.
	They couldn't wait for these cases to be broadcast, in which Jones was not allowed to defend himself on the merits at all.
	Instead, they had they had an FBI guy who had nothing to do with the anybody who died at Sandy Hook, who they got the Connecticut court awarded over a hundred million dollars to.
	It is the most insane verdict in the history of defamation.
	And just to clarify, this is all out of Connecticut.
	This is not yet out of Texas.
	Yeah, it's not even a lunatic Texas.
	They did something similar in Texas, it was just sort of like dialed down a little bit.
	Well, they but they dialed another part up, one part down, the other part up.
	But the HBO film crew that literally the judge walked the red carpet on.
	That's how nuts they were.
	That's how corrupt these judges are, systematically violating Alex Jones' civil rights.
	So he takes it up to the U.S. Supreme Court, and being the bunch of lazy political cowards they are born to be, they refuse to take the case, which means there's no other remedy through that part of the process.
	There might be remedy in the bankruptcy court, maybe not.
	Now, the Justice Department could have made a stand and stepped up.
	Ed Martin was investigating this.
	Ed Martin was finding evidence.
	He's the one President Trump has trust with to investigate all weaponization of the legal system in wrongful ways that violated civil rights, as clearly happened to Alex Jones.
	And was finding evidence of who it was tied to.
	That you know, certain mayor, certain former mayor, billionaire, big media man, Bloomberg tied to it.
	Certain Bill Gates tied to it.
	A bunch of high profile big money actors, Jeff Bezos, tied to it.
	So it implicated some of the most rogue actors in the deep state for whom.
	I mean, this week that they published the number one and number three channels on Rumble.
	And I won't mention the number two channels because that dude's a loser and he chases little people around and animals uh and other things.
	But number one and number three, we're both Alex Jones on Rumble.
	Most watch listen to views.
	That Alex Jones is you can go to you gov. Look, if you don't believe me, go to you.
	Like you can see, they they put that photo of my birthday of Alex Jones because they want they think that's a negative.
	That ain't negative.
	I'm proud and honored to stand with Alex Jones.
	I'm I'm proud of the fact I'm friends with Alex Jones.
	Alex Jones is a great American.
	The uh, and guess who agrees with me?
	Try more than 30 million Americans who have a very favorable view of them.
	Try more people than voted in the Democratic presidential primaries.
	Try the the if you look at any scope, when they covered this case just this week about Alex Jones, It was covered by literally every news station in every news uh in the world, every country in the world had some news station covering the Alex Jones case.
	Robert Alex Jones is the most impactful individual commentator in America today, especially if you care about truth and populist values.
	Now I know the answer to the question, Robert, but who who whitewashed the uh investigation?
	I that's a joke on his last name.
	Who stuck the spokes in the wheels of uh Ed Martin?
	You mean who Blanched it out?
	There you go.
	For those who don't know, Blanche in French is white.
	So the whitewash.
	It was a terrible pun, but yeah.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, these are the white app.
	The uh so you know the so on the eve of the Justice Department joining Alex Jones's submission, which would have got the Supreme Court's attention.
	Uh and on the eve of Ed Martin furthering an investigation into the systematic and systemic violation of Alex Jones's uh case and his civil rights.
	Todd Blanche intervened again.
	Todd Blanche remember is the man who's proud of the Epstein cover-up.
	He orchestrated and organized the Epstein cover up.
	He's the he's still whining to a bunch of people that shows up in the New York Times, his whining about why didn't everybody else join his cover up publicly by retweeting him.
	It's probably because Dan Bongino knows you're full of it, Toddy boy.
	The Todd Blanch, Trump thinks of him as Roy Cohn.
	He's Roy Cohn without balls or brains.
	That's what he is.
	The and so he deliberately intervening, and you know what part of the published excuse was that I've seen in various press that he supposedly said to Ed Martin, uh was alleged to have said to Ed Martin.
	He said, Why would we do this on behalf of some fringe figure?
	Imagine thinking Alex Jones.
	That's like that AI nonsense that thinks I'd be embarrassed by being photographed with Alex Jones when that's one of my proudest photos.
	It's like Todd Blanche doesn't know that Alex arguably but not arguably got Trump elected in 2016.
	Fringe.
	Exactly.
	He has no that's how clueless he is.
	He live if it's not in the New York Times, Todd Blanche doesn't know it exists.
	This is how you get the president and the vice president saying a bunch of really stupid stuff about Ukraine because they listen to the versions of Todd Blanch that are in the Pentagon or in the State Department or the Defense Department.
	And my open advice to them is please, for the love of God, the great skill of JD Vance is that he constantly reaches out to independent sources.
	He needs to keep doing that.
	God bless the president.
	Thank God for Victor Orban because Trump keeps getting his news from Fox and CNN.
	The uh, you know, Vance has the great skill to get around it, but he's gonna have to keep using that skill because otherwise he will get misled by the Todd Blanches of the world on cases like this.
	This is an utter embarrassment.
	They they have do they have no idea how many people they enraged by not doing something about this case, by not even trying to do something about this case?
	Ed Martin gets it because Ed Martin comes from the grassroots of MAGA.
	Todd Blanche has been a lifelong liberal Democrat, registered as such in New York City.
	His dream job was to work for the Sovereign District of New York, one of the most corrupt districts in the country.
	The same district.
	You know who the kind of people he was working with there?
	The James Comey's of the world, who also tutored the sovereign distribution.
	I was gonna say the Jeffrey Epsies of the world, but that might have been a step too far.
	Maybe not.
	Uh the uh so the and so he parlayed that into a big white shoe corporate law firm.
	Trump gets into a bunch of legal trouble, and he suddenly discovers maybe he's mega after all.
	Can you keep writing me those seven-figure checks, Mr. President?
	I want to be from MAGA now.
	And people act like oh, the sincere bold stand.
	Hogwash, where was he on any other case?
	Did he appear for any of the January 6th cases?
	Because I sure don't remember any of them.
	Did he appear in any of the civil rights cases?
	Because I sure don't remember any of them.
	Did he appear in any of the election cases?
	Because I sure don't remember any of them.
	So Mike Davis keeps spinning and brown nosing all you want.
	The BS ain't flying anymore, bro.
	So the uh Todd Blanche will constantly and consistently and continuously be an interference with the ability of the Justice Department to get its job done.
	So he should find what little ambassadorship he wants someplace, some little beach country he loves, ship them off and send him there.
	If that's what you want to reward his loyalty for.
	The uh Blanche, uh the failure to address the horror horrific law fair Against Alex Jones that included inculpating the Justice Department itself is a complete condemnation of the fraud and fake and phony MAGA that is Todd Blanche.
	Well, let me bring it up here.
	Why is Robert blaming Todd Blanche for all the legal chicanery and absolving Donald Trump when Trump is who put Blanche where he is?
	So Todd Blanche has the power to do what he's done.
	Okay.
	Trump doesn't make the best picks all the time.
	Trump looks for loyalty like he looks for leverage and love and all and sometimes in all the wrong places in terms of politics.
	The uh and I think that he look he's looking for a loyalist.
	He thinks Todd Blanche is a loyalist, and he makes the mistake of hiring white shoe guys.
	And he should have learned.
	I mean, did Todd, I did I don't remember anything spectacular about Todd Blanche defending Trump at all during any of those cases.
	Do you?
	No, and I was just looking it up.
	Uh people can probably see when I open up another window, the my glare changes.
	I was trying to see what he did in Jan 6.
	And I know other than representing Trump on a few motions in the in the uh No, nothing.
	But um but the bottom line he got a big fat check and then weaseled his way into the Justice Department, and he was trying, he's trying to become the attorney general, by the way.
	If Pam Bonnie wants to know who leaks the most negative information about her, she should look to her number two.
	Very interesting.
	Oh, by the way, uh Ben Dura is great.
	The the the cutting boards communities amazing sold out in one afternoon.
	I might need to step up production.
	Thanks again.
	I'll be back soon.
	Um why isn't Press Trump exonerating those rogue judges and directing A.G. Bondi to hold congressional hearings?
	Jefferson wrote the question whether the judges are invested with exclusive authority to decide on the constitutionality of law has been there, has been heretofore a subject of consideration with me in the exercise of official duties.
	Certainly, there is not a word in the constitution which has given that power to them more than to the executive or legislative branches from Rustang.
	Absolutely.
	It was the old Marbury versus Madison.
	The uh, but the other case the Supreme Court better take up, though Amy Coney Barrett failed to issue an immediate stay like she should have, probably because she saw her friend Saint Eve was on the panel, is my strong suspicion, is the National Guard in Chicago.
	And so we'll see.
	Hopefully, they take that up.
	Because you look at the plain language of the law, it fits what President Trump has the power and right to do and is the history to do so.
	But no, no greater embarrassment than the Supreme Court not taking the Alex Jones case, and no greater uh uh the uh scandal uh in in the Justice Department, other than the Epstein case that uh doesn't uh that than the Alex Jones mishandling of the case uh by Todd Blanche.
	Robert, uh, if you can't see this, it says Nick Frentis is greater than Robert Barnes.
	I that has to be a joke.
	It has to be a joke.
	We've seen life of Brian.
	Well, the Fuentes fans always love that love to flood in.
	I mean, the the the furry fan, the uh, you know, the uh all you can say is Israel and Mossad loves the fact that Nick Fuentes is popular in America.
	That's all I'll put all that's how I'll put it.
	Uh let me bring this up here, get to a few more, and then we're gonna get on to the next subject.
	But uh I want to I'm falling far behind with this.
	Okay, have a good birthday.
	If Donald John Trump doesn't normalize relations with Russia, I'm gonna be very angry with him and dump the dictator, says Mick Futz.
	Uh Trump is too gosh darn flaky.
	That's his biggest problem right now.
	Plant nerd, I got that one.
	Las Vegas reporting, I think I got okay.
	So I did get all these.
	We can go back down to the bottom.
	Robert, what do we have left?
	So we have Dr. Bowden, the indictment of Antifa, Pentagon's media rules, JFK Russia files, you uh the Washington loss on the first amendment, and the Texas takeover.
	Let's um Oh, and the Charlie Kirk visas was something that people asked uh to talk about too.
	Oh, yeah.
	Well, okay, so let's let's uh well, what do we start with?
	Let's start with um uh Robert Pickett.
	Oh, but Bowden, Dr. Bowden.
	Okay, so but Bowden was the one who got disciplined for uh prescribing Ivermectin and the other uh uh no-nos during COVID.
	What recently has happened to her?
	So the Texas Medical Board this past week, while locking out the lawyers who are supposed to be allowed into the presentation, made their determination issue a public reprimand.
	Uh, what was this public reprimand based on?
	That Dr. Bowden, following the directions and advice uh of her the and the desires of her patient, a man who is in critical condition from COVID-19 complications, wanting and needing Ivermectin, That in reviewing the situation determined that was appropriate for him, that it was on the cusp of death, wanted to give it to him.
	So who is stopping it then?
	You might say.
	Patient wants it, doctor wants it.
	Well, why isn't that they getting it?
	Because of the corruption of our hospitals.
	And the and they are protected.
	The big corruption at big hospitals and the corruption at big pharma is covered and protected by the state government medical boards, even in these conservative states.
	Because nothing gets Governor Abbott quickly moving in his wheelchair than a big pile of cash.
	He sees that cash.
	He's like, whoo, I gotta get going.
	Woo!
	I'm gonna win the race today.
	The uh the political handicap race.
	So he's but a whole bunch of people on there that have no business on there that love foreigners coming in and flooding our medical system, uh, including providing medical care.
	Good luck with that Pakistani doctor the next time you're at the table.
	You know what I mean?
	Uh there's nobody who goes, always tell people you wouldn't hire a lawyer, you wouldn't hire a doctor in the local, you know, low low budget strip mall.
	Probably don't hire your lawyer there either.
	Just saying, you know, Donald Trump could take that advice now.
	Uh, but that doesn't mean you go to the white shoe firms either.
	So the this uh this person is in severe medical condition, needs iramectin, wants ivermectin.
	The the his wife has to sue, though, to get it.
	So Sue's in court saying the hospital won't allow him to get ivermectin.
	Instead, what do you think the hospital is trying to give him?
	Remnus of it.
	I was just looking up.
	Who was it that I was looking up for the pharmacies that that prevented outlawed pharmacies from issuing prescriptions?
	And it's all of the licensing bodies that do this the AMA, the AAPHA.
	And so, and remdesivir causes uh kidney failure, it causes organ failure, it causes uh a death in something like 20% of the people they administered.
	Even though back when I was working and did a little show during COVID for Alex Jones, I predicted that they would pitch and push Remnus Vere before anybody else.
	Why?
	Because Anthony Fauci's POWs were gonna make huge money on it.
	And I saw who it was connected to at Duke, how is connected at Fauci, who was gonna get rich, and I said, watch.
	They're gonna say Remnisphere is the only good use.
	And here's the key to all the bad health protocol.
	The second thing, guess what they did?
	Ventilate him, ventilate, ventilate, ventilate, ventilate, which we now know the ventilation will increase your risk of death, didn't reduce it.
	Now you can't ask AI that because AI suppresses all of that information.
	I even asked him, I was like, give me the alternative perspective, the children's health defense perspective.
	Guess what they told me?
	They lectured me on how children's health defense is evil.
	AI, honest independent AI, right?
	This does you have what crap AI is.
	It's propaganda times 10.
	People who watch and use AI, they actually literally get dumber.
	This has been this has been studied over the last year.
	Rogan was talking about it with whatever doctor it was, and it's talking about the use it or lose it genes of intellect and your brain.
	Whereas if you don't use them like muscles, they will atrophy and and and you and they will not produce again.
	And it was a it is absolutely amazing.
	It's creating idiocracy.
	It's creating idiocracy.
	Well, we watched that movie, the uh uh for you know one of our Saturday movie nights.
	So Dr. Bowden's just trying to save his life, do it and honor his wishes and follow good medical practice.
	Ivermectin, one of the most successful drugs, miracle drug known to man, saved hundreds of millions of people's lives over a hundred years.
	This is now belatedly acknowledged by detailed studies, but not the official narrative.
	So the the the wife goes to court, sues, gets the judge to issue an order because how is a hospital stopping a patient from getting a prescription that has been prescribed by the patient's doctor?
	How the heck is that happening?
	The way it's happening is credentials.
	They love their credentials.
	Credentials are like licensures on steroids for abusing power.
	And so they said, Oh, you'll not credentialed this particular hospital.
	So we've got to murder your patient instead, if you don't mind.
	Grants an injunction to require them to credential her so she can do it.
	That's what she's operating under when she's trying to get the Ivermectin to him.
	Later on, an appellate court will reverse that.
	He ends up dying because he doesn't get the medical care that he needed from the hospital, because I think the hospital helped murder him, in my opinion.
	So what does the Texas Medical board do about this.
	Suddenly, how are they even involved?
	The patient isn't complaining.
	The doctor isn't complaining.
	It's not clear anybody is complaining.
	But Dr. Bowden started to become one of the most outspoken critics of COVID policy and protocol and of the misuse and abuse of power by hospitals and the medical establishment in the COVID context.
	She is literally going around saving thousands and thousands and thousands of lives.
	One of the great life saver of the of our medical profession in the last half century.
	And what does she get for this extraordinary effort?
	There was a doctor up.
	No, there was an investigator up in Canada, a Dr. Helen Grooves, who was investigating sudden infant death syndromes post-COVID jab and went and investigated, just asked the questions as to whether or not there was proximity, contemporaneous proximity to the jab and the SIDS.
	And they didn't like her asking those questions, and they sanctioned her, reprimanded her.
	I think they fired her, and I think it was upheld by the courts.
	That's what the nature of this was.
	So the Ted Texas Medical Board, which is out to protect corrupt medical institutions in the state of Texas, and to be an enforcer of a speech code on doctors using licensure disciplinary power as their pretext and their fig leaf.
	Now they had big problems.
	She did nothing wrong.
	No competent, capable expert would say she did anything wrong.
	The patient was thrilled that she tried to help at all.
	So who's gonna complain?
	They can't they couldn't show that she did anything wrong, couldn't that?
	No negative consequence at all came from what she was trying to do.
	It came from what the hospital was trying to do.
	So how in the world do they have authority to investigate at all?
	How does this case even become a case?
	And so just out of the blue, they developed this case.
	She has to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars defending herself.
	And then they go through this bogus routine where they mostly lie and misrepresent the facts and lie and misrepresent the history.
	Imagine this Texas medical board person saying, Oh no, no, I'll stossy investigator, fully approved of these bogus statement of facts.
	So this Orwellian order must stand and think that's something to defend on, something to stand on.
	That's how nuts one is some of these guys were.
	So the I don't know whether they're going to conduct another hearing or not because this hearing violated her due process rights.
	I wasn't able to get in.
	We were told we were going to be able to get in.
	None of the lawyers were able to get in.
	The uh, and on, but what's coming one way or the other is not only appellate uh and court challenges to this medical board action, but is going to be constitutional challenges to the rogue misuse and abuse of power by these medical licensure boards in the First Amendment, Fifth Amendment, and is applied through the 14th Amendment context.
	This case, uh, various people have helped provide some financial support for it so that 1776 Law Center uh is gonna be taking on Dr. Bowden's case and assisting in both the civil rights aspect and the any uh further court review and judicial review of this rogue action and looking at broader legislative reforms and remedies because right along with Brooke Jackson, Dr. Bowden is one of the heroes of the disastrous time period of COVID in America.
	I'm just gonna do this.
	I'm gonna give everyone the P.O. box if they want to do send anything.
	I was gonna bring up something which was the reason why I was doing that.
	Bringing up oh, the backdrop.
	Yes, I was gonna bring up some more uh tip questions over on Viva Barnes Law.locals.com.
	Chasson says, Viva respectfully, I appreciate you cannot read all the rants locals, paper comments for the third week in a row.
	I want to ask something, Robert, and you read the preface and skip the part that is my question.
	He has me blocked on X, so this is my only place I can ask him questions.
	Am I not asking the right way?
	Let me know and if I should bother.
	Well, tip I okay.
	I'll go up and look.
	Block Grok and your X feed will improve dramatically.
	Interesting.
	We've got Andrew Piscadlo, another assassination attempt catching a tree stand is not a success.
	This is a gross failure.
	Get Bon Gino out of the deputy.
	What he's referencing is they found a stand right across from where the president lands at Palm Beach Airport.
	Shuts when it was in a place as a hunter stand that's in a place where there's no no nothing because of FAA because of the proximity of the airport, they're not allowed to have hunting in there.
	So somebody was setting up a sniper's nest to murder take another Shot at the president.
	I'm trying to find Francis Chaton.
	Trump is great.
	Okay, so it's not that one, Francis.
	The problem is if you put in multiple ones, Grok's things, China's the greatest show.
	Okay.
	Yeah, we read that one.
	Yeah, no, I'm just gonna go see where Bender is great.
	Um, all right, uh, I'll find it.
	Um, did I miss this one?
	Is there any possibility that oh that we we read that one?
	F Chatham.
	Okay, is this about how about Canada declares we own everything indigenous?
	Okay, every penny we get go I read that one going up, Shitoshi Ape, DTQC.
	I didn't see anything.
	Yeah, we read them up.
	Well, let me go to let me go over to Rumble.
	We're gonna take the party.
	That's probably why he's that's probably why he's blocked on the uh the uh you get stuff wrong.
	Keep trying, Shotron.
	Uh I'm a little skeptical of your last name.
	Sounds a little Frenchy to me, but that's okay.
	I'll give you a second shot.
	Please make Alex Jones Rant standal.
	Oh, I will do that.
	Decimal Thread says the statements made by Alex are nowhere near as close to the egregious as to what MSM doesn't say.
	Randy Edwards says, trying to understand why everyone is so angry at my family.
	We kings trace our ancestors either to John Quincy Adams and Merwither Lewis.
	First amendment is a limit on Congress.
	It is not a limit on states.
	50 of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
	A little thing called the civil war.
	Resolve that, my friend.
	Says 50 to the 50 states declare their rights come from Christian God, doing so nearly 200 times combined.
	Super buff shaft.
	I remember that name.
	The 2021 Arizona Forensic Audit Joe Van Pulitzer's Cyber Ninjas did is the biggest best case to take to the Supreme Court.
	It should be led.
	It should lead many in both parties into jail.
	Talk to Joanne and get it started.
	I'm going to screenshot this.
	Never put salt in your eyes.
	Never put salt in your eyes.
	Put salt in your eyes.
	Anyone who watches kids in the hall will get that one.
	And Sidloy says, People are so freaking.
	I ran into an acquaintance on Shabbat.
	Her second COVID jab gave her severe pain, followed by permanent blindness.
	Naturally, she still had her third.
	And Sidloy, I know you're in Montreal.
	You're in Canada.
	I don't know if you're in Montreal, but I know you're in Canada based on that.
	Okay, let's take the party over to Viva Barnes Law.locals.com.
	But finish Robert Wise attempted a conspiracy to take over an entire Texas county that happens to be very oh rich.
	We've got Washington getting knocked down on its first amendment violations.
	We've got an Antifa indictment.
	What is all this stuff about Pentagon press rules?
	Charlie Kirk's visa controversy.
	And uh I think that's it.
	Oh, in the JFK Russia files.
	Uh what we're going to do, uh, was gonna say one thing first.
	Hold on.
	What was I gonna say?
	Forget it.
	We're going over locals.
	Uh, I'm gonna give everybody the link.
	We're gonna see who we raid.
	Uh, here's the link for everybody.
	Come on over to Viva Barnes Law.locus.
	Robert, what do you have on this week?
	For so on Monday, we'll be live with Richard Bears on what are the odds?
	We will review what are your best options for the upcoming elections in Bolivia, Netherlands, Argentina, New Jersey, Virginia, and New York City.
	Looking at the prediction, prediction markets and a few other uh inquiries.
	We'll have a Barnes brief on Monday.
	Then we'll have an open discussion and debate.
	Well, Barnes briefs on Monday, Wednesday, Friday.
	Open discussion on different topics.
	Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday, uh, where the whole board contributes, and we really get crowdsourced accurate intel and information.
	Uh and then Bourbons, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday.
	And then next week, uh, we will not have a show on Sunday.
	We will have it on Monday.
	And also a special edition show on Monday.
	The one and only Brent Johnson of the dollar milkshake theory.
	Uh, can explain what the heck's going on in China, Argentina, Colombia, all these other countries.
	What's gonna happen?
	Is our financial system gonna collapse?
	Are we gonna surge?
	What does all this mean?
	Oh, he's one of the top independent experts in the world.
	And he'll be alive on sidebar.
	We're gonna do that this week, but Vivo's like, oh, I'm busy traveling.
	Yeah, I gotta go to Switzerland, Robert.
	Go to Lugano.
	Yeah, Lugorno, maybe Zurich.
	I go to Disney.
	It's not that I I know like everyone loves staying home and and and being with their family.
	Um, I've I've never been to Switzerland.
	Yeah, the a lot of people be like, hey, I get to go to Legano, Switzerland.
	You're like, ah, dang, I'm gonna gotta go to Lagano Switzerland.
	I'm go, it's gonna be amazing.
	I'm going with Rumble.
	So the entire week's schedule is gonna be off, and I come back on Sunday, so it's gonna be tough.
	Here, Robert.
	Grok thinks China is the greatest country on earth.
	Winston, the China show, almost lost his mind arguing with Grok.
	Oh, yeah, that was that was great.
	That was great.
	Speaking of Winston, oh yeah, you sound very impressive.
	Speaking of Winston, oh, you're little bastard.
	Oh, what do you say?
	That's right.
	You kiss my face.
	Uh, all right, so now we're gonna go.
	Oh, so that's it.
	So my schedule is gonna be off as of Tuesday.
	I'm gonna try to pre-record something tomorrow and then maybe launch it Tuesday.
	It's gonna be uh, oh god, uh A red eye.
	Tuesday night to Wednesday morning.
	Then there's something on Thursday.
	And then that's going to be plan B. I get to.
	Am I allowed to say it?
	I'm interviewing the Prince of Serbia among other interesting people.
	I'm going to host a panel of discussion with Chris Pavlovsky.
	And then like uh Denmark or Norway or Finland.
	Well, what would Prince is it that's been accused of like systematically raping half the women he met?
	I uh have no idea.
	I was like, man, he's like an honorary principal.
	No King's Rally, Robert and no princess, no Prince of England.
	All right, so anyways, it's gonna be a good week, so stay tuned, but the whole week's gonna be off.
	Okay, now we're oh, I gotta raid.
	That's right.
	We gotta raid.
	Who is uh here?
	We're gonna go raid the Mel K. Are we gonna get in trouble if I do this?
	I don't know who I'm doing who Mel K and Mike L is.
	The Tylenol piece.
	Yeah, well, we'll we'll do it.
	Um I don't know who they are.
	If it's not uh if you don't like it, I apologize.
	I think I've been on Mel K show before.
	Yeah, I think I I'm getting mixed up between um wait a minute, hold on.
	Mel K. I belong my channel.
	I know who she's I thought I I think she I have, she's the village crazy lady.
	Isn't that her uh Twitter handle?
	So we know that that's what did I just do?
	Did I just go raid in there?
	No, so I obviously did not.
	It's forward slash raid and then link.
	Okay, here we go.
	Confirm raid.
	You're all gonna go over there, come over to viva barns law.locals.com, viva fry merch if you want to get some and uh Louis the Lobster.
	See that last the last chat was roll damn tide.
	Ah, you sick SOB.
	Oh, I didn't I didn't see that.
	Hold on, let me see here.
	I just hit raid.
	Oh, please make no, okay.
	I didn't say that.
	Oh, in our locals community.
	Hold on, hold on, down, down.
	Uh I'll have to refresh.
	I think about it on that.
	Okay.
	That uh went down and bragged about how he poisoned Tumor's corner and named all his kids after Alabama thing, and he just he was completely funny and crazy at the same time.
	Is the Las Vegas meetup planned?
	By the way, didn't answer the super chat question on YouTube.
	So go to the locals page and you'll see that uh uh that the a certain guest is in town in Vegas.
	Uh and that you can uh uh uh meet him in person and we're we're trying to get something arranged for uh either at or after that event.
	Oh, here we go.
	Now I see the roll tide, baby.
	I I don't even know what it means, but uh here we go.
	Viva.
	Oh, the channel I got that one.
	And okay, Barnes, gotta say it.
	Roll tide, baby.
	Smoke them if you got him.
	What is after the Alabama Tennessee game?
	The winners smoke a cigar.
	Okay.
	Now, what do we have left for the show?
	Uh things here.
	Well, what's the takeover of Texas?
	Not what I know that I didn't get to.
	Oh, that that's that crazy guy that was trying to take over a whole county because it's oil rich.
	And he and he was at all these scams to take it over.
	And Paxon had a suit to try to stop him from taking over the county.
	Like, because the county has like 60 people in it.
	So he thought he could raid the county and get make himself elected sheriff, mayor, king, all the rest.
	That's so it's a crazy, it's just a crazy case.
	The uh, but we got Antifa indicted.
	We've got what's all this about the Pentagon media rule.
	We got JFK Russia files.
	Who did Russia finger as the criminal culprit from the get-go?
	Uh with the Washington loses their effort to suppress religious rights.
	Uh, and the controversy over the Charlie Kirk visas.
	Okay, so let's start with the controversy over Charlie Kirk visas.
	They want to revoke or are we still on Rumble, by the way?
	Uh uh, I don't think we are.
	Oh, we are.
	I'm an idiot.
	I gotta we're updating people.
	Get over to Viva Barnes Law Dot Locals.com.
	That includes you, uh, commie tube.
	Uh I got oh, I've been making out with my dog for the whole world.
	Why I'm so embarrassed.
	Um, yeah, uh, make sure you subscribe before you leave.
	Uh before you don't come if you're not coming over, subscribe.
	Subscribe by the way.
	As Cardman will like to say, like, share, subscribe.
	Because it helps him, because it makes you feel good.
	Do it, people.
	And now we're updating.
	And we're hold on.
	I just gotta go make sure that did we raid?
	Okay, so Viva Raid Boo.
	Yeah.
	There you go.
	All right, now I'm updating.
	I'm an idiot.
	I thought I did it already.
	Uh everyone, see you later.

▲