Viva & Barnes - Ep. 286: Letitia James INDICTED! Bolton in Trouble! Senate Being Spied On! Gaza Ceasefire & MORE!

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 12, 2025 - Viva & Barnes

02:14:08

Ep. 286: Letitia James INDICTED! Bolton in Trouble! Senate Being Spied On! Gaza Ceasefire & MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Ladies and gentlemen, you can notice that I'm using Stream Yard tonight for no particular reason.
	So I can't quite do the voiceover audibly.
	So you have to look at me as I look into the mic and do the intro over voice for today's video.
	The update in the ostrich bomb standoff has entered its third or fourth week.
	I don't quite know.
	It's Canadian Thanksgiving.
	And Chris Dacey is on the ground reporting.
	And he is what he reported yesterday.
	Just look at the face of the RCMP, gleefully following orders.
	Behold.
	There goes a very unhappy Mike Rude.
	As RCMP shift change seems to be happening.
	I've got a lot to say about what just happened to Mike Rude at the Royal Canadian Legion as the RCMP liaison officers were sitting there.
	And an Air Force veteran was denied access with a service dog.
	I'm not happy.
	Not happy at all.
	Look at this nonsense.
	Unbelievable.
	Hey guys.
	So I don't know.
	One, two, three, you count, and one, two, three, four, five.
	Multiple officers per vehicle.
	Count them.
	A bunch down the road still.
	Hey guys, welcome.
	Welcome.
	Welcome.
	We need to talk to your liaisons when you're done.
	It's just, it's just more the same.
	This is what's going on in Canada.
	Bear in mind, uh, a small child went missing.
	I don't know uh what the status is on that child.
	Had they dedicated the resources to finding a lost Canadian boy that they've dedicated to this outrageous, insane standoff.
	Uh they who knows, they might have found that kid.
	One car after the next.
	What I love is I you know, I mean, I'm don't want to you know put anyone on blast just because you happen to look at the look at this guy here.
	This guy's like, yeah, don't make me just follow orders on your ass, is what he's thinking.
	Bulletproof vest, baton, guns.
	How many are there?
	There's got one.
	Let's see when we get back here.
	One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, and more coming.
	Do you know what this entire debacle must have cost?
	And you know, for what?
	What's up?
	Thank you very much.
	For what there hasn't been a ruling from the Supreme Court yet.
	Apparently, it's not quite, it's not on the docket for what they're announcing to report next week, from what I understand.
	So there might not be a uh a ruling on the what is it called?
	Not cert, but you know, petition to get to the Supreme Court.
	So we might have another week of this standoff.
	One cop after the next, overtime in Edgewood, British Columbia, squandering your tax dollars so they can terrorize the taxpayers.
	Period.
	The irony is that from what I understand, Pierre Polyev might have said something just recently, a little more forceful than uh his mouse fart silence over the last little while.
	After allegedly, apparently Trump mentioned something to Mark J. Carney at a meeting at the White House after allegedly, this is all sort of rumorings, and I hope to everything that's holy, it's true.
	Uh, after RFK Jr. told Trump, don't forget about the ostriches.
	So, no news.
	It's just it's entering its fourth week right now.
	It's Canadian Thanksgiving, and I know that the farm, Katie, her mom are giving thanks that the ostriches that the ostriches are still alive, and we're just waiting for news.
	Just sit and wait and make a whole hell of a lot of noise in the interim.
	Chris Dacey, I sent everyone the link to the tweet.
	He's doing great work up there.
	Drea Humphrey from Rebel News is doing amazing work.
	Uh Gun Reed is up there.
	Levant is, I mean, the whole team from Rebel is up there.
	They're doing great work.
	And so that's that.
	That was just I wanted to give you the intro update as to what's going on in Edgewood, British Columbia, and we'll see what happens next week.
	But it looks like more of the same, they're still trying to build their kill pen where they can slaughter these ostriches.
	Imagine it's like it's such a it's such a health crisis emergency.
	It's now been a month of a standoff on the basis that they need to slaughter these birds because they pose a public health risk.
	Cops coming in and out walking around, you know, breathing the air.
	But when they decide to go closer, when they want to make the show, then CFIA's got to get their hazmat suits on.
	So don't don't add, I see where's Doug?
	I'm not sure if they're talking about Doug Ford.
	Don't ask where any Canadian politician is.
	They are all in this together.
	Remember that that clip from back in COVID.
	We're all in this together.
	No, they're all in it together.
	They're ivory towers, the political elites.
	They're all in it together.
	Agenda 2030, passing Bill C2, Bill C8, more censorship, more egregious government powers to rifle through your mail, cut you off of the internet, search your mobile devices with no court order.
	Just more of the same, step by step to 2030.
	What month?
	What years it now?
	We're going to head into 2020.
	Are we going into 2026?
	Holy hell.
	So that's that.
	Viva, never forget it when the RCMP kidnapping children to send them to residential schools.
	Oh, then you get this is like it's just amazing.
	It's just, it's just amazing.
	Just following orders.
	They're just, they're just enabling government tyranny.
	And the look that that guy shoots, Mike Dacey.
	Like, don't record me, little man.
	To protect and to serve my ass.
	It's like, you are a lowly pleb, and how dare you.
	And maybe he's embarrassed.
	Maybe he's humiliated to be doing what he's doing.
	It depends, depends on what you want to think of.
	Just following orders or get away from me.
	Or I don't want to be doing this, but I'm still doing it anyhow because I've got a wife and kid at home.
	And that's how it works.
	Nobody wants to stand up.
	And as a result, everybody suffers.
	All right, people, David Frye, Viva Fry, former Montreal Litigator turned current Florida Rumbler Sunday night show with Robert Barnes.
	It's the bestest law show on the interwebs, if I dare say so myself.
	Uh, we have our sponsor of the evening tonight, which is the wellness company, which is doing great work as well, has been since COVID.
	And what do we have tonight?
	It's flu season, people.
	It's amazing.
	I'll tell you after my wife goes back to Canada just for like three days.
	They all get colds, their lips get dry, whatever.
	It's flu season, which means it's also flu shot season.
	After after everything we've been through over the last five years, the number of people getting flu shots is at a record low.
	Not to mention the fact that according to the CDC's own data, the flu shot is only moderately effective at best, and that's not even accounting for vaccine injuries.
	There's a much better way to stay healthy.
	Grab contagion emergency kit from the wellness company.
	If you wake up with a sore throat or a runny nose, address your symptoms immediately with doctor prescribed kit containing ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, generic tamifluid, generic Z pack, and much more.
	It's like having an urgent care kit in your own home.
	Avoid the emergency lines.
	Avoid the hospitals.
	We're going to talk about something in a second uh going on in Canada.
	You can just treat your symptoms at home without having to go to those filthy, disgusting hospitals.
	And if you're in Canada, Lord knows how long you'll be waiting.
	The kit is literally a lifesaver with thousands of reviews from people just like you and me who had their kit ready in time.
	Go over to TWC.health forward slash Viva.
	Use code Viva to save 32 bucks off.
	Get it before the flu season really kicks in.
	twc.health forward slash Viva for 32 bucks off and an additional 10%.
	And this is not medical advice.
	I'm not giving you any medical advice.
	Yada yada yada.
	You consult with a doctor.
	Uh, yeah, and you know, all the disclaimers.
	But uh check it out.
	It's amazing stuff, and the link is in the description.
	Speaking of what's going on in Canada, people.
	I just I got my friend up in Canada.
	Chet, thank you very much for all of the amazing uh miserable news you send me consistently out of Canada.
	It's free health care, people.
	It's free healthcare.
	This is un this is unbelievable.
	This is out of CBC News.
	Saskatoon man undergoes invasive medical procedures in a hospital hallway due to overcapacity.
	Overcapacity, understaffing, who the hell knows?
	Overcapacity, does it have anything to do with the five million immigrants that they've let in in the last five years that they can barely care for their own citizens?
	Open up your borders to four.
	Okay, who knows?
	It's unbelievable what he had.
	He had a he suffered a stroke.
	He was confused, a bunch of headaches.
	Uh, he had medical procedures done to diagnose what the problem was, including a plasma replacement that required a tubing, a tube being placed in his jugular vein in the hallways of the hospital.
	According to his family, the technician was quote, visibly concerned about doing this procedure, which takes approximately three to four hours in that space.
	Boxes full of plasma, sitting on the floor, had to be moved so others could get by.
	The family wrote in their accounts of it.
	Treatment was critical in his recovery of encephalitis, inflaming of the brain uh thing that wraps around the brain.
	But uh you wonder, I talked about this actually earlier last week.
	More than 153,000 people harmed in Canada's hospitals last year alone.
	Study finds.
	Jeez, I wonder why.
	Maybe it's because they're performing very serious procedures in the freaking hallways.
	You get CD fe seal when you go under the knife.
	You get sick if you are admitted to the hospital.
	You die in the hallways if you don't get a hospital.
	Uh uh, get a bed if you can find a doctor.
	Go check out the wait lines online.
	Nine hours, 15 hours routine.
	And then they treat you in the middle of the hall and they wonder why you get infections, why people are dying in ERs.
	But it's free, everybody.
	It's free.
	At least it's free healthcare, right?
	Such a such a model that America should build on.
	It's free, except you've already paid 25 to 50% of it up front in your taxes.
	All right, Robert's in the backdrop.
	I forgot that it doesn't pop in automatically uh on StreamYard.
	Robert, I'm bringing you in.
	Uh oh, hold on.
	Does he see me?
	Oh, this is gonna be so embarrassing.
	I'm joking.
	Robert, sir, how goes the battle?
	Good, good.
	Robert, I mean uh okay.
	Okay, and also if I look a little tense, it's because I'm solo parenting this week.
	The amount of time I spend on every given day cleaning up dog pee and dog poo.
	Winston is worse than Pudge now.
	He just he just unleashes on the floor.
	And then and then like the kids, they just go around, they open things, and they leave them up.
	And I know what it's parenting, and you got to teach them.
	Milk just left out.
	Then I say it, but then I leave the crema.
	So I've been going around cleaning up after dogs, cleaning up after kids, trying to exercise, trying to have fun, and uh trying to prepare for the show, which I did, Robert.
	We've got a banger of a show tonight.
	Yes, indeed.
	Uh you know what week it is, Viva.
	Um, Canadian Thanksgiving.
	No, it's the third weekend in October.
	Uh, do you know what that means as a March Madness?
	Football, baseball.
	Uh, it does involve football, yes.
	Uh uh I might have some insignia that might be a clue.
	Oh, it's um Texas AM.
	Ah, that's that that's almost sinful.
	Uh it's the uh third weekend in October means it's Tennessee, Alabama.
	Uh, the uh big uh top 10 matchup in college football.
	The uh uh there's a you there's someone who used to post that uh gotta find it.
	Uh every year he would add 10 new reasons why he hated the whole state of Alabama, and he was up to like 323 reasons to hate the whole state of Alabama.
	Uh, which goes back to uh one of college football's uh great rivalries.
	So Robert, you know how long I would have been guessing.
	I think it would have been all night long.
	I would have been oh, how did you pan out?
	Uh I was eight for 12 yesterday, but I was wrong on the main event, which is kind of upsetting.
	Ah, yeah.
	Well, uh that's no better than average.
	So the uh the up pretty good on uh UFC picks.
	I should have gone with the home team Oliveira.
	I thought I thought what's his name?
	Uh now I'm forgetting his name.
	Oh, for goodness.
	Uh, whatever.
	I thought the guy coming from Eastern Europe was gonna kick some ass, but all right, Robert, what do you got on?
	So you so hold on.
	So you're into the Texas um Tennessee, Tennessee football match.
	Yeah, real orange.
	No, no, no, not the uh you know, Texas wouldn't exist without Tennesseans.
	So the uh true fact, historically proven the not a Candace Owens fact, right?
	Who doesn't know the difference between universal time kept by airplanes and Utah time?
	Can you imagine?
	If people still take her seriously, it's unbelievable.
	So we were asking why why do you post this uh stuff because they released all the Candace Cultists coming in attacking?
	It's so I can purge the lunatics.
	Speaking of lunatics, I don't know if you saw the tweet from John Cullen.
	I didn't, I don't want to get you involved.
	Did you see the tweet from John Cullen?
	Is it hasn't he also gone nuts on this?
	Well, uh uh I won't even show it right now.
	I'll I'll send it.
	I'll I'll DM it to you so you can decide whether or not you want to bring Isaac.
	I thought John Cullen was, you know, he had a reputation during COVID.
	Uh the tweet that he put out about you, bona fide psychotic.
	And like I was like, bona fide psychotic.
	I'm surprised it's still up on Twitter because you know, some might say it's sort of a call to not good behavior, but uh batshit crazy over over this um over the Charlie Kirk that apparently you're not buying into the conspiracy theories with the degree of fervor required in order to maintain your credibility.
	It was crazy, Robert.
	I'll I'll flip it to you privately now and you can it's the same people who went down the QAnon rabbit hole, same People who went down the Dominion rabbit hole that uh were very useful patsies for the real crime.
	What you have is a very dangerous, violent Trantifa movement that I think has you know, the indie at least forensic fingerprints of some degree of MK Ultra type project at radicalizing a large group of youth, convincing them their gender isn't their gender,
	uh, and that is now escalated into violence, so much so that you have a Democratic attorney general candidate who's still leading in Virginia, who the Democratic Party won't call to withdraw, who wanted who was cheerleading the murder of his political opponents and his and his political opponents' children.
	I mean, that's how insane that was.
	And yet, the Democratic Party won't denounce it, but all the canist cultists are too busy saying, no, no, don't look over there.
	Look instead at the Egyptian flight pattern with the uh foreign spy plane combined with the secret push gun with secret with a hidden door, all the other lunatic nonsense.
	They are doing the deep states bidding once again, unwitting.
	Uh, that's why they call them useful idiots, folks.
	And the standard bearer is Queen Candace herself.
	Well, the the what's crazy is that I look, I say crazy.
	I am very open-minded to any conspiracy theory.
	Because I don't even use that in the in the derogatory way, but now they're there it's there's historical revisionism where now they're saying multiple people reported hearing two shots that day.
	And like really false, belied by the thing is like I I was I was live when this happened 45 minutes afterwards, and I watched that entire hour and a half live stream.
	Uh nobody was I like I feel like I'm going crazy.
	Was anybody credibly saying they heard two shots that day?
	No, there's only one shot.
	There was only one shot.
	Came from the front, the and came at such an angle that that explains most likely when we get the uh ammunition description the exactly how the injury and the wound occurred.
	So the uh the the evidence uh there's a good channel called Gray Hughes investigates, old school forensic investigator, and all he's done is followed this the lead.
	And he's pointed out this is the most open and shut, clear cut case ever.
	Those people who don't think Tyler Robinson did it have to believe Tyler Robinson is in on it, Tyler Robinson's partner is in on it, Tyler Robinson's mom is in on it, Tyler Robinson's dad is in on it, all the video evidence is fake, all the forensic evidence is fake, everything's fake except the fantasy land.
	Uh except for Candace Owens' dreams, because that that's she that's her other key source of evidence.
	When she's not getting basic time stamps wrong, uh, she's telling you she had dreams, and these dreams tell you where to go.
	The it's it's a joke, it's a disgrace.
	Uh the uh and it's it's done to facilitate and enable the continued protection of the Trantifa violent cult.
	Let me look at people are going to accuse me of being uh a Candace shill at to defend Candace.
	Her dream was that she had a dream, and I have no doubt that she did.
	We dream, I'm I'm sure she did because we we talk about stuff all day long.
	I I dream about Justin Trudeau, not in good ways that she dreamed that some you know that Charlie said he had been betrayed.
	I have no doubt he had been betrayed.
	I could make the argument okay, they should have had better security, they shouldn't have done it in an open area after Butler.
	Uh, but that he was betrayed.
	If anybody wants to espouse a conspiracy theory and you want to implicate Israel, go ahead.
	The way to do it, and I can steal man the argument, masad or entail Israeli intelligence, infiltrated a group of furry trans uh weirdos and brainwashed them to do it, use them as their patsies, much like the FBI infiltrated the the the vacuum house where they got the the Whitmer kidnappers.
	It's not to say that the Gretchen Whitner kidnappers that they weren't real people and that someone else did it.
	No, that's how you would go about it.
	But this idea that there were two shots, that it would be the fake shot came from the roof and it was a further stamper from somebody else.
	What's the idea about uh spy planes in the sky?
	Oh, yeah, that's another one.
	And that the there's an Egyptian spy plane that was coming in, another military plane, pretty sure.
	I mean, they're just going to more extravagant it, it's so similar to the QAnon.
	And in the in the extreme, and I coming as a critic of the uh Dominion and using computer computer.
	Now a Republican owns it, so now Democrats are unhappy with Dominion.
	So I always love that that the uh kickback.
	But you know, the was that if you looked at the evidence, it was rebutted, and you you couldn't talk them out of it.
	You know, they they went down that rabbit hole.
	And because they went down that rabbit hole, the truth of what uh happened in the election was hidden and covered up.
	And that's what I said at the time.
	And they they they wanted to chase that rabbit hole.
	They're still in there.
	Patrick Byrne is about to get a huge judgment against him because he incompetently defended himself in a defamation case from Hunter Biden, no less.
	He mentioned losing the defamation case for Hunter Biden.
	That that That's how nuts Patrick Byrne is.
	So the uh uh, I mean, these people are just not reliable, they're not trustworthy, they're not credible, they're often disinformation agents, maybe uh unwittingly, maybe will it wittingly.
	You never know with some of these bad faith actors.
	But it's clear this is just insanity.
	And if people find themselves falling down that rabbit hole, just ignore it, get out of there and stay away from it because it's utter nonsense.
	Tyler Robinson was the murderer, his motivation was the hate inspired by the left.
	Uh and and the Trantifa movement that he became part of thanks to big technology, thanks to the social cultural revolution that has happened, where we the we the taxpayers have paid for the left to take over the minds of our children, uh, which is by itself, we're gonna look back at this and say what a disaster debacle this was, re either reinforced by wayward technology that cared about the manipulating people to the deepest and darkest places of the soul and the psyche.
	And the that's what we should be looking at, but people aren't.
	This open and shut case that all stems from his parents writing him out.
	It's that simple.
	His parents saw him, recognized him, recognized the gun, recognize where he got the gun, ratted them out.
	He confessed to multiple people in multiple places along the way.
	As uh the the behavior panel pointed out.
	If you look at a lot of these kind of assassins like Luigi, like Tyler Robinson, look at their mugshot.
	Their mugshot isn't fear, their mugshot isn't anger, their mugshot is smugness because they're proud of what they did.
	That's the sickness we have to deal with.
	And the more we're not talking about that, does a favor to the Trantifa cultist.
	That's who Candace Owens is primarily helping.
	She's not primarily impugning Israel.
	By the way, she's attacking them, she's impugning her own views on Israel.
	Instead, she is defending uh and protecting the Trantifa globalist cultist movement.
	Uh, and it needs to be exposed and called for what it is.
	Insanity.
	She's a nut.
	She's always been a nut, and she's gonna be proven to be a nut in court on multiple occasions down the road.
	Well, I saw people focusing on the UAV in the air, the an unmanned aerial vehicle, also known as a drone, which the Charlie Kirk team had because they were flying a drone over the audience.
	The the other thing, uh, what will happen, I sort of jokingly say if you want to blame Israel, uh, find a way, then go by way of the infiltration, some sort of MK Ultra mind control of a group of trans furries.
	More likely than not, what it's actually gonna be is probably some form of Chinese algorithmic infiltration, social manipulation through TikTok, through Discord, and you're gonna find that there might be some foreign governments involved in this, not at the level of manufacturing a whole different type of plot as to what actually occurred, but getting people to be willing or unwilling uh MK Ultra participants who can be brainwashed into carrying out acts of violence via algorithmic manipulation.
	That's where I think it's actually gonna go.
	And that's what I think we need to be, we need to be focused on the dangers of this Trantifa movement.
	Uh good to see the president had a big uh uh conference this week with people who've been like Andy Noah, uh Savannah Hernandez, who had a defender journalistic reputation from that loser.
	What's his name?
	Uh Megat Meta, what's his name?
	Oh, you've talked about him before.
	Um Hassan, last name, something like that.
	Oh, medi hasan.
	Medi is not, yeah, yeah.
	The that guy was attacking her, uh, you know, that loser.
	The uh so the but so credit to uh for to all those people that have been the victims of this Trantifa movement, people like Mike Cernovich been calling it out since he went to the White House press office, White House press room room in 2017.
	Uh, I experienced it walking into the deplorable where the Trantifa types were throwing batteries this size at my head just to get in.
	Uh, and so I'm annoyed at anything that distracts uh from their culpability.
	The quid pro quo here, the qui bono here, who benefits is the Trantifa movement by pursuing any theory that ignores and exculpates and exonerates.
	And by the way, people say, well, Bob, that's the Fed narrative.
	No, it's not, it's the local government narrative from his parents from the video evidence.
	That's what it is.
	Uh, it's not the Fed narrative at all.
	He's being prosecuted by the state, by the local county, by the local police based on evidence provided.
	Like, well, they said, Oh, this evidence has never been in there.
	Read the probable cause statement.
	These lazy bums have never even borrowed, you know, taking the time to just read the probable cause statement.
	The the evidence is overwhelming.
	It's a smoking gun, uh, quite literally, uh, against Tyler Robinson.
	I think he's proud of it, is the truth of the matter, sadly.
	That the fact that we got to a society so sick that murdering a 31-year-old uh for for debate for just debating people, it should be what disturbs and shocks people, and that should be our focal point, not whatever loony kooky conspiracy theory.
	Candace, I think the Jews run the world.
	I think Stalin was a Jew, Owens beliefs.
	I mean, it it's it's full.
	I used to say don't never go full Kanye.
	I'm gonna say now never go full Candace.
	Uh, the she is burning her own credibility in such rapid order that if I was APAC, I would love the fact that Candace Owens and Nick Fuentes are the faces of the anti-Israeli movement in the United States, because nothing helps APAC more uh than that.
	Um what do we have on the menu for tonight, Robert?
	We got the well, speaking of APAC, uh the uh we've got uh possible Gaza peace deal.
	The president is in route uh to Israel and then Egypt as we speak uh on the plane there, along with the Secretary of War, Secretary of State, and some others.
	Uh, we you know, is it gonna be permanent or is it just another temporary uh stall and an ongoing war?
	Uh Elon Hookower, H-U-L-K-O-W-E-R, has a substack cut commenting on exactly that question.
	The we also have uh a turning turning point was in the news because of this obsessive hate and propaganda that's been built up by the left.
	The my hometown university, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, tried to deny a turning point chapter.
	Uh somebody got word to me, so I might have gone a little public with it.
	Uh, I've been reading way too many Trump truth posts of late because I read it.
	I was like, hold on a second.
	Uh I've been reading too much Trump.
	Because I was like, I'm gonna sue you, I'm gonna win, and you're gonna pay my fees.
	The uh, but credit to Harmek Dillon.
	Harmick Dylan responded and said, let us know how that goes.
	Combination of those two things.
	We'll see how that turned out as we get into it.
	Then we've also got SCOTUS, bunch of cases up at SCOTUS.
	Uh the mail-in ballots standing to sue an election context, racial redistricting and racial districts, which could have a massive impact uh on the next Congress, in fact.
	Uh postal injury, uh, when the post office gets to get away with its injury.
	Uh the and when can counselors give honest advice?
	The Camirado uh says you can't give advice if it resists this trans-Tifa agenda.
	The state is trying to force on people with suppression of speech.
	That case is before the Supreme Court of the United States.
	We also have, speaking of Trantifa types, uh another same ideological stripe.
	Uh Luigi is trying to get out of Dodge by uh alleging that the search warrant was invalid and his arrest illegal.
	To be honest, he might have a constitutional claim.
	The uh we've also got uh in speaking of justice, uh uh the big Tish uh gets indicted, uh which is nice.
	John Bolton about to get indicted.
	Christopher Ray, under grand jury investigation.
	We're finally starting to see some action for these rogue deep state actors that have undermined and sabotaged Americans' constitutional republic, so much so that poor Barack Hussein Obama's is worried about the weaponization of government.
	The man who went after more whistleblowers than all the presidents before him combined, is now concerned about the weaponization of government.
	I was listening to um Kiriyaku, what's his first name on uh Rogan, the the the F. He was a CIA whistleblower who went to jail because they prosecuted him for espionage.
	Brennan went after him in particular.
	Uh Obama weaponized everything.
	Yeah, right.
	It's amazing.
	I've got it, I've got to try to get him on the show.
	But you realize like it was it was under the the silver tongue of the serpents of Obama that things went downhill fast before you knew it, but you only found out about it about 10 years later.
	Weaponized IRS, weaponized uh everything everything against whistleblowers, and you know, occasionally assassinated American citizens extrajudicially via drone strikes when um due process uh kind of uh relates topically.
	Do you see Michael Malice's comment whether there's any uh when he was on with uh the with Greg Guttfeld, whether there was anything in common between he and Michelle Obama?
	Did he say penis?
	He said they both have big dick energy.
	Malice is like the troll without the filter.
	Where like I have those thoughts that he says out loud.
	You should never say out loud.
	Um, okay, awesome, awesome.
	And we got the Senate uh shock that they're being spied upon, as Congressman Massey was pointing out.
	It's the law you guys helped pass.
	FYI.
	The we'll we'll talk about that as Operation Arctic Frost continues to expose the scale and scope of deep state corruption that inhabited the Federal Bureau of Insurrection.
	Uh, We've got a big lawsuit against uh the U.S. government that the U.S. government should join in.
	What's that?
	Challenging the 2020 census brought by America First legal.
	The uh we've got uh a a cartoonist who got caught with libel some people keep thinking that as long as they couch their uh false statements of fact in the frame of an opinion a certain queen of Nashville queen living in Nashville might come to mind.
	No, no, that's not an escape hatch from libel lawsuits like too many tend to think.
	Zantac, remember that wonderful thing could help your stomach?
	What if it causes cancer?
	Well, there was a federal judge who decided to throw out the case because she didn't like any of the experts because she decided to replace the jury.
	So this is a case that's also reaching the high courts.
	And what's significant about it is it will reach far beyond the Zantac case.
	James Comey arrested.
	The people at Calci are trying to figure out whether it constitutes an arrest.
	It does, but we'll explain that.
	But why wasn't he perp walked like so many others were during the Trump era?
	Benny Johnson, got someone, fortunately was able to report a dangerous threat to his house that the media is trying to cover up the scale and scope of.
	That person was arrested.
	Good to know.
	Well, who gets to be excluded from the prohibition on robocalls?
	If you guessed politicians, you guessed right.
	We'll get to that as a federal court.
	court decision this week uh so that amongst others in a busy busy legal week let's just start with big Tish um well i actually so I'm only using stream art so I can't bring up everything else I just want to I want to see this I this it's trying it's driving me crazy Viva please be nuanced and show your integrity there's now I I guess they mean now or there's no overwhelming evidence of anything with the Charlie Kirk investigation.
	There's no you're an idiot no but not just that you're you're an idiot you should look yourself in the mirror and say you're an idiot because they said they just said they said there's you said understand what you said here Rev there's no overwhelming evidence and the evidence is being destroyed.
	So there is no overwhelming evidence but they're destroying the evidence and your basis for believing what you believe is saying that evidence is being destroyed that you haven't seen okay show me show me any evidence and someone says Candace isn't here to defend herself so first of all I'm steelmanning Candace's positions.
	And in fairness to Candace, she's trying to find a way to implicate Israel, but I think she's not necessarily denying that Tyler shot him.
	She's trying to say maybe he was a Mossad agent or maybe there was another shot.
	But it doesn't matter.
	When you start saying they're destroying evidence, so don't trust the FBI, nobody's trusting the FBI here.
	I've watched it unfold in real time.
	I saw the evidence the day of.
	I don't need to rely on the FBI for this.
	Now, oh, they don't have 30-06.
	I mean, it's the open and shut case of cases, the, literally the only credible claim they have is figuring out the ballistics the what ammunition was used in the angle of the shot for the lack of an exit wound.
	That's literally it everything else is crap.
	Every presentation is crap.
	It can be taken apart in about five seconds flat.
	I'd be happy to debate Candace Owens or any of them.
	They won't debate because they know how embarrassed they would be if they come on and try to make.
	Even Nick Fuentes.
	Nick Fuentes is somehow the voice of reason in the middle of all this.
	He's pointing out how insane this is.
	It's obviously insanity.
	They have video of him doing a test run, walking up, and then coming back.
	Video of him walking back up on the same day.
	Him running, taking the shot, putting the gun under the towel, running off the side.
	They have him located.
	where he dropped the gun they have him texting about where he dropped the gun and what is his parents just ID'd him right away and that's what unraveled for him the kid thought he was going to get away with it.
	Now, I think he had some help with certain things.
	I mean, he was a high IQ person from testing background, so maybe that's part of it.
	But he ran and did the shot so fast that even if Kirk had Charlie had the best security available, it's not clear to me they would have been able to prevent it because of how he planned it and how he executed it.
	Now, you have insecure facilities, and you could argue about that, about whether that could or should have been the case.
	Is there a way to avoid that?
	I don't know if there is if you're on college campuses doing this.
	even crowded to his credit, went back out, but he had to have massive security.
	to to To do it, unfortunately.
	So I think that's what we'll continue to see.
	But you know, these people are now attacking Turning Point, attacking Erica Kirk, attacking what so there's no credibility to it.
	I have reviewed it all.
	I have looked at the actual evidence.
	The evidence is overwhelming.
	It's as much of an open and shut case as any case I've ever seen.
	And if you want somebody who goes through day to day answering the questions, day to day looking at the video and the document, someone has an investigative forensic background, doesn't have a political bone in his body as to this fight.
	You can follow Gray Hughes, investigates online.
	He's going through it over and over and over again.
	Prominent military.
	I've talked I talked to people that are yeah that have deep detailed understanding of ballistics, and they uh agree that the shot from a certain angle could do what it did.
	Uh, it's not usual as to what it would did, but it can happen.
	The and they've seen it happen in cases that they've been part of.
	So uh there's just no credibility to it.
	And these are people who, but it's like the QAnon people.
	The the QAnon people, you couldn't talk them out of it at all.
	You could they they were true believing.
	I mean, that woman, uh Ashley Babbitt who died, I have no doubt, believed the nonsense.
	She thought she was uh charging into the Congress because the White Hats were were waiting for her.
	Uh the secret generals were all secretly on her side, were waiting for her to arrest Nancy Pelosi in person, and she died for it.
	Uh, the no, she died because of a corrupt rogue cop who got away with abuse of force, but don't ignore the fact the reason why she was in that position in the first place is because she bought the gibberish of QAnon.
	And some of us were out up front saying for the beginning this is garbage.
	Same with the Dominion stuff.
	Said if you pursue Dominion, all the election suits will fall apart.
	That's exactly what happened.
	That's and they got away with it.
	So, and you know, I'm I have very little patience for things that are this negative and harmful.
	The the the uh on society and politics.
	That's the difference.
	Uh, I do uh there's 80 plus hush-hushes where I pursue I'm happy, I'm the first guy to pursue alternative narrative.
	But I'm not gonna lie to cover up for the Trantifa cult and belie the obvious evidence staring at me in the face.
	And notice almost all these people, the way they respond is to say, Well, what about the evidence?
	She has the receipts.
	I'm like, what receipts?
	And then they can't cite any.
	You know, it's a giveaway that they're part of a psyop and they don't even realize.
	Uh and that that chat was uh notice a lot of the uh Psyop channels for Q are reemerging and they say the same thing, oh, you're losing credibility.
	Everything is in the same language.
	They're on the Candace Cultist train and they're using the same lingo and language as the QAnon people.
	It's back, it's back in full gear.
	Because if you were the part of the operation, I mean, here's the other problem with saying the Israel's part of even a Trantifa cult, even if you go that route.
	Look, look at Antifa.
	It's all pro-Palestinian, it's all anti-Israel, you know.
	So Israel's doing a pretty bad job.
	They're infiltrating the Trantifa cult.
	But the uh is, and I say that someone's been very critical as we'll get into the Gaza peace deal about how BB Netanyahu has handled things for the last two years.
	So the uh, but you know, this is that they they want you to pursue this rabbit trail because they know you'll get lost in it.
	It's part of a psyop.
	Candace is either a useful idiot or or or witting complicit uh conspirator to deceive people away from the movement.
	Because if you start looking and researching and reviewing this, you're gonna discover the scale and scope of the Trantifa violence that threatens our liberties on a daily basis.
	Uh, but they don't want you to look at that.
	They want you to look anywhere and everywhere else.
	And some of you are stupidly and happily rushing to do their bidding.
	Adrian no Adriano Valentino, Australia says, love your work.
	David, Australia needs more people like you are woke, weak, and useless politicians.
	Must go, God bless you.
	Thank you very much.
	Letia James hard work on Trump is coming back to bite her on the ass.
	We're gonna get to that in about 30 seconds.
	Uh this is the engaged few former lost profit singer Ian Watkins was RIP'd in prison yesterday, halfway through his 25-year sentence for child offenses.
	So, anyways, what's your favorite flavor ice cream?
	And then MK Telephone Man says they have the bullet, they have the rifle, the ballistics will come out at trial.
	They might have got it, might not be an M, what is it, a 30 odd six?
	We'll get there.
	And we'll get to some of the chat in the other room, uh, in locals.
	Robert Letitia James on the topic of the link of the chat.
	Uh dead dead to rights.
	I mean, Nate Brody, who uh I, you know, this there's some internet sometime legal drama.
	Uh, he put out a a good breakdown just to distinguish between the three properties and what this indictment refers to, so that people don't get confused between the properties, the lies, and the evidence.
	This property, Robert, that she's been indicted for mortgage fraud, which is uh falsely representing that the property would serve as her secondary residence.
	This was a um, oh geez, it was on Perone Street.
	It's uh it was a it was a property she ended up renting to a family of three, claiming the rent as a revenue, uh, declaring to the IRS that she never had any personal days in the property.
	And then the argument becomes when she lied on her loan mortgage application, which was it was a hundred and some odd thousand bucks for the property, that it was going to be her second residence.
	She gets a more favorable interest rate, she gets more favorable uh insurance coverage because if it's a secondary residence versus a rental, your insurance is halved or doubled if it's a commercial property.
	Uh, she got some credits back because it was a secondary residence.
	So the net profit or the net benefit is roughly say rounded up to 20,000 bucks.
	And um, it would seem that she's dead to rights.
	The arguments that I've heard coming from the media are that, well, it's a small amount, it's a small mortgage, so everybody does this and nobody gets prosecuted for it, which is a big fat load of shit.
	Set that aside, too small, you know, de minimis uh fraud, it's only 20,000 bucks, so don't prosecute.
	Stupid argument.
	The the real argument that she's going to presumably raise um is she didn't have the intent because when she made the declaration, it was true, and then circumstances changed and she had to rent it because life is difficult as an attorney general.
	I don't know.
	Um she's in the eastern uh district of Virginia or Eastern, what is it?
	She's in Virginia, Eastern Virginia, Eastern District, but the Norfolk division.
	So uh Eric Hunley might be able to cover the trial live.
	Uh, the assuming he gets to trial, because that's uh near his neck of the woods.
	I I might want to try going myself because it would be fun if we can get in.
	But uh, listening to Koreaku on Rogan, and he literally said, you know, where they went after he was going to trial in the Eastern District of Virginia.
	I don't know if it was the Norfolk district, and he said, good luck there.
	So I mean, what do you think?
	Norfolk is not that heavily democratic a jurisdiction.
	It's not nearly as bad as Alexandria, and none of it compares to the district of corruption.
	So the uh, so absolutely they can secure a conviction.
	This is an open and shut case.
	She took out a Fannie Mae mortgage, and the condition of getting that mortgage was that she be the owner occupied and that she not rent it, and she certified it under penalty of perjury.
	So she submitted false statements, she committed various forms of wire fraud and mail fraud, uh, and mortgage fraud.
	Uh, and we know this because she told us on her tax forms, she said on her penalty perjury.
	Hey, by the way, I'm renting this thing.
	I've never lived in in a day of my life.
	Uh, and it's homeowner uh uh owner insurance fraud.
	So it's all of it insurance fraud, mortgage fraud, male fraud, wire fraud, false statements on a penalty of perjury under uh submitted in in a for a federal transaction.
	It's she's done.
	She's done.
	Even with Nate, who Nate the lawyer who wanted immediately to let to let her off the hook, even he had to admit uh yeah, she's guilty.
	No, the uh unless she's somehow gonna show a change of circumstance.
	It was true when I said it, and whatever.
	The the things not to get confused by uh she the the emails where she clarifies uh that it's um uh not a primary residence was in respect of another property not related to this.
	The the the real argument is gonna be if she if change of circumstances it was true when I said it, or uh you know it's my first day.
	The best thing is I don't know if they're gonna be able to submit her tweets as evidence.
	Nobody's too rich and powerful.
	If you lie about control of prior statements about we have to this, we have to deal with mortgage fraud because it's such a serious crime.
	And it doesn't matter if even anyone suffered any consequence.
	It's such a serious crime.
	We have to deter it out of the outcome outset.
	So for both uh the only thing she's got going for, she's got a democratic judge appointed the case.
	Uh so that that that's it.
	Uh otherwise she's dead to rights and done for.
	Robert, uh, and as I nobody cares.
	The dog just took a dump in my office.
	So in our studio.
	And I saw the argument.
	I he comes in and it's like, hey, I think I'm gonna poop here.
	It's it's wonderful.
	I might have to go try to clean it up at some point.
	Um, okay.
	So that's that's that's that's uh Letitia James dead to rights.
	Um so he heard Letitia James' name and immediately needed to take a crap.
	It's I I don't I I I'm I'm I'm I I'm suffering from lack of training.
	So I have the exact opposite problem of Piker Hassan.
	I'm not shocking these dogs.
	I'm not even he knows not to do it.
	It doesn't matter.
	Sorry, I just see Freedom Tunes did a great version of that.
	Oh, God.
	Freedom Tunes has done a great version of his crazy rant and dog torture.
	Oh yeah, well, we'll get with nobody wants to hear about that either.
	Uh, any longer I talked about Hassan, I like people don't like there was a funny meme.
	It was uh it was John Wick, and it's all four corners of the political spectrum.
	It was the the far left, far right, libertarian conservatives, liberals, everyone's John Wick when it comes to animal um dog abuse, alleged dog abuse.
	All right, gaz a piece deal, Robert, because people are calling you a Zio shill.
	How I know that people are idiots, and it's it's funny, it's it's coming more from the YouTube channel because I don't often see the uh YouTube comments coming up this quickly.
	The amount of people calling you a Zionist shill, you got your 7,000 on YouTube astonishing.
	This isn't trying to implicate Israel, it's just a weird coincidence that anytime you point out she's lying again about Charlie Kirk's assassination, they all respond with Israel themes.
	That's amazing how come to be.
	How can you tell me you don't actually follow anything I say or do?
	Is when you respond quickly by saying that my criticism of Candace concerns it makes me an Israeli shill.
	It not only exposes them that their real motivation is they hate Israel, and they'll filter anything through that through that filter, but on the other side that they paid no attention to anything I've said over five years.
	No, it's not that you you get called uh anti-Israel for the long for like for the last year, maybe two years now.
	Um, but now on the uh topic of anti-Israel, Robert, two years into this conflict, and I was having this discussion with family.
	Um two years into this conflict, we're getting a resolution, which is basically what the resolution should have been on the eighth.
	Uh, except pretty much all the hostages are dead.
	Gaza is uh decimated, and whether or not that was the plan, uh, when when people said, well, the plan is just to decimate Gaza, and on the ninth and the tenth, they said, No, that's an anti-Semitic thing to say.
	They're just gonna go and take out Hamas.
	So here's the rubble of what was Gaza back to you.
	Here are the remains of the of the hostages, maybe 20 are alive, and uh Hamas must disarm.
	Uh, people looked at me like I was an idiot the day after saying there's been a catastrophic intelligence failure uh at all levels of the Israeli government right now.
	You can't rely on the same people who were at the helm of that catastrophic failure to now determine uh uh a pinpoint strike or an appropriate military response.
	Uh so give they're gonna release a bunch of hostages now from prison, if the Israel is, which is what basically give it, give them back all of the whoever they want from prison on October 8th, get your hostages back live on October 8th.
	Uh instead of what will now amount to have been two years of devastation, PR devastation for Israel, actual devastation for Gaza, and you've got a tenth of the living hostages who have been through two years of of life altering hell.
	And um, and and everybody who ever had a theory about what was the underlying motivation here was it to decimate a bigger buffer zone of the Gaza.
	Uh, they're gonna say, I told you so.
	And what was accomplished, I I think um not very much, but what do I know?
	The peace deal is out, Robert, or the ceasefire is out.
	They're gonna return the remains of some of the hostages, uh, the the remaining living hostages.
	Israel's gonna release a bunch of um a bunch of Palestinian prisoners, and uh you can go back to a wasteland.
	Uh it's good that there's a ceasefire, and we'll hope that both sides respect it.
	Donald Trump deserves all the credit that the left is not giving him.
	But what's your broader take on on this deal and and where it goes from here?
	So, you know, credit to President Trump for five for uh finally putting pressure on BB Netanyahu.
	My view was that was the pressure point.
	That's who he had leverage with.
	It didn't appear clear to me that he had leverage with Hamas, that it appeared to me he had leverage uh with Bibi and that he just needed to use it.
	And he was reluctant, it seemed to use it, and there was concerns because part of the hard right in Israel that BB Netanyahu was effectively forced into a coalition with, thanks to the Israeli left, obsessing over imprisoning him over champagne and cigars.
	The I think that was a mistake by the Israeli left.
	The but if you have any doubts about who Israel thanks for this peace resolution, just watch the live presentation where Whitkop, Jared Kushner, and Ivanka Trump are present.
	And anytime Trump's name was mentioned, they cheered righteously.
	And anytime Bibi Netanyahu's name was mentioned, he was booed.
	Even Whitkop was like, please please please stop booing.
	Please stop booing.
	You know, I mean, I mean that that gives you the sense that many people in Israel were very unhappy about this tactical approach.
	Thought that it thought it didn't work, uh, thought it would just lead to Israel being a pariah in the court of public opinion, and that ultimately Israel's security and safety depends at least in part on the court of Public opinion.
	So either way, credit the now, this proposal initiated from the Arab Gulf states, uh, where Trump the people want to know where Trump feels the most comfortable, probably anywhere in the world with any foreign leader.
	Uh, it's the Gulf states.
	Uh, he relates to them, connects to them.
	You know, he thinks like they do in many respects.
	There was all this controversy over him doing a deal with Qatar to guarantee Qatar's security and also allow Qatari pilots to train at a U.S. military base that Laura Loomer misconstrued into thinking the Qataris are going to play place a military base here.
	But one point, by the way, is if for all the Americans outraged by that, uh, in fact, they're not placing a Qatari military base here.
	Think what the rest of the world thinks when we put our military bases all over their country.
	Let's open up a small parenthesis here because that was part uh it was not necessarily part of the deal, but it's contemporaneous with it, and it's arguably I think it was a necessary pretext.
	Yeah, quit.
	So we're gonna we, I say uh I I can I I'm gonna include myself in America right now when I say we are going to train Qatari fighters to fly F-15s.
	Now, uh in our community, we've got a bunch of we've got a number of veterans, and there was some disagreement as to whether or not F-15s uh can be nuclear payloads.
	Uh, and I've been told both yes and no, but I like by people I like and trust.
	Set that aside.
	Training Qataris to fly F-15s.
	I can imagine in the wake of 9-11 where uh you know our ally was Saudi Arabia and 22 of the 24 terrorists were Saudi Arabian, if you believe the FBI people.
	Like the conspiracy in 9 11 was not that Saudi Arabians did not fly the planes, and it might have been who else knew or ought to have known or could have done something about it.
	Set that aside.
	Tucker's doing a good series on that.
	And uh, guess who's name comes up?
	Well, Bolton's gonna get indicted, Comey's been indicted, big Tish been indicted.
	Fanny Willis is under grand jury investigation in the southern district of uh, I'm sorry, the northern district of Georgia.
	But let's get John Brennan indicted because John Brennan's fingerprints are all over what happened on 9-11.
	Now, the question is this though is it wise to train Qatari fighters to fly F 15s?
	And the joke in the chat was uh are they gonna train them to land?
	Haha, but is it is it wise or is it potentially dangerous to train?
	We have a defense, mutual defense uh uh agreement with them.
	So I mean that ship kind of sailed with that.
	And why do we have that now?
	Why is it now signed off?
	There's two reasons.
	One, we want control of the Middle East, right?
	I mean, the that that's why we got troops in all over the place.
	We we have a big base in Qatar already.
	The uh same in Saudi Arabia.
	Uh, it was the number one reason why bin Laden cited for attacking the United States was our U.S. military bases near the whole near Mecca and Medina in uh the holy uh most holiest uh of sites in uh in Islam.
	The the reason we do it is uh can the Saudis complain when we let's say we go attack Iran or somebody else?
	Not really.
	That the the they don't have any independent real military, their military is us.
	So that's why we leverage that control.
	I personally am not a big fan of our military bases being in more places than the Roman Empire uh was spread out through its uh then civilization.
	So the uh, you know, but yeah, that's why it's there.
	So once you have a a military security agreement like that, you're gonna train them somewhere.
	You're gonna train them either in Qatar or you're gonna train them here.
	There's certain kinds of training that's safer to do, frankly, here than it is to do there.
	So that's it, it's whether you agree or disagree, I think fundamentally with whether we should have these mutual defense packs in the first place.
	But we had to sign this uh to keep Qatar in the game, uh, because they're our main mediator on the Middle East because they're because we've foolishly uh sabotaged our relationship with Russia, who would be a much more logical mediator, uh, with someone we don't have to sign a mutual defense agreement with to use their mediation skills.
	It appears Russia has successfully uh uh mediated us not going back into Iran.
	That the that you know Putin got BB to say, hey, uh no, we don't want to escalate.
	We want to de escalate with Iran and let Iran know we we want a peaceful resolution to the uh to any issues we have with uh Iran concerning the nuclear weapons program.
	They would be the more logical partner in that regard.
	But we've cut a deal with the royals.
	Uh, I get it.
	I mean, that part of Trump's whole path was use the Abraham Accords and the Royals to break through the Palestinian support uh in the Middle East and the Arab and Muslim worlds because they all hate Hamas, but they all had share in common.
	Only Turkey, because uh Turkey, Erdogan uh has a lot of backing from the Muslim Brotherhood there in Turkey, and Hamas is fundamentally a Muslim Brotherhood based organization, and And Qatar is has sympathies with the Muslim Brotherhood.
	That's where some of those allegations uh concern.
	But Qatar is mostly trying to be the Switzerland of the Middle East.
	They want to be the place that resolves the disputes and mediates disputes.
	That's why they jump into all of this in multiple capacities.
	Though I don't trust them because of a range of topics.
	But we've decided to go to business with and the Saudis and all the rest.
	The premise with the Abraham Accords is that if you could get the Arabs and the Royals on your side, you could further not only isolate Iran.
	That's only partially worked because they've had effectively a detente reproachment, the Saudis and the Iranians, uh, after you know 50 years almost of hatred of one another, dating back to the Iranians, uh, the Ayatollah wanting to overthrow all royals and claiming they were illegitimate, as well as the Sunni Shia split.
	The but you look at uh uh, you know, what he's trying to do is use those Arab states to recreate his pitch is this if Qatar, uh UAE, Dubai, Saudi Arabia, you want tourism, you want foreign investment.
	Well, you can't have your countries associated with Allah Akbar.
	Here comes the bomb.
	So you need to disassociate from terror in every significant respect.
	And it and part of that means you need to have reasonable relationships with Israel.
	You need to recognize Israel, you need to deal with Israel.
	You don't need to live in the 1950s mindset.
	The and so consequently, that that's that's who was promoting this, along with Egypt, along with Jordan, along with other countries.
	They despise Hamas.
	They want Hamas out.
	That's why they were eager to use this peace resolution to disarm and destroy Hamas's power base.
	Now, what does Hamas do as soon as they get back in?
	They start murdering other Palestinians, because that's what Hamas.
	And like the Dave Smiths and the Glenn Greenwalds and the rest, Max Blumenthal's would have a lot more credibility if they would call out Hamas when they do this horrible evil.
	But this is but they generally don't, they're generally mute.
	So the videos are circulating, and and I'm not skeptical, but uh you know, I I don't know what's going on in these videos, and people are passing them around saying that this is what's going on, and you have no way of knowing the the videos that are going around now purport to be Hamas coming in and basically killing uh uh what's what I'm looking at, collapse suspected collaborators and political opposition.
	And the and this is a way that their control, right?
	When they're they're gonna give up their arms, the uh so we'll see.
	I think the skepticism in Israel is whether Hamas will really disarm.
	The I can tell you though, Trump is committed to this deal.
	He's made it clear he's personally committed to this deal, which means in the and the official representation of Hamas was as long as Trump held up his word, they would hold up their word.
	And they trusted Trump in ways they did not trust BB Netanyahu, on you know, given the circumstances.
	And so the I think there is a great opportunity for the uh for this to hold.
	Uh, but it's gonna depend ultimately, I think.
	Uh I know a lot of the anti-Israeli people will focus on Israel, but it seems to me Trump has has got them in line, uh, has been able to discipline BB and used his attack on Qatar to do it.
	Part of why we had to cut that deal with Qatar, uh, or Qatar, depending on how you pronounce it, the is because of that attack by Israel on the Hamas uh negotiating team.
	He went too far.
	And Trump can read polls like anyone else, and he can he has Barron and other people that are at least sufficiently wired into young people to know that Israel is becoming a political pariah uh amongst uh many Americans, including the young right, the young populist right, you know, people like Owen Schreuer and others.
	Uh, you know, Dinesh D'Souza was in a debate with Owen this week.
	And at times I thought the Nesh was going a little far, was wrong in some of his criticisms.
	To Dinesh's credit, he's gonna debate Owen right on his uh show, uh, the Owen report.
	You can find on YouTube, Rumble, some other places.
	Looks like Owen has been able to get back on YouTube.
	Congrats on that.
	The uh, but so he read the and he understood that in particular the royals.
	The royals are his his leverage point into the Middle East.
	It's the Trump peace path.
	Uh, and I think it makes the most sense of anything else.
	And so the I think he'll do everything possible to hold this up.
	And I think Hamas has far less support than I think people suspect in the past.
	The fact that they're having to do this violence against other Palestinians, that tells me, oh, so you you are so fearful of whatever limited power base you still had in the with Palestinians that you got to go execute your uh your your Palestinian opponents right away.
	But that's how they that's how they coerced control in the first place.
	I'm just looking at they haven't had elections since I think they're hated in large parts of the palace.
	It's just a sense, it's a sense from various pro-Palestinian commentators.
	Uh that not only are they a complete Alexander McCorris of the Durant pointed this out right away.
	said Hamas is hated throughout the Arab and Muslim world.
	He's absolutely right about that.
	The second part is they're now losing the Palestinians.
	That they let they look back on what happened in Gaza and say the October 8th attack was a complete disaster for the Palestinian cause.
	And I think that they're and then they haven't done anything.
	If if they had confidence they had popular support, they'd hold elections.
	They haven't held any since they first got in.
	That tells me that they don't have any popular base of support, that it is shrinking rapidly.
	So the I think as long as Trump holds everybody to account, I think he can get a deal done.
	I think he can get this deal all the way through.
	And then the in the and the the I can tell you where it's going to.
	I agree with Steve Bannon.
	This is going to go to a two-state solution.
	It's only whether it's five years, 10 years, or 15 years.
	Your biggest hurdle is still going to be the Palestinian population.
	Because the uh most surveys, now how reliable a survey is in Gaza, given what's happened to the people in Gaza and the mass displacement over the last two years, I think is up in the air.
	But the but I would note by the way, the more anti-Hamas groups when they pulled the West Bank versus uh this used to be the reverse.
	It used to be Hamas was hated in the West Bank, supported in in Gaza.
	Now it's reverse, which tells you that there's even Hamas recognized, but the fact that Hamas even took this deal, uh, tells me that they uh that they are recognizing that they're on borrowed time politically.
	And so the I think if Trump pushes it through and keeps his eye on the ball, uh, that he can keep a peace in Gaza, which would be a fantastic achievement, an extraordinary achievement.
	Uh, the and uh, and I think it was because what we talked about early on, the pressure point really was Bibi.
	Uh, it was getting BB to disown what the hard right wanted, which was a greater Israel project, which was the ethnically cleanse Gaza, uh, which was a takeover and annex the West Bank.
	Trump was never on board with any of that.
	And well, some might argue he might have he might have implicitly or suggested he was by saying, Well, we can build hotels there and turn it into a beautiful international destination.
	It wouldn't be greater Israel.
	It would be thinks that the I think he still thinks that, but he he thinks he can create a wealthy paradise for the Palestinians, and he believes if he does, that they'll have something to look forward to other than hating Israel.
	That because that's that's the way Trump's brain thinks.
	He's like, hey, make somebody rich and they'll forget about wanting to murder people.
	Uh that's why he doesn't understand the Mulas and other people's like these idiot, these hardcore religious fanatics.
	Trump just finds them irrational and crazy.
	He just can't understand that logic.
	Uh, the but he really, I think, thinks that if they made Gaza a place where there was economic prosperity, it just had to be controlled by someone other than Israel, because otherwise the Palestinians would never accept it.
	Now, the open question is whether they accept it.
	I I hope they finally do and get over their 80-year hate uh you know hatred of Israel, uh, which has animated the Palestinian political cause ever since the beginning of the fighting a century ago.
	Uh, the I think it's the only future for the Palestinian cause.
	There is no right to return future, it's never gonna happen.
	Uh that that ship has sailed.
	You can think it's right or wrong, politically or otherwise, it's gone, it's finished, it's done.
	Uh, you got to move on from that.
	Uh, a two-state solution, I think could work if that uh two-state solution wasn't run by Hamas.
	Uh, so the and that's the universal consensus of pretty much everybody Arab world, Muslim world, global South, America, West, you name it.
	Yeah, I mean, I I guess the concern is it won't be Hamas, it'll be another iteration of Hamas.
	It'll be what uh the Mujahideen was.
	Well, that's what they're trying to create, a professional class that involves a lot of uh Egyptian, Indonesian, uh Jordanian, uh the even some Saudis and some Qataris, that a lot of those crowd, and that basically they're looking to Dubai.
	We could create a mini Dubai in Gaza, and if we could create a mini Dubai in Gaza, now Dubai was built with a lot of slave labor imported from Southeast Asia, but we'll put that aside for the moment.
	The uh and a lot of things in Dubai are a whole other story.
	But the that's I think the logic that Trump has.
	And put it this way it's as good as any other claim I've made, uh I've heard made uh any other argument I've heard for how you could get peace uh in a region uh where people hate each other.
	The I mean the Israeli hatred of the Palestinians has gone way, way high after October 7th, and it really hasn't diminished much.
	Understandably so.
	The uh was the thing Charlie Kirk was trying to explain.
	It's like I understand the mindset.
	I just think tactically the this is ill-advised methods that they're going about doing things.
	Um, the so yeah, we'll see.
	I think it has a real chance to hold.
	Uh, I thought it was gonna happen at a higher chance than a lot of other people thought.
	Most people in the geopolitical commentary community were like both on the pro and anti-Israeli side, and those that have no bone in the fight either way, like you know, the Duran and other people were real skeptical that this could even get done just because of the long history of it failing.
	But Trump was personally invested in this.
	George Samueli, to his credit, at the gaggle, pointed this out.
	He's like, Yeah, Trump's personally invested in this, and he has a close relationship with the royals.
	He's gonna make sure this happens uh if it's the last thing he does, and credit the president Trump for having that commitment to peace.
	Like people criticize Trump for winning the Nobel Peace Prize.
	Uh, I want my presidents to want peace prizes, not war prizes, peace prizes.
	I'm all for that.
	I don't care if it's ego, I don't care what's motivating it.
	By golly, please pursue peace.
	Please want peace, please want recognition for peace.
	Now, not the fake Nobel Peace Prize because all they do is promote a regime change people.
	I mean, that's how you can that's how somebody made a ton of money in polymarket this week, uh betting on that that loser from Venezuela as a peace activist.
	No, she's not, she's a regime change activist.
	And they've done this four times in the last eight years.
	I mean, as soon as they made Barack Obama a uh peace prize winner, you know what a complete joke that award is.
	I think well, Yasser Arafat, Yasser Arafat's Nobel Prize.
	Yeah, he he won a Nobel Prize in what year.
	Uh was awarded jointly to uh Yasser Arafat and Shimon Perez and the Isaac Rabin in 1994.
	Yeah, with the hope and belief that he would do it too, you know.
	Yeah, I hear that.
	It's always it first of all.
	I see I and I've been told I'm I'm stupid and naive for saying it.
	It has to be a two two state solution.
	The only question is you know, the right of return, is it gonna be 600,000, six million or zero if there's a separate state?
	And then what land do you give back?
	The argument is always that if you give back land and it's a two-state solution, they'll uh they'll seek the destruction of Israel in 20 years' time.
	But it was on the table.
	In fact, as here's where I agree with Dershowitz, and here we're like Dave Smith gets a lot of basic stuff wrong.
	Like Douglas Murray is another prick, so I don't care what he says about geopolitics on pretty much anything.
	Uh, he he's a war horde of the core.
	Uh, but the if you look at uh the but like Dave Smith and others will say uh that you know it's always been the Israelis denying the two-state solution.
	That's just denial of history.
	Uh the yeah, that that's just ignoring it.
	Dershowitz is right, he can document a half dozen times where a two-state solution was on the table, in particular in the late 90s by Bill Clinton, tons of money, all kinds of things, and still Arafat still turned it down.
	Why?
	Because he said he didn't want to get murdered like Sadat.
	Yeah.
	And but even then, the two state solution was on the table, but Arafat wanted the right of return of all displaced Palestinians and their uh descendants, to which Bill Clinton said, then what do you need a state for if you want to just take over the other state?
	Well, and he knew that part was never gonna happen.
	That the that was my debate with Nick Fuentes was who would you rather have nuclear weapons, Israel or Hamas?
	He said, Hamas.
	Most sane people found that insane.
	So the I did like it.
	D Smith had Nick Fuentes on, and he loved all the clickbait he got from it.
	He was like, you know, but he was he was like, I was just trying to encourage him.
	Could could you go a little light on the Nazi stuff?
	I was like, he and Glenn Greenwald get pitiful when anybody's anti-Israel, they want to platform him and pitch him and promote him.
	That's when they embarrass themselves when they when they do that stuff.
	And I say this is you know, I I think you can be uh both uh you could be skeptical and critical of the Israeli government without becoming anti-Jewish.
	Uh disagree with Mark Robert.
	Sometimes confuses the two.
	Uh, I get it, you know.
	The uh some boomer Jews tend to have that perception.
	The it's just not accurate.
	You can be very critical of BB net and God didn't pick BB.
	Okay, I don't want to hear that from my pro-Israeli friends.
	Uh, I haven't seen no evidence of that.
	The uh and the politicians that are Israel are not the Israel of the Bible.
	Sorry, that's hogwash, too.
	The so, but at the same time, recognize the reality uh of what the Palestinian cause has been, which has been a murderous terroristic cause that cares more about killing Israelis than they do boosting and uh helping their own population.
	Let's hope what Trump is trying to do is to superimpose a third force that could work that that comes from the Arab world that comes from the Islamic world that piggybacks heavily off of the royals, uh, and the wealth uh and prestige of the royals to create something new.
	He thinks in order to take away this obsessive hatred, give them something to live for rather than something to live against.
	And at least it's a it's worth pursuing because it's one of the best ideas I've heard.
	Doesn't mean it will work, but it's a better idea than any other I've heard in the last 80 years for solving this uh the uh this problem.
	Okay, I'm giving everybody the link.
	There's no paywall for the after show today because uh it doesn't go to supporters only on locals.
	So today's the day to come for the after part if you want to check it out.
	Robert, let me let me bring up a bunch of um the tipped questions over on locals.
	Uh recently visited Thomas, West Virginia near where one of Trump's AI data centers is being built.
	This is some grade 101.
	Hearing from locals, the president needs to mandate these companies to provide a continued benefit to the local communities.
	So far, this land of National State Park only gets their water taken, river streams polluted in return for hosting.
	I mean, I guess the argument is they're gonna get jobs and revenue.
	I don't know.
	Well, that there needs to be something the problem with these big AI centers is they're not big job employers.
	Yeah, they're just big resource users.
	This will destroy tourism they rely on come midterns DNC will have impoverished pollutants.
	It's one of the problems they need to solve.
	But uh it's not clear to me that there's people like Marjorie Taylor Green was critical on this exact question.
	She was like, please, Mr. President, pay attention to all these other issues, not just focus on the crypto boys and the crypto toners.
	And she's right.
	This is an area where that needs to be reviewed, just like Palinter.
	Like people are like, hey, Barnes thought you love Palantur.
	The I I didn't have a early on, I understood what the motivation was to have Palenter use the uh technological tools to out illegal immigration uh in ways that are showing up in government benefits and voter roles, but it's also becoming increasingly clear they're going way past that and becoming a surveillance state uh metric.
	And so these, you know, that's where there needs to be pushback, and credit to Marjorie Taylor Green for providing it.
	Uh, the question that I had here actually was on the next uh what did I just do here?
	How did that go over?
	It was on the next tip question.
	Robert President Trump just tilted receiving a booster, wonderful life's giving COVID vaccine.
	Heavens for friend, but is VP prepared to lead in okay, God forbid that Robert.
	So you saw the same post come out.
	Some people were saying it wasn't Trump saying it, it was the White House.
	Again, if I wanted to sabotage Trump, I would I would put out a statement like that.
	If I were an activist still in the White House, somehow sabotage Trump, I'd give him that booster to begin with.
	That's what he should be double checking.
	So the I wonder whether that's a Melania Trump thing.
	Now, credit to Melania Trump, you know, the she got taken into all the bogus nonsense about Russia kidnapping Ukrainian children and all that garbage.
	If you'd researched that at the time, as I did, you would know that was all false.
	The uh that you had children displaced in war, but there was no mass kidnapping and all the rest.
	And whenever Ukraine was actually challenged on it, they couldn't ever come up with a list of even names, the or or actual numbers from specific locations and places, they just made up random numbers like they do every day to describe Russian casualties.
	The uh they take their own casualties, pretend they're Russian.
	But uh Putin was smart, Russia was smart.
	They they listened to Melania, reached out directly to her and directly intervened to help kids get relocated back on both sides.
	And she, to their credit, gave uh credit to them as well.
	So good on that side of the aisle.
	But uh the him him still taking COVID booster shots, uh, that's that's high risk.
	Uh now he fits within the old age category that is still recommended potentially for that shot, uh, or it's not recommended against it, if you will.
	The but if I I wouldn't be taking that shot no matter how old I am.
	Uh, and I don't think it's a wise strategy for the president to do so.
	But it tells you there's a part of his brain that's still delusional when it comes to the COVID vaccine.
	Uh I I thought it might have been sabotage, and I don't know if he didn't actually take it, or maybe they they you know, it's you can't get a flu shot without the COVID, or maybe they're saying it's sort of the same thing now.
	I wouldn't do it either ever again for the rest of my life.
	But uh, will President Trump pull back his arrests of undocumented workers before the stock market is adversely impacted by irresponsible labor shortages in U.S. Great 101 is our favorite uh sarcastic question.
	Okay, he is being sarcastic, right?
	Because he's master at it.
	He presents very very well.
	Howard the Duke has anybody thought about what happens if the hostages are not released tomorrow.
	I think they will be, and I think the uh I think that will happen.
	But the we'll see.
	Uh, but I think that uh after Israeli troops have withdrawn to a certain point, which they have done, now it's Hamas's duty to return those.
	Uh, and if they don't very quickly, then uh everything then they lose all the benefits of the deal.
	And so the uh so I I'm highly confident they're gonna deliver on that side.
	Uh, I would love to have Josh Hammer.
	I'm thinking of a hand, there's a journalist named something hammer.
	Uh Josh Hammer's the newsweek guy who's an obsessively pro-Israel guy.
	He's been I mean, like he's a he's an Israel first guy.
	He doesn't want to admit he's Israel first, but he is.
	Okay.
	But the his conversations with Charlie Kirk have been leaked to somebody who was then who then leaked them to Candace Owens and Hammer responded.
	Uh had to respond to it.
	A lot of what Candace is explaining about Charlie is uh his position on Israel is wrong.
	It's what she wanted to be the case.
	It's not what was the case.
	Uh I'm gonna look into that.
	I just I pulled it up in the back.
	Oh, I scroll all the way to the top here now.
	But with the person pointing out, I mean, a lot of people have been libeled and attacked thanks to Charlie.
	I mean, one of our board members continues to be, by the way.
	Continues to be violated by the cultist.
	No, everyone's gonna believe it.
	Like the more the more he denies it, me think he doff protest too much.
	Uh roll MF and Tide.
	That has to do with country.
	I don't care about the who state of Alabama, who state Alabama, whole state of Alabama.
	I'm from Tennessee.
	Um that is football people.
	I know that.
	Uh always follow the money, says Dapper.
	Dave, obviously voting no on Prop 50, but is California's attempt to at redistricting unconstitutional US MC boroughs?
	Well, let's let's we have a case about um redistricting, Robert.
	Yes.
	I don't understand redistricting.
	No matter what happens, I read these laws, it's like my brain starts checking out.
	You have uh a black activist organization saying the previous redistricting was racist because the the black population of what state was it?
	Is it Louisiana?
	Louisiana.
	Okay, so the black population of Louisiana is one-third of the state, yet according to the redistricting, there was only one of the six districts that's majority black.
	So they say that's racist, it doesn't reflect the population.
	Then they redistrict it, and then whites or non-blacks say this is now racist because it's diluting our vote.
	How are you supposed to do redistricting in a neutral way?
	Like what is the ideal way for it to work?
	Should it not just go based on the geography of cities?
	Oh, I mean, ideally, but effectively partisan redistricting has always been permitted.
	So you draw that whoever gets the you know, get in the governor's chair and the legislature chair gets to draw it to help their own party.
	That that's historically how districting works in the United States.
	So good, bad, or otherwise.
	Now you've had these various neutral committees, these neutral commissions uh being formed.
	They're never neutral, they're usually uh all stacked with democrats.
	It was just the way for them to steal power in Republican states, uh, for the most part.
	And so in Louisiana, what happened is they did one out of six.
	It goes up.
	The courts say, No, you need two out of six.
	So then they put in two out of six.
	And then at the second suit comes up, you're like, hold on a second.
	If race is the sole basis of the redistricting uh under the voting rights act, doesn't that violate the 14th amendment to the United States Constitution?
	So the voting rights act purports to enforce the 15th amendment, but the allegation is that this is race-based redistricting.
	That is uh making race the basis of representation, which is a violation of the uh equal protection clause of the 14th amendment, both by its intention in plain language.
	And so what is now has happened is this has now gone back up to the Supreme Court, and people were originally curious why the Supreme Court had taken the case because this was the Fifth Circuit had ruled first time, no, you need two, and then turn around and said, No, two actually is unconstitutional because different panels are around those cases, by the way.
	The so when the Supreme Court took the one that said the two districts were unconstitutional, people thought the Supreme Court was gonna reverse that.
	But then the Supreme Court this summer sent out and said we want additional briefing, and we want an additional briefing on does section two of the voting rights act, if interpreted to require race-based redistricting, violate the 14th amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
	And then people realize, oh, they might finally get rid of race-based redistricting because it's the affirmative action of Congress.
	And they just got rid of affirmative action for Harvard and all the other universities.
	So presumably they'd finally get rid of it, apply the 14th Amendment consistently to something far more consequential, which is race-based redistricting, which started in the late 80s and early 90s, and it was a deal cut uh between, by the way, at the time, Republicans and black and Hispanic Democrats to screw over populist democrats who built their support on districts that were multiracial.
	And the uh corporate Republicans knew they could get rid of a lot of those populists if they could pack and stack uh black and Hispanic voters together.
	The black And Hispanic constituencies were happy with that because then they could gain power without delivering for their constituency anymore.
	The white populist Democrat had to deliver to black voters or was always at risk of losing to uh a black candidate in the primary or a black supported candidate in the primary.
	Black congressmen don't.
	They they can totally ignore their constituents, and that's what they've done.
	Same with most Mexican American uh Democrats.
	They have completely ignored the interest of their own voters.
	So much so they didn't realize the tie uh title wave that came in West Texas starting into 2020 with support for Trump because they were so betraying their voters, they cared more about illegals than their own voters when those illegals were taking jobs, wages, benefits, health care, uh program protections from their Hispanic native-born Americans.
	And so the uh the goal would be get rid of this crap.
	We never should have had race-based districting.
	I posed it since I was a kid in the 90s.
	The uh and now it looks like the Supreme Court is on and they're gonna hear oral arguments this week on Wednesday about getting rid of race-based redistricting.
	By the way, it would also mean if you're in the betting markets, you might want to take a little shot on Republicans because if this case comes down favorable, if you just listen to oral argument, they'll they'll review they usually leave some tea leaves in those oral arguments and who gets the most questions, what kind of questions are asked, what kind of focal point is the area.
	I put up the PDFs as a link in the Barnes brief to some of the oral arguments this past week, because you can usually really read it to get tea leaves of where they're going, far more than people uh understand and appreciate.
	Because Democrats would lose about 20 to 30 seats if they lost this.
	All of a sudden, Republicans would have a huge edge uh in the midterms.
	So this has ma well, I I'm all for it constitutionally, uh, because I've hated this from the beginning.
	I think it disserves everybody, this serves black voters, disserves Hispanic voters, disserves Asian voters, disserves white voters, disserves everybody.
	But uh, and I think it's unconstitutional, period, but it would have the additional benefit for those of us that might have taken the Republicans, I don't know, for it or one over there, uh, of boosting the Republicans' chances in the midterms.
	Uh I I just don't understand how you go about racial redistricting and not, I don't know, religious redistricting or sexual oriented.
	Can you have like the excuse was the voting rights act said no discrimination based on race?
	Okay.
	And they turned that into a reason to discriminate based on race.
	And but you can't what like Charlie Kirk is constantly falsely attributed to.
	He was critical of the DEI implement uh uh interpretation of the Civil Rights Act.
	He never opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, contrary to what AOC, who by the way libeled him, but she saved the libel for the House floor, right?
	Why does she save it for the House floor?
	Because she knew that was the most immune from a defamation and libel lawsuit.
	That's why she did it.
	Uh so the but it was this interpretation.
	How did a law that was designed to prohibit discrimination based on race become a law that said you must discriminate based on race uh by corrupt rogue and cowardice courts?
	But I'm just interested as how how they haven't like tried to uh apply it mutanus mutandis to um.
	Oh, because the law would apply to race, it doesn't apply to gender anyhow.
	Oh, well, that okay, fine.
	That's one easy answer to a probably a stupid question that had all right.
	Um now, what impact could it have on the midterms?
	Uh they're gonna want the decision by November or December, and then they need a quick decision.
	And if they come down and say race-based districting is unconstitutional, all those states go right back in and redistrict like that.
	They can do that, but they can Mississippi does it, Georgia does it, South Carolina does it, North Carolina does it, Tennessee does it.
	All these southern states that have Republican legislators and Republican governors finally get to redistrict there based on old school redistricting standards, which are partisan-based, which is constitutionally permitted, whether you like it or don't like it as a public policy.
	Uh, but all the racial districts are gone and 20 to 30 uh districts that were created out of whole clock, gone overnight.
	And so, like Texas that added five using this as part of their argument, they said this is coming down the pipeline based on the Fifth Circus decision in the Louisiana case in the Supreme Court's leanings.
	It will allow every other state to do it, and by allowing every other state to do it, uh, it would lead to redistricting before the 2026 midterms.
	Shut up.
	That I would have never thought that there'd be enough time if the if the decision comes down, let's just give it a say a month.
	if it comes down before 2026, there would be enough time between now and November to redistrict uh for the midterm.
	As long as they get it done before February.
	Okay.
	And and they've asked the court officially, please get this done before the end of this year.
	So I think the court by holding argument in mid October, I think that we'll have a decision by late November, early December.
	Okay, that's actually that's very interesting.
	Okay, didn't know that.
	Uh Robert, let me bring up uh the chats over on Hrumble because I saw a big red one from our friend at Don't Do That.
	Sorry, my fat fingers are gonna uh Panther AI.
	Have you heard about Dominion Voting Systems being purchased by a former?
	We're gonna get to that in a second.
	Actually, I heard about that.
	Jonathan, there's no such thing as coincidences in world affairs.
	There are only conspiracies to make them appear to happen.
	Big bad black conservative says, Viva, you have heard the Trump admin came in and fat footed the Texas GOP yesterday.
	We tried to kick 10 rhinos off the Republican ballot.
	Trump's guy came in and demanded the party abstain from voting.
	I have no idea.
	There's so many establishment hacks that still control the party apparatus.
	Uh, thanks, in my opinion, to Swampy Susie Wiles, uh, that that's why we don't get remedy.
	Uh, I mean, the uh, you know, the fed the indictment against Tish uh was handled without any involvement of Pam Bondi.
	Uh of note, uh, the now the official excuse was well, just to make it smoother and cleaner.
	Maybe it's because everything goes to die on Pam Bondi's desk.
	Uh, but the gun owners of America, other major gun rights organizations are now calling for Pam Bondi's firing.
	And a range of people are trying to, you know, everybody in the administration that anybody who has to work with her is going to defend her publicly.
	They're not going to tell you uh what they think privately or publicly for obvious reasons.
	But it's because she keeps screwing up.
	Like this, like we'll discuss the census case.
	That's a case the U.S. government should join in support.
	They're the only defendant.
	Come in and say, you know what, the suit is absolutely right.
	The 2020 census was we'll get to that in a second.
	But so uh we'll see all that percentage.
	No, that's another case.
	And when they come in and the FBI DOJ does good by way of Benny Johnson and finding that guy, you don't want to criticize Pam Bondi, but she's leaving she's successful leaves clues, and so does so do problems.
	Um, by the way, not that I'm the king of uh typos, but it says conceptual.
	You might want to change your um your handle to conservative.
	Um typos, huh?
	I'm the king of making typos, not not finding them.
	Textley says the Palestinians do not want a two-state solution.
	Yeah, they they might just have to accept it anyhow, uh, and with with I don't know, some sort of international or low, you know, geo uh proximate geopolitical uh pressure.
	Big bad black conservative.
	We have heard the Trump.
	Okay, we got we got that.
	Gorgeous mayhem, indie journal here, did a story.
	20% of Uber drivers are illegals.
	Interviews cave O'Keefe style, fake accounts, stolen identities, watch on absolutely I will, because I I knew this as well from the trucker issues that are going on in Canada and here.
	Would love to come on.
	Okay, dude, thank you.
	Let me let me screen grab that.
	I'll I'll message you afterwards.
	Oh okay.
	What's going on here?
	Let me just I want a screenshot like this.
	And then we got King of Bill Tong in the house.
	Did you know we also specialize in imported foods and candies?
	Check out Bill Tong USA for a great selection of imported food, and of course, Bill Tong.
	Bill Tong USA.com code Barnes for 10% off.
	Everyone go watch Joe Pag's interview with Josh Hammer.
	He will explain everything and put Candace in her place.
	Okay, that's from Angie K. Okay.
	Uh, so let's do the uh Pam Bondi census case.
	Wait, is that what you just want to say?
	Yeah, yeah, the census suit.
	Um I might be getting confused now.
	Was this one about um counting uh oh they were using some method of you know uh uh algorithmically determining census instead of actually just relying on real census responses and thus artificially inflating for the purposes of the census count, the number of I don't know, what is it, people eligible to vote?
	No, it's the number of people in America.
	Uh, I didn't understand the mechanism that they were using that was resulting in inflation, inflating of the numbers and thus diluting of the actual voters.
	So maybe you can flesh that out.
	But so, and why is Pam Bondi's DOJ not getting involved in not contesting the suit?
	Yeah, I mean, hopefully, we don't know yet how Pam Bondi is gonna respond.
	My advice and my hope, because Howard Lutnik is the name defendant, is that the Justice Department uh makes an appearance and joins the suit and agrees, doesn't contest the suit, doesn't contest the facts, doesn't try to make motions dismiss, just Comes in and says we agree that the plaintiffs are right.
	So America First Legal Organization originally founded by Stephen Miller, the who's now in the White House.
	Uh, I like it when Miller sticks to some of these issues and doesn't wander off in a certain foreign policy.
	You're just saying, uh, Stephen, God bless.
	The uh actual so the constitution requires actual enumeration of whole persons, and the statute, and that's been interpreted in the past to mean actual counting, not statistical estimates of counting.
	This is why the sentence people are literally supposed to go door to door to door.
	It's always a little bit of a kick when they go to certain places and they run into trouble.
	Like a lot of them are little lefty types and all the rest.
	Uh, and then they go, they think that uh Native Americans can't wait to answer, for example, and they discover that when the US government knocks on the door, some some Native Americans aren't eager to give them answers, and in some other parts of the country they respond certain, you know, differently uh to certain census takers.
	It's not always a safe job in certain parts of the country.
	The I also love them when they ask ethnicity, and there's a large part of America from my neck of the woods that says, uh, you know, what's your ancestry?
	They're like America, they're like, No, no, no, you know, your ultimate ancestor, and they get America, you know, the uh that the that's that's my kind of people.
	So that's what they're supposed to do.
	The Congress is further in required that they not use certain statistical methods to do so.
	You can't estimate this.
	You've got to actually do the enumeration, actual count, not based on some math nonsense.
	And so when you combine this, what the constitution compels and what Congress requires is it requires an actual enumeration.
	It is not in dispute that that is not what the census did in 2020.
	Part of the excuse of the pandemic, they used other excuses, and so they broke the law.
	No question they broke the law.
	The question has been what's going to be the remedy for uh for this vault law violation.
	Well, it turns out Congress provided a private right of action for any aggrieved person to sue, and this includes any person who is getting inadequate representation because of the violations of the law here.
	And so the people that sued by America First Legal are people who have been denied adequate representation.
	The state of Florida, the they sued it out of Florida, would have more congressional districts than the state of California does, uh, in terms of trade-offs.
	There'd be fewer California districts and more Florida districts if they had done it accurately.
	Instead, they basically fudge the numbers to help the left and to deal with their lazy census workers.
	And so the all that the body bonding needs to do is to come in and join the suit.
	Howard Lutnik's the defendant, join the suit, appear and agree and say we agree.
	They're all right, but we have no answer anything beyond their right, their complaints are right, their law is right.
	Judge, issue the order.
	And what's the order?
	To do a new census to get accurate reapportionment, which also could happen before the 2026 midterms, by the way.
	I don't understand how we have these problems in this day and age.
	Like the an accurate kind of commie.
	Well, that's it.
	I mean, that's exactly it's quite obvious that the the underlying goal is manipulation for the purposes of of political game, and there's no excuse to not be able to accurately count um your your population or the people who are here at least.
	And it's going to include illegals, even if it's counted properly.
	Are we getting out of it?
	That issue is still the question is whether if they follow president's executive order will get separate litigated, they couldn't.
	So that will be a separate legal issue.
	Uh why am I getting in trouble?
	Like guys, if people you have to uh go easy on me reading the uh the the rest.
	What the heck, Fever?
	You read my first sentence of my last chat, but ignore the important sentence.
	What they, the Palestinians want is from the river to the sea.
	Dude, if I bring up a chat, everybody sees the entire chat.
	I'm not reading every single word of every single chat verbatim.
	Everyone saw it.
	I understood it.
	You never know what some people I bring it up.
	Everyone saw it.
	I got I I appreciate your they don't want a two-state solution, and that was your rationale.
	Everyone saw it in your in your rumble rant.
	Um then the hold on one second, because the other big other that is gonna conservative increasingly be the Palestinian position.
	The uh, I increasingly doubt that.
	Like it, like even the survey evidence that claims support for Hamas or other groups.
	What when you dig into the survey evidence, it's like two-thirds of Palestinians think they have no effective leaders of any kind.
	Well, then that's suggests to me A different movement.
	And the question is, could Trump's strategy work?
	Give them something to live for rather than something to live against.
	I think it's worth trying.
	So is now someone's saying Viva reads like a Frenchman.
	I'll show you someone who reads like a Frenchman here.
	What does that mean?
	It's to my question, did that not be enough?
	All right.
	Um, let's go let's get out of here.
	Um, so that's the census.
	Uh, let me go see what's the next and then we got a bunch of stuff at SCOTUS.
	We got the uh mail-in ballots standing to be able to sue.
	We've got uh counselors being able to have their counseling rights and speech rights and associational rights protected.
	Uh we've got uh the Senate getting spied on, we've got the libel cartoonists, we got Luigi, we got his antic class action, we got robocalls, and we got turning point USA getting a big win against the uh uh the uh the would-be censors on the university.
	Well, let's do the turning point right away.
	This was at uh University of Chattanooga, Tennessee.
	Hold on a second, Robert.
	This is uh there's no I'm I'm a solo.
	What happened at Chattanooga?
	So the uh so the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, which is my home school, and uh apparently tried to deny through the student organization initially turning point USA opening up a chapter on the campus, and so be while it was on appeal to the uh the university and the dean of students, which had the final decision power.
	Uh word got to me that they were trying to deny it.
	So I went public, put out a comment on X that the I would represent those uh students and would because they'd already reached out to me, so that was gonna be easy.
	Uh, would be suing the school, would win, and the school would have to pay for it.
	Uh yeah, that that was the Trump part that was somehow in my brain.
	When I get irritated when I get going, but the in response, uh, assistant attorney general for civil rights, Harmade Dillon, who continues to do great work at the civil rights division.
	Uh said, let just as she said, let me know if you need uh let me know what happens.
	Let me know what's next.
	So when the assistant attorney general for civil rights says he's paying attention to the case, uh that helps get certain tension at the at the University of Tennessee Chattanooga My Home School.
	Now, I don't know if you mentioned it when I was when I had to what was the rationale?
	Is the rationale ideological, or did they at least attempt they didn't attempt to cloak like no, we can't assure the security, and we don't want to have it.
	They said you promote hate speech.
	So holy shit.
	That those commie students at that school should smack themselves in the face.
	But I dare put commies, commie organizations on that case.
	That's what I was saying.
	I guaranteed they have a comp literal communist organizations.
	Common the so in the in the wake of the man getting murdered, they then say no, not that we can't ensure security, that we actually he was a bad man and a bad organization.
	That to me tacitly almost ratifies the violence that they purport to claim is is uh you know, uh both sides, and everyone has to tone it.
	That's that's effing insane, and I won't swear and I think it was a test balloon to see if they could get away with it.
	And the mistake they made is that those students I'm from Chattanooga.
	People, as soon as they found out about, you know, got in touch with me, and I was gonna do something about it.
	And so the I so I put out the public statement, and here's the precedent.
	I mean, the number of idiots, man, the left, then they can't meme and they can't think, they're almost as bad as Candace Cultists.
	The uh, and it's the like some of the response.
	Oh, Barnes, you don't have standing to sue, you can't sue.
	I said, sue for the students, not sue my own name.
	I'm the lawyer suing.
	Apparently, that that that just can't get through their calculus.
	Uh, so the and here's the precedent.
	The students for a democratic society, SDS won a supreme court case in the early 70s on this.
	For those people that don't know, the SDS had connections to let's say violent disruption, for example.
	Though I always love the big Lebowski when he's sitting there, uh you know, uh smoking the things like oh, I was part of the original poor Huron statement before it got contaminated.
	Yeah, poor statements are radical statement, but the Lebowski was he was the real dude.
	Uh so they went to the Supreme Court, Supreme Court said you cannot, as a as a state college or state university, University of Tennessee Chattanooga is it didn't used to be the University of Chattanooga way back, but in the 1950s, one of the government money, so it became the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, and as part of that, they became a state university, and as a state university, they there's a right to uh speech, a right to assembly, and a right to petition for redress of grievances, which the Supreme Court has long interpreted as the right to association.
	But uh these are also uh government funded, or these are government institutions for the purposes of constitutional protections.
	You couldn't say private enterprise, yeah.
	Open and shut.
	So I would have brought suit under section for 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code, which if I won that suit, then the they would owe my attorney's fees, which is what I put in the post.
	The uh for for and I was gonna win that case.
	That was gonna be open and shut.
	It was just not desire to have to go through that haggle and hassle.
	But for all the other schools out there, hopefully it set the example that all these other schools that are thinking about there's some high schools, public high schools in Chattanooga in my hometown, thinking about this.
	You will be sued and you will be right in me checks if you try this nonsense.
	The read the SDS lawsuits, the Supreme Court case.
	It said even the SDS could not be banned because they said that's prior restraint on speech.
	And it is it is it is presumed unconstitutional.
	It's a prior restraint on association, uh, which is protected by the right to speech, right to assembly, and the right to petition for redress of grievances.
	And as such, the you have to show that they would be very disruptive, and that disruption is not a heckler's veto, that disruption has nothing to do with the content of their speech.
	You have to show the disruption is violent action, and that is the limited and they the Supreme Court said it is a very high evidentiary burden to meet.
	So all these public universities and schools thinking about denying turning point a chapter on your campus, you will get sued and you'll write fact checks.
	So put those kids where they get to be on campus, protect and respect those organizations and quit lying and libeling turning point in the process, please.
	Um who was the uh what's the story with Luigi?
	Um multiple cases.
	No, well, this is Luigi.
	So this is the Luigi, yeah.
	Yeah, this is Luigi the first uh uh Antifa type murderer, although worshipped and revered by the left.
	Oh, yeah, he was so he was so so good looking.
	And so look, he said when they start they celebrated that assassin, and who would have thunk you'd get another assassinate?
	Uh a would an assassin who thought he'd be and and by and large was celebrated.
	Um, so what something went on in this court where they were trying to uh the judge is trying to gag uh members of the the Trump administration from publicly speaking about this case, even though they're not on the prosecution team or uh a part of the prosecution, any of the file.
	Um I felt like I must be misunderstanding something because to expect the administration to not be able to make public statements on the on the case, which is of public interest, or at least the situation.
	Uh I I mean, I can appreciate they're gonna say you don't want to taint the jury pool.
	Uh you don't want to make prejudicial statements.
	I don't know that could uh compromise the administration of justice.
	That being said, to try to gag the entire administration for making any statements on a politically relevant case for however long it lasts, stamped a little overboard.
	Um, so where is it at it?
	I read the filing, which basically was the government saying we didn't do anything wrong, but we won't do it anymore.
	None of the people who made any statements are on the uh process are on the prosecution team or have anything to do with prosecution, so no prejudice.
	But did I not understand that they basically undertook not to make public statements anymore in any event?
	Yeah, they did.
	And this is because of judges abusing their power.
	So the only uh grounds to prohibit uh people's speech outside of the courtroom, is if it would completely prevent the judicial proceedings from being effectively performed and protection of everyone's constitutional rights,
	and so that should be very limited to things like don't present evidence that's not yet publicly known, that is not going to be admitted into trial, uh, that could that you know will get to all the jurors, right?
	That's a heavy threshold because you got a lot of jurors that will never hear about it or know about it.
	And as the as the Justice Department made clear, voidier is the answer for any concern about pretrial publicity.
	Uh, it is not gagging speech, it is not prior restraint.
	The uh second component, like one of the things I don't understand about the Charlie Kirk assassination is they have state law in Utah that has all these harsh restrictions beyond these other restrictions on what can be produced, what can be published, what can be said before trial.
	It's done in the name of protecting a defendant's rights from pretrial adverse publicity.
	But in My experience, what it tends to do is it creates doubts and skepticism about what's happening in the case because it diminishes transparency.
	Uh, and I'm just not in favor of prior restraint unless absolutely essential and necessary to the effective uh protection of constitutional rights and effective jury selection solves this problem much far more often than not.
	So that's issue one.
	Uh and then issue two is the Luigi is moving to dismiss now.
	He has a complex argument about why the federal law doesn't allow him to be prosecuted for a crime of violence involving a gun, even though he's being prosecuted for a crime of violence involving a gun.
	It was like a super technical argument.
	And I got through part of it, I was just like, this is not getting anywhere without any judge, even a judge that's sympathetic with him, in my opinion.
	Very low likelihood.
	Uh, the when you're trying to get the judge to believe the plain language of the law and the policy behind the law is somehow not what it appears to be.
	But the other argument is twofold.
	It's suppression of evidence, uh uh based on Fourth Amendment violations, and then suppression of evidence based on unmirandized custodial interrogation and suppression of evidence based on the arrest being illegal, which relates back to the first one, because if the arrest was illegal, then the search incident to arrest is no longer a justification of uh of the search.
	So it does appear to me the local cops got a little gung-ho, uh, and in getting a little gung-ho, uh they didn't conform to the Fourth Amendment.
	So you get to do a search incident to arrest.
	Uh, and you get to also do a search, what's called an inventory search when someone's been arrested, because the point is to inventory stuff so you can have it there.
	So when they, you know, when they get go out of bail that they're they're you know, their wallet, not everything is theirs, like you know, beginning of blues brothers, you know, they you know, I'll forget one used condom or what else was in there, but that they give uh the Belushi brothers, they have used that loophole huge.
	Uh, you can imagine every cop's like, I'm just gonna ransack your house now because it's a search incident to arrest.
	And I just want to make sure I get the inventory right.
	Well, Robert, they can do what the Canadian food inspection agency is doing up in Canada and just occupy your entire property for a month on end and forget a warrant.
	It's a possession, it's a it's an expropriation warrant.
	That's why the founding fathers, uh, like my cousins, the Adams brothers were right on the revolution.
	Uh, if we hadn't revolted against the Redcoats, we'd look like Comida right now.
	Yeah.
	Or the UK, where grandmas are getting arrested for their ex post.
	Um, it's unbelievable.
	So the their argument is that they arrested him, even though he gave accurate information based on a crime that they didn't have probable cause of at the time.
	They've got some decent arguments there.
	Their best argument is on the search, that the that he was six feet away from his book bag under arrest, surrounded by police officers.
	And the way the high Supreme Court and other courts have dealt with this is they've said they they don't want the search incident to arrest to just be a pretext, hey, arrest the guy, and we can do any illegal search we want.
	They that would otherwise be an illegal search.
	And they don't want the inventory search to be a pretext, a fig leaf for illegal searches.
	So what they've said is as long as what you're searching is within is immediate possession or control, if it's a search incident to arrest to make sure he doesn't have quick access to a gun or a weapon, okay, but it has to be within his immediate possession or control.
	The book bag probably wasn't.
	The second part uh is on an inventory search excuse.
	The inventory search is supposed to be for you, you have to follow your internal protocols and procedures.
	So every department has to set up internal protocols and procedures, and the goal is to make these procedures so to know when someone's doing a bogus search, that's a pretextual search versus a legitimate inventory search.
	They didn't follow their local protocols and procedures when they did the search.
	So the search probably was unconstitutional.
	The question then becomes if you throw out all the evidence that's in the bag, uh, what else is that left of the case?
	Then they're gonna argue inevitable discovery.
	That's gonna be difficult under this instance.
	So the, but I just don't see even despite the political pressure uh by the left to free Luigi, I don't see the court uh embracing that.
	Well, when they went after Ted Kaczynski, that was definitely an illegal search, in my opinion.
	No court was going to rule that way because it was Ted Gacinski and the unibomber, even though the man was an MK Ultra victim, by the way.
	A little side story they they leave out of the Ted Kaczynski unibomber story.
	It was the torture at Harvard that helped radicalize him in the first place when he was a very vulnerable young, uh super smart student there in the I think 50s uh or maybe 60s.
	So the uh so Luigi's got some constitutional argument.
	I don't think the courts are going to dismiss on those grounds.
	Uh, But I think they they still have enough independent evidence, I think, to convict, even without the book bag uh evidence, it's just not as clean and neat as it would be with the book bag evidence.
	It's interesting.
	Like this is one case where if the defense is it wasn't him, and now you know we talk about the best evidence, and what they have is a video that doesn't show him doing it, but lo and behold, he's found with a bag that has the gun in it.
	I you know, here's where I could entertain conspiracy theories based on uh a clear missing element of the evidence, which is his actual face on the actual crime, but then they piece it together with the video where people said that wasn't his face when he was checking into the hotel.
	Uh, they found him with this, you know, the orgy of evidence in his backpack out of McDonald's, miraculously.
	I can entertain conspiracy theories here, but if it is the guy that did it, the defense of the left has never been it's not him, it's an unfair prosecution.
	It was it's that it was a righteous execution.
	That's what that was their defense.
	Um, all right.
	Now hold on one second.
	So, oh yeah, that's it.
	And also on the on the subject of like, you know, when Joe Biden came out in Derek Chauvin and said, you know, we better get a conviction.
	I I did complain, but he said it and they've all said it.
	And so to the extent that you know, there are statements that have become maybe, you know, you can criticize them, but they're legally not impermissible to say that the administration and nobody in the administration can talk about this case uh outside of the court.
	Sounds crazy.
	It sounds like a gag in favor of the defendant.
	Uh and the judge seemingly, and I think quite clearly, has been rendering decisions that are in favor of a Luigi, uh, especially by not, you know, tacking.
	Well, there'll be the state court judge.
	Now, I don't know the federal court judges made any rulings yet.
	He's facing parallel proceedings.
	Okay.
	They're they're disputing parallel proceedings as well.
	Uh, on constitute, they're just preserving constitutional objections.
	Uh, I respect a lot of those uh objections uh in most cases, not necessarily in this instance.
	Uh, but the I mean, I'm not a big fan of that.
	This isn't dual double jeopardy.
	I've never understood that.
	The question is who gets priority in the prosecution, and only one should get a bite at the apple, so to speak, in the big apple, uh, then the other, but that's not the law.
	The law allows for parallel prosecutions and sequential prosecutions because they're treated as two different governments.
	Uh Robert, let me bring up some of the chat in Hrumble in Viva Barnes Law dot locals.com.
	Always follow the money, says Dapper Dave.
	J45 sent Viva.
	I made a bunch of decals in honor of Charlie, just giving them away for free.
	I didn't copyright them.
	Feel free to use it.
	And it says, Be happy, be Charlie 09010.
	September 10, 2025, never forget.
	Gray 101 says, Is it still unsafe to be a federal whistleblower?
	First term Trump taught us that you will be destroyed for patriotism no matter who's in office.
	Yeah, I don't know.
	Chauffein says APAC taking it on the chin today, and I'm loving it.
	Red Sox 1983 says, with the way Barnes is describing Candace, just asking questions over the last week.
	I gotta ask, has he seen the South Park episode dancing with Smurfs?
	Yeah.
	I haven't seen that.
	Buffalo Betsy.
	She can't claim that though, right?
	Because she had to live in New York to disqualify.
	Oh, no, that was the secondary residence for the property.
	This is a different fraud.
	This was not a this was not her declaring it was primary residence.
	It was her declaring that the property shoes for rental was a secondary residence, which she never used it as.
	DTQC says it's now official.
	Canada has entered the United States this week.
	It's now official.
	Canada has entered.
	Okay.
	Buffalo Betsy.
	Also, let's say circumstances do change after you purchase the property.
	Are you obligated to go in and amend the paperwork?
	I'm fairly certain you are.
	I mean, it's like if this were for an insurance claim and she didn't notify them of the change, they would not they would not cover the claim.
	Period.
	Yeah, just think about it.
	Like, let's say you have health insurance or life insurance, uh, and you develop a certain condition, and the uh and there's ongoing there's certain ongoing obligations that you have to submit updated information.
	Oh, for sure.
	Imagine if if you know if the if the rental property had burnt down and the insurance company discovers that she was renting it and not using it as a secondary residence, they would deny the claim outright.
	Kate Tribbok says, Robert, you're protesting too much.
	S. Ren.
	Monday I noticed a strange amount of CCP.
	Uh communist Oh, yes.
	The China show did a great job of breaking that down.
	China builds this big fancy uh show project, vanity project bridge out in the middle of rule nowhere that serves no real purpose but to broadcast how wonderful China is to the world.
	They do nothing to improve the well-being of the local people in that community.
	Like people are saying, Well, that's great.
	You know, if you just don't spend as much money on the military, you can build bridges like this.
	I I'm not for building bridges to nowhere.
	Uh I'd be for building bridges that actually help people that actually improve the economy.
	That you know, here they have this region that's surrounded by deep poverty, and they do nothing for them.
	They just build a big fancy bridge to say, Look at me, commie, I'm doing good, and a bunch of oh Sagar.
	Oh man, he took the bait on it entirely.
	And the China show now have a meme of him.
	And Crystal Paul that just making fun of him.
	The China's the China show on YouTube.
	They uh they always do a great job covering China.
	They they get the funniest stuff.
	You know, in China, is spitting is not considered assault.
	So it happens when you get into an argument with somebody.
	No, it just turns into spit.
	In fact, they even drink water to spit as much as they can on the other.
	So you get wild things there.
	They they cover all the craziness in China, which is great.
	Uh these propaganda projects for what they are.
	Yeah, well, S. Ren makes a good point.
	A failing nation with nukes does scare me.
	Black market nukes would be bad for the world.
	Showforth says, What's going on with Trump not helping Alex Jones or Mike Lindell had to declare judgment against his company?
	There's not much other he can do in the Lindell case that I'm aware of.
	And Jones, it's a little bit limited because it's what the U.S. trustee can do in the bankruptcy case.
	Uh, so it's not as I think Alex thought it would be a little simpler than I think it is.
	Now, I think the civil rights division should inquire investigate my understanding.
	Ed Martin is investigating whether or not the his civil rights were violated by uh rogue state judges because I think it did happen, but I don't know if that investigation is uh forthcoming or not.
	Have I never noticed that AOC was at the bottom of that meme?
	I don't think I ever noticed that.
	Oh, I thought somebody had that's great.
	That's why one of our great meme makers and the barns law.
	That was the best one ever.
	Buffalo Betsy says, Viva, you belong here, you're included.
	Thank you very much.
	And hopefully the paperwork will sooner than later be accepted.
	Uh Andrew Piscadlo.
	I'm happy to see the indictment for big Tish.
	Do more.
	These bad actors permeate up and down the government.
	If you keep this up, you might actually motivate those voters who are disappointed with the new and approved Bush light version of Trump.
	I can't convince minority working class voters I live amongst who are street smart that an Iran attack is in their best interest, and I want Trump to sync too with that baggage.
	Um, okay, we'll give away when they sign the deal.
	I'll give it three and a half years before it's broken.
	Piscadlo says, Robert, please expand on the area of a place you'd like them to search for bad actors to hang.
	Um to hang out.
	Big Tish Comey are great.
	Uh no, we go, we got them.
	We got a number of them.
	Uh now let's see what we got in 2000.
	Yeah, you if you were a back of America.
	Well, we lost that because Trump didn't take Colonel McGregor's advice about getting out of Afghanistan before he left.
	So he got stuck with Biden leaving it.
	And uh the Taliban is in a apparently Afghanistan and Pakistan are a war.
	The uh uh the Taliban's at it, but you know what's helping the Taliban?
	All those US Humvees are driving through and US weapons and US tanks that we left behind.
	But that I get Trump complaining about it, but Trump could have stopped that problem by getting us out of Afghanistan by following Colonel McGregor's advice before he left in 2020.
	Now I think he say it publicly, but he's regretting his failure to do that as he witnesses this on live because to see U.S. military billions of dollars we left behind.
	Yeah, well, or or that that catastrophic political failure was was big enough to you know have not sunk Biden but be used as a tool against him.
	Uh Mike has bad knees.
	Is there a valid case of market manipulation by Trump with his social media posts, causing the markets to tank with one post, then following it up with another post saying, Never mind the new expertise.
	If you can be a Trump translator, you can make all kinds of money in the market because it'd be like ah, you're trying to 100% tariffs.
	Ah, she just had a bad day.
	We'll work it out, no problem.
	Everybody, everybody chill.
	He also doesn't do this on the weekends.
	He always does so the markets go crazy right before it closes, and then you get futures going wild, then he pulls it all back.
	So that there's people making money, just shorting or betting what Trump's post really mean.
	It's like a new area of foreign policy expertise.
	Can you translate the latest Trump truth buffs?
	Uh, I think markets will respond to anything.
	So the idea of holding, I mean, unless it's explicit and fashion.
	Well, I think Trump is now manipulating, it's just Trump being Trump means the markets are gonna go a wild directions while he's president because Trump is Trump.
	Uh Robert, do we so Luigi?
	What's the libel cartoonist?
	I know that I need to.
	Oh, so that's the uh cartoonist who a woman who uh a librarian in Louisiana.
	Uh the opposed any content-based restrictions at the public library.
	Okay, that's the one where they defamed her.
	Uh they interpreted her having a constitutional position as meaning she supported uh kids getting taught how to do anal sex.
	Well, this is the one okay.
	One doesn't necessarily mean the other.
	Well, this is the one where she sued for defamation based on Facebook posts, which were arguing that she promotes basically pedophilia, uh promotes cloud porn to kids, and once and they they took their interpretation of her defending a constitutional position in ways that her statements did not support their interpretation.
	And we guess what they thought their defense was oh, opinion.
	It's along as an opinion, we can always get away with it.
	Well, opinion public figure, and uh, you know, they so it's the argument they were raising against this woman, I forget what her exact position was or or argument was in support of you know not banning books.
	Uh, but basically they said, Oh, she she supports these books that have all this lewd and lucidity, whatever the word is, uh CP for kids, showing them how to give BJs and hand jobs.
	And so they posted on Facebook that she supports child pornography, basically.
	She sued, it was initially dismissed, and then it was re-established, or uh it was it was it was reversed on appeal, and they said she's got a basic, you know, potential chance of success.
	And so proceed to the evidence, and we'll see what the evidence shows.
	Exactly.
	And the this is a reminder to everybody, you don't get to couch a factual statement in an opinion uh or in a question, like I I see being done commonly now, uh, and magically escape liability.
	If you make a statement that infers a specific fact, it can simply infer it about someone, and that fact is false.
	And that statement is and that factual claim is made with reckless disregard for the truth, even if it's disguised and couched in a question like when did you stop beating your wife?
	Oh, I'm just asking a question.
	That routine that is libel, and you can get sued for it.
	So just a little reminder uh of folks to be able to draw distinctions and don't assume everybody's making a constitutional argument, supports the outcome that constitutional argument may be.
	I support First Amendment right to burn the American flag.
	I know it's very unpopular, but I supported it since I was a kid because that's what the constitution stands for.
	Uh even offensive speech.
	Now, if it violates some other law like a fire nuisance or something else, fair to prosecute.
	But just because it's an American flag that's being burned doesn't magically remove it from speech protection.
	The but that doesn't mean I like people burning the flag, the uh or any of it.
	So you know, the there's this tendency sometimes that if someone I believe in bail, that means bail for Glenn Maxwell.
	That means bail for Jeffrey Epstein, that means bail for uh he didn't.
	That is had Epstein gotten his bail, he probably wouldn't have been dead.
	We would have a lot avoided a lot of people.
	I know the truth at the moment, but do I desire Jeffrey Epstein to be out of jail?
	No.
	Do I desire Glenn Maxwell to be out of jail?
	Hey, Mr. President, do not pardon her.
	Uh the no, the but uh the Eighth Amendment, I believe it reads in the words it's written in.
	And if you don't like it, change the constitution.
	Don't pretend the constitution doesn't stand for what it says it stands for.
	So the uh, and I think there's a tendency sometimes for people to want to condemn people who believe in the constitution because they don't like the particular policy consequence that that constitutional protection provides.
	Uh Robert, actually, on this one, I didn't see this.
	Any quick thoughts on Todd Blanche, uh Blanche holding up Tina not being moved to a federal prison.
	I hadn't heard that.
	There's a lot of debate about what can be done or not done.
	So, according to Tina Peters' lawyers, there was something in place to get that the state of Colorado was going to transfer her to a federal facility that would be less at risk for her safety based on the grounds that she may become a material witness in a federal civil rights inquiry.
	The according to Tina Peters' lawyer, uh, the person uphold holding it up is the deputy attorney general Todd Blanche.
	This is the same deputy attorney general who publicly justified and rationalized that still unsigned uh Jeffrey Epstein cover-up routine.
	He's a long-standing corporate lawyer from New York.
	He has long-standing Democratic Party ties.
	To me, he just saw an opportunity with Trump and ran with it.
	And you're not going to get honest feedback from anybody who works in the Justice Department, not publicly.
	Uh, and you're not going to get it from anybody like Mike Davis who wants to stay buddy buddy of that crap.
	They're gonna protect him.
	I understand that, but that makes them untrustworthy and unreliable on this particular topic.
	A lot of people keep complaining that Todd Blanch is a bottleneck for getting meaningful prosecutions and meaningful remedies uh in these cases of abuse of state power, whether it's the Alex Jones uh uh the civil lawfare waged against him, whether that's whether trying to take over info wars as we speak could happen at any time that they could get locked up and closed down.
	Uh, the uh whether it's Tina Peters still being in a stuck in a uh very difficult and risky state prison uh as an uh elderly woman uh whose health is vulnerable.
	The uh whether it's Kurt Benchouf in Seattle, whose objection to the effect the of the trans movement through his uh uh the mother and the girlfriend of the mother uh on his son led to him being in prison for more than 10 years in the state of Washington, uh simply for objecting to that fundamentally is what they did uh in a rigged case that was rigged from beginning to end uh in multiple ways.
	That we people are not seeing remedy on these cases, and they're looking to the deputy attorney general as being a problem.
	So the people around him say no, he's absolutely working.
	Ed Martin says no, he's working well with us, and we're he we're moving forward and progressing, and Mike Davis says he's a great champion.
	Uh all I know that he's done publicly is cover up the Epstein case.
	So uh, and I know his background, and nothing about his background gives me any confidence in him doing the right thing in any case.
	I'll be happily proven wrong once he does it.
	All right, amazing.
	Uh, let me see.
	Here we go to uh multiple SCOTUS cases, the Senate spying, the Xantac class action and robocalls left.
	So let's do the SCOTUS cases.
	Um let me then let me pull the scepter.
	I'm looking at this.
	Uh well, which ones did we miss?
	We did mail and ballots, we did racial redistricting.
	What's left for SCOTUS?
	Oh, well, we did the uh did we do mail and balloting?
	I don't think we did mail it balloting.
	Did we not racial redistrict people?
	Oh, well, well, right uh before you before you cover the mail and balloting.
	I I saw, did you see the I don't even know it's a meme or reality where uh you could they were mailing back ballots where you could see the vote through the envelope.
	Oh, that's happening in California.
	Okay.
	So the uh is it really rigged the envelope so they can know whether you're voting no, that they don't know whether you're well, they know by implication whether you voted yes, because they apparently can see that the envelope, so they can look at that and go, uh, in the trash, uh, in the trash.
	The Camifornia is an expert at rigging elections, and they're doing everything possible to rig elections so that they can rig future elections by rigging redistricting again.
	Okay, so uh let me bring it up because I just I I there's things if I don't if I don't know definitively that they're true, I don't want to get it.
	Yeah, what I can tell you is uh that the it is under investigation uh because assistant attorney general Harmie Dillon has expressed interest and that if this is the case, this is a violation of federally protected civil rights, which is a bit within her jurisdiction to investigate and prevent.
	But this is what I've seen it from multiple places that the way in which the envelope is structured is designed so that they can look through the envelope and know whether you're voting no or not.
	I mean, it would be one hell of a coincidence.
	Unless it's I mean, I don't know how you fake this.
	It would be it would be oh, I see.
	If you put it if you if you put it one way by accident, not knowing, then they can correct.
	Oh, that's true.
	And was that a coincidence that they structured the envelope that way?
	I mean, it's classic Camifornia.
	This is what the old school Democrat taught me in Grundy County, Tennessee, coal mining country.
	They once voted for the socialists in 1912, and they're radical up there, old school coal mining country.
	Now big Trump country.
	The uh uh, because that's back when you know they thought you know, socialists were more Eugene V Debs take down the system, not a bunch of would-be commie uh kids.
	The uh is that you know, he goes, uh it was the old saying, you know, doesn't matter who votes, it's who counts the votes that matters.
	They had rigged the machines so that somehow, no matter which way you voted, it always came up Democrat.
	He's like, ah, yeah, Barnes, we it's gonna be 94% in this precinct.
	How do you know that in advance?
	Well, how do you think?
	So the uh uh coming for you is an expert in that.
	Uh so what was the mail and ballot um lawsuit?
	So this is uh uh helped brought by good work by Tom Fitting at Judicial Watch.
	This is about Illinois uh being able to count ballots after election day.
	The way in which the courts are dodging it is they're saying, uh, guess what?
	No, no standing.
	No, it's no standing.
	The uh, of course, uh the remember everybody, an election case.
	If if you bring a suit in spring, it's not ripe yet.
	If you bring it in summer, it's totally moot.
	And if you bring it in fall, latches, what a lazy bum.
	You should have brought it in spring.
	The when of course, you couldn't sue either.
	So once again, this is a candidate suing.
	And they're saying the candidate for making sure that only accurate ballots are counted on the right constitutional manner because ballots that come in after election day appear to be illegal under federal law.
	But yet he's stuck with dealing with that risk, has to pay expenses out of his campaign to deal with that risk.
	And so now he doesn't have standing.
	So it's up to the Supreme Court.
	Hopefully, they they fix that rule about federal law and being all these, you know, day after, two days after, three days after counting ballots.
	They just like in Nevada, they just magically keep coming.
	Kami Fonya, they magically keep coming.
	Europe does this all the time.
	You know, the Europe, you they can't even do regime change.
	These people are so unsophisticated.
	You know, they keep trying to do regime change in Georgia, Republic of Georgia, but they keep forgetting to at least wave the Georgian flag.
	Don't have the EU flag.
	They don't mix in the Palestinian flag, the Ukrainian flag when you're trying to do regime change in Georgia as an organic protest.
	The uh, but they can't even fix elections with any sophistication.
	They just shut down in Moldova, they just shut down whole booths, ban whole candidates, arrest whole people out of out of the blue on the eve of election.
	So, but uh that so that's what's happening here.
	But the big key is the standing issue could be reinterpreted by the Supreme Court to drastically expand our ability to get election integrity before an election.
	What they're doing right now is they force you to sue after an election, and then they never want to overturn the election.
	So you never get relief and remedy when they fix the election.
	So hopefully the Supreme Court, now, unfortunately, justice like Thomas tend not to be good on standing.
	So we'll see.
	And then if you read the oral argument, it started off on that same dumb point.
	Sadly, it's one of his uh not not strong points.
	I understand where he's coming from.
	He doesn't want all these lefties bringing suits for stupid reasons and involving courts overturning the people's will.
	But this is a context in which the corrupt actors are interfering with the people's will.
	Uh so hopefully uh they they do it expand and respect standing in ways that you can bring pre- uh election challenges.
	That would be huge for improving the integrity of elections, as well as only having ballots count when they're actually cast on the day they're legally allowed to be cast.
	Uh the the standing, it should be anyone and everyone in America, even if you're not a voting age, you will be one day.
	You have standing.
	It's insanity, and we lived through it in 2020, and it was an absolute outrage.
	And I understood the argument as to how the Supreme Court made the civil war a necessary um uh outcome because of their poor decisions and or delinquent decisions.
	Um, the no doubt.
	That's all they did, but hopefully they fix it there.
	The two other Supreme Court cases up there.
	Speaking of mail, is uh you may not know it, but the Congress has passed a special law immunizing the post office for doing what?
	For misplacing your mail, like the only job they have, make sure my mail gets there.
	Well, I can understand it, Robert.
	I mean, it's their job, it's what's gonna happen when they when you know, not even negligence, but uh deliberately and intentionally, and they're like, nah, we're immune from that too.
	So that's gonna be up on the Supreme Court.
	Do they get to steal your mail and get away with it?
	Hold on, the Supreme Court, Pam Bondi's Justice Department is arguing, yes.
	Well, I presume apply the presidential immunity.
	It would be you would get immunity from acts within the con the general context of your job, which would not include deliberate, and it would not include negligence.
	It's like you I that that's the immunity I would give.
	You're doing your job right, responsibly, something falls off the table underneath immunity.
	You see something you like and you steal it, or you I don't know, leave a door open during a storm.
	That's negligence.
	You do not do not deserve immunity for that.
	That's how I and where it's an issue where it overlaps is with a concern for a lot of conservatives, and we've seen uh you know, sporadic anecdotal evidence of this.
	Uh, that the post office is stealing mail in ballots if they don't you'll have a post office employee whose union is endorsed a certain candidate stealing ballots where they don't like who it is they may have cast that ballot.
	We had that issue during 2020.
	James O'Keefe reported something and had to retract because the employee or the whistleblower recanted their statement.
	Oh, I have to refresh the email yesterday.
	It reminded him of why he didn't want to believe it.
	The uh that they there's still strong suspicions of it.
	I wouldn't doubt it.
	There's, I mean, you'll find post op ballots thrown away in the mail, thrown away in the trash.
	Who was it that did it?
	Nine times out of ten, it was the postal employee.
	So the postal employee is not always the most uh trustworthy person on the planet.
	And the so this case can't even impact that indirectly.
	And then last but not least is free speech and free association and frankly competent scientifically driven medical advice in the context of gender identity and sexuality.
	And in Camarado, they passed a law prohibiting people.
	They claim oh, we're only prohibiting certain kinds of treatment.
	That isn't it.
	Their goal is to prohibit, particularly religious groups, from being able to counsel people who don't want to change their gender, uh, who have doubts about their gender identity, yeah, yeah, uh, and who have doubts about their sexuality.
	And they basically said, No, here's the state line, you have to repeat, or guess guess guess what tool they're using.
	They're gonna review de licensure.
	Exactly.
	So I tell you, but licensure is for crap.
	It's given the state a monopoly, it's anti-free market, and you want a bunch of bureaucrats dictating who can be a lawyer, who can be a doctor, who can be even mechanic these days, who can be a solo who can be who can do your hair at the barber shop.
	You know, the the it's nuts how crazy this uh licensure obsession has become.
	But Cameron always that licensure control to try to create speech control, and that is up before the Supreme Court of the United States.
	I think based on the questioning, the only thing the Democrat liberal judges could come up with is please pretend there's no standing, please pretend there's no standing.
	That was their new excuse for trying because they know they're dead to rights on the constitution.
	Camerado should lose.
	This is exactly what we have up in Canada with the conversion therapy ban, which you know sought to prohibit uh conversion therapy, but it was only converting, you know, advising giving therapy to people who think they're trans to say no, you can you you're not a boy or you're not a girl, and you don't have to go through with this.
	That was outlawed, but you know, affirming it in straight or gay kids, uh, and universally get a government taxpayer grant subsidy.
	No, and it was the conservatives of Canada voted unanimously in favor of this of this conversion therapy ban as well.
	So that's uh I see you look to Canada, see what's coming down to the states, and it's going to appear in California, New York, Michigan, Colorado, and Maine.
	And they put the con in conservative.
	The week of left we have Senate spying, the Zantac class action, robocalls, Benny Johnson's uh the threat against Benny Johnson and the arrest, James Comey's arrest and Robo.
	Oh, no, that's it.
	Oh, five left.
	Let's so let's do well.
	Okay, I'm gonna give everybody the link.
	So there is no paywall this week for the after party.
	So come on over to the after party.
	So we'll save a little more than usual for the after party.
	The Zantac, let's just do that because you know, mainstream and not medical advice, everybody.
	I hadn't heard about this, and I hadn't heard about the reason for which Zantac is alleged to potentially cause cancer.
	The the suit was dismissed by an activist judge who basically said who adjudicated on the expert evidence before it went to trial, saying uh it's not good enough expert evidence.
	Uh, I forget exactly the reasons, but basically dismissed the expert evidence to dismiss the case before it even got to trial.
	The argument is that Zantac, Zantax, which was I I didn't realize it was also pulled from the market.
	I'm just gonna double check that can cause cancer because there's an ingredient in it, which when it breaks down becomes a carcinogenic.
	So if the if the if the drug or the medication is not properly stored, humidity temperature-wise, whatever, the medicinal ingredient, and I think it was an active ingredient, but whatever an ingredient in Zantac breaks down and becomes carcinogenic, and it was known, and it was known, and they were acting on this potential risk before the lawsuit got initiated.
	Um, and then the lawsuit gets initiated, and you have a judge basically say expert evidence is not proving what I think it needs to prove at this stage and dismisses it in in favor of it for the benefit of big pharma.
	It gets reversed on appeal.
	Let me just double check if Zantec had been pulled from the market.
	Robert, what do you think of the case?
	So uh one, it's another reminder of how big pharma, like if we want to stop dangerous drugs, uh and criminal drug dealers from harming uh America, it isn't Venezuela we should be invading, it's Pfizer.
	That's who we should be invading.
	But the uh Zantac is just another reminder of that.
	This drug popularly sold throughout the country is a solution to all your stomach issues and so forth.
	I I didn't realize.
	I mean, I I I thought it was still out there.
	I remember I remember the ads.
	I remember what the pill looks like.
	Zantac rented and is ranted and then was pulled from the market in April 2020 due to concerns about contamination with N, whatever the hell that is, a known carcinogen.
	Okay.
	Sorry, I didn't mean to cut you off.
	Yes, and by the way, five was what why haven't you heard about it?
	Because the number one advertiser, as Vice President Vance pointed out uh on the Joe Rogan interview and elsewhere, and as Secretary Robert Kennedy has pointed out, they don't advertise to sell their products, they advertise to make sure the media doesn't cover adverse news concerning their products, uh, and instead pitches and promotes their products.
	And that's why our boomer president, God bless him, still believes in the safety of some of these things that he shouldn't.
	But Zantac's another example of that.
	But they were about to get away with it because a judge decided to take off her black robe and much as they did during the pandemic, put on their white latcoat and explain to everybody how they are the expert.
	Uh, and they reflexively worship at the idol of big pharma.
	Uh, you know, it's the only vaccine, holy vaccine.
	It's that that's who they are at heart.
	That's who they are in their soul.
	And so the uh what happened here is they abused their power over expert witness control, which they have long misused and abused, uh, as their gatekeeping role.
	Uh, the to basically prohibit and prevent correct cont correct claims from reaching a jury and letting a jury decide the truth of the matter.
	And so this judge decided to, even though there were hundreds of experts in support of the argument that Xant again, FDA didn't remove it for nothing, uh, that this was a dangerous drug that caused cancer.
	Uh, that they, but she said, nope, I don't think these experts are good enough to even reach a jury and dismissed the entire class action.
	Thankfully, the 11th circuit even realized, which has been no fan of the ordinary individual, usually is a big corporate whore, more often than not, like most federal judges.
	Uh said, nah, this is this is a little too far.
	This was obviously excessive.
	So it appears that these anti-class action will be reinstated, uh, thankfully, but more consequently, if the case goes forward in the way it should, this oh this uh should change the way judges abuse their expert witness control so that legitimate cases let are decided by the jury as the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution guaranteed.
	I'm gonna certainly do a car vlog on this because um it is uh it's wild.
	Everyone was I I didn't take it, despite I think at one point it being an offer.
	Like, oh, you got indigestion, take Zantac.
	Just say, hey, oh, you're a little overweight, take Ozempic, and now we're seeing what's going on with Ozempic.
	It's like people think, oh, there are adverse events to every drug you put in your mind.
	You and Trump had to say about a Zipic.
	Uh, I think so.
	I mean, I know he just oh, yeah, you know, they got the the fat drug, I call it the fat drug, and somebody become four, and they say this fat drug's working great, and I'm like, I don't see it.
	It's it's working great at something.
	Uh, it's going to uh really cripple uh a large portion of the population.
	What it what it does is just insane.
	Uh, we're gonna end on this one, Robert, because I want to do this, I want to put this freaking journalist on on minor blast.
	Um, Charlie Kirk, not Charlie, Charlie Kirk.
	Um, Benny Johnson had gotten a the way the article describes it, you think, oh, he just got a little a letter in the mail uh without appreciating the full extent of the threat, which was not just a benign uh threat where the guy said, I'm not gonna do it, but it was uh it was it was an overt malicious act of true threat.
	Uh this guy, this is how NBC News reports on it, and it's amazing.
	Federal authorities charge a man with sending a threatening letter to the home of a conservative influencer who has deep ties to the Trump administration.
	If you don't know who Benny Johnson is, you would probably think this was the guy that threatened this the sent the threatening letter if you don't know who Benny Johnson is.
	If you don't read the article and you don't know, you'll you're never gonna get that corrected.
	And you notice how they also have to like blame Benny Johnson, say, oh, yeah, he is.
	I mean, they're contorting and distorting it to excuse and minimize what this person did.
	And instead of making like the Trump administration is weaponizing the Justice Department to just go after people who send letters in the mail when this was a murderous threatening risk to kill him and his family, and had the presence of imminent risk that they went and arrested him before he could do it in light of the Charlie Kirk assassination.
	So this was outrageous, horrendous conduct that should be uh being the rip denounced by the media, and instead it is being effectively permission slipped and and promoted by the media.
	No, so I I put out a glib tweet.
	It's like, hey, Ryan J. Riley, who is on you know they're they're they're nutbags when they're on blue sky.
	This guy was on blue sky.
	Yeah, there you go.
	Jay Riley on blue sky.
	You know you're dealing with a nut bag when they're on blue sky.
	Uh I said you use this photo, and someone could, you know, cynically think you're almost trying to make Benny look like uh the aggressor in this in this incident and not the victim.
	But the FBI and the DOJ and local law enforcement found a fingerprint, found the guy, arrested the guy.
	Uh, gonna charge him with with with uh, I don't know if it's wire using uh uttering threatening messages.
	And uh instead of having a journalist say this is absolutely atrocious, especially in the wake of they they almost try to victim blame Benny Johnson.
	The dude is always smiling, like you have to look, you have to go out of your way to find a photo of Benny Johnson not smiling.
	He's a he's a god, I don't want to say god fearing anymore because I think god loving is a better way to describe it.
	He's a god loving good family man who, if you catch him not smiling, congratulations.
	You must be shooting at like one eight thousandth of a second, and you caught that one frame.
	Um and it's just disgusting.
	So I I share that tweet, everybody, and you know we're done with this.
	Enough is enough from these these outlets who want to promote more of this violence and intolerance.
	All right, we're going over to Viva Barnes Law, dot locals.com.
	How do I give everybody the link?
	Uh, and I have to do I have to end it one by one.
	Uh here, come on over.
	Uh can't do this here.
	What's going on?
	Stop it.
	Oh, we got a raid.
	Let's go raid.
	I think I see Drew on the front page.
	How do I raid now that I'm doing this?
	Hold on one second.
	Go here, Zantac.
	That was where we're gonna raid.
	Oh, yeah.
	No, it's so Drew is on with um Elijah, who many of you you may not like him.
	Too bad.
	I like both of these guys.
	Uh, okay, let's go.
	We're gonna go raid there.
	You got the link.
	Come on over to the Rave of Barnes.
	Rob, what do you have going on this week?
	Uh, the OB alive with the uh bourbons with Barnes, uh Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday might have a what are the odds Monday, not sure as yet.
	Uh, and have some hearings and other matters on Friday.
	So then got a big legal matter that I'm working on uh all week.
	So the uh so but yeah, well, and there'll be some Barnes briefs up at Viva Barnes Law, dot locals.com.
	Maybe I uh get around there's some hush uh the Bitman library stacking the hush hushes, gotta get around to those as well.
	So the uh might see some of those, some Barnes Law School stuff.
	All of Viva Barnes Law, dot locals.com.
	Uh, I'm gonna try to get Samson on the rapper who just put out that great uh another another amazing insightful song.
	Uh, I'm gonna get a working on some interviews and I'll be live uh daily all week.
	And I'll be on with Drew on Tuesday in the afternoon, and uh that's it.
	Okay, I'm gonna raid now.
	For everybody who doesn't know, if you don't opt out, you're gonna get yeeted over, but come on over to Viva Barnes Law dot locals.com.
	No paywall today.
	So confirming the raid, let them know who sent you.
	And um booya.
	Okay, let's do this here.
	Viva has raided.
	Viva Raid Booya.
	And uh now Robert.
	Uh so what do we have left on the uh local side?
	I'll get to the tip questions in a second.
	I'm just gonna kick us off of all these platforms here.
	James Comey was still arrested, even if he wasn't paraplocked.
	The Senate uh discovers it's being spied upon by laws that the Senate itself passed.
	And Robocalls a special exemption for politicians.
	Okay, now I'm gonna remove from Rumble.
	Okay, Rumble, we're going over.
	I'm doing this on stream.

▲