All Episodes
Previous
Sept. 16, 2025 - Viva & Barnes
01:12:52
Pam Bondi War on “Hate Speech”? Kash Patel Grilled by Senate & More!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Gentlemen of the interwebs, perhaps the dumbest, most obnoxious member of government.
Ms. Hidono asks her question of Cash Patel today.
Get ready for fingernails on the eardrums.
Move on to my.
You've been asked some questions about changes to your hiring standard.
And including college uh degrees and uh possibly the age.
But you know, one question I had is um let me find it.
That you are not requiring applicants to be able to do a certain kind of pull-ups, uh, which um a lot of women cannot because of physiological differences.
Are you requiring uh these kinds of pull-ups?
We are requiring a physical program at BFTC equantico because FBI agents carrying guns in the field have to chase down bad guys and do really hard work.
The physical fitness standards of those agents.
So are you requiring these kinds of uh pull-ups?
We are requiring everything.
Did she just say because of physiological differences?
Everybody to pass the 1811 standards at BFTC.
If you want to chase down a bad guy and put him in handcuffs, you better be able to do a pull-up.
The reason I ask is that uh there uh are concerns about whether or not uh being able to do these kinds of harsh pull-ups is uh really required of FBI agents.
Harsh, harsh pull-ups.
Doing one pull-up is not harsh.
And there are always medical exemptions to that.
Let me just uh go to the incriminating part, Ms. Herono.
Do you realize what you just said?
Um a lot of women cannot because of physiological differences, uh, which um a lot of women cannot because of physiological differences.
Last time, uh, which um a lot of women cannot because of physiological differences.
Are you so uh I don't I don't get it now?
Or are we this is from Nick Sortor.
Justin, Dem Senator Maisie Hirono is whining to catch Patel saying it's quote harsh to require women to do pull-ups like men to join the FBI.
So Hirono just admitted there are physical differences between men and women.
Incredible.
She's a bigot.
I mean, though those are those are the rules.
Uh, aren't there?
Like, uh so there's there's physiological differences between men and women that men have an advantage, and we simultaneously support the endeavors of men to compete in women's sports if they identify as uh a woman.
This is from the Trust the Science Party.
This is from the uh We're not conspiracy theorists party.
This is from the two weeks to flatten the curve.
Uh boys can be girls, climate crisis party.
They are the biggest bunch of idiots on the planet.
Good afternoon, everybody.
How goes the battle?
Uh this is uh a lot of news.
I was on uh with the unusual suspects recording this morning, uh, and that episode is gonna air this afternoon, and then I'm you know driving on my way back and catching up on the news or keeping up with the news.
We had the press conference today announcing the charges that are going to be laid against Charlie Kirk's assassin, and we're gonna go over that.
Uh Cash Patel had uh Senate hearings this earlier today.
Hold on one second.
Uh I want to get know exactly what the purpose of the of the Senate hearings were.
I mean, it had to do with the investigation and a bunch of other stuff testifying today, but they have these Senate hearings.
Uh what do they call what was the the title for today's Senate Judiciary Committee and the sealed?
So it's just a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.
That was one of the questions that they had asked there today.
We're gonna go over that, and we're gonna go over Pam Bondi, the attorney general of these United States of America, who you know there's a concept called fractal wrongness, and it's when you're wrong to a statistically impossible degree.
You flip a coin, you can't get it wrong every time, even if you tried, unless you have some sort of advanced knowledge, or unless the the coin is weighted, or unless you just have incredibly bad luck at guessing that you guess to a degree that is statistically impossible in terms of not getting heads or tails right.
Pam Bondi, I believe, has been doing everything fractally wrong since she has become attorney general.
And I say this with someone who did not have a strong opinion of her one way or the other when Matt Gates uh withdrew and she was appointed.
I had no opinion of her.
You know, every everybody back in the day, I remember this now was uh not smitten, but they were shocked at how old she is, because she looks very young and naturally so.
How old is Pam Bondi?
Do you guys know how old she is?
59 years old.
I guess it's it's good if you take care of yourself and you eat healthy and you exercise, you don't get too much sun, you don't smoke, you don't do the standard stuff.
No opinion of her at the beginning, negative or positive.
My presumption was good because Trump is picking her.
Then people started coming out with the Epstein stuff early on, saying, you know, she was responsible for Epstein not being prosecuted, which is temporally and factually incorrect because she was not the attorney general of Florida when Epstein copped his sweetheart plea deal with Acosta back in 2008.
People saying she could have chosen to recharge him, not so convinced about that.
I started off with a clean slate.
I I'm convinced she's uh uh incapable of doing the job.
I say some people politely say she's incapable of rising to the occasion.
Matt Walsh earlier today said three strikes.
Like this is, you know, you you botched you didn't get involved in the Dr. Kirk Moore case until far too late.
You never got involved in the Douglas Mackey meme case.
You're still prosecuting Roger Veer for uh the Bitcoin persecution from the Biden era.
You didn't get involved in pending uh court cases, going before the Supreme Court, as relates the second amendment cases.
Uh then you botched the Epstein uh document release, boy howdy, in a way that it was so badly botched.
There are reasonable people out there saying, is this deliberate sabotage?
And now, in the wake of the Charlie Kirk assassination, taking positions in law that even this Canadian schnook, you know, former litigator from Quebec can tell you are untenable in American law.
We'll get there.
So we're gonna cover that.
Pam Bondi, the update.
Um, and what else was I about to say?
Some other stuff.
Let me see here.
I love people putting all caps.
Um all cap comments.
Uh, if you're new to the channel, Viva Fry, David Fryheit, former Montreal litigator turned current Florida rumbler.
Um this is the show.
I'm I got the three o'clock time slot in the rumble lineup.
We talk about the law, we talk about politics.
I post shorter videos, what I call vlogs, uh, on CommyTube and Rumble and Twitter, and in our Viva Barnes Law.locals.com community.
We've got an amazing Viva Barnes Law.locals.com community.
That is where if you want to support the work that we do, Robert Barnes and myself.
Uh it's 10 bucks a month, 100 bucks a year, and it's an amazing community.
But I'm exclusive daily with Rumble, and we're talking about uh the news doesn't get any better.
It's it's you know, it's we have witnessed something irreversible, uh, irreversible level of violence, irreversible levels of hate.
There's there's no going back, and uh nor should we, even if we could.
The evil, and I using that word like sincerely, the evil demonic energy and the evil demonic uh desires of a substantial portion of the of the population.
It might not be a majority, it might be a vocal minority, but it's a substantial portion who have revealed their pride in their evil.
They have revealed an absence of shame in having their evil.
And you know, some people ought to say this shaming, you know, firing, getting people fired for celebrating Charlie Kirk's murder.
Uh, I you know, don't do let's it's good to know who they are, let them talk.
That's always true.
But let people Be ashamed of thinking bad things instead of thinking that they're going to be celebrated for their evil thoughts.
That is what we just witnessed in the wake of Charlie Kirk's brutal assassination.
People who felt empowered to express the most evil feelings, the most evil intentions and the most evil desires.
They felt like they were going to get social praise from it.
They deserve to be named, shamed, and shunned.
Nothing more.
Very reasonable consequences when you express your evil.
Don't expect your neighbors to uh want to have anything to do with you.
Don't expect your employers to want to have anything to do with you.
But it does bring us to the question of you know, speech that you hate versus hate speech versus uh imminent incitement versus glorification of violence versus tacit support of terrorism, because I believe this was an act of domestic terrorism.
We're gonna get into all of it.
The press conference revealed, in my humble view, uh at least advanced knowledge of one person, possibly more in the context of the assassination.
We'll read through the charges.
I don't think we need to play the video because the video was nothing more than um the prosecutor reading through the statement, which which we have a copy of.
Pam Bondi goes on a podcast, and I had to go listen to the podcast to make sure that the context was uh proper in terms of the snipping and the clipping.
Came out of the bulwark.
Who is the bulwark?
The bulwark is political analysis and reporting free of tribal prejudices.
Subscribe here and send us tips.
The bulwark.com forward slash tips.
Attorney General Pam Bondi, there's speech and then there's hate speech.
And there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie in our society.
We will absolutely target you, go after you if you are targeting anyone with hate speech.
Words matter, especially when you're the attorney general.
I'll play the clip.
There's free speech and then there's hate speech.
And there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie in our society.
Do you see more law enforcement going after these groups who are using hate speech and putting cuffs on people so we show them that some action is better than no action?
We will absolutely target you, go after you if you are targeting anyone with hate speech, anything.
And that's across the aisle.
There's free speech.
So that was the clip.
And I'm thinking there's a there, it sounds like we're using hate speech and acts of violence interchangeably.
I wanted to go get the full context in which Pam Bondi said this, and um, it involved listening to the podcast.
It's a bit of a longer segment, but I think that's what we owe people in fairness, especially when we're going to criticize them for a position.
This is the full statement from Pam Bondi with the question in context unedited without being cut off, arguably prematurely.
A lot of work to show up to a college campus, right?
For so long, colleges allowed when a conservative will go on campus, right?
They go with all this police and security.
These universities are complicit in allowing conservatives to be harassed on campus.
And what happens when you allow a university to harass conservatives and don't expel or don't take an action is what happened last week.
It is.
And you know, on a broader level, that the anti-Semitism, what's been happening at college campuses around this country is disgusting, it's despicable, and we've been fighting that.
We've been fighting these universities left and right, and we're not going to stop.
There's free speech, and then there's hate speech.
And there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie in our society.
Do you see more law enforcement going after these groups who are using hate speech and putting cuffs on people so we show them that some action is better than no action?
We will absolutely target you, go after you if you are targeting anyone with hate speech, anything.
And that's across the aisle.
I mean, look what happened.
Think about Josh Shapiro.
What happened to Governor Shaviro?
I talked to Josh multiple times.
Democrat governor, Jewish, they firebombed his house while his wife and children were sleeping upstairs.
It's a miracle.
Again, now we're quite clearly no longer talking about hate speech, but rather attempted murder, arson, etc.
Nothing worse happened to it's a miracle that nothing happened to Josh and he and his family are safe.
They're traumatized, but that's what's happened in this world, and we are gonna fight every step of the way to show that you will face the most severe consequences if you come after someone and you target someone for their political views or for any for any reason at all.
Do you think Charlie was assassinated because our country can't handle free speech, or because one type of speech is seen as obscene by another political party?
Well, in this case, it was clearly obscene by a political party, an opposing view.
Sure.
But doesn't matter.
You can't have that hate speech in the world in which we live.
And you knew Charlie better than anyone.
He would want everyone to unite right now.
And I think what Eric has said is they had no idea what they unleashed by doing this around this country and around this world, how so many more conservatives, I think who are quiet, are going to come out and be so outspoken.
I've had my friends, a couple of my friends' kids even reach out to me who I didn't realize how conservative they were.
They're in college, how much they cared about Charlie, and they are going to be activists now.
So you you've heard the broader context.
It's a little bit of a long clip, but I think we need to see it.
And what we have, at least seemingly to me, is confounding of so-called hate speech with actual criminal action.
And you know, when I am not one to I it's very presumptuous when people say, you know, what someone would have wanted in their legacy.
Uh you can't assume intentions, but specifically on you know what Charlie Kirk believed or would have believed.
This was a tweet that he tweeted.
I don't know if it's May 2nd or February 5th, uh, 2024.
Hate speech does not exist legally in America.
There's ugly speech, there's gross speech, there's evil speech, and all of it is protected by the First Amendment.
Keep America free.
So the the question is, what is Pam Bondi talking about?
Is she talking about creating a subcategory of hate speech?
Uh, a subcategory of speech that is going to be qualified as hate speech, or is she talking about criminal harassment and deliberate targeted violence?
She put out a tweet this morning, uh, either seemingly clarifying or doubling down on it.
And I believe this is the tweet right here from Attorney General Pam Bondi, September 16, 2025.
Hate speech that crosses the line into threats of violence is not protected by the First Amendment.
It's a crime.
For too long, we've watched the radical left normalize threats, call for assassinations, and cheer on political violence.
That era is over.
Under section 8, it is a federal crime to transmit, quote, any communication containing any threat to kidnap any person or any threat to injure a person or another.
Likewise, sections whatever make it a felony to threaten public officials, members of Congress.
So we're talking about existing laws where the speech crosses the line from free speech, not hate speech, into actionable threats of violence.
You cannot call for someone's murder.
You cannot swat a member of Congress, you cannot dox a conservative family and think it will be brushed off as quote free speech, and quote.
These are acts of punishable crimes, and every single threat will be met with the full force of the law.
Free speech protects ideas, debate, even dissent, but it does not and will never protect violence.
It is clear.
This violent rhetoric is designed to silence others from voicing conservative ideals.
We will never be silenced, not our families, not our not for our not for our families, not for our freedoms, and not for Charlie.
His legacy will not be erased by fear and intimidation.
Some people are saying this is a perfectly logical clarification.
She's talking about hate speech that crosses into harassments and threats.
This is where we start, not a slippery slope, and people who are cynical will say, you know, never let a good crisis go to waste.
It's not hate speech that crosses the line into threats is not protected.
It's any speech that crosses the line into threats of violence is not protected.
It's not protected under existing laws.
You don't need more laws to outlaw that which is already outlawed under existing laws.
So it's not hate speech that crosses a line into threats of violence is not protected.
No speeches.
Unless, and this is where the problem is, unless some people are going to suggest that they're going to treat so-called hate speech with a different legal threshold as to when it crosses into violence or threats of violence, I should say, than non-hate speech, ordinary speech.
They're going to say, well, that speech, which I don't deem as hate speech, didn't cross the line into Actionable threats, but because I deem it to be an a legally not undefined, a legally non-existent concept of hate speech.
Well, we get to treat it differently then and say with some lower threshold, possibly, that now crosses the line, where had it been ordinary speech, it wouldn't.
And it's a slippery slope, to put it mildly.
But people are losing it with Pam Bondi's performance or lack thereof.
And I mean, like I I retweeted or quote-tweeted um Matt Walsh.
I'm gonna have to go pull up the tweet now because I don't seem to find it in my list.
I quote tweeted Matt Walsh, who's who's making a very salient point.
Yeah, let me bring this up because it's in response to uh uh uh another interview that Pam Bondi's giving where she says uh that they're gonna criminally go after any enterprise, any printing company that refuses to print uh a Charlie Kirk memorial uh pamphlet.
Listen to this.
I didn't get the broader context here.
I don't didn't have time.
That's horrific.
It's free speech that you shouldn't be employed anywhere if you're gonna say that.
And employers, you have an obligation to get rid of people.
You need to look at people who are saying horrible things, and they shouldn't be working with you.
Businesses cannot discriminate.
If you want to go in and print posters with Charlie's pictures on them for a vigil, you have to let them do that.
We can prosecute you for that.
But I have Harmete Dylan right now in our civil rights unit.
Looking at that immediately that Office Depot had done that.
We're looking at that.
But Sean, you know, that's how so this is uh Matt Walsh says, get rid of her today.
This is insane.
Conservatives have fought for decades for the right to refuse service to anyone.
We won that fight.
Now Pam Bondi wants to roll it back for no reason.
The employee who didn't print the flyer was already fired by his employer.
This stuff is being handled successfully through free speech and free markets.
This is totally gratuitous and pointless.
We need the AG focused on bringing down the left wing terror cells, not prosecuting Office Depot for God's sake, Capital G. Now there's a um uh a nuance here in that, and it's the nuance that a lot of people uh mistaken during the the bake the cake baking case,
which was it wasn't the case that the cake store refused to sell a cake to the people demanding the um whatever was the the gay cake or the cake celebrating a gay, it was either a gay marriage or something along those lines.
The cake shop didn't refuse to sell a cake.
They were their decision to not their decision to refuse to create a specific message with their hand was ratified by the court.
So they said you you can't, if you were to say to the gay couple, I'm not selling you a cake that's on the stand here, that would have been legitimate discrimination that would have been sanctioned by the court.
As it was, they said you can't compel the cake shop to make a message that it doesn't believe in.
When you're going to a home depot and um you're asking the home depot to make copies, and they say, I'm not making copies of this, uh, I'm not doing my job.
I'm not, you're not asking me to convey a specific message with my own hands.
I'm just not making a copy of something for you.
Uh I'm not convinced that that's not actionable.
There's gonna be a fine line there.
Is the act of making a photocopy of a banner, preparing the banner, tantamount to conveying that message yourself?
Uh and I think there's gonna be good arguments that there is, like if they came in with a banner that said death to fill in the blank, or um a message that is antithetical to the uh to basic morality, I would imagine that the print shop could say, no, I'm not printing that.
If it came in and said print up a banner to uh as a tribute to Martin Luther King, and they said, no, I'm not because I'm racist, that I don't think would be protected.
So there's it's an interesting thing, there's a nuance there, but uh Pam Bondi, through her speech and through her lack of clarity in her messaging, is creating cause for concern that this is going to turn into the very same uh crackdown on free speech that a Charlie Kirk was vocally against, even from the get-go.
And you know, making it diplomatically harder for JD Vance to go to the UK and lecture them on locking people up for social media posts, when right now it sounds like the attorney general of these United States of America is contemplating prosecuting people for so-called hate speech.
So it's interesting.
I but I, you know, Pam Bondi uh before Epstein, before anything, was doing a terrible job.
And I, and I still think she's doing a terrible job.
I'm not, you know, I'm not Cash Patel did not instill confidence either with some of the uh factual errors in reporting on the ongoing investigation while they were on the manhunt for the assassin.
But Pam Bondi's not doing herself any favors either.
And apparently there's some tension internally between Pam Bondy and Cash Patel.
None of it uh instills uh the utmost of confidence, A for competence and B for transparency.
Okay, so that was the free speech element of it.
Before we get into anything else, let me read.
Oh no, hold on a second.
Let me do it this way.
I think I can bring him up here.
Uh before we get into other stuff.
Let us go over to oh crape.
I took the hold on a second, rumble.
Seem to have lost my window in Pam Bondi when I was Googling Pam Bondi's age.
Let's see if I can bring up the chat here.
Now they're not gonna come back up, so I gotta bring them up here.
Uh all right, these were these are the rumble rants over on Rumble.
Totalitarian tiptoe.
Israel and USA government, as per Ephesians 612, are pushing final.
Reading the tip, thank you very much.
Ginger ninja says, New rule.
Zero Republican politicians out of Florida in positions of power.
And 808 Scotty says, always the object is anti-Semitism.
It should apply universally, not for any subgroup, especially another country that is performing a genocide on his and assassinations.
I know that we have uh a number of members of our crowd who are uh I I'm not I won't use the term anti-Semitic, who are critical of the state of Israel and its response to October 7.
Um what I was going to say about that, hold on one second.
Anti-Semitism apply equally and universally, not for any group or any I forget uh I had something else to say on that.
It'll come back to me.
Uh, thank you.
So now that's that's uh Pam Bondi.
And the the the issue, but you know, uh I tweeted out of Pam Bondi also in reply to these things.
Like, first of all, nobody's talking about lock.
I'm not gonna show these videos.
There's another video going viral of a student at uh some Texas university, a potentially a student, uh, making mocking gestures about Charlie Kirk getting shot in the neck and then spitting on the ground at a monument, at a um a vigil.
I was like, you know, unless you want to make an argument that they're somehow under the laws that they charged uh Shiloh Hendricks with, you know, uh causing a scene.
I forget what the word is, disorderly conduct.
I don't think most people say prosecute that individual for publicly um mocking a public execution of a political figure.
You don't need laws to criminalize speech that should not necessarily be criminalized.
You sure as hell don't need uh additional rules to justify kicking that kid out of school because what the kid did is objectively not illegal, uh arguably, but objectively contrary to the school policies.
Like this is where we're we're we're we're entering this realm where people think we're gonna more laws will somehow uh reduce the problem that currently exists, despite us having substantial and significant existing legislation to deal with it.
Pam Bondi is talking about existing laws that are used, can be used to go after threats, criminal harassment, uh, incitement, etc.
You don't need more laws.
You don't need to criminalize more speech, just apply the laws that you have.
When it comes to idiots doing things like this, I'm not even gonna play it.
You don't need more laws.
You don't need to prosecute the kid, but it definitely warrants expulsion.
These were the these were the rules, as far as I could tell from uh Texas State University.
Yeah, look at this.
Express activity.
Any speech or expressive conduct on Texas State campus protected by the First Amendment, any speech or expressive conduct on Texas State's campuses protected by First Amendment to the United States Constitution or by Section 8, Texas, and includes assemblies, protests, speeches, the distribution of written material, signage, both fixed and portable, and the circulation of petitions.
The term does not include commercial speech, so you can't say I have free speech to go advertise my goods and services, whatever.
Defamation, obviously, unlawful harassment by Definition unlawful, incitement of imminent unlawful activity, obscenity, or threats to engage in unlawful activity.
Now, whether or not it's the the good case law is not obscenity.
I'll know it when I see it.
I don't know what the Texas States University's definition of obscenity is.
I would be inclined to say mocking an assassination of a political figure at a vigil is obscene.
And not illegal.
Don't prosecute the guy.
But kick him out of school for it.
Or at least if you want to, you have your grounds.
Then the question to me is this.
I'm gonna play just a bit of it.
I just my question is this as a as a human.
What the fuck is wrong with that kid?
Like, and I'm and I'm being sincere.
Is that kid susceptible of being um uh awakening to understand how wrong what he did is?
The first question is is that is that student like is it is he is he schizophrenic?
Is he mentally unwell?
If he is, you gotta treat him and his illness.
Is he evil?
And can his evil be remedied?
Can he be brought to understand just how wrong that is?
Whether or not he thinks it's funny, maybe uh, you know, a time and a place for all humor.
Although there's an old expression in in the house of a hung man, you don't ask where you hang the fish.
It's an old Jewish expression because I I guess when you used to like dry smoked salmon or or or gefilts the fish, you'd like hang it and and and let it dry.
And in the house where someone, you know, had someone who hanged themselves, you don't say, hey, where do I hang the fish?
Because it's it's somewhat insensitive.
Can that kid be redeemed?
Or is expelling him gonna teach him the wrong lesson where he could otherwise be brought around to see the light of human decency?
I don't know.
I don't know that kid from a uh a 40-second clip.
There's no potential mistakening what was going on in that video.
He was mocking the assassination of Charlie Kirk, and then he spat on the ground, not on somebody.
But can can and there are people saying Jesus loves you.
And I'm sitting there saying, can this kid actually be uh redeemed from that?
Or is expelling him going to drive him further down a life which will turn even darker potentially to crime and whatever.
I don't know.
And how hard do you try to save people who may not be able to be saved and pose a relatively clear and present risk to your well-being simply by being in their proximity?
Someone who is prepared to mock a murder of a political of anybody is prepared to tolerate it.
And they're, you know, uh uh uh uh one step away, it's a big step maybe from condoning or even participating.
So there's that.
But we don't need more laws.
We've got enough.
And uh Cicero said, more laws, less justice.
Pam Bondi has got all the laws.
You don't need to create a separate category for hate speech in order to go after unlawful speech.
You don't need to prosecute people for what shouldn't be prosecutable, but is certainly grounds for termination, grounds for expulsion.
Anyway, so that's that.
That's that element of it.
We're gonna get into the press conference in a second.
We'll get into the press conference right now, actually.
Data 12 says, Hillary Joe and Justin watered a movement motivated by their greed for proven foreign money flow coupled with proven lying dangerous propaganda that led to the assassination of Charles J. Kirk.
What was Charles that Charlie Kirk's middle name?
Um, here we go.
Now I can see them here.
I can bring them up this way.
Did I just literally oh, I'm looking because Rumble changed their avatar to the American flag in honor of uh of um Charlie, and so I didn't see that it's it's still up here.
Uh you see, they've the the avatar is an American flag.
I was looking for the green avatar.
Uh so you don't talk about rupeing a house where there's been a hang in Hillary, Joe, and Justin water down a movement.
Okay, we got that.
From X, what is this?
Is a strong argument that's oh uh is that supposed to be Israel did it?
I'll watch this after they they took him out for asking questions.
Oh well, I mean, I'll watch it afterwards.
I we talked about it on the unusual, so you'll watch it tonight, you know.
I there I can I can't, you can't you can blame people for having the theory, but that's not a response to it.
There are dots that you can't that you can, if you wanted to steel man it, you could steal man the dots that they're connecting.
I say the inverse is true as well, but in as much as anybody wants to say it was an angry transgender supporting, you know, gay gay kid who's involved in a trans relationship, trying to do it to impress his lover.
Uh and so offended by what Charlie Kirk said about the trans community.
You can make that argument, I just think it's a little more tenuous and one step removed about what Charlie had started recently asking, seeing by way of uh Israel's response in Gaza.
Understood.
Uh, and like I said, also with the unusuals, say, for the time being, the problem about wanting to connect the dots to Israel is that it it in it involves either ignoring all of the evidence as we currently understand it, or assuming evidence that we don't yet have uh before us,
or the infinitely and always unprovable, even if it turns out to be a Discord server with a bunch of uh you know, trans activists plotting this out, uh, and actual no, no, like someone paying Tyler from Israel to do this.
You can say, well, Israel infiltrated and Israel manipulated, or they had they had assets in there who were using these people as useful idiots to carry it out.
So I would say we'll see.
Some theories will never be able to be disproven.
You cannot blame people for connecting certain dots, but the most reasonable interpretation now, based on the evidence as it exists now, is that this kid was radicalized.
We'll see by whom.
Uh, because I think, and I've said it before, and I think I have like at least an element from today's press conference indicating there were other people involved.
I don't know how many, more than one.
Uh so speaking of today's press conference.
I I won't play the entire, I won't play the press conference because we've got the charges, which are, I believe these are the charges.
Yeah, these are the charges, and I just want to focus on two sections of the charges.
The press conference was the uh prosecutor, I don't know what his title or name was, I forget offhand.
Uh just reading through it, took some questions afterwards, said, I'm not, you know, we're not this kid's entitled to the presumption of innocence.
And these are allegations, they'll be tested in the crucible of a jury trial.
And in that time, you've got to um operate on the basis of the American judicial system innocent until proven guilty.
I don't, I don't care what the outcome here is.
I I know at the very least, until definitive evidence that might say otherwise, I believe the kid pulled the trigger.
Uh there was one statement that the guy made that I wanted to bring.
I'll bring, I'll bring up actually this one.
This is from Endwokeness.
Oh, yeah, Utah prosecutor.
What's his name?
The prosecutor's name.
Uh, whatever.
Yeah.
Talking about the evidence as it currently exists.
This is the evidence.
Robinson's mother explained that over the last year or so, Robinson had become more political and had started to lean more to the left, becoming more pro-gay and trans rights oriented.
Well, I just want to say he said within the last year.
Robinson's mother explained that over the last year or so, Robinson had become more political and had started to lean more to the left.
A year or so is going to be to me a year or more, or at least give or take, which is going to bring us back to September 2024, which was election season.
So this kid got radicalized by his mother's, or at least observably radicalized by his uh to his mother's observations during the 2024 election cycle, leading up to the election.
Becoming more pro-gay and trans rights-oriented.
She stated that Robinson began to date his roommate, a biological male who was trans transitioning genders.
I mean, I it's there is you don't need to add the qualifier biological.
There is no way of transitioning from that.
I mean, unless one day we figure out a way to actually convert the chromosomes.
All right.
He he was uh in love in love with uh uh uh a man, a boy, who uh I don't know what body transfer of treatments he was going through.
Uh, and thought this would impress.
This resulted in several discussions with family members, but especially between Robinson and his father, who have very different political views.
In one conversation before the shooting, Robinson mentioned that Charlie Kirk would be holding an event at UVU, which Robert Robinson said was a stupid venue for the event.
Robinson accused Kirk of spreading hate.
Robinson's it's like delusional.
Robinson is spreading hate with his words.
So uh Robinson says Kirk is spreading hate with his words.
So kill.
And where would he have gotten that idea from?
Gee, I don't know.
Maybe every pundit who spent the last decade saying democracy as we know it is going to end if Trump gets elected.
Children are going to die, women's rights are going to be stripped away, existential threat, threat to democracy, fascist Nazi Hitler.
Gee, I wonder.
This is the same side now accusing Republicans of dehumanizing rhetoric.
His father reported that when his wife showed him the surveillance image of the suspected shooter in the news, he agreed that it looked like their son.
He also believed that the rifle that police suspected the shoot shooter used matched a rifle that was given to his son as a gift.
It was his grandfather's rifle.
So those are the facts as we know them.
Was there any FBI involvement or knowledge of?
If this started, if this if he started getting radicalized about a year ago, is he cooperating at all?
From what I understand, uh no, but they got admissions prior to his lack of cooperation.
So let me let me let me bring this part up here.
No, it was uh the alleged assassin.
Here we go.
This is what the alleged assassin said to his roommates.
And and and again, even in the answer period when they said, but what's the time frame of these text messages back and forth?
Did it predate the shooting?
Uh the prosecutor didn't really know offhand.
Listen to this, and you tell me if you think it means what I think it means.
Remember how he was engraving bullets?
The F and messages are mostly a big meme.
If I see notice bulge UWU on Fox New, I might have a stroke all right.
I'm gonna have to leave it.
That really effing sucks.
Judging from today, I'd say grandpa's gun does just fine IDK.
I think that was a two uh a 2K dollar scope.
A $2,000 scope.
Wink wink.
I don't know what that means.
Um Robinson, Robinson again, delete this exchange.
So now we've got remember that I was engraving the casings, which necessarily was before the shooting, and by how much and how long, and what other engravings are we going to find in other casings and other bullets that might still be evidence at the uh lover's uh apartment, which apparently was owned by the kids' parents in trust.
Remember the engravings.
Seems to uh indicate foreknowledge, delete these texts, seems to indicate conspiracy.
Again, Robinson, my dad wants photos of the rifle.
He says grandpa wants to know who has what.
The feds released a photo of the rifle, and it is very unique.
He's calling me RN.
Right now, not answering Robinson.
Since Trump got into office, my dad has been pretty diehard MAGA.
Remember, by the way, this is the same individual that the Harry J. Sissons, the every leftist propagandist on the internet was saying was MAGA.
Since Trump got into office, my father's been pretty diehard MAGA.
Also seems to further indicate that his radicalization quite clearly predated that because that event uh traumatized him, or at least caused him to remember uh a moment in which it began to irritate him.
So this is radicalization that predated the election.
And I've got um uh a lot of sinister conspiracy theories that are totally unsubstantiated, but you know, play into what the FBI has in fact done in the past.
You know, was anybody was this guy one of other assass would-be assassins who in fact tried to take out Trump prior to the election?
That's the time frame that we're in right now.
This is gonna be my own dots being connected.
I'm not sure who's floated this uh or even connected these dots.
About a year ago, this kid starts getting radicalized, at least to the observation of his parents, which probably means it predates this.
At the exact same time that you have the July 13 radicalization of whoever you know was radicalizing crooks, and we still know nothing about it.
The radicalization of Ryan Ruth, who's going through trial right now, but you wouldn't know it.
And this kid, around that time, who only pulls off the assassination of Charlie Kirk nine months after Trump comes into office.
Robinson.
I'm gonna turn myself in willingly.
One of my neighbors here is a deputy for the sheriff.
Again, you are all I worry about, love.
That came from Robinson, roommate.
I'm much more worried about you.
Robinson, don't talk to the media, please.
Don't take any interviews or make any comments.
If any police ask you questions, ask for a lawyer and stay silent.
So that's uh part of what was revealed in the charging documents.
And I'm curious to know what anyone thinks of my particular theory.
We are now talking about what we now know to be the radicalization of three people who either were assassins or would be assassins around the same time.
We never got closure on Butler.
We never got you know meaningful explanations on Butler.
And the exact same security failings at Butler, albeit for a president, were present during uh Charlie Kirk's Utah event.
for someone who by all accounts was going to be a future president So the press conference happened today.
Let me uh bring up the charging documents.
Then we're gonna get into some uh very bizarre stuff involving that George Zinn character, the crazy old man, and whether or not he had any advanced knowledge of this.
So uh let's start, let's go all the way to the bottom.
It's these are the charges.
Okay, we got the um Judicial District of Utah.
They're seeking the death penalty.
I I that goes without saying, I think you all heard that.
And uh Utah, okay, count one aggravated murder.
There were other counts.
Count two felony discharge of a firearm causing serious bodily injury.
Some of these after after the after the murder charge, it kind of seems superfluous, but um obstruction of justice, obstruction of justice, uh tampering with a witness.
We got that violence committed in the presence of a child.
Okay, probable cause.
So we got the shot and killed part of the the the they talk about the surveillance.
There was a cop there who heard where the shot came from, went to the location afterwards, saw some evidence uh that he then used to get footage.
They, I guess, identified roughly what the kid looked like.
They could find him coming in and going out.
They got the footage and everything, found that he jumped off the building with the right, he was walked in with the rifle in his pants, so he sort of had a uh they called it a compromise gate.
Um, he threw it off, he jumped off the building with it, hid it behind a tree, and so on and so forth.
These are the etchings on the cartridges, which I guess a number of uh talking heads didn't uh uh hear about when they were blaming it on MAGA, a mega Republican, a Trump supporter who decides to assassinate Charlie Kirk.
Washington County investigation.
Uh, here we go, the roommate.
Okay, so let's hear.
This is the part I want.
On the evening of September 11th, as law enforcement continued their investigation.
Uh Tyler James Robinson went to the Washington office with his parents and uh turned himself in.
Robinson's mother stated the following.
On September 11, the day after the shooting, Robinson's mother saw a photo of the shooter, said it looked like her son.
Um Robinson's father agreed.
Robinson's mother explained that over the last year or so, this is what we saw in the video.
Robinson had become more political leaning to the other.
Uh they have very different political views.
Uh, okay, fine, here we go.
Stupid venue.
Robinson's father reported that uh when his wife showed him the surveillance image of the suspected shooter, they agreed it looked like their son.
He also believed the rifle that the police suspected was the rifle used was a gift to his son.
They followed that they contacted the authorities.
Robinson, oh, he contacted Robinson and Robinson did not respond.
Robinson's father spoke over the phone with Robinson.
Robinson implied that he planned to take his own life.
Robinson's parents were able to convince him to meet at their home.
As they discussed the situation, Robinson implied that he was the shooter and stated that he couldn't go to jail and just wanted to end it.
When asked why he did it, Robinson explained that there is too much evil and the guy, Charlie Kirk spreads too much hate.
They talked about Robinson turning himself in.
They met with another guy who convinced him to turn himself in.
The family friends spoke to the police and reported telling Robinson that it would be best if he brought all evidence with him to the sheriff's office to avoid police having to search the parents' home.
This friend is uh is uh law enforcement.
Fairly certain that he was he has uh he was in law enforcement, and it's an interesting thing to say bring the evidence and tell the kid that they're not gonna search the home to make it easier, so he brings in the evidence, even though they're gonna search for the home no matter what.
The roommate.
Police interviewed Robinson's roommate, a biological male.
The roommate told police he received messages from Robinson about the shooting, provided these messages to police.
On September 10, roommate received a text message from Teb which said, Drop what you are doing, look under my keyboard.
The roommate looked under the keyboard and found a note that stated I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I'm gonna take it.
So this this right now, when he was asked about the timing for this, is it if it was before the shot or after?
He didn't the the prosecutor did not or could not answer.
Said I don't have that information on me.
He said, look under the desk.
I have the I'm gonna take it.
Police said the following text exchange then took place.
After reading the note, the roommate responded, What?
You're joking, right?
Robinson, I it's I am still okay, my love, but am stuck in Orm for a little while.
I don't know what that means, stuck in Orm for a little while yet.
Shouldn't be long until I can get home.
I gotta grab my rifle still.
To be honest, I hope to keep it secret till I died of old age, because this.
I'm sorry to involve you.
You weren't the one who did it, right?
I'm sorry, I thought they caught the person.
No, they grabbed some old crazy dude, then interrogated someone in similar clothing.
I had planned to grab my rifle from the draw point, but almost uh side, yada yada.
Why?
Why did I do it?
Yeah, I had enough of his hatred.
Some hate.
How long have you been planning this?
A bit over a week, I believe.
I can get close to it, but he's talking about his gun.
Robinson, I'm wishing I had circled back and grabbed his gun.
Yada, yada, yada.
Delete this message.
My dad wants photos of the rifle, Robinson.
Roommate, I'm much more worried about you.
Don't talk to the media, please.
We can get to the rest of it.
So, how much advanced knowledge is there going to be?
Who had advanced knowledge?
Who was in the Discord?
Who was putting out posts apparently the day before saying something big was going to happen.
The the old dude that that looked to be the shooter.
Here.
Old dude was just busted on photos of children, says Dirt Doll 10.
This is where we're going with this.
It's an amazing thing.
I want to know if the old his name is George Zinn, Z-I-N-N.
I want to know if this guy is known to authorities.
I mean, we're we're gonna find out, presumably, at some point.
Or maybe we won't.
But uh here we go.
This is the document.
This is from the Utah Sheriff's Office.
Uh, hold on a second.
I actually should have I should have double checked this before I do it.
Hold on a second.
Utah Sheriff Office.
George Zinn.
Sorry, I actually.
George Zinn, Elder had false acclaimed.
Hit with child porn charges.
Okay, fine.
The document is legit.
Sorry, I just wanted to make sure about that.
Um, I was moving quickly before I got here.
Michael Smith.
Arrest and booking of George Zinn for obstruction of justice, possession of child sex abuse material.
Utah Valley.
Zinn was attending an event where a shooting occurred.
Shortly after the shooting occurred, and while people were fleeing the area, Zinn was C yelling that he shot, he had shot Charlie Kirk.
UVU police took him into custody, transported him.
At the time, Zim was not cooperative with law enforcement and did not want to speak to investigators.
Zinn began to have medical issues when was transported to the local hospital.
While at the hospital, Zinn did freely state that he was not the shooter, but yelled he was to hinder law enforcement's response.
While Zinn was at the hospital, an FBI agent and an agent from Utah State Bureau met with Zinn who agreed to speak with him concerning the matter.
Zinn admitted that he had yelled that he was the shooter to allow the actual suspect to flee and to hinder law enforcement.
This guy just happens to be here with no knowledge of what's going to happen and then does this spontaneously because he's a batshit crazy evil human.
During the interview, the agents asked to look at Zinn's phone, and Zinn agreed to let them.
Zinn told the agents that he uses his phone to view and to view and abuse child and abuse child sex abuse material, and they may have some images on his phone.
Those agents did see several images on the phone of prepubescent girls scantily dressed.
At the time, Utah County special victims unit detectives were asked to take the matter over, as other agents were needed to help with the UVU incident.
Search warrant.
Got his phone during a preliminary review.
They found over 20 images of children ranging from five to 12 in various stages of undress and sexual opposing.
There were several very graphic sexual sexual text threads in which Zinn shared the images with other parties.
Zinn admitted to USCO, SVU investigators that he gets sexual gratification from this.
He's currently be held in the Utah jail for these sexual felony, whatever.
Second felony?
Why would why how much more first does it have to get?
Maybe I guess it has to get physical.
At the time, there's no information that George actually colluded with the shooter.
Zinn was in attendance and intentionally yelled that he was the shooter and in so doing obstructed law enforcement.
Okay.
Um this is this is this is freaking wild.
Let me double check that this is also not true.
George Zinn witnessed 9-11.
I'm not sure that I won't repeat this actually.
The chat, you'll know.
I had seen a meme that this is the same guy who witnessed 9-11 and suggested it was uh terrorist terrorists that did it.
But I don't know if that's true, and it's actually irrelevant for the purposes of what we're gonna get into here.
That's George Zinn.
So George Zinn is now busted with CSAM on his phone.
He is at the event, coincidentally, uh, voluntarily admits, if you believe this, to the that he deliberately yelled that he was the shooter.
And I've heard that he was also at the Boston Marathon bombing.
Um if anybody has a link to confirm that.
Here, uh, how can anyone disprove this this uh suggestion that you're you're you're proselytizing?
How can anyone disprove it?
It's based on the absence of evidence instead of the presence of evidence.
So it can never be disproven.
Now, set that aside.
I don't know if this is the same Zinn who was at 9-11 at the Boston bombing and at this event here.
He allegedly has CSAM on his phone.
He uh allegedly, by his own admission, created a distraction so that the shooter could escape.
If I'm putting dots together that I cannot substantiate right now, but that are very logical.
I think we're gonna find Zinn's name somewhere in the Discord servers, somewhere in these messages where they don't know who the guy is.
Avatars.
They always say, like you, you, you, you and you you get involved in private discussions with people online, you especially in certain communities of certain sexual natures.
You're talking to like old perverts, pedos.
So I am, you know, they say they don't know if he was if he had any advanced knowledge was involved in it.
I will not be surprised if, and in my reasoning right now, suspect that this man was in Discord servers with these young uh people with bizarre sexual predilections, getting off on it, and there was discussion in these internal servers that this was gonna happen, hence the posts before that something big's gonna happen.
Hence the celebration afterwards we got him, and that this was one of the guys there.
And that this guy.
Zinn is Ray Apps.
Okay, but we're gonna get there, Bucklebrush.
I I do want to entertain that theory as well.
Uh, but I think we're gonna find that Zinn was involved in these Discord servers or these these private chats or whatever the hell they call them.
That's that's my that's where I immediately know when I heard the CSAM now, unless you think the FBI planted it there so they can I don't know, do whatever.
Uh that's what I'm thinking.
It's not an accident that if this guy was there and deliberately wanted to create a scene to allow the shooter to get away, he had advanced knowledge of it and might have had some sort of sexual uh uh attraction to these young uh sexually confused people that he's in discord servers with this furry community and whatever.
Flip side, if he's an agent who's in there, do you do you guys remember the um the Garland, Texas, when they had that contest to draw Muhammad and there was a terrorist attack there?
Do you remember the FBI involvement in this?
This is May 2015.
When I mentioned this to uh Vinny Oshana at the Unusual Suspects, it wasn't fresh enough in his mind, the involvement of the FBI in this terrorist attack, where as far as I recollect, the FBI was literally following one of the terrorists to the event where the terrorists successfully carried out the act of terrorism.
This was okay, just a little open a little parentheses.
Gunman killed a Dallas event on Prophet Muhammad cartoons.
Okay.
Two gunmen have been shot dead after opening fire outside a conference on cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad in a suburb in Dallas.
They drove, let me make this a little bigger here.
They drove to the Curtis Central building as the event was ending, began shooting at a security officer before being killed by police.
The bomb squad was called to their vehicle for explosive.
The event organized by a group of critical of Islam included a contest for drawing the prophet.
One of the keynote speakers was Dutch politician Giert Wilder's.
Did he subsequently get stabbed to death?
I think.
Let me see what happened together.
What happened to Gert Wilde's, I think.
Uh okay, I don't know where Girl Wilder is now.
I guess he's still is he alive.
Okay, well, I'll get there in a second.
Uh security been tight.
But Garland police said they had no credible threats in advance, and it was not immediately clear if the shooting was related to the event.
Oh, yeah, right.
Let me just see something here.
FBI.
The FBI was the FBI following the terrorists at Garland shooting in 2015.
Yes, the FBI was actively monitoring and in contact with one of the terrorists in the lead up to the 2015 Garland shooting.
The nature and extent of the FBI's involvement have been the subject of controversy and scrutiny.
Decades-long investigation.
We're looking, we're seeing the same thing, right?
The FBI, the black pill in this will be if the FBI does what the FBI does, regardless of who's in charge of the FBI.
They were are in some cases grooming the people, not in the CSAM sense, but in the using them as patsies or tools to create the to create the crime so they can bust the crime and be the heroes, much like in the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot, in which two of the defendants got off on the defensive entrapment, because but for the act of participation and incitement of the FBI and its confidential human sources, it never would have happened in the first place.
Same thing with January 6th, arguably, in my view, absolutely.
But I can see the people, I can understand people don't want to believe this.
But for the involvement of the Ray Epsis, who I believe, in my sincerely held belief, was an agent.
As evidenced by the fact that he was never charged until years later, one misdemeanor, got probation.
That's what you do to a Patsy.
That's what you do to an A, that's what you do to an asset or uh what's the word I'm looking for?
An agent provocateur, someone working with intelligence.
You don't, you don't lock them up in solitary like they did to the lectern guy, Adam Johnson, or uh Enrique Tario.
So those are uh those are incidents in which a corrupt FBI creates the horror, creates the terror to quell the terror to justify their own existence.
Then you have the ones where either if they're not creating it, I arguably whether or not they were grooming the terrorists in this case, they're following him, and it still happens, the act of terror.
Now, my concern is what are we going to find in who knew what as of when in this particular case?
Because it didn't happen only a week before.
And so we're gonna find out if the FBI was actively monitoring, was involved in in the chat.
And I'm I'm not even necessarily even putting the the pointing the finger the current FBI in potentially having been aware of but unable to foil.
If this started a little over a year ago, then the question's gonna be are we dealing with another incident of a Gretchen Whitmer fednapping plot so that we can gin up political sympathy for a Democrat politician?
You remember that the reason for which the theory of ginning up the Gretchen Whitmer fed napping was to uh create sympathy for Gretchen Whitmer, get her re-elected, and demonize Donald Trump.
And these are all happening in the context of 2024, summer of, where you have the failed July 13 Butler uh assassination attempt, the failed Brian Ruth assassination attempt, and this kid getting radicalized roughly at the same time in online discord servers and whatever.
Hey, Viva, what are all your thoughts on people saying Tyler wasn't the shooter because of the entry?
Well, first of all, do we know what the exit wound was yet?
Okay, fine.
If someone wants to say that, um what are they proposing and uh what's the evidence for proposing otherwise?
And then the issue is like uh so there were there were more than two shots fired, or the kid didn't fire from where he was.
And in which case you have that there's an hour and a half long video following everything.
And there's some interesting elements in it live from the the day of, but what's the proposal?
Okay, the again, it's something that until now, at least as of now, it is either based on disregarding the current evidence or uh relying on something that doesn't yet exist.
I've seen the video of a flash coming from the window.
You're you're dealing with pixelated images and people theorizing on you know uh something for which there could be a number of other explanations, and that utterly disregards all of the evidence that currently exists.
Let me just double check one thing, actually, now that you mention it.
The exit wound.
chat GPT.
So I got to go to the crap.
So I I appreciate that it doesn't seem that there was an exit wound and that people are hypothesizing that the bullet hit plating and then ricocheted up.
I mean, uh that theory doesn't uh is irrelevant to yours, but the theory that he there there was uh uh no exit wound, then I'm not sure how it makes sense that there would be uh there would be an entry wound on the other side.
Window flash is a reflection, is another is another obvious possibility.
But people saying, like, oh, you can see the bullet, you're you're not capturing an image of the bullet at 64 frames per second.
You're just not bullets traveling 3,000 feet per second.
So it's very difficult to counter arguments that are based on disregarding the evidence and assuming evidence that doesn't exist.
Um and so that's where we're at right now.
I don't think I've I don't think I've missed anything.
We got some some clips from the FBI, the the Cash Patels hearing today.
Oh, I do want to highlight something that Gavin Newsom put out.
And it's it's it's wonderful.
These these fuckers, they they they kill you and then complain about your response to being killed.
This is what Gavin Newsom says to Stephen Miller.
I'll play what Stephen Miller says.
Party.
Party does not fight for, care about, or represent American citizens.
It is an entity devoted exclusively to the defense of hardened criminals, gangbangers, and illegal alien killers and terrorists.
The Democrat Party is not a political party, it is a domestic extremist organization party.
I mean, I find it hard to disagree with that when you literally have the Democrat Party fighting for the Kilmar Albrego Garcias of the world when you literally have the Democrat Party uh uh fighting to allow for the deportation of violent criminals?
When you literally have the Democrat Party uh mutilating children through this this trans ideology, I find it hard to disagree with that.
And when you see the Democrat Party rejoicing in a public execution of their ideological adversary, I appreciate some people are gonna disagree with it.
No, that's not what the Democrat Party means to me.
Heck, the kid asking Charlie Kirk the question himself is like, there were so many people in my thread responding violently.
I'm like, this is not what the Democrat Party is.
Well, wake up, kid.
It is.
When half of the response is on your own freaking thread, or cheering it on, maybe wake up and say it's not what you think the Democrat Party is, it's what the Democrat Party has become.
Set that aside.
Gavin Newsom, I want you to read it and then I'll emphasize it.
Wake up, America.
I think everybody woke up when they heard the shot that killed Charlie Kirk, you jackass Gavin.
Wake up, America.
Stephen Miller has already publicly labeled the Democratic Party as a terrorist organization.
Here's something that'll make it harder.
Stop supporting killing people.
Oh no, but we came out and we spoke out against it.
We strongly condemn violence on both sides.
It's a bipartisan issue.
This isn't about crime and safety.
It's about dismantling our democratic institutions.
No, killing your ideological adversaries, then cheering about it is about dismantling your democratic institutions.
But that's not it.
Listen to this.
We cannot allow acts of political violence to be weaponized and used to threaten tens of millions of Americans.
And I said, you son of a bitch.
You probably just should have stopped that sentence that we cannot allow acts of political violence.
That's where you should have put a fucking period, Gavin.
Oh no, no, no, no, no.
We can allow acts of political violence.
We just can't allow them to be weaponized and used against tens of millions of Americans.
Well, you know what?
If tens of millions of Americans are celebrating in the wake of political violence, you're not weaponizing it.
You're utilizing it.
You are exposing it.
We cannot allow acts of political violence to be weaponized and used against tens of millions of Americans.
No, you know what that implicitly suggests, Gavin?
The man objecting to being called a Democrat terrorist organization?
That implicitly acknowledges that you can allow acts of political violence.
I can send violence on both sides.
This is this is the modern day Democrat Party.
Gavin Newsom refusing to instusing to restore law and order in the streets of California.
Donating fire equipment to Ukraine while his you know so his city subsequently burns.
Taking to courts Trump's deployment of the National Guard.
That's what uh that's what Gavin Newsom's all about.
We cannot allow acts of political violence to be weaponized.
But we sure as hell can allow them.
And then we'll come out with our bleeding heart, bullshit, half-assed wishy-washy condemnations on both sides, the rhetoric on both sides.
Even if the rhetoric exists on both sides equally, which it doesn't, the media apparatus doesn't exist on both sides.
So whatever both sides' rhetoric there is, it doesn't get the same amplification, Gavin, you moron.
And it's not proportionate by any means.
Trump nearly gets killed, Corey Comparatori gets murdered.
Nobody's rioting in the streets.
People are praying.
Ryan Ruth nearly kills Trump on his on his on Mar-a-Lago, Ryan Ruth with his connections to Ukraine, nobody's burning shit in the streets.
They're praying.
Charlie Kirk gets brutally murdered in public.
Nobody's rioting in the streets.
They're literally praying.
While these demonic progressive lefty Democrats are out there mocking the vigils, spitting on the vigils, stomping through the vigils.
We cannot allow acts of political violence to be weaponized.
Okay, I think that's it.
I'm gonna give myself a ruptured aneurysm.
Let me go back up here and bring these up here.
Coffee Trout News says, considering multiple shooter distraction and a reasonable ballistic analysis by Marine Sniper, shot came from another location.
I mean, I appreciate people are gonna have their theories and they're gonna, and it's it's it's imperfect information by definition.
Now, I I know that I've listened to the people that I know with military experience, the veterans and ballistic specialists, and I and I know what they say, and I I have my trusted sources and other people have theirs.
808 Scotty says, please refer to my position as anti-Zionist globalists, not anti-Jewish Zionist, not all not as anti-Jewish.
Zionists come in all flavors, Khazar's Ashkenazi, evangelists, as well as the bankers that are in control of the central banks.
Then we got fallen.
Let me see what this is.
The plane fleeing has been addressed as well.
Uh falling.
So as far as I understand that that has been uh explained that it's protocol in that area to turn off.
I mean, I I actually shouldn't posit an explanation that I don't fully understand, but uh I I I've heard that theory that the plane turned off its uh radars, which is not protocol, where apparently it is protocol.
Uh so thank you, following.
But I and I I guess I I also appreciate this new information's coming in, and some of these theories might damn well prove to be true.
King of Bill Tonks says, Do you know we also utilize we also specialize in imported foods?
Check out the updates to built on USA for great selection in food items, and of course, Bill Tong, Bill Tong USA.com.
Code Viva for 10% off Bill Tongue.
Let me do one thing here.
I I I try not to Chet, I try not to give that individual um any the the attention that he so clearly wants.
I don't know what what happened in in one's life where the they so desperately want such awful attention that um they say and do the things that they've said.
It must be a a deep self-hatred in there somewhere.
But um, yeah, related note, remove from Twitch.
Ginger Ninja in the house.
Charles means free man or man in old English.
James means may God protect in Latin.
Kirk means church in old Scottish Charles James Kirk Freeman, may God protect the church.
And um here's the uh the news here.
Other conservatives got just got me banned from Twitch.
My entire income is gone now.
So much for the party of free speech.
I I I I uh I had uh Eli.
I don't know what he I don't know who had what role to play and what, but I I've I've heard what some of the statements were.
Twitch is community keeping and keeping everyone safe.
Based on the review of your content, we have issued a community guideline strike on your account due to the severe nature of this violation or the fact that you've incurred multiple.
Your access to Twitch services is indefinitely restricted.
That is from uh Mr. Orange from Reservoir Dogs.
Cheese ups, sicking pump fiction.
All right.
Um that's it, people.
We're gonna go to our viva barneslaw.locals.com after party.
Let me see what's going on here.
Viva, it was a bomb viva, it was a bomb threat in Utah is the story.
No receipts that I saw.
F. Charton, what is that in respect of?
That's over in our locals community.
Okay, what we're gonna go do right now, we're gonna go raid whomever is on the front page.
I think it's gonna be redacted.
Here we go.
All right.
Oh, Kyle Seraphins on.
Okay, go go check him out.
If you want to come over to Viva Barnes Law Dot Locals.com, uh, you're always welcome.
If you want to support the work that uh I do, you know how to do it.
Uh but I would say go check out uh forward slash raid, go check out redacted and let him know from whence you came.
Kyle Seraphins on, and he's been giving some good insights on this as well.
Uh Godspeed, Rumble, if you're not coming.
I say don't despair.
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
You know what?
I don't even know what that poem is supposed to mean.
Do not go quietly into that gentle light.
Rage, rage against the we'll rage.
Stay peaceful, as always, because they are not worth you sacrificing your own future out of what might feel good in the moment, but will um ruin your life and give them the satisfaction of having triggered that response and knowing that they caused you to ruin your life in response to their evil.
That's not how it works.
It's not a good way to live.
Sobo has a good Pasobo has a good point on Charlie's stream today.
Not only was there not riding and looting from the right after what happened to Charlie, there was also nearly there was there there also wasn't nearly the outpouring from corporations.
After what happened to Charlie, there also wasn't nearly the outpouring of oh, I see what you're saying.
Yeah.
That is from R.I.P. Lucas Roberts.
Okay, so go Godspeed.
Rumble, I'm gonna come over to you guys right now.
Locals, I'm sorry, and um, what else?
I'll be live tomorrow.
I've got an interview to publish on locals.
And um that's it.
Locals, let's do this.
Viva Fry.com for merch if you want.
Louis the Lobster Returns to the Sea is available on Amazon, illustrated by the daughter of a member of our locals community.
And um, the other thing.
I'm not going to be in Calgary for the uh We Unify conference because I'm going to be uh in Arizona for Charlie's funeral.
So uh I have to let the event organizers know that.
I couldn't triangulate to get up to Calgary and then down to Arizona and then back to Florida.
Uh so there's that.
Okay.
Rumble, see you tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection