Dr. Mike: Doctor or Propagandist Activist? Letitia in Big trouble? Howard Stern Cancelled? & MORE!
|
Time
Text
Ladies and gentlemen of the Interwebs, for those of you who don't know where Winnipeg is, it is in Canada.
And for those of you who might think you are watching a cartoon or a Monty Python sketch, I assure you, you are not.
Because in the era of rampant police corruption, sociopath criminals behind the badge, taking photographs of corpses and passing them internally, at least they are doing land recognition before they make the announcement.
Behold.
Good afternoon, everybody.
I am Pat Sadak and I'm a Constable with the Winnipeg Police Service Public Information Office.
We have one item to discuss with you today but before we do that I would like to acknowledge that we are on Treaty 1 territory, the home and tradition lands of the Anishinaabe, Ojibwe, Innu, Cree and Dakota peoples and in the national homeland of the Red River Metis.
Our drinking water comes from Shoal Lake 40 First Nation in Treaty 3 territory.
I'd like to now invite Chief Bowers to the-They have one thing to announce.
announce today rampant police corruption criminality within the force but first let me virtue signal I want to tell this guy something.
I'm not going to make the obvious jokes, though they're floating around in the devilish side of my brain.
I'm going to say to this man, sir, if you are on unseated land, give up your home, get it, just give your property back.
Oh, what are you doing from your, from your beautiful ivory tower?
We thank you, dear natives, for this unseated land on which I have built this ivory tower, from which I will thank you for the exploitation that we have carried out, admittedly, on you and your people for generations.
Now let's just get into the corruption within the police force.
Did you did you get are we good?
good we're virtuous okay podium to provide opening remarks listen to what they're going to say here i'm not going to play the whole thing but i'm playing everybody so uh back on november 7th 2024 i spoke to you about uh three of our officers being arrested in charge for a number of serious offenses at that time i shared that the investigation was ongoing constable elston
bostock has been charged with a number of new criminal offenses.
Let me just skip to the back.
One took a picture of a corpse, I guess, because he thought the woman was attractive, and then circulated it internally.
Three other officers in uniform forcibly evicted someone from a property under no color of law, which is also known as burglary, breaking and entering.
If it's not forcible confinement, maybe I don't know some form.
The criminals, criminals behind the badge.
The third incident I'll describe took place on or about March 16, 2023.
In this instance, while on duty, Constable Bostock and his partner, Constable Vernon Stratinsky, attended to a residence in the 300 Block of Mountain Avenue in a marked cruiser car and in full uniform.
Both officers entered the residence without authorization for the purpose of evicting the tenants at that location.
These actions were not associated in any way to their policing duties.
Just straight up criminals.
In relation to that third incident, the charges are break and enter to commit indictable offense, to wit extortion.
21st, 2021.
I want to hear this one.
And this involved a sudden death that Constable Bostock attended.
Sudden death.
While on duty, Constable Bostock attended a call for service regarding a sudden death in the 500 block of Osborne.
Sudden death cop shows up.
At which time he obtained an intimate photo of a deceased female who was only partially clothed.
Constable Bostock then distributed this photo electronically to another party.
The charges relating from that second incident are indignity to human remains, distributing an intimate image, and breach of trust.
This is the Winnipeg Police Department.
This is Alex Zoltan at Amazing Zoltan.
Go follow him.
if you don't already follow him for some good Canadian stuff.
They come out there with their nice innocent Canadian accents saying, and they say, oh, we like to thank the natives for the land that we stole from, that we acknowledge that we we stole from them.
It's unseated.
I mean, they never seeded it to us, but we stole it and we like it.
We're not giving it back.
Oh, yeah.
And, uh, we got a bunch of freaking criminals on our police force.
Eh, Winnipeg police.
I'm quoting the tweet here.
One of our senior officers is a psychopathic serial criminal who while maybe high on coca and champumps, sold drugs, extorted people, uh, stole ammunition, by the way, I think also, and took grotesque pictures with dead women in their underwear.
But before we get to that, let's do a land acknowledgement.
This is the absolute state of Canada.
It's not by accident that they do it, by the way.
It is the shielding yourself in virtue while you basically have to lay bare your corruption.
Remember with the two missing Nova Scotia kids whom I don't think we've found as of yet before they do that press conference.
They have a woman who goes on for three minutes about land acknowledgement.
You imagine being the parents of the missing children and having to sit through land acknowledgements.
And I think there was a political reason for which they did that in the case given the nature of the case and the identities of the individuals.
These guys get up and before they expose their rampant criminal corruption behind the badge, they got to pretend to be the virtue signaling ass kissers that they are.
It's atrocious.
But there's more coming out of Canada before we get on with the day because I want to do the updates of the madness.
From Winnipeg to that's central Canada to the west, never eat to the east coast, excuse me, where as you know because we've been talking about it all week, they've had a fire ban and you can't go in the forest because spontaneous combustion prohibited from hiking, biking, fishing, camping in Nova Scotia forest because it's so dry and you don't want to have a repeat of the 2023 forest fires which were criminal arson.
And of course the criminal arsonists are going to stay out of the forest when they know nobody else is there.
What could possibly go wrong?
So as they are stripping Canadians of their God-given rights.
And I think too many people have forgotten that given by God, not afforded by humans.
I had to double check.
I did the, hey, Grock, is this a real account or a fake account?
Not because I'm relying on Grock to think for me, but because I don't know what is parody and what is not parody anymore.
I go to Roger Kusner, Roger Kusner.
Oh, maybe it's Kutchner.
Oh, whatever, Roger.
And his profile says Canadian Senator from Nova Scotia, former Consul General.
Can we stop that?
Former Consul General for Canada in Boston.
And I don't even know what the hell this is.
Okay, his tweet says in respect of Fred DeLorey, who works for or is a regular on CBC, Communist Broadcasting Corporation, which says respectfully disagree in respect of another tweet, which says that it's ridiculous.
What the hell is going on here?
What is I'm going down this rabbit hole here.
Let's listen to this.
A leisurely walk in the woods is no longer allowed in Nova Scotia.
I played this yesterday.
Someone says this is obsessive.
Michael Taub, who is a columnist for the National Post, Wall Street Journal, et cetera, et cetera, says agreed.
Being cautious due to the dry conditions and possible wildflowers makes sense.
Banning walking in the woods and and threatening penalties of 25,000 dollars per incident is beyond the pale.
I agree with Michael Talbot.
I agree with, you know, banning fires to which Fred DeLorey, who is a CBC communist propaganda, uh, proponent says respectfully disagree as a woodlot owner in Nova Scotia.
Well, you can't go in your forest there, Fred.
I can tell you firsthand, the forest floor is like tinder right now.
You can feel the heat rising from it, just waiting for a spark.
Well, you better have forest management, not, not do the annual cleanings there, but set that aside.
Our provinces, small communities are tightly woven into the woods.
One fire here doesn't just burn trees.
It can jump roads, wipe out homes and trap people.
Right.
We don't have the buffer zones or firebreakers that larger provinces do.
Well, maybe you want to fix the problem instead of stripping people of their rights, but set that aside.
A short term ban on recreational access is inconvenient, for sure, but also smart.
One careless step could cost millions and devastate lives.
This is a statement that will always be true.
So enjoy your prison, CBC propagandist.
Then this guy replies and says, I was at a friend's place last night.
His wife put a cigarette out in the wild in the fire pit before we went inside for dinner.
Ten minutes later, we noticed the pit was in full blaze.
Innocent enough, but incredibly dangerous.
I support Premier Houston's call on this one hundred percent.
Hold on.
But hold on, I I have to bring up, I have to bring up my reply to this because I after after making sure after I made sure that it wasn't a parody account and I'm going to get duped into replying to a parody account, I, um, had to, I had to reply.
Grock, is it real?
It's real.
So you're a retarded lawbreaker and you expect Nova Scotians to have their rights stripped from them because you're a retarded lawbreaker.
Get bent, idiot.
Now, by the way, notice acutely missing from his tweet is whether or not they were using the fire pit.
You know what tends to make a fire pit come back from the ashes, pun intended?
If there were, what is it called?
Embers in the fire pit.
If you had had a fire in the fire pit before you put the cigarette out in it, that might explain why you didn't quite put that fire out in the fire pit.
I screenshotted his tweet for evidence for the future.
He didn't quite mention if they were actually having an outdoor fire despite the fire ban.
But that guy did something stupid or at least he blames it on the wife of one of his friends.
Way to go, coward.
He does something stupid and everybody else has to suffer.
It's the government way, people.
It's the government way.
Okay.
Now that we've had our update on Canadian madness, M. Sidloy in the house said I heard a comedian quip that land acknowledgements are.
Atlantic knowledge means our white supremacy.
Not only did you win militarily, but now you're seizing the moral high ground.
Not bad, Sidloy.
A value added man.
I've seen his name.
I know who you are, Sidloy.
I don't know in person, but thank you.
Good afternoon, everybody.
How goes the battle?
We're going to have a fun one today because I've been picking fights.
And yesterday I picked a fight with a doctor.
We're going to talk about some breaking news.
There's a lot of breaking news.
Federal court siding with Trump two to one reversing Judge Boseberg corrupt SOB Judge Boseberg.
Speaking of corrupt SOBs or POSs, depending on where you want to go about this.
We've got Leticia James., corrupt to the core, uh, and now herself under the magnifying glass, under the spotlight, the big, beautiful spotlight of, what's the word accountability?
We'll see.
We'll see.
We're live on Rumble.
We're live on Viva Barnes Law dot locals dot com, where Bill Brown is posting pictures of his dog.
Doctor Zeidelberg says he admitted using a fire pit before the cigarette but he admitted using the fire pit before the sit to the cigarette but oh yeah dude dude it's amazing.
These are these are the ones who want to take your rights away.
Who was it?
It was Justin Trudeau after he gets caught for blackface lecturing.
us on racism after he gets caught for misogyny, lecturing us on women's rights.
Pathological narcissists, psychopaths, sociopaths, whatever you want to call it, pathological abusers.
Serenity now.
I am picking a fight with Dr. Mike.
Dr. Mike is a well known doctor that is a YouTube dude and social media and whatnot.
He's actually so well known that as I was replying or playing the video of the Dr. Mike, my kid says, Hey, is that Dr. Mike?
And I said it is doctor Mike.
He ain't gonna be coming over for Christmas any time soon.
Doctor Mike was replying to a tweet from RFK junior.
I played it yesterday.
I'm going to play it again.
Secretary Kennedy puts out a tweet that says doctors, hospitals, insurance companies and pharmaceutical giants profit by keeping Americans sick.
Yesterday I played referred to a tweet by Amy McGrath, which said, This is so offensive.
It's hurtful.
I've got family members who are nurses, doctors, but I'm like, all right, good for you.
Now address the substance of what he said.
Prepare for a similar response to doctor Mike, who I have since discovered is a raging propagandist and a master at taking things out of context in order to promote his activist position, which is literally petitioning the public to literally sign a petition to literally demand that RFK Jr. resign from his post as Secretary of HHS.
Let's listen to what RFK Jr. said and you tell me where the lies are detected at every level from the doctors to the hospitals to the insurance companies, the pharmaceutical companies, people make money by keeping Americans sick.
And today we have the sickest population in the world.
More than sixty percent of our kids have chronic disease.
When my uncle was president, I was a ten year old boy, it was three percent.
We're talking about 1960 to 1963.
Brown?
Yeah.
And today it's gone up to sixty percent.
So about eight out of ten American kids cannot qualify for military service.
We have obesity crises.
We have diabetes crises.
The autism rates in our population in 1970, we have the largest epidemiological study ever performed, found that about 0.7.
seven, so less than one out of 10,000 Americans had autism.
And today, the latest data from CDC, which is one of my agencies, is one in every 31 kids, one in about every 20 boys in California, which has the best data collection of any state.
We have probably the most accurate, so it's probably worse than this.
is one in every 19 children has autism, one in every 12.8 boys.
And so we need to really change, we need to pivot at this agency and make it and and begin at every level changing these perverse incentives which make people rich by keeping us safe.
He meant safe.
The economic incentives of our agency with good public health so that we can stop it there.
You get the idea and I'm fact checking RFK junior in real time as we do this.
Dr. Mike replies to Secretary Kennedy or I should say he quote posts.
What do you call it now?
I can't call it quote tweeting.
He quote posts.
And he says, at what point will we as medical physicians, medical schools, medical organizations take a unifying stance against Secretary Kennedy repeatedly making these ridiculously inflammatory and inaccurate statements.
And look who he tags.
American Medical Association of whatever American of what is this American Osteopathic or we got Dr. Sanjay Gupta, Dr. Sanjay Gupta who was on CNN who was on Rogan admitting to the fact that CNN was providing medical disinformation.
Oh yeah, no, AAFP and whomever else.
I reply to Dr. Mike, it was not polite, everybody.
You teach your kids to speak politely until you find someone who you know deserves to be, you know, rudely x slapped.
And I say everything RFK junior said is 100% accurate, which might explain the absence of a community note.
If you've got some evidence based counterargument, make it.
Otherwise, shut your trap and keep your hominem gaslighting to yourself.
Let me go forward here just for one second and I'll give everybody that tweet.
Dr. Mike replied to one of those tweets.
And the tweet was interesting here, link to that tweet.
He replied to one of those tweets.
And let me see where it is.
I'm going to have to go down this sort of a rabbit hole to get there.
He replied with a link to a tweet of his and the link to the tweet or I should say the link to the video was a link to a YouTube video that doctor Mike put out debunking allegedly RFK Jr.'s claims.
Let's see this here.
Let's go to this one.
This is it.
Let's go.
We have to follow the whole thing here.
Here we go.
All right.
So everything he said here, he says, sure.
Here's the evidence and he links to his video.
Now I've watched the video.
In fact, I don't think I had watched the video.
I think I watched it before this tweet, but only because I saw he does this pretty much to everyone when asked a question.
Here's a link to my 30-minute video in which I call for the resignation of RFK junior.
So I asked in a quote tweet, but then I put it in response to his.
I asked in a quote tweet.
I don't suspect you're going to ask.
I watched your video, the one in which you demanded the resignation of RFK junior.
I'm going to clip the three biggest lies, misrepresentations you made in that video.
But before I do, I first need to make sure they are lies first and not just grotesque ignorance.
Did you watch the full podcast with Lex Friedman and RFK junior?
You know, the one you shared the three second clip from answer very, very, very straightforward question.
I only wish you could be so fact driven and detail oriented.
when going over RFK Jr. statements.
I do.
I am.
Can you answer the question?
It has been how many hours?
7.50 p.m.
It's been almost 24 hours.
No answer to the question.
I will not get an answer to the question.
Now, the reason why I had to make sure that it was lies or grotesque misrepresentations is important.
On the one hand, I say a lie is not a lie if someone believes it, but before you call someone a liar, you got to make sure that they're actually a liar.
There's an old saying in law.
Let me bring this out here that you don't ask a question to which you don't know the answer.
Everybody always says that it's a classic, not a trope but a principle of law.
There's an exception to that rule when there is no acceptable answer and they're damned one way or the other.
Hey, Dr. Mike, did you watch the full episode with the interview of Lex Friedman and RFK Jr.?
Let me play the clip first because it's going to be clear, or at least you're going to appreciate the degree to which the three second clip, everyone ran with it at the time.
And I remembered it.
When you went to look for the context, you could not find anything longer than a four second clip on Twitter, all from the same propagandist talking.
heads CNN, I'm sure Sanjay Gupta tweeted it.
Watch this.
Let's play this here.
However, now it's 2025 and we have a decade's worth of proof that RFK junior is in fact anti-vaccine.
There's no vaccine that is, you know, safe and effective.
But that was the clip.
You go online and you put in there's no vaccine that's safe and effective.
This is it.
Let me let me just count the seconds here.
There's no vaccine that is, you know, safe and effective.
It was four seconds and the added echo at the end.
One would think based on listening to that that RFK junior had said there's no vaccine.
that's safe and effective.
One might not even know with whom RFK junior was interlocuting.
That's not a word I just made that up.
I happened to because I watched the podcast, listened to it, whatever you want to call it.
Now go look at that statement in context and appreciate why they do a dishonest hard edit at the end of that sentence.
Who knows the answer to this question in the chat?
However, now it's 2025 and we have a decade's worth of proof that RFK junior is in fact anti-vaccine.
There's no vaccine that is safe and effective.
You've talked about that the media slanders you by calling you an anti-vaxxer.
And you've said that you're not anti-vaccine, you're pro-safe vaccine.
Difficult question.
Can you name any vaccines that you think are good?
Oh, sorry.
I think some of the live virus vaccines are probably averting more problems than they're causing.
There's no vaccine that is safe and effective.
effective in big words what about the polio can we talk about the well here's the problem here's the problem yes look yeah here's the problem the The polio vaccine contained a virus called Simian virus 40, SV40.
It's one of the most carcinogenic materials that is known to men.
In fact, it's used now by scientists around the world to induce tumors in rats.
I mean, I try to steal a minute.
Viva, he said it.
You're the one who's now saying my context.
It is panoramic.
First of all, I was making a joke.
Everybody says Lex Freeman is boring and they fall asleep during his podcast.
I kind of like him.
It's mesmerizing the way he talks.
It's like kind of the exact opposite of the way I talk.
It's painfully obvious that in the context, in the context of that discussion, I've just been locked out of my Twitter account again.
Look at this effing crap that I have to put up with now.
Let me just make sure that I'm not going to give any private information here.
Yeah, look at what I have to deal with on this, on this effing platform.
I mean, I guess it's good.
It's either automated algorithmic bullshit.
Elon fix this crap now or I'm getting mass flagged because of paid partnership rules violation because apparently when you put up a tweet that says this, thank the sponsor.
Let me see a paid partnership start.
Oh yeah, hey, look guys, it's unclear.
I violated the partnership rules by not disclosing that it was a sponsor.
I'm removing it because I don't care about it.
It's either algorithmic or I'm getting mass brigaded, but bottom line.
It's funny.
I get thrown out.
Continued X. Yes.
Thank you.
That's where I was before.
It was quite clear that RFK junior in the context was saying that there's always a risk profile to every vaccine.
I don't think Lex cut him off on purpose because he is deep state.
He's intelligence and he caught the soundbite and he knew in real time.
Oh, I got him here.
Let me get the soundbite.
I don't think that's what Lex was doing, but Lex interrupted him before he could finish the sentence.
There's no vaccine that's safe and effective in that they all have a safety risk profile and you can't ignore it.
But for Dr. Mike to come out in his debunking, and that's that was like one of the first highlights from his video.
And I'm like, great.
Now I know this guy is someone who cannot be trusted in anything that he says when it comes to anything politically related.
Like, I, and it's only because I knew the context of that.
And then he goes in to include other, other clips of RFK junior using analogies of the Holocaust under context unknown for those who don't know the context.
So it was like, that's it.
I'm watching this in the first thirty seconds.
I know I cannot trust this individual.
Everything in here now needs to be double checked, triple checked, and that this is nothing more than a hit piece on RFK junior and that everything this guy says throughout is going to be suspect.
And I'm not going to go through the entire thing now.
Everything that he said throughout was suspect.
But listen to this, just the first thirty seconds.
As a practicing doctor and someone who deeply cares about public health, I've been quite vocal about my criticism towards RFK junior.
Oh yeah, you may have said it on podcasts on YouTube.
He says he hasn't I invited Dr. Mike.
I followed him on Twitter, tagged him and I appreciate I've been very, very annoying and he might even think I'm crazy and I appreciate that.
It's called OCD with insight.
I fixated on this particular issue between last night and today.
I've invited him on.
I'd like to have these discussions with him.
Hey, Dr. Mike, did you watch the podcast?
Oh, you didn't and you relied on propaganda?
Oh, that's terrible.
I can't trust you.
Oh, you did watch it and you deliberately misrepresented what it said to promote more anti RFK propaganda.
Well, that's great.
I can't trust anything you have to say.
His message are frustrated with our healthcare system, with our lack of clear answers to some hard questions, with our poor communication and guidance throughout the pandemic.
Know that I hear you and actually agree with you.
We need to do better and change can't come soon enough.
We certainly need to be skeptical of our institutions, but healthy scientific skepticism means following data, not cherry picking it or making it up.
Now, before we fact check some of the more extreme examples of misinformation, I want to show you who RFK junior really is, what he stands for, and why, despite some of his ideas sounding good, he is incredibly dangeroerous to public health.
Accuses RFK junior of cherry pill.
Robert F. Kennedy junior is the nephew of former president John F. Kennedy.
He first became popular in the nineties as an attorney suing factories that were dumping pollution into New York's Hudson River.
That's good stuff.
However, in 2005, he began his public crusade against mercury and vaccines and eventually joined the team at World Mercury Project in 2015, which abruptly changed its name to Children's Health Defense in 2018.
Pause it there.
We're going to stop right there.
I just want to tell you the subtle innuendo.
He started something called Mercury and then abruptly change the name.
How do you how do you gradually change the name, doctor?
What was the what does the abruptly imply?
Is he trying to hide something?
He abruptly changed the name of the organization because you know that's the type of thing you typically do gradually.
You do it one letter at a time.
Holy crab apples.
I watched that whole thing, misrepresented the popper argument as related to how the AIDS epidemic got exacerbated, totally misrepresented.
I'm not even sure that he read the book The Real Anthony Fauci.
I want to bring out some of the other highlights of the misrepresentation.
Here we go.
The science is very clear.
Amazing thing when they say the science is clear and it's been proven and proven and proven.
And yet, other than repeating, there's very little actual evidence and it's an amazing thing.
I'll show you what happened with chat GPT when I try to double check some things.
Let me just play this clip right here.
I don't think there's any I don't think there's any scientific question that vaccines cause autism if you actually read the science.
If you read the science., and the science is very clear on this, that there is no causal link between autism and vaccines.
There is no causal link between autism and vaccines is a conclusion.
Everyone appreciates that.
It's not a premise.
It's not evidence.
It's a conclusion.
I'm going to steal man this for Dr. Mike in a second, but appreciate that.
We've heard the conclusion once.
And there have been many studies that have looked at millions of children comparing children who have been vaccinated versus those who haven't been vaccinated and have seen that there is no causal link.
When I was doing my debate with someone, there have been many studies.
They determine there is no causal linkal link.
Okay.
And now let me go to a quack at one of these Jubilee debates.
Skeptics.
One of the participants said that's because the people looking at it are part of the corrupt American capitalist system.
So, so, so amazing tactic.
Take something dumb that some idiot at a Jubilee debate, which is known for their high intellect, said, and then use that to debunk RFK junior.
And by the way, he's also wrong here, but let's not, let's not, let's not quibble over details.
Then the research that was done on over half a million children in Denmark, which has nothing to do with the US capitalist system, also found the same exact result.
This is because there is no causal link.
The only link between autism and vaccines is there is no causal link.
The only link is a graph that is very, very damaging, but causality does not equal correlation does not equal causality.
Autism and vaccines that exist is that the timelines sort of match up from a correlation standpoint and just because two things happen at the same time does not mean they caused one another.
The same way that we could look at this picture or we could look at the trending graph of organic food sales.
It's important to study and see if there is causality.
And when it comes to vaccines and autism, there is no causality.
And I have to say that again and again because I haven't proven it.
And the only way to convince people is by repeating the mantra.
There is no causality.
There is no causality.
Put periods in between.
There, period is period.
No period, causality.
That this has been proven internationally.
Millions of children tested to this, and this needs to be put to bed.
I don't know, the best way to put it to bed is the result.
I want to highlight something here.
Again, wordsmithing of the devil.
I was a lawyer.
I can think like a scoundrel, even if I'm not one.
Listen to this endpoint.
And just because two things happened at the same time doesn't mean they caused one another.
The same way that we could look at this picture or we could look at the trending graph of organic food sales.
Organic food sales, not organic food consumption, organic food sales.
Why might this chart be somewhat misleading?
Oh, that's right, because they didn't recognize organic certification until the year 2000 and then only implemented in 2002.
Oh, you know what else is particularly misleading about this graph that Dr. Mike is using?
Autism had already spiked before this graph started.
I mean, it's wild again, and I don't purport to know the answers.
I just know when someone is taking a hot steaming dump of lies on my face and I don't like it.
I mean, the issue is he goes on in the video talking about how consumption of highly processed foods is what might also be driving it.
I mean, it's not good for your health.
So on the one hand, you've got mass intake of highly processed foods, which we all agree are not bad for you, whether or not it causes autism or correlates to, so you've got a massive increase in the intake of highly processed foods while he's suggesting that there's a massive increase in intake of organic foods, but he only referred to sales.
And the only reason you have that stat is because as of 2000 they actually designated things organic in the States.
Oh my God.
But no, no, no, no, no.
He'll, um, he'll continue posting spam to replies before that.
I just want to see if I said everything here.
Causality and correlation.
Also, it's an amazing thing because it's very, very difficult to prove causality.
I mean, you could, you could, you want to get stupid about it.
You could say, yeah, your nose was going to break before I punched it.
The fact that I swung at the same time and when I hit your face, it broke your nose.
It happened anyhow.
Don't equate causality with correlation just because they happened at the same time.
Your nose based on what's the type of physics?
Quantum physics, your nose was going to spontaneously break at that moment anyhow.
Don't blame it on my fist.
It's an amazing thing when you deny causality because it's very, very difficult to prove in but in the most clear cut cases, one thing is clear, it correlates like a mofo.
And I'm not coming to the conclusion that vaccines per se or in of themselves probably is highly processed foods, chemicals, food dyes, environmental.
One thing is undeniable.
Autism has spiked through the roof.
It correlates to vaccines.
It correlates to bad food.
It correlates to food dyes.
It correlates to probably microplastics and a whole slew of other things.
But vaccines are the only ones you can definitely rule out because.
The studies said it doesn't correlate.
Oh, let's get to those studies.
I am not a scientist.
I just know certain things that I've read.
And you know the questions that you have to ask.
Where is it?
Oh, tabarnouche.
Mais il est où?
Je voulais amener quelque chose ici.
C'est là.
I wanted to go show the degree to which those studies that he relied on.
I don't know what the best studies would be.
All that I know is I was informed at some point in time that there was no...
Let me bring this up and I got to show you this is what this is the degree to which chat GPT is not just useless but harmful.
I asked chat GPT, is there any scientific study on autism that compares vaccinated children to unvaccinated children?
Yes, the answer says.
There have been several scientific studies that specifically compare vaccinated and unvaccinated children to investigate whether there is any link between vaccination and autism.
These studies have consistently found no association between autism between vaccines and the risk of autism spectrum disorder.
I see.
Okay.
And then it cites the.
It's the Denmark study over 500,000 children.
And I'm not, I'm more plied with chat GPT than I am with pathological liars.
They say, are you sure that's true?
My understanding is that the control group did not consist of unvaccinated children in the Denmark study.
You're right to raise that point.
And it's a valid and important distinction.
Let's break it down precisely.
Short answer in the Madsen AL study from Denmark and several other groups, the control group was not composed entirely of completely unvaccinated children.
Rather, the study compared children who received the MMR vaccine to those who had not yet received the MMR vaccine by a certain age.
So again, you don't have to be a lawyer.
A lawyer doesn't mean knowing the answers.
It just means knowing the questions and knowing the problems when you pick apart an exper expert who says, oh, yeah, no, we tested against a vaccinated no, you didn't.
Oh, no, but they only received the, didn't receive the MMR, but they had received other vaccines.
Oh, but then it gets into, well, he was only after Mercury, not after Aluminium.
And then the doctor goes on in his video to say, yeah, no, no, the RFK junior raised concerns about some element, and then they removed it, even though there was no correlation to, they did it as a precautionary measure.
Oh, okay.
If he wants to get fancy, you could have gone after the stat, which, and I think he did at some point, but it's also still disingenuous about chronic diseases in children.
And he's right.
Maybe RFK exaggerated that or maybe he overestistated it.
Or maybe you need to sit down and have a discussion and ask RFK junior, what are you counting by way of children?
And what are you counting by way of chronic disease?
This is according to chat GPT, it's worth what it's worth.
But I go up here.
First question, what percentage of American children have chronic diseases?
Depends on the percentage depends on how broadly defined chronic disease.
But in public health data, it's roughly forty percent of children.
Am I going to believe that the public health data is going to overstate that or understate that?
I'm going to go through here.
Is that for under eighteen?
Yes.
Okay.
Then I say, okay, well, chronic disease, you don't really probably get it from zero to six, maybe even from zero to twelve.
I'd say, well, let's do, uh, what did I say here?
thirteen to nineteen.
Oh, well, when you break it down from thirteen to nineteen, well, there it goes up to forty five to fifty percent according to chat GPT, taken with a grain of salt.
For US adolescents aged thirteen to nineteen, the prevalence of at least one chronic health condition is typically about 45 to 50 percent higher than the under eighteen average because risk climbs during teen years.
Oh, exactly.
What, what years was RFK junior talking about?
And if he's off by ten percent and that's your beef to discredit him and call him a quack anti-vaxer by taking stuff out of context to make him look like a liar when it makes you look like the liar, you're the liar and you want to get hung up on the details when he's highlighting a real health crisis that even you claim to agree with and want to help, But you're now hellbent on having him removed from power.
Thank you.
And that's all I have to say on that.
Dr. Mike, the invitation is an open standing invitation.
You can come anytime.
It may be heated and it will be fun, but I doubt you're going to because you couldn't even answer a clear cut yes or no question.
Did you watch the entire Lex Friedman podcast with RFK junior?
And I know damn well why you didn't answer it because that would have been my follow-up question regardless of how you answered it.
No, you didn't.
Well then you just repeatated disinformation and you didn't know.
Yes, you did.
Well, you just repeated disinformation and you knew.
That is how you ask a question in law when you don't know the answer.
Oh, people, speaking of health, let us thank our sponsor of the day.
Brickhouse Nutrition, who's got a new product called Lean, everybody.
I have, where's my Brickhouse Nutrition?
They got, they make, they make, they make, um, where is it?
Field of Greens, uh, people.
Are you a yo-yo dieter?
I can tell you that I am not.
I've been pretty consistent, 158 for about 30 years.
How old am I now?
32 years.
Your diet, you diet, you lose weight, you gain it all back plus a few extra pounds, then later you lose it, regain it, and again and again.
It's dangerous.
Studies show that they increase your risk of heart attack, stroke, type 2 diabetes, and other health problems, chronic health problems that 45 to 50 percent of ages 13 to 19 suffer from breaking free from your yoyo diet pattern is a main reason doctors created lean.
Lean is a supplement, not an injection, and you don't need a prescription.
The science behind lean is impressive.
It studied natural ingredient targets that cause you to lose weight in three powerful ways.
Lean helps maintain healthy blood sugar.
It helps control appetite and desires, and it helps burn fat by converting fat into energy.
If you're tired of losing weight, gaining it back and doing this over and over again, get lean.
Let me get you started with 20% off when you put in the code VIVA twenty.
If you go to lean dot com, take lean dot com code VIVA twenty, take lean dot com.
The link is in the description.
Thank you.
It takes you to Brickhouse Nutrition.
Great company, field of greens, delicious stuff.
And get in shape, people.
Get healthy, exercise.
It's no simpler than exercise and eating healthy.
And there are things like lean out there for those who have difficulty doing that.
Do it.
All right.
Now, what do we?
This is from our Viva Barnes law.
our viva barneslaw dot locals dot com community.
And it's not let me break it up, bring it up.
I'm going to refresh, give me a second.
I'll be back because I think I've been logged out.
la dude Yes, I was logged out, but now I can't bring it up because I lost it.
Let me go to the tipped questions over here and show you what this looks like.
Viva barneslaw dot locals dot com if you want to support the work that Robert Barnes and I do.
It's the best above average community out there.
Hot steaming dump of lies on my face, my value system.
Sorry, Shammy's eyes says hot steaming dump of lies on my face.
Viva, my value system.
Consider this bookworthy.
Thank you.
Yeah, I was going to I actually had to as I was mid sentence, tone it down a little big bad Bob.
Bob.
Has everyone seen Haldon Kumar escape from Guantanamo Bay?
I'm not proud to admit.
I'm not ashamed.
It's hilarious.
Bob is in it.
The statement that no vaccine is safe and effective is one hundred percent true because every vaccine ever created has killed a certain number of people right off the bat.
Doctor Mike is an ignorant fool.
Anyone who says something that isn't true is a liar.
Even if it's due to ignorance.
I disagree with that last part.
If you say something that's not true and you sincerely believe it, you're just wrong.
If you say it Knowing it's wrong, you're a liar.
And if you say it, having no basis to believe that it's true, you're a liar.
No, but what he meant, what he meant, what he probably should have said is totally safe and totally effective.
I mean, just put in the word totally, and then we all agree.
That's right.
Every vaccine, every jab, every foreign intrusion into the body can trigger an immunological response causing GBS, Guillaume Barret syndrome.
It can all cause transverse myelitis.
Every single jab on Earth, and nothing to do with the inherent risk of the contents of the jab, just any foreign intrusion into the body.
But what's this face?
And I knew it.
Let's cut him off.
when he was in the mid sentence going to explain the risk profile that he was referring to that he got back to when talking about the polio vaccine.
I saw this one earlier, I'll do it viva voce.
Hello, Viva, question for you, two questions, two dollar tip, question one.
In a judicial parlance, what is the phrase, it's French, isn't it?
You know what's funny is there's a lot of French expressions that actually have English origin.
The ony soa qui mal y pense is on the British coat of arms.
It's a French ish, Latin sentence that says, shame on he who thinks, thinks ill of something so innocent.
Voir dire means to see and to say., Voir, dear, Voir is to see, dear, and it's a voir, dear.
You want to see and you want to say, you want to look at something, evidence, witnesses, you want to hear them talk to determine their eligibility, their appropriateness.
So, Voir, dear is basically, let me see with my eyes and we'll comment on it in real time.
And the other one here, let's see this suppose supposed to mean being an expert on general automotive knowledge.
Can you tell me what would be the correct ignition timing on the 1955 Bel Air Chevrolet with a 327 cubic engine and a four barrel cuburator?
Kerberick, carburet.
What the hell is that even?
No, I couldn't tell you that.
I couldn't even tell you how many cylinders I think the Bronco that we've got is 470.
is a four cylinder because I remember telling someone and they thought that was a small engine, but I have no idea.
So that's Dr. Mike.
I'm going to keep reaching out and pinging him and being annoying, but I probably should stop at some point in time.
Someone's going to think I'm crazy.
The other news of the day, another time where I had to go do my homework because I want to make sure that I know what I'm talking about and don't speak out of my hat or my ass, depending on who you're talking about.
Howard Stern.
Word on the street is that his contract is up next year, not going to be renewed with Sirius XM.
Apparently he had like a $100 million five year contract and people are rejoicing in his demise as if he's going to, you know, suffer for the rest of his days for any other reason other than his own psychological state of being.
The word on the street is that there's never going to be an agreement.
Sirius XM is not going to offer anything that Howard Stern is going to accept.
Let me rephrase that.
They're not going to offer anything that Howard Stern is demanding.
Howard is not going to accept anything that Sirius XM is ready to offer.
They're going to make some agreement for his library and people are rejoicing because Howard Stern is a has turned into a POS, but some would argue that he's always been a POS.
I like Rob Schneider and you guys are going to tell me if you think this was intended to be sarcastic or serious or half half.
Rob says for those celebrating the apparent end to Howard Stern's remarkable and unparalleled run, I will not be joining you.
While I personally felt hurt when Howard called people like me idiots and fuck your freedoms to those of us who chose not to participate in the myocarditis cloth shows, I'm not going to in the least let that erase the incredible fun I had being on Stern's show and even more listening and laughing my balls off more times than I can count.
Howard single handily changed radio from a dying and boring format to what Stern turned it into daring, uproarious, unmasked, hilarity, unpredictable.
Yada yada.
His loyalty to friends, colleagues was just just as inspirational.
He's by far the best interviewer, got so much out of celebrities.
Howard was our voice asking questions that we wanted to ask if we were the ones daring to.
Yeah, okay, it goes on.
So no, I won't participate in the conservatives' impersonation of left wing cancel culture.
Now that the conservatives have control of the White House, Congress, Supreme Court, it's past time to differentiate from the previous administration's censorious and divisive agenda and the part of our culture that followed suit with cancelling and shaming and demonizing.
I'm grateful that conservatives have had the opportunity to be the voice of the people and concentrate on improving the quality of life and health of the American people.
So I want to concentrate on that.
Hope you're well.
I wish our son Robin and Al the best.
We'll remain a huge fan.
fan who was grateful for the decades for the after love Don Imas.
Don Imas and Robert and Howard Stern hated each other, or at least Don Imas hated Howard Stern.
So I don't know if there's like a little needle tongue and cheek, like Howard Stern literally said, Fuck your freedoms.
He hated everyone who was a Trump supporter, didn't want them to listen to his show anymore, et cetera, et cetera.
I appreciate what Rob Schneider is saying here.
And it's a sense, I mean, look, it's a reasonable position.
The only part I disagree with is that conservatives are canceling Howard Stern.
I argued that Howard Stern canceled himself through his behavior.
When you shit on half of your audience and tell them you don't want their support, you're canceling yourself., not vice versa.
Whether or not Howard was ever profitable, I had gone through a sixteen year period where I didn't watch or listen to Howard Stern.
When he came to Canada in 1996 or 1997, I think, it was great.
He was funny.
He was on the edge.
He was rude, crass, everything that a sixteen, seventeen year old kid would love.
And we did this press conference and he took and he meant, speaking of steaming dumps on French, what he thought was French Quebec, although he, you know, equated French from France with the French from Quebec.
But I don't believe that the right is canceling Howard Stern.
I genuinely think he canceled himself, but I was reading the reply.
the replies and then I went on a bit of a rabbit hole.
Tracy Bean says, if only people didn't have the attention span of a NAT, they'd get this comedic genius.
Okay, so I think he was being sarcastic a little bit.
Most people are not really getting the Don Imas hard joke at the end, are they?
Norm would be proud.
Okay, but someone said, let me see where the Robin.
Okay, what a fantastic.
I really enjoyed the show until, okay, I don't.
People were saying at some point, uh, what was her name?
Platon.
Uh, what was the woman's name who took who died either from an overdose accidental or deliberate the day after she appeared on Howard Stern.
Google, hold on, sorry guys, I'm totally seeing how I listened to the interview.
Plato, Howard Stern.
What was her first name?
Dana Plato.
So everyone in the chat was like, Howard Stern was a pathological, you know, rude, condescending, exploitative, demeaning, degrading, and can't disagree with that.
He did good interviews.
He did get things out of people.
He was also very mean spirited in a lot of his humor, but he was also extremely empathetic in a lot a lot of his interviews.
People were saying he bullied this woman who was on different strokes to death because she came on his show, talked about her struggle with drug addiction.
And from what everyone was saying in the chat, Howard Stern was abusive, exploitative, shamed her, mocked her, and then she ended up dying then literally the next day, either by accidental overdose or deliberate taking her life.
And I had to go listen to the interview to see if it was accurate.
And I hate what Howard Stern has become more than anybody.
But again, it's about being fair and I listened to that interview and at least Howard Stern's portion of it was was my was say flattering like Howard Stern was nice with her where I think the criticism is warranted is in the troll callers the callers in Howard's fan base notorious like they were the internet trolls before the age of the internet and then the question becomes because a lot of people have hypothesized that Howard Stern would have regular callers who would come in and do the ugly work via calling that Howard might not be able
to do in good conscience and to the extent that that is a possibility then the callers who were calling in were quite clearly very rude abusive dem, degrading, condescending, denigrating to this woman who struggled with addiction quite clearly and whether or not she was clean back then.
But Howard Stern is not getting cancelled.
He did it to himself.
He went from being the legend of radio, whether you liked him or not, he was a pioneer to becoming an absolute party.
POS, his interview with Joe Biden was nothing shy of absolute vomitous rubbish.
His interview with Kamala Harris, similar.
And when you tell half of your audience who made you famous, who supported you when you were being canceled, and then you go shit on their rights, shit on them.
And poo poo the very same freedoms that you demanded in order for your meteoric rise to fame.
Nobody canceled you except for yourself.
And I'll tell you one thing, the only reason I ever started releasing Howard Stern was because the Ford Explorer that we got came with a one year prepaid or gifted subscription to Sirius.
And when that was over and then COVID started, holy hell do I never need to hear from Howard Stern again for the rest of my days.
I can't even tell you the last time I listened to that fool.
It has been unlistenable since COVID.
And even before that, I can appreciate people not thinking fart jokes are funny.
Baba Bui, the Gary.
His crew were, you know, psychologically abusive.
He, I think, did good, you know, he did good interviews when he was interested in the human experience of the individuals.
When people get partisan politics and become shills, whether or not he was paid, he was certainly invested in the point where he was no longer interested in the human story.
He was interested in partisan politics.
So that's that.
Okay.
What's next?
Hold on.
The breaking news of the day, people.
The breaking news of the day.
Hold on.
Is.
I don't know what the breaking news of the day is.
Let me bring something up.
Donald Trump.
For God's sake, hold on.
I'll bring this up.
Yes, this is the breaking news of the day.
Total, total brain fart, as we say.
I haven't followed this story, but it's quite amazing.
Like, you know, coming right back to the beginning of the show of the cops being the criminals and it's not helping with a lot of stereotypes post millennial reporting Boston area sheriff who refused to cooperate with ICE arrested for extortion of cannabis content.
It is truly an astonishing thing that the people who purport to be the most virtuous defy the law for their virtue.
Who would have thought that the criminals would be the criminals?
Let's bring this down from post-millennial who does amazing work.
Boston area sheriff refused to cooperate with ICE, arrested for extortion of cannabis.
Tompkins is known for his refusal to work with ICE, having ended his department's contract with the federal agency.
Oh, cryp.
Wait a minute.
What's going on here?
Where is the article?
I'm not getting the article.
Well, I have another one back here somewhere.
Hold on.
I'll get the other article.
Here we go.
This one and bring this one up over here.
Hold on.
Breaking.
This one's also breaking.
Everything's breaking today.
All right.
No, that's not the...
Get this one out of here.
Breaking is...
Right here.
Breaking.
And we'll play this.
Boston's Sheriff Steven Tompkins, a Black Lives Matter activist arrested on federal extortion charges of $50,000 from a national cannabis retailer wanting to do business in Boston.
Who would have thought that Boston would be corrupt, eh?
This is the fifth, this is the filth that has permeated policing following George Floyd.
Let's hear what they have to say here.
This, my good brothers and sisters, is our Rosa Parks moment.
This is our moment where we're saying enough is enough.
and we're not going to take it anymore.
But the beautiful thing about this moment, it's not just black and brown people saying that.
It's white, yellow, red.
red young yellow how is that permitted red didn't the didn't some football teams have to change their name because it included the word red in it oh physically challenged lgbt you name a group not only in this country but on this globe isn't it absolutely amazing that the criminals always virtue signal the hardest It's amazing.
People are saying that they have had enough of the type of, how do I say neglect, being shunned to the side.
When I'm asked about the criminal justice system, it's our Rosa Parks moment.
By the way, people use the Rosa Parks line in defending Anthony Carmelo, if you can believe it.
People say to me, how are we going to fix the criminal justice system?
And what I say to them is, criminal justice system isn't broken.
Did he just do the Bill Clinton underbite?
Criminal justice system is justice system.
And what I say to them is criminal justice system is broken.
The criminal justice system was built to be punitive.
It was built to punish people.
This is so amazing.
And I'm not saying that's the wrong thing.
What I am saying, though, is when you have arrogance and ignorance and racism matched up with any punitive endeavor, bad things happen.
As all of you know, 65% of our people are going to be punished.
our inmate population is black or brown.
That's in this Commonwealth where that same demographic is 18%.
How do you get 65 out of 18 ignorance, arrogance, racism.
I don't understand if he's suggesting that they're wrongfully convicted or that they're there for, and I'm not sure that he's right on the statistics, but set that aside.
It's hilarious he's going to cry racism.
Let's hear the news on this.
Tomkin faces up to twenty years in prison for each count after allegedly exploiting dispensary partnership for personal gain.
All right, let's hear.
It's allegations, people.
Everybody's going to have their day in court.
I'm sure he's going to have claim this is racism.
This is federal.
Is it a federal?
Is it a federal charge?
Yeah, federal charges.
He's going to say it's it's federal retaliation for his anti ICE stance.
Guarantee.
If he hasn't already said it, if he's already said it, I don't know that he said it.
So I'm still predicting it, not knowing if he said it, but it's coming.
If it hasn't come already, Boston's sheriff was arrested Friday federal charges after allegedly leveraging his elected position to extort fifty Gs from a cannabis executive who was seeking state approval to open a dispensary.
A scheme the FBI director Cash Patel called a betrayal of public trust.
It's funny.
We're like, it's, I love it when the shows start somewhere and then come right back to it at the at the end, like a full circle.
It's always organic, didn't plan it this way.
Breach of trust by those in charge.
Suffolk County Tompkins, 67.
He oversees more than a thousand employees was handcuffed Friday morning in the southern district of Florida after a federal grand jury indicted him on two cases of extortion under the colour of official right.
According to a statement, when someone entrusted with enforcing the law is accused of breaking it for personal gain, it undermines the public's trust.
We all agree with this.
Patel told Fox News, FBI will pursue corruption at every level because no one is above the law.
Anybody in the chat saying, Murray Borepsy, Murray Borepsy, give me a freaking break for one second.
Tompkins was appointed sheriff in 2012019 after booting ICE agents out of the county jail.
He made headlines in 2019 after booting immigrant, immigration and customs enforcement agents out of the county jail, signing an eviction notice that required hundreds of illegal immigrants detained to be moved out within sixty days.
According to a report, according to court documents, a cannabis company applied in 2019 for a retail dispensary license in Boston to meet the state's positive impact plan to pimp.
He's a PIP requirement.
The company, come on, positive impact motivation plan, PIMP.
That's what it should have been.
The company partnered with the sheriff's department, which agreed to screen and refer graduates from its reentry program to work in the dispensaries' retail store.
The company's partnership with SCSD was formalized in a letter signed by Tompkins in 2019 and submitted with the application in 2020.
The Cannabis Commission approved the license in 2021, renewed it.
Okay.
Okay, fine.
So let's get to this to raise capital for an IPO, the initial public offering and expand as publicly traded company.
Executives sought multi-million dollar investments from institutions and other high-net worth investors, not the general public.
According to documents, by mid 2020, the company was preparing for its IPO by producing audited financial statements, hiring attorneys and obtaining additional financing.
Prosecutors alleged Tompkins pressured the cannabis executive for stock, reminding the executive.
He had helped the company in its licensing efforts.
The executive feared Tompkins might exploit his position as sheriff to undermine the partnership with the department, putting both the license and the company's planned IPO in jeopardy.
I could steal man a potential defense very easily.
But how do you go and issue the stock?
Let's see this in October 2020.
The company asked Tompkins for an updated partnership letter to submit with its license renewal application within a month of signing the letter.
And after alleged pressure on the executive, Tompkins obtained a pre IPO stake in the company.
I'd say one way or another., that's a conflict of interest, period.
Whether or not it's extortion or bribery or whatever, it's a conflict of interest.
Prosecutors claim for 50,000.
50,000 bucks is a lot of money.
But what is the all the riches of the universe for the price of your soul?
Prosecutors claim in November 2020, Tompkins wired 50,000 from his retirement account to an account controlled by the executive, purchasing nearly 29,000 shares at 1,73 bucks each.
Following a reverse stock split, he had about 14,000 shares valued at 346 bucks each.
Okay, we're still at the value.
So he bought it for 500 Gs.
Once the company launched its IPO, the stock value jumped to 960 per share.
So he's tripling his money.
Okay, so his value per 138,000.
By May, the value of Tompkins stock had dropped thousands of dollars below his by May 2022, the value of Tompkins stock had dropped thousands of dollars below his 50,000 dollars investment, but he allegedly demanded a full refund.
The executive agreed, issuing five checks between May 2020.
Oh my goodness.
Prosecutors claim that some checks were marked as a loan payment.
This is fraud.
It's funny, you read it without knowing exactly where it's going and then appreciate, yeah, you know, okay, so fine.
He, he, it was conflict of interest.
He got early, early stock purchases, triple value, didn't sell, went back down, wants his money back, needs to hide it.
So you've got to lie as to why you're getting it back.
Prosecutors claimed some checks were marked as a loan repayment and company expense at Tomkins' direction to disguise the nature of some of the payments.
I guess he's keeping his stock anyhow.
US Atina Lee wrote in a statement that the elected officials, particularly those in law enforcement, are expected to be ethical, not self serving.
His alleged actions are an affront to taxpayers.
Yada, yada, yada.
Did he keep his stock though?
From the very first day as Suffolk, Tompkins stopped to pray himself as a man of the people, principle.
Yeah, okay, we could skip this.
Tompkins who faced up to twenty years in prison.
So hold on a second.
I just want to see this.
What's his name again?
Did he keep his stock through all of this?
That's the question.
Is he demanding a repayment?
What's his name?
Sorry guys, Sheriff Stephen Tompkins.
Okay, let's just see if chat GPT is going to be able to get this.
Did he keep his shares after demanding a refund from the exec?
That's going to be another.
Did he sell them and then get one of his 50,000 or is he like, I want to keep the shares, get a 50,000 reimbursement.
So I basically have 50,000 in free stock.
Tompkins demanded a full refund of his 50 G's, even though the investment had dropped below that value.
So okay, so hold on.
The company complied, returned the entire, effectively bypassing the loss.
So the answer is no, he did not keep his shares.
He received a full refund and relinquished the shares despite that doesn't make sense.
You can't, it's publicly traded at that point.
You can't relinquish your shares.
So now let's see how I can influence this, but it was publicly traded.
You can't relinquish the shares.
Let's see what it says to that.
You're absolutely right to question that.
And this is where the situation gets murky.
Here's what's likely going on based on reporting.
Yes, the company was publicly traded, but timing matters.
He had pre IPO shares, but the company went public.
Okay, well, whatever, we'll get to that later.
That's the news, criminals.
Criminals in power and all for what?
Greed.
Of course, he's 67, knows that he's a criminal, knows that his time with any job is limited and has to look out for that nest egg, people.
Lordy, Lordy, Lordy.
Okay, we've got one more that we're going to now, you know, we'll save the rest for Viva Barnes law dot locals dot com.
Jimmy Dore has gone live.
Let me make sure I haven't forgotten anything in the chat.
I'll get to the chat for a bit.
Shane Visage says longtime listener.
Some of you remember studying John.
I'll defer to others for how Howard treated him on the show, not well.
What's his face?
Crackhead Bob.
I didn't.
He was he was always fundamentally exploitative of crackhead Bob.
But then other people are going to say crackhead Bob would have been, you know, bankrupt on the streets if he didn't have the gig from Howard Cern.
So that it was mutually exploitative.
King of Bilton says, try our biltong, almost fifty percent protein packed with B12 creatine iron zinc, zinc and more, a perfect snack addition to your weekly meal prep.
Builtongusa.com code viva for ten percent off.
Let me go over to viva barnslaw.locals.com and see what's going on in the chat over there.
And then we're going to raid Jimmy Door in a second here.
Check this out.
So remember crackhead, Bob.
Then we got, you know, you'd technically be obese.
You know, you'd technically obese at 158 and 51 viva.
I'm 55 and a half, but I'm still technically obese.
And I can appreciate why I'm technically obese.
I got like 8.9 percent body fat.
My BMI is technically what is the BMI of a male 158 pounds and 5 foot 6.
Yeah, I don't even know the calculations.
My BMI, that's that is in the overweight range just over the normal color.
So not obese but overweight, which I am only because of my muscle.
But I can also understand why being overweight because you have too much muscle is bad.
It's a strain on your heart.
Okay, we got the rest of this.
We're good.
And then what we do over here in Locals, we're going to have our after party where we're going to go through all the chat.
No way.
I've always wondered why alligators don't eat alligators more often.
That's amazing.
Because there's a lot of small alligators running around the pool, the ponds when I go biking.
But that's it.
All right, we're going to go raid.
Let me give everybody the link to vivabarneslaw.locals.com before we raid.
Jimmy Dore, link to Because what I want to do one day is have, like, I know I'm obsessed with baseball cards or UFC cards and baseball cards and I want to make breaking opening packs more exciting.
If anyone has a specific message that they want me to read and then I'll do like a weekly show where I open mail and read.
Card, read whatever comes in.
I'll even read read reading hate mail is kind of motivating the wrong behavior.
But if anyone wants to send anything, send unopened packs of baseball cards or fighting cards.
And then if we have enough for a show, we'll do a live opening and I'll read messages from the audience or send anything.
The link to where you can send things is the PO box.
And I just went there today.
I didn't look too hard, but I didn't see anything.
Felt very lonely.
I'm joking.
Send some stuff if anyone wants there.
And I'm going to try to do a weekly show where we unbox and have fun and talk and whatnot.
Now, we are absolutely going to go raid Jimmy Dore, who's live.
And make sure is he live?
He's live.
Okay.
I like Jimmy.
I like the way he talks.
All right, here we go.
Viva, watch the swamp people., see how many of the smaller gators are attacked by larger male alligators eating limbs, mostly the tail.
The really big ones eat the smaller gators, like the seven footers.
I did notice in the back of our place there was a gator that was missing an arm.
And I had got, I saw that gator when it was fresh, it was like pink nub.
But and then that gator actually snuck into our, they did, it's amazing.
Yeah, the, you see pictures of big gators in communities and like, you know that they get in either when they're small and grow in the ponds or they climb fences, by the way.
Link to, oh no, sorry, I got to go raid.
Raid, bada bing, bada boom..
And is it going to do it?
Confirm raid.
Go raid Jimmy sell telemysentia and I'll look at the chat a little bit more there.
Going on Friday night tights instead night folks says PJ pick it supplement shilling lol.
There's some there's good stuff out there and it wouldn't hurt people to do the good stuff and focus on their health.
What do we got here?
Doctor Mike said he believes that if you lie to people for what he thinks is their good, it's good.
Doctor Mike is a tool of the system.
Pretty, pretty face of tyranny.
I don't like that you have.
I don't like that you have to have honesty.
Honesty that is from 27 Buzzkill.
Send me the clip where he said that.
I'd be curious if he actually said that.
All right, we've done it.
Let me go, let me see what's going on on Jimmy door booyah viva raid FTW happy Friday.
Happy Friday, Jimmy and team, and I got to get Jimmy back on the show sooner than later.
All right, so that's it.
We're going to go and enjoy our after party at Viva Barnes Law dot locals dot com DOJ grand grand jury inquiry into Leticia James is left on the roster.
Apple news, which we're going to go over real quick.
And what was this massive decision?
Oh, there's a good decision for Trump coming out of the federal courts, uh, two to one, but the decision itself is 110 pages.
So I didn't have time to read it and I'm not relying on AI to summarize it.
So with that said, Sunday Night Show is coming up, six o'clock Viva and Barnes Law for the People, viva Barnes Law dot locals dot com.
If you want to get merch, viva fry dot com dot I can't bring up the screen because it seems to be not working right now.
That really sucks.
Okay.
Hold on.
Viva.
Well, vivafry.com, if you want to get merch, you guys know what to do.
And make sure that you are subscribed and have notifications turned on because that's the way to support the channel for free.