All Episodes
Previous Next
July 25, 2025 - Viva & Barnes
01:04:00
Trump Lawyer Meets with Maxwell! Dems Can't Read! "Canadian" Man on the Street Identified? & MORE!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, you are looking at Doug Ford, the Premier of Ontario, Canada.
America's hat.
There's another word for Canadians which is not quite so politically correct that I will not say right now.
I will avoid the obvious jokes that one can make at the expense of Doug Ford.
Suffice only to call him a raging buffoon who is destroying his province and in part Canada.
Behold.
Once I press play.
I have a tremendous amount of asylum seekers that are up in Etobico and in the hotels.
They're healthy, they're willing to work, they're hardworking people, but they're waiting over two years and they're just sucking off the system non-stop, not their fault.
The fault falls under immigration that it takes over two years to get a work permit.
So as we're paying education, paying health care, paying the rent in hotels, which is exorbitant, they want to get out there and they want to be like every other Canadian.
They want to find a job.
They want to be able to first start off renting whatever, a condo or part of a house and then buying a house.
But we're tired of waiting around.
I can't wait around.
It's costing our province an absolute fortune.
Just last year, we were close to 100,000 asylum seekers, and I'm still waiting to get paid back from the federal government.
That's one issue.
But there's jobs available in Ontario, and we need to give them work permits and make sure that they're out there working and contributing back to society.
I'm not waiting any longer.
We're issuing work permits in Ontario for these folks to give back and contribute to society in Ontario.
I hate to be juvenile.
Did he say sucking off the system?
It seems that that's what Doug Ford might be doing.
I've got to flesh this out element by element.
Just so you know, this was not originally intended to be the starting video for today's show, but my man up in Canada sent this to me and I'm like, holy shit.
Whether or not this man is a globalist pig, he sure as sugar is acting like one.
You know what the unemployment rate in Ontario is?
It's about 7%.
I'm rounding up.
It's 6.9%.
You know what problems there are in Canada right now?
Housing crisis, healthcare crisis, fentanyl crisis, unemployment, and this buffoon of a jackass is prioritizing people who are not Canadian, arguably should not be in Canada, and incorporating them.
They're healthy.
They're healthy, able.
Hey, does Ontario need more cheap labor?
Is this another modern day slavery that Doug Ford is ushering into Canada?
Let me play this again.
I have a tremendous amount of asylum seekers are up in Etobicoke and in the hotels.
They're healthy.
They're willing to work.
They're healthy.
They're willing to work.
I swear to you, I've seen movie scenes where they look at people and say, yep, this one's healthy enough to work.
Now sitting up in the field so they can go collect our vegetables so that we can, you know, go out to fancy restaurants and not have to pay too much for dinner.
They're healthy and they're ready to work.
Are we talking about humans or are we talking about slaves, Doug Ford?
They're hardworking people, but they're a hardworking people.
What the hell does that mean?
Who do you represent, you jackass?
Do you represent Ontarians, Ontario whites?
Do you represent people of Ontario or do you represent asylum seekers from abroad?
Waiting over two years and they're just sucking off the system.
Pause.
I'll keep going now.
Non-stop, not their fault.
They're sucking off the system non-stop.
It's not their fault.
I'm sorry, Doug.
It seems that your linguistic capabilities are about as good as your economic capabilities.
The fault falls under immigration that it takes over two years to get a work permit.
So as we're paying.
Why would you be issuing work permits when Ontario unemployment rate, when the Ontario unemployment rate is 6.9%?
Let me see this here.
Let's just go like, let's just go Ontario housing crisis.
Let's just do all of this.
That's really quite terrible.
Ontario housing crisis.
I know it's AI, but you'll take it.
Ontario is grappling with a severe housing affordability crisis impacting both renters and homeowners.
Here are some likely statistics highlighting the crisis.
22% of Canadians, including those in Ontario, spend 30% or more of their income on shelter.
Yeah, you better go integrate hundreds of thousands of asylum seekers, make sure that they get homes and rental properties and whatever, rent part of a home in order to buy it when Canadians, who you represent, you were elected to represent them, Doug Ford, you buffoon, are struggling to not just survive, but literally live in Canada, waiting years to get a doctor, dying in the ER rooms, dying waiting for general practitioners, living in the streets.
You know why there's a lot of people now in their golden years who are being forced out onto the streets and then forced to live in mobile container homes?
Because the cost of living is out of control.
Oh, and he's waiting to get paid back from the federal government.
Whose effing money do you think you're doing that with, Doug?
I love it.
It's like it's his money to blow and it's the Fed's money to reimburse him.
And he's like, how do the Feds not reimburse me?
Where the hell do you think they get that money from?
Go tax Canadians a little more.
The most taxed people on earth, the most propagandized people on earth, led by the most buffoon, idiot, jackasses on earth.
Serenity now.
The jokes I can make about Doug Ford that I won't, because I'm a polite, nice Canadian.
People like me belong in places where good people go.
It's obscene.
And I keep seeing these tweets coming out of Canada.
It's morbidly depressing.
It is as though you are being governed by people who have said, yep, we are sacrificing Canadians to the world.
We no longer represent Canada and Canadians, we represent asylum seekers to the detriment of Canadians.
We no longer have to solve the problems that we've already created.
We're just going to usher in more problems.
They're healthy.
Look at their hands.
Their hands are ready to work.
So that's what's going on in Canada, peeps.
And it's bad and getting worse.
Good afternoon, everybody.
How goes the battle?
Viva Fry, former Montreal litigator, turned current Florida Rumbler.
In the free state of Florida, let me just do one thing here before we go.
I want to, I was going to start with some other good stuff, which we're going to get into.
And we shall.
But first, I had to get that out of the way.
Canada, you're run by globalists.
You've ushered in Mark J. Carney, given the liberals more seats than they had after 10 years of devastation.
You have that buffoon jackass of a Doug Ford, Ford Nation, progressive conservative party.
That's what they call themselves.
It's sort of like jumbo shrimp, flat mountain, pregnant virgin, which has only happened once in the history of humankind.
Progressive conservatives, also known as regressive conservatives, also known as liberals, not even driving the speed limit anymore, just liberals in disguise.
Dishonest liberals is what progressive conservatives are in Ontario.
Shame on you, Doug Ford.
Yeah, speaking to the cost of living, I get to our sponsor of the day, people.
I'm going to show you a QR code in a second, but it's incredible.
I'm getting bills.
I mean, there are problems in Florida.
Like I'm getting my bills for home insurance, car insurance, health insurance.
And it's just like, hey, we see that you.
It's like the little paperclip in Microsoft Word.
It's like, hey, we see you've saved up a little bit of money here.
You need help getting rid of that.
Here's your health insurance.
Here's your car insurance.
Here's your home insurance.
And people are struggling not to live in debt, which is where our sponsor of today's show comes into.
The system isn't broken.
It's rigged.
And if you're behind in debt, buried in debt, that's exactly what they want.
Big banks profit when you're desperate.
Creditors win when you lose, but you don't have to play their game.
PDS debt helps you take back control.
They've helped hundreds of thousands break free from credit cards, loans, high interest traps.
It's your money.
It's your future.
Time to fight for both.
Let me just show you what the QR code is so you can go and start looking at this if you're American.
I think this is geared towards American, not my Canadian audience.
Whatever's left of it after they couldn't stand what I was saying about the Pierre Polyev election, which I was right about, people.
PDS debt goes beyond the numbers to understand your unique financial situation and craft a personalized plan designated for you.
There's no minimum credit score required.
They're here to help you save money, pay off your debt faster, and start putting money back where it belongs in your pocket.
PDS Debt is A-plus rated by the Bureau of Bet, what is it?
The Better Business Bureau, Triple B, boasts thousands of five-star reviews on Google and holds a five-star rating on TrustPilot.
Why?
Because PDS Debt has helped hundreds of thousands of people get out of debt.
I count myself among the fortunate to not need it.
If I were to need it, it would be the product that I would use.
Go to PDS Debt.
You're 30 seconds away from being debt-free.
Get your free assessment and find the best option for you right now at pdsdebt.com slash fry.
F-R-E-I.
That's pdsdebt.com slash fry.
And godspeed and good luck trying to, you know, make ends meet in this day and age.
Credit card debt for household items like groceries, utilities.
It's a rigged system and some people profit off of it a whole hell of a lot more than others.
Old man Toby.
Old man Toby Shana Shi says, I hate to ask you this question, but at what point, I'm not reading this question.
Come on, man.
Don't get me.
Get this out of here.
You got it.
Like, I made the joke.
I was going a little hard.
I was going a little hard on Doug Ford over there, eh?
I was like, yeah.
How are Canadians not up in the streets?
I was going to say up in arms, but that can be taken misconstrued.
I was like, why aren't Canadians protesting?
Oh, that's right.
We saw what happened the last time Canadians embarked on the most peaceful protest ever.
The mother effers in power right now are trying to lock two of them up for seven and eight years, respectively.
Longer than kidnappers and murderer sisters get, longer than some rapists get, longer than some cop killers get.
It's Canada, people.
It's anarcho-tyranny is what it is.
And now on with the show.
Let me make sure that we're live on Viva.
We are live on VivabarnesLaw.locals.com.
We got a timestamp.
So just so everybody knows, I put the tweet out earlier today.
Barnes not only does not share my optimistic assessment of the defamation lawsuit against Candace Owens, he believes and eloquently and passionately explained yesterday why he believes she is dead to rights in law.
And I shared the link with everybody.
And Barnes was, you know, Barnes is sassing and needling those with whom he disagrees and those who he thinks are wrong.
I've read the lawsuit.
We're going to have an amazing discussion about this on Sunday during our Viva and Barnes Law for the People Sunday night law show extravaganza, except it's at noon exceptionally on Friday, on Sunday, because I've got a family commitment that would lead to, as I mentioned in our community, locals, it would lead to family excommunication if I were to not attend, be late, or otherwise screw up.
So our Sunday show is at noon.
We're going to talk about this.
Barnes went hard on anybody who thinks there's a remote chance of success, as in Candace Owens successfully defending against that lawsuit.
Go check it out.
Bets are in, people.
I jokingly said if I had to bet, I'd bet with Barnes, but I'm sticking with my assessment that I think Candace is going to make the argument.
What I said was substantively true, although there are a lot of statements in that lawsuit, which some people are going to say are demonstrably false.
I believed it when I said it.
And even if you think I said it with actual malice, which we all acknowledge is not like mean-spirited, I want to take you down, but reckless disregard for the truth.
Even still, my subsidiary argument would be in the context of the allegations, accusations made against Brigitte Macron of sexual deviancy, perversion, whatever, the fact that she's an admitted 39-year-old former teacher who had sexual relations with her 15-year-old Student makes her, in the context of this discussion, defamation-proof because she's got no reputation susceptible of being defamed.
That's my argument.
That's my position.
I'm sticking with it.
And we'll see if Barnes gets to say, I was right, and I have to say, always bet on Barnes, or if I get to say, for a Canadian Chinook, I'm, you know, my predictions are not half bad sometimes.
We'll see.
Did I share the link?
I shared the link with everybody.
So go check that out.
Now, on with today's show.
What are we going to start with?
We're going to start with...
call it a stealth appearance on Vince's show today.
Vince Koleonez, who was talking about Donald Trump and a recent encounter with the This was Vince Colliones talking about the Epstein latest developments.
Todd Blanche has apparently met with, not apparently, he has confirmed, admittedly met with and questioned, interrogated, asked questions of Jolene Maxwell yesterday, and they've continued doing it today.
And as Vince was talking to him, I'm like, hey, I know that guy that you have in the reply of the tweet, but I'll play this so we can.
We did get an account from Todd Blanch overnight about this.
He did say this, that the conversation is continuing today.
I met with Ghelane Maxwell.
I will continue my interview of her tomorrow.
The Department of Justice will share additional information about what we learned at the appropriate time.
I want to know what the proposed community note was to that particular statement.
I'm sitting there scratching my head like, what could have been the proposed community note?
What would require clarification here?
Today I met with Ghelaine Maxwell and will continue my interview with her tomorrow.
The Department of Justice will share additional information about what we learned at the appropriate time.
I have no idea what could have been the proposed community note, but I digress.
Hey, Todd, sooner, sooner is going to be better than later.
You know, don't upend any prosecutions here.
Obviously, you've got to retain any information necessary to go after people, but we'd love to hear more as soon as you can get it to us.
But that's useful.
And what is that, if not an expression of the seriousness of the Trump administration to get to the bottom of this?
I can appreciate some people are going to say who are who have come to the conclusion that this is all a cover-up are going to say, no, no, this is not transparency.
This is a subterfuge.
He's going to ask her questions.
He's not asking her questions to prosecute.
He's prepping her on what to say to protect Trump.
I can appreciate people saying that.
I don't agree.
I agree with Vince.
I love it when he says, hey, the sooner, the better you can get some answers.
You know, I'm going to have to ask you to come on in on the weekend and give us some answers on the Epstein documents.
All right.
But I can appreciate how some people who are just either doom-pilled, TDS-afflicted, think Trump is in the files, is a bad person to children type thing.
They're going to say, yep, Todd Blanche is in there covering all bases.
Yada, yada, yada.
Okay.
I can understand the reasons why you think that.
I also just think you're delusional.
And repeat it again.
If there were anything incriminating on Trump in those files, it would have been selectively leaked to a greater degree than a birthday card from 2003 with boobies and a alleged Donald Trump signature where the pubis hair is.
I digress again.
They send this guy in there to talk to the living witness.
No other Justice Department has even bothered to talk to her.
What's that about?
Why wouldn't they talk to her if she's at the center of this epic crime ring?
Yeah, talk to her.
Todd Blanche is doing it now.
And hopefully we get some real answers.
And that's the Trump administration trying to be transparent here.
They've been trying to release grand jury testimony as well.
They've been getting pushback from the judges involved in all of that, but no question that they're trying to get the information now.
Now, let me pause this here.
Man, did you know?
Oh, you can't see it because my face is in it.
Hold on one second.
Well, I don't know if we're going to get to see the thing there.
But anyways, that's my tweet on the bottom in top reply.
That's why I said jokingly, I made a stealth appearance in stealth cameo in Vince's show today.
My comment was, was the meeting video recorded?
The meeting had better have been video recorded or at the very least audio recorded.
The only problem with audio recording is you don't get gesticulations, you don't get body language that people can then appreciate and interpret later on.
But so help me goodness.
It better have been at the very least audio recorded and ideally video recorded, potentially to disclose, publish, if not the entirety of the questions and answers, at the very least, portions of them.
They better keep her alive as well.
Bottom line.
But they've met with her, they've talked with her, and we'll see what information they're getting from her.
How is ABC News reporting on this?
No asks and no promises.
Lawyer for Maxwell says after second meeting with Deputy Attorney General Maxwell's attorney, there have been no asks and no promises.
What is this?
The second meeting between Jeffrey Epsom, this is from today, and associate Ghislaine Maxwell.
Someone told me, what is the appropriate pronunciation?
We can have Ghelane, Ghislaine, Ghilaine, Ghislaine, Shalaine.
We can't really have Shalaine.
All right, whatever.
Ghelaine Maxwell and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche ended Friday after about three hours.
Maxwell's attorneys, David Marcus, told ABC News afterwards, there have been no asks and no promises.
Marcus said Maxwell was asked about maybe 100 different people during her interview, asked about maybe 100 different people with the Deputy Attorney General.
He said she answered every question.
We haven't asked for anything.
This is not a situation where we are asking for anything in return for testimony or anything like that.
Yada, yada.
Of course, everybody knows Ms. Maxwell would welcome any relief.
Blanche didn't speak to the reporters.
Fine.
The judges that are blocking apparent release of documents.
We'll get to that in a second.
Remind me.
Judges blocking.
Who are they?
Obama appointees.
And a Maxwell pardon, which we'll get to.
Sources told ABC News that Maxwell initiated Thursday's meeting, which lasted six hours.
Maxwell is currently appealing her 20-year prison sentence for child sex trafficking and other offenses in connection with Epstein.
Bulk of her arguments in appeal, from what I understand, is that she was covered under the non-prosecution agreement and then some other evidentiary issues.
We don't want to get into the substance of the questions, Marcus said.
There were a lot of questions, and we went all day.
She answered every one of them.
She's never said, I'm not going to answer, never decline.
It is almost unheard of for a convicted sex trafficker to meet with such high-ranking Justice Department official, especially one who used to be the president's top criminal defense attorney.
ABC News, yada, yada, okay, I think we can scrap the rest of this.
After President Trump's comments on Friday about clemency, ABC News asked Maxwell's attorney whether that gave her an incentive to tell Blanche what he wanted to hear.
The comment about clemency is one where I got into yet another fight with, well, I mean, dimly count as a fight because he didn't reply to me.
I just took some SHIT from the autobot jackasses in replies.
Aaron Rupar, go look him up, by the way.
Look him up in the Urban Dictionary.
Very special man to have acquired the reputation and name that he's acquired, which is a lying sack of SHIT who will lie to your faces in promotion of political agendas.
Even when he verbatim quotes and posts the video, I believe there's still material misrepresentation.
Factually correct, materially misleading.
Let's hear, you know, hold on a second.
We got to go there first.
Aaron Rupar publishes posts on X. Trump on pardoning Ghislaine Maxwell.
Quote, I'm allowed to do it.
End quote.
Now, one of my kids is into theater, and there's a fun exercise where you can emphasize any different word in a sentence and it gives it a totally different meaning.
I'm allowed to do it.
That doesn't really work quite that well without him.
I'm allowed to do it versus I'm allowed to do it versus I'm allowed to do it are very different interpretations of the same statement.
How do you think Trump said it here?
I'm allowed to do it.
Would you consider a pardon or a commutation for Elaine Maxwell if it's something I haven't thought about?
It's really recommended.
I'm allowed to do it, but it's something I have not thought about.
But you wouldn't rule it out.
It's something I haven't.
I'm allowed to do it.
Oh, shazer.
You know, I'm allowed to break windows.
I'm allowed to throw eggs at people's cars.
Not really that so much, but I'm allowed to do it.
I think Aaron Ruper is a liar.
Confirmed even in this.
If I were going to, I would have put it in asterisks to emphasize the fact that there was an emphasis on a word that sort of issued a presumptive wrongness of pardoning Ghislaine Maxwell.
I say it's presumptively wrong the way he said it.
Let me give everyone the link to that.
And I got to show you the, I got to be out of incognito to show you this.
I got to show you the shit that I get into with the people in the replies.
Holy crab apples, they are crazy.
Oh, where did it go?
Oh, I lost it.
Hold on one second.
Let me show you what the replies are that I have to deal with.
I say, even in directly quoting the president, you think you're doing it objectively and neutrally.
You are actually doing it in a misleading manner that seems to suggest for those who don't watch the video that he says, I'm allowed to do it when asked whether or not he should.
I'm allowed to do it means that there's something presumptively wrong about doing it.
Watch this.
It's so fun to go.
Some people say, Viva, why do you do it?
I'm a glutton for punishment.
Wow, even when quoting verbatim, you still misrepresented by failing to emphasize what Trump emphasized.
I'm allowed to do it.
The emphasis there was specifically to highlight what would be presumptively wrong about doing it, in my humble opinion.
LOL, you pedophile freaks are really scraping the bottom of the barrel now.
Let me see what else we got here.
Yet he didn't dismiss the idea.
To be crystal clear, let's cut straight to the point.
Are you saying that because he can do it, it's not wrong for him to do it?
Like, this is where you realize you're either talking with bots or people who are unintelligent and don't understand basic English.
Now, I say it would be presumptively wrong to do it does not mean there might be a set of circumstances in which I can envision doing it and possibly even offer an argument for why, although presumptively wrong, it's net benefit to do it.
We're not yet there.
We'll see.
Presumptively wrong, yet practically beneficial would be, all right, she served some time.
She's had her life upended.
If she now rats out, provides evidence of unindicted co-conspirators that would allow for prosecution and conviction of the people to whom she was sex trafficking, unless it was only to Jeffrey Epstein, in which case she's got nothing to offer and nothing to pardon for because she's got nothing to offer to counter for a pardon.
The only reason it could be presumptively wrong and yet somehow justifiable is if it would lead to arrests and dismantling what some people believe to be a global pedophile sex trafficking ring, or at the very least, a ring of criminality that involved other unindicted co-conspirators, both known and unknown, who were offered non-prosecution agreements or swept up in the Alex Acosta 2008 sweetheart plea deal, which didn't only cover Epstein, but unindicted co-conspirators, both known and unknown.
But that's all we have with Donald John Trump on the Maxwell situation.
Let me see if we have any questions or queries in the chat.
We do not.
She would never give up the important names, says cultivated mind.
I could disagree with that and think that she could.
Let me just show some of the chat over here.
I think she could, and there could be good reasons, and there could be a witness relocation and whatever.
He can only pardon her for federal crimes, not state crimes.
Yes, but I believe that she's in jail neurodivergent for federal crimes right now.
Oh, hold on.
Did I not get to the tipped, not the humble rant?
We've got my man up in Canada, Chet Chisholm, says Nova Scotia, I think that's what NS stands for, announced that the plan is to double the population of both Halifax and the province.
Just because you double the population doesn't mean you suddenly have double the jobs.
Cloward-Piven strategy.
And for those of you who don't know what the Cloward-Piven strategy is.
Political strategy outlined in the 1966 by the American sociologist and political activist Richard Cloward and Francis Fox Piven.
The strategy aims to utilize, quote, militant, anti-poverty groups to facilitate a political crisis by overloading the welfare system via an increase in welfare claims, forcing the creation of a system of guaranteed minimum income and, quote, redistribution income through the federal government.
Yeah, also known as the great replacement theory, or more simple, alternatively potentially known as the great replacement theory, because that's what it is.
They're not doubling the population of Halifax with native-born Canadians.
And from what I understand is going on in Halifax, it looks like Brampton.
It looks like Vancouver.
It is a great replacement.
And it's not race-based, ethnicity-based, religion-based.
It's nationality-based.
25%, give or take now of Canada born outside of Canada.
That's what you call a great replacement, like it or not.
And they're crushing the system, they're crippling the system.
They're crushing Canadians and they're crippling Canadians into death, which they are now offering graciously because of free health care, free death care.
Old man Toby, I hate death.
Okay, I'm sorry about that.
Now, let me break this out for one second before heading into the next subject and see what's going on over on Viva Brangela.locals.com.
The thumbnail today was particularly good.
And that is the great work of DSLR Dave, my thumbnail guy up in Canada.
Thank you, Doug, for Doug.
Thank you, Dave, for all you do.
Lee-Ann Leanne says, Doug Ford, all you get from a pig is a grunt.
And then Rustang says, Viva, Barnes seemed to have had an extra edge on last night.
Burden with Barnes against those who believed that Ms. Owens had any chance in court against the Matt Collins.
Where were you listening?
Yes, I listened to it.
I think some of the criticism was against your lame, even poorly supported position on X. Barnes blasted those who thought French law was U.S. law.
Are you ready for another legal whipping from Barnes?
Absolutely.
But it has to happen first.
The funny thing is, I don't mind being wrong because being wrong does not make me wrong.
Being wrong on a subject does not make me wrong as a person.
But by the way, it has occurred where I have been right and Barnes has not been right.
And you call it a poorly, I don't even know, you call it poorly supported position on X. I mean, position on X is reasonably well supported.
A, when it comes to accusation, a 39-year-old teacher who boned her 15-year-old student, I don't care that they got married afterwards, you might argue that in this broader context, she doesn't have a reputation susceptible of defamation.
And I went through that lawsuit.
All right, so she said some things.
She relied on sources that are discredited, not reputable sources.
If that's your argument, she said things which are demonstrably false and crazy.
All right, so she's a crazy conspiracy theorist.
Are we going to now criminalize conspiracy theories?
We'll see how it pans out.
I would love nothing more than to say Barnes was right, always bet on Barnes.
And I would love nothing more to say, nothing more than to say, oh, look, the Canadian Schnook is not, you know, he's been, I've had a hat-trick of good predictions recently.
Maybe I'll just add this one to the list, but it's going to be way down the line.
We'll see how it goes.
And I think there was one more that just came in there.
No, there was that, but there was one more here.
Then we're going to get into the next subject.
Kick your health journey by adding some tasty, high-protein meat snacks.
Bill Tong is packed with B12, iron, zinc, creatine, and more.
Get some at beltong.usa.com.
Use code Viva for 10% off.
I talk about Bill Tong every day.
It's not a sponsor of the show, but I know Anton.
He's got a show called Eat at Anton's on Rumble.
Based in Texas, South African born, value added to American society.
And he makes one hell of a mean Bill Tong, which is South African beef jerky.
And I just got my shipment yesterday, and it's delish.
All right.
Next topic, people.
Back to Trump and back to idiots on the internet.
And back to situations where, if I'm wrong, by the way, I don't mind being wrong.
I actually like being wrong for a couple of reasons.
One, it lets me show that I don't have too much of an ego to admit that I was wrong.
And oddly enough, that actually builds trust over time.
Always being right or that you were right does not build trust over time.
It actually erodes trust over time.
The debate of the day right now is who is right and who is wrong.
This is Donald Trump, what I believe to be Batman slapping Jerome Powell, the head of the Fed.
Can't fire him because apparently you can appoint these guys and you can't fire them until the end of their term, which ends in May of next year.
Trump, arguably, I'm going to call it Batman slapping instead of bitch slapping because that's much less crass.
I just want to bring back up my meme.
This is Trump Batman slapping Jerome Powell, not just on why are you so over budget, you people from the feds, on renovations and over budget by like, you know, the money doesn't make the difference here.
It's the percentage of the budget, like, you know, over budget by 25, 30% just happens to represent $500 plus million dollars, but with the Batman slapping Jerome Powell by saying, why are you so over budget?
And I'll play it and then we're going to talk about it because I went and did some homework to understand the purported fact checks and to be able to retort to the shit that I took on Twitter for calling Gavin Newsom an idiot.
And fully, if I call someone an idiot on Twitter, I better be able to deal with being called an idiot on Twitter.
If I call someone a moron on Twitter, I better be able to deal with being called a moron on Twitter, which I am.
And if I'm wrong, I'll correct.
About 3.1 billion, one up a little bit, or a lot.
So the 2.7 is now 3.1.
Look at Powell's face.
Sorry.
He just for a second reminded me of my grandmother, but okay.
About 3.1 billion, one up a little bit, or a lot.
So the 2.7 is now 3.1.
I'm not aware of that.
Yeah, it just came out.
Yeah, I never heard that from anybody's face.
Yeah, it just came out.
I know said about 3.1 as well.
3.1?
3.2.
This came from us?
Yes.
I don't know who does that.
You're including the Martin renovation.
You just added in the third building, is what that is.
That's a third building.
It's a building that's being built.
No, it was built five years ago.
We finished Martin five years ago.
It's part of the overall new.
So we're going to take a look.
We're going to see what's happening.
And it's got a long way.
Do you expect any more additional business overruns?
Do you expect to be screwing up even more beyond what you've already screwed up?
Expect them.
We're ready for them, but we have a little bit of a risk.
We're ready for them.
Of course you are, you fed jackass, because you're spending other people's money.
We're ready for another $500 million overrun because it's not our money.
What do I give an F?
Expect to be finished in 2027.
We're well along, as you can see.
Nice to take these off every once in a while when we're not under too much danger.
So here's the fact check, and I'm going to poison the well or at least preemptively presuade just to cause you to focus on what many people are not even digesting in this exchange.
Five years ago.
We finished Martin five years ago.
So it's part of the overall work.
It's part of the overall work.
All right.
I'm going to leave this one here.
Now, you know what?
I'm going to give you the link to this one.
I'm going to leave this one.
It's part of the overall work.
So Donald Trump has the Fed chair guy there, Jerome Powell, talking about renovations that they're doing to one of the Fed buildings, Federal Reserve buildings.
And they are $500 million over budget as of now.
And Trump comes out with a piece of paper, pulls it out of his pocket, and says, no, you're up to $3.1 billion.
And then Powell's like, what are you talking about?
We're not over that.
We're only over by $500 million.
And you get the fact checkers out there saying, oh, Trump is including the renovations on a building known as the Martin Building, which was completed five years ago in the overrun of the current project.
And he's such an idiot, he's confused is what Gavin Newsom said.
And I said, I said, my God, Gavin, you're a moron.
He's right.
Then I have to deal with some here.
Let's see if we can, how far back we can go.
So you can't go back.
The other building, I'm not trying to put this guy on blast.
I'm highlighting that I enjoy having arguments with people who call me stupid.
The other building was completed five years earlier, so it wasn't included in this budget.
Trump erroneously said that the other building was being built.
Oh, that was a lie.
He erroneously said something in common parlance.
It's not being built.
It is built.
That was a lie.
Get out of the world's dumbest cult.
So I got to go and look at this.
I got to look up a little bit.
Okay.
You got to make sure you know what you're talking about.
If you made a mistake, you'll correct.
Fed staff members cite tariffs and inflation for costly renovation.
A sprawling $2.5 billion project to renovate the central bank's headquarters in Washington has become the focal point of attacks from the Trump administration.
This is from the New York Times.
The explanation for the cost of the project came on a nearly three-hour visit to the site hours before President Trump and top White House officials were set to visit the Fed to view the construction.
The $2.5 billion project, which started in 2022, has ensnared the Fed chair Jerome Ash Powell in controversy and given the Trump administration another way to try to discredit his management of the central bank.
Yeah, nothing like being the head of the central bank and being years behind schedule and hundreds of millions of dollars over budget.
Yeah, no, no, but you're good.
You're good.
Enjoy your life of extravagance while you manage other people's money.
Trump and Powell stood awkwardly next to each other in the White House, wearing hard hats.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
The president, first of all, capitalized that P, you jackasses.
The president presented Mr. Powell with a new higher cost of the project.
It looks like it's about 3.1 billion.
It went up a little bit or a lot, Trump said.
Mr. Powell closed his eyes and shook his head, explaining that the additional cost was related to the Martin building, another Fed office that was renovated five years ago.
Remember what Charlie?
It's all part of the same project.
Here's the renovation on the Martin building.
Yes, I asked it a loaded question.
Did it go over budget?
Yes, the renovations for the Federal Reserve Board's Martin building in Washington, D.C. is significantly over budget.
The original budget was $2.7 billion, but the latest estimates, $3.1 billion.
With ongoing concerns about potential further cost increases.
I'm not sure if they're mixing up stuff here.
And the bottom line, can you imagine saying, look, we're not over budget on this project because we were over budget on the last project.
Moron, you're stupid.
You're wrong, Trump.
You're confused.
We're over budget on this one, despite being over project, a budget on the other one.
That's like saying to someone, you idiot, I wasn't pulled over for DWI.
It was DUI.
Oh, no, no.
We're over budget this time, and yet it has nothing to do with the fact that we were over budget the last time, to which Trump is pointing out this is all part of a bigger, broader renovation project encompassing multiple buildings.
It's part of the overall work.
You can agree with that or disagree with that, but the bottom line is Trump is right yet again.
The wordsmiths of the devil are going to say, no, no, no, Viva, you're stupid.
You're in a cult.
They're only at $2.5 billion on this project.
It's not 3.1 because it doesn't include the Martin building.
All right.
So you're over budget on this one.
You were over budget on the last one.
It's part of the overall work is what Trump's point is.
And the Fed, who he's Batman slapping in front of the world to show that A, he can't do his job, B, he can sure as hell spend other people's money like it's cotton candy.
And C, trying to get that reduction in the federal interest rates at hand.
And people don't understand that Trump, inasmuch as he even made a mistake, which I think it's semantics, you know, essentially true, although maybe, yeah, the budget for this building wasn't 3.1.
Yeah, but in my mind, as president, it's all part and parcel of broader renovations, and you screwed up on all of them.
Some people are suggesting it's to set up Powell for getting fired or pressuring Powell to reduce the Fed interest rate.
From CNN, you got to know what your adversaries are saying.
How Trump is building a case to fire the Fed chair.
Explained.
A version of the story appeared in CNN's.
The Federal Reserve is an independent organization.
Independent or autonomous are two different things, meant to be insulated from politics.
It's neither federal nor a reserve, so let that sink in.
And the Supreme Court suggested this year that President Trump would need a reason or cause to fire chairman, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell.
Well, being substantially overbudget on multiple projects over time costing taxpayers billions of dollars, it's a good reason.
So Trump, who has repeatedly expressed his anger at the Fed chair for declining to lower interest rates on Trump's watch, is building one up with the help of AIDS.
It has nothing to do with monetary policy or interest rate incompetence, but rather an overbudget renovation of the Federal Reserve complex, including the historic Mariner Acclese building alongside whatever.
Read that again.
It has nothing to do with monetary policy or interest rate incompetence.
I'm sorry, being over budget might not be monetary policy as it relates to broader monetary policy, but it does have something to do with monetary policy and the inability to respect budgets and deadlines.
And we can go on, but that's what basically is the building.
Okay, so you got it.
It's either building a case to fire a man for mismanaging money, which is a good case, and he's building it quite well.
If I do say so myself, pressure to cause Powell to reduce federal interest rates, which some people believe there might be some political motivations for not doing, insulated from politics means that they get to, if they have ideological inklings, do what they want to politic without any accountability to the American people.
That's what some people might argue that's going on here.
But bottom line, that's a Batman slap if I've ever seen one.
And for those who are saying, yeah, Trump is an idiot.
They were over budget on the Martin building for different reasons.
They're over budget on this one for other reasons.
How could you possibly conflate the two?
Well, part and parcel of Federal Reserve improvements, buildings.
And when it comes to them, nothing's too good and no budget is too small to be overrun.
You tell me who's right or wrong?
Aaron Rupar or Viva Fry?
Let's see what we got up here.
Ooh, I got one.
I like the first sentence of it over on Rumble.
Viva, since you have been born in the country, since, Viva, since you have to be born in the country to be president, following that logic, wouldn't anyone in the line of succession have to also be born in the country, including senators and governors?
Well, okay, so take it with a grain of salt.
I'm a Canadian Chinook who has just acquired a mild, reasonable understanding of American law, constitutional law.
It's only for the president.
So there's no logic there.
The president is uniquely distinct from all other state, from all other representatives, which is why it only pertains to the president and not all by extension.
So I'm pretty sure it's like specifically enunciated in the Constitution that it's only the president that needs to be a natural-born citizen and not governors.
Is it in the Constitution that presidents must be born in the USA?
I know it is.
I just want to get the text.
Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 stipulates that the president must be a natural born citizen, and it's only for the president.
I think it should apply to all other levels of government and the judiciary personally, because we're seeing what happens when it doesn't.
You get commie Canadians, commie Cubans, commie Jamaicans, commie Russians up in like positions of power.
You get commies appoint second, you know, first generation born here, but raised by, you know, foreign parents like Kamala Harris.
You see what happens.
You expect Kamala Harris to have a deeply embedded respect for Second Amendment rights?
Hell no.
She's more Canadian than I am, I might argue.
I might be more American than she is, I might argue.
So I think everybody serving in government should have one citizenship to the country that they represent, should have to have been born in that country, and that should apply for the judiciary as well.
How you can possibly have two passports, dual loyalty to different countries, makes zero sense.
It should be a preclusion from being able to serve in government.
I don't even know if that's a word.
Hold on one second.
Preclusion?
Yes, the preclusion of regional parties reflects, okay, good.
The barring of evidence testimony.
Yes, I used the word right.
We're not yet done with Democrats being dumb and economically illiterate and sometimes literally illiterate.
Oh, this is so good.
I mean, it's so, it's so flipping good that it could only happen in real life.
Chad Felix Green, you might know him from the interwebs, put up a tweet that said, you're showing us a graph of stable prices suddenly rising the moment you came into power and then steadily rising higher and higher until Trump was re-elected.
Now, in incognito, you can't see that the tweet to which that was replying had since been deleted.
So I had to go here.
Let's just show you here.
This post was deleted by the author.
This post was deleted by the post author.
Post seems to be redundant.
And I'm like, guys, can anyone show me what that tweet was?
Because I can't find it to know how stupid it was.
Then I went to Fox News and I found it.
And then I subsequently asked for the tweet and found that as well.
I will steel man this to the I will steel man this even though it's I do not doubt that the Democrats have already made this argument.
I can I can think like a scoundrel even if I'm not one.
Democrats are scoundrels and I can think like a Democrat scoundrel.
Democratic Party posts Biden era price hikes in widely mocked ex-post attacking Trump.
Grocery prices rose by more than 20% under former President Joe Biden.
Here's the tweet from Democrats at the Democrats.
And it says, U.S. grocery prices reached record highs in 2025.
Prices are already higher than they were on July 2024, all in major categories listed.
Whatever.
A tweet from the official Democratic Party's X account was ridiculed on Thursday after inadvertently showing prices skyrocketing under former President Joe Biden.
The Post attempted to describe rising grocery prices under, quote, Trump's America, end quote, using a graph dating from October 2019 to 2025.
The graph claimed that, quote, U.S. grocery prices reached record highs in 2025.
Got that part.
However, many X users pointed out in the graph that the graph in fact showed prices skyrocketing in 2021 when Biden was president and only leveling off at the end of 2024 when Trump was re-elected.
You're showing us a graph of prices, a stale prices suddenly rising the moment you came into power and then steadily rising higher and higher until Trump was re-elected.
Okay, we got Greg Price.
Then we got Kyle Smith.
I don't know who that is.
Carol Roth.
All right, go down, go down, go down.
Do we all know, first of all, them deleting their tweets is stupid.
The internet is forever.
What you would have needed to do if you were a smart scoundrel, which clearly the Democrats are not, if you were a smart scoundrel, you've made a big mistake.
What do you think the pivot is, the moving goalpost?
The argument to suggest that Trump is somehow still to blame for this.
It's fairly obvious.
It only went up that much in 2021 because it takes time for inflation to come in.
Because when Trump printed trillions during COVID, this is the result of that.
It wasn't Biden's fault.
That's the obvious, disingenuous, scoundrellist response, which they could have done instead of just looking like cowards tucking, tailing, and running because they've got nothing better to add.
That would have been the argument.
When was COVID?
COVID was March 2020.
I mean, they're going to have to have some fancy mental gymnastics to say, yeah, the printing of the trillion-dollar bail, whatever it was there, the stimulus package.
It takes time for the inflationary effects of that to take place.
The disruption to supply chains obviously was going to drive up prices.
Well, then why'd you lock down the effing world, you dumb jackasses?
Set that aside.
That was the argument.
Not a delete and pretend he never said it.
If I'm thinking like a scoundrel, at least a mildly intelligent one, which clearly the Democratic Party is not.
Let me read some of the responses.
Who's in charge in 2021?
It was a trickle effects.
It was the delayed effect of inflation.
I don't know why I sound like Bernie Sanders all of a sudden.
Wow, 2020, 2021 were pretty bad.
That is not the flex they think it is.
White House Deputy Press Secretary Abigail Johnson commented, they can't be this dumb.
Are they actually this dumb?
I don't think Democrats know how to read graphs, U.S. Secretary of Veterans Affairs Doug Collins wrote.
By the way, have they deleted the post?
Congressional Democrats have been attacking.
Have they offered that retort yet?
That it was the delayed inflationary effects of Trump's COVID policies, all blaming Trump?
I guarantee you they did.
I just haven't seen it if they have.
I think there was more to that.
Hold on a second.
Let me see here.
No, that was it.
They're morons.
Okay, we got some more tipped questions and humble rants over here.
I'm going to read them before I read them.
You have to be.
Okay, fine.
Barry N. McGrowan.
Let me just read this to myself.
If you married and or effed your brother to get citizenship, should you be allowed to be a member of Congress?
Barry, I think you might have gotten that one backwards a little bit.
I think she married her brother.
The allegation is that she married her brother so that he could get citizenship, expedited citizenship, not her.
She deserves to be investigated.
And then Doug Leaf Fenn, 69.
So a designated survivor cannot be Ilhan Omer or any other foreign-born person.
I would presume that that's the case.
And by the way, speaking of Billy Madison jokes, that's where 69 comes from.
Happy Gilmore 2 is premiering tonight, and I'm thinking that we might try to do something with our locals community of a watch party.
Robert Barnes does, in addition to his bourbon with Barnes over on vivabarneslaw.locals.com with the best above average legal community out there, he does movie nights on Saturday night.
And the whole gang, the whole community starts watching a movie at the same time, in theory.
And then there's a live chat going on.
They're not broadcasting the movie via our locals community, but everybody watches it.
And there's a live chat going on.
I want to do it tonight with Happy Gilmore because we're having a watch party here.
My daughter's having some friends come over.
We're going to see how bad Happy Gilmore 2 is going to be.
I might try to do it with locals, but I don't know how many times we're going to get interrupted and have to pause the movie.
And it's only on Netflix, I think.
So some people might not have Netflix, but stay tuned to that because it might actually be happening tonight, locals.
And by the way, for those who are not yet members of our amazing VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com community, here it is.
You can join as a member, no financial requirement at all.
Or you can choose to be a supporter, 10 bucks a month, 100 bucks a year, or you can just get these things called coins and tip certain posts and tip other creators.
And it's a wonderful place to be.
So go check that out.
Other shameless self-promotion.
Go to our merch page, vivafry.com.
It's the best.
Has this existed before or did I actually think of this?
Conspiracy theorist.
Get a hat, trucker hat, coffee mug, shirt.
And some people said, no, Viva, it's not conspiracy realist.
It's conspiracy analyst.
There's a whole, there's another meme that says, I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
I'm a conspiracy analyst.
Try to visualize what that would look like on a shirt.
Doesn't work quite as well.
Go get some merch if you're so inclined.
And the other thing is you can go get Louis the Lobster.
Louis the Lobster on Amazon.
Illustrated by the daughter of one of our above-average community members.
Her name is Abigail Martin.
And it's a book that I literally wrote, my wife put together, illustrated.
And it's a good one.
Check it out.
All right.
One more story.
I'm going to bring this one up here.
Maybe we might have more than one more story, actually.
Oh, by the way, hold on one second.
One last one.
Let me see if I can pull this up real quick.
Sorry, I'm not ready to play that yet.
So everybody knows now I've sort of gotten back into baseball or trading cards.
You two.
Let's see here.
This is what happens.
I can't type anymore.
Okay, forget it.
I'll come back to that.
I'll come back to that in a second.
Let's watch this video.
This was posted the other day.
I commentated on it and what I thought was thoroughly offensive about what this guy said and also mildly suspicious when someone volunteers information to justify their point of views, identity politics information.
When someone says, you know, as a blank, unless you are invoking experience, like as a lawyer, I can tell you not to do this.
It's one thing.
When you say like, as a fill-in-the-blank identity politics, your identity does not make your arguments any stronger, nor does it make anybody else's arguments any weaker.
So you'll hear the moment in this answer.
I played it earlier this week, but it's necessary to replay it so we can hear.
Up in Canada, the level of insanity from apparent Canadians.
Can I just ask quickly, what did you think of the Freedom Convoy?
I think it was horrendous, right?
I mean, these were terrorists causing grief to all of the residents of Ottawa.
Frankly, embarrassing Canadians like ourselves, embarrassing Albertans like ourselves.
I wish they never did that.
And I really do hope that they get what they deserve in court.
I think it was ridiculous.
I hope that they get what they deserve in court.
I hope they get what they deserve in court.
This is in respect of Tamara Leach, the convoy protest organizer convicted of nonviolent mischief.
The Crown is seeking seven years in jail.
I think it was ridiculous.
Brownlee's asking 80 years.
I think whatever the Crown asks for, the judicial system should be allowed to run.
I think it's absolutely ridiculous when politicians, like Trump is doing in the U.S., right, firing people in the judicial system.
That's unacceptable.
So Polyev and his some of the, well, Polyev, first of all, not even as an MP right now, making comments that are contrary to what the judicial system is.
Can I just ask quickly, what did you think of completely inappropriate?
We don't need politicians.
They shouldn't be about the law.
Can I just ask quickly, what did you think of?
I don't know what the hell is going on.
Completely inappropriate.
We don't need politicians.
They shouldn't be about the law.
They shouldn't have any jurisdiction over the law.
And you have to let the crown prosecutors do their job.
They're the experts in this.
But like I said, terrorists deserve to go to jail.
And I hope they do get a substantial sentence.
We'll see what the judge gives.
Terrorists deserve to go to jail.
Now, I'm going to take this out because I don't want to share.
I'm just going to close it.
Oh, no, I need to keep it open.
Okay, I'm going to close this.
Apparently, this individual has been identified.
And I'm relying, you know, the actual name, where he works, you can find that on the internet.
It's not up to me to, I don't want to promote that.
On the one hand, in case it's the wrong person, it's the number one concern of ever doing that.
I'm fairly certain that this is accurate because that individual who's alleged to be the person in the video on their Twitter feed, on his Twitter feed, has a link to the interview that Alexa was conducting, not of him, nothing saying, yes, that was me in that video.
One can reasonably surmise that it's actually the individual in that video.
Allegedly, the individual was born outside of Canada.
I don't know that that's the case, in which case, it's also, I was curious when the individual said, we as, what did he say?
Canadians such as ourselves, Albertans such as ourselves, struck me as being, methinks he doth claim to be Canadian too much.
Allegedly, the individual is not Canadian, or at the very least, allegedly Pakistani-born.
And I've reached out to the person because I'd like to sincerely ask some questions as to how he can proudly boast that they're terrorists.
I'd like to know the rationale there.
I'd like to know the rationale behind the Crown are the experts when they tried to lock Tamara Leach up for violating her probation in the context of insane bail terms for nonviolent mischief.
I'd like to know what he does.
Does he work for the government?
Has he ever received funding from the government?
Was he born in Canada?
Is he importing intolerant values from adversarial nations that do not share our culture, our values, and our freedoms, and turning Canada into the hellscape that is many other countries on earth?
I'd love to know.
We'll see if the individual accepts my invitation, but the breaking news of the day is the individual has been identified in terms of where they were from their Twitter feed, have on that particular Twitter feed, whether or not it's the right person, has had some anti-Zionist tweets, some pro-Zohran Mamdani tweets, and let me see what else.
Apparently, let's see what else where they actually work.
And was a pro-Jab individual.
So surprise, surprise.
The person who thinks that they're terrorists who should be locked up.
Apparently either not from Canada or at the very least.
There we go.
Or at the very least, second generation or first generation and not espousing the values of a free and democratic society.
Now, what I wanted to say was this.
Viva breaks.
I've rebranded the second channel.
I'm using Vivo Random for the same videos as well of opening trading cards with my emphasis being on UFC.
I want to show everybody what I pulled yesterday.
Not that anybody's going to care.
Check this out, people.
It has been sent for grading.
And we're going to see what it looks like.
Check this out.
That is Diego Lopez.
Now, I'm not going to look at the next card just yet, even though I know you guys are going to see it.
Who watches UFC?
Who's into the signature, if I'm not mistaken?
It is the signature.
Oh, my goodness.
Islam Makachev, people.
One of the greatest fighters of all time.
I don't know if he's yet been anointed into the UFC Hall of Fame.
I got an Islam Makachev autograph, numbered to 50.
And this is numbered to 50.
There was something else that was very cool about it.
Oh, yes, the mark of a champion.
So that's fun stuff.
It's Viva Random on Rumble.
If you want to follow that stuff, that and random stuff.
People saying, Viva, what are you doing?
I'm not interested in any of this.
If you're not interested in it, by all means, don't look at it.
If you want to send anything to my P.O. box, I've got packages for you.
And we're going to do this.
Let me make sure I'm not showing anybody's address.
We're going to open these and the locals after party in a minute.
If you want to send anything, send unopened packs or boxes of baseball cards, people, with notes.
And I'll read the notes as we do breaking live or opening packs live or whatever.
Send stuff there.
That's the P.O. box.
It is up in Florida.
It's 9170 Glades.
It's there.
Now, what we're going to do is go to the chat for a second because I see another crumble rant.
And then we're going to get ready to wrap up and do the after party on vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Doug Lee fances a liberal politician to put forward a bill to lower the voting age here to Canada to 16.
Absolutely, because there are two ways for the liberals to nonetheless politically succeed, notwithstanding the devastating impact of their policies.
They can no longer rely on the minority vote domestically because they've screwed the minorities.
Much like the Democrats in the U.S., they still have a substantial portion of the black vote of the Latino vote, but they lost a lot of it, which is why they lost the last election.
Why, and I'm not just pointing my finger at any one demographic, why the black vote and the Jewish vote votes statistically overrepresented for the Democrats blows my freaking mind.
The ultra-Orthodox Jews vote conservative.
The liberal secular Western Jew votes, we'll see if Zohran Mamdani gets elected, but the liberal Western secular Jew or the progressive Jew, wildly overrepresented, still votes Democrat.
It makes no sense to me.
Same thing with the black community in the States and the Indigenous community in Canada.
You're voting for your oppressors.
I don't understand it.
But they can't any longer rely on exploiting the minority vote.
So they've got to import the new vote.
That's what this great replacement demographics is destiny is about.
And they've got to get them younger and dumber.
And so lower the vote to 16, because you can only convince a 16-year-old that your utopia, which leads to socialist hell, is a good idea for someone who has no life experience, no work experience, and basically no knowledge.
And I say that with respect to children.
There's some smart 16-year-olds out there.
The only way the liberals and the Democrats now can remain in power is by importing the vote and lowering the age to people who are too stupid to be able to vote, too politically ignorant to be able to vote.
Thank you for the tip question.
Jinger Ninja in the house.
Jinger Ninja is the man who made that board behind me.
It's beautiful.
Who's got his own channel says, I made and edited a video of myself shooting showing how to shoot from 100 to 1,000 yards.
Took 20 hours to edit.
It's good.
Give it a watch.
How about we give it a watch right now?
Let me see how long this is.
Oh, you know what?
Oh, that's 41 minutes, man.
Okay.
Hold on.
Hold on.
Jinja Ninja, I'm going to bring it up while we have the big audience and before we raid the next show.
I'm going to share this link with everybody, although they already have it, but let me just see.
I'm going to skip to, let's just skip to the good part right here.
That's three solid seconds or two and a half seconds.
Oh, I didn't even hear it.
*throws*
Oh, he's at a shooting range.
I heard someone else's shot.
Okay, that's wild.
All right.
Well, Ginger, everyone, go check it out, but you might need to master the art of shortening things in as much as possible for the short attention span that is the internet.
Before we head over, we got more over on our VivaBarnsLaw.locals.com community.
Let me see what's going on here.
Roostang says, Viva, are you really going, are you really going to Subway?
Okay, hold on.
Roostang says, Viva, are you really going to Subway to buy all four of the collectible Happy Gilmore 2 plastic cups?
Do you think they will be worth something in the near future?
No.
Mass-produced made-in-China crap is never going to be worth anything.
Finboy Slick says, Viva only watches Adam Sandler movies.
The other movies he pretends to have seen, he just read summaries.
So we don't find out.
No, I watch a lot of other movies, but Happy Gilmore is my happy place.
Now, I'm just, we'll see if they have ruined my happy place by making if this movie, if this sequel is as bad, if it's as bad as Dumb and Dumber 2, which was so bad, it made me retroactively dislike Dumb and Dumber 1.
I'm joking it didn't, but it was so bad, I vowed to my kid, never let us watch this again.
If it's that bad, I'm going to let the world know.
All right, we are going to raid Roseanne Barr.
If you're coming over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com, please come.
We're going to do a Q ⁇ A, have our standard after party, and I might show some of the good, what are they called?
What is it called when you land a card when you're opening?
Oh, pulls.
They're called pulls.
I might share some of the other good pulls.
I mean, they're like five, $7 cards, but it's fun.
So we're going to raid Roseanne.
Please let her know from whence you came and politely nudge her.
I want to get Roseanne on for an interview.
Go.
Sunday's show is at noon Eastern.
Remember that?
Tonight, we're probably going to have a Happy Gilmore watch off with our locals community.
So go, everybody.
Godspeed.
And I will see locals now.
The dog just came in here.
All right.
Let me just make sure that we got the raid on Roseanne.
And then we're going to end the stream.
Viva has raided the stream.
Viva raid.
What's up, Roseanne?
Dear Rosanne, Rosanna Dana.
Get up.
All right.
Oh, you want to be here when I open the things?
Is your friend still here?
Okay, get up.
Okay, get up.
All right, people.
We're going over to vivabarnslaw.locals.com.
Enjoy the rest of the weekend.
If you're not coming, see you Sunday noon.
▲
Export Selection