All Episodes
Previous Next
July 21, 2025 - Viva & Barnes
01:11:32
Mark Levin CHANGES TUNE? Adam Schiff Fraud EXPOSED! Canada Goes Full Anarcho-Tyranny AND MORE!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, Viva is going to submit a request to Rumble Studio to move the button for close room a little bit further away from the button for start stream because Viva has fat fingers and Viva is an idiot and accidentally hit close room instead of go live.
Hoyoi, now that he has stopped sweating, we shall start with the story of the day.
Going up to Kami Canada for an update in what is going down as perhaps the greatest political persecution in the history of Canada.
We were concerned that if they were starting to arrest the organizers, that they would come to the hotel.
And my husband was there.
And Mr. Bulford's wife was there.
and obviously that was the last thing that I would ever want my husband to see was to me be arrested.
We definitely didn't want that sort of activity occurring at the hotel with a woman who had been so kind to us, actually who was about to lose her business until we showed up.
But like I said in my video, I wasn't afraid.
I believe and still believe that we did an excellent job remaining peaceful, advocating for the police, advocating for respecting the police.
And so we made the conscious decision to go out and ask the police if they were looking for us.
We walked up to the hill, and I believe it was Metcalf, and we stopped and talked to some officers.
I'm not sure what their rank was.
There was two suburbans pointed with their headlights up at the hill.
And we walked up to them and Mr. Bulford identified who we were and asked the gentleman if we heard that they were looking for organizers.
We'll put it on pause there.
This is Tamara Leach, for those of you who don't know.
She was one of the purported organizers of the greatest, most beautiful, most peaceful protest the nation of Canada has ever seen.
She and Chris Barber, among others, had been thoroughly prosecuted, persecuted by the Canadian government.
This was her testimony during the commission that was held after the violent suppression of the most peaceful protest in Canada, where Tamara Leach was testifying as to her moment of arrest when she was stopped on the street like a thug criminal and arrested for having participated in organized, taken, received monies for the trucker protest.
And for anybody who doesn't remember what that looked like when she was arrested here, I'm going to bring this up just so we can all refresh our collective memories.
This was Canada.
This was the culmination of the most beautiful three-week protest against government overreach, government tyranny anybody had ever seen in the history of Canada.
And I don't think I'm exaggerating.
Can I talk to you over here?
Oh boy.
Oh, sure.
I'll turn the volume down a little bit.
Just back up.
Thank you.
Thank you.
And me.
Yeah.
Just doing their jobs, peeps.
I'm not here to direct you.
Oh, you will be.
Just doing their jobs.
That was the moment of arrest of Tamara Leach on the streets of Ottawa.
You would think you were in another era, but lo and behold, you're Justin Trudeau's, Canada, that has now been inherited by Mark J. Carney.
Tamara Leach was arrested, charged with mischief, among other charges.
She was put on the most insane bail conditions you could possibly imagine.
They tried to lock her back up after she spent like a couple of weeks in pretrial detention.
They tried to lock her back up on the basis that she violated her bail terms by attending an event that a judge authorized her to attend because she took a photograph with one of the other co-defendants at the time, Tom Morazzo, if I'm not making a mistake, posted it or it was posted on social media, and they alleged that she violated the terms of her parole and they tried to lock her up.
A nonviolent mischief charge.
They had a trial.
You'd think it was the trial of the millennium.
And she was found guilty.
I forget on which exact charges.
It doesn't really matter at this point in time.
Taking a trip down memory lane as I refreshed my memory on the details of this case.
Back in the day, peeps.
Check this out.
This is old school Viva before the Freedom Fro had grown in its entirety.
Talking about the Tamara Leach case as it was ongoing back then.
This has to be three years ago now.
Now, it was a CTV journalist, I would say journalist, but I don't have my second hand, who took to Twitter to accuse another blue check mark on Twitter of providing misinformation because that individual said indefinite jailing of someone accused of mischief should be outrageous.
And then this journalist, his name is Kevin Something, says, that's misinformation.
She's not indefinitely jailed.
Why?
She's having her bail hearing today.
To which I said, 12 days in pretrial detention on mischief charges is indefinite detention, regardless of whether or not she gets out.
You know, indefinite detention is not permanent detention.
So even if she gets out, which she should, she will nonetheless have been indefinitely detained on charges of mischief.
So whatever, I called out that individual.
And my goodness, did his tweet not age well?
Because they argued all day yesterday for the release of Tamara Lich via her defense attorneys.
Prosecution argued all day that pre-trial detention is necessary.
The judge said, I've got to sit on this.
I've been sitting since nine o'clock this morning.
I've got other obligations for the rest of the week.
I'm going to render judgment on Monday.
That will be over two weeks.
It'll be two and a half weeks after Tamara Lick was arrested on mischief charges, two and a half weeks in jail.
By the way, this was so early on.
I still wasn't sure if it was pronounced Tamara Leach.
Tamara Lich, Tamara Lick.
That was February.
That was right after they violently suppressed the protests.
They, you know, she had to think about it over the weekend in order to determine whether or not to release Tamara Leach pending trial on nonviolent mischief charges.
Wait until the weekend's over because what's another two or three days to an, as far as I'm concerned, wrongfully detained individual.
Tamara Leach was convicted and you won't believe what they're asking for in terms of a sentence for her.
Now I'm going to explain something in a bit because I finally upped my ability to stream by plugging in a second camera, a second computer screen, which we're going to see in a second.
But I want to bring this up for you.
You won't believe what they're asking for for jail time for Tamara Leach and Chris Barber, the other defendant who is also found guilty on some nonviolent mischief charges.
I was thinking maybe I'd have Tamara Leach on to talk about it, but I don't think I'd be able to bite my tongue hard enough to not say something that might compromise her standing before the judge.
They're asking for seven years.
I got to bring this up.
It's going to blow your freaking mind.
Straight from Tamara Leach's Twitter account, which says this.
Late yesterday afternoon, I received a copy of the Crown's materials for our upcoming sentencing hearing and can confirm they are seeking seven-year prison sentence for me and an additional year for Chris.
That's Chris Barber.
That would be eight years for Chris Barber.
Because what did they have the audacity of doing?
At worst, they raised money for a protest that might, I'll say that might have broken some laws.
At worst, seven years in jail.
This is from the Crown's memorandum sentencing request.
As previously stated, quote, the worst offender, worst offense principle no longer operates as a constraint on the imposition of a maximum sentence and is not something reserved for an abstract case involving the worst crime and circumstances.
Having said that, this is not an abstract case reflecting the worst case of mischief.
It is the worst case of mischief.
With this in mind, a seven-year sentence on that count for each barber and leech and one year consecutive for barber's role in counseling the disobeyance of a court order, when considered in the context of the freedom convoy and its impact, is proportionate to the gravity of the offense, the moral culpability of the offenders, and takes into consideration both the mitigating factors and both Lich and Barber's personal circumstances.
A carcell sentence is consistent with sentencing for large demonstration-related offenses and is consistent with large-scale mischief, large-scale mischief.
Who do they cite, by the way?
Hugenboss, another one of the Ottawa protesters who was railroaded by the system.
They cite their own abuses to justify further abuses.
Pavlovsky, they're citing Pavlovsky.
Oh, and Pat King.
I'm going to give myself an aneurysm or a ruptured aneurysm.
They are citing their own tyrannical abuses to justify further abuses.
The lay person is not going to know all of these cases.
Van Hugenboss is one of the Ottawa protesters who was railroaded.
Serrano, I'm not sure who it is.
I don't know everybody involved in this.
Pavlovsky?
King?
Dubey, I'm not sure if Dube was the guy who, I don't know who Dube is 2018, so that's not the right one.
The Crown respectfully disagrees that a higher sentence would create a, quote, chill or fear of participation in political expression.
You're gosh darn right.
Yeah, you want that.
You know, we disagree.
No.
Wink, wink, nudge, nudge.
We disagree.
That's what they want.
The Crown has always emphasized the importance of the right for all Canadians to be able to express themselves.
As this court found, political expressions at the very heart of the values of protected.
Now lock them up.
That right, this right, however, has never existed without limitations.
And then finding them guilty, the court agreed that Lich and Barber, in holding the line, committed criminal offenses.
These people, and I'm not talking about Tamara Leach and Chris Barber.
I'm talking about the Canadian government, cannot go to hell fast enough.
Oh yeah, no, no, no.
We don't want to chill free speech.
That's exactly what they're doing.
That's exactly what they damn well know they want to do, but not just any free speech, specifically conservative right-wing free speech.
Change your name to Muhammad and go protest for Palestine, burn shit and vandalize stuff.
Nobody's going to say boo.
They'll beat the shit out of the reporters reporting on that.
Change your name.
They'll pay you money.
They'll cut you a freaking check after they lock you up wrongfully.
They know damn well what they're doing.
It's not an accident.
It's not a bug.
It's a feature.
They are gosh forsaken tyrants of the highest order.
And it sounds like finally, I've been saying it for long enough.
I've been calling out the silence on some people for long enough.
I called it out long enough so that they could get their asses handed to them in an election that they should have won.
I'm not going to say, why didn't you do it yesterday?
Although I'm thinking it.
A lot of other people are thinking it.
Some people can say too little, too late.
I kind of adhere to Scott Adams.
Better late than never.
You can always say, why didn't you do it yesterday?
That being said, you can also also reasonably say, why the hell didn't you say it during the election?
Oh, that's right.
Because if he had said it during the election, he would have lost.
Oh, that's right.
If he had said it during the election, this is Pierre Polyev during the Canadian election, the Liberals would have gotten an even bigger stake of the government.
They would have gotten an outright majority.
Oh, yeah, no, no.
It was strategic silence.
And I've said it from the beginning.
It's not inconsistent.
I believe Pierre Polyev is a fair weather politician for good and for bad.
You can go put together a Kamala Harris-esque montage.
He is a fair weather politician for good and for bad in that you can sway him through political pressure to finally do the right thing.
He was against or at least not supporting the trucker protest until it was popular to do so.
He then did it for about a day or two, got his breakfast morning photograph with a bunch of the protesters.
Then when it became unpopular to do it, he backed right off.
After the Hulu commission, you know, it was no longer a COVID protest.
It was an inflation protest.
He's a fair weather politician For good and for bad, which means you can pressure him into doing the right thing if enough people do it.
Instead of browbeating me into silence during the election, maybe you should have put a little more pressure on Pierre.
Set that aside.
He tweets this out today: Pierre Polyev at Pierre Polyev.
Let's get this straight.
While rampant violent offenders are released hours after their most recent charges and anti-Semitic rioters vandalize businesses, terrorize daycares, and block traffic without consequences, the Crown wants seven years prison time for the charge of mischief for leech and barber.
How is this justice?
It isn't.
It has always been egregious persecution from day one.
Some people have had the liberty of calling it out from day one.
Some people have had the obligation to call it out from day one, and they were derelict in that duty.
That being said, in order to put a little emphasis on what Pierre Polyev is talking about, because I just, you know, go pull off the fur, just put in murder, something, and wrong, given a weak sentence, given a light sentence, put in the words murder, accused murder, kidnap, rape, whatever, and probation, Canada.
You'll get no shortage of people who were let out.
The dude who ran his van into protesters in Winnipeg was let out on bail.
Here, Viva Fry to Viva Fry.
A man who kidnapped a woman who was later murdered got less time in jail than what they were asking for to Mara and Chris.
The Canadian government is the enemy of the Canadian people.
This is from Inside Hamilton.
Toronto man gets probation for role in kidnapping of Brampton Teen, later murdered in Milton.
Tawan Muhammad pleaded guilty to kidnapping and spent five years in custody prior to sentencing.
They gave him one year probation.
The examples are too numerous to enumerate.
And it's about time, you know, maybe, maybe Pierre, put it on blast, you know, maybe tag J.D. Vance.
Maybe tag Donald John Trump.
You know, when they're locking up people for social media posts in England and you get the vice president of the United States saying, I'm not sure what we have in common with Europe anymore.
It's not worthless.
It's actually kind of good.
And at some point in time, you know, there's going to be enough fodder for the American government to say, if we wanted a mini China north of our border, cooking up fentanyl, importing terrorists who cross over into our border, if we needed a national security threat and wanted a mini China, we could cozy up to China too.
So they want seven years for Tamara Leach and they want eight years for Chris Barber for nonviolent mischief for having participated in, I dare say, even organized a protest.
They're still facing that $100 plus, $300 plus million dollar civil lawsuit in that corrupt judiciary of Canada.
But that's what's going on in Canada.
It is enough to irritate you.
And it's enough to...
Hitting clothes room in Rumble Studio instead of go live.
The buttons are right next to each other.
Holy cows.
I didn't swear.
I didn't swear.
I didn't react the same way I did when I stabbed myself in the forehead with that stupid metal fixture that I had back in Montreal.
But it sent immediate panic.
So sorry for the rough start because I accidentally...
Just to show you all what I'm doing today, I feel like I've entered the Matrix.
Not the Matrix, that movie with it's with, what's his name?
Tom Cruise Minority Report.
I feel like I've entered the Minority Report because you got to see what I finally got around to doing today.
I plugged in the second computer screen.
And so now I can drag things back and forth.
Look at this.
Look at this.
I can't believe I've waited three years to plug in the screen.
It's been sitting on the floor right there for so long.
It's got dust accumulating on it.
Look at this.
Look at this.
You take, hold on, let me back it up so we can just get a wide angle.
I don't know how this happens.
The mouse, the cursor, you see the cursor?
Follow it, follow it, follow it.
It's on the next screen.
You go here, you grab this, bam, it's on this screen.
Oh my goodness.
Have I been an idiot?
An idiot.
Bona fide.
That computer has been sitting on the ground.
I just plugged it in.
This is going to revolutionize the way we do streams, people.
It's a new age.
Booyah!
So that explains the...
I believe I had the same reaction the last time.
Oh, is that me?
So this is what I'm getting used to.
This is the first time I've ever done it in my life.
I don't know what the utility is of bringing it back from one screen to the next.
All that I know is that if you see me looking to this side now, it's to pull up my next story.
And we're going to talk about a few things today, people.
The Streisand effect.
Some, what else do we got there?
Oh, yes, yes.
Joe Rogan potentially endorsing the very progressive policies that turned California into a commie hellhole.
But before we even do that, we're going to do one thing first, because most important thing, we're going to thank our sponsor for today's show, which is the wellness company peeps.
And let me play this video as you can watch it while I tell you about parasite cleanses.
I'm going to tell you about a discussion I had with someone yesterday.
It's kind of fascinating.
But most people don't realize that pork is one of the biggest sources of parasites in the world.
Study after study proves it.
The CDC says pork is the primary source of trichinosis infections worldwide.
The WHO and the CDC list pork as a top source for tapeworm and toxoplasmosis.
That is the crazy cat lady thing.
You get it from cat poop, but set that aside.
Research shows pork has poor detox channels, making it easy for parasites to survive and transfer to humans.
If you eat pork or sushi, have pets, travel, or simply want to protect your gut and immune system, it's one more reason to do a targeted medical-grade full-body parasite cleanse at least once a year.
That's why the wellness company has created their ivermectin plus mibendazole parasite cleanse.
Uniquely powerful combination helps eliminate unwanted parasites and supports your immune system, digestion, and overall health.
Fill out a quick intake form online and you get a four-usage supply medical grade cleanse shipped straight to your front door.
Head over to twc.health forward slash viva.
Use promo code Viva.
It'll get you 60 bucks off plus free shipping.
The link is in the description.
Thank the fine folks at the wellness company.
They do great work.
Check it out and promo code Viva will get you 60 bucks off and free shipping.
Had a discussion with someone yesterday, a theological discussion at my kid's birthday party, and we ended up talking about the rules of koshrutes.
And like, you know, if anybody wants to go for a historical, logical explanation as to why pork is not kosher, despite the fact that the animal has a split hoof, which is the rule in Judaism, you can find a very practical explanation.
The meat tends to be more risky, as does shellfish, which are the shit eaters of the ocean.
I'm saying that lovingly because they're delicious as well.
But I'll talk about the theological discussion afterwards.
I put up a post on aviva barnslaw.locals.com, and it's a good discussion.
What I wanted to do before we get into the first story is go over to Crumble and see what's going on there.
We got Ginger Ninja in the house, who's the man who made this chessboard behind me, says if they were honest when asking for sentencing, they just asked for death by lethal injection.
The judge would grant it, and they just give her two doses.
Okay.
I understand what you're saying.
But also, you know, medical assistance in dying is now the top five killer of all Canadians, but, you know, doesn't matter.
Free healthcare is wonderful.
808 Scotty says, thanks for addressing the gold pager on your Sunday podcast.
Have you noticed rhetoric on Israel and Epstein changed immediately after?
Suddenly, Nadia Yahoo was his best buddy.
Epstein was disinfoed.
No, I didn't notice that.
I didn't put that together, but I didn't.
First of all, I didn't even know.
I thought it was a typo in the original post, the golden pager, which came through as a golden paper.
But I'm just saying, like, from a practical perspective, I would scan that thing and make sure that regardless of who that came from, but as a purely symbolic gesture, giving the president the very device that was used to detonate and terminate terrorists.
There's an old expression in the house of a hung man, don't ask where you hang the fish.
Nobody's going to get that expression.
But given what the pager represents, I wouldn't have suggested giving that to President Trump.
I mean, that could easily be misconstrued.
Ginger Ninja says, one, I wish people had told you that another monitor would make your life a thousand times easier.
Yeah, that's a joke because a number of people have.
Now get an actual mouse scrolling to the other monitor on a fingerpad will be impossible.
I won't say that's why I accidentally closed the room before going live, but I closed the room before going live.
People, the Streisand effect is a very real thing and it's a very interesting political perspective and it's a political strategy.
If you want people to stop talking about something, you stop talking about it yourself.
Now, you can read that statement in one of two ways.
And part of me sincerely wonders if part of the strategy of what's going on right now, which many attribute to be an unforced error, is Trump actually forcing the discussion on Epstein and Epstein documents by way of the attempt to tell everyone to shut up about the Epstein documents.
But the bottom line, if you want people to continue talking about something, continue talking about how they should stop talking about it.
It's the Streisand effect in the purest of forms.
And as I was getting ready for this show, I need to pull it up.
I had totally forgotten about it.
The image of Beyonce.
And I literally put in Streisand Effect images.
And this was the first one that came up.
I'm like, oh my goodness.
I absolutely forgot about that image that allegedly Beyonce didn't like and was trying to take off the internet.
And it was the Streisand effect, the modern version.
I'll tell everybody the history of the Streisand effect if they don't know about it.
That picture from a Super Bowl performance.
Apparently she was making every effort on Earth to get it off the internet.
This is the best meme I've ever seen about that photograph.
The Streisand effect literally has its origins in somebody took an aerial photo of Barbara Streisand's property for a magazine or something.
It was posted online.
It got no views.
I mean, literally, virtually zero views.
It was a drone aerial photo of Barbara Streisand's property.
She then wrote like some letter of demand, threatened to sue the guy or whatever, herself blowing it up.
And then that image went viral in ways that the original photographer could never have imagined.
And if it was his intent, could never have hoped for.
That's literally the Streisand effect.
What we've been experiencing over the last three weeks is stop talking about Epstein, stop talking about Epstein.
If you talk about Epstein, you're bad people, fake news.
Some people have even gone one step further and say, if you say on this Epstein story, you are in fact the true protector of pedoes, because no administration has done more to protect children than the Trump administration.
That is, I think that's true.
That is to say that the Trump administration has been very good in terms of going after pedoes, human trafficking, shutting down the border itself will shut down trafficking.
I agree with that.
The audacity to tell anybody that if you do not let up on the Epstein story, as implored by none other than the deputy director of the FBI, that you are the one protecting pedos, that takes balls and chutzpah.
And chutzpah, I'm using it the right way.
Robert Barnes, God bless his soul.
I don't think he uses chutzpah in the right way.
Chutzpah means gall, audacity, not necessarily courage.
It takes balls, audacity, to look at someone who is doggedly pursuing the Epstein story and saying your unwillingness to shut up about the Epstein story is in fact the true protection of pedo's.
That takes gall, chutzpah.
But many people have noticed a shift in tone from a great many public commentators, analysts, vocal right-wing folk.
I think Charlie Kirk, I don't fall Charlie Kirk.
His video went viral.
Like he says, I said my piece on Epstein.
I'm going to move on and let the administration deal with it.
I can understand that.
At some point when you got nothing new to add, you stop talking about it because you just become a zealot.
Every conversation turns up, what about Epstein?
What about Epstein?
What about Epstein?
The administration is doing amazing work.
Trump is doing amazing work.
And but for this gaff, we would be celebrating the amazing work.
We can do two things at one time.
Celebrate the amazing work and keep the pressure on for what has been a story of interest for the better part of a decade.
But Mark Levin was on.
Let me see here.
How do we do this?
Mark Levin came out recently over the weekend and said, you know, I'm done.
I'm done talking about Epstein.
In some ways, It's not a story of interest, which literally makes no sense.
And what's amazing also is Streisand Effect: the internet is forever.
You don't need to know exactly everything that anyone has ever said on a subject in order to know how to find if they've said anything on a subject before.
You go into X, you put in someone's account, and you put in specific keywords, and it will pull up not all of them, but tweets that the individuals have issued.
It's how you get some of the most egregious hypocrites on earth.
Julia Oliviana, that Democrat operative, said yesterday, I never worked for it.
Oh, yeah, what's this?
We have proof that you've worked for them?
Yeah, well, okay.
Something is making a noise here.
What was I just about to say?
So I go to, you know, Mark Levin puts out this video.
It's the first second of it.
It came from this weekend.
But I will tell you this.
We better be united.
We better be strong.
We better be focused.
We better be articulate.
We can't waste our time on Epstein and other stuff that are going on here that some people want us to focus on.
I'm about to had it with all that stuff.
Some people want us to focus on.
That's Mark Levin.
If it wasn't July 20th, I get nervous that I'm so meticulous.
I'm fairly certain it was from July 20th, but over the weekend, some people want us to focus on Epstein.
Space and other stuff that are going on here that some people want us to focus on.
That some people is an accusation and an insult.
And it's a castigation.
I don't know if that's the word.
It's castigating people, those some people who seem to want to talk.
Oh, Mark, what was this you on March 1st?
About had it with all that stuff.
Had it with it.
Welcome back, America.
We're here with, and I'm very excited about this Attorney General Pam Bonnie, a good friend, especially a good friend of my wife, but a wonderful lady, a great lawyer.
I want to get into this Epstein thing a little bit.
I think the American people are very curious about who's on this list or these lists.
This is Mark Levin.
Like March, April, May, June, July.
Let's round it up to August, five months ago.
You have been doggedly trying to get all the information.
And now we learn, thanks to you, that you've been stonewalled by people in New York.
Do you want to explain that?
But I assume the Southern District of New York is or has been holding on to this information for a reason.
That is, they don't like the names on the list.
And of course, we know New York is a hotbed of the Democrat Party, and that includes in legal circles.
Do you think that's part of the issue here, that they're trying to protect a lot of names and individuals?
In fairness, I'm going to give everybody the link to this tweet.
And it's like that is, people use the word gaslighting a little bit too flippantly and a little bit too inaccurately.
If I'm using the word gaslighting and I think using it appropriately, that is gaslighting.
Some people, he doesn't understand why some people, dude, I'm not going to accuse you of having done it because it was the trending story at the time.
You, Mark Levin, five months ago, who's on the list?
They're stonewalling you because they don't like the names of the people on that list.
Very interested in this story.
I think a lot of Americans are as well.
Five months later, I don't understand why people are still talking about it.
It's as though they forget that the internet is there and that the internet is forever.
And it's an amazing thing.
They're trying to make you believe the unbelievable.
They're trying to pretend to your face that they themselves were not the ones who were not pushing a story in a negative sense, focusing on it because it was a story.
So hold on a second.
And that's it.
We're going to keep on this story because I think it's not going away.
It can't go away.
The way they're talking about it, the way they're dealing with it, I'm not sure that they want it to go away.
That might just be a way to justify continuing to talk about it, despite the fact that there's a there.
And when we now remember and refresh our memories that Maureen Comey, recently fired Maureen Comey, was the one who was at the SDNY FBI office at the time Pam Bondi was being stonewalled and Mark Levin was saying, we're very curious about who's on this list.
Is it possible they're not disclosing it because they don't like who's on this list and they're trying to protect their own?
Five months later, sorry.
Don't ask any more questions.
All right.
Well, we'll see where that goes, people.
Let me go over to the chat for a second and see what's going on here.
Viva, you should get Daryl Cooper on your show.
I know Barnes had some negative things to say about him, but I think he would be an amazing.
I would love to have Daryl Cooper on.
I don't think Barnes said anything overtly, maliciously negative about Daryl Cooper.
It would be weird if he did.
But no, I would want to watch his most recent interview with Jeffrey Tucker Carlson, which I was not able to see.
I'll get used to the distraction of being able to pull up these stories while I'm live and to see what do we want to go to right now?
Oh, yes.
I guess we'll go to...
Now, we've done the FC and I wanted to highlight a little bit of the Streisand effect and have a good memory if you're going to take a diametrically opposing position to what you took barely five months ago.
And this gets into the theological discussion I had with a friend or the father of my kid's friend at a birthday party where we were talking about religion.
I was telling him, I know he's a religious man, and I told him I'm listening to The Case for Christ by Lee Strobel.
And I said, you know, I said, I'm getting to the point now, the archaeological evidence.
And, you know, I don't have any issue with the authenticity of the text, that it was written by the people who are claimed to have written it, and that it was written authentically.
And he's like, oh, he was sort of taken aback by this.
But that means you believe the literal word of the text, of the gospels.
And I was like, well, I believe they were written by the people who are alleged to have authored them.
I don't believe they're doctored.
I don't believe they're falsified.
But that doesn't necessarily mean that I believe everything in a literal sense any more than even current eyewitness testimony tends to get exaggerated, tends to be mildly inaccurate, and especially over the thousands of years of lore, tends to get amplified in ways to highlight that which people want to amplify them in the sense of believing in certain things.
And we get into a long theological discussion.
I said, but the bottom line, whether or not There's a God, whether or not there's any specific one religion's got it right, one religion's got it wrong.
The belief or the existence of an actual God in any one of the religion senses, let's take Christianity for example, it's not going to really change the way I live anyhow, because I still live as though there's a proverbial camera over my head, whether it's a God, whether it's an actual camera, whether it's the internet to hold you to account to the things you said in the past.
Not that you can't change your mind or change opinions, but that there has to be some consistency to it other than a switch.
And if you have switched your opinions on a switch too often, it means there's a bit of a problem with your judgment and your analyses.
I said, even if there are a God or no God, it's not going to change the way I live because I live as though there is a God.
And that also means being consistent, authentic, and honest over time.
Whether or not at some points in time I say, yep, I was wrong on Epstein.
There really was nothing there.
I thought I understood it based on the evidence I had at the time.
That's fine.
That's going to be an evolution over time.
It's not going to be a switch over time to say, I support Donald Trump and now I'm supporting, what's the guy's name?
Tallarico.
I'm talking about Joe Rogan now, which is the segue to the next story.
Joe Rogan over the weekend had on, or at least put out the podcast with a Democrat, James Tallarico.
And I obviously like Rogan.
Don't necessarily agree with everything he has to say.
I disagree with a lot of the stuff he has to say about psychedelics and drugs.
I don't think they are opening portals to different universes.
I think they are effing with the chemistry of the human brain, which if you believe in a God or intelligent design, is so, I mean, scientifically crafted in a way that if it were in a movie, you'd say, oh, this blob of fat and protein generates ideas, consciousness, creativity, thoughts, memory, emotions.
This blob of fat in your head is more powerful than any computer that you could ever hope to imagine.
It's more creative.
So I disagree that the drugs open portals to different universes or different consciousness.
They might create new connections, but I think you're messing with something you didn't design.
True, I can appreciate the argument.
God created mushrooms and therefore they must be edible.
No, God created poisons that you don't eat either.
You're poisoning yourself to some degree.
All right, set that aside.
All I have to say is I like Rogan.
He's done immeasurable culture-shifting work.
Doesn't mean I agree with everything he has to say.
And Democrat Harry Sisson.
You know when you've got Harry Sisson supporting you, you done something wrong, Rogan.
Haha, being glid here, but listen to this because I also think Harry J. Sisson doesn't even listen, not just to the long form podcasts.
What was it, a two-minute clip?
The two-minute clip he posts celebrating the awesomeness of the Democrat Party, the awesomeness of the Democrat Party that has turned commie, California into the commie hellhole that it is, that has flushed and pushed Joe Rogan out of it.
Same thing with New York, same thing with Michigan.
We'll get there in a second.
Harry J. Sisson says, Democrat James Tallarico just went on Joe Rogan and perfectly made the case for why people should be Democrats.
Doing this in front of a conservative audience is so important.
Amazing work.
Guys, how do you think this is going to work out?
Spoiler.
Harry Sisson is an idiot, will always be an idiot.
And I wonder if he got paid for that post and didn't actually watch the video that he was asked to retweet in a post.
I shouldn't accuse him of getting paid for the post.
He might be a bona fide idiot for free.
Why are you a Democrat?
Well, my mother, so I told you I was born to a single mom.
She was a preacher's daughter from Laredo down on the border.
She left home at 19.
She moved up to Austin.
She met my birth father, who was a high school dropout and had a drinking problem.
And that drinking problem sometimes led to being violent with my mother.
And there was one night it was me and mom and my birth father, and he had had too much drink and got violent again.
And that was kind of the straw that broke the camel's back.
And my mom decided right then and there that she was leaving.
So she packed all our stuff.
She put me in her little Ford escort.
She drove me to the hotel where she worked downtown.
The manager let us stay in one of the rooms for a few weeks until we found a little apartment in East Austin.
And mom, you know, she took on double duty at the hotel.
She like fought for me at every instance, even when it was her own physical safety was at risk.
And back then, this was early 90s, you know, she could pause.
Just listen to what he's about to say right now.
I'm not trying to minimize his upbringing.
When I say everybody's got a story and Tallarico looks like a sincerely nice human, listen to the catch right now.
Someone in our locals community said that Harry Sisson is not an idiot.
He's a grifter.
Listen to the, what's the word, the bellyful endorsement of the Democrat Party that Tallarico is going to express right now.
And back then, this was early 90s, she could look over at the Texas Capitol and she saw Texas Democrats like Ann Richards, Bob Bullock, people who fought for the little guy, for working people, people who were forgotten and left behind.
That was the classic Democratic Party.
And so I remember when I was, I guess I was maybe kindergarten and someone in school, they were talking about political parties.
And I asked my mom what we were.
And she was like, we're Democrats because Democrats fight for the people.
That was what she said.
My mom is still a Democrat today, but like, I don't know how much our party is still true to that, but I do know that that's our historical legacy.
I don't know how much our party is still true to that, supporting the little people, but the party that fights for the little guy.
And I think we're at our best when we do that today.
I just want to play one, because I'm not playing the rest of this verbal diarrhea.
But I do know that that's our historical legacy is the party that fights for the little guy.
I don't know that it's ever been the historical legacy of the Democrat Party.
And the more I live, the more I'm starting to realize that maybe it was always this way.
And not to say the Republican Party is pure as gold.
When I look back at Canada and I say, my goodness, Canada today is by no means free.
It's a tyrannical hellhole.
But they've got free healthcare.
You're free healthcare, free to die in a waiting room, free to die while you're waiting for a doctor.
Free healthcare in that you've already paid for it up front with taxes out the wazoo.
And I look at Canada and say, Canada is no longer a free country.
And then I say, was it ever a free country?
I do remember people telling me for years, years back, Canada is not a free country.
You cannot call yourself a free country if you don't have rights to self-defense.
You can't call yourself a free country if you don't have freedom of speech.
And Americans, I don't think, are wrong on this.
You can't call yourself a country, a free country if you do not have the God-given right to bear arms.
So maybe Canada has never been free.
Looking at the Democrat Party, any idiot who says they're sticking up for the little person today is an idiot.
So I don't know what Tallarico's current position is.
I know that he believes there's six sexes.
I'll pull that up in a second.
I know that he believes there's six sexes.
If this guy considers himself a Democrat because he thinks the Democrats fight for the little people, the Democrats endorse men beating the shit out of women.
Just say it.
Say it the way it is.
The Democrats endorse unscientific, unbiological woman abuse, period.
The Democrat Party today, they don't stand up for the little people.
They castrate the little people.
They genital mutilate the little people.
They exploit the little people for profit, for political profit and financial profit.
Tallarico getting up there and saying, yep, I don't know if the Democrat Party still fights for the little people.
I wonder if they ever did, but they sure as hell don't now.
And so you get a nice, charismatic, good-looking young man coming up.
He's got a nice, I say sob story, not from a cynical sense.
He's got one hell of a tough upbringing to the extent that what he says is true.
Coming on Joe Rogan, and you can get Rogan.
Yeah, look, Rogan says, I hope you run for president.
A man who believes there are six sexes should run for president.
A man, let me bring up some of some of his tweets that he posted about COVID.
Not for nothing.
A man who espoused the very policy that drove Joe Rogan out of California by his own admission.
And this is the joke that we have in Florida where, you know, I meet more New Yorkers in Florida than I meet Florida.
Whenever I meet a Floridian who's born and raised, I'm like, holy crap, I don't see many of you.
And people know I'm Canadian and people are like, all right, you're welcome, Canuck, so long as you don't bring down your commie policies.
The New Yorkers are welcome so long as they don't turn Florida into the shithole that New York has become that caused them to flee to Florida.
Now, bring receipts, people.
Living in Florida, I see a lot of New Yorkers, many Canadians as well.
The joke is that the people are welcome, but not their commie politics.
Joe Rogan's endorsement of James Tallarico is getting dangerously close to leaving the commie hellholes because of the destructive policies of the, quote, progressives, then ushering in those same destructive policies to destroy that land into which you move to escape those policies.
I should have said the consequences of those policies.
I have no doubt Tallarico is a nice person.
I didn't yet finish the podcast.
I listened to while I go jogging.
That does not mean he espouses good policy.
And from his track record, he espouses the exact same insane, woke, COVID trans ideology that Rogan escaped when he left Comifornia to go to Texas.
Here's one tweet.
It's a meme.
The left has always been good at memeing.
They have never been good at memeing because you have to have insight, humility, and a sense of humor to be able to mean good.
Texas Republicans hearing about a 15% COVID hospitalization rate.
Texas Republicans hearing about 0.0001% voter fraud.
I mean, these are two things that are diametrically opposed to everything Rogan has stood for for the last little while.
Part of me is also wondering about the Streisand effect.
Is Rogan putting this kid on blasts so that people go into his political history and find shit like this?
James Tallarico, to stop the spread of COVID-19, we need physical distancing, not social distancing.
Take a few minutes to text your neighbor, especially if they're over 60 or medically vulnerable.
I texted mine.
We need each other now more than, yeah, we need to leave old people die from heartbreak.
Idiots.
The amount of old people who died from cognitive decline and heartbreak.
My grandmother-in-law was one of them, Chubby Cheek Edna.
We'll never, ever really forgive and forget anybody involved in that.
Chubby Cheek Edna, she had trembles.
And when she trembled, her cheeks trembled.
And she died of loneliness.
Yeah, go text your neighbor.
That's great.
Oh my goodness.
I feel loved.
Some politician texted me.
Hey, Dan, just want to check in and make sure you and Sue are doing okay.
Let me know if y'all need anything.
I've got snacks and toilet paper.
If you run out, I can throw it over the fence.
Social distancing.
We need it.
Physical distancing.
Thanks, James.
Doing well overall.
Supplies are good.
And I'm sure panic buying will subside in a few weeks.
If not, you may have to toss a roll over then.
Smiley face.
Oh, aren't we just a human race right now?
Check this out.
After COVID, after COVID, no, sorry, James.
After COVID policies, after insane, destructive, unscientific, tyrannical COVID policies that you imposed and that you supported.
Well, now we're noticing that the kids are suffering learning deficits.
Oh, I was told that that wasn't the case at the time.
After COVID, our teachers are facing historic learning loss and an escalating mental health crisis.
Jeez, Louise, if only someone had forewarned that there would be a mental health crisis from locking people up in isolation, telling them they're going to die, having death count chirons on fake news media.
No, if only people were saying it.
Sorry, getting a little ahead of myself.
After COVID, our teachers are facing a historic learning loss and an escalating mental health crisis.
And now teachers are the latest target in the culture wars.
They're regularly accused of indoctrinating, grooming, and abusing children.
Teachers are getting it from all sides.
They might be getting it from all sides because they're giving it from all sides.
But set that aside, my goodness, after all of the destructive policies that we've implemented tyrannically, all of the predicted consequences are coming to fruition.
We're the ones who are going to solve the problem right now.
That's James Tallarico.
And it doesn't stop there.
James Tallarico.
Sorry, I forgot it's on this screen.
Now I got to go look over here.
James Tallarico, Joe Rogan fawns over Texas progressive James Tallarico, who said, quote, there are six sexes.
Let me refresh this so you can hear the.
And I, ooh, ooh, how's this going to work?
We might have to come back.
Oh, gosh, this is annoying.
Texas state rep James Tallarico, who once asserted there are six senses, six sex, not six senses.
I see trans people.
There are six sexes.
Gosh, this is annoying.
Left Joe Rogan so impressed Friday that the popular podcast host urged the young lawmaker to run for president.
Tallarico, 36, earned the comedian's seal of approval near the end of a lengthy Joe Rogan experience interview where the teacher-turned politician discussed his Christian faith, which I've understood, by the way, is wildly inaccurate and untrue to the source of Christianity.
I do not engage in those conversations for obvious reasons.
A, I don't know it.
And B, I don't judge other people's religious faith.
I just know that online there were a lot of people saying this guy doesn't have the slightest clue about the Christian faith based on sound clips that are being circulated.
You need to run for president, Rogan told Tallarico.
Let's see here.
Can we get this?
Today's headlines.
Yeah, we're not going to get it.
Bottom line, dude said that there's six sexes.
He was surprised to learn it as well.
And I have a feeling if we had a longer discussion, I know exactly what he would say.
He would say, yes, well, there's a male, female, intersex, and whatever.
And I would say, you know, so, okay, so we agree that there's two sexes and four medical conditions.
Let me double check this here.
How many sexes are there?
We're going to get it.
I mean, it's going to be the, yeah, there's the GGA.
Biological sex in humans categories X, X, X, Y. However, it's important to note to understand the context of intersex individuals.
Intersex is an umbrella term referring to people whose reproductive or sexual anatomy doesn't fit neatly into the binary categories of male or female.
The variations can involve chromosomes, hormones, or anatomy, and can be apparent at birth or discovered later in life, such as puberty.
It's estimated that roughly 1.7% of babies are born with intersex traits.
Intersex variations are not considered a disorder or a disease, but rather natural variations in human biology.
Don't consider them a disease or a condition, except for the fact that it might lead or cause infertility.
That's what Tallarico was getting at when he said there's six sexes.
Basically, two primary sexes, four medical variations that carry with them certain medical consequences.
And raising that as though that's the answer to indoctrination of transgender ideology of kids is totally fine and totally normal because there's six medically recognized intersex variations, only amounting of 1.7%, which doesn't really fit into the 15 to 20% of people who now identify as some form of trans or queer or whatever the hell they want to call it.
Intellectual dishonesty.
Well, you see, the trans ideology actually has some scientific basis because little Jimmy down the street, who now thinks he's a girl and wants to be called Jeanette and wants hormone blockers or puberty blockers because he doesn't want to see facial hair growing or pubic hair.
So we're going to give him micropenis so he can't have a proper orgasm for the rest of his life.
We're going to mutilate his genitals because some 14-year-old confused kid saw Tallarico before whoever the hell he was before saying there's six sexes.
And so a 14-year-old confused kid is actually scientifically more accurate than the rest of the world.
So that's a problem because what you have seemingly is Joe Rogan embracing the very same commie COVID tyranny, transgender ideology, woke ideology, because the flying woke, I say woke is progressive for the sake of being progressive.
I would say woke is destructive progressivism, regressive progressivism.
I am so progressive that I let a 14-year-old kid dictate to me medical conditions, medical treatment that are going to ruin their bodies for the rest of their lives.
That's woke to me.
Disagree with it or not, bottom line, Rogan seemingly enamored by a very charismatic young man who espouses all of the terrible policy that Rogan fled from California to move to the free state of Texas, now embracing it in Texas.
All right, Rogan, next time there's COVID, you're going to have Tallarico telling you you got to stay in your backyard.
Physical distancing, Biach, not even social distancing.
Stay home.
That's all I have to say about that.
Peeps.
I see someone in the house.
Bill Tong has entered the chat.
He's been here for a while, but Bill Tong in with a humble rent.
King of Bill Tong, craving a snack that's bold, authentic, and packed with protein.
Bill Tong boasts nearly 50% protein, packed with B12, creatine, iron, zinc, and more.
Billtongusa.com.
Code Viva for 10% off.
It's made in Texas, people, by a man who emigrated from South Africa, fled the non-existent white genocide hashtag sarcasm to come to the free state of Texas, has had his run-ins with the insane bureaucracy that comes with woke politics, makes a delicious product made in America.
It's awesome.
And if you don't know what Bill Tong is, it is like wet beef jerky or soft beef jerky.
It's like prosciutto made from beef.
Old man Toby.
Old man Toby should.
Viva, you should try and get Darrell Cooper.
Okay, I saw that.
Okay, that's good.
So we've got our chest.
Now let me see what's going on in our Viva Barnes Law.locals.com community.
Viva, if you believe in love and forgiveness and are against sacrificing children to the fire god, then you might be a Christian, a believer in the message of Jesus, says M.L. Money.
Everybody knows I'm born Jewish.
I genuinely appreciate the morals, the teachings of you cannot, I don't think there's anybody who can look at Jesus and say, yeah, that advice makes no sense.
But spirituality is a very fundamentally personal thing.
And whether or not, I mean, people, look, where was I?
I was out for a bike ride and I see one of those massive locusts, those big, fat, juicy crickets.
And it's just amazing.
And I understand the watchmaker analogy or the watchmaker parable that if you come across a beach and you find a watch, You don't say, oh, this is a natural variation of the erosion of rocks.
It just happened naturally.
This freaking, you know, people think they're gross.
It's the most beautiful creature on earth, tied with all the other ones.
And it's got like hydraulic mechanisms to make its legs bend up and down.
It's got ridges that make music when it creaks.
It is designed to eat aphids.
They're big.
The colors are amazing.
The colors are awesome and specifically, you know, evolved over time to camouflage with the grass.
Because when they're out in the open, they're very red, yellow, and they stick out.
But you put them back in the grass and they just blend right in.
And you're going to say, okay, well, that's just an accident.
That's just evolution.
All right.
It evolved from a system that allows for evolution.
But to say that, you know, there's no intelligent design behind it and that it just happened, you just stumbled across this.
I did not make it up.
I saw the meme, but there have never been waves that have pushed the sand into the most perfect, immaculate, intricate design for a castle ever.
And it never will happen because one requires creation and a creator.
The other one requires randomness of waves crashing on an ocean.
That's as theological as we're going to get into now because we got to get back to cosmic justice, biaches.
If there's no afterlife, you better hope that people get justice on this earth.
But I said it when it came to Caleb Pollock that, you know, some stories are so effing tragic that it makes you need, maybe out of weakness, maybe whatever, but it makes you need to believe in a God because if there's no justice on this earth, there has to be some sort of justice and retribution off this earth in the next realm, whatever that is.
Kayla Pollock is the, you know, one of the victims of the jab in Canada, offered medical assistance and dying three times by the Canadian government, struggling to make ends meet and struggling just to get her story known in Canadian media, in global media.
And she's telling her story over and over again and trying to get it out there.
And like, you know, the wrong that has been done to Kayla Pollock in Canada is such an egregious injustice that you have to hope that there's some cosmic justice in the afterlife because the bad people who don't get punished on this earth, they need to get punished somewhere.
But I said, you know, optimistically, one of her tweets actually came across my feed organically.
And I implore everyone to the extent that you can tag people who you think can help.
Please stop before you scroll.
I was paralyzed by the COVID-19 shock.
You will not hear my story on mainstream media.
If you do not believe this story or would like medical proof, you can go to my website at www.opkayla.ca.
That's www.
I'll pause it there.
I've given everyone the link.
Her video finally came across my feed organically.
I'm doom scrolling with my morning routine, and I finally see, you know, Kayla's story gaining traction so that people can know what's going on in Canada.
Other people for whom there must be justice somewhere, and maybe that justice is coming.
The criminal referral has been passed on to the DOJ.
And I know people can make the jokes about the Bermuda Triangle over Tamara Leach's desk, and you can give them, you know, never, it's the best expression ever.
Never forget it.
A zealot is someone who never changes the subject and refuses to change their mind.
It is not just very easy.
It's very annoying and it's also counterproductive.
When we're talking about Epstein, we'll talk about Epstein.
When we're talking about this, you might be skeptical because of the way things have played out historically in government, and that is correct.
But the response to DOJ receives Gabbard's criminal referral on bombshell claims, Obama admin, quote, manufactured, and quote, Russian collusion hoax.
Give Pam time to not do anything about this before you complain about her not doing anything about this.
Now, past his prologue, and some people are going to say, it's just going to be another case of nothing happening to the rich, powerful, politically connected elites.
You might be right.
But give it time before you say it, because it's one thing to wish it in advance or will it in advance.
And it's another thing to complain when enough time has gone by to say, hey, we got any updates on that referral.
The breaking news of last week is that Tulsi Gabbard issued a memo that referred to, that she referred to as a treasonous conspiracy by Obama and his administration to frame Trump with that bullshit Russia hoax crap.
I'll pull up the memo in a second, but this is the article coming out of Fox News.
DOJ receives Gabbard's criminal referral on bombshell claims Obama admin manufactured.
Senator Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley will also declassify the appendix to a 2018 DOJ Inspector General report.
Okay, that's good.
So they're showing us they can declassify things.
They're showing us that at least some portions of the government are looking to bring justice to the criminals.
DOJ brings the charges.
This is, you know, you can accuse me of kissing up to Bon Gino and Patel all you want and whatever.
One of the major defenses that I, you know, grew to appreciate that needs to be afforded to them is they don't make these prosecutorial decisions.
It's the DOJ, whatever, the regional AGs.
Tulsi Gabbard doesn't press the charges.
She gathers the evidence, brings it over to the DOJ and says, here, let's do your job now.
And now it is in Pam Bondi's court.
It's on her desk and we'll see if it falls into the event horizon of that Bermuda triangle on her desk.
Department of Justice confirmed Monday that it has received DNI Tulsi Gabbard's criminal referral related to her bombshell claims that Obama-era manufactured and politicized intelligence to create a narrative that Russia was attempting to influence the 2016 presidential election.
We talked about it at length last night during Vivo and Barnes' Law for the People.
They were trying to provoke a world war.
Understand that.
Let me just bring this out for a second and we can emphasize the degree to which they are.
Tulsi Gabbard's words: treasonous conspiracy.
These people are monsters, these people are demons.
And another good expression that I like is: you know, I believe in God not because He has revealed Himself, but because evil has revealed itself.
This is, they were prepared to go to war and they wanted it.
They were prepared to risk triggering World War III with a nuclear-armed Russia because this was all part and parcel of whatever was going on with Ukraine.
They wanted that boogeyman.
If it meant starting World War III, they were going to fabricate that boogeyman.
And I'm not coming to the defense of Russia.
What I'm saying is that in this circumstance, in this case, they made up a boogeyman on this particular issue.
You can criticize Russia, Putin, for a lot of things.
One thing you can't accuse him for now, unless you just don't believe it, in which case you're a Democrat idiot to begin with, they were manufacturing a Russia gate hacking of the emails, interfering with the elections, undermining democracy, so that when Trump got elected, that was their insurance policy to undo, usurp, undermine, take a big steaming crap on democracy.
When they lost the election, they sought to undermine Trump's presidency and hand-tie him for the better part of his term, first term, which they did.
DOJ declined to comment, but confirmed to Fox News the department received the referral.
Gabbard released unclassified documents Friday that shows, quote, overwhelming evidence, end quote, that then President Barack Obama and his national security team laid the groundwork for what would be the years-long Trump-Russia collusion probe after Trump's election win.
Their goal was to usurp President Trump and subvert the will of the American people, Gabbard had posted on X on Friday regarding the criminal referral.
Quote, no matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
The integrity of our democratic republic depends on it.
We're turning over all the documents to the DOJ for referral.
Conspiracy, important word because it'll prolong the statutory limitations.
We all know that as well.
Gabbert joined Fox News.
She detailed the overwhelming plot, yada, yada, yada.
The implications of this are frankly nothing short of historic, Gabbard said Sunday.
Over 100 documents that we released on Friday really detail and provide evidence of how this treasonous conspiracy.
I don't use the word treasonous because some people regard it as a threat given what the punishment is for treason.
Tulsi Gabbard is referring to this as a treasonous conspiracy, which I cannot, what's the definition, the technical definition of treasonous?
Look up.
See, you also don't see the fact that I see this now.
Treasonous, involving or guilty of the crime of betraying one's country.
That is the semantic difference between accusing someone of treason and accusing someone of being treasonous.
It was certainly, let me get back to that, look up treasonous.
It was certainly a crime of betraying one's country.
What Obama did and what their administration tried to do, they spied on their political adversary.
They lied and manufactured evidence before secret FISA courts so they could manufacture a hoax that could have triggered hot conflict with nuclear Russia.
This is not a Democrat or Republican issue.
This is an issue that is so serious it should concern every single American because it has to do with the integrity of our Democratic Republic, she continued.
Following Gabbard's revelations, Trump shared a video on truth showing a handful of Democrats, including Obama, vowing that no one is above the law.
Yeah, we don't need the rest of this.
Additionally, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, Republican from Iowa, will release declassified documents related to 2018 DOJ Inspector Report.
Grassley will specifically declassify the report's appendix, which Fox learned focuses on the Clinton email investigation.
Don't be one of those doom pill, not even useless, but destructive individuals.
If they're going to learn about the emails, if they're going to declassify information regarding the Clinton email investigation, it is my personal belief, substantiated by good analysis of available information, that if Russia was not behind the hack on the DNC, that means the emails were leaked or obtained in another manner.
It is my personal belief Seth Rich is the individual who downloaded and transferred the emails, and that he was subsequently murdered in DC as a result of his betrayal.
Hold up.
Wait a minute.
Something, right?
Who remembers the Podesta email, make an example.
I remember there was an email talking about making an example of a leaker.
Oh, I'm going to need the aggregate knowledge of the internet for this.
Well, let me see if chat GPT.
Did Podesta write something menacing about making an example of a leaker or traitor?
Let's try that.
Jeez, Louise.
Yes, you may be speaking of John Podesta email from 2515 published by WikiLeaks.
I'm definitely for making an example of a suspected leaker, whether or not we have a real basis for it.
Does everybody remember that?
Holy crap, it's good to have something of a memory.
John Podesta, that freaky deeky pervert with his freaky deeky art, with his handkerchief with a pizza-related map on it.
These are all from the Podesta emails, wrote in an email, I'm definitely for making an example of a suspected leaker, whether or not we have any real basis for it.
I'm not suggesting that he had anything to do with what I believe was the retribution murder of Seth Rich.
I'm explaining to you why I think what I think and why I believe what I believe.
So don't be the zealot who says, no, this is going to be more of the same.
Nothing's going to happen.
This is just like the other.
Give it a week or two.
Give it a month.
And if it turns into the Epstein debacle, well, then we shall turn up the heat.
But for now, we'll say Tulsi Gabbard, job well freaking done.
It's on Pam Bondi's desk, which now has notorious, notorious, what's the word I'm looking for?
Underpinnings or suggestions, innuendo.
It's on her desk.
She'll get around to it.
Phase one.
But don't be the zealot that doesn't give credit where credit is due.
The Trump administration has done revolutionary, transformative stuff to preserve the democratic republic that is these United States of America.
But anyone who is loyal to Trump will be loyal in terms of issuing constructive criticism and writing wrongs and mistakes that needn't have been made, unless there's a damn good reason for it.
Because the more they keep talking about certain things, the more everyone is going to keep talking about it.
All right, peeps.
And last but not least, speaking of justice and retribution, Adam Schiff for Brains McSchiff face.
Yes, I'm only saying Schiff, although it sounds...
What's going on here?
Trying to get...
I can't.
Oh, something's wrong.
It only lets me type on the second screen, which is irritating.
We're going to do one quick.
We're going to do one quick story before we head over to viva barnslaw.locals.com.
After party, we're going to raid Kimberly Guilfoyle.
Adam Schiffer brings McSchiff is in big freaking trouble, people.
And, oh, no, I just lost the thing.
Oh, here we go.
Here we go.
Yeah, look at this.
This is, it's glorious.
Adam Schiff is a criminal.
I mean, my humble opinion, he's a criminal.
He's a criminal because what he did under the, in the context of the Russia Gate hoax, was lying to the American people.
If he was an under oath, so technically it's not a crime, you know what I mean.
Dude's an effing criminal, pathological liar, scumbag, rat of the highest order.
And Donald John Trump is now putting the capital B back in blast.
Donald Trump at RealDonald Trump on truth says Adam Schiff is a thief.
He should be prosecuted just like they tried to prosecute me and everyone else.
The only difference is we were totally innocent.
It was all a giant hoax.
And he's posting an affidavit made pursuant to section 12-108G3 of a tax-related article.
Yada, yada, yada.
The undersigned make this oath in due form of law and under penalties of perjury.
Ooh, what is that?
Is that perjury?
That the following is true to the best of our knowledge, information, and belief in accordance with section whatever of the tax property article of the Maryland article, whatever, as follows.
One, we are the original mortgagers of the deed of trust recorded in the land records of the county of Montgomery, state of Maryland.
Two, that the mortgage property is our principal residence.
That the amount of the unpaid whatever is 500,000.
Adam, shift for brains, mixed shift.
Under penalty of perjury.
That seems pretty straightforward.
What's the statute limitations on perjury?
We are in, I don't know what date we're in here, 2014, probably beyond the date, unless there's ratifying that false statement.
To which Essen views, Essen means eat in German.
Oh, they're on blue sky.
You know that they're going to be tarded if they're on blue sky.
Trump posts private mortgage documents of Adam Schiff.
It's likely a crime that Trump accused accessed the documents.
Hmm.
Let me see here.
Are mortgage documents public?
Hmm.
Yeah, mortgage documents are generally considered public.
Idiots.
But in objecting to the lawlessness of bringing up those documents, they've sufficiently put it on blast.
Adam Schiff for Brains Mixif is a pathological liar who has seems I kicked myself out of my own stream here.
How do I do this, people?
I'm trying to go.
I'm back.
Don't worry.
It's not over yet.
But I opened up the window on the second screen and then it seemed to have overridden this one on this screen.
But all right, forget it.
Bottom line, people, we're going over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Let me get used to two screens.
I'm not used to it.
I'll figure it out.
Someone can tell me why that happened.
I just opened up a new window on the second screen, typed into it, and it immediately overrode my screen here.
Come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Before you even do that, by the way, because the conspiracy theorists have been right, and I take pride in having been one of those so-called conspiracy theorists, go to vivafry.com and get some merch before you leave.
Make sure that you are subscribed, that you have notifications turned on, snip, clip, share away on social media.
Go to VivaFry, get some merch.
Go to vivabarnslaw.locals.com.
Get a subscription to our wonderful community there.
I wrote a children's book.
It's called Louis the Lobster.
Goes to the sea, returns to the sea.
Hold on a second.
You can get that on Amazon.
My wife, my wife, she made a neuro brain coloring book.
So go get some of this stuff if you want some good stuff.
VivaFry.com, peeps.
And right now, we're going to go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
And I'll give everybody the link for that before we go raid Kimberly Guilfoyle.
And you let her know from whence you came when you go there.
Let me go la all here, peeps, and link.
There you go.
Bada bing, bada boom.
Now we're going to go raid Kimberly Guilfoyle and let her know that we sent you.
Say hi and wish her well, peeps.
Raid.
Boom.
Confirm raid.
People.
You got a Viva book.
You got a Viva.
You got a Viva took.
Oh, I'm too poor for the paywall part.
See you.
Don't worry about it, Coles.
Well, you can join.
Sometimes when I do these streams on StreamYard, there's no paywall.
But what I was going to say was Viva Raid.
Viva Raid.
Boo yeah.
Okay.
And now I'm going to refresh and I just like to see everybody pour into the chat over there.
▲
Export Selection