Sincere Disagreement or Inorganic Division? OUTRAGEOUS Grace Schara Verdict! AND MORE!
|
Time
Text
That Viva Frye realized he had a typo in the title.
Because the word outrageous doesn't have a why in it.
Why not?
Well, you'll just have to ask outrageous.
We shall begin with a flashback to the hearings that took place after the failed assassination attempt on Donald John Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania on the 13th of July, 2024.
Director, when the FBI learned that Iran was threatening President Trump's life, So I want to be a little bit careful here, not to talk about specific classified information, but we have been for quite some time, and I'll stick with what's in the open record.
We for some time, and I in particular for some time, have been calling out the efforts by the Iranian government to attempt to retaliate for the killing of Soleimani by going after current or former Prominent U.S. officials, and we've even had an indictment against it.
And I think that we need to recognize the brazenness of the Iranian regime, including right here in the United States.
And I expect that we're going to see more of it, and I expect there'll be more coming on that.
I'm not aware of any threat information related to protectees that wasn't, you know, passed in a timely way, but I can't really get into specifics here.
It's minority's time here, but I just felt that was a question the committee needed to understand, and it sounds like you've known that for a long time, and that information was conveyed to the Secret Service.
Let me pause.
Before a director or a former director, Christopher Wray, starts to talk again, does the manner in which he speaks not drive you crazy, like a mumbling zhlob?
Man, well, when I can share with you publicly.
And it's all, so.
Anytime someone starts a sentence with so, not anytime.
Oftentimes, they're getting ready to mislead you.
Like, make no mistake, let me be clear.
So, let me get my story straight before I get it out and buy an extra three seconds.
But listen to his zlobby manner of speech.
Any information related to threats against the former president, which, again, as we've sort of talked about, happens all too often, is something that we have a whole process.
We routinely share with Secret Service on a number of levels in a timely way.
And to my knowledge, that has consistently been followed.
Thank you.
I'm now going back and re-listening to some of the hearings that occurred in the wake of the failed July 13 Butler assassination attempt on DJT, Donald John Trump.
It was a successful murder of Corey Camperatore and two other Americans grievously injured.
I'm going back to listen to this because I'm choking on my own words here.
Back when this occurred, and I remember retweeting or quote-tweeting that video saying, you've got whatever he was, Deputy Director, Director Christopher Wray of the FBI, coming out and saying, we've been having consistent threats.
Of retaliatory assassination against Donald Trump because of killing the guy there.
I forget his name.
Soleimani.
And yet, Thomas Crooks, a loner, weirdo teenager, managed to get onto an unsecured roof that was literally carved out of the security perimeter when Donald John Trump was giving a speech in Butler, Pennsylvania.
Managed to get off, I think it was five shots.
Unstopped, but not undetected.
Despite being detected, No communication between law enforcement and Secret Service who allowed Donald John Trump to get on stage when there was a known threat with a rifle and a gate, whatever the thing is, rangefinder.
Director Wray gets up there and says, we've known about threats, legitimate, credible threats against Donald John Trump for a long time.
And yet that was the level of inadequacy, incompetence of Secret Service on that day in Butler, Pennsylvania.
And I said, holy crap.
They're basically making a public service announcement that they are utterly woefully incapable of protecting anybody and announcing it publicly during these hearings.
And you go back and you listen to this and you start to understand things better at the time, but it's almost a year later right now.
And at the time, you do recall them floating the idea that somehow there might be an Iranian connection, that somehow there might have been training, support, whatever.
In the attempted assassination from Thomas Crooks, there was suggestions that the Iranians might be involved somehow.
And if you were there at the time, we were talking about this at the time, and we were greatly skeptical that Iran would be involved.
And we were saying, Barnes and I in particular, that this sounds like a deep state attempt to try to involve, implicate the Iranians in this assassination attempt.
So that they could then go after Iran with military intervention.
And I remember it clear as day.
And we were talking about the fact that Mike Pompeo, for some bizarre reason, talking about becoming the vice president, even though there was zero chance of that happening if Donald and John Trump were on the ticket, you have the convention in Milwaukee that I was on my way to when I found out the news of the failed assassination.
I was in Michigan.
Out for a jog with my phone on mute.
And I get back and it starts going, ping, ping, ping, ping, ping.
And my wife says, did you hear what happened?
We were on our way to Milwaukee for the RNC.
And whether or not you agree with the theory, you can at least understand the concept.
Mike Pompeo floating the idea of being VP, that never happens under a Donald John Trump ticket.
And so there was, you want to write a Jean Le Carré number, you want to say you're crazy for even entertaining these ideas, go ahead.
If the assassination attempt had been successful, they then pin it on Iran.
You then have Nikki Haley and Mike Pompeo as the Republican ticket with Kamala Harris and Tim Walz as the Democrat ticket.
And you have war with Iran, which had been discussed for a very long time.
And but by the grace of God, a butterfly flapping his wings, its wings, Trump turns his head.
And now you're left with, some might say, the patsy.
Others don't even believe he was the sole shooter.
I happen to believe that.
Thomas Crooks was the only shooter there.
Call me whatever names you want.
But at the time, they were floating this potential Iranian connection.
And Barnes and others had a bit of a heated Twitter exchange yesterday.
Barnes puts out a tweet that I think some people are not fully understanding the context of.
We're going to get into the Epstein stuff in a bit.
Robert Barnes tweet.
Why did FBI Deputy Director Bongino, FBI Director Kash Patel, Attorney General Pan Bondi, shut down inquiry into Trump's assassination and refused to disclose the Epstein files?
So war whores, and I think he's talking about Ted Cruz here.
We'll get to that in a second.
Could pretend Iran was behind the assassination attempts.
And so the world wouldn't know how Epstein worked with Israel.
I saw people in response to this tweet saying viva.
Don't you acknowledge the vile anti-Semitism of Robert Barnes?
We'll get into that in a second.
I love it when people try to Jew shame me.
Oh, Viva, we're going to be on the same train car when they come for us.
Like, first of all, you're damn right, and I know it.
So maybe you should listen to what I'm saying with that in mind.
I'm not saying it to buy any good graces with the likes of the people who would put me on the train.
We'll both be on the train.
At least I'll have a clean conscience in having stuck true to what I thoroughly and honestly and sincerely believe.
The Iranian connection.
The argument was never that Iran was actually training Thomas Crooks.
In fact, all of us were very skeptical even at the mere suggestion of it.
The argument was, in fact, my personal belief, unsubstantiated or in my view substantiated as it may be, is that Butler, Pennsylvania was a Leehop or a Leehop and you had your useful idiot Crooks who was training.
Firearms training at ranges with other trained professionals who could identify lone psychopaths who are at a firing range on certain holidays there alone and bizarre looking kids.
Set that aside.
Leave the best perch from which to shoot open and unsecured by some miracle of all miracles in the most sinister of senses and maybe the idiot gets his shot off.
I think it might have been more of a remove Trump from the ticket, deep state operation, but not Iranian backed at all.
The Iranian angle was just a pretext for the American military.
The fact that we haven't heard much from that Butler, Pennsylvania, and some of us are, you know, questioning whether or not it's been closed in quotes, however you can close these things.
I said it from the beginning of the Maria Bartiromo interview with Dan Bongino and Kash Patel.
I didn't get the impression from what they stated that, you know, I think Bongino said there's no there there.
I didn't get the impression that that was writing off case closed, nothing to see.
I understood that as being if there is a there, there, there, you will hear about the there, there when we talk about it.
Some people misunderstood as that meaning that the Butler investigation is closed.
Still ambiguous.
And I've put out my questions publicly for public answers and we'll see.
But the bottom line was that the argument that Crooks might have had an Iranian connection.
I mean, we know that the second guy there, Ruth, had a Ukrainian connection.
We'll see who's exploring that.
Was a pretext.
And that is the underlying point of what Barnes was getting at, that if Secret Service comes out and says, yeah, frickin' crooks had no connection to Iran, the Ted Cruz's of the world lose the ability to argue, well, the Iranian connection potential assassination attempts, at least with respect to July 13, Butler assassination attempt.
And I mean, if you haven't seen the clip, I'll just, I'll reiterate it, replay it because...
And a lot of people are saying it doesn't make Tucker Carlson look particularly good because he's engaging in gotcha journalism and not sincere journalism.
Here.
I don't think it's gotcha journalism.
I mean, yes, Tucker Carlson is particularly sassy, snarky, argumentative.
But you know what the best retort to that is?
Knowing what you're talking about and having the information on hand.
This is the clip that went viral.
And I'll pause when we get to the potential attempt to connect Crooks and Butler to Iranian attempts to assassinate Donald Trump as a pretext slash justification to strike Iran I don't know the population.
At all?
No, I don't know the population.
You don't know the population in the country you seek to topple?
How many people living around?
92 million.
Okay.
Yeah.
I mean, this is like two quasi-alpha males head-budding.
You know what, Ted Cruz?
I don't know offhand.
I have a rough idea.
Give or take.
I mean, I'm sure some people were saying like Ted Cruz didn't want to give a number because if he's off, it'll be a gotcha.
If he were off by 10 million, I think people would have forgiven him.
You know, the size of, what was Brazil?
No, Brazil's much bigger.
Give or take 80 to 100 million, just to have an idea.
It's definitely not, you know, it's not like 5 million.
It's not Minnesota.
It's not 1.6 billion like China or India, but I think it might be closer to 2 billion now.
Had he been within 10, 15%, nobody would have had an issue.
And had he said, yeah, it's very big.
I don't know the exact number.
People might not have had an issue.
It's the arrogant pomposity.
Say, yeah, I don't know.
What are you going to do about it?
I'll play it.
I'll shut my big mouth.
Sorry.
How many people living around, by the way?
I don't know the population.
At all?
No, I don't know the population.
No, no.
You don't know the population of the country you seek to topple?
How many people living around?
92 million.
Okay.
How could you not know that?
Look at Tucker's.
Tucker has the perfect face of perpetual faux surprise.
Okay.
Look, if you're Ted Cruz or you're a Ted Cruz supporter, you don't like this.
If you're a Tucker Carlson hater, you don't like this either.
From an argumentative, purely analytical perspective, this is glorious to watch.
Rising population tables.
Well, it's kind of relevant because you're calling for the overthrow of the government.
Why is it relevant whether it's 90 million or 80 million or 100 million?
Well, if you had said that, then that would have been a different discussion.
If you had said 80 million, he's like, no, it's 92. Close enough for the purposes of strategy.
'Cause if you don't know anything about the country, Okay, what's the ethnic mix of Iran?
They are Persians and predominantly Shia.
Okay.
You don't know anything about Iran.
So, okay.
I am not the Tucker Carlson expert on a rant.
No, you don't know anything about the country.
You're the one who claims they're not trying to murder Donald Trump.
No, I'm not saying that.
You're the one who can't figure out if it was a good idea to kill General Soleimani and you said it was bad.
You don't believe they're trying to murder Trump.
Yes, I do.
Because you're not calling for military strikes against them in retaliation.
We're carrying out military strikes today.
You said Israel was.
Right.
With our health.
I've said we.
Israel is leading them.
Look at Tucker's face.
I'm surprised again.
We're supporting them.
Well, you're breaking news here because the U.S. government last night denied, the National Security Council spokesman Alex Pfeiffer denied on behalf of Trump.
That we were acting on Israel's behalf in any offensive capacity at all.
No, we're not bombing them.
Israel's bombing them.
You just said we were.
We are supporting Israel.
She's high stakes.
You're a senator.
If you're saying the United States government is at war with Iran right now, people are listening.
Nobody could like the way that went if you like or dislike any of those two.
And that is where Butler, Pennsylvania becomes relevant because at the time it was being floated as who might be behind this.
And if it's revealed that Iran was never behind Crooks and his attempt on that day, then at the very least, when Ted Cruz goes on Tucker Carlson and makes that connection, tries to draw in the potential Iranian threat and recent failed assassination.
First of all, Barnes is a big boy.
He picks his own fights and he makes his own tweets and he tweets what he thinks is appropriate, responsible, and reasonable.
If I disagree with it, I've disagreed with Barnes a couple times.
The reality is that Barnes has been pretty much on point on a lot of things well ahead of the curve on some of the most consequential things.
But one thing I do not take kindly to is being Jew-shamed by other people who claim to be Jews.
I don't know if this person is Jewish whatsoever, into being browbeaten.
Through Jew shaming into changing what I sincerely believe and what I can demonstrably, not prove definitively, but at least build the arguments for, throw out those dots, and if you blame me for connecting them, then we just have different judgment.
I don't mean to put the person on blast, but I just love the idea that do you even understand that you are Jewish and what he said is fucking vile?
God help me.
First of all, don't use the Lord's name in vain.
If you purport to be Jewish, you might want to at least put a dash in there.
Or just, you know, not use.
The Lord's name when trying to shame someone on Twitter.
If it came down to it, they would load you on the rail car right next to me.
Get that straight in your head, Aviva.
And I have absolutely no doubt they would.
Do you think that that means that I'm going to therefore, based on that tribalist, extremist, doomsday scenario, suppress any of my criticism, suppress any of my good, common, logical, good sense, and change my beliefs because of that element of tribalism?
I love it when people try to Jew shame me.
Independent critical thought absent of tribalism is a foreign concept to some people.
Also, if you're unaware of the arguments for Epstein-Maxwell extortion operation and its likely ties to international intelligence, including Israeli intelligence, you are woefully ignorant.
I am not going to do the Whitney Webb two volumes, One Nation Under Blackmail, nor am I going to get into the mistakes that she might have made in there, some of the dots that she connects that I think might be a little extraneous.
Just to back it up to the bare bones of this, we know that Epstein was running an extortion blackmail sex operation ring.
I mean, if we disagree on that, okay, fine.
Then he was just trafficking minors to prominent people and having weird stuff on his pedophile island, Lolita Express, after the Russian book Lolita of an old man who falls in love with a young girl or vice versa, I forget which.
We agree to disagree on that.
Most rational people who are semi-educated and not fully lobotomized agree that Epstein was running something of a blackmail extortion ring.
Okay.
He was working with Jelaine Maxwell, who is also now serving 20 years for trafficking, but apparently to nobody because nobody else, no clients, no one else has been charged, indicted, convicted, or jailed as a result of their sex trafficking operation.
It's an anomaly.
Jelaine Maxwell's father was Robert Maxwell.
He was a, I would say, a known intelligence asset.
Or at least a man who, on the one hand, died under very bizarre circumstances, who was, at the time of his life and death, suspected of being an intelligence asset.
Now, I have to go back and find an article from 1991 that I know that I put on archive, just in case.
Here we go, people.
It's an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory to suggest that Epstein might have some ties to Mossad.
This is from the Washington Post, 1991.
Israel gives Maxwell, this is Robert Maxwell, Ghislaine Maxwell's father, the boat that he died on was named after Ghislaine Maxwell.
Ghislaine Maxwell went on to work with Jeffrey Epstein, doing whatever the hell they did.
Some people suggest that Ghislaine Maxwell was actually the mastermind, and the other guy there, Jeffrey Epstein, was actually the one who was blackmailed into doing this as well.
Israel gives Maxwell farewell fit for hero Jerusalem November 10 publisher Robert Maxwell today was given a funeral befitting a national hero by Israel the country with which he developed an intimate and sometimes controversial relationship in the last three years of his life Maxwell who Whose body was recovered from the Atlantic Ocean off the Canary Islands last Tuesday after he disappeared from his yacht, was buried late afternoon in the prestigious hotspot, yada, yada, yada, yada.
His funeral service in Jerusalem's hall was attended by a host of Israeli politicians led by Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir and President Chaim Herzog, who eulogized the self-made tycoon as a man cast in a heroic mold.
Only a week before his death, the volatile owner of the New York Daily News and Britain's Mirror newspaper group became involved in an exchange of lawsuits with author Seymour Hersh.
Who accused Maxwell of working with Israel's Mossad intelligence agency.
Maxwell's death at sea only intensified the speculation in London, where Hirsch promised to produce further revelations of the 68-year-old publisher's clandestine Israel connections.
So far, the evidence has not been forthcoming, and senior Israeli officials, as well as sources in Britain, have disputed Hirsch's account that Maxwell helped the Mossad find Mordechai Vanunu, the Israeli nuclear technician who was abducted by the spy agency in 1986 after his leaked secrets about Israel's nuclear weapons program, to the Sunday Times in a newspaper.
I'll give everybody the link.
Call me whatever effing names you want, you intellectual cowards.
If you don't know the basic principles, the basic dots upon which people begin connecting, you're an ignorant buffoon and your accusations are fitting of an ignorant buffoon.
That's Robert Maxwell.
That has nothing to do with Ghislaine Maxwell.
That has nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein.
Oh, all right.
Is this close enough to establish a potential basis to believe that Epstein must have been and might have been?
Involved with Israeli intelligence, Ehud Barak, who was the former prime minister of Israel, met with Jeffrey Epstein dozens of times, flew on private plane report from the Times of Israel.
Former prime minister visited disgraced financier and child abuser about 30 times in 2013 to 2017.
This is after he's a known child abuser.
Now I can hear you stupid jackasses out there.
There's pictures of him with Donald Trump.
How many times did Trump interact with Epstein after it was known that he was a child sexual predator?
How many?
Post it in the links.
And by the way, if it's multiple times, I'm not saying it glibly or facetiously.
I'd like to know.
I will reassess.
How many pictures are there of Donald Trump with Epstein after he was a, it was known that he was a solicitor of child prostitution?
I think...
I think it's a big fat bagel.
Ehud Barak meets with him dozens of 30 times after it's known, meeting with him in Central Park, including 2014 in a private flight in Florida.
Former President Ehud Barak met with the late disgraced financier and child abuser Jeffrey Epstein dozens of times beginning in 2013.
Barak was among a list of Jewish names.
He's not a Jewish name, you stupid jackasses.
He's a foreign politician.
I don't care that he's Jewish.
If that were Bill Clinton, I would be just as interested, not because it's a Jewish name, because it's a prominent ex-politician of one of America's allies, one of the most powerful intelligence agencies on earth.
I don't care that it's a Jewish name.
I care that it's a former politician's name.
Including pioneering linguist Noam Chomsky, longtime Leon Bordstein, Woody Allen.
I don't care about any of these as much as I care about the former Prime Minister Ehud Barak.
Yada, yada, yada.
Epstein met with thousands of people over his career.
Okay, that's cool.
According to the Wall Street Journal Wednesday's report on the calendar, Barack visited Epstein about 30 times between 2013 and 2017 at his estates in Florida and New York, including a time in 2014 when the former Israeli premier flew with Epstein on his private aircraft from Palm Beach to Tampa.
I wouldn't put much stock in that either.
After which Epstein went to New York, Barack said his wife and Israeli security guard were also on the flight.
He said he flew with Epstein on his private plans on one other occasion, also with his wife.
According to the report, Barack also met with Epstein monthly for nearly a year, beginning 2015.
The meetings came well after Epstein's 2008-2009 conviction and sentencing for procuring a child for prostitution, but Barack has maintained that he had no...
Do you know what I say to that?
Bullshit with the hardest T on earth.
Bullshit!
The former Prime Minister of Israel, the former president of any country with intelligence security detail is not going to know, maybe I'm wrong and maybe it's mean of me, is not going to know that Jeffrey Epstein had been pleaded guilty to child prostitution or soliciting a prostitution from a minor.
Bullshit!
And if you disagree with me, fine.
But if you don't know these basic facts and you call anyone who says there must be a connection between Epstein and Israeli intelligence, call that anti-Semitic, you're an ignorant buffoon and you cloak yourself in the shield, which you use as both a shield and a sword of sorts, to put your fingers in your ears and not understand basic facts.
Was he probably connected to all intelligence, British, CIA?
We know as a matter of fact.
That he was being used as an asset intelligence for the FBI.
We know this for a fact.
You can Google that as well if you want to go down this rabbit hole.
But to sit there and pretend that it's anti-Semitic of Barnes, to theorize and connect those dots as he does, is pure stupidity, pure ignorance, and I would say pure obtuseness, if it's not a word like outrageous with a Y in it.
So that's that.
But now the underlying issue as to why we're getting into all of this.
It goes back to Iran.
And it seems that the update on the American intervention potential for is on the cooler for two weeks.
Now, I do also say, you know, Donald Trump, I played the clip yesterday, says, or at least Jack Posobiec reporting, it's out there, that Trump says, look, we're going to wait two weeks to see what Iran does or what happens before we make a decision.
Do I expect Trump or the administration to actually wait two weeks?
No.
And not out of an accusation of any malice, you don't publicly disclose your private plan of action.
In fact, we know that Trump says, I'm not telling you what I'm doing.
He said it on Rogan.
Like, you don't show your cards when you're playing Texas No Hold 'em.
You might suggest you have pocket aces, and that may or may not be true.
And that's why you never trust what a poker player says when you're playing poker.
They're playing poker.
Trump is now saying, we're going to wait two weeks.
And we'll reassess.
We'll put on a cooler and we'll decide.
Whether or not he does, time will tell.
I don't necessarily believe it, not in a negative sense, but it would be kind of silly to publicly commit to a strategy and then let Iran know they've got two weeks before America potentially strikes.
Okay, fine.
But that's the public announcement.
Now, I did put out a poll that may or may not have been skewed by...
Actually, I should probably bring up the poll because I want to see what the results are at right now.
Some would argue that Trump cooling things off, putting it in the back burner for two weeks, may or may not have listened, or not listened to, but absorbed, digested, internalized, and then maybe incorporated into policy what many perceive to be the backlash of, call it the populist base of the MAGA movement.
Everyone is now accusing everyone of not being real MAGA.
If you support war, you're not real MAGA.
If you don't support war with Iran, you're not real MAGA.
If you support war with Iran, you're a paid Mossad shill.
If you don't support war with Iran, you're a paid Qatar shill.
I don't like any of this.
I think it's all stupid.
I mean, unless you're dealing with like the Harry J. Sissons of the right, if you're dealing with the Krasensteins of the right, if you're dealing with people who you know get paid to post, who get paid to take an opinion, these accusations make a little more sense.
But by and large, it's just a cheap way of avoiding the discussion, as cheap as accusing anyone who says there might be ties between Epstein and Mossad as being anti-Semitic.
It's a cheap intellectual cop-out, and you should avoid doing it.
I put out a poll just asking a relatively straightforward question.
Did the populist pushback to the prospect of American intervention in Iran have any impact on Trump's decision mailing?
Damn it.
That might explain why nobody got it.
One day, one day.
On his decision making this week, do we see the results?
Oh, we can't see the results.
The results are 65-35.
No, it had no impact.
Yes, it had an impact.
I'll give everybody the link.
You can go falsify it with results one way or the other.
So, let me make sure.
Was it 65-35?
I think it was.
65. It's 34.1.
Yes, he heard.
65.9.
No, he didn't hear.
And what I love are the ad hominem replies like, the clickbaiters think that anybody cares about what they have to say.
First of all, by populist base, I'm not talking about myself because I haven't taken a position and some people are calling me a fence-sitting coward for it, but I legit understand when I don't have a full enough knowledge of the intricacies of the discussion to take a full-throated position one way or the other.
The discussion I had on Wednesday with the Alexes from the Duran, I found it very useful.
It didn't actually convince me that intervention was outright wrong or as wrong as some people are saying.
And some of their explanations for why intervention is wrong didn't ring entirely reasonable with me.
You know, the idea that Iran is enriching uranium to 60% as a negotiation tactic, albeit a dumb one.
Well, negotiate dumb.
Invite intervention from people who don't think you should be enriching uranium to 60%.
For the people who say, I have no problem with Iran having a nuclear weapon, if they did, it would deter Israeli aggression.
We'll just agree to disagree on that.
So I wasn't talking about me at the populist base.
I was specifically talking about Alex Jones, Infowars, Steve Bannon, people who arguably, but not arguably, played a critical, decisive role in Donald John Trump getting elected.
And whether or not when the Alex Joneses of the world, when the Steve Bannons of the world, I think Jack Posobiec to some extent as well, Owen Schroyer, Benny Johnson, when the populist base come out and say, we're not down with this and we don't like this and this is not what we wanted from an election, what we wanted from you.
And then you have people saying, shut up, sit down, let him cook.
I just wanted to know if people thought that if that had an impact and some people said, no, it didn't.
I think it did.
I thought it did from the get-go because we know that Trump reads his truth posts.
We know that he looks at the feed and the feedback.
We know that J.D. Vance was on Twitter interacting with addressing the concerns of the populist base.
And first of all, I'm not picking on any replies in particular.
I enjoy the discussion and I hope to have Laura Loomer on next week to discuss this.
Laura tweets back.
No, as in to the answer, Donald Trump never said he was going to war with Iran.
He said Iran can't have a nuke.
So many of these podcasters think they're God's gift to the world and their rants actually influence Trump.
Trump never said he wanted war with Iran.
What has changed aside from attention-starved podcasters who want to feel accomplished?
None of these liars want to admit they pushed a lie that Trump was going to war.
They all lied and said it wasn't his policy to not allow Iran to have a nuke.
I want to have this discussion viva voce with Laura because the question was not...
The question was military intervention.
And I will argue that it's splitting hairs to say a military strike is not going to war with.
That's like Joe Biden saying, well, I said a little incursion from Russia, but not a full-blown invasion.
If you say Russia can have a little incursion, you don't get to then say, well, I didn't mean that much of an incursion.
And when you say going to war with, We're just military interventioning, striking facilities, whatever.
that's basically going to war with military intervention.
The ones where it gets a little more interesting...
Do I have this one up here?
Is where...
This was in response to Brandon Dilley from Warlord Dilley, fearless leader of the Dilley meme team.
He says, Only a fucking idiot would think that ex-posts impacted anything President Trump is doing at all.
First of all, and again, not ex-posts.
Populist pushback was across all platforms.
Alex Jones' radio show, Steve Bannon' radio show, and then the idea is, well, it doesn't reach as many people as Fox News, who's pushing this war.
Not the best position to be adhering to.
And I will remain, I said I can say, infighting for infighting.
And I'm not trying to be an asshole.
I want to actually highlight why the Dilley, the meme, the Brendan Dilley attitude is probably a wrong attitude.
As a pure matter of fact, I say to Dilley, I think you're wrong.
We know that he follows the street.
Okay, fine.
This is the big point.
Assuming he's right, Trump didn't listen to the populist base at all.
Publicly disparaging and disregarding the populist voices that arguably but not arguably got Trump elected in the first place, Alex Jones, Steve Bannon, when they disagree with Trump, is not the own you think it is.
It's actually the exact same type of tribalism we see in Decry on the other side of the political spectrum.
Disagreement is not the division.
Dismissing and disparaging the disagreement as clickbait panicans is.
Food for thought, respectfully submitted.
Being heard is not a question of, let me rephrase this, the evidence of being heard is not doing what they said.
You could have been heard and ultimately disregarded the advice.
That's different than not being heard or being disregarded a priori.
Now, I wanted to play this here.
Here, this is what I want to play.
China's trying to come in.
The same crew, Levin, Hannity, Cruz, Lindsey Graham.
Lindsey Graham's over there for the assault.
The same exact crew.
The same exact crew with the blood on their hands of two million.
Let me be blunt.
Two million Ukrainians and Russians.
A million Russians dead or wounded.
A million Ukrainians dead or wounded.
And here's the point.
On this show, as you know from the very beginning, talking about Professor Mersheimer, they were leading the Ukrainians into a destructive war.
It's like the catastrophic nature of that conflict is revolting.
But this one's different.
This time they got it right.
It's going to be the argument.
Don't compare to Iraq because it's not Iraq now.
This time we know that Iran is on the verge of a...
It's different so we can never learn from the rhyming nature of history.
Recent history with respect to Russia and Ukraine.
The amazing thing is if you apply the same rationale to Russia and Ukraine, it's their war.
We don't need to be involved.
We don't need to be financing it.
Nobody ever accuses you of being anti-Ukrainian or maybe they do.
But you adopt that same strategy that many on the right adopted vis-a-vis the Ukraine-Russia war.
Let them fight it out.
We don't need to put boots on the ground and we don't need to bankrupt our country to fight this proxy war.
All of a sudden, they changed the tune here because they found a way to say, no, Iran is not Russia.
And Iran is not Russia.
The only question is, politically, strategically, historically, does this rhyme enough that you should take a step back, take a deep breath, and reassess?
Who cheerleaded that and where are they now?
Are they cheerleading?
No, because they understand the American people are revolting.
They want a new proxy before they even finish the last one.
Exactly.
It's revolting.
And the one man on Fox News who wasn't cheerleading, they fired him.
Got rid of him.
Do the people who think they know better think they get to now disregard Steve Bannon who spent four months in jail serving Donald Trump?
Jack Posobiec?
Alex Jones?
Owen Schroyer?
Do you think now they get to just disregard and suggest that they're clickbait?
Attention seekers?
Holy hell!
The disagreement is not the division.
The disparagement of the disagreement is the division.
Write that down.
Oh, do I have anything else on this?
I think I did.
I didn't even want to talk about this because I don't like this discussion.
It is fundamentally divisive.
But I do think that the disagreement, as public as it's going to be, you call everyone who disagrees, clickbait, attention-seeking, whatever, who think that they want to be...
And that you think now you get to come in and say, shut up, sit down, like you're Senator Hirono?
What do we say when Senator Hirono tells man to shut up and sit down?
This doesn't concern you.
Shut up and sit down, Bannon.
Al, shut up and sit down, populists.
You voted for Trump, let him cook.
That doesn't mean let him cook without the feedback.
And my analogy also is let him cook.
We'll give him some additional ingredients with which to cook.
The insight, the opinions, the facts, and the sentiment of the populist base that got him there in the kitchen in the first place.
And I luckily believe and understand, and I think I do know with relative certainty, that Donald Trump doesn't dispose the hardline views of the people online telling the others to shut up and sit down.
He does listen, and he does incorporate it.
He does follow his truth feed, and he does hear the voices of the people that put him in the position that he is in right now to change the world for the better, which he seems to be doing, which is why everybody wants to make sure that he doesn't make one big, bad, stupid mistake that drags America into the last four years of Ukraine, into the last 20 years of Iraq.
Say, boss, that's that.
And everybody, could your health issues be caused by an invisible enemy, fatigue, bloating, brain fog?
What if the parasites are the culprit?
I'm going to play this video here because it's going to open your eyes to something that's going on in the world.
Bada bing, bada boom, here!
What are the main differences between ivermectin and venbenazole?
These are two anti-pathogens used to treat parasitic infections and other similar types of conditions.
They are used quite often in the oncology world to treat cancer.
They both have as anti-pathogenic abilities.
Now, as a hypochondriac, everybody knows that parasites are everywhere in our food, water, and our pets.
Toxmoplasmosis, it's in cats.
That's why crazy cat ladies become crazy cat ladies.
They secretly invade your body, wreaking havoc on your gut, energy levels, and even your brain.
And the mainstream medical system doesn't want you to think about this because one great cleanse can change your life.
The Wellness Company has a solution for you.
Ivermectin Mendebezol.
Mendeb Mabendazol.
I need to pronounce that properly.
FDA-approved parasite solutions now combined in one cleanse combo.
Fill out a brief intake form on the internet.
Get your three-month supply delivered right to your door.
Lots of parasite cleanses all over social media.
None are the gold standard level of TWC, the wellness company.
Maha officially here, and the wellness company is making these hard-to-get medications digitally accessible so you can live your best life.
head over to TWC.health, the wellness company, or Tango Whiskey Charlie.health.
Use promo code VIVA.
Get 60 bucks off and free shipping.
Don't wait.
Cleanse your body today.
I had to upload the video because whenever I share it for some reason in studio, the audio doesn't work.
And so that is to make sure that you hear the words of the doctor.
The link is in the description and the wellness company has a slew of other products that are all equally good.
All right, and before we fall too far behind, and I have already, Viva the Martyr Maid podcast does a great three-part podcast about Epstein and possibly worse intelligence operations.
And we got Chris Craft says, thanks, Viva.
Rest in peace, Grace Shara.
We're going to get to the inexplicable, incomprehensible, par-for-the-course medical immunity, de facto medical immunity case of Grace Shara.
Oh, I went way too long on the intro stuff.
Sorry about that, peeps.
Buffalo Betsy says, Viva!
Audio of APAC.
Allegedly, but it sounds like it.
Talking about members of Congress.
I will keep that on the back burner and be very, very skeptical about the audio.
You just got to be careful because you have no idea what is AI generated.
And once you get burnt on something big, people will always and rightly be skeptical of your good judgment.
So I'll check that out.
I'll have a look into it and I'll see what can be done to verify the veracity, authenticity, and accuracy of that.
Chlorophyll, more like morophyll.
I'm joking, chlorophyll.
I just, every time I hear it.
Elon Levy on Winston Martin I started listening to One Nation Under Black Mill.
I've read these synopsis.
Even with Audible, I get bored quickly.
But I'm not stupid and I'm not sensitive and I'm not unrealistic.
There are too many dots, immediate proximity, big fat dots.
And for anybody to suggest it's anti-Semitic and fundamentally implausible and what a blah, bull crap, my goodness.
It's crazy.
Oh, hold on.
I wanted to bring this up here so I can read it.
King of Biltong in the house.
Thank you.
Look at that face.
King of Biltong says, premium Biltong from Biltong USA.
High protein, keto friendly, no additives.
Authentic South African flavor.
Free shipping over $54.95 American.
$54.96.
You get free shipping.
$54.95.
You silly.
You're going to pay for shipping.
Shop now.
BiltongUSA.com.
Code Viva.
10% off.
Biltong, thank you as always for being in there.
Biltong's got his own channel.
It's called Eat At.
And Tom.
And he goes live shortly after I do, if I'm not mistaken.
Buffalo Betsy.
Back in our Locals community.
VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
Laura went after Theo Vaughn in a nasty way.
Not that her being nasty should surprise anyone.
Laura Loomer, I guess.
Okay.
Ree being in recovery, telling him to go snort a line, etc.
Accused Tucker of being a cock warmer.
In the farming sense or in the genitalia for Qatar?
Well, Tucker might have some questions to answer for certain things.
It's not all wrong because some of it's wrong.
Just unnecessarily low, trashy stuff.
She's been saying I've got a foul mouth myself, but was rabid foaming at the mouth like a psycho.
I wish she'd shut her own.
Warmer.
Okay, I get what you did there.
I hope to have Laura on next week.
And I also hope to have on...
Oh, Dilley.
I'd like to have on Brendan Dilley too, but we'll see if I'm worthy.
Rue Stang says, Viva, didn't you recently rile Laura Loomer on X for her to refer to you as an anti-attention star?
Well, I suspect people looking at that poll thought I was talking about me as though I had any influence over Trump this week to not get involved, which I didn't because I didn't take that position because I'm still not on the fence.
Like I say, are you for regime change in Iran?
At what cost?
If someone can tell me that, I wouldn't expect people to send their children to go fight in Iran.
I also wouldn't necessarily expect people to risk nuclear war from some pinpoint precision strikes that blow up an aspirin factory.
Throwback to Bill Clinton.
But anyways, Laura and I, I get along even with people who hate me.
It's the Canadian side of me.
All right, I think I got to everything there.
What else did I say was going to be on the menu for today, peeps?
Let me just go to the title of today's stream and make sure I don't forget what it was inorganic.
Oh, in cryptos?
I was going to say it was the Grace Shara trial.
There was nothing else?
I think I had more stuff in the backdrop.
Hold on.
Oh, Minnesota.
There's some stuff with Minnesota.
All right.
First things first, we're going to talk about the Grace Shara trial.
If Barnes might have been going a little hard in the paint on his tweets this week, I know Barnes very well.
I think I know him pretty well.
I shouldn't say that.
I've known him for six freaking years now.
I noticed that there is a correlation, not necessarily causation, between bad cases and his tweeting.
The last time he went hard was, what was going on?
The last time he went hard, I recall it correlating to what was going on in King County in Seattle with Ben Souf, where, you know, mother effer, it's another case of lawfare, corrupt judicial system.
And this week, it coincided, correlated with Grace Shara and the awful, awful decision that just came out, the verdict that came out yesterday.
For those who don't know what's going on, You'll get something relatively accurate from what's the word I'm looking for.
More regional coverage.
Jury rules in favor of ascension in wrongful death trial in Appleton.
So what had happened is this 19-year-old girl with Down syndrome who was admitted to the hospital with COVID.
I legally can't say it, but in my humble opinion, she was killed by the hospital.
Killed by malpractice.
19 years old, Down syndrome, which will play into, you know, respect for life.
The magical DNR that appeared out of nowhere, do not resuscitate, when there was a DNI, which is for do not intubate.
Her father had been kicked out of the room, apparently for getting rowdy or angry at the treatment his daughter was getting.
And then magically they discover a do not resuscitate.
And after jacking Grace Shara up with...
And by the way, this is just also what's amazing.
After deliberating for two hours, the trial went on for a long time.
Deliberating for two hours, and I'm going to come back to this principle, Parkinson's Law of Mundanity.
A jury in Watagami County Circuit Court in Appleton on June 19 decided in favor of Ascension in the high-profile wrongful death case involving the 2021 death of a 19-year-old patient at an Ascension hospital in Appleton.
Grace Shara, 19, died on October 13, 2021, seven days after she was admitted to Ascension, yada yada, for symptoms of COVID-19.
Her father sued the hospital a year and a half later in a wrongful death case that includes claims of medical negligence, violation of informed consent, and initially battery.
The family argued that Grace died from a drug overdose from Presidex, larozapam, morphine as a result of an illegal do-not-resuscitate order.
The jury disagreed.
The jury disagreed after two hours.
Let me bring this out for one second so I can impart on you another lesson my father has always imparted on us.
He's still alive, people, so I'm not saying this in the remembering way, but my dad always used to impart this Parkinson's law of mundanity.
There was Parkinson's law.
There's a few of them.
He was not the Parkinson shaking dude, an economist.
And one of the principles was the time it takes to accomplish a task will fit.
The time it takes to accomplish the task will fit to fill the time you have to accomplish the task.
If you need to sort of like an iteration, if you want something done, give it to a busy man.
If you have.
One hour to mail a letter.
You'll write the envelope, make a mistake, have to take another envelope, forget you don't have stamps, go to the post office, get the stamp, come back, say, oh, it takes an hour.
You got two minutes to mail a freaking letter.
You'll make it happen in two minutes.
The other one was Parkinson's Law of Mundanity, if I'm not misremembering the name of it, which is the simpler the question, the more everyone's going to have an opinion on it, the more complex, the less people are going to have an opinion on it, which correlates into less deliberating.
Time over the more complex issues and the more deliberating time over the less complex issues.
You want to talk about where to put the water cooler at an office.
Everyone's going to have an opinion.
Put it by the photocopier machine.
No, no, no.
People are going to bottleneck there when they stop to talk.
Put it by the window.
No, no, no.
The UV rays are going to melt the plastic.
You're all going to die of endocrine disruptors.
But when you talk about maximizing shareholder value, everyone sits there twiddling their thumbs because it's too complex of an issue.
Two hours to deliberate, to come to a verdict of not liable is unreasonable, given the evidence that I know was adduced during that trial, given the ample evidence that was adduced, the complexity of the evidence.
What this basically means is too complex.
We shut down.
We say they did their best.
Two hours after this trial, I think it lasted three weeks, maybe close to four weeks.
Yeah, that's it.
Of the 13 claims answered by the jury in the verdict, only two of them had a dissenter.
Unanimous!
So you know they must have truly understood.
And there was only one dissenter for each of the two claims.
A civil case, unlike a criminal, doesn't require a unanimous verdict based on proof.
Instead, 10 of the 12 jurors needed to agree on each claim based on preponderance of the evidence.
They couldn't get 10 of 12. They couldn't get it based on preponderance of the evidence.
Personally, of course, I'm disappointed, said Shara Grace's father, but God knew this was going to Excuse me.
So God's will has it done, even though we're personally disappointed.
The Schar family said it will hold a press conference.
The loss of a child is heartbreaking, and we extend our deepest sympathies to the family.
Throughout this process, we have remained confident in the care provided by our team and the values, the guide, yada, yada.
Jurors weighed the evidence during the 13-day trial.
So that takes three weeks because it's like, I don't know, four or five days a week.
The suit also sought declaratory judgment from Judge Mark McGinnon stating that do not resuscitate order in question and non-consensual injection of certain drugs into Grace's body were violation of hospital policies.
I mean, it goes on.
But the bottom line that Grace Shara, whether or not financial incentives in terms of who was treated and how they were treated during COVID, one thing.
set aside the treatments, a magical appearing, do not resuscitate.
And they do not resuscitate after jacking this girl full of sedatives, medications, basically killing her.
And she was not in a critical state until they jacked her full of these sedatives and then did not resuscitate her because they had an unsigned do not resuscitate that magically appeared out of nowhere.
And they would not listen to the father saying, resuscitate my daughter.
But, after two hours, a jury that sat there and certainly thoroughly understood everything said no.
No mas.
So it is what it is in the most awful sense.
And it probably highlights something of Parkinson's law that simpler is easier to digest.
And what the plaintiff had to prove in this case, complex issues of unauthorized do not resuscitate medical issues.
And a jury says, well, they're hospitals.
They did their best.
It was chaos during COVID and too bad.
So sad.
So that's what happened after that long trial.
After Barnes and the behavior panel were involved in the jury selection, not the outcome anybody wanted.
Disastrous.
Nothing could bring back Grace Sharra.
But the only problem here is it's basically ratifying medical immunity.
So all you have to do is say, we tried our best and you will not be held liable for what Not just preponderance of the evidence, but beyond a reasonable doubt.
Medical malpractice.
Do7JJ says, Viva, you are doing a great job.
Continue doing so, my brother, from a different mother.
Thank you very much.
I love being called brother.
From a different mother, I hope so.
I mean, it would be very surprising if we had the same mother.
But brother from another father, that's a lot more probable.
Although my dad kept his schmeckle in his pants throughout his entire life, throughout his entire career, that's why my parents are still married after 52 years.
And that's it.
Thank you.
And thank you for calling me, brother.
I love it.
Okay, what else?
We're going back to Minnesota.
Hold on, let me bring this one back.
Viva, you are doing a great job.
Continue doing so, my brother.
Well, I'm going to keep doing a great job.
I don't know if it's a great job, but I'm going to keep...
who was the only Democrat to vote with Republicans.
There is news breaking.
Vote with Republicans on a compromised budget that defunded illegal alien programs in Minnesota.
She gave a tearful, fearful public statement afterwards, just so people understand the context.
This is coming from the post-millennial, and so you can treat it with the requisite degree of skepticism, if you so choose, but at the very least, treat all information with the requisite degree of skepticism, regardless of where it comes from.
Oh, you know what?
Do I want to go with...
This is coming from Postmillennial, but I think this refers to another article, so we'll get to that one too.
And it's kind of breaking.
Stop.
I'm not pulling up the video that I pulled up the other day, Yeah, as if that's not what we understood by manifesto.
They, police, authorities, said there was a manifesto.
I didn't make it up.
I didn't make that up.
I didn't make up, you know, that there was allegedly the silverware in the Butler, Pennsylvania shooting was wiped from Crook's house.
I never ran with that because I never understood it at the time.
And I think it probably might have turned out to be some of disinformation of the fog of war, not malicious way.
Oh, the encrypted, whatever.
I didn't say it.
The authorities said there was a manifesto in the car.
Then they walk it back and say it wasn't a manifesto.
There's no manifesto.
There was just his writings.
Well, now it's being reported.
Oh, but I forgot the entire reason why I said that.
When the manifesto is not immediately made public, typically it's because it doesn't fit the narrative of the narrative tellers.
The trans shooter in the Catholic school required a leak and a FOIA request to get.
This manifesto has not yet been made public, and many of us, right from the get-go, were pontificating, hypothesizing, surmising that it's probably because it doesn't fit the narrative that needs to be pushed here, which is far right-wing extremists.
This is being reported from Postmillennial New.
Minnesota assassin blames Tim Walz for his attack on state lawmakers' report.
I'm not going to defend Tim Walls for the sake of defending Tim Walls.
I will never blame a murderer.
I will never blame.
I will never believe the murderer's blame on someone else to say they made me do it.
The murderer is a fucking murderer.
He's going to burn in hell for all of eternity if you believe in that stuff.
And it's not because he's saying something that I ideologically or, as a matter of fact, agree with.
That I'm going to say, well, you see, the murderer said it, so therefore I believe it.
He's a fucking murderer.
He's a madman spouting off madman nonsense.
But he's reporting that he blames Tim Walz.
My operating theory, and it was just a theory connecting the dots as I understood them at the time, is that he targeted Hortman, with whom he was on this committee of workboard governance that focused on racial equity and all this other crap.
And he focused on Hoffman, who had just voted the lone Democrat to vote with Republicans on that compromise budget that saw the defunding of illegal aliens.
And Vance Belter is a man who was in the Congo, helping Congolese, and seemed to be quite the activist when it came to foreigners.
Vance Belter, 57, the suspect in the assassination and attempted assassination of Minnesota state lawmakers, said he blamed Governor Walz for the shooting rampage, according to a report from Alpha News.
That's what we're going to pick up.
The outlet, citing multiple sources familiar with the investigation, so I'm skeptical always, regardless of whether or not it fits a narrative I believe in, into Belter in the shooting, said in a confession letter intended for FBI Director Cash Patel, Belter confirmed that he was the, quote, shooter at large in the Minnesota shootings.
Charging documents from police indicated that the handwritten note was from Dr. Vance.
That's Luther Belter.
And that the letter was found in the Buick that he had purchased in the hours after the shooting.
They were hospitalized.
Okay, fine.
Oh, it's a developing story.
Okay, fine.
So two things here.
A, we're going to go to the source.
And B, we're going to go to the charging documents afterwards.
So to the source, Alpha P, whatever, Alpha here.
Nope, that's Gavin Newsom.
We're going to come to that one in a second.
Oh, cripe.
Now I'm lost, I've lost my...
Get this out of here.
Get your stuff together, man.
That avatar or icon looked a lot like this one.
You'll understand why.
Here we go.
Alpha News.
No, thank you.
Exclusive Vance Belter blamed Governor Walz.
Okay.
Multiple sources with direct knowledge of the investigation confirmed to Alpha News that Belter's so-called confession letter was intended for Kash Patel, the director of the FBI.
Assassination suspect Belter.
Blamed Minnesota governor.
I want to know what the source of his blame was.
Multiple sources with direct knowledge of the investigation have confirmed to Alpha News that Belter's so-called confession letter was intended for Kash Patel.
Handwritten letter discovered in the car.
Okay, fine.
After an extensive manhunt, the He made me do it?
He controlled my mind?
Is that the type of blame?
Or is it a matter of policy?
Or is it a matter of inaction of policy?
Okay, so there's nothing about the letter.
Belter has been charged with killing Hortman.
The charging documents indicate Dr. Vance Luther was found.
He had the letter.
Okay, fine.
The charges also indicate that Belter bought the Buick and an e-bike for $900 from a man he didn't know at a bus stop in North Minneapolis.
The man drove Belter to a U.S. bank where Belter emptied $2,200 from his account.
Surveillance camera at the location.
Showed him wearing a cowboy hat.
An image from the video was released by the FBI.
Security camera video from Belter's neighbor in North Minneapolis where Belter rented a room also shows him wearing a cowboy hat.
Belter rented a room in northern Minneapolis but also had a home in Green Isle.
Several sources confirmed that Belter apparently made the one-hour trip from North Minneapolis to Green Isle to retrieve a large sum of money that was hidden somewhere in his residence.
However, Belter never made it back inside and law enforcement had already recovered the money.
Why did he have a rented room in Green Isle?
No, in Minneapolis.
I'm sorry.
Why did he have a rented room?
Waltz was not named on a typed copy of Belter's hit list obtained by Alpha News that was compiled and shared among law enforcement officials soon after the shooting.
Governor Waltz, who recently referred to ICE agents as President Donald Trump's Gestapo, and urged Democrats to...
Why did he blame him?
I would have to go see if I got any sources that can tell me why he blamed them.
But that's the news!
Something in the manifesto that they're not releasing, and now the handwritten confession letter that blames Walls, and the question's going to be why.
Because he was too mean on Republicans?
Or because he wasn't doing enough.
Or because...
We'll see.
We'll see.
I'm following the story, but I want definitive evidence.
Someone just gave me.
Let me see if I can find this.
Someone had said that the best evidence is that, you know, Jenny Belter is the legal name of Vance's wife, and therefore it can't be the Jennifer Belter who interned for T-Malls.
I'm not buying that.
Okay, doesn't matter.
Let me go over to the chat before we...
I'm going to save one story for...
Let me go over to the Rumble chat and see what's going on.
Oh, by the way, while you're here, before I forget to mention it, go to the notification Make sure you have notifications turned on.
If you want to support the work that we do here, you can come to vivabarneslaw.locals.com and become a supporter.
Ten bucks a month, a hundred bucks a year if you get the entire year, or you can become a member, no financial requirements, and you can get these things called coins that they have on Locals and just, you know, go visit other creators and tip questions, tip whatever, and, you know, spread the love that way if you want to support the work.
Viva Fry for some merch, which I have not yet updated despite saying it for the longest time.
It's Jablinski Games all over again with the merch.
And Louis the Lobster is a short children's book that I wrote that's available on Amazon, illustrated by Abigail Martin, the daughter...
And I think we might have just gotten raided by the quarter.
Hey, Encryptus, did we just get raided by somebody?
Negative.
No.
In which case, people are just coming to watch.
We're going to do one more story here, people.
Oh, shoot.
Hold on.
Hold on.
Let me make sure and see who we raid today.
Let me go to my calendar here.
Let's just see what's going on.
Yep.
I'm just going to say this.
Who shall we raid today, Napoleon?
Okay.
Yeah, we're not going anywhere until we mock the ever-loving crap out of Gavin Newsom.
Primarily because everyone's going to say, viva confession through projection.
And I know that there's people out there that accuse me of doing drugs.
Other than the occasional snifter of port at Christmas, and by that I mean I like a good martini.
I don't do drugs.
Out of a morbid fear of an immediate massive heart attack, depending on the type of drug, someone accused me of doing cocaine.
I'm like, oh my god, you have no idea what a pathological fear of death hypochondriac I am.
I'm convinced if I accidentally inhaled cocaine or snorted cocaine, I would have an immediate heart attack.
And the other mind-altering drugs, because unlike Joe Rogan, I firmly believe that drugs I think they just fuck with the chemistry of your brain, and your brain is a chemistry that you should not mess with.
And that is not only the result of having a neuroscientist as a wife.
You start messing with the brain chemistry of your brain in ways that you can't necessarily undo.
You are asking for big, big trouble that oftentimes comes with smoking some of this weed, which is massively potent beyond words.
And forget DMT.
I used to watch those videos on YouTube back before they were totally blacklisted.
The guy who used to take a hit of salvia and then try to do something.
And it was like, writing a letter to Congress!
After a hit of salvia, the guy would take one puff of this and then fall into another dimension that lasted two minutes in reality, but could have been an eternity of having his soul torn apart by demons that would be indistinguishable from reality to him.
And when you come out of that, you've created those memories, and I don't think you come out of that necessarily all the time.
Set that all aside.
Okay, fine.
I believe Gavin Newsom is on drugs.
After that long, long-hearted intro, Gavin Newsom has to be on drugs because...
And like, I hadn't read the decision until I felt compelled to because I understood that Gavin Newsom lost that decision.
He tweets out yesterday, after the ruling, Donald Trump is not a king and not above the law.
Tonight, the court rightly rejected Trump's claim that he can do whatever he wants with the National Guard and not have to explain himself to a court.
We will not let this authoritarian use of military soldiers against citizens go unchecked.
You read that, you would think that Donald Trump lost.
It was unanimous!
But first of all, just read it.
Read this back, because you know where this steaming pile of human filth is going to go with this.
Donald Trump is not a king and not above the law.
Thanks for your catchphrase logo, dumbass.
Tonight, the court rightly rejected the claim that he could do whatever he wants.
Yeah, one of the arguments that was raised by Team Trump is that the courts have no oversight in his executive presidential duties.
Okay.
What do you think the court said?
The court basically said, and I'll summarize it, then we'll pull it up, it's not...
So shame on you, Trump.
But we must be wildly deferential to the authority of the president.
Now, they didn't use the word wildly, but they might as well have used the term wildly.
Where the hell is the decision?
Here we go.
I'm not going to read the whole thing.
Let me just remember it was page three.
Yeah, let's just get a little bit of the intro here.
Gavin Newsom, Adrena Chrome Deprived, high off his ass, too many meals at the laundry, versus Donald Trump, Pete Hexeth, Per curiam, three judges unanimous, the section 10, sorry, 10 USC section 12406 Congress authorized the president of the United States to, quote, call into federal service members and units of the National Guard of any state,
end quote, whenever one Or more of three conditions are satisfied in response to disturbances in Los Angeles stemming from federal enforcement of immigration laws.
The president invoked the section and only that statute to order 4,000 members of the National Guard for 60 days to protect federal personnel performing federal functions and to protect federal property.
State of California sued the president.
Plaintiffs alleged defendants' actions were ultra-virus, means out of his lawful authority, and violated the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
They also alleged that the Defense Department violated the Administrative Protection Act, the APA.
Plaintiff applied for temporary restraining order, and after a hearing, the district court issued a TRO.
In joining defendants, the president, quote, From deploying members of the California National Guard in Los Angeles, end quote, and directing defendants, quote, to return control of the California National Guard to Governor Newsom, end quote.
A radical activist out of his freaking gourd.
I don't know how old he has to be.
If he's Judge Breyer from the Supreme Court's brother, he's got to be old, demented, fart-brained.
Basically told the president, no, you've got to give back the National Guard.
You are subservient to the governor.
Nobody's a king.
Trump, you're not a king.
Now, give back your troop to King Newsome so that he can use them the way he wants to.
By the way, it was Newsome or Karen Bass who brought in the LAPD and beat the ever-loving piss out of protesters, but nobody's up in arms about that.
District Court issued the TRO primarily because it concluded that plaintiffs are likely to succeed on their claim that the president's order federalizing members of the California National Guard is ultra-virus because none of the predicates to federalization required under the article because the federalization order was not issued.
Quote, through the governor, end quote.
The governor's got to ask for it, otherwise the president doesn't have the authority to do it.
Horse shit that even a Canuck moron like myself could understand.
And predict, by the way.
You can't always predict what the activist idiot judges at the lower levels are going to do, but the predictiveness, or at least the accuracy of the prediction when it comes to fruition of the higher appellate levels, should make people take a step back and say, hmm, maybe I should listen to these people who seem to be pretty accurate.
More often than not.
Let me see here.
Blah, blah, blah.
Notably, plaintiffs conceded that the National Guard members, if validly federalized, may be deployed to protect federal property.
The district court determined that plaintiffs presented no evidence at the TRO hearing that National Guard members were engaged in any other activities, and plaintiffs do not contest that determination.
Okay.
Defendants immediately appealed.
We now grant the stay.
This is the paragraph that we want to remember, and that you might want to snip, clip, and share away with Adrena Krohn-deprived Gavin Newsom.
He won.
The court told Trump he's not a king.
And, oh, by gum, I'm going to make sure that the Trump is not a king.
Listen to what they say.
Defendants have made the required strong showing that they are likely to succeed on the merits of the appeal because that's what you do at the injunctive stage.
We disagree with defendants' primary argument that the president's decision to federalize members of the California National Guard under the section is completely insulated from judicial review.
Okay.
It's not completely insulated.
You ask for more in order to get what you're owed.
It's not completely insulated, but this is what that stupid scumbag of a liar Gavin Newsom hanged that tweet on.
They said he's not a king.
No, they reject the argument that it's not totally, completely insulated from judicial review.
Nonetheless, we are persuaded that under the longstanding precedent interpreting the statutory predecessor to section 12406, our review of that decision must be highly deferential.
Here, Gavin, let me explain it to you in Canadian, eh?
It means that it's not totally insulated from review, but that the courts are going to be highly deferential to whatever the decision of the president is.
So although he's not a total king in the parliamentary sense, eh?
He's the president, you stupid son of a bitch!
And if he makes an executive decision, the courts are going to be highly deferential to it.
As they are right now, affording the president that deference, we conclude that it is likely that the president lawfully exercised his statutory authority under section 12406, subparagraph 3, which authorizes federalization of the National Guard when, quote, the president is unable, sorry, that's right, when the president is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States, end quote.
Additionally, the Secretary of Defense transmittled Of the order to the adjutant general of the California National Guard, who is authorized under California law, quote, to issue all orders in the name of the governor, end quote, likely satisfied the statute's procedural requirements that federalization orders be issued, quote, through, end quote, the governor.
Through and not with the approval of the governor, because the governor doesn't override the president.
Thank you.
Even if there were a procedural violation, that would not justify the scope of relief provided for by the idiot, activist, lunatic, Breyer of the lower court when it issued the TRO.
Our conclusion is that it is likely the president's order.
Our conclusion is that it is likely that the president's order federalizing members of the California National Guard was authorized also resolves the 10th Amendment claim because the parties agree that the 10th Amendment claims turns on the.
End of storyo.
Gavin Newsom.
It's fantastic.
It's fantastic.
He's a big, fat loser.
And I don't mean big and fat, I just mean a big loser.
It's what he is, Gavin Newsom.
And the angrier they get, the more outrageous becomes their conduct, the more stupid the mistakes they make are, which is why I always say hatred is a consuming force, and it causes people to act so irrationally, at some point they act to their own demise.
So Gavin Newsom is one of those people.
Rosie O'Donnell is another.
The other thing is hatred is a consuming force because it makes you physically ugly.
What did I say?
It makes you physically ugly.
It's like the picture of Dorian Gray but in reverse.
I've never even seen the picture of Dorian Gray.
I just know that it's about somebody who doesn't age in real life because the portrait of him up in the attic ages with his life.
I don't even understand.
And I'm not watching it.
But I kind of understand the idea.
And that's it.
Now I think what we ought to do is go over and raid We go over and raid Jimmy Dore.
By the way, I don't know if there's a glitch in the numbers, but there seems to be 33,000 people watching right now.
It's impossible that you are all subscribed, so go and make sure that you hit subscribe.
There should be 33,000 thumbs up on this video.
I'm joking.
There should be 32,990 thumbs up because there's 10 thumbs down.
KarenSL1 says, exactly.
So stop saying you hate so, so, so, please.
Can I say loathe?
Hatred is bad.
Loathing is righteous.
And that about does it.
People, come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com before you're not going to go over to Jimmy Dore.
Encrypt us.
Bring your face up so people can see you.
Before we hit that button, I would love for you to show them your book.
Give me a link that I can show the book because one time I did it and I accidentally had identifying information on it.
But what I will do before we do this, Barnes and I are having a weekend-long meet-up, greet-up, and get informationed up in August.
And if you want to get a ticket, you can come.
And if you want to support the work that 1776 Law Center does, that is Barnes' enterprise in terms of the actual practice of law, you can support there.
There's an auction.
We are auctioning off this thing right here.
Not the hat.
The hat's mine, people.
This with a signed autograph with a special message of the book, Louie the Lobster.
And we're doing a fundraiser for that, so you can go and support there.
Get tickets if you want to come.
Behavior panel's going to be there.
There's going to be a bunch of great speakers.
There might be Fishing with Viva.
I don't know what we're going to be able to do there.
But come on over and do that.
And Encryptive, can you share a screen?
If you can share the Louie the Lobster.
Let me see here.
Absolutely.
One second while I pull that up.
I will give everyone an Amazon affiliate link.
Oh, and by the way, now that I'm thoroughly hooked on the bug, I'm thinking we're going to do like unboxing or what is it called when you open the package of cards with UFC?
So if anyone sends a box, any box of UFC cards, my PO box, I think we're going to do like either on the locals after party or just like ritualistically every Friday.
It's called card pulling.
Card pulling.
Oh, look at this.
Louis the Lobster returns to the sea.
Two things that I've been saying for a long time.
I've got to write a sequel.
We've got to upgrade and update our merch.
I'm going to update the merch right after this.
And Louis the Lobster returns to the sea.
Abigail Martin is the one who illustrated it, and it's beautiful.
Encryptus, thank you very much.
Can I pull the screen now, or am I not able to pull the screen?
Because I wanted to see something here.
There was something else I wanted to bring up.
Read the document.
Oh, no, I forgot.
Okay, that's it.
I think I got everything.
So, Encryptus, have we raided Jimmy Dore yet?
Oh, we did.
Finalizing.
Going to the Jimmy Dore.
By the way, everybody, everyone complaining that when the raid comes up, it boots you from the stream.
There's an opting out app thing that Rumble just put out.
I shared it on Twitter.
I'll share it with our community.
And that's it.
Go and raid Jimmy Dore.
Say hi for Viva.
I like doing this, actually.
Hold on a second.
Let me go see here.
join and we're going to see if, U.S. could bomb Iran this weekend.
Well, if you hadn't gotten your fix of...
...class of a certain group of Jews, which are Zionists.
And so now he's deporting people, or trying to...
If you wanted lighthearted politics, if you want something lighthearted, come over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
I love Jimmy.
Full stop.
And it's possible to love people, even if you disagree on certain issues with, but I don't actually...
Jimmy's a good guy.
And smart.
Alright.
So that's it.
Peeps!
Sunday night.
Viva and Barnes.
Law for the people.
Sunday night show.
Law extravaganza.
It's going to be amazing.
And wait.
One more thing.
One more thing before I forget.
here.
I think everybody's getting needed anyhow and over to the If I go, it's in this.
Ah, this is where it is.
I always forgot where the P.O. Box thing is.
Okay, 9170 Glades Road.
P.O. Box 139.
Boca Raton, Florida.
33434.
That's the P.O. Box.
I gotta put that somewhere.
Boom!
Go!
That's it!
Shanvisage says, so 33,000 on Rumble, 90 on Locals.
Any takeaway from the viewer metrics, Viva?
No, the locals is for our...
I think a lot of the non-paying supporters are on Rumble.
And it's a conversion, which I'm...
And some of the supporters enjoy the environment of supporters only in the chat.
On Locals and the after party is only for the paying supporters who make it possible for us to do what we do.
And we're going to go over there and have some fun discussion right now.
VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com if you want to support what we're doing and be part of the daily after show party on Locals.