All Episodes
Previous Next
June 17, 2025 - Viva & Barnes
01:10:29
Preach Socialism! Live Like KINGS! No Kings HYPOCRITES! FBI Arrests Copycap, but Not Big Dog! & MORE
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
What you are looking at is modern-day drama of the type of soap operas that you expect to see in South America at three in the morning.
Canadian politics, people.
We shall start off with something that will make you laugh and cry all at the same time.
Mr. Chair, less than 230,000 housing starts occurred in 2024, but the government allowed in over a million people in the middle of a housing crisis.
Why did they do this?
Mr. Chair, immigration is Canada's greatest strength, I say to you, and it is important not to blame newcomers to Canada for the housing crisis.
The Honourable Member.
Mr. Chair, with vacancy rates below 2% in many parts of the country, how can the Minister justify bringing in hundreds of thousands more people to Canada this year?
Pretty clear question.
What I will say is, post-pandemic, had we not increased our immigration levels, our economy would have absolutely shrunk.
Chair, it was the minister's government.
It was the Liberal government that created all this crisis.
They created the housing crisis.
They created the healthcare crisis.
They created the infrastructure crisis.
Does the minister acknowledge that the out-of-control immigration levels helped to double the cost of rent in Canada?
I'm a minister.
Thank you so much.
Don't blame the immigrants.
We recognize that we need to balance our immigration levels with the pressures on housing, and that is exactly what we are doing.
Does this not make you very, very angry?
If it doesn't enrage you, it's because you have given in to apathy, which is the tool of the devil.
I want to play just the first...
Mr. Chair, less than 230,000 housing starts occurred in 2024, but the government allowed in over a million people in the middle of a housing crisis.
Why did they do this?
Mr. Chair, immigration is Canada's greatest strength, I say to you, and it is important not to blame newcomers to Canada for the housing crisis.
Hey, jackass, he wasn't blaming the immigrants, you idiot.
He was blaming you.
Immigration is Canada's greatest strength?
What in the name of sweet holy hell does that mean?
Is immigration a greater strength for Canada than Canadians?
Immigration and immigrants are the greatest strength to Canada, not the citizens.
Not industry, not hard workers, not the middle class, not small business.
Immigrants are the greatest strength.
Don't blame the immigrants.
Bitch, nobody was blaming immigrants.
We were blaming you and your idiot liberal party for bringing in a million immigrants during a housing crisis, which exacerbates economic crises, which makes everything harder for citizens.
And, oh my goodness, what does that mean?
What does immigration is Canada's greatest strength mean?
We are governed by idiots.
We are governed by idiots who are never held to political account.
We are governed by idiots who give themselves pay raises while they destroy the people and the country they were elected to govern.
We elect idiots who live in ivory houses, who have their own security, who have wealth beyond the ordinary citizens' wildest dreams, who never have to deal with the consequences of their failed policy.
And the more it fails, the more power they give themselves.
The more power they give their...
So you brought in a million immigrants when there was a housing crisis already, putting Canadians on the streets, but then you offer them sea can homes.
You bring in a million immigrants that jacks up the cost of living, that cripples the economy, cripples the health care system, causes Canadians to die.
And then you sit there like a guy.
A retarded biatch.
Then you sit up, don't blame the immigrants.
No!
We're blaming you.
Don't hide behind the immigrants, you awful, awful scoundrel of a human.
And at the very least, for the Americans watching, this will give you a bit of a distraction from the current internal, not called an internal crisis, the strife.
We're not talking about Iran today.
I've never, ever in my life enjoyed talking about the Middle East.
The Israeli-Arab conflict.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
It goes nowhere.
I'm 46 years old now, and I have lived through at least three cycles of this.
It's rinse, wash, repeat.
Discussions.
I can predict the discussions.
I can have the discussions with myself.
The arguments for, the arguments against, where the insults come in.
And now it looks like we're on the brink of something of an escalating conflict with Iran.
And Trump, too many, seems to be reneging on an election promise not to get involved in foreign wars.
And Trump seems to be upsetting the populist base who supports him and supported him in the way.
I'm sick of talking about it because I can have the argument with myself, the pros and the cons.
I did it, you know, in a short video earlier today.
And it's not tribalism.
What it is is everybody refuses to see through their own ideological political blinders on this.
I wanted to float the theory, if everybody could just view Let me rephrase this.
If everybody could apply the same reasoning that was applied to ending the funding And saying, let Ukraine figure it out with Russia.
It's not the same.
There are material differences.
But if you could say regional conflict, and if you don't have external powers interfering in regional conflict, they'll resolve themselves differently, normally, possibly earlier, and more likely than not with less...
Then people are going to say, well, Russia's not the equivalent to Iran.
Russia's not the equivalent to whoever you think is the Israel versus whatever in that relationship.
The amount of people who said enough of this funding endless war in Ukraine.
It's not our war.
Diplomacy.
And the amount of people railing against people who said diplomacy is not a thing you can't negotiate with Putin because he's Hitler.
Now, basically adopting that same strategy, and then I can...
But it's not something we're going to resolve here.
It is not something that leaves anybody happy.
And right now you have the Charlie Kirks.
Maybe I'm not sure about Charlie Kirk, actually.
I'll just say Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannons, Owen Schroyers.
People who have been the biggest, baddest, most high-hard, die-hard supporters of Trump getting pissed off.
That we were promised no new foreign wars.
Tulsi Gabbard comes out three months ago and says, we don't believe that Iran is close to building a nuclear weapon.
And three months later, people are saying, trust Trump.
And first of all, I'm inclined.
I do ascribe to the idea that you don't vote for someone for them to do what you want to do.
You vote for them because you trust their judgment and you want them to do what they were going to do.
That's why you voted for them.
That argument sort of fails when Someone says, okay, elect me on these promises and then the tune changes.
And then you have to say, okay, well, maybe there's new information and we have to trust the person who's changing their tune.
But it's not quite as simple as what I would like to do is say, all right, you voted for someone's judgment and now you have to rely on it.
Because while that is true, you also voted for campaign promises and those you don't just get to walk away from once you get into office if you don't want to lose the support of your base and throw away the midterms in 2026.
Throw away potentially 2028, and possibly draw the world into World War III.
But I said we're not going to talk about it, and then lo and behold, I spent three minutes talking about it.
Good afternoon!
Some of you may have noticed, I got my old glasses back.
I love these.
So I went to Stanton Optical to get the broken frames of these replaced.
Finally, I had them in the front porch for like three months, and I ran into the Razio Yaya lady there, whose name I don't know, but I recognized, and I got a funny video of Her trying to get me to say, raise your ya, ya, ya singing.
Viva doesn't dance and Viva doesn't sing.
But welcome to the show, people.
For those of you who are new to the channel, Viva Frye, David Frye, former Montreal litigator turned current Florida rumbler.
And we're going to talk about the news today.
All things except Iran.
Any more than we've already talked about it.
Because we have some amazing, amazing stories.
I'm picking on the No Kings jackasses.
Randy Weingarten and Karen, we're calling her Basshole.
That's what we go with.
It's Karen Basshole.
The tyrants, the authoritarians, the people who preach like socialists yet live like kings.
We're going to talk about Kash Patel arresting, or not Kash Patel, but rather an arrest of a former Coast Guard dude for issuing threats against Donald Trump, related to but not limited to the 86-47.
And I got my questions.
You know, fuck around, find out people happening here.
We'll get to it in a bit.
Chlorfin says she has a part-time job working in the UK government advising on immigration.
Oh, I guess that was in respect of the intro video.
For those who are being raiding here, for those who come from the quartering, welcome to the channel.
If you're watching on the landing page, make sure you click on it, hit subscribe, hit turn on notifications, download the Rumble app and turn on notifications because then you get immediate notifications when your favorite creators go live.
And that is it.
We shall get into the show.
Now, where do we start?
I think we shall start with No King's Day.
We've been talking about the protests that have been happening in Los Angeles and I've said it before.
I'll say it again.
I don't like the idea of bringing horses to a protest.
I appreciate they're trained for such purposes.
I felt bad for the horses in Braveheart.
I understand people take horses and animals to battle.
I'm more of a fan of not exposing innocent animals to the consequences of human conflict.
We saw the video the other day went viral.
Some older guy, you know, putting his hand on one of the horses.
The LAPD, and it's relevant and it's critical, I'm going to keep mentioning it, hits the guy's hand with a wooden stick.
Then another guy shoves the old man and says, what are you doing?
The old man falls and everybody gets their photo ops and everybody thinks they've made their point.
There was a journalist or a documentarian.
Well, it started up.
Not ready yet.
There was a journalist, a documentarian who's there.
Apparently not.
And I'm not saying this to be funny.
Apparently not wearing goggles.
You appreciate.
Maybe he wasn't.
I don't know.
Doesn't look like he was.
You appreciate now why some of these journalists learn from the mistakes of others and wear squash goggles, protective eye gear.
This guy might lose vision in his right eye because of the actions of the LAPD.
And I'm not blaming the LAPD.
There's a little element of your taking very big chances by documenting protests where tear gas and rubber bullets will be flying.
And if it had remained a peaceful protest, like it was in Ottawa without the police initiating the violence, I might be more critical.
From what I've seen from these No Kings protests, there's pockets of violence where I won't necessarily jump to the blame of the police officers for what escalates.
He might lose his eye now, and here's what he had to say about the experience, and then we're going to get into the point.
Well, it started out pretty great.
I mean, you had...
But by 5 p.m., he says the day had turned into a nightmare.
LAPD suddenly lined up in formation facing the crowd.
And they came in with horses and people almost got trampled.
They were firing like 40 bullets in the span of like five seconds.
I mean, it sounded more like fireworks being rapidly shot off.
Woodruff says rubber bullets struck his arm and his right eye.
I sort of felt like I got slammed into the side of the head with a baseball, you know, thrown by the world's greatest pitcher.
Oh, well, it started.
So, you know, the irony in all of this is that this was done by the LAPD.
The LAPD operates not under the direct command of Karen Bass, but under the authority.
Karen Bass, I just had to make sure I understood this, basically appoints.
The chief of the police.
City council approves of it.
And that's effectively how it works.
But the bottom line is the LAPD effectively operates under the jurisdiction of the mayor.
And then you have the state police, which operates, I think, under the authority of the governor.
And then you have the National Guard, which can get called in, which operates under the authority of the president, who decides when it's necessary to bring in the National Guard.
You have had these bassholes, Karen Basshole, for the longest time.
Talking about what an authoritarian Trump is for bringing in the National Guard and calling him.
He's escalating the situation by calling in the National Guard.
He's provoking the violent response from the crowd by calling in the National Guard.
He's provoking the violent response from the illegals and the fanatic activists by trying to enforce federal law as relates to illegal aliens.
But when the LAPD comes in and damn near potentially or possibly blinds a journalist in the eye.
Nothing.
Not boo.
Nobody's calling Karen Bass the authoritarian.
Nobody's caring Karen Basshole the tyrant for siccing the police on her own people.
And she doesn't take flack for it.
Had that been the National Guard that had done that, you wouldn't hear the end of it.
But rules for thee, not for me.
Authoritarian for you when you bring in the police, but not for me.
It's righteous when I do it.
Because these people are the filthiest of hypocrites on earth.
And it's not about justice.
It's not about righteousness.
It's about wielding the batons for power.
And it's about doing everything he can to weaponize and politicize every tragedy for your own political gain and ignoring your own atrocities because it might hurt you.
The day they give these protests, by the way, do you know, I have to bring up.
What's her face?
What's her name?
Weingarten.
Here's another one who's always thinking of what I'm referring to as modern-day slavery now.
They're always thinking of their pet projects, their token minorities, and their cheap labor.
They've got a new word for it now, by the way.
You know, the undocumented citizens, undocumented migrants.
I've been saying it for a while.
I won't belabor the point now.
This is what Democrats, to some extent, also what Republicans want.
Corporations love the illegals that they can exploit, that they can effectively traffic into subservience.
The Orwellian newspeak for the modern day version of a slave is...
It means not disappearing day laborers who are trying to make ends meet.
It means not disappearing day laborers who are trying to make ends meet.
Day laborers.
And by the way, we're going to get into the left and their propensity for violence in the name of activism.
Pitchforks.
I have nothing against the pitchforks, but the irony is that during this speech, she was talking about how Democrats do it the peaceful way, literally as this pitchfork was blocking her face.
Day laborers.
When he's not disappearing day laborers.
Randy Weingarten is out there fighting for the everyday person.
She's out there preaching socialism while she's living like an absolute king.
I think everybody in the chat is going to know this, but if you don't, it's going to blow your freaking mind.
Do you know how much Randy Weingarten makes, gets paid in a year?
I will not use the word earn because she earns nothing.
Do you know what her...
much like her brother-in-arms, Mr. Three Homes, and that's all I have, Bernie Sanders.
Take a guess what Randy Weingarten makes in a year.
You are the community to this president's chaos.
And together we build a future of opportunity and justice for all.
Hope over fear.
Aspiration over anger.
The promise of America for each and every American.
That is what we are fighting for today.
You are the community to this.
Someone's got to loop this together with Bill Clinton in the episode of The Simpsons.
Well, it was actually Kang or Kodos who was pretending to be Bill Clinton.
We will move upward, not downward.
Forward, not backward.
Always twirling, twirling, twirling.
Lunacy.
Did the chat get how much she makes?
Let me see if the chat has gotten it here.
Ooh, let me see here.
I saw $500,000, says Tama Days.
$560,000 a year.
The head of the teachers' union makes $560,000 a year.
You know how much Karen Basel makes?
It's modest compared to Weingarten.
$300,000 plus a year.
Randy Weingarten gets up there talking about how the illegals, or whomever the hell she's talking about, is the community and it's Donald Trump wreaking havoc on them, while Karen Basshole sicks her LAPD and blinds a journalist.
My goodness, they have nothing to say about that.
While they live in the lap of luxury, while preaching socialism to the lowly plebs, living like kings while preaching no king's day.
It's beyond hypocrisy.
It's the Democrat way.
And I don't understand how Karen, whatever her name, not Karen Weingarten, Randy Weingarten has not received more flack for who she is, what she is, what she's done to children during COVID, what she's doing to the fabric of America now, and how she is exploiting her day laborers so she can get whatever she needs out of her day laborers while raking in over a half a million dollars US a year.
That's what's going on with the Day of Kings, people.
But when it comes to the left's propensity to violence and violence, Randy Weingarten, the president of the American Federation of Teachers, the AFT, AFT.
She should be called the department.
She should be head of the Department of American Federation of Teachers.
She could call her DAFT.
Has a salary of approximately $560,000 per year.
According to news reports, the figure is significantly higher than the average teacher.
No shit, Sherlock.
What is the average teacher's salary?
I'm going to say $56,000.
$53,000.
Florida.
Entry level Florida may earn 40. All right.
55. Average.
It's only 10 times the salary of the people she purports to represent, but she needs it.
She needs it.
It's only the best for her.
She needs proper security.
She needs to be able to drive around, fly around for No King's Day.
She needs to be able to dress nicely and look good for her things.
It's the filter up.
It's not the filter down.
It's trickle up economics.
For these union bosses and these leaders who are the biggest hypocrites on earth, not trickle down.
$560,000 a year and the average teacher makes one-tenth of that.
How they haven't revolted against her is beyond me.
How those pitchforks, those proverbial metaphorical pitchforks in that crowd haven't turned on her is beyond me.
I would love to know if anyone in that audience cheering that idiot on knows how much she makes.
I would go to those...
Why?
Because the Democrats and the activists seem to be incapable of distinguishing between activism and violence.
Homeland Security making the announcement here.
This is absolute...
This is Fafo.
Fudge around, find out.
Homeland Security put out a tweet earlier today.
If you haven't heard this story, it's going to blow your mind.
New York City Comptroller Brad Lander was arrested for assaulting law enforcement and impeding a federal officer.
Our heroic ICE It is wrong that politicians seeking higher office undermine law enforcement safety to get a viral moment.
No one is above the law, and if you lay a hand on a law enforcement officer, you will face the consequences.
And here's a little breaking news, and we're going to read the article after this.
York City Comptroller and Democratic mayoral candidate Brad Lander was detained by ICE earlier today.
NBC News obtained the video that you're seeing now from Lander's office.
His team says he was taken by masked agents while escorting a defendant out of immigration court.
NBC News has also reached out to the Department of Homeland Security for comment.
York City Comptroller and Democratic mayoral candidate Brad Lander was detained by ICE earlier today.
NBC News obtained the video that you're seeing now from Lander's office.
Here's the article.
We're going to see this.
A judicial warrant?
Where's my warrant?
We've got a warrant.
When I see the judicial warrant, I will let go when you show me the judicial warrant.
Where is it?
Where is the warrant?
I have my hand here.
We'll shut it.
He's not wrong.
Let me see the warrant.
The next round of, oh my goodness, they arrested a comptroller.
You don't have the authority to arrest U.S. citizens.
We'll see about that.
I'm not obstructing.
I'm standing right here in the hallway.
I asked to see the judicial warrant.
By asking for a judicial warrant?
You don't have the authority to arrest US citizens asking for a judicial warrant.
He's not arresting the new citizen for asking for judicial warrant.
I'm safe.
I can't believe you're arresting him.
Where are you taking him?
Get the camera.
Get the viral moments.
You'll have two viral moments now.
And with what authority?
Sorry.
Let's just let this play.
Okay, put it on pause.
Hold on, hold on.
Once we put this in pause.
Oh, gosh.
New York City Comptroller Brad Lander was arrested.
Okay, we got that part.
For assaulting an officer.
In other news, President Trump is cutting his Jesus.
Okay.
It has yet to be confirmed if Lander is facing charges.
Okay, we got that part.
Video footage of the arrest appeared to show Lander hanging on to immigration ICE officers as he's being escorted out.
He says in the video, where is it?
Where is the warrant?
New York Civil Liberties Union Executive Director Donna Lieberman said the arrest, which she claimed was motivated by Lander asking questions, was an abuse of power.
Arresting a public official, duly elected comptroller of the city of New York for asking questions is dangerous.
We saw this with Padilla, but it's around 2.0.
Liebman wrote in a statement, it sends an unmistakable authoritarian message that ICE doesn't care about the rule of law and anyone...
All elected officials and candidates for office should condemn this arrest in the strongest terms and stand up for New Yorkers.
New York Attorney General Letizia James describes it as standing up for immigrants, profoundly unacceptable, yada, yada, yada.
This is the latest example in the extreme thuggery of Trump's ICE out of control.
One can only imagine the fear of families across the country when confronted with ICE.
Former New York governor, mayoral candidate Andrew Cuomo wrote on X. Mayoral candidate Scott Stringer, Zohan Kwame Mamdani, who's now up to like 50-50 against him, called for Lander to be released immediately.
The recent politicization of federal authorities under the Trump administration is disturbing and shameful, Stringer wrote.
I call for Brad to be released immediately.
He will be.
This is fascism and all New Yorkers must speak up.
I want to see where the charges are.
Let me see if we can find the charges.
Brad Lander charges.
We might not be getting the charges yet.
Let's see here.
New York Times.
Let's go to archive and put this in and see if it hasn't been archived yet.
Oh, forget it.
We'll see the charges arrested for allegedly assaulting an officer.
In the pursuit of what the ICE officers are doing, much like that other one out of New York when they stormed the detention facility, and they'll get their viral moment, like they did with Padilla, run around with it, just same play over and over again.
And when they determine that activism includes assault or impeding police officers in the carrying out of their functions, once they make that distinction, this might happen less and less often.
The only problem is this is exactly what they want.
And every time it happens, they get the news cycle to run with the story that another Democrat, just for asking questions, has been arrested.
We will see where it goes.
I'd like to read the charging documents to the extent he does get charged.
Now, speaking of charging people, we're going to get to some disappointing things that we have going on with the administration, but some good things.
Here.
Appreciate this.
This is being reported in the New York Post.
Former Coast Guard officer arrested after allegedly threatening to assassinate Trump, per the FBI.
We're going to get to that in a second.
We'll read the article first so that we can have a more sensible discussion about the tweets afterwards and the questions being asked.
Listen to this.
A former Coast Guard lieutenant was recently arrested for allegedly making threats to kill President Donald Trump, according to court documents obtained by Fox News.
The suspect, Virginia resident Peter Stinson, served as an officer in the United States Coast Guard from 1988 to 2012.
21. He was a sharpshooter as well as a FEMA instructor during that time.
In an affidavit filed on Friday, a task force officer from the FBI revealed details about the myriad of online threats that Stinson allegedly wrote.
In one instance, Stinson Stinson allegedly made graphic threats against Donald Trump involving guns, poisoning, and even knives on multiple occasions on multiple social media platforms.
Stinson also allegedly referenced, quote, not having the necessary skills, end quote, to successfully complete an assassination, but also eerily suggested that he wasn't being entirely truthful.
The document also alleges that Stinson made several references to 8647, which government officials say, quote, is likely in reference to an Instagram post made by former FBI Director James Comey.
Quote, the post by Comey was interpreted in the news media as a violent threat to President Donald Trump and prompted an investigation by the Department of Homeland Security and the United States Secret Service.
Stinson has since made 13 additional posts on Blue Sky, including the text 8647, the document states.
The affidavit also alleges that Stinson, quote, has self-identified as a member of Antifa.
On February 2nd, Stinson allegedly posted on X. Sure, this is war.
sides will be drawn.
Antifa always wins in the end.
Violence is inherently necessary.
Stinson was charged with making threats to kill the president and is slated to make an initial appearance in Okay, remember the details of the story because they will be relevant when we get to the tweets later on.
Cash Patel took to Twitter to explain what's going on.
Explain the arrest.
And Kash Patel writes as follows.
This is a guy who threatened President Trump's life using the quote 8647 end quote language.
The exact kind of copycat law enforcement is now frequently dealing with after former director Comey's destructive Instagram debacle.
That's what Kash Patel posts.
The question that I have asked publicly now, and with the utmost of respect, not to be a troll, not to be a sass, because it's neither troll nor sass, I've said it before, and I'll say it again.
How do you go after the copycats without going after the big dog?
Now, in this particular case, and it's quite clear that people are reading that post, reading the headline, and then responding without having read the article.
I appreciate how they arrested this guy.
This guy did more than the 8647.
Quite clear.
Specifics.
Now, something we're going to say, well, even saying Luigi him is not clear enough, right?
He starts speaking enough code, which is exactly what 8647 is, to people who know better, that being the director of the FBI or the former director of the FBI.
I saw some comments saying, great, you just arrested a Coast Guard officer for using common diner jargon.
And I'm like, you're an idiot.
And she was because she was on Blue Sky.
You're an idiot who clearly didn't read the article.
They arrested this guy.
He made an 86-47, but also Luigi comments.
Guns, knives, violence necessary comments.
Whether or not that rises to the Brandenburg level threat, we'll see.
But how do you go after the copycats without going after the big dog?
Is the determination that Comey, in putting out that tweet, didn't know what he was doing and therefore cannot be charged or is not going to be charged?
I still don't know if this is on the FBI, Secret Service, DOJ, United States.
Who has the authority right now?
The article suggests that Comey has been investigated, and it would seem that it was under the jurisdiction of the United States Secret Service.
Who has the authority to charge?
From my understanding, I think Secret Service may or may not.
Pretty sure the FBI does, and I'm very certain that the DOJ under Bondi does.
How the hell do you not go after the big dog when you are now seeing the copycats?
More importantly, set aside the material distinctions here.
Some will say, well, Comey didn't rise to a true threat or a real threat.
I'm of the opinion let him raise that defense.
I'm of the opinion that when the former director of the FBI, who prides himself on working with counterterrorism, gang members, street criminals...
When the FBI director, former FBI director, had just written a book and then posted about that book after the post 8647, and the summary of the book that he posted in that post talks about how a far-right extremist was using violent rhetoric in code on the internet to instruct his fans to bring violence on his political adversaries.
When you have James Comey in an article very recently talking about how he used to watch And The Sopranos frequently, or at least on multiple occasions, talked about 86ing, whacking guys, and not in the sense of diners.
I think we know damn well that James Comey knew damn well what he did.
I would say charge him.
That's the argument.
You want to talk about mens rea?
He knew what he was doing.
He knew that it was a threat.
He knew that it would incite others to violence.
Specific?
Targeted?
Message.
86, do something.
47, to President Donald Trump.
And that is exactly what his book, Lincoln Drive or FDR Drive, was about.
But you take to Twitter and you say, look at all the copycats we have to deal with.
Now we've got to go arrest people who are issuing these threats involving 86, 47. And James Comey is still walking the streets freely, hawking his shitty book?
Come on.
At the very least, explain to the public.
Why charges have not been brought and /or will not be brought.
Or clarify to the public that investigation is still ongoing.
How long has it been now?
Over a month?
And people were like, "Vivi, you're overreacting.
Just give it time." You give it enough time, people forget about it.
You give things time, it doesn't age like wine.
It evaporates into the air.
So, yeah, I went hard right after that happened.
A, because I was enraged.
B, because the excuses for it were patently preposterous.
And C, because you had James Comey mocking the FBI and two men that I respect.
Whether or not they don't have the authority, whether or not they don't have the final word.
Okay, I don't know about that, but bottom line.
If they're not charging him, explain why or at least issue a public statement on it.
If he's being investigated still currently, let us know.
Charge him.
Internal disciplinary matters, not so interested in that.
It's an amazing thing.
He didn't mean anything by it.
That doesn't have any impact on their lunatic, unhinged fanbase.
It quite clearly did, does, and will.
And until the fist of fury is brought down on the initiators of it, There were some jackasses up in Canada saying it.
They're testing the system now.
Oh, nobody said anything.
We just said Luigi him.
Oh, I was talking about Mario Brothers.
They hear the message and they know what is being requested in the message and they act on it.
And by the way, hard cut into the news story because this broke, at least in my consciousness, right before we went live.
I was going to start the show.
With Tim Walls and his message of a couple of weeks ago?
It's an amazing thing.
You get Tim Walls coming out now and saying, we really need to tone down the rhetoric after two Minnesota lawmakers are murdered, two others shot.
We really need to tone down the rhetoric.
All of this hot talk is going to lead people to violence.
As though the stinking jackass barely three weeks ago, maybe two weeks ago, maybe less, Didn't just say this.
I'll leave the vote.
The governor's being mean and the governor's speaking out on that.
Well, maybe it's time for us to be a little meaner.
Maybe it's time for us to be a little more fierce.
Let me just play that from the beginning, and then we'll go slow through this.
This man now, yesterday, after two Minnesota lawmakers get murdered and two others get shot by...
Oh, why is it always the right with their hot rhetoric?
He said this a couple of weeks ago.
Oh.
The governor's being mean and the governor's speaking out on that.
Well, maybe it's time for us to be a little meaner.
Maybe it's time for us to be a little more fierce.
What could that mean?
What could that mean?
Oh, by the way, here.
Here's the notice of appointment of Tim Walz appointing the man who would go on to murder two lawmakers to his governor's workforce development board in 2019.
The governor's being mean and the governor's speaking out on that.
Well, maybe it's time for us to be a little meaner.
Maybe it's time for us to be a little more fierce.
And I put out a tweet that basically says, Tim Walls called on his supporters to be a little meaner, a little more fierce.
A few days later, a man he appointed to the governor's workforce development board murdered the only Democrat who voted with Republicans to defund illegal aliens.
No, no, but it's the right.
And it doesn't mean anything, right?
It's words when they say it.
And then when something happens, they pretend that they've got a moral high ground telling everyone to be nice and tone down the rhetoric after you have Maxine Waters telling people to get in the faces of Republicans and harass them and let them know they're not welcome.
You get AOC saying, take to the streets and fight, fight, fight.
You get who else?
Who was it that said the fight will continue?
Oh, then you get a Chuck shit face Schumer talking about the, And then, for whatever the reason, one of these unhinged lunatics goes and shoots up a baseball field of Republican senators or lawmakers.
And then they try to pretend that it was the right that did it.
Now, whether or not it's the right, the left, or just psychotic people who hear these messages and think that they are the righteous ones in their own stories of depravity, that was Tim Walz.
Three, two weeks ago, barely a week ago, three days ago, four days ago, someone that he appointed to his governor, work board, whatever the hell that was, bipartisan, my ass, dealing with racial equity, employment training, handicapped equity, goes out and shoots, kills the only lawmaker, Democrat, who voted with Republicans and shoots two others.
I read an article as I was just prepping for the show.
And I noticed that it was dealing with how the right spread brutal and cruel misinformation after Minnesota lawmaker killings.
The right-wing media ecosystem spins up narratives to serve their agendas after tragic events, regardless of accuracy.
Can you spell confession through projection?
The Guardian.
I can.
Thy name is The Guardian.
Tina Smith, Minnesota.
Oh, now I got to sign in for this crap.
Not gonna happen.
Hold on one second.
Oh, come on.
I'm gonna have to go archive this.
No, we are reading this one.
This has probably been archived because it's a little older.
Oh, come on.
Bicycle here, here, here, here, here.
That's it.
Is that good enough?
Oh, motorcycles here, here, here, here, here, here, here.
I've been told that this is for training AI bus.
Okay, this is a pot, this here, there.
Does that one count?
That count there?
This, this, this, and this.
Here, all of it, all of it.
One more step.
Thank you.
Last archive three hours ago.
Tina Smith, a Minnesota senator, confronted Mike Lee, a Utah senator, on Monday to tell him directly that his social media posts fueled ongoing misinformation about a shooting that killed her friend.
The fact that someone is close to or a victim of violence doesn't necessarily make their opinion on the matter more valid than other people's.
Tim, who was it?
It was Mike Lee put out a tweet that said Nightmare on Waltz Street.
I wouldn't have put a tweet out like that.
Not because of misinformation, disinformation.
It's quite clearly commentary.
It's not insensitive.
It'll be misinterpreted.
Plus, it's not a factual statement, nor is it a clear-cut specifying what the criticism is.
Lee's posts, which advanced conspiracy theories that a Minnesota assassin was Marxist and blamed the state's governor for Melissa Hartman's death, were among many threads of false or speculative claims swirling around online.
When you get to the punchline of this, it will make you not laugh.
Smith told Lee his posts were brutal and cruel.
He should think about the implication of what he's saying and doing.
Well, maybe we should follow Tim Wall's advice and get meaner and nastier.
Is that what should happen?
She wanted to hear directly how painful it was.
Within hours of the shooting, right-wing social media accounts with millions of followers manufactured false conspiracy theories about the suspect and his motives.
Falsely portraying the man whose friends say he's an evangelical Christian Trump supporter.
Oh my goodness, who's spreading false narratives now?
Yeah, go listen to his freaking roommate and don't ask why he has a roommate.
You dumb jackasses.
Go listen to the man who's married with five kids but has two male roommates in a beat-up shack.
And I'm not saying this to be judgmental, but don't ask why he lives in a beat-up shack with two other men with roommates.
Don't ask that.
Why would you ask that?
Why would you go ask his wife, Jennifer Belter, anything?
And we're going to get there in a second because my name comes up in this article.
False.
It is the latest example of right-wing media ecosystem that swiftly spins up narratives that serve their political agendas.
Can they spell Nicholas Sandman, or have they forgotten about that?
Regardless of accuracy, and does not correct them after further information shows them to be untrue or incomplete.
Vance Luther Belter was captured Sunday after he allegedly killed the Democrats.
Colin Rugg, an engagement farmer on X, advanced a debunkable theory to his followers on X that Horton was killed over her health care policy.
How is it debunkable?
Implying the violence came from the left.
Where's it debunked?
He shared a video of her crying, looking terrified after she was explaining why she was the lone Democrat to vote with Republicans.
I'm sure it's just a pure coincidence that the lone Democrat to vote with Republicans was killed.
Missing from the post was the context.
Hortman supported this care, only voting for its repeal to pass a state budget deal in an evenly split House Senate.
That makes it even worse, the Guardian.
And this might piss somebody off who might be involved in the foreign aid, helping in the Democratic Republic of Congo type individual.
They think they're debunking this by saying, oh, missing from the post was the context.
She only supported this.
Sorry, she supported this care, but only voted for repealing it to get a budget through with the help of the Republicans.
Like, do you hear yourself, The Guardian?
I don't think you do.
Right-wing social media personality, like Michael Cernovich, with 1.5 million followers, escalated the lie by suggesting Walls ordered the assassination.
I don't think they understand sarcasm when they see it, or hyperbole.
I haven't seen Mike's tweet about this, but I like Mike.
I'm not going to, between the Guardian I know Mike as a human personally.
He's a good man.
The Guardian is shit.
You can quote me, The Guardian.
He hasn't taken down the posting that's continued to advance the claims.
Posting on Monday, Democrats know they are now seen as the party of political violence, so their propaganda agents are trying to shift the blame.
It won't work.
That sounds like an absolutely accurate statement.
You shitheads, The Guardian.
It kind of sounds exactly like what Mike Waltz said about two weeks ago.
Maybe we need to get a little meaner.
Maybe we need to get a little nastier.
Laura Loomer, the far-right conspiracy theorist, and Trump whisperer posted, Waltz goons are now assassinating lawmakers who support legislation Waltz opposes.
I wouldn't have drafted a tweet that way.
A terrorist organization.
She called the Democratic Party a terrorist organization.
If it acts like one, if it walks like one...
Loomer and others also tried to tie Belter to No Kings protests.
Officials found rudimentary signs in the suspect's vehicle that said No Kings, an indication he knew of the event, not that he would attend it as a protester.
Do they understand what a narrative and a spin is?
This entire effing article is narrative spin.
Oh, they tried to falsely claim that he was connected to the No Kings.
He had signs in his car that said No Kings.
But they were only rudimentary.
They weren't sophisticated pamphlets.
What the hell does that even mean?
Who's the author?
Who's the author here?
I'm gonna go Rachel Lingang and Jason Gideon.
All right, I'll DM them privately though.
What does a sophisticated, highly developed pamphlet for a protest look like, you stupid jackasses?
Elon Musk, a frequent poster of unverified right wing claims, amplified the narrative to his 200 million, quoting claims that the left killed Hortman, saying the left is murderously violent.
Do we need to go to that leftist guy who shot the man at a Trump protest and then gave an interview to Vice later on and then ended up getting into a fatal shootout with Trump?
Belter's own recorded sermons exposed his extremist views.
He was definitely Christian, or at least pretending to be, while he's off gallivanting doing aid in the DRC, which, definitely not suspicious, flying directly from the DRC to Washington, definitely not suspicious, after having served on the Workforce Governance Board that operates in promoting Waltz's agenda of racial equity, definitely not suspicious.
Don't ask any of these questions, The Guardian.
You're doing wonderful work of journalism.
We can skip this.
Influencer seized on Belter's appointments to the state board, branding him a Waltz appointee to misleadingly suggest a personal relationship.
Nobody said personal.
We said professional.
We said Waltz knows who this guy is.
This wasn't like appointing a thousand people as, I don't know.
There were 41 people on the board.
And by the way, The Guardian, you raging propagandist jackasses, you know who else was on the board serving at the time when Belter was on the board?
Hoffman, the other guy that he shot.
In reality, Belter was first appointment by Waltz's predecessor, yet we all knew that, a Democrat in 2016, to a 60-member advisory board.
Waltz did, however, renew the appointment.
They just throw in.
Yeah, he did, however, renew it for another four years, considered a routine administrative decision.
It was the equivalent of calling a Sunday school volunteer, an appointee of the bishop, a local reporter wrote.
No, it wasn't, because the document actually says appointed, an appointment.
And enter.
Viva.
Right-wing ex-user Viva Fry, with more than 700,000 followers, first of all, thanks for the promotion, Guardian, posted a thread casting doubt on Belter being a Trump supporter.
The account has continued to post about the shootings, attempting to tie Waltz to Belter and his wife, Jennifer.
A different Jennifer Belter interned in Waltz's congressional office, though Fry is not accepting that answer.
Do you believe Governor Tim Walz spokesperson when they claim that the Jennifer Belter who interned for Tim Walz in 2010 is not the same Jennifer Belter who was married to the suspected assassin domestic terrorist Vance Belter?
The account asked in a poll.
Let's pause it right there.
Do you know what the results of that poll were?
95% of the people, the respondents, do not believe the Tim Walz spokesman when they say it's a different Jennifer Belter.
Now, I've said this day in and day out.
I'll admit, to ask whether or not it was the same Jennifer Belter in the context of the news as it was being broken and as it was being discovered.
And when I go to the Minnesota website and I see that Jennifer Belter interned for Tim Walls in 2010 for two months, was paid $3,566.66, give or take.
The thought didn't occur to me.
Maybe it's another Jennifer Belter.
We're not dealing with a name like Steve Smith, Mike Jones.
I don't even know what the most popular woman's name is now.
Karen Smith.
Karen Smith, okay, maybe.
Jennifer Belter.
B-O-E-L-T-E-R.
It's not the most common name on earth.
There are apparently 11 other Jennifer Belters in Minnesota.
A state with a population of 5.4 million people.
It's possible it's another Jennifer Belter, and so help me goodness, if it is, I will not just correct, I will amplify that information.
Tim Walsh has a flipping history of lying, and above and beyond a vague, ambiguous, bald affirmation assertion.
It's a different Jenny Belter.
Please move along, guys.
You're damn right I'm going to be skeptical, The Guardian.
Have you asked for any physical evidence?
Have they provided you any physical evidence?
It might be the most Magnolia-esque of coincidences.
Greenberry Hill level coincidences.
If you haven't seen Magnolia, go watch it.
It's a work of art.
It might be a coincidence.
And I promise you, if it is, and it's a different Jenny Belter, Jennifer Belter, I will...
When it comes to being right, it's not a question of being right.
It's a question of getting it right.
And despite what anyone thinks about me on earth, my only goal is to get it right.
And if I make a mistake, like accidentally thinking a fake tweet was real, I'll repeat it for longer than the person who wrote the tweet or was alleged to have will repeat it.
If it turns out to be a different Jennifer Belter...
I might still in my heart of hearts be forever skeptical.
But where the hell's the evidence?
Other than a Tim Walls spokesman saying, nope, it's a different Jennifer Belter.
Move along.
But thank you, The Guardian.
You could have DM'd me and, well, maybe you couldn't DM me because my DMs aren't open, but you're idiots.
So, it's not an appointment.
It was just a routine renewal.
For four years.
To a board that has, let's just say, 60 people.
One of whom was Hoffman, who Belter also shot.
Belter, who nobody's asking how he gets to the Dominican Republic of Congo, or if he does.
And no, Tim Walls, his spokesperson said it's a different Jennifer Belter.
Move along.
And I have to get into discussions with people online.
What kind of 30-year-old woman would take an internship?
It was two months.
Who the hell knows?
I don't know exactly what was going on in Tim Walls' office at the time.
I don't know if there was some event that he needed extra staff for.
But if there's evidence and the person comes up and says, will the real Jennifer Belter please stand up?
Then I will happily and gladly correct and amplify that correction.
Until then, sorry.
Call me skeptical.
Call me a conspiracy theorist.
The astronomical impossibility of the 11 other Jennifer Belters in a state of 5.5 million people that one of them happened to work for Tim Walz and the other one happened to be married to the man who was appointed by Tim Walz who just murdered a state lawmaker.
I'll be skeptical until I see the concrete evidence.
On Monday, posts showing a man at a protest with a shirt and a gun.
Yeah, that was bad.
There was clearly someone posting a picture that was clearly not the same guy saying this is it.
And it was a guy with a gun in his shirt at a Democrat rally.
Those are embarrassing mistakes to make.
And those were, I mean, that one was Local Republican officials have largely not contributed to the rumors, in some cases pushing back on the narratives.
Harry Niska, Republican floor leader in Minnesota House, said on Exit, he often has and will continue to criticize Wallace's policy and rhetoric, but there's no responsible basis to attribute to him any of the evil acts committed by Vance.
The ball doesn't lie.
And there might be those levels of coincidences.
But that committee was bipartisan.
My ass.
Buy partisan committees.
Don't bring on MAGA supporters to talk about racial equity in employment and training.
That he was a registered Republican in 2000 to 2004.
That he has some unknown roommate and nobody's asking why.
Reading off a phone and nobody's asking to see the text.
That this guy was a Trump supporter and he somehow knows how his friend voted even though there's no record of that.
Take that guy at his word and ignore everything else.
But I made it into the Guardian article.
And on that note, I realize that I am well behind on reading every and all of the Super Chats and the Rumble Rants, not the Super Chats.
Let me bring these up.
By the way, share that article.
Tag the Guardian.
Let them know.
Let them ask them, what's the evidence?
Just show me the evidence.
It's a different Jennifer Belter.
I'll have no problem believing it when the evidence is out there.
Thus far, Tampon Tim, who lied about everything from his military service to other stuff.
His spokesperson says, different Jennifer Belter.
Move along, people.
Viva says, D. Dayman, has your times changed?
Seems like you're over right after the quartering raids you.
Yeah, my time has changed.
It's three to four-ish.
And yeah, I mean, look, there's always going to be an overlap.
The Redacted's on at four o 'clock.
I know that quartering goes on until four.
So yeah, some people are going to miss an overlap.
It is what it is, and it'll never be perfect.
And we shan't let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
But my new time slot, 3 to 4.15-ish.
Then we go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com for the after party.
And today at 5 o 'clock, I'm going to be on with Dr. Drew afterwards.
So it's good.
And this time slot works a little bit better for me as well family-wise because it leaves more time in the evening to deal with family stuff and more time, well, I still have enough time in the morning to...
do all the reading and you know get what i need to get done done king of built on by the way today i was I now understand the meme of the skeleton with dust on it just sitting there waiting.
And I'm going to post it like...
Between 8 and 12. I'm not complaining because these are first world problems.
Between 8 and 12. Shows up at 1.30-ish.
And then tells you that your disgusting, filthy dogs in the downstairs have sullied up the coils and now you've got to spend $1,200 to get the coils cleaned.
And you say, that sounds very expensive.
And then you look online like, what are you going to do?
You are hostage to the demands of the population.
All that to say air conditioning is not something we really have to worry about in Canada.
And the maintenance is just...
King of Biltong in the house says premium Biltong from Biltong USA.
High protein, keto friendly, no additives, authentic South African flavor, free shipping over 55 bucks.
Shop now.
Biltong of $54.95.
So $54.96, you get free shipping.
Code Viva for 10% off.
Kim's Coffee Talk says Randy only gets paid to stir up trouble.
Most teachers do not want to be in the union.
Randy.
The dialogue box says, P.S., how about Viva's Victors as your crew followers tag?
Viva's Victors.
What did we have?
It was Viva's Dogs.
Viva Dogs.
I'm not sure which one's best.
We'll see, but that's not bad.
Dialogue box says, it's the 60-year-old, extremely excitable, apparently drunk, LOL, cup of tea woman who likes to run.
Please pop by, folks, and have a listen to TBD, the TDB.
The dialogue box, 11. I think they're for Iran.
What is sorry?
And Pinochet's helicopter tour says, so basically Democrats are mad at Republicans for taking away their slaves again.
They've been out saying it for the longest of times now.
And I just said, like, when Joel Osborne, not Joel Osborne, whatever, the woman Osborne, who's going to clean your toilets?
Then they got mad at her.
Now they just say it openly and plainly.
We done picking cotton.
Who's going to pick your vegetables?
Vegetable fruit products will rot in the fields.
Who's going to screw in those tiny little screws on your Apple iPhone?
It's undoubtedly and absolutely modern-day slavery espoused by the party that is seemingly always espoused it.
Chlorophin.
Chlorophin?
More like borophin here.
Hold on one second.
It's not borophin.
That's just in our locals community.
Chlorophin, she has a part-time job working for the UK government.
Oh, that was the first one.
Rustang says, tomorrow, Mark Grober will grieve Viva about his nefarious past.
I just, you know, I don't want the talk to be all about Israel and Iran because as it is on my end, I'm taking shit from both sides.
Well, that was a good, righteous, long rant.
Freaking Guardian, you bunch of scumbags.
All right, we still got more.
To talk about, to talk about.
Wait a minute, everybody.
Before, we are now 12,900, 13,000 strong.
Make sure that you are subscribed if you are not already subscribed.
Turn on notifications if you don't have notifications turned on.
Get a book, Louis the Lobster, over at Amazon.
It's a children's book that I wrote that a daughter of a community member illustrated.
Abigail Martin, the illustrations are beautiful.
And it's a way to get something good while supporting my independence, which will always remain intact because my conscience...
I don't believe in God.
And yet, I am fearful of something greater than myself.
I'm living my life as though it's being proverbially, metaphorically, metaphysically recorded.
Someone is watching on a big camera up there like...
I'm living my life as though my father is still alive, but as though he's always watching.
And though I know my father is sitting there saying, Viva, do you have to swear so much on Twitter?
Integrity, honesty, and accuracy are the most important things to me.
Integrity, mostly because it encompasses the others.
So yeah, there will be no biases that are tainted.
1775, which is one of the sponsors, you know, if ever any sponsor said we don't want to be on that particular episode, that will not be a sponsor for long.
The sponsors are to support the work that you do and not dictate the work that you do.
And the community support, likewise, which is why sometimes I will piss off our community by taking certain positions.
All right, all that to say, what the hell was I talking about?
We have the last story of the day, peeps.
What was it?
Conservative MP.
This we started the show with, so that's not that.
What I wanted to bring up Let me see.
I think Quartering raid just now, says Encryptus 348.
Welcome to quartering!
Thank you!
So they're only going to catch the tail end of the show.
Let me see who we're going to raid today, and then we're going to get into the last story before we bring it on over to Viva Barnes.
Who shall I raid today?
Boom.
Okay, we'll see about this.
Now, do you guys hear the dog whining?
Okay, never mind.
Forget about the air conditioning.
What was this?
Oh, yeah, that's right.
Okay, so this was the other thing.
This was supposed to be tied in with the Kash Patel arrest of the guy.
So, totally separate story.
Cash Patel announcing...
I have immediately declassified the material and turned the documents over to the Chairman Grassley for further review.
And here's the article from Just the News.
FBI gives congressional intel on alleged Chinese plot to create fake mail-in ballots in 2020.
All right.
Maybe I'm playing semantics.
Maybe I want Kash Patel to come out and say, We found new evidence indicating overt collusion, not with the CCP or involving the CCP, but involving the Democrat Party, which, given the level of Chinese Communist Party spies infiltrating the Democrats, we might very well see.
Bang, bang, McFang, Fang, Swalwell, I'm looking at you.
The including suggests that it's in addition to or among other documents.
And my question is, if they've discovered new Evidence or evidence of concealment, can criminal investigations be reopened?
Without mentioning against whom, this is the question that I have and this is the question that I know is a source of frustration for the people.
Still have the benefit of the freedom of speculating, of asking annoying questions, but also have the benefit of listening to not just the audience, but the voice of the internet.
And when Kash Patel was on with Rogan and people were very frustrated at some of the, not dismissive, but statements that sounded like, well, that's done and closed, get frustrated.
But in that same interview, it was revealing, if you find evidence of concealment, that is what we call tolls, that pauses statutes of limitations, and that might make
want to see the likes of Adam Schiff prosecuted for his crimes.
Crimes.
Lying under oath.
Lying to the American people.
Obstruction.
Falsifying evidence.
Destruction of evidence.
With the Adam Schiff's and the Kinzinger's and anybody involved in the January 6th Kangaroo Court Committee.
And what we initially heard from Kash Patel was a lot of these, you know, perjury statutes of limitations have lapsed.
Then we also hear Kash Patel suggest, or overtly state confirmed, boxes of information that was intended to be concealed from the FBI discovered in a room behind lock and key within the FBI Bureau.
Can we ask now whether or not, or can we get confirmation as to whether or not charges will be brought if evidence of concealment is revealed?
You know, with the X-Files, It was called the Twitter files at the time, but now the Twitter is X. It is the X-Files.
When it came out, the degree to which intelligence, Democrat operators, Democrat players, Democrat politicians, Jen Psaki, That struck many people as being criminal.
No charges.
When you have now Patel saying, okay, well, we've got evidence, documents, we've discovered documents, including documents that involve the CCP.
All right, good.
Might we expect some prosecutions right now?
Might we expect some reopening of investigations right now?
It's a question I would love to ask.
May I have the opportunity to ask it?
Viva Voce, that would be absolutely awesome.
I'm going to have to ask Kash Patel publicly.
These are the questions I would ask.
Same questions for the Butler assassination attempt.
Is that case closed?
And if there's evidence of concealment, there's no way anything in that could be statute of limitation barred.
And there's no way, as far as I'm concerned, that it was one lone nutbag with no let it happen on purpose by other Politicized entities.
But these are the questions that I would ask.
So Kash Patel opening the door.
Hopefully it opens slowly and then someone from the inside just kicks it right open.
And then there was one other thing.
Was it this one?
Oh no, this is the same one.
Well, there was that.
Let's go read the chat before we head on over and raid.
Whom are we going to raid?
Let me go to my text messages and see.
We are raiding the redacted today, ladies and gentlemen.
Let me give this over to Encryptus so that we shall initiate the raid.
Bada bing, bada boom.
And they're talking about...
Emergency broadcast is this World War III.
U.S. preps for massive retaliation.
King's Day false flags.
Go check out Redacted people.
But I would ask you even more so to come and become a member.
of our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community.
Above average, $10 a month or $100 a year if you get the entire year in one shot.
Lately, I've started doing some discussion about Ultimate Fighter trading cards.
As I like to call them, investments in the future.
We have our after party there.
It's always fun.
And we've got an amazing community of people who intercourse.
Who exchange and have dialogues, and we have our after party there.
There's some stuff that's behind a paywall for the supporters only, but a ton of stuff virtually, I would say the majority of it, is for members who don't necessarily have to support.
You can get coins and support if you so choose, but that's it.
Tomorrow, I will be on with What's Up with Lord Buckley at 6 o 'clock, and I think we have an emergency broadcast at noon with the Duran, and then I don't know if I'm going to have my regular show at 3 o 'clock, regardless.
Holy crap, I'm sitting on my ass talking to a camera a lot these days.
But bear in mind also, for every Hour and a quarter, hour and 45 minutes, including the after party of a broadcast.
It's six or seven hours of reading and just making sure that I've got the right clips, I've got the right info, the right intel, and if I have to make any corrections, I do.
Have we raided the redacted?
Let me see here.
Let me see if we see it.
Oh, the raid has begun, people.
Go raid the redacted.
Show some love.
Let them know from whence you came.
And we are going to take the party on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
And let me just go to the main chat here.
Refresh.
This is what we do for those who are interested.
I will bring it up.
And we do this.
I refresh, get the questions on the side here.
Did Bolster get any money, or Belter, get any money from USAID to go to the DRC?
There was, so Jake Jacobs, there was some confusion about the Red Lion Group that he was running.
So that's where I, you know, if I don't understand the information, I try to avoid hypothesizing or speculating on it.
His group is called the Red Lion Group, and then his wife was CEO of some security group, private security group.
There was some confusion, I think, because there were multiple red lion groups.
And by the way, Barnes always says, you know, for these three-letter agencies, they always pick not generic, but, you know, names that can be interchangeable.
So I don't know.
I'm going to try to pick the brain of Data Republican when she's got some info on this.
Taseba says, I would bet good money that this idea does not come under any comptroller duties.
Someone else will file the arrest.
ICE was doing detention.
And then we got a guess on the amount here.
I hear what Viva is saying, but anyone who gets hurt at these, quote, rallies and riots made the choice to go.
Sorry, but I don't care.
People who live or work in the area have to travel through.
No, I say journalists.
I mean, if journalists are getting neurodivergences, I feel violated, David.
Okay, I don't know what that means, but what we are going to do right now is, And now we're going to bring the party on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Everybody, rumble if you're not coming.
Godspeed.
Rumble.
I'm coming tomorrow.
So you know the schedule for the week.
Oh, tomorrow I've got Dad of a Republican's husband coming on.
Holy crap, apples.
So Dad of a Republican's husband faced some cancellation, social backlash, like they were trying to boycott and bankrupt his whiskey distillery.
And I think, you know what, I don't want to mention the states or locations.
I know it's public.
So sorry, Data Republicans' Husband is coming on tomorrow.
So maybe I'll see if we have some intel on stuff related to the Belcher.
So that's what's coming tomorrow for tomorrow's show, 3 o 'clock.
And that is it.
Ye shall go forth and prosper as you go raid.
Redacted.
▲
Export Selection