Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 3, 2025 - Viva & Barnes

01:35:16

Michael Cohen's Bad Legal Advice on Biden Pardons! Canadian Conservaties Grow a Pair? AND MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	For those of you listening on podcast format, what you are looking at right now is a plume of smoke rising into the sky.
	For those of you who don't know, it is Mount Etna, about to blow its lid.
	Emit more carbon dioxide than any wood-burning bagel oven on Earth.
	So the next time the government tells you that you have to have bagels that are baked and they taste like crap, just imagine this volcano erupting.
	Oh my God.
	Is that the Havalex?
	Huh?
	Is that the Havalex?
	Can you spell pyroclastic flow?
	It's all fun and games.
	Yeah, now's about the time you want to start running.
	Is it hot?
	It's hot.
	I don't think that's what she's saying.
	Oh.
	So that one was good.
	Just like a word of advice.
	If you ever want to know how far back you need to be from something in order to be safe from explosions or pyroclastic flow, go watch some fertilizer explosion videos and you'll know that you are never, never far enough away.
	I don't know what happened to these people, but the video footage is mind-blowing.
	Hey, leave!
	This is Dave over here.
	Hey, stop the phone!
	Come on!
	Can you imagine, like, the day you decide to go visit the volcano is the day it erupts.
	Look at this.
	Come on!
	Come on, man!
	What's amazing is actually watching it expand and then retract as the moon starts to rise in the sky.
	Like, everybody wants to have this experience if they would just be certain that they would live in survival.
	Look at this.
	The bloom of smoke blocking the sun as they run and try to escape.
	The amazing thing is that the ash looks like smoke.
	Holy crap, Alex.
	I just watched a documentary, I forget which one it was, called a volcanic explosion.
	There were like 20-something people on the island.
	It's tight!
	Thank you.
	That's wild.
	Now, from what I've been reading, by the way, that eruption accounted for like, what, 10 or 20 percent of global emissions for the year, that singular eruption.
	And so...
	When they tell you that you can't drive your car more than 15 minutes because your car is going to be the emitter of CO2 that's going to radically destroy the earth while they fly on their private jets.
	To tell you that, you should ask some questions.
	Someone had an interesting insight to this volcanic eruption and they said something like, Because the idiocy of all of this, I am not an environmental expert.
	Whether or not I know more than the average layperson is an irrelevant comparison.
	I'm not an expert.
	But I do know that plants consume carbon dioxide.
	And I do know that when the earth warms up a little bit, you get plant life flourishing and that emits oxygen.
	and there's something of an ebb and flow of the Earth.
	I do know that I do know that a freezing over, which temperatures tend to lower after massive eruptions, which sort of offsets everything that's going on, a global cooling deep freeze is existentially more disastrous for humankind than global warming.
	Whatever they refer to as global warming.
	That is a monumentally beautiful eruption that you see right there.
	And it's almost as though the Earth says, "All right, we're going to emit some carbon dioxide because plants, algae, phytoplankton, they look Let me see what's going on here.
	What was the documentary that I saw?
	The island of Santorini is shaking like crazy.
	that's what Encryptus says, agent guru underscore IO, who helps with the show is, What was the documentary?
	That I saw.
	I forget what it was, but it was an amazing documentary about people stuck on an island.
	The kids' parents died.
	They all got burnt by the steam.
	Their clothes didn't melt off, but they got horribly burnt.
	A bunch of them died because they were visiting a volcano and it erupted.
	Don't breathe the volcano.
	This is Dashman 91 from our locals community.
	If you don't know this, that's not just smoke.
	That ash is not just like organic ash.
	That is like crystallized, broken fragments of glass and rock shards.
	I went to Hawaii for my honeymoon with my wife, and before we had kids, when we could be reckless a little bit more, we took a doors-off helicopter tour over an erupting volcano.
	And, you know, we got some local who was selling photography of the volcanic flow going into the ocean, blowing off steam.
	He's like, you can't be there without a face mask because when that goes into the water and it immediately cools off and sends up steam, ash and whatever, there's literally like...
	So as the world sits on the edge of a potential World War III, as we are being told that the climate crisis requires us all to live in 15-minute cities, own nothing, and be happy, Mother Nature is telling us of mice and men.
	I forget what the expression is, but you can plan a picnic, but you can't control the weather.
	That was Black Eyed Peas, as far as I remember.
	Good afternoon, everybody.
	Viva Fry, former Montreal litigator, turned current Florida rumbler.
	My new time slot only for this week is 2.30 to 4.00-ish.
	And we'll see how it goes.
	And next week it should be back to normal.
	If I look like I'm in a bit of pain...
	I caught a nice peacock this morning.
	Let me just get my finger in focus.
	And if you can see it, there is both the entry wound and the exit wound of the spine of the fish up to All right.
	Before we get started on today's show, we're going to talk about Michael Cohen's bad legal advice and a DOJ that seems to be listening to it, or at least suggesting implementing the same terrible tactic, and I will explain why.
	We've got some news coming out of Canada.
	A conservative actually speaking conservative.
	A W that is not a W allegedly coming out of the conservatives forcing.
	Allegedly forcing, making an order that the Liberals table a budget before the summer.
	Spoiler alert, it's not all it's cracked up to be.
	And a bunch of other awesome, awesome stuff.
	But before we get into that, speaking of, you know, health, staying healthy, and taking care of your body, or at least not inhaling the liquid vapor glass from volcanic eruptions.
	As you get older, everybody knows this, things start to hurt more.
	Your knees crack when you stand up.
	I find that I can't sit down any longer or squat for an extended period of times, but doing my best to reverse what some people think are these signs of aging.
	By the way, it's right here.
	I got my resources here.
	Qualia Senolytic, the sponsor of today's show, is the first of its kind formula designed to help your body naturally eliminate senescent cells, which are called zombie cells.
	We'll get into it.
	It's one of the best aging, anti-aging breakthroughs out there.
	Qualia Senolytic.
	Right here, this is for the mind.
	Senolytics are a field of science that are revolutionizing human aging.
	They're called senescent cells zombie cells and as you age you get these zombie cells much like a tree that has dead leaves on it and you need to prune the dead leaves so that the green leaves can age grow properly.
	Similar thing with your body.
	Accumulation of zombie cells leads to less energy, slower workout recovery, joint discomfort, and basically feeling old.
	Qualia Senolytic is a groundbreaking, clinically tested supplement with nine vegan plant-derived compounds that help your body naturally eliminate senescent cells, helping you feel years younger in just months.
	How it works?
	You take the packet one month after month, and then you let nature and science take its course.
	Experience the science of feeling younger.
	Go to qualialife.com forward slash Viva for up to 50% off your purchase and use code Viva for an additional 15%.
	Qualialife, Q-U-A-L-I-A life.com slash Viva.
	You'll get an extra 15% off of that promo code.
	Your older self will thank you.
	Thank you, Qualia, for sponsoring this show.
	Link is in the description.
	Let's start off with the L's before we get to the W's, before we get to the L's.
	What the hell am I saying?
	We're going to start off with Canada, then we're going to get to Michael Cohen.
	And it should be one of the three eternal truths.
	If you're listening to Michael Cohen, you're probably making a mistake.
	Out of Canada, there's a guy who actually sounds like a conservative, who gave something of a speech where I said, my goodness, if only we had seen more of this during the election cycle, the election might have turned out a little bit differently.
	I present to you Matt Strauss.
	Inheritor.
	Yeah, I was going to make a Levi Strauss joke.
	I'm just not going to make it.
	This is Matt Strauss.
	This is in Parliament.
	It was a nine-minute speech.
	I'm not going to play the full three-and-a-half-minute clip just to give a taste of what we needed to have seen during the last election cycle.
	But, you know, the old expression, freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose.
	Once you've already lost the election, I guess maybe then you feel free to really go a little bit more hardcore, go a little bit more hard in the paint, as we say in Canada.
	And now we have some conservatives going a little harder in the paint where I think they should have been going super-duper ultra-mega-hard in the paint during the election and not waiting to lose it in order to go hard because they would have not necessarily lost it had they just unchained themselves from the shackles of their own suppression and their own censorship.
	It's damn beautiful, actually.
	Listen to this.
	When farming is socialized, you get bread lines and people die to starvation while standing in Soviet bread lines.
	When health care is socialized, you get lines in the ER.
	And I promise you people have died and are dying in waiting rooms, in emergency rooms across this country right now.
	Let me pause it just to flesh out the veracity of what Matt Strauss is saying.
	There were estimates that 15,000 people died in waiting rooms.
	In Canada, it was either 2022 or 2023.
	There were other estimates that 75,000 Canadians died waiting for doctors between 2018 and whatever the end date of that study was, 2024.
	You have to wait about a year and a half in some provinces to get a GP.
	Check out the wait rooms.
	I'll pull up the lists which are online, the wait times.
	And they can be 36 hours.
	Go look at how many people died in ERs in Nova Scotia in 2023.
	It will blow your freaking mind.
	So this is not hyperbole, what Matt's saying.
	It's not misinformation.
	It's truth that needed to be screamed loud and proud from the rooftops during the election cycle.
	But unfortunately, it wasn't.
	You might think that I'm being overwrought and seeing the ghost of communism where it does not exist.
	However, I would note...
	A prime minister who released a statement lionizing brutal communist dictator Fidel Castro when he died.
	A prime minister whose answer to every social problem, dental care, child care, pharma care, school lunch, climate change, what have you, was always more socialism, more central planning, more top-down pronouncements, less freedom to make choices for yourself and your family.
	The zenith of all this top-down control came during the pandemic.
	The members opposite went full communism.
	They locked Canadians down in their homes.
	They ruined weddings, funerals, Easter's, proms, and Christmases.
	They closed the borders.
	They kept mothers from children and brothers from sisters.
	They deprived this house of its ancient rights.
	They spent $600 billion of taxpayer money with no budget, doubled our national debt to pay healthy 16-year-olds to sit in their basement.
	Then, as now, they did all this in the name of crisis management.
	Let me let this go a little bit more.
	Physicians, professors, and journalists who spoke out against these abuses were hunted down.
	They had their licenses and their jobs threatened.
	I know this because it happened to me.
	At Queen's University, where I taught, Jane Philpott herself, one of the only two cabinet ministers to speak truth to Justin Trudeau's power, informed me in her dean's office that the reason the administration had to harass me was that I criticized the government.
	That is a direct quote.
	We'll end it there.
	Why the hell was this not the theme of the election?
	It's just mind-blowing that the theme of the election became...
	And yeah, what's done cannot be undone, but that's a damn good speech.
	And I invite all of you to go check out the tweet that had a three and a half minute version of it.
	And I will send you the tweet that had the full nine minute speech coming from Matt Strauss because it's well worth the watch.
	So as the conservatives now seem to be growing a pair because they got nothing left to lose, they've already lost the election.
	You have the Liberal government, we talked about it yesterday, facilitating an outright invasion of Canada.
	An outright replacement of Canada.
	What is it?
	I think it's like something now one in five or one in four people in Canada are born outside of Canada.
	The liberal government that ran the, Companies are exploiting of the cheap labor.
	It's not good for the economy.
	It's not good for housing.
	So we're going to tamp down on immigration.
	Something that, oddly enough, you didn't even really hear from the Conservative Party.
	You had some members of the Liberal Party actually talking about deportation, but you had, well, we'll reduce immigration to something reasonable, That's a crisis that's going on in Canada.
	So the Liberals ran on that.
	We'll reduce immigration to something reasonable.
	395,000 a year in a country of 40 million, down from 500,000, which is already ridiculous if you believe the numbers, which I don't because they're much more.
	And then we got the numbers for the first four months of 2025, 817,000 for the first four months.
	Now, I'm not a mathematician, but that amounts to about 2.5 million in the year.
	If it stays at those levels, whatever.
	So violate one election promise within the month or two of having been elected, or at least maybe they couldn't have done anything until they got elected.
	So we'll give them some grace there.
	$817,000, it's an outright abject replacement.
	It's not happening, but it's good that it is, and shut your mouth for noticing, bigot.
	The liberals announced they're not tabling a budget until, I don't know when, after summer.
	And why?
	Some people, in defense of the liberals, because it's defended at all costs, say, you don't table a budget during a tariff war with Donald Trump.
	Which explains exactly why a liberal government would have wanted to exacerbate a tariff war with Donald Trump, because it washes their hands of the responsibility of tabling a freaking budget, even if they had no intentions of respecting that budget.
	Remember what happened to Chrystia Freeland before she resigned?
	She was going to get out there and explain how they were What was it?
	20 billion?
	It was 20 billion.
	Over their projected deficit.
	It's a table of frickin' bill, even if you have budget, even if you have no intention of respecting it.
	But no.
	Exacerbate a crisis so that you can operate in the secrecy of darkness.
	Blame Donald Trump.
	We can't table a bill, a budget, until the trade war is over, until the tariff war is over.
	We don't want to show our cards, tip our cards to Donald Trump.
	Absolute horseshit.
	And the news of the day today, I get up on the internet.
	I see tweets.
	I read tweets, and someone was saying that, um, breaking.
	Here.
	You know, without getting into the details of my morning routine, I'm sitting and reading the news.
	And I come across a tweet that looks mildly optimistic.
	Jinglang He, University of Toronto, 28, conservative, player, views of my own, follows and reposts.
	Oh, I say follows and reposts don't equal endorsement, as if you need to say that.
	All right.
	Tweets.
	Breaking.
	Parliament just passed a conservative motion ordering Mark Carney to table a budget before the summer break.
	The liberals are now forced to table a budget this spring or face a confidence vote.
	Checkmate.
	Well done.
	CPC underscore.
	Now, I'm not actually trying to put this person on blast or mock them.
	They may have misunderstood the extent, scope, and compelling nature of whatever resolution or amendment thereto they were reading.
	They might not have read it.
	And they might have understood this to be the case in their sincerest of beliefs.
	So I read this.
	I say, okay, well, that's interesting.
	Do a little bit of fishing.
	Do a little bit of digging.
	Just scratch the surface with a dirty fingernail.
	And, you know, initial understanding is that it's a non-binding vote.
	So I just tweet back.
	Not sure.
	My understanding is a non-binding vote.
	Not sure if that's accurate.
	But it seems more symbolic than binding.
	Also, not sure what prevents the liberals from tabling a budget than simply announcing a massive higher deficit than projected, exactly like they did under Trudeau.
	As they say in French, plus ça change, plus c 'est la même chose.
	The more things change, the more they stay the same.
	Then I do a little bit more digging.
	About a knuckle depth worth of digging and come across the actual resolution or the amendment as proposed.
	Was it by Adam?
	What's his name?
	Scheer?
	Now, hold on one second.
	Let me get it.
	Because I want to read it and not make a mistake.
	Oh, tabarnouche.
	It was the actual resolution with the wording, and it's not what it says it is.
	Crabapple.
	So let me pull up the tweet here from my own Twitter thread.
	Oy, oy, oy, oy, oy, oy.
	It's so bad and it's so depressing.
	And then you don't assume bad faith of the person who's hyping it up like a massive victory, but it's not a massive victory.
	Here we go.
	This is the actual wording of the text.
	Sponsor of this motion, the Honorable Andrew Scheer.
	Subject, address and reply to the speech from the throne.
	Amendment as amended.
	With sub-amendment.
	Thanks a lot.
	Holy shitballs.
	They do this so that regular people can't understand what the ever-loving hell is going on.
	Subject.
	Address in reply to the speech from the throne.
	Amendment as amended with sub-amendment.
	Sponsor of this motion, the Honorable Andrew Scheer.
	Conservative.
	Regina Capel Saskatchewan.
	Motion at text that the motion be amended by adding the following.
	Quote.
	And we urge.
	Your Majesty's advisors to include a firm commitment to present to Parliament an economic update or budget this spring before the House adjourns for the summer that incorporates measures aimed at unleashing Canada's economic potential, including full accountability of Canada's finances with respect for the areas of jurisdiction and the institutions of Quebec and the provinces, as well as Indigenous peoples.
	What?
	In the ever-loving hell does that mean?
	Urge, firm commitment, verbal diarrhea.
	And this is what passed Yays 166 to Nays 164, and then you have it there.
	And then I included a list of the link to the House of Commons for anybody who wants to get it.
	And I'll give it to you.
	So it is by no means the...
	It's by no means the smashing victory, ordering the production of a budget.
	We urge you to firmly undertake, oh, we did our best.
	We did our best, but we can't.
	We undertook to make a firm commitment, and we've abided by that firm commitment.
	We've just been unable to meet our commitment.
	We apologize.
	Too bad, so sad.
	Go screw yourselves.
	Link here, if anybody cares about that.
	So that's what's going on in Canada.
	More things change.
	The more things stay the same after 10 years of liberal devastation and liberal destruction, you're going to have another four years of it.
	There's going to be no non-confidence vote occurring immediately after an election.
	It passed 166 to 164, this amendment that actually compels nobody to do anything.
	The liberals have 169 seats.
	And with the help of drunken McGee there, Elizabeth May and the NDPs there at like one 76, uh, de facto control.
	And I bet, There will be no budget.
	There will be no accountability.
	And all these jackass politicians, conservatives included, are going to go take their summer break and absolutely nothing is going to happen.
	So that's the Canadian updates.
	Was there anything else we cared about out of Canada?
	Care to boot out of Canada?
	I don't think so.
	I don't think so.
	We're going to get into something that's going to make your chest hurt in a second.
	But before we even do that, let's get into something that's going to make you feel a little bit better and make you a little bit healthier.
	The second and last sponsor of today's show, Field of Greens, peeps.
	It's an amazing thing.
	It's a little-known thing that you've got to eat your fruits and veggies.
	Do it, people.
	If you can't do it, you've got an alternative.
	It's Field of Greens.
	Let me get this out of here so you can actually see what the product looks like.
	We can win a beautiful, beautiful truck.
	Field of Greens, people, is a desiccated, that is a pulverized, not an extract, not a supplement, fruits and vegetables.
	And it's an amazing thing that people don't get their fruits and veggies.
	And even if you do, you can swap out an unhealthy habit in the afternoon for a healthy habit in an afternoon.
	It's USDA organic certified, made in America.
	One spoonful is one serving of fruits and vegetables that are designed to help specific organ functions.
	I'm not sure.
	I think it might be the only one that does it.
	A guaranteed health improvement or your money back.
	Go to your doctor's appointment next time.
	And if he doesn't, he or she doesn't notice an improvement in your health, blood work, whatever, you get your money back.
	Field of Greens, it's delicious.
	It's healthy.
	It's taking care of yourself.
	It's making sure that you are there to provide for the people who rely on you.
	Each fruit and vegetable in this beautiful design is specifically picked for metabolism, heart, liver, kidneys, body function.
	Go over to fieldofgreens.com.
	You'll use promo code VIVA to get 20% off and free shipping.
	And it'll bring you to a Brickhouse Nutrition website.
	But it's fieldofgreens.com forward slash VIVA.
	Use promo code VIVA to get 20% off and free shipping.
	And thank you, Field of Greens, for sponsoring the show.
	Something that's good for your health.
	And let's just move on to something that's...
	Yesterday, it broke, or at least I learned of it as we were live, that Moderna has gotten FDA approval for their revised, updated, or some jibby jab 2.0, and it's, what's it called?
	NN Spiker.
	And why anyone wants to have the word spike in something that they're putting into their body, it's bad freaking marketing.
	Not that it matters.
	Moderna got FDA approval for their new updated COVID...
	And I didn't know how to feel about it yesterday.
	And I'm fairly certain I know how I'm feeling about it today.
	because I got sent a link of Dr. Campbell talking about it.
	And what I thought was problematic, just on superficial first reading of it yesterday, I am now fairly certain is...
	Quite problematic.
	If I can find...
	Dr. Campbell's not happy, people.
	That's Dr. Campbell's face of, gosh darn it, I wish I wasn't unhappy and I'm thoroughly unimpressed.
	I gotta say with a British accent, what you're looking at right now is Dr. Campbell thoroughly unimpressed.
	Let's hear what Dr. Campbell has to say about the Moderna, recently FDA-approved spike.
	The more things change, the more things stay the same.
	A lot of people are going to be disappointed.
	A lot of people are going to have questions.
	And I say jokingly, at the very least, you can go take this wonderful jab at your sole discretion without being compelled to do it.
	So there's slight progress in turning around this massive, corrupt pharmaceutical ship.
	A warm welcome to this talk.
	Now, the FDA in the United States has just approved a new vaccine, an mRNA, Moderna vaccine, with known serious adverse events and known Multiple other adverse events.
	This is disappointing to put it mildly.
	I think we have to assume that the American bureaucracy and the FDA is more of an oil tanker, which is going to take a while to turn around rather than a sailing yacht which can tack quickly.
	What I've realized, by the way, is if I would just talk with a British accent, I think my channel would be exponentially more popular.
	People wouldn't say that man is crazy.
	They would say he must know what he's talking about.
	I'm joking.
	I just love the British accent.
	Okay, let's see what he has to say.
	Because the adverse events...
	If you haven't seen The Deer Hunter, go watch The Deer Hunter.
	It's, I think, one of the singularly best movies ever made.
	The wedding scene is a little long.
	The movie is absolutely life-altering.
	It involves Russian roulette.
	And I'm calling this like, this is like deer hunter roulette or pharmaceutical deer hunter is what I called it on Twitter.
	Listen to these freaking stats.
	Allegedly, apparently coming from Moderna's own data.
	I'm relying on Dr. Campbell for this.
	And if he's wrong, I will retract and correct.
	I don't think he's wrong.
	He's been reliable for years.
	And so with that comes the trust that I haven't seen the Moderna's own data, but I'm watching Dr. Campbell assess it.
	And it will blow your freaking mind.
	Let me immediately give you the evidence for this claim.
	Here we are.
	This is the letter granting biological license application approval.
	And really quite a concerning event.
	Now, this is the vaccine here, MN spike.
	It should probably work out from this.
	This is an mRNA vaccine that produces spike protein.
	I know.
	I know.
	The lipid nanoparticles will go everywhere.
	No, because it works so well the first time.
	I just want to see this here.
	What's it called?
	MNEX spike.
	What a great MNE spike.
	I know.
	I know.
	The lipid nanoparticles will go everywhere.
	I know.
	This is like, I'm not even angry.
	I'm just disappointed.
	Serious adverse events of this vaccine, from the manufacturer's own information, serious adverse events were reported by 2.7% of participants who received this new vaccine.
	The comparative vaccine, it was 2.6%.
	So the new vaccine, 2.7% serious adverse events, the older vaccine that is replacing, 2. 6%.
	And of course, presumably, this is a vaccine to combat JN1 variant.
	We can stop there.
	And I don't know if there's an actual definition for what qualifies as a serious adverse event.
	But I presume, by definition, it has to be serious.
	2.7%.
	2.7%.
	Like, do you know what 100 divided by 2.7 is?
	37, give or take.
	That is like saying your chances are one third.
	Sorry, hold on a second.
	One in 37 of having an adverse event.
	One in 37 people who take that, and apparently it's a fifth of the concentration level of their original Vax jab.
	One in 37 people who take that are going to have a serious adverse event.
	How many people do you think out of 100 are going to have a serious adverse reaction?
	From what is left of the COVID flu cold.
	How many?
	And it's like, they just say the words, like, oh, 2.7%.
	That means if you have 100 jelly beans in a jar, 2.7 of them are going to make you very, very sick.
	Go ahead and eat the jar.
	Not totally analogous.
	I appreciate that, but it's a good visual.
	One in 37 people are going to get adverse events from this jab for whatever variant of COVID is going around right now.
	And nobody's up in arms about this?
	At the very least, we're not being compelled to take it.
	At the very least, it's not a requirement to maintain your job, your military service.
	And I grokked it.
	It's worth what it's worth.
	Modena's new spike vaccine just got FDA approval.
	1 in 37 of getting seriously injured from it.
	Pharmaceutical deer hunter.
	But at least it's not mandatory.
	From Grok, posts on X claim a 2.7% serious adverse event rate for MNX spike compared to 2.6% from the older spike backs.
	Citing Moderna's own data, these posts express concern over the approval given the slightly higher rate and lack of placebo-controlled trials.
	However, these figures are not corroborated by official FDA or CDC reports in the provided results, and X posts are not reliable.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	Unless Dr. Campbell...
	2.7% serious adverse events from a jab for what is left of COVID.
	You've got to start getting a little blackpilled.
	I'm getting a little blackpilled.
	I don't know what the chat feels.
	I don't know if they've entirely just I'm trying to look up who exactly is responsible for authorizing this.
	And I do wonder if it's any appointed member of Trump's cabinet.
	Flip side, all right, authorize something.
	Make sure that they advise everybody that it's wildly dangerous, or at least 2.7% adverse reaction, and let people decide if they want to play Russian roulette, pharmaceutical deer hunter with their bodies.
	But it's not encouraging, and that's putting it mildly.
	Current estimates put a Falcon-heavy launch at about 79,000 metric tons of CO2, while a Starship launch is slightly less at 76,000 metric tons.
	the most common launch, the comparatively tiny Falcon 9 emits around 28,000 metric tons of carbon.
	The question this is, however...
	How many metric tons of CO2 did Etna release?
	Let's just get this into perspective.
	I don't know if Grok's going to be able to answer this.
	Mount Etna's emissions vary depending on activity, yada, yada, yada.
	Oh, we're talking millions of metric tons.
	It's not comparable.
	In fact, it looks like it would be on an ordinary day emitting as much as...
	As much as one launch.
	Oh, let me see what the chat...
	Is the chat getting blackpilt?
	I just want to see what...
	I won't read the end of that.
	I do wonder if they're still going to have immunity.
	Do they still have immunity from this thing?
	Let them sell it and let them get sued for liability.
	For people who get injured from this.
	Although they're going to say now, now they're operating in full awareness of fact and law.
	So at the very least, they're not violating the Nuremberg Code by giving people informed consent.
	Yeah, it might risk Mario carditis or whatever for something that's probably not going to do a damn thing to you.
	So you can take a chance with your life if you so choose.
	Oh, okay.
	All right.
	All right.
	Let's move on to something funny.
	I think I played it yesterday, but now I understand a little bit better what's going on.
	In Cryptis, did I play this video yesterday of Eric Swallowwell at his desk and someone coming in and asking him a question?
	No, you didn't.
	I did not.
	Well, everybody, enjoy watching Eric Swallowell, Spybanger McGee, Zelensky has some cards left to play.
	Go Google the word Zelensky cards on Twitter and you're going to see the memo was sent and the memo was received.
	Now, for whatever the reason, it's Trump and tacos.
	Just bear in mind, Eric Swallowell alleged to have and never denied having fornications.
	And some people make jokes as to who is receiving and who is giving with a Chinese spy, Fang Fang.
	I'm going to pause it.
	This pisses me off.
	These effing people live like gods among men.
	Look at this shit.
	He's a fucking king.
	Enter his realm.
	Look at this nice leather couch.
	Oh, look at the size of this room.
	They erect monuments to themselves like gods.
	And they want to replace God.
	They want to replace God and family.
	Hey, Congressman.
	Trying to help you?
	What the fuck is up with Trump always chickening out on tariffs?
	What the fuck is up with Trump?
	Anything else?
	Nope.
	That's it.
	What a slob.
	What a disgusting, blubbering slob.
	But it's just the beginning.
	Like, hey, Congressman.
	What the fuck's up with that?
	Hey, Congressman.
	Trying to help you?
	Can I help you?
	You don't know the guy?
	He just walks into your office?
	Or is this your staff?
	Can I help you, staff?
	Hey, Congressman.
	Trying to help you?
	What the fuck is up with Trump always chickening out on tariffs?
	These people belong in jail.
	Find a reason to investigate them and put them in jail.
	What the hell is up with the tacos?
	What the hell is up with the tacos, by the way?
	He's not the only one.
	And when I figured it out, they got the memo, people!
	Here's Chuck Schumer.
	He's like, when people say that they believe in lizard people, I don't know if you noticed when...
	It actually kind of looked like a serpent's tongue.
	When people say humans take on the form of reptilian creatures, I understand it as the metaphor that it is.
	And this right here is a reptilian creature disguised as a human.
	Listen, look at this guy's face.
	Oh my gosh.
	Okay, but listen to what he has to say about tacos.
	When it comes to negotiating with the terrorist government of Iran.
	Trump's all over the lot.
	One day he sounds tough, the next day he's backing off.
	And now, all of a sudden, we find out that Whitcoff and Rubio are negotiating a secret side deal with Iran.
	What kind of bull is this?
	They're going to sound tough in public and then have a side deal that lets Iran get away with everything?
	That's outrageous.
	We need to make that side deal public.
	any side deal should be before Congress and most importantly, the American people.
	If Taco Trump is already folding, No side deals.
	Taco Trump.
	This is how they get back at Tim Nobles'walls or Tampon Tim.
	And by the way, no side deals, which basically means they want to be involved and interfere with potential deals that might actually result in lasting peace in the world.
	No side deals.
	We want to know what's going on so that we can sabotage it.
	Like we did in Ukraine, and like we're going to do everywhere else to sabotage the Trump presidency, even if it comes at the expense of American and citizens' well-being.
	Look at this guy.
	Look at this.
	Like Voldemort.
	When it comes to negotiating with the terrorist government of Iran, Trump's all over the lot.
	One day he sounds tough, the next day he's backing off.
	And now, all of a sudden, we find out that Whitcoff and Rubio are negotiating a secret side deal with Iran.
	Well, now I know it's a good side deal.
	If it pisses off Chuck Schumer, you know it's a good thing.
	a fine deal.
	If Taco Trump Like, is it about him folding?
	Like, you fold a taco?
	Is it about him being a chicken, allegedly, because you put chicken in tacos?
	I don't know.
	All that I know is that Chuck Schumer...
	Is effing retarded.
	This is a man who put cheese on a raw burger.
	Look at this.
	Do you tell me that that's on a reptile in a human skin?
	Hello, little children.
	You want to come and get some burgers?
	Excuse me, Mr. Schumer.
	You don't put cheese on a raw burger.
	And how the hell did you cook the hot dogs before you uncooked the burgers?
	You've never had a barbecue in your life.
	You're cutting board.
	Looks like it might be upside down, but I'm not confident enough in that.
	I think that cutting board might be upside down because on a normal cutting board, you have the ridge around the side that collects the juices so that it doesn't spill on the floor.
	I think the cutting board's upside down.
	I think I might have just discovered yet another piece of evidence of the fakeness of it.
	And by the way, it's not on!
	I'm sorry, I'm spitting on my computer.
	It's not on!
	You can't have more phony, stupid jackasses on this earth than the likes of Chuck Schumer.
	But let me get back to my tweet because, yes, he is tar dead.
	You put cheese on uncooked beef, Patty.
	They didn't even release it on a Tuesday.
	They released it on a Monday.
	You got stupid jackass spybanger Swallowell talking about tacos and Trump on Monday.
	Holy hell.
	They got the memo.
	They are a bunch of idiots.
	And if they're pissed off about a potential side deal, they call it a side deal.
	To me, it's the deal of the administration.
	It's government.
	It's not your administration, Snake Schumer.
	It's unbelievably stupid.
	They think they're funny, they think they're cool, and they think everybody around them is stupid.
	And that's what happens.
	So anyways, if anybody knows what the hell they're trying to talk about with Taco Trump, is it about folding a taco?
	Is it about Tuesday?
	Oh, sorry.
	Go for it, encrypt us.
	No, it's Trump always chickens out.
	T-A-C-O.
	Oh.
	God, I'm sorry.
	Nothing better than having a reference that nobody's going to get.
	Oh my goodness.
	They're fundamentally stupid people.
	They have to be.
	Liberalism is a mental disorder.
	Progressivism is a mental disorder.
	Democrats are the dumbest people on earth.
	I'll say politicians right now, not to be offensive to anybody who's a bona fide good person, sincere Democrat.
	Trump always chickens out.
	Now watch the video in that context.
	Those are the words that are used.
	What that?
	Who's supposed to get that?
	I want to go to the chat.
	Did anybody get that?
	Did anybody know what the hell they were talking about?
	So dumb, says Wendy Wilde.
	The left can't meme, says Monster.
	The left can't meme because they have a mental disorder.
	And I'll call it a mental disorder.
	I'm being humorous.
	Because they have a heightened sense of self-righteousness, self-importance, which correlates to a direct reduction in humility, which correlates directly to the inability to be funny and insightful because they cannot be the requisite degree of humble to be self-deprecating to assess things properly.
	You will notice, the higher the righteousness goes, the lower the sense of humor goes.
	And I've met people who've become progressive and liberal over time.
	They end up taking themselves so seriously, they can no longer laugh at the movies like what we used to laugh at.
	They no longer find it funny because, oh, it upsets children.
	And then the people who become conservative over time get senses of humor, they loosen up in life, and they become cool and fun people to hang out with.
	And that's how you make your selection in life.
	The natural evolution.
	You drift further apart from these haughty, prissy, arrogant, pompous, self-righteous, virtue-signaling jackasses, and you meet so-called conservatives who don't take life quite so seriously, who have something of a sense of humor, and it's a lot more fun to hang around with such people.
	Trump always chickens out.
	Well, I guess it's better than cheese pizza references.
	All right.
	Well, that's that.
	Let's get into...
	Do we go to...
	We'll do some...
	you all know him because he's a pathological liar.
	He is a perjurer.
	He's a sniveling snot of a jackass.
	And if he would ever come on the channel, I would have a lot of fun having a discussion with him.
	I always say, there's nothing I would say privately or in someone's absence that I wouldn't say to their face.
	And I would love for him to try to justify to the world how he is such a sniveling snot of a jilted ex-girlfriend that he thought he was going to get a Trump, I'm sorry, a pardon from Biden by throwing Trump under the bus.
	They would reward him for his pursuit of the power of that beautiful golden ring.
	And he placed all of his bets and he went all in with the Democrats.
	They lost.
	Demented Joe didn't even pardon his sorry ass on the way out the door.
	And now Cohen is pissed.
	But Cohen is pissed.
	And he might be pissed at Biden for not giving him that pardon, but he is Donald John Trump.
	Remember, Michael Cohen is a man who admitted to stealing from Donald Trump.
	It's a man who admitted lying under oath.
	It's a man who is an admitted perjurer and just overall scumbag.
	But above all else, a bad lawyer.
	A bad lawyer who might have been a useful brute.
	A useful goon on the rink.
	You know, sometimes you don't necessarily want to play your best players all the time.
	Sometimes you just want to throw out the goon who you know fights dirty, cheats, elbows, does the dirty stuff.
	Not smart, but a useful idiot.
	That was Michael Cohen.
	So Michael Cohen, on the way out the door, tried to get Trump, you know, arrested, jailed, bankrupted, whatever.
	Did everything he could.
	Played ball with the dirty, lying, scumbag Democrat Party.
	And got nothing as a thanks for it.
	But now he's taken the position that he's going to go after Joe Biden by suggesting that now, as a result of the known mental acuity problems, which nobody knew until now, oddly enough, now's the time that Michael Cohen finally discovers that Joe Biden wasn't always all there.
	He's suggesting that we go after the pardons of Biden.
	Some might say he's angry at Biden and wants to go after the pardons.
	What vested interest would Michael Cohen have in annulling the Biden pardons?
	Absolutely none.
	He's not going to go retroactively and say, oh, Biden meant to pardon me, but he was so demented he couldn't, but he wanted to, so now pardon me.
	No.
	This is a long-shot play to get after Trump, and if the Trump administration isn't careful about it, it sounds like they might be buying into this crap.
	I don't think they are, but we'll get there.
	All right.
	From the Hill, by Warren Ballantyne, Jesse Jackson Jr., Michael Cohen, And Michael Rothenberg.
	Jesse Jackson Jr., I presume, is Jesse Jackson's son.
	So I think we're in good company here.
	The five of us having something in common.
	We were all convicted of federal crimes over the last 12 years, and we all completed applications asking for pardons from former President Joe Biden.
	Unfortunately, at 12.01 on President Trump's Inauguration Day, all five of us received emails informing us that our applications had been denied, and we would have to reapply under the new administration.
	You know what?
	Now I'm thinking, I'm going to reassess here.
	Maybe Michael Cohen, being the idiot that he is, We have all completed our sentences, so there's no question of having these shortened.
	What is at stake in some of our cases is our ability to make a living, sustain our families, and become productive members of our communities again.
	This is where the bleeding heart sissy viva comes in, where I say, at the end of the day, Michael Cohen is still a human being.
	I guess he's married.
	I think he's married and has kids.
	He's got to make a living.
	He's got to provide for his family.
	And he's a human with real thoughts and emotions.
	And I'm sure he looks in the mirror at night and he says, I am the hero in this story.
	I have been wronged in this story.
	And I'm just not getting what I deserve in life.
	I almost feel bad for Michael Cohen.
	Except there are levels of badness that you can forgive.
	And then there are levels of badness that you no longer get to forgive.
	When people seek.
	and people get to be remorselessly harsh on you.
	People who hurt themselves deserve forgiveness.
	People who go out there and try to hurt others, like Michael Cohen did, among others.
	I'm sure he feels bad, and I'm sure he's a human with thoughts and emotions, but I feel a little bit more morally justified in being remorseless with him.
	Presidential pardons have historically been the source of both relief and controversy.
	We don't care about that.
	Biden's pardons of close associates and family members raised serious ethical and legal concerns, particularly when others in similar situations were denied pardons.
	The issue at hand was not about his legal right to grant pardons, but whether his cognitive condition affected the integrity.
	It's like he was cognitively aware enough to pardon friends and family, but because Michael Cohen didn't get it, now they say he must have not been all there.
	How could he not pardon all five of us?
	It's particularly noteworthy that Biden used the full Nixon-era formula in granting full, complete, absolute, unconditional pardons to members of his family, covering a lengthy period of time.
	It's called corruption.
	Joe Biden, whether or not he knew what was going on, What a flipping weasel of a snake.
	He wasn't all there, and so we should call into question his pardons.
	But we should reconsider pardoning those who didn't get pardoned because he was so demented.
	Holy shit.
	And Cohen wonders why he got fired.
	What the heck just happened there?
	Why does this happen?
	Okay, go.
	What is this?
	Oh, these ads make things unusable.
	Holy stubborn.
	Okay, whatever.
	Let's just, let's just, I'm gonna have to work it here.
	Biden, despite advocating for criminal justice reform, denied pardons to many nonviolent drug offenders and individuals who had applied.
	He gave a lot to nonviolent drug offenders, I think, still.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	If Biden's mental capacity is in question, Congress should consider requiring competency reviews for presidential pardon decisions.
	Or just competency reviews.
	And by the way, if someone's not competent, that's what the 25th Amendment is for.
	Not retroactively saying, hey, he was there, but not all there, so let's reconsider certain things.
	Those denied pardons should be given a second chance.
	You have a second chance.
	Apply to Trump.
	See how he says, see what he says about it.
	Justice system built on impartiality cannot allow preferential treatment, particularly when personal ties may cloud judgment.
	No one disputes the presidential's constitutional discretion in wielding the pardon power, but pardons must be given fairly, justly, free of undue influence.
	If Biden's family and associates benefited from a decision process that did not include his full understanding or consent, justice demand that others denied pardons receive consideration.
	You can receive consideration.
	Submit for a pardon to the Trump administration.
	Each of us respectfully requests it of President Trump now for ourselves and for those Americans who need mercy and be forgiveness in the future.
	Warren Ballantyne is a former attorney, the radio host with more than 3 million listeners, Jesse Jackson Jr., former Democratic congressman representing Illinois, Michael Cohen, President Trump's former lawyer.
	Rothenberg is a rabbi and was a lawyer and part-time judge at the Debekalba.
	And Michael Jones, cardiologist in New Orleans.
	All five were convicted for nonviolent federal crimes between 2013 and 2023.
	Alright, if you're taking Michael Cohen's advice, you're taking bad advice.
	We've talked about this at length in terms of the risks and the clear, let's say, exposure of reassessing any presidential decision on the basis of mental acuity in the absence of a 25th Amendment.
	I don't think the Trump DOJ is contemplating investigating Biden-era pardons amid concerns over state of mind.
	Or maybe it's true, but they're not necessarily going to consider reinstating.
	Someone's stealing money from your purse without you knowing it.
	And maybe they're just going to go broader and say, yeah, we should really reassess everything he did for reasons of mental acuity.
	Okay, we'll pull it back and we'll be reasonable.
	Let's just go after whether or not the auto pen was being used without his permission, consent, or knowledge.
	DOJ is probing the Biden-era pardons granted by the president during his final weeks in office.
	President Donald Trump's Justice Department is reviewing the list of people that were granted pardons by former President Joe Biden amid new concerns that his use of auto-pen to automatically sign documents, as well as concerns about his state of mind in the final days in office.
	Critical part of this sentence is quite clearly amid new concerns about his use of an auto pen to automatically sign documents.
	Because if the question is whether or not it was his use, we're not attacking things for mental acuity.
	We're attacking things for outright fraud, which I have no doubt occurred, in my humble opinion.
	Fox News was told Tuesday that the Justice Department attorney, Ed Martin, is reviewing a list of Biden-era pardons granted by the presidency during his final weeks.
	It's unclear what individual pardons are being reviewed by Martin's office, though Roy has reported.
	This week that the office is planning to look at the preemptive pardons of Biden granted to his son, Hunter, as well as 35 death row inmates whose sentences were changed to life in prison during Biden's final day in office, DOJ officials did not respond to Fox News requests for comments on the email.
	And then we just go over the Bidens.
	But critics took umbrage at the long list of names, noting that it includes persons convicted of defrauding U.S. taxpayers, tens of millions of dollars.
	Many took aim at his use of preemptive pardons to family members and other.
	Others in his circle.
	Not to mention, not for nothing, the Cash for Kids judge.
	These idiot Democrats who say, Donald Trump arrested judges.
	It's the end of democracy.
	Cash for Kids judge was a judge convicted and deserves to rot for the rest of his life in jail for what he did to kids.
	So yeah, some judges break the law.
	Let's do the little logical thing here.
	Judges are people.
	All judges are people.
	Some people break the law.
	Therefore, some judges might break the law.
	Damn it, that might not actually be.
	All judges are people.
	Some people break the law.
	Therefore, some judges break the law.
	Whatever.
	You know what I'm getting at.
	Let me, if I can, in my limited capacity as a mildly insightful analyst, commentator, not an influencer, suggest that if the Trump DOJ is going to take the bait, And go start evaluating pardons on the basis of mental acuity.
	I don't know if this is Michael Cohen's end goal to get revenge on Donald Trump, but it will be the end result.
	It will be weaponized to go after Trump by the next administration if the precedent that is set is that you get to undermine, undo, and attack the validity of decisions made by a president on the basis of mental acuity or lack thereof in the absence of having been outed.
	By the 25th Amendment.
	It's not a double-edged sword.
	It's a Pandora's box.
	And I don't sincerely believe that the DOJ, Trump's DOJ, is actually looking at doing this, going after Biden's pardons on the basis that he was mentally unfit to have issued those pardons.
	But if they do, what will happen?
	And it's not an if, it's a when.
	The next administration, the Democrats, as soon as they get back into power, they will go and attack everything President Donald Trump did, from pardons to executive orders to decisions.
	And they will say, well, we now retroactively, retrospectively determined that he was mentally unfit to have made those decisions.
	You did this with Biden, and now we get to do it with you.
	Wildly different than going after those pardons on the basis that Biden did not know that the auto pen was being used.
	Anybody operating Trump's auto pen without his knowledge?
	You would expect and demand that that be annulled and that that person be locked up.
	I don't know what Trump does to ensure that when he uses the auto pen, it's documented that it has his consent.
	My understanding is that there's video of him acknowledging that for which the auto pen might have been used, so there's going to be no question as to whether or not he knew or was aware of what the auto pen was being used for, what he signed and what he brought into law, what he brought into executive order, or who he pardoned.
	And so Trump will cover his ass that way.
	But it should always be the case that in as much as an auto pen is ever being used, that there is concrete, contemporaneous confirmation that the president knows and approves of the use of the auto pen.
	I really strongly believe, because you also have to bear in mind, Trump always knows more than he lets on, and he knows more than we know.
	And I firmly, strongly believe in my humblest of humble opinions that they know damn well.
	That that auto pen was being used like cotton candy and old Joe was licking his ice cream and had no idea what the F was going on.
	Text messages, emails, internal correspondences, or simply the lack thereof coming from Biden.
	You don't have to have his staff scheming around saying, let's go do this without Biden knowing.
	Elizabeth Warren, yeah, I'm gonna do that.
	Hunter Biden, high off coke in the office.
	Like my dad's auto pens on the desk.
	Let me draft up a pardon.
	An absence of acknowledgement of Biden having authorized this or even been aware of it, that would be enough to initiate an investigation and then you might be able to get to the actual concrete evidence of text messages from staffers saying, let's do this, let's do that, And old Joe doesn't need to know.
	But if the DOJ is stupid enough to actually bite on this bait, this clear trap, So that is my word to the wise, my prediction and my limited analysis commentary on that issue.
	Michael Cohen remains a sneaky little bastard.
	And whether or not he's doing this just for his own personal gain and or for his personal vengeance against Donald Trump.
	He persists in giving bad legal advice.
	I'm sweating like a pig here, man.
	Am I getting too excited over what's going on?
	Let me see.
	There were a lot of tip questions that I haven't gotten to.
	We've got Rowflow1804, which I know I've never seen your name before, sir.
	Says, I figured a taco was getting screwed by the Iranians because of what, quote, putting some beef in your taco can mean.
	Tell me that that wouldn't be a better analogy.
	Really, though?
	Trump always chickens out?
	Sir, some might say that to the extent that's where your brain went with that, everyone's first guess is confession through projection.
	That's how I know that I'm, at the end of the day, a mildly innocent person.
	I thought it just meant folding like a taco or that it makes you sick and gives you explosive diarrhea.
	But that rumor of Taco Bell, I can tell you from my own experience, is just a rumor or at least didn't happen to me on that occasion.
	I actually found the Taco Bell.
	Mildly delicious.
	And the diarrhea, it didn't give me diarrhea.
	So not that anybody cares about my BMs.
	Now you know that I text on the...
	Biltong is in the house.
	Oh, it's an acrostic.
	Trump always chickens out.
	That's an acronym.
	Acrostic.
	What does that word mean?
	The nether night.
	Thank you, sir.
	King of Biltong says, Biltong is one of the highest protein snacks in the world, boasting nearly.
	50% protein and packed with B12, creatine, iron, zinc, and more.
	Visit BiltongUSA.com and use code VIVA for 10% off.
	Oh, sorry.
	Hold on one second.
	And then I got to get to this one.
	That was Roflow1804.
	And let me bring this back out.
	Back out.
	And take the rest of these.
	It's an acrostic.
	TT Full-Timer says, putting the nasty astronomy-eliminating star stink satellites have put 12 million metric tons of CO2 in the atmosphere.
	It's a good thing plants eat CO2.
	I mean, it's just, it's a damn good thing nature has a way of being smarter than its creations.
	Ooh.
	Write that down, people.
	TT Fulltimer says the 76,000 tons is 2,900 ICE vehicles driving for a year.
	Dude, what are you breaking down here?
	Encryptus says the fact that death rate from fentanyl OD is 7.4%, so it is safer than fentanyl.
	That's good, Encryptus.
	Oh, dark humor will get you through dark times.
	Write that one down.
	That's mine.
	That's mine.
	I'm tweeting that right now before anybody steals that.
	Dark humor.
	Will get you through dark times.
	Right?
	I thought of that.
	Boom.
	I'm spelling humor with a U. That's going to get me in dark.
	Dark humor will get you through dark times.
	I thought of that.
	P.S. Live now on Rumble.
	Boom.
	Okay.
	Sorry.
	I used Twitter like my diary.
	Okay, so we're done with that.
	I got everything here, right?
	Okay.
	Current estimates.
	Okay, we got that.
	We're not yet done.
	We're not yet done.
	We got more show people.
	Not that I'm also avoiding...
	It's summer break.
	The amount of children and adolescents that are roaming the house, leaving the doors open so that we air-condition the outside.
	It's the exact invert problem from Canada.
	In Canada in the winter, and now I'm an adult father.
	And I know when they touch that thermostat.
	I get into thermostat wards with my kids that night.
	They keep bringing the thermostat down to like 71 at 70, and I keep putting it back to normal, proper, appropriate temperature of 74. When they put it to 73, I can tell.
	In Canada, you leave the door open in the winter.
	You're like, oh, we're not heating the outside.
	In Florida, you leave the doors open in the summer.
	You're like, I'm not air conditioning the outside.
	I've lived long enough to have become my parents, which I guess is not that terrible a thing.
	We're going to go fishing again this afternoon.
	See, I want to show you.
	Can you see?
	How do I get in focus?
	Like this?
	Okay, focus.
	Focus on that fat.
	There we go.
	Look at that.
	Okay, now, Hold on.
	Hold on.
	Look at my palm.
	Okay.
	And now like this.
	It's amazing.
	You can see the entry and the exit wound of the spike.
	At least it didn't get stuck in my finger.
	We're going to go back to our secret fishing spot.
	And I'm going to Google how to avoid having the fish inhale the hooks into their gullet.
	I don't know that there's a way to do it.
	But we'll get there.
	Okay, enough of the rambling.
	Speaking of fentanyl, isn't that the segue that you always want?
	Going back to Canada, speaking of fentanyl, how's the fentanyl superlabs going up in Canada?
	Well, the business is going good, people.
	Business is going so good that the Mexican cartels are saying, we should probably start doing business there.
	Trump was right.
	Say it, repeat it, understand it.
	You can hate him.
	You can think you hate him.
	You can think he's a terrible human being.
	Trump was right.
	And we have the evidence now.
	I'm going to try to get Sam Cooper back on as soon as I can.
	Mocha Bezirgan, also a great Canadian journalist, independent, Mocha, at Bezirgan Mocha, so that is at B-E-Z-I-R-G-A-N-M-O-C-H-A, puts out this.
	Major drug bust!
	All in caps.
	Canadians and SINGs are making headlines in Australia.
	Australian federal police say 280 kilograms of liquid methamphetamine was imported from Vancouver, the fentanyl capital of the world.
	Canada is an industrial cooler.
	Canada in an industrial cooler.
	So let me rephrase this again.
	280 kilograms of liquid methamphetamine imported from Vancouver, Canada, in an industrial cooler.
	Seven people, including the two Canadians, have been arrested and denied bail.
	Why do I know that name?
	Hold on, we're going to come back to that.
	Police say the investigation targeted, quote, trusted insiders, helping transnational serious organized crime syndicates that purported to be able to circumvent border controls.
	Why do Singhs appear repeatedly in high-level drug busts?
	Last year in Canada's largest fentanyl super lab bust, valued at over 500 million, a Punjabi Canadian man was arrested in rural BC.
	Look, in fairness, Singh is a very common Indian last name.
	How many, quote, trusted insiders, end quote, are embedded in Canadian airports, ports, political offices, courts, and law enforcement?
	Are criminal networks exploiting religious or ethnic identities as shields?
	Good questions, Mocha.
	And good journalism.
	I actually kind of want to see what, hold on, let me see what the rest of that article is, or the rest of the thread.
	We've talked about it, and I've mentioned it over and over again.
	Sam Cooper was on multiple times now talking about it, talking about it.
	The border between Canada and America is not the same as the militarized border between Mexico and America.
	And the fact that only 1% of the fentanyl that's crossing the border is getting nabbed, or the fact that only 1% of the fentanyl nabbed crossing the border is nabbed between Canada and the U.S. does not mean that Mexico produces or imports 99% of it.
	It means that it's not a militarized border between Canada and the U.S. The infiltration of foreign interests, foreign governments, and corruption within the Canadian government policing system that you might just have a whole shitload more of it getting successfully smuggled into America from Canada.
	Let me just see what the full thread is here because I want to give Mocha the credit that he deserves.
	Drug bust, in-depth.
	Okay, so I'll give everybody the link.
	Go check it out.
	It looks a little too complicated to get into right now.
	But don't worry.
	But wait!
	There's more.
	The infamous meme.
	If I were doing a car vlog, that's where I would have inserted it right now.
	But wait!
	There's more!
	And it's coming from Sam Cooper.
	Now, listen to this.
	Mexican cartels operating...
	And let's just go ahead and get to that article.
	Which I will share with you as well.
	You can go support the work that Sam Cooper does because it's great work.
	It's over at thebureau.news.
	This is an incognito, people.
	Mexican cartels expanding operations in Canada using Indigenous reserves as factory hubs.
	Op-ed with factories on Six Nations land.
	Mexican cartels are using Canada to smuggle counterfeit goods into the U.S. and Mexico.
	Ottawa.
	Project Panda.
	A major Ontario gang task force takedown in May targeting a counterfeit tobacco factory of the Six Nations Reserve near Hamilton and Buffalo exposes a long-ignored reality.
	Mexican cartels have deeply embedded themselves in Canadian territory near the U.S. border and are expanding in tandem with Chinese state-linked crime partners using Indigenous land for counterfeit production and cross-border smuggling.
	This is no longer just a policing matter.
	It's a national security crisis.
	Yes, it's almost like Canada has become a national security threat to America.
	It's almost like everything Trump said was right.
	And whether or not you thought it was the proper cudgel or carrot and stick to be using with the threat of retaliatory tariffs, he was right.
	And I'm not going to harp on which effing Canadian politicians screwed up by not blaming it all on the Liberals.
	One that can exploit indigenous lands.
	Stunningly, an explosive intelligence report released last year labeled Canada as a safe zone for Chinese and Mexican cartel networks to traffic weapons, drugs, and counterfeit tobacco through Six Nations land.
	Quote, Mexican authorities have also stated that Canada is responsible for 12% of all lost tax revenue for Mexican government from illicit cigarettes.
	The report says, and alleges companies established in Six Nations have introduced up to 500 million cigarettes.
	Nobody really cares about cigarettes, but it includes the other stuff as well.
	That same report says that more than 73 illicit factories have operated over the past 20 years linked to 173 organized crime groups, including Mexican and Chinese networks.
	Heavily armed police units, supported by multiple agencies, raided the factory.
	Targets span sick nations, yada, yada, yada.
	Oh, Lord.
	It goes on.
	It's long, man.
	But I'll give everybody the link and you can read this.
	But the bottom line, Trump was right.
	It's a big flicking problem.
	I'm not sure you're going to get the correction from the current government, which seems embedded with, tainted by, or corrupted by the interests that have allowed this to happen in the first place.
	Here's a link to the Bureau and Sam Cooper's article.
	Let's see what else we got here.
	All right, we're going to bounce back around a few things here.
	Let me see what's going on in the...
	I see my unenthused face.
	Look at this.
	Hold on.
	I'm getting too damn old for this shit.
	I'll go get some nature rejuvenation after this.
	Go for a bike ride, go fishing, and hopefully not skewer myself on the spine of a fish.
	I'm worried about getting an infection now from that swamp water.
	No, what I was going to get at was going to the chat on vivabarnslaw.locals.com and see what's going on here.
	Tzvi Hanses says, Viva, yes, yes, you would harp on a politician.
	question.
	Okay, so I got the link there.
	Bill Brown in Local says, Just see the local news.
	Main Canadian border arrests at an all-time high.
	Bill Brown is one of our locals members.
	Well, I'm sorry.
	Templeton was a beautiful beast.
	My kid loves that picture, but Bill Brown from our Locals community is up in Maine.
	It's a known objective problem, and it's a very, very serious one at that.
	And it's been denied.
	It's been distracted from.
	It's real.
	And it's a problem.
	Anyone in the chat, by the way, watch...
	Locals and Rumble.
	Did anybody watch me on Pisco Liddy last night?
	He had me on his channel.
	Pisco Liddy is the New York litigator attorney.
	Lefty, and we had a fun discussion on my channel a while back.
	I was on his, and I wonder, I don't like watching myself again.
	I wonder if, you know, call it a performance, but I wonder how the appearance was.
	If anyone in the chat watched it, let me know what you think of it, and I'll share the link with everybody, because I want feedback, and what people think.
	Reading the chat.
	And you should never read the chat on hostile territory.
	Because no matter how nice I think I am, no matter how smart or educated or informed I think I am, or informative, the people in the other end of the silo will not agree.
	Here's a link.
	Give it a watch.
	Let me know what you think.
	It's on Commitube because that's where the commie lefties place the emphasis.
	Okay, we're not yet done.
	We can be critical of administrations, even if they are our administrations.
	And this was part of the discussion I actually had with Pisco Liddy yesterday, where he's like, you never criticized Trump.
	I'm like, first of all, I've criticized Trump during this very broadcast interview.
	I will criticize everyone where I think it's warranted.
	But I did say, and maybe this is what bias is, or maybe this is what self-awareness is.
	I said it about Pierre Poilievre and the liberals.
	When I criticize, Justin Trudeau.
	It's not to make him a better politician.
	It's to expose him as the corrupt POS that he is.
	When I criticized and criticized Pierre Poiliev and /or the Conservative Party, it's not to expose them as the corrupt POSs that they are because I don't think that they are as corrupt or I don't think those individuals are corrupt POSs in the first place.
	If ever I come to the conclusion that Pierre Poilievre is as much of a corrupt POS as Justin Trudeau.
	My criticism will shift from trying to reshape him and better him as a politician for the betterment of Canada to trying to expose his corruption for the betterment of Canada.
	At the end of the day, enlightenment is the ultimate goal.
	You do treat allies a little bit different than you treat enemies.
	You give the benefit of the doubt to friends, and when you're dealing with foes who no longer deserve it, you no longer give it to them.
	So when I criticize President Trump, On Operation War Speed, or at the very least, his insistence that it was a success, when I criticized the Trump administration for not reinstating the Brooke Jackson Key Tam lawsuit, investigating Pfizer,
	and potentially going after Fauci, so help me goodness, find an email that confirms that Biden was not aware of the Fauci pardon, annul that pardon, not on the basis of mental acuity, but on the basis of fraud, and prosecute Fauci.
	Albert Bourla didn't get a pardon.
	Let me just make sure about this before I get...
	I don't think he did.
	Please tell me he didn't.
	I don't think he did.
	There is no evidence or credible information indicating that Albert Bourla has received a pardon.
	Okay, good.
	Stéphane Banquel, CEO of Moderna, did Biden pardon Stéphane Banquel?
	I don't think he did either.
	The amount of typos, if Grok is able to, what's the word, surmise what my question was.
	No evidence indicating that Joe Biden pardoned anyone named Stéphane Banquel.
	Oh, well, it is a typo, hold on.
	Stéphane Banquel.
	I don't think he pardoned any of the pharmaceutical CEOs.
	There's no pardon there.
	So, you know, criticize because you want them to do it.
	Not criticize because you want them to be exposed and outed from power.
	What the hell was I talking about?
	Oh, that's right.
	So, criticizing where criticism is warranted, friend or foe, presumption of good faith with a friend, and certainly no presumption of good faith with a proven liar of a foe.
	That might change both ways.
	Now, we criticize the regime, but we can also compliment the regime.
	And we've been given...
	But when they do good, the light of goodness needs to be shone on them.
	Yesterday, we talked about it at length.
	I posted a clip of the what I believe to be the Colorado police chief who I didn't know.
	Let me bring up the video again.
	I argued that the Colorado police chief, whose name is, it had the word dread in his What was his name?
	I'll get it right here.
	This is the clip.
	We'll play it one more time because it's worth watching.
	Sorry, I played it yesterday, but it'll refresh.
	The context in which I'm going to say, yes, you know, tweets are just tweets, but gosh darn, was that a good tweet coming from Deputy Director Dan Bongino.
	Listen to this, jackass.
	Go Google his name.
	Stefan Redfearn.
	Red Fear, yeah.
	See, I just saw the Red Fear, but...
	Would you also refer to it as a terror attack?
	So I've been in contact with our local FBI We are in contact with them here.
	We are not calling it a terror attack at this point.
	Again, it's way too early to speculate motive.
	You know, I know there's a lot out there on social media, but I ask people just to give us a little bit of patience while we work through a really complex scene.
	A lot of witnesses were here.
	We've taken them to another location to debrief them and interview them.
	As we do that, I think the picture will become more clear.
	But it would be irresponsible for me to speculate on motive this early on.
	We're only a couple hours under this thing.
	The FBI is already calling it a targeted terror attack, which you also refer to as a terror attack.
	It would be irresponsible for me to speculate on motive.
	That, call me paranoid?
	Call me reading too much into it?
	That's a jab at Bongino.
	That's a jab at the FBI who had already come out and said this was clearly an act of terrorism.
	It would be irresponsible of me to presume intent?
	Is he saying that it was irresponsible of the FBI to come out and identify this as an act of terrorism?
	And if that's what he's doing, someone needs a bit of a smackdown, a verbal smackdown, definitely not a physical one, because that would be assault and we do not break the law.
	It would be irresponsible of me to hypothesize on motive, and anybody who would do that would be equally irresponsible.
	Hint, hint, wink, wink, nudge, nudge, FBI.
	Kiss my bottom, sir.
	Because this is what the FBI had to say about it.
	Oh, crap apples.
	Oh, cripe, I don't have a damn tweet.
	Hold on one second.
	Oh, that's great.
	It was a good one.
	It says, we don't play word games.
	Let me pull up the tweet just so that I don't misquote it.
	Here we go.
	Damn it.
	The other one, because I have two tweets to compliment the FBI on today.
	Dan Bongino, to be clear, moving forward, when the evidence passed to our FBI leadership team from an active crime scene includes clearly ideologically motivated statements, video, multiple witness accounts, Molotov cocktails, and large gatherings of like-minded people, we will investigate those incidents as targeted acts of terror.
	If the investigation turns in a different direction despite the evidence, we can make adjustments and everyone is innocent until proven guilty in our justice.
	We are not the Federal Bureau of Word Games.
	Dan.
	I love it.
	Not Deputy Director Bongino.
	Dan.
	I mean, I love it, but you know I'm partial.
	So, Redfearn?
	Guys, you can go look up.
	It'll explain who the ideological, motivated, ideological terrorist is in all of this.
	When you understand, from what I understand, of Stefan Redfearn's political ideologies, you'll understand exactly why he won't call that But the other good news, I mean, it's good news.
	It's something we've been seeing for a while, and it's amazing to see in real time.
	As Pride Month, Pride Season, Pride Year, Pride, Pride, Pride, all of it.
	Look at my junk.
	I like to do this.
	Look at my sexual proclivities month begins.
	FBI tweets out, As the Attorney General has made clear, we will protect our children and hold accountable those who mutilate them under the guise of gender-affirming care.
	Report tips of any hospitals, clinics, or practitioners performing these surgical procedures on children at 1-800-CALL-FBI or tips.fbi.gov.
	Can you appreciate what a radical shift in Zeitgeist this is?
	You know, to be clear, quoting Dan, we're not playing word games.
	When we see what is obviously in any realm of the universe an act of terror, we're going to call it that.
	And when Steadfern or whatever, Redfern wants to come on and say, well, we don't really know.
	We don't really know what it was.
	It was an Egyptian guy screaming free Palestine with Molotov cocktails and a flamethrower throwing it at a group of pro-Israelis trying to release the hostages.
	We don't know what it was.
	It could have been any number of reasons.
	Yeah, we're not denying reality anymore, people.
	And if Colorado police chief wants to deny reality, first of all, get him out of his job.
	And second of all, that's not what the FBI is doing anymore.
	And now the FBI is not denying reality on what so-called gender-affirming care in children is.
	It's genital mutilation.
	And where once upon a time, it would be the likes of libs of TikTok who was accused of doxing and harassment.
	For raising awareness of doctors, hospitals, institutions performing these genital mutilations.
	When she was accused, vilified, and people said report her to the police, now the FBI is saying, no, you report the genital mutilators to the FBI.
	If you're libs of TikTok, you are feeling somewhat vindicated by the new direction of the FBI.
	All of this flattery is not a get-out-of-jail-free card pun intended for other areas that have led to legitimate.
	People have high expectations of Dan and Cash, and people had expectations of Pan Bondi, and Pan Bondi has swung and missed on a few issues, and there's still time to make up.
	The game is not yet over.
	We're not even at the halftime yet.
	And that's all I have to say about that.
	Let me go see who's saying what in the chat.
	All right.
	Democrats pay to have children flown to other countries to have their genitals removed, says chlorophyll.
	To the extent that that's being done, and to the extent that they have sex tourism laws prohibiting that conduct, it'll only be a matter of time before they have genitals.
	It's just mind-blowing.
	Suicidal empathy, as Gad Saad put it, or as I like to put it, homicidal empathy.
	I have so much love for my child.
	I, as the adult, am going to listen to what a confused 12-year-old has to say to me.
	And it means loving them so much that I must love them to the point of facilitating irreparable mutilation of their otherwise beautiful God created existences.
	All right.
	In the rumble chat, what have we got?
	What do we got?
	That's it.
	Viva always delivers.
	It says connect the dots.
	But now I got to see in respect of what that is being said.
	FAC93 says, they all failed and believe it or not, they should go straight to jail.
	Kohl's Towing says, Viva, have you heard about the DEA possibly taking over the ATF?
	I haven't, but why the hell are there so many government organizations in the first place?
	And I mean, I appreciate drug enforcement.
	Why is there an alcohol, tobacco, and firearm entity, or whatever it's called, agency?
	And how did you get those three together?
	Alcohol, tobacco, and firearms.
	Actually kind of sounds like a pretty fun weekend.
	Bada bing, bada boom.
	I haven't heard about that, but it would be great to simplify the bureaucracy because even as we've seen with James Comey and his what I believe to be bona fide, sincere, calculated, deliberate mens rea threats against Donald Trump or call to action for his like-minded fans, there's like a massive confusion as to jurisdiction here.
	Which entity is in charge of any investigation?
	Is it the FBI?
	Is it Secret Service?
	Is it the DOJ?
	There's children out there, people.
	Screw the ATF.
	What are they even good for other than shooting innocent people who happen to have guns, says Hedu.
	I know that my sympathy or any credence I had for the ATF radically decreased after I watched the documentary.
	On Waco?
	Yeah.
	Well, with the exception of tobacco for the fun weekend, yes, I do not smoke.
	Putting anything foreign in your lungs for no good reason is a big, fat no-no.
	Okay, that's it.
	Let's go.
	I'm going to get into the chat because it's dangerous getting caught in the chat and not knowing what the hell is going on and what I stumbled into.
	There were a couple of other fun things that I think I had left on the back burner.
	Oh, yes, that's right.
	Okay, here we go.
	I wanted to bring this last one up.
	Rep Marjorie Taylor Greene.
	I like this tweet.
	And anybody who can admit they made a mistake publicly and loudly deserves some credit for that.
	MTG.
	Earlier today, June 3rd, 2025.
	Yeah, it was right before we went, give or take, before we went live.
	Says, full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of the OBBB.
	Just make sure I remember what that stands for.
	Acronym.
	The One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
	Oh, God.
	Okay, sorry.
	I knew it was the bill.
	I just didn't realize it was the actual one big beautiful bill.
	Okay.
	Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of the OBBB that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years.
	I am adamantly opposed, all caps, to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted no, all caps, if I had known this was in there.
	We have no idea what AI will be capable of in the next 10 years and giving it free reign.
	Is that how you spell it?
	I don't think that's how you spell it.
	And tying states' hands, I think that needs a little apostrophe there, is potentially dangerous.
	This needs to be stripped out in the Senate.
	When the one big beautiful bill comes back to the House for approval after Senate changes, I will not vote for it with this in it.
	We should be reducing federal power and preserving state power, not the other way around, especially with rapidly developing AI, even the experts warn.
	They have no idea what it may be capable of.
	And then we got the page here.
	In general, except as provided, and I'm reading from the bill for anybody listening on podcast, except as provided in paragraph two, no state or political subdivision thereof may enforce during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this act.
	Any law or regulation of the state or a political subdivision thereof limiting, restricting, or otherwise regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems entered into interstate commerce.
	It's pretty freaking wild that they would even jam that in there.
	Rule of construction, paragraph one, may not be construed to prohibit any law or regulation that the primary purpose of removal of legal impediments to.
	Okay, let's skip that out here.
	So this is very funny, and it's going to also come back to part of what I was discussing with Pisco Lidi yesterday, where he says, what's your view on the one big beautiful bill?
	And I said, I don't have a thorough enough or a sufficient understanding of it to have an opinion on it.
	The idea of not reining in the spending after having had Doge created for the purposes of identifying the waste.
	Is already a red flag for me.
	So the fact that they're not reining in the spending and seemingly just increasing the spending is a problem.
	What was Doge there for?
	It wasn't just there to identify where the waste is.
	It was there so that it could identify it, audit, and the government act on it.
	And so I'm sort of more online with Rep Massey's take on this.
	But again, the problem with these freaking bills, this is another thing.
	If you voted yes on something, and I'm not blaming Marjorie Taylor Greene, it's the nature of the beast.
	You're voting on something that is too big for any singular human's comprehension.
	Period.
	If only they had AI to help with that.
	So, it's too big for any one person's comprehension.
	And they vote on it, and you don't know what the fudge is in it.
	It's like, what's her face?
	Nancy Pelosi's.
	Well, we gotta vote on it to know what's in it.
	No!
	It needs to be small enough to understand what's in it, and they're so bloody big that they sneak in these Easter eggs.
	And so, good on Marjorie Taylor Greene for admitting it.
	Everybody has to now address the problem that these bills are too freaking big for anybody to vote in full awareness of fact and law on what's in it, and they end up throwing things in that are not Easter eggs.
	They are disguised Pandora's boxes.
	So I don't have an opinion on this.
	I know my inclination is to think and it seems to be on par with Elon Musk's opposition to the one big beautiful bill.
	But the fact that you have people who are voting on something, they don't know entirely what's in it, and then realizing afterwards that there are things in it that they would never have voted for, but they've already voted for it, and now they're going to demand that modifications be made in the Senate so that when it comes back to the House, they then approve of a bill that has had the changes appropriately put into it that remedy the mistake that they made because they didn't know what was in it.
	This is a problem.
	Period.
	Elon Musk tweeted, I'm sorry but I just can't stand it anymore.
	This massive outrageous pork filled congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination.
	Tell us what you really think, Elon.
	...just for us, Caroline.
	How mad do you think President Trump is going to be when he finds out that Elon Musk said, I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore.
	This massive, outrageous, pork-filled congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination.
	Shame on those who voted for it.
	You know you did wrong.
	You know it.
	Look, the president...
	On this bill, it doesn't change the president's opinion.
	This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it.
	Thank you.
	something that just crossed Carolina.
	One big, beautiful book.
	How mad do you think President Trump is going to be when he finds out that he won?
	That's my story and I'm sticking to it is not...
	I hear the redacted on backdrop, which is who we're rating.
	That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
	It's not really the most reassuring of defenses to legitimate criticism from the person who was entrusted the most to identify the problems to be solved.
	So good on Marjorie Taylor Greene for publicly admitting that she made a mistake by approving a bill when she didn't know everything that was in it because it's not humanly possible.
	She probably got either some private pushback or she was rightly outraged and thought she understood it sufficiently.
	Probably could have tapped Encryptus for an AI deep search thorough analysis of the big beautiful bill for things of interest, but you don't even know.
	It's impossible.
	It's impossible.
	And this is not how laws should be passed.
	It's not how government should operate.
	And it's not how representatives of government should be forced to vote on things that they cannot possibly adequately understand within the time frame that they are given to understand it for the purposes of voting on it.
	That's it.
	That's our show, ladies and gentlemen.
	I hope you enjoyed it.
	Before you head out, make sure that you are liked, shared, subscribed.
	Head over to Commitube every now and again just to give a little defibrillator to the algorithm there.
	Get a book, Louis the Lobster Returns to the Sea.
	And if you are so inclined and you like to support the work that we do here, you can support by subscribing.
	You can support by going to the merch store, which one day we'll have new merch.
	You can get a Louis the Lobster book.
	That's one great way to support.
	Or go to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	There are exclusive perks for paying supporters.
	We have a wonderful community for non-paying members.
	Bourbon with Barnes regularly.
	And we have a great community there.
	And that's how you can support the work that I do, that Robert Barnes does, so that we remain independent, free, critical thinkers.
	I will always be independent.
	It's just a question of whether or not it's sustainable or whether or not I'm sitting there complaining, shaking a fist at the clouds.
	Because I cannot and will not be bought, period.
	Full stop.
	That's it.
	Go raid the redacted, please, and let them know from whence you came.
	Let me see if I can...
	I want to see if our name...
	And I was going to go get to the last of the chats here.
	Stop it.
	Mr. Mike, Mr. Mike says, there's a pro jab, jab, jab section in the BBB2, according to AJ and Rand Paul.
	I'm going to look into this.
	Now I'm going to get to know what's in the one big, beautiful bill.
	It could also be one big, ballsy bill.
	One big, one big, whatever.
	AI-controlled Mark of the Beast system controlling what we as Americans can buy and sell, says Shofar.
	And TT Fulltimer says, hey, it starts at birth cutting off a bit of male penis.
	I will never agree to the argument that male circumcision is genital mutilation because there's nothing in that that impedes the natural functioning of the penis, period.
	Mutilation is something that impedes the proper normal functioning of the organ.
	And I know people are going to say, well, it causes callus on the tip of the penis, or what else?
	What's the other argument for how it interferes?
	It causes scar tissue and reduces sensitivity.
	My goodness, I wish it had reduced sensitivity in me, but bada bing, bada boom.
	I do not believe, and I don't think I can be convinced, although I'm open to the argument, that circumcision, snipping the piece of foreskin, is mutilation, because as far as I'm concerned, for the definition of mutilation, it does not impede the proper functioning of the organ.
	Piercing an ear is not mutilation.
	Micropenis is a mutilation.
	Loss of bone density is a mutilation.
	Not being able to achieve orgasm is a mutilation.
	Agree or disagree with it, that's my rationale.
	And let's see here.
	Rolflo, I figured Taco was getting screwed.
	Okay, I got that.
	All right, so that's it.
	People, thank you.
	This has been one heck of an episode.
	We're going to have our after party on Viva Barnes Law.
	See what's going on over there.
	And, um...
	Let's make sure Viva Raid is there.
	Okay, good.
	Live tomorrow.
	What day is it tomorrow?
	Wednesday.
	Same time, same back place.
	2.30.
	Next week, we'll probably go back to 4 o 'clock.
	And that is it.
	You can find this on Podbean for the oral section.
	What's it called?
	Audio section, people.
	Okay, I'm done.
	That's it.
	Locals, I'm coming.
	Rumble.

▲