Live w/ Breanna Morello: Pardons for Whitmer Fed-Nappers? Adam Schiff Pulling a Letitia James?
|
Time
Text
All right, we're gonna put this like this.
There you go.
That's a perfect balance.
and you're going to see how good the fishing is right here All right.
A minnow on the hook.
Watch this.
Okay?
Right here.
This is it.
I'm gonna cast this just 10 feet out.
Maybe that's 20 feet.
Watch this.
It's on already.
There's a fish on already.
Holy cows.
Oh my gosh.
What is it?
It's a peacock.
No, don't.
One, two, three.
Look at that.
Can everybody believe what they just witnessed?
That was on camera.
That was 30 seconds.
Stop, stop, stop, stop, stop, stop.
Get it out of your mouth.
Here you go.
Out.
Out.
Okay.
Look at this.
Peacock.
A small one.
It's gonna go back.
Ow!
Ow!
Stop it!
Stop it!
Take it!
Stop!
It's a peacock and it goes back.
Okay, here we go.
Peacock goes back.
Make babies.
Now watch this.
That's where the video ends.
You know what I realized?
When I was talking at the beginning of the video, before starting to play the video, you didn't hear my voice because I'm using StreamYard.
What I said...
In the five seconds or ten seconds when you saw nothing but a still image is, today, on this 23rd day of May, we formally celebrate the proper functioning of my parents'genitalia.
And then I also said that...
There's an expression that sometimes your sole purpose in life is to serve as a warning to others.
This morning I went to a farm down the street that my wife frequents.
It's our homeschooling favorite activity of Fridays.
And I wanted to interview the farm owner who's a guy named Jake.
Veteran, super cool guy.
And I did.
And at some point during the interview, towards the end of it, Jake picks off some grass, tall grass.
It's like a tall, not needly, but it's a very deep green thing called dog fennel.
And he's rubbing it on his skin because he says, you know, this can keep away the bugs.
And I smell it, and I was like, oh, this smells like dill.
And I take a bit of a bite.
At which point, my wife Googles and says, are you sure you're able to eat that, Viva?
And I'll show you exhibit one, which is Viva, being an idiot, followed by exhibit two, which is Viva spitting out the dog fennel, not to be confused with fennel, and I spent the last two hours, Imagining my own death.
Because I googled it and apparently it contains some metal.
It's not to be eaten, people.
It's considered toxic.
I didn't swallow any of the needles, but I chewed for about two seconds and then spat it out and then spent the last two hours dying a thousand times in my own mind.
There's an old expression, or it's not an expression, it's from Shakespeare, that the coward dies a thousand deaths, but the hero tastes the true taste of death but once.
Well, when you have OCD and you constantly catastrophize and you touch a toilet seat that was wet and you're like, oh my goodness, I just contracted something from that toilet seat and I'm about to die or I'll die slowly in the next couple of years because of that dirty toilet seat.
So word to the wise, everyone out there, dog fennel is not edible.
There have been stories of people using it as spices, but it can damage the liver in large enough quantities consumed.
It can cause toxic because it's got some heavy metal in it.
And that's that.
But today is my birthday, and I am 46 years old, which is the number of Joe Biden's presidency.
When I turned 45, it was good.
It was Trump 45. When I turned 47, it'll be good.
It'll be Trump 47. This year, for the rest of the year, I shall be the Biden 46. We're going to have a barbecue tonight, and I consulted with the number.
Okay, look.
I don't often talk.
I don't talk about who I text.
But I will share this one.
Dr. Drew might be regretting having given me his cell number.
Like, Dr. Drew, am I going to die?
Who's this?
That's my brother.
Well, hold on a second.
Dan?
I'm live right now.
I'll call you back.
Is everything okay?
Okay, everything's okay.
Dr. Drew might be regretting having given me his cell number.
Like, Dr. Drew!
I feel like Ned on The Simpsons Calling Reverend Lovejoy.
It's like, Dr. Drew, I just ate some...
Anyways, and then I called Poison Control because everyone wants to cover their tushies.
I see Brianna Morello in the backdrop.
Booyah!
Okay, everybody, just to tell you what's going on with this show, Brianna Morello, journalist extraordinaire, who is bringing up a story that should not be...
Or forgotten.
Because it goes back to the original Fednapping plot, which was the Gresham Whitmer Fednapping, which was soon eclipsed by the January 6th Fed Surrection.
Brianna Morello, we're going to talk about that, see where it goes, and we'll see if another guest comes in a little later on.
And otherwise, we might either go long, go short.
It's my birthday.
We're going to make a barbecue.
And I'm going to go fishing with the remaining minnows that I have.
Brianna, I'm bringing you on.
Ma 'am?
Brianna, how goes the battle?
Happy birthday!
Thank you.
I don't know how much of the intro you heard, but I...
It was, oh, so refreshing.
And then my wife's like, don't eat that.
And then I was like, and I could tell by her face, like I spit it up.
Apparently dog fennel is in it.
Look it up.
Look something new.
Yeah, but that's what I said.
Like, okay, look, I did, everybody should, And apparently, dogs that eat it, they get sick.
And apparently, some say that you shouldn't even consume the meat of a cow that has fed off dog fennel because the alkaloids or whatever it is get concentrated in the meat.
So anyways, Brianna, all that to say is if you didn't know that I suffer from a mild to severe case of OCV, I have been catastrophizing, as they say, for the last two hours.
Like, do I feel weird?
Do I feel my liver getting damaged?
Brianna, welcome back.
How goes the battle?
Oh, you know, it's been a crazy one, but we've got good news finally underway, so I'm excited.
I know we usually have, like, not negative, but it's more of like a damper mood.
But today, everything's looking good for us.
Now, I put up an AI-generated summary of your credentials in our locals community, but for those who might be introduced to you for the first time, former journalist Fox News, other legacy media, not in the bad sense, you left over the COVID-19 jab.
Just give everybody the elevator pitch as to who you are.
Yes.
So I used to work over at Fox.
I was a booking producer for Maria Bartiroma and a couple of other Fox business shows.
Then I ended up leaving, like you stated, because of the COVID vaccines, which actually now, because of Catherine Heritage, we actually know that the Biden regime labeled people like myself as domestic terrorists for not wanting to get the jab.
So that's a good thing.
I'm adding that to the resume as well.
So you can call me a domestic terrorist if you'd like.
I also work for Newsmax and local news and over in the sports world prior to all of this, so it's been quite What's his official title, Ed?
He is President Trump's pardon attorney, plus he is also the person who's running the weaponization group over at the DOJ.
Okay, I mean, it's fantastic.
He was the one that was supposed to be the...
Assistant U.S. Attorney to D.C. To the district, that's right.
And then he got yeeted through some politicking because he had been on podcasts of people who they claim are white, whatever, white nationalists.
And he got besmirched and defamed and then didn't pass the, they didn't even put it to a vote.
they didn't even put it to a vote and it's because we have rhinos in the senate who want So they're looking to extract as much as they can from the president.
And President Trump is coming out flat out saying, I don't have time to jump on the calls with these senators.
I'm busy.
I've got deals to push through these tariffs, these trade wars that we're trying to settle off with.
So unfortunately, he didn't have time to do that.
But I actually think it's a it's a much more beneficial role that he's in now because he's going to be investigating a lot of the people that don't even want him to be investigating them in the.
He can operate in the backdrop without having to worry about Senate approval, and he can even be more useful there.
You know, what he's doing in the interim, I think, is still very, very useful.
But Ed Martin, you know, set aside any vote.
Can be even more useful without having to go through that political process.
And so he is now the pardon attorney.
So he's looking over cases for pardons that are continually and continuously submitted to the president throughout the presidency.
Yeah, that's his role, to bring these to his attention, the president's attention.
And I think it's important because, you know, a lot of us thought after J6 that everyone, all the political prisoners were freed, but there's plenty of them that haven't been freed.
And like you alluded to before we started, you know, those who were involved allegedly in the Governor Whitmer kidnapping plot, which many people who have actually studied the case would argue that the federal government played a much larger role in that case than these actual individuals who were arrested.
So far, there are three who were charged in a state level.
they're sitting in state prison and the two who are in federal prison, they stand a chance of getting pardoned by President Trump.
So that's what we're advocating for now.
It is.
I'm going to see if I can pull up an article.
I remember it from the I think Barnes and I were among the earlier ones to look crazy and say,
this looks more like Entrapment than bona fide kidnapping, where you're dealing with people who may or may not have their mental faculties all there, who didn't have the means, who didn't have the resources, were given credit cards to buy weapons, were given training by the FBI agents.
Do you want to refresh everybody's memory as to the level of FBI involvement that could arguably be said to be entrapment and actually led to the acquittal of two of them?
Yeah, well, Christina Urso was the one who was really behind all of this, and I was following her reporting, and she's done an incredible job.
She's really been hyper-focused on this case because she saw all of this from a mile away and knew it was entrapment from the very beginning.
She's actually working on a documentary on this, and it should hopefully be out soon.
But just digging through, I mean, the FBI, through several different agencies, several different agents, I should say, were more involved in orchestrating this entire kidnapping plot than these actual men were.
They were the ones initiating a lot of this, and they were the ones instructing these men on what to do.
And many would argue that on the left that this wasn't an entrapment, but I'd argue the opposite, right?
Because if these men didn't have these FBI employees, people who were on the FBI's payroll, And so I think many would probably say no if you actually honestly heard the case getting argued out in front of a fair jury.
We've seen that time and time play out, the state stepping in, though, and prosecuting those three men.
But the ones that we're focused on, the ones who we could actually save right now, is Adam Fox and Barry Croft Jr.
They both were found guilty in August of 2022 for the conspiracy of kidnapping.
Refresh my memory.
Were they convicted on the second time around or were they convicted on the first trial?
I believe these two men were convicted the second time around.
The jury couldn't reach a verdict.
So they retried them.
A couple, I forget their names, did get acquitted after having raised the entrapment argument.
These guys got convicted on their second time around.
They're in federal...
Almost better because the state charges can't be pardoned, but it can be investigated by Harmeet Dhillon.
So what is the state of their existence right now?
I presume, I don't know if there's any appeals that they're going through, but they're currently being held up or detained on the federal conviction.
And then the question becomes whether or not they're worthy of a pardon for this, what many believe is a political persecution or outright entrapment.
Yeah, so one of the men were sentenced to 19 and a half years in prison, and the other is serving a 16-year prison sentence.
Christina Urso is the one who I've been going to because she communicates with these men.
The prison conditions, from what I understand, are horrible.
They're actually being held in one of the most horrific prisons in the United States, from my understanding.
She's done a deep dive into all of this, so she'd probably be better versed as to what their current frame, their mindset is in all of this because she communicates with them regularly.
In regards to trying to put this on people's radar, though, because I feel like most people don't remember that this even happens because, like you said, the J6 thing kind of just took people over the news.
Eclipsed it.
Yeah.
I remember we were covering the...
If you can find the article, I forget where it was, but they were talking about get used to a lot more involvement of FBI in these types of cases where we were saying there were more FBI agents.
Confidential human sources, assets involved in this, then there were defendants.
And the argument was always, but for the FBI's involvement, would these men have even done anything in the first place?
And from the evidence, I remember the FBI agents or CHSs were the ones driving the defendants to the property to do drive-bys.
They were the ones training them for weapons, suggesting explosives, giving them prepaid credit cards.
The CHS is at least one of them.
From my memory, he was paid, what, $55,000, $60,000 a year for his work as a confidential human source.
And the question was, how is this not entrapment even if these people were, you know, what's the word I'm looking for?
You know, questionable, easy targets to begin with.
How is this not entrapment?
And now I forgot what you said before that.
Well, that's a great question, though, regarding entrapment.
Constantly, I've got people who are reading through a lot of these cases that get brought up.
There was a recent one about an Islamic terror plot that was foiled by the FBI.
And so my friend, before I posted it, she's so sweet.
She's like, hold on, let me read through it all to make sure it's on entrapment before you post about it, because I bet you the FBI knew about this and might have had some say in it.
And she digged through it.
She didn't find any entrapment there.
But she's found entrapment.
And so that's why it's so important to wait before you get the press release on a lot of these cases and just don't read it at surface value because we start going through all of it.
Like you just said, they're openly admitting to participating and bringing these men to do what they were forced to do.
I mean, almost.
You know, a lot of people, I have not spoken to any of these men, but a lot of these people would tell me, Christina specifically, that these men wouldn't have participated in any of this if the FBI didn't play that significant role in it.
That's really critical in all of it.
And it's enraging that this even happened in the first place.
So our biggest fight is to get these two men out.
I think that's the easiest fight we have with President Trump to have him pay attention to all of this because that would be an easy win for him.
But then we also have those three who are being held right now in state prison.
And you know what?
Honestly, Governor Whitmer really wants to work with President Trump.
We've seen her twice so far, once in the White House and one at a press conference.
Standing behind the president.
If she wants to work with this White House, I think President Trump should hold her feet to the fire a little bit and force her to release her political prisoners.
Because ultimately, yes, she has to say over what the AG is doing.
And she could actually pardon them and free these three men.
She knows damn well that this was not something that was going to actually take place.
I always joke and say, you know, why did the FBI want to kidnap Governor Whitmer so badly that they did all of this?
But the reality of it is, is that she knew that this was a fake plot.
And so the game's over.
We need to free all of these men, all five of these men.
I found the article.
It was BuzzFeed, so you know it's got to be good.
Is it share screen?
Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping here.
This was the article I remember at the time, where BuzzFeed News, and it was watching the Watchmen.
Go to the section where they describe the entrapment.
Here we go.
Attorneys for all but one of the defendants declined invitations to comment yada yada.
To date, one defendant has formally accused the government of entrapment, arguing that the FBI assembled the key plotters, encouraged the group's anti-government feelings, and even gave its members military-style training.
Additional defendants have said they plan to make similar claims.
It succeeded on them, but people don't really necessarily even remember or fully appreciate the level of the entrapment that it was the agents or CHS is doing the training, giving them money to buy They didn't have the means.
They didn't really have, arguably, the intent.
And but for the involvement of the FBI, this would have never gone anywhere.
And then they retried the two and convicted them.
But you see, the question is this.
Easy political win for Trump.
I don't see in any realm of the universe, and I don't go by the reaction of the propagandist media.
I don't see any realm of the universe where this is politically easy to pass over, especially given that there are a bunch of rhinos who are still traumatized from January 6th.
Even conservatives who say that Jan 6th was the worst thing ever, which is why they didn't want Ed Martin in.
So I don't even know how Trump could sell this to conservatives.
Yeah, I mean, everyone who was involved in this case, I feel like, had some level of corruption.
I know you just cited a couple of key ones.
I had to pull this one up, too, because I remembered the details.
This is Urso who flagged this for me as well.
There was an FBI agent on this task as well, on this assignment.
Richard Trask is his name.
Now, you might recall, he was the one who was arrested and charged with domestic violence for assaulting his wife after the two came back from a swingers party.
God, I forgot about that.
And it was so great.
I was like, wow.
The lead agents are always corrupt criminals.
Isn't it the weird thing?
I'm not thinking of James Comey right now, but I am.
Yeah, well, you wouldn't be too far off on that one.
But yeah, he was fired by the FBI after the incident.
But again, it's just complete insanity to me.
It just highlights the fact that these people are probably more criminals than the actual ones who are sitting right now in prison cells.
So I think that's kind of the pitch here, that all these individuals who had their hand in this were corrupt people themselves.
There's no way that you should be doing this to American people.
I gotta be honest, there's a lot of people who are easy to kind of manipulate a little bit.
And I can only imagine with somebody with maybe a learning disability or maybe autistic to some degree.
If you find them on the Internet, you tell them what to do, you push them a little bit more to do something, they might actually do it.
And that's the reason why, number one, so many people are...
Because a lot of these times, the FBI misses it.
And whether or not that's intentional, that's debatable.
But it's hard to believe that these well-funded agencies are unable to catch on to these terrorists before they strike.
And then they go immediately after, Democrats push their left-leaning agenda hours after these incidents take place.
I don't know.
I just think all of this is so corrupt.
And why not just get rid of it?
There is no question.
It was actually, Encryptus just found this one.
That was the other one that I was thinking of from Vice, which said, the line between FBI stings and entrapments has not blurred.
It's gone.
This was way back in the day.
That's Vice.
Well, it was 2014.
It was back before everybody tolerated entrapment because of its political opportunism.
But the 9-11 one, or no, it was a terrorist-related one, where the judge overturned it, and I remember...
The judge said, this is like a Hollywood-level entrapment in terms of finding a target and using them.
And when you say they're vulnerable, they're useful, vulnerable people, I draw a certain analogy between the FBI exploiting those vulnerable individuals to other movements exploiting other vulnerable minors for the purposes of brainwashing them into doing certain things.
And everybody knows where I'm going with this.
Okay, well, so the question is, this is a push now to have the two men at the federal level pardoned, and Ed Martin was on your show and he said, it's on my desk and I'm going to look at it.
Yeah, so he's going to be looking at this, what I'm excited for, because I don't know if anyone's actually giving this a good look.
Now, Ed Martin, he is now officially six days into his new role, so he's got a lot of catching up with you, and I'm sure it's going to take him a lot of time.
But this is important, because these two men are sitting right now in one of the filthiest prisons in the country, and it just shouldn't be the case.
So I have a lot of faith in Ed Martin, because he understands it.
I mean, he even equated it to the J6ers.
He said, I think that they were also wrong, just like our J6ers were as well.
So I think that this is a priority for him.
And, you know, I had the pleasure of meeting Ed Martin.
I met him when I was actually going in the Rumble studio in Washington, D.C. So I'm hopeful that this is going to be a top priority for him.
He said it was.
Take him at his word, because he has not wronged any of us yet.
And now, if I'm allowed to segue into the other, which I think was the semi-good news, which had to do with two FBI whistleblowers under the old administration, this is a story that I didn't ignore.
I just never got into it, and then it sort of got away from me, but I've seen some, I don't know, internet drama or internet disagreements that are born out of this case.
I'll need you to fill me in from beginning to end on this.
The two FBI purport, you know, Who are they?
What's their story?
Yeah, so we'll highlight Steve Friend and Garrett O 'Boyle.
Those are two friends of mine.
They're great patriots who really do love this country.
Steve Friend, we'll start with him.
Steve Friend was focused on going after predators online, those who were trading child pornographic images or posting them on the dark web.
That was what his focus was.
The FBI pulled him off of that assignment and put him on J6.
So they wanted him to SWAT J6ers and to be on the SWAT team to go into these homes.
But when he's looking at these cases, he knows damn well that these people should They should, you know, maybe get turned in.
It's a bench warrant at best, some of these cases, because they weren't felony cases.
A lot of these were misdemeanor cases as well.
And so Steve Frenboudouis want that.
He didn't want to participate in it anymore.
And that's what you'd want from somebody at the FBI, somebody who upholds the Constitution, because he knew what was happening was weaponization of our federal government.
Spoke out, came forward.
He put his face on it.
And sadly, he reaped the repercussions for doing that.
Not only did he lose his job over at the FBI, but his wife, who was in the private sector, also lost her job just days after he came forward because that's what the FBI does.
They want to, when you come forward as a whistleblower, they're going to make an example out of you.
And so they go after not only just you, but your loved ones as well.
And so sadly, she lost her job.
And, you know, they've got a very young family.
Now let's talk about Garrett O 'Boyle.
If I may stop you before that, set aside a friend opposing the 6am raids, and Alpha Warrior, who I had on the channel, when he was explaining how he was raided, and they used concussive grenades or shock and bang, whatever.
To me, it literally sounded like they want people to approach the door with a firearm, thinking that they are being the victims of crime, so they can then summarily execute like they did to that 75-year-old blind handicapped man for the threats he allegedly posted about Joe Biden.
But it's one thing to be asked to do that dirty deed.
They pulled a friend off of online predator research so that he could not go after child predators online, but instead be used as a dog of war against fellow citizens who were not criminals whatsoever.
So like a double whammy pulled off of real cases to go be a political.
And that's exactly what happened.
And, you know, Steve, because I've become close friends with Steve, he's somebody who just wants to get back out there and catch predators.
He hates these people with a passion.
He's obviously got a young family himself, and he wants to protect children.
And so that's his main passion in all of this.
And so that's just key to remember.
But like you said, he just didn't want to And a lot of us are critical, right?
Because we're always like, oh, here are these FBI agents participating in it, but you could speak up.
But, you know, when other FBI agents see what happened to Steve Friend, who spoke up and went about it the right way and testified in front of Congress and was sitting next to Jim Jordan, Chairman Jim Jordan, giving press conferences and talking about what happened, and they see how badly he was wronged by the agency and how he still can't get a job.
He's pretty much unhirable, is what Tulsi Gabbard said.
And it's not because he's unhirable due to his background.
He's unhirable because he burnt this agency and they're going to retaliate against him to the fullest extent possible.
So that's important to keep in mind.
Garrett O'Boyle, so he came forward as a congressional whistleblower.
And we don't know the extent of what he was telling Congress because that's still protected.
And I've always respected him.
I don't grill him on any of that.
But he's alluded to me that it has to do with the weaponization of Joe Biden and what he witnessed, what Joe Biden's administration do to the FBI.
The FBI knew that he was speaking to Congress, but he was doing it legally, so he's allowed to do that.
He's allowed to speak to Congress, and he wasn't going out there and speaking with the media.
But Kyle Serafin was speaking with Project Veritas, and at the time, we didn't know who was speaking with Project Veritas because they did a dark screen over the person who was speaking.
They altered the voice.
So the FBI tried to say, because they knew that Garrett was speaking with Congress, they wanted to justify booting Garrett and putting him on an unpaid suspension.
So they said that Garrett was speaking to the media, but they knew within a couple of hours that it wasn't Garrett, that it was actually Kyle Serafin speaking.
And so Kyle even coming out and saying, no, it wasn't Garrett O 'Boyle.
This was a couple of months later, I believe.
I hope I got my timeline right with that.
But he came out and ultimately said, no, it wasn't Garrett.
It was me who was talking to Project Veritas to kind of save Garrett.
But it was too late because they had already made up their mind.
They didn't like the fact he was talking to Congress.
They were going to do anything possible to punish Garrett for doing just that.
Garrett, for over 32 months now, has been on an unpaid suspension waiting for all of this.
Sorry, I'm not trying to laugh.
It's just absurd.
32 months unpaid suspension.
He's been fired.
They won't call it that.
Just to also back up to Kyle Serafin, James O 'Keefe, Project Veritas, I don't want to get into any of the internet drama.
Now that might explain, because I know that there was some beef between Kyle Serafin and James O 'Keefe.
I chimed in only when it was in respect of what I thought was a mischaracterization of a video where they accused James of plying that young girl at a DC bar.
I know that there's some beef between Kyle Serafin and Dan Bongino, even if it's a one-way street.
And now I sort of think I understand that without getting into the high school drama level of it.
Is the resentment between what I perceive this week, at least on Twitter, between Kyle and the current FBI that they have not adequately or quickly enough reinstated the two whistleblowers?
I'm not sure what Kyle's current stance is on that because I haven't spoken to him on that front and I haven't seen his post yet.
But I do know, you know, I have spoken to Kyle in the past and Kyle obviously is very truthful to his friends, Garrett and Steve, and he wants both of them to be brought back and to be, you know, By the FBI.
Because the FBI, and I should tell you this fact, too.
So they moved Garrett to, I believe it was Wisconsin.
So before they even told him that he was being put on any suspension or let him know that they had any idea that he was talking to Congress or anything, they actually had him pick up and move his family, sell his house and move his family to another state.
And the first day he walked into that new field office is when they told him to go home and that he was being placed on suspension.
So he had no idea what was happening.
But the FBI, intentionally to mess with him, had him pick up and move to another state.
And then that's when they drop that nuke on him.
So obviously, you know, Kyle's very upset about that because he thinks that's very, very wrong.
And he knows that they intentionally used what they knew wasn't Garrett against Garrett.
And so that's why he's got a bone to pick with that.
But, you know, I've spoken to sources.
Since day one on all of this, in regards to why it's taking so long to bring Garrett O 'Boyle back on, because he's still technically an employee of the agency.
Garrett can't even get outside employment because he'd have to get approved by the FBI.
How does one survive for nearly three years without remuneration and without the ability to get another job, at the risk of asking a stupid question?
No, no, it's not.
Kyle again, he loves these guys.
He did some fundraising for Garrett, but I believe So I don't know how they're getting by, to be completely honest with you.
And that's the reason why I've been so enraged on X. Not enraged.
I've been very persistent with going after people about this and making sure that this is still a top priority because I know that Dan Bongino loves Garrett O 'Boyle, that they are friends.
Dan's told me this himself, that they are friends.
He's told me this prior to even being brought in as the deputy director.
I know Kash Patel has helped also Garrett, both of them have helped him actually, donations.
And just recently Garrett came out and said that Kash Patel's foundation, even though Kash Patel doesn't have a connection to it anymore because he's the FBI director now and he had to sever ties with it.
But they helped one of Garrett's friends who sadly lost his life, a veteran.
So they've helped giving that family some funding because it's Garrett's friend.
They do have the best intentions.
But the problem is getting past all of the mud.
Now, what I mean by that is my sources have told me that there was information planted into Garrett's folder to make it so that the next incoming administration can't bring him back from his suspension.
And I don't know what the details of that are.
I know that a certain senator knows that information to be false.
As soon as he heard it, he knew it was false.
And as soon as he heard it, he...
So I did my very best to advocate to make sure that everyone at the FBI knows that that's not rightful information.
That information is intentionally meant to hurt Garrett from being able to come back on.
And so I was a little personally hurt for just the simple fact that, you know, I think we're approaching Cashmere's 100th day as FBI deputy director, sorry, FBI director.
And the simple fact is, I mean, I've looked at the law itself, the rules, the regulations.
You could suspend Garrett if you want to look through his file and vet what was put in his file.
That's okay.
I'm okay with that, but pay it.
Can I stop you?
I immediately go to the most nastiest of things that the FBI has been known to either put in files or threaten to put in files.
We're not talking like child porn type stuff.
We're talking misconduct type stuff.
Misconduct.
Yeah, potentially misconduct.
Nothing that bad.
And it's nothing that gets really criminal.
Because if it was criminal, then the Biden regime would have filed charges against him if they felt that strongly about it.
But obviously it wasn't.
And so it's just something that they're claiming is a misconduct.
And they're trying to use it to make sure that the director doesn't bring him back.
Ed Martin, fighter, he assured me on my show yesterday that that information, because he knows too that it's false, that that information is not going to hurt him and that they are going to make right by all of this.
He told me that he didn't give me much in the way specifics as to where Garrett and Steve Friend might potentially be ending up soon, whether it's the FBI or with him over at the DOJ.
But he assured me that they are going to make things right and that I'm going to be personally very happy about the results of all of this.
Because I mean, this is something that I've been I know there's a lot of people who have been advocating for.
I know a lot of Americans are on their side.
So this is a win-win for everyone, unless, of course, you're a member of the Deep State Hacks.
Well, and as you've been talking, I just want to make sure that I haven't mischaracterized what I thought was Kyle's beef with Bongino.
And that's what it is, that the allegation is that Cash and Dan, in the two or three months that they've been at the FBI, haven't restored, I guess, or didn't adequately defend the two whistleblowers.
That seems to be Kyle's beef.
Is there any criticism against the two that predates their roles as director and deputy director, respectively?
Is there an argument that true conservatives did not defend them adequately when they were first put on unpaid leave for three years?
I don't know.
I don't think so.
And I think just to go back to the Kyle thing, I think that they've had even prior to this, they've had some back when Dan was, you know, podcasting with the rest of us, they had some they had some disputes publicly.
But, you know, I think that I think we could all get on board with bringing back these whistleblowers and helping them dig through the weaponization of these federal agencies.
So I think that would be a great neutralizer to that online drama.
And I look forward to it because I think it's really important.
I think that would really help.
And now that you mention it, you have good sources.
I don't know if they're better or worse than mine, but you've got good sources.
The question is this.
When Bongino and Patel did the interview with Bartiromo, and Dan says, I've seen the file.
Epstein killed himself.
The question that a lot of people are asking is, what file are they reviewing at this point?
Like, if, you know, I've said that, Right now, he has an employer, and the employer has a file and has a position.
The question that people are asking is, what file did they inherit?
And when you talk about bringing back these whistleblowers to go back and, you know, themselves be used to go after the criminalization or the criminality of the FBI under the Biden regime, what is left of that criminality?
Like, on the one hand, if you know the answer to this question, what file would Patel and Bongino have inherited from Epstein that wouldn't already just be the fruits of a corrupt Biden?
They would only put the evidence in their hands that they want them to see.
And so I think that's important to note.
When I was listening to Dan, first off, Dan is a rock star right now.
He's trying his very best, but he definitely looked tired.
I've become friends with Dan over like the last year, but I also work for Fox.
I used to run teleprompter and I don't think Dan realized it, but I used to run his teleprompter at Fox when he used to tape his weekend shows.
So I have a good understanding as to who he is and how he speaks and even on air, off air.
So when I saw that interview, I just thought he looked a little tired.
I know people were a little critical and saying that he wasn't acting how he normally would be.
I think he looked tired, but just speeding up on that front.
I think that whatever evidence they're seeing is the evidence that they wanted them to see.
I would raise the question, you know, I know that they said that the cameras are broken.
There's got to be some camera footage that we gain access to.
And I'm pretty sure that it's not over yet.
I'm pretty sure we're going to see something soon.
But I would also argue, and I've raised this concern, I would love to hear, because I know that Epstein made phone calls prior to his alleged suicide.
I would love to hear those phone calls.
I wanted to hear what the state of mind was.
They're all monitored.
Anybody who's ever called a federal prison or this was This was federal.
Yes.
They're monitored.
They tell you they're recorded.
Some people get busted because they're talking about criminality while they're talking on the lines that you're warned are being surveilled.
Just to go back to Dan and Cash and whether or not they look like they're regular cells, I can only imagine that they've gotten now...
Now they're in charge at the FBI.
Director and Deputy Director.
Literally answering letters from God from everybody on Earth.
You know, 86, 47. Now they've got to spend however long and however many resources going after would-be assassins.
They're looking, literally, if they're going over the video evidence, you know, talking about victims and the sex tapes of Epstein, they might be looking over some of the most horrific stuff on Earth.
Like, I imagine if there's a frazzled drip video, if Patel and Bongino have seen the frazzled drip video, that will mess you up for life.
They've inherited this corrupt box of criminality where set aside the corruption, it's still like staring into the abyss of hell.
And then you've got to go on and try to put on a smile on an interview.
It's got to be not just incredibly hard.
It's got to fuck you up to be crass about it.
And then getting into whether or not the state's position is whatever and these are employees of the states.
The question I had is there's always been rumorings of videos of Epstein.
The question now is having been told for the last five years under the criminal Biden regime that the cameras malfunctioned and there was no video evidence, if it comes up that there's video evidence now.
Well, I put out a poll the other day, and the most popular answer was CGI, AI, they don't believe that he's still alive.
Like, it's gotten to the point where nobody knows what to believe, and the second they hear something that doesn't fit with what they currently believe...
Is there any possibility to put forward evidence that would quell or at least resolve some of these questions without opening up a Pandora's box of more questions?
No.
I think at this point, everyone, listen, I'm not going to argue against people who are going to doubt any evidence that gets put out there, right?
Because at this point, I don't trust our government, never have, probably never will.
That's probably why I'm a journalist, though, at this point.
But I do authentically trust Dan Bongino.
And I have to say, nobody leaves a multimillion-dollar job to work for the government.
That's unheard of unless your heart is actually in this.
And so for his sake, I will say that it's not that I don't trust him.
I just don't trust the government.
I think it's a machine.
The deep state's a machine.
And I think that they've done everything possible to make sure that we don't trust them.
They have not been transparent about any of this.
You know, if we wanted transparency, by the way, the Biden administration promises that they were going to be the most transparent administration ever.
I mean, it's such a ridiculous lie.
Sorry, I cut you off.
No, no, no.
They're literally like, just look at what we put in front of you.
Don't look over here.
Don't look over here.
That's why the media didn't even know that Joe Biden was so gone.
They're like, oh, this was such a cover-up.
No, it wasn't a cover-up.
All he knew was two functioning brain cells and knew that man was gone.
Apparently Jake Tapper doesn't have two functioning brain cells.
The issue with the Epstein stuff is like we were, it was a whole prelude of disappointment where Blondie came out and said, I've got the files and then...
Then the question is, is it biding of the time until you can put out the most damning evidence that's going to take down governments, or by virtue of the fact that many believe this actual evidence would take down governments, it's never going to come out.
And now, you know, I don't know.
I understand also that there's more to come in the Epstein stuff, as there has to be, because...
Even if he did bonafide kill himself with no assistance, he just got lucky and did it.
There's still the whole client aspect of this.
I have a feeling that Blangino and Patel might be saying, how he killed himself or whether or not people let him kill himself is the least of the sinister conspiracies here.
Now we've actually got to deal with the people involved in this and we've got to do that in a way that doesn't tip our hats as to where we're going.
Yeah, and you brought up Pam Bondi.
I want to remind your audience, too, that the Pam Bondi thing, that gets me angry because Pam Bondi knew that she didn't have any of the files when she was trying to do a phase one of all of this.
And so she went on Fox News the night before before giving it to the social media influencers and goes on Fox News.
And I think it was Jessie Waters who asked her, you've seen the files.
What's in them?
Like, what is it?
Oh, it's disgusting, Jessie.
But there was nothing.
And she was lying to Jessie Waters, right?
So you think like somebody would hold her feet to the fire on that front.
But then she gave these binders, which are clearly They weren't there for this.
I know, and I've read the emails of what they were invited for.
I had on, I feel bad, I'm going to forget her name, but one of the people who was there and like, yeah, when they held that binder, it wasn't like, you know, the Chamberlain piece in our time, look what we've got.
They thought, well, first of all, the picture was taken before the embargo was lifted.
It was a debacle, put it that way.
Well, the embargo was, Let me tell you, probably 13 now, actually.
The embargo was absolute garbage.
So what they did is they took advantage of these guys.
They have them go in front of the camera and show...
they intentionally walk them out in front of the cameras.
So they show their binder and they flash their binder up because they think that they're, And then they tell him, oh, you're three hours, so you can't say anything to anyone what's in this binder.
There's nothing in the binder.
And we know there's nothing in the binder because she put a letter in there that she sent to Kash Patel saying that evidence was withheld.
So for their It's unethical to make people have an embargo on something that's going to completely damage their reputation.
And what it actually did, because some people were outraged at these social media influencers, like, oh, you guys were over here teasing this.
There's sexual assault victims involved in all of this.
And in fact, it wasn't them.
It was Pambani who told them that they can't say anything.
So absolute garbage on that front.
But I posted that there was nothing in these binders, and I put the letter that she sent to Cash Patel on my Twitter page so that people weren't being misled.
Now, normally I wouldn't go past an embargo, but I blame them.
So we went through that.
It was Liz Wheeler that in cryptos reminded me.
Sorry, I forgot.
I'm bad with names, but I remember.
She's amazing.
And, Brianna, this is where I'm an idiot.
I saw the letter as well, the cover letter.
And I'm like, someone sends it to me.
I'm like, are they sending it to me because they want me to leak it?
I don't want to burn bridges.
I don't want to get anybody into trouble.
If it's an embargo, I don't want them going to jail for having violated the embargo.
But like, yeah, where it said, you know, you're not getting anything new and the letter was there.
And had they just been allowed to say that before that picture went viral, there would have been no scandal.
Yeah, another PR disaster.
Bondi oversold and under-delivered and that's very much the worst thing you can do in business.
Well, that's why so many people don't trust what's currently being put out there, and I don't blame them.
I think we need to hear the phone calls from Epstein.
I would actually probably want at least a month's worth of phone calls to listen to, because I want to hear, did someone call him and tell him that he had to kill himself by a certain deadline?
Maybe that's possible.
What was his frame of mind like?
Where was he at in his mindset?
What was that all at the time?
Did he sound depressed?
He's saying goodbyes to people.
So I think that will be the real truth teller in all of this, because if he is saying goodbye to people on the phone, then yeah, Yeah, I would say he probably did kill himself.
But if he sounded upbeat and excited and possibly, And so if that was the case, then of course he wouldn't kill himself.
So I want to hear it.
And I've had trusted people in my community who are...
They're not autopsy professionals.
You know, they can read an autopsy report and to say where the break was, which was not commensurate with hanging, but rather with strangulation and breaking of the three bones.
This is where I wouldn't say, that's not what my opinion would be based on, because I'll operate on the basis that he had the opportunity to hang himself with sheets somehow.
And if I say that, if someone lets that happen, because they basically say to Epstein, you do it, or I was just Googling to see if Epstein had any kids, but, or we, you know, we frazzle drip family and he's like, okay, I'll do it.
I mean, it's, it's, it's, But, no, it's true.
Who was he talking to in the last month, above and beyond counsel?
And, you know, the camera's malfunctioning.
I know Alex Jones talked about nitrous oxide being in the prison to put the guards out.
Had you ever heard about that?
No, I haven't heard of that.
But I did speak to somebody who actually was held in that same prison cell.
And for background, it's actually the former NYPD commissioner, Mr. Bernie Carrick, back under And unfortunately, this was during the Obama years.
Unfortunately, they had napped him on some tax-related issues, I believe, or a mortgage issue.
And so he had pleaded guilty just to save his family of the burden of going through a criminal trial.
And they placed him in solitary confinement.
And that was the same cell that Epstein was held in.
And so I actually just happened to ask, not even knowing that there was an issue, there was a story behind all of this.
I actually turned to Bernie one day.
We were talking.
I said, do you think, like, do you think he really killed himself?
And he said, No, no.
I was in that cell.
I could tell you.
I possibly thought about the idea myself.
It was a really depressing thing to be in.
When you're in there by yourself in a dark cell like that, it could drive you crazy.
And so it could be a possibility.
Maybe he got kind of crazy in there and killed himself.
I had plenty of phone calls.
It's always a possibility.
Then the question is only how he was able to procure the items with which he allegedly killed himself when he was on suicide watch or just taken off it.
You know, reports say extra linens that he magically had access to when some people say the linens would not have had the tensile strength to hang somebody.
If he's got linens, there's a way to tie them up or reinforce them so that it'll do it.
But how did he get the linens when he was on suicide watch two weeks earlier?
I've spoken to a couple people about it.
They said that he had complained about the conditions of the cell itself and had asked for extra sheets.
I always think like if you have no sheets, is it feasible to off yourself by banging your head against the wall really hard?
Like I haven't tried that yet, but you know, if we keep going at this, I'm going to get If anyone remembers this, it was a basketball player who missed a shot and was so angry he just banged his head on the base of the basket and it was where the cushion wasn't and then he paralyzed himself for life.
fell to the ground.
I remember seeing it as like traumatizing when I was a kid.
So we're going to see if anything else comes out in the Epstein stuff.
Brianna, I don't know how long you have, and I don't want to abuse my time with you.
It's your birthday.
I know my wife is out.
I suspect we got some meat from Easy Meats down the street.
We're going to have a nice barbecue.
I love that.
In my head, I'm still panicking.
I'm looking at myself.
I don't think I'm having any dog fennel secondary results.
No, I would tell you if I was worried.
Am I retaining water?
I'm crazy by the way.
I know that I have some...
What else are you working on these days?
Well, I have been trying my best to figure out what's in the one big, beautiful bill.
And I wanted to drive this point home because I think everyone in the mainstream media is missing it.
And I've been advocating for this for quite some time now.
But as you know, Democrats love making the argument that illegal aliens should have due process.
They should be able to go through our immigration courts before being deported.
And they love that argument.
And that's the reason why Democrats flooded millions of illegals into this country, because they knew it would take us over a decade.
We need to get rid of them all.
And so that was the purpose there.
Common sense tells me that we should probably expand the courts and provide more funding for courts, immigration courts, so that we could speed up this process because Democrats didn't think we would be able to do that.
Well, I am proud to announce so far, if the Senate doesn't take it out, that there was $1.25 billion allocated towards expanding immigration courts in that bill that passed earlier this week.
What that's going to specifically do is it's going to allow them to hire more supporting staff in these courts.
It's also going to hire more judges as well.
And you're also going to be able to expand the courtroom capabilities of being able to bring more people in.
The infrastructure is going to also expand, and they're also going to be improving technology.
So mass deportations hopefully underway soon.
We've got some more funding coming their way, and we're expanding the immigration courts.
That's good news.
The ultimate kicker punchline in all of this is Trump should talk about expanding the Supreme Court as well, since the Democrats were so gung ho on doing it back in...
Yeah, the big bill, I know in Cryptis, who's, we call him the equivalent of Jamie to the Viva Frye podcast, or Rogan's Jamie to the Viva Frye podcast, he did an AI summary of it, which I don't think I shared it at the time, because even the AI summary, and he's got good tools, was too long for, it escaped my attention span.
It's, it is wild.
I've been following that.
And so the bill finally did pass, correct?
It passed today?
In the House, it passed.
It's going to get amendments out.
This is why our country isn't in the crapper right now, because all of these politicians have got to add certain things, take certain things out.
Like right now, there's like a SALT $40,000 cap on SALT that's going on right now, which is interesting in itself.
But that specifically, it could get changed.
It could get reduced when it makes its way into the Senate, because all of these RINO senators are going to want to make the adjustments.
I tried uploading it and ingesting it to Grok, and it wasn't.
So I've only been able to get through the immigration portion of all of it.
And it's everything that we suspected in regards to the funding.
So I can actually help you with that.
There's tools that are much better for that particular type of analysis.
A thousand pages is just a lot of text.
Let's hear it.
What are these tools?
Well, they're tools that I build.
So I actually am an AI developer.
And I build my own tool.
So I actually just dropped a link to my own summary on X. I'll bring it up.
If there's anything you want, just message me on X. I'm happy to help you with it.
I love it.
Thank you.
I'll bring it up afterwards, Brianna, because even the summary is long.
It talks about permanent tax cuts, tax brackets stayed lowered, supporting small business and rural growth.
I mean, it's actually...
I'll go over it afterwards.
Question of the day, will Viva eat cake, says Boopsie.
Then we got Roostang, who says, no excuses, Viva.
Tulsi Gabbard, RFK, and Tom Holman all got portfolios that were badly mangled and they are thriving through enormous adversity.
I would argue, with the exception maybe of Tulsi Gabbard, that RFK's...
They're more direct than what the FBI is dealing with.
I can't imagine what the FBI deals with.
And Ginger Ninja accuses me of, can I carry any more water for Bongino?
I can.
I carry a lot of it.
I'm upfront about it.
If it were anybody else, I would be far more critical, and it'll take me a long time to get to be as critical on Bongino and Patel as I would be on, let's just say, Director Ray or James Comey.
You're following the James Comey stuff?
Oh, yes, I am, Mr. James Comey.
I still can't believe.
That was all a PR stunt.
I don't think people caught on to it.
He had a book that came out on Monday of this week, and then he dropped that photo on Instagram a couple of days before.
It's obviously a PR stunt to get his name flashing out there, and for all of the lefties who hate President Trump to buy his book, his crappy book.
No question.
Like I say, I'm not proud to be one of the ones who made that connection at the time.
I did.
It was even worse because his denial of what he thought it meant, it's so stupid.
I posted the summary because before the picture, he posted him on the beach reading his book.
Then he posted the picture.
Then he posted a summary of the book.
And in the summary of the book, it talks about the character Buchanan pushing the limits of First Amendment rights by calling for threats against his rivals by saying something should be done to them and his fans oblige.
So I just don't understand why he's not in jail yet, because...
I think they have a sufficiently clear file to at the very least bring charges against him.
And if they don't, to the extent that they don't, it's empowering other people to run around saying 86, whoever they don't like, and ha ha, Comey got away with it, so I can say it as well.
You've been following the story of the D.C. shooting?
There's no new developments in that case?
Nothing new.
I did see that this morning that the suspect's father was once a Democrat, brought him forward as a guest.
I believe it was to the address, the presidential address.
I could be wrong on that one, but I know he was a guest.
I saw a picture of him with Ilhan Omar right behind him, so he was brought up to the podium to speak, his father.
We're talking about radical left-wing terrorists, and this is the consistency.
Time and time again, the media likes to ignore the fact that the left is the most violent group in this country.
I actually just saw the Associated Press put up a stupid story related to domestic hate groups, is what they were referring to.
Let me show you if I can pull it up so I can read to you the stupidity.
But it was so fascinating to me because here's the Associated Press signing a radical left wing group and saying that I think I took a picture.
I didn't want anyone to read it, though.
It's a no-brainer, and it's the old confession through projection when Biden's saying there's no more dangerous group than white nationalists, and they're a terrorist organization.
They're describing themselves, and they're carrying it out in real time.
It's like every time it happens, will they either find a way to blame the Pelosi hammer attack or call him a right-wing Trumpy when he's a Canadian Green Party card-carrying nudist hippie?
And then the most recent one, the bomber of the IVF facility, a far left radical as well.
And then this guy, there are those people online.
Some people suggesting cash Patel, let it happen on purpose.
And like, there's no level.
To some extent, you can't blame people for being that traumatized by the world that they will find conspiracy theories that are as outlandish as they are everywhere.
But what are you going to do?
Let's hear the screen grab.
Yeah, so this is the article that just dropped from the Associated Press.
And they're citing, of course, they are citing the Southern Poverty Law Center as their main source here.
But they're saying that hate groups in the U.S. decline, but their influence grows.
And of course, they're just citing BS stats that are from a left wing group, a radical left wing group.
And they just go on to saying that, you know.
Oh, male supremacy is also a group that they say is increasing influence here in the United States.
And they say that there has been at least seven new male supremacist hate groups, making it a total of 16 that we currently have in this country.
I would actually like to join one of these.
But what it goes on to say, it says, their rising influence came during an election year when the country saw a woman of color be the first presidential nominee for a major political party.
And then they also say that they spew misogyny and strict gender roles as another angle to all of this.
So that's what makes them a hate group is the fact that they are a bunch of just spewing – they're out there spewing gender roles.
It's just nonsense.
It just goes on to just stupidity.
I just think it's so funny.
I brought up – I forget.
I'm so senile.
I'm just talking about the SPLC.
In respect of a story, I'll refresh my memory.
SPLC and the ADL are two of the most destructive, you know, whatever they are, 501c3 organizations out there.
They should be bankrupted.
They should be sued into oblivion.
But the Southern Poverty Law Center is outrageously bad, uniquely bad.
Spam Ranger has a question for you, Brianna.
Please ask the politicians why they aren't challenging the Supreme Court overturning the line.
Item, Veto Act of 1996.
We need to plant an idea to do this for balancing the budget.
I don't know what that is.
I'd have to look into that.
Sorry, I'm usually well-versed.
So, Brianna, your show, when is it and when is it next?
Yes.
So I will be traveling for the next week.
So we don't have a show next week, but I do a morning podcast every day where I read you all the headlines, all the details on the story the corporate media is not going to tell you about.
So you could follow me on any of the podcasting platforms.
Just look up the Brianna Morello Show.
Then I also do a show every Thursday on Rumble and on X. That's also the Brianna Morello Show.
So give me a follow there as well.
And the Independent Newsroom is where all my exclusive stories drop first.
So it's a free platform that you could sign up for right now.
You could go to the Independent Newsroom.
I'll give that to everybody right now because I often go there to get my information.
Thank you.
Brianna, I mean, first of all, thank you as always.
When there's, when there's breaking news in the Epstein stuff, either you come back on here or I'll come on with you and we'll, uh, we'll talk about it.
Cause I can't wait.
They're there.
We're two months in.
We are not two years in and we're not at the end of it.
We're just at the beginning of shining that big spotlight on that abyss of the criminal pedo child sacrificing network that was the Epstein file and others.
Brianna, I'll put all of your links in the pinned comment when the show is over, but thank you very much for coming on.
Thank you for having me, and happy birthday.
Enjoy the food.
Thank you.
I got to read a ton of rants, and I'm not doing it.
Reading rants and doing ad reads in front of a guest, I hate doing it, so I'm going to go read some rants for a bit and then talk about Adam Schiff for Bings McShiff, but it's a short story, and then I'm going to go celebrate my birthday.
Well, happy birthday.
Enjoy it.
Thank you very much.
Talk to you soon.
All right, people.
Now, hold on, because I see these, and I get nervous, and I start getting anxiety, because good problems have.
I got to read birthday wishes and crumble rants.
Over on the Rumbles.
And then we're going to have our Locals After Party shortly thereafter.
The dialogue box says, Hey Viva, can you give my channel a shout out?
I refuse.
I will stop reading this.
I'm joking.
Hey Viva.
This is, by the way, the best way.
I mean, it's, this is, what's the word I'm looking for?
This is opportunity.
Cost-effective opportunity.
The dialogue box for those listening on podcast.
T-H-E-D-I-A-L-O-G-U-E box.
B-O-X.
The only way you can spell the dialogue box.
Hey, Viva, can you give my channel a shout?
The dialogue box.
I think, therefore, I run.
I offer a free alternative view on many things until my book is finished, LOL.
Then you all pay like never, and I presume you meant to say never before.
Then we got forced name change, who is a name that I see around the channel a lot.
Thank you, fourth name change.
I disagree on Bongino's look and on his body language in that interview.
He looked pissed off and like he was trying poorly to hide it.
He looked someone stitched his mouth shut and he's not happy.
I don't disagree with that.
King of Biltong says, Viva and Barnes both eat our Biltong and so should you.
Packed with B12 creatine, iron, and zinc, a great addition to a healthy diet.
Go to BiltongUSA.com.
Code Viva for 10% off.
Chance Upmore, who I had on the channel, one of the Jan Sixers who had a uniquely particular problem in that he caught charges that were incidental to the Jan Six raid, and so even the Jan Six pardon didn't resolve his other charges, which were not directly related to the Jan Six charges, but were ancillary in that they were discovered with the raid that was carried out in that bullshit trial, says Chance Upmore.
I hope more pardons start coming through for all of us victims of lawfare.
I'm starting to get anxious waiting for mine.
Just let's do more community service for something I've been pardoned for.
or And I just hope the community service was not picked by the judge and that at the very least you got to pick your own community service so that you can be happy with the community service that you're servicing to the community.
And the dialogue box.
Hey, Viva, can you give my channel a shout?
The Dialogue Box.
I think, therefore, I run.
I offer a free alternative view on many things until my book is finished.
LOL.
Then you all pay like never before.
Then we get Chance Upmore says, Happy birthday, sir.
Thanks for fighting the good fight.
Chance, thank you very much.
Then we got King of Biltong back in the house.
Happy parents' ugly bits working day, Viva.
Yeah, happy birthday.
My parents made sex 46 years ago.
46 years and nine and a half months ago.
By the way, I was 10 pounds, 6 ounces when I was born.
I was the fifth of five children.
And as the joke goes, my mother didn't even have an epidural for me, unless I'm mistaken.
10 pounds, 6 ounces.
They said I was shaped like a bread box, and in some ways, I'm still shaped like a bread box.
5'5", 5'6", with socks, 158 pounds.
Cultivated Mind says, let's make...
We don't need to do that.
Happy birthday, Viva.
By the way, Viva, I'll sponsor your show no matter what subjects you cover.
Bring on the controversy.
Cultivated Mind makes wonderful dog treats.
And I have them in the other room.
I don't have them here.
Well, I got 1775 Coffee.
I've got Paleo.
I don't know that they're a sponsor yet, but they're going to be because this stuff is awesome.
Biltong is amazing, but it's an indirect...
Not even a sponsor.
We talked about that.
I've got Qualia, which is also one of the sponsors that I also use.
Fourth Name Change says, Dan looked like someone asked him to make a statement that was untrue or went against his morals, and Dan said, go F yourself, and then sat back and watched Cash do, as he was told.
Let's see what else we've got going on in the VivaBarnesLaw.com.
Well, we've got a meme.
Of me looking old.
So I guess this is going to be me in about 50 years.
Who is that?
Oh, that's Don King.
Or they're going to have to call him Don Kingstein.
Bada bing, bada boom.
You all know what I'm going with this.
Okay, fine.
Because I'm Jewish.
All right.
See what's going on here?
Hold on.
Okay.
Adam Schifferbrains McShiftface.
This is a story that is not getting talked about enough.
Nate Brody just did a video on it.
Nate the great Brody.
Nate the lawyer.
I'm one of the fine friends that I've met through this internet venture.
And I say, in all the insanity of the universe and for the friends that I've lost because of my politics.
I'm talking to you if you're watching.
You know exactly who you are.
For the friends that I've lost, I've made a bunch of great friends.
I was on with Eric Conley earlier today.
Tried to do that show from the farm before I had chewed on the dog fennel.
Nate Brody.
Robert Barnes threw this.
Robert Gouveia.
The amount of people I've met in cryptos, the entire locals community.
Nate did a video on this, but the Adam Schifferbrains makes shift.
He's among the worst people on earth.
And I was listening to Amanda Knox on Joe Rogan today, and I would love to have an interview with Amanda Knox.
Because her story is absolutely amazing.
And she was talking about her story.
How did it relate to what I was getting at with Adam Schiff?
That's right.
And she was talking about radical forgiveness.
Or at least Rogan was.
How Amanda Knox has come to not necessarily forgive, but live with what that Italian prosecutor did to her by trying to lock up a person that he knew to be innocent and successfully locked up for four years until her conviction was overturned.
How do you forgive those people?
I think Adam Schiff is...
I do wonder if I sat down face to face and I would see the human in him and feel bad about calling him Adam Schiff for Brains McSchiff face for years.
I don't think I would because he's truly an awful person who sought to destroy other people.
How do I get to...
He's an awful person who has sought to steal the life and liberty of other people.
And so I don't harbor any personal resentment to him.
I just think he's an awful person who needs to be put on blast and he should be in jail.
He lied during Russiagate.
And now it seems that he's committed the exact same type of alleged property fraud, mortgage fraud as Leticia James, another person who is a disgusting scumbag scoundrel of an excuse for a human.
And in as much as, you know, I would forgive them because...
They are awful people who try to strip other people of property and life and freedom.
And there is nothing worse than stealing someone's freedom.
This story is old, but I think it needs to be made new again.
Adam Schiff for Brains McSchiff allegedly committed the exact same type of mortgage fraud that Leticia James did by claiming as a primary residence, multiple primary residences, so that he could get, I don't know, presumably better interest rates or whatever.
Can you imagine also lying for like, Holy hell, how stupid you have to be.
And it's not about stupid.
It's not about money.
It's about the principle of exercising your power to get the best deal possible and saying, I got it because of my power.
This is from May 3rd, 2025.
Ethics complaint hits Senator Adam Schiff, alleging mortgage fraud, voter fraud, and residency deception.
Claims that mirror allegations against New York Attorney General.
Letitia James.
Didian.
D-I-T-I-A-N.
That's from an old skit of Saturday Night Live with Chevy Chase.
In a developing scandal, they're sending shockwaves through Capitol Hill.
You know why it's sending shockwaves through Capitol Hill?
Because there are a shantan of politicians who have probably done the exact same thing.
There is no question that this is not...
They all do it, probably.
And they've all been getting away with it because it's been a trough of corruption from which these political pigs have been sucking.
Bombshell ethics complaint has been filed against U.S. Senator Adam Schiff, accusing him of a pattern of mortgage fraud, voter fraud, and unlawful campaign filings stretching back over two decades.
Initially filed October 2024.
I didn't hear about it at the time.
I'm hearing about it now.
And I got a big fat mouth and a relatively modestly large platform to put it on blast and amplify it.
Initially filed October 16, 2024 by Christine Bisch and Darren Ellis, the complaint demands urgent action by the U.S. House Committees on Ethics, Oversight, and Judiciary, and echoes growing calls of a formal criminal investigation by the Department of Justice and the FBI.
I can appreciate, you know, they've got the Epstein stuff, they've got domestic terrorism stuff, they've got, you know...
They got a lot of employees.
Send some of the lower level employees who can't be trusted to go do it.
According to the 20 page document, shift may have violated Maryland code, whatever California tax code, including statutes and mirror, According to the complaint here, in 2009, Adam Schiff's residence and voting registration was called to question in a House Ethics Committee hearing.
It goes back to 2009.
Amazing.
They just get away with it.
Adam Schiff, despite claiming to live and represent the people in the state of California, filed a reaffirmed through refinancing documents his primary residence was in Potomac, Maryland.
Sorry, I don't mean to read these addresses.
This is in the documents.
I can't do it.
The complaint further alleges Adam Schiff is on the record for having acknowledged a mortgage document filings during a House ethics hearing in 2009.
He made the claim of mistake, thereby acknowledging the appearance of a possible mortgage fund.
You know who else just made the statement of a mistake?
Latidia James!
What happens if I press two here?
Does this go on?
holy crap apples I'm Three?
Well, that's what's going on with Adam Schiff for brains.
It's the exact same thing.
They claim primary residence in more than one location so they can get better mortgage rates, so they can then represent people in a state where they wouldn't be able to necessarily represent them if they didn't have a primary residence, forgetting that they've declared a primary residence in another state.
Did you all see Leticia James explaining away her patent fraud?
Leticia James mistake.
Fraud.
It's amazing.
You mean admitting it outright?
Yeah.
What did she, she said it was a mistake on her, on her filing document that it was, um, Here it is right here.
Yeah, she said it was a mistake because Yeah, Alex Jones put this up the other day.
Here.
Check this out.
Dude, it's amazing.
Like, let them talk.
Let them speak and they shall incriminate.
I'm sure the volume's not too high here.
Here.
...the local citizens found at the Farm of Worker Group.
By the way, just stop.
Listen to her fumbling over her words because she is frazzled.
She knows.
It doesn't happen to me because I internalize my anxiety and then you go into auto drive so that you can keep speaking even if you are internally melting down.
Latidia James ain't so good at that.
Listen to the way she can't even get the words out of her mouth because it's internal crisis panic level dishonesty.
As you know, we filed a lawsuit against Donald Trump and his family.
We secured a $454 million judgment against him, which is on appeal.
The case is on appeal.
I have no idea when the case will be decided.
This investigation to me is nothing more than retribution.
It's baseless.
It's retribution.
It's baseless.
It has to do with the mistake I made, but it wasn't on a relevant document.
appreciate she said this out loud ladies and gentlemen of the jury i present to you exhibit one um it has to do with the fact that on a um a power of attorney i mistakenly indicated that i was a state of virginia and but prior to that i have indicated to the mortgage broker the Can you even notice?
I had indicated, but prior to that, I haven't even...
I apologize.
With the fact that on a power of attorney, I mistakenly indicated that I was a state of Virginia.
But prior to that, I have indicated to the mortgage broker that in fact, in bold cap letters, that I am not a resident of Virginia and never will be.
They just took the power of attorney and they're using that as a basis for enforcement for their investigation.
when in reality, power of attorney was never used to determine my eligibility for a mortgage for my niece, for a home in the state of Virginia, my niece who has children, and what's my mortgage on?
I want her to have home.
I mean, this is the thing where, like, A, I just want to know the facts.
Is it, in fact, the case that the only place where she indicated that it was her primary residence was on a power of attorney?
I'd like to know that before I can move on.
What I would say is, for the sake of steel manning the argument, I'll accept her premise.
She lied on a power of attorney.
What were the legal consequences of the mistake on the power of attorney?
How the hell do you make that type of mistake on a power of attorney?
What impact, what influence, what legal tool was that power of attorney serving as?
Seems to me like even if we take her at her word, she doesn't just admit to something that's arguably potentially very, very incriminating.
So Adam Schifferbrains is having the exact same problem now.
There was an October complaint.
I don't know what the statute of limitations would be.
To the extent that they got around the statute of limitations with Donald Trump's so-called hush money payment, reaffirming, paying interest on something that was predicated on a fraudulent document, does that start prescription anew or statute of limitations anew?
We'll find out.
But if there are people who deserve to be behind bars, and if there are people who deserve the treatment that Trump unjustly got, I could name a few offhand.
Tish?
Tish.
Letitia James.
Fannie Willis.
New York Nipple Judge Artur Engeron.
Corrupt Judge Kaplan.
I forget his first name.
Corrupt Judge Juan Marchand, whose daughter, you know, was in business with his prosecution.
Corrupt Judge Boesberg, whose daughter is also allegedly profiting off his persecutions, prosecutions of Donald Trump.
Kim Fox.
Kim Gardner.
George Soros.
Who else?
Oh, yeah, Jack Smith.
Obviously, Jack Smith.
Oh, Judge Chutney.
Let's go see their taxes, their finances.
Like Barnes always says, you scratch the surface with the criminals who prosecute the innocents.
Scratch the surface.
You will find the criminality.
So that is what's going on with Adam Schiff for Brains.
And I am saying Schiff for Brains, people, just in case you thought you heard something different.
But speaking of the corrupt judges and another development that's breaking, we heard yesterday that Trump threatened to revoke the privilege of Harvard to enroll foreign students because, you know, Harvard being Harvard, we got to back all the way to...
Yeah, that was yesterday.
Posts, this administration is holding Harvard accountable for fostering violence, anti-Semitism, and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party on its campus.
I think the last one is the most important.
It is a privilege, not a right, for universities to enroll foreign students and benefit from their higher tuition payments to help pad the multi-billion dollar endowments.
Multi-billion.
The CEO, you know, the head honcho at Harvard, I think it was over a million bucks, I forget, their salary, give or take.
Harvard had plenty of opportunity to do the right thing, it refused.
Yeah, Claudine Gay couldn't even say that calling for genocide against blacks or Jews would be violative of school policy.
They have lost their student and exchange visitor program certification as a result of their failure to adhere to the law.
This letter serves as a warning to all universities and academic institutions across the country.
I love how they make these things so polite.
Dear Maureen Martin, I'm writing to inform you effectively immediately Harvard's student and exchange visa is revoked.
As I explained to you in my April letter, it is a privilege.
We got that.
The revocation of your student exchange visitor program certification means that Harvard is prohibited from having any aliens on F or J non-immigrant status for the 2025-2026 academic school year.
The decertification also means that existing aliens, F or J non-immigrant status, must transfer to another university in order to maintain their non-immigrant status.
This action should not surprise you!
And it is the unfortunate result of Harvard's failure to comply with reporting requirements.
On April 16, 2025, I requested records pertaining to non-immigrant students enrolled at Harvard University, including information regarding misconduct and other offenses that would render foreign students inadmissible or removable.
They're harboring their illegal...
The Democrats harbor actual illegals, and the university won't provide information that might result in the revocation of visas and deportation of students who...
can agree with it or disagree with it and argue that it might be a fine line to be walking.
But Harvard is basically saying, we're going to thumb our nose at requests from the feds, the same way that Maine nutbag of a...
Is it a senator?
The governor.
Sorry, the governor of Maine.
Thumbs her nose at Trump's executive order on transgender ideology.
The same way sanctuary cities thumb their nose at the feds on enforcing immigration law or facilitating ICE to enact it.
Lose your federal funding.
Well, now they've lost their losses.
temporarily, wait for the punchline, they've lost their What could be more suspicious than Chinese students?
Arguably connected to the Chinese Communist Party, who have the funds to come to Harvard to infiltrate, influence, steal information, and then bring it back to the Communist Chinese Party.
Do you know how many students that affects, percentage-wise?
Ooh, let me think, let me think.
Okay, I want to take an educated guess.
I'm not going to Google it.
I've got my hands right here.
4.5%.
27%.
That's far too much.
Holy shiat!
Who in the chat knew that?
You didn't know that it was me.
Yeah, no, I'm just kidding.
That's over a quarter of all the students are foreign students who are basically taking, Yep.
Well, now I feel stupid.
And they help offers.
So part of this process is they help them get the student visas.
So they actually...
That's the major thing that's happening here.
This is like recruiting a foreign army is what it sounds like.
Not too different of that.
Now, to be fair, they could potentially move to different schools if the other schools will accept them.
That's in terms of dealing with the revocation, but I'm just going to...
I just want to see this.
What percentage of students?
Oh, no, this came directly at a Christy Gnomes on.
I think she was with Laura Ingram.
Yes.
Last night when I saw the interview.
Holy shit.
it's amazing no wonder they...
It's just systematic corruption.
That's wild.
Thank you, Encryptus.
Where was the...
I want the window that has the letter that I'm looking at.
That's on the backdrop right here.
Okay, good.
Consequences must follow, yada, yada.
Okay, now how do I get to page two of this?
Okay, I can read it here.
Okay, so if Harvard would like the opportunity of regaining the student exchange program, whatever, you must provide all the information within 72 hours.
Please be advised providing materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent information may subject you to...
See you.
I expect a full response.
Okay, one.
Any and all records, whether official or informal, in the possession of Harvard University, including electronic records and audio or video footage regarding illegal activity, whether on campus, by non-immigrant visas, within the last five years.
Amazing.
Any and all records, whether yada, yada, yada, in possession, okay, fine, including electronic records, fine, regarding dangerous or violent activity.
Whether on or off campus by non-immigrant visas.
Then we got the same one here.
Regarding threats to other students or university personnel whether on or off campus.
Regarding deprivation of rights of other classmates or university personnel whether on or off campus.
Any and all disciplinary records of non-immigrant students enrolled in Harvard in the last five years.
Any and all audio footage of any protest activity involving non-immigrant students.
It's funny.
I can appreciate people saying, well, why are they going after the non-immigrant students?
Well, because that's a privilege and they can't, I mean, they could probably go after American citizen students and say, ask the university to expel them.
That's not exactly what they're doing here.
When they're here on a visa that involves the feds, they are within their purview of asking for this.
Now, how do I get back to my window right here?
Bada bing, bada boom, and take this out.
So like I said in my tweet analysis, Christy Noem's doing a good job.
And that's wild.
But by the way, so that's not where the story ends.
Phil Holloway, if you don't know him, give him a follow.
Very smart.
Fun guy to hang out with.
Puts out a tweet.
Oh, that was his tweet.
Darn it, I closed it.
It said, how long until Harvard cherry picks a judge, activist judge to...
And today, they, here we go.
So, Phil Holloway said in response to Christy Noem's tweet, cherry-picked United States Federal District Court judge injunction inbound in 10-9-8, and that was yesterday.
And then today, Phil Holloway, at Phil Holloway Esquire.
Said, well, that took about as long as expected.
The federal district judge entered an injunction in favor of Harvard without even letting the DOJ weigh in.
We call this an ex parte proceeding where only one party participates.
And we'll bring this one up here.
Breaking Obama appointee, there you had it, Alison Dale Burroughs.
Let's just go see here.
It's called ex parte.
You do it in the cases of wild emergencies.
When there's an immediate risk of, for example, harm.
Destruction of evidence.
Irreparable harm like, they're coming with the bulldozer.
They're going to tear your house down and you've got to go to a judge and say, here's video.
We don't even have time to get them here.
Issue the injunction.
That level of urgency to go ex parte without the other party even being present to present its own position.
Thank you.
It's wild.
Yes, TRLs can be ex parte, but this is nuts because...
station was predictable as was its request for a TRO.
Will a court blindly issue a TRO given there is no immediate harm per se?
Probably.
And they got an ex parte TRO in joining the application, I guess, of the revocation, which is absolute insanity.
Let me see if I have an article on that.
I don't think it's going to be much more fleshed out in much more detail.
Share screen.
Did I have an article on that?
I didn't.
But that's it.
Ex parte people.
They go and say, it's such a dire emergency for what might be done for the 2025-2026 year that we have to get an ex parte injunction, temporary restraining order, enjoining the federal government from doing what they threatened to do.
Without even giving them time to be like, six hours would have been enough?
A day?
Oh, but Christy, no, I'm giving 72 hours.
Six hours?
Call them up, say, hey, we're hearing this right now.
and you get here within an hour.
That's how it's done typically when you're not operating in a flipping position.
Who's the judge?
Oh my.
Yes.
It's exactly what you thought, people.
I want to see if this judge has pronouns in bio.
Alison Dale Burroughs, born 1961, received Bachelor of Arts Cum Laude from Middlebury College, Juris Cum Laude from University of UPenn.
It's funny, UPenn comes up a lot.
With activists, for some reason.
She began her legal career as a law clerk for Judge Norma Levy Shapiro.
Served as Assistant United States Attorney in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
Yada, yada, yada.
Federal.
On July 31, 2014, President Barack Obama nominated Burroughs to serve as a United States District Judge, District of Massachusetts.
Yada, yada, yada.
Notable cases.
Let's see what her notable cases are.
Burroughs is most notable for her order putting a hold on President Donald Trump's travel ban in 2017.
And as the judge who presided over the United States v.
Salem, students for fair admissions.
Salem, I guess Salem, was the last major trial of La Costa Nostra members.
Francis Salem and co-defendant Paul Wiedek were convicted of the murder of And she also provided over a July 2020 lawsuit filed by Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology that sought to halt an immigration and customs enforcement policy that required international students in the United States on F1 visas to depart the country if they would not be attending in-person classes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
She announced that the Trump administration had agreed to reverse the policy during a July 14, 2020 hearing in the Boston courtroom.
All right.
I'll look into her history a little more and we'll talk about that more on Sunday.
So the same judge ruled on a Trump vs.
Harvard case a few years ago?
I don't know if she ruled because it sounds like he reversed the order so that it resolved the issue, but yes, she was involved in that for sure.
That sounds a little fishy.
What is the likelihood of that judge?
How many judges are in this district?
It's Boston.
Hey, it's random assignment.
What we are going to find out, actually, now that you mentioned it, we're going to find out that there was a similar level of judge selection to Judge Boesberg, who, although he was not the judge in chambers on the weekend when the deportation order was issued, and he had to come in and magically get that file, even though he wasn't the judge on call, judge in chambers, and he magically took a hold of that case yet again.
There's nobody on earth.
Do the math.
I did.
It was.0027%.
.00.
So that's a quarter of a percent likely.
Yeah.
No, no.
A quarter of a thousandth percent.
Like, it's.0027.
Oh, I'm an idiot.
Okay, I see.
Oh.
Yeah.
So you're saying it's...
It's a...
It was a similar...
No, you know what it is?
0.0027% of the time, it works every time.
That would be good for a shirt, but no one would get the reference.
No one would get the reference to this case.
They'd get the reference to Anchorman.
So that's what's going on with the Trump case, people.
The Trump-Harvard case.
Supreme Court had better get involved, and there had better start being some impeachments and moves to sanction these judges.
They're not judges.
They are activists.
Radical, lefty activists.
Did I miss any more Super Chats that came in?
I did.
There's one here.
From Kicking Snow, or as I like to sometimes say, Kickings Now.
And then we're going to go over for our locals after party to celebrate my birthday.
Kickings Now says, all of that backed by Justice Roberts.
In the same way Obama pulled Biden's strings, Roberts pulls the strings on lower courts.
Yep, that's definitely a sentiment that we cannot disagree with.
Encryptus, who do we raid right now?
We're going to go raid America's Untold Stories.
They're not live yet, but how about Anton?
Yes, let's go raid Anton.
Anton from South Africa, who, if he's listening, maybe talk about what's going on in South Africa.
I was going to play the video that I saw yesterday and shared via tweet of, I don't know if they were farmers, but a white couple being tailed by, it looked like criminal kidnapping gangs in South Africa.
They go to the police station, and the criminal kidnappers come to the police station, assault the husband.
Hell on earth.
It's hell on earth.
So, go check out Anton.
Eat at Anton's.
He makes amazing biltong.
It's like South African beef jerky.
Otherwise, Nerdrotic.
Is Nerdrotic still live if you want to go check?
Yeah, Nerdrotic is still live.
We won't raid him.
It'll be an informal raid if you want to go watch Nerdrotic.
I'm not sure who would be.
Nerdrotic does a movie, like social commentary on shitty woke stuff now.