Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 19, 2025 - Viva & Barnes

01:25:17

Bongino & Kash Claim Epstein DID IT TO HIMSELF? Biden (Allegedly) Has CANCER! & MORE! Viva Frei

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Today we are going to start the episode off by putting three awful souls on blast.
	Many of you are looking at this woman not knowing who she is.
	Even after I mention her name, you will still not know who she is.
	Jan Arden.
	A name I have not heard in damn near two decades.
	She's a Canadian singer and songwriter.
	And here is some wonderful filth coming out of her mouth.
	Verbal filth.
	Hey, Alberta.
	Hey, you bunch of fucking separatist wackos.
	How you doing?
	Feeling good about yourselves?
	You're an embarrassment to this country.
	Everything you have, everything that you have enjoyed, cherished, and benefited from comes from being part of one of the greatest countries on the planet.
	You guys have your heads so far up your asses that you obviously can't see what pricks you are, the way you are treating indigenous people.
	The way you are treating your fellow citizens, your fellow Canadians, you guys are a bunch of creepy little pricks.
	Alberta will never separate from Canada.
	It's never going to happen because people like me are going to stand up, throw their shoulders back, and keep fucking yelling and keep standing up for what I know is right.
	And what you guys are doing is...
	I am going to replay this only so that you can understand the mentality here.
	I'm going to offer an analogy in terms of how you interpret everything that she just said.
	And I hate to have gender-based stereotypes, but I'm going to go with an abusive relationship.
	In fact, I'm not even going to go with a gender-based comparison here.
	Just imagine and apply the words mutatis mutandis.
	To an abusive relationship, and this is one partner calling the other partner a worthless piece of shit who can never survive on their own, who's a total ass, but you're never leaving me.
	Just listen to this again and apply it to an abusive relationship and it's perfect.
	Hey, Alberta.
	Hey, honey.
	Hey, you bunch of fucking separatist wackos.
	Hey, you stupid piece of shit.
	Hey, you moron who could never survive on his or her own.
	How you doing?
	Feeling good about yourselves?
	You're an embarrassment to this country.
	You're a disgusting person.
	You should be ashamed of yourself.
	No one would settle for you.
	Everything you have, everything that you have enjoyed, cherished...
	Everything that you have in life, I've given to you, and you can't survive on your own.
	And benefited from, comes from being part of one of the greatest countries on the planet.
	You guys have...
	It's so great, it's produced...
	Pieces of human filth like Jan Arden, this pompous, arrogant, abusive bitch.
	Yes, I said it, in respect of a woman today.
	Your head's so far up your asses that you obviously can't see what pricks you are.
	The way you are treating indigenous people.
	Honey, you are so stupid, you don't even understand what a worthless piece of crap you are.
	You will never get out of this relationship.
	I will never let you go.
	The way you are treating...
	Your fellow citizens, your fellow Canadians, you guys are a bunch of creepy little pricks.
	I can't watch the rest of this.
	This is Jan Arden.
	Alberta will never separate.
	You will never get out of this relationship, you stupid prick.
	You're with us forever, you worthless sack of shit.
	You don't even understand how lucky you are.
	Now shut up and cook me dinner.
	Holy hell.
	That's the mentality in that psychotic woman's head.
	Like, she's captured a partner.
	And she will berate them into subservience.
	She will berate them into submission because she knows what's best for them.
	The only problem is this is the same Jan Arden who seems to have forgotten about her experience in the wonderful state of Canada where she went to a hospital because of a head injury and I'm thinking it might have left some lingering effects.
	She went to the hospital because she put on those VR goggles and...
	Smashed her head when she fell backwards.
	And I think she might have suffered brain damage, so I should be a little bit nicer on her.
	And the healthcare system in the wonderful state of Canada is so effing good that they told her friend that brought her into the hospital that he had to clean the wound on the back of her head.
	Maybe she forgot about this for good reason.
	Maybe she smashed her head hard.
	So, because there's cutbacks in the medical system here in Canada, they've asked us.
	To clean our own head.
	Because there's cutbacks in the healthcare of Canada.
	It's such a shitty, wonderful free healthcare system.
	They've asked my friend here, who, by the way, I'm not playing this entire thing, who has no idea what in the name of sweet holy hell he's doing, to wash her own wound out.
	Oh no, but you're staying Alberta, and you're going to continue to fund the rest of it for Canada, because you're a rich province, and we're the poor provinces.
	And it's so good, we steal your money, that we still can't even provide proper healthcare where I'm in here and my friend is washing the wound in my head.
	So, that's what we're doing.
	And, uh, it's, are you alright?
	Oh, by the way, it's not just that they had made her friend wash her wound out.
	They sent her home and said, yeah, you're taking out the staples on your own also, but don't worry.
	We're going to show you how to do it.
	I don't know.
	So the two prongs face the bottom.
	This is the doctor telling her how to do it at home.
	Don't come back to the hospital.
	You're free healthcare.
	Then you close the scissor, then lift.
	That doesn't look very good, doctor.
	That's right.
	It's getting caught on the gauze, that one.
	It's getting caught on the gauze.
	Go home and do it yourself.
	Learn how to remove your own staples, woman.
	This is free healthcare, baby.
	It's free because you do it to yourself.
	Wash your wound.
	We'll give you an MRI if you need one.
	We'll see.
	And then take out your own staples.
	It'll be a lot smoother than on the gauze.
	The staples won't get stuck on your head or anything.
	Just go.
	And if you get an infection, just wait a little bit before coming in because you don't want to overwhelm the healthcare system in this wonderful country that you're now beating a province into staying in.
	Oh, gosh.
	Oh, gosh.
	That's Jan Arden.
	Wonderful SOB POS human filth.
	We're not yet done with Canada, but we're going to segue into the medical system.
	Now, ordinarily, I don't do this.
	But I think it's time to put people on blast for being awful people.
	There's a doctor out of Canada who has pronouns in his bio, who puts out the most outrageous propaganda you've ever seen.
	He's, you know, a former CBC dude.
	And who has blocked me.
	Who promotes insanity on his Twitter feed with people who have also blocked me.
	It's a literal silo of psychoses.
	We on this one here?
	Yeah, we're on this one.
	A doctor with pronouns in his bio who has blocked me.
	Fear-mongering about a wave of polio with another account that has blocked me.
	Institutionalized mental illness.
	Insanity silo.
	Folie à deux.
	Folie à trois.
	Folie à quatre.
	Folie nationale tabarouette.
	This is what we are witnessing in real time.
	This is here.
	We got Dr. Brian Goldman, Night Shift MD.
	ER.
	He, him.
	Thanks.
	Immediate disqualification from the practice of medicine.
	What was he saying, though?
	He was talking with this other person who has me blocked here.
	And what he was saying, pre-order my new book here, available in digital audio.
	Oh, I was just showing the block part.
	Oh, here we go.
	Elizabeth, I fear the next round of unnecessarily infected people will be those with polio.
	I'm sorry you lost a sibling to measles and you had polio.
	Then this person in response said, Good.
	Parents today underestimate the dangers of measles.
	My parents lost a child to measles.
	I don't know how many decades ago we're talking about.
	I contracted...
	Contracted polio just before the first rollout of the vaccine.
	In Scotland.
	Okay, we're talking decades ago.
	Months spent isolated.
	How many decades ago are we talking about?
	Elizabeth, I fear the next round of unnecessary infection.
	It will be polio.
	Run and hide.
	But I block everybody on the internet who dares disagree with me.
	But you got to see this.
	But then he blocks.
	And he doesn't engage with it.
	Because why would he?
	He goes and creates his insanity silo.
	And whips up fear and further insanity.
	But he's a hero in his own freaking mind.
	Sorry, he actually put this tweet out.
	I've got a mole who sends me his wonderful tweets.
	Dr. Brian Goldman.
	In response to himself, summer camp operators are rightfully not permitted, not permitting kids not vaccinated with MMR to attend their camps.
	This is sensible since one case of measles can infect up to 20 others.
	This cause is lower rates of MMR, whatever.
	By the way, if the vaccine works and someone gets it, shouldn't the vaccine work?
	And by the way, doctor, can you tell me the demographics of who is infected with measles in Canada?
	It might not be a politically correct demographic if I hypothesize a little bit.
	Then he says, I'm taking a lot of heat for telling it like it is.
	I'm fine with that.
	How do you take...
	Oh yeah, that's right.
	He blocked me there.
	Oh yes, I'm taking a lot of heat for telling it like it is.
	I just block everybody who dares put that spotlight on my insanity propaganda.
	And the last one of the day, another doctor coming back to America who I have ragged on on the Twitterverse.
	And, you know, every now and again I rag a little too hard on someone.
	I call someone a piece of human filth and I think maybe that's wrong.
	They're a human being, Viva.
	They probably have dogs and they're probably very nice to their dogs.
	And I call them a piece of human filth and I feel a little guilty.
	Maybe I've been too hard on the person.
	Maybe I misunderstood the tweet because tweets can be misunderstood.
	Nope!
	Not today, people.
	I want to make sure I get the right doctor here.
	This is Dr. Neil Stone.
	And it's a level of propaganda and disinformation that you have to fully appreciate.
	So Dr. Neil Stone puts out a tweet.
	I won't play the video just yet.
	Okay, stop.
	He puts out a tweet that reads, quote, only very sick kids should die from measles, end quote.
	As if this is like an order or this is just a statement as a matter of fact.
	Or an acceptance of reality.
	We'll get to it.
	But it's a direct quote, right?
	Quote, Do you know what percentage of people watch the videos of a tweet included in the tweet?
	I don't know the answer to that.
	But it's not very many.
	And I can tell you that because I can tell you how many people reply to tweets.
	That don't even read the freaking tweets.
	So forget the people who don't even read the tweet to which they respond before they respond.
	Like, you didn't read the tweet because you said literally what's in my tweet.
	You didn't read the tweet because I literally, in the tweet, said the exact opposite of what you said that tweet said.
	So the amount of people who don't read the tweet itself is shockingly high.
	The amount of people who don't watch the video is shockingly higher.
	And so what this Neil Stone does, knowing that his idiot followers are not even going to go bother to watch the video that he included in his tweet, even though it's only 28 seconds long, they're going to run with his lie of the headline, oh my goodness, Secretary Kennedy said only sick kids should die from measles.
	What an inhumane bastard.
	Oh, you know what he said in the video as well?
	You stupid jackass Neil Stone?
	No kids should die of measles in this country.
	Oh, you don't believe me?
	Maybe you didn't even watch the video yourself.
	You did.
	And that's why this is dishonest, disingenuous, propaganda, misinformation of a quote from the video.
	Listen to this.
	They're sick.
	We need to know how to treat them.
	And one of the failures of the CDC in the past is they weren't telling doctors, no kids should die of measles in this country.
	No kids should die of measles.
	No kids should die of measles in this country.
	Even in 1963.
	And it goes up.
	Can you imagine what a scumbag you have to be to do that?
	The introduction of the vaccine, there were 400 deaths a year and there were up to 2 million measles cases.
	So it's only very, very sick kids should die from measles and nobody should.
	And there are very, very sick kids should die from measles and nobody in measles cases.
	So it's only very, very sick kids should die from measles and nobody should.
	There's something we're saying that the rubella portion of the vaccine...
	What an asshole.
	Like, what just an outright objective asshole?
	No, it could be a misunderstanding.
	Maybe he didn't watch the video before he published it.
	And he knows that.
	But it's not.
	I'm not giving the benefit of the doubt to people who I know are walking pieces of scum.
	Dr. Neil Stone, I have to go back and see my wonderful history with him on Twitter.
	He's a walking piece of propaganda scum.
	And he knows damn well that by putting that video out there and by misquoting it, well, he's not wrong, right?
	Because he's directly quoting from it.
	Except he cut it off, you know.
	And even they shouldn't die, was the other part.
	Three freaking seconds.
	You should die of measles in this country.
	No kid should die of measles in this country.
	No kid should die of measles in this country.
	So Dr. Neil Stone, you're a terrible person, and you should be ashamed, and you should feel bad about yourself.
	That's all I have to say about that, people.
	We will shine that big, beautiful spotlight on the wonderful stains on humanity that is Jan Arden, Dr. whatever the hell that night shift guy is, and Dr. Neil Stone, so-called Dr. Neil Stone.
	Oh, am I too mean?
	Was I too mean on Dr. Neil Stone?
	Human filth that will actually try to maliciously, dishonestly smear someone.
	And knowing how the internet works, it's an honest way of disinformation laundering.
	Well, I quoted properly from the video, except I didn't quote the part that came before, and I sort of cut...
	What was it called?
	Disjointed the quotation itself.
	Neil Stone, you should be ashamed of yourself.
	Dr. Nightshift, you too.
	Jan Arden, I still assume you're suffering from brain damage, so may you have a speedy recovery.
	Now, people, what's up?
	How goes the battle?
	This has been a wild time through which we have been living the last little while.
	And it might...
	Put a little stress on your heart, people.
	If you take things to heart and you take things personally, it might.
	I count myself into that.
	And one thing you can do, by the way, to take care of yourself is eat healthy and drink.
	Field of Greens.
	Brickhouse Nutrition's Memorial Day sale is on.
	For a limited time, you can save 25% on everything with my code MEMORIAL25.
	That includes Lean, the weight loss supplement that targets the goals of GLP-1 injections, but without needles or prescriptions.
	People are seeing real results and they love it that it curbs the cravings.
	Check out the website reviews.
	Also...
	Field of Greens is on sale.
	The super fruit and vegetable drink that literally promises your doctor will notice.
	Better health at your next visit or your money back.
	Where's mine?
	Mine's right here, actually, by the way.
	On my desk.
	It's a good way to get out of an unhealthy habit in the afternoon by swapping in a healthy habit.
	One spoonful twice a day is two servings of fruits and vegetables.
	Get your raw fruits and veggies.
	But when you can't, even when you can, it's a good habit.
	And when you're on the road, it's definitely something to carry with you, whether it's collagen, creatine, or any other doctor-formulated products.
	It's all on sale for 25% off.
	Kick off a healthy summer and save big while you're at it.
	Go to BrickHouseNutrition.com.
	Use code MEMORIAL25 for 25% off, but don't wait.
	There's only a few days left at BrickHouseNutrition.com.
	Go there.
	Thank you, BrickHouse Nutrition, for sponsoring the channel and for making a wonderful product.
	By the way, I didn't say this, and I should have said it at the beginning.
	Dr. Drew is coming up.
	And I can't say that I didn't get the idea when I was watching TimCast at lunch and I'm like, I hear that voice.
	Like, that's not TimCast.
	And it was Dr. Drew on TimCast.
	I've been following him.
	I pulled up a bunch of his tweets on the Joe Biden diagnosis of cancer.
	I mean, can you believe what world we're living in?
	We talked about it yesterday.
	And I'll tell you straight up front what I believe and what I don't believe.
	I'll tell you what I believe and I'll tell you when I acknowledge that I don't have...
	The smoking gun evidence to believe what I believe.
	That's why they're called theories.
	Some people will call them conspiracy theories.
	That means I'll be proven right in about three to five months.
	I don't think Joe Biden actually has...
	I would not be surprised if Biden doesn't actually have cancer, but that this diagnosis of cancer, this extremely advanced, virulent...
	What's the word I'm looking for?
	Aggressive form of cancer is the easier way to cover up for what is actually...
	Impacting him, which is advanced senility or dementia.
	I would not be surprised if he doesn't actually have the cancer that he's diagnosed with, because I would not be surprised if the diagnosis of cancer is the cover-up for the actual illness, which is what we all know he's been demented for a long time.
	When we're going to have Drew on, we're going to talk about how these two theories can actually merge, where if he in fact was diagnosed with cancer earlier, and some of the treatment could cause some of the mental cognitive decline, we'll get there.
	Dr. Drew said nothing about this story makes any sense.
	In order for him to have this level of advanced prostate cancer, it would have required basically medical malpractice.
	It would have required an ordinary citizen who doesn't go to the doctor for 20 years.
	Maybe they find advanced stage prostate cancer because the person's never had a colonoscopy, never had whatever.
	It doesn't happen with the president of these United States of America.
	We're going to get there.
	So Dr. Drew is coming on in a bit.
	The story that has...
	Kind of broken the internet.
	I mean, it's kind of pissed some people off.
	It's kind of led some people to say, I don't know what to believe anymore.
	I'm going to law school.
	I've listened to the full interview of Kash Patel and Dan Bongino on Maria Bartolomo.
	I always get her name mixed up.
	Maria Bartolomo.
	And, you know, the clips were circulating yesterday.
	There were a couple of clips that went viral, one of which was Kash and Bongino asserting that Epstein, in fact, killed himself.
	The other one was, oh, there was another one that went viral for bad reasons, and there was one that went viral for good reasons, which was Kash Patel rightly acknowledging that there's an existential national security threat emanating from the northern border, and even the Mexican government has worked with the U.S. to seal off the Mexican border, whereas the Canadian government hasn't yet.
	Bartaromo, thank you.
	Bartaromo, it's a very nice name.
	Okay, so I'm going to remember it by Bart Simpson Goes Roaming.
	The sound clip that broke the internet was Cash and Dan Bongino.
	Many jokingly saying, look, they look like, you know, they're uncomfortable, to put it mildly, saying that, you know, Epstein, in fact, didn't...
	How do we say this?
	When we say he didn't...
	He got Epstein'd.
	It means forcible suicide.
	So they believe that Epstein didn't get Epstein, that Epstein actually Epstein'd himself, that Epstein took his own life.
	The clip went viral.
	A lot of people had some interesting takes and responses to it.
	I played it yesterday.
	We talked about it a little bit yesterday, but we'll play it again just so we can refresh everybody's memory and talk about it a little more.
	You said Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide.
	People don't believe it.
	Well, I mean, listen, they have a right to their opinion, but as someone who has worked as a public defender, as a prosecutor, who's been in that prison system, who's been in the Metropolitan Detention Center, who's been in segregated housing, you know a suicide when you see one, and that's what that was.
	He killed himself.
	Again, you want me to get...
	I've seen the whole file.
	He killed himself.
	I know it's hard work.
	You said Jeffrey Epstein...
	It's hard work.
	It's hard work beyond...
	What anybody can possibly imagine.
	I don't envy these guys whatsoever.
	When Donald Trump gave up everything, he should be living his golden years playing golf.
	And I'm not saying that to be condescending to old people at all.
	Donald Trump has worked his life to acquire the wealth, the prestige that he had, and then he decides to take a pay cut and...
	Nearly take a...
	I was going to make a joke about a haircut.
	Nearly get killed in service of country.
	He gave up what he did not need to give up.
	What no person in their right mind would give up unless they were driven to that point to sacrifice their golden years in pursuit of the defense of country, which is what Donald Trump did and which is what Dan Bongino did.
	He's much younger and he gave up something else in order to do this.
	I don't envy any of them.
	And some of you are going to say Viva likes Dan Bongino, so he's going to go out of his way to defend Dan Bongino.
	And you might be right.
	I like Dan Bongino.
	I trust Dan Bongino.
	And I'm not yet jumping on any bandwagon of what the conspiracy online talking murmurings are.
	I know what they are.
	I live on the internet.
	I see them every day.
	I also don't believe that Epstein killed himself.
	Period.
	I mean, you guys have been around the channel for long enough.
	One of the three eternal truths is that Epstein didn't kill himself.
	So we saw that video.
	I'll just get it out of the way.
	The interview was great.
	Other than the clips that went viral, the interview is great.
	It's the first time in a long time that people can actually listen to the director of the FBI and the deputy director of the FBI and say, I now have a little bit more faith in the FBI.
	My only substantive critique to Kash Patel, or the question that I would have asked him if I were in Maria Bartiromo's position, when Kash says, we've got...
	Right now, I think they said 36,000 field agents or whatever they call them, employees at the FBI.
	They're not at the max of 38,000.
	And he's convinced that the rank and file of the FBI are, say this in a way that's not going to be insulting to the FBI, that he believes that they're trustworthy, nonpartisan, good faith actors and that they are out there to protect and to serve.
	And I would probably argue that 90 some odd percent are.
	That being said, the question I would have asked Kash Patel is, what percentage of them do you think are rabidly anti-Trump?
	And whether or not it's, I think it's 10%, because if 90% are good, even if they don't like Trump, they're going to do their jobs properly, and 90% of their job doesn't involve politically going after Trump.
	What percentage of the rank and file of the FBI are partisan or politically motivated?
	Sincere question.
	And I would like to know what he thinks.
	Because it's arguable.
	You know, when people say the FBI is a venerable institution, it started off as who's the guy, Edgar Hoover, using it to go after his political rivals.
	It's not clear that at its origins it was a venerable institution.
	It's not even clear constitutionally why you need an FBI as if state authorities are not enough to do the job.
	So historically, some might disagree that at its roots, at its conceptions, its raison d 'être, as we say in French, is a praiseworthy institution.
	It certainly has been weaponized to the point of, some argue, it being the terror, to quote House of Cards, certainly before Kash Patel and Dan Bongino took over.
	So I would have liked that question to have been asked and know what Kash Patel thinks.
	What percentage of the rank and file of the 36,000 employees working for the FBI are partisan, what we would call partisan hacks, who are vehemently anti-Trump and agree with what Peter Stroke and Lisa Page did?
	Depending on that answer, I would have more answers.
	So other than the two clips, the interview was very good and it's encouraging to have the two men there.
	The clip that went viral caused a lot of people to say, holy crap, they got to him too.
	Bongino has been covering the Epstein story since 2019.
	It was my go-to place before he sacrificed his amazing podcast to go serve country.
	Trustworthy.
	Accurate, insightful, and he had people on the inside who could give him, anonymously, accurate information that made us all smarter.
	When they came out and, some argue, looked like they were being held hostage to assert what many people do not believe and will never believe, you knew and he must have known that he was going to piss off a lot of people on the internet and many people who were the most ardent.
	Followers of the Bongino Report, the Bongino Podcast.
	Now, just to highlight one of the clips from a while back, follow the story.
	I will be following it.
	This was 2023.
	Folks, please keep your eye on this case.
	I can't emphasize to you enough.
	This Epstein thing is more than, there's more than meets the eye there.
	I know a lot of people want to make this thing go away.
	There is absolutely no way that the now CIA director, Catherine Rumler, and everyone else didn't know they were talking to a sex offender.
	The question is why were they talking to him and what were they trying to make go away?
	Does it have anything to do with the extensive video network alleged to have existed on his island and on his plane?
	What were they fixing?
	We'll see.
	Can you imagine now being at the FBI?
	And potentially, and I do not know this other than to hypothesize, some people say the videos don't exist anymore.
	Others say when Epstein's mansion was raided back in the day, someone got those videos.
	Can you imagine now?
	Bongino's in there and hypothetically might now be able to view these videos, these sex tapes that we know.
	I mean, I don't think it's musings to say that that's what Epstein was doing.
	That's what P. Diddy was doing.
	And that's why people believe, and understandably so, that this cover-up is probably the deepest, most globally extensive, politically involved cover-ups of all time, because Epstein might have been the political scientific branch of the extortion schemes, while P. Diddy was the entertainment branch.
	Maybe the political as well, because it overlaps if you have like the Kamala Harris's attending P. Diddy parties, now that you know what went on at those P. Diddy parties.
	But when you have a P. Diddy trial...
	That basically reduces this entire movie to two characters, Cassie and Jane, and ignores all of the others who are on tape, potentially blackmailed, potential politicians who might have been living the nightlife and going to P. Diddy freak-offs.
	Well, people rightly think that both of these prosecutions, the plea deal that What's-His-Face got, Epstein got back in 2007, were the cover-up.
	I personally believe that the P. Diddy trial...
	Spearheaded by James Comey's daughter Maureen Comey is the cover-up and is not the investigation.
	But you imagine now Bongino.
	Who are they trying to make go away?
	Does it have anything to do with the extensive video network alleged to have existed on his island and on his plane?
	Can you imagine if Bongino now has access to that?
	I put out this tweet earlier.
	If anybody misread it, I do not believe it's susceptible of being misread.
	First of all, I...
	I like to steelman every position.
	I live on the internet for good or for bad, and sometimes it's for bad because I have to listen to the people say, Viva, you're a rumble tool protecting Bongino because of some alleged non-disparagement clause in contracts.
	First of all, and just to...
	Let me bring this one up.
	Just to highlight something to you idiots who say these stupid things.
	A non-disparagement...
	Clause, in as much as they are standard in commercial contracts, does not require people to say positive things about other people.
	And I'll tell you this.
	I don't have to tell the truth, but I will never lie.
	So a non-disparagement would say, yeah, it's normal, A, that you have these in contracts.
	Because if things go south, both parties, you don't want anybody shitting on the other person.
	But a non-disparagement is not a positive obligation to say positive things about people who you have grown to like and trust.
	So you could say it.
	I would never lie.
	Let me rephrase that.
	How am I going to say this?
	You don't have to tell the truth, but you don't lie.
	And I will never lie.
	I will never lie because I'm afraid of being thought of as a liar.
	I'll never lie because I assume.
	That everything is recorded.
	Everything is taped.
	Everything's online.
	And that if I try to lie, I say, no, I wasn't there.
	I don't know who that was.
	And they're going to find a tweet from 2017.
	Viva lie.
	I will never lie.
	I may remain silent if I don't want to talk about something, but I will never lie.
	Dan Bongino sacrificed, I won't say arguably more than Trump, proportionately more.
	He sacrificed what he did not need to sacrifice to serve country.
	And people are out there.
	Alleging that he's been infiltrated, that he's been co-opted, that whatever.
	And so I'll read my beautiful tweet.
	It took me a long time to write this.
	Goodwill, credibility, and integrity are invaluable, intangible assets that take years to develop.
	Not everyone is capable of developing them because not everybody has character.
	Dan Bongino has deservedly earned his goodwill, credibility, and integrity through years of life experience, including insight and thoughtful analysis.
	Incredible insight.
	I can't remember my own writing.
	One does not get to disregard all of that because you might disagree even vehemently with him on one specific issue.
	We heard what he said.
	He believes Epstein killed himself.
	I vehemently disagree with this specifically because even if Epstein did, quote, kill himself, literally, with the extra linens, we're going to get into this, you know, from what we know.
	Even if he killed himself with the extra linens that were inexplicably provided to him after the cell cameras malfunctioned and the security guards slept, though he may have killed himself, in the literal semantic sense, it's inaccurate in the material sense.
	There was a movie, and I can't for the life of me remember where it was from.
	It was a television series.
	Let me bring it back out again for a second.
	There was a...
	I thought it was from Homeland or House of Cards.
	And I remember the scene.
	A white table in a well-lit kitchen.
	The man was Middle Eastern, and the two agents come up to him and say, we're going to make your life hell.
	We're going to destroy your family.
	We're going to do all of this stuff unless you take your own life.
	And they put a gun on the table, and they say, if you do this, we will pay for your family.
	They will be taken care of for the rest of their lives.
	And he does it.
	That's the scene of the movie.
	If that's how it happened with Epstein, something along those lines, you're going to be in for a hell that...
	You can't possibly imagine.
	So either you do it or we'll do it and it will be much worse.
	You might get abducted.
	Who knows?
	Tortured.
	Who knows?
	So you do it or we do it, Epstein.
	Here's some extra bed linen.
	Cameras are turned off so no guards are going to accidentally come and save you.
	And do it yourself.
	And if that's how it happened, if there is concrete evidence like...
	If there's a camera that didn't malfunction and it shows Epstein doing it, my question would still be, and you can accuse me of being a weasel that I'll be able to get out of it by saying, well, he did it literally, but it was facilitated because they wanted that loose end removed.
	I'll still say, you know, he did it himself, but under coercion or under authorization.
	It was the state, it was the administration's obligation to keep that man alive so that they could go after his clients.
	It was their obligation to keep him alive.
	He was on suicide watch.
	Two weeks before the incident, because of an attempt, allegedly, two weeks before the actual successful attempt.
	He was taken off suicide watch a day or two before this happened.
	Cameras allegedly malfunctioned.
	I mean, I'll go through the reports at the time.
	It was an inside job to tie up to his ends.
	Bongino believes Efton killed himself.
	He's either right or wrong.
	I might be wrong in this.
	I might be wrong that he did it.
	He was looking for any excuse to do it, and he found his window.
	If he's right, so be it.
	People are entitled to be wrong from time to time.
	Absolutely nobody's perfect.
	The bigger issue, which a lot of people, you know, muse about on the internet, is whether or not he sincerely believes Epstein killed himself, or if he doesn't believe it but is saying it for other as of yet unknown reasons.
	Typo.
	Damn it!
	Damn it!
	There could be a number of reasons for this, some tactical, others sinister.
	But with the goodwill he has developed over years, sacrificing it all to serve country, the fair thing would be to presume that there is a good reason for which he might say this, even if he doesn't sincerely believe it.
	The other thing is, he's an employee of the state right now.
	You don't get to run around and espouse your own personal views when you represent these United States of America and you are an employee to your employer.
	If there were anyone from the Biden regime or MSN trying to convince me Epstein actually killed himself, I would laugh him out of the room.
	I still don't believe it.
	Even coming from Dan, but he deserves the benefit of the doubt until definitive proof to the contrary.
	My humble two cents that absolutely nobody asked for.
	Even if he did do it, and there's color video, not just black and white video, my feeling would be...
	This was a let it happen on purpose or made it happen on purpose by telling him it will be so much worse if you don't do it.
	The people that you've pissed off or the people that you have dirt on, if they ever get their hands on you, it won't be pretty.
	It'll be Dexter-level unpretty.
	And maybe I have just conveniently set up a circumstance in which I can never be wrong because even if he did do it, he didn't do it in my view, but you know what I'm getting at.
	So that's where we're at right now.
	The reality is, you know, to come on the Maria Bartolomo and say it, not dismissively, but without substantiating it with, he's seen the file.
	What we need in order for the public to be assuaged that this actually happened is disclosure of the evidence.
	Right now, what we have, it's not just that it's contradictory at best.
	Do I have the...
	Here we go.
	It's not just that it's contradictory at best.
	It's that it's the absence.
	I know it's going to be a transparent.
	First of all, it is a transparent administration already.
	Whether or not it's, you know, everyone will always complain.
	It needs to be more transparent.
	When I went to the White House for that presser thing with the alternative media, I asked all the questions.
	Some people didn't like the answers.
	And I was like, well, the transparency is giving people the opportunity to ask the questions.
	And if the answers are unsatisfactory, well, that's the transparency.
	And I say, like, the problem is nobody believes that Jeffrey Epstein killed himself or that he managed to do it without a deliberate blind eye being turned to allow it to happen.
	Non-functioning cameras, deleted footage, absent sleeping security guards, extra bed linens.
	It makes no sense or it makes perfect sense, I guess, technically, if he did hang himself.
	If he did hang himself with a surplus of bed linens, I'm quoting from an article, that were inexplicably left in his cell with no cameras and security guards, it's true to say he killed himself.
	But that affirmation is only superficially true if he was allowed to kill himself for the very same reasons people believe that he was killed.
	It does nothing to resolve any conspiracy theory, it only for those others.
	This is from an article.
	Misconduct by federal jail guard led to Jeffrey Epstein's suicide.
	DOJ.
	Well, that's great.
	Misconduct.
	What do we call it?
	Layered incompetence becomes intent?
	Now, that was either Tim Pool or that was Dan Bongino who said that on the show.
	Chat, let me know.
	Layered incompetence is intent.
	I'm fairly certain that was Bongino.
	Jeffrey Epstein, despite his high profile and a jail suicide attempt two weeks earlier, was left alone in his cell with a surplus of bed linens.
	Nearly all surveillance cameras on his unit didn't record.
	One worker was on duty for 24 hours straight.
	That's not layered incompetence.
	That's implausible series of events that allows for Epstein to take his own life if he in fact did it by his own hand.
	I can't get into the medical side of things.
	Oh, this is from BBC News.
	Jeffrey Epstein.
	Jail CCTV erased by technical errors.
	What was that from?
	Do we have the dates on that?
	I didn't include the dates.
	These are BBC articles.
	DOJ reports the contributing factors that led to Jeffrey Epstein's suicide in jail.
	A report by the U.S. Department says negligence, misconduct, and job performance failures contribute.
	I'm sorry.
	You're holding the most wanted person on earth.
	You're holding the most valuable asset on earth.
	And you've got job performance failures to excuse for how that man ended up dead either by someone else's hand or his own?
	Jeffrey Epstein's suicide blamed on jails, negligence, and misconduct.
	So the reality is, let's...
	I say take Bongino at his word.
	Epstein killed himself.
	In order to...
	Convince the masses who do not believe that and will never believe that, given the six years of information that we have that just make no sense, layered incompetence, it needs to be substantiated with whatever file exists in order to avoid people jumping to conclusions and questioning credibility where they should not be questioning credibility.
	Now, I was looking for Who was it that's...
	I haven't been following the chat.
	The layered incompetence is intent or the layered negligence is intent.
	Was that Bongino or was that Tim Pool?
	It was one of the two.
	But it's inexcusable even by negligence.
	How much do we have to see before we say even if he did it by his own hand, it was let...
	Allowed to happen.
	Because dead men tell no tells.
	Or who knows?
	Maybe he's alive.
	There's people who think he's alive.
	There's people who think this is a strategic statement because he's still...
	I do not happen to believe that he's still alive.
	But I also do not believe that Epstein...
	I believe that if Epstein did it by his own hand, it was because they let him do it by his own hand.
	Bungie, no.
	In Kryptis, what's up?
	So I've been thinking a lot about this, obviously, and what the fuck does it matter?
	My thought here is what Cash and Dan are doing for the country at a grander scale is what is going to tank their reputation with people a story about a pedophile in sex trafficking?
	Or is there a story going to be bigger than that, where they route out corruption within the government, they clean up the agencies, and they make life better for all Americans for generations to come?
	Do I really care about this?
	I'll tell you, I don't give a shit.
	Do I want the people who are evil to go to jail?
	Of course I do.
	Is there a bigger story here?
	Yeah, probably.
	But I don't give a shit about the Epstein stuff.
	I care about terrorism.
	I care about murder.
	I care about fentanyl trade.
	I care about the border.
	In cryptos, some people are going to say child sex trafficking is right on the top there.
	And by, you know, what people feel to be not bearing the story, but saying that this is how it ends and we're never going to find out.
	It is in the wake also of the failure to launch of the binder and the Epstein documents.
	And so people are putting all of this together in a broader thing where Pam Bondi fails to deliver on the file that's on her desk.
	Two months later, Bongino and Patel...
	What some people feel looking sheepish assert what nobody believes.
	And the thing is this.
	I do not believe that Dan or Patel are going to trash the goodwill that they've established over years in order to propagate a lie.
	And so there has to be some better reason to it.
	Or it's true, by the way.
	Or it's just true.
	But the story, this being the story, it just takes away from everything else that they're doing.
	And if there is some national secrets involved, like we were talking before, the reality is if there's some national secrets involved, they can't reveal it or their entire mission is over.
	Understood.
	But then that would be where either don't say it in that you know the blowback it's going to get from people who just won't believe it or wait until the time is right to show it with receipts or, and I say, give it time.
	That was one of the themes in the Bartiromo interview was give it time.
	They've been in there for barely...
	Two, three months.
	And I have no doubt about the absolute cesspool and also what they're dealing with.
	Child sex trafficking, terrorism, open borders, gang-related violence.
	Yeah.
	But that was it.
	It's about picking your battles.
	And this is the battle that they chose to walk away from today.
	I can't disagree.
	Not that I'm happy about it.
	Let's be fair.
	I don't agree with it from a personal standpoint.
	I just care more about the other issues.
	Well, this, I think, to many, this is one of the biggest issues, if not the biggest issues.
	And I would say it might be one of the biggest issues.
	It is one of the, if not the biggest issues, because this might actually have some sort of impact on geopolitics as we know it.
	We talked about it here before.
	There is undoubtedly an intelligence connection to the blackmail extortion operation that Epstein was running.
	That involves...
	Not just certain specific countries, but arguably all of what we consider to be our allies in the five eyes.
	And so, you know, that's it.
	Bottom line, that's the big news.
	Dan Bongino and Kash Patel say, unequivocally, Epstein took his own life.
	My position is that if the administration allowed it to happen and then try to blame it on negligence and whatever, that's as good as someone else having done it, but at least this way it ties itself up a little more.
	But the underlying thing about all of this is that these are men who have sacrificed a lot to go inherit this cesspool in order to right the institutionalized wrongs of what we are not just complaining about, but what was abusing American society.
	And they deserve the benefit of the doubt for the goodwill and integrity that they've shown for the last however many years, decades.
	But there's no but to that, period.
	Now, hold on.
	Before we get into the tip questions, I wanted to thank...
	The second sponsor of today's show, which is 1775 Coffee.
	Everybody's got coffee!
	Where's mine?
	Where's mine?
	Oh, yeah.
	You know, I use these as smelling salts, by the way.
	Hold on.
	Oh, yeah, that's good.
	1775, people.
	1775 is giving away a free starter kit loaded with premium coffee and great gear.
	While coffee prices have jumped over 30% this year, 1775 said, screw it!
	And started fighting free...
	Flinging free kits like caffeinated Oprah on a rampage.
	If you've been waiting for a sign from God or just a halfway decent excuse to buy the coffee, it's finally here.
	But the quantities are limited.
	You'll get three bags of coffee, 260 an ounce of your choice, dark or medium, plus the longevity blend infused with anti-aging CAAKG, clinically proven to reduce biological age.
	Translation, your morning coffee will taste great and make you look younger.
	They might even blast your beard off and make you look 10 years younger.
	I think without my beard, I look older, actually, but whatever.
	You get two bags, $17.75 covers the rest.
	That's a full 16-ounce bag of coffee, plus premium gear, a matte black tumbler, which mine's not on the table anymore, frother, gold scoop, And reusable or reusable K-cup filter.
	Whole bean, ground, or pods.
	Your call.
	Start your day with coffee that actually backs what you believe in.
	Smooth, jitter-free, anti-woke, and laced with the kind of energy that keeps you young, sharp, and mildly dangerous.
	In the political sense, non-violent sense.
	Keep it peaceful, people.
	Go to 1775coffee.com, promo code VIVA, grab your, or slash VIVA, grab your free starter kit before someone else realizes that they can get it and you don't.
	Go!
	The links are in the description, 1775.
	It's a Rumble partner.
	They're amazing, and we like to support the companies that respect our dollar, and that respect us, and that respect our God-given right to unimpeded free speech on the interwebs.
	Now, let me just see this before we get back to the rest of this.
	See, I forgot to implement something here.
	Okay, Eric John, pizza artist, who did a beautiful rendition of me yesterday.
	I had my beard in the picture and then I said, I'll grow it back.
	Last night was an absolute blast.
	It was a lot of fun turning you into pizza.
	And as far as I'm concerned, all shirts should be made of Bacon Viva Pizza.
	Eric John, pizza artist over on Rumble.
	He makes art out of pizza.
	It's beautiful.
	So he's like, I'll have to, I'll find it.
	I'll find you the link and show it to you afterwards.
	Biltong says, he who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster.
	And when you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss also gazes into you.
	Frederick Nietzsche.
	I often quote the last part of that.
	don't never quote the first half but you stare into the abyss long enough eventually the abyss stares back ruse day says viva time to get another mike benz interview mike benz to cyber to posobic does anyone know anyone who's had new york prime real estate rented them directly by the state department well We know of one case of that, which is Jeffrey Epstein.
	And then, hold on, let me bring this one up so I can bring it up this way.
	Donate and get this one out of here.
	And let's bring this one up, which is King of Biltong with his beautiful purple thingy thing here.
	Looking for some healthy snacks to add to your diet?
	Try our Biltong, almost 50% protein, plus it's packed with B12, creatine, iron, zinc, and much more.
	50% protein.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Okay, much more.
	Go to biltongusa.com.
	He put code STIX, but I think he means code Viva.
	But either way, go put code STIX in.
	And then we'll show STIX that Viva's audience buys more Biltong than STIX's audience.
	I'm joking.
	Let's not start fights.
	And then there was one more after that, which was Joe Maskew.
	Viva, I have a hypothesis.
	Whatever it was that got Epstein that sweetheart deal in the Florida courts and the still having an unsealed the doc, whatever it was that got Epstein that sweetheart deal in the Florida courts and that still having unsealed the documents, which constitutionally cannot be sealed from the public, whatever that is, that's the reasons Casio Magino states that I fear maybe it's beyond us all in a way, at least for now.
	I'm going to have to keep that and see what that means.
	I'm not sure I understand that.
	And Elder Zimraya says, Trump gave up a lot in his first term and failed.
	Will he make it this term?
	I don't know.
	With the cash and dancing Congress being compromised along with SCOTUS.
	Well, first of all, they've already done an amazing amount.
	Even before we'll get back to it in a second.
	Dr. Drew, sir!
	Wow, I just dropped in on you.
	Can you hear me?
	I can hear you.
	I should have told you when you use Rumble Studio, unless you come in with a disabled camera.
	Disabled, it sounds terrible.
	With your inactive camera, you come right in.
	Drew, how are you doing?
	I'm good.
	I'm freaking out because I had a whole system set up for you and now I'm just on a laptop.
	I don't forget it.
	It's perfect.
	All right.
	All right.
	You got a nice romantic...
	We got like matching purplish blue backdrop.
	Yeah, I know.
	Look at that.
	It's very romantic.
	Okay.
	Drew, for those who don't know who you are, I'm joking.
	Dr. Drew, everybody.
	Drew, okay.
	So look, I heard you on TimCast and I know you've been doing the rounds all day today talking about the breaking news of Biden having cancer.
	Yeah.
	Without getting into my conspiracy theories that...
	He doesn't actually have cancer because we haven't seen anything they tell us this and it's almost like the perfect timing after the her tapes come out which show that he's bonafide certifiably demented in a way that is much worse than anybody initially thought.
	You have some doubts about how this could possibly come to fruition and I think they're scientifically sound.
	Could you explain them?
	In terms of how he could have at this stage advanced prostate cancer that hitherto went undetected that is now metastasized into his bone.
	Yeah, very unlikely that somebody who's a president of the United States getting regular healthcare would at presentation have metastatic disease.
	It just doesn't work like that.
	And the fact that they said, oh, we found a nodule.
	Oops, he has metastatic disease.
	No, that's also not how it works.
	So there's gaslighting.
	There's BSing right there.
	So we know this is bullshit.
	So if this is prostate cancer, which again, they show the grades.
	He's a grade six and a grade nine.
	It's behaving aggressively.
	It makes sense.
	The really interesting observation would be that this has been present for a few years, which would be sort of normative in this kind of situation, that perhaps at presentation there was some metastatic disease, and they put him on androgen deprivation therapy.
	What is androgen deprivation?
	It's castration.
	It's literally where you take testosterone and you block it throughout the body.
	And testosterone, I mean, prostate cancer slows down when you do that.
	The really interesting phenomenon, though, and as it pertains to androgen deprivation therapy, is the side effects are cognitive slowing, fatigue, Muscle loss and weakness and falls.
	That is what happens from antigen deprivation.
	And haven't we seen exactly that over the last couple of years?
	It would explain not everything.
	It would explain sort of the last two years and the decline.
	And his behavior in the Her interview is completely consistent.
	I had some recurrence of my cancer.
	And I'm a prostate cancer patient.
	And I had to have some radiation.
	At the time, I went to my urology and I said, look.
	I do not want to have antigen deprivation because I've seen people get severe dementias and severe cognitive problems commonly from that therapy and I don't want anything to do with that.
	Now, it's also possible that maybe, you know, the doctors trying to make a decision about President Biden might have delayed that therapy for fear of making his cognition worse and thereby making his cancer less treatable, more aggressive, more advanced.
	So there's a lot to be revealed here, but it's time for them to stop the bullshitting and the gaslighting and the minimizing and the narrative creation.
	No one believes you.
	Get to the facts now.
	Even to the point where you're thinking that he doesn't even have prostate cancer, that's how much they have lost our confidence in them.
	Well, I mean, it would make total sense because on the one hand, it's so cynical to think this way, but he doesn't have cancer because he's demented, but this excuse allows people to not question all of his decisions in office if he were, in fact, in an advanced state of dementia.
	The question is this.
	For people who don't understand now, and I sort of do because I listen to you on Tim Pool.
	What's the word?
	Metaseatic?
	Metastasis.
	Metastasis.
	So you say that's irreversible.
	What does that mean by the time it hits that point?
	It means that this disease is incurable, and it will continue to progress inexorably, and you can hopefully slow it down.
	But let's say he's had it for two years and been on treatment.
	Let's say that theory that I'm positing is true.
	His probable life expectancy is about two to three years from now.
	Although prostate cancer research is going along at an incredible clip, there might be some things that come along that extend him to four years or six years, and then he might dive something else first.
	How does one even get to that advanced stage?
	Because I've had two colonoscopies.
	I haven't had one in maybe close to eight years now.
	I've had the doctor who sticks his finger up your butt and feels around, but they don't really get to everything there.
	They only can feel the ones that are close enough to the exit.
	You do the colonoscopy.
	The question is, what level of medical neglect, so to speak, just not going to the doctor, would be required to get to an advanced stage of prostate cancer?
	It's a blood test.
	It's a blood test.
	We don't even do the digital rectal exams anymore.
	We watch the blood test, and when it starts to climb, or it doubles, even when it's normal like mine was, you go and you get an MRI and you get a biopsy right away.
	Somebody in the president's condition, of course, that's what happened.
	Now, could he have refused it?
	I guess, but I don't know.
	I doubt it.
	So the reality is, It's nothing to do with the digital rectal, nothing to do with colonoscopy.
	It's a blood test that's routinely done every year.
	And when it climbs, you respond to it and you make a diagnosis.
	That's it.
	If he had not had healthcare for three to five years and came in and went, oop, your PSA is high, oop, you've got metastatic disease, that makes some sense.
	But somebody at the level of...
	President of the United States, it makes no sense that his health care would miss something like that.
	It makes no sense whatsoever, number one.
	Number two, people are pushing back saying, oh, you shouldn't, oh, he's, oh, you don't take care of him.
	You shouldn't ask any questions about him.
	He's entitled to confidential health care.
	I'm tired of that.
	I'm tired of that.
	If I see somebody climbing into the pilot seat of an aircraft I'm in and they look impaired, I have a, you better be.
	Damn sure I'm going to ask questions.
	We have an ethical and moral obligation to ask those questions.
	Are you in condition to be flying this plane?
	Yes or no?
	And for God's sake, the President of the United States is a much more serious We have an obligation to ask questions about that man.
	They blew smoke at us.
	They gaslit us.
	They minimized and obfuscated.
	And the press was duplicitous in the whole thing and undermined anybody who raised their hand and said, we need to ask about this guy's medical condition.
	So I guess the...
	I didn't know what's done with...
	You could detect it with a blood test.
	Dr. Drew, does this mean I don't have to have another freaking colonoscopy?
	No, that's colon cancer.
	That's not prostate cancer.
	You're screening for colon pain cancer.
	That's every five to seven years, seven to ten years sometimes.
	But you have to get your blood test done every year, every year, every man in the country, every year, starting at age 50. If you have a first relative with prostate cancer, it starts at 40. Okay.
	So it's detected by blood, so it's not even an invasive procedure that would have gone unnoticed.
	The operating theory, let's assume that he does have advanced prostate cancer.
	Then the theory would be that he would have been diagnosed with this at least two years ago, if not more.
	Some people are hypothesizing around 2021 where he would have gotten into office and found out shortly thereafter.
	So they hid it then, concealed it then, and now they're just saying, oh, it just popped out of the blue.
	Explain what about the treatment?
	First of all, what did you call them?
	The something blockers or the...
	Engine deprivation therapy.
	So when it's localized, I got an operation, and then when there was a little recurrence, I got some radiation.
	That's sort of a typical course of somebody with localized...
	Prostate cancer, relatively low grade.
	When it's higher grade, it gets outside the capsule.
	So the prostate is a little gland at the base of the bladder, and it can extend into the pelvis, gets into the lymph nodes, and after it escapes the local spread, it goes to the bone.
	That's just where prostate cancer goes, typically in the spine first.
	And it can be very painful.
	Now, I don't see him in any pain.
	And we use radiation, targeted radiation, to alleviate the pain, but it doesn't do much else.
	However, there's a lot of fancy treatments right now where we can send radioactive isotopes to each individual prostate cancer cell and wipe the whole thing out.
	Why isn't he getting that?
	Or have they thought about that?
	You essentially have to fail androgen deprivation therapy before you get that one.
	And I suspect that is in his future.
	Would androgen deprivation therapy, if you say it blocks testosterone, it's like...
	Castration.
	Would it turn a person physically softer, fatter, more, you know, gelatinous?
	100%.
	You lose muscle mass.
	That's why they fall.
	That's the big, the two big risks of that, of that intervention, amongst other things.
	But the two big ones that I would worry about if I'm with one receiving it, when I worry about giving it to patients, cognition falls.
	And if you have someone who's already Parkinsonian, which he was, that's not a debatable point.
	Any medical student looking at a video of Joe Biden three years ago, if they could not diagnose Parkinsonism, they would be remediated.
	Look, if I saw a picture of a rash, I could tell you what it's likely to be.
	Same thing is true in certain neurological conditions.
	You look at the video the way you would look at them across the room.
	It's the same thing.
	And Parkinsonism is what he has.
	Why does he have it?
	They never told us.
	The problem with that is if you get the muscle wasting associated with antigen deprivation therapy, those symptoms can be more worse and more problematic in terms of falls.
	And by the way, one of my theories is that one thing that happens from Parkinsonism is you lose your ability to write.
	It's called micrographia.
	And your signature changes dramatically.
	And sometimes you can't even recognize it.
	So if they really wanted to justify using the auto pen, In my humble opinion, all they have to do is say, you know what?
	He was Parkinsonian and he couldn't sign his name anymore.
	We had to use the auto pen, but he approved every single time the auto pen was used.
	That seems reasonable to me.
	He approved it unless he were not of sound mind and not because of androgen deprivation, but because he's actually suffering from dementia.
	But now they've got to cloak it in cancer in order to not call people to question what they were already questioning by use of the auto pen in the first place in terms of the pardons and some of his...
	And you're getting to the point here where you're asking, you know, when is somebody incompetent, right?
	What is one of the incompetent to make decisions?
	And that's a challenging thing to ascertain.
	He refused to go through the Montreal Cognitive Inventory.
	He refused to be tested for these things.
	So we really have no objective data.
	Is it called the Montreal Cognitive?
	Montreal Cognitive Assessment.
	What does it have to do with Montreal?
	That's where they developed it.
	Not that anyone coming from that region should be, especially.
	You never know.
	Although one of the answers has to be bagels, that's for sure.
	It's poutine.
	But the fact is, he refused all that, so we have no objective data, right?
	Trump does it every year.
	Transmitters to everywhere.
	He sails through that test.
	But you are struggling with the difference.
	You should get an expert in here in terms of someone that assesses competency.
	The difference between minimal cognitive change and frank dementia.
	That is a hard thing to determine.
	And then competency on top of that is even harder.
	What is frank dementia?
	That's a diagnosable clinical type of dementia?
	Aggressive illness that ends in complete inability to care for yourself.
	And minimal cognitive change is often a precursor to dementia, but it doesn't have to be.
	I guess the question is this.
	If it happens to not actually be the cancer, but let's just call it frank dementia, what would we expect to see by way of Biden if we see any more appearances of him in the coming months?
	It depends what kinds of dementia.
	I mean, if it's dementia associated with Parkinson's disease, it can be very slow and very sporadic.
	If it's a vascular dementia, it can be inexorable.
	If it's an Alzheimer's disease, there can be steps down and steps back up again.
	Very hard to predict how these things are going to go.
	But if it is dementia, it is progressive.
	It is progressive, and it will get bad.
	And whether the antigen deprivation is, if he's in fact on that, is contributing.
	These are complicated questions, and we are being blinded to the details.
	And then we are being gaslit with bullshit sort of just-so stories that we're supposed to accept.
	Those days are over.
	We must stop all that now.
	We have an obligation to be...
	If the journalist won't do the journalistic job, the American people must do it.
	It's time.
	It's time that we require our government to be honest with us, and that's that.
	Dr. Drew, you have a show coming up, don't you?
	Tomorrow, 2 o 'clock.
	Okay, amazing.
	So when are you live on Rumble?
	2 o 'clock Pacific Time, and you can find me there, Ask Dr. Drew.
	Viva has very kindly joined me there many times.
	It's been a lot of fun.
	And that's why I'm here.
	I'm happy to exchange with you anytime, my friend.
	Someone just asked some questions.
	Changing eye color, is that a symptom of anything treatment or disease?
	I'm trying to see if Biden actually...
	I tend to think people's eyes get paler if they get older regardless, but one of the reasons that...
	Yeah, they get older, but no, I can't think of anything that would really change it.
	Let's look at some of the...
	Are you watching your...
	Oh yeah, I'm watching this.
	Let me see here.
	I'll go to locals to get the questions because that's where we get...
	Let me see here.
	Get questions in.
	I know I had some videos that I wanted to...
	Well, not wanted to bring up, but things that will maybe jog my memory.
	Oh, that's right.
	Brain surgery.
	You're right, Shawnee.
	He had a really serious brain surgery in 2000.
	And that can cause gliosis.
	That can cause scarring in the brain that progresses also.
	So just that surgery may have injured him, much like the way we think about concussions, hurting people and predisposing to dementia, brain surgery of the type he had.
	Definitely can do that.
	I'd forgotten about that.
	And actually, so that might be a reason, hypothetically, let's just say he gets diagnosed with the cancer.
	The video clip that I was thinking of was Nick Zortor pulled it up and he says, you know, I got cancer.
	And I know your explanation for that was, you know, nobody refers to like basal cell carcinoma as having cancer.
	At the time, people were saying he's demented.
	He doesn't even know that he doesn't have cancer.
	And now people are saying he had actually cancer and because he was so demented, accidentally let it slip out.
	But think about How horrific that is, that we are in this position as the citizens of a country being led.
	Just think about the model, the metaphor of an aircraft.
	This guy climbed into the pilot seat of the craft and has been flying the plane.
	And the people around him guarding the flight deck have been refusing to let us talk to him or let us know how the captain's doing.
	That is disgusting.
	That is disgusting.
	And it's inexcusable.
	It's on the order of treason in my head.
	It's scandalous at minimum.
	And we cannot let that happen.
	Look, it has happened before.
	Let's be fair.
	Who was the one?
	There was a president who...
	Woodrow Wilson had a huge stroke and was in bed and completely incapacitated.
	And his wife ran things for a while.
	But even they...
	We came clean about it eventually.
	I mean, there's only one direction this is all going, is towards the truth.
	And we have to insist upon it.
	We have to insist upon it so we can make sure this doesn't happen again.
	We're not going to get the truth because I think the actual truth would call people to call into question a lot of the Biden pardons, a lot of like every foreign policy decision in the last two years, which were reckless, if not worse.
	If he had had the brain injury from a while back, assume he's diagnosed with...
	Whatever it is, however aggressive it is when they first detect it.
	And then they say, we don't want to give you the androgen deprivation because it will make you more senile.
	That would then obviously explain how it progressed even more rapidly in order to get...
	That is a possibility.
	I mean, you could imagine sitting in a room with a bunch of doctors trying to make a decision about how to approach this case that is the President of the United States.
	Let's say he doesn't want the antigen deprivation that's like I was with my doctor.
	And let's say they go, oh gosh, he's a little bit impaired and this could get a lot worse if we start monkeying around with his testosterone levels.
	Yeah, I could see them holding back on treatment, working with the patient and the family.
	It's pretty clear now if that's what they did, it was a bad decision in terms of his prognosis, if that's what they did.
	We don't know.
	This is all speculation.
	We're sitting here speculating about how the captain's flying.
	It's just so pathetic.
	More than anything, I blame the journalists.
	I'm really pissed at them.
	Did you see the interview with, oh shoot, what's her name?
	She was at MSNBC.
	Jen Psaki?
	No, no.
	Someone in the rants will tell me.
	Shoot.
	She's nice-looking, looks depressed all the time.
	And he was interviewing with her, and in the middle of the interview, he got up and walked off the set.
	Oh, yeah, yeah.
	I saw that clip circulating today.
	Wallace?
	Something like that.
	And when they cut back to her, she expressed glee.
	Oh, he's so wonderful.
	He's so busy.
	They were delusional.
	They were played and they were delusional.
	They've got to look at themselves and start to do their job again.
	Van Jones is beginning to make noise.
	I don't know if you've seen what he's doing lately.
	He's starting to go, oh my God, Trump is smarter than me.
	He's smarter than us.
	I've been played.
	He's right.
	He's been played.
	Van Jones is a good guy.
	I don't give Van Jones the same deference I give Dan Bongino because Van Jones has been an idiot for a long time and they start to see the light only when it's politically popular or politically unpalatable to deny it any longer.
	Here's what I want.
	I want the truth.
	You're not going to get it.
	And I want everyone to come on over to Team Reality and get out of their delusional state.
	Everyone's welcome.
	They're welcome.
	I know it makes you angry, and I know they've maybe been playing some games that you don't agree with.
	Come on in.
	The water's fine.
	Get out of your delusion.
	Well, I say they're welcome, but they do not ever get to be in a position of influence or decision-making again because we can go to the COVID thing.
	There's some things that you can be forgiven for for having been wrong, but you can't be in a position of power.
	And then other people like Jake Tapper, he's not going to find his coming to God moment because he was the bad faith actor the entire time.
	They were the ones covering it up.
	They knew they were covering it up because at the time, maybe they thought it was only Alzheimer's.
	Maybe they didn't even realize he had cancer.
	It's just amazing that it comes out now, I don't know how many days after the Her clip or audio is leaked, and they've got to think of an excuse that allows them to protect...
	Biden's presidential actions of the last year of his presidency.
	And dementia would be a problem.
	Cancer?
	He gets sympathy from everybody around now who says now he can no longer criticize anything he did because he's got cancer.
	Well, they certainly timed it in such a way that was strategic.
	I'm certain that they would not have done it had not all this material been coming out about his decline.
	It's clearly an effort to persuade in the manner you're suggesting.
	Let's not do that.
	Let's stand firm and insist upon the truth.
	It was Nicole Wallace was the journalist.
	Nicole Wallace.
	It was, okay.
	That's what we got in Locals.
	Let me think about anything else in terms of the implausibility of his diagnosis.
	You heard Scott Adams also has advanced.
	Yes.
	Yeah, that's terrible.
	I mean, Scott's a fantastic guy.
	You don't wish cancer on someone you hate regardless.
	Scott is a great guy.
	Okay, so let's have a little PSA.
	What should people do?
	In order to check for prostate cancer?
	Yes.
	Here's the deal.
	Prostatecancerfoundation.org.
	You can find everything there.
	Every male over 50 every year should be getting a PSA.
	If you have a first-degree relative, that is father, son with prostate cancer, you should be starting at age 40. Even grandfather, I would start at age 40. And if you're...
	Listen, my PSA went from one to four.
	It was still normal.
	And my doctor had the good judgment to send me to urologist.
	The urologist had the good judgment to ultimately biopsy.
	And that's how I was diagnosed.
	I thought they were all overreacting.
	I was pushing back hard.
	Let me ask the intrusive questions.
	To biopsy your prostate...
	Yes.
	You go through the rectum, they numb it all up back there, and you get these little needles that go into the prostate and these capsules that pop in there and catch them.
	They take a little piece of skin off your prostate, then they go back and send it back.
	They go inside the organ and they pull a big piece out.
	The finger in the butt is for the colonoscopy, not for the prostate.
	We don't do the finger in the butt so much anymore.
	I mean, they might do it in certain circumstances.
	It's for the prostate, not for cancer so much.
	I have so many jokes that I cannot make about Canada, about my doctor who was very eager to check my prostate.
	Okay, cool.
	So that's not as invasive in order for the test.
	And the other thing is men of African descent at diagnosis typically have more aggressive cancer and more progressed cancer.
	And we're doing a horrible job.
	Of getting them properly screened.
	Horrible.
	That's because of screening and not because of genetics, the way the disease progresses.
	That's because of genetics.
	That's because of genetics.
	And then we're doing bad screening on top of that.
	It is genetic.
	And Joe Biden, who claims to have such concern for the black community, where is he on this?
	Why isn't he speaking up about it?
	Why doesn't he use his case as an example to go, you know what?
	A lot of black men die of this disease because you're not going in.
	You've got to go in.
	You've got to get done every year.
	That is, again.
	Disgusting.
	You're supposedly so concerned about that community.
	I'm concerned.
	I've been fighting this one for years, trying to raise awareness.
	It's very hard.
	They fear that there's a digital rectal exam coming, and then they don't want to know that something's wrong because they fear that it's going to interfere with their sexual functioning, which the treatment typically does not these days.
	It just does not.
	If you get it early.
	If you get it early.
	Later.
	I'm going to go re-review my blood work, which I think I sent you at one point.
	I'll double check.
	Amazing.
	Dr. Drew, I mean, this is confirming what I already thought.
	One way or the other, this is scandalous because if it's true, it's scandalous.
	Absolutely.
	This is truly scandalous.
	Everyone should be waking up to just how played we have been.
	I mean, think about just COVID and the muscling of social media companies and now gaslighting and manipulating the press and refusing to come clean about what's been going on here.
	It is absolute scandal.
	And we should not tolerate this.
	It should be not tolerated as an American public.
	Spinnaker in our Locals community says, Viva, has the PSA test improved over the years?
	I seem to recall reading years ago that there were some questions regarding its accuracy.
	There is questions about how to use the screening, when to use the screening.
	There's a little controversy between, say, the family practice community and the urological community.
	I'm involved in research on prostate cancer.
	I listen to lectures on it on a regular basis through the Prostate Cancer Foundation.
	I'm here to tell you, get the screening done.
	People are less likely to die of prostate cancer these days because of that screen.
	Okay, I'm going to go double-check my records.
	Dr. Drew, so you are live, is it daily, or are you skipping today, or is it daily ordinarily?
	Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday, though, we're going to be in noon on Friday with Jenny McCarthy also.
	And I'm looking for every opportunity to apologize for things I've gotten wrong over the last couple of years.
	And I was a little dismissive of Jenny's position about vaccines, and I need to follow my sword.
	Oh, that Jenny McCarthy about the potential correlation between vaccines and autism.
	Yep.
	I want to apologize wherever I can because that's what I want to see from everybody else.
	I want apologies for Francis Collins.
	I don't want just glib descriptions of, oh man, we just tried to stop this thing.
	We didn't care what else happened as a result.
	Again, this is scandalous.
	Without even getting too far into it because I need to probably do my own.
	Get familiar with it myself.
	The scandal about Wakefield was the guy whose original study confirmed the correlation.
	Then, from what I understood, he was politically browbeaten into withdrawing his...
	Robert Wakefield, yes.
	Was the study legitimate?
	He was the head of the CDC, and he is starting to talk, slowly but surely.
	I can tell he's disgusted.
	He's disgusted with what happened.
	Okay.
	Because I understood, A, that it was discredited.
	Jenny McCarthy got blacklisted and blackballed.
	And then I understood that the Wakefield retraction itself was politically motivated.
	Oh, that?
	I'm sorry.
	I'm confusing that.
	Yes.
	To lean on anybody's research on autism right now, you do so at your peril.
	The proper research has not been done, and that's what RFK Jr. is going to get, and let's see what he comes up with.
	That's all.
	Let's just get the right side.
	There may be nothing there.
	But let's get the right research.
	What's out there right now, it's interesting, I just read a huge study about autism, and they didn't take vaccines into account.
	You're not even allowed to ask about it.
	That's so crazy.
	Everything's got to be taken into account.
	We need to explain why this is happening, and we need to get to the bottom of it.
	That's all.
	Whatever it is.
	And I can tell you, anecdotally, it doesn't matter.
	I mean, anecdotal evidence is still evidence, but anecdotally, a lot of people note an immediate correlation.
	It might just be when it develops and when you happen to get...
	That's correct.
	Or maybe there's some very strong genetic component that sets certain people up.
	I don't know.
	We've got to figure it out.
	But let's figure it out, for God's sakes.
	It's like marijuana and schizophrenia.
	They said you might have had schizophrenic predispositions and then you smoke weed at the age of whatever.
	We used to think that.
	I was convinced of that, in fact.
	I thought it was a rare thing.
	Now it is common.
	To see psychosis from the highly concentrated THC we're giving people, it's no longer a debatable point.
	It happens.
	Well, I mean, I haven't done it in the last multiple decades, but the experience itself is a psychotic experience.
	It's a break from reality.
	The only question is, well, not your brain rewires properly after the experience has happened.
	And I knew a bunch of people who didn't come back sometimes.
	Wait, let's see this.
	I need to Viva Watchers about colonoscopy risk versus short-term length exam.
	What is he saying?
	I was supposed to apologize for something.
	I don't know what he's talking about.
	Oh, don't.
	I'll see if I can find it.
	If that was in Rumble.
	Oh, the Rumble chat is...
	The rants.
	They're aggressive there.
	Let me see here.
	Dr. Drew needs to apologize for misleading Viva Watchers about colonoscopy risk versus a short-term exam with almost no risk.
	Check the stats.
	On punctures yourself, Dr. Drew, is crap.
	They're talking about perforations when you do a colonoscopy.
	Perforations happen.
	He's correct about that.
	And so old ladies, be careful.
	Small women, be careful.
	Maybe you don't want to do it.
	I have Lynch syndrome.
	I have to get it done every freaking year.
	Every year.
	What is Lynch syndrome?
	Lynch syndrome.
	It's a genetic error and DNA repair system.
	It's an Ashkenazi Jew thing.
	It's awesome.
	So you get a colonoscopy.
	It's not even the colonoscopy.
	Every year.
	It's the process.
	The crapping until it's liquid water coming out of your butt.
	Good times.
	Good times.
	I had fun.
	They gave me whatever sedative that they give.
	It didn't do a damn thing to me.
	And I'm sitting there watching.
	It was a video game.
	I'm watching this camera go up.
	You've got to get Propofol because Propofol is, boom, lights out.
	Drew, I think I'm wired so tight.
	No, no, no.
	Now Propofol.
	Propofol is lights out.
	Dr. Drew, thank you for confirming what I thought.
	I still think it's not cancer and this is the easy way out for them.
	Whatever it is, it's a little convenient on the timing.
	Look, if he's gone in two years, you have your answer.
	But I would love them to come clean about what actually is going on.
	They can't.
	It's institutionalized.
	It's institutionalized from top to bottom, including the media.
	You have seen the light, Dr. Drew, and you've been amazing.
	You'll still be my go-to when I...
	Want to know what a lump is on my body.
	I know.
	Drew, thank you very much.
	And we'll raid you tomorrow.
	All right.
	See you.
	Thanks.
	All right.
	Have a good one.
	Now I got to go kick.
	I feel so rude kicking.
	I got to ask him to change the word from Exunt.
	Let me go back here and see what we got here.
	The Remanded said, I'm doing a four to five part series on the CFIA in Canada.
	Since they've announced they will be going ahead with the killing of the ostriches in British Columbia to follow.
	Part one is posted.
	I saw that in the chat.
	There's no rest for the wicked and there's no end of the evil.
	So let me see here.
	I'm just going to put an ostrich.
	Apparently the news was the temporary victory that the CFIA has announced they're still going to go through.
	Here we go.
	We're going to put these mother effers on blast.
	Hold on.
	This is Drea Humphrey from Rebel News reporting that it seems They're still going to kill the ostriches, peeps.
	I won't summarize the story.
	I think you all know what I'm talking about here.
	Window, tab, and here.
	Since temporarily leaving Universal Ostrich Armed, I've learned that the CFIA still plans to kill their 400 healthy BC ostriches, and the farmers may get even less compensation after they do.
	Save the ostriches, and then this is it.
	Endless.
	We're going to have an after party at Locals.
	Let me see if I've missed anything here.
	We got this.
	Trump gave up a lot in his first time.
	Okay, we got that.
	I didn't miss any tipped questions, I don't think.
	Let me see here.
	I want prison time for Francis Collins.
	I have to know.
	Get the truckers to block the road to the farm, says R.O. Poppy.
	Live stream 24-7.
	Let them be seen doing what...
	They think that they're justified in doing.
	24-hour livestream, a Starlink from Elon Musk, GoPros or whatever.
	Just stream it.
	Stream it 24-7.
	They need to get the ostriches the hell out of Commie Canada, says Jax Williams over in our local community.
	I would do whatever I could to keep them from my animals, says Allie Michael.
	Let me see what else I had on the backdrop.
	There was one other...
	We'll end it real quick on a little bit of good news.
	Jonathan Turley reporting.
	It's kind of interesting.
	Again, these decisions are not decisions on the merits, so they're interim orders.
	But today, in respect of Trump pulling the TPS temporary protected status of however many hundreds of thousands.
	Joe Biden with his auto pen signed.
	You can sign a swath of TPS for hundreds of thousands of immigrants, illegals, who would otherwise not be legally here, but in order to revoke that TPS, you've got to do it on a case-by-case basis.
	Supreme Court came down in a one-paragraph decision and said, we're going to lift that ban.
	And he can do it until there's an adjudication on the merits.
	John Turley says the Supreme Court delivered a win for the administration today by lifting the injunction on the move to terminate temporary protected status, TPS, protections for hundreds of thousands of people allowed into the country by Biden from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, Venezuela.
	And it went on for a long time.
	Maybe I'll keep that.
	We'll read the thread.
	But the news is reported in...
	Let's see what outlet we're going to take it from.
	Here, Reuters.
	Crap.
	U.S. Supreme Court lets Trump end deportation.
	The U.S. Supreme Court lets the Trump, lets the president be president.
	U.S. Supreme Court lets Trump end deportation protection for Venezuelans.
	May 19, the U.S. Supreme Court let...
	By the way, when you click on these things, it's so effing annoying.
	They are absolutely useless hyperlinks that I think they just throw in there to generate...
	More.
	Look at this.
	How Trump's crypto.
	What the F does that have to do?
	Just crypto.
	Hyperlink.
	Hyperlink.
	I just, I fell for it.
	Okay.
	Supreme Court let Donald Trump's administration Monday end temporary protected status that was granted to hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans in the United States by his predecessor, Joe Biden, who's totally not demented because he only has advanced prostate cancer.
	As the president moves to ramp up deportations as part of his hardline approach to immigration, the court granted the Justice Department's request to lift a judge's order that had halted Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's decision to terminate deportation protection conferred to Venezuelans under the temporary protected status organization.
	All right, bye.
	The program is a humanitarian designation under U.S. law for countries stricken by war, natural disaster, or other catastrophes.
	That's very large.
	Giving recipients living in the United States deportation protection and access to work permits, the Homeland Security Secretary can renew the designation.
	Monday's brief order from the court, which was 6-3, conservative majority, was unsigned, as is typical when it acts...
	On an emergency request, Liberal Justice Ketanji Brown-Jackson was the sole justice to publicly dissent.
	The court left open the door to challenges by migrants if Trump's administration tries to cancel work permits or other TPS-related documents that were issued to expire in October 26. The end of the TPS period, extended by Biden, the Department of Homeland Security has said about 348,202 Venezuelans alone were registered under the order.
	Monday's action came in.
	It goes on a little bit here.
	Scrap this.
	And then I think, if I'm not mistaken, I have the order itself.
	Docket.
	I think this is it.
	Fairly certain this is it.
	Let me see.
	Maximize and say application.
	Application for stay presented to Justice Kagan and referred by her to the court is granted the March 31, 2025 order entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
	Is this the right one?
	Yeah, this is it.
	Case number whatever is stayed pending the disposition of the appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari if such a writ is timely sought.
	Should certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically.
	family.
	Let's read this.
	The stay.
	Okay, hold on.
	The March 31st order by the United States is stayed pending.
	So they stayed the Stay.
	If such writ is timely sought, should certiorari be denied, the stay shall terminate automatically in the event if certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this court.
	This order is without prejudice to any challenge from Secretary Noem's February 3rd, 2025 vacator notice, insofar as it purports to invalidate EADs.
	Justice Brown would deny the application.
	A minor bit of good news.
	I mean, good news.
	It's a bit of sanity that whatever was issued by way of a blanket order by the totally not demented Joe Biden can also be revoked by way of blanket order and not one by one.
	Otherwise, you create a situation that is totally and utterly irremediable.
	Which seems to be the case.
	All right, peeps.
	Who are we rating in cryptos?
	Let's see here.
	We saw another.
	Ostrich.
	Oh, did Encryptus?
	Encryptus seems to be out.
	Well, I will decide who we shall raid.
	Who do we want to raid?
	Let's go raid Kimberly Guilfoyle.
	Yeah, everybody loves to raid.
	We're going to raid.
	Oh, is she live?
	Let me make sure she's live before we do this.
	Okay, so she's no longer live.
	Let me go back and see who's live here.
	Let's see here.
	How do we see what's...
	It is over.
	Let's find someone who's live that we're going to go raid.
	Click over here and...
	Seems that...
	No, the redacted seems to be over.
	Untamed Nation?
	All right, let's go...
	Let's go raid Untamed Nation.
	I don't know who he is, but we'll do it because we can.
	Cut.
	Copy.
	Over here, we go forward slash raid and bada bing, bada boom, confirm raid.
	All right, people, let him know from once he came.
	Let me know if it's good, by the way.
	I don't know who the guy is, but he's talking about Jill New, Joe Biden had cancer the entire time, Joe Altman, Joe Altman, and Matt Walsh.
	I know who both of those people are.
	I know, Joel.
	I didn't realize that.
	Okay, good.
	Go.
	Raid and say that Viva sent you, people.
	Thank you all for being here.
	We'll be live tomorrow, 4 o 'clock.
	What day is it today?
	It's Monday.
	So we'll be live at 4 o 'clock tomorrow.
	Is it Monday or Tuesday?
	It's Monday.
	It's Monday.
	We just had our show last night.
	You can get a book, Louie the Lobster.
	Make sure that you are subscribed and have notifications turned on.
	Audio will be on Podbean, whatever all the podcasts go, and the clips will go to Commutube afterwards.
	Thank you all.
	For everything.
	And we're going to have our after party at vivabarneslaw.locals.com where we shall talk about other stuff.
	Link.
	Boom.
	Bada bing.
	Thank you all.
	As always, Godspeed and locals.
	Here I come.

▲