Trump's First 100 Days RECAP! Alberta Referendum on the Horizon? AND MORE!
|
Time
Text
Ladies and gentlemen, we might be looking into a window of the future.
What happens to Viva when he loses his hair?
Because some people thought this was me and that I had shaved my head.
The words are insightful, but it is not me.
Canadians just voted their country from the frying pan into the fire as their new left-wing globalist tool of a prime minister swept elections that puts him in charge through 2029.
It was a stunning collapse for the Conservatives, led by infamous apple-muncher Pierre Polyev, who lost his own seat, which is embarrassing.
Just three months ago, Pierre was at 92% on prediction market culture, and he was leading in the polls by as much as 27 points.
So, two things popped the bubble.
First, the Liberals ditched the ridiculous Justin Trudeau for Mark Carney, a World Economic Forum tool.
I like this guy.
Who looks presidential on TV.
Second, Donald Trump, whose insults and jibes about annexing Canada triggered a rally round the maple leaf at the expense of Polly Eve, who Canadian media framed as Canada's Trump.
I'm going to pause it there.
I don't want to steal all of this fine gentleman's brainpower.
Just to say that there were people messaging me saying, Viva, we found your doppelganger, and this is what you'd look like if you ever had to shave your head a la Bruce Willis, who happens to be or be still alive.
A very good-looking man with a shaved head.
This is Saint-Ange.
Let me just see what...
Peter Saint-Ange.
I'm going to share it with everybody.
Go watch the rest of it.
I just wanted to stop it at the media framing Poilievre as being mini-Trump, as the explanation for which he had to distance himself from.
Donald John Trump.
And in so doing, alienating a portion of his base and, I dare say, losing the election.
I was having this discussion with someone who I deeply respect, private conversation.
We're like, no, Viva, you're not on the ground.
You really don't understand the degree to which he had to distinguish himself from Trump because the media was portraying him as being a mini-Trump.
And I'm like, when he was at 90 in the markets, they had already been depicting him as a mini-Trump for damn near two years.
I pulled up some headlines, some tweets.
They had been comparing him to Trump for two years.
And then he had to go and distance himself from Trump by picking a lot of fights with Trump and by attempting to be more anti-Trump than the liberals, which is ironic.
And it backfired horribly.
He did, in fact, lose his writing, but like we talked about it yesterday, there were some very interesting things going on in Pierre Poilievre's Carlton writing where they had A whopping 91 candidates on the ballot.
You want to see who won the election?
People, you know who won the election because I've been talking about it, but I've got to show you this because I saw it and now you have to see it.
You all remember Elaine's dance out of Seinfeld?
We now have Elaine Marries, apparently they're saying Phil Dunphy from, uh, geez, House or whatever that show is.
Home Improvement, not Home Improvement.
Modern Family.
This is Phil Dunphy meets Elaine from Seinfeld.
It's so uncomfortable, I'm just going to let it play.
And I'm going to comment over that.
I'm going to comment over that.
I mean, I guess if I liked him, this wouldn't be as nauseating as it is, but it looks like he's having a mild spasm attack.
I want to know what the logo is on his shirt before I make any comments on it.
This is the face of a man who's like, holy shit, I can't believe they bought it.
They actually elected me.
I am now the Prime Minister of Canada.
I am now arguably the most powerful person in Canada.
Last week, I was a globalist banker.
Governor for the Bank of England.
Now my WEF globalist plan has come to fruition.
I managed to convince a swath of Canadians that they needed to re-elect the Liberals.
Elect me.
And now I'm the most powerful man in Canada.
Embarrassing.
All around.
And now I believe that they've declared this to be a minority government and 169 ridings, seats for the Liberals.
They're going to coalition with the NDP or they're simply going to have three NDP members cross the aisle and form an objective 172 majority for the next four years and they are going to wreak havoc on all of Canada.
And the person who has been the victim of the havoc that the Liberals in spirit have inflicted on Canada and has been victim of the lawfare and a man...
Who sat there, and I'm going to find out what was going through his mind when the leader of the so-called Conservative Party said nothing as this man was convicted of mischief in the longest mischief trial in Canadian history.
As he sat there to see Pierre Poiliev say nothing.
And at the time I said, Pierre, hurry up and say nothing, man.
It's not like he got an election to win.
No, no, no, Viva.
If he says something, they're going to call him a pro-Trump or pro-Ottawa protest occupation convoy.
Extremist.
He's going to lose the election.
He has to do it.
He has to do it.
Oh, Viva, it's a good thing he did it because if he didn't do it, it would have been a liberal majority.
Oh, we might be walking into a liberal majority anyhow.
Chris Barber, if you don't know who he is, a trucker, a man who was at the heart of the Ottawa protest, allegedly the organizer, subjected to pretrial detention, the longest, most insidious, most insane mischief trial in Canadian history,
convicted, and now they're trying to lock him away for two years.
And now Pierre can't say anything of use.
And they're trying to apparently seize his truck for whatever the reason.
Chris, sir, as soon as you can unmute your mic and unable your camera.
There we go, sir.
I'm going to let it catch up here.
There might be a bit of a delay.
Chris, how goes the battle at the risk of asking the obvious?
Oh. Bye.
Can you hear me?
It goes good.
It's been a little bit of a disappointing week, but we're hanging in here.
I'm running a pilot truck today, so I can...
Crap, our connection is...
Yeah, the connection is extremely pixelated, and...
I got a suggestion.
What if we have Chris turn off the video?
I'll grab a photo and bring that up in the background and see how the video will work.
Yeah, okay.
That's a good idea.
Chris, disable your camera and we'll try to do it with mic only.
Let's see if that's going to help.
Exactly. Thank you.
you
I can see.
I can hear you.
Okay, and I can now.
Hear you better.
And let me just see what the delay is.
I'll do what my mother used to do when I was in France.
I'll say Apple, and as soon as you hear the word Apple, you say Apple.
Apple.
Okay, good.
The audio is much better now.
And I'll do a split screen and we'll bring a picture up of you.
Chris, while we get that split screen going, maybe I'll get a picture of Big Red.
Tell the world who you are.
Well, my name is Chris Barber.
I live in the prairies in Canada here, and I'm a truck driver, a business owner.
I employ about 10 people right now.
I haul agriculture equipment across the border and within Canada.
And the COVID mandates affected my life quite drastically during COVID.
And because of that, we decided there was a group of people to stand up and just stand to the government, the overreach, the teary that was happening.
And that put me in Ottawa in February of 2022.
Born and raised in Alberta?
Saskatchewan.
I actually live on the farmyard that my great-grandfather homesteaded on in 1905.
Shut up.
Do you own a metal detector?
I actually do, and I've been out.
I found a couple of horseshoes and some different things here and there on the yard, yeah.
We live in the country, of course.
My parents are about a mile away from me in the yard that I was born and raised in, and I'm living in what my grandparents' was, the place that my father was born and raised.
So we are all about family out here.
We are all about working together and building our community.
Now, I'll ask a question.
First of all, are you married and kids?
I've got two children, two stepchildren, a lovely wife, and yeah, I'm a family man, of course.
And you've been a trucker for how long now?
This will be my 32nd year of driving.
I got my license when I was 18. The first trip that I could cross the border and truck in the U.S. was when I was 21, so I've been out of quite a few years over here.
That's amazing.
How do you get into truck driving?
You're 18, you want to have a job and decide school's not for you, so you go and get a truck and you can find work that way?
You know, my uncle did a little bit of trucking when I was a kid.
I remember the trucks coming and going into the yard.
My father's a farmer.
We were born and raised on the farm.
We farm about 2,500 acres.
And I remember some gravel trucks coming in and me getting a ride in one of those gravel trucks when I was probably 10 or 11 years old.
And that was stuck in my head from that day forward that I wanted to drive big trucks.
And so I took the opportunity as soon as I was 18, got my license.
I actually did that with my father.
We both acquired our driver's license for semi-drivers.
I still love, after 32 years of driving, I still love jumping behind the wheel.
I'm in the pilot truck today, so I'm actually not hauling any loads, but my job today was escorting one of my other trucks with a big load on.
I always said, the job, in as much as people might think it's mundane, if you get to listen to podcasts, listen to audiobooks, you get to see the world in a way that most people will never see, especially the country, certainly.
Totally autonomous, and to some extent, it's going to be a job that people are going to always need, unless it all goes automated.
Pat King was involved in some of the prior protests in, I believe it was out in Red Deer, I might be mistaken, but he was out in some of the protests in Alberta beforehand.
Before the convoy, were you political or an activist at all in any way?
No, I wasn't, actually.
I like to kind of refer to myself as somebody that yelled at the steering wheel or the windshield in the truck as I was driving down the highway, just how frustrated I was with the political system in this country.
I've never been involved in a protest.
I'm not an activist.
I'm not a protester.
But, you know, the opportunity kind of came around in January of 2022 when, you know, after we announced the idea that we need to stand up, we need to do something, my phone was inundated with phone calls, messages from people all across the country.
But it's sharing that sentiment.
So I found myself in the center of this ring or circus, I guess.
And I really don't know what direction to navigate, I guess.
Looking back on it now, we kind of just did the best we could or the best we knew how.
How did it come about?
Because there's a number of people, you know, a number of people were attributed the role of head or organizer.
You and Tamara Leach definitely became the most emblematic or at least recognized as.
Without getting into any of the politics and the infighting, because I'm not interested in that, how did it come to be that you had any role organizing this whatsoever?
Well, we all had a small part.
There was a big group of people, just grassroots movement that was coming together, I guess.
I had the trucker class, I guess, the people that I brought to the table.
Tamara had her people.
Pat had his.
James Bowie.
There were so many different people that were involved.
And when the movement started to come together, we all kind of collaborated together to form what was there.
So it was just different ideas and different people from every walk of life.
And it wasn't necessarily just truck drivers.
I mean, you walk the streets in Ottawa, there was campers, there was pickups, there was cars.
There was quite a bit.
It was a huge variety of people that came together.
Everybody had an input.
If you showed up in Ottawa in those times, you could probably find something to be useful at.
It's amazing.
All right.
Oh, sorry.
Go for it.
Nope.
I was just listening for a pause there.
I didn't know what that was.
Sorry about that.
All right.
So the protest comes, I mean, as it's occurring, I mean, I can't go through the entire thing of the trucker protest itself, but at what point during the protest do you start getting indications you might be in, I'll put it in quotes, getting into trouble?
You know, I don't think I ever realized that.
We had legal people on the ground the entire time we were in Ottawa.
We were taking advice from people.
I didn't have a truck in Ottawa.
I didn't have a horn in Ottawa.
I just had my being and my voice on social media.
So every day was a different day.
It was kind of like an episode or a movie, Groundhog Day.
You know, you woke up and it was the same thing every morning.
And you just prayed that somebody from the government would come in and acknowledge the fact that all these...
Let's face it, there was 100,000 people there the first couple weekends.
Somebody from the government could have acknowledged us or at least had a conversation with us instead of name-calling us, belittling us, and trying to turn other people against us.
When do you get arrested in the context of the protest?
February 17th I got arrested.
I just grabbed a Tim Hortons from one of the downtown locations, walking down the street, and I didn't quite finish it before two officers approached me from behind.
Gently took me into custody.
They were really fair and easy to work with.
Of course, I didn't resist and just went with what was happening.
They arrest you.
What do they tell you that they're arresting you for?
I believe at that time it was just mischief.
They added another six indictable offenses to that case later, but I believe at first it was just mischief.
And I was read by Miranda Wrights and taken down to the local city of Ottawa's police station.
How long do they keep you there for?
I was there for 26 hours.
I got to spend the night there.
I was released about probably 5 or 6 o 'clock the next evening after meeting my bail conditions requirements.
Okay, that's fair enough.
How much time did you spend in pretrial detention?
You didn't spend anywhere near as much time as Tamara and Pat by any means, eh?
No, I was 26 hours that I was in the system there.
I had to meet a $120,000 bail bond.
I had conditions against contact with Tamara Leach, Pat King, and Danny Bulford.
And I had to leave the city of Ottawa within 24 hours and the province of Ontario in 72 hours.
And so I met those requirements.
My wife was my assurity at the time.
And we had the truck ready to go on the outsource of Ottawa.
We drove back to Saskatchewan and then began the trial process.
Without going into it, because it was the longest trial in Canadian history for mischief, if you can summarize that experience, and what was that like to sit through this freaking trial for?
It spanned, I think, over two years, but it was like, I don't remember, three weeks or 20-some odd days of trial, but it spanned over two years because they have to find trial dates.
What was it like?
Uh, grueling to say the least, I guess we've been, uh, I've never been involved with the legal system in this country.
So I've never been in the back of a police car, never had handcuffs on, never been in a courtroom per se, other than, uh, you know, uh, little small things here and there for traffic courts.
But, um, yeah, it was, our trial started September 5th, 2023.
Our trial ended at the end of August in 2024.
We spent 48 days in trial in the last two years.
I've added up about 120 days gone from home.
To attend trial, to attend new dates.
You know, if you're there and trial's over on Friday and you start again on Monday, there's no sense in going 3,000 kilometers all the way home.
So you kind of, you bear it and you deal with it.
So it's been excruciating costs for some travel expenses.
It's been the seventh time that we'll have to go back for trial at the end of May for another motion that we filed.
It's been quite interesting watching the Crown Prosecutor paint me as such a horrible person because of my social media posts, I guess, for the last number of years.
It's unbelievable.
May I ask the crass question, like, how do you pay for the legal fees and how much does this cost you over the years?
So my first chair lawyer, Diane Magus, is covered by the JCCF, the Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms.
My second chair lawyer, Marwa Yunus, is covered by me.
We've done a couple fundraisers around the Swift Green area.
A whole bunch of people have come together.
We've done two big fundraisers to help assist with that.
Travel expenses, I'm estimating somewhere around $40,000 for travel expenses in the last little while.
So it's cost, as well as the time not working.
I mean, I took a third of my year to spend in Ottawa for trial, so there's a 30-year income gone.
I'm thankful for my son.
He's 21 years old.
His name is Jonathan.
He holds the business down when I'm gone for that.
He dispatches trucks, fix trucks, and trucks himself.
Wherever there's something, he's definitely stepped up to the plate, and that kid's had to grow up a lot in the last couple of years.
It's enraging.
When you get convicted, you go through this freaking trial.
You get convicted on two charges, I think, but found not guilty on seven or whatever.
And I was told on the internet, Viva, you don't understand this is the best outcome possible.
I'm like, no, it's not.
What does it feel like, on the one hand, getting found not guilty of or acquitted, but what does it feel like getting convicted of mischief?
Well, there were seven charges in total.
All of them are indictable.
We were cleared of obstruction, counselling to obstruct, intimidation, counselling to intimidate.
There was a stay on the counselling to cause mischief, I guess.
Guilty on mischief and guilty of disobeying a court order.
And in the verdict that she read out on that, it was basically because of my...
What I got from it, I guess.
I shouldn't say what it was, but what I got from it was my sarcasticness in Ottawa on my social media posts that felt guilty of mischief.
Now, this is where it's going to get shocking even more so for people who don't yet find this sufficiently shocking.
The Crown has announced its intention to seek imprisonment of two years.
Did I understand that correctly from your Facebook post?
They're asking for two years in federal prison for Tamara and myself.
And at that same time when he announced the two years that he's looking for, he also announced the forfeiture order that they filed.
As of today, actually, I haven't received the forfeiture order yet on email, but I was expecting it to come soon.
They want to seize my truck, my livelihood.
They want to seize the truck that led the convoy all the way to Ottawa.
They want to seize the truck that was in Ottawa for, I believe, seven days before we took it out of the city.
It was too hard to kind of monitor for me with being so busy.
The truck wasn't in downtown.
It never honked a horn other than on the first day coming in, I would assume.
But yeah, that's the next battle that we have to fight now.
Okay, you will not be able to explain the two years in prison, so I won't even ask you to.
Two years in prison, everybody just understand that.
That's what the Crown is seeking.
And now with the...
Empowerment of the Liberals and all of this prosecution and persecution.
I dare say that.
I don't want to blackpill you, Chris.
I would say that's imminently more likely than it would have been had the Conservatives actually won.
What the hell is the rationale for the forfeiture of your truck?
You don't owe any money to the government yet.
I know.
No, I don't.
And red has been something that I've owned since it was brand new in 2003.
I bought that truck in November 26th of 2003.
I've raised my children in that truck.
I have, you know, euthanized one of my favorite pets from back in the day in the passenger seat of that truck.
There's so many things about that truck that I've, you know, fallen in love with.
It's a piece of me, and to them it's personal.
They want to devastate me.
They want to do everything in their power to destroy me.
But I don't even understand the rationale of the forfeiture.
Is it because it's an element of a crime?
Is it because they want to seize it and sell it and then satisfy some of the penalties that they seek to impose?
Court costs?
I don't even understand the rationale.
We'll find out more today, apparently.
Whenever that forfeiture order comes in, we'll find out what the rationale is behind it.
They announced it in court and on email with all the lawyers that this is what they were...
And to this moment yet, we still haven't actually seen the forfeiture order.
So we're assuming it's proceeds of crime and we're assuming, you know, are they going to put it up for auction?
Are they going to destroy it?
It's something that they don't want somebody else to have.
And the amount of attention the truck gets going down the road here, you know, that somebody is going to be interested in purchasing it and possibly giving it.
This is big red that we're looking at right here.
You can still see the screen, right?
I know we had pictures.
That's my girl.
I'm going to ask the crass question again because I don't think people fully appreciate this either.
How much does a truck like that cost?
I bought that truck for $139,000 in 2003.
That truck right now is actually obsolete.
You can't buy those long-nosed Kenworths anymore.
They're all aerodynamic, but they actually just quit building them in the last year.
So I believe the cost on one of those trucks now is about $350,000.
Okay, because this is the type of thing, if you keep it in good shape, it appreciates in value.
It doesn't depreciate in value.
The truck has 3.4 million kilometers on it.
I have done multiple engines on it.
I like to say it's like getting the space shuttle ready for launch every weekend when you're home working on it because there's so much stuff to fix and it comes down to a lot of maintenance.
I spend a lot of time in that truck, around that truck, under that truck.
For Americans watching, that's like 2 million, give or take 2 million miles.
Yes.
That is insane.
That's to the moon and back ten times.
Or maybe it's to the moon and back five times.
That is insane.
And strictly in Canada, you drove that around the States as well?
I've been all over North America with that truck.
I've been in northern Alberta, all the way to California, to Florida.
I have been all over the country with that truck.
It's been my home for 21 years.
It was a truck that I've owned a lot of trucks over the years, but I've always kept Big Red.
It's always been my baby.
It's something, you know, when I jump into that truck now, the passenger side dash has pieces of the factory paint missing where my son Jonathan used to kick his little winter boots when he was a toddler.
And, you know, even the leash of my dog that passed away in the passenger seat is still hanging from the visor in that truck.
That truck is a piece of meat.
I don't want to load the question, but I think it's obvious what I project by way of what I would feel in your position.
When you get convicted of mischief, and I don't think anybody, I think maybe Max might have said something about your situation.
I don't know that he did.
I know that he specifically said something about Natasha Graham, the journalist who was brutalized by the cops in Quebec.
When the so-called Conservative Party and the aspiring Prime Minister of Canada He comes out and says nothing.
In your shoes, are you understanding why he can't say anything?
Are you absolutely frustrated that he won't say anything?
Did you not expect him to say anything?
What was your feeling when he didn't do anything?
A little let down.
I think the one thing that we needed the most was support during that.
I think we need the support right now as well.
I know I've spoke with my local MP and I've spoke with him many times in the past.
They're in a sticky situation because anything they do or say will be used against them, no different than us.
And I understand the predicament they're in, I guess.
But if everybody lives a life like that, scared to speak out, where are we going to be sitting?
You know, exactly where we are in this new Canada as of Monday night.
How do you feel about the outcome of the election?
To ask the most obviously stupid question, how are you feeling?
I had a conversation with Tamara yesterday, and we both kind of agreed that we feel pretty let down at the fact that the Liberal government over the last 10 years has just decimated this country and the citizens.
And Monday night's election is the same thing.
It's like, what have we learned from that?
I don't think we've learned anything.
The media has been used as a propaganda tool in this country by the government.
And people have fallen for it hook, line, and sinker.
And I know this movement now growing is this Western independence movement, and it's coming into Saskatchewan and BC and definitely started in Alberta.
I'm seeing a lot.
I've seen a Facebook post from my mother today, who is a proud Canadian, and they took their Canadian flags down today and threw them, not in the trash, but they threw them in a storage bin.
Unreal.
So when do you go back to...
You have yet to get the forfeiture claim.
Maybe they've had a...
I don't know.
Maybe God touched them in their sleep and they're going to abandon that.
But when do you go back for sentencing?
So we've been obviously found guilty of mischief and disobeying a court order.
We filed a stay motion right now that we have to go back for May 21st, 22nd, 23rd.
It's basically a state of proceedings on judicial error when Justice McLean on February 16th, I believe it was, or February 7th, issued the fact that we were still in legitimate protest.
We had the right to be there.
As long as we weren't encouraging violence, having anybody showing up with anything violent, we still had the right to be there.
And that's why we thought we could stay and continue to protest.
So that hearing will happen on the 21st of May.
It'll be a couple, three days.
And then after that, the judge will rule on the stay motion.
And then sentence, obviously, is going to be held after that.
Of course, the judge was willing to sentence us the day after we were found guilty.
I think she just kind of wanted to get it finished with and done with.
But of course, the Crown had to object.
And he wants to call witness or victim impact statements.
Did I understand correctly that the Crown wants a day and a half?
Whatever the timeline is, yeah, they want probably a day, and it's going to be, yeah, victim impact statements against us.
I never had a bad experience with anybody in Ottawa.
I never spoke with anybody harshly.
I never, you know, I did my best during that time to work with law enforcement to alleviate traffic in the intersections, make sure we had emergency lanes open.
That was my primary job when we were in Ottawa.
I wasn't standing there protesting.
It was basically working with the police for three weeks.
I didn't have a bad experience with anybody in the city.
I know people did have bad experiences, and I'm not saying that, but yeah, it's been quite the ordeal.
You want to try bringing it on your camera now?
We'll see if maybe we've established a more reliable connection so that people can see it before.
Yeah, there we go.
How's that?
Yeah, it looks like it's going to work.
And so now you're back to work and you're just waiting, pausing in between to go back to court and deal with this never-ending persecution.
I've been working the whole time.
I run the business.
We run about six semis up and down the road as well as escort vehicles.
We still truck interprovincially and into the U.S. and back.
So if I'm not in court, I'm in the cab of a truck or I'm in the office doing administrative work or like today I'm sitting in an escort vehicle on my way home from piloting one of my oversized loads.
So the work has been non-stop here.
The amount of support we get from just, you know, prairie Canadians just wanting to support my business because of, What we're going through right now, it's absolutely astronomical.
I can't tell you how many phone calls I get in a day from just farmers wanting stuff.
We specialize in agriculture equipment, of course.
And if I may ask, I don't know if you're a religious man.
How do you, you know, crowd support, spiritual support is one thing.
How do you get through this on an individual human basis?
Well, I'm a Christian man, of course.
I firmly believe it got out of hand in this convoy right from the start.
It was needed and we're still being looked after by that higher power right now.
So I can't say that I'm scared.
I'm on the right side of history and I think I know that as well as many people do.
So I'm just going to keep standing and speaking our truths and standing in our truths.
Do you have a crowd?
Is there crowdsourcing?
Anything where people can go if they want to help and support?
We have a website.
We have a website that has some Big Red merch on it.
We like to call it bigredmerch.ca.
We sell hoodies and some stickers there, Big Red stickers.
There was an artist in Regina, Saskatchewan, who created a cartoon version of Big Red that we've been able to put onto a hoodie.
And it's been quite the thing.
So if anybody wants to support, I've got a hoodie here.
And what did you say the website was called?
The Great?
Yeah, bigredmerch.ca.
Okay, I'm going to bring it up here.
bigredmerch.ca.
It's going to be another impossible question.
Do you, depending on how this goes or depending on how Canada goes, do you ever contemplate skipping, not skipping out on justice, do you ever contemplate leaving and moving south of the border?
Well, I'll be honest with you.
I've been offered asylum.
I've been offered avenues to leave.
I believe that the fight is here right now, and I believe that we need to stand.
I know a lot of people are leaving right now, and I can understand and appreciate why, but I'm here, and I'm not going anywhere, and I'm going to see this thing through what we started a few years ago, and Tamara's standing beside me, and as far as I'm concerned, my family, my wife, everybody's standing with us,
so that's where we'll continue to stand.
Chris, I'm sorry I didn't get you on earlier.
And I'm sorry I didn't get you on before the election.
I don't think it would have impacted the outcome because I think we're dealing with a traumatized nation that is suffering from Stockholm Syndrome that is propagandized and doesn't even know it and is literally cheering on their own destruction in real time and thinking that the heroes are the villains and the villains are the heroes.
But maybe we'll be able to meet in person.
If there's anything ever for the updates, please let me know.
And if they go through that forfeiture nonsense, in as much as I have a big mouth and a big bullhorn, I'll use both as loud as they go.
Careful what you say, though.
It could get you in trouble.
I know that personally.
Not from here.
If and when I cross the border.
Exactly.
I'm down in the free state of Florida in the...
Freer country where, you know, First Amendment rights are actually sometimes respected.
Well, my daughter lives just outside of Washington, D.C. right now.
She's been bugging me for the last long time to get on a plane and come down and visit her before, you know, the sentencing date, just in case that chance that I won't be able to cross the border happens again.
So if I definitely get down that direction, I'll give you a shout.
All right.
And I'm supposed to be up in that neighborhood at least in September of next year.
So, Chris, we'll keep going.
Godspeed and stay strong.
Thanks so much for having me on, Viva.
That's Canada, people.
They want two years in jail after having done everything they can to bankrupt the guy, destroy the guy through the process because he had the audacity of partaking in the most peaceful protest ever.
But you get your less peaceful recent protests about what's going on in the Middle East and what happens there.
The police partake in the I was going to say the wonderful abuse of female journalists who are there documenting it.
So that's what's going on in Canada.
I wanted to have Chris on a long time ago.
They're waiting for a couple of procedures to go through.
I will do the updates when they happen.
And for everyone in Canada, wishing you the best.
And for everyone in America, take note of where things go when you have globalist commies in charge.
Now, let me get to some chat and then we're going to get to the other subjects of the day.
We've got Canada just signed itself up for May.
That is Seven Legion Studios.
Yeah, I think Michael Malice put out a tweet on that.
Pope Viva performs the Elon Musk salute.
There's an AI, which I can't bring up, but I won't bring up because some people might not appreciate any AI that would equate Viva with Pope-dom because...
It's still an important role in the world and some people may or not have a sense of humor about it.
Alright, now we're going to get to some other stuff and it's going to be some of the American stuff.
Do you hear the dog in the background?
Hold on.
Do you hear that?
Very little.
It drives me crazy.
She sits there and all that she does is whine for food all day.
Okay, everybody, we're going to move on from Canada.
Was there anything else actually to talk about in Canada, just the elections?
I think they've officially called it for a minority government at 169.
I'm telling you, they're going to do something.
The markets haven't...
What's the word I'm looking for?
The markets have not resolved to, yes, liberal minority, because I think, and I've asked Kalshi for a definition of the resolution of the market.
Because it can't just be media reporting liberal minority, because otherwise the liberal minority with NDP support, liberal minority with NDP coalition, liberal majority with...
Those markets wouldn't make sense if it was just the number of the ridings confirmed.
They're going to get a liberal coalition majority.
And I think it's going to be recognized when they resume government.
Because the NDP, the New Democrat Party, which has been decimated, has been undecimated already.
There's zero reason.
For, if not all of them, at the very least, three of those NDPs to literally cross over to the Liberals, give them their majority, and Canada is thoroughly fuked beyond what it is already fuked now.
And I will tell you one thing.
I'm going to tell you this.
In as much as I've given Pierre Poliev a very, very hard time, I think he deserves it.
I said something earlier today, like, you don't...
When you don't do what you need to do, when you don't do what you could do, should do, and needed to do at the time you had the opportunity to do it and you lose, you don't get to wash your hands of responsibility and you don't get to say, well, I would have lost anyhow because you didn't do what you could have,
should have, and needed to do when you had the opportunity to do it.
And even if the outcome were the same, you will never know it.
And all that you'll know is that the outcome was what it was because you didn't do what you could have done, should have done, and needed to do in the moment.
That being said, In as much as I sincerely believe that Pierre Poiliev actually wanted to win, and it wasn't a deliberate sabotage because it's easier being a feckless opposition leader, or you got the fear of success, or it was all just one big ploy so that Canada falls under the globalist thumb because Pierre is actually WEF,
as everyone's been saying, whatever.
I can't imagine how bad Pierre feels right now.
And similarly, when Hillary Clinton lost in 2016, I couldn't imagine how bad she felt.
The only difference is I deeply loathed Hillary Clinton and the rumors that she was like throwing shit against the wall, screaming and crying and everyone was like, oh, that didn't give me joy, but I would have liked to have been a fly on the wall.
The devastation that Pierre must be feeling now, I feel bad for Pierre because ultimately I think he's a good guy and I have nothing personally against him.
Professionally and politically, he ran the worst campaign ever, and he succumbed to a certain form of cowardice that left his most loyal base high and dry, and I would dare say discouraged others from emerging and voting if they would have otherwise not voted.
And when he lost his own riding, I would also argue that it's because he basically betrayed his base by doing exactly what he said he shouldn't do in that Jordan Peterson interview.
I still feel bad for him.
He must be devastated.
And that is the reality of politics, however.
If you cannot stomach the defeat, you won't last long in politics, and we'll see what he does after this defeat.
RyanPD911 says, Do Albertan, Saskatchewanians, Saskatchewan, and eventually Manitobians, become their own country, become a U.S. territory, or become a U.S. state?
What is your feeling?
Well, now that you mention it...
Let me just pull up the tweet that I listened to Danielle Smith's press conference today.
I like Danielle Smith.
They've got some issues.
Like, Danielle Smith is what I would call, you know, the Canadian Conservative Party, where they're still conservative, though they do espouse some things which I think are somewhat questionable, like that gender ideology where she...
Forced one of her conservative members of parliament, their MPP, to undergo re-education.
I put this, I listened to her conference this afternoon where she's talking about simplifying citizen referendum petitions such that they can get to an actual vote or consideration by the people.
And they want to reduce the threshold for citizen petitions so they can actually have citizen initiative petitions, much like you have in California.
And so that she can then get to say, oh, what's this?
There's a citizen petition for separation from Canada?
Well, if it met the threshold that we recently reduced so that it makes it easier for citizens to succeed, I'm all for it.
Who am I to say no to democracy?
Here, listen to this.
When we were talking about looking at the thresholds for both recall and citizen initiative, one of the reasons why...
We were discussing about changing it, is that you want a bar that's high, but you don't want a bar that's impossible to achieve.
And we saw with some of the recall initiatives that took place at the municipal level, the bar was impossible to achieve.
So we wanted to try to create something that was a little bit more reasonable.
And the fact that we haven't seen any citizen-initiated referendum that also suggested to us that people just thought it was pointless to try to go out and try to get that many signatures.
And so we wanted to recalibrate.
To be able to allow for voters to express an interest.
If you've got 10% of your voting public that is concerned about an issue, it's something we should know about.
So I don't want to prejudge what kind of issues might come forward.
If you look at California, they regularly have propositions.
They have 10 or 15 propositions virtually every election campaign.
And ultimately, that's what I'd like to get to.
I'd like to see a lot more citizen-initiated referendum on issues of importance.
I only know the term referendum in one concept, separating.
Because when Quebec had its referendums, that's my understanding of a referendum.
A referendum is technically just putting a question to the people.
And I love how she's...
I'm not saying being coy.
Yeah, they're going to put...
We want to make citizen petitions for referenda more easy.
Well, what sort of questions do you want to put to them?
I don't want to prejudge whatever questions they might put forward.
Do you support separation is the next question.
I'm just following up from a question earlier, too.
I just want to ask, like, or directly...
Is the door still open to Alberta separating?
I feel that question wasn't directly answered.
Well, not by me.
I believe in Alberta's sovereignty within a united Canada.
However, there is a citizen-initiated referendum process that if citizens want to put a question on a ballot and get enough of their fellow citizens to sign that petition, then those questions will be put forward.
Again, I don't want to prejudge what a question might be, but not by our government.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Yeah, so I'm against it, but if the citizens want it and they get the requirements, what can I say?
How do I get out of here?
I want to get out of here.
So that's Danielle Smith playing good politics and being a strong conservative, but not an abrasive one.
Anyhow, I'm a little depressed, but there's that.
So RyanPD911, thank you very much for that question.
It allowed me to remind me to bring that up.
I just received a notice from the CRA.
That's the Canada Revenue Agency.
That two more of my tickets totaling $11,200 is due.
Support R.B. Ham.
GiveSendGo.com R.B. Ham.
Who ran for the People's Party of Canada.
I had him on the channel a little while ago.
During the election.
CRA.
Coming to collect on abusive COVID tickets.
GiveSendGo.com R.B. Ham.
NPD Don Levin says, didn't Alberta far exceed the requirement number of petitions required to leave Canada referendum today?
I don't know.
I didn't follow.
I didn't see that if they did.
The news of the day is it will be the 100th day of Trump's presidency today.
I know this because a number of markets which said, will X occur within the first 100 days of Trump's presidency accrue at, I think it's midnight tonight?
When it becomes May 1st, if it has not yet been done, it will be resolved to know in the markets, but it will not have been done in Trump's first 100 days.
On the list were a number of pardons, the release of the Epstein documents, which looks like it's not going to be done within the 100 delays.
Let me go see what that market's looking at now.
Epstein.
Epstein.
Will they release, will they declassify Epstein documents in his first 100 days if you were to bet?
$1,000 now?
And if they do it by midnight, you'll make $100,000 or $99,000.
It's at 1%.
Basically, everything that was set to occur by way of market within the first 100 days is now basically at 1%.
Could happen.
Who knows?
But it's a long shot of long shots.
And then it expires at midnight.
That being said, it's the first 100 days of Trump's presidency and people are saying, how has it been?
You and I, we will discuss this to some extent on Sunday with Barnes, Viva Barnes Law, extravaganza, Sunday night show.
And the question is, what grade would you give Trump, either on a scale of 1 to 10 or on a letter scale of A to D, with F being a fail?
What would you give to him in terms of how he's done for the first 100 days of his presidency?
And my, you know, I would give a mid-range 5 or mid-range C, on the one hand, because there's clearly room for improvement, and on the other hand, because it clearly hasn't been a disaster.
In fact, he's been quite effective at certain things.
The border crossings is down 94%.
It's amazing how that happens.
So at the very least, the flood of illegal immigrants invading, predatory incursioning the Americas, these United States of Americas, has basically...
Shut off.
The spigot has been shut off.
And it took nothing more than, you're not going to be welcome here, and it's not going to happen anymore, and we're not telling you, do not come.
That's Kamala Harris.
Do not come.
I'm going to tell you this.
After we've been telling you for so long, do not come.
I want to see if I can find the video real quick.
Oh, I think this is it.
This is it.
Oh, God.
It's so gross.
Because A, it's Kamala, and B, It's so obviously a dubla.
Not even a dubla.
It's so bad.
Do not come.
Do not come.
Jeff Bezos came.
Bill Gates came.
Mark Zuckerberg came.
Many of them came numerous times.
The bankers have all come.
Everybody's coming.
There was another one up here.
Okay, sorry.
So that was Kamala Harris saying, you know, do not come.
But if you do, we'll give you a prepaid credit card and we'll tell you how to claim asylum.
Do not come.
Well, they're not coming anymore.
So immigration, spigot was turned off effectively on day one, if not on week one.
The war is still going on in Ukraine.
That didn't end on day one.
There's still conflict in the Middle East.
That didn't end on day one.
Trump has been getting down with some of the judges and finally bringing out the hammer when it comes to arresting corrupt illegal alien shielding judges.
So we got the good, the bad, and the ugly.
And, you know, speaking of the ugly, I mean, literally, hold on just one second.
Where was it?
Do I have a picture of it?
I don't have a picture of her anymore.
The judge that got arrested, which we've now confirmed.
Oh, here is.
It was this one.
Confirmed AI image people, but not like the real ones any better.
Yeah, she was hauled off in cuffs.
Apparently it took two sets of cuffs to make it more comfortable for her.
So it's been not a total letdown.
It's been quasi-transformational, except that transformational force that is Trump's second presidency has been severely curtailed by a bunch of corrupt judges, not just the literal corrupt ones who are aiding and abetting and harboring illegal aliens, the ones who are judicially trying to pull yet another coup and prevent the president from doing what he was elected to do.
The big news of the day, people.
Well, let me go see what the chat has to say about overall performance.
Still but ugly.
That's not what I'm looking for.
A-minus.
He is allowing his cabinet to lead and not micromanaging yet, says VegSphere.
A-minus, says Aiden Maddox.
Very effective, but the Epstein list is a big disappointment.
Bondi, too.
I think the highest I could go is a B, says The Real Rock.
A says, we need motivation.
I would give him an A+.
The tariff situation could have been handled better.
I wouldn't give him an A+.
And then there's some fives on tens.
It's mid-range.
The Epstein release was a big, big letdown.
The fact that now Virginia Gufri has apparently died is a massive problem.
And it will certainly fuel more speculation that the administration or some players are covering up what's in those documents.
But the big news of the day.
Trump did an interview yesterday and said something during the interview.
There was an exchange which the Internet has yet to recover from because they think it's the biggest screw up of it.
I'm going to play it beginning to end and not say a word.
And we're going to interpret this, fact check it, interpret, analyze and come to conclusions as to what we think is going on here.
It wasn't a member of a gang.
And then they look, and on his knuckles, he had MS-13.
There's a dispute about that.
Wait a minute.
Wait a minute.
He had MS-13 on his knuckles tattoos.
He had some tattoos that are interpreted that way, but let's move on.
Wait a minute.
Hey, Terry, Terry.
Terry.
He did not have the letter M-S-1-3.
It says M-S-1-3.
That was Photoshopped.
That was Photoshopped, Terry.
You can't do that.
Hey, they're giving you the big break of a lifetime.
You know, you're doing the interview.
I picked you because, frankly, I never heard of you, but that's okay.
I picked you, Terry.
But you're not being very nice.
He had M-S-13 tattooed.
We'll agree to disagree.
I want to move on to something else.
Terry, do you want me to show you the picture?
I saw the picture.
Here we go.
Here we go.
Don't Photoshop it.
Go look at his hand.
He did have tattoos that can be interpreted that way.
I'm not an expert on them.
I want to turn to Ukraine, sir.
I want to get to Ukraine.
No, no.
He had MS. I got to pause it here.
Has anyone...
As a pure matter of semantic fact, the tattoo does not say letter M, letter S, number one, number three.
So Trump is purely semantically, by the strictest definition of words, wrong.
Has anyone ever seen Trump as stubbornly belligerent on a point?
Ever?
And then the question is going to be, does anybody think this is a deliberate mistake intended only to not...
I've never seen Trump argue a point this doggedly.
And I have difficulty believing it's a sincere, genuine, bona fide misapprehension of fact.
He had MS as clear as you can be, not interpreted.
This is why people no longer believe the news, because it's fake news.
When he was photographed in El Salvador, they aren't there.
But let's just go.
They aren't there when he's in El Salvador.
They weren't there, but they're there now, right?
No.
They're in your picture.
Terry.
Ukraine, sir.
He's got MS-13 on his knuckles.
Okay?
We'll take a look.
It's such a disservice.
We'll take a look at that service.
Why don't you just say it?
Yes, he does.
And, you know, go on to something else.
He's contested.
Okay, I'll give Terry credit.
Terry handled that well.
I'm going to give everybody that.
Well, I don't know who that is.
You've all seen that link.
All right, let me share that.
But then we're going to get into it.
Because there are a number of photos out there.
And the spoiler, it does not seem to say letter M, letter S, number one, number three.
No.
Let's start with a couple of these pictures.
And it's not for nothing.
Okay, here we go.
There's this one.
Oh, this is a...
I don't want to see it.
How do I refresh this?
Okay, this is...
So this is one of the pictures that I initially saw, where I thought from this picture that it actually did say 1 and 3 here.
Because from this picture, it's not a question of interpretation.
It looks like that's something of an M. That definitely looks like something of an S, maybe faded.
That, although now I think it's a cross.
Is it a cross?
Looks like a 1. And what we think is a skull does look like a 3. It looks like a faded MS-1-3 on the fingers.
That was one of the videos or photos that I initially saw that I was like, oh, okay, it says MS-13.
I hate TikTok, like with a passion.
Like, what is this?
So the guy made a 10-second video with Trump dancing in the bottom.
Okay, fine.
That's one of the videos.
Or one of the pictures.
Okay, hold up.
There's another picture, and I had to go to an even worse website than TikTok, and you probably know by Freudian predictive slip, it was Reddit, where they were discussing the fact that in a photo that his wife posted to whatever the hell social media that is,
she felt the need to censor out the tats on his finger.
Now, would you do that if the tats on his finger were not something that would be incriminating in some realm of the universe?
Maybe not with the justice realm, but maybe with the gang justice realm.
And this is a real picture.
This is a real post on the left, verified in another outlet.
And this was the one that I, again, you know, zoom in.
It looks like it says MS-13.
Why would she bleep out the tats on his hand if it was nothing incriminating?
Okay.
Where the confusion is, people, is that apparently...
People think Trump is referring to this picture, which is a picture that Trump held up, which has superimposed over it the letter M to interpret the marijuana emblem.
S to indicate the smiley face, whatever the hell this thing is, logo thing.
Does that say cross?
It does say cross.
One for the cross, and three for the skull.
And now you can appreciate in that low-resolution blurry image, it wasn't a three, it was a skull.
Some people are suggesting that Trump actually thought this was on the guy's hand, as though there would also be, in small lowercase letters, marijuana, smiley, cross, three.
Trump didn't know this was Photoshop.
Make it less retarded.
Oh, I hate it when people do that.
I want to see if I have the picture of Trump holding it up.
And the suggestion is, oh my goodness, Trump literally thought the picture that he held up was not photoshopped.
Hold on, I don't have it here.
So let me find the picture.
Because it's worth looking at.
Trump MS-13 Garcia.
And it will be in one of the images.
This one right here.
All right.
And this will give you a better look at the picture.
And do we seriously think that Trump didn't know the picture had something overlaid on it and that he had typed, written on his hand, marijuana, smiley, whatever.
Is Trump deliberately making a mistake so that people are forced to argue the fact that this guy doesn't have MS-13 gang-related tats on his fingers?
Or is he sincerely making a stupid mistake that is horribly embarrassing?
I'm going to go ahead and say...
Definitely not the former.
But the fact of the matter is, it doesn't say literally the letters MS-13, but it does say marijuana, smiley face, cross, and the skull and crossbones.
And it was so incriminating that the wife herself had to bleep it out when she posted that picture on the interwebs.
Look at this.
Times of India, take it at a grain of salt.
Sometimes they're questionable.
What is the truth of Kilmar Obrega Garcia's MS-13 tattoo?
A photo that Trump shared.
Donald Trump has been accused of sharing a fake image of the knuckles of Kilmar Obrega Garcia, which shows MS-13 written on it.
Social media users pointed out that the letters MS and the numbers 13 are superimposed on the photo, and those letters and numbers do not appear on any other photos of Garcia.
Garcia is the Maryland father.
He's the El Salvadorian illegal immigrant who happens to have a child who came to the U.S. illegally in 2019.
Yada, yada, yada.
In a court case, the Trump administration claimed that he was wrongly deported to El Salvador, yada, yada, yada.
What is the truth of the photoshopped photo?
The word MS-13 are not part of the tattoo and they were used in the photo Trump shared to denote the meaning of the tattoo.
On the knuckles, there are tattoos of four symbols which stand for MS-13.
This is a hand of a man that the Democrats feel should be brought back to the United States, yada, yada, yada.
What is MS-13?
And that's about the level of their fact check.
But do we believe that Trump didn't know that the letters were actually imposed on the photo, as was with the words Marijuana Smiley?
I'll leave it to the chat to determine that, but it's quite clear, I think.
That being said, we are now discussing the fact that this man, criminal, wife-beater, alleged human trafficker, illegal alien, deported.
The administrative error was that he shouldn't have been deported to El Salvador because the rival gangs wished him harm when they were giving him that...
I forget what the word is.
Non-deportation to a specific country, not non-deportation at large.
That's the news of the day.
What we're going to say here.
So that is the question.
I'm going to come to the chat in a second.
We've got biltong in the house, people.
Oh, here we go.
Check this out.
Try our biltong, almost 50% protein packed with B12, creatine, iron, zinc, and much more.
A perfect snack.
To your weekly meal prep, go to builtonusa.com, code Viva 10% off.
They're great products.
Anton does amazing work.
Cultivated Mind says, fantastic.
Don't let him get away with moving on from the tattoo topic.
Force them to address it.
I agree.
Cultivated Mind says, weird how the gang members don't just show their employment contracts for the related gang.
That would really simplify matters immensely.
Well, then the other question also is not to be even like a lawyer.
When he's saying, no, that's what it says.
Like, imagine it said in the Greek alphabet.
I don't know what the letter is for A, like alpha, beta, gamma, sigma, epsilon, whatever.
If it had the Greek letter, or the Greek Roman numeral for M, or the Greek letter for M, the Greek letter for S, and then the Roman numeral for 1 and the Roman numeral for 3. Well, it doesn't say MS-13, but that's what it says.
So I think it's a deliberate mistake.
It's forcing the discussion.
I've never seen Trump harp on an issue like that.
Those are my personal thoughts.
All right.
Now, that being said, that's not it.
We're not done yet.
The good and the bad and the ugly of the first 100 days.
I think the hero in it for me is Homan.
Homan, I think, has been the one who has performed the best thus far.
Kash Patel has done good.
Dan Bongino has yet to have his moment.
I want to know who the pipe bombers are.
I know that Dan knows, and I know that Dan is going to get to the bottom of it.
Pam Bondi had her flub.
RFK Jr. is doing great work, but hasn't had the shine that Homan has had, and Tulsi Gabbard is doing some great stuff.
Hasn't had the shine, had a bit of the hiccup with the signal gate, as has Pete Hexeth.
Homan.
I love him.
I said from day one, you don't have to support ICE's operations.
You can support sanctuary cities if that's what you desire to do.
Sanctuary cities can stand aside and watch ICE keep their communities safe.
Because any public official, whether your mayor, city councilman, or governor, their number one responsibility is protecting the communities.
And ICE has been clear we're targeting public safety threats and national security threats.
I can't believe there's any elected official, and especially a judge, that doesn't believe we should be doing that and they should be helping us.
What I said from day one, you can sit aside and watch, you can argue against us all you want, and protest all you want, but when you cross that line, and I've said this a thousand times, when you cross that line to impediment or annoyingly harboring concealing an illegal alien lies, you will be prosecuted.
Judge or not.
Who doesn't love this guy, other than the left?
He's amazing.
Says it like it is, does what he says, he's amazing.
Let me go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com and refresh here and see what the locals community had to say about the question posed earlier about Trump's first 100 days.
Trump is right that POS has gang tats that depict MS-13, says Janeland.
Very difficult to accept and understand.
Today I read an essay by David Parker.
The last paragraph summed it up well for me.
As I've been struggling with this issue in Canada, I often say Canadians aren't polite.
They are compliant and complacent.
Parker says it more eloquently.
Most Canadians would rather be comfortable than free.
They would rather feel safe than be sovereign.
They would rather hate Americans than love their own country.
The liberals know this.
They weaponize it.
Until the conservatives learn not just how to campaign, but how to connect, they will remain the party of almost.
Almost there, almost enough, almost winning, but in politics, almost doesn't matter.
That's very good.
Oh, I forgot to mention the other thing about the Knuckles.
There's hypothesizing that he might have added those graphics to actually overlay on the original MS-13, but there is no definitive evidence for that as of yet.
Everybody needs a home, and that is for damn sure.
Now, people, I'm going to be on with Richard Surrett again at 5.38.
Very specific time because radio apparently operates by minute increments.
So you can find me there at 538, and we're going to have an abridged afterparty at the Locals community.
And I'm going to save the Nick Ricada discussion for the Locals community.
If you want to come on over, people, and you haven't done it yet, come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
You can join.
10 bucks a month, 100 bucks a year to support the work that we do.
I say that there is no better form of independence than crowdfunded independence for a crowd that knows that I will occasionally say things that piss them off despite the fact that they might not want to hear it.
Intellectual independence, there's nothing more important than it.
It's something that you cannot have when, say, sponsors try to dictate messaging.
Sponsors try to dictate speech, which is why you won't get it from Legacy Media, you won't get it from MSM, and you won't even get it from some independents who are either sponsor-captured or audience-captured.
So come on over if you want to, and if you don't, we'll be live tomorrow, Thursday, with, I don't know what, something damn good.
What I was going to bring over was if there was a tip question over in Locals.
Right down here.
TT Fulltimer.
My best done, 66,000 criminal foreign invaders.
My best thing done, 66,000 criminal foreign invaders arrested.
There is zero question that if the only thing Trump had done in his first 100 days was the border and the deportations and the raising awareness of what a bunch of criminal defending scumbags the left are, that would have been enough for a C. But they've done a lot more than that.
Roosting.
Says, Viva, the pleb does not agree with you.
Pierre Poiliev needs to remain our leader.
He delivered us more seats and turned our youth into conservatives.
Pierre, if you need an advisor who understands your base better than anyone, I'm offering you my hand.
If Pierre gets unleashed, we will win in a landslide from the next time.
Question, would you, Viva, want to be Pierre Poiliev's advisor as well?
Let me tell you one thing.
Pleb can disagree with me.
That's fine.
Pleb has been wrong.
And I'm not saying anything.
I'm not trying to start beef with Pleb the reporter, Pleb the trucker.
I like him.
But he was objectively wrong.
I was objectively right.
And promising the future yet again when you were wrong on assessing the present is not encouraging, if I can be polite about it.
Would I advise Pierre?
I was.
It was free.
And you know what they say about free advice?
All right, we're going to save the Ricada AI beef with Kurt because it's funny, and we're going to save that for the after party.
But, scumbags...
And we have a raid as well.
Oh, we have to give a raid.
Yes.
Yeah, we're going to give a raid.
But we're not there yet.
We've got a few more minutes.
I wanted to bring up Norm Eisen.
Does this guy not look like...
What's his face?
Not Phil Dunphy, but kind of Colbert.
Does he not look like Stephen Colbert, who's a little bit older and has turned a little bit more evil?
Norm Eisen, you know he's a criminal lawyer.
Bada bing, bada boom.
Let's just hear what Norm Eisen has to say.
Let me just read the tweet.
Norm Eisen, trying Trump out.
Hashtag trying Trump out now.
At Norm Eisen, my greatest fear was Trump slowly boiling the frog.
Instead, he microwaved the frog.
Judge Dugan's arrest is the latest example and will backfire.
When someone is consistently wrong, you stop listening to them.
Let's hear what he had to say about this.
When we came on at the beginning, when I came on at the beginning of the 100 days, my greatest fear for American democracy was that Donald Trump would boil the frog.
Like as an ex-diplomat, I saw Erdogan did in Turkey, Orban did in Hungary.
He didn't boil the frog.
He microwaved the frog.
Arresting a judge.
The American people, these same American people, 80%.
These are psychotic eyes.
These are the eyes of a psychopath.
I'm going to pull up those sabuku eyes.
One of whom said Donald Trump must follow court orders.
They are not going to tolerate Trump arresting judges.
And you know who else is not going to tolerate it?
The rest of the judges.
That's in a chill down the spine.
He's already losing at the Supreme Court.
He thought that was going to be his home turf.
He's lost case after case after case.
Five, four, seven, two, nine, nothing.
It's not going to work.
What you're going to see now is a pushback.
This case is baloney.
That judge released.
She has control of her courtroom.
She's entitled not to allow an arrest.
She sent that man in the hallway where the federal agents were.
There was no crime there.
It's ridiculous.
She's entitled?
That judge released.
She has control of her courtroom.
She's entitled not to allow an arrest.
In what realm of the universe would she be entitled not to allow an arrest?
Senpaku eyes, by the way.
Wait, no, it was right here.
Look at those psychotic eyes.
Senpaku eyes, if you don't know it, look it up, and it's pretty accurate.
But I can't find the one time.
There, here we go.
It was these eyes.
Give me one second, people.
on.
Sorry.
Very important call that I had to take.
Those are the senpaku eyes of a psychopath.
That's what Norm Eisen had to say.
And?
Yeah, alright.
That's about good enough.
People.
VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com Also, the unusual suspects.
I did a show this morning.
And I'm also going to save that for Locals.
It's going to be...
It's going to be...
An exclusive video of a crow savagely murdering a little chicklet, whatever, a bird.
You know when those little birds, you see them attacking crows?
This was violence, people.
And I saw it this morning.
So who are we going to rate in Cryptus?
We have Barry Cunningham, who is actually streaming Trump live at the White House.
Well, then let's obviously do that.
And while we do that...
I'm going to upload the exclusive to vivabarneslaw.locals.com and I'm going to call it Bird Violence.
And then let's do it.
Here it is.
And we shall watch it in two minutes at Viva Barnes.
Tomorrow, what's going to happen?
Four o 'clock show.
It's going to be fantastic.
We'll see what happens between now and then.
And my prediction is in, unless it's already been disproven, that they're going to try some chicanery and get a liberal majority through defecting.
NDP or whatnot.
Here it is.
Okay, let's do this.
And then I also have one about a snake that I saw the other day.
I'm going to ask the community to tell me if I was poking a venomous snake.
I wasn't poking it.
It was on the bike path and I was trying to get it to move.