All Episodes
Previous Next
April 15, 2025 - Viva & Barnes
01:44:13
Billy Baldwin DESTROYED! Canadian Liberal Politicians are THE WORST! Interview with PPC & MORE!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I will fight against is Pierre Polyev's proposal to cut 17,000 public servants' jobs per year.
That will be devastating to our public service.
That will be devastating to the quality public service Canadians deserve and receive from our public servants.
I will fight against is Pierre Polyev's proposal to cut 17,000 public servants' jobs per year.
That will be devastating to our public service.
That will be devastating to the...
By the way, you can actually hear the very moment he begins choking on his own verbal diarrhea.
It's right about the 12-second mark.
I'm sorry, I'm just choking on my verbal diarrhea rubbish.
Yasser Nakfi, people, for those of you who don't know him, he's a Canadian member of Parliament for the Liberal Party, which means that you can bet dollars to donuts.
He's a pathological liar, as are...
Let's just say the majority of politicians at large and virtually the exclusivity, the entirety, each and every single liberal politician out there, the biggest of the scumbags you've ever seen in your entire life.
We're going to come back to a lot of Canadian stuff today, but Yasser Nakfi is a liar.
Right there is a lie.
And for those of you who don't really know why you care, there's an election going on in Canada.
There's, you know, what we're witnessing in Canada.
By the way, is what happens when you have mass dependence on a federal government that basically ensures compliance from a populace and from the electorate.
And when you create a world in which too many Canadians are dependent on the government, either for employment, something like one in four Canadians is directly or indirectly employed by the government.
In terms of benefits, you get money from the government, the liberal government.
As a citizen, you're going to continue voting for them.
Member of the media, you're going to do everything you can to ensure that that fat little hand keeps stuffing your mouth full of the goody-good goods.
And so you capture an entire country.
And what we're seeing in America right now with Doge, and Trump using Doge to minimize, to reduce the size of federal government, federal bloat, federal waste, you see what happens when you try to do that as...
Ruhu Nibadu once said, when you fight corruption, corruption fights back.
When you start to interfere with people's gravy train, they start to fight back.
And we are not yet at the point of no return in America in terms of the ability to cut the bloat and to stop the government waste.
In Canada, it's unclear as to whether or not a sufficient amount, a critical mass of people, are utterly dependent on the federal government such that they will continue to vote the liberals into power.
Because at least in the short term, it guarantees their survival, their remuneration.
And they'll do it until the entire country goes bankrupt.
Remember what Elon Musk said in the States.
We've got to do some cutting.
Otherwise, eventually, the country goes bankrupt and everyone is SOL.
In Canada, and I know this because I actually listen to interviews, even if I don't necessarily support the politicians, I know what Pierre Poilievre's position is on reducing the federal government.
And it's not slashing 17,000 jobs a year.
What Pierre has proposed up in Canada is to allow for the retirement of up to 17,000 civil servant jobs a year without replacing them.
Because you see, when you continually replace and then the blob grows, it never shrinks.
And it keeps eating more and more and then it needs more and more in order to subsist.
And so what Pierre was suggesting is that you reduce.
The government bloat by not automatically renewing or filling the positions of civil servants who retire.
So I go out and make a little fact check and I say, fact check, false.
Nobody really cares.
The day goes on because it's another day in Canada where the Liberals lie.
Mark Carney comes out and says, I need to manage a crisis of the Liberal government's making.
And you've got Pierre Poilier doing everything in his power, it would seem, to not be a competitive candidate.
We're going to get there because...
Today's going to be a Canadian-centric show, but we're going to start with Billy Baldwin.
But before we get started, good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen.
How goes the battle?
Holy crabapples.
Peeps, I was a little tired, a little cranky today.
Still am.
But when you are cranky and you are tired, first sponsor of today's show, 1775 Coffee.
People, imagine winning a prize worth over $100,000 just for drinking coffee that you love, that is delicious, and that supports the parallel economy, that supports free speech.
A brand new Cybertruck and $30,000 in cash could be yours, but this is the last week to enter the entry thingy thing, whatever you call it.
Ends April 20th.
$17.75 coffee is fueling the giveaway and every dollar you spend equals one entry.
No hoops.
No selling your data to some tech giant that thinks free speech is a threat.
Just a small batch single origin coffee roasted weekly and brewed with a backbone.
It's the official coffee of free thinkers, hard workers, and rumble crowd.
That's more than...
And it makes rumble uncancellable.
And if you support the parallel economy and you give your money to companies that actually respect you as a customer, the world would be a better place.
Go to 1775coffee.com.
Use promo code VIVA.
Get 15% off.
Enter before the giveaway ends.
Cybertruck, $30,000 in cash.
And that kicks hard, people.
It's a delicious coffee, and you will love it once you taste it.
Look at me.
How is Steven Crowder in there?
Get him out of here.
Peeps, I need to go into fact-checking.
I need to be recognized as a community noter on X. I have sent in my application.
Sent in my resume.
And apparently I'm on a waiting list to be determined whether or not I can be a community notes fact-checking fact-checker guy.
I deserve it, if I dare say so myself.
We all make mistakes and I own up for my errors when they do occur.
Though, touch wood, may they remain few and far in between.
Fact check number one, we started with it.
Fact check number two.
Some people make it very easy, people.
Billy Baldwin.
And what you'll notice is as you become more and more Trump deranged, your brain actually becomes more and more mushy.
Billy Baldwin is among the most vehement, vitriolic, toxic anti-Trumpers out there.
I don't know what he thinks it's going to get him in the long run.
I don't know how it happens that people fall off the rails of common sense.
And logic.
And introspection.
But Billy Baldwin is there.
Now, Billy, let me just make sure that I pull up the right tweet here, earlier today asked for evidence in a story that has gone viral of a man who was wrongly identified as an MS-13 gang member, wrongly deported.
I mean, if only the Billy Baldwins of America would defend actual Americans with the same level of determination and grit that they defend illegal Aliens, and not even alleged, but determined MS-13 gang members.
This is the story that shook the interwebs.
A man wrongly detained, wrongly deported, innocent man deported to El Salvador, and now he's in prisons with actual MS-13 gang members.
And everyone on the internet is like, what was it?
I think this guy was the father of three.
I might be getting mistaken because there's just too much propaganda to deal with.
Billy Baldwin, earlier today, posts Muse yesterday.
And you have to appreciate the words here, and then you have to appreciate the weasel out of the absolute disgraceful, intellectually dishonest scumbags that thrive on Twitter.
Billy Baldwin asks, where was it proven that Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia is a member of MS-13?
I don't want videos of Trump or members of his administration talking about it.
I would love to see receipts, facts, court documents, and proof.
Okay. I'm mildly in tune with the news.
I keep up with things.
I like to think of myself as reasonably, not necessarily intelligent, but meticulous.
And I went to court documents, as they are so called.
I'll bring them up in a different order here.
There was, in fact, a bond hearing for this gentleman back in 2019, where, as you will see, some people say he was granted legal status as asylum.
False. There was a bond hearing back in 2019 in the matter of Abrego Garcia-Quilera Armando, charges, Immigration and Nationality Act, application, change in custody status, hearing date, April 29, 2019, appearances.
Bond memorandum.
The respondent, let me make sure I get this big enough for anybody who might have...
Granny eyes like myself.
The respondent is a native and citizen of El Salvador.
On March 29, 2019, the Department of Homeland Security served the respondent with a notice to appear, which sets forth the following factual allegations.
One, the respondent is not a citizen or national of the United States.
Two, he is a native and citizen of El Salvador.
Three, he arrived in the United States at an unknown place on an unknown date, i.e.
illegally. And four, he was not then admitted or paroled after an inspection by an immigration officer.
Accordingly, the respondent was charged with removability pursuant to INA, as an alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled, or who arrived in the United States at any time or place other than as designated by the Attorney General, yada yada.
The respondent was held in custody by the Department of Homeland Security.
Now we can get to go to the back one.
Remember what he asked for?
Evidence. No statements.
No Trump saying things, which I understand Billy Baldwin will say is self-fulfilling.
You know, self-serving, I should say.
This is from the actual bond hearing.
Now, for those of you who want to parse words and play devil's advocate, it's a bond hearing as to whether or not he has issued bond and released.
Doesn't really matter.
What this is, is...
After something of an adversarial hearing, not an ex parte, meaning not in the absence or not in the presence of in the absence of the respondent party, there's something of an adversarial nature process that goes on here before the bond judge.
An immigration judge has broad discretion to consider any matter deemed relevant to determining whether an alien's release on bond is permissible or advisable.
Relevant factors include whether the alien has a fixed address, the alien's length of residence in the United States, the alien's family ties, whether or not he may entitle the alien to reside permanently in the United States in the future, the alien's employment history, criminal activity,
yada yada yada.
After considering the information provided by both parties, the court concluded that no bond was appropriate in this matter.
The court first reasoned that the respondent failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that his release from custody would not pose a danger to others, as the evidence shows that he is a verified member of MS-13.
The BIA held that, absent any indication that the information therein is incorrect or was the result of coercion address, is, quote, inherently trustworthy and admissible.
The respondent contends that the Form I-213 in his case erroneously states that he was detained in connection to a murder investigation.
He also claims that the I-213 is internally contradicts itself as to whether the respondent fears returning to El Salvador.
The reason for the respondent's arrest given on his Form I-213 does appear at odds with the gang field interview sheet, which states that the respondent was approached because he and others were loitering outside a Home Depot.
Regardless, yada, yada, yada.
As the evidence shows, he is a verified member of MS-13.
This is from 2019, before a bond hearing, and it was confirmed on appeal.
This is the application.
Redetermination of custody status.
The respondent is a native and citizen of El Salvador.
Appeals from an immigration judge's April 24-2019 decision, denying his request for release on bond from the custody of the Department of Homeland Security.
Board review of the matter.
We review all other issues.
De novo.
It means we review it from new, as though it's the first time de novo.
What did they come to by way of conclusion?
Where is it?
That way, that way down.
Here we go.
We adopt and affirm the immigration judge's danger ruling.
See matter of Burbano.
Notwithstanding the respondent's challenges to the reliability of the GFIS, immigration judge appropriately considered allegations of gang affiliation against the respondent in determining that he is not demonstrated that he is not a danger...
Yada, yada, yada.
Yada, yada, yada.
Consequently, we need not address the immigration judge's flight risk determination.
Accordingly, the following order is entered.
The appeal is dismissed.
Meaning that there were now hearings, two of them, one de novo, in which it was argued and adjudicated by the bond judge that the man is a designated, that man is an MS-13 gang member.
People out on the internet who seem hell-bent on defending illegal aliens who are not even alleged but determined by the court To have been MS-13, gang members still want to defend and still want to move the goalposts and still insist that somehow this man should be brought back into America from El Salvador.
Do I have the...
Hold on a second here.
Here you go, Billy.
Let me see here.
This is the one.
Billy Baldwin.
I guess we're gonna have to go with this one right here.
Yeah, let's go with this one.
Bring this up.
Go back to my comment.
And we'll take this comment right here.
I now know why you're not a lawyer anymore.
You think a single accusation...
Not an accusation, by the way.
This was a finding of fact and law by a judge.
On an I-213, maybe an informant in a state where Garcia never lived is all it takes.
Billy Baldwin asked for court documents that evidence the claim that he's a gang member.
Meanwhile, you ignore the fact that he was given withholding of removal status by an immigration judge in 2019, the equivalent to asylum.
That's factually false, but that doesn't matter.
And it goes on and we don't need to go on anymore.
This is what it takes to actually know the truth in a world where you get bombarded by lies and propaganda.
So, Billy Baldwin, I hope you have enjoyed the lesson in fact and in law.
You may disagree with the judge's finding.
You may say that it's only on a bond hearing.
It wasn't at a trial on the merits.
As if you have a trial on the merits to adjudicate whether or not someone is an MS-13 gang member.
Yes, we're going to have a petition, a declaratory judgment that Mr. So-and-so is an MS-13 gang member.
Let's have a full trial and let's do that for each and every illegal alien that is currently illegal in the United States.
Before being able to deport them for being illegally in the country.
And designated by a bond judge as a gang member affirmed by a court of appeal or at least a bond appeal hearing.
Sorry, not a court of appeal.
After a de novo review of the evidence.
That's what we got for that, people.
Oy, oy, oy, oy, oy.
Now, there's some big stories, big news breaking in the...
Carmelo Anthony case, which we may or may not get to during this live stream, but I'm going to do possibly a car vlog to cover it because we're going to talk about some Canadian stuff today.
We've got someone who is going to remain anonymous because I don't even know what I can identify by way of information.
His Twitter handle is TheRemanded, and he's been doing a lot of election coverage, corruption coverage out of Canada.
Specifically, everybody's saying, Viva, you've got to see what's going on in British Columbia.
They use Dominion voting machines and they've been futzing around with the elections.
I think we need to put on blast the outrageous, egregious level of corruption that's going on in Canada right now.
And so you might see only a pulsating avatar of an individual and you'll hear a voice.
The Remanded on Twitter, well worth the follow, and has been doing amazing news to cover what is going on in Canada and shed some light on it.
The Remanded, if you can hear me.
Oh, hold on a second.
Before you come in.
Before you come in.
Actually, before I forget.
I almost forget to do the second sponsor of the show.
And it would be terrible of me because the second sponsor of the show is none other than Rumble Premium.
People, if you can, get Rumble Premium.
If you can't, just continue watching, snipping, clipping, sharing away, and supporting the channel.
Why? Because free speech is under attack and Rumble refuses to back down.
We've always believed in empowering voices, no matter how unpopular, and now we're taking that fight to the next level.
When major advertisers conspired to pull their dollars from Rumble, even so-called American brands like Dunkin' Donuts took back their money, said, we don't want to advertise there because it's too much of a right-wing culture.
Cowards! And we're going to get into political cowardice today as we talk about the elections in Canada.
Rumble is not here to fit the mold.
We are here to defend freedom of expression.
To strengthen that mission, we're excited to offer Rumble Premium, completely ad-free experience with exclusive benefits for viewers and creators.
You'll find exclusive content from creators like Russell Brand, TimCast, MugClub, Crowder, and myself as well.
One day we're going to get to it sooner than later.
It's more than a subscription.
It is a stand for free speech against censorship and supporting the companies that respect you as creators and consumers.
Get Rumble Premium for a limited time.
You get $10 off the annual plan with code VIVA10.
So go to rumble.com forward slash premium forward slash VIVA10.
Get your discount today.
Together we can and will turn the tide and we will make free speech cool again, popular again, and profitable again.
And with that said, peeps...
Let's welcome our guest if he's going to...
Don't disable your camera, Remanded, but do whatever you want to do to bring in the audio and video for whatever your avatar is going to be.
Whenever you're ready.
Can you hear me?
I can hear you now.
Oh, wow.
That was a scramble.
Well, so we don't have an avatar.
I'm going to bring up your avatar from Twitter as the video that I'll share while we do this so I can do it like this.
Okay. This way, maybe if I go like this.
No, that won't work.
Like this.
Like this.
How do I get this one so that I'm on the outside?
I'll remand it.
Okay, I'm just going to go like this.
For those who don't know who you are, go ahead and explain who you are, what you're up to.
I mean, yeah, just kind of an average Canadian out in BC.
I got three kids, a couple Huskies.
Carpenter by trade, custom homes, but now I'm a stay-at-home father.
And yeah, I just kind of got into X last year and kind of gotten into with Canadian spaces and community.
And just one night we were doing the BC election and we saw some stuff.
So that kind of pitched, that's what basically took off my last five months of living, the BC election.
Well, okay, so BC, British Columbia, this is the provincial election.
Who was running in that election?
That would be David Abbey, John Rothstad, Sonia, I can't remember her last name, and a couple of other independents and the typical parties.
I think Communist Party, libertarians, and limited independent, I think.
We do make the joke that British Columbia is like, you know, more left than San Francisco and Portland, Oregon.
So it does go, this is a...
This is a provincial election, so you have your typical parties.
Who always wins or who typically wins in British Columbia?
It's been the NDP for a bit with the small, with the two or three seats from the Greens that kind of give them their majority.
Okay. NDP, New Democrat Party, for those of you who don't know, left-er than the Liberals.
I mean, people were trying to get me to focus on what was going on in the British Columbia election, and I didn't know enough to even get into it at the time, and I didn't want to be wrong about anything.
I know what you've been reporting on it.
I mean, let's start from the beginning of the elections.
What systems do you use at the provincial level in British Columbia?
They just introduced the electronic tabulators.
So those would have been the Dominion voting systems that they rented from Ontario.
So I know a lot of people get the lingo wrong.
They think it's like Dominion voting machines, but they're actually the tabulators, so they actually feed in ballots as per the ones in the states you see.
It's the actual machines where you can press on a screen or whatnot, where there may not be an actual physical ballot used.
Okay. Physical ballots.
So is there a paper trail for this, or is it...
Digital the way we saw during the 2020 election.
Yeah, so you got a paper.
You got what they call to be the gold standard.
You pencil it in.
But then you pencil in the mark and then you put your ballot through and it counts it.
But I mean, there's also...
They introduced province-wide voting.
So basically you could vote anywhere.
And so there was this extra effort.
Like if you're in Prince George, but you lived in...
Vancouver, you could vote in Prince George and it would count.
So there's this fuss to get votes from the entire province, no matter where you were counted.
Okay. So now explain to us, I mean, I'm showing some screen grabs as we're talking here, but explain to us what the controversy was with the alleged corruption during the British Columbia election.
Because there was a massive delay between the election night and the final tally of the vote.
Am I not mistaken?
Yeah, I mean, there's always been a delay.
I think the last election, I think it was 21 or so days before they could do the final counts.
I mean, due to COVID, they had over 700,000 mail-in ballots in that election.
This one, we still do not know, which just goes into all of the points that are in the report.
It's hard to go through it because there's so many stages.
There's advanced voting, there's election day, and then there's initial count, which is like six days of just election day counting.
And then they have an extra two days, the 26th and 28th and October, that is basically everything that came in prior to election night.
And that's the final count.
So most people in BC will probably be upset about the fact that they...
They kept changing the number of mail-in ballots throughout the initial count from the 19th to the 26th.
It went from, I think, 45,000 to 49,000 to 65,000.
It ended up being 66,074.
And then after poking the bear at elections BC, that number reduced again by like 202.
So it never really settled for the average Canadian.
Okay. If you're dealing with an internet with a short attention span, what was the corruption?
What happened during the election that was scandalous?
It started off with a DDoS attack.
We were on a space and someone was like, oh, there was a DDoS.
I'm like, oh, really?
So we looked at the results page and the results page was missing 5,488 votes.
So the nine categories on the results page was missing votes.
And so I was like, well, that's really weird.
And so this guy actually did a ping on the Elections BC website, and it showed it was maxed out.
It was like 10,000 MS, whatever that means, a DDoS attack coming out from Virginia and three other locations.
And so it just kind of continued from there.
At 12.01, there was a massive deduction in the green vote.
Reduced by 2,063 votes.
And then, yeah.
And so the idea, these are the results, correct, of the most recent election?
Yep. And so this is surprisingly close.
Was this substantially closer than, say, the last provincial election?
I don't know when it was.
Oh, yeah.
And so now the idea here is that potentially if there's a reduction in the Green Party, it's to add it, it's to...
potentially swap it over or include it in the NDP so that they can eke out a very small majority over the Conservative Party, which it's a massive rise.
I want to just see what it was before, but that is the conspiracy or at least the concern.
Yeah, because when we were going through the...
News election, the media election coverages, we could actually see where those votes ended up getting allocated to.
So they deducted 2,063 votes from the Greens.
The NDP got 362, I think.
The Conservatives got 52. And there was some change for the Independents.
And so I never got a clear, detailed, and concise number to where that error actually got allocated from.
And then it just snowballed from there.
They put an announcement saying that they were going to be counting for the next hour from 1210 to 110 in 16 ridings.
They didn't end up doing that.
They then had the next day edit.
They edited that post saying, oh, we were only counting in three ridings.
But after tracking all the votes, they ended up only counting in one, and we don't know where 500 votes went.
Okay. Okay, so what happened?
I know, it's a lot.
Well, no, the question is, who was reporting on this, who was documenting this, and what is any official response to these anomalies?
The typical response we got was quality assurance and preliminary results.
And that was kind of it.
You know, you wait for the statement of vote, which is, we're still waiting.
They've moved that published date.
I think four times just by calling them mid-February, spring, end of March, and then it became indefinite.
So we'll never know when that is.
And so through all of the references, so everything in my report has a reference to it.
And every reference is from Elections BC Media.
Or correspondence with Elections BC.
So none of it is made up because you can see the screenshots, you can see the calculations.
Everything has a reference, a description.
It's all there.
What was the outcome of all of this?
The outcome is that there's a lot of irregularities that we can't actually finalize because...
They will not give us the total registration number, they will not give us the total mail-in ballots, and they will not give us the total rejected ballot count.
And so those are three substantial things, because the one thing that got highlighted when you said you would get in contact was the 376,000...
Sorry, I want to be accurate because they use a lot of estimates, roughly approximates.
376,029 vote difference between...
B.C. Elections, sorry, Elections B.C. and Elections Canada.
And so because we don't know the full registration, we can't see all 93 ridings and where the registration discrepancies are.
When we look at Point Grey, which is David Eby's riding, they changed the boundaries in I think it was like 42 Okay,
and... Well, I guess the question is this.
This sounds like some of the chicanery that was alleged accused to have been done in the States.
So where does it stand now?
Because right now you see a bunch of unanswered questions, information not being provided.
Is anybody doing the ATIPS or the Canadian equivalent of FOIAs to get this information?
We do have FOIAs, but...
I mean, it comes at a cost, and it comes at, you know, putting your name out there and hoping that you're not going to be targeted.
I mean, that's kind of the thing.
We've been trying to find a lawyer to handle them.
I think we have about 12 to 15 FOIAs that we can put forth.
But with the information that we have with transcribing the election, I mean, it should be enough on itself in order to warrant an independent investigation, which is what John Rustad had pitched back in December.
And then David Aves said that, you know, we'll just have an inside review, which never came to fruition.
For people who don't know who these names are, who are these players at the provincial level?
David Eby is now the premier of BC. David Rostad is the official opposition within the BC Conservatives.
I can understand the ambivalence from the...
The majority party, but is the conservative party pushing hard for this, or do they seem suspiciously uninterested?
Suspiciously uninterested.
I did have contact with one.
They gave me an ultimatum.
I didn't like the ultimatum.
What does that mean, an ultimatum?
It's either you dox yourself in hopes that they actually do something.
I don't see the benefit of that.
The report is done.
Just look at the report.
Spend five minutes, read my short summary.
I made an audio version, if you're not good at reading.
And then the full 300-page report, which everything there is there.
You don't need me to...
Why do you need my identity for it?
It's all there, and it's all from Elections BC, media, and correspondence.
I'm just trying to understand this.
I don't think people are going to appreciate this.
The Conservatives gained 44 seats in the 2025 election.
They had zero in the previous election?
I think it was like three, I think.
It was either zero or three.
It was liberal NDP dominated.
This election, they shoot up to 44, virtually the majority, unheard of.
By all accounts, there's some severe chicanery going on, and they're not fighting tooth and nail to get to the bottom of what people believe to be some corruption in this election cycle.
Exactly. I mean, one of the things...
So we were on top of this.
I was auditing there.
I did two complete audits of all 93 riotings.
And I think it was like November 1st or...
I think it was November 4th.
They ended up coming up with this order.
It was like this judge order on the results page.
And they're like, oh, we authorized this order.
I'm like, I'm in Ikea.
And I'm like, what is this order?
Like, what is this announcement?
And they just gave a number.
It was like order 1234-2024.
And there was no description on it.
So because I did an audit before, within five minutes within my phone, I looked at it and I was like, oh, wow, they found 748 votes.
And so I put that on the post and let the people know.
It's just like, hey, this is what this means.
748 votes.
When the election finished on the 28th, the Lieutenant Governor General put out a tweet saying, I talked with Elections BC and David Eby, and I basically approve or certify the election.
But the final result didn't come to an hour, about an hour and 27 minutes after she made that post.
So that, I mean, that's kind of weird.
And the results were short 3,464 votes.
So there's 3,464 votes in error.
Where are they?
And then that's where that order came in.
They found a box in Prince George that was 861 votes.
We had two boxes in Juan de Fuca that were in quarantine, which had the same labeling that the one in McKenzie did.
They didn't know exactly how many ballots were in error.
There's like estimated 2,500.
No, it was 2,577.
Why do I know that?
Because we tracked it.
And then they lumped in that these 2,500.
They said that these 2,500 ballots were omitted.
I was like, oh, that doesn't make any sense because your rejected ballot count is included in that.
You don't omit rejected ballots.
That makes no sense.
So here's a statistic for people to jump on.
In 96 years BC, general election has never had such a low reject ballot count.
The first time that happened was actually the first general election back in 1928.
3,259 rejected ballots.
That was the lowest ever reject ballot count.
This election, 1,820.
So it cut it in half.
It makes no sense because we were on a five-election cycle to average about 12,000 ballots to be rejected.
Last election was actually higher by 3,000 votes.
And the reason why that's kind of important is because when we look at Ontario, who has electronic tabulators, they never had the same drop in the rate of rejected ballots.
And so you try to compare things and say, you know, where's the discrepancy?
Not from when they started tracking elections back in 1996.
And I went through every single one.
Not a single riding since 1996 had we had less than 34 rejected ballots.
But in this election, we had 7 with 0 and over 70 under 34 rejected ballots.
It's just these statistical anomalies where it just makes no sense.
And so one of the things that I think that they're holding out on giving the registration total, the mail-in ballot total, and the rejected total, is that they can't come up with more ballots because they've already stated how many people participated.
So once they let that out, contact me.
We got you.
It's actually, I mean, it's mildly fascinating.
If geographically limited and not necessarily, I say, of broader appeal, there is a paper trail despite the fact that it's Dominion voting machines.
Correct. So that gets us into, and our American listeners will know what cast vote record is.
This is the whole, I think, Mike Lindell story where he got into trouble, saying that everybody should go out and request the CVR, the cast vote record.
So a lot of the American integrity accounts, one, Mad Liberals, hat to you, helped me or helped guide me through this election integrity process.
The Canadian elections don't have as much public oversight as the American ones, where they actually offer up the cast vote record.
What is the cast vote record?
It is a timestamp.
It is all of the digital information that comes off you processing your ballot.
What batch was it in?
When was it scanned?
All of that information they did not use.
They zeroed out the tabulators at initial count and final count, and they did not retain the digital data.
Full stop.
You can't audit the election now because you have no clue what those tabulators...
What they read, what they said.
And so when you look at Dominion Voting Systems' website, they have in there specifically to use the CVR as an election integrity and transparency tool.
So if you were to manually input a ballot or a number...
You would be flagged.
There would be an alert warning sign telling you where these ballots were entered into the system, what writing, and what tabulator.
They deleted it.
They admitted it.
We have the receipts.
That's a problem.
Asking the stupid question now.
What is the next step?
Nobody seems to be talking about it anymore.
The big issue at the time...
Was that they were saying, we might not know the results for a few weeks up to like, I don't know, what did CBC say at some point?
Like, we might not know for a month, give or take.
It seems that everybody's moved on and that nobody's doing anything about this.
I mean, not to point the finger or not to impose the obligation.
Who's doing what and what is there to be done?
Yeah. I mean, that's the thing.
I sent the email out to 92 of the 93 MLAs, independents, those that didn't get elected, and I gave them the information.
I said, here's the report, get back to me.
One did, said it was too long to read, don't have the time, go talk to the board of directors.
I'm like, okay.
I sent them an email, nothing back.
I mean, that's pretty much it.
I mean, aside from people just following up with their MLA, I'm not sure how a court proceeding would work.
We kind of got to look into it, but we need a candidate or an MLA to step up to the plate here and kind of do what's right.
Because from what we've brought forth or found, That's a problem.
Remanded, without asking you to disclose yourself, where can people go to look at the work you've done?
It's going to be of specific interest to British Columbia-ins, Canadians in general, and to a lesser degree, the international community.
Nobody's talking about it, but where can people go see the work that you've done with their own eyes?
At the Remanded.
On X, I did have to unfortunately drop my links.
And in my report, due to literally the last 15 hours, someone's trying to make money off of it, so I had to put a stop to that.
We'll see where that goes.
What do you mean by that?
I don't even know if I should say anything.
There's... Let's just say that there's a non-profit organization that's looking to profit off of our five months of work.
When I say our five months, it is me and a group of three other dedicated Canadians who helped bring this together.
I've requested them to not make a campaign out of it and fundraise off of our hard work without credit.
It's up to them to do the right thing and let us...
Handle what we've put together.
I haven't had a weekend off since October.
I worked through it through Christmas, through everything.
If they are listening, which I'm sure they are, just a little bit of respect and let us do the diligence from the hard work we've put together.
I remember people at the time saying, Viva, you've got to look into this and there's only so much time in the day and so much utility I can be.
It's interesting.
It sounds like...
It sounds like they did the long count.
Find the ballots.
Reduce the number of disqualified ballots so you can make up where you need and eke out.
Let me bring up the results again, which I didn't realize how monumental they were because of where it was at before.
Here, BC votes.
Where you're dealing with 2 million votes and it's 33,000 difference between the respective majorities.
It's still a minority government.
Although minority now...
Did the Green Party and the New Democrat...
Yeah. They made a pact because they needed one person to go to be Speaker.
And so they needed an agreement with the Greens.
It is worthy to note that there is a judicial declaration up in the air.
I believe they just had a judge put to their case.
This was over, I think it was Suri Guilford, where there was a discrepancy of...
21 votes.
Then they found 14 or something ballots that were, I'm doing air quotes, in error.
So that writing is actually in dispute.
And there are contradicting statements that we actually found from...
Anton Bobin, the CEO of Elections BC, that he made under the House of Commons Procedures and Affairs, stating that they do not do group mail-in ballots and they do not send them out to people.
But his testimony there as a witness contradicts the statements he made back in 2024.
Remanded, I will thank you for the good work that you're doing, the fine work that you're doing.
I just say at some point...
You might have to reveal your identity.
Not even for the greater good, but for the pursuing of your cause.
So, at The Remanded on Twitter.
Everyone's got the link now.
At The Remanded.
Before I forget to ask, what's the name mean?
Remanded. Well, The Remanded at the time.
Well, you know what?
I just want to give a shout out to you.
You're on our team.
Not to be like a big...
You know, fanboy thing.
You're on my TV screen during the convoy.
Every morning was a Viva Frey morning.
So since the convoy and get involved in it, I'd always thought about bringing it back to the people, bringing it back to the lower courts.
And so that was kind of like the remanded, you know, kind of got somewhat connects to that.
Some people are saying you have to come forward.
Others are saying, I was lucky enough when I went to Ottawa not to have a boss so nobody could fire me.
It would be very tough to cancel, but not everybody has that luxury or that good fortune.
You do what you have to do, Remanda, but keep up the good work.
I'll be following it because now I'm following you and you're doing amazing stuff.
Keep it up and we'll be in touch.
If ever you want to come back on and show your face, you've got an open invitation.
Awesome. Thank you very much.
All right, man.
Have a good one.
All right, people.
Before we get to our next guest, we're going to bounce back and forth between Canada and the U.S. because I'm not going to not talk about this.
I've started not looking into it, but there's a scandal a-brewing.
On Sunday night, which we had on the Monday afternoon with Robert Barnes, and I posted the clip of our highlight discussing Tim Pool raising the self-defense argument to Carmelo Anthony.
You all know the facts.
It's a horrendous story that nobody likes talking about.
I hate reading about.
It's violence and tragedy from beginning to end.
There will never be justice.
Someone can be sentenced to jail for the rest of their lives.
There will never be justice.
Carmelo Anthony is a track meet, an altercation, which we don't yet know the details of, but there's some details fleshed out in the police report.
Ends up stabbing another Athlete in the chest once because the athlete put his hand on him.
There's a racial dynamic to it because the victim is white, the accused is black, and the racial element of this has been exploited and amplified.
I won't say unfairly, predictably, but potentially not necessarily relevant.
Because there's a black and a white involved in an incident doesn't mean that race is a factor.
Sometimes it does mean that race is a factor.
The police report of the incident, if you take it at face value, certainly doesn't attenuate but rather puts a bit of a damper potentially on an argument of self-defense depending on how you read it.
That doesn't mean that there is no argument for self-defense.
It doesn't mean that the police report is the only side of the story.
There seems to be evidence that has not yet been disclosed by way of cell phone footage.
Apparently a number of the witnesses might have had video evidence on their phones.
But it is a horrendous tragedy in which a racial element is being amplified on social media and amplified in fundraising.
I'm going to get to that in a second.
There's also a bit of an issue that it would seem that the funds raised, which ostensibly were to be raised for the full-throated defense that everyone is entitled to constitutionally, have now been appropriated and are being used, apparently, to buy a new home for the family of the accused.
Individual. Starting with first things first, the police report.
Now, it's not because I have my own opinion on this that I'm going to abandon principle.
Innocent until proven guilty, due process, although you can come to your own personal opinion based on the facts as you appreciate them, and you don't have to apologize for that.
I say innocent until proven guilty, and everyone's got the constitutional right to a robust defense, but reading the police report, and I've read through it now, It doesn't sound like it was bona fide self-defense or at least serious fear for bodily harm warranting the use of potentially lethal force.
There's one specific section from the police report which I felt the need to highlight, and we'll read through it before we get into the second scandalous part of the story.
Here, I want to start from a full sentence.
Anthony was from Centennial High School and was sitting under the Memorial High School tent.
Austin... Anthony's the accused.
Austin is the victim.
Told Anthony that he needed to move out from under their team's tent, and Anthony grabbed his bag.
This is Carmelo Anthony.
Grabbed his bag, opened it, and reached inside, and proceeded to tell Austin, quote, touch me and see what happens, end quote.
This is a police report from one of the responding police officers.
No one really thought Anthony really had any weapons in his bag, and Austin proceeded to touch Anthony.
To touch Anthony, and then Anthony told Austin, this is the accused telling the victim to punch him and see what happens.
Punch me, see what happens.
A short time later, Austin grabbed Anthony to tell him to move, and Anthony pulled out what the witness redacted, recalled as a black knife, and stabbed Austin once in the chest and then ran away.
Austin began grabbing his chest and telling everyone to get help.
The witness advised he did not know Anthony's name, but stated another Memorial track member, another witness, minor, I believe, EP, was friends with Anthony and he could identify Anthony.
The witness described Anthony as a black male, skinny with possible goatee, short puffy hair, wearing a centennial high school clothing.
This concluded my contact with the witness.
I then instructed the crime scene, Yeti, Yeti.
Some people are going to read this, and depending on what you're...
The predetermined notion is, he says, touch me, see what happens.
That's provocation.
That's not self-defense.
Others are going to say it can be read in a sense of self-defense.
I personally believe this sounds exactly what it sounds like.
Someone who knew he had a knife and was looking for trouble, whether or not he wanted to kill the individual.
One stab wound to the chest and he bled out, presumably because it severed his aortal artery.
Horrendous, atrocious tragedy.
But my inkling right now is it doesn't sound like it was self-defense.
I can understand how someone who wants to steelman it or would argue that position will say, I told him not to touch me.
I was scared.
I said, see what happens.
Yada, yada, yada.
Fine. But it doesn't look good.
It doesn't sound good.
And what the family's doing now makes it sound even worse.
There is no shade that I am giving to Give, Send, Go full stop.
They do their due diligence.
They do their verifications when anyone opens up a new campaign.
They are fair, principled, and they do their job as a crowdfunding platform properly.
Unlike that crappy alternative, go F me, Give, Send, Go will not take down the defense fund for someone simply because it's a violent crime.
People are drawing analogies, which they may or may not prove to be analogous between Kyle Rittenhouse.
Some people said he showed up with a gun and he shot three people, three innocent people who happened to be, not that it matters, but convicted sex offenders and who were trying to beat him to death with a skateboard and who said they wanted to kill him, yada yada.
That only came out after evidence was fleshed out.
The narrative at the time was that a kid, 17-year-old, crossed state lines with a firearm, showed up to a protest and used that firearm to kill three innocent people.
And go F me, took down that fundraiser or didn't even allow him to build one up.
Forget exactly how it worked at the time.
Not analogous in my view, because I don't think there's the same level of innocence here, but the evidence is not yet out, so I may prove to be wrong.
But Give, Send, Go allows the accused, even of violent crimes, to raise funds for their own defense.
The question is going to be, what were these funds raised for?
The Give, Send, Go for Carmelo.
And I can appreciate that people see a racial element in this and that it absolutely enrages them because he's raised $434,000 for what?
We don't know.
I was under the impression it was for his legal defense, for his bond.
His bond, which was reduced to $150,000, which leaves net profit of $280,000 and change.
What do you do with that money?
Defense? It seems the family's buying a new home.
We'll get to it.
This is the give, send, go description as set up by the family.
It says, help Carmelo official fund.
Now, I'm being a bit of a lawyer here and I'm going to wordsmith.
Because it says, help Carmelo.
Does that mean help Carmelo's family?
Some people might steal that and say, yeah, well, you know, we need to help his family.
By helping his family, you're helping Carmelo.
Carmelo's going to have a nice, safe new home behind the gated community.
I'm not joking.
That's exactly what the irrational is.
So it says, help Carmelo fund.
The official fund.
This is the official support fund.
What does that mean?
I don't know.
For Carmelo and his family during this challenging and difficult time.
The narrative being spread is false, unjust, and harmful.
As a family of faith, we are deeply grateful for all your support during this trying period.
Your prayers and assistance mean more to us now more than ever.
The Anthony family.
As far as I can tell, there's no more specific description as to what the funds are going to be used for.
You get the updates.
I don't want to follow for updates, and I don't want to participate in this.
I just have to highlight, I don't know if we're still going to get to the one that I saw earlier.
You have to read some of these comments.
Anonymous Giver says, It is a new time and a new day.
Others keep your hands and comments to yourself.
We die by your hands like dogs in the streets.
Nothing happens.
Remember, it's a new day.
That sounds like a threat.
There was one in particular that I wanted to...
Here we go.
Barbara, $10, says, When I was Carmelo's age, I would have had to get up and not say a word.
God bless this young man.
There's no shade on give, send, go.
They're doing what they have principles.
They're doing what they think is the righteous thing to do, which is allow even an accused of a violent crime to raise funds for his or her defense.
These comments highlight what many people believe to be the racial element of this.
On the one hand, you get a certain section of Twitter that views this as another example of black-on-white violence.
You have these accounts that post nothing but Videos of violent incidents at high school and they always post a video of a black kid doing it to a white kid and yada, yada, yada.
The flip side on the left is you now have people quite literally saying a new day and age.
When I was a kid, I would have had to have gotten up as if this is a Rosa Parks type incident.
I would have had to have gotten up and given up my seat and not said a word.
Now we get to stab you in the chest.
Now we get to kill you.
Now the defense is not even that it's self-defense.
Now the defense is that it's a righteous killing, like with Luigi Mangione.
You scroll through that, and you see some of these comments, and you will lose a little bit of faith in humanity.
Because whether or not Anthony Carmelo is entitled to a robust defense, people are viewing this now as a warning.
Hey, back in the day...
We would have to, you know, analogizing it to the bus.
We would have to sit in the back of the bus or do what Whitey tells us.
Now, it's a new day.
God bless this young man for stabbing an athlete in the chest for no better reason, even if he did put his hands on him.
Can you imagine living in a world where, don't touch me.
Stab in the chest.
I was scared.
I said, don't touch me.
He touched me.
I stabbed him.
Self-defense.
But get to the real scandalous part of this.
And it's the news that's breaking today.
Apparently, they're using the money to buy a home.
This is from The Sun, and it's worth taking with a grain of salt.
We'll see if the details prove to be true.
The Sun in the headline says, sent home.
Family of, quote, killer, end quote, Carmelo Anthony.
To buy new house and security with donated $430,000 as he's freed in Austin Metcalf murder.
The mom of the slain teen cried in court when Anthony's bond was reduced.
They reduced his bond.
He was up there in first degree murder with a million dollar bond.
They reduced it to a quarter of a million, but I think they reduced it even more.
I'm going to read this here.
Carmelo Anthony walked out of jail silently surrounded by his family on Monday, who posted his $250,000 bond after a judge agreed to lower it to one.
Lower it from $1 million.
Unless I'm mistaken, I may or may not be right about this.
I think I am right.
The $250,000 bond, I believe they can get...
They have to post 10% of the amount of the bond in order to get a bonding agency to post the other quarter of a million.
And Cryptis, if you could double check that in real time to see if it's the case in this situation.
Sometimes you have to post the entire amount.
Sometimes you can get a bonding company if you put up a certain percentage.
And typically, I think it's 10%.
So hypothetically, it's conceivable.
That the family put up $25,000 to get him released on $250,000 bond and now they've got $434,000 less $25,000 or whatever the bond was to go buy a new house and get security, etc, etc.
The whole story is a freaking tragedy.
It makes me sick.
I hate these stories.
I don't like talking about them.
I don't like covering them.
Anthony is charged with fatally stabbing Austin Metcalf.
He is now on house arrest, where he'll be required to wear an ankle monitor and stay inside his parents' new home.
Over $420,000 has been donated to Anthony's family in an online fundraiser for the alleged killer after he reportedly faced racist threats following Metcalf's murder.
How about he faced outrage?
Forget whether it's racist.
When you're accused of killing somebody...
A high school kid for a stupid-ass altercation because you brought a knife to a track meet for whatever the reason.
During the judge's ruling on Monday, prosecutors asked Anthony's dad why he couldn't use the donated money to pay the original bond.
Andrew Anthony responded that the money was going to be used for his son's legal defense.
Okay, interesting.
He also said the cash will be used for a security to protect Anthony after he reportedly received racist threats since the stabbing.
Andrew also said the family plans to move into a new house.
For extra safety.
So it'll go for the defense, it'll go for security, and it's going to go for a new house.
In which order?
Who the hell knows?
We didn't specify in our give, send, go description.
Defense attorneys insisted the money raised online, quote, is not a bond fund, end quote, and that the family needs funds to get by because Anthony's dad is currently on leave from his job.
Family needs people to survive, defense attorney Mike Howard said, according to Fox Affiliate.
There's been tremendous amount of pressure.
I think at this point, living in a gated community, given everything for the safety of their younger children, is very warranted.
Security details and criminal defense are not cheap.
Megan Metcalf, Austin's mom, put her head down and cried when the judge ruled to reduce Anthony's bond.
Anthony's lawyers originally asked to reduce his bond to $150,000, saying a million was too high because the teen had never been in trouble before.
Self-defense. While prosecutors have charged Anthony with first-degree murder, the alleged killer is insisting he stabbed Metcalf in self-defense.
Anthony took out the knife, stabbed him in the chest in a fight, in the stance, April 2. Thank you.
So, on that, it looks like that in Texas, they do have bondsmen, and typically they allow 10 to 20% of the total bail amount.
I can't find anything about the specific percentage if there was any.
It's good enough.
I mean, I'll find it in the chat.
Let's say 10-20%.
And then the report, according to the report, Anthony told school officials that Metcalfe put his hands on him.
When cops referred to Anthony as the alleged suspect, Anthony said, I'm not alleged, I did it.
Now people say, well, he admits to first agreement.
No, he admits to stabbing Metcalfe.
And the question is going to be whether or not there's any plausible argument to self-defense.
He put his hands on me so I get to stab him.
Witnesses said Anthony told Metcalf, touch me and see what happens after Metcalf told him to leave his seat.
Leaving jail, I don't care for the rest of this.
And the question is going to be, does this smell like fraud or not?
During the hearing, prosecutors argued the murder was not justified.
For reasons unknown, the defendant brought a knife to a track meet for what probably could have been his fist fight at worst, he said.
Prosecutors said Anthony was involved in another altercation in school on February 4. Well, we'll see what the...
Backstory to this is as of Tuesday, the fundraiser raised $430,000.
It has sparked outrage online as many people as people demand the donation be taken down in respect of Metcalf's family.
And that's the story.
So whether or not you don't take it down, you need platforms like Give, Send, Go, because even if it is a bad faith defense, even if someone is guilty.
The prosecutor, the Crown in Canada, must prove the elements beyond a reasonable doubt.
It's the actus reus, the mens rea, not just that he stabbed him, but that he stabbed him with the intent to cause bodily harm in the absence of a legal justification of self-defense or whatever.
But the question really is going to be, is this now getting close to fraudulent inducements, fraudulent misrepresentations on a fundraising platform where many people...
Or probably going to say, I don't care what the hell they do with the money.
I want to stick a middle finger to white America.
Or others are going to say, no, I gave it for the defense, not so that they can go buy a half a million dollar house in a gated community.
And then who knows?
Kids of minor gets a slap on the wrist.
They get a new home out of this.
We'll see.
Following the story, that's the latest.
It's shocking.
All right, now we're going to get into back to Canada.
Election Canada.
And while we have a member of our locals community, R.B. Ham, he'll tell us his real name.
I'm always afraid to tell people their real name, even though he was on Jimmy Dore and I know his real name.
I wanted to just segue this with a little bit of Mark the Carnage Carney.
This is him speaking French, or as I like to say, satanic mantras.
But listen to what he's saying here.
Yeah, there we go.
Listen to this one.
He actually posts this.
I thought this was a Mark J. Carney's ego parody account.
I've been managing crises my entire life.
you.
I've had the good fortune of being able to work in a very close relationship with Mr. Flaherty.
He was a very fine finance minister for, I believe, Jean Chrétien, a liberal.
I worked with the former prime minister, Jean Charest, for example, because he doesn't know what to say.
It's like a fill in the blank.
There was a big scandal, a big crisis in...
An element of the financial markets.
Listen to this.
Asset-backed commercial paper.
It was a huge problem.
And I fixed it.
I fixed a huge problem of the Jean Chrétien government.
Jean Chrétien, for those of you who don't know, a liberal.
Mark Carney has been putting out liberal crises his entire life.
Even if you take him at his word for it, this is a man who has spent his career...
Putting out liberal crises.
Problems the liberals have created, they call in the wolf, and the wolf comes in and fixes the problem.
And Canadians seem to be too stupid to understand what the problem is, is that you hire a bunch or elect a bunch of liberal idiots who screw things up.
And hey, bring in Mark Carney to clean up the liberal mess.
Bring in Mark Carney to clean up Justin Trudeau.
Corruption, scandals, mess of Canada, even though Mark Carney was advising Justin Trudeau for the last five years.
So it's an amazing thing.
Elect Mark Carney so that he can handle the crises created by his own filthy, disgusting, corrupt, moronic, stupid, political, liberal party.
With that said, R.B. Hamm is running for the People's Party of Canada.
I have extended an invitation to everyone and anyone in the Conservative Party.
I've had on Roman Baber back in the day.
I have had on Eric Duhem.
Who is the Conservative leader of Quebec?
And if you thought the Conservative Party of Canada was left-leaning, well, the Conservative Party of Quebec is, by American standards, very left-leaning, but Eric Duhem is a very smart, wonderful person who's a great politician.
But Quebec is what it is.
They not only re-elect the tyrant, they give that tyrant more seats, that being François Legault, the sunset thief who locked us all down for two years in a row under curfew, even though there's no scientific explanation for imposing a curfew to combat a virus.
R.B. Ham is running for the People's Party of Canada, and as soon as he's ready to come in and unmute and un-camera Mike, we will bring him in?
I'm here.
Is your camera activated?
Let me see.
It says enable camera, so I click on it.
HD Pro Cam, and it's not coming off.
Is it a plug-in camera?
Yes. So maybe just unplug it and use your laptop.
I don't know if it's...
I don't think I have a laptop camera, but I'll see what I can do.
Curfew is a polite...
Curfew is a way a police state regulates.
The amazing thing is back when they imposed the curfew and they had a...
What was that guy's name?
Harundo? Harundo?
I forget what the guy, the medical officer of Quebec was called.
He said that, yeah, there's no scientific evidence to justify imposing a curfew to combat a virus, but it'll give everyone a reminder as to how serious the situation is when we lock you in your house from 8 to 5. I'm trying to track down where the wire goes to for my plug-in.
But it might be an app issue.
It might not be...
Do you not have a built-in camera on your laptop?
I don't think so.
You have a phone?
Yes. Oh, you've got to download the app onto your phone.
But I'm not on the phone.
I'm on my computer.
Maybe I can assist you real quick.
On your browser that you're in with Rumble, on the address bar on the upper left-hand side, there's going to be a lock or something like that.
If you click on that, you may have to enable permissions for camera.
Okay, camera.
Using now.
Reset permissions.
Okay, camera.
Allow on every visit.
It's allowed.
Now, on the bottom of the screen, next to your mic, this is an email microphone.
Click Enable Camera.
Yeah. And it says HD Pro Webcam, which I've clicked.
And OBS Virtual Camera, which I don't have anyway.
Choose the one you're using.
Oh, so you're actually clicking on the little arrow.
Click just to the left of that arrow.
No, we're getting RB's camera to work here
Um
Hold on.
I can think of a hack here.
Let me see something here.
So that button that says Enable Camera, it's actually two pieces.
There's a little down arrow, and then it has the camera icon with a little crossover.
Make sure you click on the camera where the cross is.
I'm doing that.
Oh, I right-clicked on it, but it doesn't say no.
Left-click, nothing's happening.
Are you on a laptop or a desktop?
Desktop. Should I try refreshing?
No, no.
I'm not sure that that's going to work.
Let me just do one thing here.
I'm going to think of an alternative way to fix this.
Let's go here.
I'm going to send you a StreamYard link.
Could I join on my phone?
Yeah, you can join on your phone.
I think you just might have to download the app on your phone.
I've already got the app on my phone.
Okay, so see if you can...
Yeah, get on your phone.
And then you can use the camera on your phone.
I think so.
Have you tried unplugging it and plugging it back in?
I'm joking.
But while you do that, I actually realize I haven't read the Super Chats all day.
Dammit, Viva, since I can't get you to try my favorite South Carolina-made gin, send me a P.O. box and I'll send you a gift.
It says FreeSC01.
My P.O. box is on the YouTube description.
It's in our Locals community.
I don't know what it is offhand.
Hold on one second.
Let me see if I can't get this.
I'll view my channel.
Now I gotta go to manage.
Oh, here we go.
Here we go.
Okay, the P.O. Box is 9170 Glades Roads.
9170 Glades Road.
P.O. Box 139, Boca Raton, Florida.
33434. Send stuff.
I love getting stuff.
Okay, now you gotta turn off one so we don't hear the echo.
And I'll accept this.
All right.
Okay. The other one.
Yeah, I'm going to kick the other one.
Hold on.
Kick. Looky, looky.
Mr. Ham.
All right, sir.
Better, I say, well, let me finish reading the tip questions.
We got, I'm a Viva fanboy in Proud, and Dan Proud says in Cryptus.
And then we got...
Oh, hold on.
I missed one here.
A DDoS attack can be used to open a door and hack and make alterations to break the system.
This is in respect to the last one.
We got King of Biltong says, if you're looking for some healthy snacks to add to your diet, try our Biltong.
50% protein packed with B12 creatine, iron, zinc.
Much more.
Go to BiltongUSA.com.
Code Viva for 10% off.
And DITW says, raise money for legal defense.
No problem.
However, it is not illegal for someone to profit from crime.
Killers who wrote books in prison.
I think it would have to be a conviction, not an accusation.
Not a charge, but rather a conviction.
And I'm not even sure what the rules are on that.
All right, with that said, Arbiham, very good to meet you, although I feel like I know you already because I've been watching you on Jimmy Dore from a few months ago.
For those who don't know who you are, tell us.
Well, my name is Richard Brent Winteringham.
Excuse me for the little frog in my throat.
Richard Brent Winteringham.
I'm from Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
And I go by RB Ham.
I've been writing under the name RB Ham, blogging under the name RB Ham since around the late 1990s when they first invented computers and they could start blogging.
And so I blogged primarily a left-winger all my life.
On Democratic Underground and stuff, and I wrote a couple blogs.
One was called Truth of Consequences, and the other one was called Beyond the Pale way back.
And then 9-11 happened, and I was one of the very first people to start getting cancelled because, especially on Democratic Underground, I kept bringing up all the anomalies of 9-11, all the weird stuff that was going on.
That started coming out and, you know, just basically saying there's more holes in this official story than there is, you know, that you could fly a 747 through.
And I started getting cancelled and kicked off of some platforms, and I started realizing, oh my god, it's happening.
All the things that, like, William Cooper had said, you know, in his book.
Behold a Pale Horse, which Alex Jones drew a lot of what Bill Cooper was talking about, including Bill Cooper himself predicted 9 /11 was going to happen too, and Alex also.
And so all this weird conspiracy stuff started happening, coming true, and I've been kind of like noticing it.
I'm a pattern recognition specialist, right?
What did you do in life?
Or if I may ask, what did you do for work?
I've always been a truck driver, a dock worker.
I was a janitor for a while.
That's when I got fired.
When I started speaking out against COVID, for instance, I was a janitor at the time and I got fired because I was working in a school.
And so the people all got freaked out because, oh my God, a janitor doesn't believe in the COVID religion and he's going to kill all our kids by not sanitizing properly.
So, you know, all kinds of weird stuff like that.
And so anyway, just getting back, I will quickly wrap it up.
Anyway, I've been a truck driver most of my life, but I've also been an avid reader, a voracious reader, an autodidact.
I got my grade 12 at City Park High School here in Saskatoon.
I went and took a few courses at the U of S and a few courses at the Technical University here.
I never graduated because I was too busy trying to make money.
You know, I was working at the same time, so I never graduated, but I took enough courses and stuff, learned about the university system, found a lot of problems with it.
Like, you know, they try to basically corral you into an ideology.
They teach you how to think, what to think, not how to think, and all that stuff.
And I had a big fight with my geology professor.
At the time, it was not accepted theory.
I'm an old guy.
At the time, it was not accepted theory that an asteroid killed the dinosaurs.
And I was saying, that's obvious what happened, you know, because other writers like Velikovsky were talking about cataclysmic changes, not, you know, anyway.
So I kind of got into an argument with my geology professor.
But anyway, to go along with that, so I kept working along.
And in 2000, and then, of course, after 9-11, I started...
That kind of woke me up to what was really going on in this world, and it took me down other rabbit holes, and I started just thinking differently, right?
Like, I started realizing how false flag attacks and psychological operations, writ large, are used against the population to control us.
And I'd read Edward Bernays' book, of course, Propaganda, the most famous one, the father of public relations, the nephew of Sigmund Freud, Edward Bernays.
It was celebrated for his ability to coerce the public into accepting advertising trends.
Like, he famously got women to smoke because he made it cool, right?
Stuff like that.
Along comes COVID, and I had done a lot of reading about this beforehand, and they tried to scare us the heck out of us.
You know, the Zika virus, remember?
The first SARS outbreak in Toronto.
You know, avian flu is going to kill everybody.
And every year they had a different cover on Time magazine trying to panic people.
They were conditioning us for this.
And, of course, they'd run the Rockefeller Institute's Operation Lockstep in 2010.
That was very eye-awakening.
And when I read that, they're planning for a pandemic.
How do they know a pandemic's going to come?
2017, they did the SPARS pandemic scenario.
John Hopkins University for Health Security, the Center for Health Security, ran the SPARS pandemic.
Look it up, S-P-A-R-S, pandemic.
They have a whole PDF.
You can download it, and it takes you through what they would do.
During a pandemic to, you know, control the situation, of course, and censorship's big, big, big time on that and how to make people follow orders.
And then, of course, they had Event 201 in 2019 in October.
That really made me, what the heck is going on here?
Because I watched it live when it was happening.
A month later, we get all these crazy videos coming from China, people dropping over dead.
And I'm going, wait a minute, nothing gets out of China that the government doesn't let get out of China.
So this is another coercion technique, you know, psychological operation.
And then all of a sudden, it was here, right?
This horrible thing.
The Royal College of London put out this computer model that millions would die.
And Dr. Tedros of the World Health Organization said that the infection fatality rate could be as much as 3.5%, and everybody ran with it.
Meanwhile, Dr. Fauci put out a paper.
Put out a paper saying that the infection fatality rate shouldn't be that much worse than the flu and we can handle it because I guess he didn't get the memo at the time.
Chris Witte in England, Chris Witte, their chief public health officer, when it first happened, put out a statement saying this isn't going to be a big deal.
This SARS-CoV-2 is no worse than the influenza.
So they didn't get the memo then, but then they changed.
Remember famously Fauci started saying that masks weren't effective and all that when he did his first interview and then all of a sudden he changed his mind.
So then they got the memo.
But anyway, so I could see what was happening.
So I started protesting very early on because I knew it was coming, right?
I knew the lockdowns, the mandates, and I knew also that they were going to eventually push the vaccine.
Vaccine mandate, either you lose your job or you get vaccinated, that sort of thing.
I knew it was coming.
So I started protesting early on.
Didn't get my first ticket until December of that year in 2000.
And then they did this.
Lockdown order here in Saskatchewan where you couldn't meet with anybody in public unless there was less than five people, right?
So me and my friend Mark Friesen, who I'd met during the protests, he was a right winger.
Mark Friesen, the grizzly patriot, famous conservative libertarian up here.
He was involved with the Yellow Vest movement, you know, the oil and gas, you know, people.
We met, we talked and said, hey, I'm a left-winger, you're a right-winger, but we agree on so many things.
Let's join forces.
Let's cross.
This is a class thing.
This has nothing to do with left or right anymore.
That paradigm's destroyed.
This is about right and wrong.
So we went on underground town hall tours.
We were all through Saskatchewan and Alberta.
We had to meet in secret with farmers and with the ranchers and business people in undisclosed locations that we had to keep secret.
We only communicated through texting and stuff like that.
In Saskatchewan in the year 2021, we were sneaking around like we were in East Germany or Hungary and behind the Iron Curtain in the 1950s.
It was ridiculous.
And then we said, the heck with it.
We started doing public rallies.
That's when we started getting ticketed.
I ended up getting eight tickets for $47,500.
Mark got 10 tickets for even more money.
I know you racked up a slew of tickets.
Did you contest any of them?
Oh, yeah.
The JCCF, the Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms, took up our cases and fought their best.
But just a few months ago last year, the judges here in Saskatchewan are completely corrupt, said that whatever public health says is the law.
And any other countervailing evidence is to be thrown out.
We tried to introduce the Great Barrington Declaration, J. Bataceri.
We tried to introduce Byron Bridle and Dr. Paul Alexander and Dr. Peter McCullough and, you know, all these other countervailing evidence showing that the mandates and restrictions were unscientific.
Plus, we also brought up the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
They cannot take away your right to...
Your freedom of speech, your freedom of association, unless they can demonstrably prove it.
They did not demonstrably prove it in any court of law.
It was just accepted.
As de facto by the judges because public health said it was demonstratively proven.
But it wasn't.
There was no debate.
Nobody got in Parliament and started debating this stuff.
They didn't have a round table of experts.
What they did do is they picked their public health.
The public health picked the experts that are on the, you know, they're getting paid.
They're, you know, 90% of scientists are brought off just like 90% of politicians.
And it's just taken as de facto.
And so we were...
We were charged, and now we have to pay them.
And that's why I have that give-send-go.
You can go to www.give-send-go backslash rvhound and help me out with my give-send-go because it's a tough slog.
But anyway, so I get back.
I met Mark Friesen, and he was involved with the People's Party of Canada.
I never even heard of them.
In fact, what I did remember of them was they were supposedly some kind of far-right-wing party that were all fascists and nazis.
So I started talking to him.
I looked into it.
I met Maxime Bernier.
We went on a few town hall tours with Maxime, came out to Saskatchewan during that time and went to, yeah, and we went to, we did another underground town hall with Maxime and he met farmers and ranchers and stuff and they said, who is this politician that's daring to go against the grain,
right? That was the same time he got arrested in Manitoba for meeting some of his supporters there, outdoors too.
So he was the only guy who was behind us and fighting for us.
So I joined the PPC.
I became the campaign manager in Saskatoon West last election for Kevin Boychuk.
And I learned a lot about politics, mainly that we don't have enough money in the PPC to fight these things, because we have no war chest, right?
We're all self-financing our campaigns.
I can barely, you know, get enough, especially now, because last election we did pretty good during the Freedom Movement, so we got almost, like you said, a million votes.
And in Saskatoon West, we got 6.4% of the vote.
We did really well.
There was a lot of people in this province that were really involved in the Freedom Movement.
And the Freedom Convoy happened, and just like that, boom, boom, boom, all the provinces got rid of their mandates and restrictions because they started realizing what they were doing was wrong and that their base was going to leave them.
So all these conservative, this conservative premier of our province, Scott Moe, with a stroke of the pen, got rid of all the mandates and restrictions.
He didn't ask his public health officer if it was okay, he just did it because he saw the writing on the wall, proving it was political the whole time.
And there's no way that a premier and his minister should have given over authority of the law to a public health, chief public health officer.
Let me ask you, first of all, do you have any kids?
Are you married with kids?
I'm married.
I have a son and a daughter.
I have a son and three daughters, yes.
And I'm just thinking in terms of the amount of these tickets are so...
I was just trying to see how many of these tickets were ultimately dropped.
I know there were a few cases, but by and large...
They weren't, unless the Crown dropped them before any hearing.
But the ones that went to trial on, or, you know, their contestations were generally upheld.
Did you run in 2021?
No, I was a campaign manager for Kevin Boychuck in Saskatoon.
And so now you are running as a candidate in that writing?
Now I'm running as a candidate in Saskatoon South.
Last time it was called Saskatoon Grasswoods, and that was Mark Friesen's riding, so I'm picking up the torch for Mark because he can't do it this time because he's got health problems, and that's another thing that we could talk about, but we don't want to divert too much, but he's not doing so well.
So I'm running in his riding.
We have a kid named Jackson Boot running at Saskatoon University, and the third Saskatoon riding, which was Saskatoon last time, we don't have a candidate because of the snap election.
The guy who was going to run there couldn't get his signatures in in time.
How many...
The last I saw, there were 245 PPC candidates of the 343 ridings?
We got 274.
274. Is it done now?
That's it?
There's no more entries?
Yeah, can't get anybody else.
It was done so quick, and of course, there's such a small party, a young party without a war chest, and PPC headquarters is not, we're not well-staffed like the Conservatives and Liberals, right?
So it was hard.
We did our best.
We're not, we're probably, and I'll swear to God, and I'm going to tell you the truth, we're not going to do as well as we did last time in Viva, simply for the fact, because we weren't prepared for number one, and so we've got to take some responsibility for that.
Number two, the vote-splitting meme is killing us.
I'm not afraid, I'm going, I'm knocking on doors going, you know, going door to our meeting people and that's, it's in this area anyway.
The ones who are going to vote for us like us because of our principles and values.
COVID accountability, nobody else is doing that.
We're addressing mass immigration.
We're addressing the gender ideology stuff.
We're addressing the really hard issues.
So they like that, but the...
Conservative light people are terrified so much.
They had Trudeau derangement syndrome, now they have Carney derangement syndrome.
They're scared to death of the vote splitting and they're afraid that the Liberals are going to win because of the fake polling that shows the Liberals winning.
It's really backfiring on any kind of sane, proper debate.
It's all panicking.
These people are just panicking.
And so it's going to be tough for us to gain traction this time, but I swear to God, if we stay the course, there's eventually going to be an election cycle where we will be the only alternative.
Because if they elect Pierre Poliav in three years from now, nothing fundamentally changes.
And we still have a housing crisis, an immigration crisis, and a fentanyl opioid crisis, and kids can't buy houses.
The issue is, you know, the way you describe it, it's not optimistic for anybody who is hopeful for the PPC.
I'm not sure that...
We're just being realistic.
No, I understand that.
And I'm not convinced by the vote-splitting argument.
I think what you're just going to have is everyone who would vote PPC is just going to sit at home.
Exactly. Maybe some of them are going to be sufficiently despaired that they'll go out and vote for Pierre anyhow in the hopes that...
Yeah. You're on the ground in Saskatoon.
Yes. And everybody's saying don't trust the polls.
I'm seeing a whole hell of a lot more carny propaganda, paid advertisements on, or at least posts, I don't know if they're paid, I suspect they're paid, than I am conservatives.
Yeah. Do you know what the finances are, respectively, of the liberals versus the conservatives in terms of their war chests?
Well, I know that the Liberals have way more because they're more of the globalist bankers and they have the globalist banker money behind them, but the Conservatives are very well funded.
They also have tentacles in the World Economic Forum area with Bill Barrett and Andrew Scheer and Michel Rembrandt-Garnier.
So, I mean, famously, Pierre said he's not going to leave the Paris Accords.
Famously, Pierre said he's not going to bring up the abortion debate and all this other stuff that's contentious, right?
And, yeah, so, I mean, they're very well funded.
He's got a private jet.
I mean, somebody paid for a private jet for Pierre, so he's flying around in a private jet.
Not like Maxime.
He's probably flying coach, going from interview to interview with you, and then I hear he's going on, he went on Tucker today.
I saw an image there.
That's him and Tucker.
Kind of impressive.
And that's great.
I like to see him getting out there.
But in the meantime, though, here in Canada, we're suffering because we have a lack of a ground game.
We don't have the finances the Conservatives and the Liberals have.
So we can't do the promotion, the public relations.
We can't do the advertising that they can.
So I've only got like 400 handouts and I've got some signs coming that might show up tomorrow, but I'll only have a few of them.
And I'll do my best, but it's going to be tough.
But like I said, we're just going to stay the course.
I'm going to see if I can pull up the picture because Maxime posted it, him with Tucker.
The irony of Maxime doing the legwork and doing podcasts is even if he's up there criticizing the Conservatives, he is advertising for the Conservatives.
I mean, whether people like it or not, he's advertising for the fact that the only plausible prime ministerial, prime minister candidate to beat Carney is Pierre Poilievre.
What drives me...
F-ing nuts with the Conservatives is that they seem unwilling to commit to incorporating any policy of the PPC overtly in order to woo that vote.
They just expect the PPC to be so despair they're going to vote for Pierre in the hopes that instead of actually doing anything to court the vote.
The problem with the Conservatives is they govern by polling.
And if you do the polling up here, we are, of course, famously such a nice, polite, apologetic country.
We're left of center.
And so when they do the polling, they over-poll 60 people who are 50 and 60 years older.
They get over-polled.
And so they're much more...
They've been raised and propagandized by our CBC and everything to just hate America.
There's a knee-jerk anti-Americanism up here.
And then, of course, with Trump talking about the 51st state and the tariffs.
They've just gone insane.
You saw them booing the American National Anthem at a Maple Leafs hockey game, and I'm thinking, Austin Matthews, the Toronto's best player, is American.
How's he thinking about it?
What's he thinking about it?
What's going on here?
And so it's more behavioral psychology training that the Canadians have been under to just knee-jerk hate Americans, and half this country, they have Trump derangement syndrome worse than anything in America you've ever seen.
It's crazy.
I don't even understand it.
I just say it's the deflection from their own misery.
They can hate Trump and not have to assess how their situation is negatively impacted by the liberals.
So it's easier to hate Trump than it is to fix the liberals or expect better from the conservatives.
Exactly. Donald Trump is not responsible for our fentanyl crisis.
Donald Trump is not responsible for our mass immigration crisis.
Donald Trump has nothing to do with our housing crisis.
I mean, and he's an American president who's going to be gone in four years and there's going to be somebody else and policies will change.
Relax, put your big boy pants on and do some actual negotiating instead of this...
The liberals really have latched onto this as their way back to power because they can't...
Debate the policies that they've been in charge of the last 10 years as they're on the country to the ground.
So they're running away from that.
And Carney went and adopted Piers.
No carbon tax.
So he got rid of the personal carbon tax.
All of a sudden the gas prices go down in the pump and everybody's less angry.
It's genius behavioral psychology.
It's amazing.
Let me bring this one up.
This is Carney talking about announcing that Today, I'm announcing.
My government will launch a new sector-specific mid-career training and upskilling benefit.
Oh, my God.
Priority sectors.
More free money.
Manufacturing. Construction.
Tech. And artificial intelligence.
I can't listen to him.
He actually pisses me off more than Trudeau.
His dramatic pauses.
It's like they teach him, look determined, look resolute.
Well, he's scared.
He's much scarier than Trudeau because Trudeau was incompetent.
He was evil and stupid and following these globalist policies, but he was so incompetent at it that he was easy and so smug and stupid.
He did stupid things.
Carney is much more efficient.
I mean, he's been in the belly of the beast for a while.
He's higher up in the power structure than Justin is.
He's closer to the men behind the big table, right?
So, and he's much, yeah, if he does manage to get power, I can see.
And he's already talking about the online harms bill.
You know, he's bringing that up again about how toxic American ideas are washing across our borders.
So he's going to crack down on our freedom of speech.
First day he'll be trying to get, you know, I mean, it's scary.
He's much scarier.
But again, so we put Pierre in there, which hopefully is going to happen.
There's two scenarios.
Carney gets in there and takes us right down to the depths of hell right away.
We have a revolution and Alberta decides to separate.
Or we get Polyev in there and it's a slow, it's like the frog in the boiling water.
Yeah, or Polyev gets in there and then maybe in another election cycle, you can hope to raise something of a PPC voice of opposition.
Yeah. I'm getting despaired because it just doesn't look like even reading the comments of conservatives or so-called conservatives, if I assume that they're real people.
It's just cowardice.
It's political cowardice.
And they say, yeah, he's got to compromise.
He's got to go.
And so it's great.
You're going to have a conservative pretending to be liberal to get elected when even as the conservatives are today, they're more liberal than the liberals to some extent.
It's the same.
Well, see, it bothers me that they're trying to win over the liberal vote because it's not going to work.
Those people are going to vote for a real liberal anyway.
So why would they settle for the lesser liberal, right?
It's a bad strategy.
If two years ago, after the last election, Pierre and Max got together and said, let's implement some of these really good PPC policies and we'll stick by them regardless.
We won't worry about the polling.
We'll just do this because in the long run it's the right idea.
We could be in a different world right now, but it's not going to happen because Pierre, look who his Deputy Prime Minister is, Melissa Lansman.
God bless her, but the LGBTQ thing, all that stuff, it's going to turn off the PPC-type voter.
The same thing when he says we're not even going to talk about the abortion issue.
In Canada, we have very liberal abortion laws.
The only country on earth with absolutely no criminal prohibitions on abortion at any stage.
So that's a win-win with the conservative traditional base who want actually to revisit that.
I mean, vote your conviction, whatever.
And of course, and the COVID accountability.
He's brushing it all under the...
There's millions of Canadians who did not get vaccinated, that supported the trucker movement, that are adamant that freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom of bodily autonomy, which used to be left-wing ideas, by the way.
We should be respected and valued and that we should find out what went wrong during the COVID thing.
And two, we want accountability for all the horrible mistakes, lies they made, and the crackdown on the Freedom Convoy that, you know, the complete dismissal of us has been misogynists and racists.
The absolute contempt that we were held in and the fact that...
It damaged so many people, right?
So many people lost their jobs.
And the vaccine itself hurt so many people, like Dan Hartman's son and many others.
Kayla Pollack, Stephanie Foster lost her mom here in Saskatoon.
Her mom went into the shopper's drug mart to get her booster vaccine because she got her note from the doctor saying, it's time to get your third shot.
So she, you know, like a good trooper, went down there, took the shot five minutes later.
She keeled over dead, and people kept lining up to get more while she was sitting there dead.
And then the province went and grabbed her body, and the next day they said that she died of a heart attack, but it had nothing to do with the vaccine.
I mean, things like that happening over and over and over again, and we want some accountability for that, because the people who support what the Trucker Convoy stood for, this freedom movement.
And the COVID accountability people, we're strong, and we're not going to be swayed by Pierre Polyev's milquetoast response to it.
He has not stood up for a few days during the Freedom Convoy, showed up, handed out some cookies, walked with Mr. Topp for a while, James Topp.
The next day, the liberal media started to tear him apart, and he just left us.
He just abandoned us again.
And Warren Kinsella famously wrote that Globe and Mail article, Pierre Polyev's right to abandon the Freedom Convoy.
And it's been like that ever since.
The normies want it to go away, but it's not going away for those of us who were so damaged by it, who tried to fight the system because of our moral responsibility, as Martin Luther King said, to disobey unjust laws is your moral responsibility.
We did the greatest peaceful protest, civil disobedience, since Martin Luther King's days.
And it was effective.
It changed the world.
I swear to God, if we hadn't done that, they would have brought in vaccine mandates and digital ID, and we'd still be having to show our vaccine passports just to travel.
I'm sure they were going that way.
So people have to realize, I mean, we want accountability, and if the Conservative Party of Canada stood up for us...
They'd be sweeping this election.
If they had stood up for the freedom movement right from the start, they'd be sweeping this election right now.
The question is, can they even make up for it now?
I don't know if they're going to...
The polls are one thing, the markets are another, and general sentiment is another.
I appreciate Pleb is team conservative, but I don't believe that that's the most objective assessment of the performance of the campaign you're getting.
And I think they have problems, and I think it's just absolutely outrageous that Carney even has a snowball's chance in hell.
Of winning this election.
Arby, so you got the Give, Send, Go, which I shared the link for.
How can people help you for your campaign?
Well, they can go to peoplespartyocanada.ca and the first thing that pops up is find your candidate, learn more, you press the button learn more and then the search button you just write in Saskatoon and it goes to the Saskatoon page and you'll find me there.
At R.B. Winteringham.
Richard Brant Winteringham is my name.
My name will be Richard Brant Winteringham on the ballot.
I'm running in Saskatoon South, but you can go to peoplespartyacanada.ca and that's my gifts and go.
So there's no further appeals process that you could have?
This money is going to start garnishing whatever.
They already took my income tax this year.
So I paid off the first ticket through my income tax return.
But anyway, yeah.
But Randy Hillier won his similar case out in Ontario.
And he's saying that this should give an opportunity for us to, I forget how he said it, not appeal, it's reopen the cases.
So hopefully that happens.
And if that did happen and I got refunded all that money, that'd be great.
Who knows?
Here in Saskatchewan.
How much have you paid so far of it?
I think $8,900 of it.
It's theft.
It's just absolute theft theft.
Go to rbwinteringham, go to peoplespartyofcanada.ca and you'll find me there under the candidates and you can donate to my campaign.
If you want to donate to my campaign so I can get a few more signs or whatever, you can e-transfer me at the richard.winteringham at teamppc.ca.
richard.winteringham at teamppc.ca.
I know you sent me a few lists before, but send me the three, those two again and I'll...
Put them in the pinned comment.
That's wonderful of you, Viva.
I wanted to thank you so much.
I saw you on Jimmy yesterday, and I had sent you my Jimmy Dore interview.
Good timing.
I had no idea you were on, and I actually sort of forgot that I was scheduled to be on.
You did a great job on there, and what I like about you, Viva, is you're so open.
You're open to both sides.
You change your mind when presented with new evidence.
And there's so many people in our space that got caught into that left-right dichotomy and that left-right paradigm.
And Jimmy was one of the first.
He stopped it.
He started actually listening to the people on the other side and realizing that your neighbor is not your enemy.
We're all in this together and not in the way that the Covid-iots wanted us to believe.
We're all in this together because this is a class.
This is class warfare.
It's not left versus right, with the left-wing middle class fighting the right-wing middle class, while up above, the billionaire class, you know, play us like frickin' marionette strings.
It just bothers me so much.
And people have been talking about it for many years, but now it's actually happening.
I think Jimmy's doing a good job doing that, bringing that forward.
And I think you are too, Viva.
You're really doing it.
My despair is that it doesn't seem that Canadians...
Even the so-called conservative ones are willing to do what needs to be done.
America was not saved in the last election because Trump, MAGA, conservatives, whatever, GOP.
Went milquetoast middle ground and said, well, let's just get into power, then we'll change.
No. It was the populist revolution, and it seems that conservative Canadians are scared of it because they're scared it will fail.
And so they think in order to ensure their own success, it means compromising instead of fighting on those principles.
Yeah. Hopefully that can change.
But populism is the wave of the future.
They can only hold it down so long.
I agree.
And it's worked before in history when people didn't think it would.
And remember, when David picked up that rock, a lot of people didn't think he was going to beat Goliath either.
Well, R.B., I'm going to play something after you leave, which is going to really bring back some memories or bring back some nightmares.
But thank you very much for coming on.
It's a fantastic talk.
I'm glad we finally did it.
Godspeed. I'm not holding my breath, but maybe we'll see some surprises this election.
All right.
Thank you, David.
All right.
Have a good one.
Bye. Now, by the way, I'm going to end it with this before we go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com for the after party.
Who remembers this?
We're all in this together.
Oh yeah, that's that stupid jack.
But can you, first of all...
Hey, there's the conservative jackass that lost the last election because he was a milquetoast fence-sitting pussy.
Aaron O'Toole.
Look at what they're doing with their bodies.
You know what the only one who doesn't give an F, DGAF, is the Bleu Quebecois guy right here.
And as much as I hate that party, I like that guy.
He's not buying into the...
I'm not saying your bloody mantra.
Look at each one of them with their body movements.
We're all in this together.
Oh, we're all in this together, Aaron O'Toole.
What's Trudy doing?
We're all in this together.
Trudy went with the one-handed.
The one, I forget her name here, the one on the floor.
Look what she's doing with her hands.
We're all in this together.
What is this?
It's like an orchestra of effing idiots.
And look at Jagmeet Singh.
We're all in this together.
Thank you.
We're all in this together.
Psychopaths. I hate them all.
I actually hate them.
It's not good to hate.
It makes people make mistakes.
Alright, get your butts on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com for the after party.
And that's the give, send, go one more time.
We're going to have our after party.
There's a couple of rants that I think you should read.
CultivatedMind says, raise money for legal defense.
Okay, I got that one.
CultivatedMind says, another gift coming your way, Viva, or should I say your doggy's way?
Well, if the gift is good enough, I might have to take the dog out and keep the gift.
Encryptus says, stand up for what you believe, not vote for what you don't want because you think the chances of winning are lower.
Ginger Ninja's in the house.
Part one of three.
Part one.
In three days, my carpentry business will be closed.
Rural America has been taking a beating recently, especially blue-collar workers.
I've worked my tail off for eight years, but it's not sustainable.
Ginger Ninja.
Does this have to do with Ginger Ninja's?
Part two says, I'm thankful for all the things I've learned from this, thankful for the skills I've grown, and most of all, my business was where my brother could find employment for four years after he was denied.
His religious rights and beliefs in 2021.
For four years, he was able to sustain his family of five and grow a trade where he now has even better employment.
Thank you, Lord, for this opportunity.
And then we got Biltong says, we stream every Friday, 5.30 Eastern, Sunday, 4 p.m. Eastern.
We do some light banter whilst cooking live.
Join in the fun.
Follow our channel.
And it is rumble.com forward slash C forward slash eat at Anton's.
Ginger, I'm sorry to hear that.
And I wonder if it's something that was a long time in the making or if it's tariff related.
Ginger, we're going to be over on vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
And Ginger, I'm going to see you in May when I go down for the Soldier's Journey home build, which I will be documenting and attending for the last three days, give or take.
It's going to be fantastic.
It's going to be fun.
Get on over to Locals tomorrow.
I'm doing the Unusual Suspects in the morning.
And then the show in the afternoon.
So we shall see each other then.
If you're not coming over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com, make sure you subscribe, notifications, yada, yada, yada.
Godspeed, everyone.
God bless.
And locals, let us have our after party now.
▲
Export Selection