Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 28, 2025 - Viva & Barnes

01:23:25

Trump Endorses Mark Carney? Rubio Lays Out the Visa Law! District of Corruption Strikes Again & MORE

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	The old relationship we had with the United States, based on deepening integration of our economies and tight security and military cooperation, is over.
	What exactly the United States does next is unclear.
	But what is clear?
	What is clear?
	Is that we, as Canadians, have agency.
	We have power.
	We are masters in our own home.
	We can control our destiny.
	We can give ourselves much more than any foreign government, including the United States, can ever take away.
	We can deal with this crisis best by building our strength right here at home.
	It will take hard work.
	It will take steady and focused determination from governments, from businesses, from labor.
	From Canadians.
	We will need to dramatically reduce our reliance on the United States.
	We will need to pivot our trade relationships elsewhere.
	And we will need to do things previously thought impossible at speeds we haven't seen in generations.
	Emergency. Let's play that again.
	Just pay attention to two things.
	First of all, this was a few days ago.
	The old relationship we had with the United States based on deepening integration of our economies and tight security and military cooperations.
	Dramatic pause.
	Is over.
	Oh, more pause.
	What exactly the United States does next is unclear.
	Repeat. But what is clear?
	Right now?
	What is clear is that we, as Canadians, have agency.
	Oh, we have agency.
	We have power.
	We have power.
	We are masters.
	You can do it!
	This was barely a few days ago.
	It might have been last week, but I couldn't verify the exact date.
	Our relationship with the U.S., as we knew it, is over.
	But what is clear?
	What is clear?
	Dramatic pause, take it from the Obama playbook.
	We need to become autonomous, and we can't rely on America anymore.
	And what just happened this morning?
	This morning!
	Bear in mind, people, People are entitled to evolve over time.
	They're entitled to change their positions, their views when new facts come in.
	It was a few days ago at that that Mark Carney was talking about how the relationship with the U.S. as we once knew it is over.
	He's been talking about finding alternative relations international for about a month now since he started running after being the anointed Prime Minister of Canada.
	That was three days ago.
	This is this morning.
	Mark J. Carney.
	Circus freak.
	This morning, I spoke with President Trump.
	Not even a read my message.
	Just very cryptic.
	And wait until you read this.
	It reads like it was written by an AI bot.
	Because that's what Mark Carney is.
	He's a human.
	I'm sure he's a very nice person.
	Good to his grandkids.
	He is a bot.
	That is being packaged and sold to the Canadian people.
	And if you buy that product, you are an idiot.
	And I apologize for insulting any Canadian who thinks it's in their best interest to vote for this globalist whore.
	He is being packaged and sold to you exactly like Kamala Harris was packaged and sold to you.
	Three days ago, four days ago, our relationship with the U.S. as we once knew it is over.
	He is not talking to Trump until Trump shows Canada the respect that it deserves.
	This morning, I spoke with President Trump, and my AI bot wrote this following answer.
	Hey, AI, draft a response as though I am the Prime Minister of Canada, having engaged in forceful discussions with Donald Trump.
	Oh, I can't do that, Mr. Carney, because that's impossible.
	I'm AI.
	I'm not a magician.
	This is what the Honorable Mark Carney has to say.
	Today, the Prime Minister, Mark Carney...
	Spoke with the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump.
	What the hell is this?
	He's writing in the third person?
	Today, I, the Prime Minister, Mark Carney, spoke with the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump.
	The Prime Minister and the President had a very constructive conversation about the relationship between our two countries.
	I'm sorry, I thought it was over as we once knew it.
	Oh, what's that?
	Change a little tact?
	Bend the knee, kiss the ring, Mark J. Carney?
	Oh, oh.
	The leaders agreed to begin comprehensive negotiations about a new economic and security relationship following the election.
	In the interim, the leaders agreed that conversations between the Minister of International Trade and Intergovernmental Affairs and the President of the King's Privy Council for Canada, Dominique Leblanc...
	And the United States Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, will intensify to address immediate concerns.
	The Prime Minister told the President that he would be working hard for the next month to earn the right to represent Canada in those discussions.
	The Prime Minister informed the President that his government will implement retaliatory tariffs to protect Canadian workers and our economy following the announcement of additional U.S. trade actions on April 2, 2025.
	Go to the second paragraph, please, people.
	leaders agreed to begin comprehensive negotiations about a new economic and security relationship immediately following the election.
	Thank you.
	That's really funny.
	I thought I heard Mark Carney and the liberals and all the other Trump haters out there saying, we don't have to renegotiate.
	We already have a NAFTA agreement.
	We don't have any border issues.
	It's all a pretext.
	Mark J. Carney...
	The interim anointed Prime Minister, after having railed against Trump for not showing respect to Canada, refusing to sit down and talk with him until he shows the requisite respect, three days ago, saying the relationship is over as we knew it, has now buckled, bent the knee, and basically kissed the Trump ring.
	And I said, like, it's going to cause some meltdowns among Canadians out there.
	The NPCs who had their new chip planted in.
	The Liberals, good.
	Mark J. Carney, good.
	Donald John Trump, bad.
	Donald John Trump, the biggest concern for all Canadians.
	He is the reason why we've been living in financial and economic ruin for the last decade.
	He's the reason 74,000 people died while waiting for doctors since 2018 in Canada.
	He's the reason 15,000 people died in the ERs over the last three or four years.
	It's Donald John Trump's fault and the tariffs that he implemented over the last two months that have caused the economic ruin of Canada.
	And I said when it was coming out, and the liberals were making a scandal of the tariffs.
	It was a scandal to distract from their failure.
	And we're going to get to it.
	Pierre Poilievre walked right into it.
	Like a buffoon who, if I didn't know any better, I would dare say is deliberately trying to lose this election.
	It's a lot easier to be feckless opposition than it is to be a good leader.
	Maybe he's gotten a little too comfortable with that feckless opposition stance.
	I don't actually think he's throwing it to the liberals, but if he were trying to throw it to the liberals, I don't know what he would be doing differently.
	So, plant in that chip, NPC brains melt down.
	Mark J. Carney, after pledging to fight Donald Trump, is now agreeing and discussed this morning that they've effectively announced that they're going to renegotiate NAFTA, that they're going to address border concerns.
	And I don't know if Trump is going for the double super fakie here, because this truth post from Trump pissed everybody off.
	Left and right.
	Although I have seen more of the pissed off from the right than from the left.
	Donald John Trump.
	I verified that it was real on Truth Social, where I will be posting a lot more these days, knowing that Trump actually reads the replies down there.
	Truths. Posts.
	I just finished speaking with Prime Minister Mark Carney of Canada.
	It was an extremely productive call.
	We agree on many things and will be meeting immediately after Canada's upcoming election to work on elements of politics, business, and all other factors that will end up being great for both the United States of America and Canada.
	Thank you for your attention to this matter.
	To which I just had to astutely observe, so do liberals now hate Carney or do they now love Trump?
	I actually saw a response to this.
	A liberal sycophant, and I'm fairly certain a paid political propagandist.
	Say, look at that.
	Donald Trump didn't refer to him as Governor Carney.
	He referred to him as Prime Minister Carney.
	That's the level of respect that globalist whore Mark Carney commands from Donald Trump.
	Oh, my goodness.
	It's why liberals are, I say, idiots.
	They're politically illiterate, and they are humorless buffoons.
	But set that aside.
	I don't know exactly what the play is here, but following my interview with Harrison Fields, Trump's deputy communications officer, I forget the exact name.
	Stay tuned for the full vlog of that interview.
	He said to me, let him cook.
	It might have actually been his director of Kieran Durr?
	I forgot his last name now.
	He said, let Trump cook in the sense of let Trump do what Trump does.
	I don't know if this is a double fakie to try to make Carney now look like he's bent the knee, kissed the ring, which he has.
	I don't know if it's a double fakie to try to make people hate Mark Carney.
	If it's another kick in the butt for Pierre Poilier, because had Pierre Poilier not struck an unnecessarily belligerent tone vis-à-vis his relations with Donald Trump, he might have been on that call talking about what might happen after the next election.
	And God have mercy on Canada.
	If Mark Carney, that globalist pig, actually wins the election.
	God have mercy on Canada, but my goodness, if Canadians are stupid enough to vote for that, they will get the destruction that they're voting into office.
	I don't know what the angle is on this.
	It is very much premature to say who he's going to be discussing with after the next election, but if the Liberals manage to win, it really means that Canadians deserve a Liberal government.
	Is he doing it on purpose?
	Who the heck knows.
	But one thing is for certain.
	It's not as though Donald Trump doesn't know that Mark Carney is a globalist, WEF Davos, attending Bilderberg meeting individuals.
	It's not like he doesn't know it.
	He does know it.
	And Trump doesn't like the globalists.
	So what he's up to in the long play, we'll see.
	But one thing is for certain, if Pierre Poilievre were trying to throw this election and make it look like he was trying, but trying to throw it, what would he be doing differently?
	Meanwhile, Over on Pierre Poilier's side of things, listen to this, and look at his face, by the way.
	Look at his nervous gulps.
	It looks like he doesn't even like to say what he's saying.
	It looks like he doesn't actually believe what he's saying.
	But he's saying it nonetheless, and it's the stupidest political strategy.
	I like that.
	It's like tragedy and strategy.
	When tragedy meets strategy, you have strategy.
	Listen to this.
	But I have a further message for President Trump.
	He's going to talk tough to Trump.
	He's losing to a freaking commie globalist, and he's going to talk tough on Trump?
	Here's an idea.
	Maybe get your lead back in the polls, the 30-point lead that you lost, Pierre.
	Maybe you do that before you lecture what you're going to do to Trump when you can't even beat the commie.
	Maybe. But I have a further message for President Trump.
	If you decide to go down this road, this is what's going to happen.
	Yes, you'll do damage to us in the short term, but we will fight back and we will build back.
	Within four years of a new, strong, conservative government, Canada will be completely rebuilt.
	We will rebuild our economy.
	We will not be reliant on the USA.
	Reading his words, flubbing his words, and promising that it will take four years to come back?
	That's a great, inspiring message.
	Fire all of your political consultants, Pierre.
	After we wreak havoc because I screwed up the initial...
	Back and forth with Trump.
	It'll take four years to rebuild.
	Vote for me now.
	And the Americans will have lost the greatest trading partner and friend they ever had.
	A conservative government will build pipelines and LNG plants, aggressively promote mines and other resource infrastructure that has been blocked for the last 10 years.
	We'll have new overseas trading partners.
	We will knock down intra-provincial barriers so that we can trade with ourselves.
	We will...
	Send our goods to our friends on other sides of the oceans of the world.
	We will cut taxes and speed up permits so that we can sell our oil, gas, mining, lumber, agriculture, fisheries, manufacturing, small businesses and large businesses alike.
	The world needs our resources and our expertise.
	If you, Mr. Trump...
	Don't want them.
	The rest of the world does.
	Under a new conservative government, we will put Canada first for a change.
	We will be a nation that is strong, self-reliant, standing on its own two feet so that we can stand up for ourselves and stand up to the Americans.
	You know, if I look at me, it's like, oh my God, I'm swallowed.
	Did they buy it?
	Did they buy it?
	Stand up to the Americans.
	You know that this is the result of...
	Bipolar politics.
	Bipolar politics.
	You know that that's what it is.
	Hey, standing up to the Americans is working for the liberals, conservatives.
	You better do the same thing, Pierre.
	I mean, he could have said the exact same thing, cut out all of the anti-Trump rhetoric, cut out all of the anti-American rhetoric, maybe cool it on the we're going to establish new trade partners with Europe and abroad rhetoric, and just say we're going to build a strong, independent Canada.
	And that means working hand-in-hand with our American neighbors and addressing their valid, legitimate economic concerns, border concerns, security concerns, because we do have a drug problem in Canada.
	Pierre, if you wanted to lose it, I don't know what you'd be doing differently.
	And I guess Pierre is listening to idiot liberals.
	This is Jeffrey Looscombe.
	I've been picking on this guy a bit lately, but if he wanted me to stop picking on it, he'd just stop saying such terribly stupid things.
	Best-selling author called one of fiction's brightest new stars by HuffPost.
	New read to refrain from embracing chosen best book of the year.
	What did Jeffrey Lusko have to say?
	I'll be avoiding the U.S. and their products for the foreseeable future.
	My rule is if...
	My rule is if any Canadian labor went into a product, it's okay.
	All American?
	Nope. Anybody else?
	Anybody else?
	Twitter? X?
	Anybody else on this American-owned, American-designed, American-operated app?
	Let me go virtue signal as to how much of American products I'm going to boycott on the American app because it has the biggest platform and the biggest bullhorn for me to reach my followers.
	You know, maybe Pierre has been running some polls.
	What's popular these days?
	Well, they want to boycott American products.
	They want to not drink American orange juice, and they want to not travel to Florida to get that sweet, sweet vitamin D. Well, you should jump on that bandwagon.
	We're not done yet, by the way.
	Here's another Canadian...
	I don't know.
	Who is this person?
	Oh, I can't see if I go that way.
	Well, let me see if I go like this.
	Dr. Ann Kaplan, political scientist, artist, cyclist, lover of the environment, working for change.
	That looks like a Canadian and Aussie flag.
	Is that Aussie?
	That's Aussie.
	I feel stupid.
	That might be New Zealand.
	No, that's Australia.
	Hold on a second.
	Now I've got to see this.
	New Zealand flag.
	No, that's a New Zealand flag.
	Damn it.
	Probably should have known that from reading the tweet.
	Dr. Ann Kaplan, who is boycotting America too.
	It's such a terrible country that you get deported.
	If you're even traveling through, I'm joking, people, but we're going to get to that in a second.
	We just canceled our Cantas flights to Canada via the U.S. We'll fly instead on Fly Air New Zealand to avoid the risk of being arbitrarily bailed up, having our phones seized, and being sent into detention while transiting through the U.S.A.
	Trump's U.S. indeed.
	What the hell are they all talking about?
	Oh, quote tweeting, a known pro-Ukrainian propagandist.
	But maybe these are the people that are responding to the polls to which Pierre appears to be responding.
	So yeah, we better strike that adversarial tone when it comes to Trump.
	I'm going to see what everyone's thinking about this afterwards because it's blowing my mind and it's actually making me very, very dismayed and cynical.
	As to what's going on in Canada, that we've had 10 years of, I will say, civil rights destruction, economic destruction, social cohesion destruction, one in four Canadian kids living with food insecurity, top five leading cause of death in Canada, government-sanctioned murder.
	You got people dying in ERs.
	You got people dying waiting for doctors.
	You don't have doctors.
	You got to wait 18 months to two years to get a doctor.
	In come a stupid...
	Tariff threat because of the drug problem and terrorism problem in Canada.
	And the liberals, scoundrels like they are, resign, prorogue, anoint, and are now playing the best politics to someone who seems to have just started politicking yesterday.
	Ah. Yeah, that's it.
	Anyways, that's what's going on in Canada, people.
	It's not good.
	Let me bring this one up here.
	By the way, good afternoon.
	We'll get to it in a second.
	DB63, Canada's been a country for how many centuries and now they're going to stand on their own two feet?
	It's not just that.
	It's preposterous to purport.
	I mean, Canada should be self-sufficient.
	I mean, it should be.
	A country of 40, let's just say 40 million people now that it's been invaded with open borders and every mineral and every resource on Earth.
	I can't see a reason why Canada would need to be reliant on foreign countries for matters of national security, critical infrastructure.
	Can't imagine it.
	When it comes to security, however, on a global scale, for Canada to ever pretend that they are independent and don't need America is a fool's dream.
	And the only reason that might be true is if they're relying on the de facto protection that China is giving them or will be giving them once the takeover is complete.
	Centuries. It's a decade of liberal destruction, and now Mark Carney is being rebranded and repackaged and resold to ignorant, politically naive Canadians as the solution to the very problems that his very party caused.
	And my goodness, Pierre is doing everything in his power to screw things up.
	Finboy Slick says, I hate to say it, but I don't think Pierre's strategy is wrong in the current context.
	He wouldn't get you to vote for him with that speech, but the people who wouldn't like that speech are all voting conservative anyway.
	This is wrong.
	This is wrong.
	Finboy Slick and respectfully submitted.
	We're at a stage where you need to convince the brainwashed dummies you won't let the U.S. invade.
	Do you think there's any liberals out there who are going to decide to vote for the conservatives because they've softened up?
	Or at least adopted more of a liberal perspective as it relates to what should be done or what the liberals want them to do in terms of relationships with the states?
	No! The liberals, especially the brainwashed, brain-dead ones who still listen to the CBC, will always think the conservatives are the enemy.
	And even if they do the right thing that the liberals want them to do, they will ascribe or attribute negative intent to that.
	You're never going to get them.
	Who you are going to get are the people who are absolutely fed up.
	And who don't want to switch their vote to vote for more of the same.
	And the people who might not otherwise vote.
	This is the fight I've been having on the internet with a lot of conservatives.
	They seem to think the Conservative Party of Canada and the, call them the, I don't like the term, it's irritating, the Pierre, the Poilier bros or the Conservative bros.
	I hate the word.
	But the supporters of the Conservatives seem to think, well, if all you PPCers just vote for us, then we'll win.
	Or if your candidate, because he's got no chance of becoming prime minister, should just resign.
	You should pull all your candidates from across the country and vote for us.
	No. You know what happens, first of all, when you do that?
	The people who would not otherwise vote will not otherwise vote.
	So you don't get those votes.
	And you sure as hell don't get them on policy by saying, shut your mouths, pull your candidates, and vote for us because we are not even listening to what you have to say.
	We don't care what you have to say.
	Pull your bloody candidates and understand that we're going even further to the left for your own good.
	Horse crap.
	That's what's going on in Canada.
	And that's what the Conservative Party of Canada, at least many of the vocal supporters on Twitter, seem to think.
	Pull your candidates because you guys have no chance anyhow and vote for us even though we are not listening to what you have to say.
	So much so that we're telling you who not to vote for or that you shouldn't have the right to vote for the person you want to vote for.
	You don't get those votes.
	They become dead votes because they're not going to vote.
	And I am now thoroughly convinced about the...
	Response to the vote-splitting argument?
	You're not splitting votes that you won't be getting.
	You're going to be losing them.
	And right now, Pierre is doing everything in his power to show that he is nearly different than Mark Carney.
	The only difference?
	Trump is talking to Carney and not talking to Pierre.
	Why? Because Pierre took an unnecessarily defiant stance in the beginning and now Trump doesn't even need to deal with that nincompoop.
	I'm still predicting that the Conservatives are going to win.
	But my good is they're making it hard.
	And harder than necessary.
	Serenity now.
	People, I'm going to do something that you probably shouldn't do during your own stream, but I want to play a bit of this.
	I just got back from DC today, and I got up early, got here, tried to keep up with the news, and I did.
	And I put together, I think, as I'm putting it together, I'm very hard on myself, and I'm my own worst critic, and I...
	Tend to catastrophize unnecessarily, but those are the symptoms of what people generally refer to as an OCD-ish type personality.
	I got over my gear attraction yesterday.
	I'm going to make certain improvements regardless.
	I put together what I think is a relatively decent vlog.
	Locals, you've gotten to see it now, the full documentary-style vlog.
	The audio for the interviews were great.
	I think the format works.
	And I think it could be a new genre of...
	Journalism. Sort of like gonzo journalism, but video format.
	I put together a 45-minute vlog of my experience in D.C. Now, I have to just go here and see it.
	I can't really get it.
	Where is it?
	And I wanted to play a portion of the Alina Haba interview that I had.
	And I just posted this to Twitter.
	The Twitterverse right here.
	Listen to this.
	We're live.
	We're not live now, but this is going to air unedited live.
	Ms. Hava, it is very nice to meet you.
	So nice to meet you.
	I know you from the interwebs and from lawsuits that I've been following for a very long time.
	We have lawsuits?
	I didn't know that.
	I don't know if you've ever come across any of my tweets on the New York...
	I have.
	Okay, good.
	I don't know if that's good.
	I don't even know where to start.
	You were Trump's attorney in what I call the New York People Judge Engelron case.
	No, it was in the Kaplan case.
	I've been his attorney on way more than that.
	It was his general counsel for a short period of time, right before I joined the campaign.
	Now, I'm going to tease it right there.
	And I kind of also want to tease the full-length documentary here on Crumble, because I think it might be a new style of something.
	And you'll all tell me when it goes public, but here, check this out.
	Here you go.
	Just a deep intro.
	Viva goes to Washington.
	Some of you might get the intro joke.
	The cameraman never dies.
	I tend to record landings, and this one was especially rough.
	Why do I record landings?
	Because the cameraman never dies.
	Ha, ha, ha, ha.
	Thank you.
	I'm gonna whet your appetite.
	Good morning, everybody.
	It's about 7.30.
	That is all you're going to get.
	Now, let's see what's going on in the chat.
	I'm going to post it later this afternoon after I get the feedback from locals, and if it's heartbreakingly, gut-wrenchingly, devastatingly critical, whatever it's called, feedback, I will reassess.
	Now, let's just go to the chat for a few seconds and see what's going on here.
	Wing seats are clutch, says We Are The Show.
	On the way back, I had a middle seat, and the guy next to me was rather large, and the woman next to me was not small.
	It was not...
	It was not the best one.
	But I watched another movie.
	I watched another movie and it was another bad movie.
	Brad Pitt and...
	What's his name?
	Brad Pitt and that other guy.
	George Clooney.
	Wolves. Not a guy...
	I hate movies.
	I hate modern movies.
	I'm never going to watch them.
	I'm turning you into an old, cranky man.
	Alright, nothing much is going on in the chat over there.
	Let's go to our vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Boopsie says, I saw it.
	It was good.
	A special SOV says, Fat Viva.
	A special SOV says, You like my brother record landings?
	And Tzvi Hansen says, Robert Gouveia is breathing heavily now.
	I don't know.
	Oh! Alright, I know.
	I get that.
	Come on, guys.
	Alright, we've done Canada.
	Is there any commentary on Canada?
	Am I out in left field?
	Am I being an ass?
	I'm telling you, if Canada loses, if Carney wins, Canada loses and Canada is lost.
	I firmly believe it.
	And I've still...
	I've enhanced my wager that I do not believe it's going to be a majority liberal government in any realm of the universe.
	But if it is, the loss of my wager is going to be the least of my concerns and the least of the concerns of the world.
	Corn Macabre says, Viva?
	No, Viva.
	Here's a free tip for movies.
	Check if the movie is produced, distributed by A24.
	They still make great movies.
	And Plant Shield says, Individual Thinker, you're 100%.
	We don't want Canada.
	All right, well, that's it.
	Okay, that's what happened.
	So now we've talked about what happened in D.C. yesterday.
	Wait for the documentary-style vlog to come out.
	I'm running it by a few people, including my wife and our locals community.
	Now, life comes at you fast, people.
	This is not a question of me reveling in the misery of others.
	I do not do that.
	Even I remember when Osama bin Laden got killed and people were celebrating.
	I was like, even if you don't celebrate death, You can celebrate justice.
	You can take a sigh of relief that something has ended.
	But even celebrating in the death of even your enemy, I think is a bad juju to put out there.
	And so this is not that full stop.
	Do you remember the story of this viral influencer who was a migrant?
	Also known as an illegal alien who had made his way to America and was making videos on how to screw homeowners out of money.
	And he was flashing bills while he was doing it.
	And then at some point he got arrested.
	This is from September 16, 2024.
	September 16, 2024.
	September, October, November.
	Two months before the political tide turned.
	New York Post.
	Migrant influencer Leonel Moreno, who encouraged migrants to be squatters, is ordered deported.
	But here's why he likely won't be kicked out of the country.
	Fast forward six months.
	Migrant influencer who urged other illegals to squat in U.S. homes deported to Venezuela.
	From the New York Post as well.
	I am not reveling in the fact that this illegal alien, who was breaking the law and boasting about it, got deported.
	If only because it seems that he has a child.
	Who he's undoubtedly using as both a shield and a sword in this battle.
	And this kid is going, if it is his kid, his kid is going to be the innocent victim of the criminality, stupidity, and recklessness of his father.
	This is from Nick Sorto.
	It's Nick Sortor.
	We all know he's a good friend of the channel and the community.
	The illegal immigrant influencer who went viral for teaching follows how to burglarize American homes has now been deported to Venezuela.
	Good. Should have been done years ago.
	He's now barred from coming back for life.
	And I want to show you just some of the videos if you haven't seen them.
	Estoy en peligro de muerte en United States.
	Hold on.
	I'll read it.
	I'll read it here.
	It says...
	It says...
	I think this is...
	I am in danger of death.
	In the US.
	I need protection.
	I am being persecuted in the United States.
	I have thought about it.
	Invading a house in the United States.
	I found out that there is a law that says that if a house is not inhabited, we can seize it.
	Guys, here in the United States also applies the land of invasion, and I think that will be my next business invading.
	Abandoned houses since I have looked for some codes with my friends, Africans, and they told me that they have...
	You get the idea?
	Does this one include the part where he...
	Hold on a second.
	What's this gun part?
	I haven't seen this part yet.
	Play this.
	My people, as an American citizen, which is not, I can get a gun and, well, I've been looking to buy an AR-15 or a gun.
	Look at the prices, daddy, of this beauty.
	$1,000?
	$700? $600?
	$800? Boys, I remind you that in the United States...
	I kept telling you only us Americans can carry guns in the United States.
	I guess he wasn't that much of a citizen.
	So that is the individual.
	I'm sure many of you knew this.
	Or knew of him.
	Well, the latest news of the day is he's gone.
	Deported to Venezuela.
	Let me see if I have the video.
	There was another one where he was, I think, in tears.
	And this is going to segue into the deportations as they're being applied to illegals and visa holders.
	Migrant influencer Leonel Marado who urged other illegals to squat in U.S. homes deported to Venezuela.
	The brazen migrant influencer who infamously flashed around wads of U.S.
	cash handouts and encouraged other illegal border crossers to squat in American homes has finally been deported back to Venezuela after causing uproar on the flight back.
	He encouraged other illegal migrants to invade abandoned houses in TikToks, which was was sent back to the narco state.
	You think ACLU is going to come to the rescue for this guy?
	Or do they only do that for alleged gang members?
	Venezuela's Minister of Interior, Justice and Peace...
	Diasdaro Cabello said Moreno was welcome back.
	However, the freeloading migrant caused disruption on the flight and upset his fellow passengers.
	You don't say.
	Oh, the firebrand TikToker had to be placed in his own section of the plane with extra security to calm tensions.
	It's unclear why Moreno caused the disruptions or what he was doing.
	After he stepped off the deportation flight, he flashed the thumbs up and received a pat on the shoulder from a security official escorting him off the plane.
	Migrant crossed the border illegally in April 2022 and was quickly released into the U.S. The Venezuelan border crosser, however, failed to appear for his required check-ins with immigration and ICE, leading to the floods to arrest him in Ohio 2024.
	An immigration judge ordered Moreno's deportation last October, but Venezuela refused to accept any deportation flights at that time.
	Can you believe this?
	A country saying, yeah, he's illegal.
	He's in your country.
	You've ordered him to deport.
	We don't want him back.
	Once President Trump returned to the White House and commenced a mass deportation campaign, Venezuela began allowing the flights to land again.
	He caused outrage, and we all know this stuff here.
	I don't think we're reading the same.
	Are we reading the same article?
	I hope we were, but whatever.
	So here's the question, because it's going to segue naturally into the next question of another student who had her visa revoked and apparently is in detention and about to be deported.
	Is there anybody on Earth who would say that is only speech?
	And an illegal alien who's here without color of rights, set aside the fact that he was not attending his required court hearings.
	This is freedom of speech issue.
	And someone who's here illegally has all of the same freedom of speech rights as a natural-born citizen or as a naturalized citizen.
	I don't think many people would argue that.
	Some might, and say unless he was actually breaking the law, he's allowed to go online and claim to be breaking the law.
	And you can't deport him, even though he's an illegal alien, because presumably he said the magic word asylum as he got here, and therefore he's lawfully allowed to be here, according to the idiot sycophant Democrats who think all you have to do is say the word that you were told to say on your way up here as you are being funded by NGOs who want to facilitate the invasion of your country.
	Fine. I don't think many people would say that.
	I think there is hard evidence that this guy broke the law, but even if there weren't, and it's not going to be he didn't do it, but even if he did, yada yada, even if there is not hard evidence that he actually broke the law.
	And was unlawfully squatting in people's homes, properties.
	What he did online, I think, is sufficient.
	Set aside the fact that he was already illegal to begin with.
	The other story of the day that's making the rounds is a student who's being deported allegedly on the grounds of pure speech issues.
	Although there's some facts that are in dispute with this.
	Marco Rubio explained And people are taking issue with Marco Rubio's explanation, saying it's factually incorrect.
	We'll get to the name of the student.
	Turkish student at Tufts University on a student visa apparently was taken into custody by ICE, masked men, allegedly for the following reasons.
	And we'll let Marco Rubio eloquently explain that people who are given visas are given literal privileges and not in the...
	White privilege sense, in the actual privilege sense, as in the country is letting you come in under certain very specific terms and conditions, predicated on certain behavior, and it is a privilege by definition.
	Do you know what the definition of privilege is?
	Stop this here.
	Do you know what the definition of privilege is?
	Some people say, I had the privilege of being born in a house with two parents.
	That's not a privilege.
	That's good fortune.
	That's good luck.
	You don't control your destiny, but a privilege...
	Is something that is only reserved for a select group of people.
	Privilege, definition.
	We want to be succinct and we want to be accurate.
	A special right, advantage, or immunity granted or available only to a particular person or group.
	I once got into a bit of an argument on Twitter and it wasn't worth pursuing.
	It was a while back where someone said, I had the privilege of being born into a family with two parents.
	That's not a privilege.
	Because that's not reserved exclusively for any particular group or people.
	It's good fortune because whatever your race, creed, religion, or whatever, 50% of people, give or take, end up in a broken home.
	It's not a privilege.
	It's good fortune.
	A privilege is a visa.
	A privilege is my visa.
	I come into a country and expect that I'm going to raise shit even if I don't break the law.
	You might be flirting with disaster.
	But breaking the law, you are absolutely flirting with disaster.
	When I go fishing and there's the alligator underneath, George, people like feed the alligator.
	You can't feed the alligator.
	That's a felony.
	And I'm on my visa.
	Have you ever flown your drone over here?
	You can't fly your drone in a Federal Reserve.
	That's a federal violation.
	So a visa is a privilege by definition of the most quintessential type.
	You're given a visa.
	You don't have all of the God-given rights of a natural-born citizen or a naturalized citizen.
	So with that said, Marco Rubio's explanation as to what happened, and we'll talk about it.
	Mr. Secretary, a Turkish student in Boston was detained and handcuffed on the street by plainclothes agents.
	A year ago, she wrote an opinion piece about the Gaza War.
	Could you help us understand what the specific action...
	She took, led to her visa being revoked.
	And what was your State Department's role in that process?
	Oh, we revoked her visa.
	It's an F1 visa, I believe.
	We revoked it, and here's why.
	And I'll say it again.
	I said it everywhere.
	Let me be abundantly clear, okay?
	If you go apply for a visa right now, anywhere in the world, let me just send this message out.
	If you apply for a visa to enter the United States and be a student, and you tell us that the reason why you're coming to the United States is not just because you want to write op-eds.
	But because you want to participate in movements that are involved in doing things like vandalizing universities, harassing students, taking over buildings, creating a ruckus, we're not going to give you a visa.
	I'm going to pause it there for one second because you are going to have a lot of people saying, she didn't do anything.
	Marco Rubio's lying.
	She didn't partake in vandalism.
	She didn't partake in occupations, whatever.
	First of all, I don't know the facts of this case any more than I knew the facts of Mahmoud Khalil's case.
	I happened to, after having done extensive summoning for crowdsourcing, I happen to have determined that there was, I believe, even if you believe in free speech for visa holders, one of the videos was sufficient to warrant the action that was taken.
	I'll get to that in a second just to substantiate what I'm saying.
	People are going to say, she didn't partake in that.
	He's lying right now.
	You have to listen to what he said because I only picked up on it the second time around.
	Say it again.
	I said it everywhere.
	Let me be abundantly clear, okay?
	F1 visa is a student visa, by the way.
	Just bear that in mind.
	He doesn't say that she partook in vandalism or occupation.
	He said she supported a movement that...
	If you go apply for a visa right now anywhere in the world, let me just send this message out.
	If you apply for a visa to enter the United States and be a student, and you tell us that the reason why you're coming to the United States is not just because you want to write op-eds.
	But because you want to participate in movements that are involved in doing things like vandalizing universities, harassing...
	Participate in movements that are responsible for doing such things like vandalizing.
	It doesn't mean she does them.
	It means she's participating in a movement that does do it.
	Which is also sort of the argument for Mahmoud Khalil.
	But I'll shut my big mouth and let it play out.
	Words matter.
	And facts matter even more.
	The question is, what did she do and what did she not do?
	I have my skepticism, my cynicism that all she did was write an op-ed in 2024.
	I'm somewhat cynical that that would be the only thing that put her on anybody's radar.
	You can take Marco Rubio at his word or you can call him a liar, but you can't misrepresent what he's saying.
	He didn't say she did it.
	She partook in movements that did it.
	So it might not have been her, but it might have been others within the movement that she was participating in supporting.
	...
	students, taking over buildings, creating a ruckus.
	We're not going to give you a visa.
	If you lie to us...
	And get a visa and then enter the United States and with that visa participate in that sort of activity.
	We're going to take away your visa.
	And once you've lost your visa, you're no longer legally in the United States and we have a right like every country in the world has a right to remove you from our country.
	So it's just that simple.
	I think it's crazy.
	I think it's stupid for any country in the world to welcome people into their country.
	They're going to go to your universities as visitors.
	They're visitors and say, I'm going to your universities to start a riot.
	I'm going to your universities to take over a library and harass people.
	I don't care what movement you're involved in.
	Why would any country in the world allow people to come and disrupt?
	We gave you a visa to come and study and get a degree, not to become a social activist that tears up our university campuses.
	It's a very interesting thing.
	You may not like it.
	We're going to get to the F1 visa.
	You may not like what he's saying, but you can't blame him for saying it, and you can't say that he's wrong for saying it.
	You want to go study at a university.
	And you imagine that people come to McGill to study in Canada.
	On the one hand, arguably not necessarily taking a seat for a Canadian, because I think there's many more foreigners who have more money to attend these universities than Canadians, unless you're from within the province.
	Not necessarily taking a Canadian space, but you're being given the privilege to go study at beautiful, reputable universities.
	What did you say on the application?
	Yeah, I want to go there to be activists.
	No, I didn't say it, but it goes without saying.
	That's what university is about.
	Yeah, maybe if you're an American citizen, they won't deport you, but the university might kick you out.
	When you're on a visa, it's a privilege.
	And if we've given you a visa and then you decide to do that, we're going to take it away.
	I encourage every country to do that, by the way, because I think it's crazy to invite students into your country that are coming onto your campus and destabilizing it.
	We're just not going to have it.
	So we'll revoke your visa, and once your visa is revoked, you're illegally in the country and you have to leave.
	Every country in the world has a right to decide who comes in as a visitor and who doesn't.
	If you invite me into your home because you say, I want to come to your house for dinner, and I go to your house and I start putting mud on your couch and spray painting your kitchen, I bet you're going to kick me out.
	But we're going to do the same thing if you come into the United States as a visitor and create a ruckus for us.
	We don't want it.
	We don't want it in our country.
	Go back and do it in your country.
	But you're not going to do it in our country.
	I mean, I know that people watching on my channel are probably going to say, damn right, when did Marco become alpha male for anybody who believes in that stupid terminology?
	I'm very, very sensitive to this because there is, I appreciate the argument.
	You can say whatever you want so long as it supports us or we agree with it, and the second you say something that we disagree with, well, then we deport you or revoke your visa.
	We're not quite there yet.
	The issue is, let's just look up what the visas, what the requirements are.
	Are we on this thing?
	Yeah, F1 visa.
	To enter the United States to attend a high school.
	Students cannot travel on the visa waiver program or with visitor visas.
	You must have a student visa, F or M, to travel to the United States to study.
	For sure, appears the idea.
	Okay, student acceptance at the SEVP approval.
	How to apply.
	Schedule for an interview.
	Prepare for your interview.
	185 bucks.
	Additional documents may be required.
	Attend your visa interview.
	A consular officer will interview you to determine whether you are qualified to receive a student visa.
	You must establish that you meet the requirements under U.S. law to receive your visa.
	Ink-free digital.
	Okay, fine.
	Enforcing, entering the United States, extending your state.
	What are the criteria?
	That's what I'm looking for here.
	Can I enter the United States for more than 30 days in advance, attending visa renewal, visa denial, and ineligibility?
	I was refused a visa, misrepresentation, or fraud.
	Attempting to obtain a visa by the willful misrepresentation of a material fact or fraud may result in permanent refusal or a visa or a denial of entry into the United States.
	So the question is going to be, one, as a matter of fact, what did this student actually engage in?
	And the other one's going to be a matter of law.
	As unfair and mean as it is, they're laying down the law of their own country as relates to the privilege of being gifted a visa.
	And for everybody who's out there saying visa holders have all the rights of natural-born, naturalized citizens, it's simply false.
	Because these visas do demand, sometimes, compelled behavior that is not able to be demanded of natural-born citizens.
	Even if it doesn't involve breaking the law.
	Thomas Sowell had a good one on this.
	I mean, I won't play the video again because it's the same video.
	Marco Rubio.
	Oh, nice.
	He's just quoting it.
	He's quote-tweeting this.
	It's... If you invite me into your home for dinner and I go to your house and I start putting mud on your couch and spray-painting your kitchen, you're going to kick me out.
	We're going to do the same if you come into the U.S. as a visitor.
	Which wasn't spray-painting.
	It was only an op-ed.
	I had my doubts that it was an op-ed.
	Only. And I couldn't find sufficient information just yet to come to a hard position on the application of Marco Rubio's principle in law as relates to this privilege vis-a-vis this particular student.
	So I'll wait for that.
	But as a generalized principle, I don't think Marco Rubio is wrong.
	And this is what's being reported from the Washington Compost.
	This is as favorable as it's going to get.
	For the student, Tufts student from Turkey detained by masked officers video shows the widely circulated video of Turkish doctoral student Rumaysa Öztürk's arrest in the Boston area has sent shockwaves to the academic university.
	Here we go.
	As Tufts students, Ramsey Öztürk made her way to an interfaith center to break the Ramadan fast Tuesday.
	Can you start it more as a sympathy piece?
	But it doesn't matter.
	Plainclothes officers, some masks, descended on her.
	She was screamed as an unmasked officer in a hooded sweatshirt, grabbed her security visit shows.
	Within about a minute, they whisked her away in handcuffs.
	The widely circulated video of the immigration enforcement officer, who Ozturk's lawyers said were from the Department of Homeland Security, sent shockwaves to the university.
	30-year-old from Turkey is a Fulbright scholar working on a PhD in child study in human development on an F1 visa.
	Her lawyer, Masa Kanbabi, said in an email.
	We should all be horrified by the way the DHS spirited away Rumesa in broad daylight, she wrote.
	Federal judge, district judge, considering a petition from her lawyer, ordered officers not to remove her from Massachusetts without advance notice.
	Apparently she was already in Louisiana, so that's out of jurisdiction now for habeas corpus, from what I understand.
	According to a court filing, ICE had already transferred Ozturk out of the state when the federal judge ordered to be kept in Massachusetts.
	DHS, let's see here, they engage in activities.
	DHS and ICE investigations found Osterk engaged in activities in support of Hamas, DHS said in an emailed statement without sharing evidence for the claim or responding to questions about the video.
	It added that supporting terrorists is grounds for visa termination.
	Joshua Els, Senior Vice President of Tufts, said Thursday the school learned about her visa was terminated.
	The university had no knowledge of this incident in advance, did not share any information with federal authorities prior to the event.
	They've got to make sure they cover their butt.
	We got it.
	We do it every day.
	Okay, we got the statement.
	Trump promised to deport pro-terroristic, anti-Semitic, anti-American campus protests over Israel's war in Gaza.
	Trump sent mass law...
	Okay, we got the rest of this.
	Let's see here.
	Annie Lai, a law professor at the University of California at Irvine who specializes in immigration rights, said some of the officers in the video do not have anything on their clothing, a badge or writing on the vest that identifies them as law enforcement or government officials.
	At one point in the video, an officer says, we are the police.
	The fact that they did not say they were from DHS or ICE is concerning, adding that they didn't seem to say in the video why she was being taken into custody.
	Most of the officers have their faces covered.
	During the arrest, this gives people the sense that they can be taken without knowing who is taking them and why.
	That should be deeply alarming.
	I agree.
	Turkish Embassy said it was working with the U.S. authorities to ensure that Usturk's rights were protected and that it was updating her family.
	Tusk President Sunil Kumar.
	And fellow campus leaders said the school was offering support to its community, including immigration resources to its international students and faculty.
	We recognize how frightening and distressing the situation is for her, her loved ones, and the larger community here at Tufts, especially our international students, staff, and faculty who may be feeling vulnerable or unsettled by these events.
	And we get into the rest of it.
	Okay. Okay.
	Separately, the American Association of University Professors Middle East Studies sued the Trump administration this week over what they called ideological deportation policy.
	The complaint alleges that its policies, quote, fail to give non-citizen students and faculty fair warnings as to what speech and association the government believes to be grounds for arrest, detention, and deportation.
	I think they've been sufficiently clear.
	The only question is whether or not you believe it's a double standard.
	You can support Israel and there won't be any risk of you being deported, although I suspect if you started harassing, spray painting, vandalizing, occupying in support of Israel, you would get deported if you were here on a student visa.
	But I don't think it's lack of clarity.
	They just say supporting Hamas and supporting terrorism.
	What does that mean?
	I guess you could not feign ignorance or play coy, but you could say, well, what does that mean?
	If I support the Palestinians, is that supporting Hamas?
	One thing that's relatively clear, after having done my best to ascertain what evidence was and was not out there, as relates to Mahmoud Khalil.
	This was from our stream.
	I finally found the one video where I said, okay, fine.
	Maybe it's harsh, but play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
	When I saw this video, I'm like, okay, that answers it.
	This sounds not like this man was merely a spokesperson negotiator, but an active participant in.
	Listen to this.
	They're the worst!
	This guy's a Darwin Award winner!
	This is a video you can't deny that it's him.
	And there's no argument that maybe it's not him.
	Okay, this is what he said.
	Gathered thousands of students here.
	They actually gathered thousands.
	They're not treating this as an anti-war movement.
	An anti-war movement that actually gathered thousands of students here.
	Hold on, just wait for it, people.
	Thousands of students across the United States.
	How far are you all willing to go here on campus?
	We're going to go as far as we need to to pressure the university to divest from the occupation.
	This is up to the group, to the leadership of the group to decide how far they will go.
	But now it's clear that the students will remain here.
	They will stay here until they achieve their demands.
	Okay, so that is...
	He wins a free one-way ticket.
	Okay, put on pause.
	What was funny is I was overlapping my face there.
	You notice how in that video, he went from saying, we, we will go as far as we need to, to they...
	Yeah, that might be enough when that privilege is being revoked to say, I'm sorry, did you just say we are going to disrupt the campus as much as we need to until our demands are met?
	All right.
	Sorry. Did you mention that those were your intentions when you came over?
	Oh, well, there wasn't a war when I first came over.
	I don't know if there was or wasn't.
	Did you mention that you reserved the right as a student visa to go and interrupt and support?
	Whether or not they are supporting Hamas versus the Palestinian people, there is a distinction.
	I just think most people don't...
	I think most people are actually either deliberately or inadvertently opting for the former and not the latter.
	Because I think if you support the Palestinian people, you have to vocally oppose Hamas, but that's just me.
	If a pro-Israel student did the shit that we saw occupied, like we saw in Montreal, I don't care that it would be pro-Israel and therefore pro-whatever the American agenda is.
	I would expect that visa to get revoked and that person to get...
	It's a privilege of the highest order that you have to acknowledge and be grateful for and say, yes, thank you for this opportunity to live among the free and I will do everything I can in my power to support that very freedom.
	And I appreciate that some people say telling someone to go fuck themselves is supporting the First Amendment and the Constitution.
	Supporting... Terrorist organizations or organizations that support or condone violence.
	You might be able to get away with it if you're a natural-born citizen who wants to support BLM.
	But, sorry.
	With privileges come obligations.
	Holy crap, we've got a new open-source farmer is a member of the vivabarneslaw.locals.com community.
	Welcome, good sir.
	Open-source farming sounds like an actual very good...
	What's the word I'm looking for?
	Not business venture, but philosophy.
	Let me see something here.
	I hate to say it, but that I got.
	Roosting. Viva did reasonably well in the interview with Alina Haba.
	The only time he was a schnook was when he repeated to Alina that a judge was the nipple judge.
	She had no reaction.
	The joke fell flat.
	Well, she was familiar with my tweets.
	I think more often than not, I refer to Engel Ron as the nipple judge.
	I was happy with the Alina Haba interview.
	Harrison Fields, I was also happy with that.
	I don't think I asked only softball questions, and I appreciate now people in our local community's response to some of the answers.
	They may or may not be entirely satisfactory.
	Now, I hope...
	This is always the line to walk, the fine line to tread.
	If you go there and act like a bootlicking sycophant that you're so grateful to get the invitation and you're not going to ask real questions, well, you might get invited back again, but your audience who comes to you for honesty, sincerity, and insight will say, what the hell was that, Vivo? Then you go there and you act like too much of an ass, like maybe a Caitlin Collins or a Casey Hunt, and then you'll never get invited back and you won't be able to blame them.
	By the way, I passed Caitlin Collins walking on the street yesterday in D.C. I mean, first of all, she's not a...
	I don't think she's an ugly person.
	She's taller than me, but as is 95% of the world, apparently, or at least 95% of America.
	I'm serious.
	She's wearing sunglasses.
	She looks kind of like celebrity-ish.
	I was like, I look pretty good.
	And then the person I'm walking with was like, you know, that was Caitlin Collins.
	Like, damn, it looked just like her.
	All that to say, you know, I wanted to ask my hard questions.
	I asked Harrison Fields, you know, Trump to explain his position on Operation Warp Speed because it's a legit...
	It's a legit issue that I still have.
	And he offered an answer, and it may or may not be satisfactory to even the most hardcore MAGA supporters.
	But it's a very interesting line to walk.
	Integrity versus politeness.
	And I think I walked...
	Well, I'm never going to compromise on the integrity.
	I'm certainly willing to compromise on the politeness, but not with friends and people who I like.
	I got to meet RFK Jr., and I didn't get to ask him a question, because his handler, my goodness, she was in a rush, and I...
	I'm not one to, you know, elbow in the crowd.
	So all I say, open source farmer, welcome to the channel.
	King of Biltong.
	Hold on, hold on.
	We're going to bring this one up the way I know that I can.
	Unless I haven't actually...
	Oh, I didn't do it.
	Let me see here.
	Oh, it came up.
	Boom. Look at this.
	Bada bing, bada boom.
	King of Biltong in the house.
	Just released U.S. Wagyu Piripiri Biltong.
	Great Wagyu flavor and some mild heat, almost 15% protein.
	Packed with B12, creatine, iron, zinc, and much more.
	Go to biltongusa.com.
	Code Viva for 10% off.
	King of Biltong says we stream every Friday.
	They have to change their time.
	5.30 p.m. Eastern.
	5.30 and Sunday, 4 p.m. Eastern, we do some light banter.
	Who else is cooking live?
	Join in the fun by following our channel.
	It's rumble forward slash e.
	What the hell?
	C forward slash eat at Anton's.
	And Cultivated Mind says, oops, open source farmer is my alt channel.
	It seems I used the wrong account.
	Oh, well.
	Well, I got two chats out of it.
	Thank you very much.
	Open Source Farmer, welcome to the channel, anyhow.
	I mean, I know you've been around before, so welcome.
	We've covered the Visa part.
	We're not yet done with JD Vance.
	It's not SignalGate, by the way, but I saw this story on Tim Pool, and I was listening to his analysis of it in terms of the risks and perils of AI, and I think he's...
	Very much on point in that AI is not going to be used to do the outlandish, you know, videos of crimes of a certain nature that were not actually perpetrated by the individual, although who knows, maybe one day they will be.
	But that AI is going to be used to very discreetly change.
	Wordings and phraseologies of things that were actually said such that no one will actually ever really definitively know what was truly said and what was not said.
	That's Tim's take, and it's an interesting one.
	But there was a recent, another AI fake news fake in the wake of SignalGate, much like that shitty account.
	Is it Republicans Against Trump who posted the fake Don Jr. clip of a podcast where he's talking about, you know, being allies with Russia?
	It's a fake.
	It's an AI fake.
	These idiots, they don't do their due diligence.
	And then even when they make a big mistake, and it's either a bona fide, borderline, inexcusable, but sincere mistake, or it's malicious.
	They knew it was a lie, and by the time they issued the correction, the lies already traveled across the world.
	Their apology was a jackass apology, which really makes you hate them even more.
	Speaking of which, we will get to Harry J. Sisson towards the end of this.
	So there's another one coming around.
	And you gotta love this.
	Hold on.
	I'm gonna play the audio.
	Because the audio is coming from...
	It's amazing.
	Big Blue Wave USA 2026.
	151,000 followers.
	No, 151,000 following.
	156,000 followers.
	Let me see this here.
	March 2018.
	They got the Ukrainian flag and the American flag upside down.
	They've got every...
	I don't know what...
	Oh, the Blue Wave.
	I'm an idiot.
	Okay, well, that's what the Blue Wave means.
	They got every avatar.
	They're just missing the face mask, the needles, the boosters, and what else?
	Climate crisis, whatever that one is.
	This account, which I'm convinced exists only to stir shit up, and I believe they're propaganda foreign bought accounts, but listen to this.
	They post this video.
	Everything that he's doing is getting criticized in the media, and he says that he's helping, and he's not.
	He's making us look bad.
	He's making me look bad.
	And I'll tell you this, and you wouldn't like it if I said it.
	But he's not even in Turkey.
	He is from South Africa.
	He is constantly.
	He's this great American leader in a room that has the portrait of some of the greatest men that ever lived in this country.
	And he has the audacity to act like he is an elected official.
	I am an elected official.
	I am an important one in this situation, not him.
	So if he wants to tank the economy and his cars, maybe that's what he deserves.
	You know what's amazing?
	It's so out of character that I would never have believed it in the first place.
	There are some people who you might think could act like that behind closed doors.
	I can give you any number of names.
	And not necessarily only on the left.
	But let's just...
	Rachel Maddow, for sure.
	Caitlin Collins, for sure.
	I mean, they would say that publicly.
	People who would be so viciously negative behind closed doors.
	J.D. Vance, in as much as I can know someone from reading his autobiography...
	And everything that I've ever seen about him.
	If I were to ever, you know, maybe he'd have to have a very bad day or he would be justified if he ever actually talked like that behind closed doors.
	It's not a character to the point where I would never believe it.
	But apparently people believe it.
	And apparently these jack-in-nimmies believed it.
	J.D. Vance blasting Elon Musk was not on my autocrat bingo card.
	Believe it or not, Elon, no one likes you.
	Not even Trump when they put the eye back because they're a bunch of idiots.
	He just likes your money.
	The video's fake.
	They confirmed that it's fake.
	And if you had half a brain, which anyone who flies the Ukrainian flag in their bio apparently lacks, they didn't know that it was a fake.
	And you know what the problem is?
	It'll change nothing of this idiot's assessment.
	Alright, well maybe that was fake.
	But Elon's still an autocrat.
	And believe it, nobody likes him.
	And even if he didn't say it, I bet you he's thinking it.
	Assholes. But what's even more assholey...
	Then that is the fact that the fact checkers cannot even definitively bring themselves to say that it's fake.
	Which one is this?
	Which fact check is this?
	Hold on a second.
	DW. Is this Daily Wire?
	What's DW?
	Daily Wire.
	It is Daily Wire.
	I'm just going to skip to the punchline here.
	Likely fake.
	I mean, it's crazy.
	I thought this was Associated Press.
	An audio recording on social media claims to feature U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance criticizing Elon Musk, stating that he's making us all look bad.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	An audio clip.
	We don't need to get into it.
	It's shared here.
	DW Fact Check and ARD Factenfinder, yeah?
	Investigated the clip's authenticity.
	Here's what we found.
	In the viral video purportedly criticizing Musk, you say, okay, we're there.
	Verdict. Most likely?
	Likely fake?
	I'm sorry.
	Just get out the likely.
	What is this lingering doubt that you're leaving in the minds of people who want to believe it?
	Most investigation indicates the audio is AI generated.
	This is crazy.
	Congrats, DW.
	I mean, I thought you were AP based on that.
	But the damage is done for those who believed it, and the damage will be forever done because some people are not going to believe the fact check.
	There are still people out there who...
	Oh, cripe.
	Which one was the one that the Snopes even had to confirm?
	Was false.
	I think it was the very fine people hoax.
	Snopes. I'm pretty sure it was that.
	No, it was this one.
	I still know people who consider themselves smart.
	Who I consider to be educated.
	Not smart.
	Or not informed.
	But educated.
	And it seems the more educated some people get, the more ill-informed they get.
	Even though Snopes itself said, no, Trump did not call neo-Nazis and white supremacists very fine people, how many people still believe that it's actually true?
	Because the power of the indoctrination is not merely undone by the disclosure of the truth.
	It is easier to fool people than it is to convince them they have been fooled.
	So people will forever believe that that was real, even after it's confirmed that it was fake.
	And I don't remember why we have Aaron Rupar up here.
	I thought he was going to link this in somewhere, but this was going to link it to Greenland.
	Let's just play this.
	I already have it up here.
	I might as well play it.
	Aaron Rupar, go look him up in the Urban Dictionary, has this clip to share.
	President has previously not ruled out military force when...
	He's talking about taking over Greenland.
	But your rhetoric today is more about encouraging the Greenlandic people to vote for independence.
	Do you think the rhetoric has changed about that?
	Or what's your message there?
	No, I don't think it's changed at all.
	Look, the president said clearly he doesn't think that military force is going to be necessary, but he absolutely believes that Greenland is an important part of the security, not just of the United States, but of the world and, of course, the people of Greenland, too.
	It's very simple.
	I think the president's been very consistent here.
	From his State of the Union, from his inaugural address, and every public statement that he's made, this territory, Greenland, really matters for the security of the United States.
	It's extremely vulnerable right now.
	And if the people of Greenland were willing to partner with the United States, and I think that they ultimately will partner with the United States, we could make them much more secure.
	We could do a lot more protection.
	And I think they'd fare a lot better economically as well.
	This has to happen.
	And the reason it has to happen, I hate to say it, is because our friends in Denmark have not done their job in keeping this area safe.
	They just haven't done it.
	It's very simple.
	For all of our friends in the American media who attack the administration for pointing out the obvious, what is the alternative?
	To give up the North Atlantic?
	To give up the Arctic?
	To China, to Russia, and to other regimes that don't have the best interests of the American people at heart, we have no other option.
	We need to take a significant position in Greenland to keep the people here safe, but to keep our own country safe, too.
	Bing, bing, bing, bing, bing.
	We're going to get back to this in a second.
	I noticed in our locals community, this DW is not the Daily Wire.
	This DW, look at this, by the way.
	This might be a lawsuit.
	Okay, this is the Daily Wire, DW logo there.
	The DW that we're looking at, or at least that was writing that article, which now it makes sense why there was another Germanic-sounding name in it, was this one.
	Deutsche Welle.
	Daily Wire.
	I wholeheartedly, unequivocally apologize for having assumed the DW in that was the Daily Wire and not the Deutsche Welle.
	And this is how fact-checking me fact-check in real time.
	It's a commonly shortened, a German public state-owned international broadcaster funded by the German federal tax budget.
	The service is available in 32...
	Well, that makes a whole hell of a lot more sense.
	They're the ones who are still sitting there saying that Elon's a Nazi.
	So, not the Daily Wire.
	Deutsche Welle and Daily Wire.
	Miscusi. Uh-oh, hold on a second.
	Yes? It's the Daily Wire lawyers.
	I'm joking.
	Getting back to that Greenland thing, by the way.
	This goes back to the interview that I had.
	That is J.D. Vance.
	Thoughtful, considerate, insightful, and astute.
	And he's going to go petty.
	He wasn't an elected official.
	You'd have to be an idiot to believe that that was true in the first place.
	But my goodness, if I ever heard anyone who I've respected talking like that, I might think twice again.
	But the thing about Greenland is starting to, you know, get my, not my hackles up, but get my World War III alarm bells tingling.
	They are very much putting the emphasis on Greenland, the Arctic Circle, Arctic shipping routes, while focusing on Canada, while focusing on the Panama Canal.
	And I've always sincerely believed that Donald Trump is not just smarter than people give him credit for.
	He's exquisitely smart.
	And when he says something that is beyond the understanding of the lowly hoi polloi like myself, he probably says it with better information than 99% of the people out there and 99.9% of the people out there give him credit for.
	And the concern about Greenland and ensuring Arctic safety is something that makes me deeply concerned that they know more about the vulnerability of the West right now than we care to admit.
	And that's all I have to say about that.
	What else do we have here?
	Oh yeah, we got one last one.
	Before we head on over to vivabranchlaw.locals.com I'm going to keep this one for locals.
	Only because I meant to do it.
	Get out of there.
	I meant to do it during the Canadian intro rant.
	But we'll have more of a rant over on vivabranchlaw.locals.com Rogue judges again sticking their rogue...
	Sticks in the wheels of justice that are the Trump administration.
	Talking about deportation of students who have their visas revoked and student lawyer activist organizations doing everything they can to prevent that from happening.
	Whether you agree with it or disagree with it, we know the arguments.
	Trump deporting the Trena de Aragua.
	Transnational designated terrorist criminal organization.
	Out of Venezuela, violent, criminal, murderous gangs, declared a terrorist organization under the Alien Enemies Act for the purposes of deportation, expedited deportation during a time of war-ish predatory incursions.
	You had your corrupt Judge Boesberg being the first corrupt stick in the wheels of Trump justice, and now you have...
	A corrupt DC Court of Appeals.
	Two to one.
	Saying, yep, Trump can't do it.
	The decision I will share in our locals community afterwards, and there were some highlights, but it's motivated reasoning from the majority judges.
	Two to one.
	Appeals court sides with judge who blocked deportations under wartime authority.
	Three. Judge Panel from D.C. Circuit Court of Appeal has denied the White House's push to restart deportations under a rarely used wartime authority.
	Yep. Rarely used because it's not often.
	How many millions of illegal crossings, criminals, being sent from Venezuela have we had?
	Two to one.
	Judges Wednesday left in place a lower court order that temporarily blocked the Trump administration from quickly deporting alleged Venezuelan gang members under the Alien Enemies Act.
	The White House said it plans to appeal to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court better do what it needs to do.
	Otherwise, people are going to, A, lose faith in the system, and B, when criminal transnational illegal gang members feel that they have the support of the judiciary, and when they feel that the judiciary is impeding on the executive's ability to act as executive's commander-in-chief during times of arguable but not so arguable predatory incursions, specifically as it relates to the TDA gang members from Venezuela, that might be the...
	Political permission slip that many other potential would-be transnational criminal gang members might need in order to say, I'll take my chances.
	Step foot in there, and then I get constitutional rights.
	Step foot in there illegally as members of a gang organization, and I get...
	You can't do that.
	I've got rights.
	Judge Patricia Millett, who was appointed by former President Barack Obama, cited a lack of opportunity for the alleged gang members to contest the cases against them before being quickly removed from the country.
	I'm not donating.
	Are you crazy?
	The government's removal scheme denies plaintiffs even of gossamer thread of due process, Miller wrote in a concurring statement.
	No notice, no hearing, no opportunity, zero process to show that they are not members of the gang, to contest their eligibility for removal under the law, or to invoke legal protections against being sent to a place where it appeals likely they'll be torture and their lives endangered.
	Just say the words.
	The magic word is asylum.
	Soros-funded, HAIS, migrant NGOs.
	Just say the word.
	They can't deport you.
	You say the word asylum, even if you've illegally crossed, not at a port of entry, they can't.
	The ruling upholds a temporary restraining order from District Judge Bosberg, who blocked the Trump administration on March 15th from removing immigrants under the act.
	Still can't say the word illegal.
	Because whether or not they're gang members, they're still illegal.
	Oh, but no, they're not illegal because they said asylum.
	So you have to determine whether or not it's actual bona fide asylum.
	Lawyers for the Department of Justice argued that Bosberg had overstepped his authority by inserting him into questions of foreign policy.
	Irreparable harm.
	Judge Walker, who was appointed by President Trump in his first term, agreed with that argument.
	The government likely faces irreparable harm to ongoing highly sensitive international diplomacy and national security operations if the lower court is allowed to stay in place, Walker wrote in his dissent.
	The government is likely to succeed on appeal for a technical but important reason, Rocker wrote.
	Is it justiciability?
	Maybe? The five named plaintiffs in the case should have filed their challenges in Texas where they were being held rather than in Washington, D.C. Oh, you mean they went forum shopping again?
	And they just happened to end with Judge Bothberg again?
	Is there only one judge in D.C.?
	The third judge, Karen Henderson, said little during oral arguments earlier this week, but Henderson, who was appointed by George W. Bush, voted to keep the lower court order in place.
	She rejected the government's argument that the court could not consider questions of foreign policy or national security.
	Sensitive subject matter alone does not shroud a law from the judicial eye, Henderson wrote.
	The eye of Sauron.
	Indeed, we have previously considered the precise sort of question that the government contends we cannot.
	ACLU. And Democracy Forward, which sued to block the Trump administration from using the Alien Enemies Act, hailed the appeals court order.
	You know what's funny?
	Yesterday, as I was jogging in D.C., there were a bunch of ACLU activists.
	I stopped to pet a cute pug.
	It wasn't the ACLU's pug, or maybe it was, and that was their ploy to get me to stop.
	And then I'm like, hey, we want to support the ACLU.
	I'm like, hey, I know you guys.
	You might want to go check my tweets.
	No, thank you.
	I didn't say that because I'm not an asshole.
	But I did continue jogging.
	President Trump is bound by the laws of this nation, and those laws do not permit him to use wartime powers when the United States is not at war or has not been invaded to remove individuals from the country with no process at all, said Sky Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward, in a statement.
	Sorry, it's funny how they always just omit the word predatory incursion.
	Yeah, they're not at war, technically, with Venezuela.
	What's her stupid face?
	Now understands that.
	Casey Hunt.
	It's not an invasion.
	It's a predatory incursion because these criminal gang members were coming at the behest and request of the Venezuelan president at the time.
	White House criticized the ruling, saying, President Trump was seeking to protect the American people from members of the Treno de Aragua.
	The Venezuelan gang, which had recently designated a foreign terrorist organization.
	Quote, Harrison Fields, I met him yesterday.
	A White House spokesman said in a statement, he said Trump administration would swiftly seek Supreme Court review.
	Harrison, I concur, sir.
	But nobody else has performed thus far better than Stephen Miller when he laid down the letter of the law to Casey Hunt.
	And I actually ran into Stephen Miller's wife at the event yesterday as well.
	So that's that.
	There is a portion of the judgment, which if we care to look at, I have here.
	It might replace the car vlog here.
	This is the order.
	I'll share it in our local community afterwards.
	Let me just get this bigger because I know some people are not going to be able to see this.
	Go to...
	Let's just skip to some of the conclusions here.
	This is a temporary restraining order.
	They're talking about the balance of inconvenience, the state of the factor, likelihood of the success.
	Courts jurisdiction.
	The government argues that plaintiffs sued in the wrong venue because the habeas corpus claims should be heard only in the federal district where they are detained.
	A habeas corpus...
	A habeas runs...
	A habeas remedy runs against the immediate custodian of a detainee, the person who holds them.
	In what is alleged to be unlawful custody.
	Ordinarily, the immediate custodian is the warden where they're being held.
	How did they get out of it this time?
	A habeas against the custodian must be brought in the DTD's district or confinement.
	Okay. Plaintiffs initially challenged the lawfulness of the...
	Oh, here, sorry.
	The five named plaintiffs are currently detained in Elval Detention Center, which is in the Southern District of Texas.
	For habeas, it must be there, not in court.
	Let's see how they get around this.
	Plaintiffs initially challenged the lawfulness of the proclamation of the APA and sought various forms of relief, including writ of habeas corpus, but they quickly abandoned their habeas claims and no longer contest their confinement, only their detention.
	Okay. Thank you.
	The government's second brief omits any discussion of proper venue and instead contains a conclusory assertion that the district court lacked jurisdiction because these claims sound in habeas.
	It's not really a habeas.
	Assuming habeas relief is no longer sought, I turn to plaintiffs ABA claims, which I again assume constitute claims.
	This is what we call motivated reasoning, people.
	Any way to get out of it?
	It's not really habeas corpus, so we get to hear it.
	And we're not really at war.
	And there's an irreparable harm.
	We don't really get to adjudicate on the individual expulsion of each and every one of these.
	And, you know, we want to frustrate the president's ability.
	To do what he was elected to do.
	This should come as no surprise.
	The term invasion was well known to the Fifth Congress and the American public in 1798.
	The phrase echoes throughout the Constitution, ratified by the people just nine years before.
	And in every instance, it is used in a military sense.
	How about predatory incursion?
	Predatory incursion.
	Here we go.
	A third law.
	That law granted the president the power to detain and expel invasion or predatory incursion.
	Unlike its counterparts, the Alien Enemies Act was never questioned by Jefferson or Madison, the de facto leaders of the Republicans.
	Okay. On the contrary, the Republicans minority in Congress supported its enactment.
	Perhaps, unsurprisingly, it is the only component of the Alien and Sedition Act which remains today.
	The Alien Enemies Act contains two provisions, a conditional clause and an operative clause.
	The conditional clause limits the AEA's substantive authority to conflicts between the United States and a foreign power.
	Specifically, there must be a declared war between the United States and a foreign nation or government, an invasion or predatory incursion, perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States by any foreign nation or government if these conditions are met.
	Thus, the AEA vests the president near-blanket authority to detain and deport any citizen whose affiliation traces to the belligerent state.
	A central limit to this power is the act's conditional clause that the United States be at war or under invasion or predatory incursion.
	I guess in the context of...
	It's incredible.
	Let me get into that.
	Okay. Well, that's about all we really need to know.
	The stay factors.
	Oh, we already got this part.
	Oh, we're all here.
	Okay. How do I close this without making sure?
	So that's it.
	You know, one of the questions I asked Alina Habba was, we're at a stage now where there's no checks and balances and three co-equal branches of government.
	Judiciary interprets the laws, executive applies the laws, and the legislative enacts the laws.
	We're at a point right now where the judiciary tells the executive how they get to carry out their functions as the executive.
	And that is a wholesale, wholehearted usurpation of what...
	The presidency is and what the three branches of government are.
	Right now, they're not co-equal and they're not checks and balances.
	You have rogue judges who are vitriolically partisan and anti-Trump, who are dictating to Trump what he can and cannot do as the duly elected commander-in-chief.
	All right, now we're going to take the party over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com after party.
	There was one from...
	Hold on.
	Hold on.
	There was one more from...
	Biltong, and he says, maybe one day, maybe someday when we are a big stream, haha, Viva will raid us so that we can show people to make some good food and whilst doing some light bantering.
	King of Biltong, I'll see what, I'll ask for favors, but I don't control things.
	But right now, we are going to go raid Kim Iverson.
	Those are the instructions that I've been given for the next part of this raid.
	So we go like this, forward slash raid, and I put that.
	No, I'm putting my own...
	I can't put my own channel to raid.
	That's not right.
	Hold on.
	We're going to go do this.
	We're going to go to vivabornslaw.locals.com afterparty, and we're going to have a good afterparty there.
	Let me just get my fat fingers over here to get the link.
	Viruses aren't real.
	Why Dr. Crown says everything we know is fake.
	I happen to have asked Dr. Drew this very same question yesterday, and he was none too impressed with the idea.
	That the virus doesn't exist.
	Go raid Kim Iverson if you're going to.
	Let her know that I sent you.
	Confirm raid.
	The raid has been confirmed, people.
	And now we're going to go take this party to the VivaBarnesLaw.locals.palm.com after party.
	But before you do that, before you even go, hold on one second, people.
	Have you gotten your book, Louie the Lobster, yet?
	If you haven't, what the hell?
	Go have a baby.
	And after you've made that baby, go and get Louie the Lobster Returns to the Sea.
	No, you know what?
	Order the book now.
	And then...
	You'll get the book by the time the baby's born, or in some cases, you might even get it by the time the baby has been made.
	Louis the Lobster returns to the sea on that place that sells books, Amazon.
	And here is the link.
	Link to Amazon.
	Go get it!
	And let me know what you think of it.
	Viva, keep your hands to yourself, says John African.
	Louis the Lobster returns to the sea.
	A wonderful children's book.
	Hold on one second.
	Let me go here.
	Do I get the back part of it?
	Like this?
	Eh, whatever.
	I can't get the back part.
	Go get one if you're so inclined.
	Support the work that I've done.
	Get a good book.
	I brought them to D.C. thinking, I have it all played on my head.
	I'm going to go give Donald John Trump a signed book.
	He's going to sign one of mine.
	We're going to take a picture.
	I was going to give one to RFK Jr.
	I get there, I panic, and I don't even remember.
	I gave one book away.
	I gave one book to Michael Knowles.
	Maybe we'll do a Viva and Michael Knowles sequel.
	And read it.
	But go check it out if you're so inclined.
	And more important, if you want to get some merch, you know where to do it.
	It's vivafry.com.
	We're going to be amping up the merch game sooner than later.
	Just got to figure things out.
	It's too much to do in a day, but...
	Viva Fry.
	I am Alex Jones.
	I love the pyramid shape.
	It's beautiful.
	Friends don't let friends vote Democrat.
	It's never out of season for that.
	And then some other good stuff.
	Alright, that is it.
	Go raid the Kim Iverson channel.
	If you're going to, let her know that you came from here so that I can get some street cred.
	The Viva raids are effective.
	If you're not going to, Sunday night we will be live.
	Viva and Barnes Law for the People, Sunday night law extravaganza.
	I'm going to put out some clips, maybe a car vlog, but I do have a child that I need to catch up with because I've been gone for 48 hours.
	It's like the longest 48 hours of a kid's life.
	He wants to go fishing.
	I'm going to say no to fishing.
	So go and enjoy the day and thank you all for being here.
	Rumble, Godspeed.
	Stay tuned for the Viva Goes to Washington documentary and I'm going to go get feedback from our locals community.
	Peace out, Rumble.

▲