All Episodes
March 26, 2025 - Viva & Barnes
01:23:27
Live from D.C.! Jasmine Crockett is TRASH! And Whatever Else Happens Today! Viva Frei LIVE!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Blue districts, there's been this backlash to Doge.
Is there a liability for Elon Musk, in your mind, getting involved in some of these races?
I think that we should make a liability, right?
There should be a legal liability to operating in our system that way.
When we think about the limitations that we put, we are constitutionally, you know, capable of putting limitations on the ways in which we engage systems, right?
You know, money into politics as freedom of speech, but we still put limits on that.
For instance, you can only give me $3,500 for a primary and another $3,500 for a general.
We can put limitations on that so that we can keep the system operating in the way that is naturally intended to do.
But when we have someone who has this type of unfettered money, access to money, who can then kind of funnel that into these types of super PACs where they're not as regulated as they are, right?
And that just allows them to just basically get around the rules that we have.
And we recognize that, you know, but for him spending the type of money he spent, he would not be taking press conferences out of the White House, out of the Oval Office.
So the liability, I think, will come from the people, obviously.
That's the final fail-safe in so much of what happens with the narthopathy, whether or not the people are determined that they think it's unacceptable in the way that we act.
It's very windy in Washington.
But we get to the important part of this.
That he is clearly working through and that's what obviously informs even the way that he navigates the doge.
I think people think it's unconscionable and really beyond that.
the pale, that somebody like him has given access to our leaders who have not been elected.
So I know that across the country polls and anecdotal evidence will show you that it is a liability for him to move that way.
But the problem with money in politics is that it doesn't matter.
Because the super PAC doesn't say Elon Musk's super PAC.
It says America super PAC or America first.
None of these super PACs are named for what they actually do, which is what allows them that cover, that veil of secrecy to be able to move.
By the time people actually realize who's putting the money in, it's almost always too late.
The damage has already been done.
I mean, not only that, it's that we have very loose regulation for what you can say through your spending, what type of information or disinformation you can spread.
We know that he's one of the biggest perpetrators or spreaders of disinformation on X, his own site.
We know that.
That is objective fact.
What would keep him from being someone who spreads disinformation through his super PACs, through ad buys, and through text messages?
So that's why we need more regulation, but also that's why the people are fed up.
By the way, you notice it was fate.
That the wind died down just so that we could hear the most ludicrous part of Summer Lee's statement.
Gotta say a couple things.
So I'm in Washington, D.C. As you can all tell, I'm using the Rumble Studio.
And I can see how people get addicted to this town.
Like, you walk around and there's always something happening.
Political. I was thinking to myself, it's sort of like Vegas, where like in Vegas, there's always a place to gamble.
There's always a place to go have a drink if that's what you want to do.
At whatever time of day, literally.
Here, I had lunch.
Get down here, land.
Another windy landing, but it wasn't at the Reagan Airport, so I was somehow...
Superstitiously less nervous about a windy landing at Dulles.
Land. Get to the area where I'm at.
Have a beautiful lunch.
And then I just decide to walk over to the Capitol.
And I just walk over.
I was going to make a lectern joke and whatever.
But then I see a half dozen, a dozen journalists and a small crowd.
And I stop and look at what's going on.
And it was Ro Khanna, Summer Lee, and some other guy who I didn't record.
Giving an outdoor statement on a bill that they're trying to pass.
And at any given point in time, you can run into the politician that you love or the politician that you hate.
And you can hear them and see them doing their business.
And I can see it being very addictive in that regard.
Much like Vegas after a weekend there, I can see myself getting very, very sick of this place, both in terms of the incessant politicking and the hierarchy, the ecosystem that exists out here.
That being said, small intro.
I hear Summer Lee talking about a bill that she's proposing, which she thinks should have bipartisan support, which I say is not going to get bipartisan support.
It's going to get bipartisan opposition.
Abolish PACs.
And Barnes and I have talked about this a couple of times.
This was Citizens United 2010, where the Supreme Court 5-4 on the conservative side said that individual contributions to politicians is a no-go.
There's a certain limit to that.
Not the candidates, but political action committees, which then decide how they spend the money to support messaging of the candidate they prefer.
Barnes and I have talked about it, and I know that Barnes is opposed to undoing or reversing Citizens United.
I wouldn't even say more on the fence.
I'm sort of understanding to the arguments.
It is a little bit wild.
First of all, the individual limit contributions of $3,300 is still quite a bit.
The idea that you're limited in terms of individual contributions to a candidate, but not somehow to these political action committees, and then we know what they do.
I'm amenable to the idea of limiting or undoing the potential for these political action committees, because it's not because I like Elon Musk, and now he's sort of fighting the Zuckerbergs, or at least the Zuckerberg of 2020, the Zuckbucks, or the George Soros, that I then say, yeah, it's a good idea to have political action committees.
I say, it's the law.
It's been affirmed, and now they're only complaining about it when Elon Musk is doing it as well and doing it more effectively.
But you understood what she said at the end of that justification, that it's not about democratizing the vote only.
I'm sure that that, in her mind, is the reason for it.
In her speech, which I got a better part of, she talks about brown and black people being disenfranchised, and that's political action committees disenfranchise disproportionately minorities.
I would disagree with that.
And say if they disenfranchise anybody, they disenfranchise all Americans, individuals, equally.
But at the end of it where she says it's about narrative, Elon Musk is the biggest spreader of disinformation and misinformation.
What a joke coming from the people who say boys can be girls, men can menstruate, and Russiagate was real, and January 6th was an insurrection.
What you understand about it is that it's not about democratizing anything for anybody.
It's about narrative control, pure and simple.
And now that they've got Elon Musk as the biggest PAC influencer, and they still think that they have a grip on narrative control through MSM legacy media, they want to undo, reverse political action, abolish them.
So long as they have control over the media, because then they get to run the narratives unopposed.
So then they get to run January 6th insurrection, Russiagate hoax.
And now we're going to go into the signal gate hoax.
All that to say, in as much as I have problems with a great many Democrats in particular, as they're up there talking, I'm looking through my tweets and saying, okay, fine, I've interacted with, or at least I've tagged Ro Khanna a couple of times, seems like a mildly reasonable Democrat.
Summer Lee, I think, has good intentions, but also couple that with a little bit of the sinister intentions of, yes, we want to abolish political action committees, to re-democratize.
But also we want to control the narrative.
Good afternoon, everybody.
It's been a long day.
I don't sleep well the night before I travel, especially when I know I've got to get up at 5.40 in the morning to get into the car, to drive to the airport, to catch a flight for 8.50, which is very reasonable.
I didn't sleep very well last night, but I know that I did sleep a little bit because I had a couple of dreams.
Got to D.C., landed, and I'm here.
And tomorrow is going to be one hell of a day.
Everybody who's complaining about the mic, the wind.
I was actually doing an experiment because I was recording part of that off my iPhone, and I recorded another part off my camera, which has a little buffer thing on it.
And I'm going to see if the buffer actually works well enough.
But tomorrow is indoors, where we're going to, if the day goes as planned, for a few hours, have access to and be able to Q&A with.
Cabinet secretaries and in our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community, we're getting questions that the community would like me to ask should I get certain members of the cabinet.
I've got some questions that I know I want to ask and I might have a few more given the news of the day, but that's what's coming up.
So everyone coming from the quartering, welcome to the channel.
Good to see you, Jeremy.
Thank you very much for the raid.
I have to see who I'm raiding this afternoon.
And by popular demand.
It's very flattering when people say, only an hour, that wasn't enough.
I'm going to figure out how to do the Rumble Premium segment after the main show in a way that doesn't exclude the locals community, and then we're going to have our locals only after party, after the Rumble Premium.
So I am going to start offering some exclusive content on Rumble Premium.
I just need to make sure that it doesn't actually inadvertently exclude the locals community, who shall never be excluded from anything.
And that is it.
Getting into today's show, we've got, again, I get on a plane, and I say, am I going to have what to talk about today?
And then the plane lands, and then we have what to talk about today.
But if ever I thought I was going to be in D.C., getting to not rub elbows with, but rather ask questions of politicians, members of the current cabinet, go to the Capitol.
If ever I thought that, if ever someone told me that that was going to be happening in your life, Viva, I would have said, you're nuts.
Never in a million years am I going to be looking like this, living in Florida, and now in D.C. at the Rumble studio, getting ready to ask questions, and real questions, not pandering questions, real questions.
I don't even want to spoil the alert for what it's going to be, but you know, in our locals community, what I'm going to ask RFK Jr. if and when I meet him tomorrow.
If someone had said Chuck Norris was also going to be one of the sponsors of my show, I would have also said, what the hell are you talking about?
Chuck Norris, Walker, Texas Ranger.
Everybody, one of the sponsors of today's show, Chuck Norris.
If you don't know what happened to him, you don't watch TV and you don't pay attention.
He's 80 some odd years old, still kicking butt and still working out and staying active.
In fact, what's even more shocking is he can work out longer, has more energy for his grandkids.
And is loving the best life that he's living.
He did this by making just one change.
He says he still feels like he's in his 50s.
His wife even started doing it and she's never felt better.
She says she feels 10 years younger and her body looks leaner and she has energy all day.
He made a special video.
I've played it a few times in the past when Chuck sponsored the channel, but I don't want to play the video for you now.
Go watch it.
Watch it to the end.
Click on the link in the description.
It'll change the way you think about your health.
Once again, chuckdefense.com forward slash viva.
Click the link on the description.
Just a reminder, by the way, he's 84 years young.
He's got more energy than 99% of Americans.
He discovered he could create dramatic changes to his health simply by focusing on three things that sabotage our body as we age.
Go to chuckdefense.com forward slash viva.
And Chuck, maybe one day I can get side house kicked to the face by the legendary Chuck Norris.
What do we start with?
I want to get...
I will get the bad news out of the way first.
And bad news because it's coming from Canada and the rest of our show is going to segue segment into each other because it's going to be all American politics.
Hold on.
I thought...
I thought I figured out the solution to hearing the beep perpetually, but I'm going to have to go on.
Do not disturb.
We'll start with a joke and then we'll get into the bad news.
And the joke is Canadian politics.
Where is it?
Where is it?
Come on now.
The globalists don't know how to be normal people.
That's what you have to understand.
The politicians who look at citizenry as though they are a tool for the ascension to their own power, they don't know how to be real people because they haven't lived among real people in however long.
I say that, you know, the greatest curse of all these politicians is they will never be able to live and walk among the regular citizenry ever again for the rest of their lives.
They think it's a blessing.
You know, they're in their Davos, they're in their sealed-off communities.
That is a hell of their own making.
It's a prison of their own making.
Hillary Clinton had her hot sauce in her purse when she was talking to a couple of black podcasters when she thought that would be the pandering that she needed to do.
Elizabeth Warren had her...
Don't get me a beer, huh?
When she thought she was talking to everyday Americans who, that's how they drink beer.
Kamala Harris, geez Louise, what was her?
Oh, she had one.
Well, whatever.
She had hers wherever.
She changed her draw, depending on who she was talking to.
This is Mark Carney, the globalist, three-passport-carrying, WEF, Davos, Bilderberg-frequenting, globalist whore, running for the prime ministership of Canada after having been anointed.
And he's just like you, people.
What's the hot sauce of Canada, people?
Do I give you five seconds in the chat?
What's the hot sauce of Canada?
If you're going to pander to Canadians, I'm just like you.
I've got my thick-backed bacon and my maple syrup.
I've got maple syrup.
I've got Brussels sprouts.
I've got local jam.
Do you know who goes out in Canada to get syrup because they're out of syrup?
Nobody. You know who runs out of syrup in Canada?
Nobody. Those are the best shoes ever.
Pandering of the highest order, people.
I've got maple syrup.
I've got Brussels sprouts.
I've got local honey.
I've got local jam.
It reminds me of the episode of Mr. Burns in The Simpsons when Marge Simpson gives him the fish to eat.
He's like, I've got maple syrup, people.
I put it on pancakes.
That's what Canadians do with maple.
If you're really Canadian, by the way, you put maple syrup on eggs.
It's delicious.
Pandering, pathetic, globalist pig is what he is.
Who offshores his money.
Who outsources his jobs, but now he's got his moment because he learned from all of the other globalist whores out there.
Hillary Clinton hot sauce, Kamala Harris changing her drawl every single time.
Elizabeth Warren, get me a beer, huh?
And now you got Carney with his maple syrup.
The other thing that was going on in Canada, by the way, we'll do this update too because it's worth mentioning.
I covered the video the other day.
I'll play it again one more time because at the time, I said, I don't even think I believe this.
And if someone were going to lie about these stats, because I believe CTV News would do that to influence the political landscape in Canada, what would be the reasoning for doing it?
The motive?
I can see the motive is to terrify people out of voting for the Conservatives or the PPC and to...
Encourage them to vote for the Liberals.
This is what aired a little while ago.
Someone recorded it off the TV, and there's been an update in this because I said, I don't even believe it, but if it's true, what would be the nefarious reasons for which CTV News would run this type of fake news because I don't believe that the PBC were ever going to win 84 seats?
will show it's a tight race between the two parties back at the beginning of the year nano's research had the conservatives winning a majority by a landslide with 225 seats in the house of commons by the end of february the liberals had significantly narrowed that gap leaving the conservatives just shy of 130 projected seats and a minority government and that appears to You have to understand how...
In as much as I'm rosy, optimistic about the PPC's chances of getting one, two, three seats this election, you have to understand how patently outlandish it is to suggest 52 seats for the PPC this election when they got zero the last time, but not for lack of votes, just for lack of distribution, to potentially getting 84 seats.
Now, the more I thought about it, the more I realized that if someone were going to make a bullshit stat like this, they would do it in order to equate In the minds of Canadians, the Conservative Party with the PPC.
And they would say, look how similar they are.
That's why you should fear the Conservative Party as much as you have been brainwashed into fearing the PPC.
Because there's a lot of Canadians, too many, who think the PPC are a party of xenophobe, racist, anti-Semites, despite the fact that they have a very diverse political base.
And I ran for them.
And then I got flack from who else?
The Jewish community, at least some journalists.
Why would this Jewish YouTube star run with the People's Party of Canada as if I ever brought an identity in my election campaign?
The only reason to make this up is to terrify people into believing that the conservatives are the same as the big, bad, racist, xenophobic PPC.
Because you look at it like this, you're like, oh, okay, well then, geez, if the conservatives are on par with the PPC, I'd better vote liberal if I want to avoid tyranny.
Well, there's been an update in this.
There's a guy who did some good work, and because it requires the clarification...
And the shout-out for the remanded, having looked into this.
Because people, the person who shared that video, started getting accusations that they falsified the video.
And so, I think it's the remanded.
Who is this?
I mean, I know who they are, but a healthy discourse is fundamental to a respectful and functioning society.
Well, some of my tweets might not be in line with that.
Speak in your mind organizes your thoughts regardless if right or wrong.
I like that idea, and that's the poppy flower there.
The remanded reached out, and I'll read their tweet because it goes back to that video that we saw with that stat that I didn't even believe the first time I saw the video, but, you know, if they were going to lie, I had my reasons why.
A controversial image showing PPC having 52 and 84 seats March 24, 2025, which had been published via CTV, has now been confirmed by Rob Duffy, communications manager, as, quote, We can confirm the graphic in question aired erroneously on CTV News, and the story appeared on CTV News Channel as well.
It was quickly corrected for additional broadcasts.
A user of the account of whatever bunch of names came under attack and was accused of having doctored the video when all he had done was use his phone to record the CTV program and highlight the anomaly.
His post has simply stated, I'll leave this here.
It had also appeared on three other user accounts showing that the image and feed from CTV had occurred and wasn't doctored or faked by the ex-user accounts.
I sent out a dozen communications, phone calls in Ottawa, Edmonton, and elsewhere to provide this clarity to what turned into a viral issue sincerely.
The remanded.
So, good work, the remanded.
Because it didn't make sense in any realm of the universe.
And as much as I want to be optimistic about the chances of the PPC, 84 seats is a mistake.
It's as much of a mistake, by the way, now that I think about it.
In Pennsylvania, when they announced that Kamala Harris, you know, the CNN or one of the news outlets ran a graph and it showed Kamala Harris taking Pennsylvania.
And it was like, how the hell do they know?
The election hasn't happened yet.
And then the outlet came out and said, yeah, we erroneously aired a graph that we had prepared just for the purposes of testing the live stream of the election night.
Maybe. But to the extent that that was done and it was inaccurate, I now firmly believe it was intended to further vilify or demonize the Conservative Party in the eyes of liberals.
into thinking that they're more in line with the misapprehension of what the PPC is for the purposes of terrifying them into voting for the liberals.
Because CTV News is liberal propaganda garbage.
much.
I think CTV confused the PPC with the CPC.
No, it's not possible.
The PPC is the People's Party of Canada, and the CPC is the Conservative Party of Canada.
What they were saying was that the PPC was eating into the majority government that they projected for the consumer.
Conservative Party of Canada.
So it didn't even make sense at the time, but that's as much Canadian politics as we need to get into.
Accidentally on purpose is kind of the way I tend to think about it.
Oh, and they corrected it for future broadcasts, but never announced the correction for the past broadcasts.
Oh, lordy.
All right, everybody.
Now we're going to get into the good stuff.
American politics.
And we will get into...
What's her face?
Jasmine Crockett.
In fact, we'll get into Jasmine Crockett first.
Because she really is an awful, insidious, disgusting person.
And I say that as someone who has issued my fair bit of needling on the interwebs.
But before we do that, by the way, if you haven't already done it, you should make sure to download the app and watch through the app because you get instant immediate notifications for every time the content creators that you want to watch live go live.
And so if you're looking for more freedom in your streaming, download the Rumble app.
You get to experience content like never before.
It's available on iOS and Android.
You can take Rumble with you wherever you go or just chill at home and watch the best content on Earth.
It's available on Apple TV, Roku, Amazon Fire TV, LG Smart TVs, Samsung TVs.
It gives you all the power of Rumble at your fingertips.
Rumble is the platform that respects free speech and that loves you, the creator, and the individual who wants to enjoy your God-given right to the First Amendment without censorship or narrative control.
Download the Rumble app.
Make sure you search my channel and all the others in the lineup and all the others out there, and you will get immediate notifications all the time.
And you will never complain and say, Viva, I didn't know you were going live.
So that's it.
Rumble app.
The link is in the description and download it.
Hold on a second.
Yeah, the link is in the description there, people.
Jasmine, listen to this.
Here, look at this.
If you haven't seen this...
Jasmine Crockett, Mrs. Eyelash, who got into the fight with Marjorie Taylor Greene, called Greg Abbott.
Is he the Attorney General or is he the Governor?
No, that's right.
He's the Governor.
She called him Governor Hot Wheels because Greg Abbott, for those of you who don't know, is paralyzed.
He's in a wheelchair.
She called him Mr. Hot Wheels and she's taken some flack for it.
Abbott... Talk about this here.
Abbott says Dems have nothing to sell but hate after party member appeared to mock him being in a wheelchair.
Rep Jasmine Crockett referred to Abbott as Governor Hot Wheels.
Now, maybe she meant something else by it and maybe like, I think it was a Joe Biden who told Greg Abbott or was it somebody else to stand up not knowing that he was realizing he was paralyzed in a wheelchair?
Maybe she meant something else by it.
Like maybe he drives a nice Corvette.
But just to really quickly cover this.
Governor hit back at a Democrat lawmaker who appeared to mock him for being in a wheelchair, saying such remarks will only leave the party in dust come future elections.
It's another day and another disaster by the Democrats.
The reality is they have no vision, no policy.
They have nothing to sell but hate, and Americans are not buying it.
She called him Governor Hot Wheels.
I don't know who wears long eyelashes.
I don't understand it, but people do it.
But this is the same woman who wears artificial eyelashes.
Which is very ironic given her critique.
And she's a glorious specimen of a human we're going to get to in a second.
Crockett clarified her comments in a post on X, claiming she wasn't thinking about the governor's condition.
What was she thinking about?
I was thinking about the planes, trains, and automobiles he used to transfer migrants into communities led by black mayors, deliberately stoking tension and fear among the most vulnerable.
Literally, the next line I said was that he was a, quote, hot-ass mess.
Referring to his terrible policies.
At no point did I mention or allude to his condition.
You know what's amazing?
Just either own it or apologize for it.
This is a lie.
I wasn't talking about him being Governor Hot Wheels because he's in a wheelchair.
He was Hot Wheels because he's hot wheeling around immigrants, illegal immigrants that they're deporting or migrants.
The explanation makes no sense, and that is what we would call a dishonest and disingenuous apology, because it's a lie.
And if you didn't know who Jasmine Crockett was, I'm not reading a lot of these messages.
She's a liar.
First of all, make fun of someone for their condition.
I mean, I guess it's fair game.
Someone made fun of her for her.
Lacking eyelashes condition.
They're not going to say, oh, I wasn't talking about her eyelashes.
No. You made fun of them.
Say it's fair game.
But no.
And if you didn't know who she was, I had to bring this one up because we'll never let her forget about it.
Because there are some tweets which are so damn bad and so utterly offensive.
Is it this one here?
Yes. This is an actual tweet from Jasmine Crockett.
And I will read it.
Uncensored. Because it needs to be read uncensored.
I think this is...
My response to this one is what got me blocked by Jasmine for US.
I think they can block me because I'm not a citizen.
Yet. Jasmine Crockett.
If this is what the MAGA quote mandate...
End quote.
Looks like.
Then as I've stated before, Christianity ain't the foundation of it, but cruelty and chaos are.
For fuck's sake, though.
Project 2025 said they would fuck with Head Start.
No one listened.
I'm gonna have my staff find footage of me warning of this.
And these dumb fucks literally moved in and breaking all our good shit in real time.
If this ain't some Beverly Hillbilly billionaire bullshit, I don't know what is.
I am going to get into my official capacity and do a quick IG live, that's Instagram, before my in-district swearing-in shortly.
If you follow me on that page, tune in.
You could read this in a British accent, and it wouldn't make it sound any less trashy.
That is the caliber of politician.
That despite political action committees apparently dictating the electoral process, that is the caliber of politician that still manages to get into office.
I'm not reading this one either.
There's a meme in our, at least it's a screen grab, and I cannot read that without getting into a whole hell of a lot of trouble.
She is despicable.
That I can read.
So that is the woman who made fun of a paralyzed man, coming from the same party who berated everybody for making fun of Tim Wall's kid when everybody was making fun of him, not knowing that he was on the spectrum, who then go on to make fun of Elon Musk, despite him being on the spectrum, who then go on to want to abolish political action committees after damn near 15 years of exploiting political action committees, billionaire bucks.
If they didn't have double standards, they would have zero standards at all.
Anyways, that's about as much as that story is worth.
Now, Denise Santu over in our Locals community.
David, will you ask to have what was in Kash Patel's book that was redacted to be unredacted?
Well, I might do it now.
Is that in respect of SignalGate?
I'm going to look at that.
And then we've got Israel says, I was disappointed to hear this interview relating to Max.
Well, now I'm kind of curious what this is.
Hold on one second.
I want to see what that interview is.
I might say the truth about Maxine Bernier and the PPC from Clyde Do Something.
We'll look at that in the After Party with Locals.
All right.
Now, people, now we're getting into it.
We're going to get into SignalGate.
We talked about it yesterday.
Information that I said was acutely missing from Jeff Goldberg's article in The Atlantic has now been divulged.
Not only has it been divulged, we've got more details on what is being referred to colloquially as SignalGate.
There is a FOIA lawsuit that's been filed.
And that scandal is taking on epic proportions.
By the way, I'm such an idiot that I forgot we didn't even get into the bad news after the bad news from Canada.
We'll do that, actually, in a bit.
Got distracted by syrup, man.
The scandal is now called Signalgate, and we went over it in detail yesterday.
I posted the clip today, and we don't need to go over the thorough details, but what happened in this Signalgate is that members of Trump's administration...
There's so much to go on within here.
Members of Trump's administration had started a Signal group chat to discuss strategy, apparently, or at least timing, philosophy, strategery of strikes that were to be conducted against the Houthis in Yemen.
And on the group chat, which was initiated by, apparently, created by Mike Waltz, on the chat was J.D. Vance, Tulsi Gabbard, Mike Waltz.
Who else?
A bunch of people in the administration.
And accidentally, inadvertently, allegedly, apparently, but I'm a little bit skeptical of this now, J.G., who stands for Jeff Goldberg, the journalist at The Atlantic, and J.G. was involved in responsible for a number of the anti-Trump hoaxes.
Like, he's a vitriolic anti-Trumper, propagandist, pathological liar of the highest order.
Encryptus, could you refresh my memory on the stories that he was involved with that were the outright lies?
Oh, I think he was the one responsible for Trump allegedly having referred to soldiers as suckers and losers.
Yep. That's the one, right?
Yep. Okay, good.
Among other classics.
The guy ends up in this group chat, doesn't disclose it to the group, and he claims to have had classified war plan knowledge of the strikes that were to be conducted against the Houthis after J.D.
Vance privately said, look, I'm not so aligned with this.
I don't think the timing is necessary right now.
We can wait a month, create a little bit of messaging.
People aren't going to understand what we're doing right now.
Pete Hegseth comes in and says, no, waiting a month isn't going to do very much.
So let's do it now.
And then they do it on March 15th, strike the Houthis.
The crazy thing about this is, first of all, Mike Waltz.
I had no position on his appointment because I don't really know who he is and I didn't know who he was in as much detail as I was familiar with others or became familiar after I did some research.
I've got another big brain who DMs me all the time and says, do you think it was wise of Trump to appoint a Dick Cheney Republican?
And I say, what do you mean, a Dick Cheney Republican?
And he says, you don't know about Mike Walt's history with Dick Cheney.
And if you don't...
I shall familiarize ye with Mike Wall's history.
Mike Wall's, Michael George Glenn Waltz, is an American politician, businessman, author, and former Arthur, Army Special Forces officer in the 29th and current U.S. National Security Advisor under President Donald Trump since 2025.
A member of the Republican Party, he was the U.S. Representative for Florida's 6th Congressional District from 2019 to 2025.
He was the first Army Special Forces soldier to be elected to Congress.
Sounds like a decent guy with one hell of a track record.
Waltz received four Bronze Stars while serving in the Special Forces during multiple combat tours in Afghanistan, the Middle East, and Africa.
He served in the Bush administration as a defense policy director in the Pentagon and as counterterrorism advisor to Vice President Dick Cheney.
Now, some of you will say that means nothing.
I mean, everybody serves in prior administrations, good or bad.
Others might say, to the extent that this signal gate could ostensibly, to someone who's not even conspiratorially inclined, look like a conspiracy to undermine the Trump presidency and create a scandal to sink at least some players.
Some might say, okay, he's a little bit tight with Dick Cheney.
Dick Cheney, I won't call it, not the merchant of death, he's just like, he's like death personified, came out this election cycle, or it was last or whatever, said, Donald Trump is the enemy of an America, which pretty much is the absolute best endorsement you can possibly get.
His daughter, Liz Cheney, is a traitor of the highest order.
I mean, I would argue, even in a legal sense, an actual traitor who partook in what I believe to be actual illegal conduct in that January 6th persecution of a kangaroo court committee, destroyed the evidence of that committee before they left and got their beautiful auto pen, epi pen. Pardons from demented Joe.
So Mike Walsh served as counterterrorism advisor to Dick Cheney.
Make of that what you will.
The question yesterday was, who on earth accidentally added the most vitriolic, propagandist, anti-Trump, Atlantic journalist to the group thread?
And yesterday, the answer was given by Trump.
He said it was one of Walsh's advisors.
Now, sorry, not advisors.
What's the word I'm looking for?
Member of the staff.
Staffers. He said it was one of his staffers yesterday.
Now, when I hear the word staffer, I tend to think of, like, a young...
What's her face?
Cigar lady.
What's her name?
Monica Lewinsky.
A member of staff like that.
I think of a staffer as like a young, wet-behind-the-ears person.
It turns out, apparently, that the staffer was a guy named Alex Wong.
Now this, I'm going to cite Mark Grobert because I asked Laura Loomer in her reporting, who broke this, I think she broke this, who is the staffer?
Is Alex Wong the staffer that Donald Trump was referring to as having been the one who accidentally, inadvertently, added an enemy to the Signal chats?
And... Well, I'll show you the thread down there in a bit.
So it says, this is Laura Loomer's breaking exclusive.
I have not been burnt by Laura Loomer.
She's made a few mistakes that everybody makes mistakes.
And when you know that someone's made a mistake, you double, triple check and you just make sure.
But she does good work despite sometimes being her own worst enemy.
But it looks like she's done great work here.
She writes, Candace Chu Wong, a Chinese woman who was one of the many attorneys involved in prosecuting Jan Sixers.
Alex Wong was appointed by President Trump on, that looks like, November 22, 2024, to serve as the assistant to the president and the principal deputy national security advisor under Mike Waltz, the newly appointed U.S. national security advisor.
I have discovered that Alex's wife, Candace Chu Wong, worked under the Obama administration and the Biden administration as an assistant United States attorney.
In the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, most corrupt district on earth, where she led the Violence Reduction and Trafficking Offensive Section for more than two years.
She was involved in the prosecution of many Jan Sixers during the Biden regime, under which she was nominated to become a member of the United States Sentencing Commission.
Additionally, Candace Huong served as a law clerk to Obama-appointed U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia M. Sotomayor.
Making matters worse, she worked at Covington LLP, which is one of the law firms that President recently stripped of its security clearance and terminated all of their government contracts via executive order on February 25th, 2025.
Which judge was it that forced him to reinstate Perkins Coie?
Trump accused Covington LLP of being involved in the weaponization of government.
Why do we have Chinese Deputy National Security Advisor who was married to a Chinese U.S. attorney who worked under Obama and Biden and helped prosecute Gen Sixers after the stolen 2020 election?
This is unacceptable.
And given the Chinese connections, it really makes you wonder if...
Jeffrey Goldberg, the reporter from The Atlantic, was added to the Trump signal chat on purpose as part of a foreign op to embarrass the Trump administration on behalf of China.
Alex Wong should be removed from his position, and both he and his wife should be investigated by the FBI.
And she's tagging Cash Patel.
Okay, that's pretty freaking thorough.
And if there's a mistake in there, I would very much like to know.
But the most important element of it, in my view, was, is Alex Wong the person that's alleged to have accidentally added?
J.G., Jeff Goldberg, to the chat.
And just so you know, in my understanding, it was a staffer.
Mark Robert, who is, and I would call him the idiot savant of conspiracy theories and politics as well, says, Wong is the Waltz staffer.
And I just want to make sure.
Alex Wong is the Principal Deputy Director of National Security Service.
Okay, then we got that here.
That's Mark Robert.
These are questions you can literally ask Grok.
Use the force.
No. That...
It tells me who he is.
That doesn't tell me if he was the staffer who added him to the text thread.
So if it is, good.
So now this plot has gotten very, very, very thick.
Forget the Chinese.
You got the Chinese angle, which some people might call xenophobic, even though it's a very, very big problem.
Chinese spies infiltrating American and Canadian politics.
It's a very, very big and real problem.
You got that.
You got what is basically an inexcusable error.
If it's not coming from a teenage staffer, who might actually, a teenage staffer might even be more familiar with it.
You've got what is an inexcusable error that, if nothing more, has very much embarrassed the Trump administration.
And this is an error that was made on behalf of or by Team Waltz.
And Waltz has now Dick Cheney, which is thoroughly anti-Trump.
History presents to it.
Yesterday, by the way, in our local community, someone said, I'm afraid that this could be internal sabotage among the factions of the Republican Party.
There are still people out there who are anti-Trump, never-Trumpers, who wear the GOP rhino, whatever monarchy you want to give them.
And so someone in our local community floated that and said, that's a very, very good idea.
The possibility that even within the GOP, it's not set aside Chinese influence.
They just want to...
Break Trump's presidency, much like many rhinos did back in 2016.
So that's the latest information on this.
It is an amazing thing.
Trump has made bad choices in the past.
He's made some bad choices the second time around.
They've just been less bad, and some of the choices have been very good.
The very good choices that he made, which everyone was very, very, very happy with, included Kash Patel, Tulsi Gabbard, RFK Jr., who's not involved in this story, and Pete Hegseth.
Remember, people went to bat and said Hegseth is a litmus test for this presidency.
If he doesn't get through, Trump is not going to be able to carry through with his agenda.
He got Hegseth through by the skin of his teeth.
He got Tulsi Gabbard through by the skin of her teeth.
And then they have this massive...
We'll get to the classified element of this later, but you have what is at the very least a massively embarrassing scandal.
That might call into question certain practices of the administration that, Lord knows, if it had been Democrats using Signal to have official government communications knowing that those messages get deleted after four to eight days, conservatives would be having a field day.
So that's where it's at right now, and it's starting to look very fishy, very suspicious, and very much like deliberate sabotage.
Okay. We're on the subject of deleting the messages and why Signal is a problem in that Signal messages apparently auto-delete in that they auto-delete after four to eight days depending on the configuration.
The diligent, who's a very smart man, says, get rid of Signal, can't FOIA.
Well, there is a FOIA request.
Let's make sure I can get rid of this.
Give it a second.
It might be a little bit of a...
Oh, maybe I've got to hit it here.
Hmm. I'm going to give it a second.
It doesn't seem to want to be getting removed from the stream.
Someone is suing and requesting information and requesting an injunction to prevent the potential deletion of official government documents.
Hold on, I'm gonna refresh this screen here for a second.
Hold on.
Apparently we're having some technical difficulties at the moment.
You Sorry guys, I don't know what's happening.
He's at the Rumble Studio there in DC.
There it is.
Yeah, it's wild.
It just logs me out for no good reason.
It's a lot better than I thought it was because I thought it had ended the stream because it wasn't even refreshing.
Alright, people.
Deep State God Viva.
Don't worry.
Okay, we're back.
Where was I?
I was talking about Signal.
That's right.
Signal's a problem because you can't FOIA it.
There has been a lawsuit filed.
Requesting an emergency injunction declaratory judgment to enjoin the administration from potentially having auto-deleted messages on Signal.
Sorry about that, by the way, guys.
We don't need to read the entire lawsuit because it's quite simple and quite clear.
Filed by the American Oversight filing emergency injunction demand for declaratory relief as relates to Signal Gates.
By the way, the irony in this, they randomly assigned Judge Boesberg.
Another activist judge, hell-bent on taking down Trump, randomly assigned this particular case.
The only problem is, I don't disagree with this case in substance.
Here, the lawsuit is American Oversight looking for complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief in the District of Columbia.
And then...
The essence of the lawsuit, the action arises from the defendant's failure to meet their obligations under the Federal Records Act regarding messages from a group chat discussion of planned and active military operations on March 11 through March 15, 2025, and the messaging application signal, which can be set up to automatically delete messages.
Plaintiff brings this under the Federal Records Act and the Administrative Procedure Act to prevent the unlawful destruction of federal records and to compel defendants to fulfill their legal obligations to preserve and recover federal records created through unlawful.
Unauthorized use of signal for sensitive national security decision-making.
And then there was a part here where they're asking for the relief at the end.
Declare that the messages and communications sent through the signal application in the course of conducting agency business are records subject to the Federal Records Act.
Declare that the failure to ensure such messages and communications are preserved comprises an unlawful removal.
...
of federal records in violation of the FRA.
Declare that defendants have maintained an inadequate record-keeping system under the FRA.
Declare that defendants have violated their respective duties under the FRA.
Issue emergency injunctive relief and permanent injunction ordering defendants to comply with their respective duties under the FRA and APA, including by referring the matter to the Attorney General for enforcement of the FRA, preservation of records, recovery of unlawfully removed records.
And the recovery or restoration of any deleted or destroyed materials to the extent possible.
Issue the emergency injunctive relief.
Permanent injunctive.
Okay, fine.
Grant the plaintiff for legal fees.
Okay. Prediction?
They're going to get it.
They would get it probably in the ordinary run of things.
But they're going to get it because who does this guy look like in cryptos?
He looks like someone out of like the Adams family.
Lurch? He definitely looks like Lurch.
Good. I've never even seen the Addams Family.
I just know what Lurch looks like.
Randomly assigned to Judge Boesberg.
Activist, corrupt, hack of a judge.
The one who gave Kevin Clinesmith, who falsified evidence that they submitted to the FISA court a slap on the wrist.
The one who has been ordering Trump to bring back alleged, no I should say, illegal alien, alleged Trena del Aragua, designated terrorist criminal gangs, bring them back to America.
Because they all deserve due process, each and every single one of them needs to be proven that they are, in fact, a member of the TDA before the president can deport them under the enemies...
Alien Enemies Act?
You know what I'm talking about.
This guy's got the case.
They're going to get the injunction.
It's rubber stamp it.
Blow a leaf across his desk with that order on it.
He'll stamp it.
I don't want to kick myself out of the stream again.
So that's what's going on with that lawsuit.
They've pulled Bozberg, and now the question is, what the hell was in the message that Goldberg did not include in his initial reporting because it was classified?
It came out today.
I mean, we all said yesterday, if it's not classified, then you can release it, Goldberg.
And everyone was saying, well, if it's not classified, then Tulsi Gabbard can release it.
If it's not classified, then Pete Hegseth can release it.
If it's not classified, Goldberg, as per their own testimony yesterday during that hearing, then Goldberg could release it.
And Goldberg did, to his credit today, release it.
And let me pull up what was in it.
Because, spoiler, I want to know what the chat has to think about this.
So Kyle Griffin reports.
Kyle Griffin is...
There's another guy whose name is very similar.
This guy's the biggest propagandist on earth.
And it pisses me off because...
He likes The Simpsons, and he's got a pug.
These would ordinarily be two things that would make me think someone is a trustworthy, good human.
First of all, his pug is freaking cute.
That's a new avatar, because I would have remembered seeing that pug.
His pug is cute, little fat, but those pugs always get fat.
Plus, he's got that clip from The Simpsons.
That was the episode when Lisa becomes a vegetarian.
It's the best episode of The Simpsons.
And despite those two indicators, Kyle is the biggest, most deceitful propagandist out there, tied right up with Aaron Rupar, and...
No lie with BTC.
All right.
Breaking from the Atlantic, editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg has released the Signal war plans, people.
These are war plans.
Here are the attack plans that Trump's advisors shared on Signal.
The tiny URL.
Oh, is the link to the article.
Okay. Here are the...
I'm sorry.
How did he refer to it again?
The Signal war plans.
Here are the attack plans that Trump's advisors shared on Signal.
And it says, Pete Hegseth, team update.
Time now, 1144 Eastern.
Weather is favorable.
Just confirmed with CENTCOM.
We are a go for mission launch.
1215 Eastern time.
F-18's launch first strike package.
1345. Trigger-based F-18 first strike window starts.
Target terrorist is at his known location, so should be on time.
Also, strike drones launch MQ-9s.
14-10, which I presume is 2-10.
More F-18 launch.
Second strike package.
Then 14-15, which I presume is 2-15.
Strike drones on target.
This is when the first bombs will definitely drop.
Pending earlier trigger-based targets.
3-36, 15-36.
F-18 second strike starts.
Also first sea-based tomahawks launch.
All right.
If I did not...
If I were to think that these people are as crooked as Democrats, I would say, yeah.
If your target gets a hold of this, let's just say that Jeffrey Goldberg, or let's just even say, however it happened, the target terrorist guy got a hold of this.
Where was it?
Here we go.
Yeah. If he got a hold of this and said, trigger base, the strike on the targets.
Target terror is at his known location, so should be on time.
I don't know how anybody would know.
We're talking about the Houthis.
We're talking about the Houthis.
If the terrorist got this, maybe he would know not to be at the location where he's at, but who the heck would know?
You'd make that argument.
My question for this, and I'm curious to know if I'm just playing too much, not devil's advocate, but defending what I believe to be an ideological aligned individual.
I said, you know, it's amazing.
Okay. Other than the fact that people are saying, first of all, if this were official, It would be in military code, like Zulu and whatever, and not international time.
I just said, look at this and say, okay, don't know where, don't know when, but we know the times at which something is going to happen.
But what I did say to this is, it doesn't even seem that it matches with the actual time of the actual bombs that actually fell or were launched on that actual day.
So draw whatever conclusions you want.
But the question is this, is this...
Classified? Are these war plans?
Does this contain information which is classified or should be classified?
Does this tell anything to anybody?
Or not?
Encryptus, what do you think?
We're going to hear him unmute.
I think this is a whole bunch of bullshit.
And I think Kyle is...
Well... I have not nice things to say about Kyle and I won't say them.
Well, first of all, anybody, go look up tweets, Viva Fry and Kyle Griffin, and you'll see I've been none too nice to the guy, but he's a pathological liar.
I said to Jeffrey Goldberg, like, all right, release it.
Okay, that's the worst of it?
Those are the war plans.
Times that don't actually match up with what actually happened, that don't mention targets, that don't mention locations, bombs are going to fall.
So we'll see.
It sounds like a conversation, like a casual conversation that touched on a semi-classified topic, but wasn't specific enough to be classified.
Part of me wants to say...
Were they hoping that Goldberg would actually disclose that so that it would be used to throw off?
The bottom line is I don't think they knew Goldberg was on there, and it's very embarrassing what they were doing, whether or not they're allowed to use Signal, and whether or not they're required to preserve their Signal messages.
That's a separate issue.
It's embarrassing, but it seems like, okay, here's a rough outline.
Here's what's going to happen.
Weather permitting, we're going to kill some bad people today.
That's almost like saying when Bongino came into office and said, today's a bad day to be a bad guy in America.
Well, shit!
Now the bad people in America know that they have to take care of themselves because the good guys are coming after them.
Let me see this.
But did he send this update before the fact or after?
That, as far as I understand the timeline of the story, I wanted to keep...
Let me go back and pull it up again.
That, according to my understanding, is in virtue of what...
Jeffrey Goldberg said, I knew of the timing of the strikes before it actually occurred.
So my understanding is that was before the strikes occurred, which makes it even more bizarre because the actual strikes didn't even occur according to that timeline.
So we're going to go here.
Let me get the URL here.
I'll bring this up.
We can go to Goldberg's article.
Here are the planned targets that he shared on Signal.
The administration has downplayed the importance of the text messages inadvertently sent to the editors-in-chief.
Okay, good, good, good.
So, about the Signal chat.
This is good journalism right here.
Oh, that's the exact bike I have.
What are the chances that I see the ad for the bike that I already got?
On Monday, shortly after...
I'm joking, everybody.
I'm not that stupid.
On Monday, shortly after we published a story about a massive Trump administration security breach, a reporter asked the Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, why he had shared plans about a forthcoming attack on Yemen on a signaling app.
He said, nobody was texting war plans, and that's all I have to say about that.
My goodness, they think I'm going to sign up for this garbage.
It's not going to happen anytime soon.
One more step.
Now everybody's learning.
The trick here.
Okay, there you go.
Well, they're going to say they lied, they lied.
The statement by Hegs F. Gabbard Radcliffe combined with the assertions made by numerous administrations that we are lying about the content of the signal text have led us to believe that people should see the text in order to reach their own conclusion.
There is clear public interest in disclosing this.
This is cover their ass.
Okay. Experts repeatedly told us that the use of signal chat for such sensitive discussion poses a threat to national security.
A case in point, Goldberg received information on the attacks two hours before the scheduled start of the bombing.
They just didn't follow any schedule that he got.
If this information, particularly the exact times the American aircraft were taking off for Yemen.
Had fallen into the wrong hands in that crucial two-hour period.
American pilots and other American personnel could have been exposed to even greater danger.
Pilots are taking off all the time.
Do they know the locations?
The exact times they were taken off from it?
Oh, my goodness.
As if would-be terrorists are not constantly looking at air bases for planes taking off.
All right.
Yesterday, we asked the officials across the Trump administration if they had objected to us publishing the text in emails to the CIA.
Yada, yada, yada.
We wrote, in part, in light of the statements from today, multiple officials, including before the Senate Intelligence Committee, that the information in the Signal chat about the Houthi strike is not classified, does not contain war plans.
The Atlantic is considering publishing the entirety of the Signal chain.
We sent our first request for comment and feedback.
No follow-up.
Lawyer, and then they failed to answer.
Last yesterday, late yesterday, White House Press Secretary Caroline Leavitt emailed a response.
As we have stated, there is no classified information transmitted in the group chat.
However, as the CIA Director of National Security have both expressed today, that does not mean we encourage the release of the conversation.
This was intended to be an internal...
What's the sick here?
Oh, to be an internal private deliberation among high-level seniors.
Okay, fine.
So for those reasons, yes, we object to the release.
Levit's statement did not address which elements of the text the White House considered sensitive.
CIA spokesperson asked us to withhold the name of John Radcliffe's chief of staff, which Radcliffe had shared in the signal chain RN.
And then we got that.
That's it.
I mean, that's it.
And then it doesn't even coincide with the timeline.
So the question is, is that classified?
Obviously not, because if it were, I presume Goldberg would be under investigation or charge.
They publicly took the position it wasn't classified.
What does it tell you?
What is it called?
Sources and means?
Sources and means, I think, is the specific term for it.
It doesn't look like it contains any of that.
You mean sources and methods?
Sources and methods, thank you.
As I said that, I see my own lisp.
Sources and methods.
What's in there?
Sources and methods.
Every chat gets it faster than me.
Nothing's in there.
And really now part of me wants to think that they wanted it to get released, but I am absolutely leaning to this being deliberate sabotage carried out by Wong for the purposes of tearing down the two litmus test appointments that withstood the barrage.
Matt Gaetz did not.
And who else didn't?
I forget now.
But it's to tear down Hegseth and Telsey Gabbard.
Sources and methods.
Yeah, thank you very much.
All right.
I don't think there's anything more on that.
Encryptus, do you have any questions?
Did I leave anything out about this signal gate that people are going to ask?
Get it in the chat and we'll see.
No, there's just one small correction.
You said that Signal deleted message automatically.
That's actually a setting.
It's not set by default.
And I happen to love Signal.
I use Signal every day.
I actually want you to start using Signal and us to stop using SMS to talk back and forth.
It is a wonderful application, and it's a spectacular way to communicate, which is why they use it.
It's safe.
It's secure.
I get it.
First of all, I don't believe that it's...
It might be safer and securer.
I don't believe anything is...
I don't believe...
I believe everything is being monitored.
Period. I have Signal.
You're not wrong.
But the other thing is...
Yeah, so fine.
Okay, so it doesn't automatically do it, but you can set it up to auto-delete.
So that might be a problem in terms of preservation of federal records.
Every government employee that I've ever known who uses Signal has auto-delete set, generally speaking.
Okay. Did I...
Oh, Anton is having rant problems.
He'll make it up tomorrow for a read today.
Anton doesn't need to make it up.
Neurodivergent, I'm reading, and I think there were some issues, I think, because I glitched out of the studio in a way that has never happened before.
Anton... I'm reading from a tipped question in our vivabarneslaw.locals.com from NeuroDivergent.
Just released U.S. Wagyu Peri Peri Biltong.
Great Wagyu flavor and some mild heat.
Almost 50% protein and packed with B12, creatine, iron, zinc, and much more.
Go to biltongusa.com.
Code Viva for 10% off.
And I'll show everybody what that looks like over at Vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Okay, so correction noted.
We're talking signal, right?
I know that I have signal on my phone here.
Signal. Yes.
But don't do it.
I'm not encrypted.
We're doing text.
Yeah, I see.
I see messages that are still here.
You're right.
All right, correction.
They don't automatically delete, but if they were to be deleted or set to auto-delete, it could be a problem in terms of preservation of government records because if it's on their personal phones, this is quite clearly...
Not personal, and if it's on government-issued phones, then I would imagine, to be discussed Sunday with Barnes, I would imagine that preservation of federal records would apply to their correspondence.
And I was thinking about it, actually.
I was thinking, like, okay, well, if they were to sit down at a table and talk about it over lunch, you wouldn't expect them to, you know, be required to create minutes of a lunch meeting where they might discuss it.
But if they were sitting down in cabinet, you would have minutes of a meeting.
So even if it were spoken, You would still have minutes of that meeting that would be preserved, maybe classified, if they didn't want the public knowing about it.
But they would still have even the spoken word preserved.
So that might be the issue.
But as far as I'm concerned, I want to hear the steel man argument for why what was in that message to Goldberg qualified as war plans.
And I'm putting that in quotes because I don't think it does.
All right, people, we are by no means done because I forgot the biggest, most important story of the day, which is the bad news coming out of Canada.
You guys know Sean Hartman?
He was 17 when he passed.
This is the son of Dan Hartman, his only son, who, unbeknownst to Dan, I'm not saying anything that's private because I've had Dan on a number of times and we've talked about it.
It's one of the most heartbreaking COVID stories that you'll hear.
Right up there with Matty DeGarry, right up there with Alan, Tristan Allen.
I've now...
I've met a number of people, I've had discussions with a number of people who are vaccine injured or who suffered a loss as a result of that jab, that COVID shot.
And there are too many to count.
I mean, I know personally, within my immediate one degree of separation, I would say six, but it might be closer to 10 people who have died or gotten grievously injured within close proximity of that medical experimental Sean Hartman died 33 days after his first Pfizer jab.
His father did not know that the son got it.
It's family issues that add a layer of pain to the tragedy.
His son, unbeknownst to him, got the shot and fell very ill shortly thereafter.
Went to the emergency room, apparently with like orangish bags under his eyes.
In what was arguably but not arguably medical malpractice, the doctors don't do...
I forget the...
There's a certain test that they're supposed to do to see if there's been a stroke or a heart issue.
If anybody knows what that test is, and I forget the name, but you're supposed to test for troponin.
It's like 101.
When you know that someone has taken that jab, you test for troponin.
Thank you, Martha.
When Sean Hartman went to the hospital shortly before he passed away, shortly after getting the jab, the doctor even took note of the fact that he had gotten the jab.
They send him home, give him Advil, and 33 days later, he dies in his sleep.
And D-dimer, thank you.
It's Tropin and D-dimer were the two tests that are supposed to be done that they did not do on Sean.
So Dan, his father, sued for malpractice or filed a complaint that was dismissed.
He filed for vaccine injury under the Canadian VISP, Vaccine Injury Support Program.
I believe his claim got rejected and it might still be under appeal.
I don't know if there's been progress on that, so I might not be up to speed on that.
And he was the first of two people in Canada to sue both Pfizer and the government.
His attorney, Umar Sheikh, who I had on the channel, talked about it.
Dan Hartman is suing Pfizer and the government for malfeasance and a number of other claims.
Kayla Pollack, who was rendered a quadriplegic from the Moderna booster after two Pfizer jabs, sued Moderna.
And I believe she's suing the government for a similar principle.
And I presume her lawsuit, at least against the government, is going to go the same way.
Dan Hartman, Sean Hartman's lawsuit against the government was struck today by, I want to say, a federal court in Canada.
Was it a federal or a state, a provincial court?
I'll double check.
It has to be federal because it's against the government, the feds.
It was struck without permission, without leave to amend.
On the basis that, I don't even want to misrepresent or mis-summarize.
On the basis that the government does not have a duty to care.
So it's being reported by the Canadian Independent.
The Canadian Independent is the one that did the initial cover story of Kayla Pollack's Having been rendered a quadriplegic from the Moderna jab, they do great work and you should follow them.
Canadian Independent, at C-A-N Independent.
They write, lawsuit against the Canadian government over teens' sudden death following Pfizer COVID-19 jab.
I'm not calling it a vaccination.
Dismissed by Ontario Judge.
So it's provincial.
An Ontario judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by Dan Hartman against the Attorney General of Health Canada, former Canadian Health Minister, Patty Haju, for malfeasance in public office, deceit, fraud, and negligence over the sudden 2021 death of his 17-year-old son, Sean Hartman, who was found dead on the floor In the ruling, Justice S. Antoniani struck down the case without leave to amend.
The judge didn't even say, strengthen your allegations against the government and then strengthen them and refile.
He says, no, you don't even get to amend.
It's done.
Struck. You can't amend it.
You can't try to repair or remedy the deficiencies that I claim are in your lawsuit to the point where you don't even get to sue the government.
It's done.
Finding it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The court determined that the government did not owe a private duty of care to Sean Hartman and that public health decisions including vaccine approval and promotion were core policy matters shielded from liability.
It did not owe a private duty of care to Sean Hartman.
Sean Hartman was a healthy, active teenager from Beaton, Ontario, with a deep passion for hockey.
When the Ontario Minor Hockey Association imposed a vaccine mandate for the 2021 season, Sean complied, receiving his first and only dose on August 25, 2021.
According to his father, Sean developed troubling symptoms within days, brown circles under his eyes, rash, vomiting, extremely sore shoulder, taken to the ER, but was reportedly sent home with pain medication.
33 days later, September 27, 2021, Sean was found dead beside his bed.
Government autopsy determined that the cause of death was unascertained, meaning no definitive explanation was found.
Seeking further answers, Diane Hartman consulted U.S. pathologist Ryan Cole, Dr. Ryan Cole, who concluded that Sean's death was caused by spike proteins from the vaccine accumulating in his adrenal glands.
He initially filed a claim with VISP, but it was denied within a month due to the government called insufficient evidence he has since appealed.
But has not yet received a response.
In his lawsuit against the government, Hartman alleged the Health Canada Ministry made false and misleading representations of the vaccine's safety and efficacy, failed to assess and monitor risks in accordance with their own mandate, did not properly warn the public about potential adverse effects, including death.
The claim argued that these actions created a relationship of proximity between the government and vaccine recipients giving rise to a duty of care.
Quote, the representations made by the defendants here were the expressions of core policy decisions made in an effort to protect the general Canadian public during a pandemic, the judge ruled.
Lawsuit against the government has been dismissed.
Hartman's case against Pfizer, the manufacturer, is still making its way through the court system, may take a legal path, raising broader questions about corporate responsibility, vaccine safety.
Hartman has been outspoken on social media about his son's death and has been working to raise funds for his legal defense.
You can support him here and I'll give everybody...
The link to the give send go.
You have to appreciate what we just read.
They say that there's no duty to care.
There's no duty to care.
No duty for private care.
What was the word?
I just want to make sure I...
Did not owe a private duty of care to Sean.
You appreciate that the government mandated that jab on people.
Coerced people into getting that jab.
Denied them their civil rights if they didn't get that jab on the basis of lies and misrepresentations, but set that aside.
They get to coerce you into doing something and then claim that they have no duty of care for that for which they just coerced you into doing.
The freedom to coerce without the obligation for a duty to care is actual reckless tyranny.
We get to kill you.
Or we get to do something that risks your life and you don't get to sue us for it.
And the main issue and the evidence in that case, and we've seen it now, the government knew that what they were saying was unsubstantiated and unjustified.
This is the same government that called us conspiracy theorists and disinformation purveyors.
They knew that what they were saying was inaccurate and they had no legitimate basis to think they had a reason to say it.
That's called lying.
They lied.
They knew that they didn't have the safety and efficacy claims or evidence to support the claims that they made.
They coerced the general public into it.
And then they say, we have the power of coercion, but we don't have the duty of care.
Go fuck yourselves.
That is tyranny of the highest order.
And that is how you get a government that will experiment on certain demographics for decades.
You know, the Tuskegee experiments were not just something that occurred in America.
The Tuskegee experiments themselves, yes.
But there was human experimentation in Canada that went on for decades in the residential school systems.
Oh, we can test on you.
We just don't owe you anything when we hurt you and kill you.
And that judge, I don't know who appointed the judge.
I don't know what his political leanings are.
Saying, well, it was core public policy to protect the public during a pandemic when they were just doing what they thought was...
No. You don't get to say I was just doing what we thought was necessary when we knew at the time we didn't have the basis to say that what we were doing was justified in fact and in science.
When they said, oh, it'll prevent transmission, they knew that they couldn't say that because they never tested for that.
Safe and effective, they never warned of the side effects for people who got that jab.
So, no.
That judgment cannot be allowed to stand.
It has to go to appeal.
It will not get overturned.
Because like I said, this is tyranny, or sorry, fascism is government, corporations, and the media working hand-in-hand to promote a shared narrative.
Tyranny is a court system which is politically appointed, which exists to protect itself.
Because if the court system now starts saying, yeah, holy shit, they're liable for their actions, well, the very same judges Who denied parental visitation rights because a parent wasn't jabbed?
Who coerced people into this?
Who didn't find any charter violations for detention in government-designated quarantine facilities?
Well, now they're potentially exposed for their own decisions.
They were all just doing it to protect the general public.
We were doing it for your own good, but you don't get to sue us for the damages we caused because we didn't owe you any duty of care.
Then why did you tell us to do it in the first place?
So that is horrible, awful, and it's what Dan Hartman is going through now.
Injury to injury to injury.
And to the motherfuckers in the replies who say the most horrible things, understand this.
You're anonymous.
You are scumbag trolls on the internet.
There is a hell, and the hell is on this earth.
And any one of you who thinks that you get to say the most horrible things on earth to a grieving father because you're anonymous, I don't mean to get spiritual, but God knows who you are.
And you know who you are.
So that's that.
It's another nail in the coffin of Canada.
And it's absolutely inexcusable.
Okay, let me go to the chat and see what's going on here.
Canada was forced.
I am glad I didn't have to take it, says Minot.
Jody's G says, Viva, you're my Canadian spirit animal, my brother.
What animal am I?
Fauci killed millions and lives like a king.
America, no better, says Bucklebrush Jones.
He lives like a king in a prison of his own mansion.
He's a man who can never walk among the people ever again.
For the rest of his life.
The rest of his life is going to be something of a prison like hell.
Anyhow, so that's what's going on in Canada.
It's the bad news that I'm sorry.
Alright, now with that said, people, 5.15.
When I figure out the business with Rumble Premium, I'm going to figure it out sooner than later.
I have no idea what day it is anymore.
Today is Wednesday.
Yes, I was going to look at my phone.
You see, it says it right there.
No, that says signed.
Here, there.
Wednesday. Tomorrow's Thursday.
Tomorrow I will be at the White House.
I will still be able to go live, and I think I'll be able to do it from the studio, but if not, I'll do it from my hotel.
Four o'clock tomorrow.
So it's going to be amazing.
You might want to come and think about...
There was someone who just joined the locals community, but now I don't see it because it disappeared.
Who was it?
Oh, maybe I can see it here.
No, I can't see it anymore.
Ah, crap.
Well, there was someone who just joined the vivabarneslaw.locals.com locals community.
Welcome. And now, hold on.
Did I do the Rumble Premium?
I did not do the Rumble Premium.
Go get Rumble Premium, people.
You'll notice a theme.
It's time to start pushing, supporting, promoting Rumble and everything that it's trying to do.
My weekly daily streams now, they're not on Commitube.
I put the clips over there because YouTube now gets the leftovers.
Rumble gets the main course.
And free speech is under attack, and Rumble won't back down.
And we've believed in empowering voices no matter how unpopular, and now we're taking that fight to the next level.
Rumble premium people, when major advertisers conspired to pull their dollars, even brands like American Companies, Dunkin' Donuts, pulled their dollars from Rumble because they didn't like the right-wing culture.
The right-wing culture of Russell Brand, Glenn Greenwald, et al.
That is what we call financial coercion for ideological purposes, and Rumble will have none of it.
Rumble's not here to fit a mold.
It's here to defend free expression.
To strengthen the mission, we are excited to offer Rumble Premium, completely ad-free experience with exclusive benefits for viewers and creators, and we'll find out what we're going to do for our creators.
So I have to set it up.
I have to set it up, and when I set it up, then it'll be easier for me to tell you what We'll find exclusive content from your favorite creators like Russell Brand, The Quartering, Timcast, Mug Club.
It's more than a subscription.
It's a stand against free speech because your voice matters.
Join Rumble Premium if you can.
For a limited time, you get $20 off for the annual.
It's $10 a month, so that's like 20% off, a little less, using promo code RUMBLELIVE.
So go to rumble.com forward slash premium.
Claim your special discount.
Today, together, we can and will turn the tide whether you join Rumble Premium or simply keep watching.
Your support keeps free speech alive and keeps truth tellers telling the truth.
Without fear of retribution from the censorship overlords of Commie 2. Let me go see what's in the chat, and we're going to talk here for a bit, and then we're going to take the party on over to vivabranchlaw.locos.com.
Time to move beyond speech.
Time to...
No, no, not reading that.
Do not...
Fed, Fed, Fed.
Look, Epicus, I'm being tongue-in-cheek because I think I remember your name and that type of talk.
If it's not overt Fed talk, it's talk that the Feds like, so no.
You don't get physical because...
Unless you're talking, let's get physical, physical.
Because I'm looking...
You don't get physical because it won't get you where you need to go.
It will give them the excuse to do everything they've ever wanted to do to you.
To suppress and to quell the movement.
And some might even say that it is COINTELPRO by definition.
Be on your bestest behavior, lads.
Says Hoser777.
I like that.
Americans are going to learn that they are, in fact, a territory at the moment, which makes it impossible for Canada to become the 51st state.
Make sure that you follow and smash that button, Pete.
Oh, that's true.
Before you go, make sure you're subscribed and that you have thumbs up notified.
But there's one other thing that I wanted to tell you also.
Oh, yes.
Merchandise, if you want to get a shirt.
I saw someone out of Bucky's.
On our way back from St. Augustine.
And he said, I love your shirt.
I was like, oh, he has to be a member of the community.
I don't think he was.
I think he just liked the shirt.
You don't want the shirt.
Go to Rumble.
Go to VivaFry.com.
Get some merch.
It's all here, people.
Look at this.
You get the fight.
Well, I mean, that's a little dated now, but you can still go fight.
VivaFry.com for some merch.
We got Elliot over here says, re-signal FOIA suit.
One, are they records?
Does Presidential Records or Federal Records Act control?
Well, okay.
Encrypt us.
Can you look this up?
Has the Federal Records Act ever applied to text messages?
Because if it has, then it's going to fall within the ambit.
It does.
Yes. I mean, I think it's...
This is not something you can say.
It's all communications.
Yeah. So, I mean, it's all communications.
The only one I'm trying to work around is you're at a lunch meeting and there's no minutes being taken.
How do you preserve the contents of what you discuss over a subway?
They don't need subway.
Does presidential records or federal records act control?
Suit only mentions latter.
Neither Vance nor Walsh named as defendants, though programmed in ratio attributed to walls, DC circuit has suggested that a single record can't be both Okay, I mean, that's interesting.
So they might be able to parse out how it's being broken up.
But no, there's no way that they're going to be able to argue.
That those signal messages should be subject to deletion without preservation.
I don't think.
And I certainly would not want that to be adopted either by...
I mean, that was the whole issue with the...
I'm sorry to spat on my computer again.
That was the whole issue with the FBI...
In Cryptos, am I going crazy or was the FBI using Signal as well on the day of the July 13 failed assassination attempt?
And I'm like...
That's convenient.
They all do.
Everybody does.
So the issue, the double standard here is not going to be we get to do it.
The double standard here is when I gave that, because I remember, I was like, so now we don't know what you guys were saying and what you knew and what you didn't know and when you didn't know it?
Like, okay, great.
If you had known, as I think you did, that there was a threat in the crowd minutes before you allowed Trump to take the stage, well, those are gone and we never get to see them?
Bullshit. Good messaging.
Love it.
It's Pero Calientes, which means something hot.
Pero. I'm going to say a hot dog.
Oh, is that?
I'm good.
It actually means hot dog.
I don't speak Spanish, by the way.
And now Giggles, $55.90, donated $100, but I think that's how it comes out when you join the VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com community.
And now people, we're heading over there.
And if you're not a member of the VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com community, you should go raid Kim Iverson.
Because that's the raid for today, people.
Kim Iverson, who is talking about...
Let me see what she's talking about.
Oh, I should probably get rid of that.
Kim Iverson is talking about DARPA.
The new CDC director is straight out of DARPA lab, and that should terrify you.
So Kim Iverson is on the bandwagon of not liking, at least from the header, the new director of the CDC.
So you're going to do raid, and go like this.
And then I believe I confirm raid.
Go! Let her know who sent you.
If you're going, and if you're not going, come over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com where we're going to have our after party.
And I'll give everyone the link right here.
Link to locals.
You know what's funny?
It's getting dark much earlier here than it does in Florida.
I'm looking out the window.
I see a homeless person over there.
There was a homeless person in front of the liquor store.
I see another one right there.
I am getting straight in an Uber and going to the hotel after this.
Nothing good happens after midnight and nothing good happens after 6 o'clock in D.C. So I'll be going to my hotel and maybe shooting a short video, a little synopsis of the...
I want to put out a short video on the Dan Hartman case because it's a fucking travesty.
Okay, that is it, people.
Let's go to the vivabarneslaw.locals.com for the after party, everybody.
It will not be live-streamed at the White House.
I've got to get there early.
I've got all my press creds and whatever.
We will be live at 4 o'clock afterwards and maybe we'll...
Locals is definitely going to get some exclusives.
So, vivabarneslaw.locals.com Go rate Kim Iverson and if you're not, come over to Viva.
Ending and updating.
People, thank you all for being here.
Make sure you liked, subscribed, notified.
Download the Rumble app.
It's free.
Download the app and make sure you're subscribed to Viva Fry and all your other favorite creators.
So that you don't miss it.
Viva says Roosting.
When it comes up here.
If you get to ask a question of Defense Secretary Pete Hexeth, why not ask if you could join him on a Spartan Challenge run?
Oh, dude.
Oh, there's one this week in Florida, right?
In our area.
I might have to sign up for that.
Dude, I might be able to beat Pete Hexeth.
There is a benefit to being a very small person.
My body doesn't use that much oxygen.
I can carry myself on obstacles better.
Okay, enough of this.
We're going to carry this discussion on over at VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
If you're not coming, see you tomorrow, people.
Thank you for being here.
Peace out.
Export Selection