Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 19, 2025 - Viva & Barnes

02:01:42

Elon CONFIRMS Biden Played Politics with Astronauts; JFK Files Dud? Trump Attacks Poilievre & MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Can I just record this?
	All right, I assure you this is a this is a non-starter, gentlemen.
	Keep your shirt up like that and rotate slowly.
	I have nothing.
	You want me to take my shirt?
	Pull up.
	Rotate. 360.
	Turn. Slowly.
	Slowly. Turn.
	Slowly. Stop.
	Your hands up.
	It's like a roadside sobriety test.
	Put your hands on the back of your head.
	You're gonna walk backwards to the sound of my voice.
	Start walking.
	I want to pause it.
	I want to make a little bit of light of the situation.
	I was gonna do it via tweet, but the written word can too easily be misunderstood.
	Keep walking.
	Backwards.
	This is flipping wild, by the way.
	And what's amazing is this gives you the angle, the capture of how utterly terrifying this is to be, I mean, you know, not literally, but effectively blinded by flashlights.
	And that's what you're staring down, knowing that all of those men, and I'm saying this without judgment to the police, are armed.
	And if they get startled by a noise, can open fire.
	It goes on for a few minutes and...
	Stop!
	Get on your knees?
	If the ultimate purpose was to get him on his knees in the first place, why the convoluted, complicated instructions to walk back, rotate 360 and walk backward to the sound of my voice?
	I'll be alone.
	This is a false police report.
	We are crawling back towards the sound of my voice.
	I'm not blaming cops.
	Someone in response to my tweet said, you know, it's standard protocol.
	Why?
	What happens if he trips going backwards?
	Just because he, you know, right here, you can see this little thing.
	He gets caught on this little level section of the sidewalk and falls backwards and they consider that to be a startled movement.
	I will keep this in the backdrop for a second.
	I'll tell you full disclosure.
	I was traumatized from the...
	Daniel Shaver swatting video where they killed him.
	His name was Shaver.
	I think it was Daniel Shaver.
	And as I was watching that video, and it's with me ever since, I'm watching it saying they are giving this guy incomprehensible instructions so that they can have an excuse to shoot him.
	I didn't know that that was actually the case with the guy who was just looking for an excuse to shoot him.
	But these instructions are almost designed to cause confusion, to maximize the opportunity for misunderstanding, if only for falling over backwards.
	Get on your knees and crawl towards my voice?
	This is Owen Schroyer, by the way.
	This is not nobody who's not known to anybody.
	And I say that not in any hierarchical sense.
	This is a man who is known to authorities only because he actually went to jail.
	I'm not going crazy.
	He's known to the police.
	I think, you know, wrongly so.
	And it goes on.
	Now, I wanted to just make one minor.
	This is the camera where they say, lift your shirt and show us that you have nothing there.
	And he does.
	Don't turn around too quickly.
	All right.
	And then the one there where you say, now, walk backwards.
	I think put your hands behind your head and walk backwards.
	Now, the lighthearted joke I wanted to make was...
	Owen Troyer is so cool, he looks cool getting swatted.
	This is freaking wild.
	So this is the latest of the day, people.
	Owen Troyer has been swatted.
	I think this was yesterday, if I'm not mistaken, or yesterday evening.
	Let me make sure.
	March 19th.
	So this occurred...
	Oh, it looks like 5.31am.
	It was published.
	It must have happened a little bit earlier.
	And it's a rash.
	Pun intended.
	It's a rash on society, and it's a rash of swatting on individuals.
	Owen is so high right now.
	I don't think he is.
	So, you know, Kash Patel, not Kash Patel, but Dan Bongino took to Twitter today, said, it's a bad day to be a bad guy in America, and let's hope that that's the case.
	Good afternoon, everybody.
	It's a problem.
	It looks like a campaign of terror that is being waged against Elon, against Tesla, against so-called right-wing, whatever you want to call them, conservative commentators.
	I had a discussion with our local authorities on Monday.
	I called out and said, like, proactively, you know, what does one do under such circumstances?
	What can one do to minimize the risk, to minimize the risk of an incident should something happen?
	And, you know, the advice is, by and large, police aren't stupid.
	They're doing their jobs and they have to take even anonymous calls that turn out to be fake swatting seriously.
	Hands up and comply, even if you think that they have no right to be there, is the best thing to do.
	And they do take into consideration when numbers come in from not unmarked, but undisclosed numbers.
	But this is the world in which we live.
	And until people start going to jail and getting severely punished for what could easily turn into felony murder if those laws exist in a state, is becoming common practice.
	Stop swatting and SWAT teams.
	Legitimate need for them is very rare.
	Regular police can handle most things.
	No, I think the swatting is not a euphemism, but a colloquial term.
	That, I believe, is just the standard police force just showing up to respond to what they're told was probably a violent incident of a kidnapping hostage or whatever.
	I don't think that's a tactical SWAT team.
	I think that's local police, the local sheriff, showing up with enough men to respond to what they were told to was a highly urgent, highly violent, potentially violent situation.
	But it's out of hand, and it's quite clearly a problem, and it needs to be dealt with with the full force of the law.
	Yeah, SWATing is just the term used.
	Good afternoon, everybody.
	It is 3 o 'clock.
	This is going to be...
	It's Wednesday today, right?
	So this is the Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, 3 o 'clock this week.
	Next week, my official time is going to be 4 o 'clock of the Rumble lineup rating, which is what happens throughout the day.
	Starts with Evita, goes to Steven Crowder, and then they take their audience and they rate it into the following show, channel, episode, whatever you want to call it.
	It goes to Tim Pool, it goes to the quartering, it goes to me.
	After this, we shall be rating...
	Kim Iverson, for those of you who are going to go on at 1700 o 'clock.
	And just the schedule for the show, we're going to go until 1700, 5 o 'clock Eastern.
	What we're going to do, instead of having the locals after party exclusively on locals, we're going to have that here so that we can effectively raid Kim Iverson.
	But as of about 4.30, maybe 4.20, we will only be engaging with, interacting with, and responding to the chat in our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community.
	Mark Grobert, Lord Buckley, the idiot savant of the JFK files, is coming on at 4 o 'clock to talk about it.
	The dud thus far that has been the release of the documents.
	I understand people are getting a little bit disappointed insofar as the Epstein files were not just a dud, but an embarrassment.
	And the JFK files thus far has been a dud.
	But we are going to talk about a tweet that The Quartering put out, Jeremy.
	Saying, am I reading this right?
	And it's funny and I don't take anything too seriously.
	We're going to get to that in a second.
	And we're going to talk about Pierre Poilievre and Donald Trump needling him.
	We're going to talk about Elon Musk and the massive waste going on in American government and how it's a very sad situation to some extent because people are losing their jobs.
	And on the other hand, it's a creation that is an unsustainable beast.
	And we're going to talk about much, much more.
	But before we even get there, people, you want to start your day off with something that tastes great, that is a rumble partner.
	You want to spend your hard-earned dollars on companies that respect you, not just as a consumer, but as a human.
	With God-given rights, that is where 1775 comes in.
	I drink coffee.
	I love my coffee.
	In fact, I hate bad coffee, which is why I love 1775.
	It's the one I drink every morning and look forward to.
	No weak brews, no burnt taste, just bold, small-batch, single-origin coffee that actually delivers.
	It's got an 85-plus cupping score, meaning it's not just good, it's specialty-grade, and you will taste the difference.
	Dark roast when you need to wake the F up.
	Medium roast.
	Easy.
	All-day go-to.
	Vitality Mushroom Blend with its lion's mane, which is proven to help cognitive function.
	Handpicked, roasted, and made for those who stand for hard work, freedom of speech, and coffee that actually delivers.
	Go over to 1775coffee.com.
	Use promo code VIVA for 15% off.
	Start your morning the way that they are meant to be started.
	With a big, beautiful, bold cup of 1775 coffee.
	And bear in mind that every dollar you spend on 1775 coffee.
	It enters you in the raffle to win the Tesla Cybertruck and $30,000 cash.
	So the link is in the description and we will get there.
	But now on the subject of Cybertrucks and Tesla and what can only be described as an organized, orchestrated campaign of political terror.
	There has been violence and destruction at Tesla factories, Tesla dealerships.
	Against Tesla vehicles and against Tesla owners.
	There was one video that was put up yesterday, and I believe it was Libs of TikTok that put it up.
	I didn't have it.
	I won't share it because I responded to it.
	It's an individual seemingly deciding to key a Tesla.
	What's amazing about it is you try to give the steel man argument, okay, he didn't do it on purpose.
	He was taking out his key and he had to squeeze between two.
	Bullshit.
	The guy keyed the Tesla.
	Because he thought it was the righteous thing to do.
	But like Barnes says, it's one thing to be a criminal, and it's one thing to be dumb.
	It's another thing to be a dumb criminal.
	And keying a Tesla Cybertruck, which are loaded with cameras everywhere, without shielding covering your face so that the world can see what you look like, who you are, you are a dumb criminal.
	And you will be treated as such.
	The bottom line, however, is that there has been an orchestrated campaign against Elon Musk and Tesla.
	And it's not a majority.
	These idiot propagandists on Twitter, Pekka, I'm looking at you, Pekka Koliomeni, talking about how Tesla sales are diving, dying in Europe.
	And they're all citing 2024 stats where it predates a lot of the political turmoil, which is orchestrated and deliberate and malicious.
	And...
	It was Tim Walls, I believe.
	That scumbag commie POS who's proving he's not just a useless slob.
	The word slob is a highly underused...
	The word slob.
	A big, fat slob.
	And not necessarily physically fat.
	A slob in the mental side of it.
	A moron who's lazy and...
	Juvenile.
	And that is who Tim Walls is.
	I'm not yet watching the entire podcast that he did with Gavin Newsom, but the clips I've seen are pure verbal diarrhea.
	And we're going to get to that in a second.
	But you got Tim Walls here, like a true Democrat, capital D Democrat politician, although all politicians to some extent use tragedies for political profit.
	It's so orchestrated, you might think it was by design.
	Listen to what Tim Walls has to say during his...
	Pseudo-Ted Talk.
	Slobby Ted Talk.
	Saying on my phone, I know some of you know this on the iPhone, they've got that little stock app.
	I added Tesla to it to give me a little boost during the day.
	I mean, it's great.
	He's doing stand-up.
	Good for him.
	Add a slap in the little Jerry Simon.
	Saying on my phone, I know some of you know this on the iPhone, they've got that little stock app.
	I added Tesla to it to give me a little boost during the day.
	225 and dropping.
	Yes!
	Fuck America!
	That's what I am.
	And if you own one, if you own one, we're not blaming you.
	You can take dental floss and pull the Tesla thing off, you know, and take out, just telling you.
	Can you imagine, this is what one would call a filthy, slobby, piece of shit communist.
	Someone who actively roots for the death and the demise of an American company employing Americans.
	In America, that by their own standards is a green company, a renewable company.
	He's reveling in it.
	Hedge funds that own this stock as retirement funds for Americans, fuck 'em.
	Individual retail investors, fuck 'em.
	Why?
	Because it's politics over country every day of the week.
	I love it.
	I get a kick in the morning of seeing companies, American companies fail.
	That is what a filthy, slobby communist says.
	Congratulations, Tim Walls.
	Yeah, but we're not yet done with slobby McTim.
	Look at that guy's ugly face.
	And ugly, if he were a good human, you wouldn't look at his face and see ugliness.
	Look at Gavin Newsom.
	He's getting ready to eat your pets.
	Listen to this.
	Have they figured it out that the identity piece of this is more important than the actual substance behind it?
	Well, they've been doing it for decades.
	I mean, we've saw the welfare queens.
	They've seen the Southern strategy.
	We've seen it over and over.
	It's an old playbook.
	And we're as dumb as we want to be that we allow them to do this with CRT and ESG and DEI and every three-letter word.
	And they demonize people.
	Yeah, demonize and they weaponize people.
	After they finish demonizing people, they then accuse people, their adversaries who they just demonized, of demonizing.
	...weaponize grievance to other people.
	They talk down to people, past people.
	They humiliate people.
	They weaponize difficult issues.
	But the problem line is, and I think it goes back to what...
	It drives me crazy because we all watching are on the same intellectual boat, not political boat.
	We watching are not dumb.
	We watching can see exactly what they're doing.
	And so for me to belabor the point of confession through projection, they demonize other people.
	What do they say?
	Weaponize...
	What was the word you just used here?
	They weaponize difficult issues.
	They weaponize difficult issues.
	Says Tim Walls, or the man to Tim Walls, who just weaponized the drop in Tesla stock.
	50% over the last three months, but they don't want to talk about how much it's up in the last year, two years, five years.
	Mine is, and I think it goes back to what we began with, is, and I applaud you for this, is we cannot continue to be on the defense reacting to this.
	We've got to go on the offense.
	I agree.
	Okay, so far, useless tool McSlobface hasn't said a damn word here, but wait until he does.
	We got to meet people where they are.
	But I also think this, and this is where, you know, this is part of the conversation I'm trying to have, is you got to respect people you disagree with, even, and you can't just dismiss people.
	You got to respect people you disagree with.
	What makes it so offensive is that The advice is the polar opposite of what they do in life.
	But by saying it, they get to pretend that they live by it and judging others who they claim don't live by it when, in fact, the ones they're judging do live by this.
	And they are the ones...
	They are just hypocrite scumbags.
	And if they didn't have double standards, they would have no standards at all.
	But let's just see what Slobby McSlobface has to say about this.
	How do you fight it?
	I think I could kick most of their ass.
	I do think that.
	But I don't know if we're going to fall into that place where we want to, okay, we challenge you to a WWE fight here.
	So first of all, do you not know that WWE is fake, Tim?
	And whose ass exactly do you think you can kick?
	Just out of curiosity.
	I know many of the fighters on the right.
	You may not like him, Strickland.
	You may not like...
	Oh, I can't remember his name right now.
	It doesn't matter.
	Tito Ortiz.
	You couldn't kick a fly's ass, Tim.
	It's a natural reaction.
	I think it's one of the reasons we're losing so many men.
	And again, it's multi-ethnic.
	It's not just white men.
	We're losing them.
	We're losing them to these guys online.
	You're losing the men because you're cutting their penises off, Gavin.
	People that I'm bringing on this podcast as well.
	These are bad guys, though.
	These are bad guys, though.
	Yeah, Charlie Kirk is a bad guy, though.
	I'm a good guy, though.
	I just sit there and revel in the drop of a stock, even though it means destruction and sorrow for Americans, while I complain about Trump cutting the jobs of federal employees.
	These are bad guys, though, eh?
	Look at that face, eh?
	Oh, but he can kick their ass.
	But they exist.
	Remember, weren't they just talking about not demonizing and not othering people?
	They exist.
	Not only do they exist, they persist.
	And they're actually influencing young kids every single day.
	How do we push some of those guys back under a rock?
	I think we have to first understand what their motivations are.
	I think we have to understand what they're actually doing.
	These are dumb people.
	These are absolutely stupid, awful, immoral people.
	Oh, I can't stand these dirtbags.
	Sorry.
	I think I played a little bit too much of it.
	Projecting.
	Absolutely.
	So that's where they are.
	They don't want to demonize and they don't want to other people, but they're bad guys and how do we push them under a rock while we revel in the loss of value to an American company, its contribution to the environment, and while we complain about Trump reducing the size of government because it's going to impact federal workers and people's income and livelihood.
	And it has.
	I'm going to play this because sometimes people do think or people do not ignore, but you don't have to face the consequences of government policy at an individual level.
	And people who are humans with families and homes are losing their jobs.
	People are going to have problems paying certain bills as a result of the downsizing of the government.
	But what you're witnessing right now is exactly the problem.
	With a government that grows beyond its capabilities of sustain itself.
	Sustainability.
	That's it.
	You know, the average...
	I'll give you the...
	We'll talk about the analogy afterwards.
	But when you hear the problem, you understand that it's gotten to the point where there is going to be no solution that's not going to not include or encompass innocent people.
	That's not going to hurt a little bit.
	But the alternative is unsustainability of the highest order.
	Here's Elon Musk talking about it.
	You know, the average American makes $66,000 a year.
	We're close to $40,000 in debt.
	You said to me in our last interview, we won't have a country unless we fix it now.
	Can you explain why this is so important that we identify all this waste?
	Yes, the government waste and fraud is...
	So high that it's causing a $2 trillion annual deficit.
	So that's $2,000 billion of waste and fraud that's happening.
	And the cost of our debt has gotten so high that just the interest payments on the debt exceed the entire military budget.
	And it was just growing out of control.
	So the country was going bankrupt.
	It's just, you know, a country is no different from a person.
	If a country overspends and doesn't spend wisely...
	Just like a person, a country will go bankrupt.
	So the reason I'm here is because I'm very worried about America going bankrupt due to the corruption and waste.
	And if we're going to do something about it, the ship of America is going to sink.
	And we're all on that ship.
	You know, and this may be a message to, you know, people out there who have, you know, are wealthy, have a lot of means or control companies.
	It's like, just remember, we're all on ship America here.
	Your company is not going to exist if the ship of America sinks.
	And we should do everything we possibly can to ensure that America is strong for far into the future.
	This is where I look at the billionaires building bunkers or people saying invest in gold when the economic collapse happens.
	And there's legitimate advice in there.
	Don't rely on the government because they will not come.
	We've seen what happened in North Carolina and East Palestine.
	Don't rely on the government because they're not going to help you, and they are a bunch of incompetent, corrupt buffoons.
	But if the ship goes down, Zuckerberg's bunker on his Hawaiian island, if the people can't get there to actually eat your food, you're not exactly going to survive on your own regardless.
	But the idea that $2,000 billion...
	And that a government is no different than a corporation, is no different than a human.
	And if you had a credit card and you were paying more in the interest on the outstanding debt of that credit card than you were on, say, for example, food or your housing, rent or mortgage payments, you're going to go bankrupt and everyone in your house is going to suffer.
	And so the idea that everyone's on this ship together and that some people, I know some personally and I've heard from some anecdotally, federal employees losing their jobs, potential real estate taking a hit, especially in areas that are heavily government employed.
	And it's sad and it's a problem and it's a reality.
	The flip side is you can't sustain that forever and have everyone go down on that ship.
	And so sometimes...
	The solution is going to hurt and it's going to hurt some people more than others, but the absence of a solution is going to hurt everybody.
	And then you analogize this and you understand why it is that Canada is the way it is and going in the direction that it's going.
	And when you see people in Ottawa protesting Tesla and Elon Musk, and you look at the city of Ottawa, a government town where people are employed by the government, property value is not what it's at.
	It's artificially inflated because everybody is getting paid.
	Salaries that are above average because they work for the government who get their revenues from taxing the people, you inflate artificially the value of everything in government towns such that if the government ever downsizes or even threatens to,
	you have people saying, we're not going to let you because it's going to hurt us.
	So keep feeding us, even though you're feeding us with what you're taking from the citizens, taxpaying citizens, you're taking taxes from us as well.
	But our salaries are from taxes, are from revenue, and it's an unsustainable, vicious circle that will lead to bankruptcy.
	And that's what's going on, and that's what people don't like Elon Musk for, and you have these colluded efforts to break his shit and laugh about it.
	You have, what's his face?
	Slobby McSlob face.
	Talking about, I sounded so Canadian there, talking about the decrease in value.
	Of the Tesla stock and how he loves it.
	He truly loves it.
	It's an amazing thing.
	Where was the article that I had brought up here?
	I just decided to, you know, for the sake of it, go look at Nancy Pelosi.
	This is a website, I believe, in Cryptis, in the backdrop, this is the website that tracks Nancy Pelosi's stock trades, right?
	Or is this one just in general for politicians?
	But you look at Nancy Pelosi's trades.
	Yes, that's the right one.
	Okay, it's amazing.
	I just decided to look just to see.
	Not necessarily if it's colluded, but, you know, if Nancy Pelosi gets the memo, we're going to fuck up Elon Musk's stuff.
	You're not going to want to hold it.
	Full disclosure, I think I had the stock.
	I got it at 100 and sold it because I'm a...
	What's the opposite of diamond hands?
	Profit!
	Sell!
	I don't own any Tesla.
	You know, it is an opportunity for those who don't hold it to get in now.
	But I just decided to look for the sake of it.
	I got to go down.
	Oh, hold on a second.
	I got to go like this.
	F, and Tesla, because we've got to go in reverse order.
	There were four of them.
	Let's start at number four, which was here.
	Nancy Pelosi.
	You can see it in the bottom here.
	Nancy Pelosi buying Tesla in 2021, and she bought...
	That's unbelievable.
	Does that say she bought between $500,000 and $1 million of Tesla?
	Amazing.
	Then we go up to three.
	We got Tesla.
	Another purchase, about $1 million to $5 million.
	In 2022.
	Wow.
	Then we get up to number two.
	So we're going in reverse order here.
	Then we got, oh, she sold about a million dollars or $500,000 to a million in January 2023.
	And then we go to the most recent transaction, which was a sale of up to a half a million in 2024.
	So I guess she still had some if I'm doing the math properly.
	I mean, you don't ever want to be not holding a position.
	Because Lord knows, maybe your tactics of sabotaging the company don't work.
	You got Nancy Pelosi buying Tesla and then seemingly selling it in concert with, or at least leading up to, the deliberate attack on Elon Musk, which is coming from Democrats in Washington.
	Accident?
	I'm not so sure.
	But you do wonder, and I...
	I'm very, very suspicious.
	I would like to know, and I think we're going to find out sooner than later who's funding this.
	Let me see here.
	Is this an Elon Culp meeting?
	I didn't realize I walked into a church services LOL.
	He's from Colorado, so you know it's coming from a...
	I don't even know if this is a joke or not.
	Whatever.
	You look at what's going on.
	It's quite clearly coordinated.
	It's quite clearly coordinated by a very vocal minority that is receiving funding from somewhere.
	That whether or not there is a coordination between the violent, destructive attacks on Tesla factories and the swattings on prominent conservative voices, you know, there are no accidents and there are no coincidences.
	Soros paid.
	We'll see.
	We'll see.
	In Kryptis, there was a clip going around of somebody.
	If anybody can find it in the chat.
	Of someone...
	She was on CNN.
	I think it was CNN.
	Maybe it was MSNBC.
	And the person was saying, oh, I got that person to lose their temper because I said...
	They said...
	They equated basically the violence on the Tesla factories to the violence of January 6th.
	And I put violence in quotes.
	And said, if you condemn the violence attacks on Tesla factories, you also have to condemn the violence of January 6th.
	And she was accusing this politician of having double standards because they...
	The guy...
	According to her, didn't condemn or approved of the pardons for Jan 6th, and therefore he's a hypocrite for condemning the violence against Tesla while not condemning the violence of January 6th.
	Had I been on that show, which I wasn't because they won't invite me, and maybe they don't even know who I am probably, the violence against the Tesla factories and the Tesla vehicles...
	Is actually exponentially worse than anything we saw in terms of violence from January 6th.
	Nobody was Molotov cocktailing any part of the capitol building.
	I don't think that there was any arson or burning or massive destruction of property.
	There was violence among the police and then you can go and ask why that occurred and you can probably answer your own question.
	But the two aren't even analogous to begin with.
	False premises as usual.
	What we're witnessing right now feels like something of a coordinated civil war iteration.
	And I think it's a very vocal minority that is causing a lot of damage, a lot of noise, and it's probably being amplified, and inaccurately so, by the internet.
	But it's quite interesting.
	Oh, now, people, speaking of fighting against censorship, and speaking of fighting for freedom of speech, and companies that stand for freedom of speech.
	Is it ironic that this stream is sponsored by Rumble?
	It is not ironic, people.
	Free speech is under attack, but Rumble refuses to back down.
	We've always believed in empowering voices, no matter how unpopular, and now we're taking that fight to the next level.
	When major advertisers conspire to pull their dollars, even brands like Dunkin' Donuts turn their back on Rumble.
	Why?
	Because it had a right-wing culture, and apparently they don't want right-wing culture dollars.
	We're not here to fit the mold.
	We're here to defend free expression.
	To strengthen this mission...
	I'm flubbing my tongues.
	We're excited to offer Rumble Premium, a completely ad-free experience with exclusive benefits for viewers and creators.
	You'll find exclusive content from creators like Russell Brand, Timcast, Mug Club, Crowder.
	Whoever offers premium stuff, I like to keep our stuff with our Viva Barnes Law.
	It's more than a subscription.
	It's a stand for freedom of speech and supporting companies that support freedom of speech.
	Your voice matters.
	Join Rumble Premium for a very limited time.
	You'll get $20 off the annual plan.
	Promo code RUMBLELIVE.
	Go to rumble.com forward slash premium.
	Claim your sale discount today.
	Together, we will turn the tide.
	We're turning the tide.
	What we're doing right now on the internet is amazing evidence of it.
	And the link is in the description and our last.
	And I should also every time tell everybody, download the Rumble app.
	You want to get immediate notifications for what's going on.
	You want to have it on your phone.
	You want to watch it on all sorts of things.
	If you're looking for more freedom in your streaming, download the Rumble app and experience content like you've never experienced it before.
	It's available on Android, iOS.
	You can take Rumble with you wherever you go or just chill at home.
	Watching it on Apple TV.
	Roku, amazing.
	What is it?
	Amazon Fire TV, LG Smart TVs, Samsung TV apps, everything.
	It gives you the power of Rumble at your fingertip.
	Rumble is a platform that gives you freedom of expression, that respects you as a consumer, and allows you to say what you want.
	Download the Rumble app today.
	Make sure to search and follow my channel and every other channel in the daily lineup.
	The link is in the description.
	And it is the cure for not getting notifications.
	I think they say on Commutube, like, 5%.
	Of subscribers have notifications turned on or get notifications.
	Bongino, when he did his show, was amazing in that he reminded everybody, download the app, turn on notifications, you get instant, immediate notifications, and you will never miss the content of the creators that you love to listen to.
	Now, I think it's...
	Ah, look at this.
	Encryptus!
	My very own Jamie has found the link.
	Oh, yeah, let's watch this.
	This is the...
	It is CNN.
	Kami News Network.
	Now, what's amazing is I read...
	Did I just shut myself down here?
	My goodness.
	No, that's not me.
	That's me right there.
	Let me bring it up here.
	What's amazing is...
	Oh, this is...
	Okay, fine, fine.
	This might not be an encrypted...
	This is from his perspective.
	From her perspective, I forget who the person was.
	She's like, oh, I got him riled up.
	Here, let's listen to this.
	There's also...
	There's been all kinds of vandalism against...
	Tesla's and Tesla dealerships all over the country.
	You know, Las Vegas, Kansas City, Ancinitas, Buffalo Grove, Littleton, Mass.
	I grew up right next to Littleton, Mass.
	Loveland, Colorado, Tigard, Oregon.
	All over the place.
	The other night, Donald Trump said these are domestic terrorists.
	Everybody laughed about it and scoffed at it.
	That video looks like terrorism to me.
	I mean, it's obviously an organized, coordinated effort, however people are communicating with each other, to do this to people around the country who chose.
	I think I just take a question for the
	people. They don't worry about it.
	I'm going to do it.
	Thank you.
	Okay, you know, I'm back in the stream, right?
	I accidentally X'd myself.
	Yep, you're good now.
	I hear the video.
	You got the idea from the video, but I just got excited because I think Owen Troyer said he can come on and I wanted to get him the link.
	And instead of copy the link, I just closed the stream down.
	Only myself.
	What's great is I can pop back in with minimal damage.
	Okay.
	You got the idea from the clip there.
	That wasn't the one where the woman got him riled up and then she pulls the woman card like, oh, it's so easy to trigger these men.
	They're so insecure.
	Everyone out there, by the way, go share the link to the stream.
	And may we try to break yesterday's personal record of 31,000 live viewers.
	Owen Troyer just DM'd me and said he's able to come on, but I hope I didn't get to that too late because I want to hear.
	What Owen has to say.
	Sorry.
	How long is that?
	307.
	Oh, that was 30 minutes ago.
	Just saw it.
	Crap.
	Hopefully he can get on.
	Hopefully he can get on.
	Okay.
	I told you, you've got to have your phone visible during the live stream.
	Yeah.
	I know because it was...
	Well, hopefully he can get back on.
	Do I have his text?
	I think I have his number now.
	Okay, well, hopefully he can come back on.
	Sorry about that, guys.
	Oh, nerds!
	Is he live now?
	Who's watching?
	Is Owen live?
	And maybe Viva hit the wrong button.
	I got fat fingers, people.
	They look small, but they're fat and they don't work too well.
	Let me see if I've got Owen's cell number.
	Sorry, comma, I missed the DM, period.
	Just sent you the link via DM if it's not too late, period.
	Very sorry about that, smiley face.
	Okay, we'll see if it happens.
	So that's what's going on in America, peeps.
	Now let me get to some of the...
	Oh, I lost all of the tipped questions.
	That's going to be the problem.
	Let me see if I can go back here.
	Go to vivabarneslaw.locals.com and see what's going on.
	We got Encryptus says...
	We got the link there.
	Encryptus says the new JFK files are out right now.
	Soon it will be available to be queried using AI.
	If you can help out, here's the link to the project.
	Let me bring this up for everybody to give Encryptus, who's the man in the backdrop, who's devising the AI to go help with this.
	This is the link for everybody if they want to do it.
	And I'll give everybody the link in the chat.
	Link.
	Encryptus, I shut down Rumble in the panic, and now I don't think I see any of the tip questions anymore.
	There's no way to access those, is there?
	Let me see if I can go like this and scroll up.
	Yeah, tip questions anymore.
	Do you?
	Okay, I don't think I can do it.
	Darn it.
	The only tip questions were mine.
	Okay, excellent.
	So that is where we're at, people.
	And we'll see if Owen Troy can pop in, but I might have missed the boat on that one.
	Now, well, I guess until we get there, and before we get to the JFK files, we do need to talk about good news.
	I mean, is it good news when people who are supposed to be in space for eight days are stuck up there for nine months and they finally get rescued but apparently didn't get rescued earlier because of politics?
	So this happened yesterday and I was so enveloped with the other news of the day that I think I missed the good news, which is that they landed.
	And hold on.
	Rumble Studio.
	Here we go.
	Okay, we're looking at the right article.
	Good.
	Now, I won't make the same mistake I made yesterday.
	We're going to maximize this.
	Elon Musk congratulates SpaceX and NASA for excellent work rescuing stranded astronauts.
	It's good news until you find out the bad news.
	Talk about, you know, politicizing difficult situations.
	Imagine letting two people, I won't say rot up in space, but slowly degrade up in space because of politics.
	And that is exactly what Elon Musk has suggested and seems to be the case.
	Billionaire tech titan Elon Musk shared his congratulations to SpaceX and NASA following the rescue of two astronauts.
	Thanks to the excellent work of SpaceX team working with NASA, the astronauts are now safely home.
	And so congratulations to the SpaceX NASA teams on excellent work Musk said during an exclusive interview with Hannity.
	The SpaceX founder and face of the Department of Government Efficiency also offered a huge note of appreciation to Donald Trump for prioritizing.
	And expediting the return.
	Astronauts Butch Whitmore, Wilmore, and Suni Williams had been in the International Space Station since June 2024.
	This will not be a comedy.
	This will be a horror movie.
	Except they're going to have to base it on reality and then they're going to have to have an alien invasion while they're stuck up in space.
	The mission was only scheduled to last one week after the launch of Boeing's first astronaut flight.
	However, after the spacecraft encountered technical issues and NASA determined it unsafe to arrive back to Earth, with the astronauts on board, Wilmore and Williams remained stuck there for months.
	I mean, that's the stuff of nightmares.
	Trump also blasted former President Joe Biden for not acting sooner.
	Quote, I have just asked Elon and SpaceX to get to the two brave astronauts who have been virtually abandoned by the Biden administration.
	They've been waiting for many months on SpaceX station.
	Elon will be there, be on the way.
	Hopefully, all will be safe.
	Good luck, Elon.
	Posted Trump at the time.
	All right.
	Post-Landing News Conference, SpaceX.
	Deputy Associate NASA Director.
	We've asked Trump about Musk's claim that Biden administration didn't want to bring the Starliner crew back for political reasons.
	Yeah, so I wasn't involved in any conversations with the previous administration.
	Montalbano said, it was clear we had a request from the current administration and the results you saw are what we saw today with the landing of Crew 9. Hannity pressed Musk.
	On the politics behind the astronauts' delayed return, and Musk set the record straight on his communications with the previous Biden administration.
	Quote, we definitely offered to return the astronauts earlier.
	There's no question about that, Musk said.
	Quote, the astronauts were only supposed to be there for eight days, and they've been there for almost nine months, ten months.
	So obviously that doesn't make any sense.
	SpaceX could have brought the astronauts back after a few months at most.
	And we made that offer to the Biden administration.
	It was rejected for political reasons.
	And that's just.
	A fact.
	So that's circling right back to what what's his face had to say earlier.
	Tim Walz.
	Gavin Newsom.
	Exploiting political difficult situations specifically for political reasons.
	All right, people.
	Sorry, that was too loud.
	Now we're going to take a trip to Canada before we get back with the JFK files.
	And see what's going on in the chat.
	See, now I take my phone off beep, and now it's getting overwhelmed with the beepage.
	We're not leaving Trump just yet, but we're going to loop Trump into Canadian politics.
	The news of the day being touted by Pierre Poilievre.
	For those of you who don't know who Pierre Poilievre is, he's the leader of the Conservative Party of Canada.
	Who has taken what I believe to be an unnecessarily adversarial position to Donald Trump's threats of and imposition of tariffs.
	Whatever, whatever, probably, but we'll read the description from Pierre Poilievre, and then we're going to listen to the video of Donald Trump, and then we're going to discuss all of this.
	Pierre says in a tweet, Last night, President Donald Trump endorsed Mark Carney.
	Why?
	Because as Trump said, he's, quote, easier, end quote, to deal with and knows that I will be a tough negotiator and always put Canada first.
	Carney is weak and would cave to Trump's demands, just like he did when he moved his company headquarters from Canada to New York City.
	Canadians don't want a weak and conflicted leader.
	They want a strong prime minister who will put Canada first.
	Let's hear the very short segment of what Trump had to say.
	Isn't that going to make them more hostile to us and possibly open the door for China, closer to Canada?
	And that would really put us in a bind.
	The conservative that's running is stupidly no friend of mine.
	I don't know him, but he said negative things.
	So when he says negative things, I couldn't care less.
	I think it's easier to deal, actually, with a liberal.
	Isn't that going to make them more hostile to us?
	I haven't heard the full clip in its full context, and I'm curious to know what was said after that.
	That was not an endorsement of Mark Carney.
	Full stop.
	And what that was, in fact, was criticizing what was a stupid move that you don't need to make enemies that you don't need to make if you don't need to make them.
	He's stupidly no friend of mine.
	I don't know him, but he said negative things.
	So when he says negative things, I couldn't care less.
	I think it's easier to deal, actually, with a liberal.
	Now, I'm reading the chat over in our local community.
	I'm going to keep that up in the backdrop.
	And there are people saying...
	Stephen Britton, and I'm not picking a fight with you, Stephen.
	I like you and you like me.
	Who cares what Trump has to say about Pierre Poilier?
	Pierre is taking a pro-Canada position as it would be political suicide if he didn't.
	So this is the argument coming out of Canada, is that it's a politically suicidal position to compliment Trump or to not be adversarial to Trump.
	That is to say, if he says, if he...
	Defends Trump political suicide, and if he doesn't take an adversarial position to Trump, well, that'll be political detriment, and the liberals will gain points by taking an adversarial position to Trump if the conservatives don't.
	I question whether or not it's a pro-Canada position to cause unnecessary fights with America, your southern neighbor.
	And what Trump is saying is not that it's going to be easier to deal with the liberals because they're weaker.
	What they're saying is, Pierre Pauliev made an enemy when he had absolutely no reason to make an enemy.
	And had Pierre done what I think he should have done from the beginning, which was not make an enemy that he didn't need to make, the situation would have been wildly different.
	You didn't have to pick a fight with Trump in order to pick a fight with the liberals, which is who he's running against.
	If you call someone stupid, who is going to want to work with you?
	If you call someone A threat, which is what Pierre effectively called Donald Trump by posting the cover to this article that referred to them as the double threat, Carney and Trump.
	You call someone a threat, you say they want to come and take your jobs, and then you think that that's a pro-Canada position or that they're going to be in a position to want to sit down and negotiate with you.
	The answer is going to be a big fat no, and it's a blunder that you didn't have to walk into.
	And so that is where we're at in Canada, which is a very, very, it's a very sad state of affairs for Canada because right now you have in the markets, and if you can believe this, the Conservatives are now not even 50-50.
	It's more likely, according to the Kalshi betting markets, that Mark Carney, the three-passport-carrying WEF stooge, is going to be Prime Minister than Pierre Poilievre.
	Maybe it's a long play, and you hope that...
	You hope that it's going to pan out in the long run?
	But thus far, whatever Pierre has been doing has been absolutely disastrous.
	And if you go look at the markets, they've been tanking.
	It's now fourth position that there's going to be a conservative majority government.
	I happen to think there is.
	And I think you're getting good value because I think it will stabilize itself out, but not because of Pierre, despite Pierre Poiliev.
	But you've got a situation in Canada.
	Where you have politicians unnecessarily making enemies with the people they're going to have to work with if they get elected.
	And even Carney, at the very least, is playing it a little bit better in that he's not making enemies with Trump because he's not doing anything with Trump because Trump hasn't invited him, presumably, to do anything.
	Emma Maiano says, Canada should acknowledge that the U.S. is giving $200 billion plus annually.
	If you want to lose that help, be the 51st state.
	We don't need to get into the 51st state because I don't think Trump wants it.
	I don't think America wants it.
	And Canada certainly doesn't seem to want it.
	But it wouldn't hurt for Canada to acknowledge, A, the legitimate concerns, whether or not you thought they were pretextual, of America and of Trump.
	And unforced error, absolutely.
	Bruin88 says, Love Viva, been watching him for years and is a vital part to help people see the forest among the trees.
	Well, thank you very much.
	Stop it.
	And so that's what's going on in Canada.
	And it's discouraging and it's depressing and we hope it ends properly because if the Liberals eke back into power, even with a minority government, Canada is on a death spiral.
	If the Liberals get into power with a majority government, Canada is on a death spiral on steroids.
	And in as much as I don't trust Pierre Poilievre or the Conservatives, at the very least, a Conservative majority will slow down or at least give Canada time.
	Buy a few more years of Canada's slow and steady destruction.
	I replied to him.
	Oh yeah, this was the tweet.
	I said, Trump didn't endorse Carney.
	He criticized you, rightly so, exactly like I said from day one.
	You could have said nothing on Trump, directed all of your criticism to the liberals, to their failed immigration policy, which is a fact.
	To their failed policy on drugs, which is a fact, you could have acknowledged America's legitimate border concerns, which are a fact, proven by the fact that Justin Trudeau appointed some feckless fentanyl czar, but he did it nonetheless.
	But you didn't, I said, because you thought it would be more popular in Canada to criticize Trump.
	It was a mistake.
	Now you're compounding on that mistake by doubling down on your attacks on Trump.
	This was the original tweet that he put out.
	When was it?
	I didn't get the date with this.
	It says, Carney's carbon tax on Canadian industry will help Trump take them.
	If Carney wins, Canada loses.
	Sign here to fire the liberals.
	Then you have the headline of the Toronto Sun.
	Double trouble.
	And it's Carney's face spliced with Donald Trump.
	What kind of idiot do you have to be to do that?
	Like, what happens if Pierre Poiliev gets elected?
	Now he's going to have to go and bend the knee and kiss the ring.
	To Donald Trump, if he wants to get anything out of Trump.
	And it's not just one attack.
	Trump wants our jobs.
	Carney's carbon tax is going to help him take our jobs.
	And this is pro-Canada.
	So Trump wanting to bring jobs back to America, not necessarily take Canadian jobs.
	It's not necessarily a sum-zero game.
	Well, that's not pro-American.
	That's traitorous to Canada.
	But Pierre Poilier taking this position is somehow pro-Canadian.
	Mm-hmm.
	Canada is in dire, dire straits, people.
	And by the way, as an illustration as to how much dire straits Canada is in, you'll want to stay tuned for a pre-recorded interview I did with Kelsey Sheeran today.
	It was actually amazing.
	We went for two and a quarter hours, and we got into the medical assistance and dying euthanasia crisis in Canada, but we talked about her military experience, her military trauma, and how the Canadian government would sooner You know,
	offer medical assistance in dying to veterans with PTSD than actually treat them.
	But Canada is on not a highway to hell, but it's not far off.
	And Pierre Poilievre has been doing everything in his power to lose this, the lead that he had, and to blow this election, which should have been a slam dunk.
	Now, it just so happens that the more that buffoon Talks.
	Mark Carney.
	When I say Pierre Polyev could have just shut up and let Carney talk, this is what I mean.
	I have to put together.
	It's a one-minute clip of Mark Carney spewing more verbal diarrhea than Kamala Harris.
	And something that is going to get you right in the beginning, listen to him gulp the water down.
	It's like ASMR of the political diarrhea.
	Right in the beginning.
	Listen for it.
	And listen to the montage that I put together.
	You will have a call with President Trump in the coming days.
	What are your expectations for the president in that call?
	Right there.
	One more time.
	What are your expectations for the president in that call?
	Well, I think...
	Let me say a few things.
	The first is...
	The President of the United States, the Prime Minister of Canada, but certainly the President of the United States has many responsibilities and there are many issues.
	I can think of many geostrategic issues that the President is helping to lead on.
	You can think of events most recently with respect to the Houthis and all the way through to trade and other aspects.
	So there's a wide range of issues to be discussed when we do connect.
	With respect to trade, I look forward to, at the appropriate time, having a discussion as two sovereign nations that is...
	Comprehensive, not targeted at one issue.
	Sir, what the hell did you just say?
	Can you say that again?
	In fact, not only can you say it again, can you say that five times?
	Because I understood not a damn word of what you just said.
	And I don't want to make fun of what they're wearing because I don't know why they were wearing it.
	There might have been a good reason for why they were dressed like they're in an Eyes Wide Shut movie.
	Verbal diarrhea.
	Of the highest order.
	And by the way, I'm getting breaking news as we're live.
	I don't know if it's actually breaking news, but Noé Chartier is a journalist, Epoch Times Canadian contributor.
	No public letter to his constituents, not a word.
	Mendicino has resigned his House of Commons seat.
	That is wild.
	Marco Mendicino, for those of you who don't recall...
	Is a pathological liar who's the one that suggested that there was a risk of rape at the Ottawa protest, which is why they invoked the Emergencies Act.
	It's an absolute state of chaos in Canada, and things are probably going to go the way they should.
	You want to bet on it?
	A majority conservative government, despite what Pierre is doing and not because of it.
	But there's chaos here.
	Sam Cooper?
	Who might be on sooner than later as well?
	Exclusive, Carney's Chief of Staff Marco Mendicino warned of Beijing's Vancouver mayoral election interference in 2022.
	Did nothing.
	Let's see if we can access this without a firewall.
	I think we can here.
	Okay, hold on.
	Exclusive, Carney's Chief of Staff Marco Mendicino warned of Beijing.
	So I presume this means he was warned of Beijing's Vancouver election interference in 2022 and he did nothing.
	Documents show.
	Acknowledge, former Vancouver mayor's claim that CSIS, that's Canadian intelligence service, warned, we've been sending reports up the chain and nobody's paying attention.
	Newly appointed Prime Minister Mark Carney's Chief of Staff, former political safety minister Marco Mendicino, received an explosive restricted distribution report several days after Vancouver's 2022 mayoral election.
	By the way, Vancouver, for those of you who don't understand the geopolitics of Canada, Vancouver is like, the second language is, I would say, Mandarin.
	I'm not trying to be glib.
	It's the known Chinese population hub of Canada.
	Other cities are coming close, but that's the demographic reality of Vancouver, British Columbia.
	Public Safety Canada records, including October 21, 2022, Canadian Eyes Only brief distributed to Mendicino, and then Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's National Security Advisor, Jody Thomas, confirmed that in May 2022, CSIS provided Stewart with, quote, defensive briefing, end quote, on electoral interference by the People's Republic of China.
	These documents shed new light on Stewart's subsequent claims that CSIS informed him that they had escalated concerns to Ottawa, only to be met with indifference.
	I'll give you all the links so you can read that.
	And this is in the context of Chinese infiltration in Canadian government, MPs willingly or unwillingly, sorry, I should say, wittingly or unwittingly, serving as agents to foreign interests, foreign countries.
	It's a sinking ship up in Canada.
	And it seems that Pierre Poilievre wants to play safe politics by...
	Jumping on what he perceives to be the politically popular tact of being anti-Trump in what he perceives to be an anti-Trump Canada.
	What do we got here?
	Canadian government puts their natives to sleepy sleep.
	American government will give Canadians all their guns back.
	Join us, our beautiful northern provinces.
	Commander Kim.
	Well, yesterday we had on Marty from up north talking about Alberta.
	And there's a strong movement to separate.
	It's called Wexit and Join America.
	But I don't see that happening anytime soon.
	All that I see happening is Pierre Poiliev screwing everything up.
	And it's not because I want him to.
	I have no vested interest in here.
	In fact, on the contrary, I believe the markets are a good value.
	But my goodness, is he seemingly making it more difficult than he needed to.
	And if we want to talk about confession through projection, I think, did I play this yesterday?
	He's been a politician.
	He was a political staffer.
	He got elected to the House of Commons very early on in his low 20s.
	Said he was only going to serve two terms.
	He's ended up serving, I think he's probably into his fifth.
	He's got the biggest pension, publicly paid pension of anyone.
	And he's that lifelong politician that...
	You know, you can only believe so much in the free market if you're a tenured professor at Chicago or you're a lifelong politician, right?
	And he just sort of worships in that world.
	He defaults to the same solutions all the time.
	And he's also...
	I honestly believe he disdains much about...
	The country.
	Which to me and I think to Canadians is the nature of the country.
	He disdains.
	So he's been on this mantra for the last several years.
	Canada's broken.
	Canada's broken.
	And Canada's broken because we're stupid.
	Canada's broken because we're stupid.
	And, you know, he finds an echo chamber with Jordan Peterson and other people who he sits down and talks with.
	So there's a disdain for the country that he envisions.
	It's pretty awkward for him now that the country's coming together in Canadian pride and we're under attack by the people that he's been cozying up to.
	So literally, as we speak, he's trying to find a Canadian flag to wrap himself in and play patriot.
	Last refuge of a scoundrel.
	Can you believe the projection going on in that?
	The man who's lived out of the country for the better part of the last decade serving European globalist interests is accusing Pierre Poilievre of wrapping himself in the flag while he himself, holy crap apples, harps on this manufactured crisis with America.
	all right well before we get into the uh jfk files we got row row with laura says on the jfk files at this point they will be a dud reason being if there was ever if there ever was a smoking gun among the files trust me it went up in smoke over somebody's fireplace in dc or virginia a long time ago and we got s underscore ren in local says wow he sounds Put together when he has a script to read from.
	He still slaps in a bunch of those um, um, um.
	Hyphen says he will bankrupt us.
	Stephen Britton says I don't care what Carney has to say.
	Turn this off, Eva.
	It's off now.
	You must know what your enemies have to say, Stephen.
	Lest you not know what their next plan of action is.
	Over on Rumble.
	We got Skeptical59 says healthcare is not free and it's not 200 billion.
	In Canada, they call it a healthcare system.
	It's a death care system.
	And they want to expand the death care system because it's a way for them to save a buttload of money.
	And you'll hear more about that when we publish the interview with Kelsey Sharon coming on tomorrow.
	And yes, I know Maxine Bernier is in Florida, people.
	If I can't meet up with him in person, I will certainly try to meet up with him digitally.
	Electronically.
	Digitally sounds disgusting.
	Alright, well, we're going to get to the quartering stuff in a second.
	There is one last piece of news coming out of Canada.
	And you remember that class action about the Ottawa Trucker protests where Lexi Lee with her lawyer, Paul Champ, suing...
	The Ottawa trucker protesters and the organizers and I think some donors for $300 million for the pain and suffering of that protest?
	Well, the motion to dismiss the proposed class action has been dismissed.
	The class action has not been authorized or certified yet is the proper term, but the motion to dismiss it has been dismissed.
	So the proposed class action lawsuit for $290 million can continue.
	It's a quick story.
	Proposed class action lawsuit against those who allegedly organized and funded the Freedom Convoy protests cleared another hurdle on Thursday when the Ontario Court of Appeal refused to dismiss the case.
	Some downtown Ottawa residents and businesses are suing for $290 million, alleging personal suffering and business losses from the protests.
	Can you understand this?
	By the way, you want to understand how absolutely insane this is?
	This is coming after...
	The government had shut down businesses for damn near two years.
	They had shut down Ottawa for damn near two years.
	And not only did this not hurt the business or businesses, any business that stayed open during this protest would have gotten more patronage than they had seen in the last five years.
	They were shut down because they were told to shut down.
	And the ones that stayed open got all sorts of terrible treatment, both from the government and from the people.
	The lawsuit has not yet been certified into a class action.
	Defendants tried to get the case thrown out of court by arguing that the protest was in the public interest, but the Court of Appeal upheld a lower court's ruling allowing the lawsuit to proceed.
	Court documents defendants say the plan to argue they were following police direction when they parked their trucks in the downtown core.
	The Ottawa Court have said, no, police found no evidence to suggest police directed truckers to remain parked on public streets for as long as they did or to honk their horns with the frequency.
	The motion judge understood.
	The political motivation and goals of the convoy protest, and he understood the harm the residents and businesses in the protest zone contended that they had suffered as a result of how the protest was concluded, Justice Davis Brown wrote on behalf of the three-panel judge.
	Brown said he saw no error in the judgment, yada, yada, yada.
	This is why when I first got into assessing American laws, why I could not possibly understand how many were actually dismissed.
	Like, I'm from Canada.
	To succeed on a motion to dismiss in my entire law practice in Quebec, and it's even harder in Quebec than the rest of Canada, it's exceedingly difficult to succeed on a motion to dismiss, to dismiss the case before it's ever heard on the merits.
	The amount of times I've seen it happen in the States blew my mind.
	And I remember the first one was the Nicholas Sandman dismissed.
	It got revived a little bit, revived by the very same judge who dismissed it.
	But for good or for bad, and I think it's for good.
	American courts dismiss...
	I say that, but in some cases I think should get to the merits.
	In the States, they dismiss a whole hell of a lot more cases before any hearing on the merits than in Canada.
	In Canada, they say, look, maybe you'll fail in your $300 million proposed class action, but you deserve to have your day in court, even if it means ruining the lives of the people that you're suing, in particular, Pat King, whose bank accounts are still frozen because of that particular court case, from what I understood.
	I see Mark Robert in the backdrop.
	Which this might be the perfect segue into bringing him on.
	The quartering put out a tweet earlier today.
	And the tweet reads, um, am I reading this right?
	And by the way, there's no shade or anything.
	I read this as a joke.
	And I like it, though, because it is funny.
	And you'll see why.
	He says, am I reading this right?
	And I'll read it to you, people.
	By the way, all of the podcasts are also on podcast format on Podbean, Stitcher.
	All other places where pods are found.
	And it's a synopsis.
	I mean, I don't even know what really I'm looking at.
	I hope Mark Grobert, Lord Buckley, the idiot savant of all things conspiratorial will be able to tell me what this is.
	It says, Synopsis informant has advised that one, Thomas Mosley, has been in touch with a group of Chicago Cubans who may be involved in the assassination of the late president, JFK.
	Also, this Cuban group is endeavoring to purchase, through Mosley, a variety of automatic weapons and explosives.
	What's funny is people are going to go, the ones who want to find the Jews are going to read this and they're going to find the Jews and they're going to totally ignore the Cubans.
	Although if they get to the Cubans, they're going to say, well, it's the Cubans, but the Jews are selling the Cubans.
	So basically, bottom line, it says references made to the office memorandum of the chief.
	What does that say?
	Something acting, SAIC, yada, yada, yada, yada, yada.
	All right.
	For information on all offices concerned, we're on the bottom here.
	November 26, 1963, that he had heard that Trey Mosley allegedly had been attempting to negotiate a sale of machine guns to one somebody, Escobar, and that Escobar allegedly made a comment the day before the assassination of President John F. Kennedy that,
	quote, we now have plenty of money.
	Our new backers are Jews as soon as we or they take care of Kennedy, end quote.
	And so people found the word Jew and now they're flipping out that the Jews were behind the assassination and that JFK Jr. was taken out by the Jews.
	Let me take this out of here and see where Grobert is.
	Grobert, let me see if he's waiting for me to bring him in.
	You might want to enable your camera and microphone, smiley face.
	Now, the thing is this, from what I understand, that document has been out and available since the 60s.
	From a legal perspective, that document can only be qualified as the utmost of, I don't know, like, what's beyond third-party hearsay?
	He heard from them that they were heard from somebody else that they were trying to get guns for the Cubans and that the backers were Jews.
	Speaking of Jews, sorry, I've been waiting all day for that segue.
	All right, two Jews are going to discuss the...
	Oh no, wait, you're still muted.
	Unmute your mic.
	Okay, now unmute it.
	You might want to...
	Okay, wait, let's see if this works here.
	It's not muted on my side.
	No, talk...
	Oh, wait, no.
	Now I hear you.
	Okay, beautiful.
	Do you hear me now?
	Do you hear me?
	Yes, I do.
	Is the Jews...
	We're going to talk about a lot more than just this.
	You didn't bring me on to talk about the Jews, did you?
	Is this a Jew bush?
	Which is a Jewish ambush, Viva?
	Well, everybody knows that the J in JFK stands for...
	Okay, there's so many jokes.
	But the reality is...
	Okay, Robert, we're going to get into it.
	Thus far, what I understand...
	We'll start with the JFK files and then we're going to see where the conversation goes.
	First of all, I take for granted everybody knows who you are, but we've got 31,700 people watching on Rumble.
	And we've got 125 on locals who know who you are.
	Who are you for those who may not know who you are?
	I am the president of the B 'nai B 'rith.
	I've been serving the Jewish people for over 35 years.
	I have a knish business on the side, potato kasha and spaghetti knish based in Bay Ridge, Queens.
	And let's face it, I'm a friend of the Jews.
	America's Untold Stories with Eric Hunley.
	We do, among other things, JFK American History.
	And news segments.
	We've covered a lot of different events historically.
	But apparently the JFK stuff has the most resonance among the population, among the YouTube, Rumble, and we're also a member of locals' family like Viva.
	Am I allowed?
	I think I know your upcoming scheduling.
	Are you allowed to disclose where you're going to be on Friday?
	Yeah, I'm leaving tomorrow to go to wherever the hell he is, Tim Pool.
	I'm going to be swatting him personally.
	Talking about JFK Friday morning, I guess the show is on right there.
	CW stands for...
	Oh, geez, it's the daytime show, anyhow.
	It's going to be amazing.
	Cultural War?
	Cultural War, that's right.
	Sorry.
	Okay, yeah.
	So, Tim Pool on Friday.
	Okay, that's going to be amazing, and it's well-deserved.
	Both you and Eric Hundley are going to be there together, so that's going to be amazing.
	You want my background on JFK?
	I was an investigative reporter for the Village Voice for over 10 years.
	I worked with Oliver Stone.
	I wrote a 10-hour miniseries on Oswald that Oliver and I worked on.
	Never got made, but that's not my fault.
	And, you know, a lot of JFK-related materials, LBJ and other stuff that I've studied for decades.
	Doing a big show on Tuesday with America's Untold Stories on Mark Lane, who is the author and also the subject of Rush to Judgment, both the book.
	And the documentary, which I highly recommend for anybody just getting involved in this genre, I would start with the OG Mark Lane and his book Rush to Judgment.
	Mark, I'm bringing this up just because it caught my eyes.
	It's unfair.
	You put something in all caps and I actually, it does catch my eyes.
	B 'nai B 'rith literally set up JFK.
	What the fuck?
	Julius Sheps and Zapruder.
	Julius Sheps had a ginger ale business in Brooklyn.
	I don't know what happened to him after the ginger ale business.
	That ginger ale is still around.
	Do I not see Sheps?
	Sheps, isn't that like a tonic order?
	I think it, I thought it was.
	Who's Zapruder?
	Zapruder was a dressmaker, also from New York, who moved out to Dallas and actually operated a dress business in the Dal Tex building located in Dealey Plaza.
	Now I'm going to display some wild ignorance.
	Zapruder was Jewish?
	Zapruder was Jewish, and so was his family, I guess.
	Oh, my.
	First of all, I thought it was Zapruder, and I always thought they were Italian.
	Mark, I'm starting to convince myself now.
	I'm joking.
	I'm joking.
	Anyway, just regarding that memo, that is a counterfeit fraudulent memo.
	There are many of them out there that are floating around that has no rift number.
	Oh, really?
	Here's a good one for you, Viv.
	I'll just give you one out of my own files.
	Here's one right here.
	How about this one?
	I'll give you one out of my own collection.
	This looks very official, doesn't it?
	Look how official this looks.
	This is the famous James Rowley memo.
	From a number of years ago, James Rowley was the head of the Secret Service.
	And in this particular memo, he's writing, this is from John McCone, by the way, the director of the Central Intelligence Agency, to James Rowley, the chief of the Secret Service, right here.
	This memo circulated for many years, just like that memo did.
	Let me bring the one up.
	And by the way, if you can, take a picture of that and send it to me so I can bring up like a clearer version.
	Yeah, sure.
	I mean, I could do that.
	But I just wanted to read from it a little bit of the highlight at the bottom part here.
	Oswald's subject was trained by this agency.
	Under cover of the Office of Naval Intelligence for Soviet Assignments during preliminary training in 1957, Subject was active in aerial reconnaissance of mainland China and maintained a security clearance up to confidential level.
	His military records during the period are open to your agency, and I've directed they be forwarded to the commission, that being the Warren Commission.
	Subject received additional indoctrination at our own Campiri.
	Located in Virginia, not far from Tim Pool, right from September 8th to October 17th, 1958, and participated in a few relatively minor assignments until arrangements were made for his entry into the Soviet Union in September 1959.
	While in the Soviet Union, he was on special assignment, blah, blah, blah.
	Okay, the numbers that are up in the corners here...
	These are fraudulent numbers, and that's how a lot of these documents are deciphered.
	This is a cut-and-paste job, but it fooled a lot of people for many years.
	And there's still people in the JFK community who believe that that Rowley memo is real.
	It is not, just like the one you were showing.
	Let me bring it back up, actually.
	That's...
	Come on, where is it?
	It's right here.
	So this memo...
	That's the wrong...
	Do I see...
	Oh, no, you see the right memo, correct?
	I'm going to max...
	Yeah, there's different numbers on it, and those numbers have been shown to be fraudulent.
	In other words, all of the JFK documents that just came out have continuous numbers on them, the ones that are released.
	Not only just the 80,000 pages, but year after year after year after year.
	If you go to the National Archives website, you will see folder after folder for each year that tens of thousands of documents have been released.
	Let me ask you this.
	So what portion of it is fake?
	Oh, I don't know.
	Who gives a shit what portion of it is fake?
	Then you're getting into Holocaust denial in terms of the JFK case.
	This document I just read to you has a lot of truth in it.
	There's a lot of truth.
	But the point of this document is that the CIA is admitting that Oswald worked for them.
	To rally at the Secret Service.
	So the information at the bottom, when you look at this, it's true.
	But that's not the point of the doc.
	The point of the doc is the admission by John McCone in writing that Oswald worked for the CIA through ONI.
	Okay, that's actually wild.
	And the funny thing is, when I read the memo, I was like, are backers who are Jews?
	Viva, stop it.
	Can we move on already?
	I mean, it's just a preposterous document.
	It's so absurd, I can't even talk to you about it anymore, because the level that I operate on is like a graduate school level.
	You're in a schoolyard with a roll of toilet paper, where some guy took a dump on it and signed his name, and you keep rolling it out.
	For reasons I don't understand.
	Forget the fact that Zaprudo was Jewish.
	What happened with the...
	The Zaprudo film was kept suppressed for how many years again?
	It depends what you mean by suppressed.
	Well...
	It was purchased by Time Life.
	It was put into their vault until various people got copies of it, and there are various people who got copies of it.
	It was revealed to the American public on Geraldo's show through Robert Grodin, who was actually the projectionist in the Clay Shaw case where Jim Garrison put Clay Shaw on trial for the murder of JFK.
	They had a showing.
	Garrison subpoenaed Time Life, and he got a copy of this Brita film.
	And that was shown in the courtroom.
	Hence, in the movie JFK, you see Costner saying, we're going to show you this film.
	And the jury is completely overwhelmed with...
	Nausea watching the film.
	That projectionist was a guy named Robert Grodin.
	He's one of the OG's researchers in the JFK community.
	He made a copy of that film before they returned it to Time Life, and other people made copies of the film.
	And it began to spread underground.
	When I say underground, I mean the college circuit during 67, 68, 69, 70. It ends up on TV.
	With Geraldo's nighttime show, Geraldo Tonight, or whatever it's called, on ABC.
	And that's when the American public actually saw the film for the first time.
	How many years after the assassination was it?
	13, I think.
	13 years after the public sees it, but the content of the video itself was known, just not widely viewed?
	Well, okay, so there's more to it.
	Life magazine put out stills immediately of the Zapruder film, still photos, because they were a photo magazine.
	They reversed some of the photos intentionally.
	Dan Rather from CBS News viewed the film while it was in the hands of the authorities immediately after the assassination.
	They were running around.
	Zapruder was running around trying to get a company to duplicate it.
	So he could have the original and give copies to the FBI and Secret Service.
	Dan Rather, who was in Dallas, came on live TV afterwards and claimed that he'd just seen the film, which he had.
	And he describes the film intentionally in reverse of what we now know to be the film.
	In other words, Dan Rather says Kennedy is shot in the back of the head and his head goes forward from the impact of the bullet.
	We now know that his head went back and to the left, famously described by the Kevin Costner character in the movie JFK.
	However, when he toured the college circuit, Dan Rather, as an author or whatever his college circuit was about, all of the college kids in the 70s would chant, back and to the left,
	back and to the left, back and to the left.
	This was in the 70s.
	They were taunting Dan Rather as a fraud.
	Because they had already seen at colleges across the country the actual Zapruder film smuggled in and realized that Dan Rather had lied about the actual visuals of the film, if that makes any sense.
	Yeah.
	Why he lied is a question that Dan Rather will have to answer someday.
	So, and we're going to get to, well, actually, let's just spoil the punchline.
	All that has been released thus far, you're working with Encryptus, who's our producer right now.
	Has there been anything new that has been released that was not already in the public domain?
	Well, I mean, it's new, but is it relevant?
	I mean, you've got to understand, I've looked at about...
	I don't know, since it came out, about 500 to 700 documents, let's say, right?
	95% are about the Cubans.
	When I say Cubans, I mean Bay of Pigs.
	And that is a big, big chunk of the historical archives of the CIA is the Bay of Pigs invasion, Castro, internal stuff, JM Wave out of Miami, almost all of the documents so far that I've looked at.
	And that goes back further.
	I mean, it's not just this year.
	There's year after year of documents being released, Viva, through the National Archives website.
	You can click on 2023 when Biden was president.
	You can go through tens of thousands of documents there, which I've done.
	There's things that are of interest to me, but which may not be of interest to the actual public.
	In other words, I'll give you an example.
	E. Howard Hunt, he wrote an autobiography.
	So there is a CIA asking for deletions from Hunt's autobiography in there.
	There's things about James McCord, who was one of the Watergate burglars, as was Hunt.
	There's different things in there that may not be...
	Of interest to the general public, but of interest to historians and JFK historians, nevertheless.
	Now, I'll give an example on E. Howard Hunt.
	E. Howard Hunt was one of the Watergate burglars, but he was far more than that.
	He was a lifetime CIA agent, a novelist who wrote over 50 novels, really a brilliant man.
	He, at one point, working for the White House, decided...
	As part of their Dirty Tricks program, Viva, this was the Watergate Nixon administration, decided to go into the National Archives and write phony memos like this, alleging that JFK had the Diem brothers killed in Vietnam.
	The leader and advisor of the South Vietnamese government were the Diem brothers.
	They were assassinated right before Kennedy was assassinated in October, early November of 1963.
	E. Howard Hunt went into the National Archives and wrote phony memos and inserted them into the National Archives, blaming JFK for calling for the assassination of the Diem brothers.
	The reason I mention this is to show you the vulnerability of the National Archives, of these documents coming out.
	They're not the Word of God.
	And this is part of that, and so is the one that you're looking at.
	First of all, I've got to address something in the chat.
	Everybody, Mark Robert and I are close friends.
	Yeah.
	I'm like, I should be insulted at your condescension.
	What?
	Humor translates badly on the internet.
	Oh, no, no.
	We're close friends.
	We're just riffing and kibitzing.
	And now, number two, Robert, decoy documents.
	I guess the question is this.
	Yeah.
	The fact that people are making decoy documents themselves is itself relevant.
	Yeah.
	Okay, I'm just going to back it up to the most simple thing.
	What do we not know?
	What could we discover?
	What do we not know of the official story?
	Well, I could work backwards because I could tell you what I'm looking for.
	I mean, Jefferson Morley is looking for stuff about Joe and Edie's.
	Everybody's got their thing, their area of thing.
	My area is Mexico City.
	So there's a lot of...
	Documents that have not seen the light of day because they have foreign governments attached to them.
	I know this sounds crazy, but there are redactions of countries Who don't want their government dragged into these documents.
	There's a lot of redactions for Australia.
	There's redactions for Mexico.
	There's redactions for every single country who has intelligence connections to the CIA and the United States government.
	Australia has a lot of redactions, and now apparently...
	The nation of Israel has a couple of redactions.
	Of course, that means that the Jews killed not only Christ, but they killed Kennedy as well.
	There's a note in there from Bethlehem that goes back to, I think, 5 BC from a guy's hardware store in Bethlehem saying he sold the nails to the Romans, signed Jerry Goldblatt.
	Mark, nobody can deny the history of what happened.
	It's only attribution of blame.
	I've had this argument.
	The Romans killed Christ, and they say, yes, but he was turned in and betrayed by people who all were Jews at the time.
	So you can't rewrite history, and that's what it was.
	In terms of JFK, there's a...
	Yeah, let me just finish on the Mexico City thing, because it's really important.
	The framing of, and this is for people who may or may not, I don't know what your audience knows about the assassination.
	I'll just tell you this.
	September 28th, 1963, they began the framing of Lee Harvey Oswald by claiming that he appeared in the Mexico City.
	He went to the embassy, the Soviet embassy in Mexico City.
	He visited this embassy and called them on the phone.
	And it turns out that the call on the phone and the photographs of him coming out of the embassy, We're imposters.
	And we know this going back to September 28th, 1963.
	Why do we know that?
	Because we have the transcript of J. Edgar Hoover, the head of the FBI, calling up LBJ the day after the assassination on November 23rd and telling him in detail what I just told you.
	And if you want, I could give you that transcript.
	It's a very famous transcript.
	The audio was destroyed.
	Literally 15 years ago, but we still have the transcript of J. Edgar Hoover telling LBJ that the photograph on the CIA cameras outside the Soviet embassy in Mexico City are an imposter.
	Okay, that's fine.
	Now you've got Oswald, quote-unquote, calling the Soviet embassy.
	This is about a visa.
	That turns out to be an imposter, according to J. Edgar Hoover.
	The FBI, because the CIA sent these things to the FBI.
	Now, when did they send them?
	They send them on September 28th, two months before the assassination.
	Why is Oswald on their radar being impostered, Viva, on September 28th in Mexico City?
	He was not in Mexico City.
	They were laying the groundwork.
	This is David Attlee Phillips, who was the western chief of the CIA based in Mexico City.
	A JFK hater.
	He later admitted in his own biography that, in fact, Lee Harvey Oswald was never in Mexico City, as I've claimed, you know, for 20, 30 years.
	They needed him to be in Mexico City because the plot was that he had done this for the Soviets.
	And he was going to go to Havana and then on to the Soviet Union after the assassination.
	This would allow the Joint Chiefs of Staff to start World War III, retaliate against the Soviets, and put an end to the Cuban communist regime 90 miles off the coast.
	That was the plan.
	The plan ended, however, when LBJ became president.
	LBJ said, I don't need a nuclear war.
	Thank you.
	I'm going to pull the plug on this half of the plan, but I'm going to give you Security National Action Memo number 273.
	Now, 273 replaces 263, signed by JFK just a few weeks before, 263 removing troops from Vietnam over the next year.
	He signs 273 while JFK's body is laying in a casket in the rotunda in state.
	And he gives the generals, he says, you want your fucking war?
	Here's your fucking war.
	And meaning you're not getting a war with the Soviet Union, but you are getting one of the first of many proxy wars by the United States, and that's the war in Vietnam.
	And that's the booby prize that LBJ gives to the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
	Now, keep in mind, the Joint Chiefs of Staff have come up with...
	Incredibly insane plans like Operation Northwoods, which I'm sure you're quite aware of.
	I mean, Barnes has talked about Operation Northwoods.
	Many of us are familiar with it.
	This was a plan created by the Joint Chiefs of Staff to get us into a war with Cuba, a false flag to get us to invade and take out the Cuban regime.
	There were plans now underway all through the '62-'63 for a Bay of Pigs II to go back again and this time get the job done.
	The framing of Oswald is part of this to both take out Kennedy and then start a war with Russia, with the Soviet Union at the time.
	This is interesting.
	We always talk about Operation Northwoods because it was the plot approved by the DOD to fly planes into buildings, mass shootings...
	Hold on.
	It was approved by the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
	Let me just...
	Yeah, sorry.
	Joint Chiefs of Staff brought it to JFK.
	And he says no.
	Who said, you're totally insane.
	And a year later, he's dead.
	Right, but he's not dead because of Operation Northwoods.
	The reason I mention Operation Northwoods is to show you how far out and insane they were at that time during the peak of the Cold War.
	But when I say not part of Operation Northwoods, I never thought of it as potentially not an iteration, but a sequel where kill the president, blame it on...
	I guess the thing is, at the time...
	They just blamed it on alone gunmen.
	They didn't use it as a pretext to go to war.
	They just used the elimination of JFK Jr. to go to war.
	Well, it was JFK Sr., but nevertheless, the Soviets were told to stand down.
	The Soviets believed and wrote reports out of the KGB that they believed internally their analysis was that LBJ did it.
	That's from the KGB.
	We know that after the Soviet regime collapsed.
	They were told to stand down immediately, and they were also told not to use this as a propaganda tool.
	They said, we will not blame you if you do not use this as a tool of propaganda.
	Now, how do we know that?
	Because Mark Lane, who wrote the book Rush to Judgment, It was not allowed to be published in where the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact countries.
	And you would think that would be a gift from God for them to attack the United States.
	Here is a leading lawyer and a JFK supporter writing a book that the entire Warren Commission is a lie and the Soviets never touched it with a 10-foot pole.
	And I mean a 10-foot pole from Poland.
	Okay, look, to satisfy the...
	The people who are hell-bent on finding the Jewish connection.
	You can find it, and there's players in there.
	Jack Ruby, a number of people that I didn't even know.
	Saputo, the fact that he sold the video for a million bucks.
	Okay, someone's not going to kill the president for a million dollars, hoping to cash the video, etc.
	The idea that JFK was adverse, forcing the AIPAC to register as foreign agents, and then it happens.
	To address that, if you care to address the idea that this was somehow retaliation for JFK trying to force the AIPAC to register.
	No history of it.
	It's never been written in any book.
	There's hundreds and hundreds of books, hundreds and hundreds of documents.
	This historical revisionism started five minutes ago.
	Okay.
	I just want to show you this.
	This is a great document.
	This document here, which I could send you a copy of, this is from the United States Department.
	Of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
	This is an actual document.
	I'll read this document.
	It's from 1947.
	Extra copy, blah, blah, blah.
	Washington, D.C. It is my sworn statement that one Jack Rubenstein of Chicago, noted as a potential witness for hearings of the House Committee on Un-American Activities, is performing information functions,
	meaning informant.
	For the staff of this congressional guy, it is requested that Rubenstein not be called for an open testimony in those aforementioned hearings.
	That's 1947, November 14th.
	1947.
	And the congressman is Richard M. Nixon, representative of California.
	Okay, now...
	Having nothing to do with JFK.
	Ruby was being used as an informant.
	This was a union racketeering investigation in 1947 in Chicago, and Ruby was an informant for Nixon.
	So when Nixon saw Ruby shoot Oswald on TV, he said, I know that guy, which is true.
	Wow.
	Okay, now hold on.
	Let's just get to the potential players, or even the likely versus less likely.
	CIA wanted to kill JFK because he was getting in the way of their plans for military operations, etc.
	Okay, well, there's various wings here.
	I mean, the CIA obviously was still smarting by the fact that Alan Dulles and Bissell and Cabell were fired.
	The top three guys were fired by JFK the year before.
	So they have a motive for revenge.
	Dulles, I mean, he was literally the father of the organization, was fired because of the failure of the Bay of Pigs.
	And JFK said, I'm going to scatter the CIA.
	Into a Thousand Pieces into the Wind.
	Arthur Kroc at the New York Times said the CIA had to be dismantled.
	President Truman, who was retired now, wrote an editorial to the New York Times saying, I made a mistake by authorizing the CIA's creation in 1947, the biggest mistake of my life.
	Dulles goes to visit him at his home in Missouri, begs him to write a retraction.
	Of the editorial he wrote for the New York Times, Truman refuses.
	You have situations where other agencies are involved as well.
	Oswald was ONI, who was never CIA.
	It was Office of Naval Intelligence.
	There was approximately a 13-man defector team.
	Not a team, but it was 13 defectors that were created by James Angleton to infiltrate into Eastern European countries.
	One went to Bulgaria, one went to Romania, another one went to Lithuania, one went to Moscow, and that was Lee Harvey Oswald.
	13 of them, 13, Viva, were trained.
	To be phony defectors.
	This was his phony defector program created quite brilliantly by James Angleton.
	And they had a problem because they had a honeypot program, the Soviets, where they would take these incredibly hot Soviet or Eastern European women and attach them to super horny Americans, have them get married to them here.
	Get into some domestic dispute.
	Get divorced.
	And then these women were free to roam around the country.
	The intelligence agencies were hip to this.
	And they told these 13 guys, if you bring back a wife, she's yours.
	You can't divorce her.
	And Oswald came back with Marina Oswald, who was the daughter of a KGB or a DMV, DVM uncle, living with her, who she lived with in Minsk.
	So he brought back one and she was trying to shake him in the worst way.
	Okay.
	CIA, potentially, because they're angry at firings.
	LBJ, the most prominent, because he wanted to be president.
	Yeah, I mean, if you look at LBJ, he is going to prison within two weeks of the assassination.
	The cover story of Life magazine, scheduled for November 22, 1963, was a story about Bobby Baker and LBJ and how LBJ was about to be kicked off the ticket and indicted by the Justice Department.
	How do we know that?
	They printed up a number of these issues.
	They ran off a few thousand copies anyway.
	The Bobby Baker-LBJ combination was being fed by the Justice Department to the media, Life Magazine-Time Newsweek, by Robert Francis Kennedy, who wanted LBJ off the ticket for the second term of his brother.
	He was forced onto the ticket in the first term, right here in Los Angeles, by two FBI agents who were sent by Hoover with pictures of JFK with various women, and the booby prize was putting LBJ on that ticket, which is what J. Edgar Hoover demanded.
	They were best friends, J. Edgar Hoover and LBJ.
	So he demanded that LBJ be put on that ticket.
	Bobby Kennedy hated LBJ with a passion, and LBJ repeatedly...
	He said to anyone who would listen to him, I'm going to cut that boy's throat if it's the last thing I do.
	And he'd make the sign of the throat cutting.
	And LBJ did indeed get involved in the killing of RFK here in Los Angeles in 1968.
	That's a story for another day.
	But LBJ had means, motive, and opportunity.
	Him and Connolly kind of roped JFK into coming to Dallas, to coming to Texas in the fall.
	That was their part physically in the upfront program to get him back to Dallas.
	I mean, even if he survived Dealey Plaza, the next day was a barbecue at the LBJ Ranch, and he was never going to leave that LBJ Ranch on Sunday, I'll tell you that much.
	This is the question where, like, what evidence could you have that would definitively implicate LBJ?
	Like, things are going to be, A, they're probably going to be spoken and not written, and B, even if they were ever written, they are deleted, burnt up decades ago.
	Like, what could there possibly be revealed that would definitively confirm LBJ put out the order?
	Well, I don't know about an actual order, but you could look at what he did to cover up the crime.
	If you want to say that's conspiracy, if you're covering up the crime, there's plenty of pieces of fact about the cover-up of the crime.
	I mean, as to the front-end planning of the crime, you can only suggest that he was going to go to jail, and he had motivation to do that to avoid going to prison.
	I mean, from LBJ's point of view...
	Either he kills this guy, takes his job, becomes the most powerful man in the world, or he goes to prison and you say, well, how could the vice president go to prison?
	In fact, a couple of years later, the vice president for Nixon, Spiro Wagner, went to prison.
	Let me read a few of these, and I think I got the super chats that I missed from earlier.
	To be fair, JFK used his good relationship with Egypt's Nasser to go around Israel and have a better handle on the Middle East.
	Did not have a good relationship with Nasser, that's a lie.
	Well, I would say it's factually incorrect.
	Pinochet's helicopter tours is a...
	I don't think he's...
	That's a misnomer.
	Let me just leave it that way.
	Regarding JFK Jr., Biden trade her letter that made the news yesterday that was postmarked June 1994.
	I'm from Worcester.
	It's Worcester, by the way.
	Worcester.
	JFK Jr. was photographed at the DNC on June 3rd, which was held...
	I don't even know what this is about.
	I don't know what this is about either.
	Okay, I'll have to look that up afterwards.
	And then there was, what are the odds that Lee Harvey Oswald was a diversion and Jackie got the kill shot?
	I know that's going to...
	Well, I'll tell you one of the great things, getting back to what I'm looking for inside of these documents, Jackie Kennedy testified before the Warren Commission.
	They wanted to know her point of view, what she saw and what happened.
	And she was the closest one to the wounds.
	And they were asking her questions about the wounds.
	Her testimony...
	Was deleted and put into the Warren Commission archives till 2039.
	Why would the president's wife have her entire testimony removed from the Warren Commission?
	His wife just happened to be, you know, sitting next to him.
	And it's because her testimony, one could rationally deduce, her testimony was about where, how, and when he got shot, which is what it was.
	That's not available until 2039.
	I'm hoping it's in here somewhere.
	What?
	I'm just trying to...
	Also, there's William Manchester's book, The Death of a President.
	Jackie Kennedy hired William Manchester to write the definitive book about the assassination.
	That book is called The Death of the President.
	He interviewed her, and in that book, in one of the chapters of that book, is the interview of her feeling as to who did it.
	Her feeling was LBJ killed her husband.
	And then when the book was about to come out in galley form, her and Robert Kennedy were horrified to see it in print.
	So what did they do?
	They sued their own guy in federal court, William Manchester, to prevent the release of the book.
	The judge in the case said the best I can do is that chapter.
	The chapter was removed and put into a safe in William Manchester's house in New England.
	When he died, his son was vowing to release it to no avail.
	His son was horrified and put it back in the safe.
	That chapter is now in the hands of Caroline Kennedy, who has denounced her brother, her cousin, RFK Jr., repeatedly for saying there was a conspiracy to kill her father.
	Because in there is the testimony and interview with her mother that LBJ did it.
	And who is the biggest icon of the post-World War Democratic world?
	It's LBJ.
	LBJ is a guy who is an icon.
	He's second to FDR in Democratic history.
	They cannot wrap their mind around the fact that LBJ was involved in removing the guy in front of him to take his position.
	Throughout history, the number one...
	Our assassination motivation is by the second in command.
	Going back to Roman times, that's the most prevalent whodunit in world history.
	It's the second in command.
	Are there others?
	Of course.
	But the most common is the second in command.
	The Democratic Party...
	Cannot allow LBJ, and they've done everything they can to block books, block documentaries.
	The History Channel famously, on the British documentary The Men Who Killed Kennedy Part 9, banned it from telecast in the United States on the History Channel because LBJ's people went berserk.
	That he was fingered as the mastermind behind the assassination.
	I can only recommend the book by the late Philip Nelson, a great friend of mine who wrote LBJ Mastermind of the Assassination.
	If you want to read the best book on it, read Philip Nelson's book, LBJ Mastermind of the Assassination.
	I'm still trying to think of why they would try to censor or suppress...
	Jackie Onassis' testimony.
	Right.
	What other reason could there be?
	Well, her testimony at the time would have revealed that the autopsy was falsified and wrong in terms of the bullet hole.
	Her testimony there would have contradicted the official narrative at the time.
	Absolutely.
	I mean, her testimony of seeing a shot coming and hitting her husband in the right temple would have ended everything.
	Just that simple testimony.
	You know, the shot to the throat would have ended everything, the Warren Commission stuff.
	I mean, she had to have her testimony removed.
	This is the president's wife.
	I mean, it's astounding that nobody knows this.
	I'll ask the chat if they knew that.
	I don't think many people are going to have known that.
	No.
	The idea then is, the autopsy guy, who did the autopsy that falsified the autopsy, said that that was a tracheotomy?
	Well, there's Boswell, and there's two of them doing it.
	They burned their notes, and they started to draw pictures.
	They started to draw pictures of the...
	So I'm just trying to think of what could possibly be disclosed that would reveal LBJ.
	What was their relationship to LBJ at the time, or his control over them at the time?
	Well, he's the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of the United States.
	I mean, this is a military autopsy being run at the Bethesda Naval Hospital.
	I can only emphasize that enough.
	There were other hospitals to do an autopsy, but they insisted on taking him, saying again that Jackie insisted.
	Jackie was not insisting on having an autopsy done at a specific hospital.
	Let me distract for one second because our member, NeuroDivergent, who's also a moderator, put these together and said, here we go.
	The super chat, the rumble rants that I missed.
	Coffee brand raid, Grizzlocks.
	Forced name change says, Chris P., are you here?
	I said this on Jayer's show.
	Upcoming host should be doing a call in with the outgoing host on the stream train.
	Smooth out the raid.
	Will maintain higher viewership for all.
	That's interesting.
	Grizzlock says, this lineup is hellbent on giving me a caffeine addiction.
	Buddy Cassius says, the King's Rumble is busted.
	Never fear.
	Biltong.com. I miss Biltongs.
	The difference is we don't need the government parasites.
	They can find gainful employment in the private sector.
	I agree with him there.
	We're going to get some of the chat on our locals community.
	So I'm not discouraged.
	I don't think there's going to be anything that's going to be truly revelatory.
	We don't know.
	I mean, we don't know what we don't know.
	I mean, Bill O 'Reilly, I'll give you a very famous story.
	There was a guy named Anthony Lewis.
	Anthony Lewis was the editorial director of the New York Times.
	And the day the Warren Commission came out, within two hours he said, the Warren Commission has declared, rightfully so, that Lee Harvey Oswald is the lone assassin.
	It's a complete vindication of the FBI and the different intelligence agencies.
	This is the same day they were released.
	Anthony Lewis famously...
	Announces the conclusion of the Warren Commission.
	Now, Mark Lane gets 26 volumes, and he begins reading them.
	It takes him 18 months, as it does Jim Garrison down in New Orleans, who's simultaneously reading 26 volumes, and it takes him around 18 months.
	After 18 months, Mark Lane writes a letter to Anthony Lewis at the New York Times.
	He said, I just finished reading the Warren Commission.
	It took me 18 months.
	How the hell did you do it in two hours?
	What's your secret?
	And, of course, that leads to Anthony Lewis attempting to destroy Mark Lane's career for the rest of his life.
	Anthony Lewis will then come out in 1991 with a new target, and that's Oliver Stone.
	And he goes to work with Hammers and Tongs editorially attempting to destroy Oliver Stone.
	Now, keep in mind...
	When Mark Lane's book, Rush to Judgment, comes out, the famous or infamous document by the CIA comes out with the phrase, for the first time, conspiracy theorist.
	This is created because of one man, Mark Lane.
	And in that document...
	They tell their media operatives what to do in detail, one line after another, after another, after another.
	And these are media operatives who are part of Operation Mockingbird, scattered throughout the media.
	They tell them what phrases to use, how to handle JFK doubters, what to do, what to write, feature articles, TV shows.
	It goes into immense detail, the CIA memo, exposing Operation Mockingbird.
	All of this directed...
	And created because of one man, Mark Lane, who writes a book called Rush to Judgment.
	In fact, when he cannot find a publisher in the United States, there is nobody who will publish this book.
	He goes to England, finds a publisher in England, and lo and behold, they infiltrate the publishing house and assign a CIA guy to work with them on the book.
	Lane eventually fires him, finding out that he's CIA.
	But that's the length.
	The book's not even written yet.
	And they've infiltrated the publishing house in London.
	I think I'm not changing my view.
	It seems that it's obviously LBJ and whoever he used is going to...
	Right.
	I mean, keep in mind, the quid pro quo for LBJ is the war with the Soviet Union and the invasion of Cuba.
	LBJ kind of stabs them in the back.
	But he's not insane.
	He gives them the war in Southeast Asia, where he's also reaping immense benefits from Brown and Root, who are his benefactors.
	As a politician, going back to 1949, Brown and Root funded his political campaigns as a congressman in Texas.
	And Brown and Root makes billions of dollars, as does Bell Helicopter.
	In Southeast Asia, in Vietnam, through the military-industrial complex.
	This is the gift that LBJ gives them.
	Is it World War III?
	No!
	But LBJ didn't become president to be eliminated a day later in a nuclear holocaust.
	Okay, interesting.
	Let me go to the locals community and just take some of the questions here.
	From Ken.
	Ask what the odds are of finding evidence implicating the government possibly in 10 days got money on it.
	Well, the JFK files, people are waiting on the Epstein files for the government to release something that has not yet been disclosed.
	Oliver Stone has no authority either, says Stephen Britton.
	Nobody knows more about the assassination, by the way, than Oliver Stone.
	There are things that he knows that I have never known.
	He is more steeped in this area than any author I've ever met.
	And is that out of personal interest?
	No, it's out of personal interest.
	And also, in the research of writing the script, I mean, if you want to read a book, read JFK's book of the film, in that book is the script for the movie JFK, and it's footnoted throughout the book, thousands of footnotes.
	And you say, why?
	Why are there thousands of footnotes?
	It's a great book, by the way.
	It's got photos.
	It's also got editorials and articles that I mentioned by Anthony Lewis of the New York Times and others attacking Oliver Stone and him responding in different articles that were printed at the time.
	The footnotes, and there's hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of footnotes regarding every scene in the movie, Viva, and the reason they are there is because the lawyers at Warner Brothers had to vet the script.
	And that vetting of the script leads to those footnotes.
	And he published it as a book.
	And it's a fascinating document for any lawyer who wants to read a book.
	Which is really the vetting of a screenplay, a Hollywood screenplay, by the attorneys at Warner Brothers who didn't want to get sued.
	There's different things that happen in there.
	Ruth Payne has her name changed to Williams by Oliver Stone, which he regrets ever doing.
	He wishes that she would have sued him because in Discovery, he feels, and I feel, that he would have learned that she's a member of the CIA.
	That's fascinating.
	I want to bring something up here.
	I know I can hear in Kryptis.
	Saying viva.
	Plug the book.
	Let me just share this picture right here, people.
	Louie the Lobster.
	I'm going to give you the link in a second.
	Go get the children's book.
	No one has ever regretted getting a children's book.
	It's not Oliver Stone novel level.
	Do I have the book back here?
	Go get it.
	Louie the Lobster returns to the sea, people.
	Doing my business here.
	Okay, Mark.
	That's amazing.
	The players involved.
	I don't want to go over history again.
	Lee Harvey Oswald.
	Useful Patsy.
	Kami, that they totally exploited for this?
	Yeah, but let's take another look at a Patsy, because there's Thomas Arthur Valley, and Viva says, Mark, who's Thomas Arthur Valley?
	I never heard of this, Patsy.
	Thomas Arthur Valley is the Lee Harvey Oswald of Chicago.
	He gets arrested and applied exactly the same as Dallas a couple of months before.
	Thomas Arthur Valley, ex-Marine, had been in the same area as Oswald.
	He's got rifles, tons of ammunition.
	They've got Cubans in the building.
	JFK cancels the appearance at Soldier Field in Chicago because the plot is revealed through Abraham Bolden and others, the Black Secret Service agent based in Chicago, and that plot is foiled.
	So Thomas Arthur Valley...
	Was a Lee Harvey Oswald before Lee Harvey Oswald?
	There was also a plot in Tampa.
	There was a plot in Miami.
	This was all the same year, Viva.
	This is not- This is a plot against JFK in different cities.
	This would have happened in any- Yes, same year.
	That's fascinating as well.
	Now let's take a look at Buell Wesley Frazier.
	You say, well, who's Buell Wesley Frazier?
	He's the guy that drove- Oswald to work and live next door to Ruth Payne.
	He's the guy that says he brought curtain rods into the car, which was a rifle.
	He's the guy that says he would pick him up on Friday, work with him, got him the job through his sister, Lenny Mae Randall, and tells the Dallas police that he brought or told him it was curtain rods.
	And you just go, well, that's kind of interesting.
	How did that happen?
	Who was Buell Wesley Frazier?
	Well, Buell Wesley Frazier...
	Was arrested by Dallas police, Detective Gus Rose, and he was lie detected twice, charged with the assassination of the president, and threatened with the electric chair unless he cooperated.
	Buell Wesley Frazier had a 301, you know, a British Enfield and ammo taken from his house, the exact same weapon that was apparently found on the roof of the Texas School Book Depository, Viva.
	Who was Buell Wesley Frazier?
	Another Patsy.
	Okay.
	Another Patsy for another operation that didn't come to fruition?
	Well, if they didn't need Oswald, they had arrested him twice.
	Nobody knows that another man was arrested for the murder of JFK, and that was Buell Wesley Frazier.
	Lie detected twice, and then made to flip.
	The curtain rod story came from Buell Wesley Frazier.
	Why did it involve Buell Wesley Frazier?
	The curtain rods, when he was in high school a couple years before, he worked in the shipping department of this department store for a summer job a couple years before this.
	What did he do in the shipping department?
	He shipped out curtain rods!
	How convenient!
	Darren O 'Connell is asking why Oswald, why was he picked specifically?
	I mean, I guess now we have a number of people who...
	I mean, again, I think I just answered that.
	Because the framing, you got to understand, the framing of Oswald, you're talking about a Soviet defector, right?
	You're talking about a guy who defected to the Soviet Union, but he's a phony Soviet defector.
	The State Department pays him money to come back here.
	The State Department, he's not even debriefed by the CIA when he comes back.
	Nothing happens to him.
	How is that humanly possible?
	He goes to work for Jagger Childs, a map-making company that's got top defense clearances in Texas and Fort Worth.
	He goes to work for these different companies when he comes back.
	And when he goes over there...
	What does he do?
	He does human intelligence.
	Why does he do human intelligence?
	Well, we have no satellites.
	You have to know what time the buses run.
	How did the department stores work?
	How does the TV work?
	How does the telephone work?
	How do we know he did that?
	He wrote a diary.
	He strapped it to his chest when he left Minsk and came back to the United States.
	He physically wrote down all the human intelligence as part of his assignment as an operative over in the Soviet Union.
	That's what he did.
	That's why he brought back the diary of all these nuts and bolts things of how Mintz worked.
	He also had a Minox spy camera designed in West Germany that took photos of military installations at Mintz.
	How do we know?
	Because they developed the photos of his camera.
	I mean, there's so much information out there.
	It's silly to even be debating some of these minor things, but people haven't looked into it the way a lot of us have for many, many years.
	What's the official reason for why Jack Ruby killed Lee Harvey Oswald?
	Because he was so pissed off about the assassination?
	Well, that came from his lawyer.
	That was invented by his lawyer while he was in jail after killing him, that he was aggrieved for the widow of Jackie Kennedy.
	He received $50,000 that week in cash.
	And $50,000 in cash...
	Today, you just, wow, who would kill a man for $50,000?
	But $50,000 in 1963, you guys can do the math, it's about $450,000 in today's money.
	He bought a safe and had the safe bolted to the floor of his office with an off-duty Dallas.
	Dallas police officer, by coincidence, and he bolted the safe to the floor.
	He put the money in the safe.
	He signed over power of attorney to his attorney, and he wanted his sister and brother repaid for loans and the rest to go to the IRS.
	He owed the IRS also about $40,000 in back taxes, Ruby.
	Says it would be about 518,000 today, according to...
	Yeah, roughly speaking.
	Yeah, but so it was a suicide mission for Ruby.
	He knew he was never coming back from that, but he hoped...
	Well, I'll just interject this.
	He stalks him on Friday night.
	He tries to kill him Friday night.
	Tries to kill him Saturday night.
	And Saturday night, he gets nervous.
	He begins to call up the Dallas Police Department saying, if you move Ruby...
	He calls up Friday night.
	He calls up Saturday night.
	But he calls up Saturday night and Sunday morning.
	And he says, if you move...
	Oswald, he's going to be shot.
	Because he's trying to get out of it, Jack Ruby.
	He's scared shitless, actually.
	He's addicted to dexedrine.
	He's taking handfuls of dexedrine.
	He's a homosexual, as you know.
	I did not.
	Jack Ruby was gay?
	Jack Ruby was gay.
	He lived with a guy named George Senator.
	Not that there's anything wrong with that.
	No, no, I'm just saying.
	He never laid a hand on those girls.
	So Jack Ruby tries to get out of it, and he calls up the Dallas police.
	He called up the FBI on Saturday.
	He calls up the Dallas police, and there's a kid at the desk who's answering the phone at midnight, and he says, is this Jack Ruby?
	And he slams the phone down.
	The kid recognized his voice.
	Of about 800 men on the Dallas police force, 400 of them knew Jack Ruby personally.
	So, okay, I guess the idea is that he could have done it in a way that didn't result in him getting caught doing it, but it was an act of desperation when he did do it?
	Well, again, the Campisi brothers who ran Dallas, who were above him, guaranteed he would get the top attorney and he would be eventually vindicated.
	And that was true.
	The first people to visit him in jail are the Campisis.
	They ran the Egyptian lounge of people who know Dallas.
	They were the head mobsters in Dallas, and they guaranteed him he would get the top attorney in the country, which he did.
	And his second trial, he was going to be vindicated in the second trial.
	He got a retrial, and people don't realize this.
	The case was overturned, Viva, and he was about to have a retrial when a man named Dr. Jolly West showed up in his jail cell and injected him.
	With a substance that was for the flu or the cold that Jack Ruby had, and he got cancer within a few weeks and then died.
	Okay, now stop.
	Those are the facts.
	I'm just piecing this together.
	So it was sort of like he was hoping that there would be either jury nullification or someone would say, we're not angry with him because he killed the assassin.
	Absolutely.
	Absolutely.
	They were quite confident.
	In fact, the Dallas media.
	Thought that he was going to get out for time served because he'd been in jail this whole time waiting for the retrial.
	And the sentiment was that he was a hero in the United States.
	All true.
	All true.
	And they found a new judge.
	They were putting a new jury together.
	And he was going to be retried and freed.
	What he started to do was he wanted the Warren Commission to get him out of that jail cell because he felt his life was in danger, which of course it was.
	Jolly West shows up and injects him.
	How Jolly West gets into that jail cell, you'd have to ask Jolly West that, the famous CIA MKUltra doctor that's been written about, also in the new movie Chaos, the Tom O 'Neill movie, which is directed by Errol Morris, Thin Blue Line.
	By the way, Thin Blue Lion features a Dallas detective who frames an innocent man, Viva.
	It's a good movie for a lawyer.
	It's an Academy Award-winning film, The Thin Blue Lion.
	It's about a Dallas detective framing an innocent man.
	The Dallas detective was Detective Gus Rose, the same detective I just mentioned to you who tried to frame Buell Wesley Frazier.
	We're going to wrap.
	How much more time do you have, Mark?
	I could go for another 20, I guess.
	Okay, let's do it.
	Max 20 is going to be over on Locals.
	We're going to go raid Kim Iverson.
	Who are we raiding here?
	Hold on.
	Let me just put the link in and make sure.
	Because we're going to keep this on.
	Yeah, Kim Iverson.
	Okay, if you're doing that, she's starting in 13 seconds.
	We're going to have a few more questions here in Rumble.
	Buckley, I've always meant to ask you on America's Untold Stories.
	From the release of JFK up until yesterday, have any of your views on theories changed much?
	And did the HSCA in 1992 change any of that?
	What's HSCA?
	The House Assassinations Committee, the Select Committee on Assassinations.
	Yeah, I mean, look, it's constantly changing.
	I mean, there's factoids.
	I didn't know about Frazier.
	I mean, there's stuff that I...
	That's why it's an ongoing thing.
	I mean, there's a million facts I've learned from releases of JFK documents over the years.
	I mean, even...
	In the Biden release in 2023, 2022, I urge people to go to the National Archives website and look around in there and get familiar with how this works.
	You can be your own journalist.
	You don't need me to decipher this stuff.
	You could do this yourself.
	This is your tax dollars.
	This is your government, people.
	I urge you to get in there and do it.
	But I've just been doing it a long time out of research for materials and movies and documentaries and shows that we've done.
	On America's Untold Stories.
	Or come to locals.
	We're going to end it here.
	And if you're inclined, go raid Kim Iverson.
	And if you want to come over to be a supporter on Viva Barnes, we'll get another 15 minutes of Buckley.
	Lord Buckley.
	So America's Untold Stories, Friday.
	For everybody watching on Rumble.
	Friday at 5 o 'clock.
	Friday will be...
	We're going to do...
	I'm doing Tim Pool in the morning.
	I guess that's at 9.30.
	And then Freeform Friday will be 5.30 Eastern, our regular time.
	And we will continue to talk about JFK and the news that's currently going on.
	So hopefully I'll find some smoking gun by Friday.
	Incredible.
	Now we're going to end it and everybody go raid Kim Iverson and come on over to Locals.
	If not, doing it now.
	I will be live tomorrow 3 o 'clock, same time.
	And I got an interview in the morning and I'm going to publish my pre-recorded with...
	Kelsey.
	So stay tuned, everybody.
	Rumble, thank you for being here.
	Go on to the next content creator.
	What's the word I'm looking for?
	Not content creator.
	Commentator.

▲