Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 14, 2025 - Viva & Barnes

01:33:04

King Carney Coronation Complete! Patel Goes After Swatters! Rogue Judge Blocks Trump! & MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	You like having ten fingers and ten toes?
	Keep talking.
	I asked your mother that last part.
	I'm not sure if this is the actual part of Crowder.
	Here we go.
	Okay, I think this is the announcement that I was going to make today, but I think Crowder made it first.
	Starts next week, the 17th, 9 a.m.
	That's awesome.
	And some people are asking...
	Are we going to continue, of course, Mug Club doing Rumble Premium content?
	Yes.
	Yes, we will.
	Yeah, what'll happen is those of you who are not Rumble Premium members yet, I highly recommend that you do.
	But if you, hey, you still get an entire clock of free content.
	If you are a free Rumble member.
	You will just be ported automatically to the next show in the live lineup.
	And if you are a Rumble Premium member, you get to stay with us for the additional 45 minutes to an hour like we do every day.
	And then after that, we can actually port that audience if they want to go to the next show that's coming on live at that time.
	So you're not going to get any less content from us.
	Our show stays the same.
	We're just moving times.
	You know what?
	It's sort of true.
	We're moving times and we're actually going to start.
	Right on the dot.
	Right on the dot.
	There's no 10 minutes.
	We start 10 minutes late because it's an old...
	They announced the line appeal, but let me just scroll forward because this was the big announcement and I didn't want to screw up describing it.
	There was no furlough.
	There was no back pay.
	It was not like a federal worker.
	And then, because we didn't violate any rules...
	All right, he's talking about YouTube here.
	The big announcement, people.
	Let me just bring this out.
	The big announcement is that starting next week, Rumble is introducing something unique and something different.
	I don't have any guiding points on how to describe this, so I hope I don't screw it up.
	All that I know is that there's going to be effectively something of what is a Rumble live network, call it a network for lack of a better word, that Rumble is going to have its live streaming all day, and there's a lineup of live streamers, content creators, commentators, analysts, who are going to be running their shows live and then rolling or directing their audiences into the next show as it goes throughout the day.
	And when I call it a network, it's like...
	Encrypt us in the back.
	If I'm misdescribing this, let me know.
	It's like a network of cable television, except not cable, not television, not legacy media, not propagandists, the independent voices you have come to know and trust on Rumble.
	And I was honored, flattered, and I dare say they might have made a mistake, but I'm not going to correct them on it.
	Bada bing, bada boom.
	I'm going to be part of the lineup that it starts at 9 o'clock in the morning.
	It's going to go until 10 o'clock at night.
	It's gonna be one live stream after another.
	Hold on, I think I have something of the lineup.
	Let me check my text messages over here.
	And I'm gonna be, the new show live is gonna be four to five in the afternoon, which I actually think is going to be even more convenient and more better.
	It's gonna be more convenient and more better, but let me just see here who's on the lineup without screwing anything up here.
	Starts at nine o'clock in the morning.
	Evita from Bongino's show.
	Then it goes 10 o'clock to Vince Caglianese.
	Then it goes to Steven Crowder at 11. Rolling over into Tim Pool at noon.
	Rolling over into Russell Brand at 1. Rolling into the quartering at 2. Rolling into me at 4. And then after that, I'm not sure who the lineup is, and that's not because I'm...
	Ending on me.
	It's just because I don't actually know who the lineup is currently.
	And so it's going to be an amazing, amazing idea.
	It's not going to change anything.
	We're going to have our locals after party, or I'm thinking I might even just restructure it and we have our locals pre-stream so that we can flesh out ideas and have a discussion before we go live.
	And the new schedule, Encryptus has texted me and says, mention the new interview schedule times at noon, at least Monday, Wednesday, Friday.
	Well, Encryptus and I were working on a schedule.
	I'm going to start doing pre-recorded live stream interviews.
	And so the live show 4 to 5 o'clock with the after party is going to be the news of the day.
	And I'm going to start doing long format pre-recorded interviews in lieu of, you know, not in lieu of sidebars.
	We'll still do those and I reserve the right to do those.
	But it's going to be a matter.
	And like Patio Lantern says, it's going to be more better and it's going to be amazing.
	Let me see the quartering.
	Okay.
	I wanted to do, wow, amazing cast.
	So it's fantastic.
	And the idea is, it's very interesting in that everybody's going to roll their audience into the next show.
	For those who are on, I don't know if it's the Rumble Premium part, which then gives you access to the after the Rumble Premium for the Rumble Premium content creator.
	Viva will not start four minutes.
	I've never been late to a show of my own fault in my life.
	I'm joking.
	I've been late a couple of times.
	So that is the big news for next week.
	The new schedule is going to be four to five in the afternoon, and we'll decide whether or not we do a locals after party after the stream or a pre-party so that we can talk about the news of the day.
	What else was the news of the day?
	We're going to get there, people.
	Holy, sweet, merciful crab apples.
	And before I forget, because I set this up and I want to make sure that I'm not going to run afoul of any of the rules on YouTube, because we start on YouTube and Rumble, and then we move over to Rumble, the free speech platform where we vote with our feet and our eyeballs, as we're going to do today.
	Did I mention in here that this stream contains a paid promotion?
	No, I didn't.
	There, I just clicked the button right now so that we can bring in our wonderful sponsor of the day, people, The Wellness Company.
	And let me get the video that they like me to play while we do this so that I can play the beautiful B-roll, people.
	Tell me, can you hear this?
	Encrypt this.
	Can you hear the audio when I play this?
	Because the last time I think people were saying they couldn't hear the audio.
	And then in which case, I'm going to have to mention this to Rumble Studio.
	Check this out.
	Can you hear this?
	Can you hear audio right now?
	Absolutely nothing.
	You hear nothing.
	Well, then I'll read it in this guy's voice as we do this.
	It says, what are the main differences between ivermectin and fenbendazole?
	These are two antipathogens used to treat parasitic infections and other similar types of conditions.
	They are used quite often in the oncology world to treat cancer.
	They both have as anti...
	Pathogenic abilities.
	And there was some corny piano music in the back to let you know what's going on there.
	Let me tell you what's going on.
	Could your health issues be caused by an invisible enemy?
	Fatigue, bloating, brain fog.
	What if parasites are the real culprit?
	There are a number of deep cleanses, parasitic cleanses out there.
	Let's say we trust the Wellness Company in particular.
	Did you know that 50% of Americans have some form of parasites?
	They are everywhere in our food, water, and our pets, especially crazy cat lady pets.
	They secretly invade your body, wreaking havoc on your gut, energy levels, and even your brain and the mainstream medical system.
	They don't want you thinking about it because one great cleanse can change your life.
	The Wellness Company has a solution for you.
	Ivermectin, I always screw up the way they say this, Mabendazol, and pronounced Mabendazol.
	Both FDA-approved to treat parasites now combined in a parasitic cleanse combo that wipes out many of these invaders.
	Fill out the brief medical intake form and you get a three-month supply.
	Lots of parasites cleanse are all over social media, but you get the one with the gold standard from the Wellness Company.
	Maha is officially here and the Wellness Company is making these hard-to-get medications digitally accessible and they can help.
	Improve your life.
	Maybe even save it.
	TWC.health forward slash Viva gets you 60 bucks off.
	Free shipping.
	This is for our audience only.
	TWC.health forward slash Viva.
	Don't wait to cleanse your body.
	Take control today.
	Now one thing I don't want to make sure.
	Some of what the wellness company offers are available in the U.S. only.
	Others are not.
	Let me just make sure about this one to see if it's only available in the U.S. or not.
	Give me one second.
	Let's see here.
	The Parasitic Cleanse is available only in the US. So, Canada.
	I don't know how you're going to get it there via contraband, but that is it.
	Link in the description.
	Thank you, The Wellness Company, for sponsoring this show.
	Now, getting into it, people.
	Let me just make sure that we are good across all platforms.
	We are live on Rumble, obviously.
	We are live on vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Let me see what's going on in here.
	Tlee1776 says, I always have brain fog.
	I tell you, I don't know what brain fog is.
	I know what perpetual distraction is, like having a movie screen constantly running behind your mind's eye.
	Redteam33 says, good morning, gentlemen.
	We are live here.
	And Commitube is, we're here as well.
	So, the news of the day, people.
	The coronation of King Carney is complete.
	It's so good when you come up with a beautiful alliteration.
	It's going to be my next kid's book.
	The coronation of King Carney and the glee of the globalists and the global community.
	Check this out for those of you who don't know.
	Today was the day that Mark Carney was sworn in as Prime Minister.
	And I brought in...
	Here we go.
	Watch live.
	Look at this, guys.
	Look at this.
	Riding of Willowdale near Toronto, another kind of GTA area riding since 2015, is the third and final new member to be, or new minister rather, to be sworn in.
	He becomes the Minister of Government Transformation, Public Services and Procurement.
	That is a new name, at least in some respects.
	It's sort of a combination of...
	The Ministry of Citizen Services, which was established back in July of 2023, Terry Beach, served as minister.
	Nobody cares about this any more than that.
	Mark Carney has been sworn in as Canada's next unelected, anointed prime minister.
	The one thing I want to check, and I want to do it in real time because I haven't refreshed the page since, you will recall that Mark Carney had his profile updated on the WEF website.
	This is the World Economic Forum.
	Authors, Mark Carney, up in the URL. Let's just see.
	It says, Mark Carney, this was the prime minister designate.
	Maybe it's always going to keep the word prime minister designate.
	Encrypt us.
	Is it going to keep the word prime minister designate until there's a next general election?
	If you can find that answer out, I'd be curious.
	Now I'm thinking they might actually just keep that because they can't say prime minister elect because he wasn't actually elected.
	He was quite literally designated.
	He's the new leader of Canada.
	Justin Trudeau, he's the man who's been advising Justin Trudeau for the better part of five years on global policies, climate crisis, etc., etc.
	And I should put climate crisis in quotes.
	The next leader, and when I say that he's been designated and not elected, you all know this if you're in the locals community, and you all know this if you follow me on Twitter.
	I was looking in just to confirm some of the stories as to how he was elected, who had the right to vote, and I went to the Liberal website.
	To actually see who the heck had the right to vote for this guy?
	You understand, we talked about it with Ezra Levant on Monday.
	There were apparently 400,000 votes from so-called registered liberals that determined this man as the Prime Minister of Canada.
	Of those 400,000, apparently they disqualify two-thirds.
	Don't know why, don't know how.
	Hasn't been much reporting on it, and not for lack of trying.
	I think it's not something that's widely accessible by way of information.
	152,000 votes were counted, tallied for the purposes of the designation of Mark Carney as the new Prime Minister of Canada.
	I went to the Liberal rules just to see what they actually were.
	It's stunning.
	The leadership vote rules, these are what allowed people to vote for the purposes of the 2025 leadership vote.
	The rules, the following...
	Have the following meetings, yada, yada, yada.
	The definitions, we don't care about this.
	Unless there's something in here that we care about.
	We don't.
	What I really cared about was who had the right to vote?
	Look at this, people.
	Registered liberals.
	This is real life.
	This is Canada.
	This is democracy.
	Eligibility to vote.
	Section 2.1.1.
	To vote in the leadership vote.
	A person must be a registered liberal as of 5 p.m.
	Eastern time on the 27th.
	Understand that.
	In order to vote, you have to be registered by this cutoff date.
	And what's the criteria to be a registered voter?
	The criteria to register as a registered liberal include being 14 years of age, 14 and over, a Canadian citizen, permanent resident.
	Or person with status under the Indian Act.
	So I guess at least they let Native American, Native Canadian, Indians.
	They let Indians vote.
	That's how they call it under the Indian Act.
	It's still called the Indian Act, people.
	So don't accuse me of any racism here.
	14 years and over, which means that of the 152,000 votes, first of all, I want to know how many of them were newly registered.
	How many registered right before the cutoff date?
	Where were they from?
	What were their ethnicities?
	What were their ages?
	And when I say ethnicities, are these late registrants in...
	Primarily, I don't know, bust in from Chinese interests?
	I mean, I'm entitled to know that.
	14 years of age and a permanent resident, which means Canada's future, at least for the foreseeable future, this is their rules, was determined or could have been determined by non-citizen permanent resident children aged 14 to 18. It's real life, people.
	To answer your question before designate drops off when they're sworn in, just like presidents Okay, fine.
	So then they should...
	WF, when are you going to update your website?
	Like, this was a lose-lose for the WF because as soon as they update their website, you know damn well I'm going to go say, that was fast.
	They're looking...
	So that's it.
	So they'll drop the designate and they'll say Prime Minister.
	And we'll see how long it takes them to do that because it's their boy now that is in charge of Canada.
	Much to the detriment of Canada.
	Clown Show says Skeptical.
	Bucklebrush Jones says, 14-year-olds make great decisions.
	Some people are saying it tongue-in-cheek, facetiously, glibly.
	They try to lower the age of consent.
	They try to lower the age to vote.
	And then the question is, what else do they want to lower the age?
	If someone is old enough to vote for the Prime Minister, what are those pervert pedos going to say they're old enough to consent to by way of other conduct?
	Hormone blockers?
	Double mastectomies, bottom surgery, consent.
	Canada already was once at the age of consent of 14 years old and then they upped it to 16. The Conservatives did it back in 2000, 2002, 2006. That's what's going on in Canada.
	14 year olds know nothing.
	I can tell you one thing, 14 year olds can certainly be egged on to do what their parents want them to do.
	Or what Mao Zedong wants them to do.
	So anyway, that's it.
	This is it.
	We've entered a new era.
	The news, where's the news reporting what Carney's going to do?
	I had an article out here.
	There you go.
	Is this it right here?
	NDTV. Mark Carney to be sworn in as Canada PM tomorrow.
	This was yesterday, so maybe this isn't the one I wanted.
	Former central banker Mark Carney will be sworn in as Canada's next prime minister, along with his cabinet, the governor official's office announced Wednesday.
	The new leader had promised a seamless and quick transition as he takes over from Justin Trudeau, a political novice at age 59. He was overwhelmingly elected the new leader, winning 86% of more than 150,000 votes cast.
	His jump into politics after formally heading the Bank of Canada and Bank of England comes at a time with trade tensions among the U.S. In his victory speech to supporters, Carney struck a defiant tone towards Washington, saying, in trade, in hockey, Canada will win.
	Not if your team was playing against 100 players, you moron.
	How many players are there on hockey?
	There's five.
	I'm not that stupid.
	Yeah, there's five.
	So, Carney, as in trade, as in hockey, Canada will win.
	Only when you're playing five on five, but that's not how trade works.
	Because trade, you're basically playing a team of 50 with your team of five.
	And no, in no realm of the universe, unless it's NHL playing against kindergartners, would a group of five beat a group of 50?
	He's ready to sit down with Donald Trump to negotiate a renewed trade accord in a bid to avoid further economic tussling.
	That's very interesting.
	And I believe I said this from the get-go as well.
	Everyone's like, viva!
	You already have a trade agreement with the states.
	Trump doesn't need to impose tariffs.
	There's already a trade agreement called NAFTA. I was like, yeah, and he might want to renegotiate it.
	And he might be using the fentanyl crisis and the terrorist crossing or terrorist watch list crossing as a pretext to renegotiate NAFTA. So congratulations, you played into it by not satisfying those two concerns.
	But lo and behold, that's exactly what they're going to do.
	Sit down and renegotiate.
	NAFTA might be dead and they might have NAFTA 2.0.
	That wasn't exactly the article that I wanted to bring up, but that pretty much sums it up.
	We've got Carney in here now who thinks that it's 5-on-5 hockey when it's 5-on-50 hockey when it comes to a trade war.
	Unelected, using 14-year-old children to get to that point in time.
	And I want to know who voted for Carney.
	I want the breakdown, age, citizenship status in order to know.
	All right.
	Well, that's what's coming out of Canada.
	Do we have a new person joining?
	We do.
	Flapperdog donated, or at least it's qualified as donated, or it writes it down as donated, but I believe you have now become a member of our VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com community.
	Welcome to the community.
	And Zamork says, no laid-back law today.
	No, I couldn't do it today.
	Anyhow, I want to do my show, but it might be easier going forward if I don't have the 1230 time slot.
	And I'm doing the unusual suspects immediately after this, so stay tuned for that.
	It's going to be a fun one.
	Maxime Bernier in the PPC says R.B. Ham over on Rumble are the only hope for Canada.
	I hope the propagandized citizens of our benighted country realize this, though.
	R.B. Ham, we can be realistic.
	Maxime Bernier is not going to be Prime Minister after the next election unless...
	Pierre Poiliev keeps on screwing up, and it looks like he might.
	It should be Pierre Poiliev.
	Then the only question is going to be, how big a majority, if any, is the Conservative going to have?
	have and then the question is going to be will there be true voices not of opposition but of common sense policy uh in the in the house of parliament if a few just a few members of the ppc get elected encrypt us on youtube as well let me go to see which which which one that is Hold on.
	I'm not in this stream on YouTube, so I can't see it.
	Hold on.
	I'll bring it back up here.
	I think I should be able to get it.
	Oh, is it a $4.99 from One Old Guy's Opinion, which says Hydra has placed another globalist head, Trudeau, head gone, another grown-in.
	Hail Hydra.
	Was that it, Encryptus?
	Yep, that's about what they did.
	Wait, may I ask a stupid question?
	Who's Hydra?
	Hydra is from the Marvel Universe.
	The bad guys.
	They're all Nazis.
	Wait, I'm not...
	Okay, that will not resonate with me because I don't watch those...
	I call them stupid movies.
	I don't watch Marvel movies.
	I think they're all terrible, stupid.
	But let me bring it up here.
	Why can't I even see the...
	I can't see the...
	I can't bring up the super chat.
	So I didn't know, but it's...
	The reality is that Mark Carney was unknown to a great many of us, lesser known to some of them, or at least lesser known to me, not totally unknown, but unknown to a great many.
	He has been advising Trudeau on global policy, especially climate stuff, for the longest time.
	And he had been advising Trudeau, appears out of nowhere, although we've now learned that he is...
	Christopher Freeland's son's godfather.
	And it's going to be not just the continuation, it's going to be without the messenger aspect of Trudeau's government.
	I do want to play one clip.
	I got it right here.
	I want to play this one.
	Because I played these clips when I was exploring who Carney was and I was exposing it to the world, but...
	You know, the 152,000 14-year-olds don't really care about this stuff.
	Listen to this.
	I won't play the whole thing, but I'll play some of it.
	What is the role of offsets in the context of a 1.5-degree climate emission?
	Well, thank you, Nicole.
	And let me compliment the leaders of this task force.
	It's a remarkable achievement.
	First thing to say is that this carbon budget is very precious on business as usual.
	So pre-pandemic emissions, we have less than a decade.
	Of a carbon budget to remain within one and a half degree temperature increases.
	So it is a limited carbon budget.
	And in that context, really a voluntary carbon offset market does four things.
	Voluntary carbon offset market, which means that you can willingly choose to purchase up the carbon emissions or sell yours if you don't use as many as you're allotted.
	Voluntary for now, but we've all seen what happens during COVID. It starts voluntarily, and then it's no longer voluntary.
	And just appreciate his demeanor, the way he speaks, like John Kirby, like Andy, who's the guy from the CIA, FBI, like all of these deep state apparatus, apparatchik people.
	They have that same very nasally intellectual way of talking, very calm.
	It's all the same demeanor.
	Even John Bolton, to some degree.
	The first, it's complementary, underscore that, complementary to companies' efforts to reduce absolute emissions.
	Companies' responsibility, first and foremost, is to reduce their absolute emissions.
	And as the report says, they need to first reduce, then report, including net zero plans.
	I'm sure we'll get into the specifics of that.
	And then, only then, look to offset.
	Pause.
	Appreciate also that this is at a Davos Agenda WEF electronic forum where other speakers like Bill Gates was speaking at this particular panel.
	The second thing that this does is it is catalytic.
	It's catalytic for renewable projects in many advanced economies where the economics are absolutely clear.
	They are profitable and they will be driven, but they're catalytic for projects.
	Many of which are emerging in developing economies where the economics are not yet quite there.
	And this can help tip the balance for those projects to come in.
	These offsets can also be catalytic as part of helping the economics of absolutely essential breakthrough technologies that need to happen for us to ultimately get to net zero.
	And I'm sure that will come up more clearly because Bill Gates has led on those technologies.
	You have to understand, as far as I understand it, the chat will correct me if I'm wrong.
	They're using these offsets where the prices that Western technologies are going to pay into this to improve the technologies, this is the argument, in third world or developing nations who nonetheless are going to be able to continue producing dirty energy whereas the Western markets are going to cripple their economies in order to get to net zero.
	China, India, I think China, Pollutes more than every other country combined, if I'm not mistaken.
	Fact check me on that, but I'm pretty sure.
	They're going to continue to pollute while Canada and the West cripple themselves in an attempt to achieve net zero.
	And now when you couple that with things that Mark Carney has said before in his Q&A or cross-examination with Pierre Poilievre, he's investing in the dirty energies pipelines of other countries that don't impose these limitations on themselves, while I presume betting...
	For whatever he's imposing by way of policy in Western countries.
	That's Mark Carney.
	That's Canada.
	You got Canada now.
	In the articles from today, he's going to be traveling to France and England next week to shore up the alliance with the European Union that he's been serving for the last decade as governor of the Bank of England.
	A European Union which is as fascistic and tyrannical as they claim Putin to be.
	So that's it.
	K-Man 2020 says, stupidity has no limits.
	Anyway, so that is the bottom line of what's going on in Canada.
	You know, God help Canada.
	I'm not using any Lord's name in vain.
	I sincerely mean it.
	In cryptos, I pulled up, guys, I pulled up the picture of the blocking off of American alcohol at Canadian liquor stores.
	Yes.
	Okay, fine.
	So I'm going to bring that up.
	No, it's...
	They're talking about relations with the U.S. being at an all-time low.
	Carney, when he was doing the liberal debate, talking about how he's going to go, you know, we're going to win.
	It's like hockey.
	We're going to dollar-for-dollar tariffs threaten with electricity.
	Relations are at an all-time low, and they're brainwashing Canadians into thinking that the Canadian suffering isn't a thing of American doing.
	That is it.
	Okay, people.
	Now, the other good news of the day, there's two good things.
	We're not going to only poo-poo on Pam Bondi.
	And Kash Patel.
	We can't poo-poo on Pam and Patel to keep going with the alliterations.
	No, I have to pause.
	Just one last thing.
	I'm going to see now.
	We didn't talk about this yesterday.
	Nope, not at all.
	I had it in the backdrop and we didn't get to it.
	Before we go over to Patel and Bondi over on Rumble, let's just finish it.
	The dagger.
	In the subject matter that is Canada, I had to like, you know, as a kid, you have to go like, okay, this is one.
	That's 10. That's 100. That's 1,000.
	That's 10,000.
	That's 100,000.
	That's a million.
	That's 10 million.
	That's 100 million.
	That's 1 billion.
	That's 11 billion dollars, people.
	In cryptos, while I'm talking about this, can you pull up the one, the tweet with Omar Algebra, who just was praising the fact that he gave 84 million to Syria?
	I won't belabor the point of what's going on in Canada.
	Literal death and destruction.
	And my major issue is that this tariff war will now be used and abused by the Liberal Party to recreate a reality in which all of Canadian suffering is as a result of the consequences of the tariff war and not actually predating it by a load, a decade, if not more.
	As Canadians go hungry, as Canadians literally die in...
	ER rooms of overcrowded hospitals as they literally die on waiting lists.
	Literally.
	As they literally overdose in record numbers because of the fentanyl crisis.
	Where has our money been going?
	This is from the Western Standard.
	I don't think I've ever been burnt by the Western Standard.
	$11 billion spent on overseas gender programs during Trudeau's tenure, which is...
	It's been 10 years now, but I don't know.
	We'll see.
	We'll get into the details.
	Over the last 10 years, the government of Canada has spent around $11.2 billion on overseas gender initiatives focusing on projects directly targeting gender equality and women's empowerment as outlined in Canada's feminist international assistance policy.
	Oh my god, is this called FAP? No, that's really...
	They don't really...
	They don't understand anything about optics.
	Canada's feminist international assistance policy?
	FIAP is awful close to FAP, which is not a word you want to have when you're talking about this type of stuff here.
	The figure is a conservative estimate as it primarily includes gender-targeted aid and doesn't account for the full value of gender-integrated projects, which could add billions more if fully calculated.
	Trudeau announced FIAP in the House of Commons in 2017, emphasizing Canada's commitment to gender equality.
	We are here today to launch Canada's Feminist International Assistance Policy, a policy that puts women and girls at the center of everything we do in international assistance, because we know that when women and girls thrive, everyone benefits.
	He said.
	Trudeau promised to balance the budget by 2019. They never did.
	The largest, the nine consecutive deficits, the largest was 2023, 2024. And do you see how they do it there?
	They blame that on COVID, even though their inability to balance the budget predated COVID. This is how they create crisis to literally erase the original cause of the crisis.
	I'll stop there because it's nauseating.
	You can drop the whole large statement into the chat there.
	You can bring that one up too.
	In the private?
	Okay, awesome.
	This is...
	This is the same feminist government that literally just paraded, that A, disqualified a woman, Ruby Dalla, from the liberal leadership race, ran two coy women, as clearly as ploys or as distractions, because now that we know that Chrystia Freeland's godfather of her son is Mark Carney, you can question whether or not it was ever a legitimate quest in the first place.
	Justin Trudeau...
	Allegedly groped a reporter.
	Fired his woman, Jody Wilson-Raybould, as Attorney General Mojag.
	Elbowed an NDP lady in the boobie.
	Is alleged to have done terrible things as...
	Alleged!
	Alleged!
	The NDA has yet to see the light of day.
	This man is talking about gender equality when they run the most misogynistic, at least by their own standards, administration in the history of Canadian politics.
	$11 billion.
	That could have done...
	What's the budget of the healthcare?
	I think it's 360 billion.
	So that would be a drop in the bucket for healthcare.
	But that certainly could feed a few kids.
	And then you got your dude here.
	What's his name?
	Yeah, report here.
	Look at this.
	Then you get...
	What's his face?
	Algebra.
	The liberals have announced that they will be restoring diplomatic relations in Syria.
	With the new Al-Qaeda government lifting economic sanctions and providing $84 million in aid.
	From Canadian taxpayers.
	They love women so much, and they support women so much, they are now going to give...
	It's in aid, though, people.
	It's not going to get in the hands of the terrorists.
	It's only going to go to the people who need it.
	As Christians are getting slaughtered in this Al-Qaeda hellhole, where everybody knew it was going to happen, some people predicted it was going to happen publicly and proudly, and now I guess they're sad to be right.
	But that's where our tax dollars are going.
	So $11 billion to gender crap and now $84 million in aid to Syria, where if it's anything like Ukraine, half of it's not going to get there, and that which gets there is only going to feed the very same people who are now slaughtering Christians and abusing of human rights in the most egregious possible ways.
	All right, peeps.
	That is it.
	We're going to go over to Rumble now, talk about Patel, Pam Bondi.
	What else did I have to talk about?
	There's other stuff.
	Let me make sure I didn't miss any Commitube superchats.
	I don't think I did.
	So get ready Monday.
	It's going to be 4 o'clock in the afternoon, everybody.
	Carney said he supports Hamas, says Ron.
	I'd have to see that.
	I shouldn't have meant...
	These words, you mentioned these words on Commitube and holy crab apples, it's like you don't exist anymore.
	All right, we're ending on Twitter and Commitube.
	Come on over to Rumble.
	Oh, I didn't put the link in.
	While you do that, hold on.
	Link to everything here.
	While we do that, I'll put the pinned comment up here and read two super chats, rumble rants, and tipped questions over on VivaBarns.
	So come on over to VivaFry on Rumble or VivaBarnsLaw.locals.com.
	What do we got here going on in Locals?
	Oh my God, VivaFry and Encryptus.
	Have you seen this yet?
	The Canadian Independent, former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, personal photographer, captured Trudeau crying.
	In the Governor General's office this morning on his last day of office?
	Gypsy Muse, this is not at you.
	This is at the drama teacher.
	Dude might just have COVID for the fifth time, blowing his nose.
	Persona non grata in his own country for the rest of his life.
	I often say that heaven and hell are the same thing.
	An eternity of listening to what people have to say about you in your absence.
	You can have hell on earth, and Justin Trudeau will forever live in hell on earth of his own making for the rest of his life.
	Persona non grata.
	In perpetuity.
	In his own country.
	King of Biltong is in the house.
	Make your way over, people.
	Anyone on Commitube, come on over to Rumble.
	King of Biltong says, looking for some healthy snacks to add to your diet?
	Try our Biltong, almost 50% protein, plus it's packed with B12, creatine, iron, zinc, and much more.
	Go to BiltongUSA.com, code VIVA for 10% off, and if you like a spicy...
	Beef jerky biltong.
	The Wagyu Ghost will burn your face off.
	The Piri Piri is perfect spice and delicious.
	And you can get the little girl, regular Angus, delicious biltong with no burn.
	Okay, we got those here.
	And now we shall update and go over to the free speech platform.
	Rumble.
	All right.
	And one last thing, just so that it doesn't keep that...
	Live forever in Rumble and YouTube end.
	Okay.
	All right.
	So I'd say now, well, let's say Pam Bondi is trying to make up for what happened a couple of weeks ago.
	Nick Sartor is reporting, at least, you know, Nick Sartor is reporting what Fox News is reporting, but we know that it's actually happening, so we don't have to worry about it.
	She's going to go down hard.
	Go down hard.
	She's going to come down hard on the people who are Vandalizing, and some might say committing acts of domestic terrorism against Tesla factories.
	And I am, I don't throw the word terrorism around flippantly.
	I think this fits the definition of terrorism.
	It's politically motivated to terrorize a civilian population for the purposes of effecting or enacting political change.
	I think it fits the definition of terrorism perfectly.
	Let me know in the chat if you think I'm...
	Becoming a lefty and using words to dilute them of any meaning whatsoever.
	But let's listen to this.
	We have people we're locking up on that.
	We have someone in jail right now from one of the dealerships.
	They threw a Molotov cocktail through a dealership.
	They're looking at up to 20 years in prison.
	So if you're going to touch a Tesla, go to a dealership, do anything, you better watch out because we're coming after you.
	And if you're funding this, we're coming after you.
	We're going to find out who you are.
	So, I mean, we have people.
	I know.
	Everybody's watching this video.
	They're saying, where are the Epstein files, Bondi?
	This is the problem when you make...
	It is a mistake, and I'll qualify it as a mistake, even though I still like it and trust Bondi.
	When you make a mistake, and you know, everybody's going to continually come up and say, okay, this is all fine and well, but where are the Epstein files?
	Like whatever Kinzinger, Adam Kinzinger, says for the rest of his life, you're going to say, crying Kinzinger, and...
	You thought the ghost of Keeve was real, you dumbass.
	When it's Eric Swalwell, Eric Swalwell will not be able to say anything in his life, no matter how true and meaningful, without someone saying, hey, hey, where's your bang bang with Fang Fang?
	Or do you have to fart, Swalwell?
	Whatever Pan Bondi does now, there are going to be people who are going to say, this is nice, but we're the Epstein files.
	But the question is this.
	And it's a philosophical one, but I think it's also a legal one, and I think it fits the definition of terrorism.
	When they refused, I think they refused to enhance the two Molotov cocktail lawyer who, you know, up in New York, I don't, I certainly did not give them terrorist enhancements.
	They argued terrorist enhancements in sentencing for some of the Proud Boys, which I thought was totally abusive, not because I approved of their violence, but because there was no violence that they did.
	They asked for terrorist enhancements from some of the Jan Sixers, and I would argue in that case, and I do wonder if it's political bias, my own cognitive dissonance, I don't believe that there was meaningful violence there, and I certainly don't believe that it was terrorism-inspired violence.
	Although some people will say, Viva, it was violence.
	It wasn't targeting civilians.
	But it was violence against the state for the purposes of effecting political change because they were unhappy with the election results.
	Fine.
	I don't think I have a double standard.
	I think the situations are wildly different, if only because A, I don't think that that violence was...
	I think that violence was provoked.
	Whatever violence did, in fact, occur on January 6th.
	In some cases, there literally was no violence for the terrorist enhancement charges against some of the Proud Boys because they...
	Weren't even there and didn't commit any act of violence.
	And I think that's an abuse of the terror enhancements.
	I could be convinced to abandon terrorist enhancements in general and just punish the crime appropriately.
	You blow up a building, does it matter if it's because you're a psychopath, murderous asshole, or because it was politically motivated?
	I could be led to abandon the idea of terror enhancements in general.
	I do think hate crime enhancements are stupid and should be abolished.
	All crime is hate.
	The idea that you'd have extra punishment for someone for punching someone because they didn't like them because they were Jewish or black versus they punched them because they wanted their money.
	Sorry, I think that's a pretty stupid distinction to say you go to jail for longer than the other guy who just punched him because he wanted their money.
	So hate crime enhancements, I think, should be abandoned.
	I could be convinced on terror enhancements, but once they exist, if something fits terror enhancement, this is it.
	I agree.
	All crime is hate, says Second CH. And you know, so Pam Bondi is trying to make up for it.
	They're going hard after the vandalizers of the Tesla factories, and there's good reason to believe.
	Actually, before I finish the sentence, in Cryptus, what does the deep web AI internet think George Soros and his activist organizations have with respect to funding of these movements?
	Oh, there's like three minutes of those.
	I don't need an AI tool for that.
	There's tons of evidence everywhere.
	I've been following some interesting threads on that particular topic, and it goes extremely deep and covers nearly every NGO, nearly every crazy leftist prosecutor, and a whole lot of justice.
	Interesting.
	No, it's very good.
	And I want to be sure not to jump on any bandwagons prematurely.
	But my understanding as well is the money has been followed.
	I say not definitively, but not comprehensively yet.
	All indications are there.
	So that's Pam Bondi, who wants to come down hard on people defacing Tesla factories.
	And it should be any domestic violence should be punished appropriately under the law.
	That domestic violence also includes swatting.
	And the swatting is on the menu for Kash Patel, who's fresh off his justice shall be done against that individual who defrauded FEMA for a couple thousand bucks to go to a hotel.
	And I don't want to be critical just for the sake of being critical.
	I want to compliment when complimenting is warranted.
	And as I'm trying to just kill the air space so I don't have dead air space until I find the flipping...
	I know that I brought it.
	No, this is not the right one.
	I have the tweet with Kash Patel talking about going after swatters.
	I'm just going to go to my feed because I can't seem to find it in the backdrop.
	Kash Patel has announced they're going to start taking swatting as seriously as they should.
	And I think it's an excellent initiative.
	Because I think it's a problem, and I want to actually bring this up here.
	So Cash Patel tweets out earlier today, I want to address the alarming rise in swatting incidents targeting media figures.
	The FBI is aware of this dangerous trend, and my team and I are already taking action to investigate and hold those responsible accountable.
	This isn't about politics.
	Weaponizing law enforcement against any American is not only morally reprehensible, but also endangers lives, including those of our officers.
	And including, well, I guess it goes without saying, the one being swatted.
	That will not be tolerated.
	We are fully committed to working with law enforcement to crack down on these crimes.
	More updates to come.
	Now, I said excellent.
	And it's going to get especially dangerous when people can use...
	Maybe AI deepfake is not the right word, but the frickin' voices.
	They can have Joe Rogan call up a police station and it will be indistinguishable from the real Joe Rogan.
	And then, this is what I definitely want to understand, is why Pisco says dumb tweet, and I say why.
	In Cryptis, is there something stupid about the idea that they will be using deepfake voices to phone in swats and make them indistinguishable from reality?
	No, I'm pretty sure they already do that.
	Okay, maybe that's why it's a dumb tweet, in that they're already doing it.
	But I'm curious, Pisco, Pisco, why is it a dumb tweet?
	What I don't understand...
	First of all, anybody who is caught for swatting, false swatting, deserves to be charged with attempted murder.
	I'm saying that hyperbolically.
	I'm trying to think of what they deserve to be charged with.
	They deserve to be charged with something very, very severe.
	Period.
	Full stop.
	What I don't understand is how this actually does happen in modern-day technology, that someone will call up and say something's going on from an unmarked number.
	So especially when they say it's the person calling up, because the latest accusations or incidents of swatting occurred with Chase Geyser, I believe, from Infowars, where apparently the call was from Chase saying that his family was tied up and he was going to do something terrible, and then they swatted his house.
	A number of caveats.
	I do think some people may have historically or, you know...
	May have used the term swatting in a liberal manner that is not, you know, police showing up and saying, hey, is everything okay?
	I don't think colloquially that's what we understand to be swatting.
	It's like, you know, guns out and drawn and busting down the door, not a wellness check.
	Someone said your house was on fire.
	So maybe the term has been used a little bit liberally to the point of watering it down.
	When Chase says they show up with guns, or I don't know if he said they showed up with guns drawn.
	I don't understand how they actually respond to these if they don't have a number, a receiving number on the other end.
	I don't understand, even if they thought it was a bona fide swatting, or that there was a bona fide situation of hostage or whatever, how they respond in the way they have historically responded.
	To me, it seems that there's as much fault to some extent in the response and the drasticness of the response, given the propensity or prevalence of swatting in the first place.
	Whoever does it should be, and I don't understand how they are not caught.
	And arrested and charged and convicted and sent to jail for doing it because what they are doing can and frequently has resulted in death.
	I just want to read the chat here, actually.
	We don't understand how a ghost caller can have so much power, says Bamlao.
	And there was one underneath which said, oh, where was it?
	Domestic terrorism.
	I think we can do that.
	Attempted murder is not hyperbolic.
	Yeah, but it's felony murder.
	I don't know if you can have attempted felony murder.
	What they're doing is committing a felony that can result in someone getting killed.
	And as much as felony murder, which is someone getting killed as a result of the commission of a felony, is felony murder, calling in a bogus SWAT is attempted felony murder.
	The phone number won't match is what I was trying to pull up here.
	So anyways, I don't know how the protocol exists that you can get an anonymous call from an unmarked number from someone who won't identify themselves and that leads to a swatting or you get what purports to be the individual from a number that won't match up and then you still go and proceed with a full arms guns drawn raid.
	It's a good initiative.
	Whether or not people are exaggerating and how they've been swatted, we know what happens.
	We know it leads to deadly results and we know that they have been using it as a tactic to go after some of the more prominent Controversial, if you want to call them that, conservative voices.
	So Cash Patel, godspeed on that.
	Pam Bondi, godspeed on what you're working on in terms of going after the rampant vandalism against the Tesla factories.
	Before we move on to the next segment, I hate that word, it makes my life feel like a show.
	Kevin Sorbo, let me see here.
	Kevin Sorbo, parents, here, sorry, I can't do this with my fat fingers.
	Parents said they surrounded their house with guns drawn.
	I don't understand how that's...
	Possibly acceptable.
	Just check with your bank.
	Okay, sorry.
	Let me go over to Rumble and see if I've missed anything to add to the discussion.
	Back the blue, but don't agree with materialized police force, says VegSphere.
	I agree with that.
	I mean, first of all, you back the blue, which means you don't want them to do stupid things and overreact because that causes people to not have faith in the blue.
	And showing up the way they did with the Jan Sixers, we know why they did that.
	They wanted incidents.
	Alpha Warrior.
	When they use flashbangs to get you out of a house and they know that you're an armed ex or veteran, the chances of you approaching the door with a firearm drawn...
	Which would allow them to summarily execute you are above average.
	And so the idea of the massive escalation of these incidents doesn't make sense except when it makes sense.
	With the Jan Sixers, they wanted incidents.
	With that guy who Facebooked death threats to Joe Biden and then they summarily executed him because they raid a 76-year-old geriatric blind guy knowing that he's a little bit off but not necessarily dangerous or at least not immediately dangerous.
	They want the incidents when they raided Mar-a-Lago.
	With the authorization to use deadly force, even though it was standard protocol, because it's always in the raids.
	Bull crap.
	It shouldn't be in there.
	But that's it.
	If you do back the blue, you want the blue to act in a way that doesn't cause people to lose faith in them.
	And that's what abusive swats actually do.
	Okay, going back to our local screen to see what's going on here.
	Oh, Roger Stone too?
	No, it's all of them.
	Roger Stone.
	Jeffrey Clark.
	Hauling him out in his underwear.
	Especially says, a special SOV says, you are the show, Viva.
	Yes, but it's me.
	It's always felt just like a discussion, not an episode.
	A discussion, not a show, but it's a discussion, people.
	That's where it's at right now.
	Cash Patel, Pan Bondi, riding the wave of their disappointment.
	Their early unfortunate, unforced error disappointment are now doing good, and Godspeed to them.
	Keep on keeping on.
	And that's it.
	Now I had an article from Al Jazeera for some reason here.
	What was it about?
	Did I pull up an article from Al Jazeera to talk about the federal?
	No, North Dakota Monitor.
	Okay, sorry.
	The logo looks like Al Jazeera.
	I was looking at Al Jazeera describing the prime ministership in Canada.
	So the other news of the day, by the way, more rogue judges who think they are the president, who think they have executive power.
	If you have not heard Barnes's analysis of this and other things, that's because you're not listening to the bourbon with Barnes.
	Not every night by any means, but he was going over his week in Seattle.
	Yesterday's episode, he talked about Mahmoud Khalif's green card situation.
	And as much as I said, I'm going to wait to hear Barnes's opinion on it in order to crystallize my own position.
	When Barnes agrees with me, in principle, and then agrees that it's legally justified.
	But politically, potentially not the best move.
	And as Viva says, you got to make sure you have all the evidence before you come to hard conclusions.
	And don't play cheapskate with that stage of the critical thought.
	Because it's not because you don't like the person that you abandon the same scrutiny that you demand when it's your side that's being targeted.
	So when Barnes agrees with me, and I agree, I said I would defer to Barnes.
	I guess I agreed with me all along.
	We'll talk about it more Sunday night.
	If you didn't also see the analysis on Barnes talking about rogue judges from Seattle to San Francisco to D.C. to New York, the latest iteration of it, people, is Trump can't fire his own federal employees, even if they are on probationary periods.
	It's freaking wild.
	This is how you create a permanent administrative state.
	What we are witnessing right now, and I want to make sure everybody fully appreciates this.
	If you have an unelected and unfireable bureaucratic state, that is the deep state.
	And you can't even wage war on that deep state because the other deep state, the judicial branch, which are players in this deep state swamp, these rogue federal judges who think they not only know better than the president but have more power than the president, they say not only does the deep state exist, we are precluding you from dismantling the deep state.
	You cannot fire.
	The very federal employees that are the swamp.
	You can't minimize the government.
	You can hire them as many as you want.
	And then once you hire them, they're the blob.
	That's the new starting point.
	The blob just got bigger.
	It can only get bigger.
	And you cannot trim the fat of the blob.
	So this is it.
	Story of the day.
	Washington, a second federal judge ordered late Thursday.
	That President Donald Trump's administration reinstate probationary federal workers who were fired as part of the president's and billionaire advisor Elon Musk's government downsizing.
	Just appreciate this?
	Probationary federal workers?
	Now, one of the mistakes you make, I make, everyone makes legal mistakes, and it was in the story of, it was an ABC or NBC journalist who was fired.
	And I was sort of approaching the story from a Canadian perspective that you can never fire the workers.
	And then everyone in the chat is like, Viva, your analysis is totally Canadian-centric and not in line with American law.
	There are right-to-work states and there are some non-right-to-work states.
	Meaning, there are states in which you can fire an employee at any time whatsoever for no good reason whatsoever.
	And I'm not even sure that you have to give them much severance.
	Whereas in Canada, good luck.
	You fire someone, you owe them like a week for every year that they've been on board if they don't have contractual, that's by law, if they don't have more beneficial contractual provisions.
	These are probationary workers.
	And by the way, Trump, Barnes seems to be acutely familiar with this particular judge, James Bredard.
	Ben, c'est qui James Bredard?
	Qui lui a nominé?
	On va voir ici.
	James Bredard, senior juge, born 1957, assumed office.
	Who appointed him?
	Appointed by Barack Obama.
	So, I'm not putting it on blast.
	It's good to know.
	It's not always a total confirmation.
	But federal judge James Brudar of the District of Maryland issued a temporary restraining order mandating nearly 20 federal departments and agencies to reinstate new or recent hires by Monday, 1 p.m.
	Eastern.
	The order from Bradir came hours after one from a federal judge in California.
	I actually thought this was the San Francisco judge, so maybe this is the other one.
	The lawsuit was filed on March 6th by Democrat attorneys from 19 states, District of Columbia, Arizona.
	Look at these states, beautiful states.
	States to leave, by the way.
	Bradir's order reinstates more than 23,500 probationary positions across the departments of agriculture, commerce, education, energy, yada, yada, yada.
	My God, this was...
	As well as Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
	Environment...
	Okay, fine.
	A lot of agencies.
	A hearing is scheduled for March 26th in Baltimore.
	Temporary mandate expires the evening of March 27th.
	Bradar's order did not include the nearly 5,500 employees fired from the Department of Defense and National Archives and Records Administration.
	The emergency decision out of Maryland followed an earlier ruling out of California.
	federal judge who extended a previously temporary order immediately reinstating probationary jobs at the National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, etc., etc.
	Trump administration appealed quickly, repealed the decision, the suit that was brought by more than a dozen plaintiffs, including unions, representatives, etc., etc., etc.
	Okay.
	But let's just go over to the order because the order is not worth ignoring.
	The order is worth reading.
	Sent it over in the locals community before the stream but didn't have a chance to reply to any comments on that and I believe it's this.
	It is this.
	Okay, let's just check.
	It's short.
	We can walk through it.
	Bredard!
	Yeah, there you go.
	James K. Bredard.
	We're not going to see much in it.
	For the reasons stated in the foregoing memorandum ordered, plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order granted with respect to the restrained defendants, all purported terminations of affected probationary employees, as defined below.
	On January 20th, restrained defendants, yada yada yada, to alleviate the burdens of the states conducting their mandated rapid response activities, the restrained defendants shall reinstate all affected probationary employees throughout the United States.
	Forthwith!
	The reinstated defendants, the restrained defendants, I'm sorry, restrained defendants, that being the Trump administration, shall not, through the United States, conduct any future reductions in force.
	This is amazing.
	It's absolutely amazing.
	You want to talk about an activist rogue judge.
	This is not just saying you're going to undo that.
	It's telling the president what he can and cannot do on a going-forward basis.
	Some district judge from Maryland, well, unelected, I guess, appointed by an elected official, but telling the president what he shall and shall not do on a going-forward basis.
	Where are we?
	Oh yeah, so no reductions in force, whether formally labeled as such or not, except in compliance with the notice requirements set forth in Section 3502, relevant regulations, yada, yada, yada.
	Then we've got scheduling, it looks like.
	Okay.
	Such status report shall be set forth in the affected probationary employees reinstated at each defendant agency.
	The court anticipates requiring further status reports, which may require the restrained defendants to provide further details as to their compliance activities.
	The court may also enter further orders.
	Do you understand?
	The judge is basically saying what he gets to force the president to do and then verify what the president is doing afterwards.
	And like Barnes said, it's going to be, was it Andrew Jackson?
	That's a very nice order you have there, judge.
	Now go enforce it.
	Against me, the executive?
	It's a constitutional crisis, they're going to say.
	Because the judges think that they are the unelected executive branch of the country.
	I mean, it's absolutely wild.
	Yeah, just don't listen.
	Case closed.
	What are they going to do?
	Go and arrest him.
	They'll try to hold him in criminal contempt.
	They may as well issue orders as to how the president should govern.
	I mean, that's effectively and exactly what they're doing, just on a specific issue.
	What does it say here?
	So Viva comes on at 4.30 now.
	Good.
	I don't like to watch redacted news anymore, lol.
	No, I'm going to be on at 4 o'clock.
	4 to 5 under the new schedule.
	Temporary restraining order says BAMLOW. All restrained defendants can return to work for 30 days to complete their probationary...
	Set aside the fact that it's also probationary workers who have the probationary status specifically so that you don't have to keep them on after the probationary period.
	This is creating an administrative state even bigger than the one that actually already exists.
	Hold on a second.
	Four to five is absolutely horrible.
	I can't watch.
	Oh, it's horrible that it's going to be that time because you can't watch or it's a horrible time that you refuse to watch at RP McMurphy in our locals community.
	I think you mean it's horrible in that you won't be available.
	Please let me know.
	I tried.
	Okay, sorry, I'm going into a different...
	So that's what's going on with the rogue judges.
	And we're getting to the point where even turncoat Amy Coney Barrett, who Barnes was also vehemently critical of at the time of her appointment and has been proven prophetic in that critique, the courts and Roberts are going to have to say it's either a presidential system or it's a parliamentary state.
	That is it.
	Okay, let me see what else we got going on here.
	Let me go to the chat over on Rumble.
	We got two tipped questions over in Locals.
	Did I get to these?
	Roosting says, even Trump impersonator Jason Scoop says he got swatted after he confronted Demo Rat favorite Robert De Niro and Alec Baldwin.
	If your favorite president, Bobby, come on, kiss the ring, kiss the ring, Bobby.
	I saw that guy.
	He's funny.
	I can see how people don't find him funny, though.
	Rustang also says, AI has invaded virtually every aspect of our lives.
	Fake this, fake that, bank scams, and many other scams galore.
	People need better advice on how to protect their lives from being ruined by the rampant criminality.
	Soon there will be a fake Viva with an AI-generated show.
	Dude, you know, people are doing that.
	The thing is this.
	I think I would feel dirty ever doing that without a full disclosure.
	This is an AI-generated episode or something, like an AI-generated voiceover.
	I would feel dirty.
	Ever doing it without being fully, obviously fully transparent.
	But I think I'd also just feel dirty being lazy.
	I mean, but then he said, okay, it's not lazy.
	It's efficient.
	Use science to work for you when you're sleeping.
	My dad always said, make money when you're sleeping.
	And then you found a way to succeed in life financially.
	Whereas this was always his advice sort of against being a lawyer, because when you're a lawyer, you're basically a prostitute.
	And this is actually what he said to me.
	So you're a prostitute, you sell your time, and you can only sell so many of your hours in a day.
	If you figure out how to make money when you're sleeping, you're gold, pun intended.
	So some people are going to say, by not using AI-generated content, you are not maximizing productivity of your own brand and whatever.
	Something about it feels dirty.
	Say it again?
	I'd be one of those people.
	Who what?
	You're not using it efficiently.
	Definitely do more.
	We had this exact discussion about doing AI content, but you said yourself to me, it would not be honest.
	It wouldn't go right to you.
	Well, this is the dilemma, because I know that people are doing it, and Encryptus is the AI master of our locals community.
	But I mean, I guess to be totally transparent, you'd say, caption before, caption after, maybe just a little thumbnail.
	This is AI generated, and it's just the news of the day.
	Because the amazing thing is, Encryptus is not trying to sell me on it.
	He's just telling me the realities of AI. It can think like me, speak like me, draft like me, and speak like me indistinguishably.
	And so then why not?
	Why deny the Viva analysis?
	But it's not me.
	And then the question is...
	Is it really not me?
	If the AI is even more me than me.
	This is the...
	Okay, we'll see.
	But that's where we're at for now.
	I'm not doing it.
	And if I ever do it, my goodness, is it going to be blaring across?
	This is an AI-generated voiceover analysis or a summary of the day.
	What else do we...
	Oh, this was the NPR article that I was going to bring up on the issue.
	Is this the one, the same one?
	Who's the judge in this one?
	Oh, no, this is the other one.
	Okay, good.
	I knew I had the other one here.
	This is the one, and I'm not sure now.
	I think this is the judge that Barnes knew.
	Thousands of fired federal workers must be offered reinstatement.
	Judge rules.
	Which one was this?
	I mean, there's too many to keep it.
	This is the one.
	Barnes knows this judge, not the other guy.
	Who is this judge?
	Thousands of federal employees fired from the Trump administration must be offered reinstatement within the next week.
	U.S. judge.
	San Francisco.
	U.S. District of San Francisco has ruled because he said they were terminated unlawfully.
	It is a sad day when our government would fire some good employee and say it was based on performance when they know good and well it was a lie.
	Thanks for your opinion, Judge William Alsup.
	Who appointed this guy?
	Oh, Alsup?
	Okay, here we go.
	I got this.
	Not now.
	Who appointed him?
	I'm going to take one wild guess.
	And Alsup?
	District court?
	Who nominated him?
	Ah, cripe.
	Why doesn't he have a Wikipedia page?
	How do I get to the Wikipedia page?
	Encrypt his race on.
	U.S. District Judge.
	Whatever.
	It's an amazing thing.
	He says, you didn't fire them for good reasons.
	I've determined that.
	Thursday decision marks a significant stand against President Trump's sweeping efforts to remake the federal government.
	The White House has appealed the decision.
	So what's amazing is that I do have...
	Even in my own family members, or close-knit community members, people who are losing their jobs as a result of this.
	It is an issue.
	Nobody wants to lose their job, but everybody wants to minimize government waste.
	Clinton?
	Okay, so he's Clinton.
	The other guy's Barack, and it's fantastic.
	These are the guys who want to run the country.
	Let me see this.
	Congratulations on the new dictator of the new narco state.
	I don't know if that's Cardi.
	I don't know if that's the judge.
	I don't even know who that's about.
	The internet.
	I'm going to save my bad tweet or my misinterpreted tweet for the locals after party.
	But the written word on the internet is so easy to misunderstand.
	Gantet over in our local screen says, yes, can I point out countless incidents of where an employee made a harassment claim to HR was fired for a BS reason then sued.
	Not as cut and dry as you as the others claim it to be.
	I think the issue here, Is the Trump administration doing what they were elected to do, which was cut government spending and minimize the government.
	And it's an amazing thing that you have the federal employees who work for the government have tremendously greater protections than at-will employees.
	And then they've got judges who are on their side who are going to find every mental gymnastics under the law to...
	Cut Trump down from being able to do what he was elected to do.
	Okay, we are going to talk about the next story of the day also, which is another one where I'm not sure how I feel yet.
	I want to see the evidence, people.
	I wanted to talk about it yesterday.
	Did you guys hear this story?
	A track record.
	The video went viral.
	It was encrypted.
	Well, I guess the video's here.
	The video went viral because people are saying this track runner.
	Hit the other track runner in the head.
	People are racializing it.
	If you look at this and you think that the angle to view this through is racism or race, you're on the wrong track.
	The question is, did it happen?
	Did she hit the woman in the head on purpose with the baton?
	And should she be facing charges for assault and battery?
	Can we watch the video here?
	Let's watch this with audio.
	Okay, let's watch it.
	Caught on camera.
	Details about a moment caught on camera during a track meet in Virginia.
	By the way, yes, she did it on purpose.
	No, she didn't in the chat.
	I'd like to see what you think about it.
	Watch the video first if you haven't seen it.
	High school athlete accused of attacking her opponent.
	ABC's Andrea Fujii has the latest.
	This morning, a high school track runner accused of attacking her opponent with a baton now faces assault and battery charges, but she insists it was an accident.
	I'm sorry, I hit her.
	Assault and battery her opponent with a track runner accused of attacking her opponent with a baton.
	This morning, a high school track runner accused of attacking her opponent with a baton now faces assault and battery charges.
	But she insists it was an accident.
	I'm sorry I hit her.
	I didn't mean to hit her.
	It was intentional.
	It happened during a relay race at the Virginia High School League Championships.
	Kayleen Tucker was passing Aleila Everett when Everett appeared to suddenly swing her baton, hitting Tucker in the back of the head, sending her to the ground.
	She got a concussion.
	Everett says it happened because she lost her balance.
	So I'm like this in the air.
	I catch my balance, pump my arms.
	She's cutting in, so when I pump my arms, she got hit.
	I just felt a bang on my head, and then I fell off the track immediately.
	Tucker suffered a concussion, and the judges disqualified Everett, who says intense public scrutiny quickly followed.
	Death threats, racist people, people making fake accounts to talk and harass me on my page.
	Tucker's mother saying Everett did not apologize.
	The family blames safety concerns at the track.
	She wanted my daughter to run over there in front of all these people that may jump on her because they feel like she attacked the other runner.
	Okay, put on pause.
	What's the consensus?
	I have a feeling the chat's going to say, yes, she did it on purpose.
	Let me just bring this out for a second.
	Everybody, every single person in the chat is saying she did it on purpose.
	I will tell you, I think she did it on purpose.
	And that look on her face when she had to say she was sorry was like, I'm saying it, but I don't mean it.
	You know that I'm...
	It's everybody.
	Remember when the skater killed a guy named Adam Johnson with his skate?
	And everyone's like, he did that on purpose.
	I mean, I operate on the basis that nobody would do that on purpose because nobody...
	The skater didn't want to kill anybody whether or not he wanted to kick him with his skate.
	Nobody would do it on purpose because nobody's going to think they're going to get away with it.
	Not that getting away with it is an incentive to do something.
	I operate on a basis that nobody would do that on purpose.
	I'm just reading the chat.
	It's terrible.
	I do appreciate that her apology gives me the...
	It has the indications of the dissociative denial.
	Ooh.
	I'm going to coin that if it's not already a word.
	The dissociative denial, like, it happened.
	It happened, not I did it.
	Even if she didn't mean to do it, she still hit the woman in the head with the baton.
	So it had that dissociative denial.
	I always say that the easiest person to lie to is yourself.
	Like, yeah, I didn't mean to hit her in the head.
	I just meant to hit her on the shoulder, hit her, whatever.
	Which might have been also my ultimate conclusion with that skater.
	It literally looked like he moved his body on purpose.
	Obviously didn't mean to kill the guy.
	Maybe just meant to, like, kick him in the chest or something with the skate.
	But if everybody believes she did it on purpose, well, that answers the second question, because she's being charged with assaulted battery.
	The girl got a concussion!
	Like, to get a concussion with a baton?
	First of all, maybe, and this is not to exonerate any deliberate criminal activity, maybe they can have, like, cardboard batons, like, run with, you know, the inside tube of a toilet paper thing, that way you can't...
	Beat the shit out of another runner with it.
	Anyways, okay.
	If everybody thinks that she did it on purpose, then they're going to agree with this.
	She was charged.
	She's a senior.
	She was running in the leg of the 4x200, yada, yada, yada.
	She struck her person.
	Additional details were not immediately available.
	Video of the incident showed that, okay, fine.
	I was so in disbelief.
	Tucker told the video.
	I didn't know what happened.
	Everett, I would never do that on purpose.
	She said, that is not in my character.
	The 18-year-old said that during the race, her arm became stuck after the baton inadvertently struck Tucker, and as they neared the corner of the track, her arm was literally hitting the baton until she got a little ahead, and my arm got stuck like this.
	Okay.
	The Everetts say they believe their video shows that Tucker's proximity to their daughter led to the accidental collision.
	According to the family, Tucker was running too close to Everett.
	When she tried to cut a head.
	You see, that's where I started losing a little bit of sympathy.
	Like, it was her fault because she was too close to me.
	Anyhow, look, call me a sissy Canadian.
	I'm inclined to not think the girl would do that on purpose.
	Unless there's like...
	If one were to come up with previous criminality or previous ill behavior, then I could be swayed even more.
	Anyhow, that's it.
	I will choose to believe that it was an accident.
	That being said, I could be very easily convinced by one's character.
	If she invoked her own character, which she did, if she has zero, zero tarnishes on her school record, criminal record, whatever, I could believe it's just an unfortunate accident.
	However, if it turns out that she has a history of tantrums, disqualifications, then that would play in favor of a less favorable...
	Let me ask you a question, people.
	This is an Olympic baton passing.
	Isn't this like an ancient sport?
	This thing has been running for thousands of years.
	Is this not something we would have heard of in the past?
	Someone getting hit in the head with a baton?
	Had this been an actual thing that was possible to be by accident?
	How many people have been struck?
	With batons in relay.
	I bet you it does happen often.
	I would think you were wrong.
	And then people are going to say, oh, Viva's white knighting.
	No.
	If this girl has no prior record, no prior anything, no tarnishes, nothing, and she's a track runner, then I would say she did wind up.
	Okay, you accidentally hit someone but continue to run.
	There happens to be one person in chat saying that they did it in high school.
	That one person.
	And I'm wondering...
	I won't ask Grok.
	See what AI can find in Kryptos.
	But yeah, you could also imagine she meant to hit her, just not in the head.
	I do believe I see it getting sort of stuck in the armpit and maybe just hit her here and then tap her on the head.
	I'm actually just surprised that it could concuss somebody.
	Unless they're using concussion a little bit too flippantly, but yeah.
	I'm not gullible.
	What I choose to believe is not an assumption of guilt.
	Anyhow.
	Okay.
	That was the other story.
	Now what we're going to do, because I've got to go over and do the unusual suspects, people.
	And I'm going to talk about a tweet, which I'm going to maybe just, you know, not try to be Michael Malice level.
	Not troll, but too subtle in the humor.
	Or too subtle in the messaging.
	Subtlety does not work well on Twitter.
	Sarcasm doesn't translate properly on Twitter.
	And sometimes humor gets wildly misunderstood.
	Everybody watching on Locals, if you're so inclined, it's a supporters-only afterparty.
	So if you want to come join, support the work that we do at VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
	Here is the link.
	Wait, there's a couple of...
	A couple of...
	A couple of Hrumbl hrants over on Hrumbl.
	The hook...
	6969 says, 4 to 5 is an awesome sweet spot.
	Too much competition at 1230. By 4, I'm usually looking for something to watch before Gouveia at 6. I think...
	I'm not going to pretend that I was negotiating hard.
	They said it was 4 to 5. I was like, 4 to 5 is almost better for me.
	I'll get to exercise, do all my research during the day, do a car vlog during the day, have exercise and done everything by 4. Have the 4 to 5 show where I either get the benefit of further analysis of the news or...
	News evolves over the day, so you don't end up talking about the same thing.
	And then finish by 5, 5, 36 o'clock, start having dinner at a reasonable hour and start putting children to bed at a reasonable hour.
	It's perfect.
	P. Moyer says, Viva, don't worry about an AI version of Viva.
	We will be happy to supply a set of AI viewers to compliment it.
	Touche.
	But then the other thing is, the strongest argument is you'd better own your own AI reproductions before somebody else steals them.
	But no, four to five is going to be a sweet spot.
	It's going to be amazing.
	The news happens throughout the day, and you get further details for the breaking news that happens in the morning.
	And I think everybody's also happier towards the afternoon.
	Plus, four to five, you get the California time, you get England, and you even get to start the new day in Australia with the people there.
	All right.
	With that said, people, let's go over to our vivabarneslaw.locals.com for the after party, where I'm going to berate myself for a tweet that was too subtle.
	For the Twitterverse to even understand.
	But it was so good!
	It was so good because it involved history.
	It involved semantics.
	And it involved...
	What the hell is this?
	That's hair.
	It involved someone with a Ukrainian flag in their bio.
	What time today, Viva?
	Oh, today we're at 4 to 5. Today we're at 4 o'clock, sorry, with the Unusuals.
	It's going to interfere with the Unusuals, so that might be a problem.
	Whatever.
	It is what it is, people.
	It's going to be...
	Today it's 4 o'clock, so stay tuned.
	Yes, 4 to 5 Eastern.
	Heartland Denizen.
	Viva discovers he's hairy.
	Killed with fire, Viva.
	No, wait.
	It looked...
	It was just...
	It was very curly.
	And it was getting right in the way of the mic, of the headphones.
	All right, all that to say, enough with it.
	Come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	And if you're not, enjoy the day.
	And if you're not, by the way, 4,000 of you watching over on Rumble, make sure that you're subscribed before you go.
	And make sure you go get a kid's book, people.
	Louis the Lobster returns to the sea.
	Let me zoom in on this so you can see.
	Illustrated by Abigail Martin.
	Reading, holy crap.
	Let me just show you what this looks like.
	Louis the Lobster.
	It's a children's book written by Viva Frye, illustrated by the daughter of one of our supporters over in Locals, Abigail Martin.
	It's reading baby 18 to 18. May I suggest that if they've indicated the age is up to 18 years old, you could just go ahead and up it to 99 years old, like life.
	I guess it would actually be more accurate to say, like, you want to be 35 and reading this to your child.
	Louis the lobster returns to the sea.
	Lucy Livingston lives on Lilypad Lane.
	You see the alliterations.
	One day, Lucy goes to the grocery shopping with her mom and develops the most unlikely friendship, which results in a most unexpected rescue operation.
	I don't know who drafted that summary, but that's a damn good summary.
	I think my wife, Marion, drafted that.
	And just to leave everyone with something on crumble, as you go and enjoy the rest of the day, people, don't stare into that light.
	That was me yesterday trying to look at the moon.
	I'm joking that wasn't, but I'm trying to see when that's from.
	Yep, that's it.
	All right.
	Going over to locals, people.
	Rumble.
	Peace out.
	See you this afternoon.
	Godspeed, and I will see locals right now.
	Update.
	Okay.
	Is it going to allow me to update?
	Well, hold on.
	We might.
	I don't even know if it's updating now.
	Okay, I'm going to refresh and be back in a second.
	Okay, now I'm here.
	I've refreshed everything, but I don't know if it's going to let me actually...
	Locals, supporters only.
	Update stream.
	Rumble, you're in luck.
	I can't end the stream on studio.
	Go to locals only.
	Rumble's still going.
	Okay, well, I can't do it.
	I can't update it.
	So you're going to get it.
	Let's look at this.
	When I try to troll the troll and I'm too subtle and people don't appreciate the nuance of my...
	Oh, all right.
	Let's play the clip.
	Roll it.
	Hold on.
	Rumble is getting the locals after party, but I'm only paying attention to the locals chat, people.
	Don't know why this won't work, but...
	Why is he making that face that he smells something bad?
	I don't remember what video that's from.
	I remember going over like, oh my god, the sunlight!
	Someone's going to have to tell me.
	It's spring.
	Cowbirds are back.
	I don't care for these parasitic breeders, says Lefson.
	Lefson is our resident photographer over on vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	I guess I'm going to have to open this up in a regular window because we need to go down the...
	Down the Twitter hole for this one.
	We're going to start here.
	Okay.
	Let's play this.
	It starts with the guy that people want to demonize.
	You'll call me names.
	I do have a reflexive reaction to protect those who I believe are getting wrongly besmirched.
	When did Hitler start going after the Jews?
	You mean in terms of rhetoric?
	So, yeah.
	If you take him at his word in Mein Kampf, which is, you know, it's a piece of political propaganda, you know, that he wrote as a sort of a politician in Germany in 1924, and so you have to take it with sort of a grain of salt, but it's also one of the few sources we have, like, given his audience at the time, he probably didn't have a lot of reason to make this part up, is that...
	You know, he had been from, like, small-town Germany, right?
	And he was from a middle-class family.
	His father was a civil servant, respectable people, and nationalism back then.
	He was from, like, small-town Germany, right?
	And he had been from, like, small-town Germany, right?
	And he was from a middle-class family.
	Small-town Germany.
	So this guy, Drew Pavlo, who, oh yeah, that's right, I remember Drew now, says, Daryl Cooper, Hitler grew up in small town Germany, doesn't even know Hitler was Austrian, but Joe Rogan will tell 30 million people that this man is a genius historian.
	Now, I know this only from my own life, because my grandfather, I don't even know what country it was when he was born in it, what it became after he was born, and what it became since he left.
	We say my granddad was Polish.
	But it was part of Austria at one point.
	And I think it ended up in either Ukraine.
	I mean, I think it ended up in Ukraine.
	I'm not entirely certain.
	So the idea that he made such a...
	First of all, there's not a person on Earth who doesn't know that Hitler was Austrian.
	But the attack that he said...
	This guy doesn't know a damn thing.
	He said he grew up in small-town Germany.
	So you know, if you have any experience with European history, countries change hands a lot.
	Over hundreds of years.
	So I, in my, what I thought was pretty clear, funny, if you're trying to make someone look stupid, you're best off not highlighting your own stupidity.
	Of course, you've got the Ukrainian flag in your bio, so a clear indicator.
	Setting aside the fact that Brana Alm in, Hitler's birthplace, changed hands multiple times over the century, the centuries, it was in fact part of Germany from 1938 to 1945. So even assuming it wasn't an innocent misspeak, which it obviously was.
	And I include the description of Branaum in the birthplace of Adolf Hitler was part of Germany between 1938 and 1945 during the Nazi period when Austria was annexed as part of the greater German Empire.
	I thought it was pretty clearly funny that He obviously misspoke.
	But if you want to be a technical, detail-oriented nitpicker for the purposes of demonizing someone, it was Germany at some point.
	So technically, it was small-town Germany.
	Sure, after Germany annexed it during World War II, but it was still part of Germany.
	And people didn't seem to get the multi-level, historically accurate genius of that tweet.
	But can you imagine, you try to call someone an idiot because in a three-hour podcast...
	They accidentally say he was from small-town Germany.
	First of all, Barna Allian was always, even for the last, say, 100 and some odd years before, no, 100 and whatever, 30 years, I'm not a historian, people.
	Before Germany annexed it as part of making it part of the broader German empire yet again, it was always a German-Austrian border town to begin with.
	That being said also, it wasn't always either part of Austria to begin with either.
	So people were misunderstanding that.
	What were some of the comments to that tweet, which was...
	What were some of the people saying to me?
	Learn some history, dude.
	The world map...
	Okay, one guy says, community knows Austria was part of Germany.
	This is what gets frustrating about it.
	On the one hand, people are stupid, and I say that non-judgmentally.
	On the other hand, people don't read entire tweets.
	And I always...
	Do forget.
	Well, first of all, it was clear from the tweet that people don't read the screen grabs.
	Sometimes I think they don't see that there's even a screen grab there.
	And so they say things that are in the tweet, but they don't even bother to read.
	And like, I'm done.
	I can't.
	I should not care about this.
	Anyhow, bottom line, a lesson of history.
	It was fun.
	Yeah, Austria was part of Germany at some point.
	Or at least that part was.
	After Hitler took it over during World War II, it was always a German border town.
	And if that's your basis to discredit everything that that historian Darryl Cooper had to say, you're not after the truth.
	You're an idiot.
	Full stop.
	But I knew Drew Pavlou was the idiot because he was the one that was parading around in front of the flags.
	I think that was him.
	Actually, in Cryptus, was that?
	I don't know how quickly you can check this.
	Drew Pavlou, if I'm not mistaken, posted that video.
	Of him in front of a bunch of Ukrainian flags representing the killed soldier saying, was this all in vain?
	And I replied to him, I think, for that tweet saying, yes, it was, and sending more to the slaughter is not going to change that.
	So I happen to have some...
	Anyways, but...
	Yeah, one guy says, dude, that post really made you look stupid.
	Brana was part of Germany because he annexed it from 1938 to 1945. Austria before and after.
	I was like, dude...
	I know, that was kind of part of the joke.
	And that was also in the tweet.
	Okay, it doesn't matter.
	This is why the internet's made for misunderstanding.
	One of the people says, as Viva said, the sarcasm on foam batons doesn't translate well to the short form text.
	Translate well to the sort short form text.
	Okay.
	Who did this?
	Who did this?
	This is not fair.
	This is now...
	So these are where I get not reluctant.
	This is where I'm nervous to even share these images because someone's going to cut and paste.
	When was this from?
	Because my beard actually looks kind of nice in that picture.
	And I can tell that those are both the same eye.
	And they're just mirrored, which is what makes it look wildly insane.
	So that's what's going on there.
	Let me go back to the chat in vivabarneslaw.locals.com for the bestest above average community out there.
	Special SOV says Truth Social.
	There's a post from Trump.
	Let's go to here.
	And by the way, if you want to be smart or get smarter in life, everybody who's still watching on Rumble because you're lucky that I can't end the stream through Rumble Studio for some reason, which I... Okay, whatever.
	We got this.
	Trump says the globalist Wall Street Journal has no idea what they are doing or saying.
	They are owned by the polluted thinking of the European Union which was formed for the primary purpose of quote screwing the United States of America.
	Their Wall Street Journal thinking is antiquated and weak and very bad for the USA, but have no fear.
	We will win on everything.
	Egg prices are down.
	Oil is down.
	Interest rates are down.
	And tariff-related money is pouring into the United States.
	Quote, the only thing you have to fear is fear itself.
	Now, why are we reading this one?
	Just going to go to the OP up in our locals community.
	That's a special SOV. I guess it's just a good post to read.
	Mahartse says Hitler was Austrian.
	The whole point is we know that.
	But, you know, the fact checker would say, well, you know, that town was Germany in 1938 to 1945, so technically it's not even wrong to say it was a small German town.
	Okay, everybody's going crazy and locals do.
	Anyway, bottom line, I then ended up following up with a tweet.
	It's like, I have always said that if a tweet is misinterpreted, the onus is on the drafter and not the reader.
	And so clearly that was more nuanced than appropriate.
	For the Twitterverse.
	SpecialSov says, I love posting good news when available.
	Well, thank you very much.
	Stop acknowledging Rumble, says Marta.
	I'm not.
	No, right now it's only on Locals, people.
	What we do now, check this out.
	I'll show everybody what we're going to do.
	Because I like doing this.
	This is what the after party consists of.
	Interacting with our Locals community.
	When it's through Rumble, typically it's the supporters only.
	when I don't use studio and do it through either another platform or directly through locals.
	It's for everybody.
	And I'm going to go like this.
	Share here.
	This is what we do.
	Lynn Lucinda Wio says, so eager to hear what you have to say about CashP checking on all this horrible swatting of conservative voices.
	Yep.
	And I'll just refresh it just to see that we got them here.
	Yeah.
	It's about time.
	And I do think, I mean, in as much as there are terror enhancement provisions of law, it would be the time to apply them.
	Just apply the law and we'd already be good enough.
	There will be another vote for PM, correct, says Karius.
	So the way it worked right now is he is the Prime Minister.
	From what I understand, he has undertaken...
	And Cryptis, are you able to find this?
	Because I understood that Carney had undertaken to call an election shortly or in the near future, but not imminently and certainly not immediately.
	I mean, he's appointing his own cabinet members, which...
	Because I think what might have to happen is they're either going to have to hold a by-election to have him win a seat in a riding that's going to be easy for the Liberals to win.
	Go to Westmount, Carney.
	So he is Prime Minister now, officially, unequivocally, and let's just go see if the World Economic Forum updated their website.
	Not yet.
	Slow bastards.
	So I'm still not quite sure what you need me to look for.
	If he's made any statements to the effect that he will call a national election himself.
	He has not made any direct statements to that regard.
	I looked that up just before the show.
	They are looking at an election coming up in the fall at the earliest.
	That's at the latest.
	That's the legislatively required next election every four years.
	There's one interview that he stated that, no, he doesn't have any plans of calling it immediately.
	Yeah, okay, well, that's enough.
	So, bottom line answer to the question, and whose question was it?
	It was Carrie S. There will be another election, no later than October, unless they find a way to...
	Invoke a crisis to suspend elections.
	That's the legislatively required every four years.
	There could be an election earlier if a vote for non-confidence passes, which would trigger a national election, or if Mark Carney, the anointed WEF globalist whore, says, I'll call an election because I really wasn't legit.
	I wasn't validly elected in the ordinary sense.
	I don't think he's going to do that at all.
	This guy is going to cling to the power for as long as humanly possible.
	NDP could bring down the government, says JP, sooner.
	That's correct.
	They could...
	Pass, vote on, and pass a motion for non-confidence, which would trigger a new election, because the current minority government would no longer have the confidence of all the other parties, trigger a new election.
	Jagmeet Singh has no reason not to do it now.
	He's already secured his federal pension, and so scumbag McGee should be doing it.
	Oh, and that's why the JP Spooner says, if they get back to Parliament, because Parliament is prorogued until the 24th, which is another 10 days.
	And so as government is prorogued...
	There's no business for which they could even submit a motion for non-confidence.
	So they could not even, if they wanted to, trigger an election by non-confidence until the prorogation of parliament is over, has lapsed, which it hasn't.
	So it's scoundrel-less of the highest order.
	All right, let me go up here.
	We got NDP. I got that one already.
	Obama White House.
	What's this?
	Carney.
	We'll have to hold a by-election to get an actual seat, says J.P. Spooner.
	Yeah, and then the question is, they were talking about...
	And this is where I don't know the nuances.
	Do they have to hold a by-election, or can he take the seat of someone who already has their seat and relinquishes it to them, to him?
	This is the details of the weeds that I don't fully know about.
	Obama White House Archives.
	What is this?
	White House launches campaign to cut waste.
	Vice President to take on making government more accountable.
	Oh, that's from Obama back in 2011. Well, that's right.
	That was then.
	Things are different now.
	Scrolling up here.
	Arnold Schwarzenegger is also of Austrian heritage.
	It's just like Russians and Ukrainians.
	Piran.
	Oh, that's what I just read.
	read in 2011 the Obama administration launched the campaign to cut waste an initiative that aimed at reducing waste for government spending and increasing efficiency announced by President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden the campaign focused on what yeah well Well, I mean, everybody knows that Trump was a Democrat 15 years ago.
	So it's not...
	J.P. Spooner says, Canada votes for the party and the party chooses their leader.
	This is true.
	But anyone with dignity would say, yep, I'm going to...
	Well, but he can't rule in any event for more than another...
	What month are we in?
	March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October.
	Another seven months of terror.
	Okay, I don't know what the Australian decision is here.
	It's always 420. Bill Brown is a man of the weeds.
	They are pizza bombing people now.
	No, who was it that was complaining about getting swatted?
	I think it was Michael Cohen.
	And he's like, they're ordering pizzas to my place.
	I was like, dude, you get free pizza and you're complaining?
	They don't deliver pizza unless it's already paid for.
	Anyhow, Viva, take a look at the good new interviews on Epoch Times.
	Hold on a second, this just came in.
	And we might, it's two o'clock with camera.
	I see Epoch Times, it doesn't let me read it.
	It's behind a paywall.
	And then I feel dirty using an archive link to bypass their paywall.
	So can't watch that one.
	And that is it.
	All right, peeps, what I'm going to do now is I'm going to get ready to head out because I got to drive.
	Finish the car vlog of the day, which is the Canadian stuff, and actually give the assets, give my assets to the unusual suspects because they want to know what I'm going to be talking about.
	Thank you all for being here.
	Locals, Godspeed.
	God bless.
	VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
	And next week, new schedule.
	So it's going to be same bat channel, different bat time.
	Four to five o'clock.
	And we are going to be working on pre-recording interviews, which we are going to broadcast throughout the week.
	That is it.
	And Godspeed.
	God bless.

▲