Communism in Seattle! Judge Issues INSANE Ruling! No Freedom of Info in Canada? & MORE! Viva Frei
|
Time
Text
We can't let them continue their lies and their distractions.
We can't let them deport the millions of families across this country who have been doing the work that keeps our economy going every day.
We can't let them scapegoat and criminalize immigrants who contribute, who are our neighbors, our friends, our churchgoers, our community around us that we deeply love.
Immigrants are us.
Immigrants are us, and we all deserve respect and dignity.
If you look at the food that's on your table, think about who picked it.
If you look at your homes, think about who built them.
If you look at your vulnerable elders and your kids, think about who's taking care of them.
We can't let them continue their lies and their distractions.
We can't let them deport the millions of families across this country who have been doing the work that keeps our economy going every day.
We can't let them scapegoat and criminalize immigrants who contribute, who are our neighbors, our friends, our churchgoers, our community around us that we deeply love.
Immigrants are us.
It's right next to toys are us and babies are us.
Immigrants are us.
And what can you get there?
Cheap labor so that they can pick your fruits and vegetables, J-PAL.
Immigrants are us and we all deserve respect and dignity.
If you look at the food that's on your table.
Think about who picked it.
If we illegalize slavery, who's going to pick all those crops?
I mean, they say it out loud.
And the amazing thing is, at first, they're shamed for it.
Do you remember when Joel Osborne said it on, I don't think it was The View.
I remember Rosie Perez or Rosie Perez.
Is that her?
Billy, you're so stupid.
When Joel Osborne, whatever her name was.
Mr. President, if you deport all the immigrants, who's going to wash your toilets?
And then it was like, oh, you can't say that.
It's like, oh, no, no, no, I didn't mean, I would never say.
Then you got Ralph Nader saying, if we don't have illegal immigrants, the crops are going to rot in the field.
You have the fact that some of them are white doesn't make it any worse or better.
Jayapal coming out right now and literally saying the racist thing that Joel Osborne.
Is that her name?
Why do I feel like I'm going crazy?
That Joel Osborne was shamed for having said, who's going to scrub your toilets?
Oh, no, no, that's not what we use illegal immigrants for at all, Joel.
That's a racist trope.
And now they just proudly say it.
That's what they think immigrants are us are for.
They're immigrants not are us, they're immigrants for us.
You said it wrong, Jayapal.
We need cheap, unskilled, illegal immigrants to exploit...
So that we can underpay them for, I won't even call them trivial jobs.
I won't call them menial jobs.
They are jobs that are not usually intended to be lifelong careers.
When I was up in Quebec, and by the way, you think this problem is only American.
I was up in Quebec, and I was at a farm that I used to love frequenting.
And I just noticed, summertime, and I noticed that there were buses, literal buses, that were bringing in and out, quite clearly, Mexican labor.
And I asked the farm owner, I said, like, what's up with that?
You can't...
We're up in the middle of, like, middle of Quebec.
It's not exactly the most prominent demographic.
You can't find any local labor?
You know what the guy tells me?
Nobody wants to work.
Nobody wants to work, not because the job is so bad, but because unemployment pays so good.
And what they do up in what they call la région de Quebec, you know, what they do is they claim unemployment for half of the year.
And then work under the table during that unemployment period.
And then they work for half of the year.
And they get basically half the year off with paid government work.
Or as I should say, government subsidizing while they work under the table, taking cash, not paying tax on that.
I was like, you can't find kids, like teenagers who want a summer job?
People who need this as a transitional job?
No. It's actually cheaper to pay for housing for people from South America.
For an entire summer, let's say six months, four to six months, pay for their housing, pay for their lodging, pay for their food.
I don't know what he paid them.
I didn't want to get that far into business.
That's cheaper than trying to find local employment because local employment has no interest in it because it's cheaper to be unemployed in Quebec than it is to work hard for your money.
And Payapal, an immigrant herself, exploiting unskilled labor.
It is modern slavery.
It's modern indentured servitude.
And it's exactly by design.
Democrats are not the only ones guilty of it, but my goodness, they are particularly guilty of saying the quiet part out loud and not hearing themselves.
Thank you, PayPal.
I see her name and I see PayPal.
That's all I can see.
Good morning, everybody.
Afternoon, if we're on the West Coast, the East Coast, which we are.
Good morning, East, West Coast.
Good evening, England, yada, yada, yada.
We've got one heck of a show today because yesterday...
We're going to go over some of the stuff that we saw yesterday on the live stream.
I've clipped some of the highlights.
But we've got a lot to talk about.
Dan Bongino, tapped for Deputy Director of the FBI.
I did a short car vlog on that yesterday.
Robert Barnes, kicking ass, taking names, but unfortunately being the...
You can't beat City Hall, and you sure as hell can't beat communism.
At least not with the courts in a Soviet-style system.
We're going to get to what happened to Barnes yesterday and some stuff that's going on in Canada, meanwhile in Canada.
What I wanted to start with, by the way, was...
I was going to start with this because it's just so flipping glorious.
This is a little bit old, you know, when the fires were going on.
Kamala Harris looking good, looking presidential.
This is after I think she lost.
When is this from?
It's about the California fire, so it has to be a little bit old, but I'm fairly certain this is after she already lost the election.
You want to talk about...
Verbal diarrhea, brain rot.
Like, you will get stupider if you hang around with stupid people, and you'll be brain damaged if you hang around with Kamala for a week.
listen to this through your mind when you see this you're here you're now seeing it up close it's not only seeing it Alex you can smell it you can feel it right so it's seeing it with our eyes and many people have seen it you all are covering it but to literally be on the ground here you can smell the the the The smoke that was here, you can feel the toxicity, frankly, of the environment.
You can feel the energy of all of the folks who are still here on the ground.
Alex, you can smell it.
Stop. If anybody knows where I'm going with this reference, my goodness, good on you.
I heard that, I immediately thought.
Eddie Murphy.
I think this was from Raw back in the You can smell it.
You can smell it.
He's talking about farting in the bathtub, people.
That was the original stand-up videos that we used to see long format.
That might have been delirious.
This might have been delirious.
Hold on, let me see here.
You can smell it.
You can smell it.
I won't be able to tell if it's from Delirious or Raw, but both of those were classics of an era.
Yes, Kamala Harris, you can see it with your eyes.
You can smell it with your nose.
You can hear it with your ears.
And you can touch it with your hands.
And you can feel it with the sixth sense that is the human body.
What an idiot.
I mean, it's like exactly what Trump said.
It's like she's speaking in, like, children's idiot Dr. Seuss rhyme.
The wheels on the bus, they go round and round.
The fire, you can smell it.
You can hear it.
You can feel it.
All right, people, let's get to the show here.
Let me see what's going on.
I should have double-checked that we are live, that we are live cross-platforms.
We're live on Rumble.
We are live on vivabarneslaw.locals.com, and we are live on CommieTube.
Now, before we get too far into the show, I've got to thank our two sponsors of today's episode, The Wellness Company and 1775 Coffee.
Now, hold on a second.
Got to do it like this.
Got to share a screen.
Got to make sure I play the beautiful B-roll video that they've put in the backdrop.
And there we go.
Now, by the way, the wellness company...
Folks, the countdown is on before the new administration exposes the entire pandemic.
We're going to talk about this today coming out of Canada.
Most know a large sum of people's health was negatively impacted by the global coercion that we witnessed.
Whether it's severe side effects or experiencing long COVID, check out this natural solution formulated by Dr. Peter McCullough in collaboration with The Wellness Company.
They just leveled up their original detox formula for $30 less, introducing the 3-in-1 Ultimate Spike Detox, conveniently consolidated into one capsule with four times more...
500 milligrams of bromelain, 500 milligrams of turmeric root extract.
By the way, when I had a sinus infection...
Everyone's telling me to do the turmeric root.
It was actually delicious and worked.
Nataconase, an enzyme research for its anti-clotting effects, may work to break down spike proteins.
Combined with bromelain and curcumin, it provides a potent blend for detoxification and cellular support.
Crafted with 100% natural ingredients, Ultimate Spike Detox is backed by research, offering effective support for your cells, natural repair, and recovery.
Experience the only formula approved and used by Dr. Peter McCullough, a top freedom fighter who risked it all during COVID.
Head over to TWC, the wellnesscompany.health, forward slash Viva.
It gets you 15% off and free shipping.
Again, the code is Viva.
And by the way, just so everybody appreciates, unfortunately, it's not available anywhere else but in the U.S. Available to U.S. residents only, TWC.health, forward slash Viva.
The link is in the description and our second sponsor of the day and our last sponsor of the day.
My personal favorite, it is not too late.
To get in on the chance to win the Tesla Cybertruck, but it might be too late for me to find the flipping...
Oh, here, I didn't have the...
I want to bring up the website so we can see what the coffee looks like while we're talking about 1775coffee.com, people.
Some coffee is weak.
Some coffee is sad.
Some coffee is so bad it probably votes a Democrat or talks like Kamala Harris.
But 1775 coffee is bold, strong.
It's the American first in every single cup.
The dark roast hits harder than a Trump comeback.
The medium roast smooth, no bitterness.
And the vitality mushroom blend fuels your brain like a Trump.
This is coffee that patriots drink, that rumble drinks, and that I drink.
Small farms, small batches, roasted fresh in Miami every week because your coffee should be fresher than a White House press briefing trying to explain the economy.
Whole beans, ground beans, or pods, you can get it all.
Go to 1775coffee.
Use promo code VIVA for 15% off.
Start every morning with a coffee that actually stands for something and tastes flipping delicious.
Remember, every dollar spent enters you in the raffle or whatever it's called, the draw.
To win the Tesla Cybertruck and $30,000 cash.
So go check that out.
1775 Coffee.
Go check that out.
It sounds very Canadian.
Dot com.
Promo code VIVA.
Link is in the description.
All right.
We're going to see what we start with, but it's right after I pick up.
Joe Mascu is in the house and says, VIVA!
So, I watched the sentencing hearing twice.
I couldn't figure out for the life of me how this man in Seattle violated his supposed TRO when he didn't make contact.
I don't understand how the relevant case law justifies his sentencing.
As I told Barnes in a comment, from what I could tell, he was being sentenced for being ugly.
We're going to start with it.
That's the perfect thing to start with because it's an absolute flipping outrage.
So yesterday, short notice by request of the community and because it was one of those rare opportunities where we could actually see Not just the legal system in motion, because we've seen that in a number of cases.
Rittenhouse, the other guy there, Johnny Depp.
You know, we've watched a bunch of cases live.
It's not often, often, it's not often that we get to watch Robert Barnes in action, because Barnes is, I don't know if he's ProHackVice in this case, or if he's licensed to practice in Seattle, Washington.
It's not often we get to see Barnes live in action.
Occasionally, we get to hear him live when he's at the Court of Appeal.
He was there.
I shared the audio.
It was an amazing thing to listen to when he was pleading the Elizabeth Warren, Deborah Holland defamation case for the Covington kids.
It's not very often we get to see Barnes in action and see the court system in action.
What we witnessed yesterday was an absolute freaking outrage.
Now, admittedly also, I had to go back and listen to...
To Barnes' pleadings.
I knew them.
I'm familiar with them.
The facts of this case, and I might make a mistake here or there, the facts of the case is that you've got a guy who is, let's call him a foul person.
I'm saying that not in a judgmental sense.
From a procedural perspective, he's a man who has been declared a vexatious litigant.
In that, you get it up in different jurisdictions, we'll call it a quarrelsome litigator, a vexatious litigator, someone who sues too many people.
He represents pro se, files excessive pleadings, and the court has to say, no, no, no, this is not how we do things, so go get a lawyer, or, you know, cool it, pipe down, or we'll declare you a vexatious pleader, a vexatious litigant, which means you've got to get permission of the court before you can file any further proceedings.
This guy sued a lot of people.
Just let me see here.
His name is Kurt...
Oh, it had the word hoof in it.
Oh, I forget his name now.
Kurt. I want to see how he sued Benzhoff.
Kurt Benzhoff.
Hold on.
So how many people has Kurt Benzhoff sued?
I'm pretty sure it's 70. And so you have this guy suing everybody or suing a lot of people within the judicial system, being declared a vexatious pleader.
So the court is going to hate him.
What he was accused of in this particular case was violating a no contact order with his son.
His son was 12 or 13 at the time.
His son now is 17 from what I understand.
And he was accused of 80 counts of domestic violence.
Understand this, people.
The domestic violence consisting of text messages between him and his son.
Okay. In the court, we listened to the pleadings.
They went through the text messages, and you would not be an unreasonable person for thinking that it was somewhat manipulative.
Not knowing the facts, if you operate on the basis that Ben's hoof is a bad person and the mother is a good person, those would be deemed to be manipulative tweets.
Texts, sorry.
Oh, your mother doesn't love you like I love you.
I need your help in court, but if I do it, the court won't like it, so you do it.
That way they'll receive it better.
This type of correspondence with him and his kid.
His kid was initiating the text messages despite the no contact order, which from what I understand was issued in his absence in another case.
But the 80 counts of domestic violence that they're talking about consisted of him messaging back and forth with his kid.
Whether or not you think it's manipulative, psychological manipulation, I think most of us would agree that it's not domestic violence.
But when they talk about 80 counts of domestic violence in this case, that's what they mean.
Okay, what was the question?
So he allegedly violated the TRO, or it was at least a no-contact order, by corresponding with his son.
The court thinks it was interfering with manipulating, psychologically abusing a child to turn him against his mother.
The court has already declared this guy a vexatious litigant in other circumstances.
And by and large, he's probably not a very pleasant person to hang around or be involved with at a litigation basis.
Okay. What we witnessed yesterday was nothing shy of insanity.
I posted two clips in particular, but we're going to watch one for those who didn't see it yet, which is the judge in this case, Andrea Chin, who, born in California, not native to Seattle, but close to Seattle.
She's been on the bench for a long time.
This is a misdemeanor court.
So this might be criminal or statutory, but it's not a criminal court in the sense of felony.
It's a misdemeanor court.
Where they can, I presume, only issue orders on misdemeanor crimes.
He had already been found guilty.
This was the sentencing on his 80-plus misdemeanors of domestic violence, and I'm putting it in quotes of corresponding with this kid.
They break for a 15-minute period that turned into 40, during which in Cryptus, you know, of our community, de facto Jamie started fielding some questions to, you know...
Keep people entertained while they were waiting for this judge to get back to the bench because nobody knew why she was recessed for 40 minutes when it was supposed to be 15. She comes back to the bench and we find out why she was gone for 40 minutes and it's because she allegedly just found out that she's being sued by the defendant.
Whether or not you believe it, because I don't, she either knew beforehand that she was being sued and pretended she didn't and tried to get away with it or didn't know, found out, and then refuses to recuse herself.
Listen to this.
By the way, before you complain about the audio, it's the court audio.
I can't do anything about it.
I'm just going to jack it up a little bit so we can hear.
The court was made aware that Mr. Benchiff had included me in a federal lawsuit recently.
That's my understanding.
I don't know whether there's services happened, but I was concerned about that and had...
I consulted the State of Washington Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee, and I was referred to Opinion 96.17, which the court found appropriate in this situation.
It indicates the judge should not be disqualified from presiding over a criminal case because the defendant has named the judge as a party in a civil lawsuit.
So even though I've been apparently named in a lawsuit by Mr. Benshoof, that fact has more bearing on my objectivity, my impartiality in this case.
Stop. She allegedly, by the way, I have good reason to believe she's a, I won't use any Lord's name in vain, she's a damn liar.
I have good reason to believe it and I'll tell you in a second.
She alleges that she just found out she's being sued civilly by the defendant she's about to sentence.
Oh, I called my ethics committee and they said, here's a decision that says a judge gets to not recuse herself, even though she's being sued civilly, at the sentencing hearing of the defendant that she's about to sentence.
I'll be fine.
I'll be impartial.
And let's move on to the sentencing.
This is the worst case of domestic violence I've ever seen in my life.
Listen to this.
My decision as far as sentence will be based on the evidence produced at trial.
And all other applicable statutory standards required to be impartially considered and applied in going forward.
So I just want to note that for the record.
Just note for the record, I'm not biased.
I think everyone for their patients, there's quite a bit here.
I have to start out by saying that this had to have been the worst case of Domestic violence abuse that this court has seen.
And granted, this is a Seattle municipal court.
We're not a felony court.
Defense's characterization of the situation, of all the evidence that we heard at this trial, as simply Mr. Benchoof wanting to trade tax with his son.
Oh, well, I cut it off at the wrong part.
This is the worst case of domestic violence abuse she's ever seen.
I don't mean to downgrade or downplay the potential that comes with psychological abuse.
I mean, you know, you wake up a kid, call kids' names.
There's room for psychological abuse within domestic abuse.
This judge, who's been on the bench for decades, is claiming that this is the worst case of domestic violence abuse she's ever seen.
Load of crap.
And then she went on, by the way, to sentence him to literally years in jail.
From what I understand, I think Barnes was clearing it up.
She might have reduced her initial seven-year sentence to two years.
Two years.
Years in jail.
After she finds out allegedly that she's being sued, proceeds to affirm her own independence.
Then goes on to say that this case of a father texting his son, whether or not you think it's manipulative or not, is the worst case of domestic violence abuse she's ever seen.
Yeah, take her at her word when she says she's not biased.
By the way, take her at her word also when she says she didn't know she was getting sued.
Kurt Bansouf filed a lawsuit against Judge Andrea Chin, along with other defendants, on June 7th, 2024.
June to July, August, September, October, November, December, January, February.
That's eight months ago.
Do you know what I will eat?
My underwear, if it didn't happen, if she didn't appear in that case, Ben's hoof, guaranteed being a pro se litigant, would have filed for a judgment by default against her.
Any defendant that doesn't appear, doesn't say, well, I'm going to defend myself, here's my attorney or here's my contact info, you apply for judgment by default.
She was sued eight months ago, and that judge takes a 40-minute recess before sentencing a man to years of prison for texting his son to say, I didn't know I was being sued, but even if I did, I'd be impartial.
I would like to reassert, reaffirm my judicial independence and sentence this man to years in jail because his text messages with his son were the most egregious forms of domestic violence abuse I've ever seen in my career.
Yeah. And if you believe that, I've got a bridge to sell you.
Now, but this was the truly shocking moment where I love it and I love Barnes and I thought he was going to go to jail.
Hold on.
Let me bring it here.
This is it.
This is a moment where I was mildly concerned that Barnes was actually going to go to jail.
Listen to this.
Sorry for the recording quality.
I wanted to have captions on this one, but even the auto-generated captions are pretty crappy here.
I realized that he has the case set for trial next week.
And again, it comes down to the court trying to give Mr. Benshift the benefit of the doubt.
But I can't do that.
And this all started.
But he has proven over and over again.
That he cannot be trusted.
He cannot be trusted.
The vocal fry is really, really annoying.
He can't be trusted.
This is, by the way, in the context of her determining that she's denying bond or bail pending appeal.
He's got a trial next week in another matter.
Ben Suf.
This is a non-violent, despite what she says, misdemeanor that consists of text messages that some people consider to be manipulative.
Text messages, years in jail, and she is denying...
Bail, pending appeal, because this guy can't be trusted, and him being out in the public would be a risk.
The court sat through evidence, listening to everything that had happened, led up to the year-long episode of the underlying facts of this case.
It observed Mr. Dentschoof's outrageous behavior during trial.
And for all those reasons, the court...
It feels like there is a potential danger if he is not remanded into custody today.
Danger. So I understand that you are representing him in the trial starts next week.
However, the court is going to remand Mr. Benshoof into custody today.
Absolutely. The court, after denying him continuous, so you could railroad him at trial, now denying him a chance to, meaning if he participated in this next trial, so you're going to railroad him in that case.
I mean, come on.
Mr. Barnes?
Mr. Barnes?
Mr. Barnes, your objection is noted.
Mr. Benchiff is being taken into custody today.
I moved to disqualify.
I believe this court was being dishonest earlier when it said it was not personally prejudiced.
What the court has said is clear that it is personally prejudiced.
It's not able to put its personal prejudice aside and be impartial.
So I moved to disqualify the court on due process grounds, refuse and reschedule the sentencing hearing with a court that is not compromised by personal bias against the defendant.
Alright, Mr. Barnes, that motion is denied and it's noted.
It's noted.
Denied. I'm so polite.
Okay. All right, I do have- Off with him.
Oh, by the way, was that his trial still going on?
Mr. Bayless, I have the judgment and sentence.
Please let the record reflect that now the court has again removed the defendant from his own receipt.
Well, let's see.
I have the court needed a trial in denial of his rights.
Okay, hang on.
Mr. Bayless can stay.
Maybe I missed something.
Was there a reason he was- We heard the remand of a customer.
Oh, okay.
Can we have him stand by?
Because there are several judgment and sentence forms that the parties are going to need to review.
Appreciate that, by the way.
She didn't want to bring him back for matters of justice.
She wanted to bring him back only because he apparently needed to sign certain documents or read certain documents as relates to his sentencing.
So Barnes up there, risking imprisonment because that was borderline.
I think that judge was a little bit...
On her heels because I think she recognized how wrong what she was doing was.
Okay, that's nice.
I've heard you.
Your motion is denied.
We're taking him into custody now.
We know that he's got a trial next week, but tough noogies.
He should have thought about that before he sued me eight months ago and then I pretended I didn't know about it.
That's his problem, not mine.
And then to remove him from the courtroom of his own trial after he's been sentenced.
But keep him close by because we need him to sign some papers before we throw him in jail.
So that is the commie hellhole that is Seattle, that is Washington.
Stay the hell out because you won't be safe there, period.
And I know some of you say, oh, you're never...
Look, I have the discussion with Dexter Taylor all the time, why he stayed in New York to be arrested, convicted, sentenced to a decade in jail for exercising his Second Amendment rights.
And he says, look, communism knows no bounds.
I'm like, yep, but you can certainly fight communism more effectively when you're not in jail in a commie hellhole.
So that's what Barnes did yesterday.
I haven't been able to speak to him yet.
I know that he's going to have one hell of a rant when he gets back on Locals and gets back on the internet.
But that's it.
Ben Souf has now been sentenced to what I understand is two years in jail.
A little less, a little more, whatever.
But the judge came down from seven, so good for her.
And that's the system.
Stay the hell out of it at all costs.
Barbisa Arians is present and unaccountable.
I presume she's talking about the judge and I can't disagree with that much.
Jameson2012 says, Locals Community New Task.
Locals Community New Task.
How about we make a collection of letters to Andrea Chin and publish them on Kindle?
No threats in the letters.
Target her reputation is the only thing we can do.
I just spread the truth.
She should be proud of her decision.
She should be proud of what she's done there.
And if she lied, she should be put on absolute blast.
She didn't know that she was being sued?
Grok knew.
Let me see here.
When did Andrea Chin accept service of Ben Hoof's...
Let's see if we can...
Let's see if this actually gives us an answer.
I don't think this is possibly going to give us an answer.
But it's like, it's demonstrable.
It's easily verifiable when she accepted service for it, when she began to represent herself in it.
Either through counsel or personally.
There is zero chance she was not aware of that lawsuit.
And she probably didn't disclose it for a certain period of time.
It became known.
She then has to go call the Ethics Committee.
Real rush-like.
How the hell do I get myself out of matters on this?
Court records do not publicly detail the service date for the Judge Chin.
Specifically, no updates from the docket explicitly confirm whether or not she was served.
Posts on X from February 2025 suggest during the court proceedings Judge Chin claimed to be unaware.
Oh, look at that.
It's got my own post.
I've made it into Grok, people.
However, this anecdotal and inconclusive without official documentation.
Given the standard legal procedures, service likely occurred sometime between the filing on June 7th and February 2025 when the issue surfaced in court without access to the sealed or non-public service records.
The exact date remains unclear.
For a precise answer, you could consult the PACER system.
Okay. We'll find out.
That's what the internet's for.
Oh, lordy, lordy, lordy.
Everybody. How's it going?
What do we do here?
Do we have the link?
Everyone should move their butts on over to Rumble or VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
But we'll take a couple of more subject matters here before we migrate here.
Link to Rumble here.
And I'll give you the link to locals as well for anybody who wants to come over there.
Link to Locals.
There's a lot of titles.
I got bad fingers.
Okay, what else do we do that's going to be fun?
Oh, there's so much.
There's so much.
Okay, we got the court.
The internet is good for everything.
And news breaks.
You got to double check.
You got to look into things.
And as Encryptus is in the back, we'll see if the aggregate knowledge of our Locals community, of Encryptus' massively successful AI...
Programming stuff, which we're going to come to in the second half of the show over on Rumble.
Let's see what people can determine about this.
Do you remember Whitehouse?
Sheldon Whitehouse?
He was that scumbag POS during the confirmation hearings, railing against Tulsi Gabbard, railing against Cash Patel, railing against RFK Jr.
I don't actually remember which ones.
I just remember seeing his ugly, sniveling little face.
It's like, this guy's a real piece of crap.
I have to go check my tweets on this.
Apparently... According to Libs of TikTok, who doesn't bat 100, nobody does, but pretty consistent, bombshell.
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat from Rhode Island, backed legislation that funneled millions to his wife's environmental non-profit, Ocean Conservancy.
She's been paid nearly $2.7 million while the group raked in $14.2 million plus in federal grants funded by bills Whitehouse voted for.
Now an ethics watchdog is calling for an investigation into this blatant corruption.
And we got page one here of fact.
Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust.
I like that.
This is February 24th.
To Sheldon Whitehouse.
Dear Senator Lankford, Senator Coons, the Foundation for Accountability is a non-profit organization dedicated to promoting accountability and ethics, yada, yada, yada.
We request the Senate Select Committee on Ethics investigate Sheldon Whitehouse to determine whether he violated the Senate ethics rules on conflicts of interest.
Facts. Senator Whitehouse's wife, Sandra Whitehouse, has worked for the advocacy group Ocean Conservancy since 2008.
According to tax filings, Ocean Conservancy has paid Sandra Whitehouse, through her consulting firm, a lot of money.
How much was it?
In 2008, since 2008, Ocean Conservancy has been awarded 19 government grants with approximately $14.2 million.
However, nearly half of this $14 million was given to the group in the fall of 2024 alone, all of which Senator Whitehouse directly voted for.
In September 2024, Ocean Conservancy received $5.2 million in federal grant from the National Oceanic, and it goes on.
So let's just go like this.
Ocean Conservancy, Whitehouse.
We're going to get the complaint.
Okay, but what I want to see is...
It's amazing.
It's amazing.
Ocean Conservancy.
White House.
Let's see.
Board. There are some links in the chat.
Whose voice was that?
Hold on.
Links in the chat.
Now I've got to go back to the window.
Oh, I can probably take this out here.
Let's go see.
In the private chat?
In Cryptos?
Yes. Ocean Conservancy.
Here we go.
Look at this.
Let's bring this up.
And see what it has to say.
By the way, I'm inclined to believe it, but we must give everyone the benefit of the doubt.
Ocean Conservancy statement.
Okay, I don't know if this is going to get us.
Hold on, press release in the media.
This is where you want to go.
In the news, experts.
Let's just see here.
Well, we're not finding White House.
Ah, we'll find it later.
Bottom line, there is...
Virtually little doubt that these scumbag scoundrels who are so objecting to what's going on are not personally involved with and personally benefiting from what has been the darkness of non-disclosure.
Okay, last one before we head on over to Rumble.
Another idiot being an idiot.
Complaining about downsizing of government.
Set aside whether or not it's direct corruption.
It's either direct corruption or just...
Egregious stupidity.
This is...
What's his name?
Hold on, hold on.
This is Joshua Cole lamenting the downsizing of the federal government, that he's from a district that is the leading percentage of federal employees.
And my goodness, if they fire all the employees, well, then who's going to defend the rest of them?
Listen to this, by the way, because he also mangles the World War II era poem.
Idiot. I think it's also very key.
I think I'm the only one up here that represents the 7th Congressional District.
And what is very interesting is a recent report came out that said the 7th Congressional District had the highest concentration of federal workers out of any other congressional district in the entire United States.
And so I'm very much interested to hear.
We've heard...
Pause. What were his exact words?
They have the highest...
The highest concentration of federal workers out of any other congressional district in the entire United States.
Congratulations, you're part of the problem.
We talked about this with Barnes.
They have the highest concentration of federal workers.
So you think they're going to be against cutting federal spending or at least downsizing the federal government?
Of course, that's what you call the audience capture.
That's what you call the corrupt capture.
You get everybody dependent on you so they can never vote you out of power because if they do, they're going to lose their jobs.
That is one surefire way of making sure you have their votes forever.
And so I'm very much interested to hear, we've heard Delegates Thomas talk about housing.
And I remember being here in 2020 when we had a deal with the pandemic.
The difference between then and now is we had extra money coming in.
We're not going to have extra money coming in.
We're actually going to be losing money over this situation.
I'm very much interested in how the loss of that money, of federal income, is going to impact our communities.
I also noted that Spotsylvania County, where I represent, is in the top five counties that receives federal funding.
We are about to attend a ribbon-cutting ceremony for a brand-new VA hospital next week and how these cuts are going to impact our veterans.
And Mr. Chair, I must say that I have seen so many different people on social media excited about these cuts.
Rather excited about these job losses.
Excited about cuts and excited about job losses are two different things.
There will be some either growing pains or shrinking pains necessarily, but let's just hear where you're going to go with this, Joshua Cole, because I'm interested.
You're leading me into a nice place.
This is going to be a very poignant, deep thought that you're going to issue right now.
I mean, that reminds me of a quote from a long time ago that said, at first they came for the Jews and I didn't speak up because I wasn't Jewish.
Then they came for the trade unionists and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.
And then when they came for me, there was no one to speak up because everyone had been taken.
And so I think what's very interesting is that these job cuts and these cuts are not just impacting people with federal jobs, but all across the board, people are going to be feeling the hurt.
And we have to make sure we're doing what we can within the power that we have to do that.
We can pause it there so that we spare ourselves some brain cells.
Many of you know what he's talking about, despite his best effort to mangle that as badly as humanly possible.
It was by Pastor Martin Niemüller.
First they came.
First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out because I was not a communist.
Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me, and there was no one left to speak out for me.
I think the only problem with the come with...
You're not going to get much sympathy for communists these days, especially seeing what the commies do to society.
But way to mangle the poem, Cole, and way to bastardize...
I'm surprised they haven't called it yet a federal Holocaust layoff.
What do they do?
They've already exploited for political profit the big lie, the big lie, which was a Nazi trope.
To talk about the Jews.
They've already used that one for political purposes.
Why don't they just call this like a federal worker layoff holocaust?
See, they're halfway there.
And I wouldn't put it past them to get there.
But congratulations on analogizing a downsizing of the federal government to the holocaust.
You're an idiot and you deserve everything you get in life.
All right.
With that said, people, now we're going to migrate.
Oh, we got a new subscriber.
Jatis? Jatis?
Jatis? I love looking at a name and thinking of all the different ways to pronounce it.
Here we can go with Jadis, Jadis, Jatis, Jatis, Jatis, Jatis, or it could be a silent J and it could just be Adis, and then all of the other iterations.
Welcome to the community.
You will enjoy being here.
We got Garvin from our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community.
Will you continue to livestream Barnes in court?
Every time I can, for sure.
It's just that it doesn't happen very often.
But for sure we will.
But now speaking of...
Speaking of idiot government, we should probably go to Canada.
If you've seen my vlog from earlier today, it will not be surprising to you, but we've got to watch this.
So I'm going to start playing it, and I'm going to cut it halfway, so it's going to piss everybody off who doesn't come over to Rumble.
Come on over to Rumble and watch the...
I'm going to actually...
No, no, I'll play this one here.
We're going to play this one as we migrate over.
Julie Kelly, here we go.
These are the people that are losing their jobs, by the way.
These are the people that are losing their jobs in the federal employment, and these are the people that are losing their jobs in the media in terms of reporting on them.
And as far as I'm concerned, they both deserve to lose their jobs.
It's going to stop halfway, people, so come on over to Rumble, but enjoy this.
The Justice Department is under attack.
Coming after the people that want to uphold the laws that exist.
And that should be terrifying to everyone.
That should be terrifying to everyone.
And look at the side eye.
Like AOC.
I'm convinced it's a sign of someone being deceitful.
That should terrify everyone.
Were federal prosecutors on the Justice Department's biggest investigation, the attack on the Capitol, until they were fired by the Trump administration January 31st.
That was their biggest investigation.
I'm sorry, we're migrating it over now, but come on over with the rest of this.
That was their biggest investigation.
January 6th.
I'm sorry.
Are there not 300,000 missing children in America that are being trafficked?
Is there not?
Criminal cartels coming over the border?
Is there not an opioid fentanyl crisis in America?
No. January 6th was the biggest investigation.
That, in and of itself, they say it, like, it's like the line from The Big Short.
I feel like Steve Carell.
Like, why are they confessing to their crimes?
They're not confessing.
They're bragging.
Their biggest investigation is January 6th.
Not human trafficking.
Not the sex trade.
Not child exploitation.
Not child sexual abuse material on the internet.
Not fentanyl trafficking.
Not illegal immigration.
January 6th.
And these idiots want their jobs.
Why were you fired?
Because I did my job.
I mean, it's really that simple.
It's that simple.
I went in.
I followed the facts.
I followed the law.
And I got fired because I did exactly what I was supposed to do.
I did what I was told.
I was just following rules.
I'm sorry, sir.
This is like after Nuremberg trials.
Why did you get hanged?
For doing my job.
Really? I was following the rules.
I was following the orders.
And now they're hanging me just because I did what I was told.
Just because I did my job.
You're damn right.
You're damn right.
What you did, I have no doubt that you were following the instructions.
What you did was weaponize every aspect of the government against political adversaries, thereby discrediting the system and causing irreparable harm to the country.
Harm that Cash Patel and Dan Bongino will undo for doing my job.
I was just doing my job.
Don't get mad at me.
No, my fault.
I locked up Jake Lang for four years, pre-trial denied bail.
I think we know what we did was right.
No regrets.
Absolutely none.
What we did was justice.
Justice for 140 police officers.
Wounded January 6, 2021.
Levine and Brennan were hired about a year and a half ago to prosecute cases from the riot.
So, hold on.
Understand this, by the way.
I've just pieced this together as we're listening to it.
They were hired to investigate Jan 6. They actually brought on more people to further weaponize the FBI, the DOJ.
Because they didn't have enough people on staff.
So they brought on these newbies who have barely been there for a year and they're bitching that they lost their job.
And in how many of your cases was the defendant acquitted?
None. None.
Which tells you what?
The evidence was overwhelming.
Overwhelming. The evidence was overwhelming.
You know where else they have 100% conviction rate?
You stupid jackasses.
North Korea.
Probably Russia.
Probably China.
Oh, what does it tell you?
It doesn't tell you that the jury pool was biased.
It doesn't tell you that you were dealing with unfair prosecution.
It doesn't tell you that you were violating the rules of Brady violations, disclosure of evidence.
No, no.
It tells you that they were guilty.
The fact that we, our system, convicted them after we, our system, prosecuted them, after we, our system, concealed the evidence from them, that's evidence of their guilt, not evidence of corruption.
These people...
They deserve to lose their jobs.
I'll adopt the Mark Twain expression.
I've never wished a man dead, but I've read many...
Cripe, what's it called when people die?
I've read many an obituary with delight.
There will not be justice, these idiots.
We were just doing our job.
You ruined people's lives, you drove people to suicide, you stole years of people's lives, and you got paid for it, and now you're complaining?
Why are they confessing?
They're not confessing.
We had a 100% conviction rate.
You think we're confessing to corruption?
No, we're taking pride in what we did.
Verwhelming. But last month, the president pardoned even the most violent convicts, whom he calls by another name.
So this is January 6th.
These are the hostages.
Approximately 1,500 for a pardon.
Not long after the ink was dry, letters of termination hit the Justice Department.
The letters rewrote history, calling the prosecution itself, in the words of the president, a grave national injustice.
I would love to have a discussion with these two people.
Did you violate any rules of procedure, any constitutional rules, any jurisdictional rules, any venue rules?
Were the penalties commensurate to the crime?
Did you treat the BLM protesters, even if we can equate the two of them, which I don't think we can, did you treat them similarly?
It's gonna be a big fat yes, yes, yes, yes, no.
Anyone who has watched videos of what happened on January 6th.
This is a two-minute clip and they have to reuse the same clip twice because that's how few videos they have of actual bona fide violence perpetrated by the people assuming that you think this was not the reaction to police abuse.
It's a two-minute clip.
They've used this same video twice.
Knows that the grave of national injustice was not the decision to prosecute the rioters.
The grave of national injustice has been the Department of Justice turning its back on those law enforcement officers, those members of Congress, and all of those victims who were affected.
Am fact, Dan.
Well, I hope you get prosecuted, sir.
I hope that Kash Patel, with his second in command...
Dan Bongino, prosecute both of your asses.
Give myself chest pains.
That would be ironic.
Oh, lordy, lordy.
So yeah.
Bongino, Deputy Director of the FBI.
It was...
First of all, I'm glad the chat wasn't too pissed off about it yesterday during the interview with Jana London, which was amazing.
It's always the risk of doing an interview that's unrelated to...
Possibly the most breaking piece of news in the day, which was Dan Bongino accepting the position as deputy director of the FBI, second only to the director of the FBI, Kash Patel.
I hope that both of them, I won't say prosecute, I hope they investigate, and I hope they find evidence, which I'm sure they have, but although, from what I understand, people within the FBI are in digital deletion mode, shredding documents mode.
I hope that they find the evidence of Constitutional rights violations, civil rights violations, failure to disclosure.
I hope they find evidence of that and actually prosecute, at the very least, some of the higher-up FBI agents, DOJ employees who perpetrated that.
It happened.
It's not a question of if, why, when.
It happened.
I'm just out of curiosity, was that incident before or after the video, after they shot, after Michael Byrd summarily executed Ashley Babbitt?
Was it before or after they beat and trampled Roseanne Boylan and then tried to blame her death on a drug overdose?
Was it before or after they launched concussive grenades and rubber bullets into the crowd and blew the cheeks off people?
I was not...
I was not judgmental, but I was skeptical of Jake Lang's initial, not protest of his innocence, but assertion of the legitimacy of what he did.
I was skeptical at the beginning.
I'm not skeptical anymore.
I'm sitting there.
I watched them strike Roseanne Boylan.
She dies within my vicinity, if not in my hands.
You're damn right.
When he said that the bat materialized, and I was like, oh, this guy's just covering up for his own criminality.
Never had an incident?
Never had a run-in with the law before that?
And you witnessed something like that?
But yeah, let's go.
Let's see what...
Dan Bongino.
Extensive, extensive history.
Did you guys see this picture of Dan Bongino and Hillary Clinton?
It's a real picture.
I had to double-check before including it in the vlog.
Bongino has been in the industry since 95. Police officer, NYPD, Secret Service.
Best-selling author, badass extraordinaire, knows what he's talking about, and now he's going to be the deputy director of the FBI.
The amazing thing is, I feel like I'm so dense sometimes, I don't even put two and two together.
I DM him and was like, are you going to have to abandon?
Are you going to have to give up your show?
I didn't even think about it, but I'm reading these comments.
I'm like, well, we're going to miss him on the internet.
I was like, well, oh shit, he's going to have to give up his show, at least temporarily while serving.
The stories that he's going to come back with, the experience that he's going to come back with, is going to be the next foundation on the high rise of a structure that he's currently building, that is his life story.
He'll come back with more experience, he'll come back with more stories, more insights, and rebuild, revive the Bongino show better than ever.
But in the interim, I don't know this for a fact, I'm fairly certain.
Let's see what the internet says.
Dan Bongino Net Worth.
Dan Bongino doesn't need the money.
He's an early shareholder in Rumble, from what I understand.
I think these are all publicly...
I learned this from him.
He doesn't need the money.
He doesn't need the adulation.
But it's not superficial to say everybody wants to make money.
They want to...
Get remunerated for the value that they bring to the world, and they like to get recognized for the value that they bring to the world.
This is myself as well.
He's, for the time being, setting aside a project he's been building for years.
The revenue that that brings, because it's probably a very lucrative...
He's got a big team, so with the bigger the machine, the greater the revenue, but it's not directly correlated to what Dan takes at the end of the day.
He doesn't need the money, but everybody likes getting paid for what they're worth.
He's setting aside his life project now so that he can go serve his country.
And for some people, I always say this about judges.
A judge gets paid $270,000 a year, at least in Canada.
That's a lot of money.
That's a step up from a great many lawyers.
It's a step down for a great many lawyers.
You're a senior partner at a big law firm.
You're making millions of dollars a year.
The idea that you would give that up to become a judge...
Not every successful lawyer would do that because it's a wild financial reduction.
And so typically what ends up happening, and we can see this sort of in a Biden administration, is you tap people for whom it's going to be a step up, a salary increase to go be deputy director of the FBI.
And you don't necessarily tap the most skilled people on earth.
Dan Bongino is going to take a pay cut.
He's going to have to put his life project on hold to serve country.
And that's how you know you're going to get a dedicated...
Civil servant out of Dan Bongino, and one who is perhaps the most well-equipped to do it on Earth.
You go to the Biden administration, flip side.
You get Nina Jankiewicz, who's probably getting a pay raise by becoming the disinformation czar.
That dude, Matt Damon, lookalike with the lipstick and the Hitler stash.
Probably got a pay raise to go do whatever the hell he did, but it wasn't enough of a pay raise.
He still needs to steal people's luggage at airports.
So Dan Bongino is making a sacrifice.
It is an amazing sacrifice.
His audience will undoubtedly understand, and they will wait with bated breath for him to return to the sphere of media commentary.
And in the meantime, they are going to relish in him making America great again.
And that is all I have to say about that.
What was the Kurt Benzhoof sentence yesterday?
I couldn't piece it together.
I believe it was...
At least, well, he was getting like one year less a day because I think that's the maximum for misdemeanor sentencing.
And he was getting time served on each of those.
So it ended up being years, but it was multiple one year less a day, 364 days with like 159 days credit.
And it was multiple of them.
To be served consecutively, not concurrently.
So one after the other.
So 159 days, another 159 days, four or five times.
So I think he got a couple of years.
And that was the sentence because the judge is a commie POS who's corrupt as the day is long and is now going to be put on blast and people will be able to verify her public statement from the bench that she didn't know that she got served with a civil suit and that she didn't have to recuse herself.
All right.
Did I miss anything over on Commitube?
Oh, you know what I forgot to do on Commitube?
This. I've got to end the stream because otherwise it's just a...
Page of green for an extended period of time.
And then we're going to get to Canada, people.
Meanwhile in Canada, the tide is changing and rising in America.
And they do say the rising tide lifts all ships.
Well, not the ones that are anchored to the ground.
And you've got a lot of ships up in Canada that are anchored to the ground, and they're going to get destroyed by the rising tide.
But before we do that, I just noticed King of Biltong in the house.
Here we go.
Bada bing, bada boom.
King of Biltong says, Biltong is...
I'm gonna...
Anton, I'm gonna change this a little bit just because I don't want to get accused of giving false medical advice.
Biltong is your anecdote against veganism.
Oh, I get it.
Okay, fine.
It's a metaphorical vaccine.
Biltong is your vaccine against veganism.
It's packed with B12, creatine, iron, zinc, and much, much more.
Get yourself some at BiltongUSA.com.
Code Viva for 10% off.
I get sidetracked easily, says the silver wizard won.
Who does?
Me? I don't get sidetracked.
Look at the ducks over there.
Holy cow.
Did you guys see that vlog this morning?
I saw ducks.
Bill Tong, thank you very much.
Back to Canada now.
I want to bring this one up.
So I had Ruby Dalla on Saturday.
Ruby Dalla is the soon-to-be former member of the Liberal Party who was disqualified from the leadership race of the Liberal Party of Canada.
Government's been prorogued.
What's his face?
Trudeau said he's resigning after a replacement is chosen after a robust national leadership race of the Liberal Party.
And it's such a robust leadership race that they're disqualifying the people that they don't want running or attending the debates.
If you haven't seen, I didn't see all of it.
I just saw some clips, one of which we're going to look at.
Yesterday and tonight was the leadership debate.
The debate of the contending...
Potential leaders of the Liberal Party of Canada.
Chrystia Freeland put up such a monumental soundbite viral video.
We're going to watch it.
But Ruby Dalla, born in Winnipeg, parents from India, soon to be former liberal, was disqualified from running because they said she took some, you know, took payments from foreign companies.
They unanimously decided that she had some election campaign finance violations that warranted unanimous disqualification from The liberal leadership race.
So it's not going to be so robust and it's not going to be so national.
She came on the channel Saturday, shocked, surprised that she did.
And we had a great discussion.
And I think people watch that saying she's got to be the most authentic looking phony liberal because there can be no liberal who's actually mildly sensible as Ruby Dalla appears to be.
I happen to think that the reason why they disqualified her from the race had nothing to do with any bona fide campaign finance violations, but because she wants to challenge the Liberal Party on these core tenets, which are open borders, soft on crime, allow all drugs, etc., etc.
Ruby Dalla apparently wants to deport illegal immigrants, wants to be tough on crime, and tough on illegal drugs.
It's the antithesis of the Liberal Party.
She was disqualified.
And she gave us a...
Update yesterday.
Appeal denied.
I'll do it in French so I can impress you guys.
Ma campagne à la chefferie visait à rendre la partie à ses militants My campaign to be the chief, the head of the party, was to Oh, to take it away from the militants and re-center it.
I was disqualified.
I denounced this decision, this arbitrary, whatever.
My appeal denied.
My leadership campaign was to put back in the hands of the grassroots and bring the party back to the center with progressive policies that would deliver results.
I was disqualified.
My appeal to the establishment was to fight for the millions of Canadians who believe in democracy, free speech, and fair elections.
The appeal was denied.
This is not the end, but the new beginning of a new movement of truth, to which I had to astutely observe.
You have exactly one move left, Ruby.
Burn the fucking corrupt party to the ground.
Period. You want to talk about who knows where the skeletons are?
You imagine, by the way, in a party of liberals where the biggest scandals they have are ethics violations, conflict of interests, theft, sexual assault.
That's what the Liberal Party is.
The worst they ever had on her was that she had two nannies in 2009 who complained about being underpaid and overworked.
The woman might actually be a reasonable Liberal, which is going to be a Conservative now.
If the Conservative Party has half an ounce of intellect to it, they will recruit Ruby Dalla.
And they'll pull away a bunch of Liberal voters to the Conservative Party.
And plus, Ruby actually seems to be a little bit more Conservative than some of the members of the Conservative Party.
So she was disqualified.
Burn the party to the ground.
Now you know what to do.
Burn it down.
Burn them all.
That's what she has to do.
Whether or not she does it, we'll see.
Maybe I'll invite her back on and hopefully she'll come back on.
But the highlight of all highlights came by way of the debate yesterday.
And it was...
I can't even find it now.
Oh, cripe almighty.
Where was it?
Christopher Freeland.
No, no, no.
I want to get this out.
We have to see the video.
I know that Rebel News put it up.
Okay, hold on.
So the Rebel News, is it the one here?
There we go.
This is it right here.
Do you remember when Kang and Kodos were running for president or whatever, governor in The Simpsons?
I used to be a baseball.
Listen, listen to this, and I will preface this.
Alex, I will take things that never happened for $800, courtesy of the gnome from the movie Don't Look Now, with Donald Sutherland from the 70s.
A few weeks ago, in Saskatoon, I met a little four-year-old girl.
She asked me whether I could prevent Trump from invading our country.
And that's why I am standing to lead the Liberal Party and to become the next Prime Minister of Canada.
Trump represents the greatest threat to Canada since World War II.
He is threatening us with an economic war.
And that's nothing new.
The last time that he was president, he threatened us too.
At the end of the day, I succeeded in protecting our economy.
But this time, Trump's threats are worse.
He wants to turn Canada into the 51st state, and it's no joke.
That is why he is supporting Vladimir Putin's criminal attempt to redraw Ukraine's borders.
Trump wants to redraw our borders, too.
We need a leader who understands the seriousness of these challenges and how to face them.
A leader that can respond and defend everyone in our wonderful country.
I will fight for us.
I will fight for Canada.
And together, we will win.
I made a little montage of this here.
A few weeks ago, in Saskatoon.
I met a little four-year-old girl.
She asked me whether I could prevent Trump from invading our country.
And that's why I am standing to leave the liberal...
It doesn't work as well as the one with Kamala Harris, and I think it's because it's dubbed over.
Can you believe that this psycho biatch...
Wants to pretend that a four-year-old girl in Saskatoon came up to her and said, what can I do to prevent Donald Trump from invading Canada?
This is one of those situations where they're damned if it happened and they're damned if it didn't.
First of all, it didn't happen.
There is no four-year-old girl on this earth that's coming up to Chrystia Freeland, Nazi supporter extraordinaire, and saying, I'm scared.
Is there anything you can do to help Trump not invade Canada?
It never happened.
And if it did happen, the only reason a four-year-old would have been so bloody indoctrinated with that fear-mongering bullshit to have that thought in the first place is because you are terrorizing children.
You're terrorizing vulnerable people with 24-7 fear-mongering to get them to believe absolute absurd horse shit.
Like, it's not normal that a four-year-old kid would have political fears.
Period. Unless their parents run around all day saying, Donald Trump's invading!
Donald Trump's invading!
Oh my god!
Then you get a kid who's freaking out because they have parents who are indoctrinating them with fear-mongering rubbish.
There was a story a couple weeks ago of an 11-year-old girl who apparently took her own life because she was being bullied at school or fearing that she was going to be deported.
That her and her family were going to be deported.
And the article was running with this story as if it's an example about the abuse of bullying from the right where I read it and I'm like, this is what happens when adults terrorize psychologically vulnerable children.
Donald Trump's going to deport even the nonviolent immigrants and you get an 11-year-old kid who thinks her family might be illegal or her family might be illegal who then self-harms.
Because she's been brainwashed into thinking that this is an actual real fear, imminent fear that's going to happen any day now.
I was watching cartoons, and they have climate crisis cartoons instilling terror in children as regular broadcasting.
And then you get kids, like Jana London talked about yesterday, growing up, terrified to have kids, thinking they won't be able to have kids, they won't be able to have a good life because they're going to destroy the environment by doing it.
This is adults abusing children.
So Chrystia Freeland...
If it happened, congratulations, you are a child abuser.
And it didn't happen, you're just a liar.
But meanwhile in Canada, speaking of what's going on in Canada.
Here, let's bring this up here.
Do you remember Nova Scotia?
Nova Scotia is that province that, actually before we get into that, just to refresh your memory.
Nova Scotia is the province that banned outdoor protests against COVID measures because of the alleged public emergency health risk.
So this is the province that is the leading, cutting-edge, avant-garde of constitutional violations back in the summer of 2021.
They banned outdoor protests against the COVID restrictions on the basis that it was a public health emergency, overturned obviously by the Court of Appeal.
Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, this is back in 2021, highly critical of 2021 injunction to prevent protests against COVID-19 vaccines.
The decision released Wednesday, what year was this?
2022.
No, the province can apply for it.
It's not the province's fault for applying for something stupid, politically motivated, judicially unwarranted.
It's the court's problem for having issued it.
Nova Scotia's high school.
This is old stuff.
They said the Liberal government went too far in its efforts to contain anti-vaccine protests in May last year.
The decision released Wednesday said the province should not have applied.
An ex parte injunction and a lower court order should not have granted such a sweeping measure.
Ex parte.
They couldn't even have the parties represent themselves.
They had to do it.
It was such an emergency to prevent an outdoor protest against the COVID measures.
They had to do it ex parte in the absence of the defendant.
Get an order enjoining them from exercising their constitutional rights.
To free, peaceful assembly.
Alright, well, they're back in the news.
Here, hold on a second.
Dude, I just had it.
The absolute state of Canada?
No. Meanwhile in Nova Scotia.
Here we go.
What are they doing now, guys?
It's amazing.
Your access, your Freedom to Information Act, whatever it's called in Canada.
Freedom of Information and Privacy Act.
You might not have that much freedom to information anymore and it might not be that accessible because Nova Scotia...
And Canada will soon follow.
Wants to deny, quote, vexatious information requests.
See, it's the same tactic over and over again.
Vexatious litigant?
Bar him from pleading and lock him up for years.
Oh, what's that?
You're asking for all of Teresa Tam's emails from 2019?
I don't know, man.
That seems kind of vexatious.
What does that even mean?
Well, what are you going to do with it?
You're going to criticize Teresa Tam or are you going to praise her?
Are you going to criticize the government of Nova Scotia for these documents that you're requesting?
Are you going to praise them?
Is it going to reveal our internal corruption?
Yeah, it might.
Okay, well, we're not going to give it to you.
Why? Because it's vexatious.
The province introduced changes to the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act in Surprise Bill.
Listen to this.
After once promising to give Nova Scotia's Information and Privacy Commission the power to enforce decisions, the Houston government, that's the premier, what's his name again?
Tim Houston.
He's blindsided the office and its supporters by announcing major changes under a new omnibus bill.
Just slip it into a big, fat, disgusting bill.
It's led some experts to question the province's commitment to access information.
The proposed amendment of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Protection Act, Protection of Privacy Act, will allow public bodies to refuse applications that are, quote, trivial, frivolous, or vexatious.
Requests that are deemed repetitive, excessively broad, So you gotta know what it is you're looking for before you know exactly what it is that you're looking for.
Or not made in good faith could also be denied.
You know, it's an amazing thing, like I said in my video, Canadian politicians are trying to pretend that Trump is the biggest threat to Canada while they single-handedly, or I guess multi-handedly, hand-in-hand, reign in communist tyranny in Canada.
So, yeah.
Trump is not the threat to Canada.
Chrystia Freeland is.
The provincial governments are.
The federal government is.
Theresa Tam is.
But it's very nice to have a manufactured boogeyman so that that four-year-old kid says, instead of saying, why don't I have a doctor?
Why are people dying in the ERs?
Why is Canada killing a record amount of people?
Why is government-sanctioned murder?
Top five leading causes of death in Canada.
Why can't I know what the government was doing with me, testing on me throughout the last four years?
No, instead of asking those questions, they're asking, how can we prevent Donald Trump from invading Canada?
Because that little Timmy, little Jimmy, little Ari is where your problems lie.
All right, let's go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com and see what's going on here.
Sammy says, is there two from Sammy?
Start up with Joe Maskew says, so Viva Fry, I watched the sentencing hearing twice, can't figure out for the life of me how this man...
In Seattle, violated the supposed TRO.
Okay, I got this one earlier.
Jameson says, locals community, new task about we make a collection of letters to Andrea Chin.
I got that.
Will you continue to live stream Barnes& Court?
Garvin, yes, I will.
And Sammy says, and then she looked up at me and said, freedom, my fellow Canadians, that little girl was Kamala Harris.
And it 100% actually happened.
Seriously, it did.
LOL. What do I have in the backdrop?
I'm going to save some stuff for our Locals after party.
We got the IRS.
Yeah, we'll talk about that one over in Locals.
I want to play Dan Bongino's video.
It was in my video from yesterday, but listen to this.
I never got in this for the money or notoriety.
Listen, I enjoy making money.
That I can impact people's lives and that people come out and say nice things to me as much as the next guy.
But if you think that's why I got involved in this, running as a Republican in deep blue Maryland.
What did I just do here?
My life of activism and my time in the Secret Service.
If you think I get in the Secret Service to get rich, then you don't know me and you haven't seen the government salary scale.
But I am going in this clear-eyed.
The vision of President Trump, Attorney General Bondi, and Director Patel, I am going to do my job to implement that vision.
And I can tell you right now, we are going to try our best.
Every single thing I have in me, every single strand of DNA cell in my body is going to be dedicated towards keeping this homeland safe, no matter what.
No matter what.
That's my job.
We're going to reestablish faith in this institution.
The good people there doing their job, hitting the streets, developing sources, will have your back.
We are going to reestablish faith in this institution.
The FBI belongs to the American people.
It doesn't belong to me.
It doesn't belong to anyone else but the American people.
But this is the honor of a lifetime, and it's a serious mission.
And I plan on implementing that vision.
Okay, we'll stop it there because he talks about respect for the Constitution.
It's amazing.
Alright, let me go over to Rumble and see what the chat is saying over here.
You can't just say to people, your government is trying to kill controlists.
You gotta lead them to that conclusion.
Says Kenzie67.
What else we got here?
Even with makeup on, you can't make...
Sorry. I was going to comment that she did dull herself up for this debate and it still didn't work.
Communists are trying to destroy and then recreate in their fantasy image, says Hoser777.
Canada kills over 11,000 people per year, says Jairi Sulci.
It's much more than that.
In 2024, 2023, fairly certain it was 17,000.
What was the latest euthanasia stats out of Canada?
It was 17,512 I want to say in 2023.
2023 is 15,343.
The most recent official statistics for euthanasia in Canada came on the 5th Annual Report on Medical Assistance in Dying, released by Health Canada for 2023.
According to this report, there were 15,343 MAID provisions in 2023, accounting for 4.7% of all deaths in the country.
This represents a 15.8% increase.
By the way, that's 15,343 of the ones that they report.
The number is wildly higher than that.
And that's it.
Okay, people, we're going to take the party on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Thank you all for being here.
So tomorrow I will have a live.
I will be live with the unusual suspects as well.
This afternoon, 4.30, I'm going to be on with Joel Oltman on Tina Peter's channel to discuss, keep that channel alive.
I think it's 7.50 tonight.
I think I've got a five or ten minute live bit with Rebel News, who's going to be watching the Canadian...
Liberal Party debate.
See if I maybe want to think about covering that, but it might make me puke and I don't really want to.
So that is going to be the schedule.
And if you're interested, if you're interested in coming on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com, the link shall be here.
Come one, come all, or come none.
And whoever's there, we're going to have our party afterwards.
We've got some good stuff to watch and it's going to be fun.
So Rumble, thank you all for being here.
If you're coming over, I will see you there.
And if not, I'm going to set up a video, play the rest of Dan Bongino, do what I got to do.