Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 16, 2025 - Viva & Barnes

02:38:52

Ep. 251: Bogus Social Security Payments? DOGE Lawsduit W's! Maddow Defamation! & MORE! Viva & Barnes

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is very dangerous.
	People can get cracked skulls.
	We don't need to watch much more of this.
	People can crack their skulls doing that.
	Miller dropped the glove to Perico's going to answer.
	Perico, the way, speed cycle into the zone, flipping it through.
	So, some people on the interwebs, for those of you who are listening in podcast format and can't necessarily make out the audio of what you're listening to, that was Canada.
	In all of its politeness and maturity, booing the American national anthem at some hockey game that occurred yesterday?
	It was Team Canada versus Team USA.
	I do not watch organized sports unless it's darts, bowling, and poker.
	I don't know if you consider poker a sport.
	People are saying FAFO.
	Fudge around, find out, when you boo the national anthem, then you get your asses handed to you in the first three fights of the game.
	You get your asses handed to you as the outcome of the game.
	I don't think it's FAFO.
	I definitely think it's a little bit of karma, and I think it's really, really stupid.
	I'm not going to say something hyperbolic like, I'm ashamed to be Canadian, or this doesn't represent me as a Canadian.
	It's a big country.
	You have a lot of people, a lot of people who echo this idiotic sentiment.
	But they don't represent me as a Canadian any more than I, as a Canadian, represent Canada through my actions and my words and my deeds.
	Stupid. A bunch of idiots.
	That entire stadium was filled with a bunch of...
	Well, let me rephrase.
	Those booing the American national anthem are a bunch of brain-dead idiots.
	Propagandized morons who don't understand that they're being played right now, like they were played in 2020 during COVID, like they're played for Ukraine, like you were played for the jibby jab, the face masks, the social distancing, the locking yourself at home, like you were played for, what's the most recent iteration?
	The trucker protest.
	Idiots. Dumb, childish, petulant.
	And you're only going to hurt yourselves, but I bet it feels good when you're doing it.
	You know, I'm looking at posts online today and people are like, oh, you know, this is just, look how the Canadians are reacting to the tariffs and that's like somehow an indication that the tariffs are unjust.
	This is actually confirmation that you might deserve a little bit more of a spanking from Big Brother.
	You're like, whatever Canada thinks of itself, whatever Trudeau, Jagmeet, Pierre Poilievre think, they are not equal partners in this relationship that is North America.
	Whether you like it or not, it's not a...
	Unpatriotic thing to say.
	It's a realistic thing to say.
	We're not trading equals.
	You're not military equals.
	You're not equals in this relationship.
	And play it accordingly.
	You want to play it like a bunch of spoiled, rotten brats who would sit there and boo the national anthem because you're angry about...
	A dispute between the government?
	Congratulations! You are Justin Trudeau's useful idiots.
	All of you in that stadium, congratulations.
	You might as well have Justin Trudeau or Jagmeet Singh with little strings on your arms or their fists up your butt.
	A bunch of useful idiots.
	And I said, you know, like, anyone booing the national anthem is an idiot.
	Anybody saying this is good is an idiot.
	And you go on Twitter and you see who's booing it and who's celebrating it.
	Idiots. And this is not nationally limited.
	They were booing the Canadian national anthem, I forget where, recently, in response to that.
	The only defense is going to be, well, you did it first.
	It's stupid.
	But you know what else is overtly stupid?
	Things start off as good negotiations, a nice arrangement, and then it becomes a sense of entitlement.
	Let me just, you know...
	Show you one minor fact.
	It's like, you know, somehow people don't really know this.
	You guys know what tariffs Canada already imposes on U.S. imports?
	I mean, I'm not the first person to discover this and I'm, you know, it's not new news.
	But it's not worth not knowing.
	Milk, poultry, other stuff here.
	Look at this.
	Dairy products, tariff varying from 245% to 298% on items like milk, cheese, and butter.
	Poultry, 238%.
	Fish products, subject to 100% tariff.
	Tobacco products, 100% tariff.
	You know what's an amazing thing?
	Like, maybe Canadians might want to think about this.
	It feels good.
	It feels good to cut off your nose.
	It doesn't really feel good to cut off your nose to spite your face, but congratulations on doing it.
	Feels good to pick that little scab and then get a nice, massive infection.
	Do you guys know that one in four children in Canada...
	Live in what we call food insecure households.
	So cost of living is already too high in Canada.
	Housing is already too low in Canada.
	One in four children suffers from food insecurity in Canada, but you got a stadium full of privileged, arrogant, pompous Trudeau Jagmeet Singh puppets booing the national anthem of your biggest trading partner, the one that provides you basically military defense.
	And you sit there booing and biting the hand, not that feeds you, but biting the hand that you work with, all the while saying, "We're the best partners.
	And you're booing the national anthem like a bunch of idiots.
	So congratulations.
	I'm sitting here as a Canadian in America, watching Canada, brainwashed, and they don't even understand it.
	And then some people say, Viva, it's not all of Canada.
	Of course it's not all of Canada.
	You know, the truckers that were driving across the country from east, west, north, and south to land on Ottawa.
	To protest for the rest of the Canadians who don't even know that they need people to protest for their own rights because they don't think they have any.
	Like Stockholm Syndrome, Ottawa, government employees.
	They've got it good.
	They can afford inflation.
	They can afford to work from home when the government locks things down.
	Not middle Canada so much.
	They were...
	The ones protesting for the protection of others despite them not knowing it.
	You know what the only problem was?
	The majority of Canadians didn't support the trucker protest at the time, thought that it was Russian-funded right-wing Nazi extremism, and basically supported Justin Trudeau's invocation of the Emergencies Act.
	And I say this from my own milieu.
	Maybe it's Montreal, maybe it's Quebec, maybe it's Ontario.
	That's already 40% of Canada.
	British Columbia, they're up to 60% of Canada.
	The majority of Canadians...
	Did not appreciate what the truckers were doing for them.
	And the majority of Canadians, I would dare say, thought it was wrong, bad, noisy, disruptive, yada, yada, yada.
	Take a knee for BLM during 2020 COVID.
	Arrest Maxime Bernier when he's having an outdoor rally with 35 people in Alberta.
	So, yeah, unfortunately...
	You can't help people who don't want to help themselves.
	And it seems that not only does Canada not want to help itself, they want to flush themselves down the toilet if it means starving their own children, if it means ruining their own environment as by their own logic, and booing the national anthem of someone you're going to have to come groveling back on your hands and knees to get something of a reasonable agreement between the parties now.
	But it feels good.
	It feels morally righteous to boo people because, hey, you might be suffering.
	You might have starving children.
	You might be dying waiting in your ERs and your free socialized health care.
	You might be dying in record numbers, excess deaths, whatever.
	But at least you're not American, right?
	Congratulations. And talking about the drug thing, it's a pretext, right?
	You know, the fentanyl crossing the border from Canada, it's just a pretext.
	It's only 1% of what they seize.
	1%. The amount of fentanyl seized coming from Canada could kill what?
	Millions of Americans.
	It's just a handful of Venezuelan gangs taking over apartment buildings in Aurora, Colorado.
	They're not 150-year-old recipients of Social Security.
	It's just that we don't know their birthdays.
	It's just a little bit of fraud.
	Now, listen to this.
	This is Sam Cooper.
	Let me just make sure.
	I don't want to...
	How do I do this?
	Breaking another bombshell expose by superstar investigative journalist Sam Cooper.
	Which, by the way, let's play this here.
	Daniela, I'm hearing from current and former high-level police officers that say, you know, despite what the Globe and Mail or Daniel Dale at CNN are reporting about, you know, 40 kilograms is it.
	No, Canadians have no idea the level of criminal money laundering running through our cities that's connected to this.
	So that's the issue.
	I just want to add before we look, where do we go from here?
	What Mark is saying about a hurricane, that hurricane is going to hit us with 25% or more if we don't put a real fentanyl czar in place, that is someone with credibility, that the U.S. government...
	Look, they're not going to be fooled if you put a Justin Trudeau office lackey in that position.
	They need someone that can assure the American government that the RCMP...
	We'll work with the DEA if they want to put a wiretap on a triad boss or a cartel boss in Vancouver and Toronto because it didn't happen before.
	The last point is, look, this US-Canada strike force on organized crime, I believe the American government is going to want to see legal memorandums of understanding signed with Ottawa saying, this isn't just pretty language to put off a tariff.
	This is some sort of joint laws between Canada and the United States where we will have, you know, you working with the fentanyl czar, if the FBI and DA want to come up to Vancouver and bust one of these triad command control money laundering nodes, which by the way, I'm afraid, I'll say it, some of these bosses are connected to funding of the Trudeau Liberals.
	I'll just drop that because it's true.
	Well, you know, let's play it out.
	And I believe the Trump administration knows it.
	So the Americans...
	We can stop there.
	You might want to ask yourself, what's the push to decriminalize hard drugs up in Canada?
	Might it be because some of the people who would then benefit from the contracts are already tied to the government?
	Possibly. No, it's only 1%.
	By the way, it's an amazing thing how after Trump puts a spotlight on a problem...
	Then it finally forces the propagandists, even at the CBC, to start reporting on that problem.
	Remember, it's not a problem.
	It doesn't exist.
	He's a liar.
	But it's there and it's not really a big deal.
	But it's a big deal.
	We've already known about it and we're working with the U.S. to fix it right now.
	Look at this.
	These are headlines from CBC News.
	How Mexican cartels and Chinese criminal networks are moving cocaine of the sea through Canadian ports.
	laughs
	Here, let's do another one here.
	Want to get rid of fentanyl?
	Tackle money laundering first, say experts.
	Lax penalties regulations have allowed financial crime to flourish in Canada.
	Number three, Canada's fentanyl czar lays out his goal.
	Stop the drug from crossing U.S. northern border.
	Rule created in response to Trump's broad border concerns.
	Sorry. So it's an amazing thing.
	And congratulations to all of you idiots who took the bait and participated in that debacle.
	That shameful act that if you think Canada looks good booing the American national anthem when you call the Americans brash, uninformed, uneducated, boorish, whatever, congrats, you're idiots.
	You played right into it, and now you've just made everything worse for yourself.
	Those sanctions that they imposed on Russia as a result of the war between Russia and Ukraine, guess who they didn't hurt?
	So enjoy your tariffs, Canada, and guess who they will hurt?
	You'll have more than one in four children suffering from food insecurity.
	Serenity now.
	God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things I can, and wisdom to know the difference.
	Good evening, people.
	It's Sunday night.
	I'm sorry about that rant.
	I was pissed off watching that.
	A bunch of barking seals.
	Good evening.
	It's the Viva and Barnes Sunday night law extravaganza.
	And we've got one hell of a show for you.
	Before we get into it, I do my best to read all the super chats, rumble rants, and the tipped questions on Locals.
	We're going to favor the tipped questions on Locals.
	If I miss them and you're going to be miffed, do not give them because I don't like people feeling miffed, rook, shield, whatever.
	Do my best, and that's all I can do.
	We will end on Commitube and go over to Rumble and vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	We vote with our eyeballs and we support the free speech platform that supports us.
	Then we go over to Locals for our after party.
	It's going to be awesome.
	And Barnes will join in a second.
	But before we get there, because we do have a beautiful sponsor for tonight, by the way, I'm going to show it to you.
	It's right here and here.
	It's an amazing thing.
	You know my wife is a neuroscientist.
	Did I tell you about this?
	I think you all know that my wife is a neuroscientist.
	So I get to pick the brains.
	Whenever we get calls for sponsors, I want to know that they're legit.
	I want to know that they passed the muster when it comes to my wife's neuroscientist PhD analysis.
	And it does.
	Senolytics. Have you heard of this?
	It's a class of ingredients discovered less than 10 years ago, and they're being called the biggest discovery of our time, promoting healthy aging and enhancing your physical regime.
	You get old, you start to age, and you start to hurt.
	And there is something called senolytics, which takes care of what they call zombie cells.
	Now, the qualia senolytic is this thing.
	It's like a detox.
	You do it once a month, two days, and it's supposed to get rid of the zombie cells, and it does.
	At least it's amazing.
	If someone would have told me that the science-backed ingredients that could help me feel younger a while back, wouldn't have believed it.
	I still feel pretty good.
	My knees are hurting, but they're feeling a little better now.
	Senescent cells cause symptoms of aging, such as aches and discomforts, slow workout recoveries, sluggish mental health, and energy associated with the middle-aged feeling.
	Also known as zombie cells, they are old and worn out and not serving useful function for our health anymore, but are taking up space and nutrients from our healthy cells.
	When I was on the phone with them, I asked like, you know...
	Explain to me like I'm an idiot.
	And they did.
	They said, like, it's like having leaves on a tree that are no longer absorbing, transferring or transforming sun energy into energy.
	And so you prune them.
	And this is what the senolytics does.
	Much like pruning the yellowish and dead leaves off a plant, qualia senolytics removes those worn out senescent cells to allow for the rest of them to thrive in the body.
	Takes two days a month.
	There's 12 pills in here, six and six.
	The formula is non-GMO, vegan, gluten-free, and the ingredients are meant to complement one another, factoring in the combined effects of all ingredients together.
	It's got a 100-day money-back guarantee.
	Clinically tested two-day rejuvenation regimen may hold the key to unlocking cellular health and revitalizing tissues and the body.
	Go to QualiaLife, Q-A-Q-U-A-L-I-A, QualiaLife.com forward slash Viva for up to 50% off.
	Use code Viva at checkout for an additional 15% off.
	QualiaLife.com.
	Promo code Viva slash Viva for 15% off your purchase.
	The link is in the description.
	Anyhow, thank you, Qualia.
	It's amazing stuff.
	And get fit, get healthy, and stay sharp.
	By the way, you have the Qualia Mind.
	There's a little bit of caffeine in here, so don't take it before going to bed.
	But it's good stuff.
	And yes, I very much enjoyed it.
	All right, people.
	Link in the description.
	What I wanted to talk about.
	Well, let's get to some of these.
	Tip questions before we go anywhere.
	I wrote a question above.
	Looking for help of Fran's daughter get a book self-published, Mel Matt.
	I'll do an episode on that in Locals.
	I mean, I'll have to get my wife in on that because she's the one who actually self-published.
	What the heck is it?
	Louis the Lobster.
	Well, it's not here.
	Oh, you know why?
	Because I stuck a copy of Louis the Lobster in the Tesla Cybertruck to give it over to Fresh and Fit.
	So they'll find the Louis the Lobster book somewhere in the car.
	That was one of the Easter eggs.
	But we'll do that one day over on...
	VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
	Then we've got that guy dude says, sorry, do you or Barnes happen to know an internet defamation lawyer?
	I have a case with likely section 230 implications and I'm not sure where to look.
	I would say email Barnes at BarnesLawLLP.com and that's probably the best way to at least try to reach out to Barnes.
	But there's Ron Coleman.
	There's a bunch of you to go into the lawyer community.
	You'll find them.
	Some days I feel like I'm 150 years old.
	Go Trump and...
	Elon. Yeah, no, dude, what we're witnessing right now in real time is the wildest thing on earth.
	I learned COBOL in the early 80s.
	Colleges were phasing it out because it was obsolete 45 years ago.
	We're going to get into that, people.
	But also, before we even get there, there was a little bit more that I wanted to talk about before Robert gets here.
	Yes, that's what I wanted to say.
	I'm sorry.
	The good news of the day.
	Let me just make sure that Barnes has the link.
	The good news of the day.
	Can't forget about the people that are still locked up.
	The good news, I think it was Friday that it happened, actually.
	Valentine's Day.
	Dominic Box, one of the few remaining Jan Sixers who did not get released on the day of the part and had to fight tooth and nail and had to get people mobilized behind him to make sure it happened, got out on Valentine's Day.
	This is Dominic Box.
	We will be doing an interview together in person, figuring out the date will be next week.
	One of the Jan Sixers who was held for an additional two weeks.
	Two and a half weeks?
	There's still more.
	Jeremy Brown, who has a separate legal issue, and a number of other ones that we need to keep the pressure on.
	But Dominic Box got out on Friday and is enjoying his freedom from what I have seen.
	Imagine getting out of prison and then biting into a nice, beautiful slice of pizza.
	So Dominic Box is out, and the other current pending injustices we'll get to during the stream here.
	Now let me see something over on...
	Commitube so that I don't miss too much of the super chats on Commitube.
	Okay, we're good here.
	What did I have in the backdrop that I wanted to bring up?
	Okay, we got justices and we've got injustices.
	We forget what's still going on in Romania.
	Caelan Georgescu talking about the, say, lawfare, the overriding of democracy.
	For the sake of preserving democracy, you recall that they annulled the elections in Romania because they said, you know, he couldn't have won.
	He had to have some help from the Russians on TikTok.
	I'll read you the caption after this, but this is what jackboot thugs look like.
	Covering their face, whisking people off.
	It's like the more things change, the more they stay the same.
	What's this?
	Thugs. Now I'll get to the actual caption of this.
	This is Kaelin Georgescu.
	What does the monstrosity of the oppressive and anti-democratic system in Romania look like?
	What does democracy look like in Romania these days?
	Exactly as you see.
	This is the first in a state considered democratic.
	part of the EU and a strategic partner of the USA.
	At 6:00 AM masked men entered my campaign manager and his family home, taking advantage of an abusive search warrant.
	Without any charges, they tried to cause unimaginable psychological terror.
	They found no money, no servers, no quote trolls, end quote.
	They only found a family sleeping with their six year old daughter.
	They confiscated the laptops and my campaign manager and his wife, they confiscated the laptops of my campaign manager and his wife, who was also my press manager.
	Through which they communicated on my behalf on social media accounts and mobile phones.
	Take it with a grain of salt.
	I don't know if it's true.
	I believe Kaylin Georgescu.
	There is very little in life that could be more of an affront to human decency than fraudulent misrepresentation.
	I don't know what they posted.
	I tried to get in touch and see if we can get some info or at least if Kaylin can come back on.
	They post...
	Through his social media accounts, unbeknownst to him after they seize his computers.
	At the same time, another raid was taking place in my assistant's office, from which the oppressive system even took my candidacy file for the elections, thus trying to block my actions regarding the resumption of the second round of the abusively cancelled elections.
	This is the European Union we join.
	These are the values we want.
	No thanks.
	We join the EU for moral and social principles and values, hoping that we would be supported.
	In evolving intellectually, economically, and socially.
	I hope for a better healthcare and education system, improved infrastructure, and the protection of civil liberties and national identity.
	What did we receive in return?
	What you see below.
	We received oppression and abuse in exchange for our dignity.
	Europe treats us like slaves, and if we don't obey the orders from Brussels, we get bullied.
	As a reminder that we have no rights, only obligations.
	J.D. Vance, Elon Musk, Richard Grinnell, Wunderling, what do you think about this?
	I can tell you what I think about this.
	Have I sworn yet this episode?
	It's bullshit.
	We understand what is going on right now.
	Now that you understand that USAID was funding, if not entirely, at least funding in part 90% of the news outlets in Ukraine, what do you think they're doing out in Romania?
	This is manufacturing consent.
	It's manufacturing the semblance of democracy.
	What it is, is a techno-tyranny.
	It is the...
	Loss of national autonomy to the greater good of the European Union.
	They're locking up people for social media posts in England.
	And they are literally undoing democracy in Romania to preserve democracy.
	That's all I have to say about that.
	Oh, Robert Barnes.
	How, sir?
	How goes the battle?
	Good, good.
	You know, an interesting book behind me that I've had for a while called Lords of Poverty.
	Which is about the abuse of the entire financial aid structure globally in terms of whether it's foreign aid, in terms of NGOs, in terms of so-called charities.
	And this reporter unmasks it all years ago.
	And I had never fully processed the name on the author of the book.
	The author is Graham Hancock.
	Yeah, Graham Hancock.
	The guy that's talking about the lost civilization and taking on the archaeologist and all the other folks.
	Saying, you know, maybe this technology that made the pyramids or other things wasn't made from local copper chisels and what have you.
	Some religious folks take value in it in the way he describes some things.
	Non-religious folks take some value in it.
	It's just the establishment that does it.
	But it was really a great work of investigative journalism.
	And I just never processed, oh, it's probably the same Graham Hancock.
	That was, I mean, not that I, I don't read a lot of books, Robert, but yeah, I saw Graham Hancock as you were talking about it.
	You know America's back when we're whooping the Canadians in hockey.
	And we're not only whooping them on the ice rink, we're physically whooping them to start the game after they booed our anthem.
	I don't know how bare-knuckle fist fighting is still allowed in hockey.
	I've seen enough people smack their heads on ice and elsewhere.
	That always makes me very, very nervous.
	But yeah, look, it's not FAFO because it could have gone the other way.
	It's karma.
	And karma played all the way it should.
	Maybe South Park is going to come true in another way.
	Maybe we've got to invade Canada.
	We'll take all the Brit lovers to port them to Starmer in Britain.
	He apparently likes all those kind of people.
	We'll give Montreal to the French.
	They want it anyway.
	And we'll take the rest of it and we'll keep the good Canadians and kick out the bad ones.
	And we'll appoint, we'll have Trump appoint Viva Prime Minister of the 51st State of Canada.
	It'll be governor.
	I want to bring up this meme, but I can't seem to bring it up without sure.
	Oh yeah, Governor Frye.
	That sounds good.
	No, there's a joke now of an American flag and it's got all the stars and stripes and one extra star on the bottom.
	No, it's like, you hear them booing the anthem.
	Like, why would Trump even want those, you know, those types of...
	So much for polite Canadians.
	I mean, I think Trump is...
	I'm gonna...
	Most likely with the Duran on Tuesday at 1pm Eastern Time to break down all the different geopolitical global impacts of Trump's policies and politics.
	I don't think he actually wants Canada as a 51st state.
	I think he does want more geopolitical control of important shipping routes, areas where submarines and naval activity can occur.
	He doesn't trust the Canadian government.
	To be a reliable ally over time.
	I mean, the Canadians basically use NAFTA to steal a lot of our auto industry, like Mexico did.
	And Trump has always found that to have been a bad negotiation strategy.
	But Trump always looks past the thing.
	I mean, the short answer on all of it is Trump's always going to go to something the other side is terrified of.
	In order to get what he really wants.
	His first position is not going to be his final position.
	But he wants people to believe it's his final position so he can get the negotiated outcome he wants.
	Sooner or later, the Canadians will fold like their hockey team.
	Well, I'd say all he wants is a path to connect Alaska to mainland America.
	So, by the way, the Duran Cup, I noticed it before you started.
	That is the Duran logo, people.
	And you can get different flags.
	This one's the American flag for whipping up on the Canadians.
	He'd be happy with British Columbia as a territory, but not necessarily as a population because they're more radical than, oh geez, what's the place there on the West Coast in America?
	Portland. That's got to be one of the most humiliating losses for the Canadians, you know, in forever.
	I mean, you lose at home in hockey?
	And there were three unanswered goals when Canada was up.
	I know.
	It gets up, they think it's working after they got beat up physically for booing the anthem.
	Those are some real American hockey players, right?
	You boo our anthem, we're going to come out and we'll have not one fight, not two fights, but three fights in the first nine seconds.
	Like, there you go.
	That's real hockey.
	That's real America.
	Robert, what do we have on the menu for this evening?
	We have Brooke was working on Valentine's, our Valentine's to Pfizer.
	Was the Brooke Jackson appeal, filed in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, posted the entire merits brief, worked on with Warner Mendenhall, Jeremy Friedman, and Alexis Anderson.
	They posted it at vivabarneslaw.locals.com, so if you want to read it and see it, you can.
	It's available for everybody.
	But we got the Brooke Jackson case.
	And what is the Department of Justice, the attorneys working this case, are they hiding?
	The existence of this appeal and the legal and political issues from the purported party they're supposedly representing.
	I have reason to believe that President Trump, Vice President Vance, Secretary Kennedy, and the new FDA Commissioner, and Attorney General Bondi have been excluded.
	By the attorneys running rogue at the Justice Department by not apprising them of this case.
	Because they might have a different opinion about how the case should progress than Biden's predecessor.
	And this particular issue is going to come up a few times tonight, is where the new DOJ might not have the same perspective as the old DOJ, Eric Adams, the people quitting en masse.
	And so it's an interesting thing, is how the new DOJ, which has a totally wildly different perspective on...
	The case might not proceed according...
	We'll get into it with Brooke Jackson.
	Yeah, part of the reason why the election happened relates to this case.
	So we'll be discussing the Brooke Jackson case.
	We got Robert Francis Kennedy is the new Secretary of Health and Human Services, and Tulsi Gabbard is the new Director of National Intelligence.
	If you are members of sportspicks.locals.com, we predicted the exact number of senators that would vote for both of them.
	Congratulations to all those who trailed.
	And just to celebrate Robert's acumen here, he called it.
	He called it before it was at 78%.
	And they all did very well.
	By the time I looked and it was too late, risking 80 cents to make 20, I have a bit of a bigger flavor for risk than that.
	But yeah, you're right.
	52. And you're calling 52 for Kash Patel's vote next week as well, correct?
	Yep. And Mitch McConnell will continue to destroy whatever little bit of his legacy is left, just like the Federalist Society is busy damaging itself with the actions it took in the Eric Adams case.
	And one of the topics tonight is Trump versus the world.
	The judicial branch coming after him, the various rogue lawsuits being filed, states suing him, the whole bureaucracy waging war on him.
	The Daily Starmer, the leader of the United Kingdom, is begging for a meeting because he doesn't like where the Ukraine peace deal is going.
	The Brits are yet to wake up.
	The empire's over, Brits.
	It's over.
	They apparently didn't get that message from about a century ago.
	We've got the Unitary Executive, which is going to go up to the Supreme Court and I think get a favorable ruling.
	We'll be discussing that, as well as...
	Doge's complete constitutional authority.
	Elon Musk is being sued because they're saying he's an unappointed officer.
	We'll explain why what he's doing is precisely not only constitutional, but statutorily authorized and by precedent by no less than Barack Hussein Obama, who put it in place in the first place.
	And now the Constitution compels President Trump to be doing what he's doing.
	The United...
	Insurance companies sued because they were substituting their physicians with AI.
	And apparently they trained that algorithm to just be denied, denied, denied, denied.
	We'll be discussing that.
	Of course, the United's executive was the one shot down in the streets of New York, which apparently some reporters at CNN were cheerleading the legal defento.
	Bill Burr has gone off the deep end on that, but we'll touch on that.
	Yeah, poor Bill.
	He's just not the same in the last 12 months or so.
	He needs to go back to Boston, get beat up by his dad a little more, and then maybe we'll get back to some normal, fun Bill.
	The COVID mandates in court hours before the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Minneapolis this past week, where the judges were shocked, shocked to hear me discuss that the impact of their cases impact real human beings.
	They refuse to believe such a thing.
	Oh, how do our judicial opinions impact human beings?
	This is absurd, Mr. Barnes.
	Maybe we should just replace all of them with AI.
	We might get something closer to actual rule of law.
	We've got the Second Amendment expungement issues.
	When is an expungement not an expungement?
	The Wisconsin courts are trying to figure out ways to weasel around that Second Amendment protection under the statutes for firearms possession.
	Attorney General Paxton cleared in Texas, and he was also on recently with Tucker Carlson explaining the connection between George Soros, drug cartels, and illegal immigration.
	Speaking of illegal immigration, churches are suing President Trump, demanding that their church regions and any property owned by a church be completely exempt from any immigration activity, from any effort to deport illegals and criminals.
	Let's see.
	They're all saying they have special rights.
	Bureaucrats got special rights.
	Churches got special rights.
	All of not to follow federal law on the issue of illegal immigration.
	And then when is discovery discovery?
	We'll talk about a case that was a civil rights case and how the courts constantly contradict themselves on when the failure to produce discovery is sanctionable.
	That if you're a civil litigant suing a big corporation, they impose standards on you that they don't impose if you're a corrupt cop who lost the video.
	Then it's, oh, you poor little police officer, you just accidentally lost that video that exposed you.
	We're going to say you didn't do it intentionally and not even allow the jury to know that you lost that video.
	So we'll be discussing the hypocrisy, judicial hypocrisy.
	Judges sitting on NGOs that are being funded by USAID ruling on cases concerning USAID.
	Judges ruling just like they were doing in Pfizer cases when they held stock in Pfizer.
	That's how corrupt our federal judicial branch has sadly and steadily become.
	So that and more on this edition of Law for the People.
	I gotta bring this one right up because I'm not concerned.
	I don't understand.
	Rob A., who I know.
	It says, after three plus years, I'm canceling my memberships here.
	The disrespect from our closest ally for 120 plus years is ridiculous.
	Unsubbing on every platform.
	I can't for the life of me understand which way this goes.
	I think I know Rob is Canadian.
	And so, where's the disrespect?
	Is he insulted by the America smacking around the Canadians?
	No, but I don't know if it's a joke.
	An American disappointed by the...
	It wasn't Americans that disrespected Canada.
	It was Canada that disrespected Americans.
	I need to get clarity.
	I need to get clarity.
	Rob, what does this mean?
	Serious question.
	Because I know I've seen Rob's name forever.
	Unless the disrespect is coming from me.
	He's a Canadian nationalist and he wants to take on the Americans.
	Well, build up your hockey team, eh?
	You know, if you build up that hockey team, eh?
	You won't get humiliated on a global stage, eh?
	Okay. I don't know if he was joking.
	I'm going to take it as a joke.
	Robert, let's start with the one that I find.
	We'll start with the one that has a very interesting analogy to if you want the right of return for six million people, why do you want your own state?
	Proposal of Zelensky to resolve the war in Russia.
	Our proposal is we want to join NATO and get nukes.
	I mean, I appreciate Trump comes in and negotiates.
	His first offer is more than he wants so you can get to what he wants.
	But then you come in with that, and that's stupid.
	I mean, that's not good negotiation, like to say, I'm going to overplay my hand and settle.
	That's dumb.
	That is like saying, oh, I want to settle, I want to solve this war, resolve this war.
	The two very issues were, we don't want you encroaching on our space and having nukes on the border of Russia, and we want to join NATO.
	I mean, those are the two things that started the war, and Zelensky's demanding them as a way to get out of it.
	J.D. Vance says, you know, no, idiot, and you're not talking to Joe Biden anymore.
	Is there any sense to be made from the demand?
	And how do you see a peace being resolved in Ukraine-Russia?
	Well, I think President Trump has had plans on this all along, and there's going to be a lot of misdirection.
	A lot of, as the great Red Herring reference in the book Presumed Innocent, Megyn Kelly was asking about what are some other good writers in that same vein as Scott Turow, who wrote 1L.
	I don't know if you remember that.
	That was about his first year at Harvard Law School.
	The presumed innocent is my favorite of his books by Long Mile.
	And I like the original film.
	The new Apple TV series doesn't measure up.
	But there's great truth in that first one.
	But the great defense lawyer in that case references red herrings.
	There's going to be a lot of red herrings in what Trump is doing vis-a-vis Ukraine.
	But I think within six months, he'll get a peace deal in Ukraine.
	Now, what he's requiring, for example, he's saying no more free money.
	So if Ukraine wants any money to keep its own...
	Government and society afloat, because we're actually keeping everything in Ukraine afloat, not just the military effort.
	He said, you've got to give me the raw earth minerals.
	So I don't think they want to give away that for cheap the way Trump wants to do it.
	There'll be a peace deal, and the peace deal will be Russia will get the four territories that have been historically and traditionally Russian along with Ukraine, the entire Donbass region.
	Ukraine will still have the rest of Ukraine, so they'll still have water access, Nipper access, control of Kiev, control of a lot of resources, agricultural and mineral and others.
	So they'll be able to survive and sustain themselves, and this stupid war will finally be over, and Trump will try to use it as a bridge to try to heal some degree of relations with Russia.
	You're having the same thing in Germany.
	I mean, if the AFD...
	Wins in those elections coming up, Germany wants to create the old deal that Helmut Kohl had with Russia, which was providing cheap energy to Germany.
	So we'll see what happens there.
	But Vant and Hegseth and Trump are all on the same page.
	The only thing to be done in Ukraine is a peace deal, and they get it done in six months.
	They could care less what Zelensky thinks.
	Zelensky is irrelevant.
	He's always been a stage actor, reading from a script.
	And he doesn't understand Trump has no interest in what his script is.
	So Trump has full authority to try to get a peace deal done.
	Without the money, Ukraine is nothing.
	So as Trump put, he doesn't care what Zelensky thinks.
	He'll sign on the bottom line when Trump tells him to sign on the bottom line.
	That's who and what Trump is.
	Zelensky is irrelevant.
	He won't even be part of the negotiations.
	That tells you how irrelevant Ukraine always was to this entire conflict.
	This conflict was a proxy war by the Western deep state allies and Russia.
	That's using the people of Ukraine and the land of Ukraine to do it.
	But that war is coming to an end.
	Oh, you're on mute.
	I wanted to find the evidence to show, for those who didn't fully appreciate, it wasn't just military aid.
	It was subsidizing the small businesses.
	We're paying for their janitors for crying out loud.
	This is from December 6, 2023.
	Now it will make a lot more sense.
	Ernst demands answers on small business aids sent to Ukraine.
	As the US Agency for International Development, USAID, continues to hide from accountability on foreign aid sent to Ukrainian small businesses, US Senator John Ernst, Republican from Iowa, ranking right yada yada yada, is doubling down on her oversight efforts on behalf of America's entrepreneurs.
	This follows the White House recent request for possibly 106 billion in new So it goes on.
	It's very interesting.
	Now, the USAID didn't trigger the same emotion back then because we didn't know what we know now.
	And I guess that might be a good segue to come into the last week of uncoveries and lawsuits and attempts to...
	It's an amazing thing that the left, which used to be anti-vax, anti-big business, anti-war of the 70s, has now become the party of big pharma, big corporation, war, and corruption, and concealment of the corruption.
	Crying about what Elon Musk has uncovered in the last week.
	We'll start from ground level.
	Doge, Department of Governmental Efficiency.
	What is its technical legal status within the Trump administration?
	Is it an actual, did they create a new administration?
	Is it a special administration?
	What is Doge as a political legal entity?
	So when Barack Obama came in, he got Congress to give him a special authority to create kind of an almost off-the-books digital services group of people that he could use to sort of monitor all of government.
	And so he got congressional approval for the authorizing the funds of it.
	And the right for them to not have to clear traditional conflicts of interest checks.
	So Obama created that by statute.
	And so all Trump did is take Obama's authority and call it Doge.
	That's it.
	So he's got complete congressional authority for it directly from Congress, thanks to Barack Hussein Obama, who the media never complained about when he did this.
	Now, as to the constitutional authority...
	The Unitary Executive provides that Article 2 gives all executive power, vests all executive power in the President of the United States.
	It is the most broad giving of power in any part of the branch of government.
	Judicial power.
	Is restricted and limited in a whole bunch of ways.
	Legislative power, restricted and limited in a whole bunch of ways.
	The executive power is only restricted by what's given to the legislature, what's given to the judicial, or what's in the Bill of Rights.
	So that gives you an idea and some provisions that are also included in Article 2 in terms of jury trial rights and things like that.
	And so he's got complete carte blanche as the only elected person in the entire executive branch to do whatever he wants in that respect.
	In fact, there's the take care clause, which he's ironically being sued for, which he's implementing the take care clause, which requires that he take care to make sure the laws are enforced.
	That's his obligation.
	Now here, there's a constitutionally authorized component for Doge, which I haven't heard discussed more broadly.
	Here's the provision of Article 1, which the President under Article 2 is required to take care that this provision of Article 1 be executed.
	Here's what it says.
	No money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in consequence of appropriations made by law.
	And a regular statement and account of the receipts and expenditures of all public money shall be published from time to time.
	All doges is implementing the Constitution of the United States.
	All it's doing is the president required to take care to make sure the laws are executed.
	And it's from Article 1 that says this shall be done.
	It says the money shall make sure that it's being done by law.
	And secondly, that he has to make sure that there's public accountability for all receipts and all expenditures.
	And that's what Doge is doing, making accountability.
	Is this money authorized by law?
	What they're discovering is a lot of this money was not authorized by law.
	In fact, it's often in direct contradiction to the law.
	Let me just stop you there because the question is going to be, what right does Doge even have to do this in the first place?
	The 19 to 24-year-old tech support that Elon is sending out, are they employees?
	Are they external contractors?
	Are they special appointments?
	What even are they just as a legal entity?
	There, Congress created that special provision for digital access for Obama that allowed these people to be almost off-the-books people.
	It's to enforce this constitutional provision.
	But fundamentally, it's the President of the United States implementing his constitutional obligation to make sure that any money being spent has actually been authorized by law and to make sure the public knows what's happening to public money.
	Public receipts and public expenditures of public funds.
	So the president's constitutionally not only authorized, he's constitutionally obligated to be doing what he is doing with Doge.
	And the fact that it's being discussed by Jeffrey Tucker at the Brownstone Institute based on legal research that they've done, it appears that in fact, and from other sources, it appears that every president since Truman has not had direct access to the Treasury.
	In terms of where the money is being spent, that the deep state kind of hijacked it after World War II and has precluded every single elected president from having direct access to where the money is going, which is not only insane, it's unconstitutional.
	Again, the obligation is it must be disclosed to the public where all receipts and expenditures are going and that any expenditure can only be actually issued by the Treasury if it has been authorized by law.
	And what Doge is disclosing is that a whole bunch of these monies were not authorized by law.
	They were contradictory to law.
	And that is a constitutional requirement.
	So the president would be obligated to do this even without a statute because it's a constitutional requirement.
	What is amazing is we're going to, I mean, I guess it's the segue into the next issue is the pushback from the judiciary.
	So three branches of government, you have your legislative, your executive, and your judicial.
	Congress controls the purse strings, which is the thing that they're saying, you know, like, I don't even understand the argument as to why Trump doesn't have the authority or the oversight to look at what they're doing.
	But the judiciary is getting involved, and is the word hamstringing or hampering?
	Basically hampering Trump's ability to even do this by denying Doge access or ordering them to destroy documents.
	Do you see the memes in the old Doge dog in the chat?
	Someone's got a meme with the doge dog doing, like, the cat dance.
	I see a pregnant woman, but that's the first one that I...
	I don't know what's going on there.
	But, Robert, what level of mutiny are we seeing from the judiciary in terms of tying up Trump from being able to do what he was elected to do?
	So, yeah, the two biggest hostile actors to President Trump being able to deliver are the unelected branches of government.
	The bureaucracy, Which isn't a constitutionally recognizable branch of government because it's supposed to be subject to the elected president.
	But they don't see it that way.
	And you can now see in their lawsuits they're bringing and in the public reaction, the media reaction, and the press reaction, that they think they're above the president of the United States.
	They think they're above the people.
	They think they have permanent jobs, permanently guaranteed, to line their pockets and line the pockets of their pals and allies to the shock of a lot of normies.
	There's a lot of people on the left that I've heard from being like, this is not what I bought into in the Democratic Party.
	I didn't buy into them just spending my money without any accountability.
	I didn't buy into them spending money on just foreigners and weird projects.
	I didn't then give them my money so they can line the pockets of their pals with bogus jobs and no-show jobs.
	I didn't do that.
	But the Democratic Party is saying, yeah, that's what we've been all about now for a couple of decades, is stealing taxpayer money and to line the pockets of all our political friends and allies.
	It was the Clinton Foundation on steroids, and it was being done through USAID, but not just USAID, national NED, and every single agency.
	I mean, they're spending money on things that just shock ordinary people in America.
	Like, hold on a second, my tax dollars were going to help to do trainee books in Peru?
	It's like, what?
	They were saying, you know, it's only 1% of the federal budget.
	It's $50 billion.
	And then meanwhile, you know, Lehena gets a one-time payment of $750.
	It's obscene beyond anything, and that it doesn't count as part of the State Department's budget itself, which is roughly the same.
	So there was literally no oversight whatsoever, no accountability whatsoever.
	And it was being used to fight the very interests of the Americans whose taxpayer dollars were going to fund these initiatives in the first place.
	Absolutely. And so it was not authorized by law.
	It was not being made publicly transparent or even accessible to elected leaders, both in Congress and the White House.
	And as such, it was completely unconstitutional from day one.
	However, the judicial branch is made up of the same professional managerial class that the bureaucracy is dominated by.
	And these are people who fundamentally, these are the people who gave us fascism.
	These are the people who gave us communism.
	These are the people who gave us neoliberal corporatism.
	In other words, they almost destroyed the entire world in the last century.
	These are people who should not be anywhere near power.
	And yet the judicial branch, by definition, is monopolized by a professional managerial class that mostly has no common sense experience at all.
	Most judges have never worked a real job in their lives.
	They have no clue.
	Working class?
	What? They have no idea.
	They are an old geriatric aristocracy.
	Or if they're younger, they're commies from overseas or were born overseas, and yet they're on the American federal bench deciding American constitutional law.
	So it has long been the case that our judicial branch has been disconnected and is one of the least democratic institutions that exist.
	And if they would just stay limited, like, for example, it was amazing to me.
	The number of people on social media and so-called law Twitter saying, oh, this has already been decided.
	You don't understand.
	Marbury versus Madison.
	Imagine saying, if I came on here and I was like, Viva, I'm now the king of America.
	And you're like, who says so?
	I do.
	I say, I hereby declare myself king of America.
	Judges don't get to declare to themselves their own power.
	So it's what's in the Constitution and what ain't.
	And judges have been usurping power that never belonged to them, that was never given to them constitutionally, because nobody held them to account.
	And so that, I mean, Marbury v.
	Madison was a fraud on the Constitution.
	Oh, we, the courts, are the only ones who can interpret the law.
	That's ridiculous.
	The constitutional oath is taken by everybody, including members of Congress, including the elected President of the United States.
	Not just members of, not just the courts, who, when they're not...
	They go back into their chambers, they take off their black robe, and they put on their white medical scientist's robe, and they come out and tell you what a medical scientist genius they are.
	And then they go back in and put on their medical doctor's robe and come out and tell you how they know better than your doctor does about your own health.
	These are the most arrogant people in the world.
	And if you want a highest per capita ratio of child molesters and perverts and pedophiles and sociopaths, you will find no higher per capita rate of any profession in the world more than the federal judicial branch of government.
	If you get to know these judges, you will never let them anywhere near your kids.
	That's who they are as human beings.
	The normies, though, didn't understand this.
	They thought these were just good, conscientious philosopher kings who just wanted to follow the law.
	And if they were part of the Federalist Society, by golly, they just wanted to implement the law under an originalist interpretation.
	Hogwash! Most of the Federalist Society are corporate whores who love institutional power and eviscerate constitutional liberty whenever they get the chance.
	More often than not.
	It doesn't mean everybody in the Federalist Society is bad.
	It just means a lot of them are bad.
	And was it a real big shock when it's Federal Society members issuing crazy rulings against President Trump trying to usurp his presidential power?
	And what are they really trying to do?
	They're trying to overrule an election.
	They don't like the outcome of the election.
	So they're trying to overrule it by judicial fiat, and they have no such constitutional authority.
	The only question is, how does Trump handle it?
	Does he wait to see if the Supreme Court steps in to save the judiciary from itself like he's done in the past?
	Or does he say, hey, we're in an exigent circumstances.
	It's time to go full Andrew Jackson.
	The court can issue its ruling.
	Now it can go enforce it.
	At a minimum, I am glad to see Elon Musk, senators, members of Congress, legal scholars, Mike Davis, others, finally coming around to what I've been arguing now for years, argued all the way back when he got in the first time.
	You've got to start using the impeachment power over these rogue judges because judges, unlike everybody else, Judges don't get to—you don't have to prove a misdemeanor to impeach a judge.
	You don't have to prove a felony to impeach a judge.
	Judges only serve constitutionally during good behavior.
	Now, our friend Law of Self-Defense has an interpretation that the judges can be removed by just straight majority vote.
	I'm not—I don't share that interpretation.
	I have a policy instinct opposition to it because then if Democrats ever take over, they'll kick out every Republican judge in the country.
	So I still prefer the two-thirds Senate.
	Knowing that that means we won't be able to remove these judges.
	But all you have to do is impeach them to wake them up.
	No judge has been impeached for abusing his power politically since Justice Samuel Chase at the beginning of the country.
	Federal judges, the process is different than state judges.
	And we're talking, by and large, federal judges now like Engelmeyer and I can't think of the other names offhand.
	But the legal basis for which...
	Nichols is the Trump-appointed Federalist Society nitwit.
	And I had a case in front of him on behalf of Cassandra Fairbanks, who I think is now Cassandra McDonald.
	If I got the last name wrong, my apologies, Cassandra, but that's why I remember.
	I once went to a birthday party, which she did a huge thing for a little kid.
	She was not wealthy by any stretch of the imagination.
	She wasn't like certain influencers trying to hook up with Elon.
	No comment on those.
	Hey, all you can say is congratulations to Elon.
	Congratulations to her.
	She's running the bank for life.
	And he's got kid number 325.
	He and Julian Assange clearly want to propagate the world with their own kids.
	We're talking about Ashley St. Clair, who claims to have had the baby of Elon Musk five months ago, now coming public.
	I don't think anyone on Musk's team has denied it.
	Like Pozo said, God bless.
	May everyone live a happy, healthy life.
	And I get the quartering and some other conservatives saying, hmm, I get that.
	Or quartering is more, I would put it as more independent.
	I don't think he self-identifies as a conservative.
	He's more blue-collar, old-school Wisconsin.
	But putting that little fun social drama aside, I can never get into that social drama for the most part.
	I was like, I don't really care.
	Congrats to her.
	She's got economic security.
	Congrats to Elon.
	She's got another baby.
	She's not the most unfortunate-looking woman in the world.
	Congrats to both.
	But Elon and his kids is getting kind of funny.
	That was Julian Assange's father.
	Julian Assange had like nine kids.
	He's up there with Elon, I think.
	Wait, Assange has many kids or he's many kids of the same father?
	Kids, different moms.
	Yeah, I think a similar inclination.
	It's like they want to re-propagate the planet with little Julian, little Assange's, and little musks to save humanity from itself.
	The minor fight that I got into on Saturday is like, okay, look, you know, statistically, it's better to have a father.
	This is not the way to maximize your chances of having a happy family life, but good for her, nice, happy, healthy baby.
	When it comes to Assange, it might, you know...
	If he didn't go sticking his schmeckle in people, maybe he doesn't get accused of raw...
	What's not raw dogging?
	It's called stealthing in Sweden.
	Maybe he avoids a rape charge if he just keeps it in his pants and avoids a lot of grief in life.
	But okay, setting all of that aside...
	To each their own.
	But yeah, it is...
	I will agree with Alex Jones.
	Jones sees it entirely differently because his entire worldview is, are you pro-humanity?
	Or are you anti-humanity?
	There's no other ideological framework for Jones.
	And he's like, Elon is right now pro-humanity, so he's for supporting Elon.
	He's for more human beings out there.
	And I empathize more with Alex's perspective than others on these ideological issues.
	I share a similar framework.
	But, I mean, what we're seeing is the judicial branch has gone rogue.
	It's really gone rogue all the way along.
	The judicial branch gave us the Civil War.
	Without Dred Scott, the Civil War doesn't happen.
	What most likely happens is slavery fades out by the 1870s, 1880s, like it did in a range of other countries around the world without such a conflict occurring.
	But Dred Scott made that impossible to occur, practically speaking, and guaranteed a war.
	So I might write a book about how the Supreme Court is one of the worst institutions in the history of the world, and the American federal judicial branch, because I'm a harsh critic of it, even though I'm constantly in front of it.
	Because I believe you have to knock on the door to get your answers.
	You don't run away and hide as the solution to bad people doing bad things.
	I think President Trump's instincts on this are correct, which is to take it up to the Supreme Court.
	Get the lower district courts to make one crazy ruling after another.
	Like, no, Mr. President, you can't even ask where the money is going.
	No, Mr. President, you can't even appoint people concerning national security.
	Who does and doesn't get criminally prosecuted?
	Basically, they're stripping him of all of his elected constitutional duties.
	They want to turn America into basically the parliamentary system that was what they fought from back in 1776.
	Neuter is not even the right word.
	It's eliminate the position.
	Now the executive...
	Congress gets to spend your money.
	The judicial gets to tell the president that he's got no oversight in terms of how it's spent.
	And they come up with these decisions that...
	He can't even fulfill or carry out his election promises for which he was elected.
	And it's constitutional obligations.
	And that's what makes it outrageous.
	But they are so over the top, so extreme, so ridiculous.
	You can't hire people.
	You can't fire people.
	You can't cut spending.
	You can't reduce spending.
	You can't divert spending.
	You can't change organization.
	You can't look into intelligence issues.
	You can't look into national security issues.
	You can't do this.
	Basically, you can't be the elected head of the executive branch.
	And we, the unelected judicial branch and unelected bureaucracy, are going to seize all power.
	And we're going to do whatever we want, whenever we want, like we've been doing since 1947.
	And the problem with that is the American people are outraged by it.
	I mean, they're losing normies.
	I mean, Bernie Sanders doesn't realize how much he's torched his credibility.
	You know, Bendover Bernie is just in the pocket of Big Pharma.
	Here he is, not only votes against Robert Kennedy, who's been a lifelong friend, but votes against Tulsi Gabbard, who sacrificed her political career for him.
	I mean, that's what he...
	Now, when Bernie says the American class, well, you do his accent much better than me, he means the bureaucracy.
	He means the executives at big pharmaceutical companies.
	That's who is Bernie's working class supporters.
	That's his working class allies are like him.
	People who have got fabulously rich in government.
	His war on the millionaires and the billionaires quickly became a war on the billionaires once he started squarely fitting in with the millionaires.
	But it is very selective.
	He had no objection when George Soros was having extraordinary influence over U.S. government policy.
	He had no objection when Bill Gates was having extraordinary assertion over government policy.
	I mean, this is where Bobby Kennedy is such a sweetheart.
	He only gently challenged Bernie Sanders.
	If I would have been there and said, Bernie, where were you when George Soros was running American foreign policy?
	Bernie, where were you when Bill Gates was running world global health policy?
	You were nowhere to be found.
	You were their allies.
	You were the little bitch of the billionaires, Bernie.
	That's who you were.
	The billionaire's bitch, Bernie Sanders.
	That's the reality.
	That's why they're probably going to nominate me.
	Or if they do, they'll put a closed session and Barnes will be buried under the Capitol somewhere.
	But, I mean, this was just outlandish.
	This behavior by the judicial branch and the bureaucracy.
	And by the way, all of it's being coordinated by the same guy who stole the 2020 election.
	It's Mark Elias, criminal money launderer Mark Elias.
	For those that don't know, just because he's unindicted is no excuse.
	He's still a criminal.
	Go back and investigate Russiagate and how he was the key to the money laundering to cover that up.
	He is coordinating all of these lawsuits.
	And it raises things.
	I'm a huge supporter of private sector unions.
	In that respect, I'm different than your norming conservative.
	I'm a huge opponent of government unions.
	The government is run by the people, set by the people.
	I've never agreed with the idea that there can be binding contracts, binding union provisions that overrule the elected interest of the people.
	And so that's divesting them of one of their few powers they have, which is the power of the franchise.
	But that's what all this is recognizing.
	They're asserting ludicrous ideas that they basically get to run their own government and the elected head of the executive branch can have no say.
	What is going to happen is this is going to force the Supreme Court and the institutionalists on the Supreme Court...
	Who at least historically and ideologically and intellectually align with Trump's argument on this.
	Justice Roberts, Justice Kavanaugh, and Justice Barrett have all in the past been supporters of the unitary executive theory, namely that the elected head of the executive branch runs the executive branch.
	And there can't be these independent agencies that are not subject to executive discretion or control.
	There can't be these even congressional limitations on core constitutional executive authority.
	That's what the decision that ultimately Barrett jumped suit from, but Kavanaugh and Roberts went along with in terms of presidential immunity from civil suit and criminal prosecution.
	Similar theories.
	Roberts has been the biggest advocate of this.
	So they're creating the best factual pattern to animate the conservatives, Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas, who've never liked these nationwide injunctions, never liked this excess and abuse of judicial power, never liked the bureaucracy invading the elected head of the executive branch because they recognize it disrespects the American people and their ability to control their own government.
	This is why populists and constitutionalists joined ideological conservatives in support of the unitary executive theory.
	It empowers the ordinary voter more than it empowers anyone else.
	People think of it as empowering the president, but in reality, it empowers the people to have consequence on the executive branch through their election for the president.
	And so I think that's the constitutional framework.
	And I think the Supreme Court is going to throw all this out, and they're going to finally give the...
	And I'm for Trump taking this path, because let's say Trump right now goes for Andrew Jackson.
	Then we don't have the Supreme Court precedent to make this permanently.
	On our side, on the populist, constitutionalist, individual rights side of the equation.
	So I want the Supreme Court to rule on it.
	And these lower courts are so out of touch, so arrogant.
	So, I mean, they're so vague.
	I mean, if you're a federal judge and you have family members or you yourself are receiving money from USAID, directly or indirectly, you should immediately recuse yourself.
	And yet they're not.
	That's bad behavior.
	That's sanctionable behavior.
	That's impeachable behavior.
	That's criminal behavior by these federal judges.
	And I think they need to impeach some of them.
	And realizing you're not going to remove them, but what happened when they impeached Samuel Chase, even though they knew they couldn't remove him?
	The whole judiciary woke up.
	They were like, oh, okay, sorry, maybe we won't decide to seize all this power unilaterally like we're trying to do.
	And maybe we shouldn't use it to weaponize it against our political adversaries like they're currently doing.
	This is about do we have a constitutional republic with an elected head of the executive branch or not?
	That's what these set of cases are going to decide.
	And I want the president to force it up to the Supreme Court to decide because the fact pattern is as favorable as it's ever been to get the Supreme Court to put an end to this nonsense once and for all.
	Well, and where it's currently at now, I mean, Doge is doing what it's doing.
	Even the order from Engelmeyer out of, was it Southern District?
	You know, saying like Elon is not allowed accessing information and has to delete whatever he's gotten.
	The bottom line, they're still doing it anyhow.
	And then there were the threats of holding Trump in criminal contempt.
	And then the question is, all right, great.
	Hold Trump in criminal contempt.
	Who's going to arrest him?
	I mean, there the Supreme Court admitted that the courts have no direct power over the president in that regard.
	So, I mean, so it's interesting.
	He'll just defy the lower court orders to the extent that they're unreasonable and then say, hold me in criminal contempt, do what you will, you're going to do nothing.
	He's going to take everything up to SCOTUS and force SCOTUS to get involved earlier than they probably won.
	The Supreme Court would hate to rule in favor of Trump, even though they like the unitary executive, but they're going to have no choice because they're seeing this is the other reason to do impeachment.
	You need to wake up the Supreme Court that there is rage amongst the American people and is being represented in their elected representatives and other influencers who are saying, impeach, impeach, impeach, impeach.
	The Supreme Court's not used to the judicial...
	The judiciary has only faced this kind of blowback twice in American judicial history.
	Once, all the way back during FDR, where they're like, screw you, we're going to block the entire New Deal.
	And FDR said, you know, I think you're a little old up there.
	I think you're probably overburdened.
	Why don't we add, like, I don't know, nine judges or so?
	Oh, so the Supreme Court was like, well, hold on a second.
	We didn't really mean, you know, and they completely capitulated, by the way, for the next decade.
	They went too far in FDR's camp.
	But that's another story for another day.
	And then otherwise, Justice Samuel Chase.
	So the history is when the Supreme Court realizes.
	There's rage in the American public about the judicial branch that is discrediting the judicial branch.
	People like Roberts and Kavanaugh will race in to try to recover the judicial.
	The power of the judiciary is almost entirely dependent on the credibility of the judicial branch.
	And if they realize they not only are hostile to the elected head of the executive branch...
	They're also, the members of the legislative branch are unhappy with them.
	People who can cut off their budgets.
	People who can change where venues are done.
	You know, Senator Lee put out, well, what are some reform ideas?
	Get rid of the district of corruption.
	You completely control it.
	The Congress has complete authority.
	Congress can eliminate every court but the Supreme Court.
	The Supreme Court is the only court constitutionally required.
	They've said otherwise.
	Every inferior court, in the language of the Constitution, is decided by Congress.
	They decide whether they exist.
	They decide what their jurisdiction is.
	They decide what cases they can handle.
	Now, once a federal judge is appointed, you can't change their salary, but you can change everything else.
	You can say, you know what?
	You have no more cases.
	Yes, you can do that overnight.
	You can't take away their money.
	But their salary, but you can take away their secretary salary.
	You can take away their law clerk salary.
	You can take away their U.S. marshal salary.
	It's time for Congress to start exercising meaningful oversight over the judicial brain.
	What was the lawsuit, though, however, as relates to, it might be the segue, unless we have more on this, but we also have to move on over, but the lawsuit that you can't pay an employee not to do anything because that violates, I don't even know what the argument was there.
	They can do stuff.
	You can have them script old Egyptian hieroglyphs.
	You can assign them some projects.
	But the judicial branch doesn't take Congress seriously.
	That's clear in how they don't take the American people seriously.
	They hold the American people in contempt.
	I was up in front of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals arguing a testing mandate case where the judge, I think he might even be the chief judge, was shocked.
	When I raised the question of, you know, Judge, remember, your decisions here are going to impact real people.
	They're going to have an impact on real people.
	So take that into consideration when you're interpreting the law.
	Make sure you're absolutely right when you're going to cause a lot of harm on real people.
	The only reason you're there as a human being rather than AI is because you're supposed to put the human factor into the equation.
	And he was shocked!
	And enraged.
	Oh, no, no, no.
	Nothing I do impacts the American.
	How can you possibly...
	I get it.
	He wants to screw people over and doesn't want to suffer accountability for that.
	Doesn't want to look in the mirror for what he's doing.
	But this is the mindset of the judicial branch.
	And that's why it's going to require discipline from either the Supreme Court, the Congress, or the President for them to get back in line.
	Okay, let me read a few of the...
	Everyone get your butts on over to Rumble.
	Because we're going to do this now.
	But let me read just a few of the Commitube chats.
	All judges bench...
	Are judges bench influencers?
	What does that mean?
	I mean, if you mean like public influencers, to a degree, yeah.
	All right.
	I'm just going to do these quick because I had to screen grab them because I can't keep them otherwise.
	Here we go.
	We got...
	Are we looking at the big one now?
	Yeah, we are.
	Okay. I can't read it.
	How's the weather, guys?
	This is from Forced Game Chase.
	Cold AF up here.
	Topic. I'm having a flag made of Alberta, coat of arms, but I replaced the beaver crown and helm with the eagle of the field.
	Dude, you're going to get done.
	People are getting angry about the Canadian stuff.
	Then there was a hero.
	I got the China Hustle.
	Says, Viva, could you discuss my predicament with Barnes to see how I might cause of action the China Hustle?
	Well, this is a broader thing.
	We'll have to...
	Potentially talk about it later.
	Okay, now, I say...
	Okay, let's go to Rumble for a second.
	We've got the DC federal courts must dissolve at least since Pinochet's helicopter tours.
	King of Biltong.
	Biltong, thank you for that beef bouquet.
	It was flipping delicious.
	We still have some left.
	Increase your protein intake by adding some healthy high-protein snacks to your diet.
	Also packed with B12, iron, zinc, creatine, and much more.
	Get some at BiltongUSA.com.
	Code Viva for 10% off.
	Rob, I just replied to Rob.
	Rob, I think you're in the wrong, but...
	We'll have to agree to disagree.
	We don't want all of Canada, just Alberta, Manitoba, Yukon, Northwest Territories, the Maritimes, and Saskatchewan.
	You can keep BC, Quebec, Ontario, and the rest.
	So six new states.
	That was from Panther AI or Panther Al.
	Alexi Kumu says, sadly, Europe has regressed to World War I, World War II times.
	Eiffel says, theory, Trump and Poilier had this planned months ago.
	Trump belittles Trudeau as he saber rattles with tariff threats.
	To force border security measures, Canadians rally behind Poiliev checkmate.
	Yeah, well, they're going to do that anyhow because Poiliev is certainly the lesser of the evils.
	That guy dude says, sorry, do you or Barnes happen to know of an internet defamation lawyer?
	Okay, email Barnes Law LLP.
	Robert, what's the email address where people should email you?
	RobertBarnes at BarnesLawLLP.com or if you go to the website.
	BarnesLawLLP.com.
	The best way to reach me is to go to the contact page on the law firm website because that actually goes to my entire team.
	And we've got Old Man Toby, or that's Old Man Toby.
	Viva, I was on disability for six years, got my education.
	I was able to get back to work.
	I had to turn my paycheck for three years.
	I had to turn my paycheck for three years because they would not stop my payments and still over...
	I was on disability for six years, got my education.
	I was able to go back to work.
	I had to turn my paycheck for three years because they would not stop my payments and still overpaid me.
	Okay, I'm not sure.
	Okay, now let me do one thing here.
	We're going to do this and I'm going to read a few from...
	Get your butts on over.
	We're going to end this very soon and bring it on over to VivaBarnesLaw.lo...
	Rumble and then VivaBarnesLaw.
	We got...
	Love the Honorable Barnes in his dapper waistcoat.
	And Ty, this evening, thank you both for the intellectual and entertaining perspectives.
	I learn something every time I listen to either of you independently or together.
	God bless you both.
	Any updates on the Amos Miller PDA buzz about our new confirmation label?
	It's unbelievable.
	This is from Shalina.
	Amos Miller is now having to deal with the IRS.
	So we had a tax court case.
	Another Pennsylvania department is harassing him.
	And even though the Pennsylvania Attorney General, newly elected, got elected on the grounds that he was going to stop the harassment of the Amish and the small farmers, instead, his deputies are demanding invasive all kinds of personal information, demanding that Amos and Rebecca Miller sit for depositions, demanding all kinds of discovery of everything under the sun.
	So rather than...
	Walk away from this case like was implicit in the Attorney General's election.
	This Republican Pennsylvania Attorney General is failing to keep his promises right away after getting elected.
	So unfortunately, the Amos Miller harassment continues.
	And I keep asking the newly confirmed Secretary of Agriculture at the federal level, Brooke Rollins, when is the federal government going to stop its harassment of Amos Miller and the Amish farmers?
	The Amish are the reason they have the majority they have in the U.S. Senate.
	The Amish are the reason President Trump was guaranteed re-election.
	So is Brooke Rollins the real deal?
	Or is she another fake?
	So, you know, I'm yet to see any evidence that Brooke Rollins is the real deal.
	Yet to see any evidence of that.
	It is the one appointment the president made that nobody I know in the agriculture sector that's on the small farmer side knows who the heck she is.
	So, I mean, she snuck in as part of that.
	America First group that was not Stephen Miller's America First group.
	It was an old Rick Perry, big oil-funded America First group.
	So the Robert Kennedy confirmation is very promising, but we're yet to hear from whether Brooke Rollins is going to continue the harassment of small farmers that her predecessor did.
	If she's going to stop it, announce it.
	I mean, the first thing she could do is announce that the federal case against Amos Miller is dismissed.
	For good.
	And there's going to be no more harassment.
	With prejudice.
	Yeah, with prejudice.
	Done finito.
	Show that you're for real about standing by small farmers.
	Because your predecessor that Trump appointed, that fat-ass boss hog lookalike, Sonny Perdue, was a disgrace to protecting small farmers and instigated, originated the harassment of Amos Miller.
	So if Trump is going to keep that part of his promises, and he's done a great job on all the rest.
	Brooke Rollins needs to keep her promise to President Trump and his supporters that she will actually fight for small farmers.
	So far, now, she just got in there, so I'm being unduly harsh on her.
	But I want to see action fast.
	We see action fast.
	Another key place is it appears the corrupt Justice Department is some lower level officials, I believe, are hiding the existence of the Brooke Jackson case from newly confirmed Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert Kennedy, the new commissioner of the FDA, the new Surgeon General, and from the President of the United States, the Vice President of the United States, and the Attorney General, Pam Bondi.
	I have not heard from any of them.
	I've heard from...
	Senators, I've heard from other people who are aware of the case.
	None of them appear to be aware of the case.
	Why is the Justice Department...
	The only basis they dismissed Brooke Jackson's whistleblower claim was they said it was against national policy to even question the vaccine.
	That is the exact opposite of this administration's national public policy.
	So Pam Bondi should be stepping into the case and reversing the Justice Department's position and saying we support the reinstatement.
	Of the Brooke Jackson case.
	And we shouldn't have to fight for it in the Fifth Circuit to get that right reinstated.
	That should be the joint position of the Justice Department with their actual client in this matter, who is who?
	The Secretary of Health and Human Services, who is Robert Kennedy.
	I mean, you have the arrogance of the professional bureaucratic class in this respect, just like we were talking about with the judges and the bureaucracy writ large.
	You see it in the fact that you have a hospital in Ohio refusing to provide emergency medical care to a young girl because she doesn't have a COVID vaccine, even though her condition is a heart condition for which the COVID vaccine would make worse.
	And she is related to the Vice President of the United States, Vice President Vance.
	This is how arrogant the medical establishment is after Biden pardoned Fauci, their head criminal.
	So this is why there needs to be corrective action.
	Corrective President Trump.
	He's immediately said, we're going to form health commissions.
	He's made sure Robert Kennedy got confirmed and other Kennedy allies got in.
	And he said, no more vaccine mandates on schools.
	If you want federal funding, you don't mandate vaccines, period, end of story.
	If you were in the military and you were discriminated against to play the vaccine, you're reinstated with back pay.
	Which, by the way, the Defense Department should consider extending to contractors and subcontractors who are also fired because of the military mandate.
	I think they should extend that to say, if you want to receive contractual revenues in the future from the federal government, just like they're doing with schools, if you want defense contracts, you want any contract, you can't mandate the vaccine, and if you...
	Previously discriminated against someone related to the vaccine, you have to offer full reinstatement to those individuals as a precondition of getting federal funds.
	But what it reflects writ large in the Brooke Jackson case is how we still have rogue aspects of the Justice Department, I believe, hiding information from the elected heads and the confirmed heads of their departments.
	Okay, now hold it, because we're going to do this on Rumble, but I'll just read two more.
	It's got RushBabe, not 49, says, see my question in the comments.
	Hi from Communist Weston Washington.
	And Junkman66, 611 says, regarding Brooke Jackson's case, what would be the ideal situation for Van Bondi could do to get this case moving forward?
	And Pfizer held accountable for their fraudulent trials of the COVID-19 vaccine.
	Hold on.
	Answer that one over on Rumble.
	We are ending on Commitube.
	So everyone get your butts on over to rumblevivabarnslaw.locals.com.
	And then after that, we're going to have our after party.
	So this, we're going to get into this now because it's, I'll get into hypothesizing as to who might be hiding this and it will get there.
	But okay, Rumble, Viva Frye.
	People, see you later.
	I mean, YouTube, at least.
	Okay. So, Robert, Brooke Jackson files a Ketam fraud lawsuit alleging that the trials conducted by Pfizer in the development of the COVID-19 jibby jab were fraudulent, scandalous, totally, totally compromised.
	They were totally unscientific and garbage, but they got to the results anyhow by fudging their numbers, yada, yada, yada.
	Key Tam is fraud on behalf of the state when the state doesn't take it, and she's taking this action on behalf of the state that should be taking it but doesn't.
	It goes on through the court system for a couple years at least.
	Yeah. Oh, yeah.
	So, I mean, she brought this to the Justice Department's attention while President Trump was still president.
	And so to take people back, the Pfizer vaccine received its emergency use authorization based on the Defense Department approving a particular contract with Pfizer.
	What did President Trump's contract require?
	What was the deliverable, as they say in contract terms?
	It was that Pfizer promised they would deliver a safe, effective vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 at speed and scale.
	In fact, they promised to deliver it prior to Election Day 2020.
	They actually had it available prior to Election Day 2020, but they hid that from President Trump.
	Because they didn't want President Trump to profit from it on Election Day.
	I remember it.
	They waited until after the election in order to say, we've got a working vaccine.
	Then everyone was like, they got around the fact that no one would ever take a Trump vaccine.
	And when we thought, when it was being sold as something that was going to be good and functional and the fruits of the Operation Warp Speed, we were at the time saying, that's dirty to wait for Trump to be out of office.
	Because had they disclosed it before, he might have gotten reelected, which would have ultimately turned into a bad thing four years later.
	But sorry, go ahead.
	Well, it would have been a bad thing for Pfizer.
	And it was, why did Pfizer sandbag the Trump administration and delay the announcement of the production of the COVID-19 vaccine?
	Because they didn't want President Trump to hold them to their contract.
	As people around the world are discovering, Trump's going to hold you to account when it concerns American interest.
	And Pfizer didn't want to be held to account.
	Because they already knew, based on what Brooke Jackson had disclosed to Pfizer internally, that Pfizer's clinical testing was so radically inadequate that it could not be any form of scientific basis to make any claim that the COVID vaccine was even a vaccine, least of all safe or effective or could prevent COVID-19, transmission or infection, and that they couldn't, in fact, produce it at speed and scale.
	And that that was, in fact, part of the problem with their clinical testing was attempting to do it at speed and scale in ways that no vaccine had ever been approved in that timeframe.
	The second aspect was Pfizer knew President Trump would never mandate it.
	And they knew the only way they were going to line their pockets with this vaccine, so-called vaccine, because it wasn't, it was just a drug, a therapeutic.
	In fact, in the contract, it just says a vaccine is what we're paying for.
	That prevents the infection and transmission.
	It's right in the contract.
	They're saying we're not paying for a therapeutic.
	So you see these fake doctors like Neil Stone and some of these other frauds that are out there attacking Bobby Kennedy.
	And they're out there saying, oh, this was a great vaccine.
	It wasn't even a vaccine, you fraud.
	So it wasn't a vaccine.
	It wasn't effective because it didn't prevent any degree of transmission or infection.
	In fact, it had negative efficacy.
	What is that?
	It meant the more you took it, the more likely you were to get COVID.
	Worst vaccine in history.
	And it sure wasn't safe.
	Pfizer's most recent list is like 25 different side effects, severe side effects you can get from the vaccine.
	They knew that at the time.
	But they knew President Biden wouldn't hold them to account.
	They knew President Biden would force it on the world because of his tight ties to Bill Gates and George Soros, who are big fans of medical experimentation on the American public.
	George Soros, Bill Gates from his old paternal legacy of supporting eugenics, and George Soros.
	Who was tutored by the greatest oppressive force in the history of humankind, the Nazis, who he gladly was the godfather recipient of, the sort of honorary grandson.
	When he went around, hey, steal that guy's stuff.
	Hey, steal that guy's stuff.
	And never got out of old Georgia's bloodstream.
	That Nazi instinct.
	So she goes in the fall of 2020 and blows the whistle to the Justice Department.
	Blows the whistle to the Food and Drug Administration.
	What happens?
	The same day she blows the whistle to the FDA, Pfizer, through Ventavia, her direct clinical trial employer, fire her.
	The court wouldn't even allow her to pursue her retaliation claim.
	I mean, that's how nuts the opinion was.
	The reason given for her immediate dismissal?
	They had, oh, she wasn't a good fit.
	And it's like, what does that mean?
	This is someone with an impeccable record, Brooke Jackson, impeccable record in the pharmaceutical clinical testing arena.
	It's what she was hired to do.
	She'd been doing it for a decade plus.
	And so the idea that she wasn't a good fit, no, she wasn't a good fit if what she was doing was fraudulent.
	That's what she wasn't a good fit for.
	And is it a coincidence?
	She talks to the FDA in the morning and she's fired by afternoon?
	Come on.
	And not only that, she got direct contacts from Pfizer on a phone that was only known to the FDA.
	I mean, to the FDA, rather.
	So then the Justice Department gets involved.
	Then the FBI gets involved.
	They're promising, oh, they're going to do meaningful reviews.
	They're going to stop this.
	They're just lying their ears off because Bill Barr doesn't want Trump to know about this.
	So Bill Barr hides this from Trump for the entire time frame.
	So then about almost a year into this whole process, she reaches out to me.
	Through a range of people.
	And I end up looking at the case and see what's happening.
	It's like, oh, they're just trying to hide this from the world.
	They're not seriously investigating this.
	That's hogwash.
	So we publicly disclose the suit, ask for it to be unsealed.
	It's unsealed.
	We get the British Medical Journal, one of the most well-respected medical journals in the world.
	To independently vet and validate her allegations.
	They publish an article that goes global through Europe but gets suppressed in the United States saying that what she is saying is absolutely true and accurate and that these clinical tests cannot be trusted and that this drug cannot be marketed as either safe, effective, or even a vaccine given it's none of those at all.
	So we bring suit because this is a massive fraud on the American people that has caused injury to millions of people around the world, including millions of people in America.
	Including death, including disability, including discrimination, including severe injury.
	The government, the very last minute, it looks like we're going to prevail and get to discovery.
	The Biden administration, the very last minute, intervenes and demands dismissal.
	This is how many years into the litigation?
	Just so people understand this.
	Years. Years into the litigation.
	And how many dollars?
	I mean, this is now hundreds of thousands of dollars.
	In terms of legal time of everybody on behalf of Brooke Jackson, millions.
	You're talking about millions of dollars.
	And so they come in and they say, We're now intervening.
	We chose not to intervene at any stage earlier than this.
	We let you waste time, money, investigate, etc.
	And say you support the case, you back the case, you're investigating the case, none of which they were really doing.
	And they come in and their intervention is to kill the Ketam case.
	Correct. And their only ground, they cite no evidence, not a single affidavit or declaration gets signed.
	They produce zero.
	sworn testimony from anybody in support of it.
	They say, judge, we're the United States government.
	So we get to have a monopoly over Ketam.
	We ask that you allow us to intervene so we can move to dismiss.
	And we demand that you provide no evidentiary hearing of any kind for this.
	We demand you have no discovery of any kind for this.
	We demand that you require no evidence be produced for this.
	We require that you don't even disclose...
	Disclose a legally sound reason for this.
	We just want to do it.
	And if we want to do it, that's enough.
	And it's against national health policy to question it.
	And they took it a step further.
	They said they didn't like Brooke Jackson's public speech, so they would like the judge to punish her for her public speech, raising alarms around this issue.
	And again, remember, what was the Surgeon General doing at this same time, the Biden Surgeon General?
	He was demanding Facebook censor accurate, truthful information about injuries related to the vaccines.
	He was demanding they don't allow anybody to know that the vaccines are causing problems.
	This wasn't challenging misinformation.
	This was challenging accurate information that they started labeling malinformation.
	We watched 1984 a couple of weeks back at Viva Barnes Law.
	.locals.com is a Saturday movie night live chat.
	And it was amazing watching.
	I was like, this is COVID.
	This, like, predicts everything in COVID.
	All this crazy Orwellian language.
	You know, the newspeak and, you know, all the things that happened or didn't happen.
	The gaslighting in mass.
	And so she brings suit.
	They intervene at the last minute.
	The judge says no evidence is required.
	No reason is really required.
	Nothing legally sufficient is required that has traditionally been required.
	You can just dismiss the case because the government declares so.
	Which would completely reverse the 1986 amendments passed by Senator Grassley.
	Senator Grassley is kind of the father of the modern KETAM laws.
	And he established he didn't trust the government to always do what's right.
	And he said, from the beginning of our KETAM laws, we've always allowed private citizens to be private attorney generals because the government sometimes is in on the very fraud that is being exposed.
	This is a case—these claims are not owned by the government.
	It's the same problem the Trump administration the judges are getting with the bureaucracy.
	The government is the American people.
	There is no, like, bureaucracy independent of the American people that has any legitimate authority of any kind.
	So it isn't what the government wants.
	It's what is in the interest of the American people.
	And that's what the key team laws were designed, was to protect the American people, often from corrupt actors in the government that are mishandling the people's money.
	Because that's what it's all about.
	It's about recovering the people's money back to the people.
	I want to just bring up, speaking of 1984, Robert, something that you might be thinking of.
	A quote from the book, and when you watch AOC and other people on the internet, Winston had disliked her from the very moment of seeing her.
	He knew the reason.
	It was because of the atmosphere of hockey fields and coal baths and community hikes and general clean-mindedness, which she managed to carry about her.
	He disliked nearly all women.
	No doubt.
	and above all the young ones who were the most bigoted adherents of the party, the swallers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers out of unorthodoxy.
	George Orwell.
	No doubt.
	So we made the argument, the district court dismisses, he's just a rubber stamp for the government.
	And so it goes up to the Fifth Circuit.
	But remember, the only grounds the government asserted was that it was against the Biden administration's public policy to second-guess the vaccines.
	Not that there was anything wrong in any of her allegations.
	Not that there was anything factually or legally insufficient in them.
	Not that it was a negative use of government resources for the case to be investigated.
	Clearly not, given the amount of recovery that was available to it.
	Billions and billions of dollars.
	And so, you know, the what's millions of dollars against recovery in the billions of dollars.
	And so they couldn't even make that argument.
	And they didn't even try.
	And so our argument to the Court of Appeals is this is inadequate for intervention.
	There's what's called an intervention procedure under the federal rules of civil procedure.
	It requires good cause.
	Having been on the receiving end of that, I know that good cause is usually held as a high standard.
	But also, good cause and also timeliness?
	Like, is there not a tacit renunciation?
	If it's late, you have to have good cause.
	You don't have to have good cause at the beginning.
	Okay. Because at the beginning, you have a broad right to intervene.
	But when you...
	You don't use that time frame to intervene, and the other parties vest expectations in that fact, then you have to have good cause to justify it belatedly.
	The judge said, no, you don't.
	The good cause is just the government wanting to do what it wants to do.
	Even though it was a Trump appointee, the guy had, you know, coward tattooed on his forehead.
	That's what I've said about him repeatedly.
	He doesn't like it.
	That's how I feel about his opinions.
	I think they're cowardly opinions.
	I think someone that Trump regrets appointing.
	So you're not on the bench to cower to the corruption of the executive branch in the Biden administration.
	But he did.
	But now the issue is, the policy they cited was the policy of the Biden administration Secretary of Health and Human Services.
	Clearly the policy of the Health and Human Services has now changed.
	Robert Francis Kennedy Jr. is now the appointee and the confirmed secretary of that agency.
	And clearly from his prior public statements, he does not share the opinion that we should be completely deferential and not question vaccines anywhere, especially a drug that's not even a vaccine.
	So which figurehead holds the power to reverse or change course?
	Is it HHS or the DOJ?
	Oh, multiple.
	So President Trump has the power to do it.
	Vice President Vance could have influence in that regard.
	Then Attorney General Bondi has influence.
	The Robert Kennedy at HHS has influence.
	And the FDA commissioner, the newly appointed FDA commissioner, will have influence.
	These are the people whose decisions were being weighed at the time of national policy.
	They cited Biden, they cited Harris, and they cited the HHS and the FDA.
	And that was the Justice Department doing it.
	So those are the five actors that said this is why the case has to be dismissed.
	All five now have a different opinion than their Biden predecessors.
	All five believe you should be able to challenge and question government corruption at any level.
	That you should have a right to challenge whether a drug actually is a vaccine, whether it actually is safe, whether it is effective, whether it works for you as an individual.
	And they believe in consent, which was always supposed to be required and formed consent as part of the EUA statute, but it was one that the Biden administration just ignored.
	And so to me, I think somebody in the Justice Department is hiding the existence of this appeal from Robert Kennedy, from Attorney General Bondi, from President Trump, from Vice President Vance, and from the FDA commissioner.
	And because their position is now directly opposite.
	So what makes sense for them to do is to...
	Tell the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals they support Brooke Jackson's complaint and want the case reinstated, not dismissed.
	And then that will put major pressure on the Fifth Circuit to allow the case to go forward.
	And they have two options.
	They could step in.
	Well, they have three options, technically.
	They could continue to support what Biden administration did.
	That would be directly contrary to their public statements and to why they got elected.
	Second, they could...
	We're going to intervene for the purposes of saying this case should not be dismissed.
	The case should be reinstated.
	We support its reinstatement, but we're going to let Brooke Jackson take the lead on the litigation, and the government itself is not going to step in and take over.
	Or, part three, the government could step in and take over and say, we're going to decide what really happened here.
	We're going to investigate what really happened here.
	We're going to pursue this case into discovery and to figure out what fully happened.
	And that's what...
	Bondi and Kennedy and Trump at various points have supported in one way, shape or form is to look at all drugs in this capacity, not just the COVID-19 drug, but it's been the most controversial in this context in terms of its injuries and that it's inflicted on the American people and people around the world.
	So it's going to be up.
	So hopefully somebody can get the attention.
	Of Attorney General Bondi and their key deputies, of Secretary Kennedy, of President Trump and Vice President Vance.
	So look at this case and say, hold on a second.
	Is it consistent with our current policy for this case to be dismissed because we don't agree with the Biden administration's policy that no vaccine should ever be questioned and no fraud ever exposed?
	You made me think about this and I just went back to find the select subcommittee report.
	The Brooke Jackson didn't come up in the sub-select committee's report on the investigation to the COVID pandemic.
	How do you get that to their attention?
	I think there are senators that need to bring it to attention.
	I know Senator Johnson's team has been interested in making sure this case goes further.
	I know Senator Grassley is deeply concerned about the precedent setting that would eviscerate whistleblower claims.
	No whistleblower is going to go forward.
	If they know that the government can't at the very last minute pull the rug out from underneath them like they did in Brooke Jackson's case.
	So if Senator Grassley cares about key TAM actions and he wants to restore key TAM legitimacy, reversing this case has got to be one of his top priorities.
	And then I know Senator Paul has wanted full investigation to take place here.
	So there are senators that have called for this and supported Brooke Jackson's case.
	Congressmen like Thomas Massey that have supported Brooke Jackson's case.
	And the question is, Does the newly confirmed appointees of the Trump administration, President Trump himself, know about this?
	I don't think he does.
	I think they hid it from him the entire time he was president the first time.
	And I think they're hiding it from him now.
	I think the Justice Department officials working this particular brief, what they're going to do, are not telling Kennedy about it.
	They're not telling Bondi about it.
	They're not telling Trump about it.
	And they should because the entire premise of the dismissal of Brooke Jackson is now gone.
	The entire premise was the national policy of the Biden administration was to not question the safety or efficacy of vaccines.
	That is not the policy of the Trump administration.
	In fact, it's just the opposite.
	Well, now I'm trying to, I can't share a screen again, so I'll have to refresh my computer, but I'm just pulling up an article from September where Kathy Hochul is still encouraging New Yorkers to get the COVID-19 vaccine.
	There's 15 colleges that still mandate it.
	Yeah, so is there not a political or financial reason, but from a state perspective, there's a vested interest to never look into it, to never discover the problems, because if and when they ever discover these things...
	Will there be liability at the state level for institutions that require this and continue to require it several years into the KeyTam lawsuit itself?
	Well, I mean, that's where Trump did a great act by saying no more federal funding to anybody mandating the vaccine.
	So that's going to solve 95% of that problem.
	There's still 5% out there, like subcontractors and contractors that need to be included.
	There's a bunch of contractors that only fired people because they were forced to by the Biden administration.
	So those are people that should be put into a position where they are back reinstated and allowed to take position.
	There's other areas of this that continue to need relief and remedy.
	Multiple states are looking at banning mRNA vaccines going forward because of the problems with mRNA, particularly as a vaccine delivery mechanism that caused a lot of the injuries and illness in this respect.
	But, you know, look, and all we're asking is let us see the discovery and try the case in front of a court that's hostile to us.
	So it's not like we're asking for the world.
	We're just saying we're not even asking for the demanding the government take over the case.
	So I think that's what they should do.
	It's just, you know, let us continue to prosecute the case and see whether we're right or not.
	If Pfizer is right that this is such a safe, effective, wonderful vaccine, then by golly, they should be eager to prove it to the world in front of a jury and a judge with a jury that's predisposed to them and a judge that's predisposed to them based on the court of public opinion.
	And so yet they're terrified to even allow discovery because they know what they did was they lied to President Trump.
	Rug pulled President Trump, ambushed and sabotaged President Trump so that they could force this dangerous drug on the American people to enrich themselves.
	Everybody knows that's what happened.
	Several of the Justice Department people I've affiliated with demanding the dismissal have ties to Big Pharma, either in their past or now, going back to jobs related to Big Pharma.
	So they were compromised.
	People at the FDA were compromised.
	People at CDC were compromised.
	People at HHS were compromised.
	People in the Biden administration were compromised.
	We're compromised.
	So this is a compelling case for restoring confidence in Ketan claims for Senator Grassley, critical to Senator Johnson and Senator Paul to get to the bottom of what really happened with the COVID vaccine, and critical to President Trump wanting to restore money to the budget.
	Did these people lie to him?
	Did these people hoodwink him as well as the American people?
	If so, shouldn't there be a consequence?
	Pfizer's people are telling President Trump it's a wonderful drug.
	Well, why not prove it in front of a judge and a jury then?
	That's all we're asking for.
	We're asking for the law to be followed.
	We'll see whether these, I think, rogue Justice Department lawyers keep this information hidden from President Trump and Secretary Kennedy and Attorney General Bondi, or if they get word of it.
	And take the action that needs to be taken, which is that the national policy has now changed.
	And it's to allow the court to know we don't support the dismissal that took place before.
	We support the case being reinstated because it is not the policy of the Trump administration to ignore the dangers of any drug, whether it's labeled a vaccine or not.
	And the issues, well, we won't go into it, but it's highlighted in the vivobarneslaw.locals.com community, whether the district erred in granting the DOJ's motion for permission.
	Permissive intervention to dismiss the QTAM case, whether they fail to demonstrate good cause violated constitutional principles, whether the order of dismissal with prejudice as to relator should be vacated on the grounds that the DOJ failed to articulate a constitutionally firm and reasonably grounded argument as to why the burdens from litigation outweigh its benefits, whether the district court abused of its discretion in entering dismissal of the QTAM with prejudice as relator, and whether DeNovo review.
	The order dismissing Brooke Jackson's retaliation claim must be vacated.
	Whether she pleaded sufficient facts stating a claim that she was unlawfully terminated from her employment because of her efforts to stop one or more violations.
	It's such a no-brainer, and not just because I'm biased.
	I'm biased because it's a no-brainer and she's right.
	And it is interesting now that you got Fauci getting pardoned on his way out the door, but not Burla or any of the pharma types.
	I didn't realize their stock is now at like...
	40% of what it was at the peak in 2022 when they...
	Well, yeah, and that's great credit to Children's Health Defense and great credit to Brooke Jackson, who pursued difficult cases in the courts of law, knowing the hostility to both judges and the federal government to pursuit of these cases, that in the process of using the court of public opinion to use the court of laws to educate the court of public opinion.
	I think if Brooke Jackson doesn't go public with her case, we get nowhere near the level of public attention to the issues involved.
	And the public attention, what did it lead to?
	It led to a dramatic reduction in the number of children, especially, who took this drug.
	And there's no question that Brooke Jackson's already saved the lives of millions of people around the world by going public with these disclosures, even though it ruined her career, destroyed any chance at any kind, and put her subject to a massive Macro and microscopic attention of very powerful institutions, including Pfizer, the biggest criminal drug dealer in American history.
	Pfizer. Remember that, everybody.
	That's who Pfizer is.
	But this is a matter of fact.
	Just go look up the top civil criminal penalties paid.
	It's more dangerous to expose Pfizer than it is to expose the Sonola drug cartel.
	That's the reality of the world.
	I mean, it might be a little more dangerous to expose Boeing.
	Well, I'm just saying.
	Or, you know, the Clintons.
	That was the amazing thing.
	Like, with Trump, all of his criminal cases, nobody magically died during any of the cases against Trump.
	Unlike, you can't say that.
	Can you say that about the Clintons?
	Can you say that about Boeing?
	You can't even say that about Pfizer.
	You can't even say that about Kevin Spacey.
	But, Robin, you did mention someone's name earlier in the show.
	Dr. Neil Stone.
	I don't understand who this guy is.
	I gotta show you this.
	We'll go through.
	Infectious disease doctor.
	Clinician scientist.
	Officially the first person to use word COVID.
	Nice. Personal user of his own.
	Which reminds me.
	Whenever you go to the doctor, double check if your infectious disease doctor or any of them has a social media fray and see if they're a bunch of commies like this guy.
	That's a good...
	And immediately say, uh-uh.
	No, no.
	No, thank you.
	I want a new doctor.
	I want a real doctor.
	Not one who plays one on Twitter.
	Listen to this beautiful medical tweet that he puts out.
	Rates of autism are the same in unvaccinated kids as in vaccinated kids.
	The vaccines aren't the cause.
	There. I've saved RFK Jr. a lot of time and effort.
	He posted a link to a study that was from 2002 that was a retrospective cohort of Denmarkian children from 91 to 98. And I asked, I was like, the study's 20 years old.
	The data was 10 years old in the study.
	And it only related to MMR.
	And there are major problems with the study in the way that the study was done.
	I mean, this schmuck was going around using the old bogus CDC charts about how the unvaccinated were more likely to get COVID than the vaccinated, not realizing that chart has long been exposed.
	This was part of the Brooke Jackson case.
	They were listing vaccinated people as unvaccinated if they got COVID.
	During a certain time frame of when they got the vaccine.
	It's totally fake.
	This is a doctor putting out fraudulent data, fraudulent information in its routine in the entire medical establishment.
	It's amazing because you would get your first shot.
	One of the adverse events was actually getting COVID.
	If you got COVID after your first shot, you weren't considered fully vaccinated, and therefore they said that it was an unvaccinated case of COVID.
	Or if you suffered debilitating injury or disease from the vaccine itself, within three weeks, and you suffered death, you were considered an unvaccinated death, even though it was the vaccine that caused your death.
	That was the degree of fraud they were engaged in.
	It was very similar to the Samoan measles case that they lied about Kennedy connected to.
	It was a vaccine that caused the injuries and death.
	It was a contaminated vaccine.
	And so the...
	That's why this case is critical.
	If we're going to get any reform, any remedy, or any accountability, the way to do it is for the Trump administration to join this case.
	Not just reverse the national public policy, but join the case.
	Let's find out the truth together.
	Bottom line, President Trump designed a beautiful contract.
	Maybe the greatest contract in the history of pharmaceutical contracts by the government.
	They required a safe, effective vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19, delivered at speed and scale prior to the election.
	They lied, they lied, they lied, they lied, they lied.
	It wasn't safe, it wasn't effective, it wasn't a vaccine, it didn't prevent COVID-19, and they didn't even deliver it by the date they promised to deliver it just to screw over President Trump.
	President Trump should just get to the bottom of it.
	Is this vaccine even a vaccine?
	Is it safe?
	Is it effective?
	Did they deliver at speed and scale?
	Did they lie to the President of the United States?
	Are they a bunch of criminal frauds who belong in Guantanamo for forever?
	Let's have a meaningful investigation.
	Commit, deliver on your promises to the American people.
	And the best way to do that is reinstate the Brooke Jackson case against Pfizer.
	Did she have any personal knowledge of the Maddie DeGarry situation?
	Maddie DeGarry was the kid who did the Pfizer...
	Not that specific one.
	What she saw was a bunch of people suffering adverse events and them faking and fraudulently changing the data in the results.
	No, like with Maddie DeGarry, she was one of the children, and they wrote off her transmyelitis, I forget exactly what it is, as a stomach issue and then said it was psychological.
	She's a healthy kid that takes the vaccine and ends up in a wheelchair.
	That's the bottom line as well.
	And Pfizer lied about it, and they're still hiding behind their PrEP Act immunity about it.
	Which, by the way, you know, the hospitals are all using the PrEP Act protection right now to deny people, like Vice President Vance's niece, access to needed medical care.
	That's something that Secretary Kennedy, now confirmed Secretary Kennedy, can change at the Health and Human Services.
	And so that's something that he has publicly discussed during the campaign that he would do.
	I think you're going to discover that Robert Kennedy, like Donald Trump, are men of their word.
	And they're going to deliver.
	I think that ultimately you'll see them be curious about...
	You know, make the world know, make the courts aware that their public policy has changed and they want the Brooke Jackson case to go forward.
	But you saw President Trump, he's authorizing a broad commission.
	He wants the bottom line truth to be fully exposed and he wants that commission to be headed by Robert Kennedy because he wants somebody who has a nuanced and skeptical eye attuned to this.
	Someone who's not been captured and bought off by Big Pharma and Big Food to look at what's happening.
	To our food supply?
	What's happening to our medicines?
	That we are being contaminated and killed off early and suffering a chronic disease level that we have never experienced in the history of our country.
	And so I think you'll see Tulsi Gabbard give honest intelligence information to the president.
	And this is the most reformist cabinet.
	In the history of America, in my opinion.
	I don't think you can point to another cabinet in the history of the United States that is as reformist on core issues of the abuse of power of powerful institutions, private and public, than President Trump's cabinet.
	President Trump has kept his word.
	Now it's the time for everybody else to implement that word.
	And I think you're going to see that.
	I have great confidence in both Robert Kennedy and Tulsi Gabbard in that regard.
	Let me just, two shoutouts of sorts.
	Kayla Pollack had her on the channel, rendered a quadriplegic.
	She's suing Moderna up in Canada because in Canada there's no PrEP Act immunity, but there's contractual indemnification.
	She's suing Moderna.
	I gave everybody the link to her fundraiser.
	And then you have Dan Hartman, Sean Hartman's father, who is suing Pfizer for the death of his son, who died 33 days after his first shot.
	And there was medical malpractice in that, in addition to...
	Pharmaceutical malpractice.
	This is the link.
	I put them in there.
	So if you want to support, just remember that they're still out there fighting the battle.
	All right, Robert.
	I mean, fingers crossed.
	It has to happen.
	I mean, either way, we'll continue to fight for Brooke Jackson.
	Either way, no matter what.
	But I think it's clear to me that the key people in the Justice Department and at the FDA are hiding this information from their superiors.
	Because I have no doubt I would be hearing from them.
	If, in fact, and they would be making public corrections of the existing court record, because they know, the people that are running this case, know that the current administration doesn't have the same national policy.
	And remember, that was the only reason for the dismissal.
	So that alone requires reversal of what the district court did and reinstatement of her case.
	Robert Cash to release the Epstein files?
	I heard someone promise it.
	Well, Cash Patel himself has said that he's going to do it.
	Pam Bondi also says she's going to do it.
	So it's going to be very interesting to see how much can these cabinet folks deliver on President Trump's promises concerning what they are going to do.
	I have great confidence in Kash Patel.
	He was brought to the world's attention by Amanda Milius' film, the daughter of John Milius.
	Congratulations to Amanda Milius.
	Looks like she got engaged on Valentine's Day.
	I'm never all the way sure with Amanda because she has kind of her dad's sense of humor and some things.
	So I was like...
	Is that for real?
	Is that not for real?
	That's probably for real, right?
	So I sent her congratulations.
	He said, thanks.
	So yeah, apparently it's for real.
	So congrats to Amanda Milius, great movie director, documentary plot against the president, which introduced Cash Patel to the world.
	I think Cash Patel will be confirmed, but Cash has agreed in alignment with Pam Bondi to not only clean up the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and so it's no longer just the Federal Bureau of Informants, the Federal Bureau of Instigators, and the rest.
	We're also going to go over and audit Doge's audits, the Infernal Revenue Service.
	And a bunch of IRS employees are going to get fired or put into other positions, which sounds beautiful as well from President Trump.
	Well, so we're going to maybe broach a bunch of categories here because there's an overlapping principle of the trash taking itself out.
	You got FBI officials or you got FBI...
	Employees threatening to leave.
	You've got, who is it in the Eric Adams case in the Southern District of New York?
	Prosecutors. Oh, see, oh yes, it was a justice.
	The National Review told us that these are the great lawyers, Federalist Society, Justice Scalia clerks.
	Been trying to tell people for a while, you can't trust that for one iota if you know how they get those clerkship positions.
	And so it turned out she was one of the corrupt prosecutors at the Southern District of New York.
	And basically, saying someone's a corrupt prosecutor at the Southern District of New York is kind of like an oxymoron.
	Because if they're a prosecutor at the Southern District of New York, they're probably corrupt prosecutors at the Southern District of New York.
	It's the same thing as having dealt with them for forever.
	The only currently worst department district in the entire country is the District of Corruption in Washington, D.C. So you had one of these so-called federalist society, true conservatives, who kept their mouth shut every time the Southern District of New York or any federal other court abused its power against a wide range of people.
	President Trump comes in and says, I think the case against Adams is bogus, tells Adams he's willing that he's going to dismiss the case, but he wants to make sure Adams isn't engaged in any illegal behavior regarding illegal immigration.
	He's like, otherwise, he's going to let the case go on and see if there's other crimes here that should be prosecuted.
	That's entirely within his prosecutorial power to do.
	And so they get that deal, and that enrages the arrogant, self-righteous, corrupt prosecutors at the SDNY, including the so-called Federalist Society, so-called conservatives, who are probably angling for a court position someday, promoting...
	Bill, you know, there are people out there that are like, oh, shouldn't the Eric Adams case go forward?
	It's a completely garbage case.
	It's, what do you look for for lawfare?
	Novel legal theories that haven't been used before.
	Selective prosecution, where somebody's being prosecuted for comparable or lesser conduct than similarly situated people that were not prosecuted at scale.
	And government misconduct and malfeasance in the nature of the case.
	You have all three of those in the case against Eric Adams.
	The case should have been dismissed, should have been dismissed.
	With prejudice, in my opinion.
	But I understand what the DOJ, what Trump was doing.
	He wanted to make sure that Adams wasn't violating other federal laws.
	And that's not uncommon to say, hey, you agree not to violate other federal laws.
	You agree not to interfere with illegal immigration enforcement in New York City.
	And I agree this bogus case should go away.
	But if you're committing other crimes, I'm going to leave the prosecution in place because those other crimes warrant the exercise of judicial authority to go after you.
	So that was a reasonable position.
	Andy McCarthy's a joke.
	That idiot kept running around telling everybody that James Comey's one of the most ethical, honest, honorable people in the world.
	That's what Andrew McCarthy says.
	He's got no credibility.
	None. In the National Review, no credibility.
	None. What all of these neocon, corporate whore, fake conservative lawyers are doing is exposing themselves to the rest of the conservative movement.
	Ask yourself, these are half of the people that Mitch McConnell would put up for federal judges.
	Now you know why Mitch McConnell is who he is.
	Now you know why the Federalist Society is what it is.
	Now you know why these fake conservatives are the fake conservatives people like me have been saying they are for a decade.
	What's amazing is, so the investigation into Adams started before he took an openly adverse position on the immigration issue.
	So some people say it's independent because they started that investigation before, but they only brought the charges afterwards.
	I still say horse crap to that because I think there was a bit of a falling out period.
	And again, you can see it.
	Is it a novel legal theory?
	Treating somebody getting business upgrades as bribery on an airplane is a novel legal theory.
	At the time that that indictment came out, we were looking like, this is pretty lame.
	Oh, I said it was garbage.
	This is not me saying it retroactively.
	I said as soon as I read it, this is a garbage case.
	It's selective.
	You're in the city of New York.
	You have real corruption all over the city of New York.
	So selective prosecution?
	You couldn't find any corruption with Bill Clinton in New York.
	You couldn't find any corruption with the Clinton Foundation in New York.
	You couldn't find any corruption with Hillary Clinton.
	But you can find taking business upgrades?
	I mean, Bill Clinton's idea of an upgrade was a 14-year-old.
	I mean, that's real corruption.
	So they bring the charges and then Trump gets elected.
	Then Trump says to Eric Adams, we're going to dismiss without prejudice.
	We'll revisit it back in November.
	The charges interfere with your campaign for mayor.
	They also might interfere with your helping us with illegal immigration policy.
	And then these people start walking out saying they're using this to coerce Adams into collaborating with their immigration policy.
	And then I'm like, holy crap.
	They were using these to ensure that Eric Adams would not defy their immigration policy.
	And Trump, though, had a legal basis.
	What the Biden administration was doing was bringing fake charges so that Adams would not enforce the law.
	Trump was saying, I'll only bring real charges as long as you enforce the law.
	So that's within his prosecutorial discretion.
	If you have somebody, let's say you get somebody, let's say you get Al Capone on a parking ticket.
	And normally you would never prosecute it as some sort of RICO thing.
	But you do as long to keep Al Capone from being Al Capone.
	Say, we won't pursue this case as long as you quit being a big organized gangster.
	That's what they told.
	That's within your prosecutorial discretion.
	That's a reasonable exercise of prosecutorial discretion.
	What Biden was doing was an abuse of prosecutorial discretion and unconstitutional abuse of that discretion.
	Some people were freaking out about the element that it said, we are dismissing without prejudice, not having assessed the evidence.
	As if to say, look, they didn't even look to see whether or not they should.
	And in my view, they had to do it that way, because if they looked at the evidence, then you can't make a decision to dismiss it without prejudice.
	You're saying, we're not even touching it.
	Yeah, we're saying that there's political problems with how this case was brought, and we've got a reasonable compromise that actually enforces the law rather than abdicates from the law.
	And the complaints are the biggest grandstanding.
	What it is, it's people who are outraged that the American people have a say.
	These are people that fundamentally hate democracy.
	They always talk about defending democracy, but they fundamentally hate democracy.
	They're as honest about what they say about speech and activities and expression and democratic institutions as the Orwellian leaders were in 1984.
	So these are people that down deep despise the American people.
	And don't think the American people should have any right to have any say in what they do.
	I'm a U.S. attorney from Southern District of New York.
	That's who these people think they are.
	They're mostly corrupt frauds, by the way.
	You only have to scratch it.
	The show Billions is a very lewd, barely disguised biography of how the Southern District of New York really operates and some of its lead prosecutors really operate.
	Watch that show and you're not going to come up with, oh, what honest, ethical.
	This is like law and order.
	And they're walking up the steps to the songs and they got the honest judges and the honest cops and the honest.
	That's a fantasy land, folks.
	It always was.
	There's no more corrupt department than the Southern District of New York.
	And when I told Senator Mike Lee, I say, hey, what kind of reforms we have?
	I'll give you one.
	Get rid of the Southern District of New York.
	Maybe just make it one big district.
	You don't even have to have a...
	There's no obligation.
	Your inferior courts can be however you want to put them together.
	Maybe you put New York together with, I don't know, Tennessee or something.
	So, I mean, you can do all kinds of creative things if you want to exercise meaningful congressional oversight and authority.
	But what the president did was well within his constitutional authority.
	Take, for example, all the fake law Twitter people out there running around saying...
	I mean, Matt Gaetz is going to do a TV show and be involved in the court of public opinion right now.
	He's chosen to go that route for a period of time.
	He may come back.
	To politics, but he's just decided to check out of politics for a little while and influence the court of public opinion instead.
	But he's a very honest, very courageous guy.
	So I wouldn't get too worried about adverse to Matt Gaetz.
	He's been through an extraordinary stretch where the deep state tried to deep six him in all kinds of ways.
	He survived it, and now he's looking at a different direction for the time being.
	Recently married, etc.
	But they're saying, oh, President Trump put out a statement saying when you're trying to save your country, there is no law that you're violating.
	People, oh my goodness, the president's saying he's above the law.
	No, listen to the actual statement.
	He's saying he's not violating the law by making the country a better, safer place to be.
	And now, then the question is, what does the law say?
	In fact, this is called the justification defense.
	So yes, you can violate...
	Some technical aspects of the law.
	But if the reason you're doing so is better defends and protects people, you have what the law has always recognized as justification.
	The law exists to serve the interests of the people.
	The law doesn't exist to say, well, in the name of enforcing, I can't run this red light, so I'm going to have to let that six-year-old get run over.
	No, that's never been what the law actually is.
	These people are unaware of the justification defense.
	Because to them, the law is the rule of lawyers.
	Not the rule of law, rule of lawyers.
	They want the professional managerial class to be in control and the American people to have no say.
	And that's what's undergirding all of these cases.
	Let me read a few of the Hrumble rants over in Hrumble.
	Robert Barnes is the best.
	One, two, three, four, ace.
	Alex Daviduk.
	Brooke Jackson and her attorney Barnes saved many people's lives and health, especially children's lives.
	Millions saved from harm.
	Thank you, Brooks and Barnes.
	V6 Neon.
	I don't know if this is common, but I never had any of the C19 jabs.
	I didn't have any seasonal flu for five years.
	No flu for C19 for five years.
	Barbisa Ariane says, I hope I live long enough to see the prosecution of Fauci and Gates and all those responsible.
	Hashtag flaming elm.
	Then we got...
	I can't read that.
	It's CJKPAC became a member.
	Then we got Mumroth.
	I stopped being a supporter when I asked for help on the board via email and got silence in response.
	So a disabled vet was screwed by...
	You have to appreciate the volume and unfortunately you get an expectation where if you're part of the community, it can't be done.
	So apologies, but it's not realistic to respond to everybody's request for legal advice.
	Period. Aaron Olson says, the state of New York judicial branch opened the door for global collapse in the Trump case because the judge was not an appraiser.
	Appraiser standards are set by Congress.
	Power 1234.
	For those who were at the January 6th but never charged, are they covered under Trump's pardon or do they still have something to fear?
	Robert, I think they do technically have something to fear, right?
	It was only those who got charged or convicted.
	And so the fear now is that they're going to bring charges against...
	Well, who's the they?
	That, in theory, charges could be brought against people so long as they're not time-barred.
	If they were not charged, they would be protected by the pardon.
	But who's going to do that?
	It's going to be Trump's DOJ.
	Well, some democratic states are saying they're going to do so.
	Well, but the states could have done it anyhow, notwithstanding a federal pardon.
	Well, what state crimes were violated?
	I have no freaking clue.
	The state of New York is like, oh, we're going to do something.
	It's like, what?
	Spending money.
	I don't know.
	Crossing state lines.
	You frauds.
	But that should be a smack in the face to all the conservative DAs across the country, that the Democratic DAs immediately were threatening prosecution, even when they had no jurisdiction or authority to do so.
	Why haven't Republican DAs who do have prosecution authority, do have jurisdiction?
	There were state criminal laws violated by Anthony Fauci and by Bill Gates and by George Soros.
	Why haven't they exercised any of their authority to go after them?
	Instead, Pam Bondi has to sue the states.
	Just to enforce the immigration laws because states like New York have created green light laws where the green light is for illegal immigrants to come to the country in the state of New York and they'll be protected by the state of New York.
	The state of New York is not allowing its identity information to be disclosed to the federal government for enforcement of federal criminal enforcement immigration laws.
	Okay, before we get there, let me just read a few.
	I want to get some of the tip questions over on Viva Barnes Law.
	We've got Sandy Paws says, now that we've demonstrated Amos Miller's raw milk is like crack, but healthy, is it possible to differentiate between drug legalization and food freedom?
	That's AmosMillerOrganicFarm.com.
	AmosMillerOrganicFarm.com.
	Best milk in the world.
	Sabbath is for man, not man for the Sabbath, says Garvin68.
	I'm starting to appreciate, like, I might need a day off where I just don't touch my phone.
	TOS Forever says, please see locals' comments about insurance and Nexus Lexus.
	And then we've got Raiders Nation 53. We need to annex Sunnyvale Trailer Park and make it part of the USA.
	Make Ricky, Julian, and Bubbles U.S. representatives.
	We need federal courthouse in Guam and Barron, Alaska, says Patriot Carry.
	We'll get to more of those afterwards.
	I'm not going to play the whole thing.
	I'll just play a portion of it.
	Here, Robin.
	I know what I think, and I think some people are going to maybe be surprised.
	She's not pregnant, people.
	So if she is, it's the longest gestational pregnancy.
	Everybody keeps making a joke.
	She looks like she's putting on baby weight.
	Okay, fine.
	So, number one, if you live in a community with a lot of immigrants, know your rights.
	That's one.
	It's a tangible thing you can do that I want you to do.
	I want you.
	I hate it when people say, I want you to do it.
	Okay, this is a five-minute video of AOC ostensibly giving people notice of their rights.
	Some people are suggesting she's aiding and abetting.
	What is it?
	Obstruction. But what she's doing, she has some legal protection for doing as a member of Congress and within the First Amendment.
	But what government officials are doing...
	Like the state of New York not allowing its identification files to be shared.
	Like the state of New York trying to authorize illegals to be able to vote in elections like some other cities have been pushing.
	Like George Soros using his radio stations in conspiracy with illegal leaks from the Justice Department and the FBI.
	I mean, they're going to have...
	This is where I think Gates was right.
	He was like, just fire everybody.
	Purge the whole thing.
	The problem is what you see in the Brooke Jackson case, what you're seeing in illegal immigration, is continuous sabotage of the American people's choice in their elected representatives by withholding information from them or leaking information like when a raid is going to happen.
	This has now happened three different times in different parts of the country.
	Where people connected to the FBI and the Justice Department have illegally leaked an upcoming raid so that illegals could get...
	And these aren't any illegals.
	Remember who Trump administration is focused on?
	Violent criminal illegals.
	Violent sex-offending criminal illegals.
	Okay, that's who they're focused on.
	And that's who it is the AOCs are trying to protect.
	That's who it is corrupt cities like San Francisco are trying to protect.
	That's who it is the corrupt governors and the state attorney generals in New York are trying to protect.
	Now, right now, only civil suits have been brought.
	They do need to look at criminal prosecution if this keeps happening.
	You don't have to give your state agency, you don't have to lend aid to the federal government, but you can't illegally leak things.
	You can't impair or impede the execution of those laws by affirmative action, like the kinds being taken in New York and San Francisco, and like George Soros.
	George Soros should be under criminal prosecution when his race is under.
	stations and his NGOs are coordinating to get illegal leaks so that illegal so that dangerous criminals can escape prosecution.
	And that's the thing, just to highlight, AOC, I've got minimal problem with the essence of what she said for five minutes because it's no different than Pop Brothers at Law.
	She's basically saying, shut the F up.
	If they come and ask it, you don't have to talk.
	Ask for a lawyer.
	All very fine.
	It's very funny, though, also, she's giving advice to illegals and speaking in English, but set that aside.
	Where it becomes, there was something with AOC.
	That's because she's grandstanding and virtue signaling for her liberal lefty progressive woke pals.
	She did say something which I, you know, I'm not an American lawyer, but she said you have a judicial warrant versus an administrative warrant.
	And unless it's signed by a judge, you don't have to abide by it.
	Well, I'm going to quote that from now.
	I've been saying that, by the way, for 50 years.
	I've been saying an administrative warrant is not a real warrant.
	It's not a warrant unless it's issued with probable cause by a federal judge or magistrate.
	That's the constitutional requirement of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
	So I agree with that.
	Now, for deportation proceedings, there is a second set.
	You know, question about jurisdiction, authority, etc.
	But I'm not for administrative agencies having this broad authority.
	So now, the next time the IRS does one of their little summonses, and I can say, no, you know, you need to go to the court to petition to enforce that summons, and it's not self-enforcing, so says Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
	She was given a lot of decent advice.
	If they try to intimidate you, they try to get in, don't talk to them, and make them show a war.
	They always expose themselves when they're defending their pals and allies.
	Well, that's it.
	And then meanwhile, they justify every abuse of law when it comes to...
	Yeah, where was that AOC in the January 6th cases?
	When she was hiding for her life and all that other garbage.
	That was the time to assert constitutional rights and liberties and educate people on them.
	Suddenly, she was silent during that stretch towards you.
	Robert, it has been brought to my attention.
	Lupec, well, this is not...
	There was another incident in New York yesterday in broad daylight.
	Sad Wings Raging gifted 20 subscriptions over on Viva Fry.
	Sad Wings, thank you.
	And I saw the chat thanking you for...
	Thank you.
	It's very cool what Rumble is offering.
	It's a great way to support...
	Oh, yeah, yeah, exactly.
	I mean, this is the best value anywhere.
	Got to remind the people at Rumble.
	They were saying, look at this great lineup.
	And I was like, make sure to include the best in their lineup.
	I like Dan Crowder.
	Crowder can be number one, but he should probably be number two.
	I don't want to be number one.
	Crowder can be number two.
	I'm okay with number three, but nobody else should be.
	If it's a top ten list, Chris, make sure to include the right people.
	I don't want to look like I'm getting, what's the word, prissy or, you know, sensitive.
	You're a legitimate star now, Viva!
	No, no, I saw it.
	I was like, okay, I looked at it.
	They're all good.
	I noticed that they were saying, where's Nick Fuentes on that?
	Because Fuentes has a pretty big, he's got like top 10 streaming on Rumble.
	I don't want to get that.
	Those are people, yeah, yeah.
	I fully appreciate footnoting Nick Fuentes, so he's not on that list.
	All that to say, look, I did notice we weren't on the list, but I don't want to let that upset me.
	I was going to tweak them, and I was like, I'll wait to the show to tweak them.
	And also, everything gets misunderstood when it's via tweet.
	What was the most recent one that I had?
	But speaking of that, churches are suing, demanding that they have a First Amendment right to hide out illegals on church property.
	Have you seen that?
	They're all the churches that are like, yeah, whatever.
	It's like the Unitarian church and they sit around and the Quakers, they get together and they just talk about butterflies changing the world or whatever.
	You're like, what the heck is this?
	You see how this happens in real time.
	First of all, it's like pastors, like the one that was giving the speech to Trump and Vance.
	But you see how it happens also.
	Like having lived through a couple of intifadas and the stuff of the Middle East, it's a known thing.
	You hide out in mosques and then you complain when...
	Forces go into mosques to arrest suspected terrorists.
	They're doing the exact same things here, mutanus mutanus, as terrorist strategies to hide illegal criminals in the holy institutions so that if law enforcement has to come and do it, they say, look how bad they are.
	They're breaking down church doors.
	And it's so ironic.
	These same churches, these particular churches, where were they during COVID?
	Like, I would have respect.
	For these churches, even asserting protections over dangerous, violent criminal illegals, if they had been consistent with asserting against the efforts of COVID to lock down churches.
	Almost all these same churches supported lockdowns.
	Almost all these same churches supported their own churches being shut down.
	So save the nonsense about, oh, we just care about being a sanctuary for the refugees and the lost and the injured and the impaired and those being attacked by government.
	No, you're not.
	You're a bunch of fakes, phonies, and frauds, being self-righteous, getting on your stand, saying, we want to help rapists and murderers get away with rape and murder.
	Now, that might be a fine tradition in certain churches, not to mention the one in the Vatican, but that's not one here.
	Can you imagine the Pope trying to educate J.D. Vance?
	I mean, why don't we put a debate up between the Pope and J.D. Vance?
	Good luck, Pope.
	All that to say, then, where they're actively It's frustrating the federal ability to enforce federal law.
	You might be looking at obstruction and aiding and abetting illegal immigration.
	AOC giving mildly decent legal advice.
	She might be listening to Viva Barnes' Law.Low.
	Not recently, she was like, which podcast from the right wing should I listen to?
	I think our name popped into that reply section.
	All right.
	What do we move on to now?
	So we've got United.
	Speaking of who else AOC's audience is very sympathetic with, most of AOC's core audience, I got family that feel this way, quite frankly support Luigi's defense, the man who assassinated the United CEO because of how negatively they view insurance companies.
	Now I happen to share their very negative view towards insurance companies, and particularly United.
	I can't get into details, but I dealt with years with United, and they're one of the nastiest companies in the world.
	The Obamacare was about a big giveaway to big insurers.
	People always thought it was secretly designed to have the government take over medical care.
	No, it was to help insurers take over it in a fascistic system in symbiotic relationship with the government, granting things like immunity for suit.
	But United got exposed because it turns out two things.
	One was Bill Ackman, a doctor went public with how United was trying to block.
	Emergency needed medical care of one of her patients.
	So Bill Ackman highlighted, said knew who the doctor was, and said it's a problem.
	Then United tried to intimidate Bill Ackman, Bill Ackman's billionaire, by using a corrupt law firm that once took Tucker Carlson for a ride.
	So to give you a little ancillary note before we get into the whole United AI insurer denial story.
	What this law firm did is this law firm, Locke whatever it is, told Bill Ackman, oh no, these allegations are totally false against United.
	And for a while he bought it and stepped back.
	Then he got back into it once he did further investigation to his credit.
	But the law firm he hired, I think it's Locke Libby or whatever it is, the firm that Locke something or another, maybe it's Claire Locke, something like that.
	This is a big D.C. firm that hoodwinked and suckered.
	Tucker Carlson years ago when he was at Fox News.
	So this is a law firm that convinced Tucker that the Covington kids could not sue almost anybody.
	A leading partner for that law firm went on with Tucker, and Tucker, frankly, to his discredit, failed to even reach out to me and my firm.
	I've met some of his production crews since then, but I'm still waiting for that.
	Amos Miller film to be produced that we made a lot of effort to help him do.
	So far hasn't happened.
	I'm hoping with Tucker, but he's busy doing conferences in Dubai.
	God bless him, but maybe there's better priorities, Tucker.
	But this was someone who just took Tucker for a complete ride.
	Hoodwinked him totally.
	So he put this lawyer on who said, oh, you can't sue politicians.
	Covington kids can't bring this action together as a class.
	You can't do that.
	The law prohibits it.
	And Tucker's like, okay, I guess you're right.
	Because he just got led around like a little doggy on a leash.
	The lawyer that Tucker was having this other lawyer attack was me.
	He made no effort to reach out because this lawyer was lying about the law.
	This lawyer was just hoodwinking Tucker.
	First of all, it was very controversial whether the Westfall Act immunized everybody.
	At the time the lawyer made that statement, only one court agreed with her.
	No other court had ruled that way.
	Now, since then, they have subsequently done so.
	But what this lawyer failed to disclose is that this law firm represented many of the corrupt members of Congress who were involved in defaming and libeling the Covington kids, which Tucker failed to disclose to the world because they had lied to Tucker and Tucker's crew about it and because Tucker's production crew had been too lazy to do their job to reach out to me or others to find this out.
	The other complete lie, the lawyer said, is you can't bring a defamation game as a class action.
	Yes, you can!
	What he's talking about is you can't say that you were libeled because you're part of this massive group.
	The Kentucky Fried Chicken case, where if it's over 50, you can't defame an unidentifiable swath of people, but a lot of people who've been defamed can sue together.
	Unless, of course, you're named Alex Jones, and then they throw out all those rules completely, because those rules would have prohibited the case against Alex Jones.
	But that has nothing to do with a class action.
	If you're lied about, and if Viva and I are both lied about, and 40 other named people are lied about, we can all bring the case together as one.
	Well, if they name each and every Jan Sixer and call them insurrectionists or whatever, murderers, they can class together.
	They can join together.
	They don't have to file it as separate suits.
	In fact, you're encouraged to join together.
	So this lawyer is flat out lying.
	Tucker was putting out fake news on the law because this lawyer had suckered him into it.
	If you want an idea for who Claire Locke is...
	Guess who they end up representing after the 2020 election?
	They end up representing Dominion.
	They were part of that whole corrupt scheme to actually force Tucker out.
	So the lawyer who helps put him on there is part of the law firm that ultimately makes sure he gets fired by Fox.
	So that's how badly they just kind of bit-smacked and dog-walked Tucker.
	So I see Ackman saying, oh, this firm is saying United did nothing bad.
	I reached out to Ackman and said, you can't trust this firm.
	It's one of the most corrupt deep state firms in the country.
	And I was like, I do know who that doctor is, and you can trust that doctor.
	To Ackman's credit, researched it.
	The doctor was right.
	The Clear Lock law firm was lying.
	United was lying, as usual.
	Well, now United is being sued in a class action because United has been killing its own insureds, taking actions that lead to the deaths and disabilities and severe illness and injuries of its own insured.
	People have been paying United money to protect them, particularly senior citizens in this case.
	And United contractually agreed to provide doctors and nurses before any medical decision was made about approval of services.
	And this is a Medicare Advantage product that they were selling.
	But instead, it wasn't doctors and nurses.
	It was a computer.
	And then they had designed, they used the administrative process and the way you have to go through if you have anything that's Medicare tied or Medicare funded.
	And they had figured out a way to use their AI.
	To constantly deny appeal, you would win the appeal, you'd go back, they denied the service again.
	Then you'd go and appeal, and then you'd win, and then you'd deny the service again.
	So you never got the service that you needed.
	You never got the service you contractually paid for.
	Because part of that service was to have a real doctor evaluating it, not AI.
	The other part is they had schemed it so that you were constantly in administrative, exhaustive, appellate circles of hell.
	And so I think it's a very credible suit.
	You know, I understand why some of AOC's constituency is utterly, is more sympathetic with the assassin than the person killed.
	I don't agree with it, but I understand it.
	Because this is the hell that United has put ordinary people through at the very moment they need United the most, for which to whom they've been paying money to for, in many cases, decades, is when United sabotages and betrays them.
	It is, I mean, it's the thing, it's like, there's no excuse for murder, period.
	And then the problem is when...
	People use this murder.
	I assume that even Mario did it.
	And then they use it as the catalyst to have this substantive discussion.
	It really reinforces the idea that sometimes this is the only thing you can do in order to initiate this discussion, which is the exact wrong conclusion to draw from all of this, which is why murder is bad, period, full stop.
	There's no excuse for it.
	Universal can also be a terrible company.
	It could have been adjudicated in the courts and not a vigilante murder on the streets.
	Well, it was extraordinary.
	During the same time frame, while they're lining United's pockets by United denying people necessary medical care, they are funding billions of dollars of Medicare and Medicaid funds to illegal aliens and people around the world.
	I mean, that's how nuts our government has become.
	And it's the justifiable reason.
	For the objection of the American people.
	And we need constant reform and remedy in this space.
	And I think this class action will go forward.
	They caught United badly with probably someone on the inside blowing the whistle about it.
	The irony is AI probably would have done a better job if it were programmed properly and not programmed with the three...
	AI is all about the inputs.
	I tell people they build models for sports betting and political betting.
	And I'm like, it's only as good as the input.
	It's only as good as the algorithm.
	What was incredible is they created this algorithm to deny people.
	That's the reason why I avoided insurance through most of my life.
	I said, if it's a good idea, they wouldn't sell it to me.
	It's just the very nature of the product I never quite understood.
	Unless you're just looking for peace of mind and you're willing to give somebody else money for your peace of mind.
	But that's what's extraordinary is even then, they are violating that peace of mind by stripping them of the needed care at critical junctures.
	And it does lead to the kind of sometimes irrational rage you see reflected in the assassination and the SO support for the assassin.
	But it's a serious problem that now, I would say all these insurance companies should be on hyper alert about these kind of policies because the person in regulatory influence over them is now Secretary Robert Francis Kennedy Jr.
	Who is no fan of big food, big ag, big pharma, or big insurers.
	So hopefully that will get meaningful customer and consumer and public protection from the harms of what big insurers have been doing.
	Let me bring this up before we're going to head over to VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com sooner than later.
	Will you please talk to Chris at Rumble and have him look into a way for people to tip individual videos of content creators.
	Not everyone can do live streams for Rumble Rant tips.
	I messaged him that, so it went straight to Chris.
	MboLaz says, just wondering, can Trump run and JD's VP in 2028?
	We talked about this, Robert.
	He can't, because then he could...
	Trump can't run as a VP in 2028 after having served his two terms?
	No, because I remember looking this up when people were thinking Barack Obama would as VP.
	And it applies both ways, so no.
	Also, Trump has made clear this is his last term.
	He wants to get everything he can done.
	The reason why he's moving so fast is he knows this is his last four years.
	And J.D. has proved himself to be the next president.
	The speech he gave in Europe is amazing.
	It drives him crazy because J.D. I mean, I obviously like J.D. because he reminds me of myself.
	It came from, you know, working class, poor middle America, you know, made it through college and made it through Yale, made it through these elite institutions, survived in each one.
	So I relate to him and know him personally.
	And he's a great guy, great human being.
	But these people that think they can do it, you're from, anybody is from Appalachia.
	Who has overcome the prejudices of law school, the prejudices of the Ivy League, the prejudices of corporate law, dealing with the hostility and the difficulty of being in a military hierarchy.
	He has survived all of it.
	Survived Silicon Valley, survived Hollywood.
	Do any of these people think they're going to get one up on J.D. Vance?
	They don't stand a chance.
	They're dead as soon as they walk in.
	No, and he's...
	Unassuming in it as well.
	Yeah, he's great at it.
	I mean, he knows exactly how to handle these people because he's from middle America that has survived all these people.
	So I understand exactly how he's thinking and how he's, because I've been through it.
	But these people are always arrogant.
	They think they can, because of your background, they think they're superior to you.
	They think they're better than you.
	You can do numbers around them using that very arrogance against them.
	And that's how you get people like Margaret Brennan saying, you know what created Hitler?
	Free speech.
	Free speech created Hitler, everybody.
	It was free speech that created the net.
	Can you imagine how batshit insane you have to be?
	That's what Margaret Brennan is saying right there in front of the whole world on national TV.
	Let me bring this up.
	We're going to do these, a few in our locals community.
	I don't understand why these career lawyers, prosecutors, Pentagon brass intel officers who have the veneer of conservatism just keep their head down and go fake MAGA.
	They'll receive cover from stupid Republicans in the House and the Senate.
	Their arrogance and stupidity is shocking.
	The engaged dude says, let's give the illegals a choice.
	They could leave the country in American plane or a Chilean helicopter.
	Also, has anyone else seen the videos on X that shows illegals packing up and going back to their town on their own?
	That's happening in mass.
	There are people who came here because they thought it was the way to do it.
	Now they see President Trump saying it's not the way to do it.
	You're going to have millions of people who voluntarily go back and apply to get in legally.
	That's why Trump is focused not on your...
	Ordinary normie who's just like, you know, wanted to work as a gardener to make a little money, send back home to grandma.
	He's focused on the criminals, the violent, the people that are really destructive with giving incentives to everybody else.
	If you want to do this lawfully, go back now before I turn around to you.
	Because, you know, it's going to be probably next year that he gets to the next group of people, people that are in violation of court orders to return to immigration courts.
	But the big goal is just to at least shut down the sieve.
	And it's already shut it down by 90%.
	It's already successful at stopping the flood.
	And then second, he's already being successful at removing the most dangerous and the most violent.
	And he's already being successful at getting people to voluntarily self-deport, as it was called, so that they can come back and apply legally down the road.
	Whereas if you don't leave now, you have a risk that you'll be deported and you won't be allowed to come back legally.
	We didn't discuss it last week.
	I don't remember when this happened.
	Trump bringing some of the, you know, the illegals to Guantanamo Bay.
	And I'm not sure how I feel about that.
	I don't think I like it, but I'm not sure that I understand.
	They're uniquely violent and dangerous and no other country will take them in.
	That's probably his only choice for the moment.
	Okay. That was actually, yeah.
	All right.
	I think you're going to, but hey, guess who offered to imprison him instead of Guantanamo?
	Do you see that?
	The El Salvador president.
	We reformed crime well down here, Mr. President.
	If you need some extra facilities, we can contract for you.
	You don't got to send them to Guantanamo.
	Send them down to our jails because we've been darn good at getting those gang members reformed.
	I thought your joke was Justin Trudeau welcoming them to Canada.
	Come on, persecuted in America?
	Come to Canada.
	Let me bring this one up here.
	That'd be mighty tempting of Trump, would it?
	Take the most violent and a criminal and drop him off in Toronto, Montreal.
	No, in the new 51st state, Robert.
	Wouldn't the states going after Fauci give him a reason to plead the fifth in Congress?
	The fifth wouldn't apply to that because the fifth only applies to federal criminal prosecutions.
	The question is whether you have an analog to the Fifth Amendment within the states.
	Usually you do.
	So he can assert that now anyway.
	All there has to be is criminal exposure.
	There doesn't have to be actual pending criminal prosecutions for you to assert right against self-incrimination.
	And as far as I understand it, the way that works typically or where the concern is, is if they summon him before a federal commission and then he pleads the fifth because he might be exposed on a state level, that's where he might not be compelled to testify in some federal commission under the pretext that it might create exposure for a state level crime.
	What do we do?
	Do we head on over to Rumble?
	To locals?
	Yeah, we got three left.
	We got how the federal courts abuse their power over discovery to screw civil litigants and protect corrupt cops.
	And other corrupt government actors.
	How Attorney General Paxton won his case against the out-of-control state bar authorities in the state of Texas, who had already been disciplined by Texas courts in the Sidney Powell case.
	And the win is an expungement and expungement for Second Amendment purposes.
	That's going up to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, where a big election is coming up at the beginning of April.
	A lot of people are asleep at it because it's going to determine...
	The political majority and ideological majority of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, they'll have a direct impact on issues like redistricting, on issues like a whole wide on election integrity, you name it.
	The only person I see consistently talking about this is Scott Pressler.
	And people were obsessed with his personal life.
	It's like, who cares?
	Scott Pressler is a great advocate for a lot of great causes, including paying attention to that Wisconsin Supreme Court race that will have bigger consequence than just Wisconsin.
	But one of the cases pending before them is...
	Some liberal judges are up there saying an expungement doesn't mean expungement, even though Congress says it means expungement.
	Let me bring this one up.
	Re-Luigi, why are you not calling him the alleged killer, Barnes?
	First of all, we do.
	Second of all, I'm pretty sure he...
	Well, I think he's not going to dispute his...
	Yeah, that's the thing.
	He admits it.
	Yes, I'm assuming he's not going to challenge that he was the assassin.
	But that's just my impression.
	You're right.
	He hasn't yet publicly confessed.
	And besides which, we always do it anyhow.
	And I think it might have been tongue-in-cheek.
	Well, I referenced Luigi, but I mostly was referencing they support the assassin.
	Whoever the assassin was, these people support that assassination.
	Whether it was Luigi or somebody else.
	Their defense of Luigi is not that he didn't do it.
	It's that he was righteously justified in having done it.
	But it's a fair point that he hasn't.
	Yet confessed or been convicted.
	So I'll be more clear that they support the assassin, not saying who the assassin is or isn't.
	Let me show a couple more here.
	We got any comments on J.D. Vance's kick-ass speech to the Munich Secretary Conference?
	We got that.
	Beautiful speech about the...
	It's a speech that, by the way, here's a little free bet out there for those that are out there.
	His calling out what the EU and the Romanian courts did in disbanding that Romanian election.
	Well, they got another Romanian election coming up again after that one was canceled.
	In the betting markets, the hesitance to back the favorite was the fear that the courts or the EU would again invalidate the election.
	That's not going to happen now that J.D. Vance called him out in front of the entire world.
	Oh, so it's who will win the next, who will win the Romanian presidential election and Caelan Georgescu is at 40, almost 50%.
	Yeah, he should be at 85 to 90%.
	That's the guy they stole it from the first time.
	And now because of J.D. Vance calling it out, I think he's going to...
	Romania, like everywhere else in Central Europe, is done with illegal immigration and is done with stupid wars, done with the Ukraine war.
	That's what you're seeing, political blowback all across Europe against this.
	And the only people that haven't woken up are the EU leaders.
	They were just shocked, like Hexeth coming in and saying, no, you're an idiot to wanting to get into a war with Russia.
	No, that's your problem.
	We're out of it.
	We're done with it.
	We're finished.
	And he goes, it would not be easy to beat Russia.
	How dare you tell people this?
	How dare you suggest?
	It's called common sense.
	Ask Napoleon and Hitler how invading Russia turned out.
	Just like the old Princess Bride statement, which we watched on Saturday, that you never fight a land war in Asia.
	That includes Russia, boys and girls.
	Nobody's ever profited.
	I mean, as one Russian told me years ago, I would rather eat dirt than lose.
	And they did.
	They ate rats.
	In fact, they ate each other a little bit in Leningrad because they had nothing else.
	They were starving to death when the 30 million people died during the Great War.
	So that's just saying common sense.
	We're out of the dumb business.
	We're out of the be stupid business.
	That's for the EU politicians to do.
	I wanted to show one thing.
	Everyone get your butts on over the locals if you're coming, but Robert, two last things actually while you're on the calcium markets.
	Ed Snowden, pardon, in the first hundred days?
	Probably not.
	I wish there would be, but probably not.
	There are rumors that he would, but I hope he does.
	But I think that'll be a backburner item for Trump because there's no eminence facing Snowden or Assange.
	Because there's nothing...
	Now, there is eminence facing Roger Ver.
	Yep, that's the other question.
	But the way he could do Ver is he could just dismiss the case rather than issue a pardon.
	He could tell the Justice Department to dismiss.
	Clearly, they're just now getting their hands wrapped around everything insane happening.
	And clearly, as the Eric Adams case revealed...
	They're getting sabotaged by these low-level officials in the FBI and the Justice Department.
	And that's why some of them need to be criminally prosecuted.
	I'm glad Kristi Noem called out the FBI for leaking the illegal immigration raid file.
	Those are FBI agents that need to be criminally prosecuted.
	Until they see...
	These people have never faced consequence for their bad acts ever in their lives.
	They've never seen anybody face consequence.
	It's why they're so arrogant.
	How do you get an arrogant kid?
	They are spoiled that never face consequence.
	So you've got to whack them on the rear now and then.
	You've got to let them stick the fingers in the electric outlet now and then.
	Or they're going to keep acting badly.
	And that's what we've got to do to these rogue FBI agents and rogue prosecutors.
	There was a journalist, Ferguson, who said that they had rumorings of it.
	The only thing I've noticed is that Ed Snowden has been AWOL on Twitter for over two weeks now.
	I know Trump.
	The Snowden pardon wasn't assigned.
	I knew people that put the Snowden pardon right on his desk.
	We were negotiating behind the scenes to get that done.
	I deliberately didn't.
	I wasn't counseled to anybody that was seeking a reprieve, a pardon, or dismissal in 2020 because I wanted to put in all my eggs into the Snowden basket, and we got very close to getting it done.
	So I know President Trump is inclined to do so, but I think the political dynamics are such that that's probably going to shift to being a little bit later.
	But I think those senators that made a big deal about it with Tulsi Gabbard...
	That told Trump, oh, the deep state is obsessed with Snowden still getting prosecuted.
	That's going to tempt Trump to be like, yeah, maybe it's time to go forward with that Snowden pardon.
	And Mitch McConnell being such a prick is going to motivate him even further along that way.
	I mean, Trump is a guy...
	Remember when Taylor Swift came after him?
	And he went after Taylor Swift.
	And people are like, oh, you shouldn't go after Taylor Swift.
	She's a little popular.
	Trump always says, if you come after me, you're going to pay a political price.
	Then what happens with Taylor Swift?
	She goes to the Super Bowl.
	Trump goes to the Super Bowl.
	Trump gets cheered.
	Taylor Swift gets booed.
	And she's shocked that she gets booed.
	It's like, what did you think was going to happen when you antagonize half the country, you dimwit?
	You know, I mean, she's not even a good musician.
	I mean, what a crock.
	I mean, they had her singing Stevie Nicks.
	What an embarrassment to Stevie Nicks to be this mediocre tech-made singer.
	I mean, nobody's going to know who Taylor Swift is in 50 years.
	No one's going to care.
	But Trump's always going to remind people of that sort of thing, and that's a useful thing for Trump to remind them of.
	And I've said it often, and I'll say it again, best way to teach the deep state a lesson, one of the best ways, is pardon Edward Snowden, pardon Julian Assange, pardon Roger Ver.
	Well, and Roger Ver, I mean, I'm in...
	Mild contact.
	I mean, his appeal was overturned.
	He's at the risk of being dragged across, of being McAfee'd inside a Spanish prison or being dragged to the Metropolitan Detention Center in Los Angeles, which is one of the more dangerous prisons in the world, run by hardcore violent gangs.
	That's who runs it.
	I've dealt with people at MDC many, many times.
	It can be a high risk.
	So, I mean, Roger Ver can't even be guaranteed he'll ever get to trial.
	I mean, it's a guy who's exposed the intelligence agencies involved manipulation of Bitcoin more than any other person on the planet, sought the democratization and financial freedom that Bitcoin can afford more than any other person on the planet.
	And so I'm still hoping that the Trump administration wakes up to this problem.
	I mean, what is it?
	There's a disconnect between the people handling these cases and the people that are in the Trump administration.
	And so the Justice Department is still riddled.
	With people that hate freedom and hate liberty and hate the American Constitution and hate the American people.
	And these are the people trying to prosecute, and persecute would be the better word, Roger Ver.
	Those who don't know, Bitcoin Jesus, because he's helped promote Bitcoin.
	Was wrongfully criminally targeted for wrongful prosecution for selling fireworks.
	Served federal time for fireworks.
	Ten months.
	That's how much he's been harassed throughout his whole life.
	Stood out against what happened at Ruby Ridge.
	Stood out what happened against Waco.
	Stood up about what happened against Ross Ulbrich.
	He's the main reason Ross Ulbricht even had a public defense with Roger Ver.
	So Roger Ver, the prosecution of him is a novel theory of tax law being imposed through a criminal case with selective prosecution riddled with government misfeasance, men malfeasance, by lying prosecutors and agents who lied to courts, grand juries, and foreign officials in foreign courts.
	It's the three magical components of the trilogy of unholy lawfare.
	Novel theories of prosecution, selective lawfare, and government misconduct, all of them in abundance as it relates to the Roger Ver case, and it's why he deserves a dismissal, if not a full, complete pardon.
	Done. Let's move over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com, people.
	Tomorrow, I'm going to be on with Brianna Morella at 2 o'clock.
	I might go live before or later.
	I have some ex-family here that I might have to entertain and take to the beach.
	Tuesday, I'm going to have Dominic Box on.
	It's going to be in person, I think, towards Thursday.
	Probably on with the Unusual Suspects on Wednesday.
	Robert, what do you have this week?
	Tuesday, 1 p.m. Eastern Time, on with the Durant, covering the whole global landscape.
	Ukraine, Israel, Venezuela, Colombia, Central America, South America, Latin America, North America, Canada.
	Are we just going to go in and take it?
	Greenland, let's return it to freedom.
	The Panama Canal, should it be ours again?
	What's Trump up to?
	Does he want war with China, war with Russia, war with Iran?
	Or does he want peace everywhere?
	And is he navigating his path to it?
	So it'll be a fun conversation always with the Duran.
	They're always generous at putting people from the left, the right, wide range of political ideological spectrum on.
	The only people out there that are trying to do independent geopolitical analysis, untainted by ideological predisposition and political partisanship.
	And it's not an easy task.
	Topics like Israel, you get hated by both sides if you try to do honest, independent geopolitical analysis.
	And they've had people on from both sides.
	They've had Aaron Maté and Alistair and other people that come from the Israeli skeptical side.
	They have people like me that are more on the Israeli defensive side.
	Though I'm not full Netanyahu in that regard.
	They try to have a more independent perspective.
	But I never side with anybody who ever sided with the Nazis.
	If you sided with the Nazis, not for you.
	Sorry, that's just the way of the life.
	That's a general good guidepost for life in general.
	But it'll be a lot of fun being on with Alex and Alexander.
	They really brainstormed an idea about spheres of influence.
	And Alex predicted it before I heard Trump and Rubio saying the exact same thing.
	And some people were shocked.
	A lot of people on the left never thought Trump would deliver on wanting to curtail defense industry's share of GDP.
	And what does Trump do this week?
	He says, I propose to China and Russia.
	I'll cut half of my defense budget if you cut half of yours.
	Let's de-escalate the nuclear conflict.
	Let's de-escalate military conflict.
	Let's disinvite military-marshal conflict around the world.
	President Trump got that.
	From his uncle Fred, who was the genius, who was such a genius, the government put him in charge of indexing Tesla's papers after Tesla died with all of his unique inventions in there.
	And it was Fred Trump who taught President Trump the great risk of nuclear conflict that President Trump himself has talked about repeatedly.
	But so it'll be a lot of fun.
	Duran, 1 p.m. Eastern Time.
	I'm sure that the chat will be flooded by all the Israel haters.
	So there'll be people saying, Barnes, when are you getting your geochit?
	Mark, why are you wearing a little Jew cap?
	A baseball cap suffices.
	You're wearing a Jew cap, Robert.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	It looks like a Jew cap.
	That's probably what it is.
	It sounds like maybe it's a Jew name.
	What was your real name?
	So there'll be some of those people.
	So come and enjoy in the chat to have some reasonable balance to the conversation.
	But it's always fun to be on with Adran.
	Both Alex's brilliant guys who have tried to maintain an independent voice in a very rare space.
	And they've been way above average at predicting things.
	That's what I consider the...
	A key indicator of above-average analysis, are they predictive?
	They've been extraordinarily predictive over the last half decade.
	Well, we're going to have to put it to a locals poll as to whether or not your Jewish adopted name is Barnstein or Barnberger.
	Barnberger. Barnberger.
	Not bad.
	Barnberg. Okay, bada bing, bada bing.
	Locals, come vivabarnslaw.locals.com.
	If you're coming, if not, see you tomorrow.
	And we're updating the stream now.
	Peace out.

▲