All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 6, 2025 - Viva & Barnes
01:18:15
Trudeau RESIGNS as Liberal Party Leader! Kind of... ator Jan. 6 Patriot's Day & MORE! Viva Frei Live
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Georgia Maloney was also there.
They all gathered to celebrate John Eastman, who advised Trump in 2020 that Vice President Mike Pence had the power to unilaterally discard official electoral votes during the congressional certification process.
In a video posted online, apparently taken from the audience, Trump sang Eastman's praises, insisting Eastman was Write the whole time.
Tomorrow will mark four years since Trump's conspiracy led thousands of pro-Trump extremists to storm the United States Capitol.
Fortunately for Trump, Vice President Kamala Harris doesn't share his values set.
Tomorrow, she will preside over the certification of Donald Trump's victory.
Harris will protect the tradition of peaceful transfer of power as Donald Trump celebrates efforts to destroy it.
We're going to pause it right there for one second while I figure out how to activate my camera.
What do twin powers activate?
Camera, people.
It's January 6th.
Let me bring this out for a second.
It's January 6th.
Microphone's good, peeps.
Audio's good.
I was double-checking on the other side.
January 6th, 2025.
A day that will go down in infamy.
As the day Trudeau kind of resigns but still stays in power until they have a replacement.
Okay, Justin Trudeau has announced that he is resigning as leader of the Liberal Party of Canada.
The so-called Liberal Party of Canada.
It's also the fourth year anniversary, the four-year anniversary of the insurrection.
And if you ask a bunch of those Democrats, the amount of Democrats who actually said inciting the erection Is far too high.
But it's the four-year anniversary of the insurrection, what I call the fedsurrection, what I call the flicking coup.
It was a coup.
It was not even a soft coup.
It was a hard, violent coup.
Three years premeditated and calculated so like the most devious, conniving spouse you can possibly imagine.
Who, like, plans your, you know, his or her murder of his spouse?
Like, years in advance.
And takes so long to plan it out meticulously.
What they did in letting that January 6th insurrection happen, in making sure that it happened, whether it was through the distraction of resources to tend to those pipe bombs so they could breach the Capitol, what they...
Had, as far as a long game planned for that, I mean, I gotta tell you, if they had it planned that long in advance that three years later they were gonna try to invoke that insurrection to disqualify Trump from the ballot, good for them.
I mean, good for them.
That's like, you know, intelligence without a moral compass is a weapon and not a tool.
But if they didn't think that far in advance and they just went with it, well, good for them also.
They're creative.
Four years to the day.
And I was supposed to be in D.C. today to give a keynote.
I don't know what keynote means.
I know it's an app on Apple that I've never used.
To give a talk, to give my 10-minute presentation at the pardon panel put on by Jake Lang and his posse.
Is that the right word?
And I couldn't get down because of the snowstorm.
And fortuitous as it was, because today my phone is going haywire.
Because of Justin Trudeau resigning.
I did a bit with RT.
That's right, people.
Russia Today or Russian Television, whatever the hell RT stands for, at 2 o'clock.
I'm going to get that segment and put it on blast.
I'm going to do a segment with Matt Gaetz, which is going to air tonight, talking about this.
It's amazing.
It's amazing.
My joke was that the insurrection was so, so powerful and so insurrection-y.
That the reverberations actually overthrew the Canadian Liberal government four years later.
Now, why did I start with that video from the beginning?
We're going to talk about the insurrection.
We are obviously going to talk about Justin Trudeau.
And I'm using the term insurrection tongue-in-cheek.
It was an insurrection if you're a moron.
It was an insurrection if you are a Jamie Ratskin Raskin snake in the grass.
Why is he called Ratskin?
Because he's a human wrapped in rat skin.
It was not an insurrection by any means, except for perhaps it was an insurrection against a future Trump administration.
Saturday night, there was a lawfare panel.
There was a lawfare premiere of John Eastman's movie.
We talked about it yesterday.
And this was the video clip that I wanted to play.
MSNBC. Politically retarded.
There's no other word for it.
First of all, we fought long and hard to bring that word back because it's an appropriate term.
It is political retardation in the literal sense that their information, their political views are slowing down everybody else.
You know, you have flame retardant.
There's material that burns slower.
It delays the effects of fire.
And then you have intellectual retardants and you have political retardants and their name is MSNBC because they slow down people's information acquisition and political acumen.
So they post this.
They have a whole segment where they literally melt down because Trump didn't invite press to the event.
He didn't announce that he was going to go to this event.
He didn't give a script.
And you listen to the way they talk.
Joining us now is NBC News correspondent Von Hilliard in West Palm Beach, Florida.
Also with us is Boston Globe columnist and co-host of the Sisters in Law podcast, Kimberly Atkins Store.
Von, welcome to...
A panel of political retardants.
...
both of you this morning.
Von, give us a sense of this room.
It just...
I mean, the...
The audaciousness of it.
The audaciousness of attending a premiere of a movie on Lawfare.
It's so audacious.
Listen to what this guy has to say.
It will make you stupider, but in a way it'll also make you more intelligent because you're going to understand what the idiot propagandist lying morons actually think or actually claim to think.
It's the in-your-face MF-er.
You know?
Yeah, we're going to celebrate the overturning four years later of trying to overturn an election.
You have, you know, Trump himself saying, you know, I'm a big fan of John Eastman.
You know, he was right.
He happened to be right.
That's why they changed the law and nobody wants to talk about that.
They said he's...
You know what's amazing?
They have the video of Trump saying this.
Why do you think they wouldn't play the video and instead they play a transcript?
They read a transcript.
You have to ask yourself, if you're remotely intellectually honest, why they would do that.
And the answer is quite clear.
Because they're a bunch of dirty, rotten, scoundrel liars.
And it's a lot easier to twist when they read it and inflect than just play the clip.
By the way, Trump is 100% right.
He's not allowed to do it.
He's not allowed to do it.
And they convinced him he's not allowed to do it.
Our vice president, then right after the election, they changed the law so he can't do it.
Now what he's referring to is the Electoral Count Act, which Congress did change to basically shore up the ambiguities in the 1887 law.
Shore up the ambiguities in the 1887 law.
Ambiguities. For which they are persecuting John Eastman and attempting to disbar John Eastman for theorizing that those ambiguities allowed for his legal theory.
It's so insanely devious and deceitful.
Shoring up the ambiguities.
Yeah, there was an ambiguity.
And that was John Eastman's legal theory for which he was persecuted and disbarred.
You disgusting sons of bitches.
Period. That Eastman exploited.
That he used against the country in a private legal theory that he floated internally, which had several outcomes, many of which were, at least three of which were Biden winning, and other legal theories which involved send it back to the states to have them look at it.
Am I exploiting an ambiguity?
Yeah, it's called the practice of law, you raging jackass.
In this room, what was the purpose of this gathering?
Is it just an in-your-face moment or just a tale of things to come?
It's an in-your-face moment that they did behind your back, didn't invite you, and didn't provide you a transcript.
I can't actually carry through with this.
It's political retardation.
I don't know why anybody would listen to this.
I don't know why anybody would watch it except to know your enemy.
That is the only purpose for doing it.
It's an in-your-face, behind-closed-doors, hidden meeting.
Later on, they say they did it and didn't announce it because they knew that what they were doing was wrong.
But yet it's in-your-face MFers because John Eastman proposed a theory that was used by Nixon back in 1962 against JFK.
In Hawaii.
And the ambiguity was so ambiguous that Congress thought it necessary to shore up, remove the ambiguity so that it could no longer be a legal theory that could potentially be exploited or merely invoked, depending on how you want to go about it.
Oh, good afternoon, everybody.
You know what, I gotta forget.
I always get so angry at my intros that I almost forget.
To do our sponsors, people, we've got two sponsors for today's show, and it is, we're going to start off the first one, it's the fine folks at The Wellness Company, peeps.
The globalists are gearing up for a pandemic scare after failing at the ballot box in November, possibly.
Just weeks before President Trump's inauguration, California Governor Gavin Newsom has declared a bird flu state of emergency, granting himself yet again sweeping powers reminiscent of COVID-19 policies.
This comes after a severe case of H5N1 bird flu was reported in Louisiana.
Critics like Nicholas Hulsher warned that pandemic fears may be weaponized yet again to challenge Trump's agenda yet again, including the nomination of RFK Jr. to lead HHS.
Is this a health crisis or a power play?
Last summer, Dr. Peter McCullough warned about the bird flu, likening the virus's rapid spread to gain-of-function research, which we now know that they in fact do.
McCullough urges early preventing just in case, recommending a contagion emergency kit from the wellness company.
His medically approved board has five critical life-saving medications in the package like ivermectin, Tamiflu, Nebulizer, Hydroxychloroquine, even household, every household should have one of these.
So that you don't get screwed like many of us did the last time.
Get yours by filling out the digital intake form.
Your kid arrives in one to two weeks.
Don't wait until the deep state puts their plans into action.
Stay ready for the unexpected.
Head over to twc.health forward slash viva.
Promo code viva gets you $32 off and free shipping.
And U.S. residents only.
Unfortunately, the nebulized is the thing through which you inhale the drugs so that they get absorbed by your lungs.
twc.health forward slash viva.
Promo code VIVA.
32 bucks off and free shipping.
And once you're done with making sure that you get the medication you need...
Make sure that you get the coffee you want.
1775, it's time to make mornings great again.
If your coffee tastes like it was brewed at a UN meeting, watered down, directionless, and catering to the lowest common denominator, you deserve better.
Enter 1775's Vitality Coffee, bold and built for patriots who lead, not follow.
Lion's mane and reishi sharpen your focus faster than calling out the fake news that we are harping on here.
While Cordyceps powers your energy like a Trump tweet at 2 a.m.
Those hand-picked Bolivian beans, they're so bold, they make Starbucks taste like crap to begin with.
No fillers, no compromise, and proudly backed by Rumble, the platform that stands for truth, independence, and the fight for freedom.
Go to 1775coffee.com.
Use promo code VIVA, 15% off.
Make mornings great again with a coffee that delivers bold, uncompromising quality.
Powerful and bold.
Just like all of us.
1775 Coffee, promo code VIVA.
Links are in the description.
Oh, so do we get into the good?
Is it good news?
Ding dong, the witch is dead.
First of all, I should have made sure that we are good over on Commitube.
We are.
There's a super chat over on Commitube.
Unacceptable fringe.
Viva for PM.
Tamara Leach for Governor General.
Unacceptable fringe for Speaker of the House.
Pleb for Deputy PM.
Let's go.
We're going to get into it.
There's a lot of stuff.
It's complicated.
There's a lot of Maple Leafs over here.
Canada has been liberated, sort of, says Max.
We've got to get into it, what it means, what it doesn't mean.
We've got Pao Dees has been watching since the Freedom Convoy.
That's a long time.
Freaking, what is that, three years ago now?
Barnes and I have been doing this for damn near five years now.
Five years is going to be close, too.
Let's go over to Rumble.
So, by the way, simultaneously today, I'm sort of competing with my other stream today, which I've been live streaming all day.
The pardon panel in DC.
Couldn't make it there, and I wanted to make sure it gets as broad of a viewership as humanly possible.
It should end around 5 or 6 o'clock, and I didn't want to compete with it, but I'm going to do the Matt Gaetz segment, give or take 6.30.
It airs later on, and I didn't want to miss the stream for today, especially with the news.
So, doing two streams at the same time, and let me see here.
Let's just link this here.
This is a link to pardon panel.
I put out my segment, and I think everybody should really get the pressure to Team Trump that there has to be an outright blanket pardon across the board for all Jan Sixers, non-violent and violent alike, period. I have a 10-minute video fleshing that out, my presentation, so check it out.
I'll give you the link and share it around.
Let's get to Canada.
The day was coming.
On the segment with RT, the question I was asked was, does this have to do with Trump?
Or at least that was what someone was hypothesizing in the sound clips they were playing.
This was not inevitable.
This was quite inevitable in that Canada has elections every four years if they're not triggered earlier.
So regardless of whatever else happened, there was...
Barring declaring martial law like they did in Ukraine to suspend elections indefinitely because that's what you have to do to preserve democracy.
There was going to be an election, one way or the other, by, say, September, October 2025.
Probably October.
I mean, when I ran, it was in September 2021.
So there was going to be an election within four years.
Every four years there's an election by law, unless there's a non-confidence, unless government dissolves and they trigger an election earlier.
So it was going to happen sooner than later that there would be an election and the liberals will get their asses handed to them.
They will.
And I'm not saying this because I love Pierre Poilier.
I think he's a very smart man, certainly more charismatic than Justin Trudeau, but unapologetically PPC, and I unapologetically do not trust Pierre Poilier.
Nor do I actually think the conservatives are much better than the liberals.
I guess, you know, we'll get to the same hell path just slower.
So I guess they're better.
But it's going to happen.
There was going to be an election.
Liberals will get their asses handed to them, as will the NDP, because Jagmeet Singh is the most loathsome, second most loathsome, or tied for first, Canadian politician currently, if not in the history of Canada.
It's a little early.
So Justin Trudeau, the rumors were yesterday.
Justin Trudeau is going to resign.
I was on a Twitter space this morning talking about it.
And I said, look, I'll believe it when I hear it.
Because there were a number of things that he could do that wouldn't be outright resignation.
And he sort of did a combination of it.
But I'm not trying to quibble that I was technically right because he didn't resign.
He announced his resignation.
There's going to be a leadership race within the Liberal Party.
They've prorogued Parliament for three months.
And I'll explain what that means in a bit.
And there's already...
A leadership race within the Liberal Party.
Mark Carney, we're going to get to him, has already thrown in his head.
He's already got the website built.
It's amazing.
So Trudeau made the announcement a little early.
I don't think it has anything to do with Trump.
I think it has to do with an implosion of the Liberal Party.
Trudeau has been wildly unpopular since I ran for the PPC in 2021.
I went door to door in Westmount NDG.
For those of you who don't, that's my writing.
It is...
I won't say it's more liberal than D.C. because it's not.
It's not more liberal than D.C. is Democrat.
D.C. is 95% Democrat.
Westmount NDG as a riding has gone to the liberals.
For those of you who are American, the liberals are like the Democrats and the conservatives are like the Republicans, except, talk about this also, Pierre Poilievre is not Canada's Trump, but we'll get there.
Westmount NDG, the riding that I ran in, has gone for the liberals.
Over 50% of the vote for the last 30 years, with the exception of one time when it went for the NDP in 2013.
Back when the NDP actually stood for something.
When Jack Layton, who looks a lot like my late father-in-law, was the leader of the party.
When the NDP used to be a respectable party, when it had a respectable leader, and now it's fucking scumbags like you've never seen in that party.
Sorry. Curse words.
But Trudeau was detested back in 2021.
I went door to door, and when I was thinking, I'm running with the PPC, could you sign my petition so I can get my list of names so I can get my name on the ballot?
And people were like, oh, I'll sign it, but I'm not voting for you.
I was like, oh, that's premature, but whatever.
I said, well, who are you going to vote for?
Oh, they said, I'm going to vote NDP as a protest vote to the Liberals.
They said, you're voting for the Liberals' brother, and you think that you're fighting the Liberal.
But even then, the whole point is, everybody hated Justin Trudeau.
Everybody. Mark Garneau, the astronaut, the guy who won the riding where I ran.
At one point in time, I made a joke.
Everybody knew everybody hates Justin Trudeau.
Everybody knew that Mark Garneau and Justin Trudeau didn't get along.
I put out a tweet.
Everybody hates Justin Trudeau.
Even Mark Garneau hates Justin Trudeau.
I struck a chord.
If anybody remembers, go find that tweet.
Mark Garneau was like, don't ever say my name.
I think I must have struck a chord.
Everybody hates Trudeau.
They've hated him for four years.
Driven the country into the current lamentable state that it is.
So his time was up.
And what this is now is another explanation as to why this didn't happen earlier, because the new Democrat party under Jagmeet Singh could have triggered a non-confidence vote, or at least they've made motions for non-confidence votes, but they've never passed because the NDP has been propping up the liberals.
This could have happened earlier, except dirty scumbag Jagmeet Singh has been propping up the Liberals.
And now that Jagmeet Singh has propped up the Liberals for just long enough that if they call an election now, Jagmeet Singh would have secured his federal pension.
That's why things fell apart now.
It got to that point where Jagmeet Singh pulled his supply and confidence agreement that he had with the Liberals, but then still didn't trigger a non-confidence vote when he could have months ago because he needs to get to that securing his federal pension, which...
What is the word?
Materializes? No, what's it called when something is confirmed?
Matures by February 2025.
So that's why this happened now.
They know that an election is forthcoming.
Everybody hates Trudeau.
If Trudeau does not resign and they don't have reasonable leadership or replacement, they're going to have their asses handed to them in a way that they cannot possibly fathom.
And so they're trying to minimize the damage now by getting Trudeau out, getting someone out who's less detested, and cutting their losses as far as the loss is going to be come the next election.
Okay. Who kept the turd in power?
Eastern side of Canada, nothing will change in the future.
Well, that's from Mighty Mouse 327.
Ontario and Quebec have 70-some-odd percent of the population of Canada?
I looked this up in a previous episode, in a prior show.
I was shocked.
I'm going to ask Grok, what percentage of Canadian population is Ontario and Quebec?
Let's see if we can understand my typos.
Combined population of Ontario and Quebec constitutes 60% of the total population.
So, yeah, it's true.
Ontario and Quebec kind of dictate...
The government of Canada.
And it's true.
Ontario and Quebec very much propped up or voted for, put into power a liberal minority government the last time and Trudeau since 2015.
But Jagmeet definitely propped up the Trudeau government longer than needed.
And a lot of this is to be blamed on them.
Okay, fine.
So Justin Trudeau made the announcement today in a presser.
Maybe we'll go through the full presser.
Let me just see here.
Take a couple of...
Oh, this is it.
Okay, here we go.
Okay, let's check this out.
Do we want to...
And that's exactly what we've done over the past years.
What is this?
Increased the benefits to families.
We made sure the economy was focused on...
How do I start this thing from there?
And that has changed.
Okay, here we go.
Okay, what...
Motivated by what is in the best interest.
This is inaudible.
This is inaudible.
Hold on, let me get a better one.
Or at least I'll just get the clips now.
I don't think we really need to listen to the whole thing in any event.
Here, Benny Johnson had a clip.
Let's play this one here.
I love it.
Everyone's going nuts.
But we'll talk about what it means and what it doesn't.
So last night over dinner, I told my kids about the decision that I'm sharing with you today.
I intend to resign as party leader, as prime minister, after the party selects its next leader through a robust, nationwide, competitive process.
I intend to resign after they have selected someone after a robust process.
I'm going to just play it again because it's not irrelevant what he said.
I told my kids about the decision that I'm sharing with you today.
After they watched Barbie, of course.
They went and had a Barbie night out, and then he broke the sad news to them.
I intend to resign.
I intend to resign as party leader.
As party leader.
As prime minister.
After the party selects its next leader.
After they select their next leader.
Through a robust nationwide competitive process.
Okay, so if they select their leader and it's not through a robust nationwide competitive process, he will not resign?
There's a bunch of conjunctions there.
What was the word where he added an H?
To resign as party leader, as prime minister, after the party selects...
Where's an H in a party?
Party. It's next leader...
I'll let this play out.
...
through a robust, nationwide, competitive process.
Last night, I asked the president of the Liberal Party to begin that process.
This country deserves a real choice in the next election, and it has become clear to me that if I'm having to fight internal battles, I cannot be the best option in that election.
You are the worst option Canada has ever had.
Party. Battles.
So he intends to resign after the Liberals appoint a replacement through robust nationwide contest.
Where's the one where he talks about the proroguing at Parliament?
For those who don't know what it is here, let's see.
Oh, and I'll get to that one in a second.
What did Patrick bet David?
Which clip did he have here?
It was last night over dinner.
That's the same clip.
I told my kids about the decision that I'm sharing with you.
Okay, we saw that.
There's a meme going, everyone, don't get fooled!
I mean, I guess once you know that it's fake, you know that it's fake, but it's kind of classic.
Oh, listen to this.
The position that I'm sharing with you today.
I intend to resign as party leader.
Oh, they really worked hard on that.
They worked hard on that one.
Look at the phones.
Oh, that's kind of cheap, I guess.
They got on the TVs.
Amazing. This is not an authentic video, people.
It's a meme.
So, bottom line, we won't go through the entire thing.
He goes and he pats himself on his back and he says, you know, like, we've done great stuff for Canada by destroying it and turning it into a divided totalitarian hellhole.
He said he'll do that.
He's going to resign.
He intends to resign.
After they have a robust nationwide leadership battle, which he's instructed the president to initiate as we speak.
He's prorogued Parliament.
So prorogue is ending the current session of Parliament until the next session of Parliament.
He's prorogued Parliament until March.
I don't know.
Sometime in March.
So we're January to February to March.
I think it's the end of March.
So almost three months, but like two and a half months, prorogue.
Ended government.
All the current bills that were pending, that were in debate, all of the committees, etc., are now...
Dead in the water is the right word, but they die on the vine, and they will not become law.
And then when the next session of government comes up, you can start from scratch, whatever you want to pick up in the new session.
That's proroguing.
I don't know exactly what aspects of the government...
The government doesn't fall apart, and the government doesn't stop working, but the session is over, and it will be over until...
March, until after they've had their liberal leadership contest.
And then when the next session comes in, they're going to have a new party, a new liberal party leader, who from what I understand will technically be the prime minister.
I hope I'm not making a mistake on this, but I reserve the right to make a mistake on this, because they're not calling an election just yet.
Although, once the pension checks hit, and once they mature...
They will call an election.
It's going to come earlier than October, from what I understand.
Okay, so they prorog Parliament.
So there's no more session in effect right now.
There's no more government business in effect.
Whatever. Let me see here.
Okay, sorry.
I just read one in the chat.
So that's what's happened.
So Trudeau, technically, there's an argument to be made that he hasn't resigned yet because he's still Prime Minister, but he has.
He will resign, or he will be replaced by whoever is the leader of the contest, who wins the contest.
Okay, fine.
He hasn't resigned, but he really did, and they prorode government, so even if he didn't resign, he's the feckless leader of a government that's not in session, and they're going to hold their party race.
That's what it means.
What can happen in the interim?
I'm not sure.
China called in.
I heard he is pushing Mark Carney for the job, a massive WEF puppet.
Well, now you've gotten ahead of where I was going with this.
Come on now.
So that's where it's at.
They've started the race already, the leadership contest.
We'll see who is going to vie for leadership of the party.
So he's technically, he's still prime minister, but he's announced his intention to resign.
He's prorogued parliament, so there's no government in session.
So he's still the leader of the Liberal Party, of a government that's not in session, and he will be replaced by whoever the leader is after their internal race of a robust nationwide race that they have now, give or take, two and a half to three months to do.
Like the vultures were not already swarming, where is Carney's website?
Mark Carney.
I don't know much about him.
I was picking the brain of some people.
Come on, where's Mark Carney?
He already has his...
That's irritating, because Mark Carney already has his website up.
Q&A with Mark Carney.
That's not it.
Hey, give me one second here.
I want to find this.
I'm just going to go get it over here.
Google Mark Carney for liberals.
He's... Son of a bee sting.
I'm going to go get the...
It's right over...
Here we go.
Carney for Canada.
Okay. Carney for Canada.
Open the damn website.
He's running.
He'll take my word for it, but...
Here we go.
Here we go.
Look at this.
A nice elderly gentleman.
With eyes of determination.
And Carney for Canada.
Be a part of our party's future.
Subscribe today.
No thank you.
Privacy, legal, contact.
Let me just see what...
Is this it?
It's a landing page.
Alright, well, whatever.
So he's running.
Mark Carney has officially already built a website.
So there's not much to it.
Contact. No thank you.
What the hell is this?
Privacy and legal?
Before using our site, please read this.
Personal information is information that you...
Protection of information.
Satirical parody notice.
This website is 100% satire and...
Well, glad we looked through this.
Shut up.
Well, I'm glad we discovered this in real life.
He is the party.
I didn't realize...
He's vying for the leadership.
As per articles, this website is 100% satire and is not endorsed or authorized by Mark Carney or any candidate's campaign.
Carney for Canada is not affiliated with Mark Carney.
Well, that's kind of wild.
I'm glad to do this in person.
Well, a lot of people are going to get duped by that.
Let me just turn this down here.
Let me bring this one down and bring up the article of Mark Carney.
Leadership. Is Mark Carney interested in the job of the liberals here?
Mark Carney makes his leadership pitch to skeptical leaders.
No. Just so you know, it's actually interesting.
He is vying for the leadership.
So the question is, it's going to be between Carney, Christian Freeland, which we'll get into in a second.
The novelist Margaret Atwood once met a neurosurgeon who told her, he was a big fan of hers, that he'd read all of her books and he retired.
Okay. Can we get to this here?
In the last few weeks, he has spent many hours on the phone with Liberal MPs seeking the advice.
Carney, now 59, is thinking about taking up politics after a long and successful career as an investment banker, civil banker, yada, yada, yada.
In the last few weeks, he has spent many hours on the phone with Liberal MPs seeking their advice and support for a run at the leadership of the Federal Liberal Party should that job come open in the coming days.
This was written Today.
Hey, Carney, what good timing.
The position is open.
The investment banker, for the last couple of weeks, you know how disgustingly dirty politics is.
Like, I don't know how it works, but they've decided they've milked Justin Trudeau for as much as they're going to get out of him.
The call comes in, Justin, someone else is replacing you, and it looks like Mark Carney is interested.
Who's Mark Carney, you might add?
Just take everybody's name.
Put in WEF and Google it.
That's all you need to do.
World Economic Forum.
Mark Carney.
This is how we get big finance to take big climate action.
Reject optional cookies.
When is this from?
2021. Former Bank of England Governor Mark Carney is now Finance Advisor to UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson.
Is this him?
This is him.
Hold on a second.
Hold on.
I have to make sure I'm doing the right thing here.
Let's get this one out of here.
Hold on.
Let me go to the chat.
The chat's going to get this fast.
Are there two Mark Carnies?
And now I've lost my flipping Rumble Studio.
Okay, hold on a second.
Let me go down here and see what's going on.
Sorry, the NDP.
I'm just going to double check something here.
you.
Okay, no, it's the same Mark Carney.
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
Let's just go to the WEF website.
Here. Bada-bing, bada-boom.
Mark Carney, Chair of Brookfeld Asset Management.
1988, Bachelor's in Economics, Harvard University.
Yada, yada, yada.
New York, Toronto.
Governor of Bank of Canada.
Since July 13, Governor of Bank of England.
Chairman, Fiscal Stability.
Is this the room?
He is also an external member of the Board of Stripe, a member of the Global Advisory.
Harvard University, yada, yada, yada.
Okay. Why do I feel like I'm missing something here?
I think Carney has recently been wiped off the WEF site.
There's only one.
Okay, no, we're not making a mistake here.
That's him.
M. Sidloy.
Good. I feel like I'm going crazy.
Carney was governor of Bank of Canada and the Bank of England.
Okay. So he's a WEF man.
And he's going to run.
Then the option is going to be Chrystia Freeland.
Remember when Chrystia Freeland resigned the day that she was supposed to present the fiscal update?
A fiscal update that was going to indicate that they were $23 billion over the deficit of $40 billion that they had projected?
And I said, there's only one reason why she's doing this now, and it's to cover her own ass, because she's going to run for something, and she wants to jump ship and dissociate herself from Justin Trudeau as fast as possible.
You're going to have Carney, presumably Freeland.
I don't know who else is in the running.
And then what you're going to end up having is Justin Trudeau will resign, is resigning, and it's going to be Carney, a WEF stooge, or Christian Freeland, a WEF stooge, who's going to take over the Liberal Party.
They're still going to get their butts handed to them in the next federal election.
I see Wayne Gretzky would be a great choice.
Carney is a long WWEF shill.
you.
Let's see what's going on here.
She's WEF Times.
And that's why, when some people say it, it can get worse than Justin Trudeau.
But the bottom line is, whoever takes over the Liberal Party, they're still going to lose the next election.
Unless people are very afraid of the level of fortification.
Bottom line, it doesn't matter.
If it's going to be worse than Justin Trudeau, who's going to take over the leadership of the party, they're still going to get hammered by the...
By the Conservatives in the next election.
Viva run for office, a special SOV.
Run again?
The only question as to how it can get better, Conservatives are going to have a majority government, but the only question is by how many and how many seats they're going to win.
The PPC needs to get a few voices in Parliament to actually have meaningful opposition and to actually make the Conservatives act in an actual quasi-Conservative manner.
Constitutionalist manner.
But that's it.
So now that's...
It's too little too late, and it's a question of whether or not the damage is irreparable.
But we'll see where this is going to go.
All right, now let me bring this one up here.
Will Canadians get their guns back now?
Asks Gray 101.
Over in Locals.
Poilierre has brought the discussion back up.
In terms of gun ownership.
But again, to walk back some of these laws, to undo the order in council that outlawed another 1,500 assault rifle-style guns, the question is, on a national scale, what the appetite is.
For firearm reform.
I don't know that it's that much.
And even just to undo what Justin Trudeau did since COVID would be massive.
And it's not clear that there's the appetite for it.
Canadians are of the opinion that guns are for hunting.
And you should not have them for self-defense, personal protection.
It's a national cultural attitude.
Now, let's go over here.
Do I want to get...
Eat the synthetic meat.
Eat the bugs.
Take the experimental injections.
Global warming is not fake.
Borders are racist.
Kami Lala could have been the first woman president.
America, we strong.
That is, don't obey on Rumble.
Let me go over to the locals and see what's going on in the chat over here.
There's no Pudge.
There's no Pudge like Pudge.
There's no Pudge like Pudge.
She's in here.
They're sleeping.
I'm not going to wake her up because she's actually not bothering me.
Never, ever use that term for firearms.
What did I say, Stephen Britton?
Guns? Or did I say weapons?
I don't think I use weapons.
I think I'm pretty good for that.
Trudeau sent the seized guns to Ukraine, it says Rustang.
No, so the amount of damage that Justin Trudeau has done when they went along with their revised firearms ban, and then you have that guy, forget his name now, seriously saying that they're going to send those, they're talking about sending those confiscated firearms.
To Ukraine.
Gun ban Canada, Ukraine.
Let me see if I can pull this up real quick.
There we go.
I posted it so it's an easier one to find.
Look at this.
Want to talk about the damage that the Liberal government has done to Canada?
Today, the government is adding a further 324 unique makes and models of assault-style firearms to the list of prohibited firearms.
Immediately. The government of Canada has committed to the Ukrainian government to identify whether some of these guns could
be donated to support the fight for democracy in Ukraine.
As part of that process, the government of Canada has committed to the Ukrainian government to identify whether some of these guns to the Ukrainian government whether or not the confiscated items From you Canadians can be sent over to another country because they're so useless for self-protection and fighting tyranny that we need to ship them to another country for self-protection and allegedly fighting tyranny.
Who's that effing loser?
He looks like he crawled out of the bar.
There was a comment over on Rumble.
On Locals, yeah, here we go.
Kitten is a geek, says TLDR.
Trudeau is stepping down after Parliament has been replaced and a new Prime Minister has been voted in.
Not entirely accurate.
So he's stepping down.
Well, he's prorogued Parliament, so there's no government in session.
He's allegedly said he's going to step down after the Liberal Party has voted in a replacement, and then we're going to have elections one way or the other.
that what's going to be interesting and i from what i understand it's never happened in canadian history although he's technically still the leader is if they uh if they trigger an election before the liberals have appointed a replacement or the new leader of the party uh i you know i i from what i understand there's never been an election where there effectively is no leader of the liberal party technically he's still the leader of the party although he'll resign
So... Chikali says, we offered our guns to Ukraine and they rejected the offer.
I don't know.
Did they reject the offer?
So that's what's going on in Canada, people.
Let me see what else is going on.
I had some stuff in the backdrop here, but I had to, um, uh, obviously go over that Q and a with Mark Carney.
Yeah.
Let's see here.
I'm going to go over to the chat on Locals and see what's going on there.
Do not obey.
Catch me in my eyes here.
It says, propaganda and gaslighting being the meat and potatoes of the psychological war we are under.
Truth will be censored.
The imperial liars.
Well, if you get more questions in as to what's going on in Canada, I hope that clarifies it.
I don't think it's good news.
I don't think it's bad news.
I don't think it changes much, although there are substantial changes.
But that's it.
I'll double check for some questions afterwards.
The other big news of the day is that Kamala Harris was forced to certify.
Kamala Harris certifies her own loss to Donald Trump.
And they're touting...
You know that this is happening.
I'm pulling up an NBC propagandist article for a reason.
Listen to this.
Listen to this.
I have such a dirty joke that I can't say.
Viva, shut your mouth.
Shut your mouth and play the thing.
Today, I did what I have done my entire career, which is take seriously the oath that I have taken many times to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, which included today performing my constitutional duties to ensure that...
The people of America, the voters of America, will have their votes counted, that those votes matter, and that they will determine then the outcome of an election.
Even this!
You certified the electoral college votes, you idiot, you rambling idiot.
I can't even understand what she's saying.
Today I did what my duty is, which is to make sure that the votes count and to...
I do believe very strongly that America's democracy only as strong as our willingness to fight for it.
Every single person, their willingness to fight for and respect the importance of our democracy.
Otherwise, it is very fragile and it will not be able to withstand moments of crisis.
She looks horrible.
Imagine having to preside over your own loss.
So, by the way, Vice President Kamal Harris presided over a joint session of Congress Monday, certifying the results of the 2024 election in which she lost to Donald Trump.
Oh, democracy.
Harris carried through steering Congress collective endorsement of the electoral vol.
She lost to yada, yada, yada.
Hands clasped before her, Harris looked ahead plainly and intently as four senators took turns reading off the electoral totals from each state.
She broke into a wide smile.
When the vote total reached the threshold to declare Trump the next president.
And when she received a standing ovation from her party when her vote was read.
Harris' message on January 6th was one that both she and her predecessor on the campaign trail, Joe Biden, conveyed time and again to voters.
They advocated for, quote, freedom and democracy and shunned the events of the violent riot by Trump supporters.
Amazingly insidious.
Now, all this to say is past is prologue.
And when you understand what they were doing during the peaceful transition in 2016, you have to assume they are doing something equally as insidious this time around.
Remember, we will not belabor the point.
In 2016, when they touted their peaceful transition to Donald Trump, they were actively planting the seeds to undermine his presidency.
They were planting the Russiagate hoax, lie, seize, which they had started planting well before.
They were spying on Donald Trump's campaign.
They were falsifying evidence and submitting it to courts to justify going after each and every one of anybody who had anything to do with Trump's campaign.
They spied on the incoming president.
They manufactured the Russiagate hoax to undermine his presidency, the legitimacy of his presidency.
So there was nothing peaceful about it.
Period. Full stop.
They're a bunch of goddamn demons.
Period. So assume that they're doing something similar this time around.
The only question is what?
They certified it?
Good for them.
According to them, they had no choice.
And especially after they changed the law that we started off this show with, the Eastman Law, to make it that there was no, what's the word I'm looking for?
No discretion.
To make it so that there was no ability to send back to the states to review, redo, analyze the legitimacy of their electoral votes.
Kamal Harris had no choice thanks to their own legislative reform.
Good for them.
They're doing something.
The question is not, are they doing something?
The question is, what are they doing?
So we've got two weeks left.
Thus far, it's been an uneventful day on the fourth anniversary, at least by way of American politics and law.
Not uneventful by Canadian standards.
Ironic that now it's going to be the Insurrection Day is going to coincide with Justin Trudeau announcing his intention to step down once they've found his replacement after they reconvene Parliament after proroguing it.
Okay. The question is, what are they doing?
So, when you look to the lawfare, Trump-Mershaw sentencing.
I think there was some news.
Yeah, here we go.
There was some news.
Merchant announced that he's going to sentence Trump on this Friday, this coming Friday, January 10th, 10 days before inauguration.
I am not subscribing to that cesspool.
I will just go and bypass that by going to archive.
Already archived.
So, we talked about it yesterday, that the sentencing is scheduled for January 10th.
This is the most corrupt judge out there, tied with...
New York nipple judge Engeron tied with commie DC judge Chutkin.
And there's a couple more that I'm forgetting right now.
This is the crystal that has million-year-old water locked somewhere inside of it.
Washington. So the sentencing was rescheduled to January 10th so that corrupt judge Marchand, we know everything about him, don't need to repeat it.
His daughter is making money off the prosecution, working for Authentic HQ.
The other founder of Authentic HQ founded White Dudes for Kamala.
The judge has personal disdain for Donald Trump.
And the judge has gone out of his way to do everything that he humanly...
Ken, I don't want to say legally, within the bounds of a bastardized legal system to maintain the unlawful conviction of the unlawful charges that were brought against Trump.
Okay, he said he's going to sentence him on the 10th, but that don't, you know, it'll be, he'll follow the prosecution's, not recommendations, but, you know, no jail time, no massifying, it'll be whatever, whatever limited sentence to frustrate Trump's ability to appeal the decision.
We talked about it yesterday.
Okay. Trump tries to block sentencing in New York hush money case.
Lawyers for Trump asked the New York judge to stop Trump's sentencing scheduled for Friday on his conviction for falsifying business documents.
That's the headline.
Trump is trying to stop the sentencing scheduled for Friday in his criminal hush money case, arguing it cannot legally proceed while he tries to get an appeals court to review his presidential immunity arguments.
It's an amazing thing.
To appeal the substantive element upon which the conviction is based, But to be sentenced nonetheless while that issue is still under appeal.
Lawyers for Trump asked the court, Juan Marchand, they asked the New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Marchand documents made available Monday to block the sentencing.
Marchand ruled last week that the sentence would be opposed ahead of his inauguration, which would formalize Trump's status as the first president who is a felon.
What a effing POS.
Like, he's beyond a POS.
He is an MF POS.
Trump filed a 17-page legal notice asserting Merchant had no choice but to halt the proceedings.
They argued that he had no choice but to vacate the verdict if this judge had any interest in the law, but he doesn't.
They argued that all events in the case must be automatically paused, quote, by operation of federal constitutional law.
Merchant said last week that Trump could appear at the sentencing or participate virtually, which we discussed yesterday he should, and that he did not expect to give Trump jail time probation or if he did not expect.
He intends to possibly think of resigning after his appointment.
He thinks he's not going to impose jail.
He's not sure yet.
Why don't you come in person, Trump, and we'll talk about that.
Where was I?
I lost my thought.
The judge signaled he would grant unconditional discharge, which means that there would effectively be no tangible repercussions for Trump's felony convictions, except felony status, as far as I understand.
I just got the link for my piece on my piece on RT.
I'll get that in a second so we can watch it together.
Okay, good.
It's uploading now.
Sorry, I actually have my phone on silent.
I don't know.
I'm still getting distracted.
Okay, yadda yadda.
Trump lawyers told Blanche and Eleni Bove and Mershon to indicate by 2 p.m. whether he would pause proceedings or block the sentencing, a legal mechanism known as a stay, as they seek the appeal.
It was not immediately clear how or when Mershon would respond.
Juris Trump found guilty.
Okay, we don't need to go to this.
Well, the case should have been prohibited under the reasons...
We don't need to go.
This is all crap, and you all know this because you are all above average.
My point earlier today...
Tim Pool puts out a tweet and says, how crazy would it be if Merchant decides to jail Trump?
Why not?
What would happen if Trump shows up in New York on the 10th, gets sentenced to prison, is locked up, and then can't be inaugurated?
And I just, I said to...
Tim Pool.
If Trump follows Barnes' law advice, he doesn't show up in person for that very potential, albeit exceedingly unlikely outcome.
Unless he's required to, which I don't believe he is because he can attend virtually.
No reason to do it.
I still go one step beyond the legal risk.
The judge can sentence him.
I don't think that's ever going to happen.
But then again, I did think the judge was going to vacate the verdict.
I genuinely and sincerely believe that one of the reasons...
For which they insisted Trump appear for the mugshot in Georgia, be arraigned in person in New York, is because they're just hoping, like a bunch of disgusting scoundrels, that someone manages to do something stupid to or from.
He's got Secret Service, he's got bulletproof vehicles, and he's a very, very protected man.
But we all lose sight of the fact, and maybe we don't, do not lose sight of the fact that he is here.
By the grace of God in a literal, miraculous sense.
Despite all of that security, which we now know is pretty shitty from time to time, he's here.
When they force him to go to Georgia courthouse and they have the cameras on him, it's like that scene, I forget what the movie is, they're hoping someone does something stupid.
It's a double whammy for them.
Public humiliation of the perp walk.
Public humiliation to the mugshot, which backfired wildly.
And maybe somebody does something stupid.
So he should attend virtually for every reason under the sun.
Stay the hell out of New York.
But I don't think the judge is going to sentence anything.
I don't think the judge is going to stay his sentencing.
He wouldn't have said that he's going to sentence if he's not going to sentence.
It's not like the judge didn't know what their next move would be based on his last move.
So, yeah.
That's what's going on there.
Well, can they get back their guns?
Okay, then we got over in Rumble.
Akebella03 says, maybe we redefine representative democracy.
All Canadians vote in blockchain on major issues and the role of MPs becomes fact-finding and then educating their constituents.
Robust recall legislation.
Who was I talking to about this?
If everyone could vote on policy issues and you would have immediate real-time Yeah, there could be some benefit there.
Crash Bandit on this particular issue says, LOL, the judge is showing us what it will be like living under communist rule.
This judge is showing us what it will be like living under communist rule.
Yeah. Liberal liberal democrat democracy is what we're watching there.
I think the judge is going to not stay his sentencing.
He's done everything that he possibly could to maintain this unlawful verdict.
And the reason is...
They're telling you what the reason is.
It's actually kind of amazing that they're telling you in the article.
If it happens...
It would formalize Trump's status as the first president who is a felon.
You know, I got to actually go send this to good logic Joe Nierman, who thinks he made a mistake that Trump...
The argument was you couldn't call Trump a convicted felon, or you couldn't call him a convicted felon until he was sentenced.
That was the broad consensus.
And Joe Nierman, good logic, thought that he made a mistake and that you could, in fact, call him a convicted felon, even though he hadn't been sentenced.
And I think Joe might now have to retract his retraction and say that, He was right all along.
Too many clamps over on Commitube.
Let me see this here.
I'll bring this one up so we can try to see it in real time here.
Too many clamps can't stand during a crisis.
They are quietly telling us what's coming.
Viva, will you contact JustXAshen when it breaks that AAI Corporation is encoded?
Oh, I guess that means involved because the V and the C are next to each other.
Viva, will you contact JustXAshen Well, I don't know that...
First of all, I'm following that story.
Oh, I had the patent open in my back window that I wanted to read after the show yesterday.
I'm going to follow the news there.
I know what I believe, but I'm definitely open for new information.
Forced name change says, love y'all.
We can count Alberta out.
Of that guns are just for hunting statement.
I am Canadian.
My shotgun is also for skeet and home defense, not just hunting.
Trudy can pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Well, not to get anyone in trouble, and there's no but to that, I can tell you, having done it, owned it, and done the course, if you tell them that you want it for home defense, you will not get a Remington 12-gauge shotgun if you indicate that the purpose for which you're acquiring it is home self-defense, period. It's absolutely amazing.
But that is the absolute state of Canada.
So that is what's going on with Trump and the sentencing.
It'll go down Friday.
Let's see if there's any Kalshi market for sentencing.
Sentence will...
I want to see if there will be...
Yeah, I can't find anything.
If there's a market for whether or not he's going to be sentenced on Friday, I hope to everything that is holy that Trump doesn't go in person.
Whatever minimal risk that is additional by going in person is not worth it, not in terms of getting locked up, but in terms of everything else.
So stay in the sunny state of Florida, the free state of Florida.
Stay at Mar-a-Lago.
Maybe even do the inauguration at Mar-a-Lago.
But don't go to that frickin' commie hellhole.
Okay. What else, people?
Has there been any...
Let me go see if there's been any updating news in general.
The question's gonna be, who is Biden going to pardon next?
I love it.
The market on Kalshi.
Will... The market on Kalshi for Will Biden...
Preemptively pardon anybody.
Went from 40% last night to like 57% today.
I think it dipped back down at last check.
The question is going to be, will Biden preemptively pardon someone?
And I say all signs point to yes.
And the main question, the one that I am most interested in, because I am now, I have bet on the outcome.
He is going to pardon Liz Cheney.
And I think he's going to pardon the entire...
I would not be shocked if he pardons the entire January 6th committee.
But Liz Cheney is a specific individual who has specific exposure that's been well documented.
That interim report from the sub-select committee...
On the January 6th committee, investigating the investigative committee, and they come to conclusions of law, black and white on paper, with references to United States Code provisions, witness tampering, suborning perjury.
Liz Cheney, for what she did with that woman Hutchison, back-channeling conversations with someone who she knew was represented to get around the fact that she could have conversations with that witness to bypass the fact that she had a counsel without going through her counsel.
That's witness tampering, and there's arguably subordinate perjury.
They're like concrete black and white in an interim report from a committee investigating the January 6th committee.
So she has got unique exposure that I think Biden is well aware of.
And that not medal of, I apologize, not the Medal of Honor, but the Medal of Freedom, the civilian award, is both a medal and a shield.
And you say, well, why would I?
Just in case.
Just in case.
Because the big bad Republicans are so angry and so mean and so partisan and so vindictive.
They've announced that she has legal exposure just to be sure this honorable woman who just got the Civilian Award Medal of Freedom...
I got distracted by a chat there.
Well, we'll just pardon her just in case.
So you're going to get a preemptive pardon on the one hand.
And a Liz Cheney pardon on the other.
Benny Johnson?
Not Benny Johnson.
Benny Thompson?
Benny Johnson, you're a good man.
I don't think you need a pardon.
Benny Thompson?
Could probably use a preemptive pardon as well.
Adam Schiff?
I mean, the thing is, in my view, they all need pardons.
Daniel Goldman?
But these are federal.
Arguable as to whether or not it can preclude a state prosecution.
They all need pardons because I think they've all committed actual crimes.
Liz Cheney, witness tampering, suborning perjury.
Adam Schiff?
Perjury. Lying under oath.
Daniel Goldman?
Effing liar.
So they all need partners.
But I think what Biden is probably going to do is just pardon the entire committee, just in case.
And who else?
The question is, is he going to pardon his brother, Jim?
We'll see about that.
Well, I'm certain.
First of all, it's not to be like...
It's not to be...
Holy cows.
Can't do live.
Can't do now, comma, live now.
Smiley face.
There's no question you can find...
It's not like a Lavrenta barrier thing, like find me the person, I'll show you the crime.
If they've committed what I believe to be federal crimes, undoubtedly, there's some state law that they broke.
And at the very least, in terms of Liz Cheney, although I don't think a pardon would protect against bar sanctions.
She's a member of a professional order.
It's unethical.
It violates the code of ethics to knowingly correspond, communicate with a witness that you know to be represented.
So there's no question.
Hunter Biden.
I think there's absolutely no question.
They can find easily state-level crimes.
The only question would be whether or not they're time barred.
But bottom line, Adam Schiff?
Benny Thompson?
Everyone on that committee.
Adam Kinziger is like the only one.
I don't know what they did by way of destruction of evidence.
Adam Kinziger in particular.
But all of them on that committee destroyed evidence after their committee.
And that is a federal crime.
That is the actual obstruction of justice that they were trying to go after the Jan Sixers for.
Impeding an investigation.
Why would they delete, destroy evidence after their own investigation if it's evidence upon which their committee report was based?
It makes no sense.
The only reason you do it is to frustrate the sub-select committee's investigation into the January 6th committee's investigation.
That alone, they all have exposure, in my view, and I think Biden is probably going to just pardon the whole lot of them.
Got into trouble with somebody on Twitter who didn't like that recommendation as though...
Anybody thinks they need me to give them ideas.
Okay.
I'm actually just sending the person a DM right now.
We'll see if the person wants to come on and talk about it.
Talk about it.
So that's it.
I think that's the news of the day, people.
It was almost a slow news day until...
We got some decent news out of Canada.
NeuroDivergent1 says, Hey David, Jake gave you a shout-out.
Jake gave you a shout-out on your other Jan 6 stream from his prison cell through his white oval.
Jake is in prison still, four years without a trial, and I don't care what anybody thinks about, you know.
And when we did that, when he called in yesterday, I think he finally put the...
I'm reluctant to have Jake...
Do a video because I do believe he's in prison and I don't want him to get into trouble because of doing an interview with me.
And I was concerned that, you know, someone in the background might be, something might be viewable in the background and they're going to go and go after him for something else.
So yesterday when he popped in to talk, he had a white, only his face was visible.
It looked like a sheet, but a digital sheet that had only a cutout for his face.
But he gave me a shout-out today.
It would have been nice to be there in person, but it was fortuitous that the plane kept getting delayed and now is back here, able to do some interviews on the breaking news of the day.
I think I just got another email here.
Let me just see something here.
Okay, so I just got another request here.
Would you be able to spend a half an hour or so talking about Justin's overdue exit?
I'll say yes.
And his replacement, let's see here, there's an article, breaking news.
Meet your new WEF penetrator, puppet Canadian prime minister, same as your old WEF penetrator, puppet Canadian prime minister.
Scandal, let me see if I can, this is from a substack of second smartest guy in the world.
And the article is saying, this is breaking, coming to me from one of my many, many sources.
Justin Trudeau just announced his resignation in the future.
He has probed Parliament until March 24th.
He'll remain Prime Minister until the new leader is installed.
Here is the CCP and WEF apparatchik delivering the most pathetic resignation piece.
Okay, fine.
Well, who's...
Oh, Christopher Freeland.
Prior to Trudeau's hugely profitable scandemic grifting, his greatest private sector achievements were a pastime of wearing blackface.
Okay, so I don't know who they're suggesting is going to be the new replacement, but...
They're all, by the way, any replacement.
Hypothetically, in your wildest nightmare, Jagmeet Singh becomes the next president.
He's a WEF stooge.
One of the leaders of tomorrow.
The young leaders.
The young globalist leaders.
So any replacement.
Pierre Poiliev, I do not believe, is a WEF stooge.
I know some people might hate me for that.
He's got other issues.
Jagmeet. Christian Freeland.
Mark Carney.
They are all effing WEF stooges.
WEMFers is what they are.
Write that down, people.
Okay, so there's that.
Now we got, what's the deal with Democrat presidents and their halfwit brothers?
Ted Kennedy, Billy Carter, Roger Clinton, that weird brother Obama, and now the Biden.
It's not a brother, it's a son.
Hold on one second.
Well, I don't know.
Hold on one second.
I don't know that that's a Democrat phenomenon.
Shoot. I don't think that's a purely Democrat phenomenon.
I mean, George Bush.
Jeb Bush is George Bush's brother, right?
So which one of them?
George Bush brother.
Yeah, Jeb Bush, Marvin Bush, Neil Bush.
I'm not sure.
I don't know which one would be the idiot brother in that group because they're all pretty much idiots.
And then, well, Mary Trump.
Is Donald Trump's niece.
Mary Trump.
Everybody's got one.
Mary Trump.
Niece? Is she a niece?
Mary Lee Trump.
She's critical of her brother.
She's a niece.
Every family's got an idiot brother.
I might be that idiot brother to my other brothers.
We've got King of Biltong in the house.
I'm going to bring it up over here.
Crumble because I love the nice purple.
I think purple is my new favorite color.
King of Biltong says, we plan on constructing our own manufacturing facilities this year.
Support us and your health by grabbing some Biltong.
Biltongusa.com.
Use code VIVA10 for 10%.
Hold on a second.
Hold on.
I'm going to see if the kid can bring in some bills.
I'm going to show you what it looks like.
I'm going to eat.
I don't like eating because you get food in your teeth, but I'm going to show you this before we head on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com for the after party.
I got to all of the tip questions.
Oh, I didn't get to this one.
I just fortuitously opened up in a commie tube.
Marcel Etchka says, David, have you reached out to AV?
To the seventh power, the leader attorney's co-host yet.
Great guest to have on your platform.
Hardly recommend you have viewers head over to her channel, like, share, and subscribe.
A-V to the seventh power.
I want to show what that looks like because I don't know who that is.
I have not yet.
I can tell you that much because A-V to...
The seventh power.
Here we go.
Check this out.
I haven't, but I will.
And I'll show everyone the channel.
Avie to the seventh power.
I like her thumbnails.
Hi, everybody.
Welcome back to another fun-filled episode.
If she says law is fun, well, then I'm going to be suspicious.
And I'll give this to everybody so you can go and show some love.
Link to channel.
Okay, there you go.
Thank you for that.
We'll definitely have a look at that.
I've screen grabbed it afterwards.
Let's see what we've got.
Did I miss any other super chats on Commitube?
That's a random name.
It says, Congress signed a, quote, mass casualties bill, and Trump's closest allies will be with him at the inauguration.
Perfect occasion to try to take him all out.
Well, look, not to get cynical and paranoid, which I am, When you're at...
I think I may have said this exact same thing.
I was once in a room with a $25 million diamond.
And we're sitting there holding this thing.
There are people out there who would just bust in with guns blazing and kill everybody in this room to get that diamond without even blinking an eye.
This is a reality that all presidents typically live with.
There are people out there at any moment of every day who want to take them out.
So inauguration is going to be no different.
The only question is, you know, when you want to put together a bunch of dots if they connect, where you have for the last two months government telling you we can't control drones in the sky.
And then you have people telling you forever that illegals and dangerous things are coming over the border.
And then you have rumors of...
Ground-to-air missiles.
Then you have rumors of missing warheads out of Ukraine.
Or out of what was Russia at the time.
So, it's scary.
But it's been the reality of every president all the time.
And like Trump jokingly says, being president is a very dangerous job.
Clear sight.
Did Viva Frye ever had Anton's sausage in his mouth?
Or is it just Bill Hardy frickin' Hart?
Yeah, let's get the five-guy jokes in my mouth going on here.
All right, I probably shouldn't have made that one now that I got that soundbite.
All I want for Christmas was Viva sneaking me some biltong across the Iron Rainbow.
Dude, I'm not taking any chances with that.
You F around at the border.
You're asking for, like, lifetime bands.
So, no, it's delicious stuff.
And you can't bring meats, fruits, or vegetables over the border, one way or the other.
But it is delicious.
All right, hold on.
I'm getting it.
Hold on a second.
Okay, here it is, people.
Now... Oh, yeah.
Get my headphones on.
This is what Biltong looks like.
Now, this is the Angus, which becomes particularly funny when you put your finger over the G, and this joke never gets old.
Like, whenever you see, like, a black Angus sign and the G goes out, whatever.
All right, and this is what Biltong...
Look, let me get a good piece here.
Well, they're all good pieces.
Okay, let me get this one.
It was in the fridge, so it's a little harder.
You leave it out when you're going to eat and it gets softened up, but fridging it.
This is the biltong.
Look at that.
Oh, yeah.
It's so flipping good.
And you can see the nutritional facts.
No one wants to hear ASMR.
Mm-hmm. Thank you.
And I don't know if it's...
Good or bad, but on the label, it says consume within five days.
I take longer than that every time, and it tastes equally as delicious.
That is Biltong, and now we're going to go over...
Oh, shoot!
Okay, I'm cutting it close.
We're going to go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com for our after party.
Let me give everybody the link.
If you are so inclined to come, come on over.
It's the supporters only.
That's the perk and the benefit and how I say thank you to...
The people who keep us independent and free to be objective, impartial.
And impartial does not mean blind.
And keep doing what we're doing.
So we're going to do that.
Tomorrow is Tuesday.
I will be live.
Don't know.
I'm going to be in studio.
I think I don't want to.
Do I want to?
I'm going to be.
I think I can say it.
I'm going to be in studio with Brianna Morello at some point.
In-studio at the local.
I just have to schedule it.
But we've been in contact since I posted that video of the journalist walking through the New Orleans crime scene.
So we're going to do an in-person interview sooner than later.
And it's going to be much sooner than later, just depending on our respective schedules, because the news is still relevant.
So stay tuned for that.
Wednesday, we're going to be doing The Unusual Suspects.
I feel like I'm missing something specific that I signed up for tomorrow.
Whatever. It's going to be a good week, people.
And as I say that, Stephen Britton has a question.
I saw Harvey's in Calgary with a sign that said, hey, try the Angus, but, and I shit you not, someone left the G out of Angus.
I wish I had my camera.
And then we got Encryptus.
Says we can't control drones in the sky out of one side of their mouth.
Hey, you idiots, get your government drones out of public view.
You had the damn lights on.
That is it.
Okay, so that's what we're going to do.
I'll give you the link to Locals.
Did I put up...
Oh, shoot.
I didn't put...
No, I did put up yesterday's podcast.
It's up.
And I finally was able to download the episode with the USS Liberty Barnes and I rebuttal, if you want to call it that, to Candace Owens' position.
It's going to be very cool.
And that is where we're going to end this.
Let me make sure that I didn't leave anything over.
Over on Commitube, Tom Forsythe says, as a Canadian, my only means of self-defense is sarcasm.
It's so great.
I get jokes, and that's not bad.
Okay, then we're going to go all the way to the bottom, and that's it.
Never mind.
You read it.
I voted for PPC, by the way.
It says, that's a random name.
All right, we're going to end it.
Come on over to vivaboranslaw.locals.com.
I'm going to upload my segment on RT.
Share it around.
What else?
Watch me on Matt Gaetz show tonight.
I'm very happy with that.
I'm going to say hi to Matt.
And that is all she wrote, people.
I shall see you all on the interwebs tomorrow.
Thus shall end the public section.
Come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
We have a wonderful community, and it's above average, as is everyone else who watches this on the internet.
▲
Export Selection