Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 22, 2024 - Viva & Barnes

01:23:53

Don't Believe Your Lying Eyes! German Christmas Attack Reveals the Left's Delusion & Dishonesty!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	You want us sick, you think we're dumb.
	You want us blind and you want us drugged.
	You want us poor while you get more of everything.
	But you don't get to tell me what to think and what to do.
	You don't get to tell me what is true.
	You're just liars, jeans and cooks.
	Change the rules, you get burned to books.
	And so I don't believe a single word you say.
	You're all liars, fakes and cons.
	We watch you gone, so don't believe this time you'll get away.
	You want us tricked, you want us numb, you want us scared and you want us stung.
	You want us shot and you want us fought in every way.
	You want our minds, you want our time, you want us friends up in your crime.
	I hope you know that it's time to go when we take your names.
	You don't get to tell us what...
	All right, we're not going to play the full intro because I actually want to make sure that the audio is mildly adequate.
	I'm using the new computer built-in mic.
	So let me see how this sounds.
	Go to live.
	Ooh, that's actually not bad.
	Okay, this is actually not bad.
	I'm using the new computer.
	You're going to see the light flashing because I didn't bring my floodlighting, although I think I might have some here.
	I'm in basement in Communist Canada.
	I have crossed the border into minus 17. It was cold this morning, but not cold enough to do the Impimba effect.
	I threw a pot of boiling water up in the air and may or may not have made the neighbors think I'm totally crazy because they see someone coming out half-dressed, wild hair, throwing a bucket of boiling water into the air.
	Yeah, the audio is great, says Matthew Annis, who's going to be...
	In our show today.
	Well, in our show, spiritually speaking.
	Yeah, this is amazing.
	I didn't bring my mic.
	I didn't bring the lighting.
	And we're going off the bare essentials, which is just the new computer, people.
	The new computer.
	Still can't get over what it costs, but that is the cost of doing business.
	Intro song, five times August, Liars, Cheats, and Crook.
	It's on Liars, Cheats, and Crooks.
	It's on Apple, iTunes, whatever the heck that store is.
	So I've come back to Canada.
	Just do a brief intro.
	Traveling with kids alone is not easy.
	I'm not sure that it's easier with a second parent because then the kids think they can even misbehave even more.
	But the hectic travel on...
	What was the date yesterday?
	December 21st.
	I don't remember when the last time I traveled at Christmas was.
	I don't remember what we did the last time we came back to Canada last year.
	It's unpleasant.
	To say, like, your sardines is an understatement to the extent that you land safely and get through customs and don't have any problems, delays, there were some small delays, whatever.
	Unpleasant. But I was trying to filter through that 17,000-page document on the weaponization of the federal government in the States.
	It was published Friday.
	It wasn't happening.
	Got to drive the dogs to the kennel.
	Pack up, make sure, you know, it wasn't happening, but I did get to watch two movies on the airplane yesterday.
	One was Dumb Money about the GameStop drama.
	I was not impressed with the movie.
	I texted Ian Carroll afterwards and I said, like, how...
	And I looked, I was like, how accurate is this movie?
	You know, the characters are made up with the exception of Roaring Kitty.
	It's a little oversimplified, but, you know, it gives the idea, the gist of the GameStop crisis.
	My angle from it, Robert Barnes and I, we talked about it a lot.
	The Robin Hood fraud angle.
	You know, them...
	Disabling the buy feature and only allowing the sell feature to tank the price so that they could allow their short hedge fund buddies to pick up, you know, minimize their losses.
	I remember that.
	But I didn't remember.
	I knew nothing of the roaring kitty side of it above and beyond some superficial, you know, following at the time.
	It was decent.
	Decent. And then I watched another movie called Love Bleeds Love.
	Oh, jeez.
	What was it called?
	Love Lies Bleeding.
	Love Lies Bleeding.
	Was that the name of the movie?
	It could not have been that movie because it had the woman...
	Oh, gosh.
	What was it called?
	What the heck was the name of the movie?
	Basically, it was like almost softcore lesbian porn mixed in with a little bit of extreme violence.
	Oh, come on.
	I thought it was called Love Lies Bleeding with the girl from Starlight or Star...
	Twilight. Love...
	Lies... Bleeding.
	Come on.
	I just watched it yesterday.
	Does anybody in the chat know what I'm talking about?
	It is called Love Lies Bleeding.
	2024. Thriller.
	Crime. Not a movie you want to watch on an airplane.
	A lot of lesbian sex in that movie.
	Nothing wrong with that.
	I mean, nothing wrong with that.
	Whatever. No religious element to that.
	But I don't think I liked it.
	Who said they liked it?
	Love Lies Bleeding was excellent.
	I don't know if I was watching it not in the right environment.
	I wasn't impressed.
	But I'm turning into a cranky old man when it comes to movies.
	I don't like movies at all anymore.
	Viva's watching...
	No, because now, who is the woman in the movie?
	Because there was a picture going around and it said, like, what happened to the actress in the movie?
	And then it makes sense because the actress was playing...
	What's her name?
	Kristen... I can't see this.
	My gosh, my eyes are getting bad.
	Her name was...
	Kristen Stewart.
	I had recently sat for a photo op, and it wasn't flattering, but now people can probably understand it was for the movie.
	Okay, we're going to talk about some stuff today, but we're going to first start with a bit of a laugh before we actually have to get into the awful, awful news, awful, awful coverage.
	I mean, we're living through a world where there is no reality, there is no objective reality, there's no objective morality, and it is incessant, 24-7.
	Propaganda spin rubbish.
	Because we have come back to Canada for the holidays, we'll start with a little bit of Pierre Poilièvre doing the rounds on Breakfast Television.
	I once hosted Breakfast Television.
	I don't think they're going to invite me back anymore, ever again.
	From a post of a man named Andrew Perez, I'm not putting anybody on blast here, I'm just, you know...
	I'll criticize on Twitter.
	I'm damn well going to criticize on my show.
	Principal Perez Strategies.
	Political commentator and liberal strategist.
	That tells you everything you need to know.
	Freelance writer, non-profit board leader.
	Fife House.
	C-A-S-P underscore C-A.
	He, him.
	In case anybody had any doubts.
	Gotta add the pronouns.
	Oh, is he?
	Hold on a second.
	Why does he look like he's on breakfast television?
	Anyhow, either way, he put out a tweet.
	And he's calling Pierre Poiliev a misogynist.
	I'll read you the tweet before we watch the video so you can understand just how unhinged everything is.
	In order to have an assessment of reality, you have to get your info from everywhere and then do your best to piece it together.
	It's really disgusting to see the misogyny Pierre Poiliev hurls at talented female journalist Carnie...
	Karen Siolan in this interview clip simply for doing her job.
	Misogyny. Wake up, Canada.
	This man has a consistent 20 to 25 point lead in public opinion polling.
	We can't allow PP to win in a sweeping majority and reshape Canada in ways that won't be easy to reverse.
	If he's got a 20 to 25 point lead in the poll, I don't know if you're right or you're wrong.
	Maybe you want to think...
	Why is that the case?
	You made an accusation of misogyny.
	I'm all ears, Andrew.
	Let's hear this horrid, horrid demonstration of anti-woman misogyny.
	I don't know if there's any other type of misogyny.
	That might be what we call a neoplasma misogyny.
	Let's hear Pierre Poilier being a misogynist.
	These programs, well, the Pharmacare program hasn't given out a single jar of medication, a single pill.
	So-called dental care program, according to the government's own numbers, has not helped 97% of people.
	They have a food program.
	More than 1 million Canadians have access to that program, have received coverage to that program.
	89% of dentists in this country, according to government numbers, 89% of dentists in this country have signed up for the dental care program.
	Would a conservative government...
	She just said more than a million have signed up for it, not have received benefits, just if we're actually parsing words.
	But bear in mind, people, this is not a debate.
	This is breakfast television inviting Pierre Poilievon, and as far as I'm concerned, this journalist, man, woman, black, white, Asian, Jew, whatever, is talking over him.
	Period. Those programs.
	Would a Conservative government cut the dental care program?
	Can you tell the one million Canadians who are right now receiving coverage under that plan whether or not they will continue to have coverage under a Conservative government?
	So first of all, you've revealed your own bias in simply accepting government propaganda.
	We don't know how many people have actually benefited from it.
	Is that just because you say so, sir?
	Is that just because you say so?
	What evidence or data do you have that we cannot trust those numbers?
	Oh, where do you want me to start?
	You could start with Monday.
	Were you awake on Monday?
	Their deficit was 55% bigger than they said 8 months ago.
	So we can't trust what they say on financial numbers.
	Their carbon tax was not supposed to go above 11 cents.
	And then it goes on.
	By the way, did anybody notice any misogyny there?
	Oh, were you awake on Monday?
	He wouldn't have said that if she were a man.
	And by the way, the sophistry.
	I don't know if signing up means having received the benefits.
	I'm not sure that it does mean that.
	But on the one hand, you can be a little, you know, play both sides.
	If her number is that 1 million people have signed up for it, that doesn't mean that 1 million Canadians have received coverage under the dental plan for which they've signed up.
	And that's assuming you believe the numbers.
	I mean, how dare anybody believe anything the government says?
	They projected a budget of $40 billion deficit, and they were at $63 billion the day they were supposed to give their fiscal update last week, and then Chrystia Freeland resigned.
	And now Justin Trudeau is basically done.
	He's basically done, the second they get back from Christmas break, they are going to trigger a new election, declare, they're going to vote and pass a non-confidence vote because now they have the support of the NDP and Jagmeet Singh.
	We'll get to that in a second.
	But not only was there not no misogyny in that, to suggest that you have to go kiddie gloves on a journalist because she's a woman is misogyny, you idiot.
	It's the soft bigotry or just bigotry of low expectations.
	Oh, she's a woman?
	She's a young girl?
	I better not be too mean on her because she might cry.
	That's misogyny!
	You treat a young woman journalist like you would treat Walter Cronkite.
	He's dead, but I think he's dead.
	Not the slightest bit of misogyny.
	But you can say the accusation and then the word stays, much like...
	The wrap-up smears, where you throw out the accusation.
	Other people report on the accusation.
	You look up Pierre Poilier at Breakfast Television now, and you're going to see all of these government-subsidized, propagandist outlets repeating the lie and making truth of the lie to the point where smooth-brained idiots, although he's a liberal strategist, so he's just a godforsaken scoundrel liar, will make truth of the lie.
	Want a croquet is dead?
	Okay, good.
	I felt bad.
	I mean, he has to be.
	If I remember him from my childhood, I'm 45 already.
	But yeah, so Pierre Poiliev, in as much as I don't have much faith in the liberals, I have no faith in liberals.
	I don't have much faith in the conservatives.
	He's good.
	He's good in soundbite interviews like that.
	And he's good at not letting these idiots get away with it.
	Oh, what numbers are you relying on?
	Breakfast television.
	I'm trying to Google how much government subsidy they got from the federal and the bailout, either digital or COVID ads, government ads.
	What is their level of subsidy from the federal government that they're now running the talking points on, ignoring the fact that the federal government lies through its teeth and can't provide accurate information?
	Hey, how much did the budget for the Arrive Can app, how much did that end up costing?
	But then, like I said, when they get back over Christmas, they're done.
	Because I covered the two letters from liberals, the Don Valley liberals, and there was another one calling on Justin Trudor to resign.
	And now you've got Jagmeet Singh.
	I keep looking at the wrong place for the camera.
	The camera's right there.
	You're looking at the stupid green dot, which is like, if I look at the green dot, I'm not looking at you guys in the eyes.
	I've got to look like right there.
	Look at you in the eyes.
	Jagmeet Singh.
	And by the way, this is going to be a bit of a theme of life.
	The left projects, period.
	A lot of people do it.
	It's not strictly a lefty thing, but when it comes to politics and it comes to lefties, progressive, democrats, liberals, all they do is project, and it's called the iron law of woke or lefty projection.
	So when you read that and you understand that, and by the way, when I make that accusation, I'm very much aware that someone's going to say Viva is projecting by accusing others of projecting.
	Ha ha ha, we got Viva.
	I'm aware.
	And I assess myself and say, well, I'm criticizing.
	Let's take an example.
	Jagmeet Singh of being a godforsaken hypocrite.
	I have to step back.
	Viva, if someone were to call you a hypocrite, what would they look at?
	What would they draw by way of evidence to say, Viva, you are a hypocrite in that you apply different standards to others than you apply to yourself.
	Good luck with that because I live with that neuroses day in and day out.
	Jagmeet Singh is a projecting buffoon.
	And so when you read him saying, bootlickers for billionaires, you know that he's talking about himself.
	This is what Jagmeet Singh has to say.
	And I thought, again, it was from the parody account because there's a Jagmeet Singh's ego or something like that.
	Jagmeet Singh's hypocrisy.
	It's Justin Trudeau's ego.
	Fantastic parody accounts.
	Jagmeet Singh writes, bootlicker for billionaires.
	Why don't you tell Canadians what you were up to a week ago, Pierre?
	Actually, I'll do it.
	What was he doing?
	Oh, fundraising.
	God forbid.
	A closed-door fundraiser in a $17 million mansion in one of Toronto's swankiest areas.
	Remember the word swanky, by the way.
	Tell us, Pierre, which CEOs did you meet and what did you promise to cut in exchange for their checks?
	Healthcare? Dental care?
	So, appreciate the accusations.
	Bootlicker for billionaire, attending a swanky fundraiser, and making promises to billionaires for his political future.
	Okay. Some of you might not know this.
	Others will if you've been around the channel for a little while because I brought this one up a couple of times and I love it.
	It will never get old and it will never stop being applicable until this POS scumbag is out of office forever.
	In response to that tweet, and I love it, I'm done.
	I'm calling assholes assholes.
	I'm sorry.
	I'm not sorry.
	Who am I kidding?
	I'm sorry.
	He's an asshole.
	He's an asshole.
	You are such a hypocritical asshole.
	It truly defies belief.
	If you don't remember this article, it's from eight years ago, but my goodness, has it aged?
	It's aged like some of these custom bikes that Jagmeet has in his upscale wherever the hell he lives.
	This was an article in Toronto Life called The Greatest Showman.
	The left has pinned its hopes on Jagmeet Singh, a charismatic leader with a taste for flashy suits and a following that should make Justin Trudeau nervous, the making of a political superstar.
	Swanky! Oh, he said swanky.
	They said flashy.
	This was my favorite section from this article.
	It's just amazing.
	The NDP, the New Democrat Party, this is a man of the people.
	Jagmeet has a taste for dandy luxuries that don't comport with the monkish minimalism of his party.
	He wears bespoke suits in the slim British style.
	His favorite is a brown tweed with cobalt blue stripes designed by a tailor in New Delhi, which he often pairs with a millennial pink turban.
	He owns two Rolex watches, an Oyster Perpetual Datejust, and a Submariner.
	Both were gifts.
	Oh, who were they gifts from Jagmeet?
	It says you've accused Pierre of selling out for favors or offering favors for whatever the hell.
	Where'd you get these?
	I'm just curious.
	From your parents.
	Both were gifts.
	A Crimson BMW Coupe.
	I don't think those actually cost all that much, if we're being fair.
	A BMW Coupe cost?
	No idea what those cost.
	Let's see.
	2025 BMW M4 Coupe.
	A hundred thousand?
	Okay, well, maybe they're more expensive than I thought they were.
	Never mind.
	I'll skip that one.
	No more benefit of the doubt.
	I just don't know what kind of car that is.
	A crimson BMW Coupe.
	Six designer bicycles.
	And this is Jagmeet testifying to his own minimalist, monkish, you know, fighting for the people.
	A man of the people.
	I have just an absurd number of bikes, he says.
	More than one person should have.
	His kirpan, a ceremonial Sikh dagger he wears under his jacket, is a steel design by a metalworker outside Boston.
	Since joining Queen's Park in 2011, Singh has become one of the city's most devoted partygoers, a regular at King West nightspots and gala fundraisers, at fashion shows and...
	This is the asshole who's accusing Pierre of being a bootlicker for billionaires and attending fundraisers at swanky areas.
	When you hate yourself, or when you know that you are evil, All you can do is try to look for that very same evil in others to somehow minimize your own evil and your own hypocrisy.
	Hold on one second.
	I love it when Viva Fry pronounces the car as a military coup.
	Did I say coup or coop?
	It's either a chicken coop or a military coup, one way or the other.
	That's Jagmeet Singh.
	And they've triggered the, or at least they've announced.
	He comes out and he signed a letter saying, yeah, I'm going to vote.
	No confidence.
	The second after we get back from Christmas break, I'm going to vote to take down the Trudeau government, which will happen to fall five days after I've secured my federal pension.
	Mother effing scumbag.
	All right.
	That was the light part of the show, people.
	Wait till we get him to the heavy stuff.
	Ben Lovejoy says, I'm just here to say Rumble rules.
	My portfolio of this M was a great gift and I can't get enough Viva.
	Blessings to all.
	Ben Lovejoy must be talking about the news that Rumble has asked Rumble.
	I'm sorry, I just got a text from my wife and it says, are you live?
	I am live, period.
	For a second, I thought it said, no, it said alive.
	I am live.
	I have to sneak into a basement bunker in order to do a live.
	Yeah, the news of the day, Rumble has partnered with, or there's a company that has invested $775 million in Rumble.
	Rumble, $775 million.
	I don't know the name of it.
	Tether, Tether, Tether?
	Yes, it is called Tether.
	Okay, here we go.
	And so the stock price...
	Went up 40 some odd percent after hours on Friday.
	Rumble to receive $775 million strategic investment from Tether.
	I'm a bit of an idiot, so I'm not sure exactly what Tether is, but now I know a little bit more than I did Friday.
	A video sharing platform and cloud services provider, Rumble, said on Friday it has entered into an agreement with Tether, a blockchain-enabled platform, to receive a strategic investment of $775 million.
	What does it come with in terms of...
	How much equity Tether's going to get.
	Shares of the Toronto-based company were up 43% after the bell.
	That was 43%, by the way, after it was already up 35% over the last month and a half.
	Cryptocurrencies have soared since Donald Trump won the presidential election.
	His pro-cryptocurrency stance, including a plan to create a U.S.
	Bitcoin strategic reserve, has stoked enthusiasm of crypto bulls leading to a record rally on Bitcoin.
	Rumble said that the following the completion of the transaction, Chris Pavlovsky, Rumble's chairman and CEO, will retain his controlling stake in the company.
	While Tether will own a minority position in Rumble's outstanding common stock, it will not have the right to designate any members of Rumble's board.
	That is how Chris, by the way, makes sure that he keeps control over his baby, which is Rumble.
	Rumble also said that it will use a portion of the proceeds to fund a self-tender offer for up to 70 million of Rumble's common stock.
	So you might have a little bit of...
	I don't know what that means, actually.
	Rumble also said it will use a portion of the proceeds to fund a self-tender offer for up to 70 million of Rumble's common stock.
	The investment and the tender offer are expected to close in the first quarter of 2025.
	It's good news.
	I mean, that's all I know.
	When those who know more...
	Buy up the stock and invest in Rumble as an entity.
	I have had nothing but faith from the beginning.
	And I've got nothing but optimism.
	Victor underscore Cardone.
	Is that really Victor Cardone?
	Hey, Viva, if you were to guess how many Canadians would actually prefer being the US, the 51st state, I would run a poll, but it would be very much not falsified, but it would be obviously impacted by my political ideological silo.
	I make the argument that Canada basically is a de facto 51st state already, and not in any mean or controversial, degrading, demeaning way.
	We rely, or Canada relies on the U.S. for a great number of things, trade, security, and it's on the same continent.
	People get offended at the idea, but it would be even less culturally...
	It's more conflicting than the European Union.
	How do you have a European Union and say, okay, we've got a European Union.
	It's sort of like the entity that encompasses a 51st state between two countries which were fighting to the death 60 years ago.
	The European Union consists of Germany and France, and somehow that is culturally, ideologically more in alignment than saying that Canada could be the 51st state of America?
	But I think there's a great many people who would not mind and would not care and would actually greatly, greatly appreciate it.
	All right, now let's see what's going on in VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
	Hmm, down a little.
	Viva! Tzvi Hanses says, you mean the Fourth Reich and the Third Soviet or the Third Soviet?
	Tzvi Hanses gets the joke, but yes.
	Tether is a F'd-up company and Scheisty AF says Encryptus.
	Tether is the best monopoly money there is.
	I might know of an alleged crime of crimes.
	Okay, I'm not getting into this right now.
	I wonder how many Dogecoin.
	I wonder how my Dogecoin is doing.
	Did I tell you I picked up a little Dogecoin?
	I won't say that it was before I watched the movie, but it certainly reaffirmed my decision.
	You don't want to miss.
	Well, it's 43 cents Canadian.
	I need it in US.
	You don't want to miss the next...
	That's at 32 cents.
	Okay. Anyways, that's not the topic of the show, people.
	I'll close this up here and go over here.
	Victor Cardone says, are we going to be forced to join Rumble?
	From what I understand, I did as much of a Q&A on it as I could.
	You're going to be required, if you're using Locals, to create an email account with Rumble.
	In order to continue having access to locals in the future.
	And I've answered, I think, every question that the community had.
	And I put those answers out there and hope I've done a good enough job.
	Zvi Hansen says, Viva Gadi.
	Gadi, not Gad.
	Gadi? Tab replied and he is aware of you.
	Not sure if he got the message from you, though.
	Well, I'd like to have him on now because actually this might be the perfect segue.
	Let me just see something here.
	Gadi. Gaudi Taub.
	Okay. Gaudi Taub.
	Let me just see something here.
	Oh, Lordy.
	We're going to get into the German attack committed by a Muslim Saudi and being blamed on the AFD and Elon Musk and the Jews.
	But I want to see one thing first here.
	Because if I'm not mistaken, and I don't want to make a mistake, I want to see if somebody was actually following that account.
	Okay, hold on.
	Give me one second.
	I need to get to the alleged attacker's Twitter account before I say anything that might be factually incorrect.
	It's Dr. Taleb Jawad.
	Okay, so hold on a second here.
	Let's do this.
	Twitter. Go here.
	Okay, give me one sec.
	This one.
	Okay, yeah, so here, I'm going to bring this up to make sure that my DMs are not open.
	Okay, the account of the alleged attacker, and I think we can agree that it's the attacker now, is this is the alleged attacker out of Germany.
	He's followed.
	People go into the follows and think they've gotten, like, all of the best gotchas on earth.
	He's followed by Mordechai Kadar, who I believe is one of the people, Steve Hansen, that you suggested I reach out to.
	And you don't know who followed him when.
	I mean, I don't know if there's a way to check that out, but people are making a big deal of the fact that he's followed by Tommy Robinson.
	And if you go into...
	Let me just do one thing and make sure that it doesn't...
	Followers you know.
	And those are the followers I know.
	All right, well, let's get into the attack in Germany.
	This is a world now, again, you don't know what you can believe even when you see it with your own eyes.
	You don't know what you can believe when you read it in the paper.
	You can pretty much bet that in the fog of war, there's going to be lies, disinformation, mistaken information, and truth.
	And that is...
	Pretty much all you can rely on, it's going to be chaos.
	Mordechai Kadar would be an excellent guest, says M. Sidloy.
	I've reached out to Mordechai as well, and it might be an opportune time to have it.
	But right now, let's set aside all personal feelings, and let's set aside, if we can, all internal biases.
	I only want to know what happened and factual elements of what happened in that attack.
	The one bias I will not hide is that no matter how much you hate the godforsaken legacy media, you do not hate them enough.
	This was from December 20th, two days ago.
	I'm reading it.
	They didn't even change it.
	They didn't delete this tweet to rephrase it.
	A car has driven into a group of people at a Christmas party, a Christmas market in Germany.
	A car has driven into a group.
	It's like the car has agency.
	You didn't even need to add a single letter to that statement in order to make it more accurate and less...
	What is it?
	Disenfranchising of agency?
	A car has driven into a group of people suggests that the car drove itself into a group of people.
	I'm not trying to be semantic or glib here.
	A car has driven means it drove itself.
	A car...
	Was driven means that somebody drove it.
	So you didn't even need, you needed to change one freaking letter in this headline to make it not grotesquely offensive to human dignity.
	A car was driven into a group of people at a Christmas market in Germany would have been accurate.
	A car has driven utterly absolves the driver of any responsibility.
	Even if the driver had a medical emergency, which is not the case.
	You would say a car was driven, but the driver had a heart attack.
	In this case, the driver had different motivations and ones that are being dissected by the aggregate knowledge of the internet.
	The driver happens to be, in fact, the alleged driver.
	Everybody's alleged here that nobody's been convicted.
	The alleged attacker is a Saudi refugee.
	It's from Saudi Arabia, living in Germany, claiming asylum.
	And we know a lot more about this man now than we did before.
	But set aside all intentions, what is it called when you divine intentions through tweets, which are mildly conflicting to say the least.
	The man from Saudi Arabia, Shia Muslim, Shia Muslim from what I understand, claiming asylum in Germany, these are the facts, is alleged to have driven his car through the crowd.
	One thing is clear.
	It was not a medical emergency in any heart attack sense.
	Whether or not it was a medical emergency and that the man is schizophrenic and batshit crazy.
	To commit murder, I think you have to be by definition.
	Then the only question is what motivated that person who's clearly mentally ill to the point where they'll kill people.
	We can get into that in a second as well.
	Saudi. Shia Muslim.
	Living in Germany.
	Apparently trying to fight extradition to Germany.
	Sorry, back to Saudi Arabia.
	So there was a long thread, and I believe this is the individual who broke...
	No, this is not it.
	This is actually one that I wanted to bring up afterwards, where you don't even know what you can believe anymore because people...
	I lost my page.
	Hold on a second.
	Because people say things that are false.
	At one point, the account was suspended and then re-implemented, reinstated.
	And people say, the account has been deleted, nuked.
	No, it hasn't.
	Well, it was temporarily for a second.
	Yes, maybe it was.
	Oh, and then in that time, Elon deleted a bunch of posts, so now you can't see the whole thing.
	Unverifiable. And in fact, the problem is, that allegation, I believe, remains unverifiable.
	Unless, I don't know, even if you, if those tweets were deleted, if they were archived.
	I guess an archived link could prove the existence of a tweet that is now no longer in existence for whatever the reason.
	But the tweet that broke down the individual.
	Let me just see here.
	Not that one.
	Not that one.
	And I believe it's this one.
	Here we go.
	Okay. This is coming from a man.
	Dude, I don't know any of these.
	A Saudi political commentator, writer, and public speaker, frequent guest on CNN, BBC, and France 24. Well, now I'm suspicious.
	That's how it works.
	I will be very suspicious of this individual if they're frequent guests on CNN, BBC, and France 24. Okay, now let's see what the evidence suggests here.
	A thread, 1 to 10. Raw facts you won't hear from the German media echo chambers about the latest horrendous terror attack in Germany, Magdeburg.
	Then we got here.
	Early 2006, Taleb Abdelmossam flees Saudi Arabia after being accused of rape and implications in serious crimes.
	These, I believe, are...
	Known facts, no.
	Oh, do I have to do it this way?
	Okay, so hold on.
	It doesn't let me do down the thread in incognito, so let me just...
	Let me just get this in here.
	Okay, here we go.
	I need a caffeinated beverage immediately.
	Number two, Saudi Arabia formally requested his extradition, but Germany denies the request, citing human right concerns despite clear evidence of criminal activities.
	So this is going to be the important one, I think, when attempting to interpret what is basically a...
	If you haven't seen the movie Seven, it's like the serial killer in Seven's diary.
	Try to decipher the diary.
	It's going through this guy's Twitter feed.
	Apparently, he was...
	There was an extradition request for this man back to Saudi Arabia, where I suspect he knows what he might have faced, which might explain some of the public tweets he was making in his Twitter feed.
	But there's another explanation, which we'll get to in a second, which is another woman who's explaining a concept I'm familiar with.
	I'm not a religious expert by any means, but called taqiyya, the right to mislead or deceive in furtherance of religious objectives.
	We'll get there in a second.
	Bottom line?
	Extradition requested.
	This guy obviously doesn't want to go back to Saudi Arabia.
	What's the best way not to go back to Saudi Arabia?
	Be critical of Islam?
	Pretend to be an atheist asylum seeker?
	Maybe a prose of Israel one?
	Who knows?
	Post-asylum in Germany.
	After arriving in Germany, Abdul Molson reinvents himself as a dissident, publicly declaring himself as atheist and ex-Muslim.
	The move appeared strategic, likely aimed at securing full asylum protection in Germany by portraying himself as a victim of persecution rather than a fugitive from justice.
	4 of 10.
	Abdul Mohsin begins working in a government hospital in Germany as a psychiatrist.
	Shockingly, while holding this position, he's publicly active in criminal activities, including human trafficking, trafficking, smuggling young girls.
	I'd like to see some of the evidence for this.
	Encouraging girls and minors from Saudi Arabia and Gulf countries to flee to Germany.
	These activities raise serious concerns about his involvement of certain human rights organizations, which may have facilitated or turned a blind eye to these crimes.
	This angle requires urgent investigation.
	Five of threat.
	Five of ten threat.
	Direct threats against Germany.
	In 2023 to 2024, Abdul Mohsin makes explicit threats against Germany, which authorities dismiss as, quote, freedom of expression.
	It's ironic who gets freedom of expression and who doesn't, because they're locking up native Brits for complaining about immigration problems in England.
	He was active on social media, repeatedly tweeting and posting voice recordings where he made explicit threats against Germany, openly considered the German government his enemy, claiming that Germany was conspiring against him and against all Saudi asylum seekers.
	publicly accessible and alarming, yet German authorities failed to respond or investigate further.
	And here we actually have some of this.
	The paranoid claims and repeated threats were clear indicators of a dangerous mindset, yet they were ignored by authorities despite being warned by many ex-users who tagged the German police in case they were not doing Let's just see an example.
	The thing I can hardly believe is Germany's recklessness in imagining that committing a series of crimes against the Saudi opposition will pass without accountability.
	They think that even if Talib al-Duz remains out of prison, he will not bring justice.
	They will live in their delusions due to lack of...
	You can read this.
	This is straight out of the movie Seven.
	Seven.
	You can read that.
	Okay, we're going to get this out of here.
	Six of ten.
	Ignored warnings from a Saudi girl.
	In 2023, a Saudi girl reported his terror threats to the German police via their official ex-account.
	She sent multiple messages warning that Abdelmosen repeatedly and publicly threatened to run over Germans and killed them through his social media accounts.
	Despite these clear and repeated warnings, the Berlin police and German authorities ignored her messages and failed to act.
	This negligence directly contributed to the tragedy that followed.
	On December 10, we saw what he did.
	Shameful German media coverage.
	German media's coverage of this tragedy has been shallow and misleading.
	Most headlines simply refer to him as a Saudi citizen, ignoring his criminal past, threats and motives.
	No mention of him as a Saudi fugitive, dissident, anti-Islam criminal, etc.
	It was perhaps to cover up the authorities' astonishing failure.
	They didn't even call him a terrorist.
	Well, they just said the car even drove.
	They didn't even see that he drove the car.
	The car drove itself.
	No context was provided, but his background and ignored warnings.
	The focus on his original nationality rather than his criminal history and explicit threats is a disservice to public understanding.
	Nine of ten.
	Why was an extradition request by Saudi Arabia denied by the Germany despite clear risks?
	Why were the public threats of violence ignored?
	Why did the media fail to inform about his background, motives, manipulation, etc., etc.?
	Why were the warnings from concerned individuals ignored?
	And ten of ten.
	Below is a clip by the BBC glorifying the same terrorist.
	Don't be surprised.
	It's happened over and over again.
	And may never stop until the West wakes up and takes decisive action to put an end to terrorists.
	I want to see what this is.
	you.
	I'm from Saudi Arabia.
	I'm an activist.
	I created a website to help people seeking asylum, especially from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf region.
	He's an ex-Muslim.
	He lives in Germany where he sought asylum after his life was threatened back in Saudi Arabia.
	His website has helped hundreds of ex-Muslims flee the Gulf where apostasy can be punished with a prison sentence or death.
	So if you're trying to avoid being extradited back to Saudi Arabia where you would face death...
	What's the best way to do it?
	They won't extradite you if they know that you're going to face death or torturous punishment if they allow you to be extradited.
	So what's the best way to do it?
	If we're playing a game of divining intentions.
	Yeah, I use basically WhatsApp, Twitter, Telegram.
	If I have time, I spend totally helping Saudi Saudi Arabia between 10 to 16 hours a day.
	If I have time.
	The only Arab country from which I did not have an ex-Muslim seeking help until now from me is Oman.
	90% of people who approach me are women.
	Okay. That's a pretty exhaustive threat.
	As to who he is.
	And then you don't even know what to believe.
	Is he an actual ex-Muslim?
	Is he pretending to be an ex-Muslim so that he can avoid extradition requests so that Germany will not extradite him back to a country where being an ex-Muslim apostate is punishable by death?
	You take your guess.
	But those are the facts at the very least for now.
	Is Viva Canadian?
	Viva is Canadian, JDL.
	I am Canadian.
	Currently residing in the free state of Florida.
	Now, we want to divine intentions.
	There was another very interesting analysis, and I'll play it out.
	It's a little long, but it's, you know, I say super viral is not the metric of success, but sometimes it is a metric of accuracy and value-added information to the conversation.
	This is, let me just see who this is again here.
	Sorry. How do I get out of here?
	Escape? Yeah, this is from Maral Salmasi.
	Who is politically incorrect, Iranian-German entrepreneur and producer, who put out a very thorough analysis despite claims made by the German press.
	Talaab al-Malilz is not an ex-Muslim atheist, nor is he a fan of the AFD or Elon Musk.
	While he may have spread this misinformation himself, it aligns with the practice of taqiyya, an Islamic doctrine that permits lying and deception to advance Islamic objectives.
	I'm playing this...
	I presume when people say you can lie in order to further religious objectives, it means if they're coming asking for Anne Frank, can you lie?
	That's what I presume it means.
	And I'm playing this for right or for wrong, judgment-free.
	In reality, he's a radical Shia Muslim.
	As evidenced by his name and numerous tweets and chat leaks circulating on Arabic-speaking platforms like X. Disturbingly, his plans to carry a mass killing of Germans were brought to the attention of German authorities by a Saudi woman.
	Tragically, the police ignored her warning.
	The links are added in the description.
	But let's hear what Marala says here.
	I want to address the misinformation spreading about Talib al-Abdul Mohsen, the terrorist behind the Christmas market attack in Magdeburg, Germany.
	Contrary to some claims, he was neither an atheist nor an ex-Muslim.
	Taleb Farsi portrayed himself as an atheist ex-Muslim and victim of the Saudi regime while simultaneously accusing the German government of prosecuting female Saudi asylum seekers and promoting an agenda to Islamize Europe.
	His identity as a radical Shia Muslim is evident, even from his name.
	Which explains his hostility towards Saudi Arabia and his wicked jihadi agenda.
	Leaked tweets and chat screenshots now circulating on X reveal his connection to radical Islamist networks, including a counselling to ISIS.
	And ex-Muslim organizations and activists on X have also reported receiving direct threats from Talib.
	Threaten ex-Muslims.
	It doesn't make sense.
	This is a classic example of taqiyya, an Islamic practice that allows Muslims to lie and deceive to advance His actions seek to destabilize and confuse society,
	to paralyze any meaningful response to radical threats.
	Portraying himself as a victim of Sunni Saudi Arabia, who he, from his radical Shia perspective, considers fake Muslims, he furthers both his jihadist goals and his sectarian battle.
	Individuals like Talib have no loyalty to earthly life.
	Their sero-masochistic lives are entirely devoted to preparing for Judgment Day, where the infidel will finally suffer eternal torture and hellfire while they will be rewarded in paradise for their earthly sacrifices, complete with the infamous promise of 72 virgins.
	Without a doubt, Talib is not an atheist.
	For terrorists like him, life is a temporary means to serve his violent, apocalyptic vision of...
	Divine will.
	Pretty darn interesting analysis.
	And I'll share it with everybody so that you can read it at your leisure, listen to it at your leisure, share it at your link.
	All right.
	Now, let me just put this down here a little bit like that.
	As I sit down on this couch, my ass pressure is actually causing it to sink.
	So that's an analysis.
	Now, I'm not just open to all evidence.
	I overtly seek it because I want to make sure that I don't have a blind spot either.
	And the theory, by the way, I admit I have my bias and I think it's absolutely insanely idiotic to say that this man was an AFD Alternative für Deutschland supporter and an Elon Musk supporter.
	The caveat that he might be an Elon Musk supporter is a little bit easier to rationalize because even people who want to commit acts of mass murder don't like censorship.
	And so the fact that he doesn't like censorship, it might be because he wants to more easily facilitate his acts of mass murder and spread his ideology without being censored.
	So the idea that he likes Elon Musk, that's tantrum to saying he wants free speech, which is something that I presume even the most murderous of murderers want.
	To say that he's a far-right, alternative for Deutschland, which is the AFD Christine Anderson's party, It's laughably stupid, and it's actually offensively demeaning to the victims, among others.
	Why? Now, some people are going to say he was far right, and the reason why he attacked Christians as a Muslim Saudi man, the reason why he attacked Christians at a market was to promote Islamophobic sentiment to hurt Muslims.
	I mean, this was a Norm Macdonald joke once upon a time.
	But that is the logic.
	That's the rationale.
	Because there's no other rationale that makes sense as to why.
	There is another one, which I'll get to, the Jews.
	Why would a Saudi Muslim man, even if he's an ex-Muslim atheist, so-called, if he's an alternative for Deutschland supporter, why would he kill German Christians at a Christmas market at Christmas?
	It doesn't make sense unless you twist your head into these mental gymnastics and say he's doing it to stoke anti-Islamic, Islamophobic sentiment in Germany to the AFD's content.
	I don't know how you respond to something like that, except to say that if that's what he's trying to do, and your rationale is it's sort of like a double fakie, that he's doing it to make Muslims look bad.
	Well, if he's doing it and it actually makes the AFD look bad, then even by that own twisted, morbid logic, what he's doing will not help the AFD anyhow, even if he were, in fact, an AFD supporter, a sick-in-the-head, mentally-unwell individual who thought that it would help the AFD to stoke anti-Islamic sentiment in Europe by killing Christians at a Christian market.
	So by the premises of its own delusional, irrational justification, it doesn't make sense, because if it's true...
	That he is, in fact, an AFD supporter.
	It's only going to make the AFD look bad and not actually stoke anti-Islamic sentiment.
	So it doesn't make sense on its own face.
	The other rationale is that he's a Jew or a Jewish supporter.
	So you can make fun and laugh at the ideas, but then the problem is people actually still have them.
	And so laughing at them is not going to, A, prove anybody wrong who believes them, or B, Respond to the, as outlandish as it might be, the accusation.
	So I'm bringing up a tweet from Based and Biased, and I'm not trying to put him on blast.
	I'm not trying to put him on blast at all.
	I follow him, and he's value-added to the conversation.
	I said, what's the best evidence that this guy was supporting Jews or Israel?
	And the best evidence are the tweets of a madman.
	So I said, what do you think this is all about?
	And here's a tweet where in his profile, I don't know what the date is, but I'm just going to presume that it's relatively recent.
	A series of tweets explaining why I wrote in my bio that I love Israel.
	And then another one that says, the religion of God is Judaism.
	What's amazing on the one hand is that these could be outright trolls.
	Like this could be parody.
	It could be an outright troll.
	Or it just could be...
	The tweets of an absolutely insane, you know, would-be, will-be murderer, alleged murderer.
	Or it could be exactly what Salam said to Kia, which is putting out these tweets, if you're trying to seek asylum and you're trying to ensure that you don't get extradited to a country where they allegedly execute apostates, that this is how you do it.
	You can't send me back to Saudi Arabia.
	I just said I love Israel and Judaism.
	They're going to kill me.
	So between those three possibilities, you pick the most likely one, and it's probably the most obvious one.
	That a man who will then later on go to kill Christians at a Christmas market, he didn't do it because of a genuine love for Jewish God or Jewish belief, because in as much as you can criticize Israel for a lot of things, and I don't know, Jews, whatever you want, the proportion of Israeli or Jewish terrorist attacks on Christians, there have been certainly some attacks, and typically it's, I mean, I know of them, they're back in the day more related to the Middle East conflict.
	And encampments, I'm not saying that they don't exist, full stop.
	When you go and you measure the proportion, Jewish terrorist attacks on Christians, even if you believe that this guy was legit in these sentiments, they're not all that frequent.
	The most likely?
	If a dude does not want to get extradited back to Saudi Arabia to face punishment for his crimes, what better way than to say, I'm an ex-Muslim who supports Jews, I profess that the Jewish God is the God, I love Israel, and now Germany, if you send me back to Saudi Arabia, they're obviously going to kill me.
	But it's...
	I want to read the chat because I know that some people are going to disagree with me.
	But that is the evidence.
	What's the evidence that he's an actual Jew Mossad agent?
	Well, that he put out a bunch of tweets that are totally incongruous saying that he believes in Jewish God and loves the state of Israel.
	And that therefore, this was a Jewish terrorist attack on Christians because the Saudi ex-Muslim man who's living in Germany seeking asylum put out a couple of tweets in his mentally unhinged reality that even if you take them at face value and assume he meant them, That's the justification to say this guy's an AFD supporter.
	What was this one that I had up here?
	So anyways, based in bias, I'm not putting you on the blast.
	I say, what do you think this is all about?
	What I think that's all about is a guy trying to ensure that he doesn't get extradited to Saudi Arabia.
	That's what I think it's all about.
	What do I think this is not about?
	This is not an alternative for Deutschland.
	Saudi Arabian Shia Muslim killing Christians at a Christmas market on Christmas, doing it in the name of or in support of Elon Musk, the AFD, or Israel.
	That's what I think.
	And I think it's outlandishly stupid.
	This is the level of the egregiousness of the lies.
	Yes, he's an ex-Muslim.
	He's an ex-Muslim Saudi Shia killing Christians.
	But it's not a terrorist attack, and it's actually the far right in Germany doing it.
	Yeah, that's right.
	The far right in Germany are killing Christians to promote their far right agenda by demonizing Islam and Muslims, and in so doing, actually demonizing and making the AFD look bad, and that's how they fulfill their political objectives.
	You've got to be an idiot.
	I mean, bottom line, you've got to be an idiot to think that.
	Now, I have one more thing here.
	Why did I bring this one up?
	Elon Musk deleted all evidence available, and now he's accusing the, quote, legacy media, end quote, of misinformation.
	I don't know who this person is.
	Military activist observer?
	Independent. Okay.
	These are the things that you just don't know anymore.
	They said that the account was nuked.
	It wasn't.
	I think it was temporarily suspended, because I do remember that at one point.
	They say people are following it.
	Draw some correlations.
	My goodness, people went and started following Luigi Mangione after he killed people.
	I'm not sure that you can know much about that unless the follow predated the events.
	And even then, there might be some, I say, good reason for which people would be following a man who's talking about killing Germans.
	There might be a good reason to follow accounts like that.
	Maybe the German police should have been doing it.
	Maybe if the German police would be listed as one of the people following that account, this wouldn't have happened.
	But people post information, it becomes unverifiable, and it becomes just a fog of war, disinformation, confounding reality with suspicion.
	And you can't really even easily verify if it's true.
	The account is not taken down.
	That's easy.
	It's up there in real time.
	Oh, he nuked everything earlier than November.
	No, he didn't.
	Because I can go back and scroll through that.
	I'm seeing a ton of stuff.
	Oh, but he nuked certain stuff that you won't see anymore.
	Well, that's great.
	That's something I can't verify to even disprove.
	That's all I have to say about that.
	What was this one?
	Suppressed news.
	Let me see who this is.
	Okay, now that's actually very funny.
	I learned about the watermelon from Ian Carroll.
	The individual who ran into the crowd with a car at Christmas Market in Magdeburg allegedly identified as the man an atheist, ex-Muslim, Saudi-born psychiatric activist.
	He lived in Germany since 2016.
	He's extremely anti-Islam.
	He proudly expresses his tendencies to slaughter Germans on X. Did I read this one already?
	Germany has refused to extradite him to Saudi Arabia.
	This seems mildly...
	He has expressed tendencies to slaughter Germany.
	I mean, I guess you could say he's proud.
	He is wanted by Saudi Arabia.
	Oy, oy, oy.
	That's the big news of the weekend.
	It's inverting reality.
	And the egregiousness of the lies.
	Seem to get more and more outlandish, the more they have to conceal reality.
	Even taken at its most charitable, this man is mentally ill.
	It wasn't specifically ideologically motivated.
	And he's just a criminal from a foreign country who's mentally unwell.
	By the way, that sounds a lot like what Trump is saying is coming up south of the border, you know?
	They're mentally ill individuals.
	They're draining their asylums at its most charitable.
	This is not Islamic terrorism.
	It's a mentally ill psychiatrist who's clearly unhinged, deranged, and a criminal doing everything he can to avoid extradition back to the country and then snaps and decides to go murder people.
	And what more horrific way to do it at Christmas than running a car into a Christmas market?
	At its most charitable, the German police and the German government have some blood on their hands and they have some explaining to do.
	At its least charitable, you got even bigger issues.
	All right, I think that's all I have to say about that.
	And I'm sure about it because the next video that I'm going to bring up is Don Lemon.
	Let's go to the chat over on vivabarneslaw.locals.com and see what's going on.
	I'm guessing Barnes is still recovering and won't be able to make it today.
	Oh, I should have said that at the beginning.
	We are doing our Barnes show tomorrow at 3 o'clock.
	There was a timing issue for today because I got to go to a Christmas party tonight.
	So I have to do that.
	So we couldn't do the show at 6 o'clock.
	Tomorrow, I'm going on with Pantelis at 10.30.
	I think we might co-stream that.
	I'll see if he's game with that.
	Pantelis is truly the Canadian Rogan podcaster.
	And I say that despite wanting myself to be the Canadian Rogan podcaster, even if I'm doing it out of Florida.
	Pantelis, if you don't know him, he's amazing.
	So go check out his channel.
	Check him out.
	I'm going to be live with him tomorrow, 10.30-ish.
	And then I'm going to come back and do the Sunday show with Barnes tomorrow at 3ish.
	And then we've got another party tomorrow night because it's Christmas.
	So that was back to the VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com chat.
	Then we got Lily America.
	Viva, do you ever slow down?
	I wish I had a quarter of your energy.
	As a matter of fact, I get tired just from watching all the stuff you do.
	Please tell Robert we are all thinking about him and enjoy this time with his family.
	Hopefully he is resting and not focused on the problems of the world.
	Merry Christmas, everyone.
	Merry Christmas to you, Lily America.
	Apparently, not that anybody's going to care for this bit of info, apparently I was snoring so loud yesterday that both my wife and my kid had to leave.
	We're all sharing a big bed.
	They had to leave the room.
	I wake up in the middle of the night, and I'm like, looking to feel for my wife and my kids.
	Nobody's there, and no dog either, because I don't have the dog now.
	I was all alone in bed, and apparently I was snoring so loud that the people in the other room heard me.
	Mm-hmm.
	So, that's that.
	Okay. Back to the chat on Viva Barnes Law.
	And I was going to do an AMA on the airplane yesterday, but I don't know how those things work.
	Free Spring says, oh my god, you don't want to be Rogan Meathead.
	Okay. You know what I mean.
	But I like Rogan anyhow.
	Ricortes says the, quote, he is right wing, end quote, is PR spin of the left.
	What they do is add anyone who is violent to the right so it makes the right look worse than them.
	Soon Stalin and Mao will be on the right.
	It's just the rationale for calling him an AFD supporter.
	It's evil and it's psychotic itself.
	Now, whether or not there are some tweets that need explaining, the more logical explanation is the one that I've given, but the bottom line, ow.
	That hurts.
	It's just evil.
	And it's such an insult to the injured and the murdered to refer to him like that.
	But by the way, it's the wrap-up smear.
	It's the wrap-up disinformation silo that Nancy Pelosi once said, but we're going to see it right here.
	So who's this?
	Warren Redlich.
	I can redlich my own boss.
	Oh, he's got a Tesla truck.
	Very nice.
	Dad, tech nut, libertarian Florida man retraining nomad neural nets.
	I have no idea what the hell is going on.
	Dude, I'm done.
	Rice, Stanford, Albany Law.
	That's the weirdest bio that I've ever read.
	Okay, on that note, he says, this is spectacular.
	Don Lemon gets owned.
	Watch this video.
	Where's the camera?
	Watch this video and appreciate it through the lens of disinformation laundering.
	They make up the lie.
	And then people said, look, of course he was right-wing, AFD, Elon Musk supporter.
	The news said it!
	Oh, listen to this.
	Who is the real president in the light, do you think?
	Donald Trump, I believe.
	Democratic lawmakers in Washington are calling Elon Musk President Musk now, and they're saying Donald Trump is the vice president or the head of communications.
	What's, what's, what's, what's?
	Wait a second.
	No, no one said that.
	Really? Have you not watched and paid attention to the news?
	Absolutely not.
	I'm paying attention to what I'm doing during my day so I can try and get a better life and get ahead.
	Okay, do you have your phone with you?
	I do.
	Why don't you Google right now?
	Yes, tell me.
	President Musk and see what comes up.
	No. But that's already a loaded question, you realize.
	Smart man.
	Give me the sources.
	Axios, Business Insider.
	We don't trust any of these.
	The common man doesn't trust any of this.
	ABC News, Washington Post, New York Times, The Atlantic.
	I don't trust any of them.
	He's having an orgasm at his own bullshit.
	I don't trust any of them.
	I don't trust any of these.
	We're the common man.
	We don't trust any of these.
	No one trusts the government.
	No one trusts the common news.
	We don't trust any of that anymore.
	Independent news, we are the ones that own the news now.
	People trust me.
	They don't trust MSNBC because I care and I'm actually one of them.
	I can't disagree with you.
	Okay, well then.
	I get a lot of people coming to me saying, I only watch, I don't watch corporate media.
	I want to see what I'm doing.
	Okay, do you have your phone with me?
	Why don't you Google right now?
	Yes, tell me.
	President Musk.
	Okay, Google President Musk.
	Let's do it, shall we?
	Google. Google.
	How do I do this?
	Stay signed out.
	I want to share this.
	So I think we're here.
	Share this.
	Let's go Google.
	President Musk.
	The Guardian.
	Trump said to see Elon Musk as useful activist after spending shutdown.
	Okay. Chris Christie predicts Elon Musk's influence over Trump will end.
	Trump team pushes back on President Musk talk amid spending bill negotiation.
	I mean, it's quite phenomenal, actually.
	But what I wanted to see is whether or not it was, what's the word?
	Syndicated articles that we're referring to.
	Let me go back here and do it like this.
	Eh, whatever.
	One thing is for certain.
	You're right, Don Lemon.
	It's only the most lyingest of propagandist outlets that are referring to Elon Musk.
	As President Musk.
	Am I still here?
	I believe I should be still here.
	Yeah. Only the most propagandists of the outlets, peeps.
	So you know it's got to be true because they make up the lie.
	They report on the lie.
	They then report on the reporting of the lie to make truth of the lie.
	That is the disinformation laundering.
	In real time, beautifully put.
	Never trust Google, viva fraud.
	Well, no, first of all, I don't trust Google unless it proves the point.
	I don't trust it unless it proves it.
	No. The point is what Google is producing by way of results that proves the exact issue here.
	That they make up the lie, and then because it comes up in the Google search engine, the lie that they put out there, they then somehow say that that is evidence of the truth of the lie.
	And that's called disinformation laundering.
	What was I going to do?
	So I did some Viva Barnes chats.
	They're hiding commentary behind news reporting again, says Stephen Britton.
	The news today consists of editorializing bias and then reporting it as news.
	Do I want to read this?
	Mike H underscore 1500 in local says, my eyes have seen the glory of the coming of Donald Trump.
	He is trampling out the vintage where the grapes of wrath are stored.
	He hath loosed the fateful lighting of his terrible swift doge.
	His truth is marching on.
	Yeah, baby, it just works.
	Merry Christmas.
	this.
	And let's go back to the chat here.
	Viva, check this short video out.
	It's a good one, says a special SOV.
	George Carlin, okay, so I'll watch that after the seven minutes.
	Let me go over to Crumble and see what's going on on Crumble.
	Oh my goodness!
	Matthew Ennis reminded me of what I'm supposed to do.
	We've got one more topic, people.
	Jeez Louise, we've got one more topic.
	Thank you, Matthew.
	We're talking about the report on the weaponization of the federal government.
	My gosh, I'm freaking senile!
	I haven't really paid attention to them.
	We've got Ben Lovejoy.
	I'm here to say that I love Rumble Rules.
	Okay, I got that one as well.
	Okay. Oh, my God.
	I'm so stupid.
	Thank you, Matthew.
	All right.
	So yesterday, as I'm driving, coming back to where we started this stream off, I shared the report link to the 17,000-page report of the weaponization of the federal government to our locals' community.
	And I said, folks, I'm going to try to cipher through this.
	Cipher through this?
	Decipher. I'm going to try to siphon through this, decipher it while I'm on a plane, and it never happened.
	And then we have a member of our community, Matthew Ennis.
	Hold on.
	Let me make sure I don't screw anything up here.
	Also known as Encryptus.
	And his email, because he offers a...
	He's developed an AI that summarizes things.
	I'm a little scared of AI in terms of accuracy, but I wholly recognize I cannot go through a 17,000-page report.
	No human can.
	It's almost by design, and it is, to confuse and obfuscate so that the general population does not understand just how weaponized the federal government has gotten.
	Encryptus, I-N-C-R-Y-P-T-U-S, at encrypttech, I-N-C-R-Y-P-T-E-C-H dot com, has developed his own proprietary AI, whatever the hell it is, algorithm.
	And has summarized the document for us.
	Is this it?
	No, that's the actual report.
	But then the actual...
	Oh, here we go.
	So it's called Unraveling the Truth.
	This is going to blow your freaking minds, people.
	And Encryptus is the man.
	Unraveling the Truth.
	How AI unlocked a 17,000-page government report on alleged crimes and corruption.
	Introduction. Even the summary is almost too long for my attention span.
	This sounds like it's AI generated, but damn good.
	Suppressing free speech, manipulating public policy, sheer volume of the report poses a significant barrier to the public understanding and accountability.
	This is amazing.
	Recognizing this challenge, I developed a custom AI agent inside ChatGPT to analyze, summarize, and uncover the report's findings in a way that's accessible to everyone.
	By breaking through the overwhelming complexity of the document, this tool allows you to easily explore the report's key allegations, draw critical connections, and understand the broader implications for democracy.
	In Cryptis, how much does this software cost?
	And I dare say, and I'll put it out there publicly, Needs to find a way to integrate this into the services that they offer because I don't even know how it could be offered as a tool for creators, but it would be amazing.
	If anybody can think of a good way to do it, snip, clip, and tag this section on the social medias to rumble because it's amazing.
	This article introduces the six-part series summarizing the most critical findings, the accompanying articles addressing specific aspects of the report, and the revolutionary AI tool that made it possible.
	The challenge...
	Okay, do we want to do this?
	The tools I build are...
	I'm going to read these out loud from now on, so if you don't want me to, don't do it.
	The tools I build are fully custom built.
	You can use this current tool for free built into ChatGPT.
	I'm not yet on ChatGPT, but I guess I'm going to have to get on ChatGPT.
	Where did I just put the window here?
	Okay, so we're still here, we're good.
	Okay, fine.
	I'll share this link with everybody so that you can read it.
	The six-part article is here.
	Start the...
	Gosh, this is going to get complicated.
	Can I go down like this?
	Part one, the most heinous act found in the report focuses on the single most egregious crime or abuse identified on the report, the impact, and the individuals responsible.
	The timeline of events, Joe Biden's role.
	Gosh, this is one heck of a...
	How are we going to break this down here?
	Link. You guys can take that and you can do with it as you deem appropriate.
	Wow, the mic is actually really good on this computer.
	I want to build a tool for locals and creators to add all their content into it and then summarize it.
	Link here.
	Let me read what Encryptus has texted me.
	I want to build a tool.
	For locals, for creators to add all of their content into it and then summarize or search for things that may have been said at different episodes even years ago.
	I would love it so that I could go back to my best predictions and worst predictions.
	Now, but how am I going to do this here?
	Because this is even more.
	Part one.
	I want to take this one here.
	Let's take this one.
	Part two.
	I think this is it.
	Okay. Bada bing, bada boom.
	Abuse of power.
	Too long.
	I've lost my attention already.
	Okay, I'm joking, by the way.
	I've already scrolled through this.
	I just have to scroll through.
	Abuse of power, a comprehensive list of alleged federal crimes by key figures in government and society.
	This is amazing.
	The following is a comprehensive list of details, allegations of potential federal crimes committed by the key figures across government, corporate, yada, yada, yada.
	These individuals, including high-ranking officials, corporate executives, policymakers, are alleged to have violated laws protecting the integrity of the United States justice system, dot, dot, dot, dot, dot, dot.
	Bruce Orr.
	What he allegedly did.
	Collusion with foreign entities.
	Incident. Maintained unauthorized contact with Christopher Steele, the man behind the PP dossier bullshit report financed by the DNC during the production of the discredited Steele dossier.
	Then it gives you the specific crime.
	Acting as a foreign agent without government notification.
	Explanation. Engaged in activities that furthered foreign interests without proper authorization or disclosure to DOJ.
	Penalties up to 10 years in prison.
	Failure to disclose conflicts of interest.
	This is amazing.
	This is amazing.
	Failure to disclose conflicts of interest.
	Okay, now we'll go to Rod Rosenstein.
	What he allegedly did.
	He allegedly allowed the continuation of investigations based on questionable evidence, including FISA warrant applications containing inaccuracies.
	They probably contained falsified evidence.
	Buy one.
	Kevin Kleinfeld.
	Kleinsmith? No, Kleinsmith.
	No, Kleinfeld was the attorney from Carlito's Way.
	Kevin Kleinsmith was the attorney for the FBI who falsified evidence.
	Specific crime?
	Deprivation of rights under color of law.
	Obstruction of justice.
	Allegedly withheld or delayed disclosure of documents to Congress related to the origins of the Russia investigation.
	Encryptus, if I'm being not even picky, but if I'm asking for too much.
	It would be great if this would reference the page of the report where people could go verify the information itself.
	I mean, I know I can go do it by doing Control-F, but if this summary were able to even have a hyperlink to the page of the document, holy hell.
	You know what?
	Encryptus, just keep that between us.
	Give me that so I can look like the smartest man on earth.
	AI-level intelligence, people.
	Sally Yates.
	Let's hear what Sally Yates had to do.
	As Deputy Attorney General, Yates signed off on a FISA warrant application targeting Carter Page.
	That's the one.
	It didn't have questionable evidence.
	It had falsified, well, at least the fourth renewal did, despite questions about the credibility of the Steele dossier and supporting evidence.
	Deprivation of rights.
	Who else do we have here?
	John Brennan.
	My goodness.
	What did he do?
	Brennan allegedly directed CIA personnel to engage in activities designed to influence domestic narratives, particularly during the Russia investigation.
	CIA restrictions on domestic operations is the crime.
	Holy shit.
	Eric Holder.
	What he allegedly did.
	Refused to provide key documents related to the...
	Oh, this one's old.
	Yeah, this is an older example.
	The Fast and the Furious.
	Obstruction of proceedings.
	You don't know.
	Eric Holder.
	Contempt of Congress from a validly issued subpoena that was lawfully issued and that he got.
	He's good.
	Steve Bannon.
	Steve Bannon.
	Unlawfully formed committee issuing an invalid, non-binding subpoena.
	He goes to jail for four months before they can even figure out his appeal.
	The pages are spread out between all the documents.
	Some of the documents have the same pages.
	In short, we can do that and cite the page, but the page numbers are wonky in that 17,000 pages.
	I understand what you're saying.
	It's amazing.
	It's just, this is amazing.
	Andrew Weissman.
	Let's get to Weissman.
	Andrew Weissman.
	Hold on a second.
	He spells it with two N's.
	Andrew Weissman, American attorney.
	Let me just see something here.
	See, typically what I was told...
	Oh, he is Jewish.
	Not for any other reason than I was told by a German girl.
	25 years ago, that oftentimes when you have two N's in your last name, it means you're not Jewish.
	And when you have one N, it means you are.
	Or it is more indicative of a Jewish Weissmann when it had the two N's.
	This is wild.
	Let's keep going down here.
	Weissmann, what did he do?
	Allegedly pursued politically motivated investigations, including aggressive tactics against associates of President Trump during the Mueller investigation.
	Conspiracy of rights.
	then we got James Comey sensitive memos containing classified information about meetings with President Trump to influence public opinion and investigators Jack Dorsey.
	Ooh. Former CEO of Twitter, Dorsey oversaw decisions to suppress content critical of the federal COVID-19 policies.
	The Hunter Biden laptop, sorry, election integrity concerns allegedly coordinated with federal agencies to restrict unlawful content conspiracy against rights.
	Rochelle Walensky.
	Well, you know that's going to have to do with COVID.
	What does she do?
	False misleading public health information.
	You don't say encrypt this with your amazing AI summarizing generator.
	As CDC Director Walensky made public statements about COVID-19 vaccine efficacy, masking other policies and pandemic that later proved to be inaccurate.
	They were lies at the time and they knew it.
	These statements influenced major policy decisions and public behavior.
	Specific crime?
	False statements.
	So this is an unfreaking believable tool that everybody needs to have if you don't know that you need it, and I have it.
	It's all mine, people.
	It's amazing.
	And if you're in our locals community, I don't even know if you have to be to go follow that thread.
	I'm going to go through that in a little more detail this afternoon.
	And it's going to confirm what I already know and what I already believe.
	But I want better details so that if I have Pisco back on again, a lefty, that I can drop the hard evidence on these idiots who...
	They might not even have the attention span or the, not the word is the wherewithal, but rather the impetus to go use these tools to summarize and make accessible what would otherwise be monumentally inaccessible.
	What is this tool, says Kenneth?
	It is an AI tool created by one of our local members, Encryptus.
	And you can reach out to Encryptus for business opportunities.
	I have the tool open right now.
	Anything you want to ask it.
	Maybe someone on another platform wants to ask a question that we can ask live.
	I will show you how to use it, and you can use it live during a debate.
	All right, well, Encryptus, I'll ask you the question.
	Am I the only one on screen here?
	The question I would like to ask it is...
	You know what?
	Chad, what question would you like to add about the weaponization of the federal government?
	Encryptus. Hold on, I'll share everybody.
	encryptus@encryptech. So it's encryptus, encryptus@encrypt, encrypt, encrypt, encrypttech.com.
	My God, my fat fingers and my old eyes.
	There we go.
	Encryptus and Encryptech.com.
	Let's ask it the question.
	Damn it, I'm blanking.
	The question that I had was...
	Oh, yeah, let's ask it this question.
	Okay, and this is not to put Tim Pool on any form of blast because I think he misspoke and I think it's misspoke.
	Was anyone from January 6 held without charges?
	Encryptus, will that...
	I'm talking to Encryptus now knowing that he's watching.
	Can you ask it that question?
	Was anyone held without charges?
	I'm wondering if it will give you the answer.
	Was anyone held without being ultimately charged?
	Let's see if we can ask it that question.
	And now I'm going to go back here because I want to see what part two of this.
	My gosh!
	Part one.
	Part two, allegations.
	Allegations and conclusions.
	Let's go to allegations and conclusions while that question comes up.
	It's amazing.
	AI is amazing.
	I guess, when it doesn't create a real deepfake of Vladimir Putin launching a nuclear bomb.
	Abuse of power, a comprehensive list of alleged federal crimes by key figures.
	Marty Walsh.
	Who's Marty Walsh?
	I don't even know who Marty Walsh is.
	So the answer to the question is this.
	Yes, individuals arrested in connection with the events of January 6th have been held pretrial, but such detention occurs under specific legal standards.
	Federal pretrial detention is determined based on whether an individual is a flight risk or poses a danger to the community.
	The report notes that the percentage of January 6th defendants detained pretrial is smaller than that of other federal defendants generally.
	Well, that's interesting, but that only means that they, that's only probably because they have arrested so many people in the first place that they shouldn't have.
	But was anyone arrested?
	Was anyone detained without charges?
	Is the question.
	And then the question would be, can it also generate specific names?
	This is cool.
	It's like playing an amazing science game in real time.
	So I'm at the conclusions.
	Marty Walsh.
	Misrepresentation of labor statistics.
	Oh, Walsh allegedly presented skewed labor market data to bolster administration claims about the economic recovery.
	Oh, like the ones we just saw a little while ago.
	False statements where you see they had to revise down all of their jobs by like 818,000.
	They had to revise up the actual crimes being committed by FBI stats because they lied about that too.
	Shalanda Young, who's she?
	Falsification of federal budget data.
	As Director of Office and Management of Budget, Young allegedly manipulated budgetary information to justify controversial spending initiatives.
	This included revenue.
	See, this is where I would need the sections of the documents because I'm not even familiar enough with this to be able to argue it afterwards without reading what was specifically alleged in the documents.
	So we'll see if we can find a way to cross-reference pages and have a hyperlink so that I could just go click right on it and it would bring me to the page of the document.
	That would be amazing.
	Elvis Chan, I know.
	Janet Yellen, we all know she's an idiot.
	So it's transitory inflation.
	Conclusion! This exhaustive list serves as a stark...
	Oh, it cannot provide names as they're not in the report.
	We'd have to get the data for that first.
	Interesting. Okay.
	Well, I guess you couldn't get the names of the people that are not named in the report, but Yellen is obviously named in the report, as are the others.
	Conclusion! This exhaustive list serves as a stark reminder of the importance of holding individuals in positions of power accountable for their actions.
	Allegations of corruption, censorship, yada, yada, are bad.
	Okay. Encryptus, this has been amazing.
	Okay, that's it, people.
	That's the report on the weaponization of government.
	You'll go to our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community and go through that thread.
	And I'm going to go through that thread later on today.
	Oh, yeah.
	Hold on.
	I didn't get that one.
	Come on.
	And how about this one?
	Hold on.
	Get your jokes ready.
	You heard that?
	I banged my nose on the bottom of a pool once.
	Not alcohol-related, not at night.
	Just swimming too low to the bottom.
	And ever since then, my nose clicks when I push it that side.
	How did so many...
	Okay, I'm not reading that.
	This is all the way down here.
	You guys can use it too, says Encryptus.
	Ask Encryptus to publish the Epstein list.
	Well, it would only be the best surmising as to who might be on the Epstein list, but I don't know.
	I'll ask Grok about that.
	All right, peeps, I'm going to do a short exclusive.
	We'll do an AMA over at Locals.
	I was going to do an AMA on Twitter, but it'll seem pretentious, I think.
	What the hell do I have to say?
	We're going to have our after party at Locals, and I'll get to some questions that I might have missed there.
	I'll see you all tomorrow at least twice.
	We got a new subscriber.
	Booyah! MC58GA, welcome to the club, our above-average law community.
	Oh, and by the way, stay tuned.
	Everyone who's a supporter on Locals is going to get Louis the Lobster in digital version, digital format, like a flipbook.
	I don't know how exactly it's going to be presented.
	The book is almost done.
	It's almost done to the point where it's going to be on Amazon sooner than later, or self-publishing.
	I don't know where we're going to do that.
	But everyone who is an annual subscriber.
	Is going to get it for free.
	I'm going to make it Content Plus accessible to everyone who subscribes as an annual subscriber, as a bit of an incentive, and as a thank you for everyone who is already an annual subscriber.
	Illustrations are done by the daughter of a member of our community, and they're beautiful.
	This book has been sitting in my back burner for 15 freaking years.
	That's an exaggeration.
	12 years.
	It's been sitting in the back burner.
	I wrote it, sent it to myself by email, copyrighted it, and then sat on it.
	And it's almost ready for public release.
	So stay tuned for that.
	And I'm on tomorrow, 10.30 with Pantelis in the morning.
	Barnes at 3 o'clock-ish for our Sunday show on a Monday, our recap end of the year.
	It's going to be amazing.
	And thank you all for being here.
	So Merry Christmas to everyone.
	Happy Hanukkah if you're celebrating Hanukkah.
	Happy holidays.
	Happy New Year.
	Enjoy this time of year, even when it's minus 17. I'm going to go out there and get some fresh air because I haven't seen the sunlight yet today.
	Enjoy it all for the good and the bad because spending time with family, not that it's bad, but it's not easy for everybody.
	And be well and I'll see you tomorrow.
	But thank you all for being here, peeps.
	And heading on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com after party now.
	See you tomorrow.

▲