Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 11, 2024 - Viva & Barnes

01:36:13

Iranian Drones Over America? Alex Jones Victory? Maidan'esque Coup in Romani? Viva Frei Live!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you want me weak, you want me brain dead in a sleep.
	You want us trapped while you all laugh behind the scenes.
	You want us sick, you think we're dumb.
	You want us blind and you want us drunk.
	You want us poor while you get more of everything.
	But you don't get to tell me what to think and what to do.
	No, you don't get to tell me what is true.
	You're just liars, cheats and crooks.
	Change the rules and you burn the books.
	And so I don't believe a single word you say.
	You're all liars, fakes and cons.
	Watch out and we want you gone.
	So don't believe it's time you'll get away.
	You want us tricked, you want us numb.
	You want us scared and you want us stung.
	You want us shot and you want us far.
	In every way.
	You want us to find us in every way.
	You want our minds, you want our time.
	You want us friend up in your crime.
	I hope you know that it's time to go.
	And we're taking names.
	You don't get to tell us what to think and what to do.
	No, you don't get to tell us what is true.
	You're just liars, cheats and crooks.
	Change the rules and you burn the books.
	And so we don't believe a single word you say.
	You're all liars, fakes and cons.
	Watch out and we want you gone.
	So don't believe it's time you'll get away.
	Cause we see la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, la, all your lies.
	La, la, la, la, la, la, all your lies.
	You don't get to tell us what to think and what.
	afternoon, everybody.
	I don't know how loud the audio comes in when I talk over the music.
	I don't want to blow on anybody's earphones.
	We're not yet at 3.30.
	came in a little early.
	Intro meets by five times August.
	Wired. All right, people. Good afternoon, indeed.
	And we're going to go from crazy lies to crazy eyes, people.
	We're going to start with a few funny things before we get into the show.
	Crazy lies to crazy eyes.
	Now, hold on.
	Hold on.
	I want to do something interesting here.
	A social experiment.
	I'm going to put this on mute.
	We're not going to watch the whole thing.
	You look at AOC's eyes.
	Maybe not right now.
	She looks like she's been possessed by Satan himself.
	Look at her eyes and tell me what you see.
	I don't know if I project.
	Because I see...
	On the one hand, insanity, like a mentally unhinged person, but also I see pain.
	Like, I see deep-rooted childhood trauma, and I don't know if I'm not projecting.
	I had a good childhood, people.
	I was a big pain in the ass, but I had a good childhood.
	But look at these eyes.
	We're going to play without audio.
	Look at that.
	That's fear.
	That is...
	You know what?
	Actually, take it back.
	That's like a black hole staring into the abyss.
	That's like someone who's going to eat your face if you close your eyes for long enough.
	Just take a few.
	The eyes in action.
	They are the windows of the soul.
	Don't you dare define me.
	The crazy girlfriend eyes.
	I mean, that's what it is.
	But I do see pain.
	Jokes aside.
	But we're going to have to listen to her talk.
	Side-eye.
	Well, I don't know what I'm saying.
	I was going to do a voiceover over this.
	Let's play it with the audio, and we can have a good laugh before we start today's show.
	He said that he would do it again if necessary, if there was a threat.
	What do you make of the comments?
	Well, you know, doesn't that, I just feel like that...
	That tells us everything.
	If we do not want violence on our subways, and the point of our justice system is a level of accountability to prevent a person who does not have remorse about taking another person's life.
	I mean, even people...
	She's crazy.
	I believe she's crazy.
	I also believe that she's a traumatized person from something.
	Not January 6th, people, because this predates her non-near death or near assault experience on January 6th.
	And dumb.
	Just unintelligent.
	Who have engaged in manslaughter or have taken a life accidentally.
	Biatch, he wasn't guilty of manslaughter.
	He didn't take the life by way of manslaughter.
	It was actually just not guilty of manslaughter.
	Well, actually, that was the dismiss charge of negligent homicide, I want to say.
	Express remorse.
	The fact that he expressed no remorse to having done nothing wrong is an indication that he's going to do something wrong again in the future.
	AOC. Get the hell out of government.
	You have no business being anywhere by a position of power.
	And if we do not want to unleash that level of violence, then we should exert a level of accountability to prevent that from happening.
	It's called a trial, AOC.
	It's called he had one, AOC, and was found not guilty, AOC, of any form of a crime, AOC.
	So why would he be remorseful about not having committed a crime?
	Oh, but the fact that he's not remorseful about having not committed a crime is a testament to his guilt.
	AOC put the commie back in.
	C. The C put the comedy back in AOC.
	You know where I'm getting at with that.
	I haven't seen his interview, but from what I understand, he gave a very thoughtful interview on somewhere.
	And I heard a clip, and the man is thoughtful.
	And he said, basically, look, I'd do it again, because if something had happened and I had sat there and done nothing, I wouldn't be able to live with myself.
	And so to prevent that from happening, because had that happened, I would feel ashamed for the rest of my life.
	I would do it again every day of the week.
	Do it again.
	Not kill a man, but rather subdue a man who was threatening people on a bus.
	The fact that he happened to pass away afterwards and, by all accounts, didn't have a direct causal link to the alleged chokehold is maybe an unfortunate accident of the circumstances, but was not the direct result of the chokehold.
	K2 synthetic cannabinoid.
	Cannabinanoid? Cannabinanoid.
	No. K2 synthetic cannabinoid has some serious risks, by the way, if you take too much of it.
	You can go look it up.
	There's an article in...
	Hold on, let me...
	I gotta see.
	What's going on?
	Barb Ariane, I know, is not talking about me, but Metatron says, Jones, CIA acid.
	Holy hell, people.
	I was jokingly saying that I'm noticing a lot of numbered accounts in the comment section with interesting trollish type remarks, and typically they say, you know, that's a sign of success in the industry.
	Good for me, I guess.
	I got called controlled opposition today, which I still don't know what it means, but the best is when I get called a Nazi and a Mossad in the same day.
	People, I was very happy with the thumbnail today, and I was very happy with the header.
	Jones, drones, and NATO zones.
	Bada bing, bada boom.
	That's what we're talking about today.
	Because Alex Jones got a big W. I haven't been able to see any written ruling coming from Judge Lopez.
	We'll talk about it.
	I put out a video earlier today.
	Drones, it's also like, symmetrically, Jones is five letters.
	Drones is D-R-O-N-E-S, six letters.
	And NATO zones is even longer.
	So you get the pyramid.
	It rhymes.
	And it's what we're talking about today.
	The drones.
	I've got my thoughts.
	I've got my suspicions.
	And NATO zones was sort of the cop-out.
	What's going on in Romania, which I've just started deep diving, shallow diving, dabbing my pinky toe in to understand because it relates to what's going on in Canada.
	Drones or alien spacecraft?
	Viva needs a hair product sponsor.
	I gotta go actually wash it and brush it today.
	But after this stream...
	We're taking the doors off the Bronco, so we'll see how that goes.
	I got a tool.
	It's one of those little wrenchy things, and I washed the car down just so that you don't scratch it with micro-scratches.
	We're taking the doors off the Bronco, and we're going to see how that feels.
	But let's start with Alex Jones.
	The news of the day is Alex Jones had a smashing victory yesterday, a small victory.
	Hold on, hold on, hold on, hold on.
	I don't know if I brought it up.
	Let me make sure that I have it.
	One underscore, Ben Collins, the owner of The Onion.
	I love going back and pulling up tweets that either aged well or didn't age well.
	I'm not sensitive.
	I go back and look for my bad predictions and my stupid tweets of the past.
	And if I don't, I'm fairly certain other people are going to do it in any event.
	You do recall that The Onion purported to have purchased the assets of Infowars out of the bankruptcy.
	And the dude, Ben Collins, put out a tweet back in the day.
	Let me pull up the whole tweet thread so we can go back to the coup.
	The underhanded, fraudulent deprivation of rights, theft of property, misappropriation of property, allegedly in my humble opinion, hashtag no defamation, I don't even care.
	It's what it is, and it's what I believe.
	Win the Onion.
	In the bankruptcy of Alex Jones, backed by the Connecticut judgment creditors, submitted an offer under seal in an envelope when it was supposed to be a public bid for the assets of Infowars because those same judgment creditors refused tens of millions of dollars by way of settlement paid over years.
	The Onion comes in, backed by some of the plaintiffs to buy the assets of Infowars.
	You all know this.
	And Alex Jones immediately challenged it while simultaneously streaming off other platforms because when they came in and stole, basically.
	The Infowars assets, if only for the day.
	Alex was streaming from an alternate platform, AJN Live, I believe it is.
	Alex Jones News Live.
	I think that's what it was.
	The day of, when was it?
	It was November 16. My goodness, it's already a month ago, if we can believe this.
	Ben Collins on PedoSky.
	It's amazing.
	They all flock to their pedo silo.
	Yes, you can answer it.
	Where are you going to be?
	Okay, wear shoes.
	Ben Collins, who heads over to PetoSky, BlueSky, tweeted out during the events of that day or the day before, Hi friends!
	I wanted to give you a quick update on the Onion's purchase of InfoWars, which we can't wait to relaunch as the dumbest site on the internet.
	Long and short of it, we won the bid and, you're not going to believe it, the previous Infowars folks aren't taking it well.
	On Thursday, the person overseeing the auction, that's Murray, the trustee, told us that the Onions bid of Infowars, along with the Connecticut Sandy Hook families, won.
	We haven't heard anything that changed that.
	Well, much has changed since then.
	Except, of course, from the guys currently running Infowars doing Infowars stuff.
	There was a status conference with the judge overseeing the auction on Thursday, shortly after we were deemed the winners.
	The judge had some questions about the process and assets.
	We're glad he's doing that since our bid with the families is clearly the best and transparency is even better.
	We left the hearing with clear next steps to complete the sale.
	InfoWars current management asked to continue operating until then.
	We always knew the guys who currently run...
	What's his problem?
	You have a problem saying their names, you stupid jackass?
	We're going to take this badly and use a loss to fundraise off of it.
	They did not disappoint.
	Obviously, when the current operators of InfoWars went back to operating as a business, they used that to falsely say the auction had been overturned and alleged some truly wacky stuff.
	Something about Saul Alinsky?
	God bless him.
	My goodness, this man is a...
	Gonna reserve himself a sweet seat in hell.
	We expected all of this.
	Buying this site was always going to be fun later on, but annoying right away.
	Anyhow, we look forward to completing this process at the next scheduled court date, which, at present, is a week from Monday.
	We think it's all worth it to make a better, funnier future possible.
	As always, I don't know what that means.
	You know what that aged like?
	Rotten milk.
	Let me see, what did I say?
	I said something here.
	Ah, yes, pride goeth before the fall.
	That aged like rotten milk because you know what happened last night?
	By the way, Ben Collins was lying at the time because it's not for nothing a lot of people paying attention to it, myself included.
	It's not what I understood the judge was saying.
	And what I understood the judge was saying was coming directly from the people who were in the courtroom or one step away.
	Ben Collins is a pathological liar.
	Always is, always has been.
	Cue the meme of the dude on moon pointing a gun at the other guy.
	Always has been.
	Lying then and lying to this day.
	The judge yesterday overturned it.
	Let me pull up the article that talks about it.
	The judge cancels.
	Look, I've talked about it, and if anyone has questions in the chat, I can feel them in as much as I can answer them.
	Just so you all know, by the way, I did practice law for 13 plus years.
	Hold on, the dog needs to leave.
	Get out.
	Get out.
	Go. I practiced law for 13 years.
	And did some bankruptcy.
	I don't...
	I'm probably not the best person to tout one's own experience, but trustees are barely...
	They're less trustworthy than lawyers, period.
	And in bankruptcy, the trustee, although they act and they carry out day-to-day functions, big transactions, settlement agreements, liquidation of assets has to be ratified by the judge.
	It's not the trustee that gets to do it and the judge is...
	To some extent, maybe they rubber stamp it.
	They defer to the trustee, but no, they have to...
	Have the decisions of the trustee ratified by the judge.
	That's how it works for big decisions.
	Judge cancels the...
	And I'm reading from MSNBC so that we can read from the propagandist rags to hear what they have to say.
	Bankruptcy judge cancelled the Onion's purchase of Infowars on Tuesday saying the auction did not yield the maximum amount of money for Alex Jones' creditors and that the process lacked transparency.
	Oh. It's interesting.
	It's not what Ben Collins said.
	I'm not going to approve the sale to the purchaser.
	I think there's a great lack of clarity here, the judge said.
	Lopez, after hearing lengthy hearing session to Tuesday night, Lopez did not order a new auction.
	He left it to the trustee, Christopher Murray, to decide how to resolve the matter.
	He didn't order a new auction because that is not of the purview of the trustee, but that's what the trustee does.
	He's annulled the sale, so what's the trustee going to do?
	The trustee only has two options, really.
	Go with another auction or don't go with another auction.
	He's not going to go back and say, oh yeah, we fixed it.
	Now the Onion wins.
	No. Now, in the interim, by the way, and we talked about it, I talked about it at length, Alex Jones filed an emergency injunction to annul the sale, but also to disqualify the Onion and the backers from any future bids, auctions, because they lacked such transparency.
	What pisses me off in all of this is that it doesn't sound like the judge came down hard enough on the trustee.
	Lopez's decision means that Jones can continue to broadcast on Infowars.
	In the meantime, The Onion, whose bid was backed by some of the families, previously said that it intended to relaunch Infowars as a parody figure like Jones.
	Okay. By the way, backed by The Families, who, in order to turn that bullshit offer into a more bullshit offer that they claimed was worth more money, said, well, we'll forego what The Onion would have to pay us by way of revenues that they would earn by way of the seizure of the assets of Alex Jones and Infowars.
	So, a judgment that's under appeal, no less.
	Ben Collins, the CEO of The Onion, The Onion's parent company, Global Tetrahedron, said in the statement they're deeply disappointed by the decision.
	That's funny.
	Did he say in the statement that he was a godforsaken pathological liar?
	We appreciate that the court repeatedly recognized The Onion acted in good faith.
	That sounds like a lie, by the way.
	They said that the trustee acted in good faith.
	The judge did.
	Because the judge doesn't want to, like, you know, create enemies with the trustee of the estate.
	Lacking transparency is not acting in good faith, Ben Collins.
	You pathological liar.
	And highlighting the degree to which one underscore on pedo sky lied a month ago.
	Lying today.
	We're disappointed.
	Yeah, he has sent everyone direct to the drawing board with no clear path forward.
	Okay, fine.
	Jones had fiercely...
	He accused Murray of colluding with the Onion and the Sandy Hook families.
	First United American, that was F-U-A-C, a company affiliated with Jones Online Supplement.
	They were the ones who submitted a higher bid, $3 million.
	But the judge said, no, not the judge, sorry.
	Murray said the lesser bid is good because in addition to the $1.75 million cash, they're promising to forego what the Onion's going to have to pay the creditors, the judgment creditors, from the revenues of the assets to be stolen.
	Judge said I think he had to go out and...
	Lopez said although Murray acted in good faith.
	I mean, this is not for nothing and this is not irrelevant.
	Murray acted in good faith.
	That's the trustee, not the Onion, which was the bidder that lacked transparency.
	The auction process was not transparent and FUAC should have been allowed a chance to improve its bid.
	I think they've got to go out and try to get every dollar, said Lopez.
	I think that process fell down.
	Although Infowars downfall was widely celebrated after the news broke and the onion had won, the handover came to an abrupt halt later when Lopez expressed dissatisfaction over the process.
	Jones praised the judge's decision.
	Finally, a judge had followed the law.
	And he's still on the hook for $1.5 billion.
	Christopher Matei, attorney for Sandy Hook family, said his clients were disappointed by Lopez's ruling, but they remain resilient and determined as ever to hold Jones and his corrupt businesses accountable for the harm.
	So that's that.
	Okay. I'm going to go into the chat and then actually before we head on over to...
	I'm going to destroy this dog with love.
	With love, I'm going to kiss her on the face.
	Go! Get your bed!
	Get your bed!
	Punch! Let me see what's in the chat and see if there's any questions on this because people have questions.
	Let me see if like...
	The typical questions, it's currently under appeal in both Connecticut and Texas.
	Texas does not have...
	Texas has execution notwithstanding of appeal, so they can go and try to execute on this judgment despite it being under appeal.
	The trustee, who appointed the trustee?
	I think they're a court-appointed trustee, which is why also the judge is not going to go ahead and insult the trustee, because the court appointed the trustee.
	It would sort of be like saying, we made a bad choice.
	It's sort of corruption, protecting the corruption to some extent, while slapping on the hand the fraudsters in all of this, who are the onion in collusion with other players.
	What other questions were people asking typically?
	I forget which, but let me go see here.
	What will happen, says Woody08.
	So the judge didn't order another auction, but the trustee is at the stage of liquidation of the assets because we went from bankruptcy protection for restructuring to liquidation bankruptcy.
	Okay. At least the dog is preventing me from getting deep vein thrombosis.
	Viva, are these the same parents that you see advertising on the internet begging for...
	I think.
	I'm not 100% certain.
	But another question that I often get is...
	No, it's not all the families that actually sued Alice Jones.
	And it's just a select few that actually sued.
	And the question is...
	Why? And who are they being used by?
	And I think it's pretty clear by this point in time.
	Let me see here.
	Viva, are these the same parents?
	Okay, we're going to go down.
	I'll go into locals and see what's going on there.
	Viva, did I read the manifesto?
	No, I didn't.
	And I'm not sure that I'm all that interested in doing it.
	Okay, let's see what we've got here.
	A mothership from Moran is off the eastern coast.
	It's the home of one of these drones.
	Okay, we're going to get to the drones stuff in a second.
	Okay, keep the drones questions for later.
	We'll get to that in a bit.
	Hello, good people.
	How are you?
	Says sign of Jonah.
	Rumble rocks, says Per Donato.
	Have you heard about the landmark genetic rights case in Canada?
	Steps are being taken to seek Supreme Court review by Jan 8, 2025.
	I'm not sure which one you're talking about there, but okay.
	So that is it.
	We'll go over to Commitube and see what's going on in the chat over there.
	Ask Alex to come on the show.
	Yeah, he can come on.
	I think he's going to probably ask me to come back on on his channel to talk about it for a second.
	Sully over on Commitube says, what harm did Alex Jones and Infowars do?
	I guess that's what you meant.
	Because those people, because those people absolutely nothing.
	Basically, the government is totally distracting everybody because the problem is they, Alex Jones, and this is another thing people just don't even understand what he was accused of and what he was found liable for by default.
	They didn't have any evidentiary hearing.
	They had no trial before a jury.
	I mean, they basically say he made statements that there were crisis actors, that it was a hoax, that it never happened, that it was...
	And in so doing, directed his followers to go harass the family, the FBI agents, et cetera, et cetera.
	That's what they allege.
	The evidence, which everybody thinks represents full-time coverage for years, is 16 minutes of footage over, I don't know, eight years, maybe a decade, maybe eight years.
	And in reality, although Alex was not...
	He was allowed to adduce this as evidence at a hearing or a trial because there was none, because he was defaulted into a liability verdict for alleged disclosure obligations that he failed to provide, which was to provide documents that he no longer had access to or that didn't exist in the first place.
	They alleged that he caused all sorts of emotional distress.
	In Connecticut, they argue that he abused of some, like an act by which you make profits through deceptive practices.
	It's like an acronym for the law.
	If anybody gets it, you can read it over there.
	I'll read in the chat.
	And in reality, Alex, he said some statements over the course of years, only a few of which were denying that it happened at all, which, although shocking and offensive and factually incorrect, it would not be the first time in human history that crisis actors of an event that didn't actually happen...
	Came out and argued that an event actually happened, and Alex Jones undoubtedly building off of, or at least relying on, or potentially traumatized by his knowledge of the Iraq war and the lies about taking babies out of incubators and throwing them on the ground, which got the world into a war, you know, applied that mutatus mutandus to a situation where it didn't apply.
	By and large, he said it did happen.
	He referred to the murdered children as angels repeatedly, but argued that this was being weaponized for other purposes.
	and raised legitimate criticism, suspicion as to why they would tear the school down so quickly, you know, why certain investigations weren't carried out, etc.
	And argued that this was being weaponized for the purposes of pushing an anti-Second Amendment agenda, which it was by all accounts.
	Ask Pierce Morgan.
	He apologized repeatedly, acknowledged it happened repeatedly, but even at the hearing on the quantum could not assert those Not even defenses.
	Couldn't assert his own innocence.
	Couldn't mention that he apologized.
	Couldn't mention that he stated that it happened over and over again.
	And they slapped him with an outlandish monetary condemnation on a hearing on the quantum because there was never a hearing on the merits because despite all of this, and however bad you think what he said is, statute of limitations, actual malice might apply, journalistic protections might apply, and evidence.
	So that's it.
	That was a long-winded answer to that question.
	Let me see here.
	It's rabid political persecution at this stage, says Matthew.
	And so that's it.
	That's where it's at.
	It's a small W, but in the land of the tyranny, justice is merely the cessation of the injustice.
	So we'll see what happens.
	They're going to go back and presumably hold another auction.
	Presumably abide by the rules that existed, which was public auction, and just no calculations for the bid.
	It's cash for assets.
	And who knows?
	Not Alex Jones.
	Elon Musk intervened in that case to argue that they can't sell the X accounts because Alex Jones and Infowars don't own them.
	Who knows?
	Maybe Elon Musk comes in with $10 million.
	Bam. End of story.
	Dude bought a company for $44 billion that was overvalued by roughly twofold.
	$10 million is the interest on the money, is a day's worth of interest on the money that he lost in buying Twitter for an overvalued $44 billion.
	Bada bing, bada boom.
	All right.
	Okay, let me see if I didn't miss any other legit questions.
	Not say legit.
	There's no such thing as a not legit question.
	But let me see if I didn't miss any other questions on this particular issue going back to crumble.
	don't know.
	Thank you.
	Oh, the baby's thing was during the first Gulf War, not the invasion of Iraq.
	Well, it's Iraq 1, no?
	You're late and you tell lies.
	There are no donuts here, is this sign of Jonah?
	That must be a joke.
	I wonder if Elon would loan me a million or two.
	Okay, no.
	AJ recounted his statements, recanted his statements, mega historically absurd litigation, says hiker emoji.
	Oh, that's, sorry, that's an important thing as well, where people say that the harassment of the FBI agent, the families, That's wrong.
	The harassment and the mocking of the FBI agent had already started because it had attained a certain notoriety, and that's the only reason why it came to the attention of Jones in the first place.
	So the harassment and the conspiracy theories had already been born.
	In fact, they were born the day of.
	Alex only started reporting on it when this story got to his radar.
	And it was like, you know how it is in the industry of talking about news, that if you don't talk about something, people accuse you of being controlled opposition.
	And then, you know, when you do talk about it, they still can accuse you of being controlled opposition.
	But the whole issue is that it came to Alex Jones's attention because of how popular it had already gotten.
	He didn't make it popular out of nothing.
	And now you have the basically intelligence, you know, FBI, whatever, abusing and exploiting of these families and their tragedy to basically act in such a way that, you know, at some point, public sympathy is going to dry up.
	And they're going to say, look, Alex didn't carry out the murder.
	He didn't cover up the murder, the murders, the slaughter.
	He wasn't the one criminally negligent for why it happened in the first place, and you can sue him into oblivion.
	It won't do anything to right the wrong or to remedy the mistakes, and it's going to do a whole hell of a lot to potentially turn public opinion, any sympathy that remains against people who now seem not to be out for any form of a justice, but only some form of a vengeance.
	Okay. That's Alex Jones.
	Now... Let's get to the drones, people!
	Oh, the Luigi...
	Okay, so I haven't read the manifesto, just the Luigi dude, the CEO killer.
	I do have to tell you, actually, did I bring up any of these tweets?
	I'm flabbergasted.
	I mean, I'm not flabbergasted.
	I don't know why I'm saying I'm flabbergasted.
	That the left, the progressive left, so easily and readily support terrorism.
	I mean, they say, I don't care how much you hate an industry.
	Murder is murder, period.
	And murder is murder, and denial of coverage is not murder.
	Fraudulent denial of coverage is not murder.
	Some might argue that promoting a very dangerous experimental medication that leads to death, some might argue that's murder.
	I'll still say that's not murder.
	It might be something else.
	It might be a crime against humanity.
	But it's not murder in the legal definition of the term murder.
	Therefore, it's not murder.
	So don't use it as murder.
	Okay. One must give credit where credit is due, people.
	Like, I'm going to bed last night and I'm doomed.
	I think this was when I was going to bed last night.
	I'm doom scrolling.
	And I saw something and I had to take a double take because I was like, holy shit.
	Aaron Rupert said something that's not...
	Painfully stupid.
	Aaron Rupar, and I'm reading this like, okay, I'm going to have to go make sure it wasn't Aaron Rupar's parody account.
	I don't know if there is one.
	Aaron Rupar writes, let me just make sure we're looking at the same thing here.
	It's going to blow your freaking minds that it's going to actually confirm to you that Aaron Rupar is not dumb.
	He's just a liar.
	It is possible that I am in fact wildly out of touch with popular opinion on the left, but I continue to believe that murder is bad.
	Is everyone holy shitting as much as I am?
	Now, there are a number of ways.
	Everybody, when you want to go and make someone out to be a hypocrite, a liar, a scoundrel, there's many ways to do it.
	If they say something that you know they have contradicted in the past, if you know that...
	There's many ways to look at this.
	You can go back and see if Aaron Rupar celebrated the assassination attempt on Trump.
	I don't think he would have.
	I don't know.
	I didn't go there.
	You could go back and look at whether or not you think Aaron Rupar...
	Go back and look at whether or not Aaron Rupar...
	Let me think of an example.
	If he made jokes at the murder of Corey Comparator, I don't think he would have done that either.
	So he might...
	We'll see if he supported violence under any other circumstance where it was perpetrated against the right.
	I didn't go that far.
	I was just flabbergasted that Aaron Rupar finally lost his political retardation for about one tweet.
	And it's an amazing thing to me.
	The mental gymnastics, and I put out a video for our Locals community exclusively, and I talked about it.
	The mental gymnastics that people go through to justify being wrong and doing wrong to someone that they hate.
	This is what we call motivated reasoning.
	And it's the idea that, like, you'll find a way to justify your own mistakes if you so set out with that perspective to do so.
	I don't care if you think that Brian Thompson was the most evil person on Earth.
	And I know that there are some people out there who think that he was.
	You know, evil through passivity, willing executioners.
	You know, someone saying, I'm just following orders by denying coverage that could, in theory, lead to someone dying.
	I don't know if there's been any concrete examples of someone having been denied coverage for a life-saving or life-necessity treatment.
	I wouldn't be surprised if someone could find an example of such.
	So you might hate CEOs of health insurance companies, especially ones with very, very bad...
	What's the word I'm looking for?
	Very high refusal rates, declining coverage rates.
	You might think it's Satan incarnate.
	If you're an intellectually honest person who doesn't support terrorism, you will have to come to the conclusion that as much as you hate those people, they need to go through the legal process and be punished commensurately under the law for the wrong that they've committed.
	I would dare say very few people...
	I've got to pick someone on the right also.
	George W. Bush, number two of the second one.
	Very few have more disdain for them than me.
	Extrajudicial justice is not summary execution for things that you unilaterally, arbitrarily equate to murder.
	And the amount of people I have to argue with on the internet, denying coverage is not murder, period.
	It could be immoral.
	It could be fraudulent.
	It's not murder.
	And so you want to say, well, murder with a gun is just the same as murder by denial of coverage.
	No, only if you're a terrorist or a terrorist sympathizer.
	But the amount of people on the left and seemingly on the right that have adopted this motivated reasoning to come to the conclusion that somehow murder by gun is the same thing as death by refusal to provide coverage for life necessary treatments is the same.
	This is where you see people not comparing comparables and not distinguishing that which is different.
	But apparently in New York, not billboards, but wanted posters are coming up.
	And I don't know if it's...
	Hold on.
	Here, Seth Black says BS, Viva.
	Here, so this is nice.
	I mean, I know you're limited by text.
	So I'll keep an eye out.
	Put in an explanation as to why you think...
	Why do you think that it's legal?
	I'm asking a ridiculous question because it's not.
	No one is going to find anybody guilty of murder under the law for having denied coverage.
	Period. It's not murder.
	Murder is the unlawful taking of the life of another human.
	There has to be nexus, causality, in proximity of causality.
	But I'm open to hearing arguments.
	I want to actually see what the answer to that is going to be.
	Let me see this one here.
	By the way, okay.
	It's just another look over here.
	While we continue to kill people in distant lands, forget about the genocide, clot, death jabs.
	Let's focus on some asshole.
	I don't know what that...
	Even when it comes to...
	The extrajudicial...
	First of all, it's terrorism in the actual sense of going after citizens.
	To instill fear for the purposes of promoting an ideology.
	It's also murder.
	Period. Full stop.
	That can never be justified.
	Period. Full stop.
	And why?
	You either live in a lawless country or you don't.
	You live in a lawless land or you don't.
	But I'm looking for that.
	I'm looking for the rationale here.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Okay, let me see here.
	Okay, the chat's moving a little quickly, anyhow.
	Here, let me see this.
	The Affordable Care Act passed by Obama is the cause of this video?
	Possibly. And I don't believe in political...
	I mean, the whole rationale, who was it that did it?
	Oh, yes, Kyle Kalinsky puts out a meme.
	I'm going to go get it.
	I'm going to go get it, because I don't want to misphrase it, and I kind of like my answer.
	Once you adopt this reasoning or once you ratify, tolerate this type of reasoning, it never ends.
	You misgendered me, that's tantamount to spiritual murder.
	I mean, that's where it goes.
	Because that rationale is no less broken.
	Oh, it didn't actually result in death.
	Once you've eliminated the causality, if someone commits suicide because someone misgendered them, that's tantamount to murder.
	Congratulations, you've just welcomed that in.
	You've ushered in that evil.
	Who was it?
	It was Kyle Kalinsky who wrote...
	Hold on, I'll get it in a few seconds.
	I hear my dog.
	God, that dog's hurt.
	Here we go, right here.
	Kyle Kalinske.
	And by the way, if you find yourself on the side of Kyle Kalinske, you're wrong.
	Period. This is what Kyle Kalinske posts.
	Murder? No!
	Not also murder.
	Literally not murder.
	Here, replace that guy with...
	Let's memefy this.
	Let's put...
	I don't want anyone accusing me of actually targeting anybody.
	Put anyone who pushed the COVID jab and anyone who had a family member die from it.
	And I know some people out there would say, also murder.
	And I would argue that the link is actually probably more causally connected, especially when it results from fraudulent concealment of side effects.
	Put in a...
	A white cisgender male bigot who misgendered someone who then took their own life.
	That's the rationale.
	It never ends.
	And so you either acknowledge that you're supporting terrorism and you just found a way to justify it to yourself, or you wake the F up and get out of your faulty reasoning.
	Period. Full stop.
	Oh, that's a straw man.
	Misgendered doesn't result in death.
	How about if they take their own life, Desert Rider?
	How about if someone...
	You think that some people might not look at the January 6th committee and the persecution that caused some of the defendants in jail to take their own lives or the accused to take their own lives?
	You think someone would look at that and say that that's not murder?
	I think a lot of people would look at that and say that's more causally connected to murder than anything else.
	So if it didn't result in death, it does if the person takes their own life.
	So congrats.
	Mutatus mutandus.
	Your flawed reasoning and flawed analogy, not yours as an individual, but that flawed reasoning applies.
	So, I'm not going to tolerate flawed reasoning just because, you know, it's seemingly coming from the right side.
	It's flawed reasoning.
	We're all capable of it and we're all capable of overcoming it.
	Thank you.
	I'm just going to...
	Okay, well, that's it.
	Okay. What we're going to do now, everybody, get your butts on over to either vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Look at this.
	I can share now.
	I'll chat with everybody.
	Here's the Locals link if you want to come to Locals.
	It'll be for supporters only afterwards.
	And here's the link to Crumble if you want to come to Crumble.
	We're going to do the drone, and then we're going to do the NATO zone.
	So we've done the Jones.
	No, we've done the Jones.
	We threw in the...
	The Luigi.
	And we're going to go to the drones and then the other one there.
	Let me just see one more second here.
	I see something over on Hrumble.
	And look at this.
	I'm going to bring it up here.
	One of my many theories, the drones are military governments searching for radiological chemical signatures.
	They can't tell us because they don't want to cause panic.
	Open borders have consequences.
	This is an interesting...
	Okay, we're going to get into this because I do not believe they're Iranian drones.
	Or I don't believe that they're actually Iranian drones.
	One of my many theories, the drones are military governments searching for radiological chemical signatures.
	It's a good theory.
	Okay, let's get to it.
	So we're going to end on Commitube and Twitter.
	Unfortunately, it ends up there, and then we'll bring it on.
	Let me see the number on YouTube go down to below 1,000 so we can get those people over to crumble.
	British hospital denied a couple from elective procedure for their baby.
	What's that?
	Well, British hospital denied.
	From an elective procedure.
	Well, the whole point, I mean, and then if you're...
	I don't know that...
	Anyways, whatever.
	We've belabored the point over there.
	Let's see here.
	I want to watch on YouTube if Viva denies me...
	Okay. Don't make jokes like that.
	Those are jokes.
	Let's scroll up here just while everyone trickles down.
	Okay. I don't think the CEO was personally denying claims.
	It doesn't come down to a single guy.
	No, but then the bottom line is if they were...
	He might...
	Hey, he short-sold his stock.
	If he had engaged in fraudulent trading of the stock and someone who lost all their money took their own life...
	I mean, that's the rationale.
	The bottom line, it's flawed reasoning.
	Don't engage in it and don't tolerate it just because you espouse it.
	All right.
	Bada bing, bada boom.
	We're going to update and go over to Rumble and Locals now.
	Drones, people.
	You all know that I know a little bit something about drones.
	I might be bad in terms of, like, not promoting myself, but selling my own expertise or knowledge because I ultimately feel like I know nothing.
	But I know a little bit about drones because I had to pass that frickin' test in Canada in order to fly any drone over 250 grams, which was the threshold in Canada.
	Where's my drone?
	I got the Spark now, the DJI Spark.
	It's 249 grams takeoff weight, so you don't need a...
	A license for it.
	Hold on!
	If I had a bell...
	Oh, shoot.
	It's down.
	Okay, we're gonna go.
	Jeff Bookman.
	Looks like he just became a supporter on VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
	Jeff Bookman, a man of the books.
	Welcome to the channel.
	Welcome to our above average community.
	I took that drone class.
	It was actually mildly difficult to pass, to study for.
	You learn about...
	Because it applies to basically planes and helicopters.
	Except they decided to apply it to drones because the Canadian government's, you know, a pain in the ass that ruins the joy in life.
	So over 250 grams, a bunch of restrictions apply to drones, where you can fly them, how far you can go.
	And I presume it's roughly the same from what I understand in the States, depending on the state.
	So I know a little bit of something about drones.
	So let's start off by looking at one video of the drone.
	Which is...
	I know that I had a video of one of the drones.
	And they're saying the drones are the size of cars, which I'm skeptical of.
	I would actually suggest that they're not.
	Here we go.
	This is it.
	No, that's the MyDone.
	Come on.
	Breaking report.
	Well, I don't have the freaking thing.
	Drone. Here, hold on.
	Let me just get one video.
	It was kind of like these guys with clearly New Jersey accents.
	Oh my god, look in the sky!
	Okay. All right.
	No. No.
	New Jersey.
	Where is the...
	Is this it?
	Here, this is the...
	Let me open this up.
	And minimize.
	Open. There.
	Drones. Here.
	Listen to this.
	Okay, let's look at this.
	Oh my gosh, bro.
	Look at that.
	Look at that.
	You know, that's the closest one we've gotten so far.
	The tree's blocking.
	Oh, bro.
	Oh my gosh, look at that.
	They're four-way rectangular.
	Oh, it's got blurry.
	Damn it.
	Oh, there you go.
	Oh my gosh, bro.
	So that's one of them.
	It's actually kind of amazing.
	Let's back up here.
	Let's go drones.
	They're large.
	I haven't seen them.
	The reports are that they're the size of cars, which I'd be surprised at.
	You can go look for drones that are big enough to carry a DSLR.
	And they're pretty big.
	And when the blades are spinning, it makes them, surface area-wise, pretty big.
	Size of a hood of a car, easily.
	And so they've been noticed everywhere.
	Did I pull up an article on this?
	I think I did.
	No, that's the article on the OnlyFans girl who just had sex with 100 men.
	In one day.
	Okay, I don't have that.
	Let's pull up one video now talking about it.
	We're going to play this out.
	It's a few minutes long and it's worth a listen.
	Because I don't believe the official story.
	Well, let's go to Josh Hawley here.
	Gotta love Josh Hawley.
	Bada bing, bada boom.
	Here. Yeah, you can't tell me that we don't know what that is.
	I just think they're not being honest with us.
	I think that if we don't know, if our government really has no idea, then they're even more incompetent than I thought.
	We've got to get to the bottom of this, and they need to level with the American people what's going on.
	It's crazy.
	Okay, so I was listening to Bongino as I was driving back from shooting an episode of The Unusual Suspects, and Bongino, he has the tautology of they either don't know what it is, which is terrible, And incompetent, or they do know what it is, and they're not telling us for whatever the reason, which is terrible and incompetent.
	And the rationale is, you know, his thought process is they don't like looking stupid, so the fact that they're saying we don't know, it means one of the two things according to his theory.
	I got a third theory, which is they know damn well what it is, and it's not that they're not telling us because they're scared.
	They don't give a flying F if they look stupid.
	They lie, and they're proud to lie.
	It's part of the game.
	It's part of the deceit.
	And they have no problem looking stupid if the purpose of that looking stupid is ultimately to conceal what they are up to.
	So the question is operating theories as to what the hell is going on.
	The theory now is that it's Iranian drones.
	It was Tim Pool that put it up.
	My goodness.
	Here we go.
	Breaking Report.
	It was this one.
	Okay, so let's listen to this for a bit.
	In focus now, Republican Congressman Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey, member of the House Judiciary Committee.
	I'll pause periodically.
	Do they not know what it is?
	Do they know what it is, but they don't want to tell us?
	Or are they just lying?
	Bill, right now, how do you address this at this point?
	Well, here's the real deal, Harris.
	You know, I'm also on the Transportation Committee, on the Aviation Subcommittee, and I've gotten to know people.
	And from very high sources, very qualified sources, very responsible sources, I'm going to tell you the real deal.
	Iran launched a mothership probably about a month ago that contains these drones.
	That mothership is off.
	I'm going to tell you the deal.
	It's off the east coast of the United States of America.
	They've launched drones.
	Everything that we can see or hear, and again, these are from high sources.
	I don't say this lightly.
	A mothership.
	Is that to say a vessel or a megadrone from which these baby drones are being birthed?
	They have a mothership off the east coast of America and nobody, no military has known about it for the last month.
	They have a mothership off the east coast of America.
	And nobody else has come across it?
	They have a mothership from which they can launch drones, but nobody else has launched drones from here to there to see what that mothership looks like?
	And their answer today is, we don't know what's going on?
	Now, you know, we know there was a probability it could have been our own government.
	We know it's not our own government.
	We know it's not our own government because?
	Because they would have let us know.
	So here's where I'm not going to throw any shade on this guy.
	We know it's not our own government because if it were, they would let us know.
	It's historically illiterate and factually incorrect.
	So this man's reasoning, and as much as his source might be legit, his reasoning is demonstrably flawed.
	If they were doing it, they would have told us because our own government has never lied to us.
	All right, do you have a letter signed by 51 intelligence officers attesting to that, sir?
	It could have been some really glorified hobbyist or hobbyists that were doing something unbelievable.
	They don't have the technology.
	They don't have the technology for what?
	To fly drones?
	Dude, this guy needs to go watch a drone racing competition.
	It's flipping amazing!
	I caught a flipping fish off a drone.
	Let's pretend that's possible.
	The third possibility was somebody, an adversarial country, doing this.
	Know that Iran made a deal with China to purchase drones, motherships, and technology in order to go forward.
	The sources I have are good.
	They can't reveal who they are.
	To purchase drones, motherships, and other technology from China, it sounds like the mothership is not a vessel on the water, a bigger drone in the sky.
	An actual gas-powered drone.
	I don't know.
	Like a drone plane from which they launch these baby drones.
	You can't take one of those fucking drones out of the air.
	I'll show you something in a second.
	Because they are speaking to me in confidentiality.
	These drones should be shot down.
	Whether it was some crazy hobbyist that we can't imagine, or whether it is Iran, and I think it very possibly could be, they should be shot down.
	We are not getting the full deal, and the military is on alert with this.
	Look, you've given us some pretty dire information just here, and I want to make sure that our viewers are digesting this.
	Iran has the capability to pull up along our eastern seaboard.
	And launch drones the size of an SUV into the skies of several states, particularly New Jersey, where we know the incoming president has a large home, also in the same county or nearby where some of these drones in New Jersey have been seen.
	That capability exists.
	It's possible some of those drones are here.
	So I have two questions.
	How are they fueling them?
	They have to land somewhere.
	Drones don't fly forever.
	They can fly for an extended period of time, 45 minutes to an hour, and they can fly freaking fast.
	50, 80 miles an hour, maybe even faster.
	Why don't they close down the airspace?
	Yes, it's inconvenient.
	Yes, it's the holidays.
	Shut it down.
	But if you start shooting things and you don't know how they're fueled, that's going to be mass explosions.
	This isn't like one spy balloon.
	Congressman, this is serious.
	We've got to bring them down, and we've got to find a way to bring them down.
	I don't know.
	We've got to find a way to bring them down.
	If only there were some easy way of tangling their props.
	Jeez, it's rocket science, people.
	Exactly where they're landing, obviously.
	I have some information.
	And again, this isn't just Jeff and Andrew, oh, let's get on Harris Faulkner's show and say something outrageous.
	I'm telling you, a straight deal from very high-positioned individuals who are telling me this.
	And the bottom line is they're launching them.
	They are across the country.
	We don't even have anything like this.
	Our government and also certainly our hobbyists don't.
	So think about it.
	This guy doesn't know what he's talking about.
	Hobbyists have amazing stuff.
	Some of them are pretty big, but when it comes to hobbyist drones, you don't want them big.
	You need them small.
	But you can get a DJI Inspire and you can fly that thing 15 miles.
	You're not allowed by law.
	You have to keep it in unassisted visual line.
	This guy, he doesn't know what he's talking about.
	I don't want to sound like a smartass.
	I'm not a drone expert, but I certainly am a above average drone enthusiast.
	Information but it's also common sense.
	We've got to get them down.
	We've got to determine how they function, what they do, make sure that we can get Well, if one of them happens to fall.
	And they're fueled.
	That explosion.
	That's not the risk.
	You know what the risk is?
	If one of them is carrying five kilograms of a powder is the risk.
	If one of them is carrying, if you see the power of explosives, they could be carrying something that's, you know, some of those things, just take like a DJI, DJI Inspire payload.
	Can carry three and a half kilograms.
	I mean, that's outrageous.
	And that's a small one.
	For $2,000, I kind of want that drone, actually.
	But they're useless.
	I have a small one.
	Shotguns works as Jones.
	You know what else works?
	You know what else?
	First of all, I might prove to be wrong on this.
	I don't believe they're the size of SUVs.
	I do question that because you're in another realm of drones at that point.
	They're still unmanned, but you're in another realm of drones.
	Here, you know how else you can take them down?
	Let me turn the volume down here a little bit.
	Watch this.
	It's an amazing technology.
	Frickin' bird with a rope.
	Is this one?
	Oh, that's just a bird.
	Never mind.
	They, um...
	That's right.
	Kill it.
	That's not what I wanted to show.
	I wanted to show you the ones where they take them down.
	They've trained hawks to basically go and carry a leather strap and get it tangled in the blades to take it down.
	Yes, if this is a much bigger drone, it'll be a different technology, but a net?
	They have these police nets that shoot nets.
	Like, they have cast nets to use them for fishing.
	That technology.
	That they don't know how to take these drones down.
	That they can't follow them to where they're taken off from.
	And we've got some government guy telling us that if they didn't...
	What did he say?
	He said, we know it's not our government because if it was, they would tell us?
	Holy hell!
	How much more of a stupid statement can you make?
	So what's my operating theory right now?
	Trust no one.
	You get a double-fakey false flag.
	you know that damn well the world has been struggling to get to war with Iran.
	And now you have a guy saying it's an Iranian mothership with technology purchased from China that's been parked off the coast of the East Coast of America for a month, launching these little baby drones, and we just can't seem to intercept one of them to prove that to you.
	I said, you know, just because they're from Iran doesn't...
	The whole thing, going back to that tenant media.
	A indictment where they say, oh yeah, the money was coming from Russia, but through other countries.
	The fact that they say it, and even if it was coming through Russian assets, doesn't mean that it's coming from Russian assets.
	As if it would be the first time that the intelligence would use, what do they call them?
	Not fake storefronts.
	The hell's the word I'm looking for?
	Fake fronts.
	I guess the word is fronts.
	They would use fronts in foreign countries?
	Oh yeah.
	Do we think that intelligence doesn't have anything operating in or abouts in Iran to make it look like it is, in fact, coming from Iran, although it has the fingerprints of other intelligence agencies?
	It is such a load of crap.
	And people saying, you know, they're not violating any airspace, so there's no lawful reason to take them down.
	Bullshit! First of all, by virtue of the fact that you don't know where they're coming from?
	They're already violating one rule, which is you have to be with an unassisted eyesight of the drone operator, period.
	I'm pretty sure that's the same in every state in America.
	I reserve the right to be wrong.
	That's the law in Canada.
	You can't fly within certain distances of homes or properties or persons not involved in the production or without their consent.
	Another problem.
	You can't fly over built-up areas, at least in Canada.
	Another problem.
	So nothing about the story, the explanation, even what this guy's at the high level, none of it makes sense.
	And now they're going to try to blame it on Iran.
	You know, more than the balloon up in the sky, I don't know why they couldn't shoot it down, but they finally did.
	If this thing's carrying anthrax and flying over a built-up area, a populated area, I don't know what three and a half kilograms of anthrax does, or 3.4 kilograms.
	None of it makes sense.
	They're already breaking the law.
	Those things can be taken down lawfully and, most importantly, relatively safely.
	You don't have to fire guns at it.
	Drop nets on it.
	Shoot nets at it.
	Fly another drone with a net to bring it down.
	It's not rocket science.
	It's not even drone science.
	It's common sense.
	Hold on.
	See, I love...
	Now I gotta go up and see what the conversation was.
	Quit being a bunch of sissies and spell it properly.
	Hold on, I gotta go see what's going on in the chat.
	That is the discussion.
	Viva, law enforcement uses drones in two of the major cities I know.
	Dude, it's...
	Viva, you are a coward, not a...
	Viva, you are a coward, not a realist.
	Okay, everyone's entitled to their opinion.
	Let me see here.
	I'll have a few lines of anthrax if you're offered.
	So none of the story makes sense.
	Period. Flying near but not over military bases or whatever.
	I forget what that was in New Jersey.
	They're breaking the law by virtue of what they're doing already.
	There are safe ways of taking it down.
	The fact that the government refuses to take them down and then says, we know that they're coming from Iran, but we're not even taking one down to show you and prove to you that they're from Iran is highly suspicious.
	I don't want to get blackpilled, but yeah, it could be one of them double fakie false flags and who the hell knows what they're planning to do.
	But it's an amazing thing.
	Since Trump winning, you've got the Biden administration authorizing another red line violation via attacking in Russia.
	You've got war breaking out in the Middle East.
	You've got Syria magically falling.
	And now you've got drones.
	Oh, cutouts is the word I was looking for.
	Thank you.
	You got drones magically flying over New Jersey and the most sophisticated military on Earth saying, we don't know what they are, where they're coming from, and we don't know how to stop them.
	Horse crap.
	So I do ultimately think it's going to sound crazy.
	I do think ultimately American intelligence is behind it.
	And then we see what would be the reason for that.
	There could be a number of reasons.
	One of which could be to argue some sort of false flag and the need for further military escalation in Iran.
	And, I don't know, sanctions against China.
	Okay. Let's see what we've got going on here.
	Dread Robert over in vivabarneslaw.locals.com says, if they don't know, they would be shooting them down, or if they are Iranian, same thing.
	Well, shooting them down, let's just take that to be loosely a term.
	It's actually surprisingly easy to take them down.
	And all that it would need, actually, is a DJI Phantom dragging a net, and you fly it right over that drone, and you get its props tangled up in a flipping, very light nylon cast net for fishing.
	The thing comes down, you have your one sample to know where the hell it's coming from so you can show the world.
	In fact, if someone were to give me a DJI Phantom, I'm fairly certain I could take it down.
	Why do I say that?
	Because I was able to catch a fish, biatches, with a drone.
	I won't play the whole thing, but this is one of the happiest moments of my life.
	That's another internet first, and today we're going to be doing something...
	That's another internet first, and totally...
	We're going to go fishing with a drone.
	We're not using worms.
	I know some of you have seen this many times.
	And we are going to be trolling with a jitterbug.
	Okay, let's go here.
	Trolling the jitterbug.
	You see how this works?
	This is the camera on the drone.
	Change the angle.
	This is the drone right here.
	Oh my gosh.
	Did you just see the fish?
	I got a fish.
	Oh my gosh.
	Watch the drone angle, people.
	Oh my gosh.
	This should have been the most popular video on the internet.
	We gotta go in the water.
	Look at this, by the way.
	A beautiful smallmouth bass.
	There it is.
	Okay. Watch it.
	Bam! Oh my gosh.
	Did you just see the fish?
	Watch it jump.
	Watch it jump now.
	I got a fish.
	They changed the laws out.
	Oh my gosh.
	It was a big fish!
	Okay, let's get to the happy part.
	Oh my gosh.
	We bring it to shore.
	We bring it to shore.
	That jitterbug is 15 years old, my boy.
	Oh my gosh!
	Marion! Marion!
	Marion, tell me the numbers on my GoPro are rolling.
	Look at the size of this!
	Get your camera, please.
	Quickly. No, Val, Val.
	You gotta hurry up.
	I gotta put this back.
	Sideways, please.
	Sideways. Shoot sideways.
	Quick, quick, quick.
	Bada-bing.
	And it goes back.
	Don't worry, people.
	Look at that.
	Beautiful. There you go.
	That's what you call an alien abduction experience for a fish.
	And it's off.
	So, yeah.
	Government. If you need a little drone expert.
	I'm a little rusty, and there are better people out there.
	But I can take down that.
	I can take down one drone.
	In fact, I'm surprised that drone hobbyists aren't doing it themselves.
	It's very, very easy.
	Did I tell you the time I attached a water balloon to a drone?
	Come on.
	Let me show you this, guys.
	It'll be worth it.
	I can't do these things anymore, necessarily, because they changed laws in Canada.
	Viva Fry Drone Fire.
	Hmm. Let's go over.
	No, I gotta be...
	It's in my...
	Putting out a fire.
	I waxed my leg with a drone.
	That was a good one.
	Oh, here we go.
	Using a drone to get a campfire going.
	No, that's different.
	That's just using the props.
	Oh, I can't find it.
	Viva drone fire.
	Let's see if it comes up here.
	Oh, here we go.
	This is it.
	How to use a drone to put out a fire.
	Check this out.
	Pay you $30,000.
	Okay, how to use a drone.
	It's very ingenious because I tie a water balloon to the drone.
	To release the balloon over the fire.
	I put a sparkler on it and wrapped the fishing line around the sparkler so that when the sparkler burnt out and burnt the fishing line, then it dropped the water balloon on the fire.
	Check this out.
	Yeah, there you go.
	Look at that.
	Beautiful. You'll see the sparks, I think, if you...
	Oh, yeah, the sparks are on the front.
	Okay, so check it out.
	There you go.
	You can see the sparks.
	The spark was coming down.
	I got like a limited amount of time to get that water balloon to drop on the fire.
	And look at this.
	I'm a freaking genius, people.
	There you go.
	Oh, oh, oh, oh.
	Back it up, back it up, back it up.
	Boom! Okay, I can put out a fire with a drone.
	You can take down a drone using very, very basic technology.
	Okay. What have I not done with a drone, says Mel Bell.
	Well, I can tell you what I have done with a drone.
	You'll need to pull your kids too.
	Oh, dude, I've done that twice.
	That's fantastic.
	Go look up Viva Drone.
	I waxed my legs with a drone, cooked a steak with a drone.
	Caught a fish with a drone, put out a fire with a drone, stoked a fire with a drone, and a bunch of other stuff.
	Okay. And so all that to say, I don't believe the official narrative.
	I don't believe that it's of bona fide foreign origin, because it's inconceivable that it is, is why.
	Unless, big unless, unless...
	It's another one of those Lee hops, me hops, where they're letting foreign hostile agents fly drones over American vital interests, much in the way they let that would-be assassin and, in fact, murderer crooks fly his drone over the Butler, Pennsylvania field where Trump was going to give his speech.
	I mean, in as much as, okay, foreign intelligence could be doing that, but that's a Lee hop at that point, people.
	So I don't believe anything.
	That they're saying, for the life of me.
	Okay, let's see if I've missed any questions over on the VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com side.
	Viva, the YouTube channel Tech Ingredients, recently released a video about using lasers to take down drones, says Miles Buckley.
	Dred Roberts says, if they don't know, they would be shooting them down or they are Iranian, same thing.
	Let me go to the chat here.
	Glad I'm not in New Jersey or New York, says Merchant Marine.
	JP Spooner says, could this be deliberate fear-mongering by the Biden government?
	I mean, the thing is, it's just a distraction if that's the purpose of it.
	I'm not scared.
	This does not instill enough fear.
	My other deeper fear is that it's actually not Iranians from Iran.
	It's any number of...
	Potential terrorist agents who cross the border and they are actually looking for infrastructure and surveilling for the purposes of something far more nefarious.
	And the reason for that is Iran, China don't need to fly drones to get aerial views of infrastructure.
	I think something more local, something more domestic, not domestic in that sense, but something more like terrorists who have crossed the border who are trying to plan something that requires More detailed information could be doing it.
	But bottom line, there's zero excuse to not be taking these things down.
	Not with shotguns or rifles, but with other non-lethal techniques.
	Period. Zero.
	Viva predicted modern warfare, says Jeff Wark.
	I saw the potential for drones before many people did.
	Okay, did I miss anything on that?
	Anybody have any comments that they would like me to read?
	Or theories that they would like me to theorizing?
	Somebody's messing with our heads, says Faithless.
	Find out where the big guns are kept, says Sefer Dean Squibb.
	Yeah, I forget what the military base is in New Jersey that they're flying over, but...
	And then once you realize how many terrorists have been crossing the border from Canada, presumably a lot of student visas being given to foreigners with...
	Very little.
	500,000 foreigners immigrated to Canada last year.
	500,000.
	From China, India, and the Philippines, I think, were the three major countries for immigration.
	And what is it?
	Eight times more terrorists have been caught or intercepted trying to cross into America from Canadian border.
	Little than Canadian border than from Mexico border.
	So, you know, the jokes about...
	Canada becoming the 51st state are all fun and games.
	When Canada becomes an existential threat because of their deliberate or incompetent leadership, deliberately incompetent leadership, when they become a national security threat to America, hey, they might not be annexed for a 51st state.
	They might actually just be taken over in order to be secured so that America doesn't have basically an enemy state at its northern border.
	Neurodivergent says, Viva, I tagged you on Locals.
	Let me see here.
	I'm going to go over to Neurodivergent.
	Antonia says, Toys movie with Robin Williams and LL Cool J, drone reference.
	Neurodivergent. David, I tagged you in a comment to the left about a missed Rumble rant from Anton.
	Screenshot is there.
	Where did it go?
	Oh, tabarnouche.
	J'ai manqué une Rumble rant sur les Rumble studios.
	Je vais juste rafraîchir la page pour voir qu'est-ce qui s'est passé ici.
	Rumble rant.
	Oh, it's from Neurod...
	It's from...
	Biltong, give the gift that keeps giving this festive season.
	Reduce the need for chemtrails.
	Eat more Biltong.
	We will ship Biltong to your loved ones.
	Door-to-door use code VIVATEN for 10% off.
	Oh, I didn't read it yesterday.
	Biltong, thank you very much.
	Biltongusa.com.
	I think that's the website.
	Biltongusa.com.
	That's it.
	Biltongusa.com.
	Now, speaking of Canada, and speaking of Canada being infiltrated not just by lefties, but by terrorists, potentially.
	Foreign governments.
	Calistani terroristies supporting adjacent entities.
	Chinese Communist Party commies.
	We've talked about...
	By the way, you should all watch The Unusual Suspects at 6 o'clock.
	It's going to be great.
	The parliamentary hearings into Russian...
	Disinformation, Russian interference in Canadian politics, because that's where the interference is coming from, not from the Chinese Communist Party or Kalistani Indian entities in Canadian government.
	No, it's Russia, Russia, Russia, because that allows them to continue this bullshit narrative of both the truckers having some adjacency to the Russians, whatever.
	You know that they had the parliamentary hearings where they subpoenaed Lauren Chen.
	Lauren Chen came, pleaded basically the Canadian equivalent of the Fifth Amendment.
	I can't answer questions for reasons of potential self-incrimination if they're going to indict Lauren Chen for whatever reason.
	Lauren Southern was summoned and she kicked ass and I covered that and put that on as much blast as possible because Lauren Chen is smart, educated, informed, and charismatic.
	Which is exactly everything that the idiots asking her questions are not.
	But most recently, they either summoned or they're having their round three, and they had some expert witnesses in this parliamentary hearing that was scheduled for yesterday, but it was cut short because of an alarm, a fire alarm going off, in which the expert witnesses are a Canadian journalist by the name of Rachel Gilmore, who I've said is the Canadian equivalent of Taylor Lorenz, some professor of political science at some...
	Education institution in Canada, I'll get in a second, and a Finnish expert on Russian disinformation, and his name is Pekka Kolioniemi, who I'm following on Twitter, and I wouldn't mind having a discussion with him, but something tells me it won't happen.
	So they're having another round of this Russia investigation.
	It's the most ridiculous thing you've ever seen, but I pulled a couple of highlights, and then we have to see where this goes into.
	The American side of things.
	Let's bring up Rachel Gilmore had some amazing insights in her.
	They only had their opening statements and then a fire alarm got pulled or something.
	If you're following me on Twitter or if you're on our local screen, you've already seen this here.
	In the documents the DOJ released in September in the U.S., we saw details from Russia's Good Old USA project and its guerrilla media campaign in the United States.
	Those documents show Russia identified existing sources of polarization to then exploit.
	The, quote, campaign topics they planned to focus on included stuff like what they called the, quote, threat of crime coming from people of color and immigrants and, quote, risk of job loss.
	for white Americans and what they called, quote, "privileges for people of color, perverts, and disabled." I don't know where she's getting this from, but privileges for...
	Privileges. They could have ended it that.
	Privileges. We're not allowed complaining about privileges of a certain class and discrimination against another?
	Okay, but hold on.
	So that gives you a sense of the kinds of divisions Russia focused on exacerbating.
	It's got a lot in common with what I would call the right-wing grifter sphere and what comes out of there, where people rail against immigration, attack diversity and inclusion.
	Attack diversity and inclusion that's already been pulled back from all of these entities.
	What was it?
	And they might be pulling back from the American military, which might have been investing a little bit too much in diversity, equity, and inclusion, to the point where they can't take down a frickin' drone flying over.
	Okay, whatever.
	Complain about it, you're a Russian asset.
	Or a right-wing grifter sphere.
	Pearl clutch about anti-white racism and oppose trans rights.
	By the way, notice that.
	Pearl clutch about anti-white racism.
	Not that it doesn't exist, but fake outrage about it.
	Like, those are the kinds of topics you hear from people like Tim Pool, Benny Johnson, and Lauren Southern.
	And Viva Frye, and a bunch of Canadians, and a bunch of other people, because they are issues that deserve to be criticized.
	But if you do that, you're Russian.
	And those are the same influencers who ended up on the payroll at Tenet Media, which Russia was allegedly funding to spread its talking points.
	If we accept the premise that Russia never influenced their editorial decisions, as these influencers claimed after the fact...
	It would have been difficult to claim it before the fact, when they didn't know and nobody knew.
	But okay, set that aside.
	Yeah, it didn't influence anything.
	And these are immensely successful people in the first place who, if they're going to license their content, they ain't going to do it for free.
	It's kind of an amazing thing, Rachel, when you have a product of quality, you don't give it away for free.
	And you don't fault people for not giving themselves away for free.
	And when you don't have a product of quality, you can't sell it because it's shit and nobody wants it.
	Which might be why success has a way of leaving clues, Rachel.
	You might want to look at the Tim Pools of the world, of the Dave Rubins of the world, of the Lawrence Southerns of the world.
	They didn't get famous or success by appealing to the crowd.
	They actually got it by being accurate, truthful, and on point, and relevant.
	That implies these folks are so good at dividing and polarizing Western society that Russia likely saw it as a good investment to just fund them to make more of their organic content.
	Yikes. Does she not understand how stupid that is?
	They were gonna do it anyhow, and she thinks that Russia's funding them to continue doing what they were gonna do anyhow.
	I am...
	I was going to make a very politically incorrect joke, a self-deprecating one, but that doesn't make business sense, Rachel.
	If they're giving it away for free, or they're giving it away anyhow, why in the name of sweet, merciful hell would you pay them more to continue doing it?
	Oh, because they needed a little extra incentive to continue doing what they've already been doing that has made them wildly successful.
	So let's throw a little more money at them.
	You know what would have made a lot more business sense?
	Don't give them a penny.
	And just cut and repost their stuff or at least amplify their stuff.
	Pay to amplify their stuff.
	Holy hell.
	Anyways, that's the genius opening statement or at least a portion of it from Rachel Gilmour.
	But I'm not only picking on Rachel Gilmour.
	I'm picking on her in particular.
	This guy.
	What was his name?
	No, no, no.
	This is a political science professor.
	Dean at the Royal Military College.
	That's right.
	Because I remembered it wasn't Université de Montréal.
	I'm not going to play the whole thing.
	Just play a portion of this.
	I will be speaking in French.
	Mr. Chairman, members of the committee, thank you for giving me the opportunity to testify before you today.
	It is reassuring to see how seriously the Public Safety and National Security Committee is taking the threat that Russian disinformation and influence operations are posing to Canadians, to our democracy and to our society.
	Our government has been infiltrated by China and India definitively.
	So much so, it's being kept secret, the identities of the politicians who have been infiltrated knowingly or unwittingly by China and India.
	And this guy is coming out.
	You also appreciate, like, he's an expert sitting next to the expert of Rachel Gilmore.
	What must this guy feel like?
	He must either be on par with Rachel, or he must be sitting there saying, how the hell did I end up on this panel?
	It goes on, by the way.
	The points I'm making today are my own points and do not represent the position of my employer or any organization.
	The applications enhancing Russian influence directly challenges and threatens authoritarian systems as it shows why is Russia influencing the West for the Kremlin.
	Like other authoritarian undemocratic regimes such as China, the sheer existence of democracies is a threat to its regime survival.
	Countries like Canada show every day that repression, violence, censorship and corruption we see in authoritarian regimes is not only unnecessary but that it is harmful.
	Stop! The violence, repression that we see in authoritarian regimes.
	Can someone please supercut that to Justin Trudeau sending his stormtroopers to beat the ever-loving piss out of peaceful Ottawa protesters?
	The censorship via legislation, the violence that they imposed on those peaceful protesters, freezing of bank accounts.
	This guy is unironically coming out and saying that the violence, authoritarianism, we show them that it's not necessary.
	Justin Trudeau has shown Russia that they're taking notes as to how to implement authoritarianism and violence as demonstrated by Justin Trudeau.
	Every day, that repression, violence, censorship, and corruption we see in authoritarian regimes is not only unnecessary, but that it is harmful and fundamentally not in the interest of citizens.
	Russian citizens cannot compete.
	Cannot compete with Westerners, neither in terms of living conditions, economic development, political stability, or general happiness of the people.
	Let's stop there.
	We don't need to hear any more of this garbage.
	They can't compete, eh?
	Wait until you hear this, guys.
	This one actually just broke before I went live, or pretty close to.
	No, that's not my...
	Ooh, I just saw some steak on Twitter.
	Hold on a second.
	You gotta hear this.
	You gotta hear this.
	What they've turned Canada into.
	Can't compete.
	Our government is convincing people that we should be living in trailers.
	Everyone, for the opportunity to talk about...
	Listen to this.
	...
	a major and very useful measure.
	Really... Really cool buildings that I'm starting to see pop up right across the country.
	Where I tend to see the most when I'm visiting communities who embrace unique solutions to the housing crisis is when families are trying to find a home for aging parents who have unique accessibility needs.
	For families who have a student who wants to live nearby if they're going to college or university.
	Or for people who are looking to earn a little bit extra income on the side.
	I visited not too long ago a family in my own community.
	It was Art and Joan in Hammond's Plains.
	They've been living in my own province, rather.
	They've been living in the same neighbourhood for 57 years, where they raised their own family.
	Joan ran into certain concerns that required more accessible upgrades to their home in order to continue to live in the community where they want it to remain.
	Over the years, their daughter, Deborah, now an adult, decided to raise her own family just down the street, literally.
	Listen to this.
	When they were looking for that more accessible option, they actually approached their daughter, Debra, and said, is there any chance we could actually build a spot in your backyard?
	And that's exactly what they've done.
	They worked with a company called Sprout, based in Nova Scotia, who's manufacturing these backyard suites or accessory dwelling units.
	Backyard suites.
	If you want to use a lingo.
	Backyard suites.
	You build a spot in your backyard.
	And that's exactly what they've done.
	They worked with a company called Sprout based in Nova Scotia who's manufacturing these backyard suites or accessory dwelling units.
	Accessory dwelling units.
	Trailer homes.
	If that.
	And I'm not saying this is an elitist prick like judgmentally.
	I'm just saying that, generally speaking, the sign of a successful country is not the fact that people are building trailer homes in the backyards of their family members.
	That's not the sign of a successful, thriving country that other countries are going to aspire to be.
	They're talking about building trailer homes on properties of other family members, assuming it's even allowed by the bylaws, which I suspect it wouldn't be in many cases.
	But congratulations.
	I wish mom and pops could live in a trailer in my backyard because of a housing crisis, because we've let in 500,000 immigrants a year into a country that can't handle it.
	And now we've got a healthcare issue that has been lasting decades, a housing crisis that's lasted a decade, but at least you can live in a trailer in the backyard of your family member.
	If you'll use lingo.
	What they ended up with is a beautiful space, looks up onto a little forested area, literally steps away from their daughter in the same neighborhood where they grew up.
	What you see is an energy-efficient design that keeps the cost low.
	It has all the accessibility features they need.
	And what's most important for them is they get to be close to their daughter and to her family.
	What's interesting is the opportunity not only to be next to the grandkids in their neighborhood, is the house down the street has been freed up for another family.
	to move in.
	When you see this additional supply added, it creates a cascading effect that frees up more existing housing stock for families to move into communities where the stock already exists if you add a fairly quick construction methodology with these new kinds of new kinds of buildings the change today is I have to hear the rest of this.
	I'm sorry.
	They're really important because it reflects feedback that we've heard from stakeholders out there who are in the business of building these things, including families who want to add a new building to their property to provide housing for typically a loved one, but not necessarily.
	So we'll free up some property if you empty that house and put them in a trailer in the back of your house.
	And oh, by the way, if you don't have any family to do that to, Immigrants.
	I mean, why not?
	That's the next logical step.
	By the way, yeah, Canada is the jealousy of Russia, you dumbasses, in terms of its success and in terms of its politics and its freedom.
	I don't even think...
	Putin, he might freeze bank accounts.
	He might unleash his police to beat the shit out of peaceful protesters.
	He might.
	One thing is for certain, I know Justin Trudeau has done that.
	Holy hell.
	But anyways, that was the detour of this detour.
	There was another expert who came out to talk during this Russian hearing, and he's the Finnish expert.
	I tagged him.
	Yes, Pekki Kalyonemi, and listen to what he has to say before the fire alarm.
	Mr. Kalyonemi, to make an opening statement of up to five minutes.
	Thank you.
	He only gets two minutes and 20 seconds before the fire alarm.
	Okay. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for this opportunity to appear before you today.
	I just want to say one thing.
	That mustache is like one inch on both sides away from being very problematic.
	Especially with that haircut.
	I mean, dude, I'm sorry.
	You just trim that and trim that and keep that hair.
	Dude, you got a problem.
	It's amazing.
	What a difference an inch of hair on both sides makes from totally unacceptable.
	It's perfectly acceptable.
	Okay, fine.
	Sorry, I've been saving that joke for a long time.
	So my name is Pekka Kallionemi.
	I'm a Finnish expert on social media and disinformation.
	And in recent years, I have mainly focused on Russian online disinformation in a series titled Vatnik Soup.
	Vatnik Soup.
	It's safe to say that during the last 10 years, Russian online influence operations have been the most effective in the world.
	and the Kremlin has attempted to interfere with elections and referendums around the world.
	The latest example is the massive social media campaign that Russia ran before the presidential elections in Romania.
	An unknown pro-Kremlin anti-NATO candidate gained over 20% of the total vote during the first round only by campaigning on TikTok.
	These whole elections were eventually annulled due to the massive Russian interference campaign exposed by Romanian intelligence agencies.
	In many countries...
	Pause. Do you understand what he...
	Excuse me.
	I'm choking on his bullshit.
	Do you understand what he just said?
	I didn't hear about this story.
	Now I'm going to put it on as much blast as humanly possible and hope that I can get Caelan Georgescu to come on to talk about it.
	They annulled the elections in Romania, the first round of the presidential elections, and contrary to what Pecky said here, not because they proved any Russian interference, but because intelligence leaked documents alleging Russian interference, and the constitutional court in Romania annulled the election because a Far-right,
	unknown candidate, anti-NATO, because Romania is a NATO member, broke out of nowhere to win the first round of the presidential elections and go to the second round with someone else who now has to go back and redo her campaign because they've annulled the election.
	Understand that.
	Russians hire and manipulate people to spread false narratives online, and Canada is not an exception.
	There are several prominent figures parroting Kremlin viewpoints regarding, for example, Ukraine Okay, so if you think that there was a false flag in Syria with the gas attacks, and if you think that we shouldn't be pissing away our money with the corrupt state of, corrupt country of Ukraine, paid or not, you're parroting Russian propaganda.
	If you criticize...
	2SLGBTQA plus policy, you're a Russian apologist.
	If you complain about immigration or rampant crime, you're a Putin agent.
	If you complain about the fact that in Brampton, they're putting out police videos in Hindi?
	In a language that is not French or English.
	You're a Putin propagandist.
	Tenet media was already mentioned previously, but there are also several academics, journalists, and other social media personalities who spread Russia's lies online.
	I'm just waiting for my name to be mentioned.
	I didn't get mentioned.
	I feel kind of ignored, actually.
	Some of them are motivated by money, others by ideology, or their ego.
	Motivated by ideology means you believe what you're saying.
	Some of them are motivated because they believe in what they're saying and this is unacceptable and we have to annul elections in which we allege that people are saying things because Russia is saying as well.
	Some may even have become victims of Russian blackmail, Kompromat.
	Now we know damn well what this guy's up to.
	And this is how Russia usually operates.
	They hide the origin of the message.
	It's also the reason why their messaging is so effective.
	They have this ability to make it seem organic and local.
	Of course, all this will be, and to some degree already is, supercharged with the use of AI.
	After February of 2022, Russia's main goal with their influence operations has been to stop any kind of military aid to Ukraine.
	Long term, they also try to destabilize Western societies, undermine trust in democratic institutions, and weaken adversaries through division and confusion.
	The rationale behind this is that any...
	Sorry, sir, we're going to suspend?
	That's it.
	Done. Fire alarm.
	So, by the way, if you believe any of these things and you put them online and people relate to them, you're all victims of Russian propaganda.
	And we're going to annul the election.
	Did you understand they annulled the election in Romania?
	It's wild.
	Annulled. Because the outgoing president who's reached the end of his term in Romania, who now gets to sit in his position of president until they figure the election out and find his replacement, annulled the election after having released declassified documents arguing that Russia allegedly influenced TikTok videos, and that's how this far-right, unknown, anti-NATO candidate won.
	Not that Romanians didn't actually vote or that the votes were fraudulent.
	They voted.
	But they were influenced by the wrong information.
	And you think that they're not going to use this?
	We've got this guy, Pecco Calimene, as an expert pushing this shit in Canada?
	You think Justin Trudeau's not going to try to do something similar?
	Oh, shit.
	Did Pierre Paulyev win?
	No, we've got to call a new election.
	Can't have that.
	You've got a good TikTok campaign.
	That's what's coming.
	Oh, and by the way, oh, where is it?
	Where is it?
	Hold on.
	You know who's behind all of this because it all comes back.
	It all comes back to not America in the broad sense, the Biden administration and the deep state apparatus in America.
	Listen to this.
	This is from the Monocle Daily.
	I was listening to podcasts today to try to make sure I understood what's going on in Romania.
	And I've just scratched the surface.
	So is the contention that...
	The votes cast for Caelan Georgescu were bogus, that there was something done to the counting process or the voting process, or are they more concerned about the misinformation-slash-disinformation influence operations that were run?
	No, I don't think that they say that the counting process, there was interference in that.
	It was the way that he benefited from a massive TikTok campaign.
	There'd been many dormant, hundreds of dormant accounts, which was suddenly reactivated two weeks before the election.
	There's the fact that he declared, even though he had obviously an extremely successful campaign, he declared zero spending.
	And they said the way that his campaign had been run on TikTok had the hallmark of a foreign actor, which they suggested was the Kremlin.
	In fact, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said it was Russian interference.
	He said that yesterday.
	It had the hallmarks of Russian disinformation.
	The hallmarks.
	I'm surprised they didn't actually use the same word.
	The earmark of Russian disinformation or a Russian information campaign.
	And it links back to Blinken.
	And my goodness, now I actually saw something in the chat where someone...
	Well, unfortunately, the problem...
	Well, unfortunately, Pernato might be right on this one because, I mean, it comes back to Blinken, but it comes back to the administration.
	So that's that.
	It's actually, it's stunning.
	It's stunningly shocking.
	Hold on.
	Oh, I just saw right there.
	Here we go.
	Thank you for reading our missed rant.
	Happy hump day, everyone, says King of Biltong.
	How did you know it?
	It's baby-making day today?
	Who's that guy right there?
	I like this guy.
	Here we go.
	All right, I'll get this out of here.
	That does it, peeps.
	That's our show.
	It goes back to blinking.
	Maidan 2.0 is what was just pulled off in Romania.
	If anybody has an in with Caelan Georgescu.
	Caelan Georgescu?
	Georgescu, yeah.
	Just, you know, I tweeted out.
	Go share my tweet.
	Tag him.
	I'd love to have him on to put this on blast.
	It is a Maidan coup 2.0.
	Why? Romania is a NATO member.
	They've got a very strong military base.
	I want to say, what's the C that's right next to Romania?
	C next to Romania.
	The Black Sea, sorry.
	They've got a very important military base there.
	Can't have someone getting elected in a country and maybe, maybe like...
	Breaking off from NATO.
	Maybe putting the brake pads on NATO.
	No, Anthony Blinken and the deep state apparatus will not let that happen.
	This is Maidan 2.0.
	We're witnessing it right now.
	And that's all I have to say about that.
	Okay, peeps, come for the after party.
	Come to the after party on Locals.
	And Locals, I'm going to also show you.
	I'll see if I can do it.
	Take the doors off the Bronco.
	We'll see what happens.
	I don't want to chip it.
	I don't want to dent it.
	I don't want to break it.
	So I have to do it with my wife.
	My wife.
	You forgot about the part where the people who voted frivolously are jailed before the next vote says Kikim.
	Oh, yeah.
	And they're talking about keeping Kalen Grogess.
	Georgescu? I know someone whose name is very, very, very similar to that.
	Georgescu. Just wait until they're talking about disqualifying Kalen from being on the ballot the next time they do this.
	Because they're...
	It's freaking election fortification.
	Love your intellect and energy.
	I say I have more energy than intellect, but I'll take the compliment.
	Thank you.
	All right.
	We're going to do it, people, tomorrow.
	Mike Benz, in-studio at Locals.
	I got to go drive back down to the studio.
	I have the tires rotated on the Bronco now, so it's making much less when I drive because, you know, whatever.
	Maybe I'll drive down without the doors on.
	Ooh, I'm going to have to park on the street, and then how do I...
	Maybe I don't want to take the doors off right now.
	Whatever. Mike Benz, tomorrow, 12.30, in studio at Locals.
	That's my kid.
	Okay, go for it.
	And Locals After Party is coming right now, so vivabarneslaw.locals.com if you're not coming.
	If you are coming, merch, Viva Fry, live tomorrow, 12.30, live Friday, most certainly.
	Hold on.
	Oh, that's right!
	It's on Friday, peeps.
	We're going to have Pastor Ben.
	I don't know what to expect.
	It's going to be fun.
	So stay tuned and thank you all for being here.
	Now we're going to end it and go on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com for a brief afterparty.

▲