Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 17, 2024 - Viva & Barnes

01:19:31

Train-Wreck Kamala is TRENDING! Debate Recap! FBI Lies! Georgia Election Ruling & MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	We're talking to a lot of voters.
	And I will just say that you texted me right around the Democratic convention and you said, I am talking to people and Kamala Harris has a problem with black men.
	Yeah. And I told the campaign I did not hear from them.
	I mean, who am I for them to get back to me?
	But there's a problem.
	And look, I went from battleground state to battleground state.
	They invited me to the convention.
	I didn't just want to fly there.
	I said, I'm going to go and talk to voters in battleground states.
	And I did.
	It was not curated.
	I went up to people just doing man on the street.
	Who are you going to vote for?
	Black men.
	And time after time after time, they said, I'm voting for Donald Trump.
	Why? Now, there are reasons why.
	They said, because most of the time they said, well, you know, for economic reasons, right?
	Or because he gave me a stimulus check.
	And I had to correct them over and over and tell them that that stimulus check came from the Democratic Congress and from Nancy Pelosi.
	And that Donald Trump actually held the check up so that his name could be put on the check.
	So they think they got the check directly from him.
	Meanwhile, Joe Biden has given one or two stimulus checks as well, but they seem not to know and understand that.
	You can vote for whoever you want to vote for, but the reasons that you're going to I want to play this again because I just picked up on something new.
	May I just say the first thing here?
	Yes. Are there lenses in his glasses?
	Or is he just wearing those to be the pretentious buffoon that he is?
	Two things.
	I'm going to replay this so we can bask in all its glory.
	And I picked up on something that I missed the first time.
	Talking to a lot of voters.
	And I will just say that you texted me right around the Democratic convention.
	And you said, I am talking to people and Kamala Harris has a problem with black men.
	Yeah. And I told the campaign I did not hear from them.
	I mean, who am I for them to get back to me?
	Do we sense a little bit of sass there?
	Who am I?
	I'm only Don Lemon.
	I only demanded that Elon Musk pay me $5 million a year for my 10,000 video hits.
	Who am I?
	They didn't get back to me.
	I'll tell you the thing.
	Who am I?
	Like, if I reach out, I don't expect people to get back to me.
	Who am I?
	I'm only a former CNN anchor who came out and did his wildly success.
	All right.
	I didn't pick up on his sass insult because he's a superficial, thin-skinned, arrogant, pompous jerk who thinks that his voice is the most important voice on Earth.
	But listen to this.
	There's a problem.
	Look. I went from Battleground State to Battleground State.
	When they invited me to the convention, I didn't just want to fly there.
	I said, I'm going to go and talk to voters in Battleground States.
	And I did.
	And I watched those videos, Don.
	They were amazing how you had your butt handed to you by pretty much everyone you interviewed.
	Who are you voting for?
	Trump. Who are you voting for?
	Trump. You were in Atlanta, Georgia.
	And they were saying, I'm voting for Trump.
	And you were trying to correct them there as well when some guy said to you, of course I was better off four years ago than I am now.
	And you said, well, I know the record shows.
	I know you feel that way.
	But the record actually shows that you're better off now than you were four years ago.
	Thanks, man.
	I think I know who pays the groceries in my house.
	But listen to this.
	It was not curated.
	I went up to people just doing man on the street.
	Who are you going to vote for?
	Black men.
	And time after time after time, they said, I'm voting for Donald Trump.
	Why? Now, there are reasons why.
	They said, because most of the time they said, well, you know, for economic reasons.
	Pause. This is what you call sandwiching a lie.
	This is true.
	Economic reasons.
	Because everybody he asked the question to said they were better off four years ago than they are today.
	They had more purchasing power four years ago than they had today.
	They all said that.
	Economic reasons.
	You know what I did not see ever at any point in his man on the streets?
	Any one of the people that he asked why they were voting for Trump saying, it's because he gave me a $2,000 stimulus check when governors across the country shut down our states.
	Nobody said that.
	Right? Or because he gave me a stimulus check.
	No, no.
	You notice he put the or.
	It's a disjunctive, not a conjunctive.
	So it could be one or the other, and technically he's not lying.
	It was either economic reasons or the stimulus check.
	In reality, I did not see one person say the stimulus check.
	So he's lying, but in a very deceitful way where it technically is not a lie because it's true.
	It's one or the other.
	It just happens to not be the economic stimulus check.
	Then he goes on to lecture more black men.
	I have to correct these silly people.
	First of all, that is racism, by the way.
	That is racism where he is lying because I firmly believe he's lying and I put out a challenge on Twitter.
	Not that I expect an answer because who the hell am I?
	I said, Don, I dare you to show me a video where any one of the black men that you claim to have interviewed said they were voting for Trump because of the stimulus check.
	They sure as heck said because of the economy.
	But show me one video where one of the black men you allegedly interviewed said they're voting for Trump because of the stimulus check.
	I guarantee you it didn't happen.
	And what Don Lemon is doing right there is deeply rooted racism, basically implying that black men are bought off with freebies from the government.
	They said the economy was better four years ago than it is now.
	Everybody says that.
	I mean, everybody except for Bill Maher and Don Lemon.
	Liar. Liar.
	And appreciate the insidiousness of that disjunctive lie.
	Well, you know, the moon is either made out of moon rock or cheese.
	I'm not lying, but it's a stupid lie to say it could possibly be made out of cheese.
	Well, they're voting for Trump because of economics or something that is a flat-out lie.
	All right.
	Now, people, speaking of, you know, having been better off four years ago than we are today.
	And this is a sponsored episode.
	Monetary Gold is our sponsor.
	And one of the things that I thought would be interesting is instead of me doing an ad read, which I firmly believe in and these are good people, have the company come on in a short interview.
	I probably shouldn't have sworn so early on in this episode.
	Have someone from the company come on and explain what Monetary Gold is as the sponsor.
	I'll ask the questions that everybody asks me and you can hear it from...
	The horse's mouth always seems like a bad expression.
	You can hear it from a representative's mouth.
	And I see someone in the backdrop.
	You give me the thumbs up if you're good to come in.
	All right.
	Nick is coming in, people.
	This is not going to be the whole episode.
	This is just...
	I'm asking the questions that I asked when I got on the phone to do my own due diligence.
	And I'm going to ask them live, in person.
	Sir, Nick, how goes the battle?
	I'm doing well, Harry.
	I don't mind the curse words at all, by the way.
	You don't have to tread lightly at all.
	Don't worry.
	I was thinking, do I start with something highly political or something comedic?
	And that was sort of middle ground.
	I was hoping you'd do the beginning because it just lightens the mood a little.
	So no, very happy to be here and thanks for having me on.
	Thank you very much for coming on.
	So you've sponsored...
	Monetary Gold is a sponsor of the channel.
	You don't have to sell anybody on the necessity of gold or the reliability of gold over time.
	The questions are that everybody asks me, you know...
	What makes monetary gold different?
	How is gold different than digital currency?
	How do you do it, practically speaking?
	How do you roll over your IRAs?
	Are there any penalties?
	Basic one-on-ones for anyone who's thinking of investing in gold.
	Great questions there.
	I'll touch on the first one.
	So as you're aware, there's probably a lot of companies out there.
	Our company, Monetary Gold, what we specialize in is just physical gold and silver to our clients.
	So no paper assets, ETFs, stocks, bonds, mutual funds, just physical.
	Gold and silver.
	And so the way that they can obtain that is through a coin or a bar and through an IRA or a non-IRA purchase.
	And then our company specifically, we've been doing it for 24 years now.
	So have national company.
	So deal nationwide compared to just a mom and pop shop or locally.
	And then something that really separates us.
	As we move into a society with technology, computers, phones, you probably see you can go online and buy gold and silver and do it for yourself, but you have no guidance.
	You have no one keeping you up to date on your portfolio or your holdings or buying and selling.
	So that's something that we provide our quarterly updates and just keep our clients abreast of what's going on in the market.
	So really just an interaction and a relationship more than just a one-time sale.
	Very cool.
	And the question was this also people often ask, minimum purchase.
	$10,000 for a physical purchase to be delivered to your front door, just because we've been in business 24 years.
	We also have no shipping and insurance fees, as well as no sales tax on the transaction, so it makes it very easy.
	And it said, back in the day, I once had a bad experience where I ordered something online, and first of all, insurance, shipping, you've got to wait, you've got to be there when it's delivered, although that's probably just a reality.
	But then when I opened, it was like, it had...
	Like little spots on it, like rusted red.
	And I thought, oh my God, I just got duped.
	And no, it turns out some gold can do that, but I didn't like the way it looked.
	And it was a bad first experience, but this is why I've ended up with monetary.
	So $10,000 right now buys about three and a half ounces?
	Correct. Yep.
	Three and a half ounces of gold.
	And then gold year to date is up 30%.
	Silver year to date, 33%.
	And then you can obtain physical coins or physical bars.
	So either option.
	And now for people who want to buy it but not necessarily own $10,000 worth of gold in their house, what sort of options are open there?
	So if you don't feel comfortable having it stored at your home, you can have it stored in a privately held and insured depository.
	They're third-party depositories, which are privately held and insured by Lloyds of London.
	And then there's also a company, a majority of folks have heard, Brinks.
	So you can have your metal stored there where you have your own privately held and insured depository box.
	Your name on it, safe, totally disconnected, safe from a bank, and privately held and insured.
	That's the main thing.
	All right, very cool.
	And now I just saw one of the questions I had never asked, actually.
	Gold, silver, do you do lithium?
	No, no lithium.
	No platinum?
	No, actually, no.
	Gold, silver, platinum, and palladium.
	Bricks, bars, coins, old, new, foreign, domestic.
	So tangible assets.
	Palladium. What's the market rate for an ounce of palladium?
	Palladium today is sitting roughly at, right now, $1,063 an ounce.
	So gold is the most expensive precious metal per ounce?
	It is.
	$2,692 an ounce.
	We're at an all-time high right now.
	That is...
	It's insane.
	All right.
	People always ask me about rolling over the IRA into it.
	People are concerned about penalties, not hidden fees, but things that they don't expect if they're doing it.
	How does that process work?
	So seamless with an IRA.
	Basically, you take your IRA that you currently have, and it's a paperwork process.
	You transfer a rollover.
	Whatever dollar amount you feel comfortable with into a precious metals IRA.
	And that's a tax-deferred, penalty-free process.
	And whatever dollar amount you decide to convert, it moves into physical gold and silver.
	Sits inside a depository box where it's accounted for.
	You have an online account, quarterly statement.
	So I always make it easy for everyone.
	And that's what it really is, gold and silver.
	It's very easy.
	It's just like any other retirement account.
	You have physical gold and silver as the investment.
	All right.
	And now, hypothetically, people decide they, at some point, want to sell the physical gold that they bought through monetary.
	Do they go back through monetary, or are they on their own for that?
	Go back to monetary.
	So we have a buyback program.
	Call us, and we'll do any buyback as far as gold, silver, platinum, and palladium inside an IRA, outside an IRA.
	We make it a very seamless process.
	Okay, that's amazing.
	And in order to get started, monetarygold.com.
	I don't know that there's a promo Viva for this, but it doesn't really matter.
	To get started, people just call, and there'll be a rep that picks up and gives them advice.
	Call directly, monetarygold, 888-411-GOLD, or 4653.
	Once again, 888-411.
	Gold or 4653.
	And you can call us directly and our representatives will help you if it's a physical purchase or if it's an IRA transaction.
	Get it done in 5-10 minutes.
	Very easy.
	And then the other question was this.
	What are the margins in terms of buying and selling back?
	I presume people are not doing this for a short overnight type thing.
	Are there costs?
	When you buy it back, it's at spot when you sell it as a premium or does it go the other way?
	No, you had it right.
	So when we sell the metals, there's a premium.
	And then when we buy it back, we don't charge any fees or commissions to liquidate.
	It's just the buyback for that asset, whether it's a coin or a bar, based off the price of spot on that day.
	Okay, very cool.
	And not that it matters anybody wants the queen or the king on their coins.
	The physical gold that you sell, can you pick any country or do you deal with certain countries in particular?
	Any origin.
	Like I said, old, new, foreign, domestic, anything.
	U.S. Mint, Canadian Mint, British Mint, whatever you may need.
	Very cool.
	I'm thinking of my...
	I have a bunch of silver coins from the early 60s in Canada.
	Actually, from the 40s to the 60s when the Canadian silver dollar was actually, what?
	Was it like half an ounce or three quarters of an ounce of silver back in the day?
	What about the US ones?
	Do you have any other half dollars like Kennedy's, Walking Liberties, anything of that nature?
	I don't think so.
	The one Kennedy that I have is not silver.
	I think it's the year after they went to Nickel or something.
	It doesn't feel quite as nice, but I just got to...
	A bag of highly scratched up old Canadian silver dollars.
	Very cool.
	And so have I forgotten anything, Nick?
	I think this answers every basic question that I've ever gotten and people have heard it in real time.
	I do like how you mentioned, you know, not sell gold and silver, just to kind of touch on just the main reasons why folks might want to do it, though, is just inflation.
	Diversification, that could mean they have too much money they feel sitting in the bank or sitting in the stock market.
	And it's a way to get around, or I should say, get away from the traditional stocks, bonds, mutual funds, paper investments.
	And then if we move into the digital dollar.
	Basically, to simplify that, we're kind of using a digital format now, right?
	We use pay-to-pay, you see person-to-person, credit cards, debit cards, checks.
	So the CBDC is a way for the Federal Reserve to centralize that.
	And so it affects our privacy.
	It also affects person-to-person.
	And then some of the other concerns that they have, if you have a bank run, it makes it easy.
	If everything's electronic, you could have a run on the bank.
	So gold and silver is just, once again, a way to separate you entirely from that.
	And now that you say that actually out loud, I have another question.
	You can buy in various increments, right?
	So you don't have to buy a one ounce.
	If you get like 10,000, you can get quarter ounces, tens of an ounce.
	Many different increments for gold and silver.
	Gold, one ounce, half ounce.
	Quarter of an ounce and tenth of an ounce and then silver.
	You can go all the way from one ounce bar all the way as high to a hundred ounce bar, a thousand ounce bar.
	So there's many options, bars and coins.
	And if you're the Menendez guy out of New York, is he New York or New Jersey?
	You can get with kilo bars and hide them in your fur coats in your closets.
	He was an expert.
	My goodness.
	One day, when I was a practicing lawyer, I once saw a very, very big diamond, like one of the biggest diamonds on earth.
	And I'm in a room with a bunch of people.
	I'm like, There are people on this earth who would kill everyone in this room to get that diamond.
	But I've never seen a kilo bar of gold.
	I don't know what that looks like, what it feels like.
	Maybe one day I'll come and...
	There's a good YouTube.
	I won't talk too much.
	You can go search.
	There's a gentleman down in Southern California, down in San Diego, where he has a Hershey bar, and then he has a brick of silver, a 10-ounce bar, and he asks him, which one do you want?
	You'd be surprised how many people picked the Hershey bar over the 10-ounce bar of silver.
	Oh, my goodness.
	And Nick, if I may ask, so if someone calls up Monetary Gold, they're not getting you.
	They're going to get a rep on the phone.
	Correct. They'll get a rep on the phone.
	We're a very seasoned company.
	Like I said, been here 24 years in the industry.
	So yes, they'll get a representative.
	And then we have an IRA team that handles all the paperwork, makes it a very easy process.
	And then even a non-IRA purchase, easy as well.
	All right.
	Amazing. Nick, Monetary Gold, thank you guys for sponsoring the channel.
	It's great to have this discussion viva voce with all of my audience.
	And now they know how they can protect their assets and cover their ass at the same time.
	Thanks for all the time.
	I appreciate it.
	All right, Nick.
	I'll talk to you soon.
	All right, nice day.
	Appreciate it.
	Bye now.
	Bye-bye.
	I like that.
	Cover your assets, although that's an old pun.
	That's fantastic.
	First of all, I love this because whenever I sign on with a new sponsor, I do these due diligences over the phone with them because I want to make sure I'm comfortable with everything and what separates one company from another.
	It can be subtle and it can be...
	It's fantastic.
	Monetary Gold, people.
	Thank you for sponsoring this episode.
	And now that I know that I'm unleashed to go full political...
	I will not swear.
	I'm going to swear at some point in this episode.
	Who here watched the debate last night?
	Holy hell.
	I know there were a lot of people because we watched it.
	I streamed it last night.
	This might be a little repetitive for some, but it's going to be worthy of going over once again.
	Let me just make sure actually that I'm live across all of the various platforms of the interwebs.
	Let's see here.
	Okay, we're good on Rumble.
	We are good on...
	VivaBornsLaw.locals.com.
	I'm getting the spinning wheel of death because I think I need to get a new computer.
	Cover Your Assets is also a card game.
	It's a lot of fun, says V. Loyalty.
	Okay, good.
	Done. King of Biltons in the house.
	All right, we're going to get started, people.
	So Don Lemon is a...
	I'm convinced he's a liar.
	And then I'm going to have to eat crow if he comes out with videos of black men that he interviewed saying, yeah, I'm voting for Trump because the government gave me a $2,000 stimulus check.
	When they ruined my life by locking me down, making me celebrate Christmas alone, mandating, compelling me to get a jibby jab.
	Um... Thank you.
	Hold on a second.
	I want to see this.
	Oh, Snap says, you nailed it, Viva.
	If the SHTF...
	Oh, the shit hits the fan.
	You want something worthwhile in your pocket.
	Well, thank you.
	And also...
	To the extent, you know, you don't always want to have a one ounce coin.
	You might want to, you know, cash something out and break it up into lesser increments.
	You know, if the poopoo, if the shit hits the fan and a loaf of bread goes up to $20, well, you can't give a one ounce coin and ask for change.
	So you might want to have some quarter ounce, tenth ounces.
	All right.
	Don Lemon is a liar.
	Period. Of course, everyone at CNN is a liar.
	Period. Lying through omission or lying through dishonest disjunctions is a lie.
	But he's not the only one.
	And this is what I was going to start the show with.
	Was... What's his face?
	Liar extraordinaire.
	Gavin Newsom.
	Who posts...
	It's deflect.
	It's always deflect in terms of getting away from Kamala Harris because they have no soundbites.
	I'm not going to start pulling the Gambino.
	Bongino. Soundbites and screenshots.
	Do you notice, by the way, any clip that anyone who says Kamala Harris performed well last night is sharing is truncated to 28 seconds?
	I mean...
	Oh, hold on.
	That just hurt.
	It is...
	They're so truncated because you cannot play 60 seconds consecutive of Kamala Harris talking last night and say that it's a bona fide W, that it makes her look good.
	You can't.
	I defy anybody to show me 60 seconds of Kamala talking last night that you can then definitively say most people would agree this makes her look good.
	You can't do it.
	And so what is it today, much like it was last night?
	Deflection, deflection, deflection.
	Ma Trump, ma Trump, ma Trump.
	What did RFK Jr. say during his press conference?
	Who needs policy when you have Trump to hate?
	Well, this is what Gavin Newsom's publishing today.
	And you'll notice something.
	Gavin Newsom is a POS liar.
	Piece of scum, by the way.
	I'm not saying piece of shit.
	That's rude.
	That's swearing.
	A piece of scum.
	He's a pawn scum.
	POS. Gavin Newsom says, Question.
	Could you explain your gun control policy to the parents of the victims of school shootings?
	Donald Trump.
	You need guns.
	You need them for entertainment, for sports, and other things.
	What a disgusting, soulless answer.
	Here, let me play it.
	Because you might be inclined to believe that was his answer.
	Thank you.
	With respect, could you explain your gun control policy to the parents of the victims of school shootings?
	I could.
	We have a Second Amendment and right to bear arms, essentially.
	And I'm very strongly an advocate of that.
	I think you need that.
	I think that if you ever tried to get rid of it, you wouldn't be able to do it.
	By the way, this is what you call a preface to an answer?
	Be able to take away the guns because people need that for security.
	They need it for entertainment and for sports and other things.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	What happened?
	I'm sorry.
	I was waiting for him to finish his answer, Gavin.
	They need that for security.
	They need it for entertainment and for sports and other things.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	Now, by the way, I haven't yet gotten the full answer.
	If anybody in our vivobornslaw.locals.com community can pull this town hall and the full answer, I didn't see it.
	I'd love to hear what Trump actually has to say.
	To answer that question.
	But you know what I think happened?
	Actually, I know what happened.
	There were more rolling blackouts in Gavin Newsom's failed California state.
	So he was screen recording it like I do off his phone.
	And then, crap, the power went out because Gavin Newsom, in addition to literally enacting policy that sets his state on fire, the rolling blackouts that also plague his state caused his phone to go dead.
	And he didn't get to finish Trump's answer, which is why...
	That's what he limited it to.
	Scumbag liars is what they are through and through.
	ha ha.
	What a great edit, says John John.
	Oh no, that's what we call a hard cut.
	Oh lordy, so it was deflection through and through last night, and it's going to be deflection through and through today.
	I did put out a small challenge here, and I like it.
	I think it's good.
	And I would like to...
	Here, let me bring this up here.
	Oh, Lord.
	I'll give everybody the tweet so we can tag people and say, show me where you think she won in this debate.
	I had to put out...
	And I'm going to needle Mark Cuban until he replies or until he blocks me or until he keeps ignoring me.
	I don't even think Mark Cuban knows who I am because I'm not Don Lemon.
	Anybody who sells Kamala Harris' interview with Bret Baier was anything but an abject disaster for her, can never be trusted again.
	Why? They're either stupid, compromised, or liars.
	Or a wonderful combination thereof.
	Consequences are the same.
	You can't trust them on a going-forward basis.
	Retweet and tag someone who you think deserves to see this.
	I'll start.
	Mark Cuban.
	I know that he says he wasn't in Diddy's farm or Diddy's apartment at Diddy parties.
	I know he didn't get any.
	I know he says he didn't do freak offs.
	And I have no doubt that I don't think he did.
	have something on Mark Cuban.
	It's either threat, extortion or bribery and promises.
	It's one or the other.
	Or they have naked pictures of Mark Cuban getting a freak off with P. Diddy and a bottle of oil.
	I'm joking because I don't think there's any good reason to believe that.
	But there is a good reason to not believe, to know that something is wrong with Mark Cuban in the head.
	He's either doing this out of extortion or he's doing this to buy favors for someone who, by all metrics, is going to get her ass handed to her in the next November 5th election.
	This is Mark Cuban, in all his wisdom.
	This man's a billionaire, by the way, so congratulations.
	Even mentally deficient idiots can become billionaires.
	The beautiful thing about the Bret Baier interview is that Kamala Harris understood and responded to each question.
	You know who said this?
	Jill Biden about Joe Biden.
	You answered all the questions!
	And what did Donald Trump do?
	He lied!
	I mean, Mark, congratulations.
	You are Kamala Harris's Jill Biden.
	Mark Cuban is to Kamala Harris what Jill Biden is to Joe Biden.
	Jill Biden was an elder abuser to Joe Biden, and Mark Cuban...
	I was going to quote Idiocracy, but I don't want to get cancelled for no good reason.
	I'll pick a good reason.
	Okay, she understood and responded to each question.
	She used examples of policies.
	What effing planet is this idiot living on?
	She gave real-world context.
	What? Oh, when I was a prosecutor, I prosecuted transnational gangs.
	Go listen to Harmeet Dillon's interview with Tucker Carlson to understand the dearth of professional experience that Kamala Harris had, even as a prosecutor.
	When Brett went hard after her, she didn't...
	First of all, work on your punctuation.
	When Brett went hard after her, she didn't call him names.
	She didn't quit the interview.
	She didn't make things up.
	She never once complained the questions were tough.
	She never played the victim card.
	She didn't lose her temper.
	You didn't watch the freaking debate.
	Or either that or you have been lobotomized, Mark.
	She didn't take bait to diminish or talk down to Trump supporters?
	She stood with him with full force and never backed down.
	He has been the president in campaigning for nine years.
	Kamala Harris has caught up to him in just a hundred days.
	That speaks volumes.
	It speaks volumes to you're absolutely mentally deficient.
	It's why people want to vote for her.
	That's why so many Republicans and independents are supporting her.
	Republicans like Dick Cheney and Liz Cheney and Jimmy...
	What's his name?
	Jimmy Carter?
	Is it Jimmy Carter?
	The man who's, you know, effectively, I'm not trying to make fun of anybody, is a breathing corpse that they probably put the pen in his hand like they did with that elderly lady that I played the video for yesterday.
	Sign on the line!
	You're voting for the first black woman, Jimmy!
	She is everything her opponent is not and will never be strong, smart, and measured.
	I want to make the funny joke like she's not going to sleep with you, Mark, but I don't think that's what, that's not what Mark's after with this idiotic pandering.
	But let's go and let's play some highlights, right?
	Her answering the questions on point.
	It was a masterclass in deflection.
	Trainwreck Kamala is trending today from what I've seen, but I've never looked at it just relying on what Jack Posobiec says.
	It might have been Cat Turd or Posobiec.
	Someone said Trainwreck Kamala is trending today.
	Listen to this.
	This is going to be a little repetitive, but I spliced in some funny memory into this.
	More than 70% of people tell the country is on the wrong track.
	They say the country is on the wrong track.
	If it's on the wrong track...
	That track follows three and a half years of you being vice president and President Biden being president.
	That is what they're saying, 79% of them.
	Why are they saying that?
	If you're turning the page, you've been in office for three and a half years.
	And Donald Trump has been running for office.
	But you've been the person holding the office.
	Come on.
	Do not come.
	Do not come.
	You and I both know what I'm talking about.
	You and I both know what I'm talking about.
	90% of the time, I have no idea what the fuck I'm talking about.
	More than 70% of people tell the country is on the rock for three and a half years.
	Listen to this.
	If you're turning the page, you've been in office for three and a half years.
	And Donald Trump has been running for office.
	But you've been the person holding the office.
	I mean, it's not a joke.
	It's the last act of despair of an idiot.
	Come on.
	Come on.
	You know what I'm talking about.
	She did it more than once last night.
	It's also a tactic of a narcissist manipulation to say, you know what I'm talking about.
	So I don't have to explain it anymore.
	Oh, my goodness.
	Now, this one might overlap, but I put together a montage, which we'll get to in a second.
	Okay, let's see this one here.
	Let's see what this one was.
	The best soundbite of the night.
	George Clooney said within a few minutes of talking to President Biden at a fundraiser that he thought this was not the same Joe Biden that we saw on the debate stage.
	Donald Trump is on the ballot.
	I understand.
	You met with him at least once a week for three and a half years.
	You didn't have any concerns?
	Look at that face.
	Donald Trump is on the ballot.
	Yeah. And so was Joe Biden.
	Until you stabbed him in the back.
	Joe Biden was on the ballot when you said he's good for another four years.
	Now answer the damn question.
	You spent three and a half years with him.
	You had no concerns for his mental acuity?
	Because if you did, you lied.
	If you exploited that mental acuity, you defrauded 14 million primary voters out of their vote.
	And now you want to accuse Trump of being the threat to democracy?
	What's the answer?
	Three and a half years.
	You didn't have any concerns?
	I think the American people have a concern about Donald Trump, which is why the people who know him best, including...
	General Milley, the traitor.
	I don't need to play the rest of this answer.
	You didn't have any concerns about...
	Joe Biden's mental acuity when you were selling him as good for another four years?
	I think the American people have concerns for Donald Trump.
	That is disqualifying.
	She is a liar.
	And by the way, that's another tactic.
	You can have your dishonest disjunction.
	It's either something that's true or something that's false.
	Not a lie.
	It's not a lie.
	You didn't have any concerns?
	I'm just going to go ahead and not answer that question.
	...
	week for three and a half years.
	You didn't have any concerns?
	I think the American people have a concern about Donald Trump, which is why the people who know him best...
	Disqualifying. The people who know him best.
	By the way, it's General Milley, who is one of the sources of the people who know him best.
	General Milley...
	Hold on.
	General... Forget the fact that he's a woke POS who talks about white rage or white fragility.
	I forget what it was.
	Hold on a second.
	White rage?
	Yeah, General Milley defends critical race theory.
	Look at this.
	You know who this guy is.
	This guy is an awful, awful human being.
	General Milley defends military studies of critical race theory.
	I want to understand white rage.
	You know who else General Milley is?
	Let's see if I can pull this one up real quickly.
	General Milley.
	China heads up.
	Hmm. General Milley says he wasn't trying to undermine Trump when he said he'd give China a heads up in the event that Trump were to order some form of attack.
	General Milley says he wasn't trying to undermine Trump in China call.
	He testified that he was not trying to, quote, usurp authority, end quote, when he told his Chinese counterpart he would warn China if the U.S. planned to attack them.
	That, get this out of here, No, thank you.
	This is what you call treason or sedition.
	I don't know if it's technically treason because I don't know if we're technically at war.
	Do we get to hear this guy?
	On the committee, with your permission, I'd like to address those for a minute or two.
	Again, I don't want to hear this ugly guy's voice.
	He wasn't trying to undermine Trump when he said that he would warn an enemy of an attack.
	Here, this would be one of those questions where it doesn't matter what the hell you thought you were trying to do.
	It just matters what you did.
	That's the General Milley.
	There's one more.
	There's one more from General Milley.
	If I'm not mistaken, General Milley is also the one who lied about, lied troops serious.
	That's not him as well?
	I'm not sure if that's General Milley, and I don't want to make a mistake, so if I do, I want to make it in real time and correct myself.
	Let's see it.
	Continue to cite.
	Outgoing Siri envoy admits hiding U.S. numbers.
	Let me see here.
	Millie. Oh, come on.
	Get out of here.
	Maybe it wasn't Millie.
	Might have been Miller.
	Was it Miller?
	We might explain why I got confused.
	Alright, so he wasn't the one who lied to Trump about the number of troops left in Syria.
	Forgive me.
	Although I think there might be some troops.
	Whatever. Doesn't matter.
	He was only the guy who's interested in understanding white rage, has taken the military woke, and agreed to give a heads up to a nuclear-armed enemy in the event that there was some form of attack ordered by the commander-in-chief.
	Yeah, that's the POS who is now telling Kamala and the world that Trump can't be trusted with the nuclear codes and Trump is the one who's unstable.
	Holy hell.
	Okay, okay.
	Millie set up the Jan 6 BS.
	That's from Howling Holf.
	That was him.
	Viva. Why are you putting my fake internet name in quotes?
	You all know my name is David Fryhead, right?
	That's no fact.
	It was.
	Okay, good.
	Millie for prison, then.
	Says, oh, snap.
	Yeah, so that's Kamala Harris disqualifying herself by not answering the question.
	Remember when Mark Cuban said that Kamala Harris never showed any disrespect for Trump supporters?
	Yeah, that's because she just shows disrespect for her own constituents.
	In the interview, who put this one up?
	This is from the GOP status.
	I mean, everybody, this was an obvious joke because everybody knew that it was going to be done.
	Oh, no, no, no, Brett.
	I would never call Americans stupid.
	I mean, 80% virtually say that we're on the wrong track because of you.
	50% are ready to vote for Trump, and it's going to be more than that.
	Are they wrong?
	Are they just stupid?
	Oh, no, no, Brett.
	I would never call Americans stupid.
	Oops! Roll the tape!
	Are they misguided, the 50%?
	Are they stupid?
	Oh, God, I would never say that about the American people.
	What else do we know about this population, 18 through 24?
	They are stupid.
	So are they misguided, the 50%?
	Are they stupid?
	Oh, God, I would never say that about...
	The American people?
	By the way, it's not a lie.
	Because she wouldn't say it about the American people at large.
	She'll only say it about certain demographics.
	Here, she's talking about young people.
	I remember it had to do with loans or something.
	And she...
	It's a funny joke.
	But you have a little bit of me thinks the woman doth protesteth too much on the left.
	I would never, never, never!
	No, no, no, no, no.
	Remember when Alec Baldwin?
	Would you ever pull the trigger?
	No, no, no, no, no.
	I would never do that.
	No, no, no, no, no, no.
	I would never do that.
	Oops! What else do we know about this population, 18 through 24?
	They are stupid.
	So are they misguided, the 50%?
	Okay, so that's some classic stuff right there.
	That's some classic stuff.
	And I'll just do one supercut montage, and then we're going to get into some other stuff, I think.
	Although, let me see here.
	Let me see.
	We're going to get into an update on the plagiarism story.
	Is this the one that I was doing here?
	I think I already played this one.
	Okay, you know what I'm talking about.
	I actually don't.
	Okay, we saw that one in another form or in one form or another.
	Let me bring up this one.
	These are the highlights, people.
	I mean, I'm sure we all watched it together last day and it was great.
	Kamala Harris is toast.
	Yeah, this one was a good one.
	This is some fun stuff.
	You have to take responsibility for your administration.
	Well, you know what?
	You've got to take responsibility for what happened in your administration.
	I'm Donald Trump, and I approve this message.
	I am proud to say that.
	When your ears buzz, when you hear certain things like, oh yeah, oh yeah.
	This is the Supercut.
	We're going to let it play.
	Enjoy it.
	Do I go get an energy drink while I do this?
	It's two minutes long?
	Yeah, this is the two-minute summary.
	I'll share it with everybody.
	So that you can go get this.
	But listen to this.
	And you know what I'm going to talk about right now.
	Yeah, but just a number.
	Do you think it's one million, three million?
	Let's just get to the point.
	Donald Trump, Donald Trump.
	So are you still in support of using taxpayer dollars to help prison inmates or detained illegal aliens to transition to another gender?
	I will follow the law.
	And it's a law that Donald Trump actually followed.
	Donald Trump's administration, Trump campaign.
	Will you support, as you're on record, transgender surgeries for inmates?
	I will follow the law.
	That wasn't what you said during that interview.
	Well, you know what?
	You've got to take responsibility for what happened in your administration.
	I think Donald Trump turning the page from the last decade in which we've been burdened with the kind of rhetoric coming from Donald Trump.
	You've been in office for three and a half years.
	And Donald Trump has been running for office.
	The former chief of staff to the president, Donald Trump.
	And in fact, if you listen to Donald Trump, if you watch any of his rallies, he's the one who tends to demean.
	He is unstable.
	He is unstable.
	He's not stable.
	Let me ask you this.
	You told many interviewers that Joe Biden is not on the ballot.
	I understand.
	And Donald Trump is...
	But you talked about it in a few minutes of talking to President Biden on the debate stage.
	Donald Trump is on the ballot.
	I understand.
	You met with him at least once a week for three and a half years.
	You didn't have any concerns?
	I think the American people have a concern about Donald Trump.
	Critics just say that you either relaxed or failed to enforce sanctions on Iran, allowing...
	All of this money to flow into Iran.
	Let's go back to Donald Trump.
	Not to mention how Donald Trump has treated and talked about America's military and military service people calling them suckers and losers.
	Madam Vice President, they're wrapping me very hard here.
	I hope you got to say what you wanted to say about Donald Trump.
	There are a lot of things.
	There's more to say.
	I have much more to say.
	Madam Vice President, they're giving me a hard wrap here.
	Well, I thank you for the time.
	I thank you for the time.
	It's good to meet you.
	Thank you very much.
	No, it's not.
	They're giving me a hard rap.
	Do you understand what happened there, by the way?
	I mean, Brett Baer talked about it afterwards in the analysis and there's a video clip of him going around explaining they were ending that train wreck.
	They're like, it's like, you know, when you see a car that's getting ready to drive off a cliff and you're like, stop.
	They were hard wrapping him out of there because that was an abject disaster.
	And after...
	I don't know how long it lasted for.
	I don't think there was much editing to that.
	First of all, apparently she showed up late.
	Unconfirmed, or at least unconfirmed to me, but that's what I had read online.
	And getting a hard rap, like, okay, this is over.
	I want to cue the Simpsons clip.
	Stop, stop.
	He's already dead.
	They're like, get this, end this.
	End this disaster, and let's do damage control today.
	Let's get the Mark Cubans out there to...
	Let's get the Mark Cubans out there to do damage control.
	That other kid there, Harry J. Sisson.
	Oh, she's such a woman.
	She stood up to that big, bad...
	First of all, freaking Bret Bares.
	Was he chiseled out of stone?
	I mean, that guy's got a...
	That guy's got a Greek god chiseled mansion.
	He's the Giga Chad face that you see on the internet.
	Okay, that was it.
	You need more nasal when imitating Kamala.
	Love your channel, says Scarlet Rose.
	Her voice turns my...
	And she gets it when she starts really, really like, you want to talk like that?
	You want to get Trump elected?
	Then keep saying it!
	By the way, just not that it's indicative of everything, but it's indicative of a lot.
	I am now, percentage-wise is the only thing that really matters, if I can get this going here.
	Percentage-wise now, my investment is up 26%.
	On my predictions of what's going to happen.
	So I've placed a number of bets on predicted just in terms of states and presidency and whatever.
	If Biden resigns before the transfer of power date, I forget what it is, January, Jan 5 or Jan 6. If he resigns, I'll be dancing.
	That's the long shot now that I'm hoping to be right on.
	I think he is resigning.
	Okay, now hear me out.
	I'll say this in real time and you'll flesh this out.
	I do believe he's going to resign.
	I believe he's going to resign because he is angry at Kamala Harris.
	And if that's the case, then he can't resign before pardoning Hunter and himself preemptively.
	He can't do it without having done that because he will not be able to rely on Kamala Harris to pardon Hunter.
	So how does it play out?
	I don't want to be accused of motivated reasoning.
	That is a collision that I have to work out in my head.
	Does he pardon himself, his son, and Trump before resigning?
	And if he does it, does he do it before or after the election?
	Inauguration day is January 20th.
	Okay, so it's got to be done before January 20th.
	And the way predicted has described that, he has to resign.
	I don't think passing away would qualify.
	It has to be done.
	He has to resign and leave office before January 20th or transfer power date.
	So if he resigns because he wants to passive-aggressively stab Kamala in the back or leave his ruins as her legacy, he can't rely on her to pardon Hunter Biden.
	So he's got to do it himself before he resigns.
	And that might be one heck of a way to do it.
	He will be the unifier.
	Joe, if you're listening, I just played it out of my head.
	This is how it works.
	He gets some sort of diagnosis, because remember he said, I'll withdraw if I get some sort of medical diagnosis.
	He'll say, I've just got some medical diagnosis.
	I've got to withdraw.
	I am going to be the unifier of a president by preemptively pardoning, not just Hunter, okay, fine, but by preemptively pardoning himself and pardoning Trump.
	Let's unify, and not only are we going to unify through this pardon of Trump, preemptive pardon of myself, just to be fair, and all other presidents, and his son.
	I'm going to give you, America, your first woman president.
	Kamala, enjoy the last two months of my presidency.
	That's how he can do it.
	By passive-aggressively stabbing her in the back while making himself look like the hero and the unifier while doing it.
	Clip it!
	That's what's going to happen.
	That's actually, that's how it plays out.
	Okay. Let me see what's going on here.
	I just saw a super chat.
	Enter the chat.
	The Georgia-Fulton County election ruling proves Democrats, with the assistance of Democrat judges, will steal the election again, not if it's too big to cheat, if it beats the cheat.
	I'm going to look at that ruling.
	So the ruling coming out of Georgia is that they are not going to impose new rules as relates to a hand count at this stage because it would be impossible to implement those rules and train the...
	How many election workers did they say they have?
	I think it was 7,500.
	So the ruling basically said, look, these are new rules for hand counting.
	There's not enough time to implement them and train all of the poll workers.
	So we can't do it at this last minute.
	Maybe we'll do it for another election in the future.
	And in which case, I can sort of understand it, because what the ruling said was, as far as the new regulation, there were a bunch of additional requirements.
	Hand counting.
	They had to divide all of the ballots up, open up the machines after they're counted, stack them into stacks of 75, hand count them, and make sure that the count is accurate to a ballot to what the machine says, which makes sense.
	And the judge says, look, that can't be done in such a short period of time.
	You can't train all these poll workers to do it.
	It's going to create havoc at the ballot box if they count them up and someone misses one here, misses one there.
	They fall on the ground.
	You pull a little scene out of election with...
	Matthew Broderick and that other one, Reese Witherspoon, where you crumple one up and chuck it in the garbage.
	I can understand that.
	It begs the question as to why a manual hand count was not required from the get-go.
	But, enjoyer, do not doom pill.
	Beat the cheat and make it beyond the margins.
	And I think you take 10 people and make sure those 10 people take 10 people.
	I don't make the vote early and vote often joke because that's an actual crime.
	But vote before Election Day and make sure that you get friends and family to go out.
	Don't tell them who to vote for.
	Everybody already knows.
	Just make sure they get out there and do it.
	Okay. Hold on.
	I just saw something here.
	Election was the name of that movie, if I recall.
	What did I say?
	I said Election, right?
	I didn't say anything.
	It's a good movie, in retrospect.
	Wildly inappropriate.
	Depicting relationships between teachers and students that are illegal.
	Hmm. Now that I say that out loud, let me just go see if we've heard anything from the story that was supposed to be the October Surprise.
	Mm-hmm.
	There has been no update posts from black insurrectionist iFollowBackTruePatriots at DocNetYouTube.
	Some people were telling me that he's been suspended for three days, and we'll see about that.
	Okay. What else?
	Because we've got something else.
	In fact, this was supposed to segue into something else as relates to Kamala.
	Oh yeah, that's right.
	Plagiarism! We talked about it the other day.
	And this is also just another thing.
	Everybody hates lawyers.
	99% of the time, they have a good reason to hate that lawyer.
	There's the old expression, you know, 90% of the lawyers give the other 10% a bad reputation.
	And they're right.
	And when it comes to fact checkers, it's also the case.
	Now, I consider myself to be one of the good lawyers, former lawyers, because I no longer practice.
	And I also know that I am one of the good fact checkers, because if you do not have your integrity, you have nothing.
	And if I make a mistake, it's not a question of doubling down on my mistake so that I can...
	Assert being right.
	When everyone knows that you're wrong, it doesn't make a difference if you assert being right.
	Christopher Ruffo.
	Just to refresh everybody's memory here.
	Talked about this earlier in the week.
	Christopher Ruffo broke the story like he did with Claudine Gay, I believe.
	And if he didn't break it, correct me.
	Everybody deserves the credit for actually digging down and finding this stuff.
	I believe Chris Ruffo broke the story about Kamala Harris's not alleged plagiarism, definitive, confirmed, demonstrable plagiarism in her book, Soft on Crime.
	Smart on crime.
	I'll just go down the reed here.
	I brought this up and we showed the actual plagiarism.
	Kamala Harris writes, High Point had its first face-to-face meeting with drug dealers from the city's West End neighborhood on May 18, 2024.
	The drug market shut down immediately and permanently.
	I'm not even going to go on.
	It's verbatim.
	I actually can't find where the...
	Oh, maybe she spelt percent instead of use the symbol.
	It's verbatim.
	Okay? And then there's a second one.
	So there were many, many passages of plagiarism.
	And then when the New York Times runs their fact check to downplay the plagiarism and say it's nothing serious, our plagiarism experts said it's nothing serious.
	This is what they said.
	The Times claimed that I only argued that Kamala had plagiarized five sections, quote, involving, quote, 500 words, about 500 words.
	This isn't true.
	In my story, I wrote that Stefan Weber, This is what Chris
	Ruffo wrote.
	Give me the date, please.
	October 14, three days ago.
	Okay, well, I'm just paying attention to the news.
	I came across an article in faux news, and as much as I hate them, every now and again, they put out useful information.
	There we go.
	The headline is, New York Times plagiarism consultant admits Harris' scandal, quote, more serious, end quote, than what he thought.
	Because you know what happens.
	I mean, this guy...
	You know, Chris Rufo seemed to be giving him the benefit of the doubt.
	I actually think that he was misled by the New York Times, but that's what happens when you trust scoundrels and liars.
	Oh, you're scoundrels, you're liars.
	You systematically cheat, lie, and you've done it for about 100 years.
	Read The Grey Lady Wink by Ashley Rinsberg.
	Why would you think they'd be honest with you now?
	You, Mr. Plagiarism Expert, what's his name?
	What's his name?
	Well, we'll get to it in a second.
	You, sir.
	We're used as a tool by lying scumbag scoundrels at the New York Times.
	Congratulations. How does it feel?
	I'm still voting Kamala!
	New York Times plagiarism consultant Jonathan Bailey released his, quote, full analysis, end quote, of the allegations against Vice President Kamala Harris and found them, quote, more serious, end quote, than he initially believed.
	Quote, at the time, I was unaware of the full dossier with additional allegations, which led some to accuse the New York Times of withholding that information from me.
	However, the article clearly stated that it was my initial, first of all, They withheld it from you.
	Second of all, much of an expert you are.
	You didn't think to ask for it.
	Or you didn't want to ask for it.
	Or you trusted liars and scumbags and congratulations.
	What did you learn?
	Today I reviewed the complete dossier prepared by Stephen Weber.
	Apparently you had it at the time.
	Weber. Weber.
	Whom I have covered before.
	I also formed a peer review of one of his papers in 2018.
	Quote, with this new information, while I believe this case is more serious than I commented to the New York Times, the overarching points remain.
	While there are problems with this work, that is to say her plagiarism, the pattern points to sloppy writing habits, not a malicious intent to defraud.
	End quote, he added.
	Sloppy writing habits.
	Isn't that like effectively what they said about Hillary Clinton?
	Oh yeah, she just didn't know how to keep classified information off her private server at her home.
	It's just sloppy.
	It's sloppy work.
	Coming from...
	A woman now who wants to be president of the United States, much like the other time, a woman who also wanted to become president of the United States.
	If you want to talk about setting women's rights back 100 years, these are the two women you run to be the first women ever to hold the presidency.
	A corrupt liar with a body bag and not in the sexual sense that has made its way to Wikipedia, or another one, a corrupt liar with a body bag that has made a body count that has made its way to Wikipedia.
	You pull the worst examples of females who have ascended to the rungs of power, and then you prop them up as representing women's rights.
	That's how you set things back.
	That's how you make people look and say, holy cows, did she earn it?
	Or did she kill her way to the top?
	Did she earn it?
	Or did she sleep her way to the top?
	I hurt my leg.
	Let's God punish me for making mean jokes.
	Now, what I was going to say, I wanted to bring this back in for a second, because you've got to highlight the wordsmithing of the devil here.
	With this new information, I do not reassess and I reiterate my initial conclusion.
	It was just sloppy writing habits.
	Just sloppy.
	Not malicious intent to defraud.
	Do you understand what that means right there, by the way?
	How many qualifiers do you need in a statement?
	That's three qualifiers.
	To determine if something is plagiarism.
	So, if something is plagiarism, it has to be, I guess, intent to defraud?
	No, that's right.
	It has to defraud somebody.
	It has to have been done with the intent to defraud them.
	So, plagiarism, according to this idiot expert.
	What's his name?
	Bailey. Plagiarism requires fraud.
	A, I'm not sure that that's the case because you can have accidental plagiarism or you can have oversight plagiarism.
	But let's just say, he says it's got to be fraud.
	You have to have done it not with the intent to defraud, but not just that, everybody.
	In order for this to be bonafide plagiarism, it has to be done with malicious intent to defraud.
	Three bullshit qualifiers that have never in any sane realm of the universe applied to plagiarism.
	You could do it by accident because you didn't even know that you were doing it, and it would still be a problem.
	You could do it not because you want to defraud anybody.
	But because you want to wrongly build yourself up.
	You could do it with the intent of the fraud, according to this guy, but so long as it's not a malicious intent, it's still not plagiarism.
	Bailey, congratulations.
	I don't know how long you've worked to be known as a plagiarism expert, but in one short minute, in one act, you have destroyed any credibility you might have ever had.
	And congrats, you now are the useful idiot for the New York Times.
	Link. Malicious intent to defraud in order for it to be plagiarism?
	Kiss my grits.
	I went to university.
	You don't properly source.
	And you could just because you're tired and lazy or you didn't think you needed to cite Wikipedia.
	You're getting accused of and probably sanctioned for plagiarism.
	But your honor, sir, professor, I didn't do it with the malicious intent to defraud.
	I'm off, scot-free.
	Now I can be president.
	Okay, that was fantastic.
	Oh, no, the fact checkers.
	We talked about this one yesterday.
	I'll just bring that out of the back here.
	Let me see what else I got.
	We're going to get to another one.
	Another story.
	People, you know, I get DMs.
	Do we want to do the fact check?
	Yeah, let's do that.
	Speaking of lying fact checkers.
	I'm trying to find any tweet.
	I know that I've had some tweets where I said, you know, it's nice that you're talking about how the FBI says that crime is down.
	It wasn't there that issue of like...
	Two of the biggest cities changing how they reported crime.
	Two of the biggest cities with the most crime failed to report.
	And so, obviously, you're getting flawed, skewed statistics that indicated...
	By the way...
	No, no, I'm getting it, Fox Fox.
	No, it's like, remember when people said, dude, crime is not down.
	Well, technically, the statistics say they are, so I don't trust your own experience of old ladies getting punched in the face in New York randomly.
	Crime is down.
	The stats say it is, so your observation is wrong.
	That's called gaslighting.
	And at the time, people who knew better, I wasn't among the originals because people informed me of this.
	It's like the great thing.
	I just get smarter because of the access to aggregate knowledge that I have through the network.
	People are like, no, they're not counting stats properly.
	They're wildly skewed.
	They've changed how they register them.
	And people are not reporting crimes anymore.
	No, no.
	So crime has gone down and...
	Don't believe your lying eyes.
	Okay. And then the Biden administration comes out there, like with their job numbers, remember?
	Oh, job numbers.
	Oh, we have to revise them down.
	818,000 jobs revised down.
	Well, they did the same thing with the crime, except they went the other way.
	FBI quietly updates crime data to show big jump in violence under Biden-Harris admin.
	Shocking! A 2.1% drop in violent crimes in 2022 has now been revised to a 4.5% increase.
	Crime and data expert John Lott.
	Remember they said, oh yeah, the job numbers are fantastic.
	Let's ride with that.
	Let's get the soundbites.
	No, it's like six months later?
	Oh yeah, we've got to revise those down.
	About a million.
	Just a cool million jobs that you overstated.
	But you already got the headlines, the beneficial headline.
	Oh yeah, remember when you got the beneficial headlines for a crime being down eight months later?
	No, this is two years later.
	Yeah, so those were actually a lot higher.
	And it's shocking.
	But, you know, the damage is done.
	You've been lied to, manipulated, and you've played American people for your useful idiots to buy into your propaganda for those who still believe what the government tells them.
	FBI quietly updated its 2022 crime data to show an increase in violent crimes despite previous data showing violent crimes had fallen in the year, which was touted as a victory for the Biden-Harris administration.
	Quote, for some reason, the media, they did pick the crime data.
	Hold on.
	For some reason, the media, they did pick the crime data that they think goes and makes the Democrats look as good as possible.
	And then even when the crime data that they've relied on turns out to be the very source of the data to be wrong, none of them fix it.
	John Lott.
	Lott. That's a good name.
	The founder of President Crime and Prevention, yada, yada, told Fox News.
	FBI released data in its annual Crime and Nation data for 2022.
	Found a 2.1% decrease in violent crimes compared to 2021.
	The data was lotted by Democrats and the media as a turning point for crime.
	Okay, then what happened?
	Now the data reflects an increase of 80,000 violent crimes in 2022 over 2021.
	Lott found that that umbrella, Lott found that under the umbrella of violent crimes, there were an additional 1,699 murders, 70 rapes, 35,000 robberies.
	Looking good.
	To give people the idea of the size of the change, when 2022 data came out in September 2023, they initially reported that violent crime had fallen by 2.1%.
	That's the final data, supposedly.
	The revision of that final data.
	How do you revise final data?
	Isn't that something of an oxymoron?
	What's the word?
	A contradiction in terms.
	Like a jumbo shrimp, a flat mountain.
	Yeah, I'm going to revise the final data.
	It wasn't final then, jackass!
	When they revised the final data that came out last month, now they claim that rather than a 2.1% drop, there was actually a 4.5% increase.
	Oh, you mean my lying eyes were not lying?
	And when you told me to not trust my lying eyes, you were lying.
	Amazing. Oh, I wasn't lying.
	I was just relying on the data.
	That's how it works.
	It's from a drop to an increase.
	Okay, fine.
	I think we got it.
	But you should really trust the government now.
	You should really trust Kamala now.
	You've got to take responsibility for your administration.
	Right, Kamala?
	I'm Donald Trump, and I approve this message.
	Anyways, also, numbers can be manipulated any way you want to reflect your bias.
	To some extent, it's true, but not entirely.
	Not to the point of doom-pilling, because numbers are numbers.
	That's why I don't trust the polls, because you can exclude the results that you don't want through a little...
	But ultimately, honest numbers don't lie.
	But it's tough to get to the honest numbers.
	One thing that doesn't lie is king of Biltong, people.
	Biltong is one of the most protein-dense foods.
	This isn't the sponsor.
	I'm just reading a Rumble rant, and I love this stuff.
	It's in my fridge, and it's delicious.
	Biltong is one of the most protein-dense foods in the world.
	Packed with B12, zinc, iron, creatine, and more.
	Need a healthy snack?
	Get yours at BiltongUSA.
	Viva10. BiltongUSA.com.
	Viva10 for 10% off.
	It's delicious, people.
	It's objectively...
	Hold on, hold on.
	Is it?
	No, it's this way.
	I'm like, my hand is like this.
	Inception, people.
	It's objectively delicious.
	Ouch, sorry.
	Lies, lies.
	It's lies, damn lies, and statistics.
	I forget who said that.
	I used that a number of times for my closing outro quotes.
	So that's it.
	Yeah, crime is up.
	And when you were told that it wasn't, you were being lied to.
	Much like other stuff.
	Safe and effective.
	Doesn't cause myocarditis.
	Doesn't interfere with women's menstrual cycles.
	It's not turbo cancer, people.
	It's just aggressive cancer.
	And it's not caused by that.
	It's caused by people.
	It's caused by energy drinks.
	Now, this one is not bad.
	This is called Gorgie.
	This is not a sponsor.
	It's got no aspartame, no erythritol, and no sucralose.
	It does have, I want to say steviol extract, which I've asked Barnes.
	Where is it?
	The sweetener in this is...
	Come on, Vivo, with your grandpa eyes.
	What's my problem here?
	I know that I saw it.
	Tea, vegetable juice.
	Yeah, steviol glycoside.
	So it's got stevia extract in it, which Barnes says it's good.
	And from everything that I've read, it's less bad than everything else.
	I'm putting this out here.
	I've DMed people.
	I want to put my name on an energy drink, and I want to make my own energy drink.
	It doesn't need to be sugar-free.
	It just needs to have a quarter of the sugar that's put into a Red Bull, for example.
	If you've taken a Red Bull and you've diluted it with carbonated water 50-50, it's still too sweet.
	A quarter of the sugar to a reasonable amount, 150 milligrams of caffeine, carbonated, and good for you.
	Made with cane sugar.
	I will find a company to partner with, and I'm going to make Viva...
	Viva flies.
	I don't think I can...
	I'll get sued by it.
	Don't drink it.
	There's nothing wrong with energy drinks if you don't get, like, the Celsius, which has...
	What's it called?
	It's called a synthetic caffeine, but I never realized how bad it was.
	Red Bull, I've read some stuff about, but you're almost better with more sugar than sucralose, aspartame, and some of the fake sugars.
	Hunter's crimes alone changed the data.
	That's not bad.
	Alright, so that's that.
	What else do we have here in the backdrop to talk about?
	Before we go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com for our after party.
	Alright, this is one where I was getting DMs.
	I was getting messages.
	Viva, holy hell, did you hear that the government has just authorized the use of lethal force on the civilian population?
	And it's crazy.
	Check it out.
	They're getting ready to declare martial law.
	In light of the upcoming election, which they might very well be.
	Okay, so I get the DMs, I get the messages, I see the videos.
	People send me the links and I watch them.
	When you're starting from a subject about which you know nothing, then you have to say like, holy crap, I'm not even sure I know what questions to ask.
	As it goes, the theory is that the government has recently changed a certain directive that now authorizes the military to use lethal force on...
	The civilian population.
	And this is the allegedly new directive coming from the...
	The links were legit, so this is straight up on a government website.
	It's an official website.
	And it says, the Secretary of Defense approval.
	The Secretary of Defense may approve any type of requested permissible assistance described in paragraph 3.2.
	And then you go down to the decision to approve requests for these types as permissible described in paragraph 3.2.
	Okay, fine.
	And then the one that everyone's freaking out about is this one that says, C, assistance in responding with assets with potential for lethality or any situation in which it is reasonably foreseeable that providing the requested assistance may involve the use of lethal force that is likely to result in lethal force, including death or serious bodily injury.
	It includes all support to civilian law enforcement officials in situations where confrontation between civilian law enforcement and civilian individuals or groups is reasonably anticipated.
	Okay. We're going to get back to that in a second.
	So people are flipping out and like, holy cows, the...
	Ironically enough, while Kamala Harris is saying that Trump will use the military against civilians, it seems that they're doing that themselves.
	Okay. My first question when reading this is, first of all, I thought the government always has the right...
	Not the right, sorry.
	Take that back.
	I thought the government had always empowered itself with a purported right to use lethal force on anyone as the circumstances are needed.
	Now, people are saying, yes, you know, police can use lethal force depending on the circumstances, but that's not the military on American civilians.
	Okay. Here's the anecdotes.
	Coming out of Quebec during COVID, and everyone's like, there was a story that started circulating.
	The Quebec government, in the dead of the night, passed a law that authorizes compelled vaccination of the general population.
	Okay. And I go read the legislation.
	I was like, holy shit, that's what it says.
	And people don't really fully appreciate how to read legislation.
	Under the legislation, they always have these, like, the dates it was enacted, amended, etc., etc.
	People did not know that that law was actually on the books already in Quebec for two decades, since the early 2000s.
	And so when people discover something new, the immediate reflex is to think it is new.
	And when people realize, oh, no, it's not new.
	It's been decades in the making that the government has been chiseling away at our rights.
	Then like, oh, shit.
	It's been bad for a long time.
	And so the fake news story goes around.
	They just did it overnight.
	Look at what the government's doing.
	Bad, bad, bad.
	People run with that story.
	They get discredited because it's not true.
	That law had been on the books for 20 damn years in Quebec.
	And it had.
	Much like when people said, oh my god, they could lock us in our homes if they just designate us as a sick person or a vector of disease.
	I mean, nobody knew we had a quarantine act in Canada.
	A federal quarantine act.
	That could authorize the mass lockdown of areas.
	Now, people argue over whether or not it required infection versus vectors, but the bottom line, these laws existed, but when people discover them for the first time, they think they're new, and they think the government's trying to pull a fast one overnight, but they've been pulling a fast one over time.
	And that was the question that I had with this.
	So I just go and look back and it's from what I can see, and I admit, I don't know the context of these directives.
	It seems that there had always been, or at least for an extended period of time, this type of verbiage in the directives from the Department of Defense, except for immediate response and emergency authority as described in paragraph whatever.
	This one is from 2018, if I'm not mistaken.
	And I don't know if this is under a different circumstance.
	There was another one from...
	This is the Department of Defense internal report, where it said the Secretary of Defense...
	The SECDEF is the approval authority for requests for directed assistance in support of civilian law enforcement agencies, including responding with assets that have the potential for lethality.
	This includes situations with confrontation between civilian law enforcement and civilian individual groups is anticipated.
	And this also was from well before the new directive.
	I just now forget what the date was on this.
	I put it in the tweet.
	And so, look, and not for nothing, Robert Barnes, who I rely on.
	Trust. And has not steered me wrong in our VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com community during one of his wildly awesome bourbon with Barnes.
	I think it was either yesterday or the day before.
	He said, yeah, this was a misunderstanding.
	This type of phrasing has been on the books for a long time.
	It's nothing new.
	It's not like the Biden administration is declaring war on the citizens in any more overt terms than they have been over the last several years.
	So that's my understanding of it.
	And if I'm wrong...
	I want to be corrected, and I will very much correct myself, but I put out a tweet.
	I went to our locals community, shared my thinking, and apparently it's correct.
	It's accurate.
	This has been in a very similar phraseology on the books for a long time.
	What was the name of the principle?
	I saw it in the chat here.
	The principle of chiseling away at drugs, at rights, over time.
	I forget.
	Someone's going to tell us what that...
	Term was.
	Hold on a second.
	Dog wants to leave.
	Oh lordy.
	Go. Okay, so that's it.
	Boiling the frog is not the term.
	No, it's an actual economic principle.
	Come on, someone's going to get it.
	I'm going to go to locals and see.
	What's the term, guys?
	What's the term?
	Someone shared it maybe even in the tweet.
	Incrementalism is not the term territory or is that territory?
	No, it's like named after a guy.
	It's not incrementalism.
	Hold on.
	Someone's going to get it first here.
	It was named after a guy who slippery slope is not it, erosion is not it.
	All right, hold on.
	Now I'm irritated.
	Let me go over here.
	I'm going to go back to my Twitter feed.
	I know it was in the response to the tweet.
	Okay, here we go.
	Anybody who says Harris is an idiot?
	Okay, that's what I hear.
	All right.
	It is called...
	Someone had the name for it.
	Give me a second, because it's...
	Yeah, people are saying it's Ron Paul who misunderstood it.
	It doesn't matter.
	I mean, it happens.
	I mean, it happens.
	Oh, come on.
	Well, I'm not going to find it fast enough.
	Potential lethality.
	All right, Cripe, I can't find it.
	It was named after a guy.
	The incremental...
	Cloward Piven, here we go.
	If that's not it, that's at least the word I was thinking of.
	The incremental erosion of rights that happens so slowly that you...
	Here we go.
	The Cloward Piven strategy.
	We're all going to learn together here, people.
	Bada bing, bada boom.
	Is the political strategy outlined in a 1996 by American sociologist...
	Well, can we get the definition of it?
	It's a political strategy outlined...
	Okay, can we get the definition of it?
	It's a political strategy...
	The strategy aims to utilize, quote, militant anti-poverty groups, end quote, to facilitate, quote, political crisis, end quote, by overloading the welfare system via an increase of welfare claims, forcing the creation of...
	Okay, well, that's not the term for the phenomenon.
	That's just an interesting new one.
	I'm going to have to go look into that.
	And now that's it.
	That's my understanding.
	I don't think I'm wrong.
	And if I am, I want to know.
	So that is all.
	Let me bring this up here.
	Let us go over to the chat, people.
	What do we get here?
	Just voted in North Carolina.
	Line around the building.
	So many people were talking in support of Trump.
	Still so nervous, though.
	Dems will try to steal C minor opus 67. I'm trying to think.
	I live in Florida, so statistically, you expect to see more Republicans.
	I haven't seen anybody.
	Even people who say they don't like Trump are still voting for Trump.
	Enjoyer says, the Georgia-Fulton County election rule proves it.
	Okay, Democrat, I got to that one.
	You need more nasal, I got to that one.
	Now, let's go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com and we've got Rhett PSO.
	Says, Viva, Barnes, evildoers?
	How else can withheld knowledge of this be explained?
	Info supports the author on X, Ethical Skeptic, his work on excess deaths post-COVID-19 vax.
	I replied to you, I'm going to have a look at that later.
	And then Gantet says, revising final data doesn't mean the data is wrong.
	They get the information from state agencies in regards to NIBRF, I don't know what that is, National Institute for BRS.
	Federal Institute for BRS data or are not approved.
	Many states, including Florida, have been updating their reporting to the FBI via news systems, methods, etc.
	Doesn't mean the FBI isn't lying at all, but that information gets corrected, updated constantly.
	Well, no, but you can't...
	Look, the bottom line is if you're off, if you're wrong on a net swing in the opposite direction...
	You don't get to say that we're just revising.
	It was wrong.
	It was misleading.
	And most importantly, it was being touted as a political victory to the people who are actually politically responsible for the exact inverse.
	So there's that.
	Oh, I forgot.
	I'm using StreamYard today, so I didn't see this here.
	Hold on.
	I use StreamYard with a guest, and I want to make sure that they don't accidentally pop up onto the screen with a before coming up.
	We got Biltong.
	I got that.
	Cultivated Mind.
	Hey, Viva, just checking.
	In because your energy drink comments, did you ever get a chance to try radiant energy mushroom extract?
	I have to go check.
	I know that I did.
	I tried one energy drink that was made with mushrooms.
	It seems healthier, but it really tasted like old wine that's been left out on the table for a couple of days and the alcohol is no longer in it, but it tastes like wine.
	Ouch. I'll have to go double check if I try the radiant energy mushroom.
	And we got Cultivated Mind says, the active ingredient Cordyceps M doesn't have caffeine.
	It produces adenosine trisopoate, your body natural energy molecule, no sugar either.
	Oh, that's the drink.
	I don't care about sugar in reasonable doses.
	When you look at a monster energy drink and it's got...
	55 grams of sugar?
	And I go show my kid what 55 grams of sugar looks like.
	It's crazy!
	And then the thing that pisses me off, I got another drink yesterday.
	It's not on the table.
	It says, oh, 40 calories a drink.
	And I'm looking for sucralose in it.
	And I'm drinking it.
	It's like, this tastes very sweet.
	But fake sweet.
	I was like, I don't want things to taste that sweet.
	Like 40 calories and sucralose?
	Just give me 40 calories.
	The one thing that I found that seems to be good, and tell me if I'm wrong, liquid death.
	Seems to be wrong.
	This can's got 30 milligrams of caffeine.
	It's got 30 calories.
	And it's nothing but...
	You're seeing a neurotic person here.
	It's got nothing but water, agave, nectar, black tea, citric acid, natural flavor, peridone, priodoxine, hydroxychloroquine, whatever that, B6 and B12.
	That's it.
	Just makes me pee like a racehorse because it's a big can.
	All right.
	Do I have anything else in the backdrop here?
	Once we start talking pee, it's time to wind things up.
	Kamala Harris.
	Hope he's okay.
	I got that from yesterday.
	Anybody who says Kamala won?
	And I got the DOD directors.
	No, so we did everything here, people.
	I reserve the right to be wrong.
	I'm going to go read up on that afterwards.
	Oh, sorry.
	I'll bring this up in locals afterwards because I don't think it's a true story.
	We'll read it in real time.
	It involves, allegedly, there's allegations.
	Let me see if I can find this anywhere on Google.
	Not from a reputable site, but just at least somewhere.
	Oprah. Oprah Bieber video.
	Let's see if this comes up anywhere else.
	What did Oprah do to...
	Oh, that's on TikTok, so not reliable.
	So I don't see this being reported anywhere.
	I think those three words Ooh you.
	I did just find something.
	Justin Bieber's father-in-law raves about P. Diddy parties and unearthed videos.
	Alright, we got our talking stuff for the after party on VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com Alright, people.
	I got the spinning wheel of death again.
	Let me add this here.
	If you want to support the channel, other than just watching freely and sharing snips and clips and sharing it with friends and family, if you want some good merch, I've toned it down from the best merch.
	If I can actually just, you know, bring it up here, my flipping computer.
	You can go to vivafry.com and get some merch.
	This is my wife!
	And that's our merch.
	That's when I had a short hair.
	This was in the beautiful country of Canada.
	You can get some great merch.
	If you want to support the work that Robert Barnes and I do, you can go to vivabarneslaw.locals.com where we're going to have the after party.
	And it's going to be open to everybody because it's not limited to supporters.
	So I'm going to give everybody the link.
	And you can get your butts on over there.
	Link to Locals.
	You can support us there, $10 a month or $100 a year if you get the whole thing.
	And stay tuned.
	My Louis the Lobster book, it's coming out.
	And we're using a member of the community is doing the illustrations.
	Every supporter is going to get a book.
	And everyone who signs up to support is going to get a book.
	And then I'm going to go self-publish it on Amazon.
	So it's coming soon.
	It's been a long time in the making.
	About 10 years, actually, since I wrote that short story.
	Copyrighted it.
	And now we've got a member of our community doing beautiful, beautiful animations.
	Illustrations, not animations.
	Enjoyer says, Rhode Island solicited voter registration from non-citizens at the behest of the leftist election group via The Federalist.
	I'm not doubt about that.
	I do not doubt that is what I should say.
	So that's it.
	Let me end it here, everybody.
	I'm going to obviously try to do a short video this afternoon.
	And if not, I'll just post the clips as I've been doing.
	Oh, so tomorrow!
	Sorry for scraping.
	Jack Posobiec is coming on tomorrow, talking about his new book, Bulletproof.
	We're going to talk about the flipping failed assassination attempt.
	The moment that I believed changed the trajectory of these United States of America for the better.
	Amazingly enough, the aversion of catastrophe is going to change this country in a way that even one day those screaming at the sky leftist weighing my words Are going to appreciate and understand.
	I hope in my heart of hearts that at some point they realize, holy shit, they lied about the FBI crime data.
	They lied about the jobs.
	They lied about COVID.
	Hopefully they're going to at some point say, holy shit, they lied about Trump too.
	That was my awakening.
	2015-2016 was my awakening.
	So we're ending on something of a white pill.
	Incrementalism is coming from Charles Company.
	It kind of looks like me, man.
	Hold on a second.
	Check this out.
	No. My hair's a little longer than that, guys.
	Incrementalism. Well, it's definitely not the Piven Theory because that relates to something else.
	Okay, so let's go.
	We're going to head on over to Locals.
	I think I shared the link, but I'll do it one more time.
	Link. Boom.
	See what's going on in the chat up here.
	And go over to Rumble for a second here.
	Good time hanging out.
	Take care, everyone, says Sefra Dean Squibb.
	Enjoyed it.
	Thanks for helping America wake up, says TheSilverWizard1.
	Thanks, David.
	DogdiggerHonor234. Great show, Viva.
	Thank you very much.
	And I drink water, says Lucky Doug.
	Yeah, but you need a little caffeine.
	It's a weird thing.
	I won't say what I was going to say.
	Okay, so now I will end.
	On YouTube, everything's on podcast as well, on Viva Barnes Law for the People, on Podbean.
	Whatever. It's out there.
	I think I posted the interview with...
	The whistleblower, Zachary Apotheker.
	I'm pretty sure I did.
	Removing on YouTube now.
	Okay. And I think it said I was removed from Twitter a while back.
	Whatever. Removing from Twitter.
	Rumble. Come on over to Locals.
	It's a not supporters only, so it's open to everybody.
	Ending on Rumble.

▲