Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 6, 2024 - Viva & Barnes

02:07:08

Ep. 231: FEMA Disaster Relief IS A DISASTER! Tina Peter Sentence is ABSURD! Trump UPDATES & MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	It's surreal.
	The fact that this is happening right where I grew up.
	It's literally my home at the center of this.
	It's so strange.
	My mom's house is gone.
	Just washed away.
	CeeLo, North Carolina.
	The river, it's right on that river.
	That river rose up, trapped people on the other side.
	But you're not able to cross that river when it's that high.
	And you can't wait.
	The clock is ticking, like we just said.
	The only way is over.
	Take that helicopter when there is a landing zone.
	Now they're being told that we need to predetermine flight.
	We need the logistics.
	It's overly detailed.
	You can always bog something down with bureaucracy to kill it.
	The volunteer side, if you're not search and rescue a helicopter pilot with a helicopter, and even that, it's getting really weird with federal agencies allowing some people to do things.
	I don't understand it.
	Make sure you register to vote.
	From Elon.
	He says SpaceX engineers are trying to deliver Starlink terminals and supplies to devastated areas in North Carolina right now.
	And FEMA is both failing to help and won't let others help.
	This is unconscionable.
	They just took this video a few hours ago where you can see the level of devastation.
	Roads, houses, electricity, water supply, and ground internet connections completely destroyed.
	FEMA wouldn't let them land to deliver critical supplies.
	When I bring this up, people claim that this is misinformation.
	Okay, Mr. Buttigieg, well, he's claiming no, we...
	We'll stop it there, people.
	For those of you who don't know, this is Warren Smith.
	For those of you who don't recall, the internet...
	Memory is mildly short.
	He was the teacher, former teacher, I think they have since severed ties with him, who went viral for teaching a kid how to think critically about whether or not J.K. Rowling is transphobic.
	He went viral for that.
	He's from North Carolina.
	His family's in North Carolina.
	Mother, family lost their home.
	Just gone.
	And I don't know what type of insurance people up in the mountains had or have in terms of whether or not it's going to be adequate coverage.
	But these people were mountain life, mountain insurance, which I don't know that it covers this type of flooding, and I'm not sure that it does.
	And he's giving his firsthand experience now, at least through his parents.
	Tim Kennedy, for those of you who don't follow him, I think everybody knows who Tim Kennedy is.
	Amazing. Been on Rogan a bunch of times.
	What he's doing now is what he was made for.
	And he's reporting from on the ground what we are all hearing.
	And then we're being told it's not happening.
	While we're seeing it happening, being told that it's happening, I am hearing from people on the ground who don't necessarily want to come public just yet.
	That a lot of this stuff that we're hearing is in fact true, that FEMA is in fact appropriating supplies that were donated, that FEMA is in fact excluding people from rescue missions if they're not, as Warren Smith explained, certified, whatever.
	So we're hearing this while being told that it's not happening, and yet we're hearing now also that people are quite literally being left to die.
	We're hearing that FEMA...
	I don't know if legitimate rescue efforts means...
	Anybody who's not affiliated with FEMA being blocked.
	And just so that nobody accuses me of taking things out of context or misrepresenting, this is literally what they're telling us right now.
	While we're hearing stories of absolute devastation, people who are running out of food have been...
	Dire Straits is not the word for it.
	But you got Pete Buttigieg coming up there and saying, no, no, no, legitimate rescue efforts are not being hindered.
	And then the question is, what on earth is meant by legitimate?
	We're going to talk about it again when Barnes gets in here tonight.
	Another, what was it, $150 million in aid to Lebanon after the...
	Five, eight, fifteen, who the hell knows how many billions of dollars in aid to Israel in addition to the five billion in aid to Gaza to help with the victims of this conflict.
	It's an amazing thing.
	It's that meme that has the bombs going off on one side and it says, my tax dollars, and then you got the intercepting bombs on the other side saying somehow also my tax dollars.
	You have Kamala Harris, or at least it's Mayorkas, Alejandro Mayorkas, who has facilitated the largest...
	This unlawful invasion of a nation, I don't know what would be an equivalent historically, coming out now and saying FEMA doesn't have enough money to get through the end of the hurricane season.
	We've got another hurricane coming to Florida.
	We're in the middle, not in the middle, but we're off the East Coast inland enough, and we're certainly far from the West Coast.
	It's like, man, people are getting hammered.
	Left, right, and center.
	They're going to go and try to politicize this in terms of climate crisis and say, this is why you need climate change, because if you had paid more in taxes last year, the hurricanes wouldn't have been this bad this year.
	But you see your government, and it's not squandering like, it's not like, you know, they're not on tight budgets.
	They're not squandering like hundreds of millions of dollars, whereas they're spending billions at home.
	It's almost the exact opposite.
	They're squandering hundreds of billions of dollars abroad.
	And then telling you at home, here's your $750 and we're going to help you.
	That's not all.
	Don't worry.
	That's not all of it.
	But that's just to help you through the night.
	As if money does any good when you have no place to spend it, no place to receive it, and no place to deposit it, and you have no place.
	And so we're hearing these horror stories, absolute horror stories from the ground while being told that they're not happening.
	There's a couple of things that I wanted to bring up to highlight for everybody here.
	What are we left to do?
	We plebs.
	I was going to, you know, I'm making the joke.
	I've got a SUV with 30 some odd inches of clearance.
	I can drive through water.
	I can drive over trees.
	But like, I'm told you don't go up to North Carolina unless you're carrying a firearm and prepare to use it for self-defense because that's how bad it is.
	Not from like the locals, just there's always...
	Pirates, mean-spirited, opportunistic predators who will exploit any given situation for their own good.
	So I ain't doing that.
	What can I do from down here?
	Raise awareness.
	Trump put up a GoFundMe.
	Nobody should ever use GoFundMe and I can't bring myself to do it.
	So Jacob Wells, Give, Send, Go, told me this is the charity to use.
	And so I'll remind, take the biggest night of the week.
	Link to Give, Send, Go.
	If you want to help, you know, raise the funds that the government doesn't have because they've pissed them away financing foreign proxy wars.
	They've pissed billions and billions.
	They've lost more money in pissing away hundreds of billions than would have been required to rebuild all of Lahaina, all of East Palestine and clean it up and now add to the list North Carolina.
	And then you're told, sorry, no money for you, but...
	The same freaking day, Kamala Harris comes out and says, we're sending $150 million more to deal with the devastation in Lebanon that was caused with the arms that were also procured with the finances of American taxpaying citizens.
	Here, link to Give, Send, Go.
	Putting that in...
	All of the chats here, Link.
	I think everyone in our Rumbles community, vivabarneslaw.locals.com knows it's there.
	All right.
	Let's just see if it's had any because I'm obsessive-compulsive.
	73,946.
	We'll refresh that in a second to see.
	All right.
	But classic stuff.
	It's scripted as though the manner in which this story is being told is intended to enrage and demoralize.
	An entire nation.
	Here. Oh, crab apples.
	Remember, Kamala Harris tries to distance herself from the Biden administration, all of the failures, because she's just VP.
	There's nothing she can do about any of this.
	And then she gets out there.
	I mean, did you notice Joe Biden is absent?
	And Kamala Harris is the de facto president of these United States of America.
	Telling you that she can't do anything.
	Her arms are tied and everything that's gone to hell over the last three and a half years.
	She couldn't do anything about the border because it wasn't her administration.
	And yet now she's just taking over the reins and taking credit for the things that go her way.
	Biden gave a press conference.
	Was it Friday?
	I think it was Friday.
	October 4th.
	Yeah, it was Friday.
	Where I, I believe, astutely observed that Biden, probably still salty, It's the Biden-Harris administration, not the Biden administration.
	I pulled this clip up.
	It went quasi-viral.
	Fox News wrote an article on it afterwards.
	And somehow, I'm on a blacklist with Fox News.
	I don't think there's any question about that.
	Probably because of my affiliation with...
	The notorious Robert Barnes.
	But listen to this.
	There have obviously been a number of crises that the country has been facing over the past several days with the hurricane, with the court strike, with the situation in the Middle East.
	Can you talk about how your vice president, who is running for the presidency, has worked on these crises and what role she has played over the past several days?
	Well, I'm in constant contact with her.
	She's aware.
	We're singing from the same song.
	She helped pass all the laws of being employed now.
	She was a major player.
	And everything we've done, including passage of legislation which we were told we could never pass.
	And her staff is interlocked with mine in terms of all the things we're doing.
	I want to refresh everybody's memory about that just before we head on into the more substances stuff of the evening.
	But hold on, hold on.
	Let me bring this one up also.
	Then we're going to get into the...
	Then we're going to get into...
	The Jewish space lasers, people.
	Are we eight minutes in yet?
	Yeah, we're eight minutes in so I can start swearing and I can talk about Jewish space lasers.
	I'm joking.
	I couldn't care less about that.
	Whatever rule exists on...
	Apparently, if you swear within five minutes of a YouTube video, they demonetize it or deprioritize it.
	It's a load of bullshit as far as I'm concerned.
	Bada bing, bada boom.
	Here, listen to this.
	Go ahead, Josh.
	Thanks again for doing this, Mr. President.
	Two questions.
	Joe Biden gave a press conference and they're like kissing his ass and thanking him for doing...
	Thank you.
	The amount of reporters who said, thank you, Joe Biden, for doing this.
	You got to thank the president of the United States of America for giving a press conference during one of the most disastrous, cataclysmic weeks in American history?
	Oh my goodness.
	Thank you for gracing us with the little plebs, with the little specks of some public speaks.
	Screw that one up.
	Listen to this.
	The first, Florida Senator Marco Rubio described today's jobs report as having fake numbers.
	What do you make of that?
	How worried are you that many Americans aren't hearing that the jobs numbers aren't real?
	Look. Look.
	I'm going to be very careful here.
	Yeah, be very careful, Joe.
	Whatever the hell that happens.
	You notice anything the Negro Republicans don't like, they call fake.
	Well, especially when it's fake.
	The job numbers are what the job numbers are.
	The job numbers are what the job numbers are.
	And don't forget that the job numbers are what the job numbers are.
	And the job numbers are what the job numbers are.
	Therefore, the job numbers are what the job numbers are.
	Next question.
	They're real.
	They're sincere.
	They're sincere.
	And by the way...
	What the hell does sincere mean?
	When it comes to reporting statistics, I don't care if you're sincere or insincere, so long as they're accurate.
	But when you start telling me that they're sincere, that tells me that you're lying.
	Like you did, when was it?
	August? No, it was earlier than that.
	Receipts incoming.
	Look at how the EU talks about us, how they'd like to have an economy like ours.
	Let's talk about the rest of the world looks at us and what we're doing.
	So, I, uh, well.
	I don't want to get going.
	Well, I don't want to get going.
	This is like what pathological narcissists do is they try to let you think there's more to it that makes them right while never saying it because they're not.
	Oh, remember this part?
	When was this from?
	U.S. added 818,000 fewer jobs than reported earlier.
	The Labor Department issued revised figures for the 12 months through March that point to a greater To greater economic fragility.
	Numbers are what the job numbers are.
	They're real.
	They're sincere.
	They're what we are.
	And by the way, just look at how the EU talks about us, how they'd like to have an economy like ours.
	No, no, no, sincere.
	They lie.
	All they do is lie, and they expect you to swallow their lies.
	And when you call them out on their lies, then they say, oh, all those mega folks they do is...
	They just call everything fake.
	Like what they're doing to Marjorie Taylor Greene to bring it a little bit back to what's going on in North Carolina.
	Talking about, talking about, it felt very Canadian there.
	How Marjorie Taylor Greene brought up how government controls the weather or has been, I shouldn't say controls it as though it's an ongoing thing, but has engaged in weather control tactics, weather control strategies, weather control research, weather control patterns.
	They've actually weaponized weather control.
	Operation? Crap.
	The one during the Vietnam War when they exacerbated the monsoon season to cause enhanced flooding in Vietnam.
	Okay. Forget the patents.
	If you'd seen the episode of The Unusual Suspects, which aired on Friday, you would have seen the thorough discussion of this.
	They've done it.
	They've researched it.
	They've patented it.
	It's a thing.
	They admitted it.
	That guy, I forget what his name is, admitted it in 2015 at a conference.
	But then when Marjorie Taylor Greene comes out and talks about it...
	Then they mock her, and they drop the A card, the anti-Semitic card.
	Listen to this.
	She said it happened.
	Whether or not they did it in North Carolina, I personally don't believe it.
	But to go out and say that it's a conspiracy theory, well, I guess it might be a theory.
	To go out and say that it's outlandish, scientifically inaccurate, and totally false is itself scientifically inaccurate and totally false.
	But Marjorie Taylor Greene has been on a tear over the weekend, defending her reputation.
	I'm actually reluctant to show this clip, because I know those CBS bastards are going to copyright claim this on YouTube, and I'll have to contest it like I always do and say it's quintessential fair use, you copyright troll bastards.
	I'll say it in advance.
	Quintessential fair use, CBS copyright troll bastards.
	Listen to this.
	You know, they were talking about climate change yesterday, and now we're learning that scientists and researchers are looking at how to change the weather on purpose.
	That's right.
	Lasers now could one day manipulate rain and lightning.
	CBS This Morning contributor Michio Kaku is a physics professor at City College of New York.
	Professor, nice to see you.
	Extraordinary seeing Al Gore and Bill Clinton there together with Charlie, wasn't it?
	That's right, yeah.
	They did not get into this discussion, though.
	But it is fascinating.
	I mean, lasers?
	Really? To change the weather?
	Oh, lasers?
	Really? To change the weather.
	I mean, this is nine years ago.
	It's not 59 years ago.
	And this journalist feigning ignorance at what anybody with half a brain already knew.
	How do they do it?
	Actually, we should play this out because it's kind of impressive what the apparently had been tested successfully in lab.
	Was demonstrating a decade ago.
	Listen to this.
	That's right.
	Well, as Mark Twain once famously said, everyone complains about the weather, but no one ever does anything about it.
	Well, instead of doing a rain dance, we physicists are firing trillion-watt lasers into the sky to actually precipitate rain clouds and actually bring down lightning bolts.
	This is potentially a game-changer.
	But this is experimental.
	It's experimental.
	However, in the laboratory so far, it works.
	When you have water vapors, And you have dust particles or ice crystals.
	You can precipitate rain.
	It condenses around the seeds.
	These seeds can also be created by laser beams.
	By firing trillion watt lasers, you rip apart the electrons, creating what are called ions.
	And these ions act like seeds, like dust particles, bringing down rain and even lightning.
	All right, so they're only talking about rain and lightning.
	Hold on one second.
	Directing hurricanes using lasers.
	Well, this is going back in the day.
	The man who controls the weathers.
	There was a patent or research being done on controlling the direction of hurricanes.
	And again, by the way, I'm not saying that I believe it happened here at all.
	Everybody who wants to criticize the conspiracy theory that this was government-engineered or government-directed to go for the lithium mine so the government can come in and claim the destroyed land for the purposes of security, whatever.
	Everybody who wants to make everybody who looks foolish who's espousing that says, look, anywhere this hurricane...
	This one, the one that's coming this coming week in Florida, is going straight for Mar-a-Lago.
	So there's a famous troll account on Twitter, Liam Nissan.
	And if you don't know that it's a troll account, people, it's a troll account.
	Making the joke, ah, look, we've engineered this one to go...
	Now we're going for Mar-a-Lago, because that looks like the trajectory of the hurricane as it will cross the Wang, the peninsula.
	But the bottom line, it's a thing.
	And anybody who says it's not a thing, they tell you that it's not a thing when they've been researching it, patenting it, and as we can now see from a decade earlier, celebrating the technology.
	What blows my mind is that they want to talk about cloud seeding, you know, so you can reflect the sunlight at the stratospheric level, I guess.
	And so the cloud seeding technology, which they've been doing and, you know, whatever, the idea is it's going to reflect the sunlight and cool the Earth's temperature.
	That's fine.
	Anybody who hasn't seen the movie Donnie Darko, go watch it.
	But there's the awesome scene where they're doing the high school project and the girl and Donnie, I forget her name, they come up with this idea of constantly, not bombarding you, but even when you're sleeping or when your eyes are closed, giving you visuals, giving you videos to continue to train your brain, to learn, etc.
	And the teacher, who's Noah Wiley, it's a great scene, says, well, what if your brain needs peace, needs quiet, needs no stimulation in order to develop properly?
	They think about deflecting the sunlight, but I mean, I'm asking questions out loud.
	Might that not result in more stuff being trapped in the atmosphere from the ground?
	If you have bouncing things out, presumably it's going to bounce things down as well.
	So whatever.
	When you solve one problem and you think you've solved one problem, you might have created another 10. That's what the government is for.
	But the bottom line, Marjorie Taylor Greene is not wrong.
	And anybody saying that she's outright wrong, stupid, lying, conspiracy theorist is an idiot.
	And the idiot of the evening...
	Sarah Silverman!
	We've got to go down the chain here.
	Marjorie Taylor Greene says, yes, they can control the weather.
	It's ridiculous for anyone to lie and say it can't be done.
	She got community noted because, unfortunately, Elon, for all of the good stuff on Twitter, community notes as a lefty...
	Weapon on the platform.
	Weather manipulation is possible at small scale, for example, cloud seeding.
	However, weather patterns is general and naturally occurring and cannot be controlled.
	Hurricanes and other large storms cannot be created artificially with modern technology.
	Notice nobody really said anything about created artificially, but potentially guided or manipulated once they come into existence.
	It's an amazing thing what the fact check says and what it doesn't say, but set that aside because I don't know or believe or have any reason to believe that occurred this time around.
	People are saying because the hurricane got stronger as it hit land and then sat there for an extended period of time.
	That's not an indication.
	That's an indication of an active God as far as I'm concerned, not an active government.
	But whatever.
	The fact check is still wrong.
	The fact check is opinion.
	The fact check is argument.
	Or community note, sorry.
	It's an argument and not a fact check.
	Sarah Silverman says, hi, you're an anti-Semitic pig.
	Do I get myself in trouble tonight?
	For those of you who don't know, Sarah Silverman is Jewish.
	So what some people do, they use the accusation of racism, misogyny, bigotry, anti-Semitism as a shield and a sword.
	But I had to reply to Sarah Silverman.
	I don't have to reply here, but it doesn't matter.
	It's like, oh, I didn't see anybody mention Jew.
	Hey, you're an anti-Semitic pig.
	I'm sorry.
	Is the first thing you think about when someone accuses the government of controlling the weather the Jews?
	Because if that's the case, Sarah Silverman, you might be the anti-Semite.
	You know, the blackface wearing arguably racist by their own standards woman is now accusing Marjorie Taylor Greene of being an anti-Semite, even though nobody uttered the word Jewish anywhere in that tweet, anywhere in there.
	And then people say, oh, Marjorie Taylor Greene, she's the one who talked about the Jewish space lasers.
	She's obviously an anti-Semite.
	She talked about Jewish space lasers.
	To which I had to say to anybody who's listening, Marjorie Taylor Greene never said Jewish space lasers ever.
	And the reason why I say this with a little bit of shock and astonishment is because I thought she did.
	This was a long time ago.
	I'm not going to say like two years ago.
	The first time I went to fact check this, I was like, oh, I need to see the actual post when Marjorie Taylor Greene allegedly said Jewish space lasers.
	Because if she said Jewish space lasers, that sounds crazy.
	That does sound crazy even to me.
	I mean, Chinese space lasers, we're referring to like a country that develops technology.
	But Jewish space lasers, I would be questioning someone standing there.
	She never said Jewish space lasers ever.
	And somebody who is, oh, I can't see it because they block me.
	People block me and then reply on my threads, on my tweets, making accusations against me.
	And I said, this dumbass replies to a tweet of mine and has me blocked.
	Courage. If I weren't blocked to this dumbass, I would tell him I can't forget about the whole Jewish space lasers thing because Marjorie Taylor Greene never actually said Jewish space lasers.
	Just another idiot creating false memories from fake news that he reads that makes up quotes that never actually existed.
	And it's worth reading her original post on this.
	As there are now over 70 people confirmed and 1,000 missing from the fires in California, they're a horrific tragedy I'm playing for all involved.
	I'm posting this speculation because there are too many coincidences to ignore and just putting it out here for some research I've done stemming from my curiosity over PG&E stocks, which tanked all week, then rallied Thursday after California officials announced they would not let PG&E fail.
	I find it very interesting that Roger Kimmel, on the board of directors of PG&E, is also vice chairman of Rothschild, Inc.
	I also find it interesting that long history of financial contributions that PG&E has made to Jerry Brown, who I don't think is Jewish, by the way, because we're going to get to this afterwards, over the years has spent millions in lobbying.
	What a coincidence it must be that Governor Brown signed a bill in September.
	Protect 2018, protecting PG&E and allowing PG&E to pass off its cost of fire responsibility to its customers in raid hikes and through bombs.
	It might also just be a coincidence that the fires are burning in the same projected areas that $77 billion in high-speed rail project is to be built, which also happens to be Government Brown's pet project.
	And what are the odds that...
	What are the odds that...
	Feinstein's husband, Richard Bloom, is the contractor to the rail project.
	Geez, with all that much money, we could build three US southern border walls.
	Then, oddly, there are these people who have said they saw what looked like lasers and blue beams of light causing fires and pictures and videos.
	I don't know anything about that, but I do find it really curious.
	PG&E's partnership with Solarin on space solar generators starting in 2009.
	They announced the launch into space in March 2018 and maybe even put them up before that.
	Space solar generators collect large suns, the sun's energy, and then beam it back to Earth to a transmitter to convert it to electricity.
	The idea is clean energy to replace coal and oil.
	If they are beaming the sun's energy back to the Earth, I'm sure they would...
	I mean, mistakes are never made.
	When anything new is invented, what would that look like anyway?
	A laser beam or light coming down to Earth?
	I guess.
	Could that cause a fire?
	Hmm. I don't know.
	I hope not.
	That wouldn't look so good for PG&E, solar energy, and Jerry Brown.
	Okay, let's just skip through this here.
	It's getting a little long.
	I will also say that whoever was able to buy PG&E stock at the bottom before the announcement was made...
	Then when stocks rallied, sure did well on their investment.
	I wonder how you get privy to that kind of info.
	You must have to know somebody, right?
	Seems like there's a lot of connected people in this crowd.
	And these space solar generators, I really hope that they're very good and beaming the sun's energy down to Earth.
	But what do I know?
	I just read a lot.
	Anybody notice like one word?
	In fact, two, in fact, three.
	The entire Jewish space lasers is absent from that post.
	What's amazing about that post is it actually mentions people who I'm fairly certain are not Jewish, at least some.
	And if someone looks at that post and says, my goodness, there's a lot of people in here who happen to be Jewish, they might be the anti-Semites for saying you can't even talk about people who are connected politically if they happen to be Jewish without being accused of being an anti-Semite.
	Wild. It's wild.
	And when I found out that Marjorie Taylor Greene never even said the words Jewish space lasers, my goodness, I didn't know who I could believe anymore.
	While Barnes is in the backdrop coming in here, let's just get to some of these tip chats.
	Barnes, how you doing?
	Hey, hey.
	I'll read a few of them.
	We got a few here.
	We got sent you an email, Viva, with some personal experiences from the area.
	Thank you.
	That's Blue CW Soldier.
	I've been getting a lot of messages.
	Some people don't want to talk publicly because you don't want to piss off the feds.
	Then we got Sammy says, North Carolina police just announced that they will be arresting FEMA agents if they interfere with charity citizen deployment.
	Very nice.
	That's from Sammy.
	We got Stingway.
	How do I do this here?
	We don't have a sponsor for the Today Show, but I'm going to use Rumble Advertiser Center to show everybody how good it is.
	We got a channel put up a vid on the sheriff was confiscating supplies being flown in, claimed the woman leading the effort was stealing, and it would be taken to be accounted for.
	Oh, the stuff that I'm hearing.
	Okay, we'll get to more after this.
	My family lives in Tampa, St. Pete area.
	Hopefully the wind shear for my north slows it down and decategorizes it to a one.
	Yeah, they said it's at a two, maybe going to a three.
	And let me see here.
	That's from Sadaka.
	And then we got Denise Antu in our VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com community.
	I heard that $750 is a loan, that the recipients have one year to pay it back, or they forfeit their property, don't donate to FEMA.
	And don't take the $750.
	That's what a lot of people didn't realize about the $2,000 a month during the COVID crisis, in Canada at least.
	$2,000 a month.
	You're going to get taxed on that.
	And you're going to have to pay taxes on that at the end of the day.
	And we'll stop on this one before we get into the show of the night.
	Beta or Beata?
	That's Beta 1973 is now a member of our VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com community.
	Robert, sir, how goes the battle?
	Good, good.
	The book behind you, is that Liberace's autobiography?
	No, not Liberace.
	It'd be Seaman Bodivar, a big biography on the legendary Latin American revolutionary that most political figures of a similar spirit, left or right, call their revolution a Bolivarian revolution in honor.
	And he's sort of the George Washington of Latin America.
	To be childish, but I will because I am.
	Sorry, what's his first name?
	Simon or Simon.
	Okay. Sorry, I heard that.
	That makes more sense.
	But my kid came back from the grocery store with my wife and they had one potato.
	I was like, what the hell did you get one potato?
	Oh, and then I turned it around and then I saw exactly why they got that one potato.
	I'll bring it in in a bit.
	Robert, what do we have on for the menu for tonight?
	We've got FEMA.
	It's legal power and authority.
	What it can and is not authorized to do.
	The sentencing of election whistleblower Tina Peters in Colorado.
	Amos Miller will be in Pittsburgh defending him on Tuesday morning as the state tries to shut him down.
	He's the Amish farmer.
	What's happening with COVID injured cases against various immunity claims, emergency immunity claims, kind of like FEMA's power.
	Big Pharma sued for a major conspiracy theory involving insulin pricing by the state of Texas.
	We've got the courts ordering the seizure of Internet domains in ex parte secret proceedings.
	And we've got an EU suing Hungary.
	Those cases might have a relationship that people wouldn't necessarily guess off the top.
	The Wizard of Oz made an appearance in court this week.
	Democrats confess their lawfare plans in various podcasts and their complicity and culpability in prior lawfare involving the Trump administration.
	The meme ban, a lot of free speech cases, the meme ban struck down.
	Also, the effort of the state of California to force censorship on X and other social media also struck down, thanks to Elon Musk's suit.
	And correcting the mistaken belief...
	That Tim Walsh and a range of Democrats have.
	That if you yell fire in a crowded theater, that that speech is not protected and thus any dangerous speech can be not protected.
	I'll give a little bit of the history of how that doctrine came about and then how it got overturned.
	The Alex Jones being threatened with a personal receiver out of the Travis County Courthouse as well.
	So that's a dozen or so cases for this week.
	Okay, Robert, the potato has entered the chat.
	So check this out.
	Oh, it looks like a normal potato.
	Oh, you can't see this potato and not buy that potato.
	So proud of my kid.
	And I'm going to stick it on like a Barbie doll because that is a butt cheek right there.
	Okay, well, we obviously have to start with FEMA.
	We're going to go from a lighthearted potato butt joke to like a catastrophic disaster of, I won't say government made in the hurricane sense, but certainly government exacerbated in the dereliction of duty.
	So, the hurricane came and caused a massive, catastrophic damage.
	As we saw from Warren Smith, houses swept up and disappeared.
	Whether or not people have any or adequate insurance, it's a disaster.
	Robert, the question some people are asking is, apparently, the Republicans voted against additional financing to FEMA this year.
	And so now they've got nothing to complain about because FEMA says they're out of money after having squandered nearly a billion dollars on illegal immigrants, which is another government man-made federal emergency of their own doing.
	Of all the issues, take us through this.
	First of all, I guess there's FEMA, there's the DHS, there's who's in charge of this.
	Do you want to flesh out how negligent the government is and how disgraceful it is at the time where their negligence is literally...
	Killing people, they're off giving hundreds of millions and billions to foreign countries and foreign proxy wars.
	Yeah, FEMA is the subject of many conspiracy theories because of their odd history.
	So it's not always been known as the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
	It's had a bunch of different names, and it's been located in a bunch of different agencies within different cabinet secretaries over the years.
	It didn't get the name of FEMA itself.
	Until 1979 by President Carter.
	And even then it went through multiple transformations.
	It cites as its legal authority three or four main statutes, but it cites another 60 or 70 as giving it some authority because it's all related to emergency powers.
	Now the real history of FEMA and the reason why they've been the subject of so many conspiracy theories, you can watch the X-Files movies, for example, and the X-Files show.
	The bad actors are always organizing through FEMA, disguising alien activities through FEMA and so forth.
	But the reason for a lot of that is FEMA's predecessor existence, and for a large part of its existence, its biggest part of its budget was classified.
	To give you an idea, the Dr. Strangelove reference to the underground bunker where everybody's going to live.
	Where a general's character is okay with when he finds out it's going to be five women for every man.
	And that they'll need to be attractive and so forth.
	The actual people doing that was FEMA in its predecessor form.
	I think it was called Mount Weather in the Blue Ridge Mountains.
	They were the ones managing a nuclear apocalyptic fallout.
	And a lot of your deep state types had deep...
	FEMA ties as well.
	I mean, if you dig into what some of their evacuation plans were, they would have things that really smacked of eugenics.
	Like they would say, we think we, and inspired that you could win a nuclear war.
	Many generals in the 50s and 60s believe this insanity.
	And they're like, ah, we think we can get 85% of the population safe.
	And you dig in, and they really mean 85% of the desirable population.
	And what they meant by that is, well, you know, we probably wouldn't be able to help out the handicapped, the sick, the injured, the people that are really kind of too old, that don't have any friends or family around.
	I mean, it exposed a lot of the true nature of the government's thinking, who it prioritized in saving in the case of an emergency.
	That's where the stories about FEMA camps come from, is that they designed these bunker facilities to be evacuated facilities all around the country.
	And therefore, you got the theories or concerns about, you know, are they setting these up for camps for dissidents, for example?
	And it's all related to emergency power.
	So that's part of the history, is that FEMA really wasn't actually emergency-oriented, like natural disaster-oriented.
	In a meaningful way until the Cold War ended.
	And then it's been sort of a hodgepodge of political favors.
	The people that get it are not put in those positions because they're actually very competent or capable.
	I'm Googling as you're talking whether or not the $750 amount is a loan that has to be repaid.
	I see something about a grant, FEMA grants not having to be repaid, and I don't know if that $750 is a grant or another form of payment.
	That's what FEMA's main authority is.
	In its current form, you have the Stafford Act.
	For a while, they put it under Homeland Security, the Department of Fatherland, the Securitas, a very Nazi kind of name that the W regime gave to the Patriot Act reforms after that.
	So that increased suspicions and skepticism of exactly what FEMA was up to.
	And then after the disaster of Katrina, They transitioned it out of the Department of Homeland Security and they've sort of moved it around and have purportedly tried to make it more centered around actual domestic emergencies.
	But the Biden administration had a completely different path.
	The Biden administration chose to use it primarily as an immigration tool.
	Contrary to what, for example, there were some media people lying this morning to Senator Cotton and other people saying, oh, there were no FEMA funds used to help any of the illegals or any of the migrants.
	And you can just go to FEMA's own website and it describes how it's giving all this money to Cubans or Haitians or refugees or people that are seeking asylum or people that have been given special status by the Biden administration to be here for one year. Yes, indeed, that's where all the money went.
	The money went to something that FEMA shouldn't even be involved in.
	Migrant relocation had anything to do with an emergency.
	It shows you how political this agency has long been.
	But the stories about them saying that they control who can give aid, they control how that aid is given, they can exclude people from certain airspace, they can exclude people from...
	They have no such legal power.
	You won't find that power anywhere in any of the statutes.
	The statute's purpose says over and over again they are solely to assist and supplement private efforts and local efforts.
	They are given no authority at all to exclude local or state or private efforts at relief or remedy.
	They're only even supposed to be called in by an emergency declaration when there's inadequate local and state and private resources available.
	But they are not given any special authority of declaring a martial law effectively, of having exclusive jurisdiction over responding to any kind of crisis.
	Their primary role is to give money, which is grants, and their second role is to help coordinate, help supplement, help complement existing local, state, and private rescuing efforts.
	So this talk about them...
	That, you know, rumors circulating that they're trying to exclude aid.
	They have no such legal authority.
	In fact, their obligation is to protect civil rights and civil liberties and to not be discriminatory themselves in how they behave and handle things.
	So if you're hearing any of that, it's like the local sheriffs made clear if anybody was doing that, they would arrest those people because FEMA people have no such authority to do it.
	The other main thing that FEMA does...
	Aside from create funds for people and help coordinate federal resources, for example, you can enlist private contractors, you can enlist local government workers, you can enlist people from other federal agencies to help coordinate.
	That's all they're there to do is to supplement and assist and coordinate and provide grants.
	They have no other purpose or role.
	And to the degree they're claiming any such purpose or role, that far exceeds their legal and constitutional authority.
	Let me bring something up here, because I want to fact-check in real time as well, where the rumors are funding for FEMA disaster response was diverted to support international efforts or border-related issues.
	Like, the fact.
	Okay, this is the fact.
	This is false.
	No money is being diverted from disaster response needs.
	FEMA's disaster response efforts and individual assistance is funded through the Disaster Relief Fund, which is a dedicated fund for disaster efforts.
	I don't know if that's true or not, but I presume that's true.
	Why do I feel like I'm reading a freaking shell game being played by Bernie Maddox?
	Because they start off with a straw man argument.
	No one's saying that funding for FEMA was diverted to international efforts or border issues.
	They're saying it was used to help immigrants.
	And there's no doubt about that because FEMA acknowledged it.
	So they start off with a lie.
	So a straw man is you take somebody else's argument and you create a fake version of that argument so that you can knock it down, hence a straw man.
	But it's a fake version of your opponent's argument.
	It's not the actual argument.
	This is what so-called fact checkers do all the time.
	Nobody lies more than fact checkers lie.
	They create a fake claim that they then rebut.
	And they then rebut it with a fake argument.
	So FEMA has designated part of their disaster funds over here, so all the funds that they diverted to immigrants didn't come from the disaster funds because they diverted it before it ever got there in the first place.
	Ha ha!
	See? We proved your fact check.
	These people are such a joke and an embarrassment, and they don't even realize it.
	They don't even realize that everybody knows they're lying.
	The only people who believe them are their own audience, their own crowd, their own liberal media constituency.
	Nobody else does.
	And so it's just nonsense.
	You can go to FEMA's own site, and FEMA identifies that they're helping refugees.
	They're funding all these people that the Biden administration has brought in, Haitians, Cubans, asylum seekers, refugee seekers, etc.
	That all that relocation happened in places like Springfield, Ohio, is being funded by the Biden administration through...
	Congressionally authorized resources to FEMA.
	And FEMA's not supposed to be in the immigrant resettlement business.
	But the Biden administration chose to, and that's where all the money went.
	It's amazing because they make up the lie.
	They fact check the lie.
	And then in separate articles from propaganda media, they have to acknowledge the lie.
	Mayorkas warns of low funds for hurricane relief after FEMA spent $690 million on migrant crisis.
	And they're...
	Liar of an answer is going to be, well, we didn't spend that $700 million from the Disaster Relief Fund.
	We spent that from the aggregate budget.
	So therefore, when we say, take it from this pot, we took it from this pot, but now we don't have any money left for you guys.
	Well, so it wasn't a lie.
	It wasn't diverted to international board or whatever the hell they call it.
	Yale University was doing this when I was there about that they claim they were not diverting money meant for financial aid to special pet projects that...
	The donors had not authorized.
	And what they were doing is they would raise money on the phone and elsewhere saying, hey, we really need help for financial aid.
	Can you send money in?
	And if the person's check didn't say exclusive to the financial aid fund, they took it and funded the other projects.
	And they said, well, we didn't take anything from the financial aid fund.
	I mean, it would be called embezzlement if you did it anywhere else.
	That's what they've done.
	They've embezzled funds met by Congress to be available for disasters and gave it to people who are not even American.
	And Harris announced during the middle of all this that she was going to send a bunch of money, over $100 million, to the country of Lebanon while she's still, the Biden administration and the Harris administration are still not helping out there in North Carolina with this disaster.
	The people of Lebanon are facing an increasingly dire humanitarian situation.
	I am concerned about the security and well-being of civilians suffering in Lebanon and will continue working to help meet the needs of the civilians there.
	To that end, the United States will provide nearly $157 million in additional assistance to the people of Lebanon for essential needs such as food, shelter.
	It can't be an accident that she does this while people are literally dying in North Carolina.
	This additional support brings the total of assistance over the last year to 385 million to support them for the consequences of the 8 billion in foreign aid to Israel, plus the 4 billion or whatever goes to the Palestinian side.
	I swore last night.
	I said, fuck you, North Carolina.
	Kamala Harris.
	Oh, fact check.
	She didn't actually say that.
	It cannot be an accident that she would do that at that time with that wording.
	They're struggling for shelter, food, etc.
	And here's $150 million, but $750 and you'll get more of it later.
	Well, you have David Axelrod admitting that from a Democratic perspective, the people that are impacted by this, that are democratically aligned voters around Asheville, they have confidence will find a way to vote, while they believe the very Republican-leaning rural voters won't.
	So, I mean, it's not just diversion of American money to foreign sources and to immigrants.
	It's politically motivated.
	Disaster response.
	And if this was Trump, it'd be news 24-7 on every major news broadcast station.
	Instead, they're trying to suppress all existence of it and barely discuss it.
	Contrast the media's coverage of Katrina with the coverage of this hurricane.
	It's just like the Maui coverage that disappeared once Democrats did such a shoddy job of responding to it.
	Celebrity fundraisers.
	They had marathons going, marathon events where, you know, was it Kanye or was it...
	Yeah, it was Kanye.
	The Bush doesn't care about white people.
	Black people, right?
	Black people, I mean, yeah.
	And who's the actor?
	Austin Powers.
	Mike Myers.
	Mike Myers was next to him when Kanye went off.
	Check this out.
	I'm going back to the NBC article.
	Is that NBC or CBS?
	It's NBC.
	The agency has spent $690.9 million this year to, quote, enable non-federal entities to offset allowable costs incurred for services associated with non-citizen migrant arrivals in their communities, end quote, according to FEMA's fiscal 2024 awards.
	Texas governor slammed, they tell you it's not happening, but it didn't come out of the Disaster Relief Fund.
	It just came out of the...
	The aggregate budget.
	They tell these things that are just classic lies.
	In the name of fact-checking, they're the biggest liars on the planet.
	And again, when they've been sued, courts have acknowledged this by saying they're not actually stating facts or checking facts.
	That's why they've been immune from suit, because they said nobody reasonable would interpret these people as actually engaged in what they say they're engaged in.
	I remember we covered that lawsuit at the time.
	I'll bring one up here.
	Viva, $750 from FEMA versus 99 American airliners gave $25,000 pre-settlement to help the bereaved families and survivors of $1420.
	IRS said it was not tax-free.
	I was not politically conscious back in the day.
	The ice melts and won't make the sea levels rise because the ice is lighter than water.
	True, but then there's enough portion of the ice that's outside of the water that might cause it.
	When an ice cube melts in water, the level goes down, not up.
	That I remember from science, unless I'm mistaken.
	What else?
	What else about FEMA so that we can fully...
	Well, just anybody out there that...
	FEMA has no legal authority to tell you you can't try to help people in North Carolina.
	So don't let any false statements or claims that are coming out concerning that deter you from helping out in North Carolina.
	Elon Musk is directly assisting in North Carolina.
	Dr. Phil is directly assisting in North Carolina.
	A range in eastern Tennessee, up in the Appalachian part.
	It didn't hit much in Chattanooga, my hometown.
	That's in the southeast corner.
	It was much more in the mountains.
	Up in the northeastern, the Smoky Mountains.
	I mean, the irony of all this, not far away from there, is the original foundation of FEMA.
	It's the Blue Ridge Mountains where they had that, I think, Mount Weather, whatever it was called, which was the original Dr. Strangelove bunker.
	So if anybody should have been prepared to handle that region, it should have been FEMA.
	But it's because they're not there because they've been converted into an immigration assistance agency.
	A disaster of the government's making that they're now tending to with taxpayer dollars.
	And by the way, it's gone up to over $74,781.
	Let's just refresh one more time.
	$74,781.
	I gave everybody the link there.
	And I was assured by Jacob Wells that the money is going to be divvied up among charities that are on the ground and it's going to go directly to the people in need and not be seized by or diverted by FEMA AL.
	Let me see here.
	A couple of quick ones.
	We got...
	Congrats. Oh, Congress had hearings on alien spaceships moving at impossible speeds.
	Weather machines don't surprise me.
	Check out Project HARP in Alaska.
	No question about that.
	And I'll read this one from our locals community because it's one that a lot of people routinely ask me and, Robert, we consistently answer it.
	No violence.
	But without resorting to violence and intimidation, what's the best method for an average citizen?
	read, non-lawyer, non-politician, due to influence appellate courts and SCOTUS to overturn and correct ridiculous jury verdicts, etc.
	The Trump-Hushed Money case, nonsensical civil awards, Alex Jones, and cruel, unprecedented criminal sentences We're going to get to that in a few seconds.
	Do we segue into that right now, the Tina Peters, before we head over to Rumble and vivabarneslaw.locals.com exclusively?
	Sure. I was watching the judge sentence Tina Peters.
	I didn't watch the arguments, the oral arguments, back and forth.
	Tina, I believe, was representing herself in presenting the arguments, asking for not clemency, but probation.
	I started listening to the judge render his judgment as he was sentencing.
	And I swear to you, I thought it was a scene out of a movie.
	I thought it was...
	I didn't know who was talking.
	Because it was so insanely preposterous what I was listening to.
	And the video was like a cheap...
	Speaking of butt cheek potatoes, it was like a cheek potato camera.
	You couldn't really see the judge's mouth moving.
	And I was convinced I was listening to the prosecutor plead.
	It was so wildly hyperbolic, wildly unprofessional.
	This judge getting out there and saying that Tina Peters, who was accused of...
	Unlawfully influencing public servants because she was trying to get access to the server so that she, through her FBI informant dude, could mirror Dominion's server and data information.
	That she was accused of unlawful impersonation.
	A conspiracy to commit unlawful impersonation.
	Influence of a public servant.
	Unlawful influence.
	Listening to this judge berate her.
	Tell her that she was in this only for herself.
	He called her a charlatan.
	And I had to Google what a charlatan meant.
	And then he goes on to issue his sentencing, which was there were eight convictions, three for unlawful influence of a public servant.
	Then there was the conspiracy to commit identity theft, I believe, where she was found guilty, but not actual impersonation, criminal impersonation.
	And he's rendering these orders and these sentences, three and a half years, three and a half years, to be run consecutively, not concurrently, then throws on a 15 months for the conspiracy to commit identity theft, I think, concurrently, so that's three and a half concurrent, another three and a half, sorry, consecutive, then another 15 months consecutive, and it's the most insane thing I've ever heard in my life.
	I presume, based on the way the video went viral on Twitter and elsewhere, and the way that judge, I suspect now, is on a blast that he never thought he would be on or wanted to be on.
	It's like, I don't think he thought through the consequences of what he was doing as he was doing it, but it's the most insane sentencing I've ever heard for a non-violent crime.
	He said to Tina Peters that what she did was worse than the violence that his court sees in Ohio.
	Not in Ohio, in Colorado, sorry.
	Robert, can you explain the discretion that judges have to issue sentences concurrently versus consecutively?
	And I know what you think of this, and so does our locals community, but tell the world what you think of what this judge did to Tina Peters, regardless of what you think about what Tina Peters did herself.
	Well, historically, the right to sentence defendants in a criminal case was to be determined by a jury.
	In my view, that's what the Constitution intended.
	People remember the famous give me liberty or give me death.
	Patrick Henry led to the acquittals of a tobacco farmer who wasn't paying the tobacco tax.
	What they don't know is it wasn't for an acquittal.
	It was for the jury to issue the lowest possible sentence because the jury controlled sentencing.
	Judges don't want anybody to know this, that they have hijacked and usurped to themselves and stolen.
	And that's the core of the problem.
	Judges should have no such power over sentencing.
	All sentencing should be determined, like the guilt of the crime, like the law itself, by juries.
	Judges took two things away from juries.
	First, they took away sentencing power.
	Second, they took away any question that they called a legal question.
	If it was a legal question, magically, jurors just couldn't have that power.
	Now, you won't find any constitutional originalism to justify this, but many of the judges on the right love usurping power for themselves, too.
	And consequently, they have been intellectually dishonest about conceding this fact.
	And people just take it for granted now in the legal profession that judges should control sentencing and judges should control legal questions when constitutionally they were never intended to have either authority.
	In fact, one of the big objections that led to the revolution, that led to the Bill of Rights, was these kind of colonial administrator-type officials usurping decisions about guilt, usurping decisions about fines, usurping decisions about sentences.
	And so he's just another illustration, one more example, why judges should never have this power.
	But because courts...
	Decide for themselves what power they have.
	Isn't that always nice?
	There's nobody there to discipline.
	Like, I have a case up in Seattle, Washington, that I'll be making an appearance in, where it's the judges violating the defendant's rights on a regular basis.
	A guy who's in jail basically over a mask mandate, a COVID mask mandate, and they ignored his religious and medical objections to it.
	Still in jail, and they're rigging one trial after the next, after the next.
	And the lead people rigging the trials are the judges.
	Like, one of the things they did was issue their own mask mandates and then wouldn't let him in if he didn't have a mask on and then issued a criminal sanction saying he failed to appear when they were the ones who prohibited him from appearing in the first place.
	And then they conduct a trial that excludes him from defending himself in his own trial.
	And this is what, and especially liberal Democrats, who are power mad, Remember, this is the same Colorado court system that initially, its Supreme Court, wanted to remove Trump from the ballot on patently frivolous arguments.
	The only people that are interfering with civil rights, civil liberties, and election integrity in Colorado are the judges themselves, and they're the ones who belong in prison like this scumbag does.
	He should be impeached, then he should be indicted for civil rights violations, and then he should have his rear end put in prison for nine years.
	Because that's what an honest, a constitutionally honorable country was.
	This man is a disgrace to the bench, but he represents what liberal Democrats represent on the bench.
	And he represents the dangers of ever giving judges any power at all because they will abuse it because they always have.
	It's the only tradition with giving small elites any degree of power.
	They won't do it at a good conscience.
	They won't do it to protect the individual rights or liberties.
	They will misuse and abuse it as they have throughout our entire history.
	And this judge is just the latest example of that.
	His sentence is insane.
	And here's a judge who's going to let rapists walk, murderers walk, drug dealers walk, pedophiles walk, because he cries deeply for them.
	But someone who challenged the election integrity in Colorado, nine years in state prison because he doesn't like her speech, as he was stupid enough.
	Let me just illustrate that you're not being hyperbolic in what you're saying about letting the rapists out.
	He literally said in his sentencing diatribe that Tina had none of the other factors, basically mitigating factors.
	She wasn't a drug addict.
	She knew what she was doing, as if to say the rapists don't know what they're doing, or the drug addicts, or the alcoholics, or the gang members.
	They're a product of their environment.
	She doesn't have those defenses going for her.
	FYI people, out of Colorado, we're Colorado.
	The average sentence for a convicted rapist is anywhere from 4 to 14 years.
	And it's typically lower.
	It was like 4 to 8 years.
	So Tina Peters, non-violent, first time 69-year-old woman.
	69-year-old woman, gold star mom.
	Whatever you think of her actions, believed she was blowing the whistle on corruption and fraud in the election of 2020, is going to serve twice as long as the average rapist.
	In Colorado.
	And this judge is proud of that fact.
	Explain that, where people were picking up on that, and I can't say that I picked up on it the first time, where the judge said, specifically, like, while you were exercising, he said, basically, it doesn't protect your words.
	I think that's almost verbatim what he said.
	What she did, it does not protect her words that came out of her mouth.
	I know.
	I mean, it was just...
	This is why we took the Owen Schroer case, the 1776 Law Center, on behalf of Owen Schroer to the Supreme Court.
	Try to get the Supreme Court to take it because judges were starting to sentence people based on their political beliefs, based on their political speech.
	That's not supposed to happen.
	That First Amendment prohibits it.
	But once the Supreme Court sat on its lazy rear end like it usually does and didn't take the case, judges like this feel empowered.
	Judges like this are like, all right, now we can get going.
	The people interfering in the election are judges.
	The people trying to contaminate our election are judges, more than anyone else.
	It was the judges who failed to discharge their duties to hold meaningful election contests in Georgia.
	It was the judges of the Supreme Court of the United States that failed to take the original action that was joined by a near majority of states and a near majority of members of the House of Representatives and a bunch of senators and leading legal scholars, and they were too scared to take the case.
	And the only Alito and Thomas dissented from the failure to take the case.
	So, I mean, all the rest were wusses.
	They were like, ha ha ha ha, we don't want to get involved.
	And while all that is done is allowed these liberal authoritarians that will feel all sympathy in the world for the sickest psychos on the planet because they're part of the dependent constituencies and classes that they get to control and govern and are enraged.
	By the independent people who expose the corruption and fraud of the system.
	And that's why these judges that are supposedly liberal judges are some of the nastiest, most vicious, most vile fascistic authoritarians you'll find on the planet.
	The gap between a fascist and a communist is a very thin line.
	And what you're seeing is who and how these judges act.
	They're going to weaponize their power, their control, to imprison their political dissidents and political critics and be proud of it and want to brag about it to the world and expect that they will be cheered and declared heroes and be given special foundation scholarships and grants and all the rest for being these great noble jurists who stood up.
	against the election whistleblowers, which is what she was and who she is.
	But by the terms of the sentencing itself He radically deviated from it.
	He radically deviated so badly, and he was so explicit in his political prejudice, and so explicit in wanting someone punished for their speech, and as a message to deter other people's speech, that even the commie courts of Colorado Are probably going to have to overturn this verdict.
	And overturn this sentence.
	Because he also rigged the entire trial.
	So she couldn't present a defense.
	I also want to highlight.
	Because the retort or the steel man is.
	Viva! She got rightfully convicted by a jury of her peers.
	To which I want to say.
	Convicted by the jury versus sentenced by the politically motivated judge.
	Are two very different things.
	Not only that.
	It confuses power with principle.
	Never confuse the two.
	I'm a big champion of the right of a jury trial and of the jury having more power than judges.
	That does not mean every jury decision is correct.
	If you defer your judgment about the law or justice, this is what we discussed about the Ricada case.
	If you defer to what a judge says it is or what a jury says it is, then you have a completely subjectivist interpretation.
	And by that definition, the law has no objective meaning, and truth has no objective meaning, and justice has no objective meaning.
	You're a relativist at heart.
	And so unless that's what you truly philosophically embrace, then it's not a position that's consistent with any belief that there's objective truth, that there's objective justice, that there's objective law that can be objectively discernible.
	So the fact she was convicted tells me nothing.
	The only thing that the whole case tells me is it was a rigged trial in front of a biased jury pool by a judge who was preordained to rig the sentencing in ways that contravene the principles of law governing all three.
	I'll only add my two cents to that.
	People say she was convicted by a jury so you got nothing to complain about.
	And I'm like, first of all, sentenced by the judge is different.
	But then the other question is...
	If a jury knew that they were going to be responsible for having a woman sentenced to basically life in prison given her age if she serves this entire bullshit sentence, would they have found her guilty in the first place?
	So when they want to find someone guilty, if they handle the sentencing, it's a lot easier to control by way of an outcome as opposed to under these circumstances.
	They say guilty.
	I mean, I want to bring up Jenna Griswold.
	Even that liberal jury would have gone with a very low sentence.
	Absolutely. And that's why the judge doesn't want...
	That's why the judges took away the jury's power to sentence.
	They want to control that extraordinary power.
	They don't want ordinary people to have it.
	And I would have said, the jury might have still convicted her because this is Jenna Griswold's Colorado and we're dealing with a jury pool that might be as biased as D.C. But nobody in their right mind would have sentenced her to nine years.
	Nobody in their right mind.
	Six months would have been excessive already.
	And look, Robert, entertain me.
	I just want to play the first minute and two seconds, including the judges' dramatic pause.
	Listen to this.
	I'll share the link with everybody.
	I mean, it's gone around, but as much awareness that can be raised for Tina Peters right now, you can think she's guilty all you want.
	People are saying she didn't really expose egregious election fraud because nobody really looked into it.
	But she's clearly being punished for what she attempted to do.
	Listen to a minute and two seconds of this.
	Dramatic pause.
	You have no qualms with violating the court's orders because you're innocent.
	Because you didn't do anything wrong.
	You were just doing your job.
	You have no problem trying to kick an officer.
	Your explanation about what happened is preposterous.
	It's on video.
	You have no problem lying to officers.
	It's happened multiple times.
	They're recorded conversations.
	It's just more lies.
	No objective person believes them.
	No, at the end of the day, you cared about the Jets, the podcasts, and the people finding over you.
	You abdicated your position as a servant to the Constitution, and you chose you over all else.
	Yes, you are a charlatan, and you cannot help but lie as easy it is for you to breathe.
	You betrayed your oath for no one other than you.
	It's a whole hell of a lot of confession through projection, Robert.
	That's exactly what it is.
	And any time people think that the outcome justifies what took place, that means you support the ending, the verdict, and to kill a mockingbird.
	And you're basically a moral reprobate at that point.
	Anybody who celebrates a jury verdict merely because it's a jury verdict or celebrates a sentence merely because it was someone in power issued it is kind of a disgusting human being, really.
	Let me read a few of the super chats.
	Everyone, come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com or Rumble.
	We got Eclectic Deb over on YouTube.
	It says, in fact, in that fact check on the hurricane, if it's true then, then climate change is BS, right?
	Yeah, I guess we can't affect the environment.
	Benny D says they were dropping dry ice salt into hurricane tornadoes to see what effect changing the humidity temperature would have, increasing, decreasing how bad it was.
	The research was started decades ago.
	Absolutely. I had a court commissioner in the Seattle area tell me, quote, I don't care what the Supreme Court says.
	We saw that out of Dexter Taylor's case.
	And then throw me in jail on contempt when I pointed out his ruling was illegal.
	And then we got Keith Noah says, can FEMA be sued for predatory lending to disadvantaged people?
	Apparently it says the grants don't have to be paid back.
	And then we got B-Torn says, some don't know.
	Asheville region was already flooded by two days of rain.
	A day later, monsoon rains came, washed out the soil.
	Yes, it's catastrophic.
	Okay, now what we're going to do is we're going to end on Commitube and it's going to take it out on Twitter as well.
	Robert, What do you have this week?
	I mean, we'll go over it at the end there, but for anybody who's not coming over from Commitube, come on over from Commitube, people.
	But what do you have this week?
	Oh, we got the big Amos Miller argument.
	He's the Amish farmer.
	The state of Pennsylvania is trying to shut down.
	His case will be heard in the morning in the Commonwealth Court, but they're locating their hearings in the Allegheny County Courthouse.
	They issued a detailed order about reminding people...
	They cannot rebroadcast.
	There will be a YouTube channel where you can listen in, but that will be the only place.
	There's no rebroadcasting allowed of any kind.
	That probably raises its own constitutional issues, but that will be another issue for another day.
	Make clear nobody can bring phones in.
	Nobody can have any shirts that say anything on them.
	They seem to be obsessed with that, to be honest with you.
	Bit of a peculiar order.
	But this is the same Commonwealth Court that just tried to change the election rules to favor Democrats in Pennsylvania.
	So am I confident that I will get a fair and partial hearing from unprejudiced judges?
	No, I'm not.
	We'll see what happens.
	But you can support.
	Amos Miller's got a pumpkin pie fundraiser to help support all the different legal costs.
	That he has had to incur in these years of harassment by the state of Pennsylvania and the Biden administration.
	And maybe the election will resolve some things down the road.
	But in the interim, they're trying to shut him down.
	So you can go out to amosmillerorganicfarm.com and get what you want today, because who knows whether it's available in a week, depending on what the Commonwealth Court decides to do.
	The law is quite crystal clear.
	The ruling of a prior Commonwealth Court judge, the ruling of the trial court judge, is the state does not have the legal authority or the constitutional power to shut down and prohibit a farmer from making his food accessible to willing, informed customers outside the state of Pennsylvania.
	But, you know, this is a Commonwealth Court that twice had to be overturned by a Democratic.
	This is a Commonwealth court that has illegally imprisoned farm workers on Amish farms.
	So we'll see what happens.
	I get seven and a half minutes to make arguments.
	So we'll see how that goes on Tuesday.
	Unbelievable. All right.
	I'll be listening, Robert, for sure.
	Ending on Commitube and ending on Twitter as well, just because that's how studio is designed.
	Come on over to Rumble.
	Bam. Okay, let me see.
	I'm going to go end the stream properly.
	Now, it's a good segue, or at least you touched on it.
	What's the latest on Pennsylvania election lawsuits that are ongoing right now?
	Well, those got resolved.
	Basically, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court disciplined the Commonwealth Court for trying to intervene and change the rules at the last minute.
	Like, we're not getting involved in this and dismissed it.
	So now it's other states where a range of cases are pending instead.
	So we'll see how all of that...
	Turns out, and we'll keep people updated as those cases reach new developments.
	But there's still cases everywhere.
	There's cases about who's registered to vote.
	There's cases about whether you could purge the election rolls like they did in Oklahoma and Arizona.
	I'm sorry, Oklahoma and they didn't do it in Arizona.
	They're not going to in Arizona because the court prohibited them from doing it.
	But they're challenging in Alabama on the grounds that it's within the 90-day time frame.
	That they, you know, were just a day or two late in when they purged the people who weren't supposed to be registered to vote in the first place.
	And you got people like John Ralston, a reporter out of Nevada, people like Garrett Archer, an election analyst for ABC News in Arizona, who are coming up with every excuse in the book for a while.
	And finally, at least I'll give Garrett Archer credit.
	He finally admitted his reasoning was he's fine with 100,000 illegals.
	People voting who shouldn't be, as long as it doesn't deny one person who should have the right to vote from voting.
	It's like the theory of presumption of innocence.
	I'm like, that's not how our election laws work.
	Our election laws care more about the people voting illegally than they do people voting legally.
	The goal is to make sure only legally, constitutionally qualified voters vote.
	And they're dismissive of that because they want to make sure that one person who failed to register correctly or failed to update their file correctly still gets to vote, even if it means tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, or even millions of people vote who are not constitutionally qualified to vote.
	And the legal standard should be on the side of making sure only the constitutionally qualified vote, but courts have been all over the place on this.
	What was I going to do?
	I forgot to do it when we were on YouTube as well, but it doesn't matter.
	Rumble Advertiser Center, people.
	This is going to be two advertisers.
	One for Polymarket and the other one for Rumble Advertiser Center, which is an amazing thing.
	Check this out.
	It's a beautiful rack.
	It's a beautiful rack.
	Let's see how we do this.
	I'm clicking on it.
	We're running the campaign right now.
	Let me see here.
	Polymarket is the world's largest prediction market.
	Track election results in real time and see who's leading instantly.
	See odds react in real time to current events instead of days later with the legacy media.
	This isn't some static poll that's already out of date by the time it's published.
	It's a living, breathing reflection of public sentiment in real time.
	No bias or media spin, just pure data.
	These are not the polls.
	These are percentage chances of outcome.
	If Harris is at 51%, she would win 51 out of 100 times if the election were held today.
	You could use this...
	I've got to scroll down.
	Hold on a second.
	Let me do this.
	Sorry, there we go.
	Now I can see it.
	You could use this to really drive home how close the election truly is.
	Market odds reflect the collective analysis, beliefs, and wisdom of thousands of traders reacting to real-time events.
	It's amazing.
	Go to Polymarket, people.
	Well, you can make money betting that the people are wrong that think Harris is going to win.
	Or the margin of victory in states.
	You've got a range of different odds out there.
	Polymarket is a subscriber, I believe.
	Because I saw at Polymarket was on my subscriber list, so I'm guessing it's them.
	The sportspicks.locals.com where we have a whole bunch of bets picks up on the betting markets because you can bet on the margin of victory.
	I mean, I went back and looked like given where the margin of victory odds would have been, they didn't have these in 2020 or 2016, but given how they've structured them in 2024, I think we would have gone something like 92-8 in terms of a win rate.
	On guessing the margin of victory in 2016 and 2020 being better than the betting markets are.
	It'll be on tomorrow with Richard Barris.
	What are the odds at 2 p.m.
	Eastern? I'm going to do that show.
	It'll be a shortened show because I've got to hop on a plane then to go to Pittsburgh to get ready for the oral argument Tuesday morning for Amos Miller.
	We do have a special pumpkin pie.
	I have it pinned up at Barnes underscore Law on Twitter.
	It's also pinned up at our Locals board, vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	The pumpkin pie is out, right?
	Didn't you have it last year?
	Yes, we did.
	It's amazing.
	I'm not even a pumpkin pie fan.
	And that pumpkin pie was amazing.
	And it goes, the surplus funds, it's a fundraiser.
	You get the pumpkin pie as an extra bonus.
	A fundraiser to help support all the legal fees that Amos has incurred.
	That's what I was going to say.
	People are saying, my goodness, the pumpkin pie is expensive.
	It's a fundraiser.
	It's a fundraiser where you get an awesome Amish Amos Miller pumpkin pie that is the best pumpkin pie I have ever had.
	I wholeheartedly attest to that.
	I do not like pumpkin pie.
	Ever. And I don't like anything with pumpkin, except I cook chicken and pumpkin and whatever, but best thing ever.
	And by the way, that was the Polymarket, the link now.
	You should scan the QR code and go invest in your knowledge, as we like to say.
	There's no segue.
	The best way to get on Polymarket is crypto, so get some crypto.
	It's good for you.
	What do we talk about now?
	By the way, they apparently have identified who they believe the founder of Bitcoin is.
	I think it's Netflix.
	Somebody's going to have a documentary coming out, and there's some informed speculation that it's someone who passed away a couple of years ago under suspicious circumstances.
	Is it McAfee?
	No, not McAfee.
	It's somebody else.
	That was kind of a totally off-the-radar screen, real independent guy.
	But apparently they've got mounting evidence that he was the one.
	So he's dead and he presumably cannot tap into his multi-billions of...
	He never did it for that.
	That he was an old-school independent, had to take down the state.
	And if it is him, he's a great testament to the power of individual will that people might have doubts about when they see things like the Tina Peters sentencing, when they see the corruption of our legal system.
	I mean, Norm Eisen was cheering on the Tina Peters sentencing.
	What happens when Norm's in that chair?
	Because Norm actually did.
	What Tina Peters was accused of.
	As is being documented by Jeffrey Clark, lawyer Weave, who's been wrongfully prosecuted, wrongfully targeted by the same administrative state.
	We've interviewed him here on Sidebar.
	He's been detailing both that Kamala Harris has no real history as a trial lawyer.
	Everybody knew that, by the way, in California.
	Still the dumbest lawyer I ever had to deal with in court.
	And she mostly avoided court.
	That's who she was, because she was too dumb to actually practice law.
	Failed the bar.
	Maybe repeatedly.
	We're not fully sure.
	We just know she failed at some point.
	But what he's been detailing is how Norm Eisen and these other folks, Barbara McQuaid, are going around on podcasts admitting their complicity in conspiracy to violate the civil rights of President Trump and a bunch of other people, even when they didn't have official government positions, including getting the Justice Department to give wrong advice.
	to Attorney General Sessions on whether he had to recuse because their whole goal was to use Russiagate as a cover up for Spygate which many of them were involved in and I just think there's some people that are going to have and this has got to include some judges people that have just got so used to abusing their power and never facing any consequence for it that it's just as a matter of deterring it from happening in the future Because a lot of confession through projection with what that speech that that corrupt judge in Colorado
	gave, they need to be the ones in that defendant's chair.
	And we got to put some of them in that defendant's chair, including Fauci and some of those people as well.
	But there has to be consequences or we'll never get this thing fixed.
	Let me, I won't read the lengthy response from Jeff Clark, but let me play just a bit of this, Robert, because I try to internalize this.
	The revelation was when I truly understood what you meant by the Russiagate investigation was actually a cover-up of the deep state crimes.
	I'll play a bit of this.
	You can't fire people for illegal reasons.
	You can't fire someone because of the color of their skin.
	That's an illegal reason.
	I love this legal analysis.
	You can't fire someone if your purpose is to intimidate them.
	When you see these bogus...
	And when you see a DOJ memo that comes from an attorney general who was purportedly recused from all things Russia, but how could you not have spoken about Russia when you were preparing that memo?
	It's beyond me.
	I wasn't ready because of the president's strong hiring and firing powers for an FBI director, and Director Comey himself has written, the president can hire or fire for any reason.
	I wasn't ready to talk obstruction until the stories broke about Trump's private loyalty demand to Comey.
	Who are these people, Robert?
	These are people that are part of the Democratic legal establishment that have been going around on podcasts bragging about how they helped fix Russiagate, how they helped undermine and sabotage the Trump presidency, how they got bad advice,
	how they infiltrated inappropriately legal decision-making authorities at the Justice Department, in some cases with courts, in some cases with others, the power that they did not have, a right and prerogative that they did not have,
	a privilege they did not have, to get them to fix the entire administrative state to sabotage the Trump presidency, and that they have been complicit in it on a go-forward basis, that they were complicit in a range of activities to basically try to stage a coup with January 6th, each to deny Trump election access in 2024.
	So I mean, these are people that are They belong in prison for life, people like Norm Eisen.
	What they're admitting is complete sabotage of the American Constitutional Republic at every single level in ways they did not have the legal privilege to do.
	You want to advocate for what you want in the court of public opinion?
	Fine. They're the ones who've said advocacy in the court of public opinion constitutes obstruction.
	Well, what was it that you were doing then, Norm?
	By your own admission, you're guilty of obstruction of justice.
	By your own admission, you're guilty of federal crimes, of major civil rights crimes.
	Use the confession through projection roadmap of everything they've accused anybody in Trump world of, of them confessing their own criminal behavior, and it's got to be used against them in the next administration.
	Some of these people need to—and it needs to be some high-profile names so that this gets the message across, because otherwise it won't get the message across.
	These people are bragging about their abuse of power.
	These people are proud of their abuse of power.
	They think they are beyond the law, and they need to be taught a lesson that they're beneath it.
	Well, speaking of them, I guess making examples of people, we're going to get back to Alex Jones.
	What's the latest with Alex Jones?
	I hadn't heard of any news.
	The bankruptcy, they're going to liquidate assets come November.
	At least the judge is authorizing this.
	What's the latest news of the evening?
	So the Texas plaintiff's lawyers are going to the state court and trying to shut down Infowars before Election Day.
	So it's not a coincidence they locked up Steve Bannon throughout the election and judges refused to release him early.
	They see, I mean, this is who these people are.
	I mean, name the last time a lead political advocate for a presidential candidate was imprisoned on politically motivated charges during the heart of an election season.
	I mean, has that ever happened in American history?
	And yet the media is just pretending it's not happening.
	While they have the guts.
	To accuse Trump of planning it.
	It's extraordinary, the gaslighting that's going on.
	But it's similar here.
	So they're unhappy that they're not going to be able to use the bankruptcy process to silence Alex Jones, to own his name and identity, to censor completely Infowars.
	And so instead, they're going to the political partisan courts in Travis County that are a joke.
	The Texas state legislature should consider removing Travis County's power in a wide range of ways.
	They are proving incapable of impartial justice.
	There's no reason why a whole bunch of claims couldn't be automatically removed from Travis County in any politically tainted proceeding.
	Travis County has proven this now for decades.
	Their courts are a joke.
	You walk in there, I tell people that are there, one, move out.
	Don't live in Travis County.
	Don't live in Austin, Texas.
	Because all that's going to happen is, the judges will never give you anything that vaguely resembles justice.
	It's so politically motivated, it's a complete crock.
	And the appeals court also is just a Travis County appeals court, effectively.
	So there's a bunch of Democratic hacks there.
	So unless the Texas Supreme Court steps in, which is rare.
	You're basically screwed out of any sense of justice if it comes out of Travis County.
	And so these Texas plaintiffs' lawyers have now gone to the Texas state courts asking that anything that's not part of the bankruptcy, a receiver be appointed to take over Alex Jones' life and to try to shut him down that way.
	But on what legal basis?
	If it's not part of the bankruptcy, on what legal basis?
	So what they can try to do, so a state receiver, what the other problem with this is, this is why there should be an automatic stay of any judgment.
	That's why I support bail pending appeal as well.
	I know a lot of my conservative friends don't care for it.
	Well, then change the Constitution if you don't care for it.
	Don't try to unilaterally pretend the Constitution doesn't exist.
	The same is true here because the only reason why this is even possible is because Texas doesn't have a mechanism, effective mechanism, to stay a judgment pending appeal.
	So they get to collect on the judgment before the appeal is even heard, which always strikes me as nuts given how what a crock this whole court proceeding was at the trial court level.
	And so as a collection action, you can request in some states, depends on the state, a receiver be appointed.
	Who's given the power of the court to enforce the judgment.
	And those mechanisms can include all kinds of seizures.
	Now, there's limits on what can be seized, but my guess is that this receiver, this Travis County Courthouse, and these plaintiff's lawyers won't respect those limits.
	They can't try to do anything that interferes with the bankruptcy proceeding, as the bankruptcy court has already scolded them for trying before.
	When the state judge did so, the bankruptcy court didn't hold anybody's feet to the fire and issue a sanctions award, and that was going to encourage them to come back and try it again.
	In Texas, you have a long, long list of things that are exempt.
	The receiver cannot collect on anything that's exempt.
	The receiver cannot collect on the homestead.
	The receiver cannot collect on any retirement.
	The receiver cannot collect on a wide range of benefits that are received.
	Particularly government benefits, but other benefits as well can fit within that category.
	The receiver can't collect on...
	There's $100,000 for a family of exempt individually owned items.
	Your principally owned vehicle they can't collect on.
	So there's a bunch of things they cannot collect on.
	But that doesn't mean they won't try.
	Because that's how Rogue...
	That's how rogue the receiver is likely to be.
	So watch them try to see, even though they failed in bankruptcy court, to try to seize ownership of Alex Jones' social media accounts, to try to seize ownership of Alex Jones' identity, to try to seize ownership of bank accounts that are exempt from coverage.
	For example, you can't collect wages.
	And the Texas Supreme Court has made clear you can't collect the wages once it's in a bank account either.
	But they'll violate the rules because that's who they are.
	Wages up to what amount in Texas?
	I was just trying to look that up.
	No wages, period.
	Can't collect wages, period.
	You can't collect wages.
	Salary. Yeah, right.
	That's exempt.
	Texas has the broadest homestead exemption exempt from collection of any state in America.
	But I'm going to ask this stupid question.
	If you can't collect wages...
	What the hell are you supposed to seize or garnish in order to satisfy a judgment?
	You can only collect the excess of that.
	So that if you're the person you're suing lives in Texas, there's not a lot you can collect unless they've got a lot of extra properties, a lot of extra incomes, a lot of extra accounts that are not 401ks, that are not IRAs, that are not in pension funds, that are not...
	Your principal homestead can be a massive farm.
	So, I mean, in Texas, there's a reason why Texas has the aggressive homestead protections.
	It's designed so the state can't take certain fundamental liberties away from you, even if they do rig a trial and get a crazy verdict against you, anywhere in the country, because Connecticut has to enforce its judgment as well in Texas.
	So, you know, if you want homestead protection, Texas is probably the best state in the union for it.
	Now, there's a lot of other legal ways to protect yourself that are more creative using jurisdictions.
	But what they're trying to circumvent is that.
	And so that's why my guess is they want to seize bank accounts that are exempt, but pretend they're not.
	And they probably want to seize his name and likeness and image and social media accounts.
	And the reason they're doing it, the timing, is to shut him down right on the eve of the election.
	Because he's an effective spokesperson.
	Because that's how political...
	They're going to misuse and abuse every power because that's what they have done throughout the entire case.
	And Travis County will remind everybody that they're as nuts as the Colorado courts.
	That they're as politically partisan as the New York courts.
	They are hopelessly prejudiced and unrespecting of constitutional restraint as the D.C.
	courts. That's what liberal jurisdictions have become.
	And it's why we need to look at ways to take away power from them going forward, because they are abusing it at a dangerous and perilous level for the constitutional freedoms of the country to simply be around in a decade.
	Well, I'm certainly going to clip this and make it into a short because I do think you're right about them trying to seize...
	His personal social media, his name, his brand, his persona.
	We had talked about it a while back when they were trying to claim that that was part of the assets in bankruptcy.
	So I have no doubt they're going to try to do it.
	If I may, let me entertain some of the Rumble rants over on Rumble.
	There's a big one that I saw from King of Biltong.
	Biltong is one of the most protein-dense foods in the world, packed with B12, zinc, iron, creatine, and more.
	Need a healthy snack?
	Get yours at BiltongUSA.com.
	Viva10 for 10% off.
	Game is available.
	It's delicious.
	Ben Hamilton says, love you guys, keeping the truth alive.
	Lucy the dog says, she did expose wrongdoing, but the evidence wasn't allowed.
	The SOS Secretary of State, Deep State, destroyed a good saint.
	I think you're correct, Viva, to note that whether or not it actually is happening, it is fascinating to know what the naysayers do not say about it.
	Gives one pause.
	No? Salty Scotch.
	Thank you, Viva and Barnes.
	The engaged few.
	If those job numbers were massaged any harder, they wouldn't need a cigarette and some wet naps.
	Yeah, massage, i.e.
	lies. Emergency powers don't count tropical rocket.
	Karantov. Hey, Barnes.
	I'm not saying you won't get...
	I'm saying we won't get our hair must.
	I get that one.
	Andy Pearson.
	Help me find emergency powers in the Constitution.
	Pinochet's helicopter tours.
	FEMA is ripping off the taxpayers.
	FEMA employees do not deserve the amount of money that they are paid for the quality of services rendered for the people.
	We must demand 50% pay cuts minimum for equity.
	Freddie65, what about the so-called DEI-approved vendors for FEMA?
	Supposedly one reason they're denying supplies.
	Tropical Rocket.
	Taxpayer-funded orgs are not supposed to be fact-checking.
	They should be providing real-time accounts of their work.
	Crash Bandit.
	Don't forget what this government did not do for Hawaii and Palestine, Ohio.
	Never forget.
	Hiram. Federal FY fiscal year started October 1st.
	They claim FEMA doesn't have sufficient funds to deal with the hurricane.
	Oh, I get that.
	They do have it because their year started now.
	Interesting. Sammy, I'm sure Kamala meant to say Lebanon, Pennsylvania.
	What jurisdiction does FEMA actually have?
	We talked about that.
	Tropical Rocket.
	What does the Constitution mean to keep judges honest?
	And then Squiggs, 1618, could Trump, should he win the election, pardon Tina?
	No, it's a state case, so he can't pardon Tina.
	Who could pardon Tina out of Colorado?
	It has to be the governor, right?
	The governor.
	Who is the governor?
	I don't know the specific rules in Colorado, but usually it's the governor.
	Sometimes it's like a committee and stuff like that.
	It varies by state.
	Governor of Colorado is Jared Paulus, Democrat Party.
	They're all hardcore Democrats.
	And if I look up Jared Paulus, let me just do this just for fun.
	Jared Paulus and Alex Soros.
	Let's just see if we get any pictures of the two.
	I'll find something.
	Give me a second.
	I'll do that in a sec.
	Speaking of corruption, what do we do?
	Do we do the pharmaceutical one?
	It might be good.
	Yeah, we got that.
	We got the COVID injured.
	We got the what's going on in free speech.
	And there's multiple variations of that.
	There's the meme ban in California.
	There's the fire in the theater nonsense from Tim Walsh.
	There's the Twitter suing California over the social media law reached the Ninth Circuit.
	There's the EU suing Hungary, while at the same time, U.S. authorities are involved in seizing people's Internet domains without any notice or a prior notice of any kind.
	That even a case exists, and they're busy seizing it on grounds that directly contradict what they're doing to Hungary about when it is and isn't okay to try to control foreign speech influence.
	Well, let me just take a pause and say we just cracked 20,000 libra, 20,108 right now.
	Do we have any fun additional rack readings?
	No, not yet.
	I have to see.
	You get 20 minutes until you can do another one.
	I got a minute and 17 before we can do it.
	They limit, so you don't just sit there for an entire stream reading racks.
	Not that I would do that.
	I'm a married man.
	Let's do the Gavin Newsom, that jackass who parades around.
	I think it was a late night talk show where he's like, yeah, this is how easy it is to govern.
	I just sign a bill here, sign a bill there, and implement a wildly...
	What is the word I'm looking for?
	Facially? Is that the word?
	Facially. I'm sorry.
	Facially unconstitutional law going into effect, where he's going to outlaw AI-generated memery that has the purpose of influencing elections, whatever the hell.
	Bottom line, I don't know who the plaintiff was that took it to court and already got an injunction enjoining application of that law, which they said...
	Is, I don't know, prima facie on its face, unconstitutional.
	They did not implement the least restrictive means possible in order to address the problem.
	You'll remember, I'll get the video in a second, but it's Gavin Newsom saying, look, when Elon Musk retweeted that obvious patent, patent, parody, troll video of Kamala Harris explaining why she's the ultimate DEI hire.
	So if you accuse, if you criticize her, you're both a racist and a misogynist.
	And then Gavin Newsom says, I'm going to pass a law to make this illegal.
	And then, I don't know, three months later, two months later, puts out a bill that outlaws AI-generated memery, and it's been taken to court and already enjoined from application on the basis of superficial, you know, facial-level analysis, unconstitutionality.
	Do you know who the plaintiff was in that case?
	I'm not familiar with the plaintiff.
	Yeah, Kohl's.
	I think maybe it was by Mr. Reagan.
	I forget his Twitter handle.
	But yeah, filed suit.
	Pointing out the things that we pointed out that the law was likely to get enjoined pretty quickly unless it got a crazy, just all crazy judges.
	And it didn't.
	And the court, it did immediately enjoin the law because it pointed out the state doesn't get to be the arbiter of truth.
	That the terms were very subjective and vague.
	That the word harmful, what the heck fire does that mean?
	That's always been the social media catch-all favorite.
	Call it harmful and we can regulate it.
	And the court was like...
	No, we don't just get to call it harmful.
	And in this capacity, I mean, noted that satire has always been constitutionally protected.
	Parity has always been constitutionally protected.
	But when it's stepped further, now it just made it clear the state cannot be the arbiter of truth, but that protecting election information is not a compelling interest in most cases.
	And to the degree it is, it's got to be very narrowly tailored.
	It can't be something like this.
	And the court was skeptical that it even meets.
	Like, look, we already have a bunch of tort law and statutes on the books to defend reputational harm, to defend a certain interest in privacy, a certain interest in your business model, like copyright laws, etc.
	It's like the interest in truth in election outcomes is not really a state interest.
	And if we started calling it a state interest, then that would be very dangerous and precarious for First Amendment liberties and rights.
	And in this capacity, in part corrected the mistake Tim Walsh made during the vice presidential debate, which is where Walsh said you can't yell fire in a crowded theater.
	Yes, you can.
	And that decision came from a horrendous decision issued during World War I by Justice Holmes, who himself regretted it three years later.
	Because what it was is he is, like most judges, complicit in suppressing people's civil liberties during an emergency.
	So if it's a public health emergency or war, judges are snoozing and the rest of us are losing when it comes to liberties and rights.
	Ultimately, they would undermine that.
	The logic of that decision.
	And then completely reverse it.
	That decision, the law Newsom is relying on, is a law that hasn't existed in America for 60 years, thanks to the old Berkeley free speech movement in part.
	You know, where a guy stood up at a Vietnam rally and said, you know, he had LBJ in his sniper rifle.
	And he was charged with threatening the president.
	And the Supreme Court said, you can't do that.
	That's speech.
	The same in the Brandenburg decision where a Klansman went out and said, let's do all these bad things to black people and violated Ohio law.
	And the Supreme Court said that Ohio law violates the First Amendment because they said it's not where there's a clear and present danger.
	But they try to use this, by the way, for courts to try to control lawyer speech or advocate speech.
	They're using standards that have been thrown out by the Supreme Court for 60 years.
	The standard is not fire in a crowded theater.
	The standard instead is you have to want...
	You have to intend and the nature of the statements and circumstances be such that you are likely to incite imminent lawless action.
	So you have to intend imminent lawless action.
	You have to, in fact, incite it.
	It has to be likely that you will incite it imminently.
	Otherwise, it's completely protected.
	So if you yell fire in a crowded theater and you don't intend to...
	If it's not likely to incite imminent lawless action, then guess what?
	You can yell, fire in a crowded theater under the First Amendment.
	Walsh is wrong, just as Newsom was wrong.
	And that's why the state of California also lost against X for trying to compel them to create a censorship index of how good a job were they doing censoring.
	They're like...
	You decided to define censoring.
	That's a content-driven regulation.
	That's in violation of the First Amendment, too.
	Well, hold on.
	Before we even get there, I love that.
	They said you can't scream fire in a crowded theater.
	And the piece that I was reading was like, well, of course you can if there's a fire.
	And you still can if no one's going to be brought to panic.
	And I'm sitting there thinking, yeah, there's five people in a massive theater and one jackass starts screaming fire and the other four are like, there's no fire here.
	You don't have that restriction on speech.
	But I wanted to highlight this because it's actually, It's phenomenally impactful, and it actually says, I think, a lot more than anyone would appreciate the first time reading it.
	The law does not pass constitutional scrutiny.
	We're at the injunctive level here, so they haven't had a hearing on the merits yet, but this is a superficial analysis of it.
	It does not use the least restrictive means available for advancing the state's interest here, as plaintiffs persuasively argue.
	Counterspeech is a less restrictive alternative to prohibiting videos such as those posted by plaintiff, no matter how offensive or inappropriate anyone might find them.
	It's the old expression.
	The only counter to hate speech is more speech.
	The only counter to disinformation is more speech and more information.
	And that judgment says it, which I thought was phenomenal to read.
	But... For those who aren't familiar with the X Corp, this is Twitter, who was suing Bonta, the same person again, in California.
	California was requiring Twitter on, what was it, a quarterly basis to divulge its...
	Oh, geez, what's the word I'm looking for?
	They called it content moderation, but really it was, how good a job have you done censoring this quarter?
	Because they specifically defined what...
	They kept saying, oh, we're just wanting public transparency on their content moderation.
	And X and Musk were like, that isn't what you're doing.
	You're defining what content moderation needs to be there and how well we're doing the content moderation as you see it.
	And there's another word for that.
	Censorship. How good a job have you censored this last quarter?
	And tell us how well you've censored.
	And publish to the world how well you're censoring.
	That's compelled speech, and that's imposing on them disclosing information that is content-based.
	And so consequently, it's very suspect under the First Amendment.
	And the Ninth Circuit made clear, it was like, you don't need this for actual transparency.
	If you chose not to define what content had to be moderated, you might have been okay under...
	Just, hey, let's see what transparency is.
	But that isn't what you did.
	You said, please tell us about this part and this category.
	It was a censorship index.
	It was, here's where we expect you to be censoring, and you're going to report to us quarterly on it.
	And that's why the Ninth Circuit said that law violates X's First Amendment rights.
	I'm going to show Rack again, only because it's totally apropos for the discussion of the evening, people.
	Give, send, go!
	I'll do it for free, give, send, go, but I'm going to show how Rumble Advertiser Center works.
	And if the hurricane's not so bad here next week, I'm supposed to go up to Orlando for an event sponsored by, or put on by Square, Public Square.
	So, bottom line, by the way, give, send, go.
	Nobody should use GoFMe.
	In today's world, standing up for what you believe in can come with challenges.
	That's why so many have turned to Give, Send, Go, the fundraising platform that stands for freedom and backs those who won't back down.
	From high-profile figures like Jordan Peterson to courageous individuals like Kyle Rittenhouse, Give, Send, Go has become the fundraising platform.
	What makes GiveSendGo different?
	It's not just about money.
	It's about community and hope.
	Unlike other fundraising sites, GiveSendGo offers prayers, personal support through their unique hope team.
	Every campaign organizer gets a call offering a prayer and encouragement from a team that truly cares.
	This is Jacob Wells, the CEO.
	He's been on the channel.
	He's amazing.
	Plus, with the pray button, anyone can offer a message of hope to those in need, making this more than just a fundraising platform.
	It's a movement.
	whether you're raising funds for personal needs or rallying people to a cause that matters.
	Give, send, go gives you the freedom to support who you want to support and those who deserve support with over 20 categories, 20 currencies in more than 80 countries and more funds going directly to you.
	So if you want a platform that believes in you and your mission, give it a go, give, send, go.
	GiveSendGo.com This is Dark Maga in Butler, Pennsylvania, where they attempted to assassinate President Trump.
	But, you know, Musk is doing great work on the free speech side, not only in terms of what he's doing for Twitter and X, but also his embrace of the Trump ticket and the Trump-Kennedy-Gabbard alliance.
	All of which is critical to free speech, as J.D. Vance mentioned in the vice presidential debate that he dominated rather easily.
	Hold on, did we not talk about the video?
	Yeah, we talked about it right after the debate.
	It was a dominating performance from J.D. Vance.
	It's only aged better as the week went along.
	Robert, I was just Googling Amos Miller.
	I'm friends with school shooters.
	That was such a bad statement.
	Even Saturday Night Live made fun of him for it.
	Not just that, even his correction of it afterwards made it even worse.
	First of all, what I take that it means is that his mouth is running, but he's not actually processing what he's saying, which is a very big problem.
	Like, I talk fast, my mouth is running.
	But I know when I flub and I know I have to come back and correct something, and I do.
	He's just words.
	It's like verbal diarrhea.
	It's like Kamala Harris.
	What does the give, send, go for Amos Miller?
	I found one that says Amos Miller under attack again.
	Created by Chris Hume.
	Well, right now we're just doing the fundraiser for the pumpkin pie, but they've been very helpful in the past for legal fundraisers.
	We shifted it to something where people get a direct, tangible benefit.
	The fundraising is a smaller donation per person, but you're free to give more, of course, but it's a way you get something directly from him and getting...
	A delish, delish pumpkin pie while you still can until the Commonwealth Court in the state of Pennsylvania tries to shut it down this coming week.
	And we've been ordering it.
	It's amazing.
	I had raw milk and raw...
	Water buffalo milk.
	The water buffalo milk is really good.
	What's amazing is my wife, we were drinking it, and then we had the biggest giggle fest that we'd ever had.
	There was a certain element of adrenaline rushing through because I did feel like I was breaking boundaries by drinking raw milk for the first time, but it was delicious.
	What do we move on to?
	Briefly, speaking of lawless actions by this administration, the latest effort by the Biden administration to...
	By votes, by skipping Congress and deciding to selectively forgive various student loan debt, was enjoined.
	It initially looked like they were going to get away with it.
	By one court, it got transferred to another court.
	I actually know the judge in that court.
	I have a case in front of that judge.
	And that judge pointed out, every court that's looked at this has said this is illegal.
	You've got to go through Congress.
	You didn't go through Congress.
	Consequently, that latest effort to bribe votes on the eve of the election has failed.
	Student loan effort has been enjoyed.
	Forgiveness effort.
	Yeah, they had limited the scope of the student loan forgiveness in order to try to render it compliant when it could never be.
	But two things.
	What are the limits?
	It's going to be a stupid question.
	I think I know the answer.
	But when they do things by way of executive order or executive action, what are the limits?
	Now I understand.
	Is it part of executive authority or not?
	If you're trying to spend money...
	Then, typically, that has to be approved directly by Congress.
	Otherwise, it has to be pursuant to Article 2 powers under the Constitution.
	So Article 1, legislative branch.
	Article 2, the executive branch.
	Article 3, the judicial branch.
	So does Article 2 give you that power?
	And if it does give you that power, does some other provision of the Constitution, like the Bill of Rights, take it away?
	Or limit it in some meaningful manner?
	And there'll never be any sanctions, any reprimands for attempting over and over again to violate the law, wasting taxpayer money and litigating it.
	No, just...
	They'll take another kick at the can later down.
	Exactly. All right.
	Fantastic. What now?
	The... Well, we got a range of ones.
	But on the free speech side, they're seizing internet domains without notice.
	Okay, so I read this one.
	It's interesting.
	And I know what you're...
	Well... I appreciated what you were getting in after.
	The bottom line in this is that there's like, it was an ex parte court order that was issued to go after Russian hackers.
	And they're alleging all sorts of unlawful activity from, I don't know where they're based, but what was it called?
	Blizzard? The word Blizzard is in it, right?
	They said, well, they just put a label on it.
	They said, we think we've been the victim of hacking.
	We think it's, we call it Star Blizzard.
	It's all Bill Gates and Microsoft who got the New York and...
	State of Washington attorney generals to sign up for them.
	That's why those two are on there.
	And they've sued John Doe's.
	So they haven't sued anybody.
	So they're going to a court and say, hey, court, here's about 100 domains.
	We would like you to shift their ownership to us without the other side even knowing it's going to happen.
	We want you to go to the registrars of those domains, the people who control the ultimate ownership of a domain name, and we want you to order them by court order under contempt authority.
	Of criminal sanctions, potentially, to transfer in secret ownership over all these web domains to us.
	And our sole grounds for it is we think there's these John Does.
	We think they're part of a hacking operation.
	We think they're connected to Russia.
	And they don't even say that these sites are the sites.
	They say, we believe these sites have been used for.
	The purpose of doing this.
	Not that Russians or anybody owns them impermissibly.
	But they're like, but you can't do it because if we're right and you let them know and they come in here, then they might stop us from stealing their websites.
	And the judge, because it's a judge in D.C., says, yeah, no problem.
	And just signs an order transferring ownership overnight.
	Of 100-plus internet domain names, many of which appear to be just basic domains, like law-related domains, design-related domains.
	I expected to see weird domain names.
	Instead of common domain names.
	I'm like, you just stole a bunch of people's domain names and gave it to Microsoft so they would have complete, unfettered access and control over it?
	So they could look at everything without a hearing?
	Without notice?
	Without any evidence?
	Without any discovery?
	This is insanity!
	You send me this order.
	I see it's 120 pages.
	I'm like, oh my god.
	First of all, ex parte temporary.
	This was all done without even notifying the defendants, from what I understand, if the law is anything like what it was up in Quebec.
	In fact, he admits it.
	No notice.
	The defendants have...
	Haven't even been served as sued.
	They don't even know they're being sued.
	Not only that, the people who own the sites are not even named as defendants.
	He's just seizing their domains because supposedly somebody bad somewhere once used their domains for some bad reason.
	Well, I'm reading the decision and all I'm...
	You just read this.
	There is good cause to believe Jane Doe's operate a sophisticated Russia-based cyber criminal operation.
	Look, I have the problem.
	It says Jane Doe's!
	Okay, we think...
	And then what they've discovered now is just say Russia.
	Hey, we think there's some Russians that are doing some bad stuff.
	Can you please give us all these domain names?
	Can you just steal them from these people and not let them know about it and let us control it and own it and shut down huge internet domains overnight?
	But I'm so sufficiently naive that I presume that they have the identities and they were just keeping them redacted.
	They don't know.
	They don't know who it is.
	They don't know who it is, but they do know they're Russian.
	There's good cause of belief.
	They have no idea who they are, what their names are, but they're definitely Russian.
	So they go into this, by the way.
	I was surprised when I scrolled to the end to see what the conclusions say.
	But then when I get to the end, it's just endless lists of domain names.
	And then you realize the court order itself is only, what, nine, ten pages?
	There's good cause to believe, yada, yada, yada.
	And then they go on to seize it.
	So, look, I know what I think in terms of this being what it is.
	What do you think is the underlying intent here?
	Are they trying to seize domain names?
	Are they trying to...
	Rationalize or set precedent for the ex parte unilateral seizing of private assets?
	It's both.
	But in particular, what would happen if tomorrow the government controlled Rumble?
	They go in and get a secret order requiring that the ultimate registrar of Rumble, its authority, be transferred to somebody else.
	They could shut it down overnight a month from the election.
	Or they could control it and manipulate it without people knowing.
	Without people fully knowing it, being cognizant and aware of it.
	Look at what they're trying to do with Alex Jones.
	They're trying to use a receivership to control and own Alex Jones.
	His image, his likeness, his public representations, his public statements, his public access.
	Here, they're using these proceedings, just say Russia, and watch a federal judge will without a hearing, without notice, without them even being named as parties to a case, without it even being alleged that the people who own and control these sites have done anything wrong at all.
	I mean, that's what's extraordinary.
	I kept looking for, well, clearly you have, no.
	That's why they're not even named defendants in the case.
	Wow. They're saying these Russians have used these websites.
	Please let us control these websites.
	Oh, well, does RT, is RT on Rumble?
	Yes. Okay, let's go in secret and buy up and control Rumble.
	And then, overnight, without Rumble even knowing, they could have all the inside information on Rumble.
	Because they would own the domain, they would own everything about it, they would own all the traffic, they would own all the information.
	So they're setting up a precarious precedent.
	And what's striking is the same group of people, ideologically aligned group of people, are suing Hungary in the European Union because Hungary simply stood up and said, we don't want foreigners illicitly interfering in our elections.
	And they're like, that's violating people's human rights.
	So somehow it's not human rights for people to have access to Russian media in Europe or the United States, but it is human rights for everybody to interfere in Hungary's elections.
	It tells you how insane the law is on this and how directly contradictory they are in the same week.
	No matter how cynical you get, it's hard to keep up, Robert.
	I feel stupid now for not even having made the connection.
	We talked about it earlier with the breaking up and selling off of TikTok.
	And I said, oh, there they're going to use it as a pretext to go after Truth Social, maybe even Rumble.
	But you're right.
	Hey, just accuse Rumble of having accounts that are Russian propaganda, whatever, that they have to shut down.
	And ex parte, Rumble doesn't even know.
	Let me bring this one up here.
	Patty F. Weber, $100 tip over in our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community.
	No question, only gratitude for all you do and for sharing important information with us, Robert and David.
	Patty, it is a pleasure and an honor, and thank you.
	I love the fact that Robert makes me smarter and more cynical, and I thought I couldn't get much more cynical.
	So what the hell?
	But the thing is, okay, so they haven't named any defendants.
	It's going to be the owners of those domain names, whatever they are, that are going to have to file.
	And then what they're being forced to do is litigate this in an unfriendly form.
	So they've got to initiate action themselves.
	They've got to do so in the D.C. District of Columbia courthouse that is already prejudiced against them to try to restore their rights to own their own Domain.
	And it's a reminder that there are central locations along the internet highway.
	And the government can seize control at any time of some of those places and locations.
	And that's what, you know, like it starts off with sort of generic ones, but then you get into it's like seclaw.com or, you know, look at that, bigdatabroadway.com?
	I mean, I was like, hold on a second.
	Some of this is just real generic, basic sites.
	They have no allegations in the complaint or listed in the order that these sites are controlled by anybody doing anything illegal.
	I'm scrolling now so that the chat and the aggregate knowledge of the interwebs could, you know, look into this to see.
	Cloud It Hub.
	Cloud IT Hub.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	Season given to Microsoft overnight.
	Let me see here.
	What do we got?
	Data Web Hub.
	Data Web Hub.
	Season given to Microsoft overnight.
	Okay, let's see what else we got coming down here.
	Docksecgate. SECgate.
	What the hell is my problem?
	I can't read.
	E-Flux Solutions.
	Okay, I don't know what the hell that is.
	This is really funny.
	This is testing my reading.
	Okay. Entheogenic MD.
	Okay, that sounds like it.
	It seems like an MD site.
	Seized it overnight.
	Extract or draw.
	Extract or draw.com.
	Seized overnight.
	Gallets. Crypto data.
	It appears to be a lot of sites that are involved in securing information.
	Not hacking sites.
	Sites that might protect people from hacking.
	And all of their information seized overnight and given to Microsoft in the secret trial.
	Secret Star Chamber-like proceeding.
	Gateway Docs International.
	Some of these sound like CIA fronts.
	Okay, chat's got the idea.
	Wild. All right.
	And by the European Union, they're suing Hungary.
	For trying to prohibit foreign interference in their elections.
	Because that violates human rights.
	Like, really?
	How does the EU say that with a straight face?
	The EU that is orchestrated to suppress anybody that's pro- I mean, Rumble had to remove itself from France because it was going to allow RT to be on the Rumble platform and wouldn't censor.
	And these same people have the nerve, the chutzpah, to sue Hungary for trying to keep out illicit.
	And you know the biggest foreign involvement in Hungary?
	America would be, I would bet.
	And a certain American now, now American, George Soros, who has tried to manipulate Hungarian politics for decades as he has bragged about.
	You know, the...
	I mean, he got his start manipulating Hungarian politics when he was the right-hand man to the Nazis.
	He was only 13, Robert.
	He was out of his body.
	Now, hold on.
	Pkirk334 is now a member of our VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com community.
	I think, unless you were already, and this is just a donation.
	Thank you.
	That's 100 bucks.
	Let me just read a bunch of the chats here.
	Let me do this.
	No, no.
	He became a member.
	I can see it now because it's over on the Hrumble side where you can join and be a member.
	Oh, no, that's BuzzDab is now a monthly supporter.
	Can't read the black on red.
	Lava20. Pre-sentencing closing statements.
	Tina mentioned either judge or court gave a guy found with 26 pounds of fence and all probation only.
	It's disgusting that no one is talking about this.
	I'll bring that up.
	I'm going to find the clip.
	Inter arma anim silent legis, says Pinochet helicopters.
	I don't speak Latin, so if I said something bad, forgive me.
	Emberglin game.
	Take out...
	An uppity woman, scare women to never whistleblow, and we lose the majority of people in our system who can check power.
	That's a good point.
	We got King of Biltong.
	Okay. We're going to get to the tip questions in our VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com community as well.
	I'll just bring one up right now.
	Israel threatening to hit back at Iran hard for its retaliation last Monday.
	What is the Mideast or World War III risk pre-election, Barnes?
	We'll see.
	I think Iran won't escalate at this point.
	So far, they do a lot of war theater.
	Iran. So lots of things they know aren't going to lead to a lot of death.
	So Israel has escalated against Hezbollah in Lebanon, and we'll see how all that transitions.
	But I don't think that Iran wants a broader war right now.
	They would like to be seen as standing up.
	For Lebanon and Palestinians and against Israel without the consequence of a direct hot ore with Israel.
	And I think that their self-restraint will most likely limit Israel's response.
	We got Devil Dogbong who says, Aloha Viva and Barnes, love you long time.
	I never get tired of hearing that.
	I'm listening on Rumble because the signal on locals is terrible.
	Can you please check into that?
	I absolutely will.
	Long time supporter, Mahalo.
	Kathy, absolutely.
	And I can't bring up the picture of a dog with his hands on his genitals, but it says, Viva, please say happy birthday to my best friend in the world, Sam.
	She is six years old today.
	I can't remember if I posted this photo in the chat before.
	You haven't, because I would have remembered it.
	It's a German Shepherd sitting like a lazy pup with her hand over her genitalia.
	But this is, in my opinion...
	Best demonstrates how unique she is.
	This is how she likes to sit on the couch.
	Usually I'm next to her with my arm around her shoulders.
	Sometimes after I stand up, she stays in this position.
	For a few minutes, this is how I got this photograph.
	That's hilarious.
	Alright, hold on.
	Do we save stuff for the VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com afterparty?
	Sure, yeah.
	We got three.
	We got what's happening to COVID-related injured people because of all these immunity laws that a bunch of states passed.
	We've got the HowBigPharma.
	With the pharmaceutical industry, in this case, including the pharmacies themselves, have been conspiring to inflate your prices for a wide range of medicines, including especially insulin.
	Actually, there's a subscriber, GameOn.
	He has his own Rumble channel, GameOn.
	Covers sports each morning, early in the morning, for West Coast time.
	But he's also a pharmacist.
	He has his own pharmacy channel as well.
	And he brought this to my attention.
	There's these industries set up that control pharmacy pricing and pharmacy access.
	And they're forcing people to get the name brand drug rather than the generic version of it.
	Also forcing these inflated prices.
	And it turns out they were kickback schemes and the whole thing.
	Credit to Attorney General Paxton for exposing it.
	But yes, we got the big pharma case.
	We got the Wizard of Oz makes an appearance in court.
	And what's happening on COVID immunity that we can discuss at the after party at revobarneslaw.locals.com.
	And it will be up on YouTube tomorrow.
	We're not doing it because it's not allowed on the other platform, but I did want to bring up one thing.
	The heck is my problem, man?
	I know that I have it here.
	Apparently, I don't.
	Let me just bring up merch before we go.
	First of all, everybody, make sure you hit the thumbs up button if you're not coming over to Locals from Rumble.
	Make sure you hit the subscribe button.
	If you're interested in getting merch, you can go over to get some merch at the store.
	We've got wonderful stuff and new design.
	I say it each week is going to keep coming.
	It's like Jablinski Games.
	It's coming.
	We're going to get some new merch.
	But come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	It's for supporters only, but the entire thing will be available tomorrow because the price fixing on the insulin is shocking and offensive.
	And there was one other thing that I wanted to do before we headed over there.
	It was to read a couple more of our tips from vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Oh, Viva, I already saw that one.
	Which businesses?
	Oh, word of the wise.
	Be careful of those feral hogs.
	You saw that, eh?
	Yeah, yeah.
	You know, those things like kill, they can be dangerous.
	Yeah, that's why.
	They're more dangerous than the gators.
	A thousand percent.
	I was on an embankment.
	I was on my bike.
	I mean, I thought, I think I could have gotten away into that.
	Massive. It was a 300-pound hog.
	It would have had to run up.
	That would have been a real viral moment of you trying to get away chasing you.
	Not the one I want because I'm losing a leg.
	Which business of Alex Jones could we use to support him without the government taking the funds?
	Dr. Jones Health t-shirts?
	That's a good question.
	I don't know.
	All of them are subject to execution at the moment.
	Then we got, has there ever been any effort to reach out to all the illegal migrants with the ideals of individual liberty and limited government?
	Special Red, probably not.
	Can they try to suspend the election due to multi-states not being able to vote due to two hurricanes, then use it to put...
	That's controlled at the state level, and the short answer is no.
	There's never been.
	We did an election during the Civil War.
	Yeah, but they commended Iraq for holding elections while there were suicide bombers going off, but now they would look for any excuse to suspend the elections here.
	Let me put this one up here.
	Please find out and tell me how many terabytes of storage are required to hold the public video library of Alex Jones.
	His stuff, where is it being hosted now?
	It's on Rumble.
	It's also throughout YouTube, throughout Rumble.
	It's a bunch of places you can download it.
	All right, I want to hear Becky, and then we're going to head on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Do you think the P. Diddy case is going to be used against Trump somehow?
	Newer videos on YouTube mention politicians.
	If they had anything with Trump and P. Diddy, it would be out already.
	So I'm convinced they have nothing.
	They discussed a weak connection to Trump, just raised stronger ties to Obama, at least trying to weaken his support from among the black community.
	I say no.
	I think if they had it, they would have done it already.
	What do you say, Robert?
	Yeah. Agreed.
	They're losing votes because the economy sucks, because immigration is a disaster, and because World War III clocks are ticking.
	Closer than they've ever been.
	You can't fix that with some scandal or whatever nonsense.
	I'm still waiting for them to come up with a video of Trump using the N-word, which they said they had a while ago, and I said...
	None of that would matter.
	All right, we're ending it.
	We're ending it now.
	We're going to go over to local supporters only.
	If you don't come, not come, can't come, don't want to come, whatever, it's going to be on podcast tomorrow, maybe even later tonight, tomorrow.
	And the entire stream will be on Viva Clips tomorrow.
	And the Viva Clips are going to be on Viva Fry throughout the week because I've got a good system with a local guy who's editing this together.
	I think the system is working.
	So that is it.
	I'll be live throughout the week.
	I'm going to be on, what's Mike Lindell's platform?
	I forget what it's called, but I'm going to be on there on Tuesday to talk about Tina Peters because I got a big mouth in him.
	Mildly decent platform to put it on blast.
	So stay tuned for that, and I'll be live throughout the week.
	So standard stuff.

▲