Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 22, 2024 - Viva & Barnes

01:55:00

Live with Darren Beattie! Jan. 6 Pipe Bombs and Trump Failed Assassination BREAKING NEWS! Viva Frei

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	But not everyone has that same sense of responsibility.
	Some folks just don't understand what it takes to be a good neighbor.
	Paul Gazelka wants you to take the hotline down for people to report violations of the stay-home order.
	Do we need a hotline?
	Is it being used?
	It is being used, and we simply want people to be able to call and let folks know, and it's for their own good.
	We have numbers.
	If somebody sees a fire at a neighbor's house, they want to tell them.
	If we see people that may not be as informed on this, it's an educational piece.
	So we're certainly going to do that.
	And we're not going to take down a telephone number that allows people just to try and keep their neighbors safe.
	We're not going to take down a snitch line.
	Hold on, hold on.
	But not everyone has that same sense of responsibility.
	Some folks just don't understand what it takes to be a good neighbor.
	Stop. Is there anybody in this room right now who's not saying to themselves...
	Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there.
	Impossible. I'm going to come back to that a little later in the show because I don't have Darren forever, and I want to get to some amazing stuff with him.
	First of all, everybody, good afternoon.
	Viva Frye.
	You know who I am.
	We got Darren Beattie in the house, who is...
	What do they call it?
	The chief...
	Oh, my God.
	Editor-in-chief at The Revolver.
	Amazing, amazing guy.
	Does amazing work.
	And I'm going to pick his brain on two...
	Issues that have been, one has been pushed to the backdrop, the failed assassination attempt of Donald Trump.
	The other, I never made it sufficiently to the forefront.
	The pipe bombs, and I think they're somewhat related.
	But before I bring in Darren, and before I get into this, I was going to say, like, a lot of people accuse Tim Walz of being beta, and I don't know that those are fair criticisms, because what is a man?
	I mean, what does it mean to be a man?
	Some might say Tim Wallace is not...
	It doesn't matter.
	We're going to get back to that a little bit later.
	But in today's society, it's tough to be a man in a world dominated by overly masculine liberal women.
	I'm going to show you another clip later on also.
	When Darren's not waiting.
	That's just not how it's meant to be.
	Everywhere we look, it's gender neutral, this product, or made for her, that product.
	That's why we started a company that embodies the ethos of Men's Lives Matter 2. With products that aren't designed to be gender neutral or used by people with pronouns, our products at Rumble are designed and built by men, for men, period.
	Pun intended.
	So if you struggle with low energy, mood swings, hair loss, and if you need to perform better at the gym, maybe in bed.
	And recover quickly thereafter.
	I got some jokes, but I can't embarrass my wife.
	Or about me.
	Doesn't matter.
	Throw out all the other garbage supplements and try animal organs.
	They are traditionally the most nutrient-rich supplements on the planet, but our bison organs are a step above.
	The grass-fed, non-vaccinated bison are a species where the weak are allowed to die and only the strongest survive.
	So here's our commitment to you.
	For men who have real confidence in their products, try this hit-in.
	If you don't like it, return it for a refund.
	This is what it looks like.
	They're supplements.
	You swallow them.
	They're amazing.
	It's a known fact also, by the way, when animals, like when bears go and attack bison, deer, or whatever, they go for the organs first because the organs are nutrient-rich.
	And now they've taken all of that wonderful rich goo of the organs and they've condensed it into a supplement.
	It's fantastic.
	Click on the link in the bio below or go to bnaked.com slash viva.
	That promo code gets you 15% off to try our products and get hooked on the power of bison.
	And if anybody thinks I'm faking this, Go to YouTube, or maybe go to Google, put in Viva Fry Bison Balls.
	You may be humorously entertained or grossed out, depends.
	Alright, we've got Darren Beattie in the backdrop.
	The order of the show, we're going to do this all on YouTube with Darren.
	I think we've got 45 minutes, give or take, and I'll see how long I can push my luck with Darren.
	And then we're going to end when Darren leaves.
	We're going to go over to Rumble and talk about the DNC.
	The Demonic National Convention is entering day four.
	We'll do a day three recap.
	Darren, you ready?
	Coming in.
	Coming in hot.
	Three, two, one.
	Sir, looking good.
	How goes the battle?
	It's all good.
	Great to be here again.
	It's been a while.
	It's been a while, and holy hell has the world changed just a little bit since the last time you were here.
	Oh, yes.
	Dan, before we even get into anything, I think everybody knows who you are, but just in case they don't, 30,000-foot overview, who you are, where they can find you, and then we're getting into it.
	Darren Beattie, founder and editor of Revolver.News, the cutting-edge, investigative, analytical aggregator on the web.
	You know, a lot of people were recently complaining about Drudge.
	I think Senator Mike Lee was.
	Originally, we were sort of designed to be an alternative to Drudge, and that's what President Trump praised us as.
	But we evolved into, I think it's safe to say, in all humility, A powerhouse of investigative journalism that has really shaped the national narrative on a number of critical issues, including January 6, which we'll get into.
	So that's revolver.news.
	If you want to get the biggest bang for your buck in terms of high leverage donations, support us at revolver.news.
	I have a history before that.
	I served in Trump's White House the first term as a speechwriter and policy aide.
	And before that, believe it or not, I was a professor of political philosophy at Duke University.
	So a varied life, as they would say.
	And now I'm here with the pleasure and honor of speaking with you.
	It's amazing.
	First of all, it's amazing.
	I've known you from the Internet, but I...
	First of all, you exude an aura of a little bit of rage at the system.
	The work that you've been doing at Revolver has been cutting edge.
	I mean, I think Revolver was the...
	You guys broke the Ray Epps story.
	I don't think anybody did any better of a deep dive of Ray Epps, scaffold guy, that blew the lid off of that?
	Yeah, I think that's fair to say.
	I mean, with breaking, there were some people on Twitter that were saying, hey, look at this guy.
	But we did really comprehensive deep dive pieces that...
	Analyze Ray Epps, the best compilation of footage of Ray Epps that put it into a real narrative that made sense that basically it's not just about Ray Epps.
	Again, I've talked about this a lot, but there could be people listening for the first time who have not yet gone into this extremely disturbing but extremely interesting rabbit hole of not just Ray Epps, but a host of curious characters who were congregated right at that peace monument.
	By the Capitol, where the first breach occurred, and a number of these really suspicious individuals forget that they haven't been indicted.
	Many of them have not even been identified, and that's where Scaffold Commander comes in, who is, in my view, if I could ask a genie one question, I would say, I want to know the identity of Scaffold Commander.
	Pulled out every trick in the book.
	I've used facial recognition.
	I used all the favors, all the contacts, and still nothing.
	But the behavior was absolutely egregious on his part.
	And yeah, I encourage everyone, go and read the two-part series, Meet Ray Epps Part 1, Meet Ray Epps Part 2. The Part 2 gets into that sort of coordinated activity surrounding the first.
	Which ties in like an interesting Lego to the pipe bomb.
	We'll get into that.
	But this was just analyzing the Peace Monument breach as a standalone issue and the coordinated activity and the curious cast of characters there.
	And yes, absolutely.
	This made Ray Epps a household name.
	And don't take my word for it.
	Ray Epps says it and he said it in his legal complaints.
	The DOJ has said it.
	Threatened to sue us.
	He sued Fox News.
	He hasn't sued me and he hasn't sued Tucker Carlson.
	He sued Fox for having Tucker Carlson talk about it with me.
	I think he thinks he'll have more luck with Fox, which has a history of settling these kinds of disputes.
	I am not inclined to settle and I can only speak for myself, but I would imagine Tucker would not be inclined to settle either.
	We did.
	I think we briefly, I don't know if we talked about it, or I definitely covered it, but Ray Epps did in fact, well, first of all, Ray Epps, what many people believe the instigator of all of this, I mean, he even took credit for it in text messages with his nephew, I think.
	He was orchestrated.
	He said this.
	He was never charged until, I don't know, what, two years later?
	More than two.
	I think close to three or maybe even more than three.
	And he was charging a very interesting...
	I want to get into this because I think people misunderstand the kind of structure of these, oh, is this guy a Fed type arguments?
	And, you know, we kind of, you know, Revolver really opened up that question as to the federal involvement of January 6th generally.
	And our first piece on this was not about...
	It was about charging documents in relation to Oath Keepers and Proud Boys.
	And we pointed out, well, it's interesting, the selective prosecution going on, whereby you have a lot of underlings who are being prosecuted for serious things, and then you have some of the top people who aren't really being touched.
	And of course...
	You know, it depends what the circumstances are.
	If there isn't a lot of evidence on the top person, sometimes they'll go after the small fish to get to the big fish.
	But if there's just as much, if not more evidence on the top people, and those people are being ignored, and the people below are being charged, in the charging documents, it's basically saying all the stuff they did with the top people, and the top people are in touch, then that's kind of strange, and it invites...
	Further scrutiny.
	But I think people, not a lot, I think we do have a lot of discerning listeners, but some detractors, I think, misunderstand the nature of the argument.
	The argument isn't, this person is not charged, therefore the person is a Fed.
	And then by extension...
	The second this person is charged, no matter how long it takes and no matter what the circumstances surrounding the charge, that automatically refutes the notion that the person is charged.
	It doesn't really work like that.
	I mean, you have to look at the circumstances and the timeline.
	In the case of Epps, it's like this guy on paper should have been the public face of the evil January 6th.
	You know, insurrection.
	I mean, this guy, this huge guy, commanding presence.
	I mean, I'll give him that.
	He's a commanding, he's a remarkable figure in many ways.
	Very good at crowd control.
	This huge commanding presence in camo gear, not the, you know, the hoity-toity.
	Walt's Kamala camo gear in real, manly, former Marine camo gear.
	This is Ray Epps in his gear, with a Trump hat, urging people to go into the Capitol in advance.
	Incidentally, he was the head of the Arizona chapter of the Oath Keeper organization, the most demonized and heavily prosecuted militia group associated with January 6th.
	Maybe the Proud Boys are a close second, but still highly demonized, highly prosecuted militia.
	So you have a guy, one of the only people on camera...
	Demanding people go into the Capitol in advance as early as the evening before.
	And then there's a ton of footage the day of of him like obsessively, like a Where's Waldo type figure telling people, go to the Capitol.
	It's that way.
	That's where our problems are.
	Go to the Capitol here, Capitol there.
	He skips the speech to direct people to go to the Capitol.
	And then he happens to be pre-positioned at that breach site.
	While Trump is still speaking.
	So, but here's one of the few guys caught on camera doing the whole going to the Capitol in advance thing.
	Camo gear.
	Trump hat.
	Former leadership position in the most demonized and heavily prosecuted militia group associated with January 6th.
	You would think this guy would be the poster boy for all the people.
	pointing fingers at the MAGA insurrection.
	And in fact, for a time, he kind of was.
	The New York Times did a day of rage video compilation to gin up this narrative that January 6th was this horrible event planned in advance.
	And of all the footage that the New York Times had access to, they chose to feature Ray Epps telling people, you know, reasonably so, telling people go into the Capitol, go into the Capitol.
	And then...
	When Revolver mainstreamed this idea that there could be federal involvement, very shortly after that, the whole tune changed.
	The New York Times, which kind of implicitly suggested this guy could have been a major figure in the insurrection.
	Went on to write fully dedicated puff pieces about Mr. Epps, and then nobody kind of, and then Adam Kinzinger, who'd never met a January 6th participant, he didn't want to see Rotting in prison for 50 years, Kinzinger came to his defense.
	In fact, you look at the records of some of these interrogations from the January 6th committee, Kinzinger was more of an advocate of Epps than Epps' own lawyer.
	And then you have...
	Epps retains counsel by a guy who formerly worked for David Brock, one of the most notorious and disgraced Democrat hatchet.
	Men in existence.
	And so all of a sudden, there's this about face whereby the guy who should, under ordinary circumstances, on paper, be like the poster boy for the evil Fedsurrection guy, the guy in camo, the guy with the Trump hat, the guy telling people to go in the Capitol, so on and so forth, the guy who was a former Oathkeeper leader.
	But instead, he's the only guy that all of these mainstream institutions will vigorously And then when, you know, the cat's out of the bag, and it became indefensible, and it became so egregious the fact that this guy was not charged with anything, three years after, the DOJ reluctantly, with giving him advance notice, does this wrist slap misdemeanor indictment?
	And I can only imagine someone looking at that and saying, Well, he was charged after all.
	I guess you were wrong.
	I guess that just completely erases the entire history of suspicious behavior, suspicious circumstance that doesn't add up.
	They wrist slapped him with a misdemeanor.
	That must ipso facto mean that he's no longer a Fed.
	People don't understand that it's not the exception.
	It's almost the rule that quote-unquote Feds, and again, the term Fed is kind of...
	It can mean a variety of things, but it's not the exception.
	It's almost the rule that at a certain point, assets of the government will get burned when they become more of a liability than an asset.
	But you say burned.
	He was sentenced to probation compared to what the other people say.
	Exactly. I wouldn't even consider this a burn.
	But that's even to kind of strongman the argument is to say, even if he were given a serious sentence, which he wasn't, that still wouldn't erase the history of suspicion going on there.
	There's a long history of people who are informants and assets of other kinds being burned.
	It's all a question of how valuable they are to the government and how much leverage they have with the government.
	And I happen to think the fact that they didn't do this much earlier and that they were still kind of...
	I don't think it's just a story of January 6th.
	In my personal opinion, I don't have proof of this, but I've looked into this a ton, and I've kind of extrapolated my own plausible scenario for this.
	In my personal opinion, I think that his history and operations goes back far.
	Back before January 6th and involves things that could be even more sensitive than January 6th.
	And that accounts for the unusual degree of protection that he enjoyed relative to other folks that may or may not have been assets.
	And not for nothing, you know, number two men at the Oath Keepers, which we now know was heavily infiltrated by the FBI.
	No, if you look into this, if you look into this, it's like...
	Who didn't have a relationship with the government?
	And that's where it gets into this question.
	It's like, it's very, you know, it's kind of a murky area.
	What constitutes an asset or a quote-unquote Fed?
	Look at the Proud Boys, for instance.
	We know that the head of it, Enrique Tarrio, had a history of being an informant.
	That doesn't mean that he was an informant at the time of January 6th, but we know that he had a long established communication history with a number of people within law enforcement and intelligence leading up to January 6th.
	Same thing with Biggs, who was another proud boy, who was sentenced.
	And so it's like you get into these things where it's like...
	Who's using who?
	And there's a line of communication that's established with people in law enforcement, and there could be pretextual things like, oh, it's just a line of communications.
	Hey, guys, I'm talking from the handler's point of view.
	We totally respect your right to freedom of speech and assembly, but let's just establish a line of communication so you can tell me what's going on, so we can make sure that your rights are respected and this or that.
	And they use that to keep tabs on what the people are doing.
	And again, they trade information.
	In the case of Joe Biggs, I believe he was...
	I'm giving information to the FBI, other feds about Antifa with whom Proud Boys were clashing.
	So it becomes this weird thing where these guys have handlers almost like friends in law enforcement that they communicate directly and they're each trying to get value out of the other.
	Does this mean someone is a fed?
	Well, it means that there's a line of communication and some degree of cooperation.
	And in the case of the Proud Boys, that's very relevant because There were all of these suspicious characters, as I mentioned in this Ray Epps Part II piece, who were congregated at the peace monument while Trump was still speaking.
	And all of these people are suspicious.
	They're not Proud Boys, incidentally.
	The Proud Boys arrived after.
	And yes, the Proud Boys did things, not all of which were defensible.
	But I think the bird's eye view and basically the thesis that we propound is that...
	The Proud Boys were kind of set up in the sense that I believe that the feds had people set up at that breach site.
	They directed the Proud Boys to go to that breach site and they knew it would kick off there.
	And then the Proud Boys could be blamed.
	Meanwhile, these other figures who are far more suspicious and egregious, including the scaffold commander.
	Would go by totally unindicted, unidentified, and the narrative to the mainstream is, oh, it was just the Proud Boys when all these other people did it.
	Now, how did that coordination happen?
	Did Proud Boys' leadership agree to be at that place at that time?
	How exactly might that have happened?
	I don't know, but there was absolutely...
	Communication, a lot of communication between Proud Boys leadership and a variety of law enforcement officials from a variety of agencies such that it is inconceivable that key people in those agencies didn't know that the Proud Boys could be led to this location where they had a bunch of feds planted to kick off that initial...
	Breach. Now, again, we haven't even talked about the pipe bomb yet.
	The breach was perfectly synchronized to the discovery of these two pipe bombs.
	And so I'll leave it there, and I'm happy to entertain questions or whatever.
	Oh, yeah.
	We're going to get into it.
	Just to highlight also, I was going to say something.
	Scaffolding guy never identified.
	Correct. So an individual never been identified, let alone charged.
	This is going to segue us into the pipe bomb.
	I've been watching not a lot of Bongino, but I've been getting to catch him.
	And I remember at the time, Cernovich was saying, what about the pipe bombs?
	And I was following this the day of.
	I didn't hear about the pipe bombs.
	Pipe bombs were outside the DNC.
	I don't say the DNC.
	They were left outside near where Kamala Harris was supposed to be.
	Yeah, so this is, I say that there are two smoking guns of what I've dubbed to be the Fedsurrection.
	One is the Ray Epps saga, but with the Ray Epps, I don't just mean him individually.
	I mean that whole cast of curious characters who coordinated to effect that initial breach on the West perimeter of the Capitol that really kicked off at 12.53 p.m., and that timeline is going to be very significant, as you'll see shortly.
	The other smoking gun is the story of these so-called January 6th pipe bombs.
	Now, the smoking gun about the pipe bombs is the timeline.
	By the way, Darren, if there's anything you want to share, like a link that I can bring up, either flip it to me in the private chat.
	It's at revolver.news right now.
	I've conveniently put some key pieces right at the top.
	So everybody who's curious, go to revolver.news and you can read along these pipe bomb pieces.
	Later on, you want to check out the Ray Epps stuff.
	You can go to our exclusive section and find that or scroll down and on the sidebars, there's a link to our sort of January 6th series that hasn't been updated in a while, but it does include the Ray Epps stuff there.
	But right now I'll be talking about the...
	The infamous pipe bombs that were news for a moment and then, what's the word?
	Disappeared it.
	And so much so that even...
	Benny Thompson in the January 6th committee was just not interested in discussing it.
	Yeah, so let's start from the beginning because I just kind of want to set the table so people understand why it's so bizarre.
	And really, if I drill down the key aspect here, it's the timeline.
	So we're told by the FBI with supporting surveillance footage that purports to show the pipe bomber near the RNC and near the DNC.
	We're told that the evening before, that is January 5th, between 7 p.m. and 9 p.m., this pipe bomber went to the DNC, planted a bomb at the DNC, then went to the RNC.
	Technically speaking, it's not the RNC.
	That bomb was planted in a back alley by the Capitol Hill Club, which is adjacent to the RNC.
	So two separate locations of pipe bombs, allegedly from the day before.
	Planted the evening before.
	Allegedly, I guess.
	Allegedly. And the allegedly will come into focus shortly. So those were planted the evening before.
	were they found?
	They had been sitting in their respective locations, undiscovered, for nearly 17 hours until approximately 1240 p.m., a random pedestrian discovers The bomb in a back alley by the RNC.
	So that's around 1240.
	This random pedestrian calls in and alerts Capitol Police, which begin responding to it at around 1250.
	And so you have law enforcement first responding to the discovery of the pipe bomb at 1250, which is merely three minutes before that first and decisive Ray Epps breach.
	Then, as we now know from surveillance footage, which is remarkable in its own right, and I'll get to that, but at 1.05 p.m., so barely 25 minutes after the first one's discovered, at 1.05 p.m., you have a plainclothes undercover Capitol Police officer stumble upon another pipe bomb near the DNC building.
	And reports that.
	So there are scandals within scandals here, but let's just step out and understand what we just established.
	According to the official story, there were two pipe bombs planted the evening before, and they sat around for over 16 hours to be independently discovered within a 20-25 minute time frame that perfectly coincided.
	With that unfolding attack on the Capitol that Ray Epps orchestrated in his own work.
	And just to clarify one thing, it's one pipe bomb at two separate locations.
	One pipe bomb each at two separate locations.
	Yes. Okay.
	Two pipe bombs in total, two locations in total, one pipe bomb near the RNC and one near the DNC.
	And here's another thing I'd like to point out.
	Sorry, my computer is...
	Don't worry about it.
	And I'll explain to everybody why the 17-hour lapse is so important is that they have security at this event.
	They presumably have bomb-sniffing dogs.
	Well, the 17 hours just makes it so implausible because let's just start with the DNC bomb.
	Now, the RNC bomb, you could kind of understand how it would take a while for someone to find it because it was, like, unsconced behind.
	A trash bin in a back alley.
	So you can kind of think, I guess it could be lying around for that long before it was discovered.
	Now, it's weird that that was the one that was discovered first.
	And it's still weird that it was discovered precisely as the attack on the Capitol was unfolding.
	But you could kind of see how it could be lying around there for that long.
	The bomb at the DNC, and again, you can see this from the photos that we have.
	On our pieces at revolver.news, the photos really drive this home.
	It is conspicuous.
	The bomb is lying by a bench right outside an entrance to the DNC building.
	You can't miss it.
	It's right there.
	And so anyone walking by should be able to see this.
	Pedestrians, you know, January 6 in the morning was a very high foot traffic day.
	So it's remarkable that no pedestrians saw it.
	These are the actual pipe bombs?
	Yes. And someone in the chat said you can't really call them bombs.
	Were they determined to be functional or do we not even know that?
	We'll get to that.
	They look like dildos.
	You can see how conspicuous that bomb is at the bench by the DNC.
	Anyone having a coffee that morning sitting at the bench?
	Anyone walking by?
	Any pedestrian.
	There's a regularly stationed DNC security guard there.
	We did a walkthrough establishing all this.
	They didn't find it.
	So that's sitting out there for nearly 17 hours.
	Oh, and by the way, the Secret Service of the United States missed that bomb when sweeping the DNC building the morning of January 6th.
	Now we're starting to get in interesting territory.
	Why was the Secret Service sweeping that area?
	Because Kamala Harris went into that building later on January 6th.
	She went into the building around 1130, and the sweep occurred between 8 and 10. And we've now confirmed from this...
	OIG report, that is to say the Inspector General of the DHS, Secret Service, is housed within the DHS, which just happens to be the most aggressively politically weaponized agency within the national security bureaucracy.
	That's another story.
	But the IG report confirms that the Secret Service did indeed do a sweep of that area.
	That sweep did involve canines, not just one, but two canines, so that's two officers with two canines, who swept the garage where Kamala was to enter.
	This is just feet.
	From the pipe bombs, which were told incidentally by the FBI that it has viable explosive material.
	So did those dogs who could usually smell explosives from miles away, did they just happen to have COVID that day?
	And leave aside the dogs, you can, you know, if you're walking around there and we have surveillance footage that shows just how close they were, there's no way you're a Secret Service agent.
	Looking just feet around there and you miss it.
	And on top of that, we're told that there was a Secret Service agent who was stationed there for five hours who managed not to see it.
	So just to put this in perspective, you have this bomb right out there conspicuous that anybody could see.
	It's somehow undiscovered for 17 hours by motorists, by pedestrians, by security guards, by the Secret Service United States and their two canine units.
	And then it just happens to be discovered by a plainclothes Capitol Police officer merely 15 minutes after the first one is discovered in a manner such that both of those discoveries are...
	Exactly synchronized with the unfolding attack on the Capitol.
	Now, why was it critical for the Secret Service to, quote, unquote, miss the bomb in their morning sweep?
	Well, if you do a sweep in the morning and you find the bomb, things go down very differently.
	You say, oh, my God, people are planting bombs around.
	We have a huge event at the Capitol.
	We need to beef up security immediately.
	And then by one o'clock when the certification proceeding was to begin, they probably would have had very beefed up security and January 6th would not have unfolded the way it did.
	Instead, with the synchronicity, with the discovery of the pipe bombs, just as the attack on the Capitol was unfolding, instead of having time to say, oh my God, stuff's going down, we need to beef up security, it's...
	Oh, my God, we need to address the pipe bombs.
	Then all of a sudden, they don't have enough resources to protect against the attack on the Capitol.
	And that's, in fact, their official excuse for why those people, including the Ray Epps group, was able to breach that area with the bike racks.
	In fact, there is a law enforcement official on record in one of the January 6 reports saying we wanted to deliver...
	Hundreds of more bike racks to that area, but we couldn't because law enforcement was addressing the pipe bomb.
	So this synchronicity between the timing of the pipe bomb's discovery and the unfolding attack in the Capitol was so precise and so remarkable that the former head of the Capitol Police, Steven Sun, said, you know, these bombs probably weren't even planted to go off.
	They were planted precisely to have a diversionary effect.
	So there's law enforcement resources diverted away from the Capitol to the pipe bombs such that it's easier for the attack on the Capitol to happen.
	And the timeline certainly suggests that this is deliberate and not simply coincidental, because what are the chances?
	The only problem with that is it wasn't unknown, presumably MAGA terrorists who discovered the pipe bombs, You know, allowed for the diversion effect.
	It was, quote unquote, random people.
	One being a random pedestrian, Carlin Younger, who at the time worked for an emergency response broadband company called FirstNet that had done a big deal with the FBI.
	Currently, she works for an organization called Pendulum.
	Which tracks disinformation narratives.
	Almost all of its employees are former intelligence officials.
	And it does contract work with the government to track disinformation narratives.
	Interesting job for this woman who just randomly discovers the RNC pipe bomb at the exact time that would have to be discovered for the diversion.
	And the other person who discovers the DNC bomb after nobody else did, including Secret Service.
	Just happens to be a plainclothes undercover Capitol Police officer.
	So how could the ostensible MAGA pipe bomber have counted on these two bombs not being found for over 16 hours, only to be randomly and conveniently found by Miss Carlin Younger and this plainclothes Capitol Police officer?
	Again, that was a big mouthful.
	I'll let the audience digest this, but there's another stage to this that we need to get into, and that is...
	The surveillance footage depicting the discovery of the DNC bombs.
	One quick question.
	The idea that the pipe bombs would have been the excuse to divert resources from the Capitol to deal with the bombs and then people penetrate, if that were ever to be the pretext or the excuse, the January 6th Committee didn't come to that conclusion or finding in any event, right?
	Because that would have opened the door to more investigations of the pipe bombs.
	Well, like, I mean, there was never, like, there's no official Grand Ayatollah who can, you know, issue a definitive pronouncement on that.
	But that was the hypothesis of a lot of key officials, including Stephen Sun, who was the head of the Capitol Police.
	And there were numerous anecdotes, including the one that I told about them not being able to deliver the bike racks.
	On account of the pipe bombs, that certainly supported the idea that the pipe bombs did indeed divert resources.
	So yes, I mean, the alternative is that it's just a huge coincidence that these two pipe bombs are lying around undiscovered for 17 hours, and they're both discovered within basically a 20-minute time frame that happens to perfectly coincide with the unfolding attack on the Capitol.
	That's the alternative explanation.
	And we are, in fact, told that they were live so that if they are or were, in fact, live, bomb-sniffing dogs should have, would have, in all likelihood, picked them up.
	So the idea is they were not there until actually after the sweep because they would have been detected if they were.
	And, Darren, am I wrong in thinking this is the video that we wanted to look at?
	This could be.
	I mean, there's a lot of interesting video.
	This is a bit before.
	The bomb is actually discovered at 105.
	So this could be the newer footage that shows someone who may have been the person who planted the bomb.
	I'm still somewhat agnostic on that.
	I certainly think in light of all the evidence, it's very plausible that the FBI footage of the pipe bomber.
	Is fake or somehow misleading and that actually the bombs were planted shortly before they were discovered?
	Because if they were planted the evening before, that opens a lot of risk.
	A random person could actually have found those bombs much earlier and that would ruin the plot because then they couldn't say it was diverting resources.
	So if I were doing the op, I would say it probably makes more sense to plant it.
	Right before.
	So you don't run the risk of some rando guy just saying, hey, there's a bomb.
	And then you say, oh, shoot, you're not supposed to discover this until, you know, one o'clock, something like that.
	But I'm agnostic on that.
	It could be either way.
	But certainly it was all set up so that they wouldn't be discovered until that critical window.
	Coinciding with the unfolding attack on the Capitol.
	And incidentally, we've covered this from so many angles.
	One of the more interesting angles is, so all this new footage, this explosive footage, this is from Capitol Police cameras.
	There's another set that conveniently have a blind spot.
	Right where the bench is.
	You'll notice that the camera has to pan to the bench, but its default setting does not include the bench, and I think it's overwhelmingly likely that the people who planted the bomb happened to know that that was a blind spot and took advantage of it.
	But the DNC security cameras do not have a blind spot, and it was the DNC footage that the FBI presented to the public of the person who's allegedly the bomber.
	We analyzed this footage very meticulously, and we were able to show two things definitively.
	We were able to show that the FBI is in possession of footage that would settle the question as to whether the person planted the bomb.
	And for whatever reason, they haven't released that footage.
	There's no explanation for that.
	And it's a very simple case.
	So when I say definitive, it's not this kind of...
	Clickbait, kind of bullshit talk.
	It was definitive.
	It's a logical argument.
	We know that they have their two cameras.
	They've shown us footage from two different cameras with two different angles.
	And yet, the footage they show us of the person sitting in the bench planting the bomb is from the camera whose angle doesn't clearly show what they're doing at the bench.
	But we know that they have the two cameras because they've shown us other footage from the camera with that better angle.
	So why wouldn't they have shown this?
	Just for propaganda purposes, it would be much better to have footage of the person actually planting the bomb.
	They curiously withheld that in light of all these questions as to was it really planted the evening before?
	Was it planted right before it was discovered?
	That is very damning indeed.
	Additionally, we've shown that it's extremely likely that the footage was tampered with, specifically the frame rate.
	We showed that the frame rate, of the DNC footage is less than two frames per second.
	Which is well below any industry standard.
	You buy a cheapo surveillance camera, the type of stuff you have at a gas station in the middle of nowhere, that's going to have, at worst, 8 frames per second.
	So it wasn't even just the DNC, which is an important building, high crime area, VIP area.
	DNC building, not that one, but a DNC building break-in was a subject of...
	One of the biggest American scandals in history.
	It's inconceivable that the DNC would get the cheapo camera.
	But even if they had gotten the cheapo camera, it would have had eight frames per second.
	Whereas what we have is less than one frame per second.
	So overwhelming likelihood that was doctored.
	There's still a question.
	What is the chain of custody of this DNC footage that could settle a lot?
	And that remains.
	So that's just sort of a side detail that confirms there's a lot of weird stuff going on with this DNC bomb, and it gets even weirder once we talk about the Capitol Police surveillance footage depicting the discovery of the DNC bomb, which I'm happy to get into, but again, I've been talking a lot here.
	No, no, please get it.
	We're going to loop all of this into at least a connection to the Trump assassination and talk about your assassination attempt, and you're covering that as well, because there is some overlap and there's some...
	Very interesting interplay.
	The footage of the guy discovering it.
	Seems to be a plainclothes police officer, walks over to the thing and looks down.
	If I may also just bring up the pictures of the bombs, because I think this is also interesting.
	There was discussion as to whether or not these, you know, they use a timer.
	There was some discussion as to whether or not these were known tools that the FBI uses when making their own bombs for practicing purposes.
	Yeah. So there's a lot going on there.
	And again, I don't...
	Want to get too sidetracked, but I'll bring up some of the salient points here.
	What's notable is that both of these bombs are equipped with kitchen timers that are set to at most an hour.
	Now, this really kind of reinforces the diversion thesis, because if they were tempted to go off, assuming that they were planted the evening before, like we're told, the latest that they would go off would be like 9.30 p.m.
	So what?
	Why would someone plant it for it to go off the evening before?
	In the case of the RNC bomb in some back alley somewhere, it amounts to nothing.
	So the fact that it was equipped with a kitchen timer set to only an hour seems to make it a lot more likely that it was never intended to go off in the first place.
	Why would you want it to go out the evening before?
	Much better to have it discovered exactly, you know, as the attack on the Capitol is unfolding and then you have that diversion effect.
	So that's one aspect.
	And another is, yes, again, I'm kind of agnostic on this, but I think it's quite plausible that these were part of a training exercise.
	And you know what's interesting?
	I don't want to get too distracted into this because there's a lot going on.
	It's very strange if you look in the history of questionable events like this, how often it is that there just happens to be some kind of drill or training exercise running concurrent to the actual event whose sort of subject matter or thesis Happens to overlap quite closely with
	the actual event that happens.
	And I think one of the reasons that might be is that it's an excellent kind of plausible deniability mechanism there.
	If you're caught red-handed, you say, oh, there's just confusion because we were running an exercise and this or that.
	And so I'm not saying that's necessarily the case here, but again, it wouldn't.
	It would surprise me if these bombs were sort of exercise material.
	Of some sort.
	We're told that they're viable, but that doesn't necessarily mean that they could detonate.
	It could just mean that they had explosive material.
	So if it had real explosive material, which a lot of these training things do, that doesn't mean that it's actually able to go off.
	So there are these distinctions that are kind of interesting, but much more important to focus, I think, on this surveillance footage depicting the discovery, because this is something that...
	Even if you don't buy into the whole thing, which I think by now it's clear to everyone this is an operation, but the surveillance footage is just undeniable and it's remarkable.
	Where can I find that?
	On your website?
	Yeah, you can go to revolver.news and we did a major piece on this to sort of put it on the map.
	The footage was obtained thanks to the efforts of Thomas Massey, who really put pressure on Kevin McCarthy to release it.
	He did, and it turned out to be like the most important footage of January 6th.
	So it's a piece, it's number three right now at Revolver.
	It's called Secret Service Foreknowledge or Criminal Negligence?
	Damning New Evidence Services in FBI's January 6th Pipon story.
	So that has a detailed breakdown of this footage.
	But I'll go over the highlights because what it shows is at 105, again, it shows this plainclothes Capitol Police officer finding the bomb.
	The plainclothes officer goes to the Secret Service cars and the Secret Service, the Metro PD was part of the Secret Service detail that day.
	Remember, Kamala was in the building at this point.
	This is 105.
	She entered the building around 1130.
	So plainclothes officer finds the bomb.
	And again, that finding is so weird because we talk about the RNC and the DNC bomb, but this is a kind of retroactive fiction.
	There's no reason that the first bomb would be discovered in a back alley at the Capitol Hill Club.
	And the immediate thought of law enforcement is, oh, we found this bomb.
	It's kind of close to the RNC building, so there's got to be another one at the DNC building.
	And then just like 15 minutes later, they magically find this device that had been sitting there undiscovered for the previous 17 hours.
	It just doesn't make any sense.
	But that's by the by.
	But you see in this video, the plainclothes officer goes, then he alerts the Secret Service detail in the Metro PD car and then in the black SUV.
	And here's where it really gets weird.
	There's no sense of urgency.
	There's no sense of panic.
	There's no sense of it being an emergency.
	We're going to see kids gallivanting right there.
	Or any kind of immediate or present danger.
	They take their good time.
	They stay in the car for like a minute before even getting out, whereupon they stand around in the most lackadaisical fashion imaginable.
	And as you point out, the coup de grace here, they allow a group of school children.
	To cross the street right in the direction of the bomb.
	This is the secret service of the United States, folks.
	They're just alerted to the presence of a pipe bomb outside a building where their protectee, who is the VP-elect Kamala Harris is.
	They're not worried for their own lives.
	They're not worried for Kamala's life.
	They're not worried for this group of schoolchildren that crosses the street.
	So either, you know...
	They're totally nuts and they don't care about anyone's life and their own or the kids or Kamala.
	Or, more likely, overwhelmingly likely, they knew that the bombs posed no danger.
	They knew that the bombs were fake.
	But then the question is, how would they know it's fake?
	How would the same Secret Service that magically missed these bombs in their canine sweep the morning of?
	Then they're informed of the bombs and they don't do anything about it.
	And by the way, I love this part.
	Just minutes after they let schoolchildren walk right by the bombs, they go through the spectacle and, you know, pomp and circumstance of getting a bomb-safe robot defuse the bomb.
	You know, it's safe enough to have kids walk by and for them to stand around.
	But for some reason, you know, minutes later, they need a bomb-safe robot.
	But it's very clear from the footage that they don't feel threatened whatsoever by this bomb.
	In fact, one of the officers goes right up to it and snaps a picture, then gives a thumbs up, and then they all leave.
	So the question is...
	How would they have known this in advance?
	How would Kamala Harris' Secret Service detail have known this in advance?
	And here's a funny thing.
	This story is so close to being completely broken.
	I have a guy that an overwhelming conviction is one of the key cover-up people in this whole affair.
	And his name is Ashen Benedict.
	He was...
	The special agent in charge for the ATF.
	We all talk about the FBI in relation to this, but the ATF was a major, you know, first response organization of the pipe bombs, specifically Ashton Benedict, who'd been with the ATF for 25 years.
	Now, after January 6th, curiously, D.C. Mayor puts him in charge of the Metro PD, after which he's shuffled over to the Capitol Police.
	Where he becomes head of Dignitary Protection and Intelligence, a position that he occupies to this day.
	Now, but he was also on the ground as a first responder to the pipe bomb, basically oversaw that response.
	When this footage came out, people in Congress were all, you know, obviously interested, you know, Thomas Massey principally, but others too.
	And there was a closed door meeting with Ash and Benedict.
	One of the Capitol Police officers who was on the ground and depicted in that surveillance footage that we just saw.
	And the idea was, let's ask these people what the hell's going on.
	How do you explain what you see in the video?
	That you're alerted to a bomb?
	You let kids walk by?
	You stand around doing nothing?
	What the hell's going on, guys?
	They're asked this, and Benedict is clearly the handler in this case.
	He's not representing that he was...
	He's actually there as a first responder.
	He's there in his capacity as the Capitol Police guy, which happens to be the key position you want to be in if you want to gatekeep people investigating what happened on the event that you were on the scene and leading the response to.
	So they're asked, and the response endorsed by Benedict was, the reason for that behavior is that we didn't want to cause panic.
	If I would steel man it, that would be my answer.
	I don't know what panic it causes to set up a safe perimeter.
	For people who understand how the Secret Service is known to operate, you know, butler notwithstanding, the idea that you would be alerted to an explosive device and you let kids walk in the direction of it, right by it, and you do that so as not to cause panic, that is not believable.
	So either this person needs to be fired immediately because he has no sense of security.
	Keep in mind, this guy is currently the head of dignitary protection.
	This is the guy in charge of protecting our members of Congress, you know, which is a whole, like, separate thing.
	Like, even people not into the pipe bomb story should be alarmed by that.
	But, of course, I don't think this is a serious answer.
	This is an answer, say, you know, F you, we're not going to tell you.
	But it's clear that somebody would give that answer.
	Is hiding something.
	We have a more extensive piece on this that gets into Benedict.
	But that was the best they had.
	Then the other question is, first of all, how did you know to go to the DNC so quickly?
	Because again, this parallelism is kind of fake.
	You're not going to think, oh, there's something kind of close to the RNC.
	Therefore, the other one must be at the DNC and they find it like 15 minutes later.
	And then somehow they know that there's not a third bomb.
	How do they know that?
	They just stop once the other one's found.
	And again, there's no answer to that either.
	So that's a separate thing.
	But Ashton Benedict, you're going to hear a lot more of him in the future.
	In my view, he is the key cover-up guy.
	And he's currently in charge of protection at the Capitol Intelligence, which is quite amazing.
	So we have this surveillance footage.
	The secret service is protecting Kamala Harris.
	Now, think about this.
	The regime media, the Democrats, have been trying to shove down our throats for a long time, for years now, this notion that January 6th was the worst domestic terror event in history, even worse than 9-11, worse than civil war and so forth.
	They bent over backwards and outright lied in order to support this false narrative, and we've exposed many of these lies.
	But one thing that they don't have to lie about is this incident, at least in the narrow respect that they don't have to lie about the fact that Kamala Harris was in the building and she did come within 20 feet of this.
	So then the question becomes, why wouldn't Kamala Harris, one of the most politically opportunistic creatures on the planet, not be milking this for all that it's worth?
	Why isn't this the number one talking point related to January 6th?
	Why isn't Kamala saying, hey, I almost lost my life to this deadly MAGA pipe bomb.
	I almost came within 20 feet.
	How's that for domestic terror?
	She hasn't been doing this at all.
	Or think about in light of Butler, think about how they could balance that out and saying, yes, you know, Trump was almost assassinated, but Kamala was the first one.
	She almost was assassinated on January 6th.
	And yet, instead of being the number one talking point, it's their most carefully guarded secret.
	To this day...
	Kamala Harris has not so much as acknowledged her presence in the DNC on that day.
	So it makes you think, in light of all these other things, in light of this surveillance footage showing that her Secret Service detail clearly knew that the bombs was fake in advance, in light of the fact that that bomb was conveniently sitting out there for nearly 17 hours and missed by everyone, including the Secret Service, only to be conveniently found by the plainclothes officer.
	Right as the unfolding attack on the Capitol was happening.
	Just as the DNC surveillance footage is so clearly doctored and has their withholding footage.
	All of these things happening together, you wonder, for Kamala not to talk about it at all.
	To just leave all of that political interest on the table.
	How dark does that secret have to be?
	And I think in light of the context that I've...
	I'm sketched with you today.
	I think people can start to get an inkling about how dark and how dirty this is.
	And that's in its own right.
	That's leaving aside the fact that now this January 6th hoax, which again, they couldn't even coordinate off to the pipe bomb because the pipe bombs were discovered in exact synchronicity to the...
	Breach of the West Perimeter of the Capitol, which I've showed in the revolver piece is totally Fed-saturated in its own right.
	So the dominoes fall.
	The pipe bomb is fake and a hoax.
	The first breach of the Capitol was fake or, you know, Fed-induced.
	And therefore, the entire January 6th becomes a lie, becomes a Fed-surrection.
	But it's worse than that because...
	The pipe bomb issue implicates the Secret Service.
	It implicates both Kamala Harris and the Secret Service and is an early example of the intense corruption and politicization of the Secret Service, which, as I pointed out, is conveniently housed within the DHS, which is the most aggressively corrupt and politicized organization within the national security bureaucracy.
	In fact, Benny Thompson, who Ran the January 6th Committee, the disgraced January 6th Committee, was an 11-time head of the Homeland Security Committee.
	He was the DHS's stooge in Congress whenever the Democrats were in power.
	And he is notorious now for saying Trump is a convicted felon, so he should not enjoy Secret Service protection.
	So these connections start to get very dark and very dirty.
	Unfortunately... I'm looking at the clock now.
	I have about five more minutes, but I do hope that I was able to sketch a plausible case, and if people are curious and disturbed, which they should be, about what I was saying, I really invite people, go to revolver.news, read the full pieces, and more importantly, look at the footage, because the footage speaks louder than even our exposition, as much as I am proud of our exposition at Revolver.
	Let me, well, if we can...
	Very quickly loop it into Butler.
	Who's the FBI or Secret Service who was responsible for the deletion of all of the text messages from January 6th that's now intimately involved with Butler?
	I forget his name.
	Is it Roe or is it Abate?
	Yeah, I don't know the name, but look, the deletion of the text, like the media was trying to make this out to be, oh, was some Trump-related thing?
	Of course not.
	The deletion of these texts...
	Mark my words, the deletion of these Secret Service texts is directly in relation to this pipe bomb hoax.
	Directly in relation to the pipe bomb hoax.
	Now, as to the specific and exact connections to Butler, other than the institutional connection that they both involve the Secret Service, which is important, like if the Secret Service is in on a cover-up in the pipe bomb, it lends more plausibility to something weird going on in Butler, and also you see odd parallels.
	For instance, It's, you know, it's inconceivable that the Secret Service would miss the pipe bomb in its sweep in the morning.
	It's inconceivable that the Secret Service would behave innocently the way that they did when they're informed of the bomb and they let kids walk right by it.
	Just as it's inconceivable that the Secret Service could let someone on the roof within, you know, 150 yards of former president when he's speaking.
	But these patterns start to suggest something collectively.
	And it's a very dark...
	A very dark thing indeed.
	And maybe we'll have to do a whole separate conversation on Butler because I think it has gotten the short shrift, unfortunately, but partly because it's so dark.
	People don't want to process just how close it got and what it really means that it very well could have been a setup from the inside.
	Look, I believe there's not a question that it was.
	It's impossible to believe it wasn't.
	The latest, if you have any information on this, because people have been saying, who's the man in front of Thomas Crooks?
	This is the latest video footage to be released.
	That's Thomas Crooks right there.
	Music. Do you have any information on this?
	I'm reluctant to ask the question, because it's not a question of putting anybody on doxing or putting on blast.
	It's just that in the context of this video, it does look very weird that there's a dude who's also mildly suspicious within five or eight feet of Crooks.
	Do you have any information on that or on the news?
	I have no idea.
	I'm just seeing this footage for the first time, so I really don't know.
	I can't really speak to that.
	And you're not done by any measure with January 6th or the pipe bombs?
	No, I mean, you know, it's...
	The pipe bomb thing is in its end phase.
	As a chess analogy, we're in the end game here.
	We have specific names.
	I'm not cavalier about naming names.
	It's only something I do when I have an extremely high confidence threshold.
	And here I am saying that I am absolutely convinced that Ashen Benedict, who is no slouch, he's the head of Dignitary Protection at the Capitol Police.
	Is a major figure in this cover-up.
	We have surveillance footage directly implicating the Secret Service.
	We have an IG report confirming that the Secret Service was, you know, displayed cover-up behavior.
	And again, we don't even have time to go into some of the details of that report.
	But we have cumulatively a very dark picture that implicates not just, you know, general agencies, that implicates...
	Kamala Harris' Secret Service detail, the ATF, the FBI.
	You know, if the pipe bomber planted the bomb on the day of only to, you know, discover it shortly thereafter, that means the whole footage that the FBI showed us is fake and a hoax.
	So there's just a lot of dominoes here, and it's rare to, like, be in an endgame situation where you have names, you have footage.
	So I think this story is going to continue to be extremely interesting over the course of the next several weeks and months as it wraps up and as the regime goes into extreme damage control mode.
	Darren, please come back anytime you can, anytime you want to.
	Open invitation, always.
	Fantastic. You're amazing.
	I'll put all the links.
	I've shared the links, but I'll put all the links in the pinned comment, and we'll stay in touch.
	Thank you so much.
	My pleasure.
	Have a good day.
	You too.
	All right.
	That's amazing.
	And I sort of like the way Darren says it.
	It's like incredibly dark to think about.
	But when you appreciate that January 6th was effectively supposed to be...
	January 6th occurred after impeachment number one, after Russiagate hoax, after a bunch of other less consequential things.
	The setup, I don't know if they set it up with the insurrection angle in mind to try to get Trump off the ballot four years later.
	But... I believe it was quite clearly set up so that they could have the insurrection and then attempt to impeach Trump a second time.
	And when he survived that, the plan around January 6th didn't pan out.
	So then what do you have to do?
	Go with the lawfare.
	Go with the removal of the ballot for 14th Amendment disqualification.
	And when that doesn't work, have the same players, the same Secret Service, the same bad agents within the state try to kill Donald Trump.
	And but for the grace of God, holy, sweet, merciful goodness, can we possibly appreciate how close we came to that?
	Okay. This is what we're going to do.
	That was good.
	That's the YouTube segment.
	We're not breaking up the interview with Darren Beattie.
	I don't think YouTube likes Darren Beattie.
	I don't think YouTube likes Sam Sorbel that I had on the other day.
	But Rumble does.
	And we're going to bring this over to Rumble now.
	So what I'm going to do, let me see.
	I'm going to give everybody the link to locals.
	I'm going to do this in the chat here.
	Link. Two locals.
	Boom. I'm going to enjoy the typo.
	I'm giving you a typo anyhow.
	And we got the link to Rumble, which is already in the pinned comment.
	But actually, before we do that, give me one second because I want to bring these up here.
	I should have brought this up when Darren was here.
	Hold on.
	Present. Live with Darren BD.
	Check it out.
	Okay, we got Super Buff Shaft.
	Nice. Viva.
	Jovan Pulitzer, who helped do the forensic audit in Arizona, I tried to get you to interview, is doing a show on Roseanne tonight, 7 p.m.
	Well, let me just go ahead.
	Go ahead and screen.
	Biltong is in the house just in time.
	I'm going to screen grab that, and I'm going to actually reach out to him.
	I don't remember if I did or did not yet.
	King of Biltong says, Good afternoon from Anton's.
	10% off your Biltong using code VIVATEN on BiltongUSA.com, AntonUSA.com.
	Biltong is like prosciutto.
	Yes! It's like prosciutto, except it's made with beef.
	Cured, air-dried, slowly aging, whilst drying.
	And the...
	The Wagyu Angus is spicy.
	No, sorry.
	The Wagyu Ghost Pepper.
	Or the Wagyu Ghost.
	Spicy. There's an expression which I won't use because it's crass, but it's spicy on both sides.
	Pipe bombs were the pretense to pause the Congressional 100 hours of public discovery.
	Evacuate the House.
	Scare Senators.
	Scare Pence.
	Interfere with operations of Congress.
	That is from Epic Guess.
	And that is an Epic Guesser.
	James of...
	The Greater Area.
	James of TGA.
	Or is that Grand Theft Auto?
	TGA. The Grand whatever.
	It says, It has been particularly interesting that the Never Trump, Liz Cheney, Romney communist strand have been trapped on the insurrection strand and no one else.
	It was their Plan G insurance policy.
	When all else would fail, then go with that.
	And when that failed, Butler.
	And then let me see here.
	We got some in our vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	I think I can bring these up here.
	Look at this.
	Okay. Boom.
	I'll do it.
	I'm just sharing the screen here.
	Share screen.
	There we go.
	Bada bing, bada boom.
	We got Sammy.
	The couple of weeks leading up to January 6th, senators were very vocal about forcing the vote on the floor, leveraging that position against the election fortifiers to attempt to keep them honest.
	They were pretty resolute up until the breach of the Capitol.
	It is very convenient that as soon as Congress reconvened, all of those resistant voices quickly changed their tune to show that they were not with Trump or the insurrectionists.
	It's so obviously organized, it makes you disgust.
	Sammy, I agree.
	Finboy Slick says, that timer can't do more than 60 minutes.
	Who leaves viable pipe bombs laying around without arming them?
	Were they planning to return to the spot and turn them on later?
	Unlikely, if I had to say that, Finboy.
	And then we got to Gant that says, how do people not see this guy as literally promoting and doing what the Nazis did in World War II?
	That speech is horrifying.
	Oh, no, sorry.
	I presume you're talking about, not I presume, you're talking about Tim AWOL's walls from the beginning.
	We got a lot more stuff that we're going to do on the Rumble end of things.
	So for all of you on YouTube, how many are we here?
	Let's see.
	YouTube is screwing around.
	1,100 people on YouTube.
	Come on over to Rumble or come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	And if you don't, I'll put up the entire stream in any event on Viva Clips.
	But for now, I'm using stream here and I forget how to do this.
	Remove. Okay, we're ending on YouTube.
	vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Rumble. Viva Fry.
	Ending on Commitube now.
	Okay. Now I get to go to the comments section in Rumble and see what's going on here.
	We got...
	Oh, FD Man.
	What do we got here?
	We got another Rumble Rant.
	Just to read a few of these.
	We got...
	The same legacy deep state operatives did this in the 1960s to JFK, RFK, MLK, Malcolm X, CIA invented the terms conspiracy theory and conspiracy theorists for the Warren Commission.
	Not to quibble over semantics, the term conspiracy theory existed prior to, I think there's some tracing it back, but it was certainly weaponized for the purposes for which it was weaponized at that time.
	And it's very interesting, JFK, RFK, MLK, CIA.
	There's a song from Hair that had all the three-letter agencies.
	C-I-A, K-G-B, M-I-6.
	It's weird.
	It's like the Holy Trinity.
	When there's no God, you need to find a God anyhow.
	The Holy Trinity, all of these three-letter agencies pretending to be God because they don't believe in one.
	There it go, getting religiously.
	I'm not getting religious, people.
	Okay. With that said, I want to bring it up.
	Has anybody looked into who that individual in front of Crooks was?
	Did I shut the video down?
	Yeah, shut the video down.
	What is this?
	What is this?
	No, this is the pipe bomb.
	I ask the question because it's very, very bizarre in that new video of Crooks, which apparently a shop owner or one of the stand guys had and didn't even realize that it was Crooks.
	You see Crooks, and you see a guy ahead of him wearing sunglasses, walking alone, eight feet in front of Crooks.
	And some people are saying, who is that?
	It kind of looks like an Agent Smith, but that's not to spread any fake news or anything.
	It's just a question, I presume.
	And I ask the question not to suggest it's an Agent Smith handler of the FBI.
	I ask the question, because if that dude's walking eight feet from Crooks, did they find that guy and ask him if he had any other information?
	Because in that video, and I should have specified this earlier, in that video, Crooks doesn't have a backpack on.
	He doesn't have his...
	Sorry, that hand gesture looked problematic.
	He doesn't have his backpack.
	He doesn't have the rangefinder.
	And he doesn't have his bike.
	And so the guy in front of him, did he notice him?
	I mean, when I'm walking around, I notice if there's a sketchy-looking dude eight feet on my back.
	And maybe they should have asked him, did you see him with the rangefinder?
	When and where?
	Why wasn't he having a rangefinder in that video?
	If I could pull it back up, I would very much like to see this again.
	Greg Price.
	It was Ceruto.
	It's in the back here.
	Yeah, I don't think I have it.
	You know what I'm getting at.
	That's what I'm getting at.
	I suspect the aggregate knowledge of the internet, or at the very least, authorities should have, would have, and will look into that question.
	And don't get into the bad habit of misidentifying people like they did with the alleged FBI agent lady behind the stand or behind Trump who took out her cell phone and everyone accused her of being FBI and it turned out she's just not FBI, not intelligence, just a woman who had a reaction to take out her phone after a wildly Here it is.
	Here it is.
	I knew I had it.
	Tony Saruga, board member, big data pioneer, Intel Ops, CIA NSA contractor, whistleblower.
	And he asks the question, I don't know who this individual is.
	Who's the guy with Matthew Crooks?
	This is why, let me bring it up and just make it big here.
	That's close.
	And not that this guy's intelligence, but did he know that he was there?
	And now you look at...
	...and now you look at the same...
	26. No rangefinder.
	I presume the authorities are looking into that, but I say that almost tongue-in-cheek, because the authorities are not going to look into that which they don't want to find.
	Alright, who's watching the Demonic National Convention?
	Who's watching this crap?
	I was watching it last night, doing my best, just like, it's painful.
	It's painful.
	But, look, I think people set up traps.
	They lay out the bait and every now and again people take the bait.
	Let's go full circle back to the intro video of today.
	This is AWOLS, no balls to the walls, walls.
	But not everyone!
	Talking about what it means to be a good neighbor.
	State Farmers there.
	And it's as though these idiots...
	It's not that they...
	I don't know.
	I can't say that they don't have good memories.
	I can't say that they're liars.
	They know exactly what they're doing.
	They are fascist, dictator, statists, communists, whatever you want to call them.
	They are anti-American, anti-freedom, period.
	And when you listen to Walls in his response on this radio call-in, listen to what he says.
	But not everyone has that same sense of responsibility.
	Some folks just don't understand what it takes to be a good neighbor.
	What it takes to be.
	First of all, I hate when people talk like this.
	Some people just don't understand what it takes to be a good neighbor.
	A good neighbor.
	A good neighbor means calling the cops to protect that neighbor from themselves.
	That's what it means.
	Paul Gazelka wants you to take the hotline down for people to report violations of the stay-home order.
	Do we need a hotline?
	Yes, we do.
	Yes, we do.
	It is being used, and we simply want people to be able to call and let folks know, and it's for their own...
	Call and let folks know.
	I do hate it when people use the word folks, because it's such a...
	Insidious way of trying to disguise what you're saying.
	You'll notice that people say folks a lot when they're trying to make what they're doing sound less offensive.
	Well, some folks, you know, Obama uses the word folks a lot.
	Some folks, you know, just want to allow them to call folks.
	You don't want them to call folks.
	You want them to call the authorities.
	We have numbers.
	If somebody sees a fire at a neighbor's house, they want to tell them.
	Yeah, so if a fire at a neighbor's house, you want to tell them.
	Equate 911 to a COVID snitch line.
	If we see people that may not be as informed on this, it's an educational piece.
	He's literally talking about re-education.
	Send them to camp.
	We're certainly going to do that, and we're not going to take down a telephone number that allows people just to try and keep their neighbors safe.
	To keep their neighbors safe is the euphemism for a snitch line.
	Now, Tim Walz is an SOB.
	He's a bad man.
	I mean, I think we're all seeing that right now.
	I'm meticulously, obsessively, compulsively following the betting markets as an indication as to where the general consensus is.
	I've been showing you.
	Kamala Harris was once at, not once, like two weeks ago was at 57 cents to be the favorite and Trump was at 44 cents, the unfavorite, to become the next president.
	It's virtually even now.
	The more they talk, the more people hate them.
	The more unscripted, uncurated moments that they share with the public, the more the public hates them.
	Tim Walls is an SOB, a POS.
	I'm going with three letter A. He's a three letter acronym for a bad person.
	Stolen Valor.
	You got Tim Walls, Stolen Valor, period.
	Anybody who says that it's not is dumb or a liar.
	When he says, I misspoke about my combat experience.
	That is confirmation that he lied.
	Now, he says, I misspoke.
	He said something that was not true about his own life experience.
	Misspoke, whatever.
	It's confirmation he misspoke about experience, which is stolen ballot.
	He's also a total fascist dictator who sets up snitch lines so that you could snitch on your neighbors during a pandemic.
	I wonder where he got it from.
	Hold on.
	CBC snitch neighbor.
	I've shown this like a dozen times.
	Oh, look at this.
	I wonder where he got it.
	Maybe he got it from, you know, Kami Trudeau, who loves the basic dictatorship of China.
	The pleasure and peril of snitching on your neighbors during a pandemic.
	This is from Canada, from the CBC.
	You should love the ability to snitch on your neighbor.
	It gives little Karen and little Chad over there power over their neighbors as to when they leave their house, whose hand they hold, what playground they play at during a pandemic.
	You know what the punchline of this article was?
	The only peril of snitching on your neighbor was that it disparately affected blacks.
	Let me see here.
	It had a disparate effect on racial minorities.
	Look at this.
	Experts say reporting on neighbors offers a sense of control, but adversely affects minorities.
	The bad thing about it is not that you're snitching on your neighbor like a commie bastard.
	It's that people are going to snitch and it's going to affect minorities more than whitey.
	Call on whitey.
	Don't call on minority.
	Oh my god, so he's a fascist commie statist pig.
	That's what he is, Tim Walsh.
	Now, the only thing is, don't go and make fun of his freaking kid because of it.
	I mean, you might want to approach all genetically connected people with a similar skepticism.
	The joke of the day or the tweets of the day are making fun of his kid for crying and saying, that's my daddy when he's on stage.
	And people are relentlessly mocking the kid for ugly crying, and I'm putting it in quotes, for, you know, behavior.
	That's a little bizarre for a 17-year-old, but the kid's frickin' 17!
	The kid's a kid!
	A minor!
	But for the fact that the father might be using him as a political bait, don't fall for it!
	Don't fall for it!
	Plus, apparently, I don't take it for what it's worth.
	Apparently, he's neurodivergent, has a learning disability.
	I'm putting both of these in quotes.
	Whether or not it's true, people say, oh, he can't have a learning disability.
	He can't be neurodivergent.
	He drives a car.
	I've got friends and family members.
	We have a big family.
	People neurodivergent can drive.
	They can work.
	They can be totally functional.
	They might just have other manners in which their neurodivergence manifests.
	Some of it might be...
	Not reading people's skills.
	Not responding to stress properly or normally.
	So, bottom line, don't do it.
	Do I think that Tim Walls is parading his kid out there knowing that the kid's going to get made fun of so that Tim Walls can then pretend to be the victim and he can go from victimizer to victim because people are making fun of his neurodivergent kid?
	It's a good strategy.
	Justin Trudeau did it when he paraded his son around.
	Team Barbie not telling the world that it's his son so that people naturally jump to the conclusion that it was his gay lover because it's a week after he announced the divorce from his wife.
	You knew damn well that was going to happen.
	Do you guys know this?
	You all have to know it.
	Hold on.
	Team Barbie Trudeau tweet.
	He puts this tweet out a week after his divorce.
	By the way, also a week after saying, we need privacy for our family and kids because we're getting divorced.
	It's very upsetting.
	Whoa, whoa, whoa.
	Did he delete it?
	Ooh, looky, looky.
	It looks like it's no longer on the internet.
	You son of a bitch, Trudeau.
	Hold on.
	Oh, no, no.
	Okay, here it is.
	I thought he deleted it.
	We're Team Barbie.
	This is what Justin Trudeau tweets out a week after announcing his divorce, asking for privacy for his wife and especially his kids.
	Tweets out a picture.
	I didn't know it was his son, but I looked it up very quickly just to make sure before responding, make sure you understand.
	Not many people knew that's his son.
	Doesn't really look like it.
	I guess it doesn't really look like his son at all.
	He knew damn well by tweeting this if people weren't going to make gay jokes because people have made that joke about Trudeau in the past.
	They were definitely going to make something about a bizarre joke and make fun of the person in that video wearing a pink V-neck cut-off sleeve shirt.
	We're Team Barbie.
	He knew damn well people were going to make jokes.
	And he put his kids out there, then he puts one out with his daughter a week later, dressed in something where, you know, a little scantily dressed, but it's normal.
	I don't find anything abnormal about it.
	But he knew damn well other people on the internet would make those jokes.
	Let me show you this one, too.
	One dude, I don't want to put him on blast, made such an inappropriate comment.
	Team Oppenheimer?
	He made such an inappropriate comment and rightly got into big trouble.
	You put out a picture on the internet and you know that people are going to make fun of things.
	Here. This is the one we put out of his daughter a week later.
	Nice looking kid.
	A kid also.
	You have to have your head examined to make fun of a kid knowingly.
	But he does this knowing that the internet is what it is.
	I got kids.
	I tell him, you post something on social media, just go look in the mirror and make fun of yourself remorselessly for five minutes.
	That's what's going to happen, whether you like it or not.
	People call me also, make fun of my hair, make fun of the fact that I'm short, make fun of my lips.
	First of all, I don't give a sweet bugger all, but I've gotten used to it.
	Now, it's a big-ass long rant.
	Bottom line, whether or not Tim Walz put his kid out there knowing that his kid would get made fun of so that he can then say, look at me, woe is me, I'm the victim, and play it politically.
	Whether or not he did it on purpose, it's by virtue of the way some people have been making fun of that kid, he's going to do it?
	And he's going to score some political points for doing this.
	Don't make fun of freaking kids.
	Not hard.
	What else?
	Shea, boss.
	Now, I'm going to bring this up here because this is an apropos comment.
	Remember when the crazy-ass prof insulted Barron Trump in a congressional hearing and the press said Barron may have a learning disability?
	Justin Trudeau-Castro.
	That's from FD Man, FD Man.
	Comrade Harris, no balls, walls, 2024, DNC, says FD Man.
	JFK and the unspeakable.
	Why he died and why it matters by James Douglas shows the workings of the deep state plants and the Warren Commission.
	Yeah, so the bottom line, everyone says, you don't make fun of Barron Trump when he's a minor.
	I think I waited until, what's her name, Greta Van Thunberg was an adult before...
	I thought it was child exploitation to put her out there in the first place.
	Put out a young, apparently autistic or on-the-spectrum kid who's having a public meltdown so that they can exploit her for their political...
	It's disgusting and it's inhumane.
	I'm certainly not going to make fun of her for it.
	Now that she's an adult, however, and engaging in public discourse, I'll still weigh my words, but if you engage in public discourse on the internet, especially Twitter, you are engaging in it for the purposes of engaging.
	That kid wasn't exactly doing that yesterday.
	Be smarter and don't be jerks.
	Period. All right.
	We all heard about the lies now.
	I gotta get the...
	Is this the one?
	This is the one.
	So the other big news, by the way, this is sort of DNC adjacent.
	It has now been confirmed.
	Woe is me.
	We talk about 1984.
	I forget the verse, and if anybody can find it, I mean, I'll check it out.
	I mean, I'd like to remember it.
	I'll go check and try to refresh it.
	When they talk about chocolate production, and you realize just the government is lying to you, period.
	They always have been.
	They always will be.
	And they need to be held to account and not given more power to investigate themselves.
	A necessary evil that needs to be kept as small as humanly possible.
	All the government does is lie, through and through.
	You can't even...
	Unless you're there and you see it with your own eyes, you cannot know that something has happened if the government tells you this.
	And they've been touting the...
	By the way, Joe Biden has recovered the economy, and yet Kamala Harris is going to tackle price gouging, inflation, whatever.
	He beat pharma, and yet Kamala Harris, day one, is going to go after big pharma, take him on universal healthcare.
	She's not a commie.
	Price fixing, price...
	Price fixing to fix price gouging.
	All right.
	The bottom line.
	Jobs. They've been reporting quarterly job statistics, which now have been confirmed to be absolute bunk, overestimated by, you know, a mere cool nearly 1 million.
	818,000, apparently they exaggerated for the jobs.
	Raimondo! Who's Raimondo?
	Hold on.
	Let me play this.
	Watch this.
	When you hear that.
	That's very loud for me.
	Hold on.
	Let me turn my volume down.
	Here. Listen to this.
	When you hear that, do you potentially think that this new numbers could be a liability for this campaign?
	No. When I hear that, first of all, I don't believe it because I've never heard Donald Trump say anything truthful.
	It is, though, from the Bureau of Labor.
	I'm not familiar with that.
	When you hear that, do you potentially think that this new numbers could be a liability for this campaign?
	No. When I hear that, first of all, I don't believe it because I've never heard Donald Trump say anything truthful.
	It is, though, from the Bureau of Labor.
	I'm not familiar with that.
	I'm not familiar with that.
	It's from the Bureau of Labor.
	I'm not familiar with that.
	Who is she, by the way?
	Hold on.
	I've got to increase my screen here.
	Who is Gina Raimondo?
	Gina Raimondo is an American businesswoman, politician, venture capitalist, who has served as the 40th United States Secretary of Commerce since 2021.
	Now, I don't know anything about that.
	I've never heard Donald Trump say anything true, and I don't even know diddly squat about my own.
	I don't know anything about that.
	Her job.
	Fired. You're out.
	Pack your shit.
	Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
	What other response would there be to that?
	And it's worse than not knowing.
	If you don't know anything about that, how then do you dare say that someone else is lying about it?
	It's such a sick joke.
	It's such a sick joke.
	I'm just looking up something else just to make sure.
	Okay, just double-checking.
	We're good.
	It's pathological.
	I don't know anything about them.
	So DNC adjacent, they're up there, broad daylight, national primetime television, saying that they don't know how to do their jobs, they don't know anything about their jobs, and they don't believe anything if Donald Trump says it.
	And they never mention a lie that Donald Trump says.
	Add it to the list, by the way, because if she said that Trump was lying about that, suggesting it wasn't accurate, it was.
	So take it off the list.
	That is one less example of Donald Trump lying that you get to even allude to because it's not Donald Trump lying.
	What else do we have as highlights from last night?
	It's like you watch the DNC.
	It's demonic.
	Everybody looks...
	Oprah Winfrey looks healthier now than she's ever looked in her entire life.
	So if everybody has the face that they deserve at 50...
	I guess Oprah Winfrey is the exception.
	And maybe she's not as bad of a person as some people make her up to be.
	All right.
	Okay, okay, okay, okay.
	Check this out.
	Let's go to Oprah Winfrey.
	She does look very good.
	Hold on.
	How old is she?
	I think she was born in 1954.
	Oprah age.
	70? Sorry, I didn't mean to yell.
	70? Good for her.
	What is it that she must be taking?
	Like the adrenochrome?
	I'm joking?
	Hashtag joking.
	Let's see, because there's a good one.
	I watched her full 15-minute speech.
	It's baffled them with bullshit.
	That's all that it is.
	15 minutes, platitudes, contradictions.
	They get up there and talk about, we're not the party of division, we're the party of unity.
	But those bastards are the enemy.
	We're not the party of fear.
	We're the party of optimism.
	But if they get into office, they're going to strip you of your fundamental...
	I mean, they don't even...
	It's like, I don't know that they don't understand that they are absolute hypocrites guilty of whatever they accuse others of.
	I think they do know that.
	And they just bank on the fact that their audience are a bunch of low-information idiots who are going to gobble this goo up like it's gobbledygook.
	I mean, it's like, you listen to it.
	I'm not even going to play the whole thing.
	But listen to this portion of her speech.
	And despite what some would have you think, we are not so different from our neighbors.
	We are not so different from our neighbors.
	When a house is on fire, we don't ask about the homeowner's race or religion.
	No, you ask their pronouns.
	When you go and get them.
	How should I?
	I'm here to save you.
	They, Zzer, he, who, who, who?
	Which one?
	No, we don't ask their...
	What a load of shit.
	The first thing you do is get up and say, pronouns, please.
	Okay, I'll shut my big mouth and let it play through.
	You know what I'm going to do?
	Actually, hold on a second.
	I'm going to do one thing better than that.
	Just so that I make sure I shut my big mouth.
	I'm going to go get something out of the fridge.
	Here, enjoy this.
	I'll be back in a second.
	And despite what some would have you think...
	We are not so different from our neighbors.
	When a house is on fire, we don't ask about the homeowner's race or religion.
	We don't wonder who their partner is or how they voted.
	No! We just try to do the best we can to save them.
	And if the place happens to belong to a childless cat lady...
	Oh, there goes the division.
	We don't ask anything.
	And why do they go to her?
	Why would they pan to her?
	I'm sorry.
	This is how I also think that we're being trolled in real life.
	She mentions the childless cat lady and they...
	I said I was going to let this play through.
	And they immediately pan to that woman in the audience?
	Hold on.
	This place happens to belong to a childless cat lady?
	Oh, you're so funny, Oprah.
	Stand to the childless cat lady.
	Well...
	We try to get that cat out too.
	Childish cat ladies unite.
	It's verbal diarrhea.
	But that is hilarious.
	Maybe it's impossible for them to pan to the audience without immediately panning to a childish cat lady.
	Hypocrites. Verbal diarrhea.
	Whatever they say.
	They are.
	They are not.
	And whatever they say you are, they are.
	Period. One thing, though.
	Good. One thing.
	Hold on.
	Hold on a second.
	What does this mean?
	Viva is a good dude.
	You're lost.
	Oh, is somebody leaving?
	It is their loss.
	My grandmother said I was a good dude.
	Now I kind of want to go to the Twitter discussion and see what the heck was going on there.
	Whoever fielded that question, let me know what the discussion was about.
	I'm curious to know now.
	How do I see chat in real time?
	Okay, whatever.
	Got distracted.
	The cameraman found a childish cat lady.
	I have to pee.
	I should have gone to pee at the same time.
	Okay, so that's one highlight.
	It's nice.
	Oprah Winfrey's looking good for 70. I guess all the money in the world can actually buy you...
	I don't know, the proper care to be healthy, or at least appear healthy.
	Although then, that doesn't really explain why Bill Clinton looks the way he does.
	I don't make fun, I don't age shame.
	I'm not going to play the Bill Clinton clip, but one of the highlights was Bill Clinton saying that Donald Trump is older than him.
	We talked about it yesterday, or the day before, I forget which.
	Donald Trump looks exponentially better than Bill Clinton.
	If you're going to bring up age and how someone is older than you, maybe don't if you don't look anywhere near as healthy as them.
	If you're going to try to play that age-shaming game, make sure that you're freaking Chuck Norris and not Bill Clinton.
	Okay, set that aside.
	Rant over.
	What do we got here?
	When the house is on fire, I got this one.
	Oh yeah, that's right.
	When the house is on fire, by the way, Oprah Winfrey doesn't ask what race, religion you are.
	But she sure as hell will ask you if you're vaccinated.
	This is like, look, I don't remember everything.
	I'm just listening to that clip of Oprah Winfrey and I say, okay, she's very nice and inclusive.
	Hmm, what did she do during COVID?
	Oh, she was a biatch.
	Oprah Winfrey said she's fully vaccinated, reading from the Business Insider.
	And she's throwing a big taco party when her friends are too.
	But don't worry, she won't ask you your race or religion when she's saving you.
	She'll just ask if you're vaccinated.
	And if the firemen aren't vaccinated, fired.
	Oprah Winfrey is vaccinated and ready for tacos.
	Who gives a sweet flying bugger all?
	On March 25, the media mogul posted a letter on her personal website, Oprah Daily, where she shared her experience getting the COVID-19 vaccine.
	What freaking experience?
	Jackasses! And her plans for a pandemic-free future.
	Though Oprah isn't ready to party just yet.
	Quote, when enough friends are vaccinated, I may have an outdoor taco party.
	Congratulations, Oprah.
	You're an idiot.
	Your entire judgment is gone.
	Your moral judgment is gone.
	And may you never forget what you did during the pandemic.
	And I'm putting it in quotes, people.
	Okay, speaking of people who only accuse others of doing what they are doing and others of being what they are, Gavin American Psycho Newsom.
	We should call him Gavin Paul Bateman Newsom.
	Listen to this.
	Okay, I'm going to let this one play and it'll allow me to focus here.
	I've heard it before.
	You guys listen to this.
	Give me a second.
	With mutual friends having dinner, none of us even imagined we'd be in politics.
	The idea that I'd be here today announcing those 482 votes.
	She's our nominee for the party.
	It's surreal and just obvious point of pride.
	What a point of privilege.
	And what an opportunity to showcase someone whose next-level talent that's now in the shadow of being vice president has a chance to shine.
	You obviously speak to her often.
	What is she saying about what this last month has been like, what this moment has been like for her?
	I don't know that she's even had a chance to process.
	I don't think any of us, few of us, have had a chance to process the last three and a half weeks, let alone the last three and a half years, to be candid with you.
	I mean, COVID and all the stress, the polarization that we're all experiencing.
	So, look, this is a sprint.
	She recognizes what's at stake, and she recognizes you've got to stay on the offense.
	You've got to stay on the offense every single day in every single way.
	No one's denying what's on the other side.
	But, look, no one's also denying.
	The choice.
	This is daylight and darkness.
	Party of unity.
	Daylight darkness.
	And it's a beautiful thing to watch.
	I mean this.
	It's a beautiful thing to watch.
	Donald Trump spinning.
	He doesn't know what to do.
	He doesn't know how to do it.
	But he'll ultimately land somewhere.
	And that's why we also have to be humble as it relates to what's in front of us in the next few months.
	And we just saw where she is.
	That's in Milwaukee, where Republicans just had their convention.
	That is exactly where they just showed Vice President Harris on stage.
	Why do you think he hasn't been able to figure out how to go up against her?
	I think a lot of theories.
	I have my own.
	I don't think he ever imagined this would happen.
	I don't think he would.
	Imagine it would happen so quickly.
	I don't think he imagined we would consolidate as a party so quickly.
	And I don't think he also imagined the one intangible.
	There's a sense of spirit and pride.
	There's the intangible.
	The thing that sort of defies...
	Hold on.
	I can't figure out how to get myself out of here.
	There's a sense of energy that's beyond just these four walls.
	You see it out there.
	You feel it out there.
	I don't know what I've done here.
	And it's impacting the people around them that are now openly expressing concern, that are openly offering advice to a president.
	It's not easily, well, not easy to take advice.
	you.
	The heck did I just do?
	Okay. Look, let me stop there.
	I accidentally, with my fat fingers, opened a new window with myself in it.
	Let me just make sure that I'm still live here.
	I hope I didn't kill the stream.
	Am I still here, guys?
	You still see me, right?
	What did you do?
	Hold on.
	What did you do, Viva?
	You silly, silly child, man.
	Let me press play here.
	Okay, I'm back.
	Yeah, sorry.
	I have fat fingers.
	If you don't know, look at these hands.
	Fat, pudgy, ugly hands.
	I did, however, play classical piano for 16 years, and I won the Concours Vincent Vandy when I was 13, beating out another pianist.
	And my teacher...
	I was very angry that I beat this other guy.
	I won't give his name because, I mean, it's all funny.
	He practiced six hours of piano a day.
	I practiced an hour and a half of piano a day.
	With these short, pudgy little sausages, I could play good Bach.
	And I won with La Berceuse, was the song that I won with.
	So I think I'm still live on all platforms.
	I just accidentally swiped myself up.
	Because I'm an idiot.
	Rumble. Here.
	Let me go here.
	And... Yeah, I'm good.
	Alright, what I did forget to do, however, was shut down the stream on YouTube.
	So it's been playing an hour of my green, blurred-out face.
	Gavin Newsom accusing Trump of spinning his head and not knowing what to do, etc., etc.
	I get tired of constantly talking about confession through projection.
	You're supposed to see what they call a bump in the polls as a result of this convention.
	And by all accounts, they haven't, if only based on the markets.
	So the people who are flipping their shit right now, and I'm not saying this is not like political spin, pull the Bongino, get 10 people, show up and vote, unless you can't vote, in which case mobilize people to vote.
	What's quite clear is they're not getting the bump that they wanted.
	RFK Jr. tomorrow is expected to announce that he's withdrawing from the race and endorsing Trump.
	They are...
	They are the ones who are going crazy, not knowing what to do because it's not going the way they want, but they try to create the idea that it's somehow Trump that's doing it.
	It's a load of crap.
	Can you imagine what's going to happen tomorrow?
	I don't want to get ahead of myself, and I don't want to get ahead of the betting markets either.
	The markets are the useful indicator, a more accurate of an indicator than any poll you see online.
	If you follow Barnes, and Barnes has sportspicks.locals.com, where he gets into political gambling and all that stuff, and it's not gambling, political betting.
	And he had an amazing theory, which is when Kamala Harris kicks off, you have seen it in real time.
	The propaganda machine of the Pravda arm of the Democrat government, you know, the Democrats.
	I have never seen propaganda like this in my entire life.
	I might not have been looking for it, and I might not have been paying attention, but I've never seen a propaganda psychological operation like what we see now.
	And it comes out, and Kamala Harris, the best thing since sliced bread, going to have the honeymoon right up until your wonderful DNC, and it's supposed to generate an uptick.
	And she had the good honeymoon, and the media was running with it.
	And it was all good news, 90% favorable for Kamala, 10% favorable for Trump.
	That was indicated in the markets.
	Come the end of August, this is going to level out.
	And what we saw, you know, 60% Kamala at one point, or 58%.
	That's going to level out.
	It should be 50-50, just ordinary politics 50-50.
	So you're looking at a 20% swing regardless.
	But the more she talks, the more she tanks.
	That's good.
	You can use that.
	And if RFK Jr. comes out tomorrow and says, I'm dropping out of the race because of the Democrat lawfare, because they denied me secret service protection for six months and forced me to spend millions of dollars on security, because they've wagered lawfare against me to keep me off the ballots, I'm dropping out because they are corrupt, they are not Democratic, and they are pieces of political rubbish, and I'm endorsing Trump, and he's going to put me on his cabinet in charge of HHS, Health and Human Services, or the CIA?
	Holy hell!
	You want to know who's going to have a freaking meltdown?
	Not Trump?
	So, Gavin Newsom, congrats for telling us what is going on within the Kamala camp.
	They are panicking.
	They don't know what to do.
	They're not seeing the spike that they wanted.
	They're actually seeing numbers dive.
	And they don't know what to do.
	How desperate they get?
	Lordy, lordy.
	Let's not go down that path.
	Okay. Here's a...
	A decent joke.
	You can appreciate a decent joke when you see one, but you can also appreciate a political sell-out when you see one.
	This is a good joke, good delivery.
	Kenan Thompson is funny.
	You ever seen a document that could kill a small animal and democracy at the same time?
	Thank you.
	Let's just assume that that was a document that could kill democracy.
	See, that's a good joke.
	Here it is.
	You know how when you download an app...
	And there are hundreds of pages there that you don't read.
	It's just the terms and conditions.
	And you just click agree.
	Right? Well, these are the terms and conditions of a second Trump presidency.
	You vote for him.
	You vote for all of this.
	Let's take a look.
	Let's take a look.
	You know what the problem is, though?
	It is a big-ass book.
	And you didn't read it, Keenan.
	So you don't know what you're talking about.
	But you got your notes from your handlers.
	And they said, big book bad.
	You make joke.
	Big book bad.
	And Keenan says, I make joke.
	Big book bad.
	Get paycheck.
	Very happy.
	Handshake. We're done.
	Oh, man.
	Okay, good.
	Oh, I got to go hit that little button there so I can see the rumble rants coming.
	So that's Keenan.
	But it's a funny joke.
	It is a big book.
	I mean, if it were, in fact, a book that could kill democracy, like Karl Marx's, you know, oh, geez, Communist Manifesto.
	Yeah, it can kill democracy and an animal.
	That's a good joke.
	Good for him.
	I mean, he's funny, but unfortunately, he's using his powers for evil.
	What else do we have?
	Oh my goodness.
	Okay, I'm giving you the highlights so that you don't have to go.
	This was on Twitter.
	This is freaking hilarious.
	It's not Ryan Long or Justin Long?
	No, Justin Long was the guy from Dodgeball.
	Ryan Long.
	It's not Ryan Long.
	It kind of looks like Ryan Long.
	Maybe it is, but I don't think it is.
	What brought you out of today?
	No, listen.
	My name is Noah Swartz.
	I use he, they pronouns.
	Like, I'm just...
	Really excited that we have, like, the first black woman that could be the president of the United States.
	And, you know, like, my wife, right?
	We're in a polyamorous relationship.
	The lover that my wife took is African American.
	And, like, I've learned so much about the struggle that people of color go through.
	Look at the reporter.
	He's not quite sure.
	Is this person, like, on the fringe but serious?
	Or is this person playing me and making a joke?
	Right there.
	He kind of looks like me.
	Do we see a bit of a similarity here?
	I see it, unfortunately, because I actually thought it was me for a second.
	It's funny.
	It's funny because you can't tell anymore.
	And that could just as easily have been a real person.
	It's when they get into the boyfriend.
	You're the boy.
	I'll give everybody the link to that so you can...
	I haven't given the links in the chat here.
	The link is in...
	I'll give it in VivaBarnes here.
	It's a hilarious bit.
	You should go check it out.
	And I'll give it in Locals here.
	Okay, so that was another one.
	Humorous, but not part of the DNC per se.
	What else do we got?
	Oh, by the way, so now I've got the answer and my wife gave it to me.
	It is Tim Walsh!
	Not Tim Walsh.
	Is it Tim Walsh?
	Matt Walsh.
	In... Disguise at the DNC.
	And that new documentary, Am I Racist?
	Holy crap, it looks freaking hilarious.
	The deadpan delivery of Matt Walsh is amazing.
	And the delivery of that guy, to keep a straight face while you do that, it's amazing.
	That guy that we just saw there, we know is a...
	It's not a...
	What's the word I'm looking for?
	Parody. Living parody.
	It's performance art.
	It's delicious.
	It's glorious.
	This one...
	I'm still not sure about.
	I genuinely believe that Olivia, what's her name?
	Olivia Juliana.
	I believe that she's playing the absolute longest parody game on earth.
	Because you, and I'm not making fun of her for being overweight.
	There's nothing to that.
	It just kind of plays into this particular one where I think like, if someone's trying to troll the world and if someone's trying to like do the best possible parody ever, some of her other tweets have been so insanely idiotic, so insanely over the top.
	More over the top than that last clip that we just saw, I ask questions.
	She posted this, or at least someone posted this clip.
	Oh boy, who posted this?
	Steve Loves Ammo posted this.
	Listen to this.
	There's an old expression, in the house of a hung man, don't ask where you hang the fish.
	As if to say, like, when certain things are, you know, obvious or like, you know, don't mention them.
	I don't even know what she...
	Set aside the fact that she's overweight.
	Almost irrelevant.
	She says this, and I don't know what she means by it if it's not intended to be some form of long-game parody.
	Listen to this.
	But we will only be heard if we vote.
	As the saying goes, if you're not at the table, you're on the menu.
	So Gen Z, let's take our seat in our democracy and cast our ballots this November for Kamala Harris and Tim Walls.
	Okay, so I guess she's suggesting that if Gen Z doesn't get up and vote, get to the table, they will be eaten by MAGA Republicans and eaten in the sense of taking...
	Hold on.
	If you're not at the table, you're on the menu meeting.
	Sometimes I'm a little dense.
	Let's see what AI has to say.
	Basically, it means if you are not represented at the decision-making table, you are in a financially vulnerable position.
	You get left out, or worse yet, you are on the menu.
	This quote certainly applies to both nursing as a profession, and specifically...
	Okay. It's a very, very odd...
	And by the way, going back to being baited also...
	So that the victimizers can pretend to be the victim?
	Let's just hypothetically assume you know that you're overweight and that on the internet people make fun of superficial, trivial things.
	Okay. Then you bait them into insulting you for that by using an expression that draws attention to one's overweightedness, thus baiting people into making fun of someone.
	For being overweight.
	And then that person gets to say, look how bad and mean these MAGA Republicans are.
	Instead of addressing the substance of my analogy, they pick on me for being overweight.
	Congratulations, you've been baited into it by someone who is deliberately baiting you by dropping an analogy or a phrase that is overtly humorous under the context that leads to certain types of comments.
	So don't fall for the bait.
	Did I just fall for the bait?
	All right, that's another one.
	Let's see what else.
	Let's go.
	I got the whole list here.
	Oh, I shouldn't have closed all these because I'm going to need these for later.
	Let me see here.
	Talk about baiting.
	We'll save a few for afterwards.
	All right, I think we're going to end with this one here.
	What the...
	Okay. I don't necessarily...
	I don't espouse this view.
	I should say this.
	There is a movement on the internet.
	Repeal the...
	Is it the 25th Amendment?
	Whichever amendment was that allowed women the right to vote and...
	I think it's satirical, but some people might actually mean it.
	And then there's other people who say the expression that white liberal women are the worst or something along those lines.
	These are tropes on the internet.
	I'm not saying I agree with them, people.
	I just know because I live on the internet.
	This is another one.
	Baiting people into saying it.
	There could be nothing more cringe, nothing more embarrassing.
	Look at Elaine from Seinfeld.
	Badass. Oh, she's so badass.
	She also looks good for her age.
	How old is Elaine?
	I think she's Juliette Louis Dreyfus.
	Age. 63. Good for her.
	Okay. Oh, yeah.
	This is badass.
	Oh, yeah.
	The gang is all here.
	I mean, maybe some of them don't identify as white or maybe some of them are Latino.
	That to me looks like 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 white women.
	I'm sure they'll go for diversity in terms of gender or sexual orientation.
	That's 9 white women or maybe white adjacent women.
	Not a man.
	Not a person of color.
	That is diversity for you, by the way.
	This is the party of diversity.
	Now let me just go and play this one more time here.
	Okay. Here, stop here.
	Okay. Gang's all here to protect reproductive rights.
	LGBTQ, our schools.
	Our kids, bullcrap.
	Our environment, bullcrap.
	Small business, oh yeah, right.
	The party that shut everything down.
	Our economy, bullcrap.
	That lies about it.
	Working families, bullcrap.
	Retirees, affordable and attainable housing.
	Our communities.
	Garbage. Healthcare.
	Reproductive rights.
	LGBT. Are they just like...
	Is it like bingo wheel?
	They're just throwing words out here?
	Good-paying jobs.
	Families. Our schools.
	Our kids.
	Our economy.
	Our unions.
	Our people.
	Rubbish. It's garbage.
	I mean, this is...
	It's just terrible.
	You know what?
	I'm going to save the rest for the after-party, including Billy Baldwin being a world-class POS.
	Before we head over to locals for the after-party peeps, Let me see something.
	I'm going to give the locals to everybody.
	How do I share?
	Locals here, and we'll post that there.
	And I'll go into Rumble, and I'll do locals here.
	Locals. And I will also just read the rants before we head over.
	Everyone, head over to Rumble at locals, vivaboranslaw.locals.com if you want the after party.
	Otherwise, I will be live again tomorrow at my daily bat time, 1230.
	She drinks the color purple mixed with Marina Abramovich Crab Shake.
	Marina Bromwich is the one who did the spirit cooking.
	It was just art, people.
	It was just art.
	Cut yourself and make yourself bleed was just, you know.
	This is a billionaire who is oppressed.
	Oprah. Flat out lie from the dumbass secretary psycho woman.
	She thinks about how her husband lives.
	Life of lies.
	FD Man says, remember when the crazy-ass prophet said...
	Okay, that was fine.
	We've got that one too.
	And let's just bring this out and see what we've got in our tipped community at vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Ganthet says, isn't this the same witch that did nothing for the people of Hawaii while buying up their lands and forcing them out of their burnt-down homes?
	I presume, Ganthet, you are talking about Oprah Winfrey, and I believe that you are accurate.
	Devil Dog Mom says, Viva, did you see the letter Oprah wrote to Trump?
	He posted it.
	Oh. Oh.
	Hold on.
	I did not see that yet.
	I have been online for the better part of the day.
	Oh, well, okay.
	Elon's getting into the picture.
	Elon just said, my times have changed.
	Check this out.
	I know where we're going with this.
	Because it's Oprah on...
	Yeah, hold on.
	Let's play it out with this, and I'll see if I can find that.
	Let's go with this.
	Various celebrities in New York, because it was the opening concert in New York, and there were all kinds of celebrities, very, very famous people coming in, to be seated.
	And that...
	When you were seated, you got the loudest applause.
	People stood up and roared and cheered when you walked in.
	Why is that?
	What is this fascination?
	I don't know.
	Maybe I should be a rock star.
	They thought you were going to moonwalk.
	He was great, I have to say.
	I don't know what that is.
	Let me bring this one up now.
	I'm going to keep that on pause because I just found the letter.
	Let's just have a look at this as we...
	Prepare to end for the day, people.
	It's been a wonderful day.
	It's been nice seeing all of you on the internet, but come on over to Viva Barnes Law.
	We've still got a lot more here.
	It says, Donald!
	What year is this?
	January 11, 2000?
	Or is that...
	Okay, it looks like...
	Donald, I received the book.
	I have to accept...
	I received the book.
	I have to tell you, your comments made me a little weepy.
	It's one thing to say and live a life of integrity.
	Still another to have people like yourself notice.
	Thank you, Oprah.
	Too bad we're not running for office.
	What a team.
	I tell you, what a way to end the show exactly where we started.
	To be a good liar, you have to have a good memory.
	Do you think Oprah remembered this?
	Oh, no, but things have changed.
	Now Trump is bad.
	Too bad we're not running for office.
	What a team.
	Or as I should say, what a team.
	Everybody, it's been a great day.
	I hope we've had fun.
	I hope you've learned.
	Darren Beattie's awesome.
	Tomorrow, we'll maybe do the DNC recap.
	Oh no, tomorrow we're going to have probably some breaking news after the RFK announcement, so we'll see what happens with that.
	Let me take this out so I can say goodbye to you properly if you're not coming over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Before we even do that...
	Because I systematically forget, people.
	Viva Fry.
	We are putting up new merch.
	I'm going to get new merch.
	By the way, I do notice I don't wear anything except for merch.
	And that's not to say, like, I don't...
	These shirts last forever.
	I'm sweating through this one.
	That's all I wear.
	This is Viva Barnes University.
	Not a real university.
	We've got some new merch up.
	And there's going to be a whole heck of a lot more coming up soon.
	Don't vote for an idiot.
	I love it, is the shirt.
	And you can get it in the mug, which is probably the easier thing to do.
	And, yeah, you get the mug.
	Get the mug with the Trump.
	This is, I mean, I talked about it yesterday.
	Put on the full armor of God so that you can take your stand against the devil's schemes.
	Ephesians 611.
	Trump, when he was shot at 611, in an act of divine intervention, and I genuinely believe it and truly believe it.
	So, there's that.
	What else do we have on the...
	This is the newest stuff.
	But I forget.
	And I've made a...
	That's something else.
	Okay, we're back down there.
	Why don't...
	No, I'm seeing now...
	Okay, whatever.
	It's vivafry.com, vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	And Artificial Insanity says, yeah, how casual it becomes is disgusting.
	I think a lot of women are going to regret it later in life when they realize what they really did.
	I think I know what you're talking about, but I have not been a part of that conversation.
	So... Everybody?
	That's it.
	Now we're really ending it.
	We're going to go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	See you again tomorrow at 1230.
	I'll try to get out a car vlog later on this afternoon, maybe one while I'm fishing, just to recap something of interest.
	I've been meaning to just go over the Alvin Bragg basically submitting to the discretion of Judge Marchand in the sentencing.
	I'll get one out this afternoon.
	You know what to do.
	Like, share, subscribe.
	Make sure that your notifications are turned on.
	Share my stuff.
	Snip, clip, and help me grow that way because that is the easiest way.
	Word of mouth, people.
	VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com.
	Thank you.
	And I'm going to end on Twitter.
	Twitter. Peace.
	We're out.
	And rumble.
	As much as I love you, we are now going over to the after party.
	VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com.
	So ending there.
	And I do that by going to rumble and ending.
	Peace, people!

▲