All Episodes
Previous Next
April 24, 2024 - Viva & Barnes
01:18:23
Trump Immunity TOMORROW! Trump Contempt TODAY! "Foreign Aid" MADNESS & MORE! Viva Frei
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Minister Gilbo, you lost a court case to me and the judge ordered you to pay $20,000 but instead of paying it yourself, you had taxpayers pay for it.
Why?
Minister Gilbo, the court ordered you to pay me $20,000 but you foisted that on taxpayers instead.
You illegally blocked me on Twitter.
You fought for two years, you used a quarter million dollars in taxpayers' money, and then you stiffed the taxpayer and foisted the bill on them.
Why did you do that?
This is the greatest video ever.
Why don't you think you have to answer for $20,000 of legal bills that you sent to the taxpayer to pay your fine?
Because you're a pleb, and the government does not respond to plebs, Ezra.
Why aren't you talking about it?
You had a lot to say in court.
You claimed that your Twitter account was a personal account.
If that's the case, why didn't you pay the fine personally?
Look at that scumbag's face, and I'm talking about Stephen Gilbo.
Do you disrespect taxpayers, Mr. Gilbo?
Sure seems that way.
Hey, you're on the board of a Chinese agency, a Chinese government agency.
For the environment.
Well, when he didn't answer the first question...
How is that not a conflict of interest, given that you're in the Canadian cabinet?
You know he's going to answer this one, Ezra, given his propensity to answering questions.
Is that why you never criticized China, the world's largest producer of plastic?
Why are your staff pulling at me?
Why are they assaulting me, sir?
Okay, I'm not going to play the whole thing.
Why don't you ever criticize China?
Have you received help from China in your political campaigns too?
I'm going to put it on pause here.
There's going to be the cheap joke that Ezra is out of breath just by walking.
I think I know Ezra well enough to know that that's like...
When you get excited, people, like you start catching a fish and you're like, oh!
Just to pull a rogue in there.
This is like the excitement of, oh my goodness!
I ran into Stephen Gilbo on the street.
And anyone who thinks it's easy to walk, focus, talk, carry a camera at the same time, holy hell, Ezra sounds like he just caught lightning in a bottle.
This is like, this is mana from the heavens.
Stephen Gilbo, he's got, and I'm talking about Stephen Gilbo here, he's got the face of a commie.
I know I've been using that word a lot these days.
He's got the face.
Of a convicted criminal.
But look at his face.
Let me see if I can get here.
And bear in mind, or at least try to think of how closely it resembles Jack Smith's face.
I'm going to do a side-by-side actually after this.
Look at that face.
Look at that face right there.
Ladies and gentlemen, love the jury.
That is the face of a criminal.
Oh, let me screen grab this.
I'm going to screen grab that and I'm going to go do a side-by-side with Jack Smith.
This man has dirty stuff on his computer.
That much?
No confession through projection.
I just look at this guy and this guy, if I had to guess that he was a pervert, I would guess that this man's a pervert.
Yes, hashtag confession through projection.
Viva's admitting he's a pervert.
Thanks.
But he's a pervert.
China refuses to sign the anti-plastics treaty.
Why are you forcing that on Canadians?
To please his Chinese overlords.
Period.
Look at that face.
Oh, my God!
Ezra, if you say Stephen Gilbo three times in the mirror in the middle of the night at 3 a.m., he'll appear behind you, and that will be what you see over your shoulder.
What do you mean by it?
What is the cause that...
Okay, we're going to stop it there.
I'm going to give everybody a link to that tweet.
Share it far and wide.
It's...
Look, there's very few things.
I won't say there's very few things.
Not everything on the internet makes me happy to watch.
Watching Stephen Gilbo get humiliated like the disgusting criminal that he is.
And by the way, he is a convicted criminal or he pled guilty to, you know, whatever it was.
Oh, that type of activist interference.
There's a word for it.
Not mischief.
Whatever.
How come he doesn't answer any questions?
He is accountable to the people of Canada.
For those of you who don't know the backstory to that, it's wild and it's amazing.
And for those who, you know, accuse Ezra and rebel media of looking for trouble, well, sometimes you gotta look for trouble.
Ezra got blocked by Stephen Gilbo on Twitter.
Most people would say, all right, that man's a piece of scum, Stephen Gilbo, and good riddance to bad rubbish.
Others would say, I'm going to sue you because you're not allowed doing that as a member of government up in Camden.
He sued Stephen Gilbeau.
Stephen Gilbeau's defense.
Stephen Gilbeau, oh my goodness.
He's the former minister of heritage.
He's the idiot that sits there trying to explain away why the original...
Online Streaming Act contained an exception specifying that it would not apply to individual user accounts.
Then the liberal scoundrels in the middle of the night eliminated that exclusion and then said, don't worry, it's not going to apply to individual user accounts.
And they said, well, why did you remove the exception that specifies that?
And he was...
And then, lo and behold, it's going to apply to individual user accounts if they're big enough and act like a broadcaster.
That's Stephen Gilbo.
Gilbo blocks him, and then Ezra sues him.
Gilbo's defense was, it's my personal account.
It wasn't, it's my first day.
It was, it's my personal account and I can block you personally.
And the court said no.
And from what I understand, following it, you know, not meticulously, I wasn't in court live streaming it.
They say, he says, you have to unblock them and you have to pay $20,000 in court costs, I believe.
Or maybe it was legal fees, something along those lines.
I just got a call from somebody who I...
I'll take it later.
If you're watching, by the way, I can't talk right now.
I'm live.
I'll call you back in a bit.
So he got ordered to pay $20,000 to reimburse.
It was either legal fees or court costs, maybe a bit of both.
I forget.
It doesn't really matter.
And what does Stephen Guilbault do?
Stephen Guilbault, whose defense was, it's my private account, and the government's answer was, no, it's not.
You have to unblock them.
He paid for the $20,000 in court costs, legal fees, whatever it was, with taxpayer dollars.
Now...
To Steelman Stephen Gilboa, he's going to say, well, I guess I made a mistake.
It wasn't my personal account.
It was a government account.
Therefore, the taxpayers have to pay this.
After he dragged it through court, from what Ezra says, for a couple of years.
The scumbag scoundrel, POS, and yes, I'm not going to say the swears yet because it's still early, but I'm going to use the acronyms.
That scumbag POS wasted taxpayer dollars contesting Ezra Levant's lawsuit.
In the same way, strapped for cash, CBC state-funded propaganda dragged, who was it, the Conservative Party through court claiming copyright infringement.
They're so strapped for cash, they drag them through the court system claiming a frivolous copyright claim.
Stephen Gilbo drags Ezra through court using taxpayer dollars, tax-paid lawyers, to assert a bullshit defense.
I just did it.
Damn it.
I'm sorry.
A bullplop defense.
A grade A bullplop defense.
Then gets ordered to pay court costs or legal fees and pays it out of taxpayer dollars.
Scoundrels.
Scoundrels of the highest order.
And then that raging authoritarian just sits there and walks the streets because he doesn't have to answer.
The questions of independent media.
He'll only ask the softball questions of the CBC.
This didn't happen, so don't anyone say like Viva said parody and didn't say parody.
Parody, people.
CBC would go ask him, how did it feel when you lost your court case, Stephen Gable?
Oh, it was very hard.
I genuinely thought I was able to block him because it was my personal account, but I made a mistake and so that's it.
The government should pay for it.
The taxpayer dollars should pay for it.
Scoundrels, scum of the earth.
Did I share that link?
Link?
Link.
Come on, fat fingers.
Let's do this.
Link to tweet.
Go share it far and wide because it's a thing of beauty.
It's a thing of beauty.
When Ezra catches his targets, political targets, in public, he did it in the WEF at Davos.
It was glorious.
And then you had Alexa Lavoie in the end there.
You can go watch the full video to check it out.
But share and share.
It's beautiful.
Good afternoon, everybody.
You go to bed at night and he's like, oh crap, what are we going to have to talk about between yesterday and today?
Then the world happens.
Then you see, speaking of scoundrel buffoons, traitorous scoundrels in government, then you see, what was it, Congress or the Senate?
I forget which, the House, waving Ukrainian flags after they just agreed to ship another $60 billion to Ukraine.
They're so happy.
To provide support to foreign countries, foreign citizens, while their own citizens die of overdoses at record rates, take their own lives in terms of veterans at record rates.
Cities are unlivable, illegal immigrant crisis in America.
They're happy to ship tens of billions of dollars off to foreign countries for the amount of money that gets laundered, lost, misappropriated through corruption.
They could solve Lahaina.
They could solve East Palestine.
They could resolve gun violence in schools by hiring armed guards out of every public school that doesn't already have an armed guard.
But no, there are a bunch of virtue-signaling, scoundrel-less POSs who prefer to ship tens of...
I'm getting ahead of myself.
That's going to be in the show today.
So we're talking about the aid package, the TikTok thingy thing that's going through.
We're going to talk about the Trump contempt, the Trump trial.
Judge Marchand issued an order.
What else do I have in the backdrop here?
I should take notes.
Oh, it's good stuff.
It's good stuff.
Oh, censorship out of Australia.
We're going to have a lot of fun stuff.
For those of you who are not familiar, we're going to do another one of our Locals supporter chats at about, give or take, 2.30-ish.
That is in our Locals community, vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
We've got 120,000 members.
Those are non-supporting, just people who are part of the community.
You could join that.
For absolutely no cost, just come to the community, vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
For those who choose to support, we have this perk that we do on the channel.
It's a one-on-one discussion.
It's like an interview.
It has yet to get adversarial, but I have no doubt one day it'll get adversarial, or at least ideologically confrontational.
We're doing one today, another one today, so stay tuned for that.
That's going to be exclusive on the Locals After Party.
If you don't know who I am, and you just say, how did I stumble across this Raging Lunatics channel?
I am Viva Frye, David Frye, former Montreal litigator, turned current Florida rumbler.
Plugging away with the car vlogs, either, you know, plugging away with the car vlogs, because people like the shorter format.
I feel that there might be some sort of inorganic algorithmic suppression when your own videos are not getting showed to your own subscribers on Commitube, but it doesn't matter.
I'm going to continue doing it anyhow.
The more they chicane, the harder I'm going to work.
We start off on YouTube, Rumble, and vivabarneslaw.locals.com, and then what we do, because we vote with our feet, we vote with our eyeballs, we vote with our dollar, we leave the Commitube platform and we go to Rumble.
And then we have the rest of the stream on Rumble.
Then we end on Rumble and have the exclusive after party at Locals.
And then I put up either the entire stream or clips on YouTube the day after.
So it's not a question of doing that, which we're not allowed to do on YouTube on other platforms.
I'm a good boy, as my grandmother used to say.
It's a question of favoring the platforms that favor free speech because the war on free speech is...
It's getting jacked up on steroids.
I mean, it's making the old drug Olympics look like child's play to the level of the censorship that they're trying to bring.
That's going to be the first story because it's a funny one.
And I screwed up with the meme that I wanted to do, but whatever.
I'm going to make fun of myself while I do that.
Before we even get there, those are the rules of the game.
The link to the rumble is in the pinned comment.
And if you just are so inclined to go start it over there right now, go do it.
No legal advice, no medical advice, no election fortification advice.
We have these things called Super Chats, Rumble Rants.
I do my best to read them all.
If you're going to be upset, if I don't read them, don't give them.
I don't want people feeling upset.
Okay.
You may have noticed when you came into the stream.
I'm just going to go down because I'm totally neurotic OCD like it's nobody's business.
Yes, I did check the box off.
It said this stream contains a paid promotion.
Because it does, I love all of my sponsors.
And I drink the coffee.
In this particular case, the sponsor is 1775 Coffee.
Stop drinking woke coffee.
Are you a sleepy Joe who has zero cognitive performance?
I love this.
Scared of walking upstairs without being worried that you're going to fall down?
Do you struggle to muster focus and brainpower?
To do basic things, you know, like say words.
You need to stop drinking woke liberal coffee and start your day by drinking Rumble's own 1775 Coffee.
Never mind that it will be the best tasting coffee you've ever had.
It's strong.
So if you like that soft tea water that your mama made, don't drink 1775 coffee.
It's good, robust, rich, flavorful, and it doesn't taste like that burnt Starby's crap.
It's delicious.
If you're tired of that, come on over.
It's a locally sourced family farm at Altitude Mountains in Bolivia.
So instead of waking up tomorrow and drinking your mold-infested, corporate-owned, woke ideology coffee that's probably making you sick from pesticides to spray it with, try 1775 Coffee.
Support freedom of speech.
Support the freedom parallel economy that really is trying to save humanity from itself.
1775coffee.com 1775coffee.com forward slash Viva.
Promo code Viva.
You'll get 10% off your first order.
The link is in the description.
I take my coffee like I take...
I was going to make my mother's joke, like I take my men strong.
But I take my coffee like I come.
Short and strong.
Robust and strong.
1775coffee forward slash Viva.
Links in the description.
You know what it is.
You know, the thing with the thing.
Okay, speaking of the parallel economy, censorship, the war on words, you see videos, and I say this often because we're living in a world where it's becoming more and more common.
You see a video and you say, I have to make sure that that's a real video.
And I'm actually just going very slowly here because I can't seem to find the video.
Here it is.
You see a video and you say, holy crap, that's hilarious.
That has to be fake.
We knew that Australia was bad.
Apparently they got a new PM.
His name is...
I'll get his name in a second.
This is the video.
Very grainy.
Just to explain why I picked the wrong photograph to make my crappy memes.
But the memes are great in theory.
They're just...
I cannot deliver in technique.
Listen to this video and understand what the Prime Minister...
Of Australia is actually saying right here.
Spoiler alert, he is taking credit praising, lauding the fact that he had memes taken off the internet.
Listen.
Platforms.
That's why I still love the accent.
No matter how fascistic and tyrannical it gets, I will always love the Australian accent.
I don't mean that South African, whatever.
Platforms have a responsibility to make sure.
That misinformation isn't got out there.
I noticed today, for example, on the way up here, they've removed various sites that were up containing fake images of myself.
Fake images of myself.
Superimposed.
On other people.
That's the sort of thing that is going on on social media.
I'm going to stop there because something's driving me crazy.
Why the heck do I have this screen and screen?
Hold on one second.
No, no, no.
Did they change something on StreamYard?
That's what I want.
Okay, I want that view.
I don't want to see my face while I'm watching videos.
Here.
Social media has a responsibility to do the right thing here.
Do the right thing here.
Do the right thing.
Let me just do a play-by-play here.
Containing fake images.
They've removed.
They've removed various sites that were up.
I'm going to translate the accent for us Americans.
Us North Americans.
Containing fake images of myself.
Fake images of myself.
They've removed websites containing fake images of myself.
Were these like extortionists?
Here's your face on somebody who's doing something bad and we want money and people are going to think this is real?
No.
Superimposed.
On other people.
That's the sort of thing that is going on on social media.
Fake images of a face put on somebody else is going on.
You mean a meme?
You tyrant?
You mean you had websites take down memes of you?
Social media has a responsibility to do the right thing here.
Social media has the responsibility.
To do the right thing.
You can't make fun of your dictator or your dictator, because that would be problematic, eh?
To which I just bloody well had to do this.
I did it with the former guy first.
Such an idiot.
This, I think it's a pretty good meme.
I mean, this one came out well.
I am once again asking you to delete memes of me from the internet.
That's the Bernie Sanders, for those of you who don't know.
What's his name?
Albanez.
Anthony...
Albanese.
Wasn't Albania a communist country at one point?
Maybe.
Norman S. Omen?
All right, so that was my one attempt.
There was that one.
And then I think I'll do that.
I had a second one.
It's not the best, but if they want to take down memes off the internet, they're going to come at Elon Musk and say, hey, Elon, take down that bloody tweet that Viva put up of me and Bernie Sanders.
It's bloody embarrassing, Ace.
But then if Elon doesn't do it, what happens then?
Hold on, I'll tell you what happens if Elon doesn't take down the tweet because I made a meme for that one too.
Not as good as the first one, but here we go.
Yeah, it's actually terrible.
Hold on, I'm going to show you.
I'm just going to show off my hard work.
Wasted time.
This is what I do.
Then I get up in the morning and then I make a stupid meme and it takes way too long.
It's not well done.
The idea is perfect, but the execution is terrible.
Yeah.
This is what happens when you don't take down.
When Australian PM demands a meme deletion and Elon Musk says, GFS, GFYS, that means go flip yourself.
And it's supposed to be the screaming Trump lady.
Yeah, so, okay, lame.
But that's what's going on, people, by the way.
And Chris Poblosky has been tweeting about it.
The unbridled, unbridled, is that the word?
Relentless, ramped up.
War on free speech coming out of Australia, New Zealand, France, Brazil.
Do people not understand that this is not even the slow walk towards communism?
And I'm using the word loosely.
I got a funny anecdote afterwards.
It's the slow walk towards absolute statism, authoritarianism, tyranny, fascism, whatever you want to call it.
The absence of freedom.
You can't make means of the OCA.
I'm your prime minister.
You've got to come to me for your truth.
What was it, Jacinda Ardern, the New Zealand PM, who literally had her soul sucked out of her body with all of the evil that she imposed on the world.
They say, you want your information, you get it from the government.
When has the government ever been the source of truth?
When in the history of humankind has the government ever been the source of truth, let alone the only arbiter of truth?
I mean, it's like, Orwell, it wasn't...
It wasn't prescient.
It wasn't predictive.
It was a summary of the past 1984.
He wasn't predicting the future.
He was synthesizing the history of humankind in a way that made it timeless.
Okay, so there's that.
Now, what I wanted to do...
UK, love you, Tommy Robinson.
I'm looking in here in the Rumble side.
I'm going to tell everybody now, and I'll talk about it in further detail.
I'm going to be on Jenna Ellis' show tonight with a gentleman named Robert Petillo.
And I'll just tell the anecdote now because everybody should go watch it.
Even if you have your political issues with Jenna Ellis, suck it up and go watch it because I'm on it and it's hilarious.
I didn't know there was going to be a panelist and I didn't know it was going to be Robert Petillo who, if one were to say, you know...
There are two sides of the political ideological spectrum.
I would be on one, and Robert Petillo would be on the other.
And I was not mincing words.
It was fun, and I give Robert Petillo credit for actually going on Jen Ellis to discuss the Trump trial, the gag order, all this stuff, and what was the other one?
And the immunity case that's coming up before the Supreme Court tomorrow.
So we're going to talk about that today, but go watch.
Don't be a baby Bigfoot.
Go watch it today.
I don't have the link yet, I don't think.
Let me see here.
Maybe I do have the link.
Drops tonight at 9pm.
I don't know where we're supposed to find it.
How do I share the link so people know where to go?
Watch it.
It's funny and you'll like it.
Okay.
All right.
22 minutes in.
Do we do one story here?
Let me see what we got in the back.
We'll do one short story before we go over to...
Talk about the Trump gag order, a ruling from Judge Marchand, quashing a subpoena.
Not the end of the world, but it's definitely worth noticing.
Let's do this one here because apparently they're not proud of waving Ukrainian flags in Parliament in the House.
I don't know if it's the Senate or Congress.
I don't know what the word is for that, but let's say the House because I'm a dumb Canuck and I don't know what the...
I get mixed up on the American terms.
It sure as hell is not the Parliament.
Congress people, congressmen and women, are out there waving their Ukrainian flags after passing a bill that is a four-pronged bill, money to Israel, money to Gaza, money to Taiwan, money to Ukraine, and the TikTok, what's the word, when you dispose of your assets, but you know what I'm saying.
And apparently, apparently they don't want the video that Rep Massey took, they don't want that going viral for some reason.
Apparently they've threatened Rep Massey.
For having filmed a seven-second video in the house, whatever that place is.
Here, this is it right here.
Hold on, don't look at it yet.
We're going to get there in a second.
This is from Dinesh D'Souza.
Don't watch the video yet.
And he says, the house...
Okay, so it is the house.
Thank you.
Okay.
The House is threatening to fine Representative Thomas Massey for posting this video.
So I'm reposting it here.
Please share widely as a gesture of defiance against these small minded fools who despise getting exposed for their America last policies.
Well, Dinesh D'Souza, I'm going to have to fact check you on that.
We don't know if it's America last, but we certainly know that it's not America first.
Right now, it looks like Ukraine first.
Maybe, no, I won't even say tie it up there with Israel.
It'll be Ukraine first, Israel second.
Then, like, helping the victims of the war that they are financing by providing military aid to Israel.
Then it's Gaza third.
Then Taiwan fourth.
So it's not America last.
It's just, at the very least, fact check, America fifth.
Maybe last, but we don't know that for certain.
We can't make that statement.
It's definitely not America first.
And it sounds like it's America fifth.
For now.
I'm trying to think here.
What else is there?
What other country are they favoring?
Can't think of one for now.
This is the video.
Thank you.
Hold on.
I gotta see something.
I gotta see something.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Okay, right there.
Right there.
Okay, I might be seeing something.
Okay, no, that flag is not at the front.
There's an American flag in the middle for now.
What is that yellow thing above it?
I mean, that I thought maybe was part of Ukraine.
Look at all these people in the gallery.
So they don't want you seeing that video.
To which I had to reply.
I mean, why wouldn't they?
Are they not proud of this?
Were there not people posting the still, the image, to show that this shows America's support for Ukraine?
$60 billion more to Ukraine.
And don't worry, for all the bad things that we say, at the risk of being called a Putin shill, I will give Zelensky credit where Zelensky deserves credit.
He's thanked the American taxpayers.
He's very polite after he comes and gets another $60 billion from America.
He tweets, I am grateful to the United States, the United States Senate, for approving vital aid to Ukraine today.
I think Majority Leader Chuck Schumer...
And Republican leader Mitch McConnell, I thank them for their strong leadership in advancing this bipartisan legislation.
This is how you know you sort of are potentially on the way to losing your country when it's bipartisan, America fifth or later.
As well as the U.S. senators on both sides of the aisle who voted in favor of it.
The vote reinforces America's role as a beacon of democracy?
By shipping billions of dollars to a corrupt regime that is so flipping corrupt, they don't know if it's 30 or 70% of this aid that reaches the end line.
It's so corrupt that when it finally gets exposed, Zelensky has to oust certain members of his government who have been misappropriating millions of this aid.
It's so corrupt, I'm fairly certain their leading export leading up to 2014, which is when this conflict pretty much seriously began, the leading export of Ukraine was human trafficking.
That might be hyperbole, but you get what I'm trying to get at here.
It's so corrupt.
Ukraine is so corrupt.
I mean, it's so corrupt.
You used to have videos raging against the corruption, the far-right Nazification of Ukraine, right up until 2021, 2022, when the outbreak, when Russia invaded the East.
And then Ukraine became a sacred cow.
Hold on, I haven't finished reading his tweet yet.
My apologies.
Now I don't know where it is.
That's great.
I am so grateful to all Americans who continue to support Ukraine.
They didn't have their choice.
Hey, Zelensky, the majority of Americans don't support this crap.
So what you should be thanking America for is stealing American taxpayer dollars that are needed in America.
I'm paying taxes in America.
I would love to know what percentage of the taxes I paid in America were directly whisked off to Ukraine.
Forget the veterans who are committing suicide at record rates.
Forget the homeless.
Forget the...
Geez, the overdose.
The fentanyl crisis.
Forget the open border.
Forget Lahaina.
Have they been rebuilt yet?
Have they been made whole?
Forget East Palestine.
Forget Flint, Michigan.
I'm so glad that the money that I'm paying to the government in America, whatever percentage, is just being plucked out of my back pocket and shipped to a foreign country.
And in fairness, it wouldn't have been much better in Canada.
To the historical significance of this bill extends beyond politics.
You're damn right.
It represents senators and congressmen, whatever the heck we are here.
Throwing their nation under the bus.
At the altar of globalism.
I equally appreciate President Biden's support and look forward to the bill being signed soon and the next military aid package matching the resoluteness that I always see in our negotiations.
Ukraine's long-range capabilities, artillery, and air defense are critical tools for restoring just peace sooner.
Hey Americans, he's thanking you for your money.
This is from Al Jazeera.
When was this from?
January 2024.
Ukraine says it uncovers 40 million arms corruption scheme.
Oh, that's just what they uncovers.
It was a one-off.
That's the only time it's ever happened.
Security Service of Ukraine says five charged over plot to embezzle funds earmarked to buy 100,000 mortar shells.
Yep.
Thank you for your money.
It's going to go to good use.
There was more to that thing here.
Hold on one second.
Was there more?
Oh, yeah, that's right.
It's funny.
When you spend a lot of time on the internet, you see things.
You don't put together dots, but you kind of put together dots because they're kind of connected.
It's funny.
I read a statement from Rep.
Hakeem Jeffries last night.
He's talking about how beautiful this bipartisan bill is.
It's amazing resoluteness.
We're going to just go ship another $60 billion off to Ukraine because they need it more than Americans.
Yeah, this was Hakeem Jeffery's statement from last night.
I'll just get to the good part.
Congratulations to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, yada yada.
Pat ourselves on the back, jerk ourselves off here.
Highly consequential legislation that supports democracy and freedom throughout the world by funding conflict.
It's amazing.
The House Republican majority irresponsibly delayed critical security assistance to our Democratic allies in Ukraine, Israel, and the Indo-Pacific for months until a bar-partisan coalition, yada yada yada.
Then I saw something from, what's his face here?
You know, the total non-rhino, the total non-democrat Mitt Romney.
My statement on the national security supplement.
After months of needless delay.
Does that sound familiar?
Oh yeah.
Irresponsible delay.
Needless delay.
When you got a bipartisan Mitt Romney spouting off Hakeem Jeffries' talking point, you might want to think that he is not only a rhino hack.
But he might actually be a rabid, brain-dead Democrat with a capital D. So there was that connection that I put together.
There was another one that I saw, which is equally glorious.
It's almost satire.
I watched it.
I was like, oh, is this Tyler Fisher?
Is this Tyler Fisher doing a bit?
Here we go.
Listen to this.
I was going to start the show off with this, but no, instead I'm just going to go to it now.
I was like, oh, that kind of looks like Tyler Fisher.
Ty the Fisher, if you don't follow him on Twitter, he's amazing.
Stand-up comic.
Glorious.
What does this guy have to say?
Hey, good, good.
It's good to see you.
This is totally organic, totally natural, totally authentic, not staged, not a setup whatsoever.
This is how people do things.
You got the camera rolling?
Okay, okay.
You can hear me?
You can hear me?
Yes.
Oh, good, good.
Let's roll.
I just wanted to give you an update that I'm about to walk across the street from my office here in Washington.
And give 60 billion of my constituents' tax dollars to a foreign country.
Oh, no, that's not what he was going to say.
Sorry.
And we're going to take the vote right now.
We're voting right now.
Right now.
To give you the support you need.
So we're going to get this passed out of the House of Representatives.
We're going to send it to the Senate.
The Senate will vote on it soon.
We're behind you.
We're rooting for you.
We're going to give you the support that you guys all need right now to fight and win.
Thank you.
Thank you.
So do you think it would be passed today?
I think it's going to be passed.
Y 'all got any more of that taxpayer dollars?
You think we're going to get that taxpayer dollars today?
Because of my corrupt regime, you know, I've got some people here.
They need to get paid.
Do you understand?
People don't even know what the money's funding.
Business, economy, government.
You're funding a foreign government.
Y 'all got any of that?
Because it's been a while since my last American taxpayer dollar paycheck.
Passed in the House of Representatives today, yes.
I think it's going to pass in like a half an hour.
I think it's going to pass.
When do we get my money?
Then the next step is, then it goes to the Senate, which is our other body in Congress, and the Senate will vote on it probably Monday or Tuesday, and I think it'll pass there, too.
We're there.
Well, we believe in you.
We're behind you.
You're doing it right now.
Well, we believe in you, which is our other body in Congress, and the Senate will vote on it probably Monday or Tuesday.
There's an edit.
I think it'll pass there, too.
It was a hard edit.
What did he say?
I want to know what he said right there.
This is where, like, if I were a real pain in the ass and I knew, I mean, I don't know if a FOIA request would get that.
What happened?
What did they cut out of this video?
Probably Monday or Tuesday.
You can hear there's a bit of audio left over, which means whoever's on the other end, I think it's Zielinski, said something.
I think it'll pass there, too.
Well, we believe in you.
We're behind you.
You're doing an amazing job.
Your bravery, your courage.
It's just inspiring to all of us.
I can't even get the bullshit out of my mouth as I try to squeeze it out.
We're going to pass this bill.
I talked to the administration.
They're actually getting weapons and ammunition and equipment ready right now in our stores and depots in Europe.
Are you going to stock it up in Finland that just joined NATO so that you can use it?
Use a new...
Partner to NATO?
Use them as a weapon stockpiling nation?
I urge it very quickly and get it to you.
Thank you.
All right.
All right.
Be well.
Be safe.
Slava, Ukraine.
Slava, Ukraine.
Holy hell.
First of all, he obviously doesn't understand the history of that term.
the Nazi, not origin, but the Nazi adaptation during World War II.
He obviously doesn't understand that.
Maybe someone should remind him that he basically just said a Nazi chant.
What are we going to do, Justin?
Oh, hold on a second.
There was another edit right there.
There was another edit right there.
What happened there?
What did he say that you didn't want to be in the video?
And now he's getting another call.
We will.
Thank you.
Say it again.
Say it again, Crow.
So let me just see who this individual is.
I know I know him, but Rep Jason Crow.
Let's go over here.
Dad, Little League, yada, yada, yada.
Whiskey enthusiast.
He might have been drinking there.
Colorado 6. Is he...
I thought he was Democrat, but then people in the comments...
That's what a traitor in government looks like.
You want to talk about insurrection?
It doesn't need to be done through violence, people.
It doesn't need to be done with flagpoles and pepper spray as if you can do insurrection.
It can be done politically.
When you have representatives of one government proudly waving the flag of a foreign nation in their governmental buildings, you have a soft insurrection.
That's actually kind of funny.
Soft insurrection.
Trademarked.
It's mine.
Nobody can use it.
That's going on a shirt right after the show.
You got a soft insurrection.
When you got your own government saying glory to another country, you've got a soft insurrection.
Oh, lordy, lordy, lordy.
That video is open treason.
I don't know if it's open treason because I don't think we're at war with the particular country that he's pledging.
Allegiance to, to some extent.
Viva, just saying thanks for choosing Florida.
Keep up the good stuff.
Love you.
Well, okay, that's a good segue into the next segment because it's not going to be a long one, but it's going to be a funny one.
Let me just give everybody the link.
Share.
Who gave a thumbs down on Rumble?
I say, who the hell dares to do that?
Don't forget to hit the thumbs up.
We're 3,500-ish.
We only have 237 thumbs up on Rumble.
Here's the link for YouTube because we're going over to rumble.
Bada bing, bada boom.
There's a typo in there.
What I was just about to say, by the way, about Florida.
Ah, whatever.
Let's see the number drop significantly.
Then we're going to go over to rumble.
Then we're going to go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
It's treacherous and it is treasonous, but we're not at war with the country that they're pledging their...
Loyalty, too.
Yeah, like, this is interesting.
Slava.
Slava, kind of slave to Ukraine.
The number's supposed to go down, not up, people.
Come on.
Come on, let's get out of here.
It's at 1204.
Satisfy my OCD.
Come to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Contemplate becoming a supporter if you want to support the work that Robert Barnes and I do.
Or you could...
Oh, yeah, that's right.
That's what I wanted to do before we went over.
Thank you.
What about troops in Niger?
I don't...
Know enough about that, but I love your dog, by the way.
That's an Australian Shepherd.
Beautiful-looking dog.
Don't know enough to have an opinion, and what I wanted to do before we went over was to read the Hrumble Rants over on the Hrumbles, because there's a three, and we got this.
Crash Bandit, my government is pissing on my head and telling me it's Ukraining, huh?
Bada bing, bada boom, Crash Bandit.
And those things there, the whale, I think it means that they're either members...
Or subscribers?
I forget how it works.
How many freedom bucks to live stream you getting a perm for the awesome Viva Fro?
Is a perm straight or frizzy?
I've washed my hair and brushed.
I didn't wash it.
I brushed it this morning and put on argan oil so it looks greasy and shiny, but it's super smooth.
There's truth and lies, mis, disinformation, and myths.
All right, good.
And now we're under $1,100.
So we're going to end on YouTube.
Go over to the free speech platform Rumble.
Stay tuned for big news coming from Rumble.
And also, this is going to be the perfect segue.
It involves Eric Adams.
Come on over to Rumble.
Yeah.
Alright, so it's another one of those things where I don't think people are protesting quite in the right way, but it's not so morally objectionable that I would feel the need to dissociate myself from them as humans if I ever ran into them.
Is it this one?
New Democrats?
Oh, the Roseanne.
Oh, we're going to do Roseanne.
We're going to talk more Roseanne.
Okay, no.
No, so it's this one right here.
New Democrat.
New!
Yeah, this is it.
Okay, so check this out.
Oh, I'm stretching my legs while we're going to watch this one.
Okay, I'm opening this up and check it.
Are you Eric Adams?
Yeah, fuck you!
You support the guys on Pasta.
They're homeless people all over New York.
Babe, you're always partying.
You don't usually care about the citizens of New York.
Why are you even in Miami?
You know there are people being arrested there.
People are homeless in New York.
People cannot afford food.
You keep cutting the education budget so you can fund the police.
That's all you care about, funding the police.
I think she probably got kicked off that flight.
There's no way the pilot's going to take off on her.
Are you Eric Adams?
I love this.
Are you Eric Adams?
And he's like, oh, is it a fan?
Yeah, fuck you!
There you have it!
I mean, it's like every time I run into someone on the street and say, Viva?
I was like, I don't know.
Is it I love your channel or is it fuck you coming next?
Thus far, I've actually never run into a fuck you.
I don't think so.
I've only run into somebody snubbing me quite overtly, but that's totally different.
But I love it.
For a second, he's like, oh, am I about to get love?
Am I about to get love?
Fuck you.
Oh, and his heart just broke.
Boom.
There you go.
Oh, there you go.
That's it.
That's the moment.
He's like.
What did you just say to me?
Nobody tells me to go.
I love it.
You support the genocide in Palestine.
Et cetera, et cetera.
Let me see something here.
I'm going to bring that down.
I want to bring that out.
This is...
I mean, I appreciate people who are very passionate about the Middle East conflict.
This is not how you sway opinions one way or the other.
It's quite actually the opposite.
Like that crackhead...
Not crackhead.
It was called...
Yeah, crackhead Barney.
I'm not making things up.
Crackhead Barney aggressing Alec Baldwin in a coffee shop.
Like, if you do something that makes Alec Baldwin look like the victim, you're doing it wrong.
And if you get on a plane...
This is how you turn everybody off to your position.
But maybe she got caught up in the moment.
What I was going to highlight from this...
Is this.
He's confronted on a plane by a propeller.
Eric Adams spotted flying back from a weekend in Miami.
That's the segue.
That's the connection to all of this.
He's flying back from Miami.
And I made a humorous tweet.
Oh, the man who hates the don't say gay.
I don't think anybody's ever accused Florida of being anti-Semitic, but all of the rest.
He's flying back.
It's bad enough to be hell on earth, but it's good enough to vacation in, or in Eric Adams' case, from what I understand, there was a conference there.
But if Eric Adams truly believes in what he says, he should boycott any conference that would be held in a don't-say-gay, racist, bigoted...
Homophobic, transphobic state.
He should stand by his principle and boycott that state.
And like Dave Rubin was saying the other day, please, all of you, all of you, it's so terrible down here.
Stay out.
Stay out.
Leave it nice.
Every time I run into a New Yorker, because the joke here is you run into more New Yorkers than Floridians.
I was like, are you a New Yorker who has fled?
To not import that very same policy that you fled in New York?
Or are you one of the New Yorkers who fled from New York and now you're going to bring in the shitty policy that you fled from in New York?
Time will tell.
All right, so that was it.
That's the funny part.
Oh, and okay, hold on.
Let me bring this up.
Actually, I have to do a follow-up with Tommy.
Sorry, you're seeing my thoughts in real time.
SSJ to Rich says, Viva, did you see the update with Tommy?
The head of police there admitted in court they faked the arrest documents.
I don't think they admitted they faked it.
I think they screwed up on the date because they were rushing to get it out.
Not that they faked it after the fact or didn't have authorization, but they made a mistake on the date.
I haven't had the follow-up with Tommy, and I'm definitely going to reach out to him because, hey.
Judge me by the friends I've made and judge me by the enemies I've made, but I believe that even if I might disagree with Tommy on a number of issues, because how can you not?
I disagree with me on a number of issues depending on when you ask me.
I like Tommy and I think he's a genuinely good person.
As I have now learned is also the case of a number of the people who were demonized the most to me.
Cernovich, I think back to a lot of quality advice that I got from Cernovich.
Smart.
Thoughtful, insightful, not the demon I was told he was in my DMs before we had our first interview.
Alex Jones, Owen Schroyer, and I'm adding Tommy Robinson to that list because I do believe Tommy Robinson is the British version of the Alex Jones.
And so that was the segue.
Now let's get to the Trump.
Let me see here.
What do we want to start with with Trump?
Yeah, I'm going to save the Roseanne part for the after show on Locals.
This is what we're going to talk about.
There's not much happening today in the court.
Hold on one second.
Let me see.
Just make sure that there is no court today in the Trump trial, but there was a ruling issued yesterday.
They're publishing transcripts.
You might want to watch all of that on Gouveia, Robert Gouveia, watching The Watchers.
I think he's going to go over his beautiful interpretation of the transcripts.
I'm going to look through for doing the highlights.
I don't think I'm going to do a live and just go through those transcripts because diva no like reading.
So there's no Court Wednesdays as a rule.
They're waiting on the contempt ruling from the judge because they raised arguments for the contempt yesterday.
I did a short breakdown video from the car yesterday.
And I talked about it during the day.
If you don't follow me on Twitter, you would have missed it.
Or if you're not part of our VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com community.
But the bottom line, they were grilling the defendants.
Trump.
Merchant.
I mean, it's almost like Merchant.
Juge Merchant.
It's almost like he's the prosecutor.
And he's back and forth from the inner-city press live-tweet reporting on this.
Saying to Blanche, Trump's attorney, is like...
Are you telling me Trump didn't think he might be violating the gag order when he quoted Jesse Waters?
What's the difference between writing the sign and carrying the sign that someone else wrote, to use an imperfect analogy?
They're entertaining, flat-out, communistic, fascistic, statist, totalitarian, whatever you want to call it, suppression of free speech, gagging a defendant while the woman who can't be gagged, the liar porn star, goes to social media.
And goes to podcasts.
While the convicted perjurer, Michael Cohen, convicted perjurer, even according to Arthur Engerum, takes to Twitter to call Trump Mr. Shittin' Pants or Stinkin' Pants or something.
They can talk.
And Trump is being held up on contempt charges for calling Michael Cohen a sleazebag, for tweeting Jesse Waters.
Because by tweeting Jesse Waters, MSM Fox News journalist, he's making the words himself as though they were his own.
That's what's waiting.
But now, hold on a second.
This was the breaking.
That's coming.
The judge is going to find him guilty in contempt.
The only question is going to be how much are they going to find him?
I think the judge was looking at $10,000.
But...
Oh, here.
And the response.
Here we go.
George Conway.
Now, I think that's Kellyanne Conway's wife, right?
Or husband.
Vote for Joe, not the psycho.
Is this Kellyanne Conway?
George Conway?
I don't know who this guy is.
I probably should, and I don't mean to do the guy like, I don't know who everybody is on the internet, and certainly I've been learning as I've moved to the States.
I don't know who he is, but I know he's an idiot.
And Michael Cohen, shift to the trial, if we could, for one second.
Where is your concern level at this point regarding David Pecker's testimony and Michael Cohen's testimony?
Well, Michael Cohen is a convicted liar and he's got no credibility whatsoever.
Can you imagine someone's going to argue that that's violative of a gag order?
That a defendant shouldn't have the right to state basic facts?
You've got to be a commie idiot to suggest that thus far.
Maybe he says something worse.
I know that he doesn't because I've watched it.
Maybe that's it.
Calling a convicted perjurer a convicted liar and totally untrustworthy.
Witness intimidation.
Who's a lawyer and you rely on your lawyers?
But Michael Cohn was a convicted lawyer.
He was a lawyer for many people, not just me.
Are you prepared to take the stand if it comes down to it?
Oh, yeah.
Oh, sure.
I'd very willingly take the stand.
Right now, if you look at what the legal scholars are saying, and as I said, Jonathan Turley, McCarthy.
One day he's going to mention, if you listen to what the legal scholars...
No, that's not his voice.
If you listen to what the legal scholars are saying, Jonathan Turley, Dershowitz, Viva Frye, one day it's going to happen, people.
Dershowitz last night.
It's not going to happen.
They say there's no case.
There is no case.
They brought a case that doesn't exist.
And they're right.
Other than we have a very conflicted judge.
A judge is highly conflicted.
Talking about the judge?
Gag.
What's he talking about the judge?
Highly conflicted.
Why?
Because his daughter is financially benefiting from this prosecution.
He should recuse himself immediately.
There's never been a judge so conflicted as this guy.
That's intimidating.
You are intimidating the judge, Trump.
I mean, maybe that's what George Conway's talking about.
He should absolutely recuse himself immediately.
That's all they have.
They have a good judge for them.
But other than that, they have no case.
Oh, when he said the judge should recuse himself, he meant the judge should off himself.
That's like the G. K-Y-S.
For anybody who knows on Twitter, like, go kill yourself.
When he said recuse himself, he meant violence.
That's what he was threatening the judge.
That's what this commie pig, George Conway, is arguing, suggesting is another violation of a gag order.
And there's two things here, and we have to appreciate this.
Either as a black and white letter of the law, letter of the law of the gag order, it's not a violation.
In which case, he's an idiot for suggesting it is.
Or, under the black and white letter of the law, it is a violation.
In which case, the rage should be directed at the fact that, not that it's a violation, but that there's a gag order out there.
I mean, they...
representing Adam Schiff and fundraising on this, working for Kamala Harris's 2020 campaign.
And that's the daughter of the judge who's sitting in this trial.
If it is violative of the gag order, you should be outraged at the existence of the gag order, not at the existence of any black-on-white technical violation of the gag order, unless you are a raging, statist, commie pig like George Conway.
It's not even fair to pigs.
Pigs are delicious.
And they're cute.
They're not soft, by the way.
For anybody who has never actually touched a pig or pet a pig, they're like, burn.
And their hair is not soft like a dog.
It's coarse.
And their snout is not like mushy, like jelly or like slime.
It's like a hard muscle.
It's almost like, ugh, they're cute anyhow.
And by the way, they will eat you.
So that's the moral justification for eating pig.
It's a life or death situation.
Either you eat them, either we eat pigs, or they will eat us.
That's George Conway reveling in the fact that there's a...
Totally totalitarian gag order, in effect, and Trump's violated him.
Send them to jail.
Ah.
Ah.
Thank you.
But that's not the best part of it.
Okay, so now that's one part.
We'll see what happens.
But he's going to get found to be in contempt of court.
Only question is going to be how much.
And Juan Marchand, who really wants to jail him, might he jail him?
This is the other one.
This will be a subject of a short vlog this afternoon.
Trump...
I'll give credit where I got the information from.
And then this is Inner City Press.
Go follow him.
He's amazing.
Matthew Russell Lee.
He was on the channel.
I'm trying to get him back on.
But the dude doesn't just follow one case at the federal courthouse.
He's like a federal courthouse prostitute.
It just goes from one case to another.
In Trump trial, Justice Merchant denies Trump's bid to subpoena Stormy Daniels and others.
Cohen Those are the two witnesses from the prosecution.
Trump, I'll explain it in a second.
I'll steel man it, even though I don't believe in the steel man argument.
Karen McDougall, the one who claims also that, you know, she got paid to shut up.
He meant E. Jean Carroll here.
I didn't know her name.
Not Cartel.
I thought there was another woman.
E. Jean Carroll.
Jessica Lee's Natasha Stoynoff.
Stoynoff!
This request is overbroad and is not limited to the subject matter of the case.
That's what he says to everybody.
Now, we're going to read through this right now, but I'm going to give everybody the tweet.
There is a steel man to be had here.
The first thing to say is it's not because the judge dismissed or quashed this subpoena that he does not get to call these people as witnesses or doesn't get to ask them questions because Stormy and Michael Cohen are going to be witnesses for the prosecution.
So he'll get to cross-examine them.
But this was a subpoena duches tecum, as we say.
Here's the link to the tweet.
This was a subpoena duches tecum, which means a subpoena.
Bring with you the documents.
Link.
And what documents were they asking for?
What time frame?
And the judge says, no, the documents you're asking for are too broad, unrelated, ex post fact, or after the fact of the allegations, therefore unrelated, and too broad.
So maybe go reformulate.
It didn't say maybe go reformulate.
I presume they can, time permitting.
But let's look at this here.
Boom.
That's very nice.
We can see it.
And we're not going to...
Well, it's only four pages.
A decision on defendant's motion to compel compliance with a subpoena.
Bring with you the documents.
To Stephanie Clifford, that's the non-porn star name of Stormy Daniels.
April 23rd, Donald John Trump was arraigned before this court, charged with falsifying business records in the first degree.
Ordinarily a misdemeanor, but they jacked that bad boy up to a 34-count felony charge because they alleged it violates federal election law.
Which the feds themselves investigated and decided not to prosecute.
Set that aside.
Jury's not going to hear that.
Okay.
Stormy Daniels seeking all materials related to the documentary.
Stormy.
The subpoena also sought all documents for a period between April 2023 after the fact and the president relating to communications with Michael Cohen.
Karen McDougald, Elizabeth E. Jean Carroll, Jessica Leeds, etc., etc.
Okay.
Finally, the subpoena sought all documents relating to communications with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of the SDNY during...
The period of April 2018 to the present.
All after the fact.
So that's relevant.
And I'll steelman it.
I'm going to steelman it, but don't think I agree with it.
It's a load of steaming dog crap.
If there were objections to relevance or admissibility, you do that as they try to admit them into evidence.
The argument was that you don't quash the subpoena for that.
They'll prepare the documents because otherwise...
It can cause unnecessary delays to the trial, which they would love.
Just, you know, drag Trump through trial for even longer.
But bottom line, you know, let them bring the documents and debate relevance when it comes time for admissibility.
But whatever.
Okay.
For the following reasons, it's denied.
And the motions to quash are granted.
Okay.
So let me go into the relevance here.
To sustain a subpoena, the issuing party must demonstrate, quote, that the testimony or evidence sought is reasonably likely to be relevant and material to the proceedings and that the subpoena is not overbroad or unreasonably burdensome.
Do you know how this bullshit fluff gets interpreted one way or the other depending on how you want it to be interpreted?
Like, motivated reasoning.
In my life as a practicing attorney and I had 13 plus years of active law experience.
For those who think I'm just some nutbag with no meaningful experience.
It's just bullshit.
I mean, this is what's so irritating about it.
It's bullshit.
The judge will interpret this whichever way he wants, depending on his predetermined motivation.
Does he want the subpoena to be maintained?
Oh, it's not overbroad and it's not unreasonably burdensome.
Oh, he doesn't want it to be maintained?
Oh, it's overbroad and unreasonably burdensome.
The issue here, you know, they're going to say, what's the relevance?
Well, if Trump wants to show that Stormy Daniels was extorting him and that this wasn't a...
Catch and kill, but this was a acquiescing to extortion just because it was the cheaper way to do it.
Well, you might want to see some correspondence between her and Michael Cohen.
If you want to find out if they've been banging, you might want to get some of that correspondence.
Yeah, post dates, the accusations.
Yeah, he's alleged to have done this in 2016, 2017.
What relevance could anything that happened in 2018 on be?
It could show extortion scheme.
It could show financial interest to profit off this scheme.
If Stormy goes out and...
She orchestrates, organizes, plans the release of her documentary, Stormy, with Netflix for the eve of this trial.
I'm not sorry, for the convenient timing of what was going on in this trial.
But I could easily make both arguments.
Oh, maybe there's going to be some stuff that's overbroad.
You don't need to see her contract with NBC or whatever.
I'm sorry.
I want to know how much she got paid for that.
I want to know how much money she's making off part two of her extortion scheme.
Extort and profit.
I want to see her correspondence with the other McDougal woman, E. Jean Carroll.
Hey, were they shaking hands and saying, way to shake him down, together we'll do this?
I'm sorry, that could be relevant for credibility of the witness.
But no.
The Court of Appeals has held the subpoena properly quashed when the party issuing the subpoena fails to, quote, demonstrate any theory of relevance.
Any theory!
Oh, bullshit, they didn't have a relevance to any theory.
They may not have had one that the judge bought.
Don't tell me they didn't have any theory of relevancy.
I just built it right there.
But instead merely desires the opportunity for an unconstrained foray into confidential records in the hopes of unearthing some unspecified information that will impeach the witnesses.
Oh, a foray into confidential information?
Oh, you mean like exactly what they did by pressing charges against Trump's attorneys up in Georgia?
Oh, that?
Going after Jeffrey Clark for an internal legal memo?
Like that?
Accuse your adversaries of what you are doing so as to create confusion.
When deciding a motion to quash, access must be afforded to data relevant and material to the determination of guilt or innocence.
As, for example, when a request for access is directed towards a revealing specific biases, prejudices, or ulterior motives.
If I were reading this decision right now, I'd say, oh, he's going to maintain the subpoena.
But, no.
Defendant's first request seeks all documents that relate to the documentary.
And one or more of the following topics.
Defendant's first request mirrors that of the request to NBC on March 11, 2024, in a subpoena that was quashed by this court.
Oh, so he's relying on his own bias precedent to issue another bias ruling right now.
Well, I quashed it before, dumbass.
Why do you think I would change my mind now?
Think I'm going to second-guess my own biases?
First, defendants seek all documents that relate to the documentary and one or more of the following topics.
The premiere of the documentary, the release date, editing of the documentary, promotion, marketing, and he writes, yada yada.
Fine.
H and agreements between Stephanie Clifford and so on and so forth.
All right.
All of it.
So, I mean, to me, this is an indication.
Come back with a more circumscribed subpoena later.
But this request is overbroad and seeks general discovery.
And you know what's going to happen now?
They're going to get her on the stand.
And ask her some questions, and if it becomes relevant, she will not have the documents prepared, and it'll cause a delay in the trial, which they want to do anyhow.
Defendant's second request seeks, for the time period of 2023 to the present, all documents relating to communications with the following Michael Cohen, his reps, Karen McDougall, another one who was allegedly paid off, E. Jean Carroll, who's a lying, batshit crazy lady who hallucinated, in my humble view, liar, and...
Someone who exploited recently changed laws to go after Trump.
Like, you know, just exploiting the laws.
How they fortified 2024.
It's general discovery, not limited to the subject matter.
Defend his third request from 2018 to the present.
All documents related to communications with the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of New York.
Daniels 318.
The request is overbroad.
Seeks general discovery, not limited.
There you go.
That's it.
Quashed.
Duck on it, Trump.
Oh, you thought we were going to rule in your favor?
Tell me.
Didn't you learn from the last one, Trump?
Don't even try anymore.
All right, well, that's what's going on there.
And I'll put together either a short vlog or edit that section.
I'll just do whatever.
I go into my car now.
It's for quiet time to shoot vlogs.
So that's that.
Trial takes up tomorrow.
Oh, sorry.
So trial takes up tomorrow, but also Supreme Court arguments on Trump's immunity claim.
And just to whet your appetites.
That subject came up with Robert Petillo and Jenna Ellis.
And I think it's funny that I think people are going to watch that and they're going to say this freaking Canadian schnook madman makes a lot more sense and seems to have a better understanding of U.S. constitutional law than many people out there.
If I can flatter myself.
The argument's tomorrow.
I don't want to spoil the Jenna Ellis bit.
This is what's happening tomorrow.
The question before the Supreme Court tomorrow, which will have an impact, we've talked about this ad nauseum on Viva Barnes Law, Sunday Night Law Extravaganza with Robert Barnes.
The question is, what immunity, presidential immunity, is the Supreme Court going to recognize?
Is it going to be no immunity?
No one is above the law?
Is it going to be broad immunity?
As in, we want to avoid this type of bullshit from happening again in the future?
Is it going to be some form of immunity that shields the president from prosecutorial harassment once out of office?
Recall, Jack Smith even alleged this.
I think it was in the...
Hold on a second.
Which one has the immunity claim?
It's the D.C. It's the D.C. It's not the Florida Court.
So the D.C. Court of Appeals already came out and said there's limited immunity, I think.
Don't quote me on that, but I'm pretty sure.
But it's out of the D.C. court.
Jack Smith, in his pleading, said, don't worry.
The argument that broad immunity is needed to avoid prosecutorial harassment of an ex-president, it won't happen.
Just trust him on that.
It won't happen.
He's probably right.
It won't happen to Biden.
It won't happen to Obama.
It'll only happen to politically disfavored, politically unpopular, or the political adversary, Trump.
DeSantis, Vivek Ramaswamy.
Jack Smith says, don't worry, we're not going to abuse of it.
You're abusing of it already, you dumbass.
And so that's going to be the question, is how broad an immunity are they going to afford to a former president?
Because you want to avoid judicial harassment, extortion of a president.
And you know, like, people were shocked.
And outraged at one of Trump's arguments.
And they'll probably make it tomorrow.
Are you saying, Mr. Trump, that you could kill someone in the White House?
And unless you are impeached and convicted, you cannot be tried for that?
What the hell do you think Obama did to that 16-year-old kid overseas?
Extrajudicial assassination of an American citizen.
He's not being arrested.
Well, I happen to think that he should be arrested for that.
But I would go out on the same principle that I'm advocating for, that if that wasn't good enough for him to be convicted and impeached, sorry, impeached and convicted, then you can't prosecute him for that after the fact.
But people get outraged?
How dare you suggest that you can kill someone and get away with it?
Obama did that, literally.
And now you could impeach a former president, and so you want to prosecute Obama?
Impeach him?
Have him convicted, and then you can charge him for murder for what he did, which I believe was murder.
Or the flip side, you've got to recognize a broad immunity to a president to kill people.
Even if it's overseas and a 16-year-old American citizen, or if it's the cook at the White House because he put too much clam in the chowder.
So yeah, I think there has to be a reasonable middle ground.
Purely personal acts would not be shielded by immunity.
And that would be what I think would be the reasonable solution here.
Broad immunity.
Call it blanket immunity for any presidential or quasi-presidential or presumptively presidential act.
And then have a very small carve-out for purely personal acts.
The only problem being?
I've seen how they weaponize their interpretation of the law.
They'll then cloak every...
Judicial harassment, prosecutorial harassment to say, well, this is not broad immunity.
This is under his purely personal act.
When he paid Stormy Daniels, it had nothing to do with the presidency.
It was purely personal.
When he said, I want to make sure that the election wasn't stolen in Georgia, it was purely personal.
It wasn't presidential or quasi-presidential or presumptively presidential.
So they'll probably go with my pre-hearing predictions.
They'll go with the broad presidential immunity with the car vote for presumptively purely personal acts.
But I'm not even convinced they're going to...
We'll see.
But I'm not even convinced that would resolve the issue because all you'll get is Leticia James saying, purely personal act, prosecute.
Leticia James, purely personal act, prosecute.
Okay, that's it.
That's for tomorrow.
By the way, I'm going to live stream it also.
I think it's at 10 o 'clock.
It's at 10 o 'clock.
I'm going to live stream commentate, so that'll be fun.
Stay tuned.
It's apparently...
Yeah, okay.
All right, so that's it.
Stay tuned for that.
Let me see if we don't have any more rumble rants to read.
We do.
And then there's a couple of tips in the vivobarneslaw.locals.com community.
Dahook96969 says, Australian cattle dog, blue healer.
Ah, you're right.
Damn it.
Not a shepherd.
Australian Shepherd is an American breed.
Blue healers have Australian dingo bloodline.
It's a beautiful dog.
And it's one that requires a lot of exercise, from what I understand.
And they are not predatorial, but they need things to chase.
SSJRich.
Viva, do you see the update with Tommy?
Okay, so I got that one before.
And let me bring this up before we get on to the next subject matter.
Before we go on to...
VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com What was I doing here?
I was going to Locals.
That's right.
Okay, so the tipped questions in Locals.
Doug Leaf Fan, $1 tip.
You can't film a vote, but you can film sex acts.
That's going...
That had nothing to do with the homosexual nature of the sex acts.
Anybody filming sex acts in a government building...
Lacked parental upbringing.
Pam Walker, $3 tip.
David, you need to see this.
Okay, hold on.
Is this real, though?
I need to make sure.
Instead of fining Democrats for waving flags, the House Sergeant at Arms just called and said I will be fined $500 if I don't delete this video post.
Hold on a second.
I don't know if this is real.
I think it is because I know the member of our community who posted it, but I'm always, you know, screen grab.
I'm going to go look for a spec.
And so this is Thomas Massey saying it.
There's more in his tweet, which I can't get to.
And it says, upon viewing Rep.
Massey's tweet, our team reached out to the Sergeant and Arms.
I do not agree with this assessment, and there will be no fine imposed on Representative Massey.
Oh, that's nice.
Will you sanction the guy who threatened to find a member of government for showing us what goes on in government buildings?
I said it before, like, in a tyranny, Justice is merely a cessation of the abuse.
He won't get fined.
That's right.
We're sticking up.
How about you go maybe have a talk and fire the guy who just threatens to fine and shut up a member of government for revealing what's going on in the government building?
Maybe that's a good idea.
Thank you very much.
That was from Pam Walker.
Denise Antu, $1.
David, I was just saying to myself that Obama should be brought up on charges of murder of U.S. citizens, and then you made the point.
Great minds.
My grandmother used to say, great minds think alike, and fools seldom differ.
Bada bing, bada boom, try to work that one out.
All right.
Let's have, I'm going to save, I'm going to save a fun one for viva barneslaw.locals.com.
Let me just reply to an email.
No, we'll talk about it during the chat.
What was I going to say here?
know that we've talked about.
Oh, there's some exhibits during the Trump trial.
Let me bring this up here.
These are some of the evidence.
It's so wild.
I got to keep this in the background and just do this for commentary later.
It's like they don't know what they don't know what the crime is here.
It sounds like some are suggesting that the crime is that, you know, Trump was paying for positive coverage.
If the argument is that the positive coverage is a contribution in kind, then you'd go after They signed a non-prosecure, they signed a...
They signed some sort of agreement with the government.
So this is the evidence of conspiracy to interfere with an election.
Positive headlines from a journal.
A load of shit.
Some of the National Enquirer headlines that ex-AMI chief David Pecker testified were part of the behind-the-scenes scheme.
This is editorializing right here.
Unless he's quoting someone.
Behind-the-scenes scheme to prop up Trump and discredit his political rivals have been...
Did not the entire steel dossier that Hillary Clinton funded seek to do exactly that?
And her team gave it to the FBI, who then leaked it to Yahoo News, who then published it so that the FBI could use it as a basis to go get a secret bullshit FISA warrant?
Holy hell!
It's endless.
It's not hierarchy.
It's lawlessness.
Okay, but that's not what I wanted to talk about.
Last topic of the day for Hrumble.
Hold on, let me see something.
We're 5,700 and some odd strong.
Are we at?
We're at 500 thumbs up.
That's only a ratio of 1 to 10, which is actually pretty good, so I'm not going to complain.
Drop a thumbs up.
Make sure you're subscribed.
Oh, by the way, if I didn't show you this.
Here, hold on one second.
Let me skip through this ad here, just so that we can look at my ugly punim while we do this.
Bada bing, bada boom.
Look at this.
If you're not familiar with it, you can actually go and subscribe.
Join vivabarneslaw.locals.com right here by clicking that beautiful little red button.
Booyah!
582,000 posts?
That has to include comments on our...
It's a beautiful community.
So you can do it right there.
Okay, last topic of the day before we head on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
This was new to my eye.
And I haven't read through it yet, but it came from a very trusted friend, Jessica Rose, who tagged this article.
Here, Noé Chartier.
Noé Chartier.
C 'est qui, Monsieur Noé Chartier?
He works for Epoch Times Canada, senior reporter, federal politics.
Okay.
And he put this out the other day.
It says, Pfizer chose not to tell regulators about SV40 sequence in COVID shots.
Now, I think that's the...
The DNA thing that they found in the shots, and I had Jessica on who talked about it.
Oh, am I going to be able to...
Hold on a second.
Okay.
Oh, cripe.
Let me see something here.
Can I do this?
Am I going to get in trouble for doing this?
Okay, bub.
Well, this might resolve our...
Will I be able to read the article if I do this?
I want to give...
I should probably just subscribe.
It's when you do it in incognito.
Okay, it's going to make it up here.
Let me see if we can get to the article.
If not, we'll have to find something else to talk about.
I do have something else to talk about, so don't worry about it.
Let me see if that's going to help.
Bottom line, people are saying, Viva, is this going to affect immunity of Pfizer if they chose not to give material information to the government of Canada?
In Canada, I drew this distinction a while back, we didn't have the PrEP Act, and so the pharma companies didn't get immunity.
What they got in Canada, Australia, South Africa, I believe, was an indemnity clause in their supply agreements, pursuant to which an indemnity clause means that if they get sued for whatever the reason, the government comes in and holds them harmless.
Will this change whether or not the government will, in fact, hold them harmless if they concealed material information from the government?
Yeah, I would argue that it should.
In the States, if it turns out to be the same fact in the States, alleged fact, that they concealed relevant information, then yeah, that could impact their PrEP Act immunity because Vice vitiates many things.
Pfizer chose not to tell regulators about SV40 sequence in COVID shots Health Canada.
A senior Health Canada official says pharma giant Pfizer made a conscious decision not to advise regulators that its mRNA COVID-19 vaccines contained a DNA sequence called Stimian Virus 40. The one that came from monkeys, I think?
Apparently, it wasn't a big deal.
Don't worry about it.
But they had to clean up their shots afterwards.
This information appears among multiple emails between staff from key drug regulators, including Health Canada, the US FDA.
They might be F'd.
And the European Medicines Agency.
Okay, hold on a second here.
He wrote an email to the colleague.
Health Canada had obtained confirmation two weeks earlier from Pfizer that the DNA sequences were in fact present in this vaccine.
I understand there have been internal discussions at the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research regarding the presence, the presence is how you spell it in French, presence of an SV40 enhanced prometer sequence, noting that its presence is unrelated to the purpose of Pfizer's plasmid as a transcription template.
I mean, I know what these words mean, but Pfizer has communicated to us recently that they apparently chose not to mention this to EMA, FDA, or Health Canada at the time of their initial subsequent submission.
Hmm.
Yeah.
Crimes against humanity, arguably.
Oh, don't worry.
It doesn't do anything.
It's not a big deal.
There's no health risk.
That's why we chose not to mention it.
That's why we basically provided a product that we misrepresented.
Yeah, you might be effed, and I hope to...
If there is a God, I hope to God that you are effed.
Pfizer and Albert Bourla, I'm kind of looking at you.
Guy wins a Freedom Award.
For his crimes against humanity.
Mr. McKerna, geonomics expert, had found quantities of DNA in the mRNA shots above regulatory threshold set up by health agencies.
Smith wrote to the study that he had questions coming to agencies.
Epoch Times had contacted Health Canada.
Yada, yada, yada.
Find an email.
Okay, so what we're going to do here is zero checks.
That's the news, and I don't want to take all of this from the Epoch Times.
Where's the article?
Hold on one second.
I'm going to give everybody a link to the article.
But that's it.
The bottom line is we knew this.
It was brought to our attention some time recently.
And now it seems that they just outright lied.
Let's go.
That's amazing.
Okay, here.
I'm going to give everybody a link to the article.
Bada bing, bada boom, et voila.
Link.
Cat turd, axiom number one.
They lie about everything, says Jabbery308.
And there's some stuff here that I do not understand.
Truth over facts brought to you by Pfizer, says XXX featuring Smurf.
Oh, so some DNA is okay.
The Vax just had too much DNA.
All right.
Boom.
You know what we're going to do?
Actually, because we're not going to have too much time on...
No.
Come on over to Rumble.
Come on over to Locals.
We're going to do it.
So we're going to have the chat.
I'm going to cover a subject before we do that.
And then I will post the entire stream on YouTube.
And we'll see where it goes from there.
I'm just going to refresh here in vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Okay, let's make sure there's no tipped questions that I missed.
And there are not.
So here's the link.
Come on over.
If you're not coming over, even if you don't want to watch Jenna Ellis tonight, go watch it because it's going to be fun.
And share it.
Share it around to promote me, not Jenna Ellis.
I'm just joking, but do it.
Do it.
Do it.
Okay.
What else do we got?
The current state of prosecutor behavior is a lot like ambulance chasers of old, says It's Flying in Rumble.
And I've got It's Roseanne Barr's joke on Twitter.
It's saucy.
So we'll play it over at vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Tomorrow, I will be live streaming the immunity oral arguments before SCOTUS.
What else?
Thank you all for being here on Rumble.
If you're not coming over, come over.
Come on!
Come on!
I'm going to pull a Peter Griffin here.
But that's it.
Ending on Rumble.
Stay tuned for big news.
And going over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
A few more stories and our Locals supporter conversation.
Ending.
Three, two, one.
Booyah.
All right, locals.
I think we're alone now.
Let me see here.
I don't allow the evil to infect my brain, says Spices.
You realize you can go look at the price of oil right now.
All Pfizer...
Oh, here we go.
Well, Michigan winter days.
I missed your...
Me winter days.
▲
Export Selection