Trevor Bauer EXONERATED! Dexter Taylor CONVICTED! Donald Trump PERSECUTED! & More! Viva Frei Live
|
Time
Text
This is my feeling.
I support your right to protest, but I'm not going to one of those.
You know why?
Because I think protests are a lot like war.
Let me explain to you.
You ever catch a fish?
You know when you catch a fish?
The moment that fish is on the line, your whole body gets excited.
Like, oh shit!
Oh shit!
That is an ancient thing that is in us because it used to be that was survival.
If you caught that fish, your family was going to have food.
That's why you get so excited.
Oh my gosh.
Did you just see the fish?
Just...
I got a fish.
Oh my gosh.
Oh my gosh.
Marian!
Look at what I caught with the drone!
It's a huge freaking bass.
Tell me the numbers on my GoPro are rolling.
Look at the size of this!
Holy cows.
Holy cows!
Oh my gosh!
This is the biggest fish!
Oh my gosh!
Please, please, please stay.
Please stay.
Look at this!
This is the...
Who sees this?
Who sees this?
Oh my gloves are stuck in his things.
You've all seen me fish, and I don't often catch fish on camera.
I just caught this.
It's so big, I can't even get the camera to fill this fish in.
This was yesterday.
My mouth is as big as my fist.
I'm going to weigh this fish.
Holy cow!
This is the biggest bass I've ever caught in my life.
This is like two feet long.
Oh my goodness.
Is there anybody out there?
Who doesn't love fishing.
The funniest thing is this.
I feel kind of stupid now.
I told Marion, my wife, who's a neuroscientist, I was like, I never even thought of it the way Joe Rogan explained it in that podcast with Mexican OT.
I never thought about the physiology, the neuroscience behind why I freak out every single time I catch a fish.
And Marion looks at me and she says, What's your problem?
And then she goes on to say, you would have been a hunter back in the day as opposed to a gatherer.
The person who runs out into danger, gets that neurophysiological thrill from the catch.
You would have been the hunter and other people would have stayed and been the gatherer.
And then she goes like one level deeper than that.
And then she says, your grandfather.
The only man in your family to have left Poland in 1936, give or take.
He was a hunter.
And the others were gatherers, sedentary, and weren't into the adventure of the unknown.
I was going to make a dark joke, and that ended the way it ended.
But I never thought about what it feels, why you get that physiological response when you hook a fish.
And then Rogan puts it in my head like, holy crap, it's an ancient response.
You're going to eat.
You're going to survive another day.
And if you lose this fish, you might not eat.
You might not survive another day.
And then I had to, you know, loop it in with the drone fishing best top five moment of my life.
And I don't know what's going to be able to knock that one out of the top five.
I don't think anything will.
The other one was kayak fishing from Venison, Quebec.
The biggest pike I ever caught.
No net.
It literally jumped into the boat.
And then what was the last one?
The last one was the bass that I caught yesterday.
Guys, dude, I don't catch fish like this all the time.
And it's like the one time I go out to do a Viva vlog, you know, talk about the Trump trial.
And I couldn't do it because there was this fountain making noise.
And I'm like, well, okay, I'll just fish then, I guess.
And then I catch this monster.
And the blue steel face was not on purpose.
I could fit my fist.
In that fish's mouth.
It was so big and beautiful.
By the way, also just to address a couple of things, some people said, isn't it illegal to fish with a drone?
Funny story behind that.
When I caught that fish off the drone, this was in Quebec in, I want to say six years ago, 2018, give or take.
It was absolutely not against the law back in the day.
I did some interviews.
WCAX Vermont calls me up and says, oh, we saw your video.
It's hilarious.
You want to do an interview?
I do an interview.
I go on Vermont's WCAX.
We do an interview.
Everyone loved it.
Reporters are laughing hysterically.
A week later, someone sends me a link and says, Viva, well, David, did you know that they published something of a follow-up correction?
May a cool poem?
He's like, no, send me the link.
They did a follow-up a week later.
They all had their stern, solemn faces.
I'm like, last week we showed you a video of a man who caught a fish with a drum.
And then we immediately got calls as to whether or not this is legal.
In fact, it's illegal in Vermont.
And so...
Sorry.
I get distracted.
They said it was, in fact, illegal in Vermont at the time.
Because you're not allowed fishing with the assistance of a drone.
As if it makes it any easier.
Having a loud, burring plane dragging a jitterbug makes it easier.
It doesn't make it easier, but I understand how you could use drones for fishing to give you an unfair advantage.
If you scope out where the fish are, if you scare the fish inland.
I could think of ways.
Canada subsequently updated their drone laws and included a provision, which I like to pretend is the Viva provision, that says you cannot transport a living animal via drone.
So now I do wonder whether or not that would be illegal in Canada.
I would argue that I'm not transporting a fish when I fish with a drone, but whatever.
Better off avoiding the arguments than raising them.
And that's it.
Holy crab apples, people!
Take one day off!
To do an episode of The Unusual Suspects, a banger of an episode.
Check it out if you haven't seen it yet.
I sent it out to Locals, Twitter, etc.
The Unusual Suspects.
Take one day off and there's almost too much to cover.
Today, we're going to cover Dexter Taylor got convicted.
He's the ghost gun guy with an arsenal of weapons that he built himself in his New York apartment.
Convicted, whisked off to Rikers.
I'm going to talk about that when we are live on Rumble, YouTube, and VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com because I want to give that story the maximum blast that it can.
Also, before we go to Rumble exclusively, Pennsylvania.
The madness hasn't reached peak communist insanity in Pennsylvania.
Robert Barnes, my partner in law for the Sunday show and our wonderful VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com community, did a bourbon with Barnes the other night talking about another file that he and 1776 Law Center are getting involved in.
It's going to blow your freaking mind.
I've said that now three days in a row.
And every time I say it, I think of the buffoon from the Adam Sandler.
They're all going to laugh at you, Skip.
It blew my freaking mind!
It's going to blow your mind, what's going on in Pennsylvania.
There's no end to the tyrannical communist madness.
They've jailed two people, no trial, no nothing, for 30 days from what the Lancaster Agriculture is reporting.
Because allegedly, all allegedly, some freaking administrative tribunal issued something that looks like a warrant that has no...
Apparently no legal, criminal, civil probative value.
Sent it to some sheriffs who then locked up these guys for purported violations of some order, of some administrative tribunal, from what I understand.
We'll talk about that.
Then we're going to get into Trump.
Joan Ehrman is coming on at, give or take, 12.30.
12.30-ish.
Then we're going to end on YouTube.
And we're going to go over to Rumble and VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
Finish the stream.
We've got another fun guest coming on at 1-ish.
To talk about how she was on the New York bestseller list for all of 12 hours before she was corruptly removed from the list.
It's an interesting story.
It'll also just highlight the value or lack thereof of the New York Times bestseller list.
Then we're going to go to vivabarneslaw.locals.com for our exclusive afterparty.
That's the way it works.
Viva Frye, David Frye, former Montreal litigator turned current Florida rumbler.
There was one thing I wanted to announce before I forgot.
Saturday, there is a Spartan Race out in Boca area.
And I was fortunate enough to have been given an opportunity to offer this as a perk, as a fundraiser of sorts.
It's a little short notice, so I wasn't really able to do very much with it.
But bottom line, anybody who wants to run the Spartan Race, if you go subscribe to an annual subscription at vivabarneslaw.locals.com, I will be able to get your email address and get you into the race if you so choose.
In fact, even if you subscribe, As a supporter on vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
It's $10 a month or $100, the discount rate for a year.
I'll send you the email anyhow, and you can choose to use or not use the Spartan Race ticket.
I'm going to be there.
I'm going to run it at least once.
It's a cool three miles.
I could probably run that five times without a water bag.
What are they called?
A camelback.
And it's also available to all supporters.
If you're interested, I put up a post.
Just let me know, and I'll get your email and get you in there.
Okay.
That's that.
That's the good news, the fishing, the fun news, the race.
And now let's get into the hair-pulling, madness-inducing bad news of the day.
And it's bad news.
Some people are going to say, Fafo.
Fuck around, find out.
I can appreciate it.
Because somebody was Fafo-ing, and now they are off at Rikers Island.
It's surreal when you think about it.
For those of you who are new to the channel, or sufficiently new, or missed a stream last week, A gentleman named Dexter Taylor.
Carbon Mike on...
Let me make sure I can get his proper Twitter handle.
Carbon Mike...
Oh, come on.
What's the problem here?
Carbon Mike.
It's Carbon Mike on Twitter.
Yeah, here we go.
Oh, because his Twitter handle is Future Radio Cast.
Future Radio Cast.
He's a gentleman.
Race doesn't matter.
And there's no but.
Dexter believes that, or at least during our interview, raised it as a relevant factor.
That they are prosecuting someone who has no criminal record, who is value-added to society, because he was making, building ghost guns in his apartment in New York.
Not selling them, not carrying them, not get caught with them in his car.
He's a black man, and he got arrested, raided, FBI raided.
The ATF was in there as well, but it might not have been the FBI.
It was the ATF and police got raided.
Dexter Taylor, they raid his apartment because he was buying these kits and manufacturing, making his own firearms at home.
And he made 13 of these things.
Some of them were AR-15 style rifles.
Others were handguns.
He was buying these kits that they sell.
I knew none of this.
Manufacturing.
Making them at home.
He would machine out parts that you needed for the handle or whatever.
I know nothing about, or very little about firearms.
I shouldn't say that.
I know enough to have passed my firearm license up in Canada.
And he had built some 13 firearms over the years.
They get his information from the places that are selling these kits.
To assemble firearms.
They raid him.
The news at the time says, Arsenal of firearms seized at New York Man's apartment.
Let me just make sure I can do this here.
Dexter Taylor.
Am I going to find the article here?
Arrested.
Let's see here.
Well, I'm not going to find it.
It doesn't matter.
The headline was, Arsenal of firearms.
Arsenal of weapons found at New York Man's apartment.
He went on trial because this is unlawful possession of a firearm in the state of New York.
It has to be registered with the state, from what I understand, and these were not registered.
He was in trial last week and the week before and this week, or last week and this week, and he was able to do interviews after court, and we did an amazing interview where he was defiant, unapologetic, and said basically this is the government's way of telling Certain demographics shut up and we'll take care of you.
You're not able to take care of yourself.
He was arrested, prosecuted, notwithstanding the Bruin decision, which came down from the Supreme Court, which New York State swiftly said, we're not going to respect.
We're going to redraft regulations and try to circumvent or outright ignore the Supreme Court precedent in Bruin, which reaffirmed Second Amendment rights for the purposes of self-defense.
He had his trial.
I don't think he seemed optimistic because, look, I'm realistic and maybe even a little cynical now.
I said, like, the law is the law.
You're going to get a bunch of jury members out there who say, well, the law says you have to register your firearm with the state.
Did you do that?
No.
Bang.
Convicted.
It's a no-brainer.
I suspect he was hoping for some form of jury nullification.
I suspect he was hoping, I don't know what public backlash might...
Maybe he was hoping that the jury themselves would say, if he can't do this, I can't do this.
None of us have Second Amendment rights.
The state, the city is going to shit.
We can't get on the metro.
Dexter was very happy that some of the jury members were working class people.
I said, yeah, they'll have to take the metro to work, or the subway as you call it in America, and they'll know what happens when people...
Can't defend themselves.
They've seen the incidents in the subways.
They've seen the violence.
Maybe they'll be sympathetic.
But at the end of the day, I think he was hoping for jury nullification.
It went into deliberation the day before yesterday.
He's texting me and saying, you know, we're in deliberation.
Or at least I'm getting the info.
We're in deliberation.
I was like, how do you feel?
How do you think I feel?
And that's it.
Convicted.
Hauled off to Rikers Island.
Like, it's not a joke.
There's no, like, okay, you can go home, wait for your sentencing, and then, you know, appeal, and maybe you'll get authorization to post bond pending appeal because if you start serving your sentence and then you're ultimately acquitted on appeal because there are constitutional issues to be raised on appeal.
That, from what I understand, could not be raised during the jury trial.
No.
Hauled off to Rikers Island.
And when we were doing the interview, Dexter's like, They want to put me in jail.
They want to take a value-added, contributing citizen and throw him in jail and make him a burden of the state.
Not only can he not make money, he's going to cost the state money.
This is a man with no criminal record.
He's got a kid.
He's got an ex-wife.
Hauled off to Rikers Island.
He was explaining what happened when he was initially arrested and they haul him off.
And I think it was Rikers as well.
And he spent a week there before he could get out.
And he's like, you know, it was actually an interesting experience.
It was actually, his experience wasn't horrifying or horrific.
And he met some cellmates and they talked and it was bonding and that's it.
Now he's been hauled off.
So convicted by the jury, swiftly hauled off to Rikers Island where, you know, he'll have his appellate rights.
And then in the meantime, the productive taxpaying member of society has now been turned into a burden of the state, a burden for the people.
And he's in...
Living hell.
I don't care if it's not as living hell as Alcatraz.
He's in living hell until he can either successfully get bail pending appeal or until he succeeds on appeal.
Because from what he explained during the interview, he could not mention the Second Amendment.
He could not mention the Constitution during the trial.
And the way, from what I understand, from what he explained, is that they'll try the law.
They will convict him based on the black and white letter of the law.
And then he can raise constitutional arguments before the higher courts, not before the jury.
And that's it.
So Dexter, a man, has had a portion of his life to be determined how much stolen from him.
And he's hauled off.
And now people are going to say, well, that's the law of Texas.
If you don't like it, Texas.
New York.
If you don't like it, move to Texas.
And Dexter's point in that, he didn't say it during our interview.
He said it in another interview that I heard.
He's like...
The commie, fascist, statist tactics, whatever you want to call them.
I'm going with commies these days because it has a better ring to it than statist.
Statist does not have the negative connotation that communist does, but it's basically the same thing.
It's like, yeah, I give all my powers to the state.
He said in one of the other interviews, and I just lost my train of thought, oh, crap.
Oh, come on.
I just thought I was going to say.
Chat, what was the sentence that I was just on?
I forget now.
This is why I shouldn't read the chat.
It'll come back to me in a second.
But, um...
Wow, it's gonna drive me crazy.
The state is full commie.
That's not what I was getting at.
Escape.
Oh, that's right!
Thank you very much, Paul Freeman.
So, in another interview, I didn't ask him this question.
Everyone's like, well, just leave.
This is what you get for living in a crime-infested commie shithole.
And he says, do you think the commies, the fascists, the statists are going to stop at New York?
Where in the history of humankind have they said, ah, well, we're happy with our current borders.
It's not a bad argument.
So the argument's going to be, where am I going to go?
I'm going to go flee to Texas?
I'm going to go flee to Florida?
I mean, my answer to that would be, yeah, and wage the effect of political war from Texas or from Florida.
You know, it's very tough to stay in Canada where you are literally silenced, literally shut up, literally have your assets frozen, literally denied the ability to make a living.
It's very difficult to fight the political war effectively when they literally silence you and bankrupt you.
And he was more defiant.
He says, I'm going to stay here.
I'm born and raised in New York, and I'm going to stay here and fight the political war here.
Well, now he's in jail, and I want to put that on as much blast as humanly possible.
Yeah, and then people say, Viva, it's not that easy for me to leave New York.
And I was talking about this with somebody else the other day.
Having done it now, and I'm glad I didn't know what was going to be involved in doing it, it's an investment to flee.
I mean, an investment, it's an expense.
It's a wildly costly proposition.
I had no idea.
And it's almost better to jump off the cliff not knowing what's below and...
Hope to grow your wings as opposed to knowing the spikes and the tetanus-infested needles that are at the bottom and then being fearful of not growing your wings because you're going to land in that.
If I had known what it cost, it might have been a deterrent in the first place.
It's prohibitively costly in all respects, complicated, stressful.
And so, yeah, I'm sensitive to that.
Not everybody has the option or the luxury.
Those that can.
Those that leave, you know, like my grandfather.
Leave Poland in 1936 with, I don't know if it was $20 in his pocket, but it wasn't meaningful money.
Leave.
And then you come somewhere, naked is the day you were born, to start anew.
We can start it.
Free Carbon Mike.
Make a trend on Twitter.
I don't know how...
Who are you going to get political support from for this in New York?
Hochul?
Ichbe wants to...
Jab up six-month-old babies and more.
You're not going to get political soap for who?
From Leticia James?
Good luck with that.
See, and I don't like the word globalist either because that has too much of another connotation to it.
I mean, it is globalism.
It's one world government.
It's basically suppression of all individual rights for the state.
That's why statist is better.
Globalists are statists.
Who knows?
I'm just maybe mixing up terms here.
So that's Carbon Mike.
And like an idiot, I didn't make sure that we were live on all platforms.
We are live on all platforms.
Okay, good.
That's Carbon Micah.
It's very sad.
It's very depressing.
He goes away and now I realize, holy crap, how am I supposed to get in touch with him?
And find other means.
How is he supposed to communicate with the world?
That's it.
And I appreciate it's the judicial system.
Someone gets convicted of murder, they get whisked off to jail and go ahead and appeal.
But this is a human.
This is a human that I got to know.
And this is a human who I happen to think is very sympathetic and not a criminal.
And now he's off in Rikers Island for up to 18 years because that's what the sentence can carry.
All right.
Other depressing bullshit, if I may swear because it's early, but it doesn't matter.
Other depressing bullshit.
Listen to this.
Barnes talked about it on A Bourbon with Barnes the other night.
Lancaster.
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Bob.
Why do I remember that from an SNL skit involving Dan Aykroyd?
From a tiny hamlet in western Pennsylvania.
I remember Dan Aykroyd.
Okay, so hold on a second.
What's going on here?
Because I don't want to see this.
This is a story which will, again, blow your freaking mind.
This is the way it's being reported by Lancaster Farming.
And I'm saying this non-judgmentally.
I don't know what kind of news outlet Lancaster Farming is.
Livestock ultrasound operators.
Jailed.
You've read the headline, right?
These are not drug dealers.
These are not murderers.
These are not illegal immigrants committing crimes, beating up police officers.
No!
Livestock ultrasound operators jailed.
Why?
Accused of unlicensed vet practice.
Holy shit.
Okay, I'm skeptical.
And this is not even going to be highly critical of what's going on.
I don't think they know the details of what's going on.
But they ran that headline.
And then there's going to be people out there saying, Fafo, fudge around, find out.
You don't want to do the time?
Don't do the crime.
Practicing veterinary...
What does it say here?
I mean, I can't even get over this.
Unlicensed vet practice landing you in jail on a warrant for your arrest?
Was it 30 days, I think?
Listen to this.
Two Pennsylvania men operating a dairy reproduction service.
Hmm.
Do you know what that's called?
Farming.
Two Pennsylvania farmers, or men involved in farming, are in prison.
And I presume they're using words properly, not jail, but prison, following a complaint of practicing veterinary medicine without a license.
This is what Pennsylvania's got to worry about.
Two dudes ultrasounding cows to see if they're pregnant for the purposes of farming.
Rusty Hur.
43 was booked at Lancaster County Prison on April 11, while Ethan Wentworth, 33, was sent to York County Prison on April 10. By the way, go watch Bourbon with Barnes from the night before last if you want to see an angry Barnes.
Heron Wentworth are listed as operators, operating partners of Airville-based Noble Solutions, LLC.
I'm going to go to that website after this just so we can see this here.
Copy.
Veterinarians, Barnes' theory is correct.
He says, I suspect this is not, you know, organic.
I suspect this is competitive.
This might be people who don't like who these people are working with.
Veterinarians have made multiple complaints about, quote, the illegal practice of veterinary medicines by unlicensed individuals employed by Noble Solutions, end quote, according to a complaint filed with the Department of State in 2020 by the Pennsylvania Veterinary Medicine Association.
Oh, so a state association of Pennsylvania going after farmers.
Sound familiar?
Amos Miller, Amish farmers, the war on what we can eat, see, think, drink, put in our bodies.
The complaint alleges that people employed by Noble were doing ultrasounds and making diagnoses?
Like what?
You're pregnant?
Holy shit, I didn't realize that when I looked at my wife when she was a big bell, I was like, you're pregnant.
I was practicing medicine without a license?
I didn't realize that when we did the little pee-pee test.
And it came back positive.
We were practicing medicine.
If I had done that with my dog, I would have been convicted of practicing veterinary medicine without a license.
Holy crap.
I'm happy.
I wasn't in Pennsylvania when I pulled out one of my dog's rotten teeth.
Holy crap.
I could be in jail.
The document sites reports from veterinary association members and posts on Facebook.
Well, there's nothing more reliable than that.
In 2010, Hare was ordered to pay $3,500 fine and cease and desist from unlicensed practice of veterinary medicine.
Oh, was it for the same thing?
Was it for diagnosing pregnant cows?
Wentworth got a cease and desist in 2018, along with a $3,000 civil penalty.
How the hell, then, did he end up in prison?
If I may ask the obvious, ignorant, Quebec Chinook attorney, former attorney questions.
The 2020 complaint alleges that Heron Wentworth continued to practice veterinary medicine without a license and hired others to do the same.
Are we still talking ultrasounds for the purposes of determining if pregnancy has occurred?
According to the dairy farmer, Ben Miesmore, who is acting spokesman for Heron Wentworth, both men were advised by their former attorneys not to pay the fines or appear in court because they don't see an issue with using ultrasound for reproductive services specifically.
You know who else doesn't see a problem with that and shouldn't?
Every freaking person with half a brain and half an iota of intellectual honesty, which might incidentally exclude basically all Democrats.
Sorry to get political.
Progressives, I should say, so I don't...
You know, small D Democrats, not bad.
Big D Democrats, criminals.
He said they're each serving 30-day sentences in prison without bail.
Holy, merciful hell.
This is coming from one eye.
They don't seem very critical.
This is like, oh yeah, well, this is what happens.
Ultrasound a cow.
Say it's pregnant.
Jail.
Oh, you didn't pay the $3,000 civil fine.
Jail for 30 days without bail.
Well, it makes sense.
It makes sense in communism.
It makes sense in North Korea.
13 years hard labor after a one-hour trial for Otto Warmbier.
That makes sense in North Korea.
Pennsylvania?
Congratulations, you're on par with New York in terms of North Korea-level tyranny.
Maysmore, who's involved with Heron Wentworth in unrelated business, said the law governing veterinary practice is vague and doesn't cover ultrasounding, which is a common practice on dairy farms, he said.
No, Shiot Sherlock.
I know of up to 20 individuals in the state using ultrasound for reproduction.
Anyone can purchase one.
They are readily available today, he said.
Numerous dairy farmers in Lancaster, London.
Lebanon, sorry, Lebanon.
York, surrounding countries depend on the services of no bull and the operators.
Arrest has caused problems for those farms, Maysmore.
Well, they don't care how many cows die.
Go to the state-sanctioned, the state-licensed veterinarians.
Oh, you want to know if your cow's pregnant?
You want to know if it took?
Go to the state-licensed veterinary doctors, whatever you want to call them.
Nobody else gets to do it unless they're licensed.
And even, well, that's what I presume is going to be the argument.
Pennsylvania Veterinary Medicine Association deferred comments to the Department of the State, which said it couldn't confirm or deny an investigation due to confidentiality statutes.
Do you know what it's called, locking people up and then hiding it?
It's called...
Communism?
It's called what you accuse Vladimir Putin of.
It's called what North Korea Kim Jong-un actually does.
Search for Pennsylvania licensing system verification didn't turn up any veterinary license for...
Oh, I don't think that's the argument.
The department reviews every potential practice act violation of which it becomes aware, whether that is through a complaint filed directly to the department, a notification, or through media reports, etc., etc.
Let me see here.
In the State Board of Veterinary Medicine, if the State Board of Veterinary Medicine is going to interpret ultrasound as practicing medicine, the law needs to be changed, Maison Moore said.
This really affects every single one of us.
They're in jail for 30 days without bail, apparently.
Barnes is on it.
There's a little procedure in law called habeas corpus.
Show me the body.
It's what civilized societies have and what civilized societies respect.
I do not travel to countries that do not have habeas corpus rules.
The only problem is I'm in a country now that doesn't seem to respect habeas corpus rules.
A recording on the phone line is listed, Noble Solution, yada, yada, yada.
The message urges callers to contact the veterinary board and local lawmakers to express their concern about the situation.
A Noble Solution LLC fund has been set up on a give-send-go.
Give me that for one second.
And at local banks...
For more information, call 717-887-6465.
And I would encourage everyone to call for more information and expose this egregious corruption.
I'm just going to read something.
I'm going to read something that...
I'm not showing the warrant because it has an address on it and I didn't take the time to bleep out an address and I ain't getting into trouble.
The alleged warrant pursuant to which...
These gentlemen were whisked up and jailed for 30 days with no bail because of an unpaid civil fine from a tribunal that apparently doesn't have the authority to jail in the first place.
You're going to see my ugly pun.
Hold on.
In the matter of the State Board of Veterinary Medicine Investigative Subpoena Duchess Tecum.
That means subpoena, you bring the documents with you.
At the BPOA.
I have to Google what that acronym stands for.
Yeah, the Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs.
I'm sorry, I'm going to get angry.
Since when in the hell, in what satanic universe does the Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs have the authority to lock anybody up?
Can you imagine this?
Can you imagine the Bar Society issuing a, whatever the hell they call this, a warrant?
What are they calling this thing?
A warrant of arrest.
To the sheriff of Lancaster County, who might, as Barnes intimated in his Bourbon with Barnes, you might want to start thinking twice about mitigating your losses here.
Minimizing your damages here.
Because something tells me a lot of people are going to start getting sued for civil rights violations.
Something tells me that.
It's Barnes.
And when Barnes says things like that, it's not for nothing.
You are hereby commanded to take into custody.
The body of rusty hair.
Bear in mind, I'm going to vomit.
This is coming from the Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs, telling the sheriff, you are hereby commanded to take into custody the body of rusty hair of the address.
Holy crap, I almost read it.
I'm an idiot.
If he can be found at this Commonwealth and bring him to the Lancaster County Prison for immediate incarceration because he has been adjudicated in contempt of this court.
That would be, I presume, the Bureau of Professional...
Occupational Affairs.
Adjudicated in contempt of this court's November 30, 2021 order and has failed to purge himself as directed by this court's order dated May 16, 2023.
The proto-notary, a fancy word as far as I understand, of clerk.
Not a notary, but a proto-notary.
I don't know if it's a hard T or a soft TH.
Is directed to send copies of this warrant to the Lancaster County Sheriff and the Warden of the Lancaster County Prison at the following address.
What?
I don't want to swear again.
It's not too early.
Holy shit.
This is the Bureau of...
What do they call it?
I've got to remember.
The Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs drafts up a warrant for arrest, says the guy didn't pay our civil fine, and sends it to the sheriff's arrest him and incarcerate him for 30 days with no bail, and they do it?
That's where it lies now.
Barnes is involved.
Barnes is looking into this, and...
People are going to get sued, and rightly so.
So, put that on blast.
I'm not having a heart attack.
It's a muscle pain because I've been doing my push-ups, but my goodness.
The tightness in the chest, you've got to breathe down to the diaphragm, crack the back.
Joe Nierman is in the background.
Good logic is here.
Another man who has gotten his ass spanked.
He makes this beautiful motion.
It was like...
I don't know.
What was it?
20 some odd pages.
Beautifully drafted.
Why the gag order in Trump's New York trial is unconstitutional.
Violates not only his First Amendment right, but ours to hear him.
He drafts it.
He goes.
He serves it.
He has to re-serve it on Leticia James.
Nope.
Get out.
And I was like, you're going to have your heart ripped out of your bum bum, Joe.
Because I didn't want to be too pessimistic, but I didn't think it was going to go anywhere.
All that to say, the battle continues, but let's hear from Joe himself.
Sir.
Three, two, one.
How goes the battle, Joe?
Right now, the battle for people to even know about this, to get this beyond the law tube sphere, has been very, very much a struggle.
What became evident to me is this is not an argument that is being made by anyone else.
It's a very, very important argument that I'm making.
It's far beyond Donald Trump.
This is about...
This is about our fundamental freedoms because there's a precedent that's being set here.
And what we're seeing is that the New York court is saying, well, this worked in Washington.
This should work here.
And it's a precedent that never should have been allowed in Washington.
And it's the way that we consider situations that a gag order may be entertained by a court.
Meaning, the cases that were cited by Judge Merchant when he issued this gag order were We're Landmark Communications, Shepard v.
Maxwell, and Nebraska Association.
Those are the three cases he cited.
And then he looked back also and said, Judge Hudkin did this, so this works for me also.
And those cases do talk about scenarios where you can have a balancing test that might open up the doorway to limiting First Amendment.
First Amendment rights.
Normally they were talking about actually freedom of press in those cases, but the point is that you can sort of infringe on the First Amendment rights in certain scenarios.
But those scenarios that they talked about were always where we were protecting, the court was interested in protecting someone else's constitutional right.
So in all three of those cases, what you had was a media that was being somewhat aggressive, and in two out of three of them, the media still won.
But only one of them was the media, like, was so egregious in stripping a guy of a right to a fair trial because they were just so invasive in the trial and talking to the jury directly that the Supreme Court said, whoa, that's way too much.
But the only time they talk about this balancing test that, look, if it's very serious, it's not speculative.
it's definitely certain that there's going to be a harm from this expression of First Amendment rights, then we can start thinking about maybe dialing back when it's stepping on someone else's And there's line after line after line in every one of those cases about how terrible it is and how the purpose of the media and the free expression is that we can criticize the government, criticize the judges.
Basically hold their feet to the fire.
That's why we have First Amendment rights.
That's why political speech is the most protected speech in the world.
And even though this was clearly political speech by virtually any yardstick you can imagine, that to say that in this case, where there's no constitutional right that's being protected, that's the...
Mershine said that the reason we have to do this is in this...
Administration of justice is what he said.
The state's interest.
There is no state interest in the fair administration of justice.
That's not a constitutional right.
Yeah, and Shepard v.
Maxwell, where a guy, a defendant, couldn't get a fair trial because the jury was talking to the media, which hated the defendant, during the deliberations and meeting with them in the hallway that the Supreme Court said, all right, this is crazy.
I mean, this is crazy that the media is interfering in this trial so much.
And they specifically said, we need to protect his 14th Amendment due process rights, which were completely ignored by the court, and they didn't care about his 14th Amendment rights.
So now, Judge Morshan, when there's no constitutional right that's being protected here, and this is what I said in an oral argument, I said, in those cases, you have one constitutional right of Party A, their First Amendment right, versus another person's due process rights.
Over here...
We have both of them on the same side of Donald Trump.
You have his First Amendment rights and also that he's concerned that he's going to be prejudiced and his due process rights are being stripped away.
Both constitutional issues are on the same side of the ledger and you still issue a gag order?
And just to highlight this for everybody, because the insanity was that the judge said we can violate Trump's First Amendment rights or the First Amendment constitutional rights of the defendant for the preservation of the...
I mean, I'm paraphrasing the orderly administration of justice or the...
The state's interest in the fair administration of justice.
Fair administration of justice was the exact word.
So there's the thing.
We violate an individual citizen's constitutional rights to protect what is not even a constitutional right, but a purported, call it a privilege or call it just nothing, of the state.
That was the argument.
I mean, I get the impression either Marchand did not read the cases or he just takes for granted nobody's going to read the cases and just go on his word of what they say.
Well, in his follow-up order, this is because he made two orders.
There was one order on March 26th.
And then after that, like on March 28th, and he carved out, what did he do?
He said, you can't talk about witnesses or anything that they may potentially testify about.
Potential witnesses.
Potential witnesses.
You can't talk about anyone who works for the DA's office aside from the DA.
You can't talk about anyone who works for the court aside from the judge.
And you can't talk about any potential, any jurors.
Which is basically all he left that relates to this case at all.
Is he himself individually and Alvin Bragg individually.
And he also said you can't have an agent talk about it.
I mean, you can't have anyone else tweet out or your lawyers talk about it.
You can't talk about any family members of anyone related to those persons.
Then what happened was on March 28th, after this first gag order was issued, Trump tweeted out that Judge Mershan's daughter...
Has gotten $7 million from the DNC because she works for a PR company that literally is hired by the DNC, by Kamala Harris, and by the biggest of the bigwigs, and has gotten over the last couple of years $7 million for her PR efforts.
And that she's also, she's admitted that she's talked about this case with her father.
And he was urging that Judge Merchant certainly has to recuse himself in this case because of his interest.
And there was even this former judge who went on CNN and said that, yeah, that's a pretty significant thing, that there's not even supposed to be the appearance of there being anyone within six degrees of a judge that he should recuse himself.
So that is a very serious thing under...
New York perspective, that judgment of Shanz is basically said, eh.
And instead, what does he say?
He says, you can't talk about my family members or Alvin Bragg's family members, as if it was about the daughter.
No, it's about her influence on you.
So he expanded the order on April 1st, which you'd have to think was like, you know, April Fool's joke or something.
But he expanded the order to say, you also can't talk about my family members or Alvin Bragg's family members.
I mean, it was so overt in the fact that this is a Trump law.
That's how they're looking at it.
And what he did also in the second order was he tried finding more legal justification.
So he looked back to the gag order that was issued by Chutkin and by...
And that was endorsed by Judge Pan in the D.C. Circuit Court.
And he tried quoting from their language there that there are certain scenarios where you have to have concerns.
Like, what if someone's threatening a juror?
Yeah, but that's the way the media was running with it.
Like, they're talking about a 13-year-old girl when they're talking about his daughter.
And they were very slow, too.
I don't even think that they fully addressed.
She's a political activist who worked on the Kamala Harris campaign, who works with Adam Schiff and Democrat PACs, political action committees, raised 90-some-odd million dollars.
This was reported by the New York Post, and all Trump was doing when attacking the daughter of the judge was linking out, originally at least, to that New York Post article.
And so people are still under the impression she's a 16-year-old.
They're thinking his daughter is like a barren Trump situation.
Yeah.
Yeah, and that he was trying to basically punch at the judge by bringing in an irrelevant minor.
Who's related as a way of trying to brutally punish them in a way that most people would be like, alright, that's a line you shouldn't be crossing.
But that's not at all what was happening here.
She's a grown adult who's making millions of dollars.
She's a political activist.
She's a player, not a spectator in what's going on.
Alright, so now, you filed it originally on Friday.
You had some issues of service.
They said, now serve it on Leticia James.
She closed her office at 4.30.
It was closed on Monday.
When you get, let's say, how did you serve it?
And what happens when you get to court?
Who do you present this in front of?
Okay, so there was a whole back and forth with the clerk's office as to how they wanted it filed and creating a nice stuff link.
Because what they have is a, you can throw it into their basic oversized Dropbox where anyone can throw stuff in, or you can upload it directly to your case, which is what...
Is a normal scenario here.
They didn't create a link for me.
They gave me a docket number and never created a link for me to upload it to my case.
So I was constantly putting it into their Dropbox called digital submissions.
And the clerk would review it and then say, okay, this is acceptable.
Or this has to be changed.
You have to add this.
And they were basically...
I spent days trying to meet their approval with what is acceptable for both the petition, the verified petition, what dates should be on the notice of petition, and that all depends on when service is effectuated and things of that nature.
Anyhow, at the end of the day, they told me that on Friday that...
That by statute, I'm required to serve Letitia James, even though she has nothing to do with this case.
It's just a quirk of an Article 78 proceeding.
That the Attorney General needs to be aware of all litigation involving the state?
I guess.
I mean, it just says that in Article 78 proceeding that's brought against a board member or anyone who's government-related, that you have to serve the Attorney General.
And bear in mind...
I blame you and Barnes for this.
This is all your fault that you dragged me into this fight because I'm a commercial litigator by trade.
I'm a YouTuber and commercial litigator.
He calls me out.
He's like, hey, Joe, he's a member of the media and he's a New York attorney.
He should file this thing.
And I was like, I can't really come up with a good excuse not to, other than the fact that I know nothing.
Grow your wings as you jump off the cliff.
Barnes sees around corners that people don't even know exist yet.
So when he suggested it, there's a damn good reason.
And it was only after I researched and I found that there is a case that goes back to 1980s where the New York Times succeeded in taking off a gag order on Joel Steinberg's attorneys, who was a defendant in a case, because of freedom of the press issues.
And that's why I was like, all right, this is the exact same scenario right here.
I'm trying to intercede into a criminal action.
Because of issues of freedom of the press by the gag order.
So I was like, I have standing here.
And the story was like a little bit of an outline as to how to go forward.
But none of those records...
Are findable.
They're all in archives, anything that goes back to the 1980s.
They weren't computerized back then.
So I had to try and reinvent the wheel, which is why I missed the fact that I had to serve the Attorney General.
So I found that out late Friday afternoon.
And then I have to give her a 24-hour notice if I want to bring a motion on an expedited basis because it's an emergency, which is what I was trying to do.
So I served her on Monday and gave her the 24-hour notice.
When you go and serve the Attorney General or the District Attorney, they actually have receiving windows.
It's not like you're meeting.
I'm not seeing Letitia James.
I'm not seeing Alvin Bragg.
I'm basically walking up to a window where people come and drop stuff off all the time.
With Letitia James, they actually have a whole security system.
You have to go down into this basement thing, and there's a guard who walks with you upstairs to escort you up to the window there, and they take your papers.
Everyone is very nice here because they're all very professional about it.
This is New York.
People get served all the time.
It was much weirder walking to Judge Mershon's office because you don't normally walk into a judge's office to hand them papers that, hey, I'm the guy who's suing you.
I even was surprised when the clerk of the court told me that I could do it.
Normally an attorney wouldn't serve himself, and if you're a party, you definitely can't serve it because there's an issue of trust.
I guess because I'm an attorney, I don't even know why it is, but the clerk said that's okay, that I can serve personally.
Expositious way to do it.
So that's what I did.
So I served that notice, got all that done by Monday, and then uploaded it Tuesday morning and had a whole back and forth with the court as to exactly how they wanted my PDF formatted.
They were making me crazy.
They would tell me one thing, I would upload it.
They're like, no, no, no, we meant to do it this way.
No, we meant to do it that way.
And finally, at 2 o 'clock, they're like, yeah, we really need you to have it done this way.
Oh, and by the way, the judge wants you here at 3 o 'clock for oral argument.
Which judge?
So this was Judge Rosado.
Okay, so you're not presenting this before Judge Mershon.
You actually serve it physically or you give it?
This is not even the same courthouse.
This is the appellate court because when you're suing a judge, you have to go to the bosses of the judge, which is the appellate court.
So we have four departments.
The way it works here is the lowest court is called the Supreme Court for one reason or another.
And then the court above that is called the Appellate Division, which has four departments.
Manhattan, which is called the county.
Okay.
I filed all this stuff was in the first department of the appellate division.
So Judge Rosado was an appellate court judge, and they always have for an emergency relief in Supreme court.
And I guess also in appellate court now, and then this first time I have it to bring for emergency relief in the appellate court, but they have a judge like on standby.
Who's ready to basically, you know, hear your arguments and give you a decision, boom, on the spot.
Because the relief I'm seeking is, I can't wait for a month when this petition is going to be heard to get this relief.
I need this relief now.
And so when you have that, so I have to put in an affidavit as to why this is an emergency.
You have to explain to the court why this is an emergency.
And then you...
Get in front of the judge.
And when I got there, I was actually, I thought I might be unopposed.
I was like, Judge Morshan's not going to come down here.
Who's going to come down here and argue?
Well, I was wrong.
Because when they called me down there, I went flying my ass down to the courthouse while I'm having these digital submissions being uploaded and trying to get the clerk to approve them.
And I got in there at 3, 305, and...
And then I had to give my physical papers and pay for this whole thing with the court.
And then they're like, all right, here are the attorneys who are arguing against you.
We're sending you down.
And so there's an assistant district attorney who came in there, and there was also a representative who was on behalf of Bragg.
And then there was an attorney from the office corps administration, and they basically stand in on behalf of judges who were being named in suits.
So he was on behalf of Judge Mershon.
So those are the two attorneys.
So you have two attorneys facing you.
You're in front of a judge.
It's one judge of the Court of Appeals.
It's not three.
Correct.
Okay.
Correct.
Because it's emergency relief.
They don't assemble a panel for you.
They just give you one judge.
What's the word?
In Quebec, it used to be in office.
There's a word?
In chambers.
This is in chambers and the judge is sitting there waiting for emergency orders?
Well, so chambers normally refers to the office of the judge.
We'll refer to that as chambers.
This is sort of an in-between.
It was not in courtroom.
It basically looks like...
Picture like an office conference room.
In chambers is not literally or always in the actual chamber of the judge.
There's a judge sitting there in chambers waiting to deal with emergency motions.
That's who you got in front of.
So I'm not by a stand.
I'm not by anything.
I walk in and sitting at the head of this big oak table was Judge Rosato who introduced herself and...
And they had me sit on one side of this oak table and the other two attorneys sit on the other side.
She was, I cannot describe how nice she was.
I'm only saying this because, you know, everyone else in the building there was sneering at me as if I was scum.
Because they all, the clerks, when I walked in there, I was like, hi, I'm Joe Nierman.
I'm here because I have an emergency.
And the guy, the clerk looks at me with this, with this really, with this terrible glare.
And he's like, we know who you are.
Because they all had been dealing with me telling them, hey, I have this emergency thing that I need to bring in here.
They were not happy with me bringing this application.
The attorneys were looking at it.
You have to realize, I'm not a name.
I'm not anything.
So they look at me like I'm some crackpot Trumpist.
I'm basically some homeless attorney who thinks I'm going to change the world.
So there's literally...
It's not even a lack of respect.
It was...
There's palpable disrespect and animosity.
Elitism.
Who is this?
Yeah, who is this douchebag who thinks that he's going to interfere here on this?
How long do you plead for respectively?
You present, they rebut, and then you get to re-rebut?
I was hoping I would get to re-rebut.
I went through all my arguments.
I went through how those flawed...
Legal analysis, how there's terribly flawed application, even if you could have a balancing test, that you have to show a compelling need, and you have to show that this is as limited and narrowly tailored as possible when this is the broadest possible thing in the world.
I establish how you cannot know...
That his tweets were what did it.
Even if we believe everything Alvin Bragg said in his support of his motion, he doesn't know that the reason that someone's calling and harassing or threatening the DA's office is because they saw a tweet from Donald Trump or because they read an article that Alvin Bragg, that New York is trying to lock up the next GOP candidate.
They might be getting hate and harassment because they're seeking to impose a gag order, not because of what's being said in the absence of one.
They don't understand this.
I think they do.
So you present all your arguments.
I present all my arguments.
I fleshed out your arguments when I went through your motion.
It was beautiful.
Thank you.
They then retort.
How long do you present for?
So she, and this is what I'm saying, she was so nice.
She really was.
And she's the most accomplished one out of everyone in the room.
You're an appellate court judge, and she's a relatively young woman.
That's someone who probably knows how to be cold calculating and a jerk.
Politically, to get ahead.
I'm not saying that about her individually.
I'm just saying someone to attain that position.
Usually, you don't get there by being Pollyanna.
And yet, when I walked in there, the first thing she's like, Hi, I'm Judge Rosado.
And I'm going to be presiding over this.
I just want to make sure I get the pronunciation of your name properly.
And I'm going to let you speak first.
And then I'm going to let the other side.
She was so nice and trying to make me feel comfortable.
And compared to everyone else in the building who was looking at me as if they literally wanted to do me.
To shut you up.
For YouTube's sake, we'll say, do me physical harm.
So she let me go for as long, for really as long as I wanted.
And I try not to take advantage of that by, you know, condensing what the legal arguments, what my legal arguments were.
And I also hit very hard about, you know, how there's reeks of unfairness.
The one thing that she saw, this was funny, in my papers, you went through them, in my papers.
I talk about how not only is there a peacock special...
This is her Lynette Rosado?
Correct.
Yeah, that's her.
Well, I don't know how old this picture is, but yeah, she looks about 45. I mean, she looks pretty young for a pellet judge.
Okay.
She doesn't...
There's no crows...
She just looks young.
I mean, that's what I'm saying.
None of these bangs and these...
None of what you and I have with, like, you know, the crow's feet over here.
It's makeup.
We don't wear makeup, Joe.
I'm just saying.
And she was, throughout the entire time, she was just very, very nice to me, at least as far as being polite.
It wasn't like she was looking to do any favors for me, which I didn't expect her to be that way.
I was expecting her to be kind of aggressive, like, okay, make your point, Council, make your point, Council, and then let's move on.
But she was not like that.
So the one thing she had seen was that I included screenshots of Michael Cohen's Mea culpa stuff, where he basically talks for an hour, blasting Trump.
The title of every one of these podcasts that he does, and he does them like two or three times a week, every one of them is Trump is deranged, this is why Trump will lose.
I mean, he's killing him over and over again, and when you see pictures that in the last...
Two months, there's been 25 podcasts and 24 of them identify Trump by name in some derogatory fashion.
And this is how he's able to poison the public.
And Trump is not even allowed to respond to anything that he says.
And he's the criminal defendant.
And this guy's going to be testifying against him.
And he's the criminal defendant.
And this guy can talk about him, but Trump can't respond back to him?
It sounds insane.
Joe, let me bring up one concrete example while we're talking.
Here.
This is Michael Cohen.
I had to verify it.
It seems to be the official Michael Cohen account.
Let me back it up again.
In case you were curious what happened to the defaulted $175 million appeal bond, now only $160 million more to secure our New York Attorney General to seize.
And then I replied to him and said, it actually, that is a ratio.
That's a ratio.
I said, so this convicted perjurer gets to attack Trump on Twitter, but if Trump rightly calls this convicted perjurer a convicted perjurer slash sleazebag, Trump gets brought in on contempt charges.
Michael, you're a courageous man attacking a gag man.
Come on my channel for an interview.
I will ask all the questions Trump can't.
DM me if interested.
Nice.
Or do what cowardly sleazebag convicted perjurers do continue to punch at a man whose hands are tied behind his back?
Nice.
I have yet to get a...
He's getting fat and rich by attacking him also.
So I threw all this out.
Their response, so the assistant district attorney, and I'm not going to call these people out by name, at first he spent the first five minutes saying how there is no basis in law or in fact or in, or, and starting signing case law for me to get delay, for a reporter to delay the trial of Donald Trump.
And I'm like, dude, I didn't ask for that anyway.
You heard me argue here for the last 15 minutes.
I didn't mention that.
It's nowhere in my papers.
Like, you didn't even, Read my papers.
Like, literally, I didn't have enough respect to spend the 10 minutes, because it's double-spaced 15 pages.
I mean, how long does it take to read that, if you're an attorney?
Didn't give it the 10 minutes to actually read what I wrote.
That's the level of, like, this is a joke.
This is a joke application.
And from their perspective, this is a joke application.
I don't even have to read it.
I'll just get up here and give the same arguments I gave a week ago in Trump's application.
And that's why he thought I was moving to delay the trial.
And then he goes on there.
And basically, the one thing that he said, which I knew was going to push the judge if she needed any pushing, I don't know, but was going to push her was essentially that People are scared of him.
We're getting calls and complaints from jurors, potential jurors, from witnesses that they're terrified of him and what he's going to say to ruin their lives.
And they're legitimately terrified of him.
And that's why this gag needs to stay.
That's not a legal argument.
There's no exception in con law for he's scary.
There's no such thing.
It doesn't even make any sense.
My feels.
Yeah.
Okay, and now, so they present what will be the same argument for why it was issued in the first place.
Yeah, and then they said this has been decided.
That was the other thing.
This has been decided.
It was, yeah.
And, oh, so this was also funny, is that he started, the first guy started saying that I don't have a right to be here because being a member of the media doesn't give you any added standing over the public at large, which is technically true.
It's technically true, but that was his argument.
That just because I'm a member of the media, that I'm still just like everyone else.
But the counter to that is, yeah, technically anyone who's actually interested and can establish their interest in him should have standing.
The other guy gets up, the second guy gets up, and he's like, he's not even a member of the media.
He's got nothing to do with the media.
He's just some blogger.
And I'm sitting there, and I'm wearing this around my neck there.
Like, I'm like...
I'm like, really?
He's like, he's just some blogger with a YouTuber, someone on YouTube that he talks to his little audience there.
He's not accredited with, he's not with accredited news agency like CNN or MSNBC or ABC News or even Fox News.
He's just some blogger.
So he has no standing here.
I'm like, this guy's telling me I have no standing, that I'm just an ordinary guy and that's why I don't have standing.
He's saying I'm not a member of the media and that's why I have no standing.
They're literally saying opposite things here and it's just, you know, ignoring me.
Ignore him, ignore him, ignore him.
And it was so apparent that they had nothing to say about my argument about the legal analysis, that you need to have a constitutional basis.
It's a protection that you're seeking.
They had no argument about the misapplication, the lack of compelling need, the lack of tailoring of this order.
They had no argument about the Sixth Amendment issues with the fact that he's being hamstrung while Michael Cohen is punching him and punching him and punching him and the blatant screaming unfairness of a criminal defendant having to go through that.
They had no argument about that at all.
It's just, this has been decided.
It's like Jake Tapper saying, it's debunked, it's debunked, it's debunked, when it's like...
What?
How?
That's not an argument.
So I was like, I really should win here.
Well, yeah, except all they're going to do is repeat what they said to get in the first place, and they're all...
The gentleman of the bar protects the gentleman of the bar, to quote Barnes.
But that's why what I think is this, though.
I was like, they really are looking at me like I'm some crackpot who came off the street.
That's how they're looking at me.
Unless...
These are important legal issues.
Because if this is allowed to stand, it's much, much bigger than Donald Trump.
Because if we now change the landscape of where a gag can be issued, that it's just fair administration of justice, you literally can say that in any case.
That we need to have fair administration of justice, and that justifies silencing a defendant.
And this will be used against any political enemies, all the...
Time.
You have way too much influence.
God forbid, Viva, if you ever found yourself in the crosshairs of the government and they trumped up some charges against you, it's very easy for them to say he's got a massive following.
Oh, and I told Trude to go fuck himself.
I mean, that's a terrible thing to say.
And that people respond.
And that people respond.
And we got this one person who called up and said that he wants to do physical harm.
And it's all because Viva tweeted out.
And there'll be a gag order on you.
For sure.
And it's ridiculous.
You can always claim fair administration of justice.
You have to have a yardstick if we're going to protect our First Amendment rights from being routinely infringed.
Well, no.
They are going to be converted into, what's the word?
Capricious privileges in the eyes of the government.
It's no longer a right.
You have it when they say you have it.
So bottom line, Joe, the judge, what does she do?
She deliberates or does she issue it sitting right there?
No, she issued it on the spot.
Like, they made us wait 15 minutes and she signed off and said interim relief application denied.
That's all.
Was there a...
Four words.
Four words, okay.
No motivation because obviously there's not...
Does she say a motivated judgment to follow or no?
Or a written ruling to follow?
No.
No.
Nothing at all.
But that's not...
Just to clarify procedurally.
That's not the end of this case.
It's not even technically the end of my motion.
It just means that my request for an immediate relief is denied.
And then they say, come back on May 6th, and then I'll argue before a full panel.
And that's actually televised.
That's actually, you can actually...
I will be live streaming that, Joe.
You'll send me the link.
You said May 5th?
May 6th.
May 6th, yeah.
Beautiful.
Maybe I'll have you host my channel for me.
I'll let you log in on my channel.
We can co-stream.
We'll do it cross-platform.
We'll make a party out of this.
Yeah, so...
The interim of the emergency relief denied.
No further justification.
You'll have an argument before a panel of three judges at the time.
I'm not sure if it's three or five.
Just as long as it's more than one.
Yeah, it is going to be more than one.
It is going to be more than one.
But my point is this.
They're going to look at me...
The other side...
Looks at this as, there's no way I can possibly win here.
He's a crackpot.
He's a lunatic.
He's some YouTuber who's talking to seven friends online and thinks he's a journalist.
That's how they're looking at me, as like, I'm some idiot.
And that's how the court is likely to look at me.
I mean, I have to have that concern.
And that's why I was like, these are really important rights, basic understanding of interpretation of Supreme Court precedent.
I need to really find someone who's an attorney who has stature just for them to even listen to the argument.
But that's a double-edged sword in a sense.
And I appreciate that.
Get Dershowitz to join him.
Doesn't even have to do the work.
Bottom line, though, you could have like a Steven Crowder of the media.
They'll say, well, he's an extremist.
We are going to deny him relief.
You have Dershowitz come in.
They're going to say, oh, he's now a Trumpian.
He's to be disregarded.
They won't make the underwear joke with Dershowitz.
Get Turley in.
I understand.
They'll find a reason one way or the other, but it wouldn't hurt.
Have people attempted...
I mean, I tagged Dershowitz, and I'll speak with him directly.
If you can, I'd appreciate it.
But tag Turley to maybe even add their name.
I didn't think of Turley.
He would be great, too.
He would be ideal.
Yeah, Jonathan Turley would be great.
In fact, now that you mention him, he's going to the top of my list because he's not yet been disreputed by the left as someone who's in league with Trump.
Well, I don't know.
He's a regular on Fox, so I think that does him in.
But they will not be able to discredit him except in as much as he defended Trump during the impeachment.
I think he's wicked smart, so he would be good.
He is.
He's never replied to me on Twitter, and I don't think that's because he hates me.
He might not know me, or it might be too politically controversial.
I just think that clarification of these constitutional precedents...
Because, look, what I said here is perfectly consonant with every case I've seen on point until Trump comes along.
Until Trump comes along and Pan comes up with her own thing.
I've never seen anyone argue that...
That a gag, which is called a prior restraint on speech, has ever been thought to be applied in a situation where there wasn't someone's constitutional right that they were trying to insulate and protect.
That's the only time that it ever comes up.
But it's never been worded precisely like that.
They say heavy presumption against the constitutional validity of a gag order and all these things about how they hate gag orders.
And every time they've been considering it, you know, they've made reference to, and on the other side you have this person's Sixth Amendment rights or 14th Amendment rights, but they never expressly said you need to have this.
Now, I also found a second department in New York case where they basically said, you know, they were going through the same analysis and they were basically fixating on the person's Sixth Amendment rights.
So everything I've seen...
Is consistent with this.
It's never been expressed that it must be to protect the constitutional right if you're going to be infringing on First Amendment rights.
That's something which, honestly, the Supreme Court, if we can get this case up to the Supreme Court for them to actually make that termination, that you can never infringe on those First Amendment rights unless it's protecting someone else's constitutional right, which is the way the law should be.
That's how you actually guarantee that the First Amendment actually stands as foundational.
And difficult to unearth from its bedrock position is by saying that's the only scenario, that's the only power that's strong enough to ever move that bedrock is someone else's constitutional right.
That's how we protect this First Amendment.
That's why this needs to be fought.
And it needs to be fought by someone who's going to be taken seriously.
As much as I can throw my heart into it, I could argue with the logic of Socrates and the brilliant tongue of Frederick Douglass, and I will still...
Because of gravitas, because of a lack of having a name, and it's also, I'm representing myself, it just makes the whole case seem much smaller than it is.
This is a big deal.
Joe, I will apply for ProHackVice in New York, and I will come.
Please do, by all means.
I'm joking, I can't, but...
I cannot.
I will keep fighting this alone.
I'm just telling you, if that's how this goes, we will lose on this.
Well, just get everyone out there who's watching now.
Clip, snip.
I'll snip this segment.
Tweet away and tag the Dershowitzes of the world, the Turles of the world.
Someone who's in New York.
There's a lot of reputable people who can legitimize your efforts.
I don't think it's quite...
I don't think anything's going to change it because I think it's a foregone conclusion.
To the extent you think it'll legitimize it.
It certainly can go to the Court of Appeals here in New York, the highest court in New York, because that's the next level.
And if Court of Appeals rejects it, it can go to SCOTUS.
And I'll tell you, wouldn't that be cool if Good Logic became landmark case in First Amendment law?
It'd be easy to remember, right?
The Good Logic case.
It'll be amazing.
So it is going to be aired May 6th.
Dude, get ready.
I see you salivating.
I see you salivating.
Theory, add to agenda.
I'm joking.
Theory doesn't work on this phone.
Amazing.
Okay.
Phenomenal.
What's next on your schedule?
When are you live next?
Tonight.
Tonight, I will ask this.
Those of you who are watching, I just threw out a tweet on Twitter.
I'm at the following pro, and I gave a three-minute breakdown as to why this case is important.
And if you can, and with, you know, links to like my detailed explanation of the oral arguments.
So if you can all share that, I would be appreciative.
That's how we get attention of the likes of Jonathan Turley or Dershowitz or Jay Sekulow.
But people who are like, who can actually give, who's joining into this would actually give this the seriousness that it merits.
Understood.
Now, Joe, I'm going to snip and clip this segment when we're done, and I'll put it out on blast as I give everyone the link to Locals and Rumble.
Joe, GoodLogic, it is at the following pro, P-R-O.
GoodLogic is G-O-O-D-L-A-W-G-I-C.
What is your Locals community?
GoodLogic at Locals.com.
GoodLogic.
Locals.
GoodLogic.
Locals.com.
Logic, L-A-W-G-I-C.
I'll put all the links in there after the stream is up and done and wrapped up.
You're awesome.
Joe, Godspeed.
I'm going to see you on May 6th, whether you know it or not.
I won't see you, but you'll see me.
You'll feel my presence.
All right.
Take care, brother.
Thank you.
Have a good one.
Thank you.
All right, people.
Next guest is coming, and we're going to take a little bit of a break from the New York travesty to talk about the New York Times travesty.
But before I get there, everyone get your butts over to Rumble or Locals.
Here's the link to Locals in the chat.
The link to Rumble is already there.
And while everyone migrates...
By the way, I bit my tongue if you see me in a little bit of discomfort or doing this more often than normal, although I do it a lot.
As everyone migrates over to Rumble and or Locals, I will read the Super Chats, which I have not yet gotten to.
You'll see he caught on camera, but you really should see the one that snapped the line and got away.
That's in response to the fish that I caught.
Young teams with home pregnancy tests getting nervous, says Ragnar Rocker.
The last one was from Ian.
Viva!
In the US, you won't go to jail for the civil offense.
They just bastardized the Constitution by making non-payment of the civil fine a crime.
Absolutely!
That's what we were talking about in Canada.
Oh, they're just giving COVID tickets.
You don't go to jail for a ticket.
Well, see what happens when you have an unpaid ticket.
Go talk to Francois Amalaga, the guy that I did an interview with twice.
Jailed for a long time for not paying his COVID fines.
Nate the lawyer.
All my people are here.
The Trevor Bauer story is insane.
On the other side, we're going to have Trevor Bauer.
We're going to have the...
Contemptuous posts from Trump.
And what else do I have in the backdrop here?
I have a lot of stuff.
Hakeem Jeffries.
A woman accused of Trevor Bauer.
Robert...
Oh yeah, a tweet that I replied to that Robert F. Kennedy put out that I think he shouldn't have put out.
Good stuff on the other side on Rumble and vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
What else do we have here?
That's a Nate, the lawyer, by the way, who just put out a banger on the Trevor Bauer story.
Well, Leesley, really appreciates Viva promoting GoodLogic's efforts in this case.
My pleasure.
And harmanarman, harmanarman.
Ten bucks.
I hope you didn't mean to put in a comment.
Now, rumble and continuation with the big stories.
We're ending on YouTube, vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
No, no, I don't want to open up the window.
I want to end it on YouTube.
Come over to rumble.
Ending on YouTube.
Three, two, one.
Bada bing.
All right, now.
This is a young lady that I met at our vivabarneslaw.locals.com meetup up in Vegas, in Nevada, in Vegas, with Barnes over the weekend.
And she was with Ariadna Jacobs, who's had her lawsuit litigation against Taylor Lorenz and the Washington Post.
I know very little about this story, except for our brief discussion, and I kind of wanted to keep it that way.
Because if it involves the New York Times in discrediting that rubbish institution, that rubbish...
I say this as it's a rubbish accolade.
I'm sure if I ever published a book, I would want it to be on the New York Times bestseller list.
I say that, but I've never even wanted any awards that they give for lawyers.
Lonnie was apparently on the New York Times list for all of 12 hours before she was yeeted, and there's some controversy.
I hate that word.
It's controversy as to why that happened.
So a brief interlude.
We're going to get away from Trump and then get back to Trump afterwards.
Welcome and say hello to Lonnie.
Is it Sarem or Serum?
It's Lanny Serum.
Lanny Serum.
Lanny, tell the world who you are.
I'm not going into childhood.
This is a very, very specific...
I talked about childhood for about a year.
Tell everybody who you are who may not know you.
Well, I'm an actor and a writer, and I wrote a script that Thomas Ian Nicholas, he starred in all the American Pie movies, the Rookie of the Year, and I had worked on turning into a movie.
And then I had a small book publisher convince me that it could also be a book, it could be a series, it could be like Twilight.
And so we turned it into a book, and then Tom and I...
Went around to Comic-Cons for over two years, pre-selling the book, promoting the book.
We go into a town for the Comic-Con three days early and do all their morning press.
We go on Fox in the morning, whatever the local area, Cincinnati or Columbus or whatever it was, we do press for them.
We do the con that weekend with whoever that other...
Actors that that convention had, Jason Momoa, those types of people.
And so we did that for over two years and we had a bunch of pre-sales.
And so when my book came out, I was number one on the New York Times list for 23 hours.
And basically the list came out that night and then that morning a guy started tweeting.
And by six o 'clock that night.
Without doing any research, without talking to me, talking to anyone on my team, the New York Times just pulled me from the list.
We've got to back up a number of things here.
The book itself, how many pages of a book?
Like 420.
A big-ass book.
And it's like Twilight-ish.
I've seen portions of Twilight, but it's like sort of fantasy.
It's a fiction fantasy.
Yeah, mine's about a young woman that moves to Las Vegas to work for a magic show, but she can do real magic.
So there's no vampires in this one.
This one's for all ages.
I purposely, you know, wrote it so that, you know, just like kind of Harry Potter, a lot of adults read it, but, you know, there's nothing wrong with kids reading it and anybody...
Basically, it's for anyone who likes magic.
And so you spend a lot...
I mean, how long does it take to write a 400-page book, beginning to end?
I'm dyslexic.
It took me a long time.
I was always a script writer.
I started writing scripts when I was nine.
So this was the first book I'd ever attempted to write.
So it took me over two years.
I started the script.
I wrote the script in 2010 and the book came out in 2017.
So I'd been working.
We worked on this project for seven years before the book came out.
Okay.
And then seven years includes the time when you're going to the Comic-Cons to pitch the book.
Is it already available for sale?
No, we started out pitching it before it was for sale so that we could get those pre-sales and grow an audience.
I mean, when you are independent in the entertainment business, you do...
A lot.
You work really hard to kind of get a new IP out there.
That's the only way anyone's going to care about your project unless, you know, you're Chris Pratt.
So you do everything you can.
And so there was a lot of hustling involved to kind of get that.
I mean, I used all my connections.
I mean, this was like, you know, like I had, you know, all my life I wanted to just have my own project, start my own thing, you know, have my own.
Something that was mine.
And so I had spent pretty much my whole life really working towards this, but this is what this was.
I knew it was special, and I put kind of everything into kind of making it successful.
So you launched the book, make it publicly available.
How long between the time that it's publicly available, officially launched, and the New York Times establishing who's on the bestseller list?
So, the list is a weekly list.
So, the book officially comes out, like, on the Tuesday before.
And then, books typically come out on Tuesday, and then the list runs through Saturday night.
Bookstores report to the Times.
They don't really have an official set of rules, but any bookstore...
Any bookstore can report to the New York Times.
Bookstores don't have to.
So there's a lot of bookstores that only report to the Times or they only report to BookScan or they report to neither.
So there are sales out there that don't count.
You can't sell books anywhere else and have them count.
So you could have, like at your event, if you had sold books there, you could have sold a thousand of them.
They wouldn't count unless you put them through a bookstore.
So the bookstores...
Have to be involved and everybody does it because that's the only way to make them count.
So if you're doing an event somewhere, not in a bookstore, you're going to put book sales through a bookstore.
That's just how it works.
Publish.
It's known and it's very common.
The New York Times, though, you know, says, well.
It's not actually based upon sales.
They actually say it's a cultivated list.
In 1983, William Blatty, he wrote The Exorcist.
He also wrote a book called Legion.
And he knew he was supposed to be on the list.
And he kept not being on the list, not being on the list.
And so eventually, he sued them for $6 million.
And he lost because they said, oh, it's a cultivated list.
It's not based upon sales.
So that makes my situation weirder.
But basically, I...
My book came out.
It was technically not a young adult book because the main protagonist is in her 20s.
And the young adult community, they're very elitist.
Even people in it, you can find tweets that they'll say they're a toxic community.
But they said, well, the book's not a young adult book because the main protagonist is in her 20s.
Because they'll say the main protagonist has to be 13 to 18. You don't tell the New York Times where to put you on the list.
I knocked this book to number two that was very popular at the time.
It was a very Black Lives Matter-charged book.
What was the name of the book?
It's called The Hate U Give.
It was by Angie Thomas.
She had been number one on the list for 25 weeks.
Some people call that book a CRT book.
It's about a girl who's 15 who has a best friend.
They're both black and she watches her Best friend gets shot by a white cop.
There's a lot of...
So what's funny is at the time there was some controversy about her book being promoted to kids because there's a lot of very rough language and obviously it's a very...
Adult things.
Yeah, adult things.
But the protagonist is 15 so it's totally fine, I guess.
I don't know.
And so you bump her to number two as your book gets out.
I bumped her to number two.
And then, again, I didn't know that my book was a young adult book because technically it wasn't.
So I didn't do the normal things that people do in the young adult community.
I didn't send them ARCs, which is like advanced copies.
I didn't go kiss the ring of anyone that mattered in that community.
So this guy starts tweeting at 8 o 'clock in the morning, my book's not real, my sale's not real.
I got called a racist because of literally the book getting knocked to number two.
And her book was a HarperCollins book.
She had a big-time agent who later got sort of MeToo'd.
She had fired him, so that was even kind of funnier.
And so this guy, Phil Stamper, who was a wannabe author, who's now a best-selling author, got a book deal off of what happened with me, starts tweeting, and this other guy, Jeremy West, joined in.
And later, after I got kicked off the list, That agent took Jeremy West and Phil Stamper out for cocktails and they toasted a handbook for cocktails.
It's wild.
This is like the opposite or a form of cancel culture.
Politically motivated.
They get their clicks and their gangs and they go and manipulate.
What was the reason, if any, were you given for being pulled from the New York Times bestseller list for the category of young adults?
Yeah, young adults.
So I was in 796 articles.
796 articles in nine days once I got kicked off the list.
I was the most talked about thing on Twitter.
Somebody did a chart.
They said, like, this is how many people are talking about Game of Thrones.
This was, like, during the second to last season of Game of Thrones was on.
And the second to last episode was on.
So this was back when Game of Thrones was the biggest thing on the planet.
So, like, this is how many people are talking about Game of Thrones.
This was how many people were talking about my book.
My press release had come out in Entertainment Weekly.
And Phil Stamper called my press release put out by an unknown reporter or something.
But they actually only gave an answer to one reporter.
I sent official letters, both FedEx email.
They never responded to me.
They only responded to one person, funny enough, the girl whose article you just threw up from Vulture.
Answer was sales inconsistencies, which again makes no sense because they've said it's a cultivated list.
Even funnier, eventually what that sort of came out to kind of mean is they said, basically they accused me of book buying, which because we had all those books sales done for two years that are supposed to count, that's how you're supposed to count.
She froze.
Uh-oh.
Lonnie, if you can hear me, you froze and I'm expecting...
You froze for a bit there.
I don't think I...
Oh, okay.
I don't know what the last...
Did you...
So, if you bulk buy books and they think you do, actually, they don't have to prove it.
They just, for whatever reason, they decide maybe you bulk buy.
They have a system in place because it happens so often, especially with books for speakers.
Speakers are trying to make a lot of fees, so they'll buy their own book.
They put a dagger next to your name.
They literally have a system in place if someone does what they accused me of doing, which I didn't actually do because I had sales to back it up, but they never bothered to check.
They never bothered to talk to me about it, and they just pulled me from the list.
They're not adding you to any other list.
It's not like they're going to...
Now measure you in adult fiction or whatever the heck you want.
Adult fantasy.
No, no, they never...
What's actually...
So funny enough, there was a brief moment, so...
They issued the list, right?
And then they pulled it down.
And then they put it back up for five minutes.
I don't even have a screenshot of it because it happened so fast.
But they pulled it down for five minutes and put back the list with me and Angie Thomas switched.
And the only reason I knew that happened because some people started tweeting.
They switched the list.
And then five or ten minutes later, they pulled that down and I was off the list.
They never responded to anything.
They never responded to anything my attorney said to them.
They never would talk to us about any of it.
How much research or what could you do in eight hours?
Nothing.
You know, you're never speaking to me, never verifying anything.
And they have a system in place.
Again, even though I didn't do what they said I did, they have a system in place.
Why didn't they just give me a dagger?
If they'd given me a dagger, even nobody would have cared because basically a dagger, like most people don't even know what that means.
But by pulling me from the list.
It made it seem like I had snuck into the New York Times' office and erased Angie Thomas' name and wrote my name.
And to this day, people call me a scam artist.
All kinds of things.
I get turned down for loans.
I had a lady who built me barn doors and the barn doors didn't close right.
And I messaged her and I was like, hey, the doors, they close at the top but they don't close at the bottom because they're not.
She's like, oh, I looked you up.
I know who you are.
You're trying to scam me.
I still have the text.
I'm like, what does my book have to do with my barn doors that are supposed to go in front of my washer and dryer not closing?
This makes no sense.
The moral of the story, everyone who's watching here already knows that New York Times list.
It's an inorganically manipulated list to favor political ideological allies and to punish, you know, the disfavored.
But it compromises the sale of the book after it occurs?
Yes.
I mean, basically, if you're on the New York Times bestseller list, like, you become, you know...
Nope.
She froze again.
All right, well, hold on.
We'll see.
We'll give it 30 more seconds.
You froze again, but if you're on the New York Times bestseller list...
Say that again?
You froze again.
If you're on it, what happens?
I mean, obviously, it's marketable, etc.
Oh, yeah.
Obviously, it elevates everything about your career.
It obviously elevates sales.
You instantly become known as a great author, a great person.
And apparently, I'm the only author in history that's ever been kicked off the New York Times bestseller list.
While they leave people off all the time, I'm the only person that's ever been kicked off.
So when you get kicked off, I can tell you, as the only person that's ever had it happen to, We're freezing in.
I'll just read Desert Rider1234 says you could throw that on a resume and claim that distinction.
Lonnie, we froze again.
I was just saying that even people that have, like, James Patterson's been number one on the list more times than anyone else, like, ever, and he actually has started to call them out for, you know, not being, for just...
Their list being trash, basically.
And he's won it more times than anyone.
He holds the record.
He holds the Guinness Book of World Records.
So the list is trash, but it's known for being like, that's what everybody looks up to.
It's the awards.
It's idolatry.
That being said, it's an accomplishment to have been on it for 12 or 24 hours, 23 hours.
And add it to your resume.
You're the only person to have ever been kicked off.
This is the book.
Hold on.
Make sure I got it here.
This is the book.
It's on Amazon.
Everyone?
If you look at the star rating, just know that when everything went down, I had a lot of people go on there and rate me one star, and they literally would write, I never read this book one star.
So we'll see my star rating went up eventually, because some people who read it, who liked it, went on it.
But there are some...
Hold on.
This is funny.
This is funny.
It's all garbage.
Once everyone realizes it's all garbage.
Where did it go?
I saw the star rating somewhere.
It's right there.
Yeah.
So look at this.
All five or all one?
A few in the middle.
Lonnie, are you on Twitter?
Are you on social medias?
I am on Twitter.
Twitter was what took me down, you know.
So for a while, I'm not on there as much.
I'm trying to get back on there.
I'm on Instagram.
I have a website.
I'm on Facebook.
But yeah, I'm on all those things.
Ariana is encouraging me to be on Twitter more.
So I'm trying to be good.
What is your website?
If you have to point people in one direction.
So if you want to buy the book, handbookseries.com is the website.
My Instagram is L-A-N-I-E-R-S.
My Twitter handle is rockandrollgypsy.
And my Facebook is just my name, Lainey.
Text me all of that right after we're done, and I'll put it up in the pinned comment.
Okay, perfect.
Lonnie, congratulations on your distinction.
Thank you.
All right.
I'll talk to you soon.
Okay.
Bye.
All right.
Have a good one.
Be careful what you wish for.
That's the moral of the story.
I want to get on the New York Times.
And you get there, and then they just rip your heart out of your tushy.
The New York Times bestseller list, it's an accolade for...
Everybody knows what it is.
Everybody knows what it means.
It's still nice to have under your belt.
But Lonnie has it.
So as if we didn't need to know what rubbish the New York Times bestseller list was because of the political crap, you knock down.
You knock down that book from number one to two?
Expect some blowback, people.
Oh, now, speaking of blowback, first of all, I didn't get a bunch of these crumble rants that I want to get to.
We're going to do Trump, some stuff, and then we might just go right into Trevor Bauer.
But before we do that, here we go.
Let's zoom in here.
I'm not your buddy guy.
No offense, but I think people need to develop the attitude of not caring.
If something is a New York bestseller, the New York Times, since before Hitler, have been bad with their opinions.
I agree, but the problem is you put your blood, sweat, and tears into a project where that is, short of selling a million copies, piss off with your awards in the New York Times.
People like to get recognition for the hard work they've done, but I happen to think those institutions are absolute rubbish and don't deserve...
The praise of people who know better.
But I'm not in that industry and it's very easy for me to say.
Jason of the Greater Area, of TGA.
Are the courts really as infested with communist nutjobs as it seems?
Or is it some kind of show?
Probably the former.
Janeway, an Albany appeals court reached out on locals.
Did you see?
Well, no.
I'm going to go see what this says.
And now, just because I can still read Hebrew, Chag Kasher Ush Sameach Chag Kasher Vesameach David Ninsap Ninsap?
Vivesap?
Well, whatever.
That says either Vivesap or Nunsap, because I can't tell.
Nunsap.
Okay.
And then we've got angry marsupial.
Viva is pronounced Lancaster.
But yes, our Commonwealth is being destroyed by Democrats who hate us.
All right, so that's it.
Now, what was I going to say?
I'm going to clean up the windows here, get rid of this window.
Okay, boom.
And now I can bring up the other windows because it's tough to bring them up here.
People, we're going to talk about Trevor Bauer.
Let's talk about Trevor Bauer.
We're going to start off...
Okay, the Trevor Bauer story, I was following a little bit back in the day when this baseball player was accused of assaulting a woman and she, you know...
He said all the things that you have to say in order for all of the powers that be to say believe all women.
Trevor Bauer, after a summary investigation by Major League Baseball, was summarily dismissed without pay, had his contract basically cancelled.
The estimate, from what I learned from the unusual suspects yesterday, is that he's lost roughly $350 to $400 million in salary, sponsorships, future earnings.
This guy was like, I don't follow baseball, I don't watch sports all that much, but was like, the best, most...
Talented pitcher in baseball back in 2011-12 gets accused of this act by a woman.
Despite all evidence to the contrary, the backlash need no evidence in order to lash back.
And his life was ruined.
He was effectively cancelled.
I was going back to look at some of this stuff and I came across an interview breaking?
No, is that it?
No, that's not it.
An interview with...
Where is it?
With the blimp!
The pimp!
The pimp on a blimp!
Oh, come on.
I have it.
Alex Stein did an interview with the first accuser, and I couldn't tell if it was an interview or a shtick where Alex Stein was splicing together his interview with the accuser.
Oh, come on.
I have to find it.
Where is it?
Alex Stein Trevor Bauer.
Sorry, I thought I had this in the backdrop.
Here we go.
It's not a gag and it's not a shtick.
Alex Stein interviewed this woman, the first accuser, who evidence came out.
I'm not jumping on the bandwagon one way or the other.
I'm just coming to the conclusions now that the evidence is in.
The woman was a liar, pathological liar, who went out to do this to destroy a man to try to extort money from him.
And the text messages were there.
Is this the one I wanted to see?
Now we have an investigative journalist.
This is Sarah Fields.
I'm sure Sarah wants to ask you a question.
So Sarah, please, what question do you have for Lindsay?
I actually, I don't have a whole lot of questions.
I just, I mean, these text messages are incredibly concerning and it doesn't really feel like something that should be joked around about.
This is in the text messages.
The first accuser says, I'm going to go after and get me my money from this guy.
Make him choke you out.
Be the absolute W-H-O-R-B.
Need daddy to choke me up.
Be an absolute whore to try to get in on his $51 million.
That was his contract.
To roundabout.
But, I mean, were you granted a restraining order?
No.
You were not granted a restraining order because, like, okay.
So, I'm not going to sit here and I'm not going to call you a liar because I don't think that that would be appropriate.
But what I will say is that if anybody ever accuses someone of something so Horrific.
And it's not actually true.
That would be the most disgusting thing because this man's career has potentially been completely destroyed.
His future has been completely stained.
And that is very bothersome to me as someone who is a DV victim myself, a DV survivor, as well as my daughter is also a survivor of a horrific thing that we came out of.
And I was myself accused of something that I absolutely did not do.
And that was horrific in itself.
It caused trauma and it caused PTSD.
Not just to me, but to my entire family.
And now a lot of that is out in the open.
And it's brought that trauma back all over again of what I went through in my marriage with my abusive ex-husband, who now, years later, we've been finally exonerated.
It's been proven that everything we did say was true because now he sits in a prison cell for 15 years in actually not far from here, believe it or not.
And it should be longer than that.
I think that anyone who accuses someone of doing something like this and is not telling the truth because they're putting money over life, they value money over the life of someone else, belongs in a jail cell right next to my ex-husband.
Do you agree that fake sexual assault accusers should go to prison, Lindsay?
I absolutely do.
And I think there's a big reason that that has never happened to me in two and a half years because of all of the different evidence that has been laid out there.
So Alex Stein, Primetime99, actually did an interview with the first accuser.
And by all accounts, fabricated.
By all accounts, an extortion scheme.
And she wasn't the first or the only as relates to trying to extort Trevor Bauer.
And I gotta tell you, man, keep your schmeckle in your pants and life will be a lot easier to deal with.
There's no victim blaming here with Trevor Bauer.
I joked around yesterday on The Unusual Suspects.
I would not want to be a single person who has to navigate the dating world in this day and age.
I sure as hell would not want to be worth 50 or however much that is multiplied over the factor of a career.
Be worth that type of money.
Be into whatever Trevor Bauer was into by way of sexual...
It's wild and outrageous.
But the bottom line is, by all accounts, not just one but two lying extorters, and the latest news of the day is one of them, or the second extorter, is going to jail or has been convicted of extorting Trevor Bauer.
Hold on one second.
Where is the article that I have here?
Here we go.
We'll take the post-millennial.
We take the articles that we want to promote close.
Poso.
Close.
Breaking.
Former MLB pitcher Trevor Bauer's accuser has been charged with felony fraud in faked abortion scheme.
This is another one of the two accusers who, text messages reveal now, was interested in stripping Trevor Bauer and then made some claims against him afterwards.
We're going to watch Trevor Bauer's video because he lays it out with the receipts.
A woman who, this is not the first one, not the, what was her name?
The first one.
A woman who falsely accused former Los Angeles Dodgers pitcher Trevor Bauer of sexual assault has been charged with fraudulent schemes and artifices.
Not orifices.
Artifices.
According to the TMZ, the woman charged against Darcy Esomunu in Arizona.
Maricopa County grand jury previously indicted her on the felony account.
In a video statement, we're going to watch a video statement.
He said it stems from allegations made against Bauer in a 2023 lawsuit.
She alleged that Bauer raped her during a 2020 encounter and that she became pregnant.
The only problem?
Not only does she have no evidence of ever having become pregnant, the only evidence indicates that she was never pregnant.
She insinuated it, but I didn't take her to word.
Bauer said it displaying messages he received the next morning, explaining why she came on to me.
And after months afterwards, she repeatedly requested to sleep with me again.
Where Trower may have displayed some poor judgment is right here.
At one point she had requested a sample of my sperm so she could have my child whenever she wanted to in the future.
That should have been the first red flag, Trevor.
Not that it would have made a difference because they can fabricate the accusations out of whole cloth, but it certainly doesn't help you if you actually engage in certain activities and the type of sexual...
Bauer denied any wrongdoing in the counter suit stating that they did have consensual sex one time during which the condom broke.
It's possible.
He claimed in the counter suit that Esamonu told him she was pregnant and demanded over one million to terminate the pregnancy.
He said it was only after Lindsay Hill made her claims against Bauer with those claims being later withdrawn with prejudice that Esamonu Got a lawyer.
This was over a year after the encounter.
Wait until you see the text messages.
Or I don't know how.
Oh, Trevor Bauer got them during the discovery, I guess, communication of documents in his lawsuit.
Wait until you see the messages between Esamonu and her counsel.
She demanded $3.6 million and claimed that I forced her to have an abortion, leaving her emotionally devastated and irretrievably damaged by it.
There's nothing.
She never did it.
She was never pregnant.
Okay, fine.
Yada, yada, yada.
It's a breaking story.
Let's go to the original source, which is Trevor Bauer's video itself.
Now, hold on one second.
Open up the windows.
Did I just shut down everything?
No, I'm still here.
Oh, keep your schmeckle in your pants.
Get married young.
And that's not to say that to blame Trevor for anything that happened.
These are the risks when you're dealing with absolute crazy people in this world.
I was telling the guys yesterday, like, I practiced law for 13 years.
Once you practice law for 13 years and you see what goes on behind the smiles, you know what goes on behind the closed doors, because you do.
You get access to a lot of socially privileged information.
And you see the people who smile and wave at you when you do your errands.
And then you know what they do behind closed doors.
You don't trust anybody.
So don't trust anybody.
But my goodness, did this guy get done dirty, Trevor Bauer.
And...
Oi, oi, oi!
What are you doing, Winston?
Stop that.
Let's hear what Trevor has to say for himself.
Because the man comes with the receipts.
The man's life has been destroyed.
Here, listen to this.
Okay, we're going to start.
We'll pause as we go along here.
Let's do this like this.
Make sure we're looking at the same thing.
The man has been so defamed.
And people are not even going to know that the first one there, Lauren Hill or whatever her...
What was her name?
The first one.
People are not even going to know that she withdrew with prejudice her claim.
They're still going to think he's a rapist.
His contract was cancelled by Major League Baseball.
Summary investigation.
Destroy a man's life.
Believe all women.
Even when they're lying.
One of the women who accused me of sexual assault...
Oh, and by the way, now he's resorted to having to make self-defense videos to fight in the court of public opinion from his hotel room.
Vinny Oceana on The Unusual Suspect said this looks like a...
Oh, no, it wasn't him.
It was Rob Gorgiulo said this looks like a cheap hotel.
This looks like a nice hotel.
You got your Japanese...
Looks like Japanese sort of motif in the back.
But at least he made his bed.
Like, my wife would be yelling at him.
Maybe he should have made it a little better.
But let's see what he has to say for himself.
This is the face and the video that Lindsay Hill...
Well, today, the only other one...
Oh, and by the way, injured as well.
There was a whole issue as to whether or not she had marks on her face from the alleged abuse.
Darcy Adana Asamonu has been criminally indicted for committing felony fraud against me and another man.
So now she's facing up to 16 years in prison.
Her claims are even more absurd than Lindsay's were, so here's some of the details.
We had one plain sexual encounter in December of 2020.
Nothing that could be considered remotely rough.
She initiated it, but don't take my word for it.
Take hers.
This is a picture and text message she sent me the next morning.
Hold on.
Let's read this.
Not that I'm...
In females, for example, hormones present at ovulation can drive a woman to choose a cocky, confident man with a slight stubble and more masculine features.
Men can sniff out an ovulating woman just by smelling her t-shirt.
The women appear to prefer the smell of a man with dissimilar genes, which could give her a boost of the evolutionary ladder.
Okay, hold on.
I'm just going to put the dog on the room while we...
She sent me the next morning, explaining why she came on to me.
And for months afterward, she repeatedly requested to sleep with me again.
For example, this text from January 7th, 2021.
At one point, she even requested a sample of my sperm so she could...
Have my child whenever she wanted to in the future.
I guess by this point the damage is done.
I just want to sleep next to you again.
I will be very quiet, I promise.
And I will sleep though.
In the morning I'll have to leave and will slip out with a blink.
What did she say here?
Let's just read all these.
I guess you smelled cocky and confident with slight stubble.
I didn't make that comment that your shoulders looked broad.
Oh my goodness.
Okay.
I guess you smell cocky.
My feminine lenses are on.
I just want to sleep next to you again.
I'll be very quiet.
I'm not certain, but I can sleep over there later.
Not certain, but if I can sleep there, it's peaceful for me.
7th, 2021.
At one point, she even requested a sample of my sperm so she could have my child whenever she wanted to in the future.
I suspect this is after they had sex.
I suspect this is the moment where he realized he's dealing with a...
Was it Sharon Stone in Basic Instinct?
I hope this guy doesn't have any rabbits, but this is probably the moment where he realized, oh shit, was it worth it?
Now, it's hard to keep track, but she's made at least four seven-figure demands over the last few years.
More than a year after the one time we slept together, and only after Lindsay Hill made up her false allegations, Adana retained a lawyer.
She then demanded $3.6 million and claimed I forced her to have an abortion, leaving her emotionally devastated and irretrievably damaged by it.
But here's the thing.
She never had an abortion because she was never even pregnant.
And that's corroborated by her own medical records.
Let's just stop here.
Pregnancy urine.
Value negative.
Standard range and units negative.
When I refused to pay her the $3.6 million she was asking for, she made up a bogus sexual assault claim and filed a civil suit against me.
There's no silver lining for Trevor here unless he can get some form of financial retribution or justice at the end.
This has to serve as a warning for young, not even young rich men, young rich people in today's dating market.
But I presume it's...
Much more risky for men than it is for women.
You're a young, rich man with infinite wealth, $51 million contract, and you multiply that over years with sponsorships?
Holy crap.
Keep it in the pants and you'll avoid a lot of problems.
Oh my goodness.
Anyhow, listen to this.
It gets better.
Or worse.
In that version of her story, she claimed for the first time, by the way, that there was non-consensual sex.
But her texts from the next morning show what actually happened.
Remember this text in which she explains why she came on to me?
And by the way, this is scientifically accurate.
Joe Rogan had an episode where I forget who they were talking about, but women on the pill, where it subdues the woman's sexual drive or something along those lines.
When they're on the pill, they're more attracted to more effeminate men.
And when they come off the pill, all of a sudden their preferences in men change.
So ladies out there, let that be fair warning.
And men out there, let that be fair warning.
She also claims that instead of an abortion, she actually had a miscarriage, but that's impossible, of course, because, again, she was never even pregnant.
We now have emails between her and the first two law firms that dropped her, in which they acknowledge they never had any evidence to support her claims.
I'm pausing it here.
Lesson of life, by the way, lesson for lawyers out there.
When someone comes to you and says, I need you for this file, yeah, and you say, okay, well...
Have you had a lawyer?
Yeah, I had a lawyer before and he didn't understand the file.
I had another one there.
He was too busy.
When someone's on their third lawyer, typically, not always, but statistically relevant often, the problem is them and not all of the lawyers that came before them who didn't understand the file, weren't paying attention, were too expensive, screwed them, yada, yada, yada.
She's on her third lawyer.
Listen to this and understand what this means in legalese.
He obviously got this from Discovery, so he blacked out the, or he whited out the email addresses and stuff.
Subject, re-phone call.
To confirm, and it's in bold, by the way.
When you get something in bold from anybody, especially your lawyer, without proof of the abortion or even the date of the abortion, we cannot continue to represent you.
In other words, you're a godforsaken liar.
We have now discovered it.
Time to end the mandate.
We urge you to consult with other attorneys who may have different standards.
Go find a liar who's prepared to take on a client.
And by the way, just for all those lawyers out there who say, well, I'll take on a client and a lie if it means getting paid, she will do what she tried to do to Trevor Bauer to her lawyers.
Claim that they stole from them.
File ethics complaints.
Your bad client becomes a nightmare.
And they say like 80% of your clients...
No. 20% of your clients are responsible for 80% of your revenue, for those of you who've never heard this rule.
20% of your clients are also responsible for 80% of your heartache, headache, and wasted time.
This is amazing.
We urge you to consult with other attorneys who may have different standards.
Go find another liar.
We're not ruining ourselves over you and piss off mandate over.
But they'll try to get my money.
Listen to this.
Great.
This is from another lawyer.
I appreciate your time and input today and we're glad we can agree.
What's the settlement?
750k to 3.6 million.
And they'll get a 20% of that.
As explained on the phone, we will start high and understand the lowest you will accept to settle is 750k.
Have a beautiful day, Adana.
Oh, that's so nice.
Anyway.
I agree.
I appreciate and thank you.
And by the way, this goes south also.
I then shared an audio recording I have in which Adana contradicts her own claims and asks me for money.
In the emails, her lawyers agreed that that's insurmountable evidence and they informed Adana that they can no longer represent her unless she can provide documentation or proof of her...
Okay, hold on.
And let's read this one together.
Hi, Adana.
As your legal counsel, we have all agreed that the recording is detrimental to your case to the point where we will very likely not be able to continue representation of you on this matter.
Translation, we just discovered you're a goddamn liar.
We just discovered you're a psychopath.
That you've been lying to us, we've been putting our necks out for you based on the representations that you've been giving to us, and you're making us look like stupid liars ourselves.
Sorry, we've all agreed that the recording is devastating for your case.
And we probably can't represent you anymore because we now know that you are a liar and we feel very bad for having taken Trevor Bauer through the ringer.
We are requesting a copy of the recording to verify the authenticity.
We are now investigating our own client, which is probably what every lawyer should do before taking a client on, but it's very difficult to do sometimes.
I know this is difficult news.
But without the medical records of your abortion and a recording like this, this is what we feel is insurmountable.
Hugs.
Hugs.
Holy shit!
And hugs, by the way.
Hugs.
Never heard of a lawyer ending a lawyer correspondence with that, but yeah.
So we've discovered you're a liar.
We're going to make sure that you're a liar by investigating the evidence provided by the person we're suing.
I know it's very difficult, but to the extent that you can't prove what you're saying, you look like a liar, and we have insurmountable evidence now that you are a liar, it's insurmountable.
Hugs.
For claims.
Of course, she couldn't do that, so the law firm urged her to consult other law firms with different standards.
Now, Adana has filed more than 10 police reports claiming sexual assault or harassment against other men, including at least one other professional athlete.
But after the Scottsdale police completed their investigation into her claim against me, she's the one being indicted for felony fraud.
That's pretty wild.
And not just against me, against another man as well.
Felony fraud.
And from what I understand, Nate Brody broke it down.
There's different classes of felony fraud.
And she's like second most serious.
So she faces years in jail for this.
She made up bogus sexual assault claims and attempted to extort him too.
That gets worse.
In my lawsuit against her, we subpoenaed a witness whom she knew for relevant documents to use in our case.
What's she going to do?
Pass this prologue.
And when she found out, she immediately made sexual assault claims against him too.
Her M.O. is clear.
Lie to men to get their money, extort them if she must, and when they refuse to pay, stop paying or stop giving her what she wants, go to the police, accuse them of sexual assault, and file a civil suit against them to retaliate.
Anyone who makes false claims should go to jail for potentially as long as the crime that they falsely accused someone would have carried by way of jail sentence.
That is an easy deterrent.
And just so no one can say, well, he still has two other accusers.
Just because the first two are complete frauds doesn't mean the others are.
Here's a couple of facts about them.
They both had lawyers first demand in excess of $3 million to not go public.
In both cases, only after I refused to pay any sum of money, did their lawyers make anonymous claims in the media.
They both had the opportunity to file a criminal complaint against me.
Neither of them did.
They both had the opportunity to file a civil suit.
Now, this is where it gets a little too complicated for anybody who's not really thoroughly emotionally invested in this story to continue following.
But my goodness.
Be careful what you wish for in life.
You want success.
You want fame.
Notoriety is a bad word.
And then you get it all.
You're a young man.
And you go and you shtup crazy one time.
And you are FFL.
They both had the opportunity to participate in Lindsay Hill's civil suit against me.
They could have even done so anonymously.
They both refused.
One of them even submitted a statement to the court stating that she never made public accusations against me.
The other refused to participate so vehemently that Lindsay Hill took legal action against her trying to force her to participate.
She still refused.
So they both had the opportunity to testify under a penalty of perjury.
Neither of them did.
One can only wonder why.
Perhaps it's because all their claims against me are lies.
It's been two years since these women and their lawyers attempted to weaponize anonymous claims in the media against me.
He's in that time now.
I think he went to pitch in, I want to say, Japan or Korea, and now he's in Mexico pitching for Diablo Rojo.
The team called Diablo Rojo, which I jokingly said, thanks to Dora the Explorer, I know means the Red Devils.
To take my money.
I addressed them at the time, and as far as I'm concerned, it's in the past.
But if there comes a time in the future where I need to defend myself further, I will not hesitate to do so.
For now, there's no reason to speak further on this topic, though, because outside of Adana, who's now been indicted with felony fraud, there are no claims against me, no ongoing investigations, and no outstanding lawsuits.
Are you going to get hired back?
I don't know what happens to a man's pitching career if he's been out, or at least in minor leagues or lesser leagues for a few years.
Can't make that time and money back, but does he still have an arm?
I don't know how baseball works or how baseball players age or pitchers age over time.
At this point, I'm not sure what else I can possibly do to prove my innocence in all this.
Probably nothing for a great many people.
And not do what I was accused of.
And every institution that our society has entrusted to rule on issues like these, like courts, judges, law enforcement officers, prosecutors, they all agree with me.
They've rejected every single claim made against me, even going as far as charging one of my accusers with a felony.
If any evidence of any of these claims actually existed, I would have been charged, or at the very least arrested.
But that never happened.
What else do I have to do to prove that this entire situation has been a massive lie?
This is insane.
At what point do I get to go back to work and continue earning a living?
You know what the amazing thing about this is?
Let me just share that tweet with everybody so everyone can do their part.
And if you so choose, give this a little bit of attention because one thing is for certain, Trevor Bauer news.
You'd think the indictment of one of the accusers for fraud would be big news.
Let's see who's covering it today.
Oh, ESPN's covering it now.
These search results are different than they were yesterday.
All righty.
A little bit of progress.
It's said like the arrest of the criminal fraudsters who tried to extort money out of Trevor Bauer didn't get quite as much coverage as the original accusations of sexual impropriety.
It'll never undo the damage.
But Trevor Bauer, hey, look at this.
We got some headlines today.
Woman who accused Trevor Bauer of sexual assault indicted for fraud in Arizona.
Trevor Bauer accuser indicted on fraud charges in Arizona.
The Trevor Bauer's accusers faces extortion charge.
Here we go.
USA Today, ESPN people.
Yahoo!
I don't know what SB Nation is.
Look at this.
It's starting to make the headlines.
So hopefully a little, some form of vindication for Trevor.
I've got no dog in the fight.
I just know what I believe based on the evidence that I've seen.
And I believe that those ladies are crazy and evil.
And that's a bad combination.
Link to his video.
Link to video.
Yeah, Crash Bandit says drop in the bucket compared to what they did to Jones.
Oh, well, true.
I didn't actually link the video.
Link to video tweet.
But that's it.
It's a...
Oh, God.
Can't imagine dating in today's day and age.
Can't imagine dating...
As a young man who, with tons of money, holy hell.
Anyhow, there is a life lesson in there.
Inasmuch as you have to select your clients of law carefully and don't be allured by big promises, big paydays, big payouts, choose your partners carefully and don't be blinded by the physical appearance.
And the demands for sex and your sperm so they can make babies of you whenever they want.
All right, well, that's Trevor Bauer's story, and now you know, for those of you who had any interest in that.
Has everyone heard Brittany Griner's wife is pregnant, as confirmed by Brittany, says Hoppity Hooper.
You'd think a married man wouldn't try so hard to date single women.
Am I correct, Viva?
Hold on, was Trevor Bauer married?
Am I missing one important fact here?
Hold on.
Trevor Bauer married.
Is he married to Rachel Luba?
Okay, Toko News.
He's one of the most famous agents where she sounds like...
I'm just going to go to the chat.
Is he married?
If he's married, it's...
Well, even asking for a double whammy trouble there because you'll get murdered by your wife.
I'm laughing, but, you know...
Hold on.
Viva Russell Warren is trolling you.
Oh, okay, fine.
I thought he was...
Well, I'm sorry, Russell.
I thought you were a sincere human and not a troll bot.
I'm up here canceling single men.
Okay, I have no idea what that means.
All right, what else?
Let's go here.
We're going to go to some more.
There's a few crumble rants left that have been brought up here.
Bada bing, bada boom.
That was for Joe Viva, says Janeway.
No offense, but I think people need to develop an attitude for not caring about something like the New York Times bestseller.
The New York Times...
Okay, we got that already.
And we're going to go like this.
Da, da, da.
Da, da.
Thank you.
And we're going to take care of a bit of a spam now.
Okay, good.
Now, what else?
I didn't get to the tweets for Trump.
I said we were going to come back to Trump after the New York Times.
Let me just see what's back in the book here.
Maybe I'll save the tweets.
We've seen the tweets.
Now we're going to get to the tweets because it's going to segue perfectly into this.
Alright, back to the segment on Donald Trump.
The persecution in New York.
The man who's been gagged that can no longer respond to the witnesses who are trolling him in social media.
Do you guys appreciate?
That it's not just Michael Cohen that's trolling Trump in social media.
It's Stormy Daniels as well.
The convicted perjurer is free to speak and free to troll Trump.
The alleged liar and porn star Stormy Daniels is free to troll Trump online.
And he's not free to call any one of them the names that they deserve to be called.
Let me see.
I want to pull up the...
These are the four screen games.
So Trump has been brought up on charges for contempt.
I showed you the...
I showed you the motion he's going to be before Judge Mershon on April 24. Listen to this.
I'll just read these tweets because it's amazing.
Michael Avenatti tweeted, he's tweeting from prison, We can't be hypocrites when it comes to the First Amendment.
It is outrageous that Cohen and Daniels can do countless TV interviews, post on social media, make money on bogus documentaries, all by talking shit about Trump, but he's gagged and threatened with jail if he responds.
To which Donald Trump says, Thank you, Michael Avenatti, for revealing the truth about two sleazebags who have, with their lies and misrepresentations, cost our country dearly.
That allegedly, according to George Soros-funded Alvin Bragg, violates Donald Trump's corrupt Judge Juan Marchand-issued gag order.
That.
Sleazebags.
That's witness intimidation, I guess.
There's another one.
Look what I found.
Will the fake news report it?
And it's a letter from Stormy Daniels that says, over the past few weeks I've been...
Asked countless times to comment on reports of an alleged sexual relationship with Donald Trump many, many, many years ago.
The fact of the matter is, as alleged, I've denied the existence of this relationship 2006, 2011, 2016, 2017, 2018.
That's five times.
I'm not denying this affair because I was paid hush money, as has been reported.
I'm denying the affair because it never happened.
This is not news, by the way.
Some people are like, this is new.
Look at this.
This is not news.
Of course it's not news.
How then does Trump tweeting this out now possibly support a charge for contempt?
They want to gag him so that he cannot call out the lies and show the evidence to the people.
What's the other one?
Has Mark Pomerantz been prosecuted for his terrible acts in and out of the DA's office?
Has disgraced attorney and felon Michael Cohen been prosecuted for lying?
Only Trump people get prosecuted by this judge and these thugs.
A dark day for the country.
This is allegedly contemptuous conduct.
What was the last one?
This one's long.
The White House thugs should not be allowed to have these dangerous and unfair Biden trials during my campaign for president.
All of them civil and criminal could have been brought more than three years ago.
It is an illegal attack on a political opponent.
It is communism at its worst and election interference at its best.
No such thing has ever happened in our country before.
On Monday, I'll be forced to sit gagged before a highly conflicted and corrupt judge whose hatred for me has no bounds.
All of these New York and DC judges and prosecutors have the same mindset.
Nobody but nobody but this Soros prosecutor, Alvin Bragg, wanted to take this ridiculous case.
All legal scholars say it is a sham.
Biden's DOJ is running the case.
Just think of it.
These animals want to put the former president of the United States who got more Contempt.
Let me see.
Was there another one?
No, that was it.
There was another exhibit in the motion.
Those are the four charges.
Now, remember the last one that we just read.
Let me just close this here.
I'll give this to everybody.
Remember the last one.
They could have brought these three years ago.
They could have done this.
And nobody wanted to take that one anyhow.
Link to tweet.
Boom.
Nobody wanted to bring charges up before.
The feds investigated the alleged federal election interference and decided to do nothing.
But they wait until 2024 to tie Trump up in a six-week trial and gag him during the trial while these porn star perjurers get to defame Trump and he can't respond.
And when he does, like he does, said nothing intimidating in there.
There's no threatening witness.
There's no coercing testimony or intimidating testimony.
He's just saying what everybody already knows.
Bring him in on contempt.
Oh, but no, it's just justice.
Just Trump.
Not going to get any special treatment.
Listen to this.
Is it this one?
Oh, no, it was Gouveia who posted another interview.
This is one of the prospective jurors who really is making the most of her 15 minutes of fame.
And by the way, people will say, how dare people attack her?
She's just a prospective juror doing her jury duty.
The woman has given more interviews.
In 24 hours?
Than I gave after I caught that fish with the drone.
Let's see what she has to say here.
You literally just left the courtroom.
Yes.
You were in seat what number?
13. Seat number 13. And you told me that you were dismissed because?
Because?
I work in cybersecurity due to the nature of my job.
She's very happy about that.
It would be extremely hard for me to...
Be here for the hours needed for as long as this trial is going to be.
Schedule-wise.
So did you have a sense that you were coming for the Trump trial?
Schedule-wise.
I'm so busy.
I work in IT.
I can't possibly give up six weeks of my life.
But the leading presidential, the presumptive nominee, leading presidential candidate, former president, during the election season, should be sandbagged with a six-week trial.
At best.
No, no, no.
But the IT lady, she gets to go home.
I can't be expected to do my work after 4:30.
I coordinate with a lot of people.
I'm a very important person.
I have many leather-bound books in my office and I drink fine whiskey and wear Sex Panther perfume.
Yesterday when you got your jury summons and you knew what was happening today or on Monday?
So I...
I didn't, but when I got my jury summons, I had texted my mom like, oh, I've got jury duty coming up.
And she said, oh, I think mid-April is when the jurors for the Trump trial are getting called.
And I was like, oh, wow, that would be fascinating.
Fascinating.
That would be fascinating.
I got here yesterday and there's a massive line and Trump protesters and counter-protesters.
And it's like, well, I'm either on that trial or one down the hall from that trial.
And then our holding room had something like 250 people in it.
And you were part of that first batch of 96. So you were inside of the courtroom the entire time yesterday during the jury selection process.
This is the woman I posted the clip yesterday and it went quasi-viral for Twitter, who basically said Trump's a misogynist, a racist.
He put at risk her entire family, but she could have been totally impartial because the right to a fair trial is...
She would have been able to put aside all of her personal opinions on Trump.
So I wasn't, I think, I was in the first group of jurors that they brought into the courtroom, but we weren't in the courtroom.
And you got to be one of the lucky ones that was seated in seat 13, that initial batch to answer the questions.
You did answer the series of 42 questions.
You were asked the question about what you thought of Donald Trump.
I know that they were yes or no questions, but whether you could be fair and impartial to Donald Trump.
And you said yes.
And you responded.
I responded, yes, I can be fair and impartial.
The question was, do you have any prior beliefs or opinions, I believe it was worded, about the defendant that would prohibit you from being fair and impartial?
And I said I would be able to be fair and impartial.
I believe that she's covering up the fact that she lied right now.
The question was...
Prohibit you from being any...
Prior beliefs or opinions.
Do you have any prior beliefs or opinions that would preclude you from being impartial?
And then in the other interview that went viral yesterday, she said, I've got a Chinese adopted sister and she got angry and she felt uncomfortable by Trump's comms and it made me angry.
His COVID was abysmal and it basically put my entire family at risk.
I don't like him on reproductive rights.
I believe it was worded.
Silence is golden.
But by the way, I don't mean to pick on her.
This is, understand that she didn't get dismissed for bias reasons.
She got dismissed for scheduling and still offered her time.
What do you think the other members of the jury are like?
You think they're much different?
The defendant that would prohibit you from being fair and impartial.
And I said I would be able to be fair and impartial.
Two questions off the top of my mind, and I'm sure Jose has a follow-up.
Number one, you were seated there.
How far away from Donald Trump, the former president?
They think he's like Jeffrey Dahmer.
Did he try to eat your face when you were there?
Could you smell his breath?
Could you smell his cologne?
What type of tie did he have?
How did he do his knot?
Did you feel scared to be that close to the Donald Trump?
Oh, gosh.
Estimate.
You know, maybe you...
30 feet?
20 feet?
What was that like, answering questions?
What was that like?
Including some about Donald Trump as he is sitting 30 feet.
This is journalism, people.
It was odd.
It was such an interesting experience because I had never seen him in person before.
And you see someone blown up so larger than life.
You see someone who you have been indoctrinated to hate.
And then you see them...
They're just a person.
And you don't question anything.
I mean, you've got to reaffirm it.
He must be really evil.
I bet his hair hides his horns.
And the media, for so many years, to see them in person is very jarring.
And you get the sense that it's like, oh, this is just another guy.
And also he sees me talking about him, which is bizarre.
It's just another guy.
But he's Satan incarnate.
How can this be?
I cannot make sense of any of this.
That was the interview.
Those were the tweets or the truth social posts that have now got Trump brought up on contempt charges and he's going to be standing before Judge Juan Marchand on April 24th and I'll be following it.
Oh, yeah.
Was it this one that I had up here?
This is what she had to say about that.
We've seen this yesterday.
We need to watch this again.
But I do want to bring up something from one of the other accusers, E. Jean Carroll.
E. Jean Carroll is sort of like, oh my goodness.
You compare it to Trevor Bauer, at least I won't make the jokes that I'm thinking.
Everybody knows what jokes I'm making.
E. Jean Carroll is a...
Bonafide nutbag.
Like the nuttiest of nuts that goes into a bag of stale, rotten, moldy nuts.
She's a moldy nut.
That's what we shall call her.
She posted this the other day.
By the other day, I mean yesterday.
April 17. Yeah, it was yesterday.
Thank you, Time, for the staggeringly great honor of being named to the Time 100.
The 100 most influential people of 2024.
This is a tribute.
To every survivor in the country.
What did I write?
Oh, I guess it's not there.
Let's just go see.
Let's just go see what's going on here.
Time Magazine.
I'll tell you what I wrote in a second.
Let's just go see what they have to say about E. Jean Carroll.
The 100 most...
She's dressed very nicely.
I mean, I guess she started to spend some of that money in advance on her wardrobe.
How much do I have to read?
Okay, it's very short.
The triumph of E. Jean Carroll starts with her disclosures.
Here was this woman from the self-described, quote, silent generation.
Silent generation?
Have you read her flipping Facebook page?
Time?
Ripping off the gag.
She embodied what Me Too was actually about.
Yeah, women making up lies to take down prominent men.
Oh, sorry.
Not a woman taking down a powerful man, but a woman freeing herself.
And in E. Jean Carroll's case, it just so happens.
Three millions more alongside her.
We like to count women's days and then count them out.
We like to count women's days and then count them out.
That's impossible to do with E. Jean.
Her moves are undeniably heroic.
And while we should all bow in gratitude to her for adding her name to the long list of women who have sacrificed themselves by telling their stories out loud in the hopes that one day we will end the harassment, the violence, the deafening silence, this was not her job.
Her only job was to survive.
So we honor her.
Let's also think about how to say thanks.
So as we honor her, let's also think about how to say thank you by making the country safer.
Am I allowed vomiting?
I mean, I feel like I'm going to puke.
That's repugnant.
Holy hell.
This goes back to the Tommy Robinson interview.
E. Jean Carroll is, in my view, a liar.
Or she's a hallucinator.
Time Magazine could get an email from E. Jean Carroll to her lawyer saying, I made the entire thing up.
It was a lie.
I just wanted to do it for political purposes.
Time Magazine could have that email and they would fight tooth and nail to never let it see the light of day because they would have to shame themselves for having so poetically backed up a woman who is, by all accounts, a psychopath of a liar.
This is like in Tommy Robinson.
When the politicians got behind...
The fake story of the Syrian refugee who was allegedly waterboarded by a racist 15-year-old.
Once it got debunked, or to the extent it was debunkable, they would never let it happen because it would be a humiliation to them for having jumped on this story, pounced on it, and gotten duped by it.
So they protect and conceal and cover up, and they prosecute and persecute Tommy Robinson to conceal and hide their own stupidity and gullibility.
Time Magazine right now is on board with that.
Nothing that they ever have that would prove E. Jean Carroll to be a psychopath liar would ever be allowed to see the light of day because of how they have sunk themselves into this lie with all of their purported credibility.
Holy hell, that was worse than I thought it was going to be.
Oh, Lord.
Lordy, lordy.
Now let me see what we've got in the backdrop.
I'm going to save some stuff.
We're going on a little bit longer than we should here today.
In the backdrop, and this is going to be the bait to get all of you to come from Rumble over to Locals.
I had a tweet to RFK.
I think he saw it.
Link to Locals.
But I will criticize where I think criticism is warranted.
And Robert F. Kennedy Jr. put out a tweet that deserves to be criticized.
Let's see what else we got.
We got a couple of other stuff in there.
All right.
Let's head on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
But before we do, let me just make sure I got all of this.
What one of these cases is the one where the girl did a media tour saying she would be the one swearing in Trump?
Oh, that was Georgia, I think.
That was the Georgia jury person, or the grand jury person.
That was the floor person of the jury, the special grand jury in the Georgia indictment, I think.
That was for Joe.
Okay, so now we've caught up on all this.
Everybody, if you are so inclined, come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com for the amazing after-party.
Locals.
Here.
Tomorrow, by the way, it's confirmed.
Jason Palmer.
Jason Palmer, who's running for president against Joe Biden, who's the only...
Jason Palmer is the man who destroyed Joe Biden's sweep of the electoral votes by getting the four American Samoa, if I'm pronouncing it properly, the four electoral college votes from American Samoa, who they don't have the right to vote in the federal, the general election, but they can vote in the primaries.
Very curious.
He's coming on tomorrow.
Jason Palmer, 1 o 'clock to 2 o 'clock.
We'll see if it goes a little longer.
It's going to be amazing, so please stay tuned for that.
I'm going to set up the link tonight or this afternoon so everybody can share it around.
It's going to be fantastic.
It's not going to be a gotcha ambush.
I sincerely want to understand whether or not he's to the left of Biden, more centrist to Biden.
Why even run against Biden?
Is it opening up the window for attacks?
And we're going to get into it.
Policy stuff.
What does he agree with?
What does he disagree with?
How do they defend certain policies?
And what does the future hold if we get another four years of Biden?
So, that'll be tomorrow, 1 o 'clock Eastern.
Jason Palmer, stay tuned.
But come on over to Locals.
VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com Boom!
Right there.
I'll read some comments all in here.
Jacob Castro, howdy, peace out.
What do we got here?
I'm going to go up here.
Viva, will you tell the Rumble people to turn the auto-rotate for the screen less sensitive?
I can barely move my phone.
The screen gets cutting off.
Impossible to watch.
I'll ask.
I don't know if that's...
I don't know if that's...
Your phone or the programming.
BlueBunny420 says, Viva, just in.
Juror 2 dismissed.
Juror 2 dismissed.
Well, we might have to.
Let's see here.
Juror two dismissed.
Two jurors dismissed in Trump's hush money case.
Who we got here?
Associated Press.
Stop.
I have not heard this.
Well, obviously, I haven't heard it.
We've been live and I haven't been watching the news while I'm doing this.
This is how fast things move.
Two jurors dismissed.
Two jurors from the Trump hush money trial were dismissed Thursday after one...
One after expressing doubt about her ability to be fair and impartial, and the other over concerns that some of his answers in court may not have been accurate.
The dismissals reduced to five.
Well, they might not get there by the end of the day.
Jurors who have been seated for the first ever criminal trial president.
The setbacks in the selection process emerged during a frenetic morning, in which prosecutors also asked Trump to be held in contempt over a series of social media posts.
The seating of the jury, whatever it happens, will be a seminal moment.
Yada, yada, yada.
The jury selection process picked up momentum, okay?
But on Thursday, Juan Marchand revealed in court that one of the seven, a cancer nurse had conveyed that after sleeping on it overnight, she had concerns about her ability to be fair and impartial in this case.
The jurors names are being kept confidential.
The woman told the judge, Yesterday alone...
I had friends, colleagues, and family push things to my phone regarding questioning my identity as a juror.
I don't believe at this point that I can be fair and unbiased and let the outside influences not affect my decision-making.
A second juror was dismissed after prosecutors raised concerns that he may not have been honest in answering a jury selection question by saying that he had never been accused or convicted of a crime.
All right, well, yeah, they gotta worry about the runaway jury activists, like the one that we just saw who was still, despite all of her personal feelings, and I believe...
Outrageously dishonest answers on the jury questionnaire form, nonetheless offered to be available to sit on the jury.
So I'll put a little afternoon vlog catch-up thingy thing with the thing.
You know the thing.
All right.
Come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com for the after party because we got some fun stuff to talk about.
And if you're not going to do that, I will see you all tomorrow.
Maybe a little earlier, but one o 'clock for certain.