Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 23, 2024 - Viva & Barnes

01:35:45

Viva Saturday - Fani Willis, Letitia James Scandal, Russia, AND MORE? Viva Frei Live!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is a straight-up lion of a dog.
	Oh my goodness, you're beautiful.
	Lion or dog?
	Oh!
	They're there.
	There's manatees right there.
	Hold on a second.
	Hold on.
	I think I just heard something breathe.
	Yeah!
	Okay.
	Check.
	There's three manatees right here.
	And they seem to have massive scars on their back.
	Hold on.
	That one right there.
	One, two.
	Thank you.
	Right there.
	Look at that.
	Oh, you can't see me as a reflection.
	Hold on.
	Okay, there's three manatees right here.
	And they've got massive scars on their backs.
	Almost looks like a sturgeon because of the pattern.
	This one right here.
	There, you can see that right there.
	Beautiful manatee.
	Oh, wow.
	Yeah, he's right there.
	Oh my goodness.
	Look at the scars on the back of that one.
	That's what happens when people come through too fast in boats.
	And you know it's from the propeller because you have slashes every few inches.
	Are they playing?
	Oh, they're playing.
	It was at that point he realized they were not playing.
	They're hugging each other and spinning in circles.
	What an idiot I am.
	They're hugging each other and spinning in circles.
	You can see the propeller scars.
	Let's see if I can get a better view.
	You can see there's a propeller scar on this guy's back right there.
	Okay.
	That one's got three, oh my goodness, look at the propeller scars on that.
	As the propeller spins as it goes by.
	And they seem to be dancing with each other in the water.
	Oh my goodness.
	And then look at the scars on this one.
	They were doing the tango de la sexy from what I was explained afterwards.
	It turns around.
	Starting with a longer, peaceful video that celebrates the beauty of life before we get into the misery of government.
	Look at this.
	It swims.
	How's my audio, people?
	You'll see.
	I'm back in the office.
	Big blade.
	I don't know what that is.
	The rudder?
	A boat?
	I got some amazing underwater footage as well.
	Audio is good.
	Okay, because I cleaned the cables, redid it.
	I didn't redo anything.
	So this was at Wikiwashi Natural Springs.
	I'm going to put together a nice vlog of our experience.
	This is why you're supposed to go through slowly.
	Oh my goodness, there's one right there with all of those scars on its back.
	It's wild.
	And this one right here.
	can't imagine how bad someone has to feel after hitting a manatee with their boat.
	I'll take that one.
	That is wild.
	This is going to serve as basically the five-minute countdown timer until we go live, because we're going to cover some Trudeau, some Joe Biden, some Leticia James.
	It's going to make everyone want to puke.
	So let's look at...
	Beautiful bee.
	Manatees are my new favorite animal, hands down.
	They are massive.
	So they're solitary animals, which means that when they're dancing...
	Okay, now we're going to get the scars.
	Look at that.
	Look at this.
	It looks like a sturgeon.
	If anybody's ever caught a sturgeon, you have massive, beautiful patterns on the back of it.
	This is clearly the props and that little rudder thing that they have going down.
	Sea cows.
	From a dog lion to a sea cow.
	Okay.
	That's my joke.
	That's amazing.
	From a lion dog to a sea cow.
	All right, done.
	Get out of there with that ad.
	Good evening.
	Afternoon?
	Morning?
	It's not morning.
	Good afternoon.
	Yeah, we're doing a live stream today because when I set this stream up, the weather was not so good.
	Now it's beautiful and sunny.
	I hear the kids have come back from a day with the mum.
	And I'll still get to do some fishing after the stream.
	But we gotta cover some stories.
	I was away from the office all week.
	And catching up!
	Holy cows, catching up!
	I'm using Rumble Studio again.
	And until they can integrate one improvement that I've suggested, which is to create a landing page on YouTube before we go live.
	Because you set it up in Rumble.
	And it sets up the landing page in Rumble and VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
	One of the issues is that when you run a paid ad on a stream, you've got to go into YouTube and click this stream contains a paid ad.
	And so if you don't set up the stream beforehand, you've got to go at the beginning of the stream once you go live to get to the page, make it monetized, and check that little box so that you don't get accused of breaking the rules.
	On the commie tube.
	Because the other thing I'm going to test out again today is the rack system that Rumble Studio has enabled.
	And if I haven't explained what Rack is, I mean, I tell you it's going to revolutionize.
	It's not just because I have a contract with Rumble and I'm partial to them.
	I have a contract with Rumble because I like them.
	I've liked Chris since I first set digital eyes on him.
	That sounds kind of pervy.
	I have liked Chris since I first met him via the interwebs.
	I've liked the company.
	Since I first discovered it.
	So I'm not saying this for any reasons of contract.
	This is going to revolutionize the way content creators run ads on their streams.
	The system is RAC, Rumble Advertiser Center.
	And when it's enabled for everybody, you go live through Rumble Studio and there's a tab that you click on and it says ads.
	And it proposes which ads are available for your stream.
	And you can read them and say, oh, do I like this one?
	Do I like that one?
	It tells you how much...
	What the ad revenue is per view.
	And so you can decide which company you want to run with and when during the stream you want to run with it because if they're paying X whatever pennies per view, well, quite clearly you want to wait until you have the biggest viewership of the stream before you hit click and accept and they run the ad and you read the script and you run the ad and it's beautiful.
	You can pick the ones you like to work with.
	You can pick the time of the stream when you want to work with them, which would be beneficial for you and maximum eyeballs for them.
	And I'm telling you, you don't have to have an agent.
	You don't have to deal with negotiating.
	It is going to revolutionize the way things work in terms of monetizing content on the interwebs.
	It's fantastic.
	It's phenomenal.
	And we'll see when we decide to go with the ad.
	I know which one I'm going to go with because I like it, because I already drink it.
	And no, it's not alcohol.
	Good afternoon, everybody.
	What a week.
	So I was up in...
	Well, the area is what?
	Wikiwashi.
	Homosassa.
	We went to the Homosassa State Park.
	Amazing.
	We then went to Crystal River, went swimming with manatees, but I had a better view of the manatees from the kayak on the Wikiwashi River than I did snorkeling with them.
	But it's amazing.
	Florida is amazing.
	It's beautiful.
	And to finally get to an area that has fresh water that you're able to swim in?
	Fantastic.
	And when I say fresh water that you're able to swim in, I've showed everybody a video.
	The other day.
	Did I show the one of...
	Let me just show you another.
	Not only can you swim in the river, but you can jump off trees into the river.
	Hold on, I'm going to pull up the video here.
	Oh yeah, there it is.
	Okay, boom, shakalaka.
	Here, I shared it on vivabarneslaw.locals.com a little while ago, but you're going to love this.
	At least, I think it's fantastic.
	So if I go to share screen, and I go to vivabarneslaw right here, and I go here...
	And I maximized this.
	Check this out, people.
	There was a tree hanging over the river.
	Someone had carved little notches into it.
	Look at my toes.
	And I saw a bunch of teenagers jumping off a tree.
	Not to be outdone.
	I had to show those teenagers what's up.
	I measured risk, everybody.
	I had all of the worst-case scenarios plotted in my mind.
	Right now, the worst-case scenario, slipping, running down the tree, and getting your groin nailed in between.
	Worst-case scenario up here, getting your foot stuck.
	Yes, sir.
	What did he say?
	the water is well deep enough.
	Three, two, one.
	Good!
	Okay.
	That was...
	That's it.
	That was fantastic.
	I gotta put that pause here.
	So we were up exploring Florida, and Florida's a beautiful place.
	It doesn't have mountains, but it's got beautiful alligators.
	Let's see some in there.
	Oh, lordy.
	So that's it.
	But we've had a week.
	What a week!
	There's been breaking news about Leticia James.
	There's an article that appeared in the New York Post about Leticia James, I don't know, not engaging in fraud herself, but having a double standard that makes her the most corrupt attorney general in recent memory.
	We've got the Trump appeal of Nipple Judge Engeron's decision.
	We've got Jonathan Turley, who is shocked by what's going on in New York.
	Everybody who's ever operated.
	In the legal industry knows what an absolute political persecution this is.
	We're talking about that.
	We're going to talk about Christra Freeland finally accidentally telling the truth.
	We've got some fun clips and we've got some law stuff.
	So while we're here, let me see this.
	Another feature that they've integrated in the Rumble studio is I can now...
	Categorize the tipped chat and come to them.
	Rumble is great and better for creators.
	I've been uploading gaming clips and music for a couple of years now.
	My content has an exponentially higher value count than on YouTube, says Lord of the Reed.
	And then if we take that one down, and I can bring up this one right here.
	Pim.
	Shout out to my buddy, SandKing0077, who's been streaming a lot.
	On Rumble, sometimes for 10 hours straight.
	That's far too long to be streamed.
	That's going to cause some serious problems at some point in time, either with the butt or, you know, muscles.
	I find that I'm having pains in the underside of my legs, but I still haven't gotten the better chair that I've been meaning to get.
	All right, people.
	So the way it works, if you're new to the channel, we start on YouTube, Rumble, and VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com, where I've made sure that we are live and well.
	We are...
	And what we do is we stay on YouTube for a little bit and then we end on YouTube so that we can take our eyes, our feet, and our dollars over to Rumble or vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Now that I mention it, I forgot to pin the comment in the chat.
	In the Rumbles, in the YouTube, that is the link to the Rumble.
	Hold on one second.
	Let me do that.
	Put this on pause.
	And how do I do this?
	I want to just put the link to Rumble is right here.
	Link to Rumble.
	Boom.
	So you can come on over to Rumble.
	We're going to end here in about 20-30 minutes and then have the remainder of the stream over on Rumble and then end it there and then have our exclusive afterparty at vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	It doesn't seem that all of the Rumble rants are appearing in the stream.
	Hey Viva, I heard, have you heard of John Ward?
	Says most evil.
	I'll have to Google that.
	Ginger Ninja says, I've been MIA for a few weeks.
	Had to watch the fan hearings on Gouveia's channel.
	Sorry, by the way, after the fact, do you see how Judge McAfee was definitely going to come to the conclusion he came to?
	We're going to get to it, Ginger Ninja.
	We're going to talk about that as well because I put out a video yesterday, which I presume everybody has seen, just because the shorter videos on YouTube...
	Get far more viewership than the longer streams on YouTube, but I also cut the streams.
	FUTViva.
	Is that University of Toronto?
	Remember, chat, you're a world champion.
	Don't let your memes be dreams.
	World champion, John Ward, world champion.
	I'm getting confused with Mike Ward, who's the Canadian comic that I've had on the channel.
	Ginger Ninja?
	We're going to get there.
	Some might say the judge was compromised.
	Let me get my stool here.
	I don't think he might have been compromised in that he might have been too afraid to make the proper decision, but I think he set it up so that the Court of Appeal has no choice, but we'll get there.
	And by the way, Phil Holloway might be joining us at some point to discuss that.
	Rumble is great for all kids.
	Okay, good.
	All right, we started with the beauty of nature, and now, unfortunately, we have to go to the repulsiveness of government.
	Joe Biden put this video out today.
	It's impossible to keep up with the lies.
	And if they couldn't lie, they wouldn't be allowed to talk.
	And if they didn't have low information voters, and I say low information, not low IQ, because one is a matter of fact that is non-judgmental, and the other one is a judgment call as to someone's intelligence.
	Low information voters.
	They're not just Democrats, but I think they predominantly tend to be more on the side of the aisle that relies on the disinformation and has the bullhorn.
	Joe Biden put this out, and I've got so many things to say about this video.
	And who was it that...
	It was Elliot, who...
	Hold on a second, let me just see here.
	I want to make sure I get this right.
	Yeah, it was Tom Elliot.
	So all Americans, not just seniors.
	Stop it, stop it, Joe.
	I'm talking.
	It was Tom Elliot, who's worth a follow on Twitter, who put it out, and it's a classic.
	Listen to this.
	Moving.
	So all Americans, not just seniors, pay $35 a month.
	Have a $2,000 cap for prescription drugs.
	I want to make those $800 ACA savings permanent.
	Stop.
	I'm stopping there.
	Understand what's going on here, by the way.
	This is a highly edited, pre-recorded, scripted video.
	Why?
	It's not like Joe Biden is giving a speech publicly in live time that they couldn't edit out that apparent stutter.
	Why would they leave that in?
	Moving.
	So all Americans, not just seniors.
	Pay $35 a month.
	Have a $2,000 cap for prescription drugs.
	I want to make those $800 ACA savings permanent.
	Why would they leave that in?
	First of all, I don't believe that's evidence of a stutter.
	I believe it's evidence of someone who's lost his mind and can no longer speak in coherent sentences such that they require highly edited, scripted, not live views.
	Why would they have left that in, though?
	They're going to use this to now say, look, there's evidence that Biden's had a stutter.
	He's not demented.
	It's a bit of stutter.
	We're just leaving it in now.
	In a highly produced multiple edit video, like every time they cut angles, it's an edit.
	You'll notice the audio.
	There's edits.
	This is edited.
	Why they would have left that in can only be strategic.
	They could have just asked him to say the line again and say it properly.
	But that's not what I wanted to highlight here.
	Meanwhile, Donald Trump is about to pass in serving himself.
	This is the guy who doesn't care about science and reason.
	Look at Obama.
	Look at this gangster.
	Look at this effing gangster.
	I'd look down on you.
	I'm the real gangster.
	Remember that time when I told you that we basically experimented on billions of people?
	We had the clinical trials on billions of people?
	I got away with it.
	And by the way, this is my boy right here.
	This is the guy who doesn't care about science and reason.
	Remember, during the pandemic, Donald Trump told us to inject ourselves with bleach.
	He said there's nothing to worry about.
	He said there's nothing to worry about if you do it.
	Now Trump keeps telling us he's going to terminate the ACA.
	Listen to this.
	Hold on.
	I want to also highlight the random spontaneous outburst of anger.
	Say he's permanent.
	Meanwhile, Donald Trump is about the past and serving himself.
	It's about the past and serving himself.
	Trump is about the past and serving himself.
	This is the guy who doesn't care about science and reason.
	Remember, during the pandemic, Donald Trump told us to inject ourselves with bleach.
	He said there's nothing to worry about if you do it.
	No, that's interesting.
	I remember being alive at that time, Mr. Joe Biden.
	I remember this.
	I don't think that's what he said, sir.
	I mean, I know you might not be lying because you're too demented to know if you're even...
	Saying something that happened or not.
	It might have happened in your mind.
	Supposing we hit the body with a tremendous, whether it's ultraviolet or just very powerful light, and I think you said that hasn't been checked, but you're going to test it.
	Do you know where the expression sunlight is the greatest disinfectant came from?
	I believe it was the first flu, the first Spanish flu.
	I'll double check that after this.
	Sunlight is the greatest disinfectant.
	Why?
	I don't know.
	I'm not a doctor.
	Supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way.
	And I think you said you're going to test that too.
	Sounds interesting.
	I don't know why they threw this in.
	And then I see the disinfectant where it knocks it out in a minute.
	One minute.
	And is there a way we can do something like that?
	Is there a way we can do something like that?
	Injection inside or...
	Almost a cleaning.
	Nothing to worry about if you do it.
	There's a tremendous number in the lungs.
	So it'd be interesting to check that.
	So you're going to have to use medical doctors.
	But it sounds interesting to me.
	Floating an idea.
	Something.
	But he said, do it.
	And there's nothing to worry about if you do it.
	And anyone going to fact check him?
	I said, you know, community notes will get to that next year.
	It's outrageous.
	They cannot.
	They cannot do anything but lie through and through.
	Rely on the ignorance of the electorate to believe the lie.
	Say the lie so many times that it becomes truth.
	A lie so brazen.
	No person in their right mind would believe that anybody would have the audacity to make such a lie.
	Just keep saying it over and over again and people will end up believing it.
	Oh, lordy lordy.
	Okay, let me see here.
	I just want to check that everything is refreshing.
	Ginger Ninja says, part two, do you recognize a common personality between him and another person with a gavel?
	Maybe a Canadian citizen's inquiry.
	They're the same appearance of impartiality, spineless cowards, says Ginger Ninja.
	Ginger Ninja, we'll get to it!
	Because I think the Judge McAfee did what he had.
	Well, I think he was a coward.
	I mean, there's no way around that, but I think he did.
	Do a sufficient job in terms of setting up a successful appeal.
	John S. says, you're starting to get quoted by other channels now like Doug in Exile, Lumberjack, Logic, etc.
	None of them seem to be able to pronounce Fry right.
	That's fine.
	Nobody pronounced my last name right.
	They say Free Heat, Free Height, Fry Height.
	I don't care.
	I'm not sensitive about it.
	One thing that is interesting, however, it's become a term.
	If you Google Viva Fry, you get Viva Fry.
	So that's Joe Biden lying, but, you know, again, it's a day ending and a why.
	We're not done yet gagging.
	Here's someone who accidentally told the truth, but only because she's an idiot.
	I mean, look, I'm not going to say that she said it because, oh, if I do, I'll get fact-checked.
	But let me pull up Christa Freeland, among the most repulsive people in Canadian politics, had this to say.
	Let me put on pause and bring this up here.
	Krista Freeland finally told the truth, and wouldn't you know it, it was by accident.
	We're going to get a bunch of random subject matter, and then we're going to get to the legal stuffs of the day.
	Here, listen to this.
	This is a classic.
	You want to scratch your eardrums out with nails to make her voice end.
	But why won't you follow his example and actually take the jackboots off the necks of Canadians?
	I must say that that language is entirely inappropriate when we're talking about a democracy.
	Well, that language is entirely inappropriate when we're talking about a democracy.
	I must say, cover your ears, children.
	That language is inappropriate.
	Go fuck yourself, Christy Freeland.
	Whatever you're, Christa Freeland.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	That's how you're going to dodge this?
	With what you did to Canada and to Canadians, I must say that language is entirely inappropriate.
	What do dictators do?
	They lock people up indefinitely.
	They freeze assets.
	They confine people to their homes.
	They medically experiment on them.
	They impose mercy killings on them.
	That's what actual jackboot dictators do.
	I must say, I find it very insulting to be told what I am by you.
	But by the way, listen to her accidentally telling the truth.
	I must say that that language is entirely inappropriate when we're talking about a democracy.
	I began by talking about Prime Minister Mulroney.
	And the exceptional courage he showed in recognizing Ukrainian independence.
	There are people in the world right now who do have real dictatorships oppressing them, like the people of Ukraine.
	Oops, I'm sorry.
	Was that an accidental dig at Zelensky?
	There are people who have actual dictators oppressing them.
	Real dictatorships oppressing them like the people of Ukraine.
	And to use that language, talking about a government policy you disagree with is entirely inappropriate and cheapens our discourse and our democracy.
	Go to hell.
	Go to hell, Chrystia Freeland.
	The best thing I told her.
	Hold on.
	It's entirely inappropriate.
	I don't want to deal with the substance of it.
	So I'm just going to say it's inappropriate and shame you.
	Go F yourself.
	Petty tyrant.
	Support Nazi regimes, squander Canadian tax dollars, literally to kill Canadians, and literally to save money to the system that can't take care of the Canadians as it is.
	How Canada has become a world leader in euthanasia.
	Shipping billions of dollars to Ukraine.
	Hugging a man who gave a standing ovation to an actual Nazi.
	Zelensky can't pretend not to know who Hanka was.
	He can't pretend not to know who was fighting the Soviets in World War II.
	Oh, look at her.
	Go to Ukraine, Chrystia Freeland, and stay there if that is where your priorities lie.
	I mean, it's the abject destruction of Canada.
	And then they claim not to be tyrants while acting like tyrants.
	Maybe not as bad as other regimes.
	Maybe not as bad as North Korea.
	Maybe not as bad as the People's Republic of China.
	Maybe not as bad.
	Maybe not quite the same distance.
	But my lordy, is it the same direction?
	And my lordy, is it going in the same direction in America as well?
	When you get government officials who can, with no due process or with totally corrupt due process, which is no due process at all, freeze assets, nationalize assets, lock you in your homes, force you to ingest things into your body, human experimentation and euthanasia...
	Those were the trademarks of what regime historically?
	I can give you one name and it rhymes with Schmittler.
	Oh, but they're not quite as bad.
	You know, they didn't kill 12 million people.
	They didn't go after Jews, gypsies, blacks, gays, and the handicapped.
	They went after all Canadians who refused to ingest themselves with something.
	And then the ones that got injured from what they forced them to take.
	Ignore them.
	Offer them death.
	Mercy killings.
	Oh.
	Okay, well, we started off with beautiful manatees, and now we're dealing with actual animals.
	So, that's it.
	But now, speaking of corrupt kangaroo courts seizing assets, corrupt due process is no due process at all.
	Okay, Ginger Ninja, we're going to talk about it.
	Do I have it as a backdrop here?
	Judge Scott McAfee, I put out a video yesterday.
	We might get Phil Holloway on, who, if you don't follow him on Twitter, and he's got a new channel, Inside the Law with Phil Holloway.
	Definitely worth a follow.
	Scott McAfee came down with that decision.
	It is currently being appealed, and he has issued the certificate of immediate review of his own decision so that it goes straight to the Court of Appeal, and the Georgia Court of Appeals now gets to decide whether or not to take it up.
	That's the video I put out yesterday.
	I won't summarize everything except to summarize that much.
	There are various ways.
	I say, like, I'm not susceptible of corruption.
	I say that, and I believe it, and it's the truth.
	That's not to say that everybody is not susceptible of intimidation.
	There's corruption, there's intimidation.
	These are two coercive ways of getting either compliance or silencing individuals.
	I don't think I'm courageous, but I think I'm stubborn and loud.
	That's not to say that I'm not susceptible of intimidation.
	Do this or we'll do that.
	Well, I wouldn't come out and lie, but there are ways to get people to shut up.
	Whether or not Scott McAfee was corrupt in that he did that on purpose or he might have been intimidated.
	He might have been judicially intimidated.
	He might have been actually just outright intimidated.
	He might know how things work in Fulton County.
	He couldn't do it.
	But then what could he do is issue a ruling that is so damning.
	The odor of mendacity.
	As he mentioned in his ruling, and do everything to set up a disqualification, but doing the disqualification himself.
	Set up a fact pattern that a Georgia Court of Appeals will say, yeah, you got it wrong, Scott.
	Shame on you.
	But he set it up so that they could have the layup.
	Odor of mendacity comes from his judgment.
	An odor of mendacity is quite literally the appearance of conflict, which he said is sufficient.
	He says, oh, look, it's...
	Appearance of conflict is sufficient to warrant disqualification, but it's a spectrum.
	And I don't have enough guidance to actually go to the full end of the spectrum to disqualify Fannie Wills.
	Was he threatened?
	Was he trying to secure political success in the future?
	I don't think so.
	Was he trying to secure integrity with a corrupt DA's office?
	I don't think so.
	So whether or not he was a coward or intimidated or threatened or whatever, he came to the wrong decision in law, but he set up the right fact pattern.
	And they filed their, that is say, Trump and the other defendants filed a motion for immediate review.
	Scott McAfee issued the certificate of And now we're going to see what the Georgia Court of Appeal has to say.
	So, Scott, I'm not blackpilled.
	I'm still optimistic, but I've realized now what the optimist is, is however bad it gets, he'll say, well, it's got to get better at some point.
	So I appreciate that.
	But we can call him a coward, and I think he is a judicial coward.
	But we don't know what the level of intimidation was, or maybe he's just not that smart.
	The thing is this, if he were truly a coward who was never going to disqualify Fannie Willis, I don't think he drafts the decision the way he drafted it.
	You don't say things like legally improper, odor of mendacity.
	Those are conclusions of fact that are damning.
	So damning that I don't see how a court of appeal is going to come to any other conclusion that Scott McAfee himself should have come to.
	So there's that.
	Let me see here.
	I'm just going back to the chat to make sure everything here.
	Trump 2024 says not even...
	Oh, where's my...
	I gotta make America great again Hat from somebody yesterday DeSundin says put the stupid fanny doctrine Into Georgia law It never should have gotten to this place Most people are cowards these days Weak men create hard times Says Trudeau is retarded That's true.
	Trudeau is retarded.
	Sorry.
	That's your handle.
	I'm just reading the handle.
	That being said, it is also very easy for, you know...
	Behind the comfort of your anonymity on the interwebs, typing away to judge those who have put their faces, necks, and livelihoods on the line?
	You know, Scott McAfee, some could say that that ruling itself is sufficiently damning that Scott has exposed himself if there were that level of corruption.
	I think that's the case.
	But we're talking law here, so I think he set it up so that the Georgia Court of Appeals can come in and do the right thing.
	But we'll see.
	With that said, everybody, let me see, go to the chat in YouTube.
	Joe Scope says, I'm just going to read this.
	Viva Frye, is there a way a normal person without a specialized career can move to Florida to live and work?
	I have no idea where to start.
	Otherwise, I'm happy.
	Okay, Joe, don't make jokes like that, Scope.
	He says, otherwise, I'm applying for a maid.
	Don't make jokes like that.
	I put out a video.
	It was an interview with my immigration attorney.
	My problem, actually.
	Jeez Louise.
	I'm having an absolute brain fart.
	I'm having a total brain fight.
	I can't remember her name.
	That's terrible.
	Oh, for goodness sake.
	Dorothy McCann, for God's sake.
	I had Dorothy McCann, my immigration lawyer, come on and explain the options.
	So look for that video.
	It's still out there.
	All right, what we're going to do now, we're going to end it on YouTube.
	Let me see who's on YouTube.
	3,000?
	Come on over to Rumble because we're going to get into the good Fannie Willis stuff.
	There's a lot of stuff in the Fannie Willis.
	There was an article in the New York Post about Fannie Willis' dealing with an Irish society, a charity, blocking the sale of a property that was overvalued, that infringed on a lender's ability to recoup his loan.
	We're going to talk about the appeal there.
	We're going to talk about Fannie Willis being just the most corrupt person in politics these days.
	Idaho Ranch Girl, five bucks, says, I have to go chase this herd of a hundred elk out of my west field, and in case they kill me instead, consider this your inheritance, mon petit au jus.
	Idaho Ranch Girl, go have fun chasing the elk.
	Try to get one of them to put a GoPro on one of their antlers and let them go run wild.
	You'll capture some beautiful video that you can probably sell to GoPro.
	So, okay, while everyone migrates.
	But before everyone migrates, holy crab apples, am I an idiot?
	You notice this stream said contains a paid promotion.
	I'm going to do this right now and I'm going to use this rack, this wonderful thing that Rumble has created for creators.
	And I say it's an amazing thing.
	It's easy for me.
	I pick the product I want to work with because it's one that I drink every morning.
	Since I have discovered it, 1775 Coffee.
	Attention all coffee lovers, are you tired of the same old cup of joe?
	Say goodbye to bland and ordinary and say hello to an extraordinary coffee experience with 1775 Coffee Company.
	It's the year before 1776, people.
	And I'm telling you, look, it's strong coffee.
	I'd say it would put hair on your chest, but if anyone's ever seen me, you've seen me with my top up.
	I got no hair on my chest.
	In fact, I'm rather hairless.
	Don't know if that's a good thing or a bad thing.
	It's good, bold, strong coffee.
	And not in the way...
	Not burnt like Starbucks.
	Rich, robust, and delicious.
	I can ask Marion to bring in the bag.
	We drink it every morning and it's delicious.
	Picture this.
	A cup of freshly roasted coffee crafted with care and passion.
	That's what you get with 1775 coffee.
	Every sip is like a journey through time.
	I can't say I've had the temporal hallucinations while drinking it, but it's damn good.
	When our forefathers brewed coffee to fuel their revolutionary spirit, that's why it's called 1775, people.
	Whether you're starting your day or taking a well-deserved break, let 1775 Coffee be your companion.
	Here's the best part.
	By supporting 1775, you're not just getting great coffee.
	You're supporting a company that gives back to the community, honoring the spirit of service and sacrifice.
	They've partnered with Rumble.
	It's a delicious coffee.
	The link, oh yeah, we see it right there.
	Booyah!
	And the link should be in the description if they've integrated this properly.
	And it's a wonderful coffee.
	Everybody drinks coffee.
	Who doesn't drink coffee?
	Unless you drink decaf, in which case, what the hell are you drinking coffee for?
	Drinking decaf coffee is like drinking de-alcoholized beer.
	I guess it's good, you know, when...
	I don't know if I was going to make a joke, but 1775, delicious coffee, wonderful to work with them, and it's wonderful that they've teamed up with Rumble.
	Bada bing, bada boom.
	Now what we do...
	Is we go and we migrate with our bottoms and our eyes over to the YouTubes.
	To the rumbles!
	Get away from YouTube!
	We're ending it on YouTube.
	So I go here, and we're going to get into the fan.
	Oh, hold on, hold on.
	While you do that, I'll just share one thing that'll make you puke.
	Not this one.
	We've already puked enough there.
	It's a great meme.
	It's a great meme.
	And it perfectly exemplifies politics and corruption.
	That's Fannie Willis on the top and on the bottom.
	I've verified this as best I could.
	Trump's comments were offensive.
	They were baseless.
	Isn't it funny how they always immediately go to, I find that offensive.
	Well, if I find it offensive, then I don't have to deal with it.
	Wrong.
	I was going to say something wrong.
	I don't give a shit if you find it offensive.
	You could be as offended as you want.
	Answer the substance of it.
	I don't have to.
	It's offensive.
	How dare you use that language?
	Jackboots.
	Trump's comments were offensive.
	They were baseless.
	They were void of any facts and or any evidence.
	What they were were comments that unfortunately fomented violence.
	Comments that I would describe as race baiting.
	Comments unfortunately that appeals to the bottom of our humanity.
	To stand up to an administration which is too male, too pale, and too stale.
	I hate her.
	I hate her.
	Too male, too pale, and too stale.
	Pay it again, Craig.
	Too male, too pale, and too stale.
	Trump's comments were offensive.
	They were baseless.
	Intended to incite violence.
	What do you see here?
	Comments that unfortunately fomented violence.
	Comments that I would describe as race baiting.
	Comments unfortunately appeals to the bottom of our humanity.
	Now go get those people who are too male, too pale, and too stale.
	Get them.
	Out of office.
	I don't know.
	Whatever you have to do.
	That's who we're dealing with right now.
	Leticia James.
	All right, we've done good.
	Everyone has now gotten off of YouTube, or at least a lot.
	There's still 2,700 people on YouTube.
	Get on over to Rumble, or come to Locals, actually.
	That's the other best alternative.
	In fact, it's probably the best alternative.
	Here, hold on.
	Link to Locals, and then we're ending it there.
	Link to Locals.
	Boom.
	Too male?
	Too pale?
	Can you imagine saying something like that in the reverse sense?
	I can't, I already have the rhyming one, but I can't say it because I, anybody who talks like that about anybody except for white males is racist, anti-Semitic, homophobic, transphobic, misogynist, Islamophobic, what's the, indigenophobic, anybody, you use that phraseology with any other race, religion, ethnicity, creed, gender, or whatever the heck you want to call it.
	You're a bigot who's getting cancelled, but if you're Leticia James, you get elected.
	Alright, that's it.
	We're really ending it on YouTube.
	Rumble and locals only.
	As of now.
	Bada bing, bada boom.
	All right.
	All right.
	Speaking of Leticia James, let's do the minor scandal before we get into the New York stuff.
	You've seen this.
	I'm going to do a shorter vlog on this later tonight if it does not result in getting in trouble with the missus.
	I am going to actually have the journalist on as well who broke the story, who wrote this article from the New York Post, Miranda Devine.
	It's not a bombshell.
	It's not like...
	I consider Meg the journalist who found the expenses that Leticia James paid herself, living off the slush fund of her election campaign.
	I consider that to be...
	You know, an investigatable offense, potentially even unlawful.
	This just highlights the political persecution, the hypocrisy, the rules for thee but not for me aspect of what Leticia James is doing.
	We can skip over a lot of this because a lot of it is detail.
	The bottom line in this particular case, there's a building in New York called the American Irish Historical Society.
	It's a charity.
	They own a building.
	Which has been in the Irish community for a very long time.
	They have run into financial problems.
	Okay, so over the years, the financial mismanagement and the misfortune had befallen the society.
	It was facing foreclosure.
	So this guy, Doyle, a Doyle who clearly is Irish, I presume based on Doyle.
	Oh, Doyle rules!
	Loans the charity $3 million.
	Based on the alleged value of their building, the Historical Society building.
	He doesn't get repaid.
	He lends them $3 million so they can continue operating.
	They don't have to sell the building.
	And he's told it's worth $80 million.
	If it ever sells, you'll get your money back, guaranteed.
	$80 million, you only loaned us $3 million.
	They tell him it's worth $80 million because of...
	Error rights.
	You know, the rights above a building in New York City can be worth a substantial amount of money.
	In this case, it seems to not be the case.
	Society had been dominated for a half-century by the Cahill family.
	Okay, so we don't need to go into this.
	Cahill, who's a...
	There's a lot of stuff that's...
	In 2019, his son, Christopher, got embroiled in an ugly confrontation with the director of the Irish...
	Okay, I don't think there's...
	Yeah, these are the details of the philosophy.
	Society's financial woes and dysfunction had reached a crisis point by 2021 when Cahill tried to sell the building for $52 million, later reduced to $44 million.
	He died the following year.
	They didn't get to sell.
	They were trying to sell it.
	Leticia James allegedly gets a petition of 40,000 signatures that says...
	You can't let them sell this historic building.
	It's a charity.
	And because it's a charity, the Office of the Attorney General gets to approve or interfere with or prevent the sale of a historical building.
	Listen to this.
	She announced that by state law, any sale of a non-profit asset had to be approved by her.
	This is Leticia James effectively kiboshing the plan.
	It's an amazing place, James gushed to the Irish voice.
	We have to save it.
	Had to save it.
	One day people can come in there and enjoy it again.
	It's all very well, but the Doyle, who loaned the $3 million, said, I want my money!
	The Attorney General appointed the Interim Board of Directors, and Doyle was persuaded not to try to collect his money before he secured it with a mortgage by 2023.
	August 2023, he still hasn't been paid.
	He initiates foreclosure proceedings.
	Ironically enough, kind of what Leticia James is going to try to do to Trump's assets, allegedly, if she follows through on executing the judgment pending the appeal.
	There's analogies in terms of the Process the loans, except in this case, there seems to have actually been fraud, fraudulent inducement, fraudulent overvaluation of assets, and an actual victim of the fraud, the dude who loaned 3 million bucks to the society based on a valuation of 80 million bucks, when it's actually only worth 40 million, still more than enough to cover his 3 million.
	So the guy who loaned the 3 million bucks says, I want my money back, sell your asset, pay me my 3 million, and I'll be gone.
	He was promptly blocked by the attorney general who claimed the mortgage was invalid because he was a board member.
	So they're actually defrauding the victim of the fraud here by saying, no, no, no.
	I know you loaned $3 million.
	You secured it with a lien on the property.
	But it was an invalid mortgage.
	It's an invalid loan because you were a board member.
	You didn't have the right to do it.
	So Doyle launched a lawsuit against the Society and requested a subpoena be issued against James, requiring her to produce a raft of documents, including anything relating to the company events, yada, yada.
	Whether or not she has any other ties to this, I don't know.
	The depths of the corruption is truly impossible to underestimate.
	Any events she held there?
	Contributions to her political campaigns from the Society or any of its members?
	It's interesting.
	If the guy's asking for this, I presume he has an inkling of idea, especially if he was on the board.
	Doyle's lawyer, Tim Parlatore, alleged that James'enthusiastic involvement in the Doyle case may be driven by connections with the defendant.
	Yeah.
	Key points of the uncanny similarities between this and the Trump case.
	We'll get there.
	The lawsuit alleges that Doyle was given, quote, fraudulently inflated valuations of the townhouse, putting its market value at over a million bucks.
	Cahill and the society's current president general, James Normale, made representatives to Doyle that the building had air rights and could be built or rebuilt higher than its current height.
	In reality, there were no such air rights The actual value is closer to $20 million.
	It's still more than enough to pay him back if he ever gets to sell the building, foreclose, and force the judicial sale so he can collect.
	But Leticia James comes in because, you know, she wants to be a savior and save this historic building.
	She didn't give a crap about this guy who loaned an actual $3 million based on an actual alleged fraudulent overvaluation.
	Tish James said nobody's above the law, which should include Tish James, who seems to have actively aided and abetted in the art of the steal, the lawyer said to The Post.
	And then we get into the Trump case.
	So it's interesting.
	I mean, the corruption that it could ultimately show, I'll give everybody the link to the article.
	I've been in touch with Miranda Devine, so I think she's going to come on sooner than later.
	But she's going to come on, hopefully.
	Link to article.
	It doesn't show what I think is actual Leticia fraud at this stage.
	If they're subpoenaing, subpoenaing Leticia James on the basis of...
	Did she take any donations from this?
	Does she have any connections to it?
	I presume that they probably know.
	At least Doyle probably knows, especially if he's been on the board.
	But this doesn't evidence fraudulent behavior by Leticia James as much in my humble and very, take it with a grain of salt, former Canadian Quebec litigator.
	Leticia James using her election campaign as a slush fund, as Meg, the journalist, detailed when I had her on, That, to me, is, you know, pursuable offenses.
	This, there might be something in there, but for now, it just shows that she is a corrupt hack.
	It's all politics, and it has nothing to do with principle or justice.
	In this Irish case, you have a financially distressed entity that happens to be a charity soliciting through fraudulent means a loan from that guy, Doyle, on the basis that the property's...
	Fraudulently overvalued.
	When he comes in and says, I gave you $3 million based on these warranties and representations.
	Here we have actual fraud.
	We have an actual victim.
	We have an actual, I would not have done this had I known.
	The exact opposite on all three fronts from the Trump case where she went balls to the wall, hard on the paint against Trump, even though there was no victim, there was no fraud, and no one was saying I wouldn't have done it had I known.
	They said I would have done it again had I known.
	She's coming and saying, no, I'm going to prevent the sale of the building because it's virtue signaling.
	There might be some historical purpose to it.
	I understand that.
	I presume if the building is a historical building, whether or not it operates as the Irish...
	What was it?
	The Irish A. The American Irish Historical Society.
	Whether it operates as that, the building itself is going to remain intact.
	They probably will not be able to modify the exterior.
	They probably have to...
	There'll probably be a lot of encumbrances on that property in terms of preserving it.
	But you've got actual fraud.
	You've got actual deceitful overvaluations of property, and then you get Tish James coming and saying, it'll make me a lot more popular if I oppose the sale of this and actually allow the justice to run its course.
	So that's the...
	I think it's a non-scandal, personally, but it does illustrate exactly who we're dealing with.
	A fundamentally grotesquely corrupt political hack who was campaigning on and elected on persecuting, prosecuting, and ousting Trump from office.
	Now, getting to the Trump side of things, it's freaking wild.
	You heard the catchphrase of the day last week.
	Oh, I'm sitting on a flipping pillow.
	If you saw what I was sitting on.
	Yes, it's not to give me extra hype, people.
	It's to give me extra cushion.
	The catchphrase of earlier this week was, Trump doesn't have the cash.
	He's bankrupt.
	It's a practical impossibility for him to raise, to post the bond.
	Because the amazingly wild thing is, Bond companies don't typically post more than a $100 million bond.
	In this case, the ridiculous kangaroo court award is for $455 million, $358 million plus $90 some odd million in interest.
	The bond company was requiring the bond to be secured with, I think it was actually a billion dollars in cash.
	They say, look, we're not in the real estate business.
	If we post a bond, we're going to require more cash than the award itself would require.
	So it's like, A, impossible, and B, impractical.
	See, my voice is cracking like I'm going through puberty again.
	But the catchphrase of the week was practical impossibility.
	Trump is broke.
	He's bankrupt.
	I won't put anyone on blast, but people were stupidly celebrating in that, as though it's true, which it's not, and as though if it were true, it would be something to celebrate.
	Is this the actual defendant's joint motion for a certificate?
	That is not the right legal document.
	Viva, get your producer to get things in order, I say.
	Where is Attorney General?
	No, that's not it.
	Motion for joint McAfee's certificate.
	That's the certificate.
	I had the...
	Oh, cripe.
	I had the motion for appeal anyhow.
	The practical impossibility statement was taken from the award, the motion for permission to stay.
	The motion to stay execution of the judgment pending appeal.
	Hold on.
	Trump motion.
	Oh, no.
	I'm going to go with Trump New York appeal PDF.
	I know I had it earlier.
	Courthouse news.
	Is this it?
	Yeah, this is it.
	Okay, here, hold on one second.
	I don't know why I didn't have that before.
	Oh, because I do have it.
	I just didn't understand what I was looking at.
	Here it is.
	This is the reply memorandum of law further support of a stay pending appeal pursuant to...
	What am I going to go with?
	Criminal procedure laws?
	I don't know what CPLR stands for.
	It's practice, whatever.
	It's not criminal law.
	That's the whole thing.
	Trump is asking for a stay of the...
	The order pending appeal.
	Why?
	Because he'll suffer irreparable harm if they do not stay execution of the order.
	And an appeal court says, yeah, Letitia James is a corrupt hack.
	Nipple Judge Engeron, who's been overturned now four or five times by the Court of Appeal, is overturned yet again.
	But my goodness, they sold the building to a third party who doesn't necessarily have to sell it back to Trump.
	And so they'll give him money, but money can't compensate for the damage necessarily.
	So the practical impossibility...
	Was an argument raised in the motion to stay the execution pending appeal?
	And it's just the most logical, obvious argument.
	I'm not going to read through the whole thing.
	Introduction and summary of argument.
	The court should stay execution of the Supreme Court's decision and order after a non-jury trial on February, yada, yada.
	The Attorney General's leading argument that this court lacks authority to waive or reduce appellate bond.
	Requirements under any circumstances contradicts the plain language of the rules of procedure, whatever they are.
	This court's inherent authority and a host of New York cases, it's very, for anybody who's practiced law, and look, again, I was a civil litigator in Quebec no longer.
	Everybody knows the courts have the inherent authority pretty much to do whatever they deem necessary under any circumstances.
	If there's no provision of law, if there's no provision of procedure, You can invoke the court's inherent authority to issue justice.
	I presume it's roughly the same in New York.
	To say that they don't have the authority to stay their order is the most idiotic, baseless, and judicially unsound argument potential to raise.
	They always have the requisite authority to make sure an injustice does not occur.
	They can't break the law if there's a specific provision.
	I would dare say, under some circumstances, the court can say, I know what the law is, but I know what is required for equity.
	So it's a bullshit argument that they've been raising.
	Oh, you can't stay the award.
	You issued the award.
	You have to execute.
	There's no inherent power to stay a $500 million unprecedented court order while it's being appealed on very good grounds.
	Oh.
	Okay, they clearly gives the court discretion with respect to such automatic stays and allows it to stay all proceedings to enforce a judgment or order appealed from, in a case not provided for under section whatever.
	In deciding whether to enter the stay, the court may consider any relevant factor, including the presumptive merits of the appeal and exigency of hardships or hardship confronting any party.
	Here, defendants' ongoing diligent efforts have proven that a bond in the judgment's full amount is a practical impossibility.
	Oh, he's bankrupt!
	That's what we should take away.
	That's the headline.
	The judgment is bullshit.
	Through and through.
	From what they allege in here, the judge made basic...
	Commercial errors.
	Counting income twice.
	Not distinguishing between gross proceeds and net proceeds.
	I mean, who would have expected anything less from an idiot judge that does not practice in the commercial division, whose claim to fame is showing his tits to his alumni and boasting about the negative rulings that he's issued against Eric Trump.
	So they say, look, we have amazing law.
	Arguments as to why this award is bullcrap.
	And executing it or not staying execution will cause irreparable harm because it's a practical impossibility.
	I don't know that there's ever been a case like this post a $500 million bond pending appeal.
	Okay, then we get these.
	The diligence efforts have included approaching about 30, 30 companies, four separate brokers.
	And they all said the same thing.
	Here we go.
	A bond requirement of this enormous magnitude effectively requiring cash reserves approaching a billion dollars.
	Is unprecedented for a private company, even when it comes to publicly traded companies, courts routinely waive or reduce the bond amount, enforcing an impossible bond requirement as a condition of appeal would inflict manifest irreparable injury on defendants and, quote, defeat or impair this court's appellate jurisdiction.
	Hey, dude, you can appeal.
	As Judge Nipple Aguron said in his email, you know, denying...
	What did he deny?
	I think he was being requested to review his own decision.
	He's like, I'm sure the Court of Appeal will bring you justice.
	Yeah, if you can get there, they know damn well what they're doing.
	It's not an accident.
	It's not like an oversight.
	It's the purpose.
	The manifold errors in the judgment warrant a further stay.
	Among other errors, Supreme Court disrespectfully disregarded the court's previous rulings in this case that the statute of limitation applies.
	And, quote, the continuing wrong doctrine does not delay or extend these periods.
	Moreover, Supreme Court ridiculously valued Mar-a-Lago at anywhere between 18 and 27.6 million, underestimating the value by 50 to 100 times.
	Supreme Court imposed a massive disgorgement award in the absence of any evidence that the alleged misrepresentations caused the supposedly ill-gotten proceeds.
	Compare that to the Irish case.
	The fraudulent warranties in the Irish case got the $3 million loan from the guy that got duped into it, Doyle.
	In this case, nothing.
	Trump was a whale.
	Everyone would have done business with him.
	Everybody was repaid in full.
	Everybody was happy to have done it.
	And then we'll get into this.
	Supreme Court double, triple counted damages, committed elementary errors in the process, such as conflating the proceeds of the sale with the profits from that sale.
	Such basic mistakes would have been prevented if this case had been allowed to be adjudicated in the commercial division where it belonged.
	And it goes on.
	Oh, yeah.
	The discouragement of the discourse is unconstitutional.
	I think it's quite clear that the Trump team has been watching Viva Barnes Law on Sunday nights.
	People are like, there's nothing unconstitutional.
	It's not an excessive fine.
	It's a judgment from other courts, so it can't be unconstitutional.
	Morons!
	It is grossly disproportional in violation of the excessive fines claim of the United States Constitution and parallel clause of the New York Constitution, as well as basic principles of due process and selective prosecution.
	Because the judgment is unconstitutionally excessive, the bond requirement violates the Eighth Amendment as well!
	Because it imposes an irrational punitive sanction in a case in which there was no victim, no fraud, no crime, no nothing.
	But Leticia James campaigned off taking Trump down.
	And when her theory of the case of foreign money laundering because domestic banks wouldn't lend him money, when that failed, well, then she had to pivot a little bit.
	And now it's, show me the man, I'll find you the fraud.
	Let me give everybody the link to that.
	So that's the appeal.
	Oh, link.
	To a motion for a stay.
	But because all they do is lie, the highlight was not the strengths of that request.
	The highlights were not the idiocy of that judgment.
	The highlight was that people think Trump is somehow insolvent.
	Imagine they just came down.
	New York nipple judge Engron came down and said, no, 500 million.
	A trillion.
	It's a trillion.
	I mean, what did they give to Alex Jones?
	They awarded...
	1.2 billion or 1.6 billion?
	That's half as much as the reparations that they were asking for, the Armenians were asking for, for the Armenian genocide.
	I'm not joking, by the way.
	I have to find the article.
	Armenian genocide, I don't know, say victims or advocate groups, were asking for $3 billion in compensation for the Armenian genocide reparations.
	Alex Jones got ordered to pay 1.2 billion.
	80 million or some odd, 60 to 90 million to the FBI agent who had no family get killed in that incident.
	It was 60, 80, or 90 million to that FBI agent because people made fun of him afterwards and called him all sorts of names, not even Alex Jones.
	So what if Nipple Judge Engeron came in and said, now 500 million is not going to teach him a lesson.
	That's not enough discourse.
	A billion.
	Oh, does Trump become insolvent because you have an absolutely idiotic, unconstitutional, unlawful...
	Totally politically compromised judge and prosecutor that ordered him to pay a billion.
	He's insolvent.
	Post the bond Trump, a billion.
	A trillion.
	A gazillion.
	So, the fact that you have an outrageous award does not make Trump insolvent by any means.
	It makes the system absolutely broken and any idiots celebrating this corrupt, dumb, or communist.
	And maybe a little bit of all three.
	So that was the motion.
	Now, when they say...
	Remember when Letitia James came out and said, Hey, no, it's about the law.
	No one is as rich as they...
	Trump is...
	You are not as rich as you think you are.
	Because we're a bunch of filthy, corrupt commies who can come in and say, I like what you have.
	I want what you have.
	I will take what you have.
	I mean, it's been done throughout history.
	Public lynchings like this have been done throughout history.
	They've been racially motivated.
	Religiously motivated?
	Ethnically motivated?
	And you get court systems that say, yeah, oh, he probably did commit that crime.
	We better lock him up.
	We better take his shit, too.
	Hey, Trump, I like 40. What is it called?
	40 Rock?
	It's not 40, whatever.
	I like that building, Trump.
	Be ashamed if someone took it from you.
	I mean, I did campaign off of it.
	She promised that she would, she said that she would enforce the judgment.
	No one is above the law.
	It looks like they've taken the first step towards it.
	Now, I don't want people to panic because it is the first procedural clerical step towards executing a judgment.
	You remember that guy there?
	He secured his $3 million loan with a mortgage?
	Well, you can secure or at least prevent the sale of a property by registering a lien against it and in some jurisdictions, from what I understand.
	Filing a judgment, registering a judgment against the property is effectively placing a lien on the property where anybody who's going to buy it is like, oh, I like Trump's property up in Westchester, New York.
	I want to buy it.
	Oh, shit, look at that.
	The government's owed $500 million.
	So if I buy it, I have to pay them first.
	You can't sell it if it's got a judgment lien against it.
	And it looks like that's what Leticia James has done.
	This is from March 23rd.
	That's today.
	David McKay Wilson.
	That's him.
	Let me see who he is.
	He's a journalist.
	David McKay Wilson.
	Hold on.
	We want to give everybody credit when they go like this.
	David McKay Wilson has written on Hudson Valley public issues since his arrival to cover White Plains City Hall for the reporter dispatch.
	Since then, he has had numerous assignments, City Hall and Yonkers and New Rochelle, county government in Westchester and Putnam, the statehouse and regional education reporter.
	He has written...
	The Tax Watch column, since 2012, Wilson is a recreation enthusiast with interests in alpine and cross-country skiing, hiking, and swing dance.
	He had me right up until the swing dance.
	Now I'm totally suspicious of this guy.
	Bada bing, bada bing, I'm joking.
	Okay.
	Attorney General James files judgment in Westchester, placing liens on Trump properties in fraud action.
	It's the first step.
	She's not seizing them yet.
	She's basically making sure that Trump can't sell his properties and abscond with the cash.
	Look at this flipping building.
	It's glorious.
	People who have never built anything of value in their lives have no problem stealing from others.
	What Leticia James and New York Nipple Judge Angeron are doing is theft.
	Legally, judicially, I don't believe it's legally sound or judicially sound, but it's lawful lawfare theft.
	As Donald Trump eyes a Monday deadline to post an appeal bond in his civil fraud case.
	State Attorney Leticia James has registered the judgment with the Westchester County Clerk, setting up the framework for James to seize Trump properties in Westchester, New York, if she decides to do so.
	Two of Trump's iconic properties, the Seven Springs Mansion Estate and Trump National Golf Course, are among James' possible targets.
	Let me talk about the buildings.
	Seven Springs, located in North Carolina, a 60-room mansion built by Washington Post publisher Eugene Meyer in the early 20th century.
	Trump National in Briarcliff Manor is one of his organization's myriad golf courses around the world.
	Its 18-hole course on the Hill was the focus of a high-profile protest over Trump's aggressive attempts to cut the tax value during his first run for president.
	Oh, we can get into that.
	James' action comes after Trump's embarks on his third campaign for the presidency while facing criminal indictments in four jurisdictions.
	We know all this crap.
	Does Trump have the cash or not?
	Meanwhile, Trump, the litigious Republican Party standard bearer in the 2024 presidential election, recently filed a defamation suit against ABC commentator George Stephanopoulos.
	Again, we talked about this too.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	And we go into the decision.
	They say Trump lacked the cash and wanted to cut the amount of the bond to $100 million.
	By the way, that's one of the remedies.
	Okay, whatever.
	So they get into this thing.
	Okay.
	She's registered the liens against the properties.
	What does that mean?
	It's the first procedural step in being able to seize under judicial authority and sell.
	And if she goes ahead and does it...
	The question is this.
	We know that she's corrupt enough to do it.
	We know that she's brazen enough to do it.
	The question is, is she stupid enough to do it?
	You go and you seize that property and you try to manage it?
	I mean, do you think Leticia James knows how to manage a property?
	They'll try to sell it.
	Sell it on a fire sale, judicial sale.
	Oh, someone's going to come in there and scoop that thing up.
	Hey, you think Leticia James wants to worry about managing a property?
	It's the same reason why the bond companies won't give bond for this.
	If there's a default or whatever, they don't want to have to worry about managing a property.
	They'll probably end up selling it.
	At a fire sale, they'll cut their losses and take $350 million, $300 million, whatever.
	Leticia Jays would take that, sell it at a grossly undervalued price, like a distressed sale, and she doesn't care.
	And even if Trump wins on appeal, well, he can't get the property back.
	I was thinking about this by the way.
	He can't get the property back unless Elon Musk buys it and then agrees to sell it back to Trump for whatever he bought it for off a fire sale.
	That's just a thought that I have.
	But it's corruption.
	I like what you've got.
	Give it to me.
	That's mine.
	So this is the first step towards that.
	Now, when Leticia James argues before Nipple Judge Engeron that they don't have the authority to stay, our hands are tied, people.
	We can't stay.
	We can't find alternative remedies to just ensure that you don't sell it, abscond, and move to Russia, Trump.
	There's nothing we can do.
	Our hands are tied.
	Sorry.
	Pay up or we seize it and sell it.
	And if we can't pay you back after we get reversed on appeal, well, sue us.
	We'll pay you back with taxpayer dollars.
	Even Jonathan Turley.
	And I don't say even Jonathan Turley because I don't expect anything from Jonathan Turley other than legit analysis.
	Jonathan Turley became the left's public enemy number one when he had the audacity of defending Trump in impeachment number one.
	Truly alarming, he says.
	Turley rips New York judge for refusing easy solution for Trump.
	What's the easy solution?
	Any number of things.
	I'm going to guess.
	An undertaking not to sell the property until the appeal?
	Easy enough.
	You've already registered your judgment against it.
	He's not going to be able to sell it anyhow.
	An undertaking not to sell it?
	And, I don't know, maybe ask him for $100 million.
	Maybe $200 million.
	Undertaking not to sell?
	A judicial prohibition?
	To not sell, as if he was going to sell that anyhow.
	And a cool $200 million, maybe $100 million, just to make sure that you don't abscond anyhow, whatever.
	A penalty.
	George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley on Friday criticized a judge for his treatment to foreign president Donald Trump.
	New York nipple judge Angeron issued his $450 million.
	Rather than requiring Trump to pay the full judgment for his appeal, Angeron could allow him to pay $100 million in cash and negotiate other terms, such as not selling it.
	To postpone.
	But the judge is neglecting to be reasonable.
	Turley asserted on Fox News.
	No shit!
	Because that's the intended outcome.
	And then he gets to hang his hat on that.
	Well, my hands are tied.
	My hands are tied on my nipples.
	If the judge was really concerned whether Trump would be honest in future dealings, they could just impose a monitor.
	What do we call it?
	A trustee.
	A property.
	What's the word?
	I think it's trustee, actually.
	A court-appointed trustee.
	Now, you could make it...
	Anyone who knows how to manage a property.
	Instead, he imposes this ridiculous amount of penalty on Trump.
	He could have picked any figure because none of us could make sense out of this.
	He could have said a trillion...
	It's really funny, actually, because I didn't read all the...
	I am happy to say that I'm on...
	Maybe Turley won't be happy if I say this, but I'm pleased with my own assessments.
	He could have said a trillion dollars, sit back and watch the defendant scramble to have to sell properties in order to protect properties.
	As you know, this is going to eventually have to come to some judge who is going to say enough.
	I mean, This really shocks the conscience.
	Democrat attorney Leticia James.
	Okay, we know the rest.
	What's happening to the New York legal system is truly alarming.
	This was one of the premier systems in the world for business, and now people are fleeing New York.
	That's what's happening here.
	Commies ruin everything.
	But it's by design, because then when everybody leaves and they got this big, beautiful building that's going to be dilapidated, hey, you got a place for your illegal immigrants now, Leticia.
	And I do wonder if that's not the end goal of all of this.
	Forbes estimates his net worth would be $2.6 billion, mostly consisting of hard assets.
	Yeah, like a house, property, stuff that's not liquid.
	If he had $2.6 billion in cash, he wouldn't sit on it.
	He might be able to make 5% on that if he bought government bonds.
	But if you have $2.6 billion in cash and you're an entrepreneur and a businessman, you don't sit back and retire like Trump could have done and some are probably saying ought to have done.
	Oh, so that's it.
	Okay, so Turley agrees with me.
	I agree with Turley.
	I'm happy.
	I didn't actually know that he had the trillion-dollar analogy either, but it's fantastic.
	Here's a link to the article from The Daily Caller.
	So she looks like she...
	The question is going to be, is she stupid enough to do it?
	New York is a free-range prison, says Wittesauce.
	Commies have no future in MAGA country, says Whiskornalta.
	Here's a link to the article.
	But it's wild.
	I mean, it's just...
	There's no other way to describe it.
	Anybody who thinks that this is anything other than a grotesque injustice is in on it.
	Thinks it'll never happen to them.
	And I think...
	Do I dare say that that ends it on this?
	Leticia James McAfee?
	Okay.
	No, no.
	What is this?
	What is this?
	Oh, no.
	This is what we're going to talk about over at Locals when we have our Locals after party people.
	Just to whet the appetite.
	The situation in Russia is...
	I've gotten sufficiently cynical now, people.
	And I still don't think I'm cynical enough.
	Hold on one second.
	Do we have a new member?
	We have a new member.
	By the way, you'll notice on Rumble...
	Let me see something here.
	Bada bing, bada boom, king of biltong.
	I was just eating it this morning.
	We get back from spring break.
	We don't really have much food in the fridge.
	But I had the biltong in the fridge.
	And I wanted protein.
	This is not an ad, by the way, except in as much as Biltong is giving a super chat.
	A rumble rant.
	It's freaking delicious.
	It was 130 calories a serving.
	It's just pure protein.
	Oh, it's like good steak.
	King of Biltong.
	I will read your rumble rant begrudgingly.
	Good afternoon from Anton's Meat and Eat.
	Free shipping for your Biltong with code VIVA on BiltongUSA.com.
	Biltong, a perfect pairing for high protein, keto, and carnivore diets.
	If you're a vegetarian, it might not be for you.
	But if you're a vegetarian, follow me through on this logic.
	If all the cows eat are grass, how can they be anything more than grass?
	So if you eat a cow, you're eating...
	Effectively, what is nothing more than the product of grass, so it can't be anything other than vegetarian.
	That's my theory.
	Of course, I once floated a theory with a rabbi.
	Well, if all Christians are descendants of Jesus, does anybody need to convert to Judaism?
	Because technically, Jesus was a Jew and everybody's all descendants of the same religion.
	The rabbi was not convinced with that argument either, but that's why I don't do theology.
	Eric 4x4 says, Viva, every coffee I have ever tasted, even when others tell me it's good coffee, has tasted like battery acid.
	I have to put more stuff in the coffee than actual coffee, so I just drink tea.
	Well, if you don't like strong coffee and you like...
	I'm not going to be judgmental to Nescafe.
	If you like very dilute Tim Hortons coffee, then you might not like 1775.
	I'm trying to think of the coffee that I've had that was just...
	I find Starbucks coffee to be undrinkable, but I think it's because I just find it burnt.
	I make a fresh pot.
	But if you don't like strong coffee, Eric, 4x4, then it might not be for you.
	Then we got, I can't read red on black anymore.
	Stealer Susan is now a monthly supporter.
	People, if you've noticed, oh, don't do it, don't do it.
	If you've noticed that there's a link, if you want to support and go to Rumble, not Rumble, vivabarneslaw.locals.com, there's a link down there.
	You can go in 10 bucks a month, 100 bucks a year, best community on earth.
	But good to see a new supporter.
	Welcome.
	Viva the Chiron for your ad is too small to read clearly on TV.
	All right, I'm screen grabbing that.
	I'm going to send it to the team.
	And is it a hyperlink?
	That's the other question also.
	Is it a hyperlink?
	Let me see here.
	I'm just going to read some chat here.
	I live in Columbia now, brother.
	The coffee here is the cat's ass.
	Is that good, Mark J. Steele, the cat's ass?
	Or is the cat's ass bad, but the B's D is good?
	I'm not reading that whiskey horn also about Starbucks coffee, but I do not like their coffee.
	Starbucks purposely burns its coffee so that it tastes the same.
	I've got a good palate for reviewing coffee.
	We're going to save a topic exclusively for locals.
	Do you want to know what I think about Candace Owens and alleged anti-Semitism?
	Or do you want to know my conspiracy theory about what we're witnessing right now in Russia?
	Do I dare ask the chat for this?
	We're going to talk about...
	I'll talk about something that will get me in trouble.
	I'm joking.
	It won't because I can't get into trouble because all I do is speak my...
	What I believe is right.
	Candace Owens has left the Daily Wire.
	When did I get into trouble?
	Oh, the Daily Wire and the Steven Crowder thing.
	I said, I'm not a fan of...
	Recording conversations and then publishing them unless there's a damn good reason to.
	Then I got a little flack for that.
	Candace Owens has parted ways with the Daily Wire.
	I don't know under what terms because from what I understood, they couldn't fire her without having to buy her out.
	I don't know.
	I may or may not understand the terms of whatever agreement they had.
	That was my understanding.
	That they couldn't get rid of her without buying her out unless she quit.
	And I don't know what the terms of her agreement was.
	Whatever.
	How lucrative her contract was.
	None of my business.
	She is no longer with the Daily Wire and now the rumors are afloat.
	She's starting a locals community and I suggested it would be great if we kick off her locals campaign with an in-person interview.
	Either at the Miami locals office or I'll tough it out.
	I'll go to the Longboat Keys office of Rumble and we can do an in-person interview there.
	I've been looking for a good reason to go back.
	But I would love to have the interview because nobody's perfect and everybody can make the same accusations about others.
	Grifters, they've done bad things in the past.
	I say they can make those accusations of everybody except me because I'm a good boy.
	I've lived on the internet.
	I'm sort of tongue-in-cheek, but I've lived on the internet accidentally before I knew that I was ever going to be in this world.
	I've been on the internet since 2014.
	So it would be tough for people to find embarrassing stuff about me, find compromising stuff, live a pretty lame and tame life, but that's probably a good way to stay out of trouble.
	So I've heard some of the criticism about Candace Owens from back in the day.
	Yeah, I won't get into it.
	But the accusations of anti-Semitism now, and it seems that the accusations of anti-Semitism are a catch-all for disregarding For disregarding assessing someone's legitimate opinion.
	It might not be a correct opinion, but it might be their sincere, legitimate opinion.
	Now, hold on.
	Let me bring this up because I didn't bring it up.
	I didn't think I was going to get here because I hate talking religion.
	I hate talking this stuff because people are very much backed into their corners and are not interested in honestly assessing other people's diverging opinions.
	Here we go.
	I'll take this up here.
	Bada bing, bada boom.
	Can someone explain to me the most anti-Semitic post, anti-Semitic statement, allegedly, that Candace Owens has said?
	I ask.
	It's a sincere question.
	I understand what she thinks about what's going on in Israel Gaza right now.
	I understand that it's now become a litmus test.
	It's become black and white, cut and dry.
	No room for nuance because how can there be nuance with Hamas?
	There can't be nuance with Hamas.
	But there can be nuance in the broader geopolitical debate.
	Can someone share the most undeniable examples of real Candace O's anti-Semitic rhetoric?
	Apparently she said there's Jewish gangs that run Hollywood.
	Holy shit!
	If that's anti-Semitism, I might get in trouble.
	Statistical over-representation is not only something that one can take pride in when it's good.
	It's something that one has to address when they don't think it's good.
	And certainly you don't get to shield yourself from criticism by saying, how dare you say that?
	I find that offensive.
	There's statistical over-representation in Hollywood.
	Everybody knows it.
	It's a good thing when people want to praise Oscar winners, directors, etc., who happen to be Jewish.
	Now, whether or not there's Jewish gangs in Hollywood, would I find that hard to believe?
	Are they gangs?
	Of people who happen to be Jewish and gangs in a colloquial sense?
	Or is it like the Hebrew hammer type gang?
	If that's it, I'm not sure that I would call that anti-Semitism in any meaningful sense.
	And then I saw this thing here.
	Candace, I saw you start a local community.
	How about an inaugural interview with a minor local?
	If it's closer at Longboat Keys, I'll go there too.
	I'll tough it out.
	This was one of the most recent examples that the media runs with.
	Apparently she liked this tweet.
	Which says, Christ Gnosis, I have no idea what this is.
	It says February 20th, Rabbi, are you drunk on Christian blood again?
	Like any conspiracy theorist, Candace Owens has arrived at her inevitable destination.
	Oh, two names in there.
	Conspiracy theorist and the suggestion that she's anti-Semitic because she apparently hearted this tweet.
	As if hearting is an indication of approval.
	Or, what do they say, like retweets are not endorsements?
	I firmly have the belief that the heart is no longer, it's not a sign of endorsement.
	It might be, that was a funny joke, haha, but I wouldn't heart it myself.
	If she legit intentionally hearted it and then stuck with that heart, would I think it's anti-Semitic?
	Call me a very insensitive person.
	No, this reads more like stand-up.
	Comedy than legit antisemitism.
	But maybe I just have thicker skin and don't give a shit what people say on the internet.
	Maybe.
	Oh, but this translates into real-life violence.
	That's a little different.
	But we have laws against real-life violence, and I'm not really convinced.
	Like, if there's been antisemitism for thousands of years, you can't blame it on the internet.
	You can't blame real-life violence, the pogroms of the late 1800s that chased my grandmother and her family out of Russia.
	It was more her family because she was born here.
	You can't blame the internet for historical violence against Jews.
	And so if you say that this type of stuff leads to real-life violence and real-life anti-Semitism, well, then how do you account for the last thousands of years of real-life violence?
	So mean internet words, if it's...
	It says to me, are you drunk on Christian blood again?
	Apparently, Candace hearted the tweet.
	Now, from what I understand, her explanation was that she didn't read the full tweet, and maybe she saw, are you drunk?
	You know, maybe it's in here.
	She saw this.
	Are you drunk?
	And then, well, she had to go hearted, so she would have had to have seen the bottom part.
	Whatever.
	If she hearted it, would that be anti-Semitism?
	Would that be saying, that's funny, edgy humor that not for everybody?
	But apparently, her explanation was, she didn't read it.
	She unhearted it.
	Move on.
	If that's the best of it, and her criticizing Israel.
	So that's where I got into it with somebody on the interwebs.
	I'm just going to go Google my name and see if I've been cancelled.
	I'm joking.
	So then we have this.
	And I'm taking it as a sincere expression of idea.
	And I'll explain my sincere rebuttal to this theory.
	Here.
	Presentation.
	Share.
	I'm not trying to put anybody on blast.
	I asked the question and somebody answered it.
	What I presume was a sincere, thoughtful response.
	Sure, I can cover that.
	This is a response to my question.
	The worst types of anti-Semitism don't come in the form of someone making an I hate Jews type remark.
	The worst forms come as blood libels meant to pin society's ills on the Jews.
	The classic example is when Jews were accused of causing the bubonic plague or of baking their Passover meals with the blood of Christian children.
	If someone says, quote, Israel is committing genocide, end quote, that is a far more anti-Semitic statement than if someone were to say, I hate big-nosed kikes.
	The latter is just someone being an idiot, and they can be ignored while the former is actually dangerous slander that leads to pogroms.
	Regarding Candace, she's been doing a whole lot of the former lately.
	To be clear, I don't actually think she explicitly hates Jews.
	I think she's all childish, ego-driven temper tantrum for her.
	Her career is full of those.
	But in temper tantrum, she's promoting, she's propping up a whole lot of people who genuinely are the world's worst anti-Semites.
	People like Norman Finkelstein, the world's most notorious anti-Semite and self-hating Jew.
	There's a reason that all these groipers and Nazis have been praising Candace.
	Even Twitter's most notorious anti-Semite, Jackson Hinkle, Just praised her.
	The worst people in the world all see and support what she's doing, and she's not even pretending to this.
	This is where we've gotten into the guilt by association.
	How about if the support is trolling?
	Or how about the fact that bad people, without commenting on any of these names, bad people can still be convinced, can still like an argument.
	An argument can still be valid even if bad people like it.
	Let's phrase it that way.
	It speaks volumes to her character or lack thereof.
	I'm someone who actually agrees with her politics on most issues, but what she's doing lately is helping up prop a war against the Jews, has been utterly gross.
	Here's a quick recap of some of the things she's been doing, and it goes on.
	I said to that individual, if Israel is guilty of genocide is far worse anti-Semitism, then we've just changed the definition of anti-Semitism.
	People routinely criticize China.
	China is guilty of genocide.
	Turkey is guilty of having perpetrated a genocide against the Armenians.
	When you say China is guilty of genocide, is that anti-Chinese sentiment?
	We can't say that because there's a lot of Asian hate crime that we're noticing in America now.
	And if you say that China is committing genocide or that the COVID virus came out of a lab in Wuhan, China, well, that's going to promote anti-Asian hate crime in America, set aside the fact that...
	Those perpetrating anti-Asian hate crime, generally speaking, tend not to be the ones that you think they are.
	Let's just say that it's true.
	Let's just say that there is a causal connection.
	When you rightly point out that COVID originated in a lab in Wuhan, China, it might lead some nutbags to do stupid things.
	Does that mean that you can't say it?
	Because it leads to bad people doing bad things, does that mean you don't get to say it?
	Because there's a potential of that?
	Does that mean it's not true?
	Now, by the way, I do not believe that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, and this will get me into trouble as well.
	Do I believe that the response is exceedingly disproportionate and potentially extremely problematic in that you're going to entrust the government that was at the helm of the biggest security failure in the history of Israel to go and now be able to orchestrate and organize a proper response to it?
	Does it mean that I don't get to ask questions about how the most intelligent military with the most secure border on Earth, the most well-trained military, the most deeply trained intelligence could have had a lapse over such a prolonged period of time?
	No.
	Does it mean I can't ask that?
	So, if we agree that what happened in October, on October 7th, it was perpetrated by Hamas, it happened, it was terrorism.
	It was inexplicable intelligence failure at best and something much more sinister at worst.
	Do I then, is it anti-Semitic of me to say, well, I don't, why would I trust the government that just had the biggest intelligence failure in the world to wage the proper response to their own intelligence failure?
	So with that said, and now I kind of lost my train of thought.
	Oh.
	I do not believe that Israel is perpetrating genocide in the true sense of the term.
	I do believe that the response is giving a lot of fodder for a lot of people who say going overboard, heavy-handed, expanding, etc.
	Because I don't think you can ignore those arguments.
	Do I think that it's anti-Semitic to say that Israel is committing genocide?
	Well, no more than it's anti-Chinese to say that China is committing genocide.
	Do I think some people, and maybe a great many of the people who say it, are in fact anti-Semitic?
	Probably.
	But I don't get to divine intentions in order to abscond from dealing with the arguments.
	I can have the argument as to whether or not it constitutes genocide.
	Unfortunately, under the definition, the UN definition, by that definition, it might very well constitute genocide, but that definition includes linguistic, suppressing in whole or in part linguistic rights.
	In that case, you know, you might have an argument for genocide in Quebec.
	This is what happens when you broaden terms beyond any meaningful definition.
	But it's not because someone might be an anti-Semite and be anti-Semitically motivated in their theories, theses, and arguments that I get to say, you're a disgusting person.
	I no longer have to address that.
	So do I believe that Candace Owens is anti-Semitic?
	Norm Finkelstein?
	Who's the...
	Scott Horton?
	I think there might be some deep underlying prejudice that compromises their ability to think.
	But that doesn't mean that I don't have to, you know, that I get to protect myself from having to address the substance of their arguments.
	I don't think Candace Owens is anti-Semitic, period.
	But maybe I'm just an idiot.
	So that's that.
	I'll have to go back and watch this and make sure I didn't...
	I only say what I believe.
	I'm not fence-sitting here.
	I'm not deliberately walking in the middle of the highway getting hit by traffic on both sides, but I've got my questions.
	I've had them from day one.
	Hamas is a terrorist group, period.
	If there's any entity with genocidal intent, it's Hamas.
	The argument to that, the flip side argument to that, and I can steel-man both of these.
	Well, Hamas has genocidal intent, but they don't have genocidal capabilities, so they're not genocidal then.
	Israel allegedly, arguably, has genocidal intent, and they have genocidal capabilities.
	The obvious argument to that is then they've been doing a very bad job at it because the population of Gaza has grown from 1.6 million to 5.7 million.
	I mean, I could ping-pong these back and forth and steel-man both sides.
	The one thing that you cannot...
	Or that you cannot walk away from having to address at some point is that the response seems to lend credence, or at least you cannot blame people for thinking that this response was intended to expand the borders beyond what they were prior to October 7, if only to create a bigger buffer zone.
	You might think that that's the legitimate response to this.
	And in which case, don't call it an evacuation if they're never coming back.
	But anyways, this is why I would never want to be...
	You get involved in politics and you're dealing with ugly stuff.
	So let's go to the chat and see what the hell's going on here because...
	Okay, I'll bring up this.
	Well, I'll read it.
	It says...
	Oh, no, I'll bring it up.
	Hold on a second.
	We want to see these so that nobody accuses me of either reading something that's not there or misreading.
	The Jews run Hollywood.
	They ought to, since they built it, says The Engaged View.
	Call it anti-Semitic if you want, but I think a dude running a sex toy company and talking openly about sex fetishes with their daughter is kind of sus.
	I'm not sure who you're talking about.
	I think I know who you're talking about, but the whole point is it's not anti-Semitic because you're criticizing someone who happens to be Jewish.
	And pulling that card all the time actually, on the one hand, undermines what true antisemitism is.
	And on the other hand, foments what actual antisemitism is.
	You think that someone's untouchable?
	You can't criticize them?
	You can't draw cartoons about them because they're Jewish?
	But if they're Donald Trump, you can make them look like a bloated pig?
	I mean, that's how you foment actual antisemitism.
	And at the end of the day, people have hated people throughout history.
	It's going to happen.
	There's nothing you can do about it.
	But...
	If you look at someone and say that they are a pervert because they're Jewish, well, that I would argue is anti-Semitism.
	If you look at someone and say they're a pervert and someone else comes out and says, you can't say that, they're Jewish, that's anti-Semitic.
	I'm like, dude, I don't care.
	Jewish, black, Muslim, whatever, perverts are perverts.
	Harvey Weinstein is a pervert.
	It's not anti-Semitic to say it.
	It might be anti-Semitic to say he's a pervert because he's Jewish.
	I would say that that is anti-Semitism.
	There's plenty of perverts.
	Plenty of Jewish perverts and plenty of non-Jewish perverts.
	Unless their perversion is justified in the name of Judaism or in the name of a religion, you don't get to make that connection.
	And if you do, then you might have a problem.
	How about we all learn the definition of Semitic?
	It refers to all people from the Middle East, including Arabs, Jews, Akkadians, and Phoenicians.
	Yes, this is true, but everybody understands how the term is being used now.
	That was about the dude Candace was arguing with.
	Lord of Three, who's the dude?
	Give me the name in the chat.
	The name of the guy, I think I know who you're talking about.
	It's the rabbi guy who owns a sex shop, right?
	I just want to see if anybody in the chat knows that I know that...
	I think I'm...
	Is nobody in the chat?
	I'm going to go to locals.
	Rabbi Barkley?
	Okay, hold on.
	Is it Shmooley Barkley or Barkley?
	Rabbi Shmooley.
	That name sounds more familiar.
	Let me just see if I know who this guy is.
	I'm fairly certain I know who this guy is.
	Rabbi Shmooley.
	That's the one I was thinking of.
	Yeah, I remember coming across him a little while ago.
	Look, it's sexual liberation for some and weird for others, but anyhow.
	Okay.
	I know where I find myself on that spectrum.
	So that's it.
	Let's see if Eva's going to be in trouble because I'm going to see if my parents are going to comment, David, how can you do that?
	I'm joking, by the way.
	I'm not embarrassed about any of this.
	I know people can say you're part of a tribe.
	Maybe I should be part of a tribe.
	Nobody's untouchable because of their identity.
	And that is a knife that cuts both ways.
	Winston came back from the kennel.
	His breath smells a little better because he had his teeth cleaned.
	Yes, your breath does smell much better.
	And you're handsome because you had a shower.
	He's a good dog.
	Okay, down you go.
	All right.
	With that said, people, let's see what else we got in here.
	What's wrong with...
	Okay.
	The fact that he's Jewish is irrelevant.
	It's still creepy, says Lord of the Rings.
	I agree.
	Creepiness is creepiness.
	When people try to connect with things that are not necessarily connected, it's not because someone's Jewish that they've done something.
	And if someone says it is, well, that's where you get into the...
	They did it.
	They're perverted because they're X. Whatever.
	Perverts come in all shapes and sizes.
	Okay.
	Here's what we're doing.
	We're ending it on Rumble.
	Come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com, right?
	And we're going to talk Russia and my conspiracy theory, which I think, I mean, no matter how cynical you get, it's hard to keep up, people.
	Here's the link to link to locals.
	But before we do that, I'm going to read some of the tips in locals because we'll give them the biggest...
	Baddest audience we have.
	LilyAmerica1 sent a $3 tip.
	My grandpa is sick and in the rehabilitation home.
	My grandma doesn't think he will last much longer.
	Can you pray that God spares him some pain?
	And if you're not a believer, can you please send him some good, positive vibes, please?
	His name is Sonny.
	Lily, done and done.
	When I was talking about this with somebody, the belief in a God, not a religious God, it's like a chemical change of the spirit in the good way.
	And I can see how it happens as you get older.
	I'm not sure that I'll ever believe in a Jewish God versus a Christian God versus a Muslim God versus whatever.
	But I cannot but believe that there was some intelligent design to the world in which we live.
	And I do believe in the positive vibes because we are, at the end of the day, we emit energy, good and bad.
	And I hope I emit good energy.
	Sunny, there you go.
	Spuds, UVC disinfectant is commonly used for potable water and wastewater treatment.
	Viva Friday.
	No, that's going back to Trump's statement.
	There's also UV treatment for a number of ailments.
	I don't want to get into any trouble.
	A gentler kind of tyranny, says Spuds.
	Jayash62, five bucks, says President Trump posted earlier this week that the amount by Judge Engram was not arbitrary at all.
	It's almost exactly the amount of cash he has available in his campaign funds.
	Ooh, that's good.
	I'm going to screen grab that and make sure I get back to that.
	Spam rager says 85% of anti-Asian hate crime in San Francisco and probably the rest of the USA is perpetrated by leftist Blacks.
	This was reported by San Francisco Chronicle.
	And let me just make sure that...
	Let me show it so that nobody...
	There we go.
	Dirty secret.
	This is San Francisco Chronicle.
	Dirty secret of Black on Asian violence is out.
	March 2, 2021.
	Editors note, this 2020 column originally appeared in print in the San Francisco Chronicle.
	As of 2019, the Chronicle essay...
	Hold on, how does this...
	Get this out of here.
	How is this a 2010 article?
	In San Francisco's dirty little secret.
	Well, anyways, at least there.
	That's the article that the rumble...
	that the tip was referring to.
	And then we got Stu P. Dassault says, there are two things you don't talk about, politics and religion.
	Now you want to talk about the subject that covers both.
	No one can win that argument.
	Every discussion doesn't need to be an argument, says Victor Cardone.
	No, the religion one is particularly irritating because the second you say anything, nobody goes for the substance of the argument.
	It's, are you Jewish?
	That's why you're saying what you're saying.
	And it goes both ways.
	Oh, if you're Jewish and you say, I got questions, anti-Semite or self-hating Jew, how dare you?
	And if you're Jewish and you say, I support Israel, Zionist, whatever the hell that means these days.
	Oh, yeah, I think Hamas is bad.
	Oh, that's because you're Jewish.
	No.
	Anyhow, that's it.
	Yeah, but that's why I hate that discussion.
	That's probably as much into it as I'll ever get.
	And now you know if you wanted to hate me.
	And that's the reason.
	That's your reason.
	Okay, we are heading on over to Viva Barnes Law.
	Locals.locals.com.
	Thank you all for being here.
	Locals people, come on over.
	And I'm going to go...
	Oh, it's going to be supporter only because I'm using Rumble Studio.
	So you'll want to be a supporter if you want to catch my theory on Russia.
	Or if you just want to support the work that Robert Barnes and I do in our VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com community.
	It's a great place.
	If you're not coming, stay tuned.
	I'll probably do a very, very short summary of at least one or two of the topics we did tonight because I want to make it simple and I want to make it accessible.
	So I'm going to Locals supporters only because that's the function they have.
	In Rumble Studio.
	It'll give you a few minutes to update, to become members if you so choose.
	If you don't want to, tomorrow night, people.
	Six o 'clock.
	The best law show on the interwebs.
	And that's it.
	Oh my goodness.
	Have I forgotten?
	Cancel.
	Okay, I just hope my...
	I hope Phil Holloway wasn't waiting in the backdrop the entire time.
	Okay, we're out and I'll see if I can get Phil on sooner than later.
	Updating the stream, everybody.
	See you all tomorrow if you're not coming over to vibobarnslaw.locals.com for the supporters to give them back a little something for the support that they give us.

▲