Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 23, 2024 - Viva & Barnes

01:26:23

Julian Assange EXTRADITION! Big Fani in BIG TROUBLE! Engoron STRIKES AGAIN! & MORE! Viva Frei Live

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Yes.
	Get ready to vomit with Elizabeth Warren.
	We haven't seen her in a while.
	Brett Kavanaugh and the Trump-appointed extremists on the United States Supreme Court tried to stop President Biden from canceling your student loan debt.
	Well, too bad.
	The president has already canceled student loan debt for nearly 4 million people.
	Let me just give you one example.
	The Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program.
	It's simple.
	If you've spent at least 10 years of your life in public service, then the rest of us want to say thank you by canceling whatever student loan debt you have left.
	This program's been around for a while, but it wasn't working.
	In fact, before President Biden came along, only 7,000 people total had ever gotten their debt forgiven.
	That's firefighters, nurses, and public school teachers who were just out of luck.
	But after the Biden administration took over, over 790,000 people have already seen their student loans canceled.
	That's 790,000 people, and every day, more teachers, more nurses, more firefighters hit their 10-year mark and see the rest of their debt canceled.
	It's amazing what good government can do to change people's lives.
	It's amazing what good government can do to absolve you of the debts into which you contracted.
	First of all, it bothers me that we have matching color patterns.
	It's almost like we called each other this morning and said, Hey, Elizabeth, what are you wearing today?
	Purple and black?
	Well, I think I'll do that too.
	Let me just bring up one.
	Highlight two things here.
	Let's replay it, shall we?
	Brett Kavanaugh and the Trump-appointed extremists on...
	Let's stop it right there.
	Do you know, can you imagine the balls it takes to refer to a Supreme Court justice as an extremist?
	They have just gotten so flippant with the most hyperbolic rhetoric.
	Call everybody Nazis.
	Call everybody fascists.
	Call everybody extremists.
	Call everybody domestic terrorists.
	What do you think that does?
	Calling Brett Kavanaugh an extremist.
	Do you think that might give the political permission slip to some lefty loon to show up on his front lawn with ropes and a gun to kill him?
	I'm asking the obvious questions here, Elizabeth Warren.
	Do you think you should be sanctioned for this type of inflammatory, demonizing rhetoric?
	Set aside the dehumanizing rhetoric.
	Justice Kavanaugh and the other...
	Conservative.
	Extremists on a Supreme Court.
	Well, what do you do with extremists, Elizabeth?
	Brett Kavanaugh and the Trump-appointed extremists on the United States Supreme Court tried to stop President Biden from canceling your student loan debt.
	Your debt from canceling...
	I think the operative word would be your debt.
	Why stop at student loans?
	I mean, I know everybody makes these arguments.
	Why stop at student loans?
	I had to pay off a mortgage.
	But cancel my mortgage debt.
	Cancel my credit card debt.
	Oh, but you took that out so that you could study something that wouldn't allow you to repay the debt that you took out to study that.
	Your debt.
	And she thinks it's an amazing thing.
	Like, oh, we're highlighting the fact that it's yours and that he stopped you from expunging something that you willingly contracted into, set aside the problems that might go with interest rates, etc.
	Your debt.
	Your debt and your communist big brother government was not allowed to unilaterally bypass the three branches of government to do that which they haven't done through the legislative process.
	But it's extremists' fault and they are the ones who didn't cancel your debt.
	What are you going to do about it, lefty loons out there?
	Well, too bad.
	First of all, look at those dead eyes.
	Look at those dead eyes.
	Can I zoom in?
	I can't.
	Well, too bad.
	Because POTUS doesn't listen to SCOTUS.
	Very insurrection.
	POTUS says, I know what the Supreme Court ruled.
	Screw him.
	You notice I was about to say something else?
	Screw him.
	Oh, yeah.
	I am going to defy one of the three branches of the government, the judicial branch.
	I defy them.
	Screw them.
	I know what they said.
	Too bad.
	Very insurrection-y.
	Proudly.
	Call them extremists.
	Give that dog-whistle political permission slip to the lefty loons who are then going to go out and protest on his front lawn.
	As if that's acceptable.
	Plot to kill him.
	They don't say boo for that.
	But they keep calling them extremists.
	Domestic terrorists.
	Threats to democracy.
	I know they get immunity.
	I know they benefit from, in Canada, parliamentary immunity.
	Sovereign immunity.
	They should be sanctioned for that.
	I'm a proponent of free speech.
	They should be sanctioned for that type of rhetoric that is effectively...
	It's not just like somebody on the street saying it.
	These are the elected officials calling judges extremists, threats to democracy, And they just say it.
	And then when the actual poo-poo hits the fan in real life, they sit there and say, well, my goodness, we need more gun control laws.
	I hate Elizabeth Ward.
	I hate the sound of her voice.
	I hate the look of her face.
	I hate the things she says substantively.
	And I really forgot that she's faded into total irrelevance, but for the fact that...
	We just dedicated this morning's...
	What time is it?
	It's Friday afternoon.
	This afternoon's opening rant to it.
	Everybody, good afternoon.
	Can you believe what happens?
	Like, I wake up in the morning, I'm like, okay, we got a couple of things to talk about.
	Pop on Eric Hunley's stream.
	As we're live, holy crab apples, the poo-poo is hitting the fanny this time.
	We're going to talk about it.
	It's wild.
	On today's show, we're going to talk about Nipple Judge Engoron's...
	Order from yesterday coming by way of two-line email.
	We're gonna talk about the poo-poo hitting the fanny.
	It's a thing of beauty, what's going on here.
	I do not believe in lying.
	I just reiterate the very common sense saying, you don't have to tell the truth.
	You just can't lie.
	So shut your mouth if you're incapable of telling the truth.
	She's in so much flipping trouble, my bet, that she's gonna get disqualified.
	The odds just went up exponentially now.
	She's going to get disqualified.
	She might suffer some perjury charges.
	She and Nathan Wade.
	We'll get there.
	We're talking Julian Assange as well and whatever stuff else comes up on the interwebs as we go about this.
	Now, for those of you who are new to the channel, hello, how goes the battle?
	We start off on YouTube, Rumble, and VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com where everyone is above average.
	In fact, I got one of the exhibits to the pleadings in the chat at vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	I posted it to Twitter.
	And people were like, where'd you get that heat sheet?
	We're going to get to it.
	I was like, at our wonderful community.
	We are getting back to the locals interviews, the supporter chats.
	We're doing it today.
	Jeanette Victoria over on Locals afterwards, exclusively on Locals.
	So we start on YouTube, Rumble, and Locals.
	End on YouTube, and we move our feet, our eyes, and our wallets over to Rumble, the free speech platform.
	And then when the stream is done, when the stream is done, we then go over to Locals for the After Party, take questions, and have our wonderful community there.
	So that's the order of the day for those of you who might want to get over to Locals.
	Here's the link.
	And, oh, dude, no, no, we're going to have fun with the fanny.
	That's the first time I've used that one.
	We're going to have fun with the fanny over on the Rumble side.
	I'm going to do the Julian Assange bit, the story.
	Just cover the latest.
	There's nothing revolutionary in here, but we're going to talk about that on YouTube Rumble and vivavornslaw.locals.com.
	And it's funny.
	I've been covering the Julian Assange saga.
	I mean, now I go back to the vlogs and they go back to 2019 when the news broke that he was being arrested.
	When he got kicked out of the Ecuadorian embassy after seven years there?
	And then he got arrested by the UK authorities.
	I mean, it's like a trip down memory lane, literally.
	And I put together a montage to summarize that which I don't want to have to necessarily summarize again.
	Let me see something here.
	It says, Viva...
	Oh, hold on.
	Why is my screen small?
	Viva was on Eric's chat begging for the heat map.
	That's where he got it from.
	No, I got it from our locals community, dude.
	I have the screen open in the back here.
	I can't even tell you who sent it to me in our local screen.
	I mean, it's an exhibit to the filing.
	The filing we posted in vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	But who put the heat map up?
	Bring on the heat, people.
	My goodness, there's a lot of chat going on in locals.
	What a wonderful place.
	Here it is.
	Who brought the heat map?
	It was Mandelichi.
	The phone records, January through November 2020.
	It's pretty damning.
	We're going to pull it up.
	Don't worry about it.
	Mandelichi, thank you very much.
	Didn't beg for it on...
	I was begging for the PDF of the pleading.
	That's true.
	All right, let me just see what I have in the backdrop here.
	The link to Rumble is in the pinned comment on YouTube.
	Okay, we got Fannie Willis.
	TDS.
	Oh, Leticia James.
	We got some clips when we talk about New York nipple judge Engelron's ridiculous refusal to stay his ridiculous ruling.
	We got The Report and Julian Assange.
	Okay.
	What I wanted to talk about, actually, just before we get going.
	Yesterday, I don't know who saw the interview with Kayla Pollack.
	It's heartbreaking.
	It's enraging.
	It's, to some extent, inspiring as well, where we are dealing with people who have had adversity forced on them through no fault of their own, who are living through it and who are going to do as much as they can to thrive and help others.
	If you didn't see the interview yesterday, Kayla Pollack, Canadian woman out of Ontario, suffered an adverse event of special interest, that being Traverse Myelitis, which resulted in her becoming a quadriplegic.
	And after her booster, after two Pfizer shots with the Moderna booster.
	Showing up to the hospital, paralyzed.
	She's having her socialized medical doctor tell her it's in her head as she's lying flat, paralyzed on a table.
	And then another doctor, you know, decides to do an MRI and decides to treat her.
	Treat her as a patient and not as a crazy person because these doctors are so...
	It's enraging.
	She is diagnosed with Traverse Myelitis, which results in her now being quadriplegic, I believe is the term.
	And the government, it's not just that the government arguably imposed this, caused this reality to become a reality, has utterly neglected her and utterly abandoned her.
	To the point where she was offered medical assistance in dying, you know, maids, that wonderful euphemism for mercy killings that Hitler 2.0, I mean Justin Trudeau up in Canada, is imposing now, recommending, expanding.
	Medical assistance in dying in Quebec.
	For a period of time, it was the third leading cause of death.
	Euthanasia, mercy killing, government-sanctioned murder, in my view, in many cases, represents 4.2% of all death in Canada.
	They offered, because they can't care for her adequately, because it's a disgusting, broken, dilapidated system, her doctors offered her medical assistance in dying.
	They injure her.
	They can't treat her.
	Her life has been turned into a living hell.
	They offer her medical assistance in dying, mercy killing.
	And so I'm on a bit of a mission in as much as I can be to raise awareness.
	The link to her Give, Send, Go is here.
	I know all of you have seen it.
	I'm just going to show everybody one more time.
	I'm going to see.
	She needs a wheelchair-accessible van.
	It was at $41,000.
	Half of her goal is not enough, and I'm trying to get this to have traction.
	She was at $41,000 the last time.
	Let's see if we go to here, $41,890.
	So that's it.
	If you can help, please.
	All right.
	It's unbelievable.
	It's the joke.
	It's the sick, sick joke that we said as a sick, disgusting twist of irony, like the government's going to injure the Canadians through their...
	Unscientific and what we now know to be highly political jab mandate policies to then offer euthanasia to the people that they've injured that they can't care for because the system is broken while they still ship hundreds of millions, billions of dollars off to fund a war in Ukraine.
	These mother...
	Oh.
	And then look at this.
	Look at this.
	Look at this son of a...
	February 24th.
	I'm not playing the whole thing, don't worry.
	February 24th.
	2022.
	In the early hours of that Thursday morning, Russian tanks rolled across Ukraine's borders.
	They're making, our government is now financing propaganda for foreign conflict.
	As Vladimir Putin launched the full-scale invasion.
	It's just out of the blue.
	Like, one day Putin woke up and said, I'm going to invade Ukraine.
	Just like that.
	Nothing going back.
	Whatever.
	I hate an invasion.
	That has unleashed unspeakable violence and brutality.
	That has left countless dead and forced millions to flee.
	That has upended peace and stability in Europe.
	I want everyone to appreciate something here.
	I'm not watching the rest of this.
	I cannot.
	In his tweet, he says, almost two years ago, Putin chose war.
	This is the Prime Minister of Canada through his official Twitter account.
	Putin chose war and invaded Ukraine, unleashing unspeakable violence and brutality on the Ukrainian people.
	Two years later, I want to make one thing very clear.
	Canada's support for Ukraine continues to be unwavering and unequivocal.
	Slava Ukraini.
	The Prime Minister of Canada is making a chant, Glory to Ukraine, which has a history to it.
	And not an entirely clean history that a man who just invited a Ukrainian Nazi SS soldier into parliament and gave him a standing ovation should be making, arguably.
	Now, there's debate as to the Nazi history, the far-right extremist history of the expression Slava Ukraini, glory to Ukraine.
	There's a debate, I'll grant that.
	But I'll also tell you, there's a debate.
	This is from Yahoo News.
	And even Yahoo News has to attenuate that problematic history.
	The expression goes back to the 1850s, a poet, glory to Ukraine.
	But there's other history that might be relevant so that a prime minister of Canada should not necessarily be chanting glory to another country from his official Twitter account.
	He doesn't represent that country.
	If he would say it, and this is not even, he would say this, for any country on earth, it should be disqualifying from public office.
	But the history from Yahoo News, and you know that when they're forced to spin, that there's truth to it.
	Is Slava Ukraini a far-right slogan?
	Ukraine's detractors claim that, quote, Slava Ukraini, end quote, is an inherently far-right slogan because it was also used by the far-right Nazis.
	Pre and during World War II.
	Just because.
	But it's detractors that say that.
	I will read it without my own commentary.
	Ukraine's detractors have claimed that Slava Ukraine is an Just a Nazi.
	Just a far-right Nazi.
	The vine factions of OUN regarded Poland and the USSR as the greatest threats to the cause of Ukrainian independence, particularly the latter, which led them to join forces with Nazi Germany.
	Just a small piece of history, people, for those who are saying Slava Ukraini.
	Yeah, it might go back to the 1850s.
	It might also go back to Nazi Germany when they joined forces with Hitler to fight the Soviets, which apparently the idiots in Canadian Parliament didn't even know, giving a standing ovation to someone who fought the Soviets.
	During World War II?
	Oh yeah, an SS Nazi soldier.
	The Vine, just understand this.
	The Vine factions of the OUN, that group that said Slava Ukraini, that had Stepan Bandera in its history, and they considered...
	Poland and the USSR as their greatest threats to the cause of Ukrainian independence, particularly the latter, which led them to join forces with Nazi Germany.
	Without excusing the role of some OUN members in Nazi war crimes, it should be noted that the Nazis viewed Ukrainians and other Slavic peoples as, quote, radically inferior, end quote, and essentially used OUN as a means to an end when fighting against the Soviets.
	Not to, without making excuses for the Nazi history of the expression Slavo-Ukraine, let's make excuses!
	For the Nazi history of Slava Ukraini.
	And let's write it off and say anybody who talks about it is a Russian propagandist, Putin shill.
	But Justin Trudeau gets up there and after having invited a Nazi soldier, an SS Ukrainian Nazi soldier into parliament to show off to Zelensky, gives him a standing ovation, lets his Speaker of the House fall on the sword because they're all such a bunch of incompetent buffoons.
	Not only do they make the mistake, they don't even understand basic history.
	Now he's saying Slava Ukraini.
	And accusing other people of being anti-Semites.
	Here's the tweet, just in case you want a little piece of history.
	So there's that.
	I really should have the heart rate, not the heart rate monitor, but my blood pressure machine down here while I do the stream.
	I could see if I could keep track in real time.
	So there's that.
	All right.
	Now you've had your piece of history.
	There's a debate as to whether or not Slava Ukraini...
	There is no debate as to whether or not it has Nazi far-right national socialist history.
	The only question is whether or not it's inherently that.
	What a way to frame it.
	When you take an exam or a test and it says all or none or never or always, you know that you're pretty much going to get into a position where the answer is going to be no because it's not all.
	Very rarely.
	It's not always very rarely.
	It's not never.
	And it's usually like a middle ground.
	So when they say it's inherently far right, they are setting up the straw man to say, no, it's not inherently far right, but it certainly became far right when they joined the Nazis and said Slava Ukraini.
	Oh, and by the way, at one point in history, they had to stop lowering their hands above their head when they were saying it.
	That gets a pass.
	But post a sheet of a white piece of paper on a...
	Lamp post, and that's a hate crime.
	One, two, three, four.
	Oh my goodness.
	Well, the number is not going to be the same when you guys see it, but it literally is at one, two, three, four.
	Live viewers on YouTube.
	How many are we at on Rumble?
	4,300.
	Very nice.
	And how many are we at on VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com?
	260.
	Very nice.
	So that's the intro rant.
	But we're going to talk about Julian Assange.
	Before we head on over to Rumble, because this is an important story.
	There's not, I mean, if you've been following it, there's not that much radical news.
	But there were protests, there were demonstrations in the UK where Assange just had a two-day hearing as to whether or not they're going to rehear or challenge certain parts of the initial magistrate's ruling that threw out his contestation or his opposition to extradition.
	We'll get there in a second, but first we're going to take a trip down.
	Memory Lane.
	And it's going to be cringy.
	I will apologize for it.
	I will apologize for the way I used to.
	Oh, there he is right there.
	So I'm going through all of the vlogs because I have a playlist, the Julian Assange playlist.
	And I figured I'll piece together the summary so that you can all see the evolution of man's decision.
	Sorry, wrong one.
	Of man's descent into madness.
	The radicalization, as some would say, of Viva Frye.
	I'm joking.
	It's the awakening of Viva Frye.
	This is where it started.
	This is a piece of it together.
	So enjoy this.
	It's cringe, but it's hard for me to watch.
	Yeah, okay, it's playing.
	April 11th, 2019, Julian Assange is arrested by British authorities in the Ecuadorian embassy in London.
	Where do we even start breaking this one down?
	Listen to this intro song.
	What is this song?
	Terrible.
	I have been following the Julian Assange subject since the very beginning and I've done a few videos on the subject already, breaking things down.
	So to avoid repetition, I'm not going to repeat myself of what I've said in those videos.
	Go watch those videos first if you need to be brought up to speed on the Julian Assange situation.
	Is it me or was the media surprisingly silent about the fact that Julian Assange just got sentenced to 50 weeks in a high-security UK prison for breaching his bail conditions?
	I don't think it's just me.
	Julian Assange.
	Most of you probably only know him through WikiLeaks as a result of the 2016 presidential election between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.
	He is an Australian computer programmer who founded WikiLeaks in 2006.
	Between April and November 2010, Julian Assange on WikiLeaks published classified information which was leaked to him by Chelsea Manning.
	Following the 2010 leaks, the United States federal government launched a criminal investigation into Julian Assange.
	Coincidentally enough, or not so coincidentally to some, in November 2010, Sweden issued an international warrant for the arrest of Julian Assange relating to alleged rape and assault charges that occurred in Sweden.
	Julian Assange denied those charges and said that if he were extradited to Sweden, he would then be extradited to the United States to face the charges that were being brought against him.
	In December 2010, Assange surrendered to the UK police but was released on bail conditions and this is what's going to come back in 2019.
	He was released on bail conditions while he fought the extradition to Sweden.
	For about two years, Julian Assange fought extradition to Sweden because he argued That the extradition to Sweden was just a pretext to extradite him to the US to face charges for publication of classified information or whatever.
	His fight against the extradition ultimately failed.
	And instead of being extradited to Sweden, he sought refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy where he stayed for about seven years until he was kicked out in 2019.
	And so what changed on April 11th, 2019?
	Good question.
	A lot of people are going to think that the United States had a role in influencing the Ecuadorian embassy to invite the British authorities in so they could arrest Julian Assange.
	For whatever the reason, the Ecuadorian embassy invited in the British authorities who promptly arrested Julian Assange.
	And now the next question is: Is Julian Assange going to get extradited to the United States to face charges for having published classified information that was leaked to him through Chelsea Nining.
	So I have no doubt the judge did not conduct a fair hearing, did not allow the best presentation of evidence, showed bias throughout, has had a history of ruling in favor of the government, rubber stamping the government, an extradition request.
	So I have no doubt that they're going to order his extradition.
	Now, he still can appeal that, but you don't have the best appellate rights in the UK like you do in the United States.
	A lot of people asked the question in the last video, how a non-U.S.
	citizen who never stepped foot on U.S. soil can be charged under the Espionage Act.
	I spent the better part of Saturday reading Julian Assange's indictment and breaking it down, and it's fascinating.
	Some are going to say that the disclosure of highly classified information on WikiLeaks put the lives of American soldiers and American citizens at risk.
	Others are going to say that the American military are committing war crimes in certain countries.
	The public has a right to know, and they should be held to account.
	Just because it's a U.S. uniform...
	Doesn't mean morally horrendous actions suddenly become okay.
	And Julian Assange exposed him.
	The only allegation is that he gave some clues to Manning about how Manning could get that information to them.
	That's what every publisher does.
	Testify, people.
	And so that's the summary.
	It was like watching a wedding video.
	Remember when Barnes and I first met?
	We were courting each other, intellectually, legally speaking.
	Does everybody remember this wild journey of Julian Assange?
	I remember going back to 2011 when he was facing these rape charges out of Sweden.
	I remember my best friend at the time telling me, yeah, that's not a trumped-up, bogus charge.
	I was not even interested in any of this.
	You remember what happened.
	Bradley Manning.
	Chelsea Manning provided classified information to WikiLeaks' Julian Assange.
	It contained a video called Collateral Murder, which was the video of the Americans killing 11 Iraqis, including two Reuters journalists and two kids in a van.
	And they have it on video.
	Just minor things that most people would consider war crimes.
	Then Julian Assange went on to publish these, what do they call them, cables?
	Publish a bunch of classified information without redacting the names of people, and I'm not trying to minimize it, without redacting the names of translators in Afghanistan, which put them at risk, etc.
	Published documents that showed war crimes torture carried out by the American government.
	They go after him.
	Start investigating him.
	And then just spontaneously he gets two charges of alleged rape or sexual assault out of Sweden.
	And it was from allegedly what they call stealthing.
	Popping a condom while you're involved in sex.
	Keep your schmeckle in your pants, people.
	You can avoid a lot of these problems in life.
	I mean, I understand if you're single or if you're not involved in a relationship, you have to, you want to have carnal relations with the opposite sex or the same, whatever.
	You want to have relations.
	Keep it in your pants, especially when you're a prized target.
	It's never going to end well.
	You should actually never even be alone in the same room as someone of the opposite sex if you're a high-priced target, or even someone of the same sex.
	Yeah, forgot about that.
	Just these magic charges.
	And then they want to extradite him to Sweden, where he would then have been extradited to the U.S., where he could face charges for what at the time was one charge of illegally obtaining, what was it, illegally accessing a computer, which they never proved.
	He holds up to avoid extradition for seven years in the Ecuadorian embassy in the UK.
	Apparently his behavior was so bad, allegedly towards the end he was losing his mind, wiping feces on the wall.
	I think I remember that being the news at the time.
	Ecuador kicks him out, and I remember him being hauled off by the UK authorities.
	Answered at the time, how could they have done that without violating international law as relates to embassies being basically foreign soil on another person's land?
	Hey, who knows?
	I also remember there was something about the IMF loan in Ecuador at the time that might have explained why Ecuador said, get him out, UK come take him.
	He then gets sentenced to 50 weeks for breaching his bail conditions.
	And from what I remember at the time, you could only have gotten a year in jail for breaching your bail conditions.
	The bail conditions on the Swedish rape charges that had since been dropped.
	Some will say they were dropped because of the passage of time, not because of proving of innocence, but whatever.
	The bogus charges were ultimately dropped, but they got him on the bail, breaching his bail.
	And then it was May where they get the superseding indictment, the second superseding indictment, which accuses him of violating the Espionage Act, the 1917 Espionage Act.
	And the only real accusations, and I went back to reread it yesterday.
	I was going to do a vlog, and then frickin' Judge Engeron has to come down with his decision.
	Is this the, um...
	Yeah, this is the, I believe this is the second superseding indictment.
	The only, they got to get him on espionage act.
	And everybody knows that it was Bradley Manning, Chelsea Manning, whatever you decide to call her.
	It's wild, the world that we live in.
	The only accusations they could have to try to get Assange on espionage was that he participated in the hacking.
	Because otherwise, everybody knows, Manning said he's not going to testify against Assange.
	He got his sentence commuted by Obama.
	Odd why Chelsea Manning gets his sentence commuted by Obama, but nobody's pardoning Assange, despite having been holed up basically in prison for over a decade now.
	So the only way they could get Assange was by arguing some sort of active collaboration in the hacking.
	It's a load of shit.
	Oh, shoot.
	It's a load of garbage.
	It's a load of garbage.
	Share screen.
	Window.
	Returned.
	I believe this is the document.
	Yeah, let's share this here.
	And so we're not going over the whole thing.
	The bottom line, this entire indictment, paragraph 19. Hold on, let me just go to the top.
	I just want to make sure this is the second superseding indictment.
	They had the initial indictment, the superseding indictment, which added espionage charges.
	I don't think he's facing the death penalty from all accounts, even though I thought death penalty was a possibility under the Espionage Act.
	He's only facing a cool 175 years in prison.
	Then they had a second superseding indictment which added more details because they got to flesh out that he's not a journalist.
	He's a hacker.
	And that's what they do in the...
	That's all that they do in the intro paragraphs.
	Listen to this.
	He repeatedly sought to obtain...
	Paragraph two.
	Assange WikiLeaks repeatedly sought obtained disseminated information Yeah, committing war crimes will do that to you.
	Killing journalists will do that to you.
	But then they just go and say, hey, look, he's just a hacker.
	He recruits individuals to hack into computers and illegally obtain information that they provide to WikiLeaks.
	All right.
	Then he hosted a hacking website.
	Not a website.
	He hosted a hacking conference.
	At the hacking at random conference, you know, they did bad things.
	He says, go, give us, we're looking for information.
	So he's a hacker.
	He's not a journalist, even though he did not hack the information that Manning gave him.
	Manning did that willingly, but this is where they really have to flesh it out.
	Assange agrees to help Manning crack a password.
	This is the bulk of the allegations so that they can bring espionage charges against him.
	March 8th, 2010, Assange told Manning that Assange would have...
	Someone tried to crack a password hash to enable Manning to hack into U.S. government computers.
	Specifically, Assange agreed to assist Manning in cracking a password hash stored on the United States computer.
	The encrypted password hash that Manning gave to Assange to crack.
	Following Assange's curious eyes never run dry comment.
	They say this at least six times.
	Because Manning said, look, what do you want?
	Curious eyes never run dry.
	He's Aussie.
	Curious eyes never run dry.
	he gives him this thing he gives it to Assange to crack was stored as a hash value in a computer file that was accessible only by users with administrative level privileges Manning did not have administrative level privileges and used special software namely a Linux operating system to access the computer file and obtain the encrypted password hash that Manning then provided to a I'm not going to belabor the point.
	But even in the second superstition...
	Sorry, Boomer.
	Even in the second superseding indictment, the evidence that Assange participated in the hack is thin to implausible.
	And so they issue the second superseding indictment.
	Yes, it was under the Trump administration, but now that I know how the deep state did not want Trump pardoning Assange, and now that we know that we had aspects, elements of the deep state actively lying to Trump during his presidency, concealing facts from Trump during his presidency, I would be reluctant to place this blame of the superseding indictment on Trump.
	Maybe that's because of my own bias and I'm very much aware of that.
	But knowing that there were interests not acting in line with Trump's interests while he was president, actively undermining his presidency while he was president, I don't place much stock in the argument that this is Trump's fault because this second superseding indictment came while he was president.
	Because the discussion was whether or not he was going to pardon Assange and I think he got the stern warning.
	That would be a bridge too far.
	Yeah, rest in peace.
	And then the Australian media and all of the propaganda media is still running with the narrative that...
	Assange got this via Russian hackers.
	A lot of his WikiLeaks documents via Russian hackers.
	Russian hackers who hacked the DNC servers to provide this to Assange so that he could help Trump get elected.
	Assange has come out and said, as has Kim.com, it wasn't Russians.
	We know damn well it wasn't Russians.
	And there are many people out there who believe it was Seth Rich.
	And there have been many rumors.
	There have been many unconfirmed suggestions that it was Seth Rich, which led to his murder.
	By way of failed robbery where they took nothing but his life at four in the morning in D.C. So that's the ups and the downs.
	That's basically the summary.
	And so what ended up happening is he got 50 weeks.
	No, it was 50 weeks, not 50 months.
	I'm an idiot.
	Can't do math.
	He got 50 weeks for a breach of bail.
	In the interim, America filed these indictments to try to get him extradited.
	And there was a hearing for the extradition that was denied, but only on one basis.
	All of the objections for Assange to not get extradited, to oppose extradition, all of them were dismissed by this magistrate court with the exception of one, that Assange posed a suicide risk to himself.
	And if extradited...
	He had a very substantial risk of self-harm.
	So all of the other bases to oppose the extradition, you know, that he's being extradited to the country that was plotting his assassination, Hillary Clinton, some other dipshit under Trump's administration drawing up plans to how they could assassinate Julian Assange.
	All of the bases for objecting to the extradition were dismissed with the exception of one, which was he's a suicide risk, so we're not going to extradite him.
	That was later overturned by a higher court in the UK with assurance from the US, the country that behind closed doors was plotting to kill Julian Assange, that they're going to treat him real good when they get him in America.
	Pompeo, thank you, Free Spirit.
	Pompeo was the one drawing up plans to assassinate Assange.
	Hillary Clinton was the one, I believe, talking about drone striking him because, you know, Obama ran around drone strike killing American citizens.
	Why not kill an Aussie?
	And so...
	Yeah, initially his extradition was granted but only on one basis and everything else was dismissed.
	A higher court then overturned all of it and said you can get extradited.
	They've already signed off on the extradition papers.
	And so what happened this week?
	That's a very long-winded answer to get to where we're at.
	He had a two-day hearing in order to contest.
	He had a two-day hearing requesting that he be authorized to challenge, just have a rehearing on the other bases for which his opposition to the extradition was denied.
	That's all he wants.
	Just basically to have not a second kick at the can, but the ability to contest the other bases that were refused, not granted opposing his extradition.
	Two-day hearing.
	His wife was out there speaking.
	Back in the day, you know, it was the eternal question.
	And I was...
	2019, I was starting to maybe share my opinion, but maybe I wasn't confident enough with my intelligence level to share it.
	What do I think?
	They've criminalized...
	The ability of whistleblowers and leakers, and I dare even say hackers, they've criminalized the revealing of government crimes.
	That's wonderful.
	Yes, Julian Assange is a journalist.
	Because I don't know what a journalist is, except to say that potato head Brian Stetler is not a journalist.
	Grab him by the ground, stick your fingers down there, Don Lemon, not a journalist.
	Rachel Maddow.
	You won't get infected if you get the jab.
	Not a journalist.
	What we call journalists are propagandists.
	Who we call hackers are journalists.
	So I believe he is a journalist.
	Yeah, you're damn right it's dangerous when you reveal war crimes committed by a government.
	You're damn right it's dangerous when you reveal that a government is killing journalists, killing children.
	Criminalize that?
	Yeah, you've criminalized journalism and you've basically protected the mob.
	You've protected the gang.
	So that's what I think.
	They had their two-day hearing, and the ruling is expected to come down.
	The ruling as to whether or not he gets to retry or rehear or oppose the other basis for which they were rejected.
	The ruling is going to be issued in March.
	If it's a no, swiftly carried off to the United States, the country that was plotting his assassination.
	I'm sure they'll put him in the same jail as Epstein.
	So it's a bloody outrage.
	He risked sources.
	Here's the idea.
	Don't commit war crimes and there will be nothing to report, nothing to leak.
	Yes, there were other things that were not related to the war crimes that he released, like cables going back, and the only purpose for doing that was to embarrass the government.
	The government should not be operating in darkness, people.
	Period.
	Ever.
	Full stop.
	The government is not above the people.
	The government is for the people.
	A government that operates in the shadows of its own...
	In the shadows of the woods where it can hide its own crimes, it's not a government.
	It's a mob.
	It's a cartel.
	It's a gangster.
	Which pretty much is what it is.
	Epstein Jail was shut down.
	Well, you get my joke, internal machine.
	Okay, by the people, for the people, and we're done on YouTube, people.
	So here is the link to Rumble.
	Did I miss any?
	Oh, hold on.
	Let me get the superchats here.
	Ian, with his...
	I'm pro...
	Gun.
	Changed my mind hat on a dog.
	The chuckle factor is when this latest harebrained attempt to cancel the debt is overturned again.
	They don't have to listen.
	When they oppose POTUS, SCOTUS, sorry, it's righteous defiance.
	When Trump opposes SCOTUS or even criticizes SCOTUS, it's insurrection.
	It's not hierarchy, people.
	It's lawlessness.
	Do I have that?
	Okay, we're good here.
	So let's...
	Here, hold on one second.
	I'm going to go over here.
	I want to go over to Rumble.
	Boom shakalaka.
	There you go.
	And let's go.
	Here's the link to Rumble.
	If anybody wants to come directly over to Rumble.
	And stay for our local supporter chat.
	I'm not comparing any of our local supporter chat support member people who sit down for interviews with me because they are all unique and beautiful snowflakes, not in the bad way, as in the singularly...
	Unique sense with stories to tell.
	It's gonna be another good one today.
	The number must go down from 1,595 on YouTube to a lower number, and then I will end the stream on the tube.
	There we go, just did.
	Okay, we're off for YouTube, people.
	The full stream or, you know, the remainder of the clips will be on YouTube later, because Fanny Willis.
	We're getting down with a Fanny, and we're getting down with a New York nipple judge, Engron.
	Come on over to Rumble.
	Done on YouTube.
	Peace.
	Let me see here.
	Boom.
	Kid Rock punching a kid.
	But Kid Rock punching a kid at that Umlani Grove was hilarious.
	Kid Rock punched a kid?
	That's not nice.
	You can't do that.
	And let's see what's going on in the chat here.
	Okay, I don't know if this person's spamming, but just to read one, Wilma Strait says, attention, Mel Gibson is live right now.
	Biden is going down tonight.
	Deep State in panic.
	You can't miss this one.
	And I think it's spam.
	That might be spam.
	If it happens more than once or twice in a short period of time, Mel Gibson is live?
	Let me just independently verify.
	Mel Gibson live?
	Mel Gibson isn't live?
	I say I've been...
	Someone said something on the internet that wasn't true.
	How dare you?
	Okay.
	So that's it.
	We're going to go with New York nipple jive.
	So the news of yesterday...
	And I love it.
	I think I figured out the system.
	When the news breaks, you see, you've got to bone up on all of the information and then put out an accurate short video to summarize it for people who don't have the time or don't have the patience to sit down through live streams.
	New York Nipple Judge Angeron.
	I believe Gouveia, Robert Gouveia watching The Watchers, calls him Areola Judge.
	I go with New York Nipple Judge because of the alliteration.
	New York nipple judge.
	This is the guy that, you know, he's a judicially corrupt hack.
	Period.
	Full stop.
	There's no way for anybody who's been following it to look at that guy and think he's anything other than an absolute judicially corrupt partisan hack.
	Communist.
	I was gonna...
	I'll stop there.
	Commie.
	And I remember, like, so I didn't know who Engoron was when this trial initially started.
	The worst thing that I saw at the time was he took his glasses off when the cameras entered through and was like, hey, you might remember me as that judge that prosecuted Trump.
	Hey, thumbs up.
	And they were saying he looked like the Fonz from Happy Days or something.
	Then I learned a little bit about New York nipple judge Engoron, who...
	Won't go over it all here, you know, who bragged about the tools that he has to yield the judicial results that he wants.
	Who, you know, biased to the core.
	Who had a, what's it called, an alumni website where he's posting his rulings against Eric Trump bragging to his sycophants, where he's showing off his disgusting 80-year-old nipples to children.
	Because I presume there are teenagers on that alumni website.
	You know, so he issued his summary ruling on the valuation of Mar-a-Lago.
	Nothing to try here.
	Have a six-week trial on quantum only, basically, because fraud was already established by way of summary judgment.
	One of the tools.
	I've got tools.
	And comes down with the wild...
	Ruling $355 million in a fine for disgorgement of ill-gotten gains in an alleged fraud for which there was no victim and nobody complained and everybody was happy and everybody made money.
	But he got a preferential rate from the bank by artificially overvaluing his assets.
	Except the bank came in and said, we didn't give him a preferential rate because of fraud.
	We wanted his business.
	He was a whale.
	We did it in full awareness of fact and law.
	We'd do it again.
	And we're in fact being prejudiced by your ruling that says he can't do business with us for three years.
	You take the two middle fingers court.
	Okay.
	$355 million plus $98 million in pre-judgment interest at a rate of 9%.
	All right.
	That's $455 million.
	That's nearly a half a billion dollars.
	If he appeals it, which he is obviously doing, apparently by the rules of New York law, he's got to post the entire amount of the award plus annual interest in what they call it, at the court, at the office of the court.
	I forget what it is in Quebec.
	It's the same thing.
	Like, hey, I'm disputing that I owe the amount, so you don't get to take it, plaintiff, in this case, the government.
	So you've got to post it at court.
	And it sits there.
	Just a half a million dollars.
	Sorry, a half a million.
	Half a billion dollars just sitting there.
	So Trump doesn't get to invest it.
	He doesn't get to make five and a half percent interest if you invested in a government bond or whatever.
	So he gets to lose interest on a half a billion dollars while paying the interest to the court.
	Or the other option is to get bond and he would have to put up 10% of the amount and a bond company would have to guarantee the rest and he'd have to pay the bond company fees.
	Either way, this is costing $50 to $100 million a year probably.
	He asks New York nipple judge Areola Mann for a 30-day stay.
	I presume so he can either figure out what to do, maybe make an emergency motion to the Court of Appeal.
	I don't know how this works in the States and I'm going to obviously ask Barnes on Sunday and I haven't been able to find a satisfactory answer.
	Under Quebec civil law, I no longer practice law people, but the rules at the time was that certain execution was stayed of a judgment if you appealed just by virtue of the appeal, and other times you had to ask for permission to stay execution of the order pending an appeal.
	So I don't know who he has to petition for this.
	It seems that he asked the judge, look, don't make us go to the court of appeal.
	Can you just stay your decision for 30 days while we weigh options and possibly petition the court of appeal for a stay of the order?
	And what do you think New York Nipple Judge Engeron said?
	Do you think he went to his alumni website afterwards and said, hey guys, check out the email that I just did shutting them down.
	Do you think he sent it to them beforehand?
	Here we go.
	Look at this.
	This is it.
	Okay.
	Come here.
	Come here, everybody.
	Come, come, come.
	Let's look.
	No, that's not going to work.
	Is that going to work?
	We'll get the request, the ask, and the refusal.
	Here's the ask.
	Oh, okay.
	Sorry.
	I actually got...
	So I got this document from the court filing.
	They had all their freaking email addresses just out there for everybody.
	Like, I think it's...
	I'll tell you conspiratorially, I think, and I'll tell you this afterwards.
	I think they do it on purpose.
	So that, you know, what's her face?
	Even the court there, Allison Greenfield, New York nipple judge's girlfriend, is right there.
	Allison Greenfield.
	They had her email address.
	I'm sure they do it so that people can get the address because it's public.
	Send them threats so they can then pretend to be victims again.
	Don't threaten.
	Don't harass people.
	Period.
	It gives the victimizers the fodder to cry victimhood.
	So don't do it.
	I blacked it out anyhow.
	Because I'm a responsible, non-journalist, political, legal commentator.
	All right.
	Shut my face, Dave.
	Let's go.
	Let's just read this here.
	Dear Justice Ingeron.
	I would have ended this with a love that will echo through the ages.
	Clifford S. Roberts.
	Dear Justice Engron, we are in receipt of your email where the court does not address the defendant's request for a temporary stay of enforcement of the judgment necessary to protect...
	Let me read this again.
	We are in receipt of your email where the court does not address the defendant's request for a temporary stay.
	Oh, so this might not be the most detailed request.
	This is saying, we sent you another file.
	Another request.
	We sent you a previous email.
	We asked for a bunch of things.
	I should go back and pull that one up.
	I'll do that.
	We're in receipt of the email where the court doesn't address the request for a temporary stay of enforcement to the judgment necessary to protect the defendant's appellate rights and ensure an orderly post-judgment process.
	As the court is well aware, the monitor that the court appointed remains in place.
	So there's someone who's making sure that he's not going to sell one of his towers and run out of the country with the half a billion dollars.
	Make sure that he doesn't fire sales.
	Sell under the radar.
	In fact, he doesn't start liquidating his assets.
	So you've got a monitor in place, make sure he's running the business properly.
	Maybe now there's a monitor in place because they're not allowed running the business.
	As such, there's no exigency or potential prejudice to the Attorney General from a brief stay of enforcement of the judgment.
	To the contrary, the prejudice to the defense is considerable.
	Obviously.
	And now people are going to say, well, tough noogies.
	Obviously, executing a judgment is going to be difficult.
	It's going to cause prejudice.
	That's the point of a judgment.
	That's the point of a fine.
	It's supposed to prejudice you.
	There's a difference between, you know, A, if you're appealing, execution of a final order, and an order that is so wildly absurd, unprecedented, unheard of, because to my knowledge, I'm not sure that this has ever been done before, where you have not only no victimless crime, no victim fraud, an order of this magnitude.
	I don't think it's ever been done before.
	And I think the purpose is specifically to bankrupt, obviously.
	So the prejudice of the defense, it's considerable.
	It's astronomical.
	But that's part of the process.
	I mean, you're telling the guy, stop hitting me.
	It hurts.
	He's like, I'm hitting you because it hurts.
	Stupid.
	You think I don't know it hurts?
	I wouldn't be doing it if it didn't hurt.
	Oh, can you stay your order?
	It's hurting us.
	Oh, I know it is.
	To which the judge says, dear Mr. Robert, you have failed to explain.
	Can you imagine sitting that disgusting Disgusting man sitting...
	I think he probably does it in a British accent too, as he plays with his nipples.
	"Alison, dictate this for me.
	You have failed to explain, much less justify, any basis for a stay.
	I am confident that the appellate division will protect your appellate rights.
	Justice Engeron." And do not dictate that I was twisting my nipples as we did that.
	It's just dismiss, dismissive.
	You fail to explain, much less justify.
	First of all, anger on?
	What's that?
	What's the difference here?
	So could you explain without justifying?
	Could you justify without explaining?
	Or is this just verbal diarrhea coming from the mouth of a man or the fingers of a man who is bent on destroying Trump, period?
	You have failed to explain.
	Much less justify.
	So you could offer an explanation without it being a justification as a basis for the stay.
	I'm confident, and this is a needle by the way, just understand this.
	I'm confident that the appellate division will protect your appellate rights.
	We're not talking about appellate rights here necessarily.
	We're talking about survival in the interim.
	I'm sure the appellate division, and I think it's a little wink wink nudge nudge because we're talking about the appellate division.
	Of New York State.
	And I believe it's the one that has issued some questionable rulings.
	Although, from what I understand, N 'Go Run has been overturned by the appeals court a number of times in the context of this very file.
	So, thanks.
	No thanks.
	No stay for...
	No stay for you.
	You don't get no stay.
	So, pody up the dough, get a bond, or petition the court of appeal, which is what I presume has to happen, for an emergency...
	A stay of the order or some interim relief pending appeal.
	I know the argument for what prejudice the government will suffer.
	Well, we want the interest on that $500 million.
	We want 9% interest.
	We want you to pay us interest rates that no citizen gets anywhere without taking massive risk.
	We want you to pay us 9% a year while this goes on.
	9% on $450 million.
	No, I think the interest is on interest as well.
	So I think the interest is on the full 450, whatever.
	So the government's argument is, well, we want that money and we want that interest while you appeal.
	Because if you lose, well, then we've lost out on all those years of interest.
	Except if he loses on appeal, the assets are not going anywhere.
	They might be depreciating in value because people are fleeing that communist hellhole of a state in New York.
	So the assets might go down in value through...
	Total fault of Leticia James and everything else that's going on in that godforsaken state.
	But the assets really aren't going anywhere.
	So other than being denied of interest or the ability to spend the money while he appeals this outlandish ruling, the government suffers no prejudice.
	Crippling someone financially while they have to appeal an outrageous decision is prejudice in and of itself.
	So I don't know what the process is.
	Or who he has to petition now, and I suspect it's going to be the Court of Appeal.
	But the New York Nipple Judge says, no.
	No stay for you.
	And I don't have very good things to say about New York Nipple Judge.
	We're witnessing corruption.
	We are witnessing corruption.
	We are witnessing...
	I mean, I say it's communism in action as a joke, but not as a joke.
	We're witnessing how the government, through corrupt lawfare...
	Can expropriate private assets.
	That's what we're witnessing right now.
	This is nothing shy of the government saying, we're going to find a corrupt judicial means of taking your shit.
	Period.
	Oh, look, that's ours now.
	And we're going to run it.
	Hey, maybe we're going to take your Trump Tower and we'll use it for migrants because we've created a problem.
	And so let's go through corrupt judicial means, manufacture our solution to it.
	Oh no, totally unrelated.
	But it's ours now.
	And why?
	Because we didn't like you.
	And if you ask Hogle, don't worry.
	This is unique to Trump.
	Well, it won't happen to law-abiding New Yorkers.
	What does the law say?
	Who the hell knows?
	No victim, no complainant, no fraud.
	The evidence, even after the summary finding of fraud, disproved the summary finding of fraud.
	We take that property.
	And very convenient, we've got another problem here.
	Too many illegal immigrants because we've opened our borders like a bunch of idiots.
	So we'll nationalize your tower through judicial legal means, corrupt to the core, and we'll turn it into an asylum center.
	Sounds good.
	Sounds good.
	Hold on.
	Hold on.
	I see.
	That's the end of that segment.
	Because I see someone not criticizing, but correcting me, and I want to see...
	You're off in your video about Chicago.
	Government is not asking people to do what the government should be doing.
	Government is asking residents to aid and abed.
	Okay, so even when I'm wrong, here we go, to aid and abed fugitives of the law.
	Illegal for both parties to do lols.
	Okay, fine.
	I thought it was I actually made a mistake and I was going to take it very much to heart.
	So that's it.
	That's New York.
	It's an outrage.
	But, oh...
	Sweet Fanny, Fanny.
	Oh my goodness, people!
	Oh my goodness!
	So yesterday, I put out a video also just talking about the latest news of the day yesterday.
	The judge in the Fanny Willis case, Scott McAfee, we discovered that in 2020, he gave $150 to Fanny Willis' election campaign for, I think it was for district attorney.
	I said, I don't really care about that.
	He worked under Fannie.
	He probably should have disclosed that to the parties in this case.
	I was just on with Nate Brody, Joe Nierman, Good Logic, Eric Hunley, Danny Ahn, and Ron Coleman popped in for like literally 30 seconds and then he had to go do an oof-roof.
	That's a religious thing.
	I had to look it up to actually refresh and remember what it meant.
	Nate, the lawyer.
	Nate the Great.
	Nate, the lawyer, Nate Brody, said it's not that.
	It's actually just totally common that there's overlap, especially when you're a judge, when you're whatever, or when you work with the DA.
	So that incestuous relationship, as I called it, it's a small world of law.
	It's not a big deal.
	They either knew or could have figured it out.
	And the $150 is nominal.
	Okay.
	So I said, I'm sticking with my prediction.
	The judge is going to disqualify Big Fannie Wade and Big Fannie Willis and Nathan Wade.
	All right.
	Then the news of today breaks, people.
	You remember that part of the trial when Yurdy said, no, no, they were dating since 2019.
	They were bumping ugly since 2019.
	And then Terrence Bradley, who they then proceeded to annihilate with gratuitous accusations of sexual assault, he came and said, yeah, I okayed that affidavit where I said their relationship predated.
	That as well, you know, privilege or in confidence, so you can't talk about it.
	And then Nathan Wade gets on the stand and says, no, we only started knocking boots in 2022 because in 2021 and 2020, I was going through medical procedures.
	I was suffering from an illness that precluded my ability to engage in the nasty.
	And then when Fanny Willis gets on the stage, because she's a raging, raging psychopath.
	She gets on the stage and says, I don't want to emasculate a black man.
	I mean, this is verbatim.
	I don't talk in racial terms.
	I don't talk in ethnic terms as a reflex.
	I actually consider that something of a form of racism or discrimination to just look at someone and say, I wouldn't emasculate a Jew.
	I wouldn't emasculate a woman.
	I wouldn't emasculate a black man.
	She gets up and says, I wouldn't emasculate a black man because he was going through some procedure.
	Strongly implying it was prostate cancer and he couldn't get it up for the purposes of doing the nasty.
	The irony being, when someone says, I wouldn't emasculate a black man to the world, that's exactly what she's doing.
	And she knows it.
	It's not to protect from emasculation.
	It's to emasculate.
	It's a power move done by narcissists who want to insult and degrade while pretending that they're not doing it.
	I wouldn't emasculate a black man, but he had something unique that precluded the sex.
	Well, we don't know if they were having sex, but what we do know is that they lied about the date of their relationship, it would seem.
	We don't know if they were having sex, but we certainly know that he spent the night, got there at 12.30 and left at 4.30 in the morning.
	We certainly know that before they said they were officially dating, Before they signed Nathan Wade's contract, they were in contact.
	And I mean, contact of a...
	We don't know about the type of the contract.
	Listen to this.
	And then we'll get into the...
	It's an eight-page motion.
	It's interesting, and I'll do probably a short summary of it later.
	2,000-plus calls, 12,000 texts alleged between DA Fannie Willis, special prosecutor.
	I don't really think it's alleged anymore.
	I mean, I know they're going to say it's alleged because it comes from an expert report, and it hasn't been...
	I don't know.
	Proven or admitted?
	Donald Trump's Georgia attorneys hired a private investigator to map calls, texts between Willis and Nathan Quaid.
	Listen to this.
	A private investigator hired by former President Donald Trump, Georgia's attorneys, alleged more than 2,000 phone calls and just under 12,000 text messages.
	I'm trying to think of anyone on earth that I would have had 12,000 text messages with within a year.
	I wish there were an app to determine it.
	Because I don't even think I...
	I mean, I text my wife a lot.
	Like, she just texted me right now.
	Apparently, she took my kid to meet my mom.
	That's weird.
	That's not so weird.
	My parents are coming over for dinner.
	I don't think I text my wife.
	Dude, I actually...
	I have no idea.
	But that sounds like a lot of text messages.
	You just assume, like, it's five seconds of text message.
	I'll do the math later.
	All right, listen to this.
	On Friday, Trump attorneys, yada, yada, yada.
	Okay, they hired a 59-year-old investigator.
	The eight pages, basically one page consists of certifying what this guy does.
	And as an expert, yes, he's worked with law enforcement.
	He used the system to track and, you know, geolocate their calls.
	And he produced what's called a heat map.
	And it's getting heated up.
	Wade and Willis engaged in a now-acknowledged romantic relationship, but the couple claimed their relationship only began after Willis was hired.
	Willis is the locally elected district.
	What are you summarizing on this crap for?
	Using a cellular geomapping and analysis program called CellHawk.
	Middle Stats report revealed more than 2,000 voice calls and just under 12,000 text messages in an 11-month period prior to Nathan Wade getting the contract.
	Whoopsie doodle.
	Forget disqualification at this point.
	What's the penalty for perjury?
	They're going to get disbarred.
	Friday's courtier said, a heat map highlights the interaction patterns which demonstrate a prevalence of calls made in the evening hours.
	The analysis appears to indicate Willis and Wade were communicating extensively before they say the romantic relationship began.
	Then we got the reports.
	And I just want to show the heat map.
	There's some key findings.
	Listen to this.
	Slides 8. November 30, deeper analysis described in the attached affidavit of Mr. Wade's cell phone tracking on November 30 revealing the following activity.
	Following a call from Ms. Fannie Willis at 11:30 p.m., which continues for 40 minutes, leaving the towers located near his residence at 12:05, outgoing call at 12:38 to Fannie Willis a.m.
	That's after midnight now.
	Traveling directly and arriving within Geofence located at the Dogwood address at 12:43 a.m., leaving the Dogwood address at 4:55 a.m.
	He makes the booty call at 11:30 p.m., gets there by 12:43 a.m., stays and leaves four hours later.
	I would have been out there by one o 'clock in the morning.
	Bada bing, bada boom, I would have been home with my schmeggle in my pants because I'm a married man and don't...
	Oh, God.
	Anyway, that's the best part of that affidavit.
	What's super cool...
	Let's go to the heat map, shall we?
	Where did I put the heat map up?
	I have the heat map.
	Okay, I have the heat map.
	Let me put this down here.
	That's the...
	Okay, close this.
	I saved the heat map.
	It's right here.
	See, if I had mind maps or whatever the heck Govea uses, I could do this smoother, but I like boomerang.
	Boomerang!
	I'm a boomerang!
	Okay, here, hold on.
	Now I go to the window, and it's right here.
	Look at this.
	This is fantastic.
	It's the visual.
	It's the visual of the document that's so good.
	Hawk Analytics.
	Heat map analysis.
	During the period of records in 2021, so January 1st, 2021, to November 30th, 2021, prior to the contract, they reveal the following between Wade and Willis.
	12,000 text messages, 2,000 voice calls, 9,000 text messages.
	Heavy concentration after...
	I can't highlight.
	Here.
	Heavy concentration after hours.
	Seven...
	Days a week.
	That ain't no professional relationship right there, I'll tell you what.
	Maybe it is, maybe it is.
	Maybe they were talking about that conference that they attended back in the day.
	Now, if anybody wants that heat map, Mandelichi, in our locals community, put it up and it's glorious.
	And let me see if I can pull up the actual PDF, which is right.
	Is this supplemental exhibit?
	Ah, yes, here we go.
	Let's bring this up and just meander through it.
	Real quick-like, so that we can all see what's going on.
	It's so wild.
	This is cosmic justice.
	This is karma.
	The corrupt people are the ones prosecuting Trump right now.
	And it just seems that one after the other suffers some form of Trump curse.
	When you are filled with hatred, it eventually consumes you.
	These people are filled with hatred.
	And they will eventually consume them.
	So supplemental defense.
	Exhibit 38 to the hearing.
	On the motion to disqualify.
	President Trump here.
	I follow this thing.
	Yada, yada.
	Okay, fine.
	The cell lock analysis and reports.
	Well, I mean, this is...
	Okay, so...
	We don't need to see this.
	Bottom line, this is exactly what we're just...
	We get into the...
	What's the word I'm looking for?
	Expertise of the expert.
	Charles Milstead, 59 years old.
	Criminal defense investigator.
	Working with yada, yada, yada.
	They get the AT&T documents.
	Upon receipt, began using a leads online analytics tool called Cellhawk.
	It's considered by law enforcement the gold standard.
	And he goes to show, like, they made sure to, like, really be conservative in their assessment by taking only specific cell towers within, like, 3,000 feet of Wade's Yurdy address so they wouldn't accidentally potentially capture other movements.
	Cornerstone of Cellhawk analytics tool is its inability to manipulate data.
	It's uploaded, received by the cell provider custodian.
	Once loaded, it can be cleared and examined in innumerable ways.
	From there, the data can be generated using filters.
	Under normal circumstances, analysis is conducted on data involving far narrower record periods, perhaps a few days or even a few weeks.
	Okay, fine.
	This is how they did it.
	Generating report attaches Exhibit A, isolating all interactions between Mr. Wade and Mrs. Wills during the period, the dates, times, frequency, duration, etc., etc.
	The report revealed 2,000 voice calls, under 12,000 text messages in the 11 months leading up to 2021.
	That date being critical because that is when they said their relationship began.
	No, that was when Wade got the contract, when they said their relationship only began in 2022.
	The romantic, sexy time.
	Listen to this.
	Focusing on geolocation activity near Dogwood Drive, Hapeville.
	That's where Yurdy's apartment was.
	Yurdy, the one who also testified, yeah, they were bumping uglies well before 2022.
	In 2019.
	Can't remember if it was November, but it was in 2019.
	She testified by Yurdy to be the address of her condominium, generating a report to reflect such activity attached as Exhibit C. Excuse me.
	Given the urgency associated with the need to analyze this newly acquired data against the relevant testimony, I construed a very conservative geofence which isolated two cell towers in the closest proximity to Yerti's apartment or condo.
	The purpose of this geofence was to conduct an initial assessment of whether Wade's phone ever connected to these towers.
	Additionally, the modality...
	Was used to eliminate the possibility that hits could be associated with routine travel on either the I-75, I-85, or visits to the nearby attractions or the airport.
	Remember the testimony.
	Oh no, I was there to go to restaurants even though I was going through a procedure that made me very fearful of germs.
	I was going to the airport even though I was going through a procedure that made me very fearful of germs.
	This guy says, I've narrowed this data down to a way that excludes that possibility as per their testimony.
	Following the initial conservative sweep limited to those two towers, I further constrained those findings to hits on the Alpha Sector azimuth, which pointed directly at the Dogwood Drive community.
	Additionally, the report was limited to those occasions when the phone was connected for an extended period of time.
	The conservative analysis using the above-reference modality revealed a minimum of 35 occasions where Wade's phone connected for an extended period of time to either one of those towers in proximity to the Dogwood address, based upon associated data, use, voice, et cetera, et cetera.
	Because the limitations, what do we got here?
	Oh, anyways, then he goes, that's how they did it.
	Bottom line.
	So fantastic.
	Additionally, on November 29, 2021, Mr. Wade's phone was pinging on the East Cobb Towers near his residence following a call from Ms. Willis.
	The call continued.
	His phone left the East Cobb area just after midnight and arrived within the geofence located on the Dogwood address at 1243 in the morning.
	And then the phone remained there until 440.
	55 in the morning when I guess he had to go home not to his I guess I don't know did he go home to his wife I mean they weren't they were they were divorced by that time right no oh no that's right they're just their marriage was irretrievably broken wild Oh, man.
	Yep.
	So that's it.
	They're thoroughly screwed and not in the way that they're used to.
	So we'll see what happens.
	The hearing is going to pick up again next Friday.
	And my goodness, will I be streaming it?
	Guaranteed.
	And that's not even getting like the Simpsons joke.
	Hashtag not a guarantee.
	Guaranteed.
	We're there watching this live.
	Because I think, I mean, I think also they're going to open up the evidentiary hearing as to open up, continue the investigation into Terrence Bradley.
	And, you know, whether or not he was rightly invoking privilege.
	They're caught in a lie where the data confirms the lie, confirms their lie, and confirms the truthfulness of Yurti's testimony.
	Oh my goodness.
	It couldn't happen to better people.
	I do still feel bad for Wade, and I still feel bad for Terrence Bradley.
	I even feel bad for Fannie Willis, but they're going to get what they deserve in this.
	Politically, And possibly, possibly legally.
	Let's go back to the Rumble Rants and see what's here.
	No!
	First of all, thank you for the support.
	But I don't think so.
	They had no self-preservation until such time as they decided to take on these bullshit prosecutions.
	Now it's self-preservation, in a sense, because this is arguably RICO-level corruption itself.
	This is arguably election interference.
	It's a fight for existence at this point, but they didn't have to jump off that cliff.
	I'm not your buddy guy says disbarment isn't enough of a punishment for judicial persecution.
	These people should be sentenced for life to prison with no parole.
	With great power comes great responsibility /accountability.
	The reality is that they're trying to destroy somebody's life.
	They're trying to bankrupt them.
	They're trying to kill them through the process, but they should be thankful at least they're not poisoning them.
	And they are trying to take someone's life effectively.
	Turning someone into a slave by taking their assets unduly is taking someone's life to some extent.
	In a way.
	In a meaningful way.
	Trying to get them locked up for the rest of their lives is trying to steal their life.
	Not through murder.
	Through a form of judicial murder.
	And I believe that they should suffer the same consequences that they would have imposed had they been successful in their criminal, RICO, unjust...
	Persecution.
	I could go with that.
	Whatever the punishment would be, had they succeeded, but then almost like there's no risk.
	But no, whatever the punishment would be, had they succeeded, should be their punishment.
	Anyhow, I can't wait for next week.
	I said I feel sad for Fanny, says RFB.
	Where did it just go?
	There was a...
	There it says.
	You said you feel sad for Fanny, RFB99.
	I do.
	I'm not trying to be virtuous.
	They need to be punished.
	They deserve to be punished.
	But I can still feel bad for them.
	They are weak, fragile, incompetent people.
	Which adds to their malevolence.
	Goodness gracious.
	I feel bad for people who don't even feel bad for themselves.
	But it doesn't change the fact that I do believe they deserve to be punished for what they're doing, legally, for what they've done.
	Politically, absolutely.
	And they will.
	I mean, they're done.
	Terrence Bradley.
	I'm telling you, I'm predicting this as well.
	Now also, it's going to show that Terrence Bradley filed false proceedings in the context of Nathan Wade's divorce.
	But I said it before this news came out.
	You know, Nathan Bradley was just being used as a letterhead for the pleadings that I know Nathan Wade was drafting himself but slapping on Terence Bradley's letterhead.
	Yeah, now Terence Bradley's going to get effed.
	Because if it turns out that he filed pleadings that contained disinformation that he swore to and that he knew it, by all accounts, he's going to face disbarment.
	They're all going to face disciplinary proceedings, probably.
	Maybe not, because politics is what it is.
	So that's that.
	All right, people.
	We got some more stuff on it.
	End Fannie section.
	Session?
	The segment.
	Yes.
	The Fannie segment is over, I think.
	Let me just make sure that I didn't forget anything here.
	Yeah, hold on.
	What was this?
	This is the indictment.
	Oh, that's Biden's indictment.
	Okay, we talked about that the other day.
	And I'll get to the chat and we'll have some fun chat.
	But there's one more.
	There's one more.
	Okay, so this is the article.
	Fannie Wade.
	Okay, that was in the incognito, but we can get rid of that.
	There is stuff that, there's other things.
	By the way, come on over to Locals, where we're going to have our Locals chat.
	Terrence Bradley seemed kind of slow in the head, says Roostang, on Locals.
	I think he, no, I think he was just the deer caught in the headlights.
	And then especially when they ripped his heart.
	Out of his backside in real time.
	And he couldn't understand why.
	He's like, I was so loyal to you, Nathan.
	I was protecting you the entire time.
	And then you decide to eviscerate me for no good reason.
	It doesn't even make strategic sense.
	Oh, all right.
	You know, speaking of corruption, hold on.
	Oh, God.
	Oh, it's so itchy.
	Okay.
	I might have to...
	I'm going to have to, I think, gift these headphones to my kid and get a new pair that are a little bit wider on my ears.
	I think I have big ears and it hurts.
	Okay.
	Speaking of deeply corrupt people with no conscience, which one do we want to start with?
	Let's start with another person who makes me want to puke when I listen to them talk because of the inflection in her voice.
	The puppy dog evil in her eyes.
	No one is above the law.
	This is Fanny Willis talking about...
	Just listen to this.
	Because this is a transition into...
	A transition into a trans topic, which is just glorious.
	Because Fanny Willis is...
	Not Fanny Willis.
	Leticia James is just an idiot.
	The scale and the scope...
	Is staggering.
	Donald Trump's fraud is staggering.
	Staggering.
	And so too is his ego.
	Can you imagine something more inappropriate for a...
	What is she?
	A district attorney or an attorney general?
	Staggering.
	By the way, just bear in mind, she's talking about herself right now.
	Understand that.
	And once you understand that she's talking about herself, it will allow you to understand her.
	The scale and the scope of Donald Trump's fraud is staggering.
	That's a nice pearl necklace you got there, Leticia.
	And his belief that the rules do not apply to him.
	Confession through projection.
	Today, we are holding Donald Trump accountable.
	Bullcrap.
	She's a liar.
	She's a cheat.
	A lack of contrition because they expect someone who did no wrong to show contrition.
	Flouting the rules.
	All of us.
	Get the hell out of New York people.
	country unless your name is Trump and former presidents are no exception.
	Oh my gosh.
	She made a decision is a massive victory for every American who believes in that Get out of New York.
	Persecution.
	Equally.
	Fairly.
	Justly.
	You want to talk about ego?
	Can you imagine any bigger of an ego than what we just saw right there?
	She thinks she's the emperor of Rome.
	It was so gross.
	So gross.
	But then there's this one.
	I love this one.
	I love this one.
	What was this one about?
	Oh, hold on.
	I actually haven't listened to this one.
	I just said, oh, well, while we're on the topic, look at this.
	Look at her.
	Why is it only women that have so far held into account?
	Fonnie Willis has got some guilty pleas.
	E. Jean Carroll got a huge judgment.
	You have.
	Can you imagine that this is the lamentable state of journalism?
	Why is it only...
	I can't believe this is reality!
	Why don't you be...
	Is the word cuck?
	Like, I don't know.
	I've never used that word before unironically.
	I'm trying to use an unironic word to describe this level of groveling bootlicking.
	Who is this guy?
	Why is it only women?
	Why don't you actually say what you're...
	Oh, no.
	Why is it only women that have so far held...
	This is such a good question.
	Heart-hitting turtles.
	I've got a huge judgment.
	You have the second biggest judgment in the history of New York State.
	Why is it women?
	Someone once told me, if you want something done, give it to a woman.
	Thank you.
	Why is it only women?
	I actually, I kind of want to vomit right now.
	Some guilty pleas.
	E. Jean Carroll got a huge judgment.
	You have second biggest judgment in the history of New York State.
	Why is it women?
	Someone once told me, If you want something done, give it to a woman.
	It's such an ego, and she doesn't understand how disgusting she looks.
	It's mind-blowing.
	She does not understand how repulsive, how egotistical, how arrogant, how detached from reality she looks.
	When Barnes talks about the...
	Elitist political class being so detached that they just don't understand?
	I think he's right.
	Even if you were genuinely evil, genuinely Machiavellian in your politics, in your law, you wouldn't act like that because you know everyone is looking at that laughing at what an idiot you look like.
	Someone once told me if you want something done, give it to a woman.
	Who the hell told you that?
	Can you even imagine thinking like that?
	If you want a baby maid, you don't ask a woman.
	Someone's got to make the insanity stop.
	But speaking of women, and speaking of this idiot just not ending her stupidity, this is out of New York.
	I'm not going into the article, by the way.
	NASA County Executive Bruce Blakeman announced he is signing an executive order banning Transgender athletes banning men from women's sports.
	Banning boys from girls' sports.
	That's what that Orwellian inksock newspeak actually means.
	So, he signed an order banning boys and men from girls' sports.
	Okay.
	Kind of makes sense.
	In a world where up is not down and down is not up and good is not evil and evil is not good.
	To which, New York Attorney General James, this is deeply transphobic...
	We'll start again.
	Can't stop laughing.
	It's deeply transphobic and deeply dangerous.
	It's dangerous not letting boys compete in girls' sports.
	It's dangerous not letting men compete in women's sports.
	It's dangerous.
	Because you know what's not dangerous is having a man injure three basketball players in one half.
	What's not dangerous is having a trans male UFC fighter crack the skull of a woman.
	What's not dangerous...
	I can't think of another example offhand.
	You know where I'm going with this.
	In New York, we have laws that protect our diverse communities from hate and discrimination of any kind.
	We will always stand up to those who break our laws and threaten our communities.
	and my office is reviewing our legal options.
	Make it stop, people.
	Allowing men and boys in women and girls sports is not diversity, it's oppression.
	Period.
	It is not diversity to allow XY chromosomes compete against XX chromosomes.
	It's oppression.
	You are not celebrating diversity by compelling girls to compete against boys.
	You are actually engaging in deep misogyny.
	Leticia James.
	But everybody knows you hate yourself already, and so it's only normal that this self-hatred materializes and metastasizes into oppression of other women.
	And if they dare complain about it, they're transphobic, I would imagine.
	Riley Gaines is transphobic.
	Riley Gaines is...
	We have to see what legal remedies we have against the likes of women who don't want to compete against men, because that's discrimination.
	And no one is above it.
	Get the hell out of New York, people.
	Period.
	Full stop.
	People, I dare say we've done it.
	One last reminder before we head over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	If you are inclined, come on over.
	I'll give you the link.
	We're going to engage in our locals chat with Jeanette Victoria.
	That's the link.
	Hatred does not account for their insanity, says Sean Joe.
	Oh, hold on a second.
	Okay, so that's the link.
	Let's just refresh and see if we're having an impact whatsoever.
	41, 890, 42. Good, it's going up.
	It's going up.
	Make it go viral.
	It's my pinned tweet, by the way, now, so if anybody can retweet it.
	And I've tagged a bunch of people who I think should be interested in the story because it's an outrage.
	Okay.
	I was going to do one last thing before we head over to VivaBranchLabLotLocus.com, boy.
	Hey, Bob, hold on one second.
	Right here.
	I'm not your buddy, guy.
	Says, that woman is so despicable.
	I truly cannot stand her absolute fascistic arrogance.
	I also agree with your assessment of holding them accountable to the equivalent punishment of their accusations.
	And then just to go over some chat here.
	You be well.
	All, says Seferdine Squibb, the best in the world health care of Canada.
	Yeah.
	I left New York State over a decade ago, says Streganona.
	Phobia vaccine safe and effective definition change 1984.
	Let's see what we got here.
	Then if we scroll up, I think people who are members of Viva Barnes Law.
	Oh, America First PHL says, I don't feel sad for any of them.
	First, they hate white people and they only care about themselves.
	Well, that was it.
	I saw it.
	There we go.
	No, I'm not your buddy.
	We saw that.
	Okay.
	And then we got another one.
	In real time, The Soaring Sparrow says, Viva, we are witnessing the tropes of crazed woman in white, E. Jean Scarecrow, and the black queen mentality running the legal system.
	As a woman, it is an embarrassment and a horror.
	Sets us back.
	Well, it does remind me of that line from Family Guy, back when they could afford to be politically incorrect.
	Congratulations on setting your people back a thousand years.
	I mean, I remember the context, which I won't go into.
	But basically, it's like...
	This is the type of behavior that sets everybody back.
	I'm saying this even when Soros does these things.
	It perpetuates the worst of stereotypes.
	It reflects poorly on all members of identifiable groups, especially when they invoke their race, religion, creed, sex for doing it.
	If you want something, give it to a woman.
	So you're saying basically now that I should judge all women by the actions of this woman?
	You don't want that, and I don't want that, and I won't do it, but just please stop doing it, Leticia.
	You don't represent women, and Lord have mercy if you represent all women.
	I'm not reading that, Mr. Alien.
	You're trying to get me in trouble.
	How Viva got cancelled by reading a chat.
	Sean Joseph, Vanny, Leticia, and Big Mike make some linebacking.
	Okay.
	All right.
	So we're going to do this.
	We're going to end this on Rumble.
	Come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com for our wonderful party.
	I'll see when Jeanette checks in to the backstage.
	And we're going to do that maybe an hour.
	And then what time is it?
	Four, five.
	Then maybe I'm gonna like push my luck, try to cram out a vlog and not get in trouble with my parents for being late for dinner.
	We are trying a smoker.
	I smell it.
	We're smoking some chicken.
	I'm gonna make a barbecue.
	Maybe get some steak from Easy Meats on Glades.
	Easy Meats.
	E-E-E-A-S-Y.
	Meats.
	M-E-A-T-S.
	Easy Meats.
	Brazilian meat shop butcher on Glades and near the...
	441.
	Not an ad, but I will sell their stuff every day because it's so damn good.
	It sells itself.
	All right.
	Now, all that to say is I'm going to go over here and end the stream on locals.
	On Rumble.
	On Rumble.
	Come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	And locals, here I come.
	Peace out, peeps.
	Sunday night show.
	It's going to be banger.

▲