All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 23, 2024 - Viva & Barnes
01:16:46
Fani Willis SAVE BY THE COURT (For Now); Soros & The Atlantic THREATEN Trump? & More! Viva Frei Live
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Let me see that we're live here.
Okay, so I'm getting updates on the upper right-hand corner of Rumble Studio, which I'm using.
They've launched today, people.
Wait, I'm going to get into the stream in a bit.
For now, I just got to make sure everything looks like it's working properly.
So what I'm going to do, we should be live streaming across the interwebs, or the only places that matter, but two of the three matter more than the third.
YouTube, Rumble.
And vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Now, we did a test run.
We did a couple of test runs on Rumble Studio before.
I sent them a list of, like, with the help of our community, I sent them a list of, like, 15 action items that they had to resolve, integrate the improvements.
Now I'm seeing live chat in the comment section, which is great.
They are going to integrate a number of more improvements as things go along, but you've got to...
Give them credit for doing what they're able to do right now.
And, you know, they're going to make this into something amazing.
What I'm looking forward to see is if we are live on YouTube.
If I go live here.
I don't think we're live on YouTube.
So I don't know if that's my mistake.
Okay, that doesn't matter, so we'll do that afterwards.
VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
We're live.
Okay, good.
So the only problem here seems that we're not live on YouTube.
Bill, if I can bring up pictures of Templeton while we're live streaming, that'll be the most amazing thing ever.
Okay, good.
We're live on Locals, so the only one that did not auto-populate is YouTube.
And the question is going to be, why?
I'm up at the top here.
Now I go here.
Yeah, so the link doesn't seem to be good.
Let me see if I can fix this in real time easily.
Hmm.
No, I don't think we're going to be able to do it.
So forget it.
We're not going to be on YouTube today whatsoever.
Now I can see.
Look at this.
No.
Oh, that's cool.
So I can click on a profile.
I want to bring up a comment.
It's the only way to bring up comments by doing this.
Pin.
Okay, see now I can do that and then I can unpin it.
Okay, good.
Look at this.
So it says good here on Rumble.
So it looks like the only way I can bring in comments is by pinning them in studio.
And then I can, let's just see here.
I'll go to Astral Doge Plays and I'll say pin this one up now.
Astral Doge Plays.
That is a locals comment.
Now the question is going to be when Rumble rants or tips come in from locals, how can I bring those up?
So we're good on Rumble.
We're good on Locals.
Doesn't matter.
That is probably me that did not set up the RTMP properly in Rumble Studio.
And Rumble Studio looks like it's good to go, people!
Oh my goodness!
And we talked about the big news that Chris deployed?
No.
Divulged.
That Chris explained on Patrick BetDavid.
What day is it today?
Hold on a second.
Is it Tuesday or Wednesday?
It's Tuesday.
Yes.
Patrick BetDavid yesterday.
Chris Pawlowski, the CEO of Rumble, was on there.
Talking about YouTube sucks.
Checky checky.
Yep.
I call it Commitube.
It's good in that it allows us to reach the bigger playground so that we can suck people over to our side of the interwebs.
So I'm going to keep doing it.
I'm not cutting off my nose to spite my face.
Here's a free test rant.
All it'll cost you is another mullet mention.
All right, and now I can see it.
Check this out.
Okay, here.
There you go.
Look at this.
Boom.
So I can see the rant.
Now the only question is I'm not asking locals for a tip, but it'll happen.
I want to see what the locals tips look like.
So when I bring it up now, do you see the amount of it?
I don't think you do.
You see like this rant.
Okay, that was $1.
Okay, and I'm going to unpin that like that.
Okay, and we got Finboy Slick.
Here we go.
Here's a rant.
So I don't think it gives the amount.
Not that that matters, but full credit to the people who support this.
Natalie McClendon.
Boom shakalaka.
So by the way, if anybody's interested, I don't know if it's published and viewable at vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Let me see.
Let me see.
It is...
Everybody?
If anybody wants to see the new vehicle, I call her Barb for Badass Red Bronco.
Plus, my mother's name is Barbro.
It's in Locals exclusive, people, so they all got the sneak peek.
Okay, so now everything's as good as it's going to get for this stream.
Oh, yes, sorry.
So two things to notice.
They're working on it.
It doesn't create a separate video link in Locals in advance of the stream.
So it pops up when it goes live, but it doesn't create...
The video livestream beforehand.
So they're gonna add that because it's a very useful feature.
It does it on Rumble.
So when I create the livestream, you can see the live, you know, upcoming on Rumble.
But the pre-live chat is not integrated in Rumble yet.
So there's gonna be chat on the Rumble video that gets up live, but there's not one for locals.
But I can't see that chat through Rumble Studio until I go live.
So if I want to interact with the chat, I'm going to have to go to Rumble for the time being, but they're going to fix that as well.
So those are the two things that they're going to work on, and I'm going to unpin the rant.
What was I going to say?
Viva, I want to hear you say, take off, eh, you hoser?
Take off, eh, you hoser?
Hold on.
Yeah, that was from those guys there, the two Canadian guys, eh?
Hmm.
Okay, so now that I know that it's good, I can do what I want it to do, which is start the stream.
Properly.
So let me bring myself out and get the intro video up here.
Let me see if this works.
I'm going to take myself out.
Share screen.
I don't know if anybody can hear me here.
What do we want to start with?
Tucker Carlson.
We want to start with this.
So let's bring this up.
Okay, now it takes me out, which I don't like.
I can't see that.
Okay, Tucker Carlson is there.
Do I have to go to presentation?
Okay, so now I'm here.
Okay, now we're going to have a test number one, people.
Hold on.
Test number one.
I can't do the intro video without me being in the screen, so maybe I'll talk to them about that, but I don't really care about that.
everybody.
Tucker Carlson just posted this on Instagram.
Thank you for your call.
You have reached the media line.
For all urgent requests, please send your request by email.
Yes, hi.
I couldn't understand the French part, but it's Tucker Carlson calling from the United I love the ominous music.
We are coming to liberate Canada.
We are coming to liberate Canada.
And we'll be there soon.
Okay, so first question, people.
Did you hear that?
Was the audio working there?
Let me go.
Now, look at this.
I can go to solo.
Leave it in the backdrop.
Did you hear the audio?
Question number one.
Yes, we did.
Love this Tucker video, Saving America and Canada.
Okay, good.
So you all heard the audio.
They've obviously resolved that problem from the last time.
It's fantastic.
Okay.
Veuillez-nous laisser un message pour le premier ministre Justine Trudeau.
C 'est une blague, tabarouette.
Laughing mouth.
Yes, audio.
Yes, heard that.
Okay.
Perfect.
All right, people.
Well, oh, God.
We've got a show for today?
I was like, every day, every day.
I was just on with Joe Nierman.
Good logic.
Last night, I was like, oh, my goodness.
What's going to happen between last night and this morning that there's going to be something interesting, newsworthy, legal-oriented to talk about?
There is no shortage of the news.
First of all, let's just get back to Tucker Carlson because you undoubtedly know that the media...
The lying scumbags that they are are going to try to frame this as something of a threat.
What does he mean he's coming to liberate Canada?
Hold on.
Calling Justin Trudeau before our arrival.
Could anyone look friendlier than Tucker Carlson?
Ligne médiatique.
Yes, hi.
I couldn't understand the French part, but it's Tucker Carlson calling from the United States.
And I'd be grateful if you pass a message on Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
We are coming to liberate Canada.
We are coming to liberate Canada.
And we'll be there soon.
Well, there's the old expression, you can't save people who don't want to save themselves.
He's coming to Liberate Canada.
I guess he's doing a Canadian tour.
He's going to do some speaking gigs.
He's going to try to talk some sense into Canadians.
I was having an exchange with someone on the interwebs who purports to work in the Canadian military, who says, I served in the Canadian Air Force.
Canada's nothing close to a totalitarian, tyrannical regime.
All of you need to stop with that.
Let me bring up the...
We're going to start with the Canadian segments, and then we're going to get into the other stuff.
So now, looky here.
Look at this.
Boom shakalaka.
Here's the tweet from Patrick Gagnon, who says, to the people who refer to Canada as a dictatorship, I served in the Canadian Armed Forces for two decades of my life.
First of all, the fact that you served doesn't mean you learned the right lessons.
You deserve respect and gratitude for your service.
It doesn't lend legitimacy to your bad political takes.
I can state without a doubt.
That you have absolutely no idea what living in those conditions are like.
Oh, I'm sorry, did you serve in the force or did you live in tyrannical regimes for two decades?
I highly encourage you to join the Canadian Air Force and see for yourself.
First things first, like optically, if you want to say that Canada is not a military regime, a tyrannical dictatorship, whatever, maybe don't post a photo that literally looks like it came out of Kim Jong-un's photo album.
The fact that someone joined the army and served.
Means that they are brave, selfless, but not right.
As a blank doesn't make you any writer on any given subject, any more correct on any given subject.
And I tell you, like I said in the responses, which you can't see here, I interviewed people who came from communist countries.
I interviewed people who came from dictatorships.
My neighbor, back in Canada, at one point in time said to me, David, don't make jokes about Canada being communist.
It's not there.
And then nine months later, when I run into him again, he's like, Okay, now you can say it.
I don't know why he just went from Eastern European to Middle Eastern, but whatever.
My response to this man who served for two decades in the Canadian Air Force, by the way, nothing also a sign of less tyranny, less government dictatorship, than the military telling you to shut up, the country's not a dictatorship.
Government detainment with no due process.
For those of you who may have forgotten, those things called...
Quarantine hotels, government-designated quarantine facilities, where they were whisking people off to, against their will, with no due process, and in certain cases, without even allowing them to consult with an attorney or tell their families where they were going.
Yeah, no, that's nothing dictatorship about that.
Forced house arrest with no due process.
True, that's a provincial issue.
But my goodness, the federal can get involved and stop.
Provincial abuses of charter rights.
Forced house arrest with no due process.
Five and a half months in Quebec in 2021.
Another month and a half the next year because it worked so well.
Prohibition of protest and public assembly.
Everybody remember that injunction that came out of Nova Scotia?
Prohibiting outdoor protest against COVID mandates.
There's no dictatorship there, eh, Mr. Canadian Air Force?
Coerced submission to medical experimentation.
Need I elaborate on that one?
Frozen bank accounts with no due process.
Nothing tyrannical about that.
State-funded media promoting government propaganda.
Nothing tyrannical dictatorship about that.
Political prisoners detained for years with no trial.
The Kutzmen.
There's 13 of them, but I think only four are in jail.
Pre-trial detention.
Political prisoners.
I already just said that one.
Political persecution for exercise of unfavorable speech.
And I could go on.
And I just said, I've interviewed.
It's an amazing thing.
Like, oh, I was in the Canadian Air Force for two decades, so trust me, I know what a dictatorship is.
Yeah, I interview people who fled communist, tyrannical regimes and are now saying, holy shit, how do you people not see it?
It's here and it's coming.
Oh, but I'll defer to my own experience, which is less than those who I don't want to listen to.
All right.
Not the same direction.
It's not the same distance, but it's one heck of the same direction.
So on the menu for today, by the way, we're going to talk about...
Fannie Willis.
What you talking about, Willis?
Because there is some news coming out of Big Fannie's case.
And yesterday, there was a hearing before the judge in the Nathan Wade-Jocelyn Wade divorce proceedings tackling two issues, one of which was unsealing the divorce proceedings, and the other of which was addressing Big Fannie Willis' motion to quash her subpoena.
We're going to talk about that.
We are going to talk about what I think is...
Objectively, unequivocally, categorically, a not-so-veiled, poorly-veiled, or damn obvious threat against President Donald John Trump.
Posted in an article by The Atlantic, tweeted by Satan's spawn himself, Alex Soros.
And I actually have to engage with people on Twitter who are telling me that you're connecting dots that don't exist, Vivo.
We're going to get to that.
The other thing that I was going to talk about?
Oh, the invasion at the border.
I'll play a video.
It made the rounds last week, but maybe it's going to be a little more poignant this week.
And some other stuff.
Now let me go to the chat because I can follow it all the way through.
Look at this.
It's in the saving.
Freedom is saving gold, silver, safety.
Smash the like harder, you bigots, says Jacob Castro.
I just wish it was an easier way just to highlight the comment.
Coutts lawyers suck because they should be released to prepare their court case.
I can't judge.
There's nothing the lawyers in the Coutts case could do to secure the freedom of their wrongly imprisoned clients.
And let's see here.
You could liberate Canada with Nerf guns.
Well, Justin Trudeau is gathering all of the tampons from the men's washroom just in case there's any nosebleeds.
You know, you can stick those things up your nose and that's it.
Okay, so let's get to the first things first.
What do we do?
We want to do Fanny Willis first?
Let's do Fanny Willis first.
I mean, we can't all be left out of the let's do Fanny Willis.
Terrible.
Just terrible.
Did I pull up the videos from Fanny Willis?
Oh yeah, here we go.
Here we go.
So let's bring this video up.
Not now.
And let's press play.
Let me set the context here.
I probably just jumped right into that a little quick studio.
Bring back studio.
And now I go to solo.
So yesterday...
In the divorce proceedings, the judge, the guy you just saw there, who's a fine judge, I would have liked things to go differently, but I think he got it right, is adjudicating on two questions of law.
One of which is, do they unseal Jocelyn Wade and Nathan Wade's divorce proceedings because allegedly they were improperly sealed because public documents is the rule and there's only, under certain circumstances, you can seal a file.
Used very liberally these days.
Okay.
And then the other question was whether or not they quashed Fannie Willis' subpoena.
Nathan Wade's attorney did not get involved from what I saw.
It was a 30-minute hearing, pleadings.
It was good.
It was fun.
Nathan Wade's lawyers did not really intervene much.
It was mostly Jocelyn Wade and Ashley Merchant, the lawyer for the defendant in the Georgia Rico case, who's the one that made this motion in the first place.
They present their arguments.
As relates to the unsealing of the divorce proceedings, they talk about whether or not there's the natural public interest in public court files, public hearings, and the exception being if there's confidential information, preserve the rights of whomever.
And then there's a procedure to go through to seal a court file, which apparently in this case didn't happen.
The prior judge, prior counsel, they agreed on it, and then they just sealed the file.
So the judge in this one overturns that decision rightly.
But wait until you hear what he has to say at the end, because it's perhaps the most telling thing ever.
So listen to this.
I've summarized the arguments so you don't have to listen to it yourselves.
this is the ruling.
Right.
I find that the prior order, although it was by consent of parties, was not properly entered because the Uniform Superior Court rules require a hearing to be had.
We can find no evidence that any such hearing was ever had.
So you understand what he's saying there.
Even if it's by consent, you still have to have a hearing.
He wasn't the judge who entered that ceiling.
And he's basically saying to the other judge, you should have had a hearing.
There was no hearing, and I don't see any good reason to keep this sealed.
I'm going to grant the motion vacating the consent order sealing the record.
And I'll do that today.
I have your written order, Ms. Merchant.
Unless you have something else, you're excused.
Yes.
Well done, Counselor.
Well done, Counselor.
And everyone in that crowd is extremely happy.
I think that even the old man right here, I think that's Nathan Wade's lawyer.
Hey, they're laughing.
Good job, Merchant.
You just blew this flipping case wide open.
Oh, is she?
First of all...
Now we have Mr. Axe on this motion.
That is phenomenal.
And that woman is happy and job well done.
I mean, everybody knows it.
What the...
First of all, why was this sealed in the first place?
And don't tell me that there's not a public interest to know what was going on in this file.
One of the arguments they raised, at least Jocelyn Wade's counsel, it's like, yeah, it was consent order.
At the time, I don't think I knew that my hubby was boning Fannie Willis and taking payments under a contract that he entered into the day before he divorced me.
Yeah, talk about circumstances that might change my desire to seal the file.
But the judge said, as a matter of procedure, there was no hearing on it.
There was no reason to do it.
Bam!
Unsealed.
Well done, councillor.
Well done indeed.
Now, Marco Polo has already started going over the documents that are being unsealed as we speak.
Look, I can't do everything, and I try to keep up.
So I'm going to go catch up on that.
I'm going to bring that up afterwards.
But let's just get to the second part of this hearing, which was, does Big Fanny Willis have to sit her Big Fanny down to go through deposition?
And unfortunately...
The judge got it right, but the answer is going to be no.
Hold on, here it is.
Is it four minutes?
Yeah, it's four minutes.
I'll pause it periodically so that we can appreciate what's going on in as much as I understand what's going on, which I think I do.
Well, both sides have good points.
In this case, it was, is Fannie Willis exempt from deposition because she's a...
What are they, a political figure of importance?
She's a political figure of importance, and unless she has unique knowledge of the subject matter, she's exempt from being deposed.
Okay, so the question was not whether or not she's an important position of power.
Everybody can concede that she is, although her attorney was really rubbing it in the face of everybody.
She's Fulton County's district attorney, or Georgia district attorney.
She manages 1,300 people.
Okay, that wasn't the question.
The question was really more, and the judge got to it, does she have unique knowledge relevant to the divorce proceedings?
And the judge, as you're going to hear, is going to say, maybe she does, maybe she doesn't, I don't know.
But it seems like the most important person with the most unique knowledge of this would be Nathan Wade himself.
And if something comes out that Nathan Wade can't answer, you've got to go ask Big Fanny, I'll reassess the subpoena then, but listen here.
Ms. Hastings, I agree with.
The irretriebly broken does not prohibit you from presenting evidence of adultery if that's relevant to equitable division of marital estate or marital assets.
I agree with you there.
You're not prohibited from getting into that.
However, I also agree with Mr. Axon that OCGA 9-11-26.1 is there for a reason.
And the key part to me I mean, this is where you can't let your personal preference get in the way of appreciating that the judge is right.
And you'll hear what he's going to say, like, okay, as of when were you boning Fannie Willis?
Or when were you boning my husband?
Ms. Fannie, well, your husband can answer that question.
I don't have unique, I might have knowledge, but it's not unique, it's shared knowledge, if you know what I'm saying.
Where I think she might have unique knowledge, I'll impart my wisdom at the end of this, but listen to this.
And under D1, that statute, that the party seeking the deposition has exhausted other reasonable means of discovery.
There you go.
Such discovery to be inadequate.
So you've got to exhaust the other reasonable means.
I'm not in a position where I have sufficient information to make a finding either way of whether the proposed opponent has unique knowledge.
Because this case is a divorce, and I understand there are children, but they have attained the age majority.
So we don't have to deal with child custody or visitation or child support.
Or who's going to have the final say on medical or educational or religious issues?
So that takes out a large portion of what people normally fight over in divorces.
It seems to me, and you can correct me if I'm wrong, that what we have here is a math problem.
Equitable division of the marital assets after determining what they actually are.
alimony and attorney's fees that's a mathematical equation that we need to solve the solution will be a number or three numbers but the numbers will be expressed in dollars and cents I don't know if there's any damages or punitive damages resulting from infidelity.
I know that there's that discussion as to whether or not, not the discussion, but she can raise infidelity later on.
Some people are saying, well, It's relevant when they entered into this contract, whether or not Fannie broke any laws, any ethics rules in Georgia.
That is true, but there are two different jurisdictions here of relevance.
One is going to be in the context of the divorce proceeding.
So, was there concealment of assets?
Fannie Willis is not uniquely aware of it, because Nathan Wade is going to be familiar as to when he started hiding his assets.
Whether or not there was disposition of assets, you know, gifting stuff to Fannie.
Well, Fanny's not uniquely aware of that, or she doesn't have unique knowledge of that.
Nathan Wade has knowledge of that.
So depose Nathan Wade.
And if he can't answer the questions, go ask Fanny.
And without Mr. Wade having been deposed yet or given sworn testimony yet, I'll note for the record we have a hearing set for nine days away where sworn testimony can be presented.
Without me Knowing what Mr. Wade would say, it seems to me that Mr. Wade would be the first and best source of information on what his income has been and how he's been spending it, and that he would have firsthand knowledge of whether he's engaged in an extramarital affair.
Only after I hear what Mr. Wade has to say do I think I can make the determination of whether the proposed opponent has any unique knowledge about these issues.
I can tell you what, one thing she does have unique knowledge about, was he any good in the...
Because once again, this is a math problem, and that we need to find a solution to.
So, with all that being said, I'm not prepared, Mr. Axum, to grant your protective order.
But, but...
Since the deposition is set for tomorrow, and our first evidentiary hearing is set for the 31st, I will issue a stay, and I will stay the deposition until I'm in a better position to make a determination of whether the proposed department would have any unique knowledge, unique being the key word there, that is not possessed by Mr. Wade himself.
Can't disagree with that, and as much as you might want to, it's very difficult to disagree with that.
So they're going to stay, they're not going to quash the subpoena, put it on pause.
Let Nathan Wade testify on the 31st.
My goodness, that's going to be broadcast live.
That's going to be amazing.
Okay, we're going to get to what Marco Polo has been disclosing, or at least releasing as of this morning.
I'm just noticing things now.
I want to take note of these things.
I can't write in the chat, so that's interesting.
How do I write in the chat?
Okay, we're going to work through some kinks in real time.
It doesn't look like I can actually...
Like in the chat or share links in the chat.
So if I want to share the link to Locals, that's difficult.
If I want to share the links to the tweets, I don't think I can do that.
Okay, take note.
And if anybody who has my text number wants to DM me these improvements afterwards, please go ahead.
And if you have any improvements of your own, share them in our Locals community.
VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com Okay.
That is...
There, and I haven't seen.
I'm trying to just see if I can get any more.
Okay, I'm just looking here.
Oh, so now I can go back here and say, okay, here.
Hold on.
Let me just do this here.
I'm going to open up the link in Locals.
Okay, good.
And now I can go to Rumble and put the link here.
Okay, now let me go to Locals and see if I've missed any tips.
Okay, so I got the two tips so I can see those.
Okay, good enough.
Everything look like it's working well enough.
Okay, so that's the latest from Fannie Willis.
I'll probably do a car vlog because it'll be fun to...
You know, highlight those clips.
What's being released today?
Let me see if I...
I believe I have Marco Polo.
Yes, I do.
Right over here, Mr. Marco Polo doing the proverbial Lord's work.
Okay, let me see here.
Okay, this is...
Okay, here we go.
So we're going to rapidly go through this because I don't know how much is here.
Just unsealed the divorce docket of Fanny for DA.
Is that her?
I'm not following her.
Well, I'm following her now.
All right.
Download the entire docket.
Yeah, by the way, people, download...
Well, Marco Polo's got it, and so if I need anything, I'll get to him.
But let's see here.
Paramore...
Okay, what is this?
Fanny for DA's Paramore held in contempt in August.
What does a Paramore mean?
Oh yeah, we knew about this.
Okay, so he was in contempt.
Let's see here.
Defendant's motion is granted.
This is an order on defendant's motion for citation of contempt and second motion to extend mediation deadline.
Paramore, so I guess that's Nathan Wade and I see the word amour in it, so it must have to do with a lover.
Defendant's motion is granted.
The court finds the petitioner in willful contempt of the court's May 10, 2023 order granting defendant's motion to compel.
That's to say he was supposed to provide documentation and refuse to do it willfully.
Defendant may purge himself of this contempt by delivering the discovery described in paragraphs 7 and 8, yada yada, within a certain delay.
Okay, fine.
So he was held in contempt.
Not a good man.
Okay, what else do we got?
Many of the docket entries remind us of the child support litigation our founder was involved with.
Was involved with Hunter Biden in Arkansas.
Okay, so the guy withheld basic information.
Yes, but just as important are the dates of the divorce, filing, and Fannie for DA's appointment of Wade.
Her paramour.
What the heck does paramour mean?
Hold on one second.
Paramour.
Paramour definition.
A lover, especially the illicit partner of a married person.
Add it to the vocab, people.
Thank you, Marco Polo.
So let's just see what the dates are.
This is the defendant's motion to reopen discovery, presumably once she found out that her hubby hubby had been boning another woman and hiding assets potentially from her while bilking her bank accounts.
And she's a single mother of 26 years, a stay-at-home mom.
The divorce case was filed by plaintiff Nathan J. Wade on November 2nd, 2021.
Since that date, he is engaged in a...
Pervasive pattern of what can only be described as a willful and deliberate effort on the part of the plaintiff to withhold information and documents which are relevant to the instant divorce action and necessary for a defendant to properly defend herself and assert her claims regarding alimony and equitable division of marital property.
Can't divide it if you don't know what you got.
Okay, so they filed for divorce on November 1st.
This we knew, and then he...
No.
They signed...
Okay, so what did they do?
What happened here?
Hold on a second.
Okay.
Defendant recently learned that plaintiff was appointed the anti-corruption...
They give themselves the names of the saints.
The devils always cloak their names in the names of the saints.
Hold on a second.
Okay, I'm going to close this.
So yes, the anti-corruption unit...
Defendant recently learned that plaintiff was appointed the anti-corruption special prosecutor for Fulton County in the matter of State of Georgia versus Donald John Trump on November 1, 2021.
As stated, plaintiff learned the instant divorce action from his wife of 26 years.
As stated, plaintiff filed the instant divorce action from his wife of 26 years on or about November 2nd.
2021.
Got my contract.
Bye-bye, baby.
Now I'm going to go bone the woman who just gave it to me.
Oh, I, I, I, I, did J. Degeneracy.
Degeneracy.
Upon information and belief, plaintiff has earned no less than half a million dollars in his role as...
What was his role, though?
It was anti-corruption.
Anti-corruption special prosecutor.
He's earned no less than half a million bucks.
Okay.
Phenomenal.
Outrageous.
Hilarious.
Do I go back here?
Okay, so we've done this.
We've done that.
In addition to Wade's appointments and the compensation thereof being a black box to his own estranged wife.
Wade has tried to play some shell games with corporate entities.
Okay.
Oh, you know what?
Forget about it.
I mean, there's no question.
Plaintiff has dissolved and formulated entirely new business entities purportedly before and during the pendency of this case, yet he has refused to comply with discovery, hence the contempt from earlier, so as to provide even the most basic of financials regarding same.
For instance, plaintiff was a partner owner and the registered agent for Wade, Bradley, and Campbell Firm, LLC, Limited Liability Corporation.
However, plaintiff dissolved said...
During the pendency of his divorce case, and is now, quote, partner at Wade Campbell Firm, LLC, per the company website.
However, a search of the Georgia Corporation's division reveals no such registered entity, but does reveal separate active entities for Nathan J. Wade, PC.
What do I want to say here?
Something prosecutor?
Or something council?
Prosecutor council?
Essentially, plaintiffs acting in ways which...
Make him appear to be deliberately transitioning his business in order to hide information.
Oh my goodness.
How long does this go for?
Isn't this paragraph rich, says Marco Polo.
The judge reversed this unjust sealing order today.
The sealing was done by an earlier judge who has since recused due to campaign donations.
That might explain...
That might explain the procedurally improper sealing of the case in the first place.
In this case, the injury to the party's professional reputation significantly outweighs the public benefit by allowing this document to remain sealed.
This public has no interest in having unfettered access to this filing.
Bullshit.
And there is no public benefit herein.
Bullshit.
Can you imagine this?
It's institutionalized corruption from top to bottom.
Oh, there's no interest in knowing when this man entered into a contract with Fannie Willis.
Let me think.
In the context of the divorce, it would be public knowledge when he was appointed special prosecutor.
What relevancy to the divorce?
What public interest in the context of the divorce?
The corrupt hiding of assets by the man who's allegedly the prosecutor in this case?
That might be a public interest?
Criminals acting like criminals might be of public interest.
Okay, so I think that's all that Marco Polo has provided for the time being.
And that's good enough.
Let me refresh and just see here.
Marco Polo.
So that's it.
Okay, that's good.
That's what we've got for now.
So let's get out of here so I don't accidentally share my DMs, not that there's anything in there.
Yeah, yeah, the public interest, Your Honor.
Might be in the public knowing that the man who's prosecuting the former president and, in all likelihood, soon to be president, is himself a corrupt scumbag of questionable ethics, questionable morality, and questionable abeyance of the law, abiding by the law.
Maybe.
Just maybe.
Okay, now what I'm noticing here...
Oh, here's...
Okay, see, they need to highlight the rumble rants better, so I'll just take note of that.
Hold on.
Irony does not even begin to describe Nathan.
Let me just take that as a note.
Highlighting rumble rants needs to be better.
No, not better.
That's negative speech.
More prominent.
You see, I could be a CEO because I'm so diplomatic.
One must use constructive language, not negative language.
One must encourage.
I'm joking.
But yeah, it needs to be more prominent because...
Thank you very much, Finboy.
See, if I scroll up now, I'm looking for any other Rumble Rants.
It would be great if they had them highlighted, bookmarked like they used to be.
Okay.
So...
I'm not reading that.
Okay, so that's the latest from Fanny Willis.
Car vlog incoming because...
What the hell else am I going to do with my life?
This is my life and I love doing it.
Okay.
As a segue, by the way, to, you know, it might be useful knowing that the people...
Prosecuting alleged RICO violations might be themselves the ones committing RICO violations.
Let's go to George Soros.
Son, spawn of Satan.
Overtly, in my humble opinion, and I'm not a dramatic person looking for scandal.
No but to that.
This is an overt threat, and anybody who thinks it's not is an idiot.
So here's the tweet.
I'll try to pull up Laura Loomer's breakdown of it.
Laura Loomer's interpretation goes a little bit deeper than I might have gone, but I can't say that she's wrong.
This is what Soros tweeted.
Alexander Soros.
What a good-looking young man.
That doesn't even look like the same guy that was spewing verbal diarrhea on the stage of the WEF.
So that's Alexander Soros.
Hold on a second.
Hold on a second.
What is this?
What is this?
It looks like a dam.
Okay, I don't know what the meaning or import of that is.
All right, so this is Alex Soros, George Soros' son.
He tweets out this.
Last year, the crime and inflation crisis largely evaporated.
So did the leading theories about what had caused them.
Okay.
Crime, inflation.
So they show a bullet hole and they show some money.
Anybody out there notice anything interesting about this?
I mean, it's crazy, because you'll sound crazy for pointing it out.
It's not an accident.
I mean, it's so not an accident, you have to be an idiot to think it's an accident.
This is a bullet hole, and this is, look closely, $10, $20, we're up to $30.
Another $5, $35.
That's a $10 right there, an old one, not in circulation.
Where'd they get that one?
$45.
That's $1.
$46.
$47.
A bullet hole?
And $47.
When you consider what goes...
First of all, that's not a stock photo image either.
Like, I went to Alamy, stock photo.
I went to Shutterstock.
I went to the other one there, the big one.
Not AP.
What's the big one where if you use their photos, you get copyclaimed?
I went looking for stock photos.
There is no stock photo with $47 American cash.
That is a bullet hole.
And that is number 47. Who would be the 47th president of the United States of America?
If Trump gets elected, it will be Trump.
He was 45. Biden's 46. 47 to be determined.
Oh, no, no.
It's just a coincidence.
It's a coincidence.
I'll pull up...
What's her face?
It's Laura Loomer's interpretation afterwards.
Let's just...
And by the way, I give everybody the benefit of the doubt, even when they are Satan and they don't deserve it.
All right.
Maybe...
Alex Soros didn't put it together.
He's just tweeting this article from The Atlantic.
The great normalization.
Oddly enough, it seems that what is being normalized here are overt threats on the president.
The great normalization.
It's amazing, by the way.
By Roger Karma.
I mean, it's like we're in a simulation, and if this is an accident, which it isn't...
Karma is the name of the journalist who wrote this.
Last year, the crime and inflation crisis largely evaporated.
So did leading theorists about what caused them.
Okay.
Bullet hole?
$47.
Illustration by the Atlantic.
Oh, it was Getty Images.
Hold on.
Okay.
So it was the Atlantic that made the illustration.
Let's just see if we can do something in real time here.
This is what we're going to do.
Check this out.
I'm going to screen grab that.
I'm going to do this afterwards.
I don't want to make an accident in the meantime.
So the Atlantic puts together this visual.
Bullet hole, 47. Watch this.
Getty.
No, we're going to go like this.
We're going to go like this.
Google.
Getty images, 47 American dollars.
Get the images.
Get the images.
Anybody who doesn't know how stock photos work, people will look up search terms as to what is in the news and then take stock photos and upload them.
Do you see any of that image here?
I'm going to go do a reverse image search afterwards.
This is what comes up.
Let's just be a little bit...
Getty Images, American dollars.
Let's go like that.
Here we go.
$83,000.
And what are you going to get here?
I'm going to find out where that image comes from because I guarantee you...
Atlantic.
Here's one.
Here's one.
Look at this one.
Oh no, you can't see that one.
Let me close that.
This one right here, there you go, is current currency.
These are the current bills.
Okay, hold on one second.
So there's no image that comes up.
That was an image, a set of images created by the Atlantic.
And someone might have thought it was a funny joke.
Hey, nobody's going to get this because we're a bunch of children.
We're a bunch of children.
And we do stupid things.
And if we get caught, oops!
When Gretchen Whitmer put up the 8645 prominently in the background when she was giving an interview to that schmuck on NBC, she didn't mean anything by it.
You'd have to be stupid conspiracy theorists to think that she meant 80 feet out, what is it, 8 miles out, 6 feet under.
Or, you know, cancel the president.
Oh, no, no, she just did it.
I'm going to go to Google image search.
Okay, images.
I'm going to upload the image, search by image, drag, upload file.
Give me one second to do this in real time.
I'll pull it up once I've gotten the search results.
Screenshot.
Bada bing, bada boom.
Checky, checky.
Here, look at this.
Share screen.
If anybody doesn't know this, you go to Google reverse image search and it'll tell you a lot of stuff here.
Let's see here.
Find image source.
Okay, here we go.
Look at this.
See exact matches.
Interesting.
I don't know what we're looking at here.
Hold on one second.
Let me get this back.
Interesting.
Okay, so we're seeing this image has been around.
Let's see here.
Pocket currency.
Make sure that I'm seeing this in 100.
We got this image right here.
Which comes up, when is the article from?
Source Getty Images.
There's no date on this article.
Okay, it doesn't matter.
Okay, interesting.
The image has existed.
Now let's go up here.
Open this up.
Okay, and then we go to Find Image Source.
Are we seeing the same thing?
Okay, we're getting to that.
Okay, now you see it.
2016, 2010, 2017, 2018.
Interesting.
Now let's bring up, for the sake of it, bring this down, okay.
Let's bring up, I'm going to open up a window here.
Hold on, do this.
Twitter, I'm going to bring up Laura Loomer's analysis of this.
Knowing that the image preexisted.
I mean, it's so interesting.
Knowing that that image has been around and was specifically selected is even more interesting.
I want to know how they did it.
Okay, so now we're going to Loomer.
Hold on.
Loomer.
Laura Loomer.
Her breakdown of this.
No, no, Justin.
Okay, here we go.
Good morning.
No, no, no, no, no, no, no.
Two hours ago?
No, she posted this yesterday.
Hold on.
Hold on.
Ah, hold on.
Let's do Loomer and Threat.
Let's just get this tweet up here.
Here we go.
Here we go.
Okay, got it.
Boom.
Give me two seconds.
Incognito.
Boom shakalaka.
And let's bring this up.
Okay, it's coming up, people.
I had to find it.
Sorry, I should have had that on the backdrop.
Share screen, lower Loomer analysis.
Here we go.
Analysis of the assassination threat against President Trump by Alex Soros, son of Democrat Party megadonor George Soros.
He's the son of George Soros.
His post tonight is a direct threat of violence against President Trump.
If you look closely at the photo in the Atlantic...
Alex, the article that Alex Soros posted tonight, there's a call for the assassination embedded in the pictures.
Not only does one of the pictures have a single bullet hole through glass, and not only is the $47 of cash seen, but there's messaging conveyed through the arrangement of the money.
This analysis is going to, maybe in the depth that it goes, not withstand scrutiny, considering that that image might be a decade old.
I'm going to go finish up looking at that afterwards.
On another note...
Okay, so hold on a second.
While some of the bills are upside down with obfuscated writing, States of America is legible on one of the bills.
On another bill, you'll see all these pictures afterwards, the finger is covering the face of the U.S. President.
And on another bill, the words, quote, silver certificate, end quote, are legible.
The $47 in cash is a reference to the 47th President of the United States of America.
This would be true whether or not that that image preexisted.
The image was selected.
I mean...
And the funny thing is, you have to go find that particular image to illustrate inflation?
Interesting.
Silver bullet equals simple guaranteed solution for a difficult problem equals certificate.
Alex Soros is conveying that the silver bullet for $47 is the death of that financial, and the financial will be paid to the person who does it.
This is a threat against the life of President Trump, the son of George Soros, and the Atlantic are suggesting they will give an award to whoever does this.
Legible text on the bottom of the bill with the president's face on it says, quote, will pay to the bearer on demand.
It says that on all on all bills, a.k.a.
a paid hitman.
The assassination threat needs to be taken very seriously.
She takes a bunch of people.
That's it.
It's crazy.
Now that we know the additional fact, I'm going to go see when that image first appeared on the internet.
The fact that it's an older image that was specifically chosen by the Atlantic, as opposed to any and all of the other images which would have illustrated inflation.
Interesting.
What does the chat say?
I mean, to me, it's a no-brainer.
He's not 47 yet, says Missy McDougall.
No, but pretty interesting.
Swexit says, oh, here, I can do it like this.
Yeah, it definitely looks like I pay you.
Well, I'm going to put together a car blog.
With all of this information, I want to go back to the...
I saved the reverse image lookup.
That's interesting.
Okay.
For the side of the political aisle that screams dog whistles, oh, when Trump said, you know...
Fight like hell.
He meant insurrection.
But when we put a bullet hole and a very carefully selected couple of images, you guys are the crazy ones.
I mean, it's a double standard to say the least.
But for those people who see dog whistles and hear dog whistles and everything, to pretend that that is not...
The other thing is, though, I mean, everybody knows it.
Everybody knows that that's what they want.
I mean, everybody knows that that's what they want.
And everybody knows that they would be having a field day.
Remember when Gretchen Whitmer did her NBC News appearance, 8645?
Whitmer-Trump campaign clash after 8645 seen next to Michigan governor.
Oh yeah, I'm sure she just randomly had 8645 in the backdrop as she's doing a television show appearance on...
Who's that guy?
You saw his face.
Just an accident.
Oh yeah, 86 means just to cancel from the menu.
I'm not saying...
Eight miles out, six feet deep, or 86 before Wikipedia.
From what I recall, I think Wikipedia actually modified the entry for what 86 means.
But you go to Urban Dictionary, everybody knows what 86 means.
So, yeah, I'm sure it's just a coincidence.
Okay.
Wild.
We are living through wild times.
But speaking of Trump, and...
Pick was probably created right after Trump swamped Iowa.
No, the whole thing is...
Let me bring this up here.
And this is not to make fun.
Full stop.
This is to highlight the learning curve here.
Pick was probably created right after Trump swamped Iowa.
If the $47 in the hand, that unique combination, was created a long time ago, it's not a new picture.
So it wasn't created specifically for Trump.
It was, however, deliberately selected for the two images in that screen.
And if you're going to illustrate inflation...
Why would that even be the picture of money that you use?
Old, outdated bills of an image that's been around for a decade.
Maybe they got it for free.
Maybe they already had it on their backdrop.
We'll see if The Atlantic has ever used that picture before.
I got more sleuthing to do once I'm done here.
Okay.
So yeah, no, they couldn't have created that image, but what they could have done is certainly created that combination.
Hey, let's put a bullet hole and let's be cheeky and cute.
Get something with $47 or 47 cents.
Get something with 47. Could have done with 45 as well, but that might have been too obvious.
And then they lose the defense.
Well, he was the 45th president.
He's not yet the 47th.
So that's it.
Okay, now, but hold on.
On the topic of Trump and why I think everybody does love him secretly, the man is funny.
He's got good comedic timing.
And it was Joe Rogan.
Who said it best.
He's got perfect delivery.
Listen to this.
And this I do for Vivek.
Because he's very big into it.
I happen to agree with him.
But he said, could you mention this?
I will never.
He said, I love Vivek.
I love him too now.
I didn't love him when he was running.
But I like him now.
It's amazing the way you can like somebody when you win.
Fantastic.
Vivek is great.
He's really great.
But he wanted this, and I'll give him full credit for it.
It's very important, actually.
I will never allow the creation of a central bank digital currency.
If anybody doesn't think that's important.
And this I do for Vivek, because he's very big into it.
I happen to agree with him.
It's amazing the way you can like somebody when you win.
Classic.
It's amazing how you can like...
Yeah, it's a lot easier to like people when you're kicking ass.
And yes, when you're in battle, it's battle.
Don't whine about the nicknames.
If you want to take to the battlefield, ooh, you can't cut me there.
This is battle and you can't punch me.
You called me the sanctimonious?
That's terrible.
And now you want to retire the name because the battle's over?
That's not how...
That's exactly how it works.
You fight when you're in battle, fairly, honorably.
And that might include name-calling.
And then when it's done, if you are man enough, if you are big enough to shake hands and say, well done, well played, you beat me, now we move on together.
If the purpose is really the betterment of the country.
And by the way, I've said it before, I still think Vivek is going to be VP.
I've read the news that Vivek was left off the shortlist.
I don't believe any news.
Especially when it contradicts my predictions.
But I've said it, I'm still sticking with it.
Vivek for VP.
And I think the more people chant it louder and louder, Trump has been known to not be influenced in the negative sense, but he's been known to listen to what the people want.
But that's some funny stuff, by the way.
So, it isn't pieces of silver.
Now it is fiat currency with devaluation to boot.
And I know that people don't like Vivek, but I think they're wrong.
Okay, so that was the funny clip there.
Let's see what else I got here.
Thus far, by the way, chat, let me know if you have any improvement recommendations.
Oh, stop it, XXS, T. Smurf.
He's big pharma.
First of all, pharma medicines are not all bad.
Like Joe Rogan also says.
If you get a broken arm or you need to be hospitalized, America, you know, the hospital is probably where you want to go, but you don't go to the hospital to keep you healthy in everyday life.
Big pharma is a problem.
Pharma itself is not necessarily a problem.
And so there's that.
But I mean, look, if nothing Vivek says or does can convince you, then that's fine.
But just at least recognize that that's not a rational position.
That's a position of emotion.
There's nothing he can say.
He did that, and I'll never trust him again, despite everything he says, despite all of the amazing positions he takes, pardon the January Sixers, pardon Assange, pardon, what's-his-face?
Snowden.
Okay.
Anyways, I'll disagree with everybody who thinks Vivek is a fake, but we do not have to be, we do not have to agree on everything, so long as we can respect well-thought-out opinions, which I think mine is.
Okay.
Now, that being said, what else we got here?
Oh, did you got that?
So the big news yesterday is the Supreme Court in a one-paragrapher.
Let me see if I can pull this up because I know that I have it on my computer.
It's not really all that interesting of a one-paragrapher, but it could be useful to read it.
Here, hold on.
Let me close this in the backdrop.
Keep that open.
I screen grabbed it.
I know that I did.
And I think...
Is this it right here?
No.
Whatever.
It's a one-liner.
It says we're vacating the lower court's decision or the Court of Appeals decision to issue an injunction enjoining the...
enjoining and preventing federal agents from removing barbed wire that the state of Texas erected to prevent the invasion of America via the Texas border.
So the case was a December case predicated on whether or not Texas...
Let me just make sure I don't want to screw anything up here.
I think this is it right here.
Yeah, so the issue whether the Supreme Court should block an order by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that generally bars federal border agents from cutting or removing razor wire installed by Texas along the portion of the Mexican-U.S.
border.
That was what was at issue.
The Court of Appeals issued an injunction preventing federal agents from doing that.
And the Supreme Court yesterday, 5-4 split decision, came down and said, no motivation above and beyond, we're vacating the Fifth Circuit decision.
And today, federal agents are going in there taking down the razor wire that the state of Texas erected to prevent the illegal invasion.
of America by immigrants, illegal immigrants, coming across the southern border.
The argument is the federal has exclusive jurisdiction over matters of immigration.
It's our exclusive jurisdiction.
Texas, you don't get to interfere with it.
The problem?
They're not doing a godforsaken thing.
So the federal says it's our exclusive jurisdiction.
We're going to prevent you, Texas, from enforcing or implementing any laws, from forcing or implementing any border controls, because it's our exclusive jurisdiction, but we're not doing a damn thing about it.
That's called invasion by lawfare.
I mean, that should be an impeachable offense.
It is allowing for the invasion of a nation.
Borders are important for Ukraine.
Defending Ukraine's borders, important.
Defending America's border?
Don't be racist.
Did you see this?
Did you see this video?
This is shared by...
It's an older video.
I think it's from last week.
It's not that old.
It's from two days ago.
Listen to this.
Amuse.
Posted this, but it originated from One Streis Ponders Media.
What does that say?
One Streis Ponders Media.
Okay, that's where it's from.
Listen to this.
And you tell me if this is not sinister.
By the way, if you are smart enough, you will know who I am.
But you are really not smart enough to know who I am.
But soon you're going to know who I am.
Very easy.
Wow, very easy.
But the entitlement, the entitlement.
No, believe me.
I'm much better than that.
The entitlement, guys.
Wow.
If you are smart enough, you will know who I am.
Can you appreciate what's going on here?
Appreciate what's going on in this video.
If you are smart enough, you will know who I am.
But you are really not smart enough to know who I am.
But soon you're going to know who I am.
Wow.
The entitlement.
No, believe me.
I'm much better than that.
The entitlement, guys.
First Responders Media.
I finally figured out how to read it.
One might ask the painfully obvious question, why the hell are there Middle Easterners crossing the border illegally from Mexico?
Can we just ask the obvious question?
Oh, I thought this was climate refugees from South America.
I thought this was refugees from crime-ridden South America.
That man, for those of you who've never heard of Middle Eastern accents, and I say this without judgment, is Middle Eastern.
We've seen Chinese immigrants crossing the Mexican border.
We've seen Russian immigrants illegally crossing the Mexican border.
I'm making sure to specify illegally, even for the European ones, because this has nothing to do with race, religion, or creed.
It has to do with breaking the law.
It has to do with illegal immigration.
Illegal immigrants illegally crossing the border.
And the federal government is now preventing Texas from doing anything about it.
You've got a Middle Eastern man crossing the border.
Well-dressed, by the way.
Let me bring that up, actually, because it's not for nothing.
Let me bring this up here.
Bring that tweet back up.
A well-dressed man.
Is this right here?
Who I am.
But soon you're going to know who I am.
Wow, very easy.
The entitlement, the entitlement.
No, believe me, I'm much better than that.
The entitlement, guys.
Wow.
I would say relatively well-dressed, clean.
I mean, I don't know what goes into marching across multiple countries to cross a border illegally.
A Middle Eastern man crossing the Mexican border, issuing what is nothing short of an ominous threat.
You'll know who I am.
When confronted as to who he is and why he's crossing the border illegally from Mexico.
Last I checked, Mexico was not in the Middle East.
Mexico is separated by an ocean.
What the hell's going on here?
Chinese, Russian, Middle Eastern, illegal immigrants flying to South America so they can cross the border illegally?
And now the federal government, with the help of the Supreme Court, is basically saying, come right in.
Not only are we not going to stop you...
Maybe we'll put you in our military.
Maybe we'll fast-track you to citizenship if you vote Democrat.
I'm seeing theories.
I'm seeing people hypothesize that...
Just got news from somebody.
Can you send me a link?
I'm live right now.
Smiley face if you're watching.
Um...
Thank you.
I forgot what I was saying.
Damn it!
Oh, no, that's right.
Compromised court.
People are suggesting that Roberts, Amy Coney, blackmailed, bribed, owned, controlled, threatened, whatever.
But it is what it is.
And you got Canada.
Basically opening its borders to foreigners.
I mean, at least it's not illegal crossing in Canada because it's very tough to illegally cross into Canada.
I mean, even if you're a Middle Eastern man and you fly across the ocean to Mexico, you're not crossing into Canada via the southern border.
But, you know, the lawfare invasion in Canada, record population growth, 96% of it is funded, is fueled by immigration.
It's a takeover.
It's an invasion.
It's a replacement.
Not based on race.
Based on politics.
Roxham Road is wide open.
Yeah, I think they closed it.
Well, I think they closed it down.
Hold on a second.
Let me bring this here.
I think they closed...
I thought they had closed Roxham Road.
I might be wrong about it.
But the bottom line, the only people illegally crossing into Canada from the States are the ones that, you know, Mayor Eric Adams is shipping up to the border.
You know, when...
DeSantis ships illegal immigrants, flies them to Martha's Vineyard.
It's human trafficking, fraud, exploitation of humans for political purpose.
When Eric Adams out of New York gives bus passes to illegal immigrants because they can't shelter them, he says, go to the border with Canada, they'll let you in.
Nothing wrong with that.
Rules for thee but not for me.
A bunch of filthy, filthy hypocrites.
So...
Yeah, I think the Roxham Road is closed.
Let me just see here.
Well, looky, looky, looky.
Okay, I'm going to bring this up.
I'll have to do some.
My goodness.
See, it's just going to be endless homework.
The breaking news now out of Canada is that a federal court, a federal court, I don't know the context of the file, declared Trump's invocation of the Emergencies Act.
No, was it not the Emergencies Act?
Hold on one second.
Did I just shut...
No, the studio's right here.
Jeez Louise.
Sorry, I thought I just shut everything down.
I thought I just shut everything down.
Here, it's this.
Emergency Act invocation declared unreasonable by federal court.
It is so declared that the decision to issue the proclamation and dissociative regulations and order was unreasonable and ultra-virus.
All right, I'll do a...
It is declared that the regulations infringed on Section 2B of the Charter.
Okay, I'll have to see what that was.
Yeah, the problem here, this is not to do with studio.
I don't know why the window comes down every time I open up the window.
Okay, it's still there.
So that's it.
All right, everybody, let me see what else we got in the backdrop here.
while we're making sure I covered all the stories.
Yeah, LoneWolf01 says they're flying as many into the border as you see coming through the southern border.
Some of them, I'm sure, are coming from South American countries, but quite clearly some of them are coming from overseas and had to get to the South American countries for the specific purpose of crossing a border illegally.
Okay, what else do we got here?
Not disabled camera.
That's not what we want to do.
Eh, okay.
Get questions in Locals or Rumble.
And then the question is this.
If I want to do the...
What about Roxham Road?
Hold on.
We'll see if Roxham Road is closed.
I thought they had closed it down.
Google.
Is Roxham Road open?
Months after closure...
More asylum seekers arriving by air.
Well, this is according to the CBC, so take it for what it's worth.
My understanding was that they had actually closed down the Roxham Road crossing, but I might be wrong.
I would actually defer to Alexa Lavoie on that, so I'll ask her on Twitter afterwards.
What else do we got here?
Have we covered it all?
I think we have.
Let's go to the chat and see what's going on in the chat.
A federal court in Canada has ruled Trudeau's...
I mean, I haven't read the article.
I'll go read the decision and just pull out the highlights.
I don't know what the context of the lawsuit was, but I can imagine.
And that's it.
Okay.
Tucker and Viva, that would be history.
Viva, did you see the shout-out on the Patrick Bet David podcast?
I didn't, but I didn't make it through.
I didn't get to the end yet.
Well, I'll have to go back and look for that.
There was another story I was going to talk about something in Canada.
Let's just do it real quick.
Bill Brown says he'd probably go on Tucker's show, but maybe Tucker has been doing more obscure.
Ooh, hold on.
He'd probably go on Tucker's show, but maybe Tucker has been doing more obscure podcasts.
Yeah.
Oh, dude.
I don't know if you're talking about me, Bill, but oh, yeah.
I would go on Tucker's podcast, obviously, any day of the week.
Okay.
While we decide, while we try to figure out one thing here, let's just go to the fake news coming out of Canada.
As per my previous tweet as to how you control, how you turn something into a dictatorship.
This is CTV News, by the way.
They're not state-funded like the CBC, but they certainly get the perks, the ads, the subsidies, tax benefits, whatever.
They are indirectly subsidized by the Trudeau regime.
Listen to what they want us to believe now.
Most Canadians who plan to vote liberal, doing so to stop conservatives from winning, poll.
So I always say, like, oh, they're going to poll 1,000 people, and then I get corrected, or people say, look, Viva, you don't need to do a bigger poll than a few thousand, because...
That, you know, after that, the margin of error doesn't go up or down.
So, you know, a thousand people is good enough for being within a margin of error that is not benefited from serving, I don't know, a hundred thousand people.
Other people are going to say, obviously this is so stupid of a question because everybody who votes liberal is doing it to stop the conservatives from winning.
So what kind of stupid thing is this?
Like, I mean, it's so stupid.
It's almost definitional.
Why are you voting Liberal?
Because I don't want the Conservatives to win.
Oh, genius.
Hey, I want the Conservatives to win.
Have you thought about voting Liberal?
I mean, it's so dumb, it's baked into it in the first place, but they want to set this poll out here that it's a matter of protest to vote Liberal now.
Vote Liberal so that you don't have Pierre Poiliev ascend to power.
Most Canadians who plan on voting Liberal are more motivated to stop Conservatives from winning The election rather than endorsing the party's vision and leader according to a new poll.
Well, that, by the way, just means that most liberals are stupid.
I mean, that literally means that most liberals are dumb idiots who don't mind suffering so long as they think they're suffering for virtuous purposes.
I mean, by the way, liberals are, you know, they're like Democrats, kind of, you know.
It's, um, the suffering is good.
The suffering is great.
We surrender our soul as of this date.
Meanwhile, the opposite is true of most conservative supporters.
The non-profit Angus Reid.
Look, Angus Reid, I don't want to say anything that I cannot immediately substantiate.
All that I will say is that all of these polling entities are a load of steaming shit, eh?
They conducted an online survey over two days among representative randomized sample of 1,600 Canadian adults.
The margin of error is give or take 2%.
Two points, whatever the hell.
19 times out of 20. I don't even know what the hell that means.
The survey was self-commissioned and paid for by the Institute.
Hmm, that's curious.
Why would they do that?
I want to see the question.
Here we go.
While there certainly is a significant amount of distaste for Trudeau among the Canadian public, that does not appear to be the strongest motivating factor for those who intend to vote for the Conservative Party.
Okay.
Instead, three in five, 62% Conservative supporters said they are more likely to vote because they back the Conservative leader's vision rather than wanting to prevent another...
Term led by Trudeau.
These voters make up a quarter of the election.
Those are intelligent, logical, reasonable people.
Meanwhile, 3 in 5, 63% liberal supporters said they are more motivated to prevent conservative government rather than support Trudeau.
That's because you're idiots.
Spiteful, stupid children.
I mean, that's what the liberal brain is, as far as I can tell now, having lived through it.
Any adult who is a liberal is an arrogant...
That's too broad.
That's too mean.
The defining characteristic of the vocal liberal mind is haughtiness, pride, virtue signaling, a sense of self-worth that is exceeded by actual worth, and a lack of sense of humor.
And this pretty much proves it.
Yeah, we're not going to vote for our guy because we support his policies and endorse him.
No, we're going to vote for him out of spite because we don't like the other guy.
And as shitty as things are now, well, at least it's shitty under our guy.
This means that just 9% of the electorate is passionate about and inspired by the respect of voting liberal.
Oh, that's nice.
However, strategic voting could be the wild card in the election.
Oh, that's amazing.
Many NDP voters appear willing to support the liberals in the event that the CPC are on track to victory, it wrote.
Yeah, because the NDP followers are just as dumb, stupid, haughty, proud, and ignorant as the liberals.
Imagine supporting Jagmeet Singh, the man who has been propping up the Trudeau government.
A man who has more bikes than anybody should have.
He's got a custom suit that he loves to wear.
Oh yeah, he's doing just well.
Just fine for himself.
More than one-third of the NDP supporters said they would likely switch their vote to Liberal and 10. 30% said they would consider that option.
Others said it's unlikely and not going to happen because they're stubborn, stupid, and they don't learn from their mistakes.
If you're not liberal when you're a kid, you have no heart.
And if you're not conservative when you're an adult, you have no brain.
I think Mark Twain said that.
Okay, the rest of us I don't care about.
Oh, look at this, man.
I am just so happy.
Although he's...
Never mind.
Okay.
Now I'm going to take that screen out.
Stop screen share.
I'm going to go to Rumble and just see if I didn't miss any Rumble rants.
See, it's much easier to see it in Rumble.
I believe it implies that if someone shoots 47, he will become a dead president.
Absolute call for violence, says Sleestack Nation.
GOP Congress in Rumble says the cover photo for Alex Soros X account is from an environmental disaster article.
Interesting.
Okay, I'm going to actually bring that up afterwards.
Wait, so this means voting matters and Trump's going to win?
Interesting.
That is from Sammy.
Then we got Beer and Gear says, all of those bills are old school silver certificates.
Think silver bullet.
Yep.
Wait, is Trump considered old money?
Says Sammy.
Then we got Astro Sweat says, irony does not even begin to describe Nathan.
And then we got Finboy Slick.
He transitioned his business.
It now identifies as legit.
And then we got Sammy for $10.
Says, Viva, won't say the C word, but use Fanny.
You know it's a British vulgar slang for the female genitalia.
Basically the C word.
Yes, I wanted to hear you say genitalia because I'm very mature and it's my duty.
Fanny in Brit talk means vagina?
Hold on, let me see here.
Let's just do this in real time.
Fanny.
British slang.
Maybe it's spelled F-A-N-N-Y.
Fanny in British slang.
Fanny.
The female genitals?
British.
Look at this.
You learn something new every day.
Genitalia.
Show me.
Okay.
Fanny.
Noun, plural.
Fanny's.
Slang.
Taboo.
British.
The female genitals, mainly U.S. and Canadian, for buttocks.
I've never known it for anything other than the buttocks.
Hence has been the joke running around, you know, the poo-poo is going to hit the fanny.
Oh God, now that I know the British term, that's even nastier.
Oh, gross.
That's funny.
Okay.
People, it's, what time is it now?
It's 1.15.
I'm going to maybe call it short here because I want to go to the car.
And do a vlog.
I got three vlogs to do now.
Fanny.
The poopoo hitting the fanny.
I want to go finish my research now on the origins of that image.
And not to be the motivated reasoning.
The fact that that's an old image, specifically so chosen, is even more curious than had it been set up.
If it were deliberately set up, it would have been more clear cut.
The fact that it was deliberately selected.
When I can think of countless other images that would have been more representative of inflation than that is interesting as well.
They didn't make the image, they just selected the image.
Okay.
And that's it.
What else is going on here?
Let's see.
In the Rumble, so I think it's good, Rumble Studio.
They have certainly integrated the most important recommendations that we, as a community, requested back in the initial...
Testing phases, and it's now rolled out to everybody.
So you can stop using StreamYard.
You can stop using...
What's that other one there?
OBS?
Whatever.
You can use this.
Now, the chat seems to have, as I say this...
Immediately as I say this, the chat seems to have frozen.
Hold on one second.
Supreme Court of Canada ruled invocation of the Emergency Act is illegal.
That wasn't Supreme Court.
I think that was Federal Court.
That is coming from Dozer.
January 6th, hard, 1500 miles.
Oh, January 6th.
Hold on.
Was there not news about that?
No, that was yesterday.
All right, people.
I'm going to hit refresh here just to do a test.
▲
Export Selection