Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Jan. 19, 2024 - Viva & Barnes

01:33:04

Canadian Fires & MSM Lies! WEF Goes Mainstream! Seeing Color & MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	I do see color, because I believe if you don't see color, you can't see racism.
	And whatever happens, black, white, disabled person, even someone with disabilities, I always, for the most part, people are like, when they're young, they kind of make the spot hot.
	Younger people know what that means?
	No idea what that means.
	But what I would say is, no, I want you to be able to go up to those people and really understand those people.
	I do see color, because I believe...
	I'm going to play this, I'm going to pause this, because it's Aurelian in its insanity.
	I do see color.
	I do see color.
	Because I believe if you don't see color, you can't see racism.
	If you don't see color, you can't see racism.
	Let me try to wrap my head around that one.
	If I don't see the color of a person's skin...
	I can't see racism.
	I'm trying to think if I agree with this or disagree with this.
	I believe if you don't see color, you can't see racism.
	I think you're right.
	If I don't see color, I can't see racism.
	Oh my goodness!
	This is not even the best part of the clip, though.
	Yeah, I do see color.
	That's called racism.
	Period.
	I do see color.
	Because I believe if you don't see color, well, you can't be racist.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	You can't see racism.
	I think I'm inclined to agree with that.
	But I just...
	One step further of this insanity is when the man, I forget who this guy, I don't know who he is, he's working for the New England Patriots, he's the first black general, not general manager, he's the first black position of whatever he is, and I don't know who he is, of the New England Patriots.
	Listen to this.
	That moment when you equate race with physical disabilities.
	And whatever happens, black, white, Understanding a person because of their history,
	race, religion, creed, disability is far different than reducing them to that or using that as an identification.
	And whatever happens, black, white, disabled person.
	Can you imagine the man who says, I do see color, then goes on to immediately equate race with disability?
	I mean, one should not be judged for disability, but disability, by definition, is lacking a physical ability, and it's typically through injury or birth conditions.
	Imagine just basically tacitly admitting that that's how you see race.
	That you see those two things on a physiological, moral par.
	That's called racism.
	Period.
	Full stop.
	Okay.
	What day is it and what time is it?
	Good afternoon, East Coast?
	Good morning, West Coast?
	And what I wanted to say is we have a special guest.
	I've never seen this person before, never met them before, and I'm still not seeing them now because it's an avatar.
	But it doesn't matter.
	It was during the stream of the Iowa Caucus.
	I get a DM in Twitter.
	And the person says, I was at the Iowa Caucus.
	I was like, oh, can you make it on now?
	And then I didn't see that they responded in my DMs while I was live doing the caucus coverage.
	Caucus!
	And so that person who attended the caucus in Iowa, the Iowa caucus, said, I want to tell you what happened.
	It was kind of a fun experience, so that's how we're going to start this show.
	On the menu for today, I did a vlog in the car this morning, people, and it's going to come out this afternoon, but I'm going to talk about it at length, in depth, long format, the Canadian wildfires.
	We were all called conspiracy theorists.
	For suggesting that there was strong indications that those wildfires, which were being chalked up to climate change, were the result of arson, at least in part.
	And we've got now thorough confirmation a man in Nova Scotia's record-breaking wildfire arrested for arson.
	I'm going to talk about Jan 6, the pipe bomb tapes, the pipe bomb videos, WEF, and another breaking news story coming out of Canada.
	Keith Wilson.
	You all know him.
	He was the convoy attorney.
	I've had him on the channel a number of times.
	He was the object of an ethics complaint filed by a lawyer who can only be described as an insidious activist coming out of Canada.
	The breaking news of the day is his ethics complaint has been dismissed.
	We'll get to it.
	And now, by the way, you know, I did a podcast at the Patrick Bette David Valuetainment Studio with the unusual suspects.
	And because I don't leave empty-handed...
	I'm joking.
	I took one of these drinks and then I didn't drink it during the show.
	And then I realized also it wasn't a flavor that I wanted.
	So I took a cherry one on the way home.
	So hashtag not an ad.
	I don't know what this is even called.
	What is this called?
	This is the product.
	And apparently it's got no sugar, no caffeine, no sucralose.
	And so the only question is, is stevia?
	That's what the sweetener is.
	Is that going to upset my stomach?
	We'll see.
	It's not going to.
	I've had it before.
	Okay, without further adieu, it's without further ado, we've got an individual, I spoke with him briefly before, Netcat, who attended the Iowa caucus and who's going to tell us about the Iowa caucus.
	But before we even bring him in, I keep forgetting to do these things.
	We are live currently on vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	If anybody wants to preemptively come over there now, that's the link.
	We are simultaneously streaming YouTube, Rumble, vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	The link to Rumble is in the pinned comment on YouTube.
	We're going to end probably after the interview with Netcat and then go over to Rumble.
	Then we end on Rumble when the stream is done.
	We have our after party at Locals where I answer tipped questions.
	We have our beautiful community and we have a fun after party.
	And then the last thing I just almost forgot to do is...
	Hold on.
	Viva Barnes Law.
	No, I wanted to go to Viva Fry.
	If anybody wants a shirt...
	Look, people, you've got to wear shirts anyhow.
	If you want to come on over to the merch store, Viva Fry, and you can get tumblers.
	You can get...
	Oh, look at those beautiful tumblers with the awesomest catchphrases.
	Yes, fed, fed, fed.
	Oh, yep.
	You got tumblers, you got shirts, you got all the good stuff.
	So you can go there and support the channel.
	It's not the cheapest stuff on earth because costs are costs and shipping is not...
	You know, ideal, but you're getting it on the one hand because people need shirts, people need cups, and you want to support the channel.
	That's the easiest way to do it.
	But it's fantastic stuff.
	Populism fixes everything.
	Wanted for president.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	Okay.
	And speaking of clothes...
	Apparently salmon is a very popular color in Florida, and my wife got me some salmon.
	Salmon-colored shorts, because the other ones got too dirty, and I kept on wearing the dirty shirts, even though they were totally comfortable, but they got stained, and then I can't wear stained pants.
	All right, whatever.
	Okay, everybody, that's it.
	That's the intro.
	Netcat, I'm bringing you in in three, two, one.
	Boom shakalaka.
	Sir, how goes the battle?
	Pretty good, and I gotta say, I'm jealous.
	You're able to wear shorts.
	It's in the negative windshields here right now.
	Dude, I was walking the dog barefoot this morning.
	It's a little chilly.
	It's like 72 degrees.
	The truth is, I do miss winter because I don't know what season it is.
	I don't know what month it is.
	I don't know.
	The passage of time.
	And I was just talking about it with my wife yesterday.
	Like, you attribute memories to seasons.
	And when it's all one big season, you don't even have that delineating, like, that important delineator in your memory.
	So everything becomes one long...
	One long memory when you have no seasons.
	Netcat, I mean, look, you mentioned to me before we started that you have a channel.
	Who are you?
	My channel is called Netcat Media.
	It's two words.
	And basically, I play lots of games on it.
	I occasionally spout off about current media like, say, Star Wars, Marvel, and just how shit things have been lately, but that I want things to get better.
	That's mostly what the channel is.
	I just kind of like to just be out there and talk and have fun.
	Is it the one with the...
	It looks like a green cat with a coconut shell face mask?
	Yes.
	It's supposed to be Battle Cat from He-Man.
	Dude, I have no idea what that is, but I'm putting the link in.
	Battle Cat from He-Man.
	Hold on just one second.
	Look, this was not...
	I'm not going to grill you on this, but I just want to make sure I got the right one.
	This is the channel.
	Yep, that's it.
	Ooh, and you said, is Andrew Tate someone we should look up to?
	Lying douchebag.
	Well, I might watch that just to hear what you say.
	Yes, spoiler alert, we shouldn't.
	He's an ass.
	You're gonna make, well, I don't want people hate, well, no, our audiences, I think my audience is not evenly split.
	Even if people don't like Andrew Tate, I don't think people agree with what's been done to him out of Romania.
	Oh, no, I actually don't agree legally with a lot of the things that I've seen.
	That video is not anything about legal.
	It's just about whether he's a good person.
	I do think that there's been lack of due process.
	Good.
	So at least opinions will not trump legal assessments.
	And so you have the YouTube channel, Netcat Media.
	I don't want to dox you, but were you in Iowa for the event or do you live in Iowa?
	Oh, actually, I definitely don't mind seeing the city that I'm in.
	I'm actually in Iowa City, which is in Johnson County.
	What state is Iowa City in?
	Iowa.
	Okay, that was a joke.
	Okay.
	So you're in Iowa City.
	I'm not going to ask you, unless you want to elect your political leanings.
	Oh, no.
	I'm actually going to in what we're talking about.
	So, yeah.
	Okay, so...
	Yeah, tell me what happens.
	So, basically, I decided that I was going to go...
	About two weeks ago, I decided, you know...
	I'm actually off that day, so I'm going to go caucus because I've been watching this guy by the name of Vivek Ramaswamy for a while, and I'm liking what he has to say, so I think I'm going to go out and see what this caucus stuff is like and speak my mind.
	So I looked it up, and by the way, with my avatar, you can see what I actually wear to go walking and stuff in this weather with the big trench coat.
	I actually thought that the caucus was going to be where the primary originally was.
	So I walked down the hill to where that was.
	Yeah, the caucus is a lot more spread out than that.
	So instead of it being the normal polling place, it's spread out into all the different precincts.
	So there's like 20 different Or more.
	I don't remember how many of the precincts there were, but there were a lot.
	So when I was down there, which I hiked down there in negative 17 degree wind chill, thankfully somebody else made the same mistake and drove over to me and asked if I was trying to get to the actual caucus.
	And I was like, yeah.
	And they told me to jump in and we drove over there in time.
	Hold on one second.
	You got into a car with a stranger.
	Yes.
	This Iowa City sounds like a wild place where you can trust random strangers.
	Okay, also I can appreciate circumstances.
	Yeah, I mean, in normal circumstances, I probably wouldn't have, but we're talking 6.30 at night and, as I said, negative 17 degree wind chill.
	Who else is going to be out there trying to prey on somebody in that weather?
	Democrats who want to go find a Republican.
	Hey, I'll drive you to the caucus.
	Get in.
	And then the doors lock and you look and there's no handle on the inside.
	And they're like, now I got you.
	So you get in and they drive you.
	So this is what I understood only after the evening is that they had the caucus sites like in.
	I mean, 99 different locations.
	Yep.
	Okay.
	So you get to one of them.
	I mean, I presume you only visited one, right?
	There's only one you're allowed to visit because it's based on where you live.
	So when you get there, you actually have to show ID that shows that you live in that precinct.
	I know.
	It's shocking.
	They actually check IDs.
	Those damn racist Republicans.
	Okay.
	But they check in IDs, but you don't need to be a registered Republican or you don't have to be a historical Republican.
	You just need to re-register as a Republican the day of.
	Yep.
	And to be honest, I wasn't registered as a Republican.
	I'm not registered as anything because I consider myself to be a centrist.
	So I'm one of the people that registered as Republican at the site.
	Which I find, which to me, when everybody's talking about, look at all these people who register as that, they're all obviously Democrats.
	No, I'm not one.
	So they're using the fact that I registered as Republican that day as evidence of Democrats registering as Republican.
	Now, I'm not going to say that it didn't happen, because I'm sure it has.
	It is interesting that even though you were allowed to do that, Trump still won with 51%, and it was a massive, smashing success.
	So maybe there is evidence to suggest that it brought out new people who would register as Republicans to caucus for Trump.
	Yeah.
	Okay, and so you get the ID, register, you get in.
	Is it bedlam, or is it like, I mean, when I hear caucus and what I understood that it meant is like everybody's shouting, trying to convince people who to vote for.
	Okay.
	It was actually pretty calm.
	It was basically a cafeteria.
	Everybody would just sit in wherever they felt like sitting.
	And for about 15-20 minutes before the caucus officially started, everyone was just kind of milling around, talking, just saying what we thought.
	And I'd like to mention that there were three people from the DeSantis campaign that were actually at there.
	And what I thought was interesting was that as I was registering, I heard one of them say that they wanted to speak for DeSantis, and the chair said you can only speak for DeSantis if no one in the caucus speaks for DeSantis, because this is for the caucus members, not for you.
	Okay, interesting.
	And so you get into the room, and how many people are in the room?
	There were a total of 61 people, including me.
	Okay.
	And how many people get to speak for how long?
	It's a ballot on a paper.
	Nobody's raising their hands.
	Correct.
	Okay.
	First, I'd like to say that once it started, when people talk about it being a caucus, I would say that a more layman term for it would be just, it's a meeting.
	Because it was called to order by a chairman and there was a secretary.
	And it was things like, okay, will we confirm the temporary chairman to be the chairman?
	Will we confirm the temporary secretary to be the secretary?
	Everyone laughed and said, yes, we do.
	And then it just kind of proceeded.
	They said who the actual candidates were and asked who here would like to speak for each candidate.
	And they would take one person to speak for five to ten minutes for each candidate.
	So at this point, I had no idea what I was doing, but I was like, screw it.
	I raised my hand and I decided to do a speech for Vivek and I had nothing planned.
	You elected to speak for Vivek?
	Yes.
	Interesting.
	Do I dare ask who you voted for?
	No, I won't.
	I won't.
	I don't care.
	It's almost as an intrusive question as asking...
	The reason why I said I don't care is because if I said I was going to speak for Vivek, I think it's pretty obvious who I voted for.
	You never know.
	Maybe you're trying to do a double fakey, get some of the Haley people to vote for Vivek, and then you vote for Trump.
	So how long are you allotted to speak in support of a candidate?
	We're getting about five to ten minutes.
	There were no timers or anything, though.
	We can just go up and speak your mind.
	Okay, interesting.
	And are people coherent, or are there unhinged speakers up there?
	At mine, everybody was very coherent.
	Okay, very interesting.
	Yeah, sorry, go for it.
	One thing that I found kind of interesting was that the person who elected to speak for Nikki was actually the secretary that was there.
	I mean, if you want to go conspiracy theory, which I don't, but I'm sure that some people could, but who knows?
	The secretary of the caucus.
	So the person who's there to take the minutes speaks on behalf of one of the candidates.
	Yeah, I thought that that was a little interesting.
	I don't think that it means anything.
	And what was the argument for Nikki Haley?
	That she's going to be super good for the war machine and she's going to be super good for internet registration?
	What are the compelling arguments that were presented to even consider Nikki Haley?
	She's a woman and that we really need to beat Biden and she pulls the best against Biden.
	That's basically what that speech came down to.
	Oh my goodness.
	So the person who spoke for Nikki, the secretary, was also a woman?
	No.
	That was a guy.
	Okay.
	That's even worse.
	That's even worse, actually.
	I mean, that's the definition of white knighting.
	So some dude gets up and says, we've got to support women.
	All right, awesome.
	Yes.
	Basically, yes.
	Had he read the news about Nikki Haley's alleged affairs, and did he think he was going to get lucky?
	I mean, that's that.
	Okay, bada-bing, bada-boom.
	Too soon.
	Okay, cool.
	So the Nikki Haley speech is trivial identity politics.
	Who spoke on behalf of Trump?
	An older lady, I'd probably say like 60, 70 years old.
	And she basically talked about how Trump's first term was really good and that he doesn't deserve all the slings and arrows that have been coming at him.
	And that the election being stolen was really bad.
	So let's fix that by voting Trump back in and get the second term we should have had before.
	Okay.
	And I'd like to mention, since you're asking about whether things are calm or not, all this is actually being said in just a calm speaking matter.
	No theatrics, no nothing.
	Yeah, I mean, I guess it's people of the same political side in theory, just, you know, it's not like the rivals.
	It wouldn't be like having a Democrat and Republican viva voce debate as to who should win.
	Now I got to ask you this.
	I mean, I could present very strong arguments for Trump, but I could present strong arguments for Vivek.
	What was your position for Vivek?
	To sum it up, Vivek is Trump but better.
	So I was talking about...
	I was talking about how when Trump ran in 2016, he hadn't had a political position either.
	So the people who say, well, Vivek doesn't have a political position, well, that could have been said about Trump as well.
	And Vivek is a businessman and a lawyer, as opposed to a businessman and an entrepreneur, which means that if he gets into office, he's actually going to understand what he can and cannot do.
	Which, frankly, Trump didn't know.
	Yes, but the problem with that argument is that people are going to say that argument applies even better for Harvard graduate DeSantis.
	Yes, and that may be true, but I don't care.
	I forgot that.
	He went to Yale Law School to get it?
	He went to Harvard?
	Yeah.
	From Harvard University Biology to Yale Law.
	That's amazing.
	But the thing is that DeSantis, Doesn't as well have the same platforms that Vivek has.
	Where Vivek is talking about what he wants to do with the FBI and the thriller agencies, Vivek actually breaks down what he plans to do.
	Vivek actually has plans that he shares.
	So, it's not pie in the sky.
	Vivek says what he can and can't do just with the President's power.
	And he admits when he can't do something without the help of Congress.
	Which, with someone like Ron DeSantis, he just says, I'm going to do all these things.
	Well, yeah, he's been able to do that in Florida because he's had the support of Congress.
	Is he going to be able to do all the things that he wants to do?
	Without the support of a friendly Congress?
	So, yeah.
	And another thing for Vivek is that he's younger.
	He actually understands technology.
	I mean, I just saw a few days ago him going into detail about AI.
	I mean, wouldn't it be nice to have someone up at that level who actually understands technology?
	These are decent arguments.
	To these arguments, I would all say present them in 2028 after Vivek has been VP for four years.
	And that's why I want him to be VP.
	I want him to be the next office over from Trump so that he can talk to Trump when there's shit going on and he can advise him directly.
	Now that he's dropped out, I 100% want to have Trump with Vivek as VP.
	So how many people spoke, how long were the speeches for, and then what happens when you get to the vote part?
	There were four people who spoke, one for each of the main four.
	It was asked for Asa Hutchinson, and absolutely zero people, because they had to ask for each person who was actually on it, and basically everybody laughed when it was asked who would speak.
	And yes, Joe, man, that's another one of the things.
	Do you think that Trump would even have understood the central bank?
	I think he would have, but I do think Vivek has been instrumental in pushing points that become...
	Like when Trump came out in 2016 and brought the immigration, illegal immigration discussion to the fore, that's what Vivek is doing now with some of the populist and more important talking points and issues.
	So Vivek has been of immeasurable value.
	So yeah, I think that's definitely Vivek influence.
	Yes, exactly.
	So only one person spoke for all four candidates for five to ten minutes.
	And then they say, thank you, let's vote?
	Yes, pretty much.
	On paper, right?
	Yes.
	The chair walked around the room and handed each person a green slip of paper and told us, write whoever you want onto this paper.
	And then they came around and collected them.
	And I point out that it's green because they collected them and put them into a white bag.
	So the contrast in colors is very clear.
	And then, and I had no idea that this was going to happen, since I was one of the speakers, I was called to help count.
	Okay.
	So you saw the outcome in real time?
	Yep, I saw the outcome in real time, and I confirmed the outcome.
	As well.
	So you said it was 61 people who voted at that particular location?
	Yep.
	I'm going to say...
	I'm going to do some math.
	I don't know which way that precinct went.
	I'm going to say 40 votes for Trump.
	No.
	More or less?
	This particular county is one of the more blue counties in Iowa.
	This is a county that has the University of Iowa in it.
	So it's a university town.
	There were 36 votes for Haley, 13 for Trump.
	Yes.
	I was shocked.
	People in the chat are saying lib country.
	That's a precinct, that's not a county, right?
	When they said that, Hillary, Nikki won one county.
	It was Johnson County, yes.
	And the precinct I'm in is in Johnson County.
	Okay.
	Very cool.
	And what time did it end?
	It ended around, say, 8 o 'clock or so.
	And they count the votes.
	Do they announce it in real time and all Haley fans go crazy?
	Like, woo, we won one building.
	We announced it real-time right after all of us has confirmed it.
	Oh, and I would also like to mention, as far as the count goes, it was the four speakers, the chairman, and one person who did not declare who they were supporting.
	So that's how we went and we all confirmed the vote, counted and everything.
	And it was declared, and it was just like, okay, cool.
	Our business here is done.
	And that's literally pretty much all that that was.
	It's very cool.
	I mean, it's an interesting process.
	It's not quite as chaotic as I understood some of the primaries in 20, I want to say 2016, the DNC primaries.
	But I have no idea what the rules even were.
	Oh, and for Dushkin?
	And Vivek got two votes, so me and somebody else.
	I would love to know whether or not that other person came in and intended to vote for Vivek or if I actually convinced them.
	I'm never going to know, but I'd love to know if I actually affected that.
	Well, I'd say one thing is good.
	Vivek, despite the fact that he was single digits and give or take 8%, that's amazing.
	It's amazing that he even got to 8%.
	And more amazing than that?
	He's out there stumping hard for Trump now and pushing the important discussion points that everybody should be focusing on.
	Yep.
	And I'd like to say one other thing about a rumor that I've heard going around.
	Well, not rumor, but a position that's been annoying me.
	With CNN coming out and announcing it early for Trump, I've been seeing people talk about how this may have made people get out of line because it doesn't matter anymore.
	Guys.
	We weren't in line.
	We're in a room.
	We've already braved the cold to be there.
	We're in the room.
	We're talking.
	We're discussing this stuff.
	The door's closed.
	And on the other side of the room from us, what, do you think that we're going to look at the fact that CNN just announced something and then get up and walk out after we've already gone to the trouble of being here?
	What the fuck are you, stupid?
	Well, it wasn't CNN.
	It was Fox News, apparently.
	Oh, Fox.
	I'm sorry.
	My bad.
	But my argument remains the same.
	Absolutely.
	And it's a legit argument.
	And either way, yeah.
	But people are going to complain one way or the other.
	Oh, yeah.
	It's just been annoying me, and I've been wanting to go off on that.
	Well, point well taken, Netcat.
	So that's very cool.
	Okay, everybody.
	First of all, Netcat, thank you.
	I mean, I love the first-hand account.
	I wanted to get down there for it, but I just got back from Canada and just got over my sinus infection.
	And I wasn't just about to go back up to that weather, so I'm going to sit here and chill barefoot.
	But I was curious to how it happened, and it's very, very cool.
	And thanks for having me on.
	I'm really happy to actually share the experience.
	Dude, it's amazing.
	I can tell you one thing.
	I'm going to go check out your video on Andrew Tate afterwards.
	That's for damn certain.
	It's Netcat Media on YouTube.
	Are you also on Rumble?
	I am on Rumble, and it's the same name.
	Okay, awesome.
	I don't do as much on Rumble, largely because I tend to stream from my PlayStation.
	And unfortunately, I only get to choose Twitch or YouTube.
	I really freaking wish that I could stream directly from my PlayStation to Rumble.
	Well, I'll ask Pavlovsky if that's in the books for what's upcoming at Rumble this year.
	Cool.
	Well, thank you for the talk.
	Thank you for coming.
	Keep in touch.
	We're now, we are DMing, so keep in touch and we'll see how the rest of this 2024 goes.
	Oh, yes.
	Thank you.
	All right, man.
	Have a good day.
	You too.
	Bye.
	Well, there you have it, people.
	That's what a caucus looks and sounds like.
	I'm just reading some of the chat.
	Oh, I said I wanted to bring up one.
	I'll bring up one.
	First, I want to bring up some chat here.
	That's the caucus.
	Very interesting experience.
	I would have liked it to be a little more...
	What's the word I'm looking for?
	Chaotic, but there's another word.
	It's a biblical way of describing chaos.
	Whatever, it'll come to me in a second.
	Mark Peterson said, I bet Evel Knievel has more airtime than Prince Harry.
	I don't know what that means, but you have a beautiful dog.
	What do we got here?
	We got Trump Haley 2024.
	Ha ha ha!
	Good troll.
	Not gonna happen.
	I'm gonna come back to a comment in a second.
	It's choose heretics, choose coronation revolution now.
	Let's see what's in the thing there.
	It says sovereign military order of Jerusalem.
	Okay, I'm just reading the avatar.
	I have to pull my glasses down.
	S-T-F-U-F-F-S, which surely stands for...
	I'm going to make a joke.
	Salmon shorts, my arse, those are pink, and they're salmon.
	Now, Nightwatch, Nate, I wanted to bring this up.
	Love how everyone is begging for Vivek, the big pharma snake still.
	I think he meant shill.
	Do you research people?
	Soros educated, WEF approved, and Pfizer funded.
	He has been groomed like Obama 2.0.
	I'm not making fun of you, Nightwatch.
	People are entitled to their opinions.
	To this, I would only say this.
	Soros educated.
	Is one way of describing having been given a scholarship or having accepted a scholarship in 2008 from Soros' brother who provided scholarships to students.
	The argument, the better argument might be he didn't need that scholarship because he already had 300 and some odd thousand dollars.
	Bad argument.
	Not Soros-funded, period.
	It's a, what do they call it, a bursary?
	A fund from Soros' brother over a decade ago.
	Sorry, bad argument.
	Two.
	What was the second one here?
	Big Pharma Snake.
	I don't know, because he worked in pharma.
	The other one, WEF approved.
	You do know that he sued the WEF to take down his name and any suggested connection between the WEF and him, because what the WEF does, we're going to talk about this a little later, is they basically...
	Sorry, hold on.
	They basically...
	You know, just create landing pages with people's faces and names and then imply some sort of connection between them, even if they don't have overt connections with them.
	And Vivek sued them to take it down, and he won.
	And I believe they had to pay him a certain nominal amount of money and apologize for it.
	So these are all bad arguments, just to get that out there.
	Okay.
	With that said...
	Hold on.
	I'm just reading some of the chat here.
	Yeah, okay, this is why, like, I'll entertain the discussion for a few more seconds.
	He got his Ivy League education from Soros, brother.
	Why do they see so much potential in him?
	You apply for bursaries, and they grant bursaries, much like, you know, that Ukrainian Nazi soldier out of Canada set up a bursary and gave the monies to people.
	You know, people apply, and they select a candidate.
	This is not grooming in any relevant sense.
	Okay, and I think we might have reached the end of the internet on that one.
	Before we go over to Rumble, let me just give everybody the link right there, because I want to cover this story, because it's a good story.
	I'm going to cover it here, and then it'll be the end of our YouTube journey.
	Let me give everybody the links to Locals and Rumble.
	Keith Wilson, the amazing thing is when you start defending the politically disfavored, you start facing random, arbitrary, abusive ethics complaints.
	People who have never been your client start filing complaints.
	And they go after your license because if you're a practicing lawyer, psychologist, whatever, your license is kind of important.
	When you're no longer practicing, there's a big middle finger that one can give when these abusive political activist scoundrels file frivolous ethics complaints to try to take your license away.
	Keith Wilson is a practicing attorney.
	Keith Wilson was representing a number of the convoy individuals.
	He acted along with Eva Cipiak and, oh God, Miller, I forget his first name now, Miller, during the Rouleau Commission, practicing lawyer with courage, audacity, and intelligence, which must be a very, very intimidating set of attributes to the scumbag who files, what's his name?
	I know it starts off with W-O-R, Worman, Worman, Worman.
	Warman?
	Is it W-A-R?
	Yeah, Warman here.
	This guy, Richard Warman, who files ethics complaints left, right, and center.
	So, just going to read this article.
	Just got it hot off the press.
	Law Society dismisses complaint over lawyers' convoy protest tweets.
	Keith Bolton apologized, says Society.
	Complaint...
	Oh, complainant!
	This activist lawyer...
	I'll Google his name so you can see who he is, because he's not in terms of the doxing, but in terms of the political activism.
	His name's out there.
	He's very proud of what he does.
	Finds ruling incomprehensible.
	It's incomprehensible.
	The Law Society of Alberta has dismissed a code of conduct complaint filed almost two years ago against one of that province's lawyers about his tweets he made during the 2022 convoy, the Ottawa convoy.
	You know who filed it?
	Not a client.
	Not someone who's been harmed in the context of...
	Mr. Wilson's representation of them as a client.
	An activist hack-schlock of a lawyer who goes around looking for fights, filing complaints against his political, ideological adversaries, because that's the only way these dirty scoundrels can fight.
	In December 2023...
	In a December 2023 document obtained by Radio Canada, state-funded propaganda, the Law Society said Keith Wilson was remorseful and committed to doing better in the future.
	Wilson was a familiar face during the 2022 demonstrations at the nation's capital.
	At the time, he was part of a legal team, yada, yada, yada.
	The complaint was filed with the Law Society of Ottawa.
	Odd, because I think Wilson practices out of...
	Alberta, but maybe whatever.
	Filed with the Law Society of Ottawa by human rights lawyer Richard Warman.
	Can you imagine a human rights lawyer?
	A so-called human rights lawyer that wants to punish someone for their free speech because it was a tweet.
	He wanted to punish Keith Wilson.
	For a tweet.
	I'll see if we can find it.
	Here we go.
	Warman alleged that Wilson engaged, quote, in trivialization of the Holocaust by retweeting material comparing Justin Trudeau to Adolf Hitler.
	Hey, Warman!
	I compare Justin Trudeau to Adolf Hitler.
	Forbes magazine, Forbes News compares Justin Trudeau to Adolf Hitler.
	Take your victim exploitation and shove it.
	Scum.
	Oh, I want to see the...
	Using the hashtag Free Tamara, a reference to the convoy organizer who was arrested at the time.
	I want to see the tweet.
	I want to see if I can find the tweet.
	According to Warman, Wilson's posts violated different code of conduct rules, including one that requires lawyers in the course of their professional practice to not communicate with anyone in a way that is abusive or offensive.
	Hey, Warman, grow the F up.
	Grow some skin that's a little thicker than a butterfly's wings.
	You snowflake.
	Warman also alleged that Wilson posted, quote, material inciting police officers to disobey their oath to uphold and enforce the law because it would benefit his clients.
	Can you...
	I gotta...
	We gotta find the tweet.
	We gotta find the tweet.
	One tweet Wilson posted included a video of Edmonton police officer who was supporting the trucker and thanking him.
	Thanking them for standing up to police officers.
	To the several hundred extra police now massing at Ottawa.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	Watch the video.
	Decide which side of history you want to be on.
	The world is watching.
	That's the tweet.
	Oh my goodness.
	Candid and remorseful.
	I hope Wilson didn't have to go to Jordan Peterson re-education camp over this.
	The Law Society's Contact Committee opted to investigate the complaint by holding a private meeting between Wilson and a member of its board known as a bencher.
	The approach is typically used to see if a lawyer understands their, quote, ethical obligations, end quote, according to the society's website.
	Okay, the committee then decides a further disciplinary hearing is needed.
	According to the decision, the bencher indicated Wilson had apologized for his conduct and accepted responsibility.
	Wilson was courteous civil candidate.
	That's because Wilson is a good man.
	And Warman is not.
	Throughout the investigative process, the document said he was committed to doing better.
	We'll be more careful in the future.
	He also acknowledged that the Society expects lawyers to encourage public respect for the administration of justice.
	Yada, yada.
	Okay, let's get to Warman.
	In a statement to Radio Canada, Wilson was not concerned about how the positions I took...
	Okay, fine.
	I want to hear where Warman...
	Warman told Radio Canada that the messages Wilson posted on the Law Society's decision were unacceptable.
	Quote, when you're a lawyer and you encourage police officers to break the law for the benefit of your clients, I think it's a scandal!
	Well, other people with bigger brains don't, Warman.
	It was incomprehensible that the Law Society gave Wilson basically a tap on the wrist, he added.
	I don't understand how.
	That encourages public respect of the Law Society of Alberta's ability to govern their own members and to uphold the professional conduct, Warman said.
	Oh, hold on, let me go up here for the first, I want to see, what was his first name?
	His name is Warman.
	Warman.
	It's amazing, eh?
	Like, Noman S. Omen.
	The name is the indication.
	Richard Warman.
	Let's see here.
	There were some other...
	He's done other equally.
	Oh, no, wait.
	Is he on with the anti-hate?
	I think he has something to do with the anti-hate network.
	All right, at the risk of saying something that's not...
	100% accurate.
	I'll find out later.
	Or I'm going to find out right now by checking another source.
	Let me see something here.
	That's the story.
	So a little bit of good news.
	Is he not involved in the answer?
	It doesn't matter.
	That's warm and you get an idea for who he is, how much of a human rights attorney he is, and so on and so forth.
	Okay.
	That is it.
	Thus ends our transmission on YouTube, and we're going to go over to the free speech platform of Rumble.
	500 people on YouTube?
	Get out!
	Flee, people!
	Let's see that number go below 500.
	The link to Rumble is there.
	The link to locals is here now.
	The number just went up to 510.
	That's the wrong direction, everybody.
	Did I miss any Super Chats here?
	I didn't.
	Oh, you know what?
	Actually, while everyone does that, I'm gonna read the "hrumble" rants on both platforms.
	Nike7VV is spelled color wrong, getting very American consensus around the water cooler.
	Carrie Lake VP, Vivek Chief of Staff, We've considered that.
	I don't think it's going to be Carrie Lake.
	Barnes has some compelling reasons as to why.
	Froma.
	We want mullet autonomy.
	And GingerNinja says, I hate that I missed your live with Alpha.
	That was amazing.
	Watched the replay last night.
	Had never heard of him before.
	The guy has gonads and principles.
	So rare.
	He's right.
	Things are going to get much worse.
	Everyone's got to go watch that interview yesterday.
	Because...
	And especially the clip that I put out on Twitter this morning.
	And GingerNinja is the man...
	Who put that there?
	Oh my gosh.
	Nobody puts anything on that chess set.
	That's the chessboard that Ginger Ninja made.
	And Ginger Ninja is on Twitter.
	I think he's now over 100 people.
	So go check out Ginger Ninja.
	Okay, we're ending on YouTube.
	Get on over to Rumble.
	Bye-bye, YouTube.
	Three, two, one.
	Excellent.
	Okay.
	Now, hold on.
	Let me finish this up here.
	Let's get into the story of the day, people.
	I was called a conspiracy theorist many and many a times.
	The term is so stupid.
	Calling me a conspiracy theorist is as stupid as calling me a Nazi, which I've also been called on Twitter, which is just...
	Calling me a conspiracy theorist is about as stupid as calling me a right-wing extremist.
	They're stupid for different reasons.
	Because calling me a conspiracy theorist when I am right, and when I turn out to be right, and not right by fluke...
	Just by right, by having a network of friends, trusted contacts, sources, a brain, a brain that can think a little fast-ish.
	So last summer, you know, we went through the summer of love in 2020, the summer of insurrection or non-insurrection where you had autonomous zones set up, police stations burned, courthouses, Molotov cocktailed, whatever.
	So you had your summer of love.
	And in Canada, we had our summer of climate change forest fires.
	For anybody who doesn't remember, let me see something here.
	Who can find, let me see here, Justin Trudeau.
	I want to get the good ones.
	You're all going to get the vlog later on.
	It's a short vlog, and it's good.
	Here we go.
	You have the summer.
	Where we had forest fires, record-breaking forest fires.
	And I'm trying to actually just even understand whether or not they were in fact record-breaking.
	Trying to figure out what the objective metric is to decide how bad a forest fire season is.
	Do you go by number of fires, number of non-contained fires, number of hectares burned?
	It seems that a dishonest way of going about it might be to measure number of hectares burnt.
	Because if the fire is in, I'm not saying an irrelevant location, if the fire is in a not...
	Risk-relevant region, they might let it burn.
	And in which case, you can't measure hectares as the objective metric for how bad a fire season was because you might have one big fire that you just let burn out of control because it was no risk, no problem.
	And, you know, it's a little bit of nature rejuvenation.
	Some people don't know this.
	There are certain types of seeds that only hatch under situations of extreme heat.
	It's very cool, by the way.
	You know what?
	Hold on one second.
	Let me just fact check myself in real time.
	Seeds that only open in fire.
	Yeah, okay, fine.
	I just want to make sure that I'm not stupid because I do remember this as being some of the things that you learn.
	You're like, oh, interesting.
	So there is an actual natural reason for why there might be forest fires.
	Plants like buckbrush and menzanita have seeds with a hard shell that require the heat from fire to break them open so they can sprout.
	And by the way, after a forest fire, when you have all that carbon and that burnt material on the soil, it makes for richer soil.
	So it actually makes for richer regrowth afterwards.
	Okay, when burned, nutrients from the fire-prone fuel load are recycled into the soil below the plant.
	So there are natural reasons for which forest fires are not all bad.
	So, do you go by number of fires?
	Do you go by number of uncontrolled fires?
	Do you go by number of hectares?
	I don't know.
	But all that to say is apparently we had a record-breaking forest fire season last summer, and it really didn't make much sense to me at the time for reasons which are kind of obvious.
	Jonathan Wilkinson.
	Okay, so this dude right here.
	Jonathan Wilkinson.
	Minister of Energy and Natural Resources for the Liberal Party.
	So you know...
	Oh my God!
	He did it!
	Oh, I didn't see that.
	He, him.
	Il, lui.
	Il le fait en français.
	Mon homme!
	Check ça bien!
	Il est tellement politiquement correct qu 'il indique ses prénoms.
	Prénoms?
	Non.
	Ses pronouns.
	I don't know what the hell the pronouns are en français.
	Il lui is French for he, him.
	All right, that's your man right there, by the way.
	Just in case you thought he was a woman.
	Let me just get in here.
	Just in case you thought this guy was a she, her.
	Very important that he indicated that.
	This is the Minister of Energy and Natural Resources.
	Trust the science.
	He, him, il lui.
	Okay.
	He went on in a whole...
	I don't think we get the tweet diatribe.
	This is from August 11. This is after the forest fires.
	We're going to just pull out some classic tweets.
	Wildfires have always occurred across Canada, but what is new is their frequency and their intensity.
	The science is clear, biatches.
	The root cause of this fact is climate change.
	Oh, oh, oh, I demanded a retraction and a correction from this man.
	Minister, this is two months after, by the way.
	There was good reason to understand, to know that they were...
	There was strong indications that arson was at play at the time.
	Oh, I don't think I brought up enough of the tweets.
	Oh, you see, this is a problem when you open up the tweets in incognito.
	So Justin Trudeau, you know, this is June 6th, this is right at the same time, announces that, you know, never let a good crisis go to waste.
	He's going to match the Red Cross donations to fight the forest fires.
	And I said, you're using our tax dollars to match donations to the Red Cross where the CEO makes $600,000 a year?
	Maybe Red Cross Canada is a little bit better.
	That's not your money.
	And then in another one of my tweets, it's like, oh, is your mother or brother on Red Cross Canada CEO's salary?
	Let's see what she makes, Red Cross.
	Conrad Sovy, $321,000 a year.
	CEOs at top charities earn top dollar.
	Red Cross.
	Where is it?
	Here we go.
	Red Cross.
	Red Cross.
	Here we go.
	That's right.
	Red Cross.
	The Canadian Red Cross.
	$320,000 for the CEO.
	Only the best.
	But Justin Trudeau is going to go match our donation dollars so they can line their pockets.
	At the time, there were indications that it was Arson.
	People were being arrested.
	It wasn't being reported.
	They were running with the narrative.
	What's going on here?
	Jeez Louise, did I not bring up the article?
	Oh, someone's got to fire the producer here.
	Okay, hold on.
	Let's just get the article.
	Well, we're going to get to the punchline, people.
	Let's go.
	Nova Scotia arson.
	The bottom line?
	Arson.
	Someone was arrested in the world record.
	The Canadian record.
	Arson.
	Dude, what the flipping heck is going on here?
	I can't even find the link.
	What's going on?
	Here, this is it.
	Give me a second here.
	I'll figure this out one of these days.
	I'm just going to blast through the links that I brought up just so I can get them out of here.
	Why is it not...
	It's right here.
	Okay, good.
	Here, about my privacy.
	Let's see what you say about my privacy.
	I close you.
	Nova Scotia man charged with starting province's largest ever wildfire.
	Dalton Clark Stewart, 22, accused of lighting Canada's Barrington Lake fire, which burned for one month in 2023.
	A Nova Scotia man has been charged for allegedly starting the eastern Canada's...
	Starting the Eastern Canada's largest ever wildfire.
	The charge against Dalton Clark, 22, come only days after a Quebec man, inspired by conspiracy theories, pleaded guilty to 14 charges of arson after deliberately lighting the forest fires.
	We knew that people were getting arrested for arson at the time.
	And the amazing thing is the truth is directly proportionate to the distruth, misinformation, disinformation being pushed by the media at the time.
	Everybody paying attention knew what was going on.
	And those who called it out at the time were called conspiracy theorists.
	And the fact-checkers at the time, for spewing disinformation, were hailed as the heroes for promoting the narrative.
	I gotta pull one up right here.
	It's just the best one ever.
	Where's the actual politifact?
	Here we go.
	Look at this one.
	I'm going to bring up an archived link to this PolitiFact fact check.
	It's mind-blowing.
	What the fact checkers do, ask the government for comment and then repeat the government propaganda.
	Listen to this.
	June 6th, the wildfires in Canada were planned.
	Well, nobody would make that claim.
	So take that straw man and shove it up your fake fact-checking arse, PolitiFact.
	No evidence wildfires in Canada were set intentionally.
	June 8th.
	Sarah Swan.
	Does she get fired for this?
	Do they get fired for doing their job terribly?
	Do they get fired for being objectively wrong?
	Do they never get published again?
	If your time is short, like Viva, there have been no reports the wildfires in Canada were set intentionally.
	Bullshit.
	Absolute total bullshit.
	And it's not just bullshit now knowing what we know now.
	It was bullshit at the time.
	Canada's government said the wildfires this year have been especially widespread and severe because of continued drought and warmer temperatures.
	You know who you should really believe when trying to assess government incompetence and government failed response, failed planning, failed policy?
	You should really listen to the government.
	Oh, cripe, it's not our fault.
	It has nothing to do with our poor forest management policy.
	It has to do with the climate crisis.
	We need more power, not less.
	Climate change is also causing wildfires and other natural disasters to become more frequent and extreme.
	Bullshit.
	But I want to bring up the ones at the time.
	The evidence was there at the time.
	Hold on.
	Canada, forest, fire, arson.
	I'm not going to get anything really old.
	There was an article at the time.
	I was posting at the time, hey, this guy just got arrested for arson.
	This guy got arrested for arson.
	I'm not saying it's arson.
	I'm just saying a lot of people are getting arrested for arson.
	Why are you guys pushing the climate crisis hoax quite this hard?
	Let's see some of the highlights from the time.
	Oh, it's amazing.
	By the way, at the same time that they're saying it's climate crisis, drier weather is making fire more severe.
	This is from July 7th.
	As Quebec gets wetter due to climate change, risks of landslide increase.
	Amazing.
	This was from June 8th.
	Environmentalists say climate change is making Quebec wildfires worse.
	That's a funny one.
	You know, one month apart.
	And by the way, it wasn't just wet weather in Quebec.
	It was wet in Nova Scotia to the point where they were having flooding.
	And then just look at this.
	It's Orwell's 1984.
	We're mid-speech.
	And they literally...
	Tear the speech up, swap the words, and the crowd just goes on cheering and pretending like nothing happened.
	Look at this.
	Also look at the picture.
	June 2nd, 2023.
	Wildfire season linked to climate change, scientists.
	And the amount of forests burned by wildfire is projected to double by 2050 due to our climate causing longer, more intense, whatever.
	Flash forward.
	23 hours ago.
	Same picture, by the way.
	It's the same picture.
	Let's just swap out what we said about it.
	Nova Scotia News.
	Man charged following Barrington Lake fire.
	I mean, life has become unintentional parody.
	Let's see what else there are.
	I mean, stay tuned for the vlog.
	It's going to come out afterwards.
	And then I said as a joke, but it wasn't really a joke.
	I was like, all right, well, look, there's only one way they're going to be able to make sense of this, okay?
	It's climate crisis.
	That's where the fires are going.
	It's dry.
	The lightning strikes and the fires burn.
	And that happens.
	There's no question about it that that happens.
	I'm going to get to the other explanation for that, provided by the Fraser Institute, which is not a nothing institution.
	Now that it's been confirmed, Nova Scotia arson, the largest forest fire in Nova Scotia history, arson.
	The Quebec man who's fueled by government conspiracy theories admits to 14 acts of arson.
	I said jokingly, all right, now they're going to say, well, it's arson, but climate crisis is making the arson worse.
	You'll notice on the screen here, on the bottom, CTV News.
	Those propagandists, yeah.
	This is their expert.
	Listen to what he has to say.
	I would say it's always sad and I would say also very infuriating to see that people are leading up fires in the Boreal Forest on purpose.
	Of course, that's very sad this happened.
	But of course, the conditions, the weather conditions were very, very fire conducive this year.
	Notwithstanding the cause of the fire, if it's an arson, if it's an accidental fire, human-caused fire, or natural fires...
	Conditions have to be very conducive to have the kind of fires that we had this year.
	Saying that the climate change was not involved in those fires, even if they are some human cause or a natural, is kind of an intellectual dishonest.
	And it has been already proven that those conditions that happened in Quebec were at least twice too likely to occur because of climate change.
	That the climate change was not involved in those.
	To be very conducive to have the kind of fires that we had this year.
	Saying that the climate change was not involved in those fires, even if they are arson, human cause, or natural, is kind of an intellectual dishonesty.
	Can you believe the balls on that so-called expert?
	To deny the climate change is that issue, regardless of whether or not it's arson, is intellectual dishonesty?
	Ooh, me thinks thou art guilty of that of which you accuse others.
	En français on dit...
	My dog's pooping.
	En français on dit confession par l 'entremise de la projection.
	I don't think that's how you would actually translate it.
	But confession through projection, homie.
	It's intellectual dishonesty to deny climate change when talking about acts of criminal arson.
	But I can understand the rationale.
	You know, if you go to...
	If someone sets fire to a barn and it's arson, well, if the farmer is storing dry wheat, not wheat, excuse me, what's that stuff called?
	Hay.
	If the farmer's storing hay in there, well, it'll burn down the barn faster.
	Okay.
	I can understand the argument.
	But how about this?
	How about if we just think about this for one second?
	Maybe it's not climate crisis, especially when...
	The news is announcing, do I have the one about Nova Scotia flooding?
	That Nova Scotia's flooding.
	Quebec is flooding, while Somal Tennessee's saying forest fires are out of control.
	Maybe it's not climate crisis, climate change.
	Maybe it's just bad government policy.
	Starting with, oh, I don't know.
	Let's just, the Fraser Institute, people.
	Oh, but this is not a peer-reviewed journal.
	Canada's burning because of bad...
	Forest policy, not climate change.
	Well, if you have bad forest policy, and you couple that with criminal arson, what do you get?
	Forest fires and lots of them, dummies.
	Do I want to go through this whole...
	It's not that long.
	Unless you've been living in an underground cave, you're aware that there's been massive explosion of forest fire across Canada, sending smoke to the Americans.
	Here at home, our usual opportunistic climate analysis, including Trudeau, yada yada.
	Blame the flames on climate change.
	Okay, but let's bring some other facts to the hysteria.
	First, the climate is indeed warming.
	Okay, but is it the recent atmospheric warming causing increased fires?
	Let's see here.
	Can we get into this here?
	I just want to get to the good stuff.
	As the Royal Society and Independent Scientific Academy in the United Kingdom summarizes in a 2020 blog post updating its 2016...
	Fire activity is on the rise in some regions, but when considering the total area burned at the ground level, we are not seeing an increase overall.
	An overall increase.
	Okay.
	What about Canada per se?
	It is clear.
	Hold on.
	It is clear that Canada's fire issues are climate driven.
	Is it clear?
	Unless one believes the inverse correlation suggests causality, the answer is no. 2020 study in the Journal of Progress in Disaster Science.
	Where authors show a fairly sharp declining trend in the number of fires annually over time and a mixed record of areas burned, though the authors take note of an apparent increase in areas burned over the last two decades.
	Okay.
	There we go.
	Let's go here.
	More specifically, they find that Canada has failed to fund the proactive management of forest fires sufficient and is not poised to do better moving forward.
	Wildfire management agencies in Canada are at a tipping point.
	Pre-suppression, sick, and suppression costs are increasing, but program budgets are not.
	Wildfire suppression continues to a...
	Wildfire suppression contributes to a wildfire problem, but paradoxically, it is wildfire use that will help solve this problem.
	The wildfire management toolbox must include wildfire use to manage wildfires at the landscape level because it is not feasible to effectively use prescribed burns.
	Yada yada.
	All right, Canada's having a hell of a season, there's no disputing that, and it's producing hellish landscapes across Canada and North America.
	What it is not, however, is a call for more of the same old climate action, but rather a call for more sane, real-world time management of fire risk in Canada's forests, a practice that Canadian governments have failed at for decades.
	Much like in California, by the way, just not for nothing.
	Much like in California, where they had massive forest fires because you can't clear the forest, you get all that...
	Easy to burn stuff.
	Apparently there's some invasive species that burn quicker.
	No.
	Not policy.
	It's never the government's policy.
	It's never the government's failure that should result in them getting spanked.
	It's as a result of something beyond the powers of government that should result in them getting more power.
	By the way, but it's not just that in Canada.
	You know, bad forest policy.
	Whatever.
	Bad forest management policy.
	I don't have the screen grabs.
	You'll see them in the vlog.
	They were systematically firing, laying off, forcing the resignations of firefighters across the country for the last two years.
	Whenever they imposed that wonderful constitutional and above all else scientific vaccine mandate.
	Vaccine in quotes.
	The jab mandate.
	As a result of COVID policies across Canada, Nova Scotia firefighters were leaving the force.
	Fired or leaving.
	Ontario firefighters fired or resigning in protest.
	So we didn't have enough forest firefighters in Canada because of bad government policy.
	We had forests that were ready to burn because of bad forest management policy.
	And then we had criminal arsons starting fires.
	Hmm.
	Climate change.
	Dumbasses.
	Justin Trudeau is a dumbass, an opportunist.
	Wilkins, that guy there, dumbass.
	There was another one from Ontario who also had she, her, not Ontario, Winnipeg, the MP for Winnipeg.
	Proud Lakota, she, her, and her bone.
	They all jumped on it.
	Climate change.
	They all deserve to get community noted.
	They all deserve to be publicly mocked and humiliated.
	And they all should be required to issue corrections and resign from office.
	It's not too much to ask.
	Let me see if I had any more.
	Highlighting the insanity.
	See, this is a problem.
	In incognito, you don't get the...
	Oh yeah, and POTUS chimed in also.
	POTUS, climate crisis.
	I asked the aggregate knowledge of the interwebs to give me all of the best tweets.
	To highlight the stupidity, hypocrisy, misinformation and disinformation coming from our elected officials at the time.
	I got a good bunch, so stay tuned.
	Vlog coming soon.
	Although it's a perfect segue into, you know, the elites who are currently gathering at Davos to decide our fates, you know.
	Climate crisis, health issues, we need more power.
	We need to shut down Canada.
	Get rid of your wood-burning stoves.
	Get rid of your cars.
	You don't get to drive.
	And they're going to fly into Davos and, you know, tell you how to live your life.
	I want to double-check one fact, actually.
	Google, Davos Escort Services sold out.
	Hmm.
	Hmm.
	You know, just boop.
	What else would you accept?
	I don't know how reliable the messenger is.
	Let's see here.
	Escort services sell out of Davos as finance leaders gather at the World Economic Forum.
	I mean, I guess with Epstein out of business now, I mean, where are these elites going to get their escorts?
	Forex factory?
	I don't know which ones, you know, what these outlets, how reliable they are.
	This one does not look reliable.
	The 54th Annual Gathering at the World Economic Forum begins today in the small Alpine town of Davos.
	Invitation-only meeting brings 2,800 leaders from 120 countries.
	Yadda, yadda, yadda.
	What's on the menu?
	Oh, hold on.
	Is it from the New York Post?
	Oh, it's Tyler Durden.
	Ah, whatever.
	It seems that the escort services have all sold out in Davos and the neighboring regions.
	They can't get him the way they used to anymore since Jeffrey Epstein took his own life tragically in his jail cell where he had been stripped of clothing and any ability to kill himself, where the cameras weren't working and the security guards were sleeping.
	It's a tragedy.
	How could he do that to himself?
	So, yeah, that's it.
	So they're gathering there, by the way, and, you know, they don't want you listening to the likes of me.
	They don't want people having too much to think.
	Having too much free access to reliable, accurate, and responsible information providers.
	But don't take my word for it.
	Take this woman over here who's going to tell you after you live your life.
	I don't know who she is, but hold on.
	Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen.
	Your annual global risk report.
	Look at all these people.
	All of these people.
	I shouldn't judge them personally.
	I'm sure they're very nice.
	How many of them have escorts?
	Let's just pick.
	I want to zoom in.
	I can't zoom in.
	This guy right here with the blue tie right in the middle, he's got an escort.
	Okay, I'm joking.
	I don't know who the hell that guy is.
	Stunning and sobering read.
	Oh, yes.
	It's a...
	For the Global Risk Report.
	It's very stunning.
	It's terrifying.
	The people are thinking for themselves here.
	Makes for a stunning and sobering read.
	For the global business community.
	The top concern for the next two years is not conflict.
	No, no, no.
	Or climate.
	Of course not.
	It is disinformation and misinformation.
	Could they make this look anything more like a 1984 ad if they tried?
	I mean, I guess the colors could be red.
	They must have learned from Biden's mistake.
	Don't put the red in the back, yeah?
	Red is the color of the blood.
	We want to put the blue here.
	It'd be much less intimidating.
	Then you have Germans and whoever this woman is, she might be Swiss.
	Shouting at you about how you are going to lose your rights to the internet for disinformation, misinformation.
	It's not conflict.
	No.
	We want the conflict.
	It's we don't want you getting the information, yeah.
	Followed closely by polarization within our society.
	Look how sympathetic her eyes are.
	She looks so authentic and she looks like she's genuinely concerned about polarization.
	These people are in panic right now.
	I mean, I'm looking at this, I see her feigning sincerity, but I do see deep fear.
	What is this?
	The only way we can control the masses, yeah, is to make sure that they only go to politifact.
	For the news, yeah.
	Because once the firefights, the climate fires in Canada, there's no evidence of arson, yeah.
	Oh, what's this?
	We learned that a year later.
	Oh, it's my bad.
	These risks are serious because they limit our ability to tackle the big global challenges we are facing.
	Oh, there you go.
	These mother effers!
	Can you believe this?
	I want to hear this again because it's almost like she said something by accident.
	They are.
	To control what the masses know and learn and then they know it.
	Tackle the big global challenges we are facing.
	Changes in our climate.
	Oh, yeah.
	And our geopolitical climate.
	Oh, yeah.
	How did you guys get to Davos?
	Just out of curiosity.
	You took the electric trains?
	Shifts in our demography.
	Oh, shifts in our demography.
	And in our technology.
	Shifts in our demography.
	You mean like when 96% of Canada's population growth is driven by immigration?
	Can't have people complaining about that.
	In fact, I believe at one point in time that was even called conspiracy theory to identify.
	Spiraling.
	Hold on.
	Yes!
	That is the Klaus Schwab.
	That is Herr Führer himself sitting on stage.
	She's doing a good job, Klaus.
	She's selling it.
	Conflicts and intensified geopolitical competition.
	Who has ever seen Mystery Science Theater 3000?
	A bunch of jackasses in that audience.
	Look at that.
	The sobering reality is that we are once again competing more intensely across countries than we have in several decades.
	This woman has taken speech classes.
	And this makes the theme of this year's Davos meeting even more relevant.
	Rebuilding trust.
	Here's how you rebuild trust.
	Go to hell and stay there.
	I don't want to hear from you or see you ever again in my life.
	That's how you rebuild trust.
	This is not a time for conflicts or polarization.
	Oh, no.
	You would bring us together, Jan.
	This is a time to build trust.
	This is a time to drive global collaboration more than ever before.
	Do you know what global collaboration to build trust to combat disinformation means, people?
	They're telling you this.
	In real time and a bunch of jackass silhouettes in the crowd.
	Like, yeah, how can we all use our respective technologies to bring about this outcome?
	We must have global collaboration with the cabinets with whom we have penetrated so that we can control the disinformation and the misinformation online, yeah, so that there will be no polarization and so that nobody comes after us with the proverbial pitchforks because we have ruined and controlled their lives, yeah.
	Oh, my dog.
	This requires immediate and structural responses to match the size of the global challenges.
	Digital currency, online registration.
	They're loving Nikki Haley and Nikki Haley is loving this.
	And if she becomes president, she will make you show the papers to get onto the Internet.
	We will see who says what then, eh?
	When you put out the tweet of the disinformation, misinformation, we get the FBI at your front door with the flashbangs.
	I believe it can be done.
	Oh, look at that face.
	Look at that face.
	I believe it can be done.
	I am so happy with myself.
	I want to know how much that dress costs.
	I want to know how much that necklace costs.
	I want to know how they got there.
	And I believe that Europe can and must take the lead in shaping.
	That global response.
	The amazing thing is, it's not like Rebel News pulled that clip, but it's not like people are pulling these clips from secret recordings.
	By the way, did Hillary Clinton ever give her speech that she gave to the bankers?
	It's not like people are pulling these clips surreptitiously.
	The WEF is publishing these things on their website.
	Sorry, on their YouTube channel.
	Oh, cripe.
	Pudge just took a poop on the floor and she's not yet done.
	Now she's crawled into her bed.
	It's not because I haven't walked her, everybody.
	Pudge is paralyzed and it just comes out when it comes out.
	Now my home office studio smells like poo poo.
	Yeah, once this office smells like poo-poo.
	Okay, that's the WEF, everybody.
	They're out to control information.
	It's all a conspiracy theory.
	I'm old enough now to remember when the idea of a group of elites secretly meeting in the Swiss mountains was a conspiracy theory.
	Then it became public knowledge.
	Then it was, oh, the Great Reset is a conspiracy theory.
	Then we saw their actual, you know, PDF presentations.
	Then what was the other one?
	What was the other one?
	Oh, then the Great Reset.
	Did I say that one already?
	Was a conspiracy theory until it became confirmed fact.
	And Agenda 2030 was a conspiracy theory until they had to admit it.
	And now trust these tyrannical scumbags to put in the structural system framework to control the disinformation and misinformation on the internet.
	Okay.
	What I was going to do before going on to the next story, hold on, was go to present, was go to the MSM Wildfires.
	This is our stream right here.
	Mighty Megatron says, Javier Malay shitted on these people yesterday.
	Did you hear his speech?
	They're going to get that man killed.
	Hold on.
	Not only did I hear the speech, I listened to the full 20-some-odd minutes.
	Let me pull the clip.
	The thing is this.
	I was trying to pull the best highlight from his speech.
	But I couldn't...
	I mean, it was just...
	The whole thing was beautiful.
	I think I pulled what is the best portion.
	Let me get that.
	Is this...
	Something tells me they're not going to invite Javier Malay back next year.
	There it is.
	I'll pull that up in two seconds, actually.
	They're not going to...
	I mean, I don't know if they're going to kill him.
	The problem is he ended it with enough of a...
	He ended it with enough of a flattering response.
	Like, oh, yeah, okay.
	It's great to be here, yeah.
	Let me go here.
	Okay.
	Sorry.
	Mighty Megatron.
	So yeah, there you go.
	Rumbled.
	Top up your ego.
	I don't know what that means.
	Banana dance?
	Oh, banana dance.
	Okay.
	Chechism.
	It's a good thing we fired so many first responders who can't return to work until 2027 at the earliest in Nova Scotia.
	And then the carbon tax is crippling our fire departments who are trying to fuel the trucks.
	It's amazing.
	It's almost by design.
	Forest fires is how you get blueberries.
	Finboy Slick.
	Which might explain why the Lac-Saint-Jean region has so many blueberries.
	Hey, Viva, have you seen this release study on vax injuries?
	Oh, dude, I'm going to go through this publication.
	Is it peer-reviewed?
	Aurora Bennu, is it peer-reviewed?
	I'm joking.
	I'm not engaging with those people anymore, but I'm going to open that up in a window and look at it afterwards.
	Thank you very much.
	Yeah, Viva, stop being a shill for big from...
	Okay, fine.
	I got that one before.
	Oh, and then you got Viva, have you spelled color wrong?
	Okay, no, I got that one too.
	So hold on.
	Javier Malay, people.
	The man's crazy, but in the good way.
	Something tells me they're not going to be inviting...
	Something tells me Havre Millet will not be invited back to the next WEF.
	Let's hear the opening.
	I pulled, you know, the smallest, densest, awesome.
	Middle finger to the WEF.
	Listen to this.
	Whatever you want to correct a supposed market failure inexorably, as a result of not knowing what the market is or as a result of having fallen in love with a failed model, you are opening up the doors to socialism and condemning people to poverty.
	However, faced with the theoretical demonstration that state intervention is harmful and empirical evidence that it has failed couldn't have been otherwise, the solution to be proposed by collectivists is not greater freedom, but rather greater regulation, which creates a downward spiral of regulations until we're all poorer and the life of all of us depends on a bureaucrat sitting in a luxury...
	That's a zinger right there.
	He's like, oh yeah, when you're wrong because your models failed, it shows you didn't understand your models, and what do you do?
	You double down because you're idiots, and you get some dumbass bureaucrat who's suffering no consequences from their fractal wrongness, sitting in this luxury whatever, saying, no, no, no, we just didn't do it properly.
	It's clinging to their models or ignoring reality.
	Amazing.
	This guy, this guy is...
	This is as polite as you can be while ripping someone's heart out of their chest and taking a pee-pee on it.
	It's actually amazing.
	I would not have the self-control, self-restraint to do it like this.
	Libertarianism already provides for equality of these sexes.
	The cornerstone of our creed says that all humans are created equal, that we all have the same unalienable rights granted by the creator, including...
	Life, freedom, and ownership.
	All that this radical feminism agenda has led to is greater state intervention to hinder the economic process, giving a job to bureaucrats who have not contributed anything to society.
	Who's ever seen it?
	Who's seen the video where he's going, arugula?
	He doesn't say arugula, but that's how I remembered it.
	Arugula is rip it out.
	Government agencies out, out, out.
	DEI, out.
	Gender equality out!
	Useless bureaucrats who suck at the government's teat, suck up our taxpayer dollars to provide nothing of value and only destruction, ideological, political, and institutional.
	Examples, ministries of women or international organizations devoted to promoting this agenda.
	Another conflict presented by socialists is that of humans against nature, claiming that we human beings damage the planet, which should be protected at all costs, even going as far as advocating for population control mechanisms or the bloody abortion.
	Unfortunately, these harmful ideas have taken a stronghold in our society.
	Yeah, I don't know how much better it gets than that.
	And Finboy Slick has reminded me of what the word was.
	Afuera!
	Where was it?
	Here we go.
	Hold on.
	You know what Javier Malay says about the hair on the sides of your head?
	Afuera!
	The guy's crazy, but he's very, very smart.
	Eloquent.
	And more important than anything, he's right.
	Period.
	Full stop.
	Okay, well, that was the highlight.
	25 minutes, a worthwhile listen.
	I've been like just, you know, at night, I'm a normal person.
	I'm just listening to WEF speeches to see if I can pull out any snippets and clippets of devastating, egregious, you know, vocal admissions.
	What's amazing is how little viewership.
	Any video from the WEF gets on YouTube.
	I mean, I'd be embarrassed.
	They got like millions of followers and hundreds sometimes, thousands of views per video.
	It's because they're saying nothing of value.
	The only reason anybody listens to them is to find the snippets and clippets where they say the quiet part out loud and tell us in advance what they want to do.
	Control information, global collaboration to make sure you don't get any of that pesky disinformation /misinformation.
	You want to see Pudge?
	Look, at least now I know she's not going to poop on me.
	Come here.
	Pudge has pooped on the ground.
	Why'd you do it?
	I didn't do it on purpose.
	It just happens.
	I'm so ashamed of myself.
	Okay, get out of here.
	Now I'm going to go boil my hand when this stream is over after touching my hair.
	Okay, what else do we got?
	Let me see here.
	Go to the chat.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	Someone says, gross?
	What is that?
	That's my dog!
	Pudge tried to tell you.
	She had to poo-poo.
	No, she doesn't even know.
	I have to get her in advance, take her out, squeeze her.
	Only the UN has hands in 192 countries.
	All in agreement, says Calamity Sioux.
	Okay, and we got, let me see here.
	Oh, here we go.
	So, Coron...
	No, Coron...
	Yeah, I never drink anything that tastes like watermelon, but it's amazing.
	True North.
	It's just carbonated water with caffeine.
	125 milligrams.
	I need to get them as a sponsor.
	It doesn't make sense if they're not sponsoring the channel.
	125 milligrams of caffeine.
	It's seltzer water with a little extra nutrients.
	Doesn't taste good, but it does taste good because you know that you're not packing down that disgusting sugar of that disgusting Red Bull.
	And then we got Crash Bandit.
	I won't bring it up.
	I'll just read it.
	We keep assuming that their models are wrong.
	I propose this.
	The models are doing exactly what they want, and that is making the populace scared so they can get more power and control.
	Change my mind.
	No!
	Nobody has to change your mind.
	It's, um...
	Their models are wrong.
	But the strategy is working.
	Cornon Macrops is going to order the grapefruit lemonade next.
	Yeah, the black cherry is good.
	I haven't actually tasted a flavor that's bad.
	I just don't like watermelon anything in general.
	Okay, what else do we have?
	I think we're going to end on...
	Hold on, what time is it?
	It's been an hour and 22 minutes, so I'm going to probably go for another eight minutes.
	Let me see here.
	You know what?
	I'm going to save the pipe bomb story for our locals after party.
	I think.
	Let me see something here.
	Fulton, we got the Fannie Willis.
	Yeah, I'll save the Darren J. Beattie pipe bomb stuff for our Locals after party because I'm actually curious as to what our community thinks about it, how we piece that together.
	Here's the link for everybody who's going to come on over to the east side after this is done.
	Link to Locals.
	And what was I going to say?
	So coming up, just so I remember what's going on, tomorrow I'm going to be off the grid because I volunteered to judge at a high school public speaking, public speech and debate competition.
	Got to get up super, super early for that.
	Sunday night's going to be our show, and next week there's going to be awesomeness, so stay tuned.
	Last part of the day.
	Fannie Willis update, and I have to take it from Fox News.
	Forget me.
	Fannie Willis, DA.
	Let's see here.
	We've got Fulton County DA.
	Fannie Willis attempts to quash subpoena related to alleged misconduct.
	Covered it earlier this week.
	I want to just play a clip from a judge in one of those cases from a year ago, but I wanted to read this first as the segue.
	The news.
	Georgia Prosecutor Fannie Willis has neither confirmed nor denied her alleged improper relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade.
	It's not the relationship that was the problem.
	It was the bypassing the ethical rules of governance to basically usurp tax dollars to hire your boyfriend, among others, and I don't care that you hired others as well, to do the persecution and read article for free.
	Nope!
	See if I can get this through an archive link, because Viva ain't paying.
	Georgia prosecutor Fannie Willis is hitting back at the allegations she's engaged in an improper relationship.
	Nobody cares about the relationship!
	You could not be boning him, and it would still be just as problematic.
	Accusing the estranged wife of interfering with her prosecution of former President Trump.
	Willis has been subpoenaed to give pretrial deposition in the divorce case of Nathan Wade and Jocelyn Wade on January 23rd.
	But in a Thursday court filing, she argued that the subpoena should be quashed.
	Let's see if the quashed means you cancel the subpoena.
	You get a subpoena, technically it's binding, and if you don't want to go to court, you've got to go get a judge to say, I quash your subpoena, not to be confused with squash.
	I squish you.
	A portion of the filing reads, defendant Jocelyn Wade has conspired with interested parties in the criminal election interference case to use the civil discovery process to annoy, embarrass, and oppress Attorney Will.
	You know what that means, by the way?
	That is exactly what Fannie Willis has done vis-a-vis Trump.
	It's an amazing thing for her to make that...
	Can you imagine?
	First of all, if I'm a wife getting divorced from my husband on the basis that he did not disclose $700,000 in income, revenue, or wealth, and he's boning this woman who's paying him that money, holy shit, you better...
	Damn dollars to donuts.
	I'm going to subpoena her and want to hear what she has to say.
	But that Fannie Willis doesn't say, okay, that's the reason.
	But she goes to conspiracy with interested parties to interfere with election interference.
	Well, you know damn well that's exactly what Fannie's doing with her persecution of Trump.
	You know damn well.
	Accuse your enemies of doing what you are doing so as to create confusion.
	Confession through projection.
	Fannie Willis is grade A level scumbaggery.
	Willis'attorney, Sinke Aksum, wrote that the attempt to question Willis is obstructing and interfering with the ongoing criminal case.
	Bullshit!
	I'll give you the questions.
	Um...
	Never mind.
	I was gonna make such a dirty joke, I can't even do it.
	Sorry.
	That they want to help her resolve her divorce fairly and privately.
	Yada, yada.
	Okay, fine.
	And that any response to Willis' motion will come in a filing with the court.
	Trump co-defendant Michael Roman's lawyers accused Willis and Wade of engaging in an improper relationship.
	I covered that last week.
	You all know that.
	Roman's lawyer Ashley Merchant did not provide evidence because the case is under seal, but presumably Ashley Merchant has seen the evidence of that.
	Divorce proceeding, which is under seal, which from what I understand is also very suspect.
	Sus, as the kids say.
	Merchant alleges that Willis, they got into a relationship, improper relationship because, you know, they're basically boning each other while prosecuting Trump.
	And how good does that feel?
	That Willis then...
	She violated ethics rules in hiring Wade, usurped taxpayer dollars to pay her boyfriend without going through the standard legal process, transparency process, that Wade, her boyfriend, that she's been paying upwards of a million dollars over the last three years to, takes her on lavish vacations, cruises, etc., etc.
	The relationship is not what's at issue here, Fannie, but you know that, but it's the easy distraction.
	County records show that Wade was paid nearly $650,000 in legal fees since January 2022.
	An amount authorized by the district attorney or Willis.
	Yeah, it was authorized by her.
	Hiring him wasn't authorized properly.
	Oh yeah, then she went to a church and pulled out the race card.
	She pulled out the race card.
	She pulled out so many race cards.
	I didn't know that you had that many.
	Race, race.
	You get a race card.
	Everyone gets a race card.
	In the motion filed Thursday, Willis' attorney argued that they've been separated for more than two years, uncontested no-fault divorce, absence of any relevant basis to question Willis.
	Merchant has cited...
	This is Merchant Roman's attorney.
	Special sources.
	Okay, I would never have filed something like this if I didn't have multiple sources to corroborate, Merchant told WSBTV in an interview last week defending the motion.
	Okay.
	That's it.
	What else do we got?
	Trump has called for the case against him to be dropped outright over the allegations.
	You have a very big event yesterday, as you saw in Georgia, where the district attorney is totally compromised.
	The case has to be dropped, Trump told reporters last week.
	They went after 18, 20 people.
	She was out of her mind.
	Now it turns out the case is totally compromised.
	It's illegal.
	What she did is illegal, maybe even unethical.
	I mean, I guess it would have to be unethical if it's illegal.
	So we'll let the state handle that, but what a sad situation it is, he added.
	And that's it.
	And then we're going to end just with a video of what the judge said to Fannie Willis last year.
	Look at this.
	It's amazing.
	Dismiss that.
	Just listen to this.
	Using the title of your office and having on social media that you as this political office holder are holding a fundraiser for the opponent of someone that this political office is investigating.
	I don't know that it's an actual conflict, but I use that phrase, what were you thinking, where the prosecutor thought I could prosecute the co-defendant of someone I defended.
	It's a what-are-you-thinking moment.
	The optics are horrific.
	If you are trying to have the public believe that this is a nonpartisan, driven by the facts...
	I'm not here to critique decisions.
	The decision was made.
	But if we are trying to maintain confidence that this investigation is pursuing facts in a nonpartisan sense, no matter who the district attorney is, we follow the evidence where it goes.
	I just want to pause.
	This is from a year ago.
	This was on a previous motion to disqualify.
	Imagine what this judge—he was elected, by the way.
	Robert McBurney was elected, not appointed.
	But this was from a year ago under another motion to disqualify before any of this evidence had surfaced.
	So imagine what this judge might have to say about this now because he's being as polite as he can, but he's really not being all that polite to Fannie.
	And ignore the fact that I hosted a fundraiser for the proponent of someone I've just named Target.
	That strikes me as problematic, maybe not from an actual conflict level, but if we are at a cocktail party and people are asking...
	Do you think that this is a fair, balanced approach to things?
	I do.
	Well, how do you explain this?
	How does one explain?
	I mean, that's the concern I'm working through, is that it's not a lowercase a appearance.
	It's like a capital A with flashy lights fundraiser, district attorney for the political opponent of someone I've named the target of my investigation.
	I'm the legal advisor to the grand jury, and I'm on national media almost nightly talking about this investigation.
	That's problematic.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	Five words, you pronounce...
	Bye-bye.
	It's problematic.
	Scott Adams in his book, Loser Think, problematic.
	It's an understatement.
	It's corruption.
	Egregious corruption.
	2024 will be the year of vindication.
	That's my prediction.
	It's going to be vindication for January Sixers.
	It's going to be vindication for Trump.
	And it's going to be vindication in that, I hope, and cross my fingers.
	That there will be political and legal retribution for the wrongdoers.
	All right.
	Everybody, with that said, we're going to end this on Rumble, and we're going to go to our vivabarneslaw.locals.com exclusive afterparty.
	Let me just see a few of the chats in here.
	Board of Education, afuera!
	FBI, afuera!
	Oh, that's funny.
	You need to look at it from a Trump lens.
	If this we, a Trump lawyer prosecuting a dem...
	Oh, yeah.
	Flip everything around.
	It'll just be over.
	Okay, I'm not reading that.
	Not reading that.
	I like bacon.
	Rabid.
	99. As do I. And on that note, people, we shall end the Viva Fry stream on Rumble.
	Come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	The link one last time.
	Just one last time.
	Right there.
	And I will see you all Sunday, if no earlier.
	I might try to get out a vlog tomorrow.
	We'll see.
	We'll see.
	It might be a talkie vlog with no fancy editing because I'm not sure how much time I'm going to have.
	But we're ending on Rumble right now.
	Rumble, they've got big news coming out next week, so stay tuned.
	And with that said, peeps, enjoy the weekend if you're not coming over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Rumble transmission over.
	Locals, are we still good here?
	Okay.
	Oh, yeah.
	Well, look at those two dogs.
	You all think they're like...

▲