Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 14, 2023 - Viva & Barnes

01:34:16

George Floyd Death Certificate MODIFIED? w/ John Beaudoin Sr. - Hunter Biden; CNN & MORE! Viva Frei

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Nick Fuentes back on.
	A white supremacist anti-Semite?
	Yeah, as long as he doesn't break the rules.
	Well, those are breaking the rules.
	No, having views, having thoughts in your head is not against the law or breaking the rules.
	If you say things on the platform that violate the platform...
	And if you promote your show and you say them on your show?
	Well...
	If I started spewing white supremacist stuff now in front of you, right, and I then tweeted a link to the show, you'd be happy with that?
	I like Zuby.
	I'm not saying I would be happy with it, but I wouldn't want you banned from X for that.
	Really?
	So I could look down the barrel of this camera and say I think all black people should be thrown out of this country.
	Watch how they clip this one.
	Zuby knows how the internet works.
	Yeah, Pierce, it's a crazy thing.
	I would like to know who espouses those views.
	That's the beauty of freedom of speech.
	Okay, so someone will clip it, right?
	And I could say that, and then I could tweet a link to this show to promote the show, and you would think I should stay on X. Yes, I would support your right to free speech.
	Wow.
	That's not free speech, it's hate speech.
	No, it's free...
	Hate speech.
	I mean, I know Pierce is approaching this discussion from the British perspective, much like a Canadian might be approaching it from the Canadian perspective.
	Hate speech, it's not bloody recognised under the First Amendment as a restrictive method, Pierce.
	Freedom of speech specifically exists to protect views and people espousing views.
	There are six different criteria excluded under the First Amendment.
	Not one of which is hate speech, Pierce.
	This is where you might have gone.
	There's defamation, incitement, criminal discourse, criminal activity.
	What's it?
	Fraud.
	There are six carved out criteria.
	In America, one of them is not hate speech.
	Imagine saying immigrant to go home.
	In as much as it's unpopular to say, becomes hate speech worthy of being unbanned?
	So when people tell Piers Morgan to go home because nobody needs his censorship and anti-Second Amendment perspective in America, that would be hate speech?
	Ban them from Twitter?
	So that nobody can tell Piers Morgan to go home because of his un-American views?
	And I'm not saying this, by the way, but I'd like to know who would be saying it if people were saying it about me.
	Go back to Canada, if it's what they'd be saying.
	Including child pornography, including defamation, including all sorts of things.
	You can't famously go into a theater and shout fire.
	Including all sorts of things, but not hate speech, Pierce.
	Proud of theater, right?
	So there are lots of restrictions already.
	Look, there are people who think that I engage in hate speech.
	There's people who think that you engage in hate speech.
	Hate speech is a very subjective, it's an extraordinarily subjective term.
	And if anyone who has ever said anything over the decades...
	So for you, there's no limit.
	Anyone can say anything.
	I don't think you can directly call to violence.
	It's an amazing thing.
	Hate speech is very subjective.
	So anyone can say anything.
	No, Pierce, we already established that.
	My goodness, Zuby's doing good.
	Right.
	No.
	Anyhow, all that's to say, shout out to Zuby for not keeping his composure.
	It's not like he was under attack.
	It is very easy to get distracted and flustered when you're on a platform as big as Pierce Morgan, you know, having that talk over you.
	I thought that was a great clip to start with because...
	It might be relevant for today's discussion.
	I don't know if we're going to get in trouble for talking about the George Floyd situation.
	But before we do, let's just make sure that we're live everywhere.
	I was glitching on StreamYards.
	I was trying to say and put in the chat, went for a jog this morning in the rain.
	It's beautiful.
	It would not let me send that message.
	Four times.
	An error occurred.
	Wait a moment and try again.
	Then I do mic check and the mic check goes through.
	Then I put in, went for a jog in the rain this morning.
	It was beautiful.
	An error occurred.
	Wait.
	And then we're back to chat.
	So let's make sure that we're live everywhere before we get into this because I hesitated on the thumbnail and the caption or the title to describe this.
	I don't want to be accused of clickbait.
	I don't want to be accused of anything.
	That would impugn what I pride myself on, my integrity.
	And I ran the title by our guest.
	And he says, I'm going to pronounce this name the way the French do, Jean Beaudoin.
	Although it's Jean Beaudoin.
	I don't want to mischaracterize what we're going to discuss today.
	I don't want to oversell it.
	I don't want to make it what it's not.
	And I don't want anyone saying clickbait, exploitive rubbish.
	You're going to meet Jean Beaudoin Sr.
	And we're going to talk about what he says he's discovered and what he believes is a strong indication that George Floyd's death certificate was modified to conceal what was the initial indication of cause of death.
	Now, you know, when someone else is out there saying, I question the official narrative, lawsuits, defamation, oh, whatever it is.
	Hate speech.
	You can't do that.
	You can't question the narrative without getting deplatformed sanctions.
	Poop.
	It doesn't matter.
	We're doing it today.
	And what I was going to say is that for those of you who don't know me, Viva Fry, Montreal litigator turned Florida rumbler.
	When I go a day without streaming or making a vlog, I feel like I have not accomplished anything.
	Even though technically I might have accomplished 10 other items which are equally, if not more important, a day without streaming, a day without video, a day without...
	Oh, you know, communicating with the world feels like a day lost.
	Although, I did communicate with our locals community, vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	We're going to catch up and we've got some news.
	So what we're going to do today, we have a guest, John Baudouin Sr.
	You might know him from his research and work on the COVID question, COVID stats, COVID data.
	You're going to know him based on what we're going to talk about today.
	A little bit of that, George Floyd.
	After the interview, I'm going to continue on on Rumble.
	So about 45-50 minutes in, we're going to end on YouTube and Rumble and go over exclusively to Rumble.
	If you're watching on vivabarneslaw.locals.com Am I good there?
	Are we good here?
	We are good here.
	Then we're going to have our after party on vivabarneslaw.locals.com So that's the order for the day.
	Shall we get going?
	Six minutes in?
	Good.
	Monsieur Baudouin.
	Est-ce que vous êtes prêts, monsieur?
	That's French for are you ready?
	He's ready.
	Okay, I'm bringing him in.
	Three, two, one.
	John, sir, how goes the battle?
	Oh, going very well, actually.
	Winning on all fronts.
	So I appreciate the pronunciation of my name.
	And I will say, je n 'ai pas profond, mon père did not teach me.
	Beaudoin, for those of you who don't, might have surmised it is definitively of French origin.
	But there's a lot of, you know.
	Many multi-generational who have a French name, last name, who don't speak French, much like I have Freiheit as a last name, but I don't speak German.
	Although in Yiddish, it means the same thing, freedom, in all Germanic languages.
	John, there's going to be a lot of people, I suspect, who might be watching now who have no idea who you are.
	There's going to be a lot who do because you've been a pivotal, but not necessarily the, you know, the, what do they call them, the headline name in the COVID research battle that has been ongoing.
	Many people are going to know who you are, but for those who don't, Let's do the 30,000-foot overview.
	We're not going to delve into too much history today, maybe some, before we get into the present, but who are you?
	Well, I'm 59, so I was born in 64. It gives a relative view of how I grew up and when I grew up.
	So you had the Vietnam War ending as I was a child, growing up in the 70s, and then got into some trouble as a kid, nothing major.
	Just as kids do.
	Boys, we used to run around free.
	Now everybody's kind of locked up on their electronic devices.
	And then I found school somehow.
	It was cool to get A's.
	So I did really well in high school.
	I got a full scholarship, became an engineer.
	And then I didn't like that, so I ended up in sales.
	So my career is large contract sales, very strategic, big deal.
	I'll just say...
	The guidance control system for the Trident nuclear missile, the Polaris missile that pops out of submarines, I put together the deal for all the design software for that.
	It's netted over a billion dollars, and it spanned Raytheon, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Honeywell.
	And the prime contractor was Draper Laboratory in Cambridge, where MIT is.
	So my career was really high-tech conversations where I had to translate among financial people, legal and contracts people.
	Really super bright engineers doing crazy designs.
	So I just communicate well.
	And then I raised a family, raised three boys on my own, divorced a long time ago, full custody for years.
	And when COVID hit, I was, I'll just tell your audience, I had lost my son a few years before COVID in a motorcycle accident.
	And so I sat on the couch depressed.
	COVID hit.
	My middle son said, this is all BS.
	I was like, no, you got to take it seriously, Charlie.
	You know, people are dying.
	So I looked into the data.
	I wanted to be a good dad.
	And I found out they were lying about a lot of stuff.
	They changed the file.
	When I looked at it, I wrote to the CDC.
	I said, you have some math errors in your 2014 through 2018 data.
	And when they wrote, they didn't write back.
	They took the file down for 36 hours.
	When they put it back up, they changed the data.
	They changed historical data to meet the narrative they were pushing in 2020.
	I can't prove any of it, but I know it happened to me, and that set me off.
	Sorry, so when you say you can't prove it because you didn't have screen grabs before and after, but you know that you saw it with your...
	It's the gaslighting, the memory holding.
	If you don't screen grab it, you don't have a record of it, but you know it happened, and people will think you're crazy.
	I don't think anyone's going to think you're crazy, though.
	We've seen how they've...
	Deleted and stealth edited in real time to fit the narrative.
	So you get heavily involved in just COVID research and tracking the data with your interest, obsession, and area of expertise.
	Yes, yes.
	I actually went to law school for a year at 56 years old.
	And before I went a day to the school, I said, I'm not taking any vaccine by email.
	And they wrote back, don't worry, you're over 30, you don't have to take a vaccine.
	So that incorporates as part of the contract as an inducement, right?
	I go for a year, and then they say, we have a vaccine mandate, and they throw me out.
	So now I have a lawsuit against the school.
	I have a lawsuit against the governor and federal court for deprivation of rights.
	I've got a lot of stuff going on.
	The chat said I'm a little low.
	I've upped my volume a little bit, so we're going to see if this is better now.
	I don't know that we need to get into the COVID stuff, although it might be incidental to, you know, it will incidentally touch on what's going on here.
	So you get heavily involved in that world of the interwebs for COVID, you know, with the likes of Jessica Rose and a number of the other experts who were analyzing the data in ways, analyzing the data, identifying weaknesses in the data, and calling out the people on it.
	And you've established quite a...
	I see, in the milieu, a very, very respectable reputation for having done that.
	And that might be a subject for another day entirely.
	So how does it get into George Floyd?
	And what is your business in looking into George Floyd?
	Well, first of all, I don't even want to talk about this, but it needs to be talked about because the truth is just so important to me.
	And there are personal reasons.
	I've had signs.
	From God, if you will.
	So I have, through public records request, all the Massachusetts test certificates for the last nine years.
	Somebody else got them from Minnesota.
	And so after a year of analyzing Massachusetts, that person, and she wants to remain anonymous, alerted me that they had them.
	And then another guy in New York City, and I started analyzing those as well.
	If I may, I might interrupt you.
	I'm going to not do it too often just to get clarification on points.
	So you have nine years of death certificate data from Massachusetts.
	Yes, and now Minnesota.
	And you had this because that was part of what you were looking into for the COVID deaths to track pre-COVID, post-COVID, I presume, right?
	That's correct.
	The news said that a seven-year-old girl died from COVID.
	And I thought, you know, for everything I know, there's no way a healthy seven-year-old dies from COVID.
	So I got the death certificate and it actually said she died of COVID.
	But then I found another record.
	She reacted to the vaccine in five minutes, vomited for eight to ten hours.
	They waited a couple of weeks, gave her another vaccine.
	She had stomach pain.
	She was dead in four days.
	And on her death certificate, they wrote COVID.
	It's the only thing they wrote in part one.
	So there's a massive amount of fraud being committed by Massachusetts on official death records.
	And that's what set me off to do all the analyses.
	Is the name of that seven-year-old girl public?
	I don't want to violate privacy.
	Yeah, I've said it many times.
	In Massachusetts law, I can say it.
	Her name is Cassidy.
	And if you look at anything I've done, you can find the records.
	It's also the first chapter in my book is named Cassidy.
	It's similar to Trista Martin, the family about whose daughter passed away after the jab.
	Sean Hartman.
	And the most recent one, which was Shauna Carroll.
	Her daughter was given...
	Two jabs within three weeks of each other, fell violently ill and passed away, and then they mark it as a COVID death.
	So you get this one particular case, which I imagine is, that's enough to set off an otherwise rational person for a very long time.
	Was that the first one that you discovered that set you off, or was that one of the ones that you discovered during your research?
	That's the one that caused me to file eight public records requests, which is the Massachusetts state version of a FOIA.
	And seven of them were denied.
	The one that came through was the entire death certificate database.
	Now, when I say I have the death certificate database, a certificate is just a piece of paper with a state seal on it.
	It's got a few things filled out.
	In the database, for every record, that's every decedent, every dead person, there are 315 different columns on a spreadsheet.
	So I have the middle names, first names, last names, parents' names, where the parents are from, the manner of death, all the causes, the burial plot.
	I got everything for everybody.
	I guess that is...
	I never appreciated that that's public information.
	And so how many names are on this list?
	How many entries?
	500,000 roughly.
	500,000 over nine years, you said?
	Yes.
	For my own personal curiosity, what's the apportionment of the nine years?
	So the four years...
	Yeah, it's about $59,000 to $60,000 per year until you get to 2020, in which there were about 8,800 extra deaths in nine weeks from mid-March to mid-June for the big COVID wave that they called the COVID wave.
	I could get into what that really was.
	I interviewed a medical examiner for three and a half hours who worked in Boston, and we reviewed hundreds of death certificates, and she told me what they were doing during that time.
	There's a lot I could get into on the COVID stuff.
	If you want to hit the George Floyd stuff first, it's up to you where you want to go.
	Yeah, well, this might segue.
	This is how you got the information.
	So you get nine years of data for Massachusetts.
	How does it come to be that you get the nine years of data for Minnesota?
	Well, as people talk to each other in our circles, like you said, I know Jessica Rose and a bunch of people and call it the movement, the truth movement.
	We just want truth.
	And somebody pointed me to someone in Minnesota.
	I contacted that person, and they wanted the analysis that I've done in Massachusetts also done in Minnesota.
	She has the same unidentified, or excuse me, not de-identified record, unredacted records that I have.
	Maybe 150 different columns.
	There's a few things missing, but still enough.
	So she, I'll just say she, she actually pointed out the George Floyd death certificate to me and said, look at it.
	Look at it.
	Something's funny with it.
	Look at the UCOD, which means underlying cause of death, which is a terrible name for the root cause of death, the thing that started the causal chain that caused death.
	Like, you know, this caused...
	Not be able to breathe, cause anoxic brain injury, cause death.
	It's like, what was the root cause, the original cause?
	And I kind of didn't pay attention because I was so involved in the data that I didn't want to get involved in George Floyd.
	And then finally, I was like, you know what?
	She's right.
	And I then understood how the CDC operates, where the states send the written death certificates.
	To the CDC.
	Or the records, I should say.
	Not certificates, but the database.
	So the information is in English words that are sent to the CDC.
	Cause A, cause B, cause C, cause D. That's part one of the death certificate.
	And it's in backwards time order with A being the immediate cause.
	Go ahead.
	Now question.
	The CDC is the Center for Disease Control.
	Why would death certificates go through the CDC as a rule to begin with?
	Well, I don't know.
	I don't think it's a rule that they have to, but the CDC has software called TransAx and another program called Acme.
	And they run it through the TransAx Acme software to convert the words.
	It's not AI, but you can say it's AI.
	It's understanding the words and converting them into international cause of death codes, ICD-10 codes.
	And those ICD-10 codes are how...
	Everybody in the world tracks causes of death.
	When they say heart disease is up, they're saying the I4s are up.
	It's the I is for circulatory system and four is like a lot of cardio stuff.
	So they're not telling you the cardiac stuff is up.
	They're telling you anything coded with an I4 is up, is high.
	And so to create, to apply these codes as the CDC does, it actually creates a single point of failure in a system.
	I'm a systems engineer, electrical engineer.
	And so this being a single point of failure, if the CDC has anything wrong, then everything is wrong from there on.
	So the state sends it to the CDC for coding.
	The CDC sends it back to the state with the codes applied.
	Okay.
	Clarify that.
	We'll take George Floyd just as the concrete example.
	He dies.
	The state sends what to the CDC for coding?
	What is the document form whatever entry that they sent to the CDC?
	Yep.
	So every state law, you know, all the state laws are different, but most of the states have a law where a death record must be created within, it's like usually 48 hours.
	So they create a record.
	Not everything's filled out.
	I mean, they haven't done the autopsy.
	They haven't done a lot of stuff.
	They get the person's name.
	They get the date and time of death and the physician attending or the medical examiner.
	Medical examiners get the bodies.
	Usually within 24 hours.
	So they create the record and then they start filling it out.
	When it gets to a certain point, they get the causes of death, they write it, then they send it to the CDC.
	And what's it?
	It is a database on a spreadsheet that is, in the case of Massachusetts, 350 in different columns.
	It has race, gender, date of birth, date of death, everything in there.
	Okay.
	And now concretely.
	I keep wanting to think Minnesota.
	The state is Minnesota.
	The city is Minneapolis.
	What does the state send to the CDC in the initial report of George Floyd's cause of death?
	I can't say definitively.
	I can just say that whatever was there doesn't seem to be what's there now because the software will run on what was sent to the CDC originally by Minnesota.
	It will look at the last cause listed in Part 1 as the UCOD, usually.
	Now, there are probably something in the algorithm within the Transacts Acme software that pulls something else out.
	I don't know the details.
	The manual is online.
	It's a reference in my book, the Transacts Acme User Manual.
	You can go to the CDC website and find it, or you can...
	Buy my book and get the reference.
	I haven't put that link in yet, but I will.
	Is now a good time to bring this up, John?
	Sure.
	Absolutely.
	You're going to have to walk us through this, but explain what's going on here.
	I can zoom in if you would like me to.
	Yeah, that's great.
	Wow.
	You did a great job.
	This is not a death certificate.
	The spreadsheet is 315 columns wide, and I have to drag my fingers across the sheet many times to get to the right column.
	So what I did is I created this template, and all I do is type in his share file number.
	Everybody's assigned a unique number.
	And it populates this visual representation of George Floyd's death certificate.
	If I may ask you now, you said, so you created this template.
	Is that to say you could pull up this template for every one of the entries of the nine years of data that you have?
	Yes.
	Okay.
	I can type in any one of, probably Minnesota has about 420,000 death certificates in a database.
	This stuff makes my head short-circuit.
	This is like creating an Excel spreadsheet that extracts the data, populates it into this predetermined thing.
	So you have the date of death, the gender, or the sex, surname, city, and then you got the ACME, universal cause of death, or underlying cause of death, sorry.
	All this stuff.
	So you have these, and we're going to show this because you got another one here with the name blacked out, and we'll get to that in a second.
	So you get the data, you've created this template to simplify the otherwise...
	Non-digestible data in the CDC's database?
	Yes.
	It's just an easier visual representation.
	It helps me a lot in efficiency of looking through data as well.
	Okay.
	And now we'll go through the obvious stuff here.
	You've got the date of death is May 25th, 2020.
	Floyd, Minneapolis, X42, ACME, UCOD.
	This I know is critical.
	What does that mean?
	If you scroll down to the bottom, I can read it.
	All right, so X42 is accidental poisoning by and exposure to narcotics and psychodysleptics, hallucinogens, not elsewhere classified.
	So they have a specific code for that underlying cause of death?
	That actually works for meth.
	There are acute cocaine overdoses, acute meth overdoses.
	It works for all of them.
	It's poisoning by a psych...
	You know, a drug.
	If you know this offhand, how many of those do they get in a year in Minnesota?
	Well, on this particular one, on the bottom of the right side, it says, there you go, 348 records in Minnesota were the UCOD.
	In 2020?
	In 2020 alone.
	Okay.
	348 were...
	The underlying cause of death was X42, which is accidental poisoning by exposure to narcotics or psychodysleptics.
	Don't know what that means.
	Hallucinogens.
	Not elsewhere classified.
	Okay.
	I'm going to come back up.
	This is where I should come, John?
	Sure, sure.
	So the important thing to look at here is part one.
	Part one is causes.
	Part two is other significant conditions contributing.
	A lot of times they put like smoking, obesity, things like that usually go in part two.
	If something was in the causal chain of events that caused death, it's usually in part one.
	So what you're looking at here is cause A, which is the immediate cause.
	And this probably should have been broken up to be A, B, C, D. And by the way, for your audience, different states and different people, especially doctors, physicians that are not medical examiners, they do a horrible job.
	Sometimes they write these things backwards.
	They're all over the place.
	So, in this case, it was a medical examiner, so it should be right.
	Cardiopulmonary arrest, complicating law enforcement, subdual restraint, and neck compression.
	Now, cardiopulmonary arrest means his heart stopped and he stopped breathing.
	If you fall off a building and you die by hitting the ground, your heart stops, but there's no point in putting it on there.
	It's put on these death certificates because it's...
	You know, it was something leading up to the heart stopping, and then the heart finally stopped.
	And the other issue, before we go on, is that these are counted as heart-related issues.
	This is, well, they say heart deaths have increased.
	I-46, which is what this is, is on very many death certificates where the heart, there was no problem.
	It's just their heart stopped.
	The I-469 cardiac arrest unspecified.
	There it is.
	So that's another thing we can talk about some other time.
	So people spouting data.
	All the PhDs, MDs, and everybody looking at CDC data, they think they're looking at accurate data that has to do with the heart, but it's not.
	So let's get back to George Floyd.
	So they're saying that the neck compression killed him.
	It was the immediate cause.
	His heart stopped.
	That's what did it.
	That's it.
	And by the way, he also had, in part two, Atherosclerosis.
	Arteriosclerotic and hypertensive heart disease, fentanyl intoxication, recent amphetamine use.
	Does that mean contemporaneous with the death or does that mean like within the last week?
	The latter, more likely.
	Otherwise, they would have written intoxication, which means it was in his blood at the time.
	Which we had with the fentanyl intoxication in the first place right before.
	Okay.
	They also use the word acute very often to describe, like, acute fentanyl intoxication means it happened in the moment.
	I'm surprised it doesn't say acute here.
	So, you know, yeah.
	I don't know how they call it the UCOD when it's, first of all, it's in part two.
	So the software, Acme and Transact software by the CDC, how did it possibly read this?
	Now, this is the death certificate as it currently is.
	And when I say currently, I mean as of November was the last time I got this database.
	So how did they get the X42 to be the Acme UCOD from that software if it's in part two and part one is that he died from The knee on the neck.
	I mean, the underlying cause of death is the root cause of death.
	Something, in my opinion, and I don't, you know, you can't know anything for sure unless you dive into the code of the acne transacts.
	But how does the death certificate as it is now represent an X42 as a UCOD?
	It doesn't.
	So I believe...
	And I originally tried to just, I just wanted to get the information to the defense attorney and get out of it because I don't want to deal with the George Floyd situation.
	I have more things.
	I don't want people shooting arrows at me for this.
	But the original death certificate, I seriously doubt had that as cause one.
	That's also kind of a weird phrase that I've...
	Never seen.
	And by that as cause one, you mean cardiopulmonary arrest.
	See, I'm just trying to make sure I even understand what it says.
	It sounds like he had a heart attack, which complicated.
	It's not a heart attack.
	That's the problem.
	Everybody thinks this is a heart attack.
	All this means is that your heart stopped.
	Let's say cardiac arrest.
	Arrest, right?
	Your heart stopped.
	That's all I mean.
	I'll read it this way then.
	Heart stopped, complicating law enforcement subdue.
	I don't even read that as heart stopped because of law enforcement subdue.
	Unless I'm reading it wrong.
	I know.
	It is not written the way I have ever seen a physician or medical examiner write a death certificate.
	And I've looked at probably tens of thousands by now after a year and a half.
	And to understand this data, this is the template that you've compiled from the data on the CDC that was sent back from the CDC to the state?
	That's correct.
	So someone hypothetically could say, well, the CDC got the coding, the UCOD wrong, sending it back, and the original recommendation, for lack of a better word, would have been suffocation or some dual neck compression.
	So someone's gonna someone's gonna say how do you know where that error came from?
	Is it coming from the CDC sending it back with the wrong code or did someone change it and you know only change part of it?
	Well, that's where a defense attorney really needs to look into this.
	This is very serious.
	If the original death certificate from the medical examiner who did the autopsy originally had the fentanyl intoxication as the root cause of death, and then somebody changed it after it went back to the state in order to meet a narrative they're trying to push on the people.
	That really needs to be looked into by a defense attorney.
	Just the fact that X42 is there, it's still there, and they haven't fixed it to match what the words say.
	See, the X42, on this same record as Cause A, they don't match.
	And now, typically, they would match.
	Yeah, I mean, go to the right, and let's see that other one.
	So now, to explain what we have here, this is another individual.
	Who died, and the underlying cause of death is the same as George Floyd.
	This is the same year, so we got different city certifiers.
	So this is the only other one out of the 348 that does not have in the written cause A, B, C, D fentanyl overdose.
	So this is like George Floyd's in that it is an aberration.
	And 348 records.
	I looked through every single one of them.
	And every single one has fentanyl intoxication as the last cause.
	I'm just comparing.
	You got fentanyl intoxication for both of these in part two.
	In part two.
	Yep.
	That's the only one.
	And I only found this yesterday, David.
	The only other one of the 348 that has...
	UCOD X42 without it being in the Part 1 cause of death.
	What does foreign body aspirate?
	I mean, I know what it means, but does that mean choking?
	Yeah, yes.
	Yeah, he aspirated something that's not supposed to be in your lungs into his lungs.
	Maybe he breathed in a...
	Well, I don't want to speculate.
	No, I mean, I could just imagine maybe...
	I don't know if that would be the same description for choking on your vomit as an OD, for example, but...
	Yeah, they usually write that.
	And then we got here, injury description, ingested, injected illicit drugs.
	And if we go to injury description, decedent experienced a cardiopulmonary arrest while being restrained by law enforcement officers.
	So 348 all have X-42 and they are demonstrable X-42s.
	That has that as the number one cause of death in the description.
	If you, I don't know if you loaded the other pages, but the other pages.
	Oh, you did?
	Wow.
	All right.
	I'm going to bring it out.
	Hold on like this.
	There you go.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	Now tell us what's going on here.
	So what you're looking at, well, I just wanted to show you that there's not an ME listed on George Floyd's record.
	I don't know why.
	It says medical examiner case.
	Why does it not say medical examiner case?
	Was that removed?
	Why is the medical examiner not signing up for having written this death certificate?
	You would think that the seriousness of the case, somebody would put their name to it, right?
	Put their profession to it.
	Can I scroll up to the top?
	Who do we see up here as the certificate surname?
	What does this mean?
	Baker?
	His last name is Baker.
	Oh, okay.
	He doesn't bake donuts, no.
	Okay, so that's not...
	No, but I thought that was maybe the certifier of the city.
	Yeah, he is the...
	Now, it doesn't say there.
	I could look it up, actually, whether or not he's a medical examiner or a physician attending or a nurse practitioner.
	Okay.
	And so this data that we're seeing here is compiled from George Floyd's data from the CDC.
	Every line is a different person.
	These are records of every different person where you see on that line, cardiopulmonary arrest, complicating law enforcement, subdural restraint, neck compression.
	That's George Floyd where the arrow is.
	If you go to the next slide, I'll show you some.
	Okay, so this is cause A, cause B, cause C. What's in red is where it says fentanyl.
	Now, remember I said the UCOD is the last one listed.
	So if there's only something listed in A, then that's the last one.
	And all of those that are in red with the red bar under A on the left, those all say either fentanyl or meth or something like that.
	The red squares, the three red squares to the right, you see two of them are in cause B, and it says fentanyl.
	That's the last one listed.
	And then you go out to C, there's one there, the last cause listed, fentanyl toxicity.
	So I'm showing you that every one of those other 348 records.
	Are correct in that the UCOD is the last cause listed on the death record.
	And on the screen right now, there are probably 10, 20, 30, there's over 30 people listed out of the 348.
	I didn't want to, and oh, there's the next screen.
	I'm not going to give you the whole 348, but all of these were in cause A, which was the last one listed.
	So the software was working fine.
	I think somebody intervened in the software and changed something.
	That's what I'm saying.
	Okay.
	And has this been mentioned publicly yet?
	Not really, no.
	There were probably four or five of us who knew this for the last month.
	I tried to contact a very well-known doctor.
	I didn't understand.
	What side of the case he was on?
	So we had a confusing conversation at first.
	And then we figured it out.
	It's like, all right, we shouldn't talk.
	And then I just want the truth to go to the defense attorney because everybody's got their opinions.
	The worst this was was involuntary manslaughter because Floyd was in the care of the officer who had a legal duty to act and determine his status.
	That's the worst it could be is involuntary manslaughter.
	I don't see how it can be anyway.
	Yeah, I'm just Googling right now.
	I think Derek Chauvin is now pro se.
	I think he's representing himself.
	Yeah, I read that.
	So I don't even think he's got an attorney anymore.
	And what can be done to obtain...
	In as much as it could potentially exist, the original data information sent from the state to the CDC, which would confirm or contradict what the CDC sent back to the state.
	I mean, you know the law better than I do, but if I were, George, if I were Chauvin, or his attorney, I would ask the state for the evidence.
	I mean, number one, it's Brady evidence, right?
	And secondly, you should be able to get it on a state FOIA.
	And then thirdly, you should get it on a federal FOIA because the record was in the hands of CDC, which is a federal entity.
	So the chain of custody of that death certificate and the original one written and every version of it should be obtained by defense counsel.
	You've got more time, right?
	We're going to go over to Rumble, and then I'll keep you there, and we'll start talking a bit about some of the COVID stuff.
	You got a little bit more time?
	Absolutely.
	Okay, so, and that does it for Chauvin.
	These are the questions, this is the data, and there's something that doesn't make sense that needs to be made sense of if it means nothing more than cramming, what is it, a square peg into a circle hole, or is it a circle peg into a square hole?
	There's information that requires clarification because the underlying cause of death code coming back from the CDC does not match the conviction information and the other data on the CDC's info space place.
	That was one heck of a way of saying database.
	Okay.
	What we're going to do now, everybody, just give us two seconds.
	I'm going to give everyone the link so you come on over to Rumble because also I'm not scared of YouTube.
	But they might not like some of the stuff that you're going to tell us, which I might snip and clip and stick out there anyhow.
	Get on over to Rumble, and we're going to end on YouTube.
	Or go to vivabarneslaw.locals.com for those of you who might not be able to access Rumble if you happen to be in France.
	And I saw that chat from earlier on.
	Go to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	We're streaming there as well now.
	So one thing's for certain, we're ending on YouTube.
	So Rumble or Locals, see you there in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1. All right.
	John, let's get into my questions.
	We're going back to the first question of the apportioning or the deaths that occurred for the five years prior to COVID compared to the three and a half going on four years after.
	You said that there were an average of however many, but 8,000 excess deaths in the peak of the curve that we all had to kill ourselves to flatten, no pun intended.
	Flesh that out a little more, because I presume now the excess deaths in 23 and 22 far exceed the excess deaths that occurred at the height of the pandemic and even in 2021.
	No.
	Well, first of all, it depends on where you are.
	Where people get it wrong, a lot of big names get it wrong, is that they think data has integrity and veracity, and it doesn't.
	You have to go state by state.
	And you have to learn the custom and practice of the medical examiners and doctors who are filling out death certificates in those states.
	One state might say something to do with cancer and bone and marrow.
	And another state might be like, yeah, it's like bone cancer or whatever.
	It comes out completely different when it gets translated into ICD-10 codes.
	In Michigan, the C4-1 bone and articular cartilage cancers are very high.
	And in Massachusetts, C795.
	Bone and bone marrow cancers are high.
	So I just wanted to say there that there are differences by state.
	So what happened by state?
	I got to shorten this up.
	More than 4,000 people died in Massachusetts, I believe, from the vaccine.
	And I can show that with data and I can back it up with individual cases, especially Brianna was 30 years old, high school English teacher, got the Moderna, reacted in hours.
	Terrible headache.
	Went to the ER.
	Her headache was so bad.
	She went back to the ER again.
	Terrible headache.
	Take Tylenol.
	Go home.
	She didn't recognize her sister.
	The family brought her in.
	They cut a hole in her head to relieve the pressure.
	Didn't work because clots were all through her head.
	She had a seizure.
	Paralyzed in half her body.
	She was brain dead in a couple of days.
	They took her off life support in two weeks and they wrote on her death certificate.
	COVID.
	COVID.
	And six doctors from Harvard Medical College and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center wrote a report about her entitled Fatal Post-COVID mRNA Vaccine-Associated Cerebral Ischemia, which means...
	Bleeding on the...
	Well, ischemia is bleeding, right?
	Is it?
	No, no, no.
	It's the other...
	That's hemorrhagic.
	Okay.
	What that means, real short, sorry.
	The vaccine killed her by stroke.
	That's what that means.
	They're telling you in the title, the vaccine killed her by stroke.
	Fatal?
	Dead, right?
	Post-COVID mRNA vaccine, so after the COVID mRNA vaccine, associated cerebral ischemia, which is stroked by clots and blocking downstream oxygenation of cells so your brain cells die.
	The chat's correct me.
	Clotting.
	It was a 50-50 and I got it wrong.
	And if I may ask the obvious question, what does her death certificate say to this day?
	It still says COVID as the last in part one.
	Which I was talking about moments ago with regard to George Floyd.
	So the last thing listed is COVID-19.
	Now, even in the six-page medical report, it says she was asymptomatic for COVID three months earlier, which was really four and a half months because I've talked to an extended family member.
	But regardless of three or four and a half months, she reacted to the vaccine in hours, and she was brain dead in two days.
	Whereas she had COVID.
	Three to four and a half months earlier, without symptoms, just a positive test, and they told the world on her death certificate that COVID caused her death.
	That's one of...
	So what I do is I take the data that shows that people are dying from strokes or cardiac arrhythmia, pulmonary embolism, acute post-hemorrhagic anemia, thrombocytopenia.
	Those graphs are through the roof like you've never seen anywhere else.
	And what I do is I trace those down to people.
	I correlate them to VAERS records with the same age, the same death date, the same gender, and same other symptoms, and I know I have the right person, and then I can ascertain the vaccination date from the VAERS record.
	In all of this data, like I said, there's nothing else like this in the world with absolute proof.
	But now you said, just to show that I'm not an idiot, everybody, that much of an idiot, hold on, in Canada.
	More people than expected are dying in Canada for 2023, for reasons that are not yet clear.
	So the excess mortality in Canada is definitively up.
	But now asking this, you would be able to tell if there's not excess mortality overall, because now all of the, and I'm not saying this to be glib or crass, all of the old, fragile people have pretty much got killed in the first wave of this.
	So there might not be excess deaths.
	You got it.
	You got the whole kit and caboodle there.
	That's what says it all.
	Massachusetts is very different from the world.
	New York, New Jersey, and Massachusetts.
	600 pharma companies in Massachusetts with $47 billion in venture capital financing.
	There are 10 pharma companies in Massachusetts with over $1 billion in revenue.
	50 companies with over $100 million in revenue.
	Moderna's headquarters, I drive by on my way to Costco to buy groceries.
	Pfizer's divisional headquarters for their mRNA vaccine is in Andover, Massachusetts.
	So you've got R&D, marketing, and manufacturing in Massachusetts for these vaccines.
	And in New York City, you've got Wall Street where the executives for pharma live.
	And you've got New Jersey as a suburb.
	Those three ran away from the world and purported COVID deaths per population in the first months of COVID, the first year.
	Belgium was a distant fourth.
	I'm talking in the world.
	Belgium was a distant fourth.
	Why did Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, half a world away from China, have the most COVID deaths?
	Because it was mostly fraud.
	90% of the COVID deaths in mass were fraud.
	They weren't COVID.
	But there was excess deaths.
	It was caused by a lot of protocol deaths, recommendations from the CDC.
	And people say, well, why would doctors kill people knowingly?
	Well, they're not knowingly.
	They're just following the recommendations of the CDC.
	I mean, I presume you were able to also confirm the data that the ventilators killed more people than they potentially ever saved.
	Well, absolutely.
	In addition to the book that's right there.
	The real CDC, all right?
	And I'm not trying to copy the real Anthony Fauci.
	I wrote under the name Cocaine de Chien, which is Naughty Dog in French, and the initials of which just happened to be CDC.
	You said Cocaine de Chien.
	Yeah.
	Okay, Cocaine is a...
	Okay, fine.
	I'm sorry, I didn't understand your accent there, sir.
	Yeah, well, I don't...
	All right, sorry, go on.
	No, so...
	I just happened to write under that name because I like El Gatamalo, the bad cat, but I'm French, so I made it, and I like dogs, so I made it the bad dog, right?
	So the book, it was like, well, I'm the real CDC with a little d for d.
	Anyway, the second document I have coming out around the same time, hopefully before Christmas, is called the CDC Memorandum.
	It's 100 pages of factual allegations enumerated in a legal type memorandum double space.
	Double line spaced.
	Along with legal analysis of uttering, involuntary manslaughter, depraved heart murder, and felony murder.
	And it has a lot of ventilator deaths.
	I have six files right now.
	Each file is several thousand pages of medical records for people who were killed in hospitals.
	Danielle was...
	95% oxygen when she went in.
	They hit her with remdesivir immediately.
	The EUA for remdesivir was like April, May of 2020, and then October 22nd.
	That still didn't kick in the acute renal failure deaths.
	They started after November 2nd.
	That's the monetary CMS.gov date where they get 20% extra.
	Everything was behavior modification through financial incentives.
	That's what the CARES Act was, was behavior modification of the entire health industry to steer doctors and hospitals toward using whatever medication they wanted them to use.
	So all the money that flowed, and they didn't care how much money flowed.
	It was trillions to kill people.
	They just did what they were told.
	The doctors do.
	If you could briefly flesh that out.
	We've heard discussion about it.
	I've always seen it.
	Financial incentives to declare certain deaths, COVID deaths.
	Financial incentives to administer certain types of treatment, remdesivir ventilators?
	You got it.
	I mean, Walter Williams, if you want more of something, subsidize it.
	They subsidized something and they knew the behavior that would flow from their written words.
	And the behavior is the doctors and the hospital administrator is going to tell the doctors.
	And I know a doctor moved out of state because he didn't want to kill people.
	And he told me what they were doing.
	They had a 95% oxygen guy come in.
	They put him on a ventilator because the administrators told the doctors, if you don't do that, we're all going to die.
	Because the ventilator contains the aerosols to the patient and the CPAP doesn't.
	So if you don't put him on the ventilator, then the nurses are going to die.
	The doctors are going to die.
	So the doctors put him on a ventilator to save the doctors and nurses.
	And they killed people.
	Other than jamming something down his lungs, put a bag over his head.
	I know that they oxygenated and it's not like inhaling CO2, but this was, and I forget who the guest was, that basically confirmed in the early days, they were doing this as a matter of not helping the patient, but protecting the staff, even out of their irrational fear of inhaling the same air in the same room.
	And they got incentives for the ventilators.
	Remdesivir.
	When did it become clear?
	That remdesivir was correlated with, I won't say cause because I'm not a doctor, correlated with renal failure, organ failure.
	I don't know about the general public, but in the data I have for both Massachusetts and Minnesota, the Minnesota is actually, both of them are very stark if you understand how to read waveforms.
	Now, I'll just say that COVID had a very high wave in Massachusetts.
	Remember I said Massachusetts is very different, the first wave.
	We scared the world into believing that this was far worse than it was.
	So you have this high wave of COVID, and then you have another smaller wave in the winter of COVID.
	There's no correlation.
	And in Minnesota, let's say there's a smaller wave of COVID.
	Reno failure did not go up with COVID in 2020.
	And then in the end of the year, it still did not go up with COVID at the end of 2020.
	In 2021, so I told you the money kicked in November 2nd, around two weeks after that time, so end of November, December, all of a sudden, acute renal failure and COVID deaths start paralleling each other perfectly.
	The curves, they follow each other like they're swimming together.
	It's perfect.
	And the renal failure deaths just take off like a rocket.
	2,000 extra, 2,000 extra.
	Acute renal failure involved deaths in Massachusetts alone in 21 and 22. That's just Massachusetts.
	1600 in Minnesota.
	Sorry.
	No, I'll just make sense of this for the adults like myself.
	The reason why this is relevant is because you didn't see renal failure with the initial wave of COVID, but now you're seeing it with the subsequent waves of COVID coupled with whatever the order was to the practical order to treat COVID with remdesivir.
	Well, the order to treat them was there earlier.
	But when the money kicked in, it's the money.
	When the money kicked in, the behavior changed.
	That's just the way it is.
	What was it again, the date at which the money kicked in?
	And what was the name of that order?
	It had three letters to it?
	Oh, if you go to CMS.gov, you can find it.
	It's on November 2nd.
	So if you do, again, links in my book.
	I can't memorize.
	I get hundreds of references.
	But yeah, if you go to CMS.gov and you look for COVID protocols, COVID treatments, drugs, you'll find baricitinib, which is another one.
	That they think killed people.
	And remdesivir.
	And, you know, David, I don't necessarily believe that remdesivir alone took out people's kidneys.
	I believe it's a combination.
	Every single one I've found, vancomycin is there.
	And a doctor told me, no, it can't be vancomycin.
	It's like, vancomycin is a kidney killer.
	Absolutely is.
	Just like I thought I was sufficiently black-pilled.
	John, thank you for making me even more black-pilled.
	I think this is it.
	CMS issued an interim final rule with the comment period that established the new COVID-19 treatment add-on payment under the Medicare...
	Inpatient prospective payment system.
	These things are foreign to me.
	The NCTAP, designed to mitigate potential financial disincentives for hospitals to provide new COVID-19 treatments, was effective from November 2nd, 2020 until September 23rd.
	Is that it?
	The NCTAP?
	Oh, so maybe that's not exactly what I thought it was going to confirm what you said there.
	Yeah, if you go down there, Illumiant is baricitinib.
	And Veclari, if you go down to the bottom, look for Veclari.
	Yeah, here we go.
	See what it says next to Beclery?
	Remdesivir.
	The second word in that paragraph, Remdesivir.
	And that's January 21. Well, that was the...
	These are just things that they're re-approving and redoing those dates.
	But the key date there you saw at the beginning is November 2. Holy crap, apples.
	Okay.
	It gets a lot worse than that.
	You want to keep going?
	You have to laugh or cry.
	Those are the two options.
	Well, I mean, in 2020, excuse me, in 2022, when I got the data, the first thing I did was I wrote a bunch of code in spreadsheets.
	I wish I could write SQL SQL, but I can't.
	So I did it in spreadsheets.
	And I told the 2020 and 2021 columns to turn yellow.
	Whichever one was greater.
	And when I put in all the codes and I did analyses on all the years, the greater excess of respiratory codes was in 2020.
	So pneumonia, like people were dying from pneumonia, ARDS, COPD more than normal in 2020.
	Then all of a sudden they start vaccinating in 21. All the I-codes, which are circulatory, and D-codes, which are blood.
	So anything to do with the blood or blood transport system, they went through the roof.
	They blew away the pneumonia.
	Cardiac arrest, cardiac arrhythmia, like young people dying in their sleep or dying on the sports field.
	Pulmonary embolism, clots in lungs, tons of those.
	Post-hemorrhagic anemia, that means sudden blood loss anemia.
	That means, and I looked through them, more than 89% were non-traumatic.
	Which means you randomly start having internal bleeding.
	Yep.
	Yep.
	You weren't hit by something.
	The surgeon didn't make an oopsie in the operating room.
	Oh, no.
	John, you're wrong.
	They were magically hit.
	They were suddenly hit by climate change.
	Sports drinks.
	What's the other one?
	Oh, my goodness.
	So when people say, look, I'm noticing from my own, what's the word?
	Just observation.
	A lot more people of middle age dropping dead in their sleep.
	And then everyone's like, well, you have no data.
	Do you have data to support that that as a cause of death has increased?
	Whether or not we want to say it's the long COVID, that has increased and we're not tricking ourselves?
	I do.
	The hard part is showing it to people.
	You can show it to scientists who aren't people.
	But regular people, you show them a graph and they're like, I don't remember school.
	It's tough.
	You really nailed it at the beginning, though, when you said bunch of old people.
	So it creates what's called a Simpsons paradox.
	So if you have two things happening, one is low and one is high, and you combine them and say, oh, look at what I have.
	Well, what you have is zero.
	Negative one and positive one are zero.
	But if you saw them independently, you'd say, well, why are those low and why are those high?
	So what happened in 2020 in nine weeks in Massachusetts?
	It created Simpsons paradoxes that will last three, four, five years.
	And that means all the old people died.
	Who would die?
	They died early.
	Did they die six months early, a year early?
	I mean, it peanut butters over time.
	But what that did was when it went back to normal, it shouldn't have been normal.
	It should have been a deficit of excess deaths.
	It should have been a deficit, but it wasn't because the younger people were dying from the vaccine and they were filling in that deficit that the old people left.
	Does that make sense?
	Yeah, well, for sure.
	The initial waves go through.
	They take out the weak and the elderly.
	And so you have an increase there.
	The young who are not yet succumbing to whatever it is.
	And then those 10,000, let's just take Massachusetts, those 8,000 old people who died in 2020 are not there in 2022 to die.
	But the number remains the same because other people have filled their shoes.
	And even in the young people, let's look at the young people who died in the year of COVID.
	You've got Down syndrome.
	You've got cerebral palsy.
	All kinds of genetic disorders where people were somewhat unhealthy through their younger years and they didn't make it past 7 or 10 or 12. Those are the kids who died with COVID.
	Like, what did they really die from?
	Not sure, but they died with COVID.
	Those weak, and I hate to say it like that, right, susceptible to various types of death.
	They were gone in 21, and all of a sudden you've got athletes dying on basketball courts and cross-country running, and that did not happen in 2020 from COVID.
	None of those people died from COVID.
	Let me, I'll ask you the Steelman rebuttal.
	People are going to say, there was the data that said, you know, X amount more athletes died or collapsed this year than in previous years.
	The rebuttal to that is, well, there was one case of, they found one example who wasn't an athlete.
	And then the flip side argument also, they say, well, there are more athletes now and we're including more people in the athlete category than we did back in 2016, for example.
	So that skews the numbers.
	Do you have a concrete way of rebutting that rebuttal?
	Absolutely.
	It's crazy to look at data in those cases.
	The cases are so few, you look and see in their heart, their heart's being attacked by asinophils or lymphocytes.
	So certain types of white blood cells that do not.
	They don't respond necessarily to COVID.
	They do respond to the vaccine.
	So the vaccine creates a system where when the cells are transfected by the vaccine, by the lipid nanoparticles, the body responds with eosinophils, a certain type of white cell, and it attacks the heart muscle or it attacks the endothelium in your brain.
	The inside lining of all your blood vessels is called endothelium.
	They're endothelial cells.
	They are the first that are transfected by the vaccine.
	It doesn't stay in your arm.
	We know that.
	We were told it stays in your arm.
	It doesn't.
	It goes around your body.
	If you hit a vein with that injection, if you're the one in 50, one in 200, pick a number.
	I mean, there's no number that's good for me.
	I'm not joining that death lottery.
	But if you do take a hit in your vein, it's going somewhere.
	And if it goes to your heart...
	It takes out your heart.
	If it goes to your brain, it takes out your brain.
	It goes into the cells.
	The cells say, ah, this isn't human.
	Kill me.
	So T cells come and they attack and they eat away a hole in your endothelium.
	So you're poking holes in the capillaries in your vein.
	Your body responds by clotting.
	Everything's messed up.
	These are not vaccines.
	People got to get it through their heads.
	They changed the definition of vaccine.
	You know that.
	In order to call them vaccines.
	These are gene drug therapies never before used in humans en masse.
	I'm going to see if I can pull up the article that said that the CDC guidance when administering the vaccine was not to aspirate because that would make needle-reluctant people even more reluctant to get the jab.
	So you don't aspirate.
	You don't even know that you haven't tapped into a vein.
	And then you can inject the jab directly into a vein, which you're not supposed to do under any circumstances, from what I understand.
	Right.
	So it's called the pink book.
	By the CDC.
	It was put out by two nurses.
	Their names are on the web.
	I have them as references.
	If not in my book, then it's in my lawsuit against the governor.
	And in that, the nurses state, we don't want the patient to be uncomfortable.
	Needle wiggle might cause discomfort.
	So not only do not aspirate, but inject as fast as you can.
	Like, are you kidding me?
	So both of those things are terrible.
	And in the next paragraph, they write, in the paragraph after that, they write, we don't have any scientific evidence for this.
	We just think it'll be more comfortable for the patient.
	That's how dumb this whole thing is.
	The whole world follows the CDC.
	The CDC had two nurses write this pink book on how to inject with no scientific evidence of what's better.
	Marc Girardeau out of France.
	Has done so much work in studying a bolus, B-O-L-U-S.
	You inject, you get a whole bunch of travels to somewhere.
	Now, why do you think aortic dissections are happening at the arch?
	And why are they there?
	Now, I'm an engineer, so I'm thinking...
	The density of the lipid nanoparticles is different than the rest of the fluid in the blood.
	When it goes around the arch, there are Bernoulli equations for fluid dynamics that will say where are those going to go based on the relative density.
	And if it's at the same spot, if the aortic dissections are happening at the same spot, you can say something different from blood is going to that spot based on the relative density.
	And based on fluid dynamics, you could say, yep, the lipid nanoparticles are causing the body to eat a hole, and people's aortic arches are blown apart.
	I'm going to have to read this more thoroughly afterwards, but I came across this.
	Although the syringe aspiration may increase the level of pain in the injection site, it represents a simple technique to decrease the risk of vaccine introduction into the vascular system and potentially decrease the risk of severe reactions.
	I'm going to read this afterwards.
	That just struck me because I knew that.
	Or at least I thought I knew that.
	Just can't figure out where that article in the NCBI is going.
	Holy crab apples.
	Do you have any more doom pills?
	Is there a darker pill than the ones you've already given?
	Oh, man.
	You know, it all comes down to systems, right?
	The experts are looking at medical and biological systems, and they're missing a lot of the behavioral.
	Almost all of this is behavioral.
	The CARES Act and other acts that were written, like CARES Act, by the way, was 2019.
	How did they know this was coming?
	They just changed a few variables when they passed it in March.
	It was written in 2018.
	And everything to do with that is behavior modifications for people to act differently.
	Which people?
	The doctors, nurses, and so forth.
	You've got medical board coercion.
	You have to understand the intersection of law, economics, and psychology.
	And that's where we are.
	Because everything...
	David, when you meet people and they say, well, you can't say that all these doctors are killing people on purpose.
	No, of course I'm not saying that, but I can explain the behavioral system that was put in place to make them do it.
	And they knew ahead of time what they were doing.
	I didn't start here, David.
	I started, like, I don't believe anybody.
	You know, there's no way they're doing this.
	Oh, there's no way.
	The only way to mess with all-cause death is to actually kill people.
	There's no way they're killing people.
	I was wrong.
	Well, and John, I've been saying it for a while.
	I didn't start off on Nuremberg 2.0, but my goodness, I'm there now.
	If you have a few more minutes, I'm just going to, there's some questions in our locals community, if I may.
	This is from Mighty P. It says, thank you, John.
	I'm in Massachusetts, and there's still a majority who are oblivious to the harms of the experimental injections.
	Thank you for pursuing and exposing the truth.
	Mighty P says, Mighty P, P is peace in French.
	Does John follow or work with ethical skeptic on Twitter?
	I've tried.
	He doesn't work with other people, and he does a really good job.
	I do very similar stuff, but I'm working with record-level source data, so I have a level of detail that nobody else can do.
	Not only can I show the data, and data is only persuasive.
	When you look down into the individual person and you look through their obituary and you read about them, and if you can get medical records, that data is conclusive, not just persuasive.
	And so I appreciate Ethical Skeptic's work.
	We've had a couple of messages back and forth.
	Like, one thing that kind of handcuffs him is he'll look at renal failure.
	I think he was looking at, you know, CDC puts out something on renal failure.
	It combines N17 and N18 that's chronic and acute.
	Well, the problem is the chronic went down because a bunch of old people died, and then they weren't available to die again, and they died with chronic renal failure, maybe stage 1, 2, 3, or 4. And so then there's a deficit, and when you combine the two, there was a 20% increase in renal failure.
	Like, okay, let me look at acute.
	You didn't have a problem before.
	All of a sudden, you have a problem.
	Now, acute renal failure was up 100%.
	100%.
	Over 100,000 people in the United States, excess, more than normal, died of acute renal failure in the last two years, not including 2023.
	And so there's even more.
	So they murdered 100,000 people with these drugs.
	It was a side effect of long COVID, John.
	You'd be crazy to think otherwise.
	Entry required says, "Read my post comment and have John Beaudoin Senior comment on what you interpret the substance I presume that has to do with the jab.
	I'll see if I can find that.
	As much as Big Pharma is to blame for this, and they are not the only ones lying on death certificates.
	We need to never...
	They are not the ones lying on death certificates.
	That's from Pasha Moyer.
	And there were some...
	Chats in the Rumble, which says, I'm not your buddy guy.
	Oh, these I can actually bring up so we can see this.
	I love that guy.
	What's amazing is, I see I'm not your buddy guy on Bongino's feeds.
	I see the same community in various streams.
	I'm not your buddy guy says, Viva, I'm late.
	Did you see Dan Bongino give you a shout out on his show this morning?
	No.
	Unless this is an old stream.
	In regards to George Floyd, it bothered me with the amount of censorship as I reported the full body cam and YouTube removed.
	Oh yeah, no question.
	They needed to...
	I remember what I thought originally, and then I watched the trial.
	Green Thumb Nursing says, Hey Viva, please have John Porter on.
	He's launching a Canadian barter system.
	Barter it.
	Has been doing barter pay for decades.
	Huge freedom advocate from Ontario, helping unite the country.
	Very cool.
	Chet Chisholm.
	I'm sure you must have seen him, John, as well.
	When I saw the Floyd video, I said that looked like cardiac, drug-induced, or both.
	From that point on, I was forever labeled a heretic.
	And then Ginger Ninja says, just to fulfill your fear, clickbait title, fake news, every fear hides a wish, and so on.
	So...
	I just got to ask, on a personal level, what sort of backlash demonization have you gotten as an individual human in the state of Massachusetts?
	And what the hell are you still doing in that state?
	You should come down to Florida.
	It's nice here.
	But what sort of backlash have you taken as an individual?
	Well, I mean, I started out, the whole mask thing was ridiculous, right?
	So I sued the governor over the mask mandate in May, end of May or early June of 2020.
	He didn't like, they were afraid of my lawsuit.
	So he changed the order for the entire state.
	I'm deaf in one ear.
	I got a shot when I was four years old, streptomycin and penicillin mixed together.
	It makes small kids go deaf, so I have no hearing in my right ear.
	So I said, you're depriving me of receiving free speech from others because I can't see their lips move when you order them to cover their mouths.
	To get around that, he made an exception in paragraph 2B of order 55 that replaced the original order, and that exception said, Not only does anybody hearing impaired not have to wear a mask, but nobody speaking to anybody hearing impaired had to wear a mask.
	So I never had to wear a mask, and people talking to me didn't, and that took my standing, so I was booted on standing.
	But I still kind of won a little victory.
	Now, I went to play soccer, over 56 league, and I show up, no mask.
	The ref says, where's your mask?
	I said, I have an exception from the governor.
	I don't have to wear one.
	And the ref walks away.
	The other team, we start playing.
	Hey, where's your mask?
	Like, I don't have to wear one.
	I have an exception from the governor.
	They start swearing at me and yelling at me all 90 minutes.
	My own team is saying, John, just put a mask on.
	They put me to the turf three times, artificial turf.
	My knees were bleeding, like, at least 20 square inches on each knee.
	The scabs lasted eight weeks, and they were hard, dirty fouls from behind.
	I went into the post office not wearing a mask.
	She said, wear a mask.
	I said, I have an exception from the governor.
	The clerk was like, okay.
	The people in line, you're a sick man.
	They start yelling at me and stuff.
	I'm just trying to mail a package, right?
	And then in Costco...
	Put a mask on.
	Like, I don't need to.
	I'm still visualizing the first one.
	You got a bunch of healthy, middle-aged men acting like a bunch of coward sissies saying, put on a mask.
	We're playing.
	Are you outdoors?
	We're outdoors running around a 110-yard soccer field and all these guys, this sweat flying, snot going everywhere.
	People are bleeding.
	There's bodily fluids everywhere.
	And, you know, we're...
	We play rough, even though it's an over-56 league.
	And they put a mask on.
	Like, what the hell is wrong with you?
	The mask isn't doing anything.
	Grow a pair.
	It's absolutely delusional.
	I mean, this is how, like, when people say, how did societies devolve into Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia?
	Look, it's not the same, but it's the same direction.
	I mean, that's in, you can convince otherwise, and they're probably intelligent, in quotes, professional men who, or, you know.
	Adults who have jobs and they're very educated and they're smart and they've succumbed to absolute insanity.
	When I went to law school, I befriended...
	I don't know if he wants his name out there.
	Jeff Bowman.
	So Jeff Bowman had his legs blown off in the Boston bombing.
	And he has these mechanical legs.
	There's a movie about him with...
	Oh, I forget the actor's name.
	Jake Gyllenhaal plays him in the movie.
	And, you know, the Boston City, Boston Marathon bombing.
	So, Jeff, you know, these mechanical legs are not, it's tough to get around.
	So we step outside the classroom after our first class in law school.
	And the arrows on the floor is telling him to go to the right.
	He can't go to the left.
	The classroom is the next one to our left.
	We had to walk the entire perimeter of the building.
	With his legs, right?
	Why?
	I mean, these people are crazy with their stupid rules.
	Like COVID only flows in one direction in our building.
	He couldn't just walk 10 steps to the left.
	I said, just go, Jeff.
	Nobody's going to say anything.
	You're like, nope.
	They want me to do this.
	I'm going to show them I'm doing this.
	So I walked the whole building with them.
	These people are nuts.
	And they threw me out of law school for not getting the vaccine, so I'm suing them.
	What's the status of that lawsuit now?
	Well, it was dismissed on standing, which is unbelievable.
	Sorry, you, the one who suffered the consequences, don't have standing?
	How do they rationalize that?
	Well, she rationalized it because I actually had a pro bono lawyer at the time who did the oral argument.
	And the guy before me had some weak case where he was pro se, didn't have any money, didn't do anything.
	She was so nice and sweet in talking to him.
	And then I get up there.
	My lawyer gets up there.
	It's like, yeah, this is about being thrown out of law school for not taking the vaccine.
	You should have seen the stern look on her face and the way she talked to my lawyer.
	She was decided already.
	But how do I not have standing?
	I don't know.
	I'm on appeal.
	I've got to do my brief for the appeal.
	I'm just trying to think like a scoundrel.
	You can't figure it out.
	They're saying I don't have any standing because it was a likelihood of success in the merits.
	That's for an injunction.
	No, what did they say?
	It's the merely speculative prong of Lujan versus Defenders of Wildlife.
	You remember?
	No, no.
	So redressability and traceability.
	It's garbage.
	If you read it, if Barnes read that, he would laugh for a day.
	Well, do flip it to me.
	For a slow news day, I'll talk about it tomorrow.
	So I go there for a year.
	I pay $28,000.
	Before I went a day, I said, I'm not taking the vaccine.
	They wrote to me and said, don't worry, you're over 30. You don't have to take the vaccine in writing from the director of admissions.
	They first said the director of admissions is not an agent of the school.
	He has no authority to tell you that.
	I guess they never heard her respond to Yot Superior, right?
	And then I had a contract.
	And then, oh, the judge said, well, he got his year of school.
	Like, no, I didn't contract for a year of school.
	I contracted for a degree after three years.
	If I keep my grades up and pay my money, it's an options contract.
	You know?
	They're out of their minds.
	There's no other way.
	But this is how you see a society devolve.
	And I remember having this discussion with my father in March 2020.
	He's like, you can see how quickly society goes crazy.
	And then with enough indoctrination, fear porn media for three years, it can convert even the holdouts from the beginning or turn others, you know.
	Are you familiar with Iqbal versus Ashcroft?
	I know by name, but I'll need some stronger refresher.
	If you have a minute, do you have a minute to discuss?
	Absolutely, please.
	Okay, great.
	So Iqbal was a Pakistani who, after 9-11, was grabbed in New York City and thrown into a federal holding cell.
	They ended up deporting him back to Pakistan, but he says the guards beat him up a lot, and that may have happened, but he sued.
	Under responde et superior, right?
	The guards all the way up to the Attorney General of the United States, John Ashcroft.
	The case was appealed and then appealed again.
	It went to the Supreme Court, okay, on standing.
	And the Supreme Court added a clause of, not speculative, but...
	The robustness of the claim on its face.
	I'm not using the right words.
	There's one word.
	It's plausible.
	It's plausible, right?
	You didn't say enough to say that it's plausible.
	Well, how come there's a 25-page limit?
	And how am I going to say enough facts?
	Anyway, Iqbal v.
	Ashcroft is the number one assault on the rights of Americans.
	If you sue the government over abridging your rights, whether it's the first, second, or whatever amendment you can choose.
	Iqbal will get you thrown out on standing, no matter what, because it's left to the subjective whim of any judge to throw you out on standing.
	Trump, not Trump, but the Texas and Missouri Attorneys General that sued Pennsylvania for the election stuff, you remember what they were thrown out on?
	Standing.
	You know what case they used to throw them out?
	It was Iqbal versus Ashcroft.
	I'm pulling this up while you're talking.
	I've got to make sense of it.
	This is your case.
	U.S. District Court Judge DeFaniel Gorton sided with the state officials, sued by John Paul Beaudoin, senior last year.
	He didn't have, quote, standing to bring the case because he failed to show, quote, concrete and particularized harm caused by their COVID shot orders and statements, in particular that they were not responsible for the way he was taken off the enrollment list at the school.
	It's, I mean, I...
	Hold on.
	You got the wrong case.
	So the case against the law school is in state court.
	This case is against the governor, public health commissioner, the chief medical examiner, and four individual medical examiners for originally I used criminal statutes for fraud.
	I also included civil action for deprivation of rights.
	So I've amended that complaint.
	And so they're saying, I use third-party doctrine.
	I said, The school would not have enacted the vaccine mandate, and all other schools, which won't let me in because I don't have the vaccine, would not have enacted their vaccine mandates had the state not committed fraud on the death certificates that inflated the COVID deaths and they hid the vaccine deaths.
	Now, they're saying it's not plausible.
	So the third prong of Lujan versus Defenders of Wildlife is redressability.
	If the court sided with me and made the state admit the truth about these deaths, Would that change the mandates?
	And I say, yes, it would.
	And they're saying, no, that's only speculative.
	I want to find the other decision where you lack standing to be the one who's...
	Yeah, it's a state court.
	It's a state court one.
	What are you working on now?
	Tell us what you have.
	You got therealcdc.com, but you got a book.
	What's the book is called?
	The book is called The Real CDC, and the subtitle is Public Health Crimes 2020 to 2022.
	That will be out within a couple of weeks.
	It's on pre-order at that site, therealcdc.com.
	I have another publication coming out called...
	At the risk of asking the stupid question, though.
	Will it be available on Amazon?
	Oh, yeah.
	It's going to have to be.
	I didn't want to.
	I tried to get away with it.
	It's been out for like a week.
	The website's been live.
	And there's just not enough traffic.
	And people are telling me they won't buy it until it's on Amazon because then it becomes real.
	I didn't mean in terms of caving to the evil of Amazon.
	I think Amazon, to the extent it gives the independents voices, it's still a tool you'd have to be cutting off your nose to spite your face not to use it.
	I just wonder if they're going to yeet you.
	I don't want to give anybody any ideas, not that they need me to, whether or not they're going to just find a reason to suppress or ban your book from the platform.
	Oh, well, there's going through Amazon and there's going through Amazon.
	Books are a special thing at Amazon where they'll control everything about it.
	I think I'm going to sell it on Amazon just as a product being sold on Amazon.
	So I don't have to worry about a bestsellers list or anything like that.
	But yeah, it'll be available there.
	And I have a bundle with another document I'm coming out with.
	And that is, oh, by the way, the book is for everybody.
	It's not for scientists and PhDs and stuff.
	I write and show data in such a way that normal people can read it, and it's real.
	It's not confidence intervals and p-values and statistical methods, which I think are inappropriate anyway.
	That's a long discussion.
	So the second document is called the CDC Memorandum.
	It's a notice of criminal liability, cease and desist, and required action to the directors of the CDC, FDA, NIH.
	Twelve of their underlings.
	It'll be copied to at least six state attorneys general, and I believe it will get before at least two grand juries to investigate the federal government.
	And it's got up to 120 pages of factual allegations enumerated, lots of data, you know, what oxygen level was somebody on this date and time, and then when were they put on a ventilator, what drugs were they given.
	It's got all that.
	It's got 150 pages of 400 graphs of various causes of death.
	Nobody in the world has seen this level of detail of not only data, but individual people.
	And if they ignore it, they're notified once they get it, right?
	So I'm going to have somebody serve it to them.
	They will have been notified.
	They can't say they didn't know.
	So the defense of ignorance of fact can never be used in the future when they get brought before a grand jury.
	I believe a grand jury would find probable cause to indict them.
	So they have the opportunity to set the world right and say what these vaccines are doing.
	And I've proven it all.
	There's enough in that document to burn them all.
	So that's called Bus CDC Memorandum.
	It's also available at that site, The Real CDC.
	You can buy it in a bundle.
	I have the price wicked low right now.
	I have to change it because everybody's buying the bundle.
	It's really cheap.
	I see the question for the lazy people.
	Is this going to be available on audio?
	Probably not, unless I get a lot of requests.
	I don't know how graphs would translate into audio.
	Is the CDC memo, it sounds like it's structured the way Steve Deese's The Rise of the Fourth Reich.
	Have you read The Rise of the Fourth Reich?
	No, I don't read much.
	Kind of weird.
	I didn't read it either.
	I listened to it.
	But it's a book that's drafted in sort of an opening argument.
	It's like a trial of the crimes of the COVID era.
	I hope I'm not mixing up books.
	I'm pretty sure that's what it is.
	And it's drafted like opening arguments, witness testimony.
	So it's a book documenting everything that went down and went wrong during COVID, drafted in sort of like an argumentative or argument brief style.
	It's very good.
	And so what do you have coming?
	So you got that?
	So I got that.
	I'm driving up to New Hampshire right after this and going to talk to some state legislators.
	There's a bill I drafted.
	I'll leave it there, but if it goes through, it'll be pretty good.
	I'm also involved in a grand jury team out in Oregon.
	They're at the Fifth Circuit right now on appeal.
	It's a petition.
	To put information in front of a federal grand jury to investigate the FDA and CDC for much of the same type of fraud I described.
	In fact, my data is a big piece of it now.
	And that's Dr. Henry Ely, Senator Kim Thatcher, and Senator Dennis Linthicum, state senators of Oregon.
	Those are the three petitioners or plaintiffs, if you will.
	What else do I have going on?
	I have a lot of other stuff going on, too.
	So I get the two books.
	Oh, my two lawsuits.
	The bill up there.
	I've got things ready to go for three state attorneys general to start investigating this stuff.
	I have enough evidence to send it all down.
	It's ready.
	Ready to go.
	I will say Godspeed on that.
	I wish.
	I hope.
	I was just thinking today how above and beyond the immunity from adverse effects or adverse events that's been gifted to these pharma companies, they haven't been gifted shareholder immunity.
	I'm waiting for the first shareholder lawsuits to be filed based on false representations.
	Yeah, so I look at overall systems, and if I can get any type of...
	There's my doggie.
	I thought I shut the door.
	Let's see.
	I'm going to back it.
	Let's see the dog.
	Can you pick him up?
	Come here, buddy.
	We're going to have a dog off.
	I'm going to pick him up.
	Cooper, come here.
	He's backing up.
	That's a beautiful dog.
	Your backdrop is down.
	Here we go.
	That's Cooper.
	That's a beautiful dog.
	Let me zoom in a little bit.
	That's a good-looking dog.
	Your backdrop fell down, if you want to.
	Yeah, I'll get it.
	Do you want me to take you out while you fix that, or are you okay with it?
	I'll just fix it right now.
	Okay.
	I'm going to show you this one here.
	So, you got dogs.
	Let me get this.
	So, you got dogs.
	There's two types of dogs.
	That's mine right there, sitting.
	He's got a dog bed, and he chooses to sleep on my backpack next to this croc.
	And he's out and then they got the other one there who's sitting in her own...
	No, she hasn't done anything yet.
	John, you're doing amazing stuff.
	I don't know if people are discovering you for the first time today.
	It's going to be...
	You came highly recommended by people, whom I don't want to disclose publicly, but people that I trust privately and personally who said, highly recommended, trustworthy, smart, and doing what very few other people are doing.
	Thank you.
	Appreciate that.
	Thank you for fleshing it out.
	I wish I knew who that was.
	I'll tell you privately afterwards.
	All right.
	When I got the recommendation, I have to go to people that I trust to say, am I stepping in it or is this like, you know, legit?
	And they said, totally legit.
	Oh, there's so much chaos out there with people with fake stories and they exaggerate.
	I don't exaggerate anything.
	I'm very conservative with everything I say.
	But who knows that?
	You don't know me, so how would you know that I'm being honest?
	No, but it's my own ignorance.
	There's levels to the scrutiny of the stuff that we analyze, and I know some names, and I have my own circle.
	They overlap, but then there's people that I've never heard of who I wish I had heard of them, and I wish I knew of them, and now I go back and try to catch up on as much homework as I can.
	But look, what you did was...
	The weirdest thing is, like, the guy came over to fix my internet yesterday.
	He's also an electrician, so he came down and helped me out on the side.
	But I'm sitting there trying to tell him stuff.
	It's like, you know, I know I'm just a guy in my basement talking to you about an electrical problem.
	But I'm also the guy that has the best data in the entire world on COVID vaccines and COVID.
	And nobody knows me.
	And I'm just a regular guy.
	But how do I tell people?
	Forget about all these studies.
	The randomized, controlled, peer-reviewed, all that bullshit.
	It's all BS.
	Excuse my language.
	I don't know how you feel.
	It's all bullshit, man.
	If somebody dies in front of you and they have berry juice, I have this story about Tommy and the berry bush.
	Tommy was supposed to be back from the other village.
	He didn't come back.
	They look down at the end of the village.
	Tommy's laying under a berry bush with berry juice coming out of his mouth, with foam coming out of his mouth.
	He's dead.
	And everybody goes, oh my God, we have to have a funeral for Tommy.
	Let's collect some berries and bake some pies for us all.
	Like, no, don't eat the freaking berries.
	It's obvious what happened.
	You don't need to know.
	Somebody dies in five minutes from the vaccine.
	What do you need to know?
	The problem is people are too heavily invested because they've sacrificed more than they ever wanted to sacrifice and they can't bring themselves to admit it.
	And with their own bodies, it's one thing.
	I could say, okay, fine.
	I may have done something that I'd never do again had I known then what I know now.
	But at least I didn't expose other people to that, the people who I'm entrusted to care for, for the people who've done it.
	How can you ever say, oh my God, I might have done something that might have compromised?
	David, you wouldn't believe this one.
	I have a death certificate.
	In Western Massachusetts, a 16-year-old girl died running cross-country.
	Lymphohistiosidic myocarditis.
	Okay, she died from myocarditis.
	Her pronouns are in her obituary.
	I'm sure she did everything that that whole cult said to do, including getting all her boosters and stuff.
	Well, there's a woman, Dr. Sarah Goff, in Western Massachusetts, who got some younger grad students together.
	They wrote a paper, and in the paper, they're saying how doctors should be censored from talking about the vaccine in social media.
	You can't let doctors say anything bad about the vaccine in social media.
	That was 10 months after the girl died.
	Sarah Goff is her mother.
	That's the mother of the girl who died from myocarditis.
	Now, I'm going out on a limb here.
	I think the vaccine killed her by myocarditis, and yet she's going and getting a bunch of people.
	Western Mass is extremely liberal, by the way, the whole Amherst area.
	Really, really bad.
	And they're in a cult.
	I can't imagine.
	Her own daughter.
	And now she wants all doctors silenced from social media.
	They're not allowed to talk about the vaccine.
	Chuck, she can't face what she probably did.
	And I, to some extent, can't blame her.
	I didn't see this play.
	My parents went to see this play in New York.
	And I'll spoiler alert.
	The mother has been living with a hallucination of her kid the entire time.
	And then you find out the kid's been dead from childhood.
	But the mother has been living with the memory, the ghost of the child.
	Yeah.
	I mean, how can you ever expect them to admit this to themselves and then also feel the wrath from everyone else who has had a similar experience or exposed their children to the risk?
	I understand that it's a total self-defense mechanism, but it's the most cowardly or self-preservation.
	They'll live with a lie.
	They don't come forward.
	I've tried to talk to a couple of parents, and I gave up.
	I'm like, you know what?
	I'm going forward with the data because I want to save the kids who are still alive.
	I want to reach the parents to make sure they don't vaccinate their kids.
	Everything has been so surreal and so weird the last few years.
	I can't even believe I have all this information.
	And, you know, I go back to St. Thomas Aquinas and libertarian theory, and that's where we need to be.
	Centralized anything is the least efficient system whenever you centralize power and control.
	And the same thing happens with electrons on a circuit board.
	If you have a CPU, a central processing unit, it's less efficient than if you have a processing unit that handles the communications, one that handles graphics, one that handles arithmetic.
	A distributed processing system is always better.
	Central processing, CDC, FDA, they just killed a million people in the last three years.
	They killed a million in the U.S. They killed a million people.
	And a million people with how many life years left?
	I mean, not to be cynical, but the death of an 81-year-old, they don't have the life years, the productivity that the death of a 40-year-old has.
	You just hit on a very big part of a chapter of mine.
	Life years lost is huge.
	Huge.
	It's orders of magnitude more than COVID itself.
	Even if you count the COVID they're lying about.
	You're right.
	It was 81.3 in Massachusetts.
	The average COVID death was above the average lifespan.
	Six years.
	Yep, it was.
	It's all in my book.
	And I explain systems.
	I'm a systems engineer.
	I think in the intersection of law economics, morality.
	So the subtitle of my second book is The Pandemic is Moral, Not Viral.
	We have a pandemic of immorality where people will accept.
	All these things that are happening and just shrug their shoulders and walk away.
	Hey, your neighbor's kid was killed.
	You know, you might want to step forward and support him.
	You know, I got to move to New Hampshire.
	I got to get out of Massachusetts.
	No, I had a high school friend had passed away without identifying their sleep.
	And then, you know, like another friend who's sort of aligned is at the funeral.
	And like they mentioned, like, did she?
	We know that this person has had some.
	Any correlation?
	And then you immediately get the conspiracy theory stink eye.
	You're like, oh, you're a Trump supporter.
	This conversation's over.
	Because it's easier to live with the lie.
	Did you go over and talk to the funeral director?
	I did that a couple of years ago in 21. I was like, so, you know, you feel him out for conversation and then all of a sudden they open up like, oh, you wouldn't believe the stuff that's going on.
	First of all, all these COVID deaths are BS and this is the funeral director.
	You know, you get a real conversation when you kind of tease it out with somebody in a small setting.
	There's no way they'd go public because the licenses are given out by the state for funeral directors.
	Imagine that's the only thing you've ever done your whole career and you're making good money.
	And if you say the wrong thing, the state can take your ability to make money.
	I had a conversation with someone.
	I was biking through the forest and we start talking and they work in healthcare.
	And then it's immediate.
	We're aligned and we start talking.
	And I was like, do you want to come on to discuss this?
	I'm like, absolutely not.
	I'll lose my job.
	There's no way I'm doing this, especially in the political environment where it was.
	It wasn't Florida.
	John, will you have 10 more minutes?
	Yeah, sure.
	Okay, so what we're going to do, everybody, we're going to go over to Locals because there's a couple of questions there and I'll get some Locals chat and we'll finish it up there.
	I was going to continue with some other topics, but I'm not going to do that today.
	We're going to end this on Rumble.
	Come on over to Locals, get some questions in there.
	Make sure that I haven't left any Rumble rants out here.
	I haven't.
	And there's some chat in there and we'll get some Q&A in Locals.
	Everyone, get your butts on over there.
	I'm going to end this on Rumble.
	Thank you.
	For those who are not going to come on Rumble, thank you for being here.
	I'll be live tomorrow.
	I'll cover the stories that I was planning on covering today, but this went...
	My goodness.
	I still got questions, and we're an hour and a half in.
	So I'm going to end this on Rumble.
	Come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com for a little after-party Q&A.
	Okay, done.
	See you all tomorrow.
	Okay, now we're still here.
	We're still live.
	It changes nothing.
	And let me just make sure, John, on our Locals chat...

▲