Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 16, 2023 - Viva & Barnes

01:42:04

Newsom For Sale to China! Trudeau Black-Socks! Protests in Canada AND MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Can I ever want to stop what they're doing right now and go read?
	It's literally two pages.
	Go read a letter to America.
	And please come back here and just let me know what you think.
	Because I feel like I'm going through like an existential crisis right now.
	And a lot of people are.
	So I just need someone else to be feeling this.
	This is fucking insane.
	I just read Osama bin Laden's letter to America, which I will be going through right here.
	but it's actually so mind-fucking to me that terrorism has been sold as this idea to the American people and honestly just so many Western inhabitants within certain nations that this group of people, this-Western?
	Western inhabitants?
	Hold on.
	Am I in the screen here?
	Is my audio on here?
	Let me make sure about this.
	Western inhabitants.
	Okay, that's one way of talking about citizens, but okay.
	Random group of people just suddenly wakes up one day and just fucking hates you.
	Just wants you dead, wants you gone, and this is all because they believe that they're better than us.
	Like, that is the root of terrorism.
	I'm not going to play a full three minutes of this idiocy.
	It's going to raise a number of questions: censorship, whether or not reading the words of your self-declared Enemies, ideological adversaries, people who are willing to do all sorts of terrible things in the name of, I mean, everyone's the hero in their own story.
	All of that.
	We're going to get to some kickers on this because The Guardian recently took down their original publication of Letter to America, drafted allegedly by Osama bin Laden in 2002.
	They published it in 2002.
	It's been on the internet.
	2002, 12, 20, 21 years.
	Older than many of these idiots.
	And now, all of a sudden, the Guardian took it down.
	I'll show you.
	I'll play a couple more just because I don't think anybody commenting on TikTok, the Chinese social manipulation app, I don't think any of these buffoons actually read it because I don't think they would agree with everything in it.
	It doesn't make sense.
	They just hate your fucking nation.
	But reading this letter, it becomes apparent to me that the actions of 9-11...
	And those acts committed against the USA and its people were all just the buildup of our government failing other nations in majority of these situations.
	Oh, we can stop it there.
	What did Colin Rugg have to say about this?
	There's a number of montages going viral of themselves.
	Colin Rugg.
	First of all, good afternoon, everybody.
	Colin Rugg, the new latest trend in TikTok is liberal creators promoting and encouraging people to read.
	Terrorist Osama Bin Laden's, quote, letter to America, end quote.
	There's nothing, call me controversial, there's nothing wrong with reading it.
	There's nothing wrong with understanding the thought process of someone who would willingly murder innocent civilians in pursuit of whatever objective they think justified that conduct in the first place.
	And it's not to say that you can't learn from it and also potentially...
	Potentially, you know, Ron Paul.
	Was it Ron Paul or Rand Paul?
	Ron Paul's moment with Giuliani in the election of whatever year it was.
	Dave Smith talked about it when he was on the show.
	You know, you can understand other countries' grievances, even if it means, you know, disagreeing with the method through which they carry out revenge for those purported grievances.
	Reading it, reading Mein Kampf, it's not going to turn you into Hitler.
	It might allow you to understand the rationale that allowed for an individual to come into power and a society to, to some extent, support that to greater or lesser degrees, whether or not you want to agree that Hitler was democratically elected or not and usurp power.
	It might help you to understand.
	It's not going to turn you into a demon.
	Many users appear to sympathize with bin Laden, who was responsible for 9 /11.
	In his letter, Bin Laden outlines al-Qaeda's motives behind 9 /11.
	TikTok users have touted the letters as making them question why certain acts of terror, including 9 /11, are really considered terrorism.
	Read the entire thing.
	In Bin Laden's letter, he justifies the 9-11 attacks where nearly 3,000 Americans were killed due to the U.S. support of Israel, among other things.
	Bin Laden wrote that the creation of Israel is a crime that must be erased in the letter.
	I think that's where people stop reading because that's the only current trending aspect of this.
	They certainly didn't read the part about homosexuality, but I don't believe any of these liberal TikTok influencer idiots have read the entire letter.
	And I certainly believe that even if they did read the entire letter, they will certainly cherry pick what they think will make them the friends of their enemies.
	Calling for violence, he added, each and every person whose hands have become polluted in the contribution towards Israel's founding ought to, quote, pay its price and pay for it heavily.
	The American left, folks.
	I am more inclined to think that this is actually China's TikTok and not America's left.
	You're not going to not have stupid people.
	Idiots, loudmouths, in a society of 360 million people.
	The question that people need to be asking here is not why are there idiots in the world.
	There will always be idiots in the world.
	There will always be propagandists.
	There will always be dishonest liars who misrepresent facts, as I think many people who purport to have read the letter are doing.
	You'll always have idiots who believe nonsense.
	The question is...
	How is it that they get such an amplification of their stupidity, their dishonesty, and their lies?
	How is that?
	Entereth TikTok.
	I believe, and it's not really, you know, in as much as I believe China is waging a biological war against America, and no, I'm not just talking about my Sharona Cyrus, COVID.
	originated in a lab in Wuhan, China, whether or not America had a hand in that, you know, Fauci via third-party NGO, what was it, EcoHealth Alliance, funding gain-of-function research in a lab in China, whether or not China, as a reprisal to Trump's presidency, Trump's re-election, willingly, accidentally, whatever, It's one hell of a coincidence, both for China and for Democrats.
	But set all of that aside.
	I believe China is waging a biological war against America via fentanyl, being smuggled in through the easiest way they can get into the country.
	Attacking middle-aged, fighting-aged men.
	Attacking the next generation that, you know, in theory grows up to be the intellectual competitor to China.
	Attacking them, killing them.
	By the hundreds of thousands annually.
	So I believe that's going on.
	To the extent I believe that's going on, call me a crazy conspiracy theorist all you want.
	Do I not also believe that TikTok, the Chinese app, is waging a social media war against America?
	I do.
	What the hell?
	Why is that algorithmically being promoted?
	Idiots will always exist.
	Idiots will always have a bullhorn.
	Typically what happens is when idiots spout off stupidity, you know, people might rubberneck and say, hey, I want to hear what that idiot has to say today.
	But it doesn't get amplified.
	It doesn't get what appears to be normalized and promoted.
	Unless you're on TikTok.
	So I genuinely believe that China is waging an all-out, call it a digital war.
	It's physical when it comes to fentanyl poisoning.
	But also a digital war to bring about the demise, the collapse of the West.
	Or at the very least, the crippling of the West.
	So that China can take over in all aspects of commercial warfare and so on.
	But it doesn't change the underlying story here.
	Let me see if I can pull this up.
	I think I brought it up on the...
	I'm not going to go through the letter.
	Read it.
	If you read that letter and you can't distinguish what would otherwise be legitimate political grievances in the absence of massive acts of terrorism, if you can't distinguish between legitimate political critique and grievances versus vitriolic hatred of specific groups versus active calls to action and...
	Action, a call to violence.
	If you can't distinguish between those, or you stop reading when it gets to the Israel part because that's the trending topic that everyone's become a master on, if you can't distinguish that, there's very little hope for you.
	Except for life tends to, you know, teach people things if they can live long enough.
	That was a quote from the Amy Winehouse documentary.
	It's always stuck with me.
	Life can teach you a lot of things if you can get far enough into it.
	It's sort of a variation of...
	Thomas Jefferson?
	No, who was it that wrote?
	Oh, geez.
	Time makes more converts than reason.
	Thomas Paine.
	I'm sorry, that's who it was.
	Thomas Paine.
	Time makes more converts than reason.
	So live long enough, you'll learn.
	There's a reason why the old expression exists.
	If you're not a liberal when you're a kid, you have no heart.
	And if you're not a conservative when you're an adult, you have no brain.
	So life will teach a lot of these people the lessons, or they'll learn for themselves from their stupidity.
	The question now remains, however.
	Hold on.
	Hold on.
	Ah, cripe.
	Don't take my word for it.
	Let me just get the Guardian, which published the letter to the American people in 2002 and had it up on their website for 21 years, decides to take it down now that it's going viral.
	What happens when you...
	This is censorship.
	What happens when you actually memory hole?
	What people find to be relevant information in the current time.
	What happens?
	People say, oh, well, it must have been totally false, and therefore I can trust by the censorship that the reason why they're censoring it is because it's so stupid and so outlandish that no one needs to read it.
	That's how dumb it is.
	Wrong.
	This is the actual screen grab.
	If you go to the article, the link where it had been published for 21 years, The Guardian says, removed documents.
	Totally normal.
	Totally normal.
	The page previously displayed a document containing, in translation, the full text of Osama Bin Laden's "Letter to the American People" as reported in the Observer on Sunday 24 November 2002.
	The document, which was published here on the same day, was removed on 15 November 21 years later.
	Makes total sense.
	That's not gonna...
	That's not going to confirm certain people's conspiracy theories.
	That's not going to legitimize certain people's intolerant ideas by virtue of the fact that now The Guardian has got to take it down.
	The question would have been, why would they have published it in the first place?
	That's the first question.
	There's two aspects of the censorship here.
	One is not making a decision, not publishing something in real time for reasons which you may or may not disagree with when it comes to publishing the manifestos.
	Sometimes they have no problem leaking them.
	They have no problem publishing them of these killers when it promotes the narrative that the people want.
	And then they find a good reason not to publish the manifestos when it runs contrary to narratives.
	And then the pretext will be, well, we don't publish documents that incite and promote violence.
	Okay.
	Had the Guardian said in 2002, November, so we're now a year and some out of 9-11.
	Had the Guardian said at the time, there's a letter going around.
	Purporting to have been written by Osama Bin Laden, the mastermind behind 9 /11, we're not publishing it because we deem it to be a call to terrorism.
	Had they said that then, I could have said, okay, well, you know, I think most of us are big boys and we can deal with it, but that's your journalistic editorial discretion, and I may or may not choose to read your publication in the future if you exercise it in a way that runs contrary to my values too often.
	That would be one thing.
	They ran it back then.
	They ran a letter.
	Which, arguably, but not so arguably, I mean, to the extent that they're seeing it as legitimizing terrorism today, they presumably thought it legitimized terrorism back in the day.
	Why would they have published it then?
	The Guardian publishing a letter that admonishes, condemns American citizens.
	By virtue of the fact that they purportedly voted for the government, which is carrying out atrocities internationally, and therefore they are legitimate military targets, why would The Guardian have published it back then if that's what they think now and presumably that's what they thought then?
	One might think maybe they wanted to sow a little discord, draw a little heat on America.
	Okay.
	Why would they take it down now?
	Like people haven't seen it?
	Screen grabbed it?
	Like you're gonna erase it from the internet?
	No.
	What you're gonna do...
	By taking it down is somewhat exactly like what you did by publishing it in the first place.
	Sow discord, bring the heat on America, and cause discord in the country ostensibly for the purposes of causing political chaos.
	You delete things, you censor things, you memory hole things, you do not prove them wrong.
	You actually legitimize them in the eyes of the people who believe them.
	And you raise suspicion in the people who might have been middle ground.
	Anybody wants it?
	Go read the actual thing.
	Read the entire document.
	If you're a member of the 2SLGBTQIA plus community, you're going to have problems with what was written in there.
	Even if you sympathize with what Osama wrote about his grievances against the state of Israel.
	Go read it.
	But don't stop reading after one page.
	And don't listen to these TikTok influencer idiots who are being artificially amplified and promoted on that Chinese app of a website app thing, whatever the hell TikTok is, to sow discord in American politics.
	That's what it's doing.
	That's what it's there for.
	And congratulations if you are on that platform, sharing that, and thinking that you should be positively influenced by that document.
	Do I crack the knuckles?
	How did I just...
	Ramble for 14 minutes.
	That doesn't even make sense to me.
	I haven't even done the intros.
	I haven't talked about what's going on yesterday, today.
	Good afternoon, everybody.
	I haven't checked if we're live on Rumble.
	Are we live on Rumble?
	We are good.
	China controls the algorithm, says Craven.
	There's no question about that.
	Controls?
	I mean, it's designed to sow discord.
	Who was that?
	I was listening to The Rock on Rogan.
	I think it was from the Rocks episode.
	It might have been from another one where they were talking about how apparently like 15...
	The top 14...
	14 of the top 15 Christian websites on Facebook are allegedly like Russian troll farm, bot farms, whatever.
	I don't know.
	All that I know is that there is...
	There's a deliberate attempt to sow discord in society.
	To fracture within...
	Within allies.
	To cause...
	What's the word?
	Infinite division among allies to the point where you have Ben Shapiro and Candace Owens bickering with one another publicly for the world to see that there's a fracturing even within what were hitherto allies within a fractured world.
	So I believe absolutely there's an algorithm doing it on purpose and successfully at that.
	Oh, Gin Bottle.
	Thoroughly agree, Viva.
	Well, I'll say this, Gin Bottle.
	I also agree with Gin Bottle.
	No, it's still too early.
	Today I'm having a...
	I'm not gonna do ASMR.
	No, there's no question.
	Jim, you agree because it's right.
	Not because I'm right.
	It's also not my original thought, so.
	All right.
	We're live on Rumble.
	I see my mug there.
	Good.
	Let me see this.
	Okay, I got a little nick under my chin, which seems to be a little bit less noticeable than it was yesterday.
	When I appeared on The Unusual Suspects with Vinny Oceana, Brandon Aceto, Roger Stone, and oh my goodness, the gentleman sitting to my left who reminds me of my brother-in-law is going to be angry that I can't remember his name now.
	I've become part of a thing at...
	It's on Valuetainment's channel, and it's a gang called The Unusual Suspects, and they have guests that come and...
	I've been on twice and I love it.
	I mean, I love Vinny.
	If you haven't seen Vinny, Vinny is the man who went apeshit crazy on the guy from the Lincoln Project, the bald guy who was...
	Vinny's awesome.
	Roger Stone, we did an episode yesterday, The Unusual Suspects.
	Go check it out.
	It's amazing.
	Roger Stone was there.
	An encyclopedia, the political encyclopedia of the world.
	And what I've noticed, I'm old enough now to have...
	I still remember what it was like to be a child, both physically and politically and ideologically.
	I remember when I was a political, ideological child, I remember thinking Roger Stone must be a bad man because everybody says he's a bad man.
	Media says he's a liar.
	He's an enemy.
	He's a threat.
	I know Roger Stone now.
	And as much as, you know, look, people, everyone has their quirks and their other things.
	What I think I believe now is that Roger Stone is not...
	He might be a villain, but he's not the villain for the reasons the media said he was.
	He's an absolute political encyclopedia.
	How he ever survived and thrived in the world of politics, I can't understand.
	Although, as he explains it, you know, back in the day, in the world of politics, there was still an understanding that it's a game.
	You play, you win some, you lose some.
	But the game of politics back in the day was not...
	You win some, and then we come after you, try to lock you up, try to lock up your family, try to steal your assets, try to shut you down, try to ruin your life, try to prevent you from providing for your family.
	Those were not the rules back then, although JFK might have something to say about that.
	So I did that yesterday, and it was fantastic.
	Now, I forget what that was all about.
	It doesn't matter.
	Standard disclaimers, no medical advice, no election fornication advice, no legal advice ever.
	Do not take legal advice from anyone.
	Unless they're a mandated attorney in the context of a mandate, certainly not from internet lawyers, trained and intelligent as they may be.
	Don't do it.
	Okay, now are we live on vivabarneslaw.locals.com?
	We are.
	Okay, so let's just take a little break here.
	Deep breath.
	I actually found a breathing technique on an eight-minute breathing video, which was actually good.
	Politics has always been a dirty game.
	Oh, just subbed to the usual sucks that looks interesting.
	It's fantastic.
	You will not regret it, but I wanted to bring up this one.
	Politics has always been a dirty game.
	You know why?
	Because politics ruins everything.
	Now, some people say politics is merely the struggle for power.
	There is politics within everything.
	Politics within a law firm that's not political.
	Politics within a band that's not political.
	Politics is the struggle for power.
	But politics ruins everything.
	Everything.
	It ruins music, science, art, video games.
	What else?
	It even ruins politics.
	And if you want to get your shirt that says politics ruins everything, and we're working on another one.
	If you want to get your merch, if you want to support the channel, support Viva Fry and Robert Barnes, you can go to VivaFry.com and get some good merch.
	It's just VivaFry.com.
	I bought that domain before I was even anything.
	I was nothing.
	Irrelevant.
	As I'll say as I continue to be.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	If you're new to the channel, we start on YouTube Rumble and VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
	We then end on YouTube, because YouTube is not a free speech platform, to go and grace Rumble, the free speech platform, with our eyes, our dollars, and our attention, because that is how you reward companies that do good.
	That is how you reward countries that do good.
	With your eyes, with your dollars, and with your feet.
	And that is how you penalize companies that do not do good and countries that do not do good.
	You don't spend money there, you don't travel there, and you leave.
	So in about 10 minutes, we'll go over there.
	We're going to start with...
	Yeah, we're going to do Trudeau.
	We might be here for another 20 or 25 minutes.
	We're going to start with...
	We're going to do Trudeau, Gavin Newsom, and China for sale.
	Then we're going to go over to Rumble.
	And it's fitting because people call YouTube Commitube, and for good reason.
	Where do we start with this?
	Do we start with...
	We start with the socks.
	I'll take the socks!
	The socks!
	All right.
	Not that.
	Justin Trudeau.
	Here we go.
	Oh, yeah.
	This is the video that Trudeau publishes because he's a narcissistic sociopath.
	Canadians and Californians have felt the impacts of climate change and understand the opportunities that come with climate action.
	Gavin Newsom and I spoke about that and many other priorities today and about how we can keep working together.
	Good to see you again, my friend.
	Because that's what friends do.
	Like men.
	Like men.
	Soldiers.
	Look at this.
	Give it to him, Trudeau.
	Slap his back.
	That's what Trudeau shares.
	A four-second clip.
	That's not the entirety of the clip.
	Oh my goodness.
	I love it.
	My wife sends me things just because she's been pulled into my algorithm on YouTube.
	She's like, Dave, have you seen this?
	And I was like...
	Scene what?
	The socks?
	It's like, what do you mean the socks?
	What did I miss?
	It's like, I was busy yesterday.
	I didn't catch everything.
	So that was the four-second clip.
	That's what Trudeau, the sociopathic narcissist, wants you to see.
	Nothing but a man.
	He gets up there and he smacks Gavin Newsom on the back.
	Oh my.
	The idea of Trudeau touching me like that makes me sick.
	That's not the full clip if you had any doubts.
	Here's a longer clip.
	And if Gavin Newsom...
	Was attempting to roast and humiliate Justin Trudeau at the international scale?
	Because, you know, they're both competing for China's attention right now.
	Maybe Gavin Newsom says, look, President Xi, I'm the man you want to be doing business with.
	Forget Justin Trudeau.
	I mean, you've already got your police stations up in Canada.
	You've already got your soldiers training on Canadian soil.
	Leave him.
	Come to me.
	And to show you why you should do this, I'm going to make Justin Trudeau my B-I-T-C-H.
	Look at this, guys.
	Oh, okay, fine.
	Sorry.
	That's way too loud.
	Jeez Louise.
	Okay.
	Handshake.
	It's good to see you.
	When did you get in, by the way?
	I got in a few hours ago.
	Literally.
	I was in Vancouver last night.
	Well, let me be the first to look.
	Oh, this is about as natural as saccharine.
	You are the first to welcome me.
	What a pleasure to be back.
	It's always so good to see you.
	We got a lot to talk about, obviously.
	Speaking of Golden Gate, I think you gave me these socks last time.
	Can you imagine this, by the way?
	When my wife told me there was a socks gaffe, I was like, oh, someone like Gavin Newsom brought up the socks.
	No, Trudeau is still parading around the international community, and his claim to fame, even in his own mind, is his quirky socks.
	Oh, I believe you got these from me, Gavin.
	My socks.
	Let me talk about my socks.
	You know, when I'm not beating the ever-loving piss out of soldiers who are protesting in front of Parliament, I like to talk about my socks.
	Talk about, obviously, I'm speaking of Golden Gate.
	I think you gave me these socks last time.
	Unbelievable.
	So, you know, maybe someone did.
	You're still doing those socks.
	Well, you know what?
	Have you ever been caught with black socks on?
	I mean, it'd be just too embarrassing.
	It'd be just too embarrassing.
	Listen, so much to talk about on climate, on climate change.
	Is it conceivable that Justin hears a word that starts with black and does not immediately think blackface?
	And I don't know if Gavin did it on purpose.
	Have you ever been caught with black socks on?
	Oh no, he's never been caught in black socks.
	He's only been caught in blackface multiple times.
	Oh my, look at Trudeau's face right there.
	What did you just say to me, Gavin?
	It would be just too embarrassing to be caught in Black Sox.
	I'm going to give everybody this, and Rebel News picking out the gems.
	Everything about it is disgusting, horrendous, cringeworthy, and an embarrassment.
	This guy now, Justin Trudeau, he's flying to California.
	Got to talk about the climate.
	And he's like, hey, hey, hey, Gavin, look at my socks.
	I got funny socks.
	Oh, look at my hair.
	I'm a beautiful...
	The women love my flowing hair.
	Have you ever been caught in black socks?
	No, it would be too embarrassing.
	So that's the gem of the day.
	Here it is, the link to the tweet.
	It would be too...
	Have you ever been caught in black socks?
	It's impossible!
	Gavin Newsom did not do that on purpose, which leads me to believe...
	That Gavin Newsom is evil.
	No, I'm joking.
	So that was the humiliation of the Black Sox.
	I mean, the memes write themselves from that, but I haven't gotten that far into it to see what memes already exist out there.
	But, you know, Justin Trudeau, Gavin Newsom meeting to, you know, talk about the world.
	They're very big, big, important men because, you know, President Xi Jinping came to California to, you know, scope out his new, to scope out his next backyard, his next playground.
	I've got to play the video of what Gavin Newsom made San Francisco look like.
	Because when you have communist Chinese dictators coming to your country and you want to impress them, you don't want drug-addicted homeless people.
	You know, pissing and shitting all over the street, as is done to such a degree that you apparently can't walk through the streets of San Francisco without stepping in needles and human waste.
	I mean, Xi Jinping is going to come down here and say, Gavin, I thought you were a communist.
	And Gavin's going to be like, yes, I am.
	He's like, well, then why are there homeless people?
	I'm not supposed to see these.
	Get them out of here.
	Gavin Newsom's got to come in and clean up the streets before they get there.
	And this is what the streets...
	I mean, so...
	The ultimate joke about all of this, the sick, sad, twisted joke, Gavin Newsom, who talked about eradicating homelessness in his 10-year plan 20 years ago, I don't know when that video was from, I think it was close to 20 years ago, basically shipped out, cleaned up, barricaded the homeless people out of San Francisco, I believe it was, where Xi Jinping is coming to, you know, see who's going to bend over for the cash faster than between him and Trudeau.
	And this is what the streets of...
	Hold on one second.
	Let me refresh and just see whether it's...
	It's San Francisco, but I get mistaken between San Francisco or San Diego.
	And not because of proximity, just because of the name.
	San Diego is south.
	It's where my wife has neuroscience conferences every now and again that I once went to.
	San Francisco is four hours north of LA.
	Okay.
	This is San Francisco.
	My good God, what's up with the audio today?
	sorry people okay so I
	I think the music is added over.
	All right, so there's a joke in there.
	I believe the music is added over, the dictatorship communist music of Stalin.
	But that was the view of San Francisco yesterday or the day before.
	Probably the day before because I think I missed an entire day of social media consumption yesterday.
	News consumption, sorry, not social media consumption.
	Gavin Newsom.
	In anticipation of communist dictator Xi Jinping coming to San Francisco, California, wants to make it look like he's got a successful clean state.
	That he hasn't, you know, screwed everything up.
	That they don't have a massive homeless epidemic in California.
	A drug epidemic.
	An overdose epidemic.
	Gotta make it look like you're a functional dictator.
	Because the only thing worse than a functional dictator is a dysfunctional dictator.
	Or a bad dictator.
	So they clean up the streets.
	Lock out the homeless.
	The Lord knows where they put them temporarily, but my goodness, if they can put them somewhere temporarily, they can presumably solve that problem just as quickly long term, but some people might think that's not the plan here.
	It's not part of Agenda 2030.
	In response to the accusation that Gavin Newsom only made the streets of San Francisco look clean in order to impress the communist dictator that he's, you know...
	cozying up to basically announcing america's for sale california's for sale and if i become president you can have all of this all of it could be I mean, Justin Trudeau basically has already done that with Canada.
	In answering the accusation that he only cleaned up the streets in order to impress Xi Jinping, this is what he said.
	Let's just make sure the audio is not going to blow our ears out here.
	Folks say, oh, they're just cleaning up this place because all those fancy leaders are coming into town.
	That's true, because it's true.
	But it's also true, for months and months and months prior to APEC, we've been having different conversations.
	Folks say, oh, they're just cleaning up this place because all those fancy leaders are coming into town.
	That's true, because it's true.
	It's not a joke.
	That's true, that accusation, because it's true.
	I mean, you got Gavin Newsom trying to give Kamala Harris a run for her stupid.
	Time is an amazing thing.
	It comes after what came before and before what comes after.
	And who knows?
	Space and time.
	It's above us, beneath us, in front of us.
	It's like that episode from The Simpsons.
	When I was a boy, I'll pull up that clip before we leave.
	I mean, I've played it a dozen times.
	Yang and Cotto dressed up as Bill Clinton and I want to say George Bush running for president.
	And they say, when I was a boy, I dreamed of being a baseball.
	But progress is about going forward, not backwards, upwards, not downwards, and always twirling, twirling, twirling.
	I mean, it's true.
	Because it's true.
	Thank you, philosopher philosophizing Gavin Newsom.
	Oh, I can clean up the mess to impress you when I want to pretend that there's no mess to impress you.
	But there's a lot of other...
	Oh!
	It's atrocious.
	I remember as an anecdote, I couldn't find the tweet, but I know that I tweeted it.
	I was out in La Malbaix, which is a beautiful area of Quebec.
	It's like...
	Five, six hours east of Montreal.
	Beautiful on the north side of the St. Lawrence River, the North Shore.
	And I was out there.
	It's a world-renowned tourist region.
	And there was some building, I forget what it was, a government building.
	And they had the European Union flag, a few European flags, and the flag of China, front and center and prominent.
	And I'm like, look, I'm not xenophobic and there's no but.
	I don't really like seeing foreign flags in my country, certainly not flags of communist dictatorships that I don't want to emulate.
	And I was like, what the hell is this Chinese flag, the flag of China, flying front and center in the middle of the province of Quebec?
	So I go into the building and I say, I have it on video.
	It's like, dude, it's in French.
	I don't talk like that in French.
	Excusez-moi, pourquoi est-ce qu 'il y a un drapeau de Chine à l 'extérieur?
	Why is the flag of China flying outside?
	And the guy goes, well, it's because we just had the G5 summit here, so they're part of the G5.
	And I was like, oh, okay, fine.
	And I leave, and I go, and I tweet.
	And then the aggregate knowledge of the interweb says, viva, the guy lied to you or is an idiot.
	China's not part of the G5.
	I was like, well, now I'm pissed.
	There's a difference between paying tribute, respect, and there's probably a way to do it, versus basically...
	Surrendering ideologically your country to adverse foreign interests.
	I appreciate that what we saw in that video, the Chinese flags on the street were Chinese nationals or Chinese citizens or, you know, Chinese Americans flying their flag and showing their respects to their delegate.
	Can't prevent people from flying their flags in public.
	What that looked like to me, however, more so was this can all be yours, Xi Jinping.
	And I'm a good dictator just for your presence so you don't have to see them.
	I got out all of them.
	Oh, Trudeau organized military training in 2019 with Chinese military at base Petawawa, confirmed by the news Ottawa Citizen.
	Oh, Ned Heads.
	I like reading this because it means you're new to the channel, and I say that respectfully.
	I've talked about this at length.
	Not just the news here.
	Hold on, let me pull it up.
	I forget who the Minister of Defense was.
	He says, we're not doing it anymore.
	Canada training.
	Chinese soldiers.
	For wintertime combat on Canadian news.
	On Canadian soil.
	And what did our minister of...
	What was his name?
	What did our...
	What was his name?
	Harjeet Sajan.
	What did he say?
	We're not doing it anymore.
	Well, once we get busted training communist soldiers or the soldiers of communist regimes on our soil.
	For wintertime combat, when is Canada going to become a threat to the United States?
	I mean, sooner than later, unless Biden sells out all of the U.S. to China as well.
	In which case, it's just going to become a satellite of China.
	Canadian soldiers no longer training Chinese troops, the defense minister says.
	That's nice.
	Oh, isn't that nice?
	You're no longer doing it.
	Defense Minister Harjit Sajjan has confirmed Canadian soldiers are no longer trained.
	Do you know what that means?
	Don't treat me like I'm an idiot.
	We did it.
	We did it.
	We were doing it.
	And now, as of date unspecified, we're no longer doing it.
	And I imagine the date as of which you're no longer doing it is the date at which people became aware that you were doing it.
	Amid scrutiny following a report that senior civil servants opposed the decision last year to stop training activities with the regime.
	Okay, as I said, I've covered it many times.
	I just wanted to bring it up so we can have fun in real time.
	All right, well, that was it.
	That's the fun stuff here.
	Here's the link to the article.
	My flag has a slashy...
	Oh, that looks like a Diagalon.
	Oh, my goodness.
	Some members of Diagalon supporters sent me some stuff, and I got this...
	The big football diagonal ring.
	And it says F-Y-M-M-F-U make me.
	Which, you know, some people, you know, it's fun stuff.
	Okay, do I have anything more about Gavin Newsom?
	I don't think so.
	I think that's it.
	You've got the sock skate black.
	Have you ever been caught in black socks?
	It's classic.
	Oh, you know what?
	We'll do one last very brief update before going over to Rumble.
	So that people who are still on Commitube can understand the endgame of communism?
	Censorship, manipulation of algorithms, suppression of information, artificial promotion of information.
	Owen Schroer, InfoWars guy, was sued, was dropped from the lawsuit, but people still think they hate Owen Schroer because they imagine he said things that he...
	Never actually said, but who the hell has time to verify their beliefs and thought systems in today's day and age?
	We're all very busy.
	It's easy.
	I just want to believe, okay?
	Don't make me verify what it is that I already believe.
	It might be wrong, and then I have to spend more time trying to actually learn.
	Schroyer, we talked about it, covered it.
	He was on the channel recently talking about how he was going to jail for 60 days for allegedly breaching his agreement that he had since he interrupted.
	Congressional hearing in 2019, where he called the Democrats basically not Satanists.
	I believe he used criminals.
	I forget what he said.
	He interrupted Herb Nadler while speaking in Congress, was on his way out, and then got detained.
	They went after him hard.
	He agreed to some terms which he allegedly violated by being present at the Capitol building on January 6, 2021.
	Chanted 1776, which according to the indictment, or according to the complaint, is violent insurrectionist rhetoric.
	And so they said, you broke your terms, we're sending you to jail now for 60 days.
	He gets to jail, they put him in solitary confinement for one week because COVID, because my COVID.
	He gets out.
	And he puts out a video, or he does a phone call video, which a Twitter handle that is being managed by other people while he's in jail, Owen Schroyer, without a C, Owen Schroyer, 1776, posts to Twitter.
	He obviously rubbed someone the wrong way with the video that he posted about having been in solitary for a week, having gotten out, he's fine, he thanks everyone for their support, it's given him a big heart, all the support that he's gotten.
	Someone at the BOP, the Bureau of Prisons, didn't like it, threw him back into solitary.
	No explanation.
	Back into solitary indefinitely where he might serve his 60 days in solitary.
	The account that is being managed by other people while he's back into solitary put up an update November 15 from yesterday.
	Yesterday evening.
	This is Owen Schroyer, 1776.
	I'm not signing it, thank you.
	Does it not let me see the profile unless I sign in?
	This is what happens when you go incognito.
	Okay, whatever.
	It's Owen Schroer.
	O-W-E-N-S-H-R-O-Y-E-R.
	1776.
	Insurrectionist talk.
	Vivek, you better be careful with all that 1776 moment stuff.
	They'll come after you next.
	You get too popular, Vivek, they will come after you.
	Update.
	Owen will remain in solitary confinement until 1128.
	That's November 20th.
	That's 12 more days.
	Just throw them in solitary.
	Lights on.
	Noise, sleep deprivation, solitary confinement.
	It's torture.
	It's an Eighth Amendment violation.
	It's unconstitutional.
	It's inhumane.
	And the world is now realizing how corrupt the judicial system is, the prosecutorial system, the jail, the justice system.
	And those same idiots, the ones who wanted judicial reform, the racism all the time in the judicial system, well, they don't care if it's a white dude going into solitary for damn near a month now because of speech.
	Because they don't like that speech.
	Because they're not politically aligned, so abuse him.
	They don't even listen to the words of Martin Luther King.
	An injustice anywhere is an injustice everywhere.
	No, no.
	Racism, judicial reform when it comes to a certain demographic of the American population, to jail for life when it comes to another.
	And not a racial demographic in this case, a political demographic.
	As we've seen in Georgia.
	They don't even care about race.
	It's all politics.
	One of the defendants, who happens to be a black man, was one of the only ones who didn't get bail for the Georgia indictment.
	Bizarre.
	There might have been other reasons, I'm sure.
	But nobody's complaining about it.
	So the funny thing is, it's not racial-based.
	It's ideological, politically motivated.
	Tolerance of injustice or intolerance of injustice.
	11, 20, 12 days.
	I had trouble.
	You know, I have trouble going away from my family for three days, even if it's to go to Vegas for the Freedom Fest.
	I used to have trouble going to camp for a month because I missed my family, I missed my dogs.
	This man is in prison, and now he's in solitary.
	I'll say indefinitely, although they put a date on it, to November 28th.
	That's 12 more days.
	At the earliest.
	At this time, his normal privileges will be reinstated.
	It's funny how...
	Human rights became privileges under a tyrannical regime.
	Remember when Justin Trudeau talked about get vaccinated and you can get your privileges back.
	God-given rights are privileges to tyrants who want to replace God.
	Write that down.
	For now, he is only able to communicate via mail.
	Despite 23 hours a day of lockdown, he remains in good spirits.
	I am as mentally strong as ever.
	Angry.
	Angry.
	Angry Viva Smash.
	Okay, there's the link to the tweet so everybody can go share that.
	Okay, we've given YouTube more time than they deserve.
	So here are the options right now, people.
	Here's the link to Rumble.
	If you want to go over to Rumble, there's 517 people here, which is good.
	I don't like seeing a lot of people on YouTube anyhow.
	Come over to Rumble.
	Or, if you want to bypass Rumble, and come over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com, where, after each stream, we have a Locals Community exclusive.
	I'll announce the winner.
	The winner.
	I will announce the latest participant in the Locals Convo, as we call them.
	It'll be our seventh or eighth now where there are supporting members of our locals community and just members.
	So members don't have to pay.
	You get a ton of stuff.
	It's an amazing community.
	There are supporters who choose to support the work that Robert Barnes and I do.
	That Robert Barnes and me do.
	No, I do.
	And what I do, it's turned into something of a tradition now.
	I put up a post.
	They say supporters only.
	Post into it.
	Oh, jeez, did I put the supporters only up the last time?
	And then we pick one and we have a conversation.
	It's wonderful.
	Angry, hold on one second.
	Angry slows you down and gives you cancer.
	Frustrated gives you strength and power.
	Okay, I'll take frustrated then.
	I'll take frustrated for 800 who's on first.
	So anyways, if you want to, you know, don't come to Rumble, come to Rumble or come to Locals.
	Rumble owns locals.
	Locals is part of Rumble, so it's six of one way, half a dozen of the other, as we say.
	Bonds and I. Now, Bonds and me.
	Bonds and me make good content.
	Okay, that's it.
	So come on over there.
	We're going to end on YouTube in 5, 4, 3. That's a wrap for YouTube.
	Now it's Rumble.
	Okay, now hold on.
	Did I see any...
	There are Rumble rants here that I didn't get to.
	Okay, let's start with the Rumble rants.
	Ms. Scoozy for not getting them on YouTube.
	Now it's Rumble.
	Okay, now hold on.
	You know what the problem is?
	I realize it's my computer volume that's very loud.
	Okay, hold on one second.
	I don't like that.
	There are Rumble rams.
	There you go.
	That's frustrated Viva right there.
	I'm Not Your Buddy Guy.
	$2 says, Is it just me?
	Or did it seem like China came over to evaluate his investment in Joe Biden and the vassal states of America?
	Seeing a Chinese flag.
	Raised higher than the American flag said it all.
	Okay, so that's the point.
	Thank you, I'm not your buddy guy for raising it.
	I put out a tweet the other day and said, look, I'm going to fly my American flag outside because I don't think people should decide to move to another country and then fly there for a lag in that country.
	It sort of seems more like a matter of conquest than a matter of...
	Assimilation has a negative term, but you chose to live somewhere.
	And so you should choose to support that country, province to which you decided to move.
	Other people were saying, look, there's nothing wrong with it.
	I fly my other flag below the flag of the country in which I live.
	And I can accept that as a compromise.
	That's not what we saw there, and that's not what we've been seeing lately.
	Kirsting.
	History will be written by those who never read it.
	It's not bad.
	ThinboySlick says, I'm not sure it's still on Netflix, but...
	Quote, "Get me Roger Stone" was a pretty good documentary.
	And then we got Finboy Slick says, "Taiwan got Trudeau right in that video from six years ago.
	I linked you before for sure." Finboy, you saw, I played that.
	I think it was not yesterday because I didn't go live yesterday, other than the sidebar.
	Other than the sidebar.
	I had a great two-hour sidebar last night.
	I talked about that on Tuesday.
	That was a hilarious, hilarious video of a CGI Chinese panda teabagging Justin Trudeau in the face.
	Gross.
	Disgusting.
	And shall, you know, live on forever.
	Okay.
	What do we do here?
	I guess we can...
	Look, I don't like talking about the Palestinian stuff.
	The whole Palestine war is the most divisive.
	You talk about fracturing fractures among...
	We no longer live in a world where you can say, okay, we will agree to disagree on that.
	And still, you know, be aligned on the other stuff, which is equally important for us to be aligned on.
	Now it's like people have adopted this bullshit litmus test that it's all or nothing when it comes to not just alignment, but interactions.
	Social media has...
	And I'm not...
	Look, I'm also not innocent of this.
	I look back at some tweets and I say, yeah, you probably could have...
	You could have avoided the F-bomb or you're just being a jerk for the sake of being a jerk with people who I think deserve it.
	I'm not innocent of it.
	But what it's resulting in now is things like fracturing within people who are on the same team.
	And it's not to say they should always be on the same team.
	You could branch off and you could agree like, okay, we disagree on something so fundamental, we're no longer on the same team.
	But we're beyond that.
	So there was the story of the...
	I hate framing these things this way.
	It was a Jewish protester who got shoved.
	We didn't know the details.
	Got shoved, fell back, hit his head, died.
	And then there were people saying...
	First of all, I don't like people rage-tweeting.
	Look how terrible this is.
	People saying, don't tweet yet.
	We don't know at all what happened.
	And then they get accused of being sympathizers or whatever.
	Yeah, I've now thoroughly adopted the wait before sharing, double check, and even then maybe just avoid it.
	So the guy is a pro-Israel, or at least he's protesting.
	He's at a protest, he's at a march, whatever.
	Gets allegedly shoved by an alleged pro-Palestinian protester, falls back, hits his head, ends up dying of a brain hemorrhage.
	I had to go to Fox News.
	Apologize, Fox.
	They've made an arrest.
	So pro-Palestinian, this is the new dichotomy, although probably accurate enough for all intents and purposes.
	Pro-Palestinian protester arrested in death of Jewish man Paul Kessler.
	Ventura County College professor Loay Al-Naji has been charged in the California man's death.
	You watch videos of people hitting their head.
	People don't understand this.
	This is why you don't punch people if you absolutely can avoid it, even if they deserve it, because you don't even have to break someone's jaw in order for them to stumble, fall back, hit their head, and you're going to jail for a long time.
	If you need to see any videos of people smashing their heads just from tripping, just from falling, just from one punch in the face and getting knocked out and then whacking their head on the ground.
	More often than not, the death, the serious injury comes not from the getting knocked out cold from one shot, but the limpness with which they fall back on the ground and their head whacks on the pavement.
	I mean, you've seen it in the UFC, except there...
	More often than not, you know, sometimes it doesn't happen all the time.
	They still got like two inches or three inches of bounce in the floor.
	There's no bounce on pavement, which means that the only bounce you're going to get for cushioning is going to be your brain knocking up against the back of your skull, which is probably going to crack.
	So don't fight!
	For God's sakes.
	I mean, it's the last resort, not the first resort.
	Police have arrested pro-Palestinian California college professor in the death of the Jewish man, Paul Kessler, at concurrent pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian demonstrations on November 5. I'm not yet through the Dave Smith versus Laura Loomer debate.
	I've watched enough to think I know what I think of it.
	Get to it afterwards.
	Loai Abdel Fattah Al-Naji, 50, was taken into custody, charged with involuntary manslaughter and jailed on a million-dollar bail per ventura.
	We're not providing any additional information at this moment in time.
	However, there will be additional information released later today.
	This was today.
	I mean, it's straight up out of V for Vendetta, you know, escalation, escalation, someone does something, and then it's just going to set off the fire in this tinderbox.
	Investigators with the department allege that Al-Najji caused Kessler, a 69-year-old pro-Israel protester, To knock his head onto the concrete when he fell, which resulted in brain hemorrhaging that would kill him hours later in the hospital.
	Okay, we got this.
	Do we want to see this?
	Do we want to read this?
	What is this?
	I'm looking for those who are listening.
	It says the suspect arrested in Paul Kessler.
	This is the press release.
	Whatever, we can get to that later.
	I'll see if it's anything interesting.
	Although previously obtained warrant to search on Najee's vehicle and home.
	They detained the suspect for hours.
	They had insufficient evidence to carry out an arrest.
	It's unclear what new evidence led to Al-Najji's arrest.
	Maybe there's video that they have.
	I didn't see the video.
	In the weeks preceding his arrest, some witnesses have told Fox News that the pro-Palestinian protester struck Kessler with his megaphone.
	An autopsy carried out by Ventura medical examiner showed minor adhesions to his mouth, in addition to swelling to his brain that killed him.
	Department wrote that they're still crowdsourcing photos and video from 3 and 4 p.m.
	The intersections, yada, yada, yada.
	Al-Najji is a full-time professor teaching computer science at Ventura County.
	One way or the other, if it was innocuous shoving, or sorry, if it was an innocuous contact, his life is ruined.
	If it was a deliberate contact, but he had absolutely no intent of making this man fall and hit his head and die, his life is ruined.
	If it was deliberate, but he didn't want to kill him, just wanted to shove him, His life is ruined.
	And if you wanted to kill him, his life is ruined.
	And is the other man's life over?
	Stupid conflicts.
	And I hate the idea that it's pro-Palestine or pro-Israel when really it should be anti-Hamas and pro-peace.
	I mean, that's basically the way it should be broken down.
	People seem to be ignoring the fact that the Palestinian people are as much victims of Hamas terror as they are victims of a number of other issues.
	Anyhow, but that's it.
	I won't get pulled.
	So that's it.
	That's the update.
	The man's arrested.
	More likely than not, if we're just hypothesizing as to what happened, it wasn't bumping shoulders by accident as he was trying to cross the street.
	Might have been an innocuous shove.
	Might have get my bullhorn in your face.
	The man trips over his feet.
	Hits his head.
	Dead.
	Two lives ruined directly and indirectly more, including their family.
	Okay, but while we're on the...
	While we're on the subject, I got into, not a tiff, but rather an exchange with Pierce Morgan on Twitter.
	Okay, I'll read the tweet so that I don't get accused of editorializing.
	And we'll watch it, because we'll watch it for the sake of understanding.
	Pierce Morgan says, Okay, whatever.
	Superstition.
	After Jeremy Corbyn refused to call Hamas a terror group, his brother says October 7 was a, quote, false flag, end quote, operation planned by the Israeli government.
	Disgusting anti-Semitism.
	My flags go off.
	I mean, let's just say, let's say you consider it morally reprehensible to refer to it as a false flag operation, and I'm quoting Pierce here, but planned by the Israeli government.
	To go from there...
	In as much as you find that idea offensive to saying disgusting anti-Semitism, I mean, what is it if you accuse the American government, the US government, of having partaken in a false flag?
	I mean, is that anti-white?
	Is it anti-Christian?
	Is it just anti-American?
	Is it even anti-American?
	Or is it just, yeah, governments do shitty things?
	The idea that you can easily, obviously, and understandably accuse the US government of False flag operations.
	And it would not be reflexively any sort of anti-anyism or obia or whatever.
	But the second you do this with the Israeli government, it becomes that.
	Flags start going off.
	But then I also had to hear what Jeremy Corbyn's brother had to say.
	At first, I must say, I thought it was Noam Chomsky.
	Whose also gets the accusations every now and again.
	And whose politics I don't agree with, but still listen to sometimes.
	This is what Jeremy Corbyn's brother had to say.
	What was your initial reaction on the 7th of October when Hamas invaded Israel?
	What did you think?
	What did you feel?
	Well, I was suspicious from the start because the gates were clearly opened for soldiers, whatever they were, to come in.
	Suspicious from the start is, I mean, anybody not suspicious of everything these days hasn't learned anything from the last four years.
	They let the gates open.
	They left the gates open.
	Admittedly, it's an easy...
	Perspective to have when you're playing Monday morning quarterback, but thus far, not only not anti-Semitic, thus far, these seem to be legitimate queries.
	And, you know, then they were let out.
	So the whole thing, whatever happened, was done with the connivance of the government of Israel or even, well, they used what happened as a pretext.
	It was a prepared thing.
	And people died as a consequence because of the...
	The Israeli government wanted to allow it to happen.
	By the way, the ultimate irony here is you got Piers Morgan calling Corbyn an anti-Semite for floating this idea.
	You're going to have other people calling Corbyn a Zionist propagandist for even legitimizing the idea that people were killed.
	There are people out there who still think it was a lie about the number or whatever.
	A lie, not just mistaken accounts.
	But this is like when we talk about the ultimate fracturing of everything.
	You're going to have people who are going to potentially accuse Corbyn of now repeating Zionist propaganda as relates to the deaths, the murders, the terrorist attack that occurred in the first place, although he doesn't seem to call it a terrorist attack.
	Do I understand correctly you're saying it was basically a false flag operation?
	Yes, it was a false flag operation.
	This is where I've had the disagreement, respectful with some people, that people think false flag means...
	It necessarily and only that the government of the purported victim is the one that carried out the purported attack.
	People think that that's the only iteration of a false flag where I, and people can agree or disagree with me, will say that there's a spectrum and multiple iterations of what false flag could possibly mean.
	Ranging from it never happened whatsoever and it's an outright lie used as the pretext.
	To the most traditional false flag, which would be like the Nazis setting up the attack of the radio station back as the pretext to get into World War II.
	Killing Polish soldiers, bringing the Polish soldiers in, dressing them in Nazi uniforms, and then saying the Poles killed the Nazi soldiers, and so we need to go invade Poland.
	That's the second iteration.
	And then the third iteration...
	Could be, you know, a lee hop, me hop, let it happen on purpose, made it happen on purpose type thing where it happened and through inaction was allowed to be exacerbated.
	You could have that type, which I think fits into false flag.
	Or you could have the outright let it happen on purpose.
	And then you can have it happened, but exaggerate the gravity of it for the pretext.
	There's a number of iterations of false flags here that it doesn't mean they did it themselves and blamed it on somebody else.
	Maybe that doesn't make sense.
	Operation on that day was agreed by Israel at the highest level because they let in these soldiers.
	They knew the soldiers were going to kill people.
	Where I would take egregious issue with Corbyn right now is referring to Hamas terrorists as soldiers.
	I think that's what he means.
	There were also fake stories about baby beheadings, which didn't happen.
	So it's a bit like, say, the Pearl Harbor.
	The American government knew it was going to happen, allowed the Japanese planes in, knew some of their sailors would be killed and ships sunk, but they would get out of it the ability to join the war.
	And that's what they did.
	So here, the excuse was, it was an excuse, a pretext to launch this genocide attack.
	This thing they did on the 7th of October was clearly something which they'd been either tricked into or paid to do or whatever.
	I mean, I don't know who this man is on a personal level.
	He might very well be a vitriolic anti-Semite conspiracy theorist nutcase.
	It doesn't mean that he's always unnecessarily wrong on everything.
	Right, he's saying...
	Either tricked into is obvious.
	I mean, they had to have been tricked into it even on the most charitable interpretations of how it could have happened.
	It was time to prepare for this genocide and to get the oil under Gaza.
	I see you've seen these posters.
	Oh, hold on.
	The oil under Gaza.
	I'm going to have to double check that.
	You might also just be wrong on a great, ignorant oil under Gaza.
	Oh, maybe, I don't know, maybe they mean a pipeline or something.
	Okay, doesn't matter.
	Of Israeli hostages around London, and I assume you know that many of them are pulled down, you know, almost a majority of them are pulled down within 24 hours.
	Why do you think that is?
	Because people support Palestine, and they see that as opposition to Palestine and propaganda.
	Why is it that they see, you know...
	Well, I think...
	Look, what are these hostages?
	Now, listen, just go back to the 7th of October, right?
	What happened?
	The gates are opened, these soldiers, or maybe they're not soldiers, they're paid operatives, I don't know, go in, collect people, and they let them out.
	It sounds like he's referring to the Hamas terrorists as soldiers, which that will be a big problem for a great many people, and understandably so.
	Unless he's suggesting that they were dressed like soldiers, which is some of the information that has come out, is that they were wearing IDF soldier uniforms, unless that's what he means.
	Otherwise, if he, like his brother, is incapable of properly referring to designated terrorist organizations and those who carry out the terrorist attacks for those designated terrorist organizations as terrorists as opposed to soldiers, yeah, we'll have a problem there.
	These hostages are an hour or two later.
	Well, that's done in an arranged way.
	So maybe these hostages are not really hostages.
	Some of them might be.
	Some of them might be just, okay, we're going to be hostages today.
	You know, a fake operation.
	I don't know.
	But a big aspect of that thing on the 7th of October was fake.
	It was organized.
	It was controlled.
	I'm not sure.
	Some of those ideas are offensive.
	If that were said about the American government, about, let's just say, 9-11.
	Many people said it.
	You wouldn't reflexively jump to any sort of identity politics dismissal of idea.
	You'd call them a conspiracy theorist nutcase, and then who knows over the next 20 years how many of those what-ifs panned out to be true.
	But I disagree with Piers Morgan in reflexively writing off all those questions as evidence of anti-Semitism, though it might be there with that man in particular.
	This is part of the social media world of just dismissing people.
	So as to avoid addressing any of their ideas.
	Now, you can dismiss people once they have proven that they are, in fact, just terrible, wrong, and stupid.
	Get over here!
	But that requires a high threshold of evidence, persisted over an extended period of time, and even then, you know, you can dismiss the person, but then don't dismiss the ideas just by...
	With the cheap one-offs to not have to address them.
	Yo, yo, what up?
	Oh, look at that.
	How do I catch it?
	Pudge TV.
	I catch Pudge TV just randomly.
	Oil in Gaza.
	Aha, says Honor234.
	I imagine what he's referring to is not natural resources in the ground, because as far as I understand, that would be a wildly stupid thing for him to have suggested.
	But maybe something about a pipeline.
	I have heard some discussion of hypothesizing as to what the long-term objective would be if it were either nefarious from the get-go or exploitive as a result of the terrorist attack.
	The pipeline, I have heard.
	But oil under Gaza, I have not heard.
	So that's it.
	Followed by taking advantage of the tragedy, Mel Belfort.
	Yeah, that might fit into a false flag.
	Variation.
	And so that's it.
	I just wanted to play that.
	I had a little back and forth with peers who called me, you know, delusional names and whatever.
	Of course I don't care.
	I have been called a great many names and I will continue to be called a great many names.
	All right.
	What do we move on to now?
	So that's it for the, you know, international...
	Someone's got gas, it would seem, and it's not me.
	Oh, let's come back to America for a bit.
	Leticia James.
	She's not done yet.
	Look, we'll do the update on the Trump stuff.
	There's not going to be any meaningful update on the Trump, New York, Leticia James, Judge Engelron persecution, the bullcrap trial there about the fraud.
	We've talked about it at length.
	If and when there's news on Judge Engelron, his wife, or his kid in terms of judicial corruption, we'll talk about it.
	And when there's, you know, we'll do the weekly update as to how the defense in that case is going because they started their defense this week.
	But Leticia James is on a roll.
	Look at this, guys.
	This is amazing.
	Okay.
	No video for Pepsi.
	Pepsi doesn't get a video.
	But they get an update.
	New York Attorney James.
	When was this?
	She put this up.
	No, hold on.
	I want to see the date of the tweet.
	November 15th.
	Yeah, this was yesterday.
	Okay.
	New York Attorney James.
	Attorney General.
	Leticia James.
	I'm in Buffalo to announce a historic lawsuit against PepsiCo for endangering our environment and New Yorkers' health.
	Pepsi's plastic packaging...
	Pepsi's plastic packaging.
	This is like Billy Madison.
	The pup perked up his puppy ears.
	Pepsi's plastic packaging is polluting the Buffalo River, harming our wildlife and contaminating buffalo's drinking water with dangerous microplastics.
	Alright.
	It's interesting.
	I'm trying to make sense of it.
	What the hell did I just read?
	It sounds like Leticia James is going after PepsiCo Pepsi company on the basis that they're endangering the environment because surely they have to be the ones polluting like it's them in the manufacturing process like just dumping plastics into the water but that's not really what it sounds like because what it sounds like is their packaging is harming the rivers i didn't see an allegation that pepsi was the one
	putting the plastics into the rivers and lo and behold They're not.
	Look at this.
	Oh, am I not going to be able to get it in?
	Ooh, I'm not doing that.
	Hold on a second.
	Archive, PH.
	Undoubtedly, this has been archived.
	Here.
	There we go.
	Last archive 19 hours ago.
	Let's go see what the allegations are.
	If you think that Leticia James is going after Pepsi because people are littering their products and not Pepsi, give yourself a prize.
	New York Attorney General sues Pepsi over plastic packaging.
	The alliterations here are driving me nuts.
	Leticia James claimed that the snack giant was the largest contributor to pollution along the Buffalo River, which a state survey found was contaminated with single-use plastics.
	You'll notice how dishonest liars the New York Times are still framing it.
	From the headline, it sounds like...
	And what is this?
	That's called the byline?
	The description.
	It would sound like to a normal intellectually endowed individual...
	That PepsiCo is the one responsible for the plastic pollution on the shorelines.
	That's not the case.
	Just get here.
	Okay, she's suing them.
	Fine.
	Second paragraph.
	Attorney General Letizia James said her office had found that much of the plastic waste along the Buffalo River was from the company's products.
	Much of it, by the way, it's going to turn out to be 17%.
	James is seeking unspecified damages and demanding that the company provide a remedy for the contamination in the Buffalo region caused by its products and reduce the quantity of PepsiCo's plastic packaging entering the river.
	You know, I feel like Jim Carrey out of Liar Liar.
	You're like, you know how you stop the pollution?
	Tell your citizens to stop polluting, Leticia.
	Quit breaking the law, AH!
	I won't say it because I don't want anyone to think I'm calling Leticia James an AH.
	She's also demanding that the company stop selling or distributing single-use plastic products in the Buffalo area that do not contain, quote, adequate warning levels.
	Here's one.
	Don't effing pollute, you morons.
	Oh, no, that's...
	I mean, this is...
	After they went after the gun manufacturers for people committing crimes with their products, it only makes sense you go after the producers, the businesses, for the people polluting with their products.
	I mean, imagine that.
	Oh my gosh.
	All New Yorkers have a basic right to clean water, yet PepsiCo's irresponsible packaging and marketing endanger...
	Their irresponsible packaging?
	No!
	Marketing.
	Wait until you get to the marketing.
	And I've got to read this in her voice.
	All New Yorkers have a basic right to clean water, yet PepsiCo's irresponsible packaging and marketing endanger Buffalo's water supply, environment, and public health, Ms. James said and Ms. David.
	No one is above the law.
	Just to get to the statistics part of this thing.
	Along with other companies that have committed to sustainability, PepsiCo has said it aims to make its packaging recyclable, compostable, biodegradable by 2025.
	We're not there yet.
	The company also says it wants to cut virgin plastic by 50% by 2030.
	We're not there yet.
	But Ms. James' office said the company had not followed through so far.
	Yeah, Ms. James, it ain't 2025 yet.
	In the process has contributed to public nuisance.
	We've talked about this with Robert Barnes all the time, how these public nuisance laws are abused to go after things that are absolutely either not nuisances or not the responsibility of the people they're going after, the entities.
	They surveyed 2,000 pieces of trash, wrappers, bottles, chip bags.
	PepsiCo was the largest contributor, accounting for more than 17% of identifiable trash.
	Where was it?
	There was one other part here.
	Okay, whatever.
	There was a part where they said that they've marked their packaging as being recyclable.
	Yeah.
	When a human who eats that crap puts it into a recycling bin.
	So this is the next step in going after the corporations for wrongful acts committed by citizens who should know better.
	It's the infantilizing of the citizenry.
	It's the corruption of the prosecutorial process.
	They'll go after Pepsi.
	Pepsi will pay a little fine.
	And let's talk about this.
	Leticia James will say, look at this.
	I'm a successful attorney general.
	I went after Trump and desecrated the judicial system.
	Now I went after Pepsi and they paid a $7 million, a drop in the bucket.
	Pepsi's gonna do whatever it does, increase the price of its product.
	And lo and behold, the people who were doing the pollution in the first place Oh.
	Oh.
	Or Pepsi just says, piss off, Leticia.
	I'm going to take my business out of your corrupt, urine-soaked heckhole of a state and go somewhere else.
	All you New Yorkers who work for Trump Towers, all you New Yorkers who work for Pepsi, enjoy your unemployment.
	Thank Leticia for it.
	That would probably be the better thing.
	Has it gotten bad enough yet, as Bongino always asks?
	Maybe it's got to get worse.
	Okay, so hold on just one second here.
	All right, next story of the day, people.
	Which one was it?
	Oh, Nikki Haley.
	Oh, yes.
	Okay, so Nikki Haley, by the way, has made the news.
	Oh, my goodness, has she made the news.
	And people think that they've got the ultimate gotcha.
	We'll get to the gotcha in a bit.
	I think I pulled up both clips.
	If anyone had any doubts about the uniparty nature of American politics, or what they call the, is it neocon, I think is the word, or rhino, Republican in name only, or how there are overlapping interests in both parties that cause people to think it's just two wings of the same bird flying in the same direction.
	Let's play this here.
	I think we'll get at least This is Nikki Haley on Fox News.
	When I get into office, the first thing we have to do, social media accounts, social media...
	First of all, I'm gonna stop right there.
	I appreciate people like confidence, and they like it when people don't show weakness.
	When I get into office...
	I hate it.
	Whether it's Vivek saying it, whether it's Nikki Haley saying it, whether it's Chris Christie who has 0.00 chance of getting into office, I hate it.
	It's presumptuous.
	It's not confidence.
	It's just blind stupidity and arrogance and pomposity.
	Nikki, you're not making it into the office.
	I mean, you might.
	But say, if.
	Like, just a little bit of humbleness, humility, and reasonability.
	When I get into office, I'm going to take away your rights.
	When I get into office, the first thing we have to do, social media accounts, social media companies, they have to show America their algorithms.
	Let us see why they're pushing what they're pushing.
	The second thing is every person on social media should be verified by their name.
	First of all, it's a national security threat.
	When you do that...
	National security threat!
	Everybody, give up your rights.
	It's a national security threat.
	That's it.
	Give up your rights.
	It's a health emergency.
	Give up your rights.
	It's a panic.
	Panic, panic, panic.
	National emergency, public health emergency, whatever.
	Give up your rights.
	And now they are privileges that will give back to you if and when the tyrant so chooses.
	All of a sudden, people have to stand by what they say.
	And it gets rid of the Russian person on social media should be verified by their name.
	First of all, it's a national security threat.
	When you do that...
	All of a sudden, people have to stand by what they say.
	And it gets rid of the Russian bots, the Iranian bots, and the Chinese bots.
	And then you're going to get some civility when people know their name is next to what they say.
	And they know their pastor and their family member is going to see it.
	It's going to help our kids and it's going to help our country.
	There will be some accountability when people can only speak if they choose to dox themselves.
	Now, it's so wildly unconstitutional.
	It's so wildly irresponsible.
	And it shows a degree, not just of stupidity, but I'd say corruption, when they've seen what happens when donor IDs, donor information gets doxed.
	The government goes after them.
	It's like she learned nothing from Obama's scandal about sicking the IRS on people who contributed to certain political causes.
	But it's like, it's what she wants.
	It's what they all want, is they want to know every aspect, however intimate, of your life so that you are not free to do anything.
	She learned nothing from January 6th.
	I mean, jeez, I was going to say, I don't want people to think I'm being glib about it.
	Imagine how much easier the FBI's job would have been had all those, had everyone on Twitter been forced to identify themselves from the get-go.
	My goodness.
	They could have 10,000 people in jail.
	They could just, hey, go up to your front door and...
	There's not accountability, actually.
	It's a very interesting thing.
	Someone raised the argument that the Federalist Papers were written under anonymity.
	I think that was Roger Stone yesterday in the episode of Unusual Suspects.
	I don't know that as a fact.
	I'm just going to presume that it's true because the source is decent.
	They wrote the Federalist Papers under anonymity.
	It didn't make them less...
	What's the word I'm looking for?
	It didn't make them more irresponsible.
	It didn't create more accountability.
	It didn't create less accountability to do it anonymously.
	Sometimes, in fact, if you're not free to say things anonymously, it will create the absolute inverse of accountability.
	It will create self-imposed censorship.
	You will actually have people not speaking out in any way, shape, or form for fear of obvious, clear reprisals, government or otherwise, or leaks, so that everybody can find out Where the individual lives.
	Okay, well, it's only for Twitter to know.
	Yeah, right?
	And when you donated to the trucker convoy in Canada, it was only for, you know, GoFundMe or Give, Send, Go to Know until there's a hack and then they leak it and then you get your vigilante psychopaths on the internet saying, oh, well, now I know where that person lives and I know who said what and I want to find them and I don't like what they said.
	It's crazy.
	It's delusional.
	It's unconstitutional.
	And she didn't just say it once.
	She said it twice.
	Let me see here.
	I have the other one.
	Here, this is the other one.
	It wasn't an accident.
	It wasn't a flub.
	They need to verify every single person on their outlet.
	And I want it by name.
	I want it by name.
	You know what else I hate?
	I hate the presumptuousness of saying...
	When I become president, I also hate when people who are on a team, or supposed to be on a team, say I. I used to work in shoe sales.
	And they would say, do you have a size 7?
	I'd say, let me go see what we have in the back.
	It always drives me a little bit nuts.
	It's a quirk when someone says, I have size 7 and 8. No, no.
	This is not, you know.
	I want everybody's name.
	It's a form of control and domination.
	I want to know who you are and where you live.
	I'm sorry, Nikki.
	Some people might not want you to know what their name is and where they live for the purposes of being able to talk.
	And I want it by name.
	What about Smug?
	Does he qualify?
	I've provided them with my government.
	If Smug is on your driver's license, then look, you can put Smug in parentheses, but I want everybody's name.
	I want everybody's name.
	All of them!
	I'm picturing like Gary Oldman here.
	I want him.
	Now, let me see if I can find the tweet.
	Trump...
	Let me see here.
	Some people thought they had a bit of a gotcha moment because in 2023...
	Sorry, in 2013, Trump put out a tweet.
	Let me see if I can find it real quick.
	Trump put out a tweet in 2013, seemingly saying the same thing, except it was a little bit different for reasons which we'll get into.
	Here we go.
	I got it right here.
	Okay, here it is.
	Bring it up, people.
	Look at this.
	Trump's a hypocrite.
	If anybody's complaining about Nikki Haley saying it, well, you should know that Trump said the exact same thing, and therefore you have a double standard where you'll forgive Trump for everything that you'll hold against other people, and you have political and ideological inconsistencies.
	because look what Trump wrote in May of 2013: "It should be mandatory that all haters and losers use their real name or identification when tweeting.
	They will no longer Oh my goodness!
	That sounds exactly like what Nikki Haley said.
	If you are a politically disingenuous individual who wants to pretend that A, Trump is not being mildly facetious with this tweet, and B, that even if he did believe it, The world of 2013 was a different galaxy from the world of 2023.
	Trump hadn't become president yet.
	Trump hadn't seen the way all the institutions can be weaponized.
	I suspect he was being more glib than serious here anyhow by saying all of the haters and losers and not all of social media users.
	It's like, hey, you guys want to take...
	Pot shots at me?
	You wouldn't be so brave if you had, if your name and face and address...
	Yeah, well, no shit.
	They obviously wouldn't.
	Maybe for good reasons.
	Like Mike Tyson said, there's no consequence for being an idiot on social media.
	In real life, you gotta worry about getting punched in the face.
	Above and beyond making that point, I think Trump was being probably more facetious than serious here.
	And one way or another, the world has changed a little bit in the last 10 years to the point where even if Trump did believe this in 2013, Methinks he doth not believe it in 2023.
	But she's saying it as a matter of policy.
	When she becomes president, I mean, look, my face and name is out there.
	I still don't want people knowing my cell number, address, social security number.
	There are levels of the information that you are comfortable even allowing having corporations to have.
	Anybody who wants to have one of those...
	Bitcoin or digital currency trading things.
	You've got to show passport, government IDs in order to get paid.
	Anybody who wants to do any of those gambling websites.
	But this is what she wants for the ability to use social media as a matter of policy.
	And she thinks that she is going to become president.
	Talk about reading the room wrong.
	I just saw a big red thing.
	A new member.
	Ooh.
	Ooh, look at you.
	See, I can't.
	I'm going to have to let the folks at Rumble know.
	I can't read this.
	Uncle Pudge is now a monthly supporter.
	Oh, that's PudgeTV.
	Okay, cool.
	PudgeTV, welcome to the channel.
	The red on black, either I'm getting older or I can't read that font.
	Either way, I'm going to let him know.
	While we're here, FinboySlick says, you look at what happened during the Whitmer, and to think governments do not infiltrate their adversaries and steer them in strategic ways is pretty...
	It's not naive, it's delusional.
	I mean, how many acts of entrapment do we need to see before we can fully appreciate that, unfortunately, you can't trust the institution?
	There's a lot of good people in the FBI and there are no doubts.
	Once you realize that there are certain pervasive problems that are so toxic is the bad word, they undermine the institution as a whole.
	There are some acts which are so egregious, it's sort of the poison jellybean theory.
	Like, okay, well, there's only one poison jellybean in there.
	I'm not taking anything out of that jar.
	So there might be a lot of good field workers in the FBI who do good work, who are absolutely repulsed by what's going on.
	Once you understand the degree to which they infiltrated, and arguably, but not arguably, because two of them were acquitted, entrapped some of the defendants in the Whitmer kidnapping.
	Infiltrated and arguably steered the Proud Boys, if not outright fabricated, the nonsense for the seditious conspiracy.
	The Oath Keepers.
	You know, some of the post-9-11 plots.
	Once you understand they've done this, they do this and they will continue to do this, it's not naive to pretend they don't.
	It's delusional.
	Okay, get me Rogers and we got that one.
	You look what happened during Whitmer.
	Taiwan got Trudeau.
	Okay, we got that there.
	And then we got Eco Pius.
	She wants to know who everyone is to hold them accountable.
	When are the politicians being held accountable for their lies?
	They aren't.
	They're already verified.
	What was it that I just read that the Pentagon couldn't fail its audit again?
	Which one was it that failed its audit?
	Hold on a second.
	I think it failed its audit.
	Failed audit.
	Again, I think it was the Pentagon.
	Look at this.
	It's just unbelievable.
	The citizens are held to the law and the politicians are above it.
	I don't know what stars and stripes are, so maybe this is all a propagandist outlet, but I don't think it is.
	Where was the headline?
	This was not a surprise.
	Pentagon again fails annual audit of $3.8 trillion in military assets.
	Why would they be able to account for it?
	I mean, if I fail my annual accounting, I get fined, pay interest, and some people go to jail for failing their own audit.
	Government?
	Well, we better create a committee to look into why they failed their audits and fund them with a billion dollars.
	And then we're going to audit the company.
	We're going to audit the entity that's supposed to audit.
	The Pentagon has again failed its independent annual audit mainly because defense officials could not provide auditors with enough information to form a full accounting evaluation.
	What other reason would there be to fail an audit?
	Well, we failed the audit mostly because we failed to provide the information required for the audit.
	Flipping geniuses.
	Auditing the department's $3.8 trillion in assets and $4 trillion in liabilities is a massive undertaking.
	All right, here I got a simpler idea.
	Reduce your budget, reduce your assets.
	That'll make it simpler.
	Pentagon Comptroller Mike McCourt said, but the improvements and changes we are making every day as a result of those audits positively affects every soldier, sailor, airman, marine, guard, DOD.
	Hundreds of independent auditors examine the Pentagon's books each year to determine whether it can account for the money it's given and how effectively the military is spending it.
	There are three possible audit ratings.
	An unqualified opinion, a qualified opinion, and a disclaimer of opinion.
	Consolidated, this is so amazing.
	We can't do it.
	We got too much to audit.
	Oh my goodness.
	They got too much to audit.
	Over-evaluate an asset, however.
	We'll take a court of a billion dollars.
	Allegedly overvalue an asset.
	Oh my goodness.
	Jail.
	Treat their inability to audit their assets the way you would treat a citizen who provides a false tax return or an incorrect tax return.
	No, of course not.
	No one's above the law, except the government.
	Consolidated 23rd Yada, which is overall accounting of the defense, Yada Yada, gave a disclaimer of opinion, which means the Pentagon couldn't give auditors enough financial data to allow them to form an opinion.
	Nothing better than that.
	An unqualified or clean opinion is the highest possible ratings, and a qualified opinion is an acceptable rating.
	Both being the auditors were given enough information to make a complete judgment.
	This was the sixth year of progress towards an unmodified opinion.
	One year.
	One year, we'll get it.
	Hmm.
	One of the...
	29 components.
	Stand alone on it.
	7 received unmodified opinions.
	1 received a qualified opinion.
	18 received disclaimer opinions.
	This is phenomenal.
	Pentagon said the remaining 3 component opinions are pending.
	Okay, whatever.
	How long does this go on for?
	Ugh!
	Let's just read.
	The Pentagon said Wednesday that significant progress was made across five areas in 2023.
	Workplace modernization, workforce modernization, business operations, quality decision making, reliable networks, and enhanced public confidence.
	Quote, for example, the Department of the Air Force has deployed a total of 65 automated systems, saving approximately 429,000 labor hours and improving the audibility of business practices, the Pentagon said.
	Still can't do it, though.
	Oh, it doesn't matter.
	Okay, you can go read this for yourself.
	But yeah, that was just a fun tangent.
	Oh, lordy, lordy, lordy.
	Here we go.
	There's the link, everybody.
	Let's go to the chat just for a few minutes, shall we?
	See what's going on here.
	Round up to the nearest trillion, says B.C. Zuhai.
	Enhanced political confidence.
	Bah, good one, says Mel Bell.
	Chrissy Kingdom, there's a discussion going on that I will not get in.
	Kat Futuba, Viva, have me on as a guest.
	Well, let me go screen grab this and just see who we are in general anyhow.
	But taxation and inflation is theft, period, says Vito1327.
	Well, you know what?
	Now that you actually mention it, hold on one second.
	Now that you mention it, shameless self-promotion only because you reminded me of it.
	Where is my beautiful...
	It's my expression, and if someone else thought of it before me, well, too bad.
	I didn't know.
	We'll call it contemporaneous creation.
	Taxation is not theft.
	It's armed robbery.
	Oh, no.
	Bouncy cat.
	I passed over it.
	I passed over it.
	Here it is.
	Oh, yes.
	That would look good on a car.
	If I could...
	Okay, I seem to have ordered it.
	Well, I'll get it anyhow.
	Taxation isn't theft, it's armed robbery.
	VivaFry.com.
	Okay.
	Man, oh man, it never ends.
	Okay, what else we got?
	There were a couple more stories here before we head on over to VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
	Oh, this will be all...
	Oh!
	Okay, we're going to play it out with a fun video, but this is going to be one where I have to express how stupid this all is.
	Especially, you know, bringing it back to the...
	The protester who was shoved hits his head and dies.
	To have people acting like this in congressional hearings, I know it must feel good in the moment or you think it feels good in the moment.
	It's going to look stupid for an eternity.
	I happen to like this guy.
	Senator Mullen, his name is Mark Wayne Mullen.
	And I was looking him up because...
	No lie with Brian Taylor Cohen, this guy on Twitter, he's a pathological liar, oddly enough, put out a tweet, and it was a still image of Mullen seemingly ducking below the chairs in Congress on January 6th, and BTC, no lie with BTC, whatever the hell his Twitter handle is, says, oh, you weren't such a strong man then.
	I looked into that a little bit.
	I might tweet about it this afternoon, but this was the comment.
	That went viral yesterday.
	The exchange that went viral yesterday with something funny.
	Pretends like he's self-made.
	What a clown.
	Fraud.
	Always has been.
	Always will be.
	Now, this apparently is Senator Mullen reading a statement from the union boss who has a very, very funny Twitter handle.
	It's something SOB.
	His name is O 'Brien.
	We'll get to that in a second.
	So he's reading a statement from this man who they have a history because five months ago, the union boss apparently was running his mouth and insulting Senator Mullen and his integrity.
	Quit the tough guy act and these Senate hearings.
	You know where to find me.
	Any place, any time, cowboy.
	Sir, this is a time, this is a place.
	So stupid.
	You want to run your mouth.
	We can be two consenting adults.
	We can finish it here.
	Okay, that's fine.
	Perfect.
	You want to do it now?
	I'd love to do it right now.
	Well, stand your butt up, then.
	You know what's really annoying?
	They make Bernie Sanders the one who's raising the legitimate point.
	You're a senator, for goodness sake.
	And this is stupid.
	By the way, by all accounts, Mullen would wipe the floor.
	Not that it matters.
	Apparently Mullen was a competitive wrestler.
	Would destroy.
	Mr. SOB, whose name is something O 'Brien.
	I'll look for his Twitter handle.
	It's so stupid all of this.
	It's all stupid.
	Should not have been done.
	Makes for fun stuff.
	Teamster SOB is his Twitter handle.
	I mean, he obviously did it on purpose.
	I think.
	His Twitter handle, Fighting for Workers, is a full-contact sport.
	Proud fourth-generation Teamsters.
	Everything I know about the Teamsters, I learned from Homer Simpson on The Simpsons.
	Making this influential union bigger, faster, stronger.
	Sean and Joey's dad, Nanny's son.
	Teamster, S-O-B.
	Had to have been done on purpose.
	It was.
	I mean, it obviously was.
	All stupid.
	Especially in conjunction with the fact that...
	Consenting adults, there's only a certain level of assault that one can consent to if American law is anything like Canadian law.
	It's funny, but it's stupid.
	With that said, fake civility has kept us in the Uniparty for decades, says Garborg.
	He was an MMA fighter, says Dragon45.
	Okay, I didn't know about that.
	Oh, so all that to say, by the way, during January 6th, Brian Taylor, BTC, was alleging...
	Let me bring it up here.
	I'll bring it up because otherwise I'll forget.
	I was looking for videos to contextualize the image.
	No lie.
	Let's just look at this guy.
	No lie with BTC.
	And you know what you're going to get is going to be a lie.
	Here we go.
	This is the tweet.
	Give me a second.
	I'll bring this up.
	It's like, you know, the People's Party.
	Not the People's Party is a bad example.
	That's why people say the People's Party of Canada shouldn't have named themselves the People's Party of Canada because these names are always counterintuitive.
	But no lie with BTC.
	You're going to get a lie.
	This is what no lie had to say.
	This was tough guy Mark Wayne Mullen on January 6th while, quote, peaceful tourists were invading the capital.
	Not so tough then, was he?
	This is why if you're going to troll someone on the internet, You better make sure you're not an idiot.
	And Brian Tyler Cohen, at no lie with BTC.
	You're an idiot.
	I mean, this guy's, this is a pure propaganda account.
	But I went to look up this, you know, see if I could find the video from which this still was taken.
	Or, you know, more context on this.
	And it actually seems that on the day of, Mullen...
	He was actually one of the only senators to remain in Congress until everyone else got out.
	He was one of the senators who actually approached some of the protesters and confronted them on what they were doing, saying, "Is this worth getting shot over?" He was actually one of the senators who, immediately after the events of January 6th, gave an interview in which he identified or said, "I firmly believe that there were agitators within the crowd who..." I don't know if they were paid or not, but they were clearly agitators because they were the ones stirring up the crowd.
	He was the one who was present when Ashley Babbitt was shot dead point blank by Lieutenant Byrd.
	And I didn't want to make the joke because I don't think it's something that should be made into a joke.
	I don't know if he's ducking because he just heard the bullet that killed Ashley Babbitt go off, but he was there when it happened.
	So Brian...
	Cohen, Tyler Cohen.
	No lie with BTC.
	Not only does it seem that you're wrong on the bravery and heroism of Mullen, you might be highlighting the fact that the only reason Mullen might have been ducking behind the chair is because Lieutenant Byrd was summarily executing Ashley Babbitt point blank by shooting her in the neck.
	I don't care that he was absolved of any blameworthiness for what he did.
	So, good point.
	You're an idiot.
	You highlighted the opposite and you proved that you're a liar.
	To be expected with No Lie with BTC.
	Okay, well, I think that's done.
	We're going to play us out with a video that's going to make you very, very irritated.
	It's more TikTok crap.
	I mean, TikTok is the stuff that makes you go nuts.
	Oh, this is Pleb the Reporter.
	This is Pleb the Reporter doing more journalism.
	Truck Driver Pleb.
	At Truck Driver Pleb.
	Follow him.
	He's funny and does good work, even if he, you know, takes the piss out of the PPC and PPC support as People's Party of Canada.
	Remember this picture?
	This is the dude who is posing with Justin Trudeau now, who apparently is also posting videos on the TikTok world of indoctrinating your children.
	People saw the video.
	It was one of those, I think it was a libs of TikTok type thing where they said, like, these are the people teaching your kids in school, indoctrinating them, and then, you know, people, the internet is what it is.
	You don't need to have everyone's name, face, and address for accountability.
	Oftentimes, the internet just sorts that out for them.
	I'll play you the video.
	And let me see, is it a TikTok video?
	I think it was a TikTok video.
	Either way, I'll play you the video of this individual announcing how he's proud to indoctrinate your children, and then lo and behold, yep, he's also a Trudeau sycophant, so it all makes sense.
	I will play us out with this, and while we watch this piece of nauseating video, I will send everybody the link to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Before we get it started, I will thank you all for being here.
	Days of today, Thursday.
	I may or may not go live tomorrow.
	It's been a very long week.
	And I think Eric Hunley and Freeform...
	It's not Freeform Friday.
	It's America's not until...
	Whatever.
	Eric Hunley might be live at noon and I think he wants me to come on.
	So I think I'll go on with Hunley at noon and the gang.
	Sunday night, we're going to have our show.
	This afternoon, when the kids are back from school, I'm going to go out and make a magnet fishing video with my child.
	We tried to make one the other day.
	It was uneventful.
	And so...
	We're going to try again.
	The weather's beautiful.
	I want to find, like, I don't know.
	I want to find something interesting.
	Dragging a super powerful magnet through the canals of Florida.
	So, I'm going to do that.
	So, if I'm not live tomorrow, but I probably will because I can't help it, one way or the other, Sunday night is going to be amazing.
	If you want to support us, vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Come join the community.
	Viva Fry for merch.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	You know what to do.
	That said, here, hold on one second.
	Here's the link.
	To locals, where we will have the after party for 20-30 minutes to cover some stuff there and have some fun discussion.
	So, all that to say, thank you all for being here.
	If you're not coming over to Viva Barnes, enjoy the day.
	Thank you for accompanying me through this therapy session.
	I guess we'll call it Viva therapy.
	It's as much therapy for me as it is for you, I hope.
	Or at least I should say, it is as much therapy for me as I hope it is for you.
	Making sense of the world and trying not to lose all faith in humanity in the process.
	With that said, enjoy losing faith in humanity.
	Oh, enjoy losing a little bit of faith in humanity.
	It's always in the eyes, people.
	The eyes are the window to the soul.
	When someone tells you who they are, believe them.
	Actions speak louder than words, but listen to the words.
	And look into the eyes, people.
	With that said, enjoy!
	The flag behind me seems to really trigger a lot of snowflakes.
	And yes, I am your worst nightmare.
	So let's get one thing clear.
	If you have a problem that I have this flag in my classroom, stop following me right now.
	Just block me.
	Or better yet, leave a comment so I know who I can block.
	Because I will never stop supporting the rights of all individuals to be loved for who they are.
	And yes, I do teach about stuff like this in my classroom.
	Thank you for asking.
	I teach about Marxism.
	I teach about socialism.
	I teach about trans rights.
	I teach about LGBTQ history.
	I teach about black history.
	Something tells me we're going to hear about some untowardly behavior of this individual.
	Something tells me that if it makes the news, I wouldn't be shocked.
	Okay, I'm just going to leave it play out.
	I will see you all tomorrow on Twitter.
	Viva Frye.
	Rumble, Viva Frye, locals, vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	I'm heading there now.
	See you Sunday night.
	Peace out, peeps.
	I teach about the racial history of our country and the genocide that we've inflicted upon indigenous people.
	I teach about redlining and Africville and the Starlight Tours.
	I teach about the history of Sir John A. MacDonald.
	I teach about wealth and equality in Canada and the concentration of wealth in the 1%.
	I talk about the prevalence of LGBTQ and trans people in millennial and Gen Z generations and compare it to left-handedness.
	I teach about intersectionality.
	I teach about the Polytechnic Massacre.
	I teach about the Sixties Scoop.
	And do you want to know why I teach about these things?
	Because they are important and because they are related to the curriculum.
	I do not push anything on my students.
	All I do is show them the world that we live in.
	The one thing I could be argued of pushing on my students, if anything, is that we should all be loved and respected for who we are.
	And because of the courses that I teach, all of this can be connected to curriculum.
	But beyond that, in Ontario, under the Education Act...
	I'm sorry, I said I wouldn't say anything.
	I don't push anything on my kids, except for everything that I just said I push on my kids.
	I don't push anything on my kids, but if I do, it's love and tolerate everyone, unless they disagree with me, in which case block me or let me know who you are so I can block you.
	These idiots don't even understand their own ideological hypocrisy.
	There I said it.
	I'm sorry, now I'm really out.
	Enjoy the next 25 seconds of this painful, painful video.
	Teach whatever they think is beneficial to their students.
	There is obviously a boundary to that, but what I talk about in my classroom, what I do in my classroom, will not break any of the rules.
	Just because you're a triggered snowflake who can't handle gay people existing does not mean that what I am doing is by any means wrong.
	It just means that you're an antiquated dinosaur, and sooner or later, your children will think to themselves, why does my parent think that way?
	Why does my parent act that way?
	Why does my parent talk that way?
	Holy shit.
	Can you imagine the projection of intolerance?
	It's pure projection.

▲