Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 10, 2023 - Viva & Barnes

01:48:41

Live with Marco Polo - Talking Judge Engoron, Hunter Biden, and that Crazy Democrat Guy! Viva Frei

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Everybody, I don't care what you have about politics.
	I've been doing a lot of coverage of the Trump trials, particularly the New York fraud trial, where Judge Engeron came to the summary judgment as a matter of law that Trump fraudulently inflated the value of Mar-a-Lago property, which Trump evaluated at several hundred million dollars.
	This is not the video that I wanted to start with.
	and Judge Angeron basing it on the county appraiser said it's actually worth 18 to $27 million.
	So I'm gonna go do a little Viva on the street, sleuthing, journalizing.
	I'm gonna go look at this property, Mar-a-Lago, and inspect it.
	And we're gonna come to the determination together whether or not this property is worth a piddly, a mere $18 to $27 million, or closer to what Trump says it's worth, and the rest of the rational world.
	Who else?
	Just want to flash forward a little bit.
	Look at this beautiful place.
	Okay, this is not the video that I wanted to start with anyhow.
	All that I did want to say about that intro video.
	Politics aside, the new Blink-182 album is damn, damn good.
	Oh my gosh, is it good.
	I listened to it that night.
	I listened to it twice.
	I mean, I listened to it play in loop.
	What I was going to say here.
	Okay, so hold on.
	That was not supposed to be the starting video.
	By the way, if I'm lisping a little more than ordinary, sitting there telling my wife, like, Marion, I don't know why I have so many cankers right now, but I've got a few cankers in my mouth.
	And she's like, well, what have you been eating?
	It's like, I've been eating the same thing, you know, like all the stuff.
	Oh, yeah, and the kid's Halloween candy.
	I'm doing it for them.
	I'm eating their candy so they don't have to eat it.
	It's amazing.
	One week out of Halloween, and then it's like you keep biting that part of your lip and your tongue, and it's disastrous.
	Okay, everybody, good afternoon.
	Never eat.
	East Coast.
	Good morning, West Coast.
	Good evening, England.
	And top of the morning to you, Ossiland.
	That wasn't the video that I wanted to start with.
	What I wanted to start with, because it's a follow-up from yesterday, It's ridiculous.
	I know that I brought the tweet up.
	It was the video of the police state in full force.
	Let me just get it because we need to start with this.
	We went over this in detail in our Locals exclusive VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com community where there was a January Sixer who was on the loose, people.
	He's on the loose.
	He was a wild, crazy man.
	So dangerous, the police state had to pull out every element of the police state to find this clear and present danger to modern society.
	I'm going to play you this video and you're going to think it's parody.
	I mean, I was watching the video.
	I'm like, okay, this happened at January 6th.
	This is a two-year-old video.
	Oh, this video's a joke.
	No, no, this video came out, World News Tonight, ABC World News, two days ago.
	We're going to play this, and I'm going to periodically interject to link this into the police state that Dinesh D'Souza just documented in his documentary, Police State, which I watched, or which was premiering at Mar-a-Lago, the intro video.
	See, it's all a beautiful circle of life.
	Listen to this.
	Now to the urgent manhunt, 40 miles outside New York City at this hour in Middlesex County, New Jersey.
	Urgent manhunt!
	Look at this guy's face.
	This guy's like, I can't even stand the waft of my own bullshit.
	After a suspect wanted in the January 6th attack.
	A suspect wanted in the January 6th attack.
	Now he is accused of, what do they call it?
	Assault of a federal officer, AFO.
	So he's accused of assault.
	It's a serious crime.
	Urgent manhunt for a January 6th suspect.
	January 6th, 2021.
	We are heading into 2024.
	This is not a murderer.
	This is not a terrorist.
	This is a January 6th insurrectionist at best, and he's not even that.
	Evaded authorities.
	This was the scene in central New Jersey today.
	Massive police presence.
	The FBI and SWAT team called in.
	I said they were looking for a reason to execute this guy.
	Luckily, the spoiler alert and the...
	I guess the happy ending.
	He turned himself in.
	Surrendered without incidents.
	Listen to this.
	An all-out manhunt for an alleged assault on a federal officer two and a half years ago.
	Attack at the Capitol.
	Evaded arrest.
	Fleeing on foot.
	Helicopters.
	Swat.
	Rifles.
	According to USA Today, Yetman is suspect number 278 AFO wanted for assault of a federal officer, pictured at the Capitol in these photos on the FBI's website.
	In an interview earlier this In an interview earlier this year.
	I don't know if that interview is with police, with investigators, or on a podcast.
	I'm curious.
	They interviewed him earlier this year and then didn't detain him then?
	And it becomes an urgent manhunt where they flex the almighty force of the police state?
	But wait, there's an actual hilarious punchline in this.
	Yetman indicated he was at the Capitol that day, but said he did nothing wrong.
	Door-to-door.
	Can you believe this?
	Armed with long guns and canines.
	The border?
	Forget it.
	Door-to-door.
	Long rifles, canines, SWAT, tactical.
	This is a flipping joke.
	This is the funniest part of it.
	I didn't pick up on it.
	Apparently, Julie Kelly picked up on it before our locals community did, but someone in our locals community says, was that neighbor's name Stassi?
	The neighbor's name is Stassi.
	Asking questions.
	Even though the sun has gone down, we can see...
	Okay, that's all we need to see of that absolute load of crap.
	The neighbor's name is actually Stassi.
	Some people were joking.
	Maybe she was trolling the internet.
	I double-checked in as much as, you know, you can Google and find.
	Seems her last name is Stassi.
	I imagine she's Italian.
	But that's quite ironic.
	When we're witnessing the full force of the police state and we're interviewing the neighbor and her last name is Stassi.
	That is like, you know, the propaganda arm of fascistic, tyrannical regimes.
	But no, that was her real name.
	So don't anyone think that she was trolling the media?
	I didn't quite pull a Garrett Ziegler-level due diligence verification.
	But that was her real name.
	And let me just share the window here.
	What's my problem?
	Garrett, I see in the back I'm going to bring you in two seconds just to share the good news.
	They didn't kill him because he turned himself in.
	Surrenders without incident after widespread manhunt, FBI says.
	Yetman was wanted for taking part in the January 6th riot at the Capitol.
	They're going to fuck this guy's life up, that's for sure.
	Okay, standard disclaimers.
	We're going to end on YouTube in, I don't know, 15, 20 minutes.
	Go over to Rumble.
	The link to Rumble is in the pinned comment in the chat.
	For those of you who don't know me, Montreal litigator turned Floridian Rumbler.
	We start on YouTube, Rumble, and vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	We end on YouTube because it's a communist hellhole, and we go over to Rumble exclusively.
	Where we party for the rest of the stream.
	And then after I end on Rumble, I have a bit of an after party at our VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com community where we chat, I take tips, we answer questions, and it's a wonderful thing.
	So that's where we go after that.
	I'm going to bring Garrett in in two seconds.
	Now, for those of you who don't know who Garrett Ziegler is, before I do that, no medical advice, no election fortification advice.
	YouTube takes 30% of Super Chats.
	So if you want to support the channel, thank you.
	And any way you do it is wonderful, even if it's only sharing.
	Rumble takes 20% of their equivalent Rumble rents.
	For the rest of the year, they take 0%.
	So all that's beautiful.
	I see my face in the back here.
	The best way to support?
	Go to vivabarneslaw.locals.com and join.
	$7 a month, $70 a year discounted rate.
	Or people willingly choose to support with more.
	There's tons of content for everybody.
	Non-paying, non-supporting members.
	And there's tons of exclusive stuff for the supporters to show our thanks.
	So that's that.
	That's the intro.
	All right.
	Garrett, the man of the hour.
	He's shuffling papers.
	I see he's got...
	Oh my gosh.
	If you don't know who Garrett Ziegler Marco Polo is, you do.
	And if you don't, it's because you don't watch the channel.
	I've got a box of his...
	a box of his Hunter Biden memos, reports under my desk that I'm, you know, periodically giving to lucky people.
	Garrett, you ready?
	Yeah.
	He's been on once before.
	Let's make sure.
	Mic check one, two.
	you Check, check.
	Oh yeah, that's a beautiful mic.
	Garrett, how goes the battle, sir?
	Thank you for having me on.
	You know, I'm south of Chicago, and so you're going to notice that I still have bags under my eyes, but I can assure you I'm awake.
	Oh, south of Chicago.
	Yeah, so I'm in Central Time, so it's still in the morning for me.
	I hope you don't mind that I'm going to have coffee.
	It's like my own addiction.
	I drink it throughout the day.
	See, it's a weird thing now.
	I think I've gotten to a point in my life where I no longer drink coffee after the morning unless it's an iced coffee, and I've moved into energy drinks.
	No, that's good.
	My wife does iced coffee.
	I start getting headaches if I don't have caffeine, like huge migraines.
	How do you sleep?
	What's your sleep pattern like?
	Terrible right now.
	It's a point of contention between me and my lovely wife.
	I usually sleep from 3 to 9 right now, but I need to get it back to what I was at the White House, which is about 10 to 5, where I'm operating.
	I'm operating better if it's at 10 to 5. You mean 3 to 9, like 3 in the morning to 9 in the morning?
	That's entirely not a good sleep.
	Terrible.
	Watch the Joe Rogan episode on sleep, or was it Anthony Huberman?
	One of the two, Huberman.
	It might have been Huberman on Rogan.
	I don't know.
	Garrett, okay, for those who don't know who you are, just give the 30,000-foot overview.
	We're not going to do the childhood thing like we did the first time around.
	But for those who may not know who you are, the work that you're doing, who are you?
	Well, there's a commenter that's amusing right now.
	So Marco Polo is the name of our nonprofit.
	It's a C3.
	It's about a dozen guys.
	And I'm the founder of it and the face of it.
	And I've sent David a box of reports because he...
	Quite frankly, sees more people than I do.
	I'm in rural Illinois, and you're right down there by Mar-a-Lago and everything.
	And so I thought, you meet more people than I do, and I think you'd meet people that would like the report.
	And so that's what I've done.
	I've sent boxes to people who I know are fair-minded who will read this thing.
	And so I am just the founder of this research group.
	Our research group is trying to reinvent...
	What the right conceives of as opposition research.
	Our inspiration was actually Fusion GPS, but unlike Fusion GPS, we actually want to put out true stuff.
	But I realized that the right had no answer to Fusion GPS, which was like this quasi thing that nobody really understood that worked with the law firm.
	So we've actually worked with a couple of law firms, and that's what, you know, we find that a lot of lawyers are, how do we say this tactfully?
	Technologically deficient.
	And they don't know their ass from their elbow when it comes to digital investigations.
	And so we've worked with a couple of law firms researching the opposing expert witnesses, the counsel, the opposing defendants.
	In the criminal case in Fulton County, some defendants.
	And then we worked with one firm with regard to a civil case.
	And so we really do the due diligence for...
	Not only law firms, but other groups.
	When we were talking beforehand, we've had three mini stories this week.
	Just very small things.
	We had the feral leftist in Arlington.
	We had the softcore porno with the sheriff in Fulton County.
	And then we had the judge with the bonus torso photo.
	These things came up throughout the day.
	We did not plan on this.
	We just knew that, hey, We can scrape, first of all, and I know this is a long intro, but I'm talking to the guy in the comments who says you must have a time machine because that's not Marco Polo.
	You're right.
	I'm German, by the way.
	I'm not Italian, so I'm not Marco Polo.
	But that's just the name of the group.
	The judge thing, starting out with that one.
	We knew that they were going to take it down, not immediately, but pretty close after we discovered it, right?
	So before we go public with any of this stuff, there's like 12 hours of dialogue between me and my guys.
	Like, one of the dudes was examining the vein in his arm.
	It's like, are we sure that it's him, right?
	And so we went back through all 160 newsletters and looked at syntax and say, sure as shit, that is him.
	He's writing these weird, I don't even talk to people from my high school really, right?
	But he's like writing these screes to his high school and he's signing them with bonus torso photos.
	We're getting ahead of ourselves'cause we're gonna go through those three stories.
	So you do opposition research as a business, the Marco Polo 501c3 thing.
	No, no, no.
	Marco Polo is the opposition research firm.
	The reason why we have it as a non-profit is because, number one, we don't want to work with candidates themselves.
	We think that this is how Fusion GPS started putting out BS.
	When you work for candidates, you sort of...
	Lose your objectivity filter of whether or not this is actually, you know, bad or candidates will tell you, hey, really dig on this and you're digging.
	And, you know, we consider ourselves sort of digital archaeologists a bit.
	And so if you're working with a candidate, you'll be, you know, brushing off a fossil and you'll say, you know, there's really nothing there, dude.
	Like, we got to move on.
	And then the candidate will be, you know, trying to browbeat you into still digging on that.
	So it's a C3.
	We, for the first two years, Focused almost exclusively, but not exclusively, almost exclusively on the Bidens.
	And we put this out last October.
	And one other topic that we've really delved into is the Larry Ray sex cult.
	And I know you probably know of this guy named Matthew Russell Lee for Inner City Press.
	Absolutely.
	Yes, I know of him.
	He's been on the channel.
	I love that guy.
	And he covered this trial in the spring of 22 whereby this dude, Larry Ray, He got convicted or tried to be convicted.
	He basically moved into his daughter's dorm at the Sarah Lawrence College up in New York City, Westchester County.
	And he pimped out one of her friends eventually and made like $2 million off this girl.
	And the SDNY prosecutors, David, accidentally leaked the John list to the public docket.
	And it was up there for an hour.
	So all of our guys are there on pacer.
	So how do you get the notification when something goes up on pace or accidentally?
	Do you just get automatic live updates of entries?
	Well, this is a very good question because I can nerd out here.
	So there are multiple services.
	Court Listeners, that's what everybody uses.
	Even hags like Margaret Wheeler use Court Listener.
	You know that horrible human being, Empty Wheel.
	I can't even look at her.
	She uses Court Listener, and Court Listener fails sometimes, and it has a delay of a couple days or even a couple weeks.
	There's also Pacer Pro, which we subscribe to, which we find to be much more piercing and prompt.
	So every time something goes on Pacer—and this thing was only up there for an hour.
	So we were like—we were like just— We're feverishly downloading this thing because an hour later, Matthew Russell Lee gets an email and said, please delete this document.
	It was sent out in mistake.
	It's like, I don't have to follow your rules.
	So we put it up on our website, and now the names of 121 Johns.
	And you know, this is coming up again.
	The Pentagon sex trafficking ring was announced in the District of Massachusetts a couple days ago.
	And these...
	Brothels were set up right outside the Pentagon in Tyson's Corner and right outside of Harvard in Cambridge.
	And we're going to be watching that case.
	I hope to God a couple of the Johns get outed.
	So I don't know much about this.
	I mean, I know Matthew Russell Lee.
	I mean, he's been on the channel.
	He was covering the Ghislaine Maxwell trial at the time.
	Does amazing, amazing work.
	It's Inner City Press.
	Who was pimping out their daughter's friends?
	This is a bonus topic for the day.
	I just realized that I want to go on this show a lot more because I forget that you litigated for decades.
	This is very exciting to me.
	Number one, the prosecution is going down in Massachusetts.
	There are these three.
	I don't know if they're Chinese-born, but they're definitely Chinese ethnics.
	Ran a brothel.
	They're sex traffickers.
	They moved women across state lines, and they had a couple of high-end departments where they would have these women liaison with clients.
	If I may pause you there, are they Chinese nationals or Chinese?
	Are the women that they pimped?
	Both.
	The pimps were Chinese and the women, and there are multiple...
	Some people are speculating without evidence, although it's a hell of a good speculation, that these people were deliberately...
	First of all, the rates were very high, like $600 an hour.
	I mean, that's not Hunter level, but $600 is a pretty high end.
	Still cheaper than a lawyer.
	At least you're getting screwed in a good way this time.
	Sorry, that joke writes itself.
	Yeah, it does.
	$600 an hour to have sex with a woman who has sex for a living.
	Yes, and I'm looking at my clock just because I think it was Wednesday when they announced this.
	So District of Massachusetts announced this, that they were prosecuting three individuals.
	One of them was in state.
	The other had to be – the other was by the marshals in the Central District of California.
	And they were – basically had these women in sex slavery where… They would pay for the women's lodging and let them stay at the rendezvous site, at the brothel, basically, if they sold themselves.
	So they basically had these poor, objectively attractive Asian women in sexual slavery.
	And I love that the feds – this is one of the few things that they've done right probably in 2023.
	I love that the feds are going after the people running the show.
	Not going after the women.
	We make that very clear in our Biden laptop dossier.
	You go after Hunter, but even more importantly in the sex trafficking ring, go after the people making the money.
	Because that's the only way it'll kill the actual ring.
	So that is, you know, in the Larry Ray sex cult trial, two Johns got immunity.
	Randy Levinson and Stuart Pilch.
	And we put up dossiers on our website about them.
	Sent this to their wives, everything.
	Hilariously.
	Absolutely hilariously.
	One of these dudes was still on a prep military school in Houston.
	It was on the board.
	We sent it to the entire faculty in PTA.
	This dude's on your trustee board, and he's like, you gotta mutilate a sex trafficking ring in the SDNY.
	He's still on the board.
	Stuart Pilch.
	He's an accountant.
	Counts the CIA as a client, literally.
	So I hope that they gave immunity to...
	Well, I hope they don't give immunity.
	I hope a couple of the Johns get outed.
	If they have to give them immunity to testify at the trial, we're going to be making flyers about them as well.
	So that's what we do.
	We are made up of a couple private investigators, a forensic accountant, and sleuths, and...
	I imagine a community that sends you stuff that you might still not notice even despite all your...
	Totally.
	And we're constantly looking...
	What I do all day is scour OSINT GitHub pages for different plugins and different tools.
	Right now, there's this tool called Clearview AI that the enemies are using.
	To hunt down these people.
	It's very relevant.
	That video you showed at the beginning, there's no way they ID that guy without Clearview.
	And so, how do we combat...
	Marco Polo is trying to get access to Clearview somehow.
	Because then we'll know what the enemy knows.
	Because the standard commercial off the shelf...
	Facial recognition tools are good enough to track this sort of douchebag, Brendan Martin, who was screaming at that poll worker, right?
	That was an easy one.
	We got that.
	We got that guy because he stupidly had a LinkedIn photo.
	But the Clearview AI is the one that the police use, and that's tens of thousands of dollars a year.
	Real quick, this comment, is tar and feathering still legal?
	No, but it's freaking awesome.
	I suggested that on Abby Lowell.
	I love the fact that you follow the chat also.
	And starting next week, when I work out the logistics, I'm going to be using the Rumble Studio, and I'll be able to pull up all the comments from Rumble, from YouTube, when we're live on YouTube, from local.
	So here we go.
	Oh, no, that's not the right one.
	Anyway, here it is.
	Here it is.
	But, okay, Jared, actually, just before we move on to the others, or move on anywhere.
	So they accidentally posted, what, the names of the Johns, that being the clients?
	Yes, so...
	Under what context?
	Like, what is the filing that has the names of the users?
	So, this is very good.
	So I was beavering away on my Telegram channel posting about this, like, in March of 2022.
	So the setting is this.
	The SDNY prosecutors, there were three on the team, posted, were trying to post this on this sealed docket.
	So this was going to be a sealed exhibit in the upcoming trial, which was just days away.
	And the exhibit was an email that the pimped-out woman named Claudia Drury sent to her madam named Isabella Pollack.
	Isabella Pollack is now serving four years in the pen at Club Fed down in Florida, not far from you.
	And the email was a list of regulars.
	And a few others.
	And Claudia Drury had like 100 regulars.
	Two married couples are on this list.
	The wife who is the head of culture at Gap, that clothing store.
	So you basically have two married couples using a female prostitute to have threesomes with.
	And Larry Ray was profiting from it.
	It's an absolute carnival.
	It's disgusting.
	So this, they realized the power.
	So, by the way.
	All these news organizations, the Daily Mail, New York Post, ABC, they all get the list, but they're so litigation-averse, and what Marco Polo would call P-U-S-S-I-E-S, that they don't post the names.
	They just post the exhibits.
	And obviously the concern is going to be, I don't know what legal basis there could be to go after, but...
	Any individual who's on that, what was supposed to be a sealed document, his name is outed, her name is outed.
	Yes, they're two women.
	They'll sue for whatever the reason, intentional infliction of emotional distress, violation of a court order, whatever.
	We're totally in the clear because we're a publisher and we have this long history of publishing.
	And what's important is that this was never meant to be made public, which helps the authenticity of it.
	For example, this was a madam, basically.
	Mad at the prostitute saying, hey, give me a list of your people.
	It was basically the manager asking for inventory.
	So this was never meant to be made public.
	And so what we did for your listeners is we reached out to everybody.
	Who we were going to do a profile on.
	And of course, all of them told us to F off.
	And they never denied it.
	Because it was all real.
	We've made so many people delete their Twitter profiles.
	We were tagging people on Twitter back in the summer of 2022 with the list.
	I mean, it's not a concern that I have.
	But I can understand what a terror it is.
	Oh yeah, hey, I'm Marco Polo.
	I'm Garrett Ziegler from Marco Polo.
	Your name came up as a client to a prostitute on a list.
	Can you give us a comment?
	Holy crap!
	I mean, I can't imagine living with that skeleton in my closet, the fear that they must have on a daily basis, but to get the call?
	You know, our motive is very simple.
	This is not your dad's solicitation.
	We'll put it that way.
	This was a woman.
	Held in bondage.
	Her pimp got convicted unanimously in just hours of deliberation over a week's long trial that she was held against her will.
	We're not in the business of picking on every single dude who philanders.
	This was a sex trafficking operation.
	Not just my words, but liberal SDNY.
	And I guess, you know, if anyone's into it, it's different than a brothel in Vegas.
	It's different than consensual prostitution.
	So this is actual holding women captive against their will for the purposes of sex slavery.
	The comment here is, well, my next question is, are any of these political types?
	Is anybody using this as blackmail material a la the Epstein list?
	We don't know, and that's the reason for our group, our group's mission statement.
	Everybody has to have a mission statement, or at least in the 21st century they tell you to.
	It's to expose blackmail.
	So there's actually a paragraph in this report that Hunter will never admit is true, but we think it is, which is when you expose blackmail in the moment, it's sort of like pulling out a splinter.
	My two-year-old had a splinter once, right?
	So in the moment, pulling out the splinter really hurts.
	But then two minutes later, you're like, wow, I actually have some relief from this terrible splinter.
	When you reveal blackmail, it definitely brings stuff out in the immediate.
	But then those people can no longer be controlled by that material.
	It's a very interesting, nuanced idea.
	And I believe in it wholeheartedly.
	What most people do, like you were saying, David, is the coward's way out, which is they don't address it.
	They hide behind it.
	Everybody is fallible.
	Not one of these people, thank you, John, he said good analogy.
	Thank you very much.
	Maybe that's, you know, I got a little bit of wisdom from having a two-year-old.
	The only problem is now it's triggered my rabbit hole of...
	Splinter removal videos on YouTube.
	Oh yeah, there's a weird subculture about that.
	Oh, it's amazing.
	Under like the microscopes too.
	Well, they do the hair, ingrown hair removals.
	There's only so many good splinter removal videos on YouTube and there's one that's just a four-inch splinter.
	It's so, whatever.
	Okay, so the analogy is good, however, because it's true.
	Once you're outed...
	It can no longer be held against you.
	Then there's only a few alternatives left as to how they can deal with you.
	And these men and women on that list, and I'm so glad we're going into this because I've never had somebody interested in it who has any sort of huge profile.
	They don't want to touch it because it's so close to the bone.
	The reason why we've only had, we've had about a half a dozen congressmen and then Ron Johnson, the sitting senator.
	They all use our report.
	But we've only had about a half dozen congressmen and Ron Johnson talk about it.
	Talk about us explicitly publicly because I think they're just a little bit uneasy.
	This is very close to the bone.
	Remember, Hunter, he was crying literally in a deposition that I was present at about this.
	I trigger him.
	Joe would get triggered if you brought this up because it brings up people who, you know, we compare a lot of DC machinations to WWE, fake wrestling.
	If the Republicans really, really want to get serious about this impeachment inquiry, they need to get Mel Monzack, the president's power of attorney, and other people like Ted Kaufman, who are in the president's life daily, who are back there in Delaware.
	All those people are covered extensively in this report.
	So the reason why I bring that up is, you know, we're a little bit, we're a guerrilla group.
	In the sense that nothing's off limits.
	If it's true, we're not going to break laws.
	We're not going to put genitalia.
	We're not a porn site.
	There's no genitalia on our site.
	But we're going to expose the truth no matter how ugly it is.
	And that sort of alarms some people.
	Because they don't want to go too close to the bone.
	And I think that's...
	I can't live like that.
	I'm trying to pull up one good segue before we head over to Rumble exclusively.
	Because you said the word.
	Dismiss.
	Does everybody know who John Lajoie was?
	Women are stupid.
	Sorry, I'm not playing the whole thing.
	Forget it.
	Women are stupid.
	No, no, he says genitalia.
	That's the point I was going to say.
	Yeah, no, there's no genitalia on our site.
	And again...
	I don't know if any of your listeners know this, but we partially won the lawsuit from the Sugar Brother.
	The guy who's funding the son of the U.S. President, Kevin Morris, sued us in May for ridiculous stuff.
	And we filed an anti-slap motion.
	One of those got granted, meaning he owes us legal fees.
	There's no private right of action for doxing.
	He accused us of doxing.
	So ridiculous.
	All it was was a freaking real estate.
	We didn't meet any section of the statute, David.
	We didn't have malicious intent.
	There was no imminent fear of the guy's life.
	None of the elements of the statute were met.
	But he's mad at us.
	So he has a lot of money to spare, and he paid this portly man to file a ridiculous lawsuit, a bar complaint about which is forthcoming against this dude.
	But not only that, Hunter sued us in federal court in September, and that's where I'm leading with this.
	Hunter is saying that we violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and one of the statements in the lawsuit is that we invaded his privacy, that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy.
	That's ridiculous, David.
	Hunter uploaded, I think, almost a dozen videos of himself to Pornhub.
	He shattered any expectation of privacy.
	His stated goal was being an amateur porn star.
	So there's no expectation of privacy if the president's son, he had over six different pornography accounts, and we logged all of them using Archive PH.
	He really liked Star Wars.
	One of his Pornhub accounts was like Droid Hunter.
	His main Gmail account for creating the pornography accounts was droidhunter88 at gmail.com, which is the year he graduated high school.
	So the president said he has no expectation of privacy.
	I didn't upload the stuff to Pornhub.
	That was Hunter.
	They're basically saying that we're not legitimate publishers, which is ridiculous.
	We just publish things they don't like.
	Which again...
	20 years ago was what you were supposed to do.
	I was like, I'm doing what, like, muckrakers 100 years ago did.
	Okay?
	And they tried to imprison those guys 100 years ago.
	They're trying to imprison me.
	Now that you mention it, because the arguments were, to people who were publishing it, watch out for revenge porn accusations.
	Watch out for public disclosure of a private fact.
	And what you're saying sort of puts a nail on that concept, is that...
	It's not revenge porn when he posted it.
	It's not public disclosure of a private fact when he posted it.
	Yes.
	Thank you for going into that.
	You know that language.
	Revelation of a private fact.
	We talked about this internally with our lawyer for weeks and weeks.
	We were going back and forth.
	He's the one doing it.
	All we're doing, we didn't post the videos, right?
	All we're doing, just like with the sheriff, the gay sheriff down in, I think he's bisexual.
	Even with the bisexual...
	Sheriff in Florida.
	Or in Atlanta.
	We're not going out and looking at this stuff.
	This thing is still on the internet.
	Garrett, can you hear me?
	Yes, sir.
	And I'm still moving?
	Yes.
	Can you hear an annoying dog in the background?
	No, no, no, no.
	I'm just...
	My computer...
	Now I'm frozen on Jean Lajoie.
	Show me your genitals.
	Because I just wanted to make the joke.
	And if I have to reboot my flipping computer, the spinning wheel of death is spinning.
	So anyone who doesn't want to...
	I can still hear you, though, man.
	And I'm still moving.
	I'm not like frozen in an awkward position.
	You are frozen, but I can hear you.
	Oh, son of a gun.
	My golden retriever puppy is barking in the background, so I'm sorry.
	My little kid just came home.
	I'm going to give this 30 more seconds, but I might have to quit and then bring everyone back in.
	Oh, gosh, if I have to do this.
	Okay, let me just see if I can't even...
	Everybody, it's not going to kill the stream.
	I'm just going to have to reboot.
	Oh, gosh.
	Okay, everyone listening to my voice right now.
	Bear with me.
	I'm going to...
	How do I force quit on Mac?
	Control F, escape?
	I would go to the top left apple and then to the top apple at the top of the screen and then force quit.
	If I'm still on, I would just urge everyone, you can get a copy of this at bidenlaptopreport.com.
	If you want to give to our legal defense fund, it's fightbiden.org.
	Two different lawsuits we're facing.
	So ridiculous.
	just for publishing the truth.
	Good plug.
	Hey, I appreciate it, right?
	We have a couple thousand of these left.
	We've sold 12,000 copies.
	Well, look at this.
	Okay, Garrett, you can see me now, right?
	Yes.
	Okay, so while this reboots...
	It's a very colorful room.
	Say it again?
	There's like a cool hue.
	It's almost like Marco Polo.
	Well, it is...
	I got...
	Now you're going to see the backdrop here.
	We got the American flag.
	I said I was going to put it outside, but then I realized it's not the best weather for the flag to go outside.
	Okay, hold on a second.
	I'm going to do this.
	This.
	Oh, is this a pain in the neck?
	Well, when we come back...
	When we come back...
	Yeah, there's a problem.
	Your computer shut down.
	No crap.
	Computer.
	Oh, my goodness.
	Now I've got to re...
	All right, well, Garrett, while we're still good, Viva Tangent Cam, Purple Hue, and we're still good on Rumble, right?
	So, like, while this all takes a little bit of time to get back, just make sure that we're still alive.
	So, Garrett, look, we're not going to waste this time because we're still, we can still hear each other.
	What were we talking about?
	The list, oh, the public is called for a private fact.
	Yes.
	So you got sued, and then it got dismissed, and they had to pay legal fees, or at least a portion.
	Yes, a part of it has to be they have to pay a portion of our legal fees.
	Those causes of action that weren't dismissed, and this is the preliminary stage.
	There's been no discovery.
	We filed an anti-slap motion, and we're appealing the causes of actions that weren't dismissed.
	But on the one that was, he owes us legal fees because he sued us in California, and California has a strong anti-slap statute.
	Now, the federal case, yeah.
	What do those legal fees come to, give or take?
	I mean, is it a substantial sum?
	It's a substantial amount.
	The only goal with this, they know that their legal claims are ridiculous.
	That's why we're filing bar complaints.
	Their whole goal is to bankrupt me personally.
	They realize that I can't really be bought off, like I'm not a consulting type, right?
	So I can't just like, usually, that's usually what they do is like...
	Sort of weak-willed people is, if they are causing trouble, and that's what our group is doing to the Bidens, we're making them mad.
	They've hired Denver Riggleman, the failed congressman, to start a propaganda campaign against me personally.
	Midas Touch has been doing videos about me.
	And so what they'll try to do is just buy off.
	Like, find a donor.
	To give a million and then have that donor basically say, hey, wink, wink, nod, nod.
	You should try something else.
	You should go on other topics.
	You should do other things rather than go into the Bidens.
	They realize it hasn't really worked with our group, and so now they're just filing frivolous lawsuits.
	And because we want to win, we have to hire good, expensive attorneys, and that's their whole goal.
	It's a war of attrition.
	This is like 1850 Comanche, Texas Ranger war stuff in the plains.
	Who can kill more people?
	For those who don't know Midas Touch, I mean, I know of them on the internet.
	Tell people who they are.
	Well, this is also an extremely good question because they have a connection to the Biden laptop.
	Midas Touch is a group of rabid, loud, leftist lawyers and commentators, overall terrible, lying human being, pawn scum.
	One of their lawyers is named Ben Micellis.
	I'm probably botching the surname.
	But he represents a guy who's featured in the Biden laptop on May 24, 2018.
	He's going to be in the sex-related crime section.
	He's a former Secret Service agent, former special agent in charge, in fact, of the Los Angeles field office.
	This guy is named Robert Savage.
	And Ben Micellis represented him and sent a bunch of letters to the New York Post demanding retraction and threatening lawsuits.
	Because according to the Biden laptop, Robert Savage came to the aid of Hunter at the Jeremy Hotel and said, we talked about this on the first time I was on your show, come on H, this is linked to Celtics account.
	So what happened is that Hunter accidentally sent $25,000 from an account linked to Joe Biden to a Russian pimp named Golnora.
	Robert Savage, who's represented by the Midas Touch douchebag, came in and he was out of the Secret Service by then.
	So he's tried to threaten to sue these people by saying, I wasn't a Secret Service agent.
	I was retired.
	Well, he retired on April 1st, all right?
	And the incident went down six weeks later.
	But he swooped in.
	He was running cleanup.
	He is a PI.
	And head of a private security firm in Beverly Hills, he gets a call that said, hey, the infamous first son is holed up at a hotel room in Beverly Hills at the Jeremy.
	He's on crack.
	He just used Joe's account that's monitored by the Secret Service and DHS.
	That's why he said he's getting calls from D.C. every 10. So that's the Midas touch.
	And Denver Riggleman had a 10-minute long ad hominem attack laden video about my group saying just awful things about my appearance.
	He doesn't like the way I look, the way I sound.
	But guess what, David?
	There's not one correction.
	We've offered $1,000.
	for one person to find an error in this.
	$1,000.
	I made the joke the first time, excluding typos.
	Yes, excluding typos.
	It has to be a material error.
	So for a year, all we did was argue and lie Lovingly discuss with our attorneys the elements of certain federal crimes.
	Like, there's nothing in here that's accusing Hunter of a crime he didn't do.
	There's many times where we know that Hunter committed a crime, but we don't have the documentary evidence for it.
	Maybe he paid him in cash as opposed to Venmo.
	So what we do is just list out the Venmo transactions.
	This is a Russian pimp.
	Hunter Venmoed the Russian pimp this amount of money after he solicited the prostitute.
	It's all there.
	All right, now we're doing it.
	Come on over to Rumble, and I'm not pulling up the John Lajoie for what that joke was going to be worth.
	It caused a headache.
	We're going to end this on YouTube now, and we're going to get into the actual three big stories.
	It's going to be tracking down that guy who berated the Republican poll greeter, and poll P-O-L-L, not P-O-L-E, given the subject matter.
	The gay porn guy.
	That's the one that I'm not totally up to speed on.
	And then Judge Enger on and whether or not there's a connection between any of this.
	Ending on YouTube right now.
	Come on over to Rumble.
	VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com is one option.
	Here's Rumble.
	I got the VivaBarnes in the backdrop again here.
	I'm going to share that link so you can come watch it wherever you want.
	And YouTube, enjoy the weekend.
	We'll see you Sunday night.
	Everyone else will stay here.
	We're ending on YouTube in 3, 2...
	No, that's bringing it up, not ending it.
	Ending on YouTube in 3, 2, 1, now.
	Alright, Garrett.
	The fact that...
	Hunter wired money to a Russian pimp.
	And this is confirmed fact.
	And everyone out there, these liars, these pathological partisan hacks are saying, forgive him, he's just a drug addict.
	Okay, fine.
	If anybody doesn't think that that's compromising to the point of blackmailing the president because his son used his account to pay a pimp for a hooker, you're an idiot.
	You're an absolute idiot and you are part of the problem.
	Period.
	I agree, and if somebody doesn't want to believe our report, which features emails, text messages, Venmo transactions, go look at an exhibit put together by an IRS agent of an interview of Golnora.
	That was in the trove of documents released by the Ways and Means Committee a couple months ago.
	They released 112 PDF documents, and one of them was a recap of an interview that the IRS did with Golnora.
	So this isn't hypothetical.
	I'm not...
	You know, I'm not speculating here.
	There is a woman named Golnora in L.A. who ran a company called Emerald Fantasy Girls Incorporated.
	She was a pimp.
	Hunter solicited one of her prostitutes, and she was interviewed by the feds about it, hilariously.
	Yeah, I mean, it was reported in the New York Post, because it's like people are going to, I guess, believe it when it comes from a brand that they recognize.
	Speaking of also people potentially ripping off your hard work.
	Garrett, there's a few people ripping it off, but I don't know where they're...
	Let's see here.
	This is Joe Biden inadvertently...
	Oh, this was before our report was released, I must admit.
	Okay, okay.
	So it inadvertently helped Hunter pay Russian-linked escorts.
	Report.
	And then it says here, Joe Biden inadvertently financed, inadvertently, thanks, that presupposes an intent that you may or may not know.
	Financed his son Hunter's dalliances, dalliances, whatever the hell that is, with a Russian-linked escort ring, according to a report Monday.
	President Biden wired his 52-year-old son $100,000 to help him pay bills from December, yada, yada, yada, citing records.
	By the way, what they don't know is that we fed that stuff to the Washington Department.
	And they didn't want to name us.
	Say that again.
	You glitched out for a second.
	Sorry.
	Yeah, Marco Polo was the one who fed the Washington Examiner with the background research to do that report that the New York Post incited hilariously.
	Washington Examiner is reasonably reliable?
	Yeah, I think that they're reasonably reliable on the non-op-ed section.
	The problem is they're a little bit of establishment or a lot of establishment, and they refuse to—they don't want to name us at all.
	They look at us as, again, this sort of guerrilla group that they don't really trust us.
	I don't know.
	They're owned by a name named Philip Anschutz.
	I think he lives in Arizona.
	He's an oligarch.
	And I think they're reliable, but again, I think this— This piece they did that relied on our research but didn't name us is actually one of the best things they've ever done.
	They really got into the mechanics of the pimp payments.
	And I was shocked.
	Andrew Kerr was the writer on that story.
	I talked to him about this.
	And they really went where the Washington Examiner doesn't really feel comfortable going.
	The Washington Examiner was what I call the bow tie publication of D.C. They like to put on bow ties and pretend like they're sort of above it.
	They went there with the Bidens.
	Because you have to.
	I mean, this is a group of feral dogs.
	I mean, this picture on 304 in our report, this is Hunter with a prostitute smoking crack and a poster of Elsa behind him.
	And he was 52 at the time.
	Remember that, what's that movie, Frozen?
	Yep, yep, if it's Elsa.
	I was going to unwrap one of the books.
	And everybody can read this for free on bidencrimes.info.
	It's online.
	There's an e-reader version, so you don't have to just, you know, you can follow along.
	Someone is getting an opened one.
	What page is it on, Garrett?
	304.
	304.
	It's broken up into three big sections, business-related crimes, sex-related crimes, and drug-related crimes.
	And anybody can go look it up on the e-reader and follow the hyperlinks.
	There's 2,000 footnotes on it.
	Not one material error has been found, and believe me, they've paid Margaret Wheeler, as known Empty Wheel, to go through it with a fine-tooth comb and to try to pick any holes in it.
	And it's just primary source document.
	I see why we're not showing these pictures.
	Yeah, that's the president's son.
	By the way, that prostitute, Kellyanne Corey at the time, David, she had an active warrant for her arrest in the state of Pennsylvania.
	For what?
	Stealing from a Walmart.
	We put the picture of the Walmart on page 304 hilariously.
	We looked at the police report in Pennsylvania.
	I'm not sure.
	I mean, people were flipping out about Engeron's nips.
	I'm not showing that picture.
	Even what you used to censor looks oddly like...
	Who's the woman that painted flowers?
	Margaret?
	Oh, who's the one who's famous for painting flowers that look like vaginas?
	Oh, someone in the chat's going to get it.
	Whatever.
	What you used to censor it looked enough like what it was censoring that I was confused for a second.
	Okay, so now we're going to get into the topics of the day, Garrett.
	Do we start?
	We'll start with...
	Let's start...
	Well, we're going to have to go backwards.
	Okay, let's start with the gay porn guy.
	This is the one that's...
	I'm going to have questions because I'm not up to speed on the story.
	Who is it?
	What did they do?
	Was it known?
	Tell everybody what's going on here.
	So, if you want to put our screen up very quickly, it's just our Substack, Marco Polo 501c3.
	Okay, hold on a second.
	There's no paywall on this.
	It's a gentleman by the name of Patrick Labatt.
	Substack Marco Polo...
	No, hold on a second.
	Yeah, Marco Polo 501c3.substack.com.
	And the guy who demanded that DJT and all of the other defendants...
	Have their mug shots taken.
	He too has a penchant for the visual.
	We did not discover this video, but what we found were screenshots of it on Twitter back from September of him starring in a softcore porno.
	Where he's told to, quote, get his fine ass under a fellow actor.
	So the sheriff in Fulton County who arrested DJT made him pose for the mugshot.
	He was the bottom, literally, in a softcore gay porno.
	If you could share the link with me in the private chat, it'll make it easier for me.
	So this was...
	He's using his real face, so this is not private information.
	Oh, his name is on the credits.
	That's what's so hilarious.
	Some people are going to say, okay, so what's the big deal?
	He's starring in softcore gay porn.
	There's nothing wrong.
	I mean, to each their own.
	He's now involved in a prosecution that shouldn't taint any judgment or whatever.
	It's not like this is blackmail material.
	Or is it?
	Well, that's where it becomes a good argument.
	I would argue that it is because he's not addressing it.
	First of all, I just sent it to you.
	The argument on our side, a good argument on our side, is that his wife and him filed for divorce two weeks after this was first revealed.
	Then they called it off.
	So I don't even think he told his wife.
	I think he's been by this whole time.
	And what our value add here, very simply, is that we found the video.
	It had never been posted before.
	Whereas just screenshots in September came out.
	And what we want to do is just tell the truth.
	These aren't serious people.
	What happens if I push the play button?
	Do I want to do this?
	There's no genitalia in it.
	It's just two guys making out.
	I don't know if you can...
	Stomach that.
	No, I got nothing against homosexuality, but I just like, and he's the guy on the bottom.
	No, Patrick Labata is the dude on the top.
	They're tussling.
	This is crazy.
	Where is this available?
	Where was this available to the public?
	On a archived link online, because once this came out, they made the video private on YouTube.
	So it goes against – so here's my argument.
	If there's nothing wrong with this, why are they running scared, making their Twitter profiles private, making the YouTube video private, and getting divorces?
	Not to sound like if anybody knew of this beforehand.
	I mean I guess they would have made it private before, but it's clear.
	No, it was totally visible when it was released on – so we weren't the ones who discovered the – The existence of it.
	What we did was discovered and made public the actual video.
	And the series is called The Closet, and it's about hidden sexual lives of black men.
	That's literally what the description is.
	This is the production company thanking all the actors.
	So there's not a dozen episodes.
	He's the guy on the bottom up here.
	He's the light-skinned one, yeah.
	So Patrick Labatt is named...
	Right there on the credit list.
	And what this...
	Sinwatt Network Films is a production company.
	And they've done this series for a dozen years.
	There's the first one, which was called Groomsman.
	Episode 1 was the one Patrick Labatt started in 2006.
	And now they're still going.
	They're on episode 13. So again, I think that the reason why we started digging into this guy is because they did something wholly unnecessary.
	They made everyone pose for these disgusting, ridiculous mugshots to try to humiliate everyone.
	Now, there's an argument to be made that President Trump fundraised a lot off this and it was actually good for him.
	But what about all the other people?
	What about all the other defendants?
	You have actual rapists down there who probably don't even get mugshotted.
	And their jails are overflowing.
	We put this in our substack piece.
	One guy got eaten alive literally by vermin.
	Rats ate his skin alive in this Fulton County jail.
	So you have a guy who's prisoners.
	The prison he oversees, people are getting...
	One of them was killed by bed bug bites.
	So you have third world living conditions.
	He's trying to humiliate people who are getting...
	Prosecuted for thought crimes, basically, thinking the election was overturned.
	Not all the charges, okay?
	I'm fair.
	Some of them are ridiculous but serious.
	Some of them are ridiculous and just unserious.
	What's his face?
	The guy who pulled the alarm there, Jamal Brown.
	Did they mugshot him?
	No, of course not.
	And the idea of mugshotting prominent politicians and lawyers who are not going anywhere regardless.
	That's what I'm saying.
	It's usually a means of identification.
	These people have thousands of photos online.
	This was a pure humiliation tactic.
	And so, again, if you go back and read our substack, we just lay out the facts.
	This is what happened.
	If you go read all of our substacks, there's very little opinion in it.
	Every assertion we make has a hyperlink.
	Everybody can go watch the video.
	If they want to watch this video and think this dude is a serious guy who cares about...
	Enforcing the law without fear or favor.
	You know, we got a video for you.
	Sort of like we got a bridge to sell you.
	Well, not just that.
	It's that once you discover this, which is albeit public but not known and certainly hidden, and then they take it down.
	There's other stuff.
	I mean, it's not guilt by whatever, but anyone who would go to do something like this will do something worse, probably has done something worse that has not yet seen the light of day.
	Yeah, and why is he not proud of it, David?
	If they know that nothing is wrong with this, right, and this guy's a proud bisexual, you'll notice we didn't put any degrading language in there.
	Why not wear it proudly?
	Why not go on Twitter and say, hey, people discovered that I moonlighted as a bisexual softcore porn artist.
	I'm proud of it.
	My past is glorious.
	Now I'm the highest law enforcement official in...
	In Fulton County, which is a huge metropolitan area.
	But no!
	They scurry like rats, and that's really what Marco Polo's in the business of.
	I've double-checked enough.
	I'm just going to play the first 30 seconds.
	It's hilarious.
	There's a story.
	The groomsmen.
	Listen to the music.
	And if you think we're home of folks, I'm not.
	I don't agree with it.
	I think it's a simp.
	I'm not a...
	If you go to, like, minute two, you'll see that the wives, that's his wife, in the show.
	Okay, um, do I want to go two minutes in?
	Okay, here.
	Oh my goodness.
	Okay, that I find.
	This is outrageous!
	So it's a horribly acted thing.
	It'd be one thing if the dude were, like, a good actor, but no, it's like high school drama class style videos, and this was on, you could buy this on DVD, David.
	No, I tell you, you describe them as not serious people.
	I would describe them as compromised.
	I don't know how anybody...
	Look, set aside how you feel.
	I don't really have any problem with what consenting adults do, period.
	I'm not a religious man, but I understand people have religious objections.
	Yes.
	How do you...
	I'm not in the business of throwing people off buildings like the Muslims, okay?
	Just for a disclaimer.
	I say this...
	How do they go for a position of public office knowing they have this skeleton in the closet?
	It's poor judgment and also this above-the-law, it'll never happen because I've got people to keep all this stuff quiet, and then entereth Marco Polo.
	Holy crap.
	The fact that they've reacted like this suggests one thing.
	Number one, he never told his wife.
	Because they filed for divorce.
	This appeared on Twitter on September 5th, and we were very clear.
	In fact, our first post about this, which is not went viral but mini-viral, about Labatt, we quote-tweeted the person who originally found it.
	Okay, so we're not claiming that we were the first ones to discover this.
	We confirmed it through facial recognition technology and finding the dang video and seeing his name on the credits and scouring the Facebook of the production company and finding his name on the thank-yous.
	So it's him.
	1,000%.
	1,000% it's him.
	What his reaction tells us is that he never told his wife.
	They filed for divorce.
	The YouTube video was made private.
	By the way, Maurice is the guy who runs the production company.
	I called him.
	He told me to F off.
	I was like, why'd you make the video private?
	If you're a proud homosexual, why would you make this private, man?
	I was urging him to make it public again.
	If you've got no problem with this, why are you scurrying?
	You know what I mean?
	Just from an argumentation standpoint.
	If you're a proud homosexual, why would you make these things private?
	And I can think of examples of women, you know, attractive Hollywood actresses who have done these.
	And it's not a source of pride, but like, yeah, I did it.
	Big flipping deal.
	Yeah.
	Without giving any names.
	There might be the homosexual, you know, guilt aspect to that.
	There might be his family, whatever.
	But what's clear is that...
	These are compromised men who are in positions of power that are abusing of that power to shame and publicly humiliate other people who, by all accounts, the Grab Him by the Pussy video, I don't think Trump said what people said he said.
	No, he didn't say he assaulted him.
	He said that he was with loose women.
	That's what he said.
	And that the worst thing, like, my goodness, I was going to say, can you imagine if they found a video like this with Trump?
	But the worst thing that Trump has ever been...
	Accused of having done is grabbing by the peepee and...
	What he got convicted of in that bullshit New York case with Lewis E. Carroll, sexual battery, by a totally batshit crazy woman whose story does not make a lick of sense.
	That's the worst they got on him.
	And the people prosecuting him, crack, hookers, gay porn, and these are the people who are, you know, what's the word?
	Enforcing democracy right now.
	Yeah, protecting democracy with a capital P and capital D. No, these are unserious people.
	And I think what makes them So it's not just me.
	I'm not making this about me.
	That's why it's not called the Garrett Ziegler Research Group.
	Marco Polo, though, has a practice of we really trigger people, and I think it's because we add very little commentary to these, and we put the video – we just put it out there.
	I mean Patrick Labatt is living a double life, and that's not my opinion.
	That's based on his reaction to this.
	Video that was shot in 2005, he could have come out and said, you know, I didn't tell my wife about this.
	She doesn't know that I'm a bisexual, but I am, and so be it.
	He could have said that.
	Don't you agree?
	Or he said, I needed the money, it was COVID, I'm not proud of myself, or whatever.
	There's a thousand excuses involving owning up to it.
	And not apologizing for it, because it's not something you do by accident, and it's certainly not something that you do thinking it's going to stay private.
	Back in Quebec, we used to have this thing called bleu nuit, which is blue night, which is sort of like softcore porn that they would run at midnight.
	Look, I don't think anybody would be, maybe they'd be not proud in 50 years, but nobody does it thinking it's not going to get viewership.
	That's what they do it for.
	Softcore...
	Whatever.
	You do that for public consumption, and it's difficult to then say, like, I'm ashamed of it.
	You could say that.
	I shouldn't have done it.
	I needed the money.
	Or I did it.
	Piss off.
	And it doesn't reflect on anything in terms of my ability to enforce justice.
	The long arm of the law.
	Oh, there's a number of jokes in there, Garrett, that I will not get into.
	So that's one story.
	You discovered that this week.
	Yeah, that's a mini story.
	We didn't set out to do this.
	Who found it?
	Who found it?
	And how?
	I found it on Twitter very simply because we were starting to create profiles of the people in Fulton County because a couple people blood out, but the stuff is really starting to heat up now.
	And we were doing profiles of all the prosecutors, all the ADAs, and we were doing profiles of the sheriff.
	And I just was running his face through facial recognition, and then I found this Twitter picture.
	Of him in bed with a dude.
	And then I just started following it.
	I'm a very...
	I can scour digital archives well, and then I found the production company and found archive.org pages from 2006 saying, holy shit, that's his name, Patrick Labatt!
	And then we found the video.
	And then we actually purchased...
	This is, by the way, it's not news, but it's hilarious.
	It'll be the first time our Marco Polo debit card is used on an unseemly site.
	But we purchased a DVD copy of Episode 1 of Groomsmen so that if our substack gets taken down, we have the digital...
	And I'll find somebody with a DVD ripper to be able to archive it.
	Because I don't want this Episode 1...
	I don't want them to burn all the Episode 1. So we bought a copy of Episode 1 on DVD.
	Only one copy.
	Yeah, we just got one.
	Because once I have the DVD, I'll have a buddy of mine rip it, and I'll just flood the zone with it.
	Was it available on VHS?
	No.
	Hilariously.
	That's funny.
	This is 2006, I believe, is the release date.
	And I think they've done like an episode a year.
	So that explains.
	I think they were on episode 13 in 2020.
	And, you know, flamboyantly proud homosexual leader of the film production company, then posted on Facebook, we're in our 13th year.
	Thanks to everybody who's made this a success.
	Patrick LeBas.
	No, but hold on.
	This is soft course.
	They don't actually show any penetration, correct?
	We don't know that.
	We know that in episode one, they don't.
	Okay.
	Because I'm just thinking like thinking as a scoundrel could say.
	I was just acting.
	We didn't have any penetration.
	There was no genital-to-mouth or genital-to-butt contact.
	And so we were just acting.
	It's embarrassing.
	Sorry, I want to put it away.
	That's why in the sub-sec piece we were very clear that it's softcore.
	Labatt is very clearly in his boxers making out with another dude in a bed, and he's told to, quote, get his fine ass underneath the other actor.
	And then you have the wives of the men.
	So it's basically this series, which is...
	Difficult to watch, like you saw.
	It's so bad.
	The acting is terrible.
	The script is terrible.
	And the plot is gross.
	But they basically have all these men's wives walking in and then puking because they're leading these double lives.
	Just from a purely plot, even if it's porno...
	Who wants to see vomiting while watching sex?
	I mean, unless you're into that and there's a bunch of, you know, there's a fine German sub-niche of, you know, Scheiser porn and vomit porn.
	But, like, who even wants to see vomiting with sex, even if you're into that as a...
	Okay, so that's interesting.
	That's mini story number one that we found by accident.
	And there's no broader connection between Labatt and Engeron.
	We don't know.
	Okay.
	No.
	Oh!
	We don't know.
	We don't know.
	All we know for sure is that based on his acting penchant, the sheriff of Fulton County was secretly bisexual.
	Because I found very...
	I don't know if I've known of a male heterosexual actor that would shoot something like that and actually go forward with all the making out and all of...
	You know, laying in bed with a dude.
	So that's mini-story number one.
	It's acting.
	Yeah.
	Mini-story number one we found by accident.
	Mini-story number two, I'll just go in chronological order.
	Do it, do it, because I'm going to open up, I had the windows open, I'm going to go find your tweet and pull up the Engram newsletter.
	Yeah, so, this too, so we were, this, the background for everybody watching.
	By profile, I mean we were doing a deep dive, going back, like, everything you can find on the internet about someone, which we are pros at.
	I don't say that lightly, and I don't say that braggadociously, as the president would say.
	I mean, if it's on the internet, we'll be able to find it.
	And so we were doing that with Labatt and all the ADAs.
	I was doing that with Labatt and all the ADAs.
	And then the group, the broader group, started to really dig in on Ingeron, and we found this.
	Wheatley Alumni Association newsletter, started reading through them.
	What hasn't been reported yet is hilarious.
	He always tags clippings of himself in the news, in these newsletters.
	So he's a huge narcissist.
	All of these articles about Ingeron's trial of Trump, he's putting those articles in his own newsletter that he maintains.
	So this guy is such a narcissist that probably right after he gets out of the bench, every night, And sees Trump outside the courthouse making comments.
	He's looking up his name and reading every single article.
	And then more than that, he's posting these to his high school alumni newsletters.
	And while reading through this, because they were a trove of PII, these boomers have the digital hygiene and opsec of an African tribe, dude.
	It's terrible.
	They leave their personal phone numbers, home addresses, everything on the internet.
	Because they don't know that people can find out a lot of information.
	They're stupid about what they put on the internet.
	So Ingeron posted all this stuff.
	I get a good idea of who I've been married three times, four kids.
	I've got a good background of who this guy is.
	You said Ingeron's been married three times?
	Yep, three times.
	This latest one, who, by the way, there's currently stalled divorce proceedings between Don Marie.
	I know Laura Loomer put out some great info on his...
	The current wife Dawn and her just disgusting tweets about the president, that breaks every – there's no way that he should not recuse himself.
	In our federal case against Hunter, the judge was appointed by the plaintiff's daddy in June and also gave money to the plaintiff's daddy, which will probably be the background for a motion of recusal for us.
	Hernan Vera.
	Is our judge in the case against Hunter?
	And Hunter's dad just appointed the guy to the Central District of California.
	That's how much of a kangaroo court we're in.
	But in the federal law, you don't even have to have actual bias.
	You just have to have the appearance of bias or the plausible possibility of bias to get a recusal.
	The New York state law, we looked this up, and there's no reason why Trump's I pulled up those tweets yesterday, and I met Laura Loomer for the first time at Mar-a-Lago.
	She's done some great work.
	It's not that I'm going to judge anybody or prejudge anybody.
	I don't know of the consistency errors that she's made that might make people treat her research with a little bit more scrutiny.
	So I don't, but how do we know that that account, and I showed the tweets, it was retweets and a couple of comments, how do we know that that's Angeron's wife's Twitter feed?
	Very good question.
	And this goes back to her BS statement she gave to Newsweek.
	She made a statement that she doesn't have a Twitter account.
	Yeah, she doesn't have a Twitter account.
	She has an account on X, and she's going to hide behind that.
	She's going to hide behind the change in names.
	That's what she told Newsweek.
	We know it because of different services that we subscribe to, namely Ben Verified, Truthfinder, and Truthfinder, that it goes back that the email account that she used to set up the account resolves to her email.
	How do you get that info?
	I'm going to be able to nerd out here.
	When Twitter was hacked, there was a leak that showed the email address used to create an account.
	That email address is like...
	is linked to the wife.
	So she lied to Newsweek.
	Well, she's going to say that she didn't lie because she said – she rightly said that she doesn't have a Twitter account right now.
	She has an X account.
	So the writer at Newsweek got duped because they're idiots probably.
	But no, that's his wife, and she's just absolutely – Rabid and feral, like I kept saying.
	I mean, these are not sane people.
	She's commenting on the case while her husband is overseeing it.
	Okay, so to the extent now that we can definitively say it is indeed her...
	It's Dawn Marie Ingeron, absolutely.
	Okay, and that's decent evidence.
	I don't know how you can piece it together with the leak and trace it to the email address.
	Yes, so these leaks get posted.
	I am not a savant on the dark web, but these breaches, these hack and leaks, like with Ashley Madison, this is in our report on the Biden laptop.
	Ashley Madison got hacked.
	The data got leaked.
	Hunter's credit card information, address, IP address, and other information were in the leak.
	That's how we know he had an Ashley Madison account.
	In the same vein, there was a scraping.
	I won't call it a hack.
	There was a scraping of Twitter that allowed people – To look at the email address used to create a Twitter account, Dawn Marie's was her email, and we know that based on Truthfinder been verified on white pages.
	Okay, so that's amazing.
	So it is indeed his wife posting real-time shitposting against Alina Haba, among other things.
	Yes, on decisions her husband's made.
	Like, we're not...
	What I'm trying to say is, for the devil's advocate...
	My position is not that the wives of judges can't have political opinions, right?
	That's not what me and you are saying.
	They can have political opinions.
	A wife of a right-wing judge can post, you know, the country's going to hell because of inflation.
	But what we're saying is grounds for recusal is the freaking wife posting about decisions her husband judge made that very day.
	It's wild beyond belief.
	Again, they can have their own views, but even they should have the discretion to not post contemporaneous tweets about pending litigation with their husband.
	Let's say that Ingeron was not the judge in this case, but was a judge in the same court, right?
	So let's say Ingeron wasn't assigned to the case, but he was still sitting as a justice in the County of New York.
	Then the argument for recusal would be more difficult because you could say, hey, it doesn't matter what his wife thinks.
	Ingeron's not presiding over this trial.
	Sure, his colleague is, but there's enough levels of separation.
	They don't even have that.
	First of all, it goes from, you know, you can complain about systemic corruption.
	You can say, look, they're part of a system and judicial corruption, yada, yada, versus individualized bias, where you step down.
	It's not her involved in a system.
	It's her commenting on the rulings of her husband.
	And like they say, happy wife, happy life.
	I think if Engeron wants to please his wife, that's, you know, it's one step below the systemic and it's at the individual level.
	Justices in the National Supreme Court recuse themselves based on financial holdings of their wives, right?
	Same thing here.
	They should – he should recuse himself.
	Oh, another thing.
	Set aside – let's say that Marco Polo hadn't found the email address that was used to create Dawn Marie and Garant's Twitter account.
	So we didn't have that hard evidence.
	Just her reaction alone.
	Was enough to prove it was her.
	She made it private within the hour.
	Well, I've made that mistake.
	They were scurrying like rats.
	I've made that mistake once before with that Dr. Solnats who allegedly put out a tweet that said I would get the vax again and, you know, they refused it out of selfishness.
	And then I said, is this real?
	And then when I went back, I was blocked and I said, well, she blocked me, therefore it has to be real.
	Set that aside.
	It could be a parody account.
	It could be someone trying to sabotage her.
	But no, linking it back to the email address.
	That's satisfactory to me.
	But what's the story?
	This is his wife now, but there's also, Laura was reporting on something about his son being in the courtroom and being involved in some activist organization?
	Yes, this is actually, in my opinion, more juicy of a story.
	So, for people who just tuned in...
	We found these bonus torso photos and creepy.
	By the way, the photo is not in itself in a vacuum scandalous.
	A lot of narcissists and workout people post these before and after photos, right?
	So, for the record...
	We're not saying that alone is scandalous, alright?
	So people who've never heard me before, I know people do before and after photos, and they're proud of their figure, and they worked hard for it.
	That's not what we're saying.
	We're saying this dude is a freaking creep.
	Because he posted this on his high school alumni.
	I'll say this.
	Yes, he could be doing, look, I lost 100 pounds.
	I'm 75 years old, looking good.
	He doesn't look terrible for 74, right?
	But he looks creepy.
	And the reason why we're doing this is because this guy does not have good judgment.
	He's doing this on a high school alumni newsletter.
	Alumni means it's not like only for his class.
	There's probably three people left of his class.
	This is for alumni, anyone who's graduated.
	So there could be a 16, 17, 18-year-old kid on there.
	There could be an 18-year-old girl looking at this.
	An old dude saying, hey, check out, and blocking his length.
	He's not wearing underwear there.
	No, he's naked.
	His nipples and that sternum thing looks like a nose, and then it looks like a smiling cat or some demon in his chest.
	It's not about – it's about the judgment overall, but I said this – And the overall thesis – by the way, we found this by accident.
	We just – we couldn't – it was hilarious to us.
	We had to put it out.
	It's like this guy is totally not serious.
	These are not serious people.
	These are not – these are people who have – Demented minds.
	They don't have sound judgment.
	They're total narcissists.
	This guy posts articles about his own ruling.
	And that's what I said yesterday.
	The wildly inappropriate...
	disgusting.
	It shows something's wrong with him, but not necessarily judicially wrong.
	Yes.
	This is where it proves something is judicially wrong with him.
	Yes.
	he's posting links to his own decisions and this is where I just realized today this was a very very contemporaneous website like this was this was live and up-to-date as of support September 23rd.
	No, as of October 26th even, David.
	He's doing it as of two weeks ago.
	In fact, they hilariously have a substack of this, and he has made substack posts throughout the trial.
	This is like the biggest thing that's ever happened to him.
	Wow.
	That's why I'm so happy we revealed this.
	And more than the wife being biased...
	Laura, and we did not find this, so all credit goes to Laura, about Ian.
	His son Ian was employed by the court, got positioned by the court, was in court that day, and is basically just riding out the nepotistic gravy train because his daddy's a judge, which I think is more important than the wife stuff.
	It's more important than the shirtless, the topless.
	It's more important than the wife stuff, but this is like all of it together.
	It's like a minority report orgy of judicial bias.
	I mean, it's systemic.
	This is systemic.
	The judge's bias, I don't know who found the original speech that he gave eight years ago about having the tools to, you know...
	Yes, can we play that?
	Oh, I'll find it again.
	I had it lined up.
	There's a great account on Twitter that I'm honored.
	We want to hire him to do some work for us.
	Mays Moore.
	And he cut out the best...
	He found the best clips of it and just did a montage.
	Mazemore.
	Mazemore.
	Yeah.
	Let's see here.
	Mazemore.
	Okay.
	Let's see how many tweets.
	10,000 posts, so I should be able to find this pretty easily.
	Scrolling through.
	I think it's in the Gateway Pundit article from yesterday.
	I can find it.
	See if you can find that.
	I'll find...
	Let me see here.
	I know I put it up a few times.
	Viva Fry, Angoron tweet.
	Yeah, I had it all lined up, and then I screwed up my...
	Here we go.
	I got it right here.
	This is not the long one, but here.
	Boom, incognito.
	The incognito wouldn't show me the inappropriate picture of Angoron's...
	It wouldn't show me Angoron's body in incognito.
	Here we go.
	Which one is this?
	122.
	I have one last thing to say about tools.
	A lot of what I do involves motions.
	These summary judgment motions I mentioned.
	Am I following the law or am I making law?
	I'm following law.
	I'm an impartial referee.
	But it's hard to factor out my own emotions.
	And I have tools.
	Somebody can say, well, Your Honor, you have to throw out this case because it's just like another case.
	Well, is it just like another case?
	What if the defendant was wearing a red sweater instead of a blue sweater?
	It's amazing.
	We go and he goes on, "I can prevent someone from making an argument.
	Just estoppel.
	You said something different in this case or even another case.
	Prevent you from making that argument." And then you put that together with how he's denied Trump all of his defenses.
	Can't have a political bias from Leticia James.
	Can't have worthless clause provision.
	All of those arguments thrown out by the judge who's saying, "I have the tools to implement my bias in a file." And he doesn't get a jury.
	Also in that video, as you know, he said, juries get it wrong.
	And it's not just the one out of 100.
	Juries can get it wrong, no doubt.
	But he was so flippant about it and saying that, you know, how could they ever reach this conclusion?
	Well, he actually, he prefaced it even more.
	He said, what I'm about to say now is controversial, and I'm going to say it even though I'm on camera.
	I bet he didn't think he was going to get to this level of being on camera.
	Juries get it wrong.
	And I've got a tool.
	Jury nullification.
	Verdict.
	Nullification, notwithstanding a verdict.
	It's Jainov.
	It's judgment, notwithstanding a verdict.
	Jainov.
	I could just set it aside, and I've done it twice.
	Overturned once.
	Confirmed once, so not bad, even though it's controversial.
	There's a biting connection to this, David.
	Oh, now please do it.
	So Devin Archer, for the second time, is appealing to the Supreme Court because his conviction in an Indian bond fraud case in the Southern District of New York was given a new trial by Ronnie Abrams, who is married to Greg Andres, who was the lead prosecutor of Paul Manafort for Robert Mueller.
	And so...
	Ronnie Abrams, sister of Dan Abrams, who you know, she granted Archer's motion for a new trial, which was reversed by the Second Circuit because Ronnie Abrams thought she knew better than the jury.
	So one of the last holdouts and one of the great things about our Anglo-American tradition is the jury.
	And I know what the Bill of Rights says.
	It's all criminal proceedings, which is why they're even allowed.
	To do this to DJT because it's not a criminal proceeding, meaning they don't have to give him a jury trial and a civil proceeding.
	But I love jury trials.
	I think it's one of the last holdouts.
	I love that Sam Bankman Free got convicted by a jury of his peers because, first of all, it's a high bar to get a conviction.
	You've got to have – it's got to be unanimous beyond a reasonable doubt.
	There's so much beauty around a jury of one's peers and the fact that everybody is afforded one as a right, and I think that what Ingeron has done, like you said, is take away every lever for some person who's not biased to have any effect on this trial.
	It's Alex Jones-ing Donald Trump.
	They do not have a trial on the substance, on the merits.
	They have a trial on the damages of the foregone default verdict in Alex Jones' case.
	And here, summary judgment.
	The tool by which Engeron ruled Trump guilty of fraud vis-a-vis Mar-a-Lago.
	And if that were the only thing, if there were only that one video, it would have been enough.
	Then you throw in the wife.
	Then you throw in the son.
	Then you throw in the perversion.
	This is systematic.
	It's a takeover.
	This is election interference and this is a takeover of democracy.
	I agree completely.
	And all we did in our Substack piece and on our Twitter is put out the facts.
	Everybody can go follow those hyperlinks.
	Read them for yourself.
	It's him.
	It's crazy.
	We're just revealing to people for who they are.
	That's all we've done.
	And it's a joke.
	You could not write this into a movie and have people believe it.
	It's so preposterous.
	Is there anything else on Engron that you...
	Are there venues that you're continuing to look?
	Is there anything else that you haven't disclosed yet?
	Yeah, we're looking through now everything with Ian.
	Because I think that's the...
	There's obviously a portal to make complaints about judges.
	But if there's anything with Ian that we can...
	Basically, compared to Joey and Hunter.
	This is Joey and Hunter on a much smaller scale.
	Daddy's the judge.
	Give some gifts to the son.
	So that's our – we know the wife had a Twitter account.
	We know that he's a pervert who's a narcissist, but we're going to be really digging into Ian and the clerk because we have no gag order.
	Jesse Waters called him Judge Nudy, and I love that.
	That's what we're going to be calling him from now on, the male version of Judge Judy.
	So Judge Nudy is a nepotistic, narcissistic creep, and we're going to be digging into Greenfield.
	She's running for a seat right now, the portly clerk who was hubby-hubby with Chuck Schumer.
	She's running for the seat in New York City, and so we're going to be obviously...
	Doing things that make people aware of what she's been doing in this case because if – first of all, like I said, Dawn and the judge are estranged by all accounts.
	There's – we looked at the docket in Nassau County Court where they live on Long Island.
	There was divorce filed.
	The male was actually the plaintiff against Dawn in November of 2020, but there's been no finalization.
	So I think they're just estranged, which could go in his favor, which could say, hey, I'm – yeah, she's my wife, but she has no bearing on my biases because we're estranged.
	We're just both leftists, so ha-ha.
	But I think that one of the beauties of us putting this out there is we don't know what we'll find next.
	This is – the bonus torso photos.
	Are just creepy things from Judge Nudy.
	But once people start looking into this guy's background, who knows what we're all going to find.
	I was trying to find the Jesse Waters video.
	Of Judge Nudy.
	Go to our page.
	Well, did they...
	Did Jesse...
	Was there verification, their due diligence, your due diligence?
	I don't want to start a fight.
	Yes, they just copied us.
	Okay.
	I mean, it's the ultimate flattery, but it would have been nice for them to mention you by name during the report.
	Well, the only reason why I went on the show was to talk about the other things that you're letting me talk about right now, which is our position is not that he needs to be fired for being a creep and posting before and after photos.
	That's not our position.
	Our position is that...
	He needs to be looked into further.
	Ian, let's do a deep dive on Ian.
	I would have loved to have the platform on Waters' show to say, hey, oh, and by the way, the dad is a creep absolutely and a narcissist who posts links about his own rulings to his alumni newsletter, but he also has a son who's employed or was employed by the court and was in court when Trump was in there testifying.
	So that, again, is where the public should be focusing on.
	This ridiculous selfie thing is just...
	It's an appetizer in a weird way.
	That's a terrible analogy.
	No, it's just a cherry on top.
	It's a thing to get your attention.
	Well, it's judicially irrelevant, but character-wise very relevant.
	Yes.
	But the judicial corruption is through the roof.
	And I was reluctant to retweet Laura Loomer's tweet because mistakes happen and you don't want to put someone who's...
	When we get off the line, I'll send you the email address that Don used to create the Twitter account.
	No, forget that!
	Okay, fine.
	We'll talk after.
	And so now you're looking into Ian, the clerk who's chummy-chummy with Chuck Schumer.
	Allison Greenfield, the one who was really, really smiling with Chuck Schumer.
	Who knows what...
	Can be found.
	But my goodness.
	Knowing the skeletons they all have had in their closets up until now, I would be crapping in my boots if I were them because it's forever.
	I operated on the basis that the internet was forever as of 2007.
	It's forever.
	You can't hide yourself.
	It will never go away and people will find out.
	And live a good life.
	Keep your schmeckle in your pants and you'll be very, very happy.
	Speaking of this, one thing that I think there's a reason why Greenwald won't have me on to discuss our dossier because Glenn has been very fair about the Bidens.
	He knows Joe is corrupt.
	He knows.
	But one reason why is because I think he won't have me on is because this is totally, totally off topic.
	But I want to say it about the internet being forever.
	But Glenn was in like the 2003-2005 range was like a huge pornographer.
	And we found these things on Archive.org about him owning porn production companies.
	I shit you not, this is all real.
	I can send you the archive.
	And I think that he didn't really- Oh my goodness, it's bad for so many reasons, but not the political ones.
	I mean, look, there's a lot of- You've heard of this, right?
	His porn companies.
	I have not.
	Yeah, so we were doing a deep dive on him because I really liked his views.
	And I liked that he- Did the Snowden stuff and everything, but then when we got to these archive.org sites in 2005, like, holy crap, he's owning these porn companies.
	And I think that he's mad at us for just finding this, and he won't have me on to discuss the dossier.
	Yeah, dude, I mean, look, I can understand that.
	Oh my goodness!
	It's a decent business.
	Montreal is known as being something of a porn center because there's a lot of porn production companies in Montreal.
	There was a Kanawagi Reserve where they had the servers that they could host content on the native reserve and somehow circumvent certain restrictions.
	What is the soul of Montreal?
	How many people are there?
	Montreal, population-wise, has got to be, I want to say, 3 million, give or take, including Laval.
	I mean, Montreal's basically half the population of the province.
	No, it's much more than that if you go greater...
	Yeah, the metro area.
	Yeah, because you've got Montreal, then you've got Laval, which is like...
	No, it's millions of people.
	So the soul is basically just...
	It's French, wealthy, and...
	Would you call it a pretentious place?
	No, no, no.
	And it's 50-50 English-French.
	It's 50-50 French allophone because Montreal...
	The entire province of Quebec is 85% French-Canadian.
	But that's the entire province.
	Montreal is 50-50.
	So demographically...
	So it says Montreal population is nearly 2 million.
	But I'm going to go...
	My mom used to go up there.
	She worked for this company called Quebecor World.
	Huge printing company.
	Oh, Quebecor.
	Yeah, I know Quebecor.
	Quebecor World, yeah.
	They got bought out.
	But my mom used to go to Montreal.
	So yes, if you include the greater Montreal area, which includes Laval, which is massive, La Prairie, whatever, Dollar Desert, it's 4.2 million.
	So it's basically more than half the province.
	By the way, hey, since I have you on, are you aware of a French phrase about the meaning of it as like reason for being, raison d 'être?
	Raison d 'être, yeah.
	Say it again, raison d 'être.
	Raison d 'être, the reason for existing.
	Yes, there's many times where I want to use that phrase, but I'm afraid to do it because I'll botch the pronunciation.
	Well, it's more poetic than the German zeitgeist and other things like that, but yeah, raison d 'être, the reason for being.
	Yes.
	Oh my goodness.
	So we've done two of the three mini-stories, and then the last mini-story...
	Hold on, no, the last mini-story we're queuing up with the video, and I've been...
	Here we go.
	Oh God, it's...
	I'll tell you this.
	I'll preface this.
	Do we see it?
	I didn't share this originally.
	I don't like retweeting, putting not innocent, but rather citizens on blast.
	What's the word I'm looking for?
	The proudness.
	The brazenness.
	The fact that he's a government contractor.
	That's where we really went hog wild.
	Once we knew he was a fad, we didn't care.
	Listen to this.
	The brazenness, and he's not ashamed, he's not embarrassed, and he's not scared of what he's doing.
	And he doesn't look mentally ill.
	I mean, I think he's probably got some issues.
	He really believes this, that we love the KKK.
	He's not clearly mentally ill, as in not responsible for his actions.
	Not drunk, not on drugs.
	Okay, watch this.
	Everybody's seen it, but...
	That's crazy!
	You might as well have been pointing a gun at my head.
	The fact that in someone's mind, and I say a Biden voter, that those two things are symbolically equivalent.
	It's delusional.
	I'd be scared on my wits right now.
	And then you're out here among decent people.
	Oh yeah, he's real decent.
	Thanks for coming out there.
	He's the decent person.
	What's your policy prescription?
	What are your policy prescriptions?
	I love that.
	Fucking rapist rights.
	Rapist rights?
	People's fucking families in their fucking bedrooms.
	That's pretty wild.
	You fucking animal.
	One of my favorites is that he misconstrues what he means by one.
	Try to steal my vote next year.
	I'm gonna fucking remember you personally.
	I just had a good idea.
	I'm gonna take a picture of you right now.
	Yeah, so I did ask our lawyer.
	He was very, very good about what he said because there was no...
	Is that alright?
	Yeah, you can.
	No direct imminent threats?
	Yes, he was very tacit about I'm gonna remember you.
	Like, you can tell he was swirling around.
	Alright, how do I try to scare this dude without threatening him?
	I'm gonna take a picture.
	I'm gonna take a picture of him, put it on a list and sick and...
	He doesn't realize that Matthew is alluding to recording somebody, and then he said, yeah, you want a one-party country.
	So he doesn't realize that Matthew is saying, yeah, you can take a picture of me because in Virginia, you don't need my consent.
	You just need one of the parties.
	He's stupid.
	He's like, yeah, you want a one-party country.
	And it's pure confession through projection.
	He wants the one-party country because he wants Matthew, whoever the guy is there, he wants him to disappear.
	Hey, sir, how are you?
	Not done yet.
	He's not done yet, though.
	God, this guy kept his cool.
	He's coming back.
	Is he coming back?
	comes back.
	You'll be buddy-buddy with these folks.
	They're not going to be buddy-buddy with these people because they put on the face of a good neighbor, but they support lynch mobs and fucking KKK.
	They support lynch mobs and fucking KKK.
	Brazen and proud.
	I love the cargo shorts from 2005.
	What a douchebag.
	By the way, we figured out...
	We talked to Matthew, the guy who was accosted, and we figured that wasn't his Prius.
	Because the first question we asked him is, hey, send us the high-res of the video, because if that's his Prius, we'll have our PI run the plates and know this guy immediately.
	But it wasn't his Prius.
	He was walking to the precinct.
	A lot of people were making the jokes like, oh my god, he drives a Prius.
	We thought that fit too, but then Matthew said, no, no, no, after the video cuts, I saw that he did not go into the Prius.
	But the reasons for us caring about this are very simple.
	This dude is a federal contractor.
	Stop there, stop there.
	When did you realize?
	Like, I see this video.
	It's like, oh, some jackass on the street.
	I'm moving on with my day.
	And I think, I want to say that I think I only retweeted it after you put out The Federal Contractor.
	I think, because this is my thought process.
	How does that happen?
	Like, do you run facial recognition on every video that you see on the internet?
	No, we ran.
	So I'll give you, again, I love that you're a nerd like me, I can tell.
	So I realized that this video had been up.
	I watched it probably three hours after it was posted, but I was watching it because we did it a day later, right?
	We didn't get there on the day.
	I waited about 12 hours to see if anybody else had done it, if he had been ID'd.
	So I made a mental note the first day I watched it.
	Hey, if this guy isn't ID'd...
	Marco Polo will spend a couple hours and mess with this guy because he deserves it.
	He was just feral.
	Did you see him?
	I'm going to take a picture and I'm going to put it with my group and they're going to come and get you.
	You can tell he's a puss because he acted like a 14-year-old version of Garrett who got in a fight with a guy.
	Behind his schoolyard.
	Because he was shaking when he was talking.
	When you watch this video on high res, he's like, do you want to put a gun to my head?
	He was stuttering, and if he tried to hold his hand up, you could see that he was shaking, which means he's never done this before.
	He's a total puss.
	He couldn't even tell a guy off without shaking like a little girl.
	So you can tell that he probably gets manicures and he never...
	I bet he'd never done that before because in Arlington, he never sees conservatives.
	This guy's living in a one-party county.
	It's like 95 to 5 there.
	It's almost as bad as D.C. So that's the first thing I saw.
	His forehead, by the way, looked like Kevin Morris.
	It looked like the skin of a pug dog.
	If you look at that video, he has so many curls in his forehead, it looks like a pug dog.
	And he says, you might as well put an effing gun to my head while his hand was shaking.
	It's almost like when James O 'Keefe confronted Adam Goldman, a degenerate writer for the New York Times in D.C., and Adam Goldman is holding – my phone's upstairs.
	He's holding his phone, Adam Goldman, and he's shaking because he's trying to record James O 'Keefe back.
	If you look up James O 'Keefe, Adam Goldman, Adam Goldman pulls out his phone and starts recording James, and he's like – Yeah, James, I can record too.
	It's like, dude, you're a grown man.
	You're shaking like an eighth grader on a spelling bee right now.
	Look at the ripples in that forehead.
	Yes, he looks like a pug dog.
	That's the freeze frame.
	That's the freeze frame we used for the picture.
	He looks like a pug dog.
	That's how Kevin Morris looks.
	Kevin Morris has aged about three years and six months just dealing with us.
	Oh my goodness.
	These are not...
	These are people who, you know, all the Greeks would say, this guy, you know, the mastery of oneself, one's emotions, one's carnal urges, that is the Greek ideal of fully human.
	This guy's not fully human.
	He couldn't control himself there.
	Matthew was very kind during the entire encounter, never threatened him, never met his intensity.
	Matthew Hurt could have cussed at him back.
	He could have met his profanity with more profanity.
	This guy was just getting madder and madder.
	He reminded me of my son a little bit when my son is done with...
	Blueberries and nobody's getting him more blueberries.
	He just gets madder and madder.
	And he has like a two-year-old's ability to control himself.
	When my two-year-old starts acting like that, we don't get mad at him, right?
	We say, calm down.
	But he's two.
	He has no reason.
	He can't even go to the bathroom on his own, right?
	But this is a 50-year-old guy with a role in some way over our freaking foster care system.
	We figured that out.
	Oh, so who is he?
	How do you find it out?
	Like, how does that happen?
	How does that happen?
	Well, we use facial recognition to confirm his identity through his LinkedIn photo.
	He stupidly had a photo on LinkedIn.
	And we ran that through a facial recognition tool and then found all of these photos of him at rallies.
	He's a heckler.
	He heckled DJT at a 4th of July celebration in 2018.
	He made it to the cover of the Daily Mail.
	And then he also was a volunteer for Elizabeth Warren's campaign and was seen at rallies there.
	And then we also have a photo of him at another rally holding a sign about how you should tax religion, not science.
	Yeah, so we were very fair with him.
	This guy, me and you, now that you live in the US, we pay for him, man.
	We pay for this pug dog.
	HHS is...
	Health and Human Services.
	Health and Human Services.
	And he works at a division within HHS called the Children's Bureau.
	And they help oversee foster care.
	And he's a software guy.
	So he, in some way...
	This is not a stretch.
	If you go down on our thread a little bit— It doesn't let me do that in Cognito.
	Yeah, in our thread, you'll see that we list his donation history.
	We list—there's many— Many links online displaying his work.
	His name and email address are freely available on the HHS government website.
	That's his heckling photo where he went in the middle of a crowd.
	When he talked about decent people, look at all the other people of all colors looking at this guy.
	Look at this guy over here.
	The two women.
	What the heck?
	Everybody else was celebrating the 4th of July and he just goes in there and starts screaming at Trump like my boy.
	Right, like a two-year-old.
	Unreal, unreal.
	And then, yeah, that's his archive LinkedIn.
	It said he works at a contractor named ICF, and he's the technical administrator for the Children's Bureau, Taxes for Science.
	How old is this picture?
	He looks substantially younger.
	Yeah, he, like Kevin Morris, he has Trump derangement syndrome.
	That ages people.
	I think that picture was in 2017.
	And I looked to see when I first tweeted it, the day before I think you identified him, but it was a fair tweet where I was just counting the expletives in his response, and I said, yeah, he's the good guy.
	17 F-bombs.
	Is this in here?
	I think this is it.
	13 F-bombs, two shits, confessions of protection, you want a one-party country, and they're not good neighbors.
	Oh my goodness.
	I know, right?
	And this is the guy who's a decent human being and a good...
	I wouldn't...
	Ask him for sugar.
	If I were out of sugar for coffee.
	Holy crap.
	He too, like Ingeron, is apparently separated from his wife, who is an attorney in D.C. He knows Russian.
	He's actually a polyglot, so he's not stupid.
	He knows like six languages.
	He met his wife in Krakow.
	She's Polish-born lawyer in D.C. who works for one of these leftist consulting houses doing like...
	Environmental – ESG garbage.
	We, of course, reached out to her for a comment about her estranged husband never got back with us.
	But it's him.
	It's 1,000% him.
	And again, we know that false positives abound, so it took us about six hours for me to say, yes, I bet my life on that it's him.
	We got all of his addresses, looked up his entire family, made a family tree, looked at every single photo of him online.
	Looked at his address, right?
	Because Matthew was at a particular location that day, and does his address comport with the precinct that Matthew would have taken the video in?
	And sure as shit it does.
	So we're always, I'm like you, I'm a little bit cautious.
	Like, I don't want to be the first mover on things.
	I'd rather, that's why we didn't try to do it that day.
	It's like, somebody else IDM if...
	Maybe this sounds cocky, but whatever I said, if nobody else can do it, we can do it.
	So then we waited until the next day, and again, we have talked with Gates's folks.
	There has to be some consequence.
	This guy cannot stay a federal contractor.
	I can't in good conscience pay this person.
	Garrett, do you have a few minutes to go into our Locals community and maybe answer any questions that the Locals community might have?
	This has been amazing.
	Thank you.
	Before we leave.
	Yeah, got through all three mini-stories.
	Amazing.
	And then some bonuses that we got before the three mini-stories.
	Everybody knows where to find you.
	I'll put the links in there.
	What have you got coming up on the front burner that people can look forward to expect in the coming weeks?
	So 35 states left on my 50 – I'm going to all 50 states to talk about the Biden Laptop dossier.
	The best way you can possibly support us is go to bidenlaptopreport.com.
	Get a report.
	If you want to read it for free beforehand, go to bidencrimes.info.
	If you want to support our legal defense fund, go to fightbiden.org.
	We made it very simple.
	All those links.
	Forward on to lesser, to harder ones to remember.
	FightBiden.org and BidenLaptopReport.com.
	So I'm going to all 35 states by the end of 2024.
	I've gone to 15 so far.
	And lawsuits, because I don't want to be bankrupted.
	We have to keep this out there.
	They cannot censor this if you buy a physical copy, because Microsoft on their Edge browser is still censoring it.
	Joey has a guy named Vinny Steropoli, who's an executive, who made Microsoft.
	If you go to our site, if you go to our report on Microsoft's...
	It'll say that our site is unsafe and you have to click through three times.
	Unreal.
	And you're going to send me those links.
	I'll put them in the pinned comment.
	All of our social media is marcopolo501c3.
	Right.
	And I almost forgot to read the rumble rants.
	Finboy Slick says, Viva does not practice law anymore, but he's still fully committed to being technologically deficient, Garrett.
	That is not true.
	It takes a lot to run this stuff.
	The multitasking that I'm doing here, people might not...
	Everyone appreciates it.
	It's a good natured joke.
	Oh, that was me.
	I sent that to her the day before.
	That's all Marco Polo.
	MTG, Marjorie Taylor Greene showed us one of Hunter's special photos during a committee meeting.
	All us.
	I'm not your buddy guy.
	Says, call me a conspiracy theorist, but I would feel confident in saying I wouldn't put it past the Bidens to have sold state secrets to enrich themselves.
	Or sold, you know, or, well, okay, no.
	Worse yet, how many kids call their dad Paedo Pete?
	And we know that it's Pete now because of one of his aliases for his email addresses, I think.
	Well, yes, Paedo Pete was the name that Hunter Biden II gave to his sister, weirdly.
	And more importantly, we know that Hunter...
	Put down the address where the classified documents were on his license.
	So we know that Hunter was residing there.
	Hunter resided where classified documents were.
	hilarious unbelievable louis tina 007 i live in georgia the fulton county jailhouse it's well known throughout the state for its inhumane treatment of their inmates it's unbelievable and i'm not your buddy guy says i've been trying to warn people the stakes of these next elections across the west could not be more dire the left globally have gone insane and been mentally prepping for years to do something bad i'm not your buddy guy i know he's very pessimistic and i'm trying I agree with him.
	The West is tearing.
	All I can do is tell the truth.
	You do absolutely amazing work.
	I'll say it.
	I want you to meet the other guys in the group sometime.
	Oh, sorry.
	FriedPie says, say just a dildo for me, Viva, which is Justin Dildo or Justin Trudeau.
	No, but I have such faith in you that if you tell me something's good to go, or if you've already gone, what I said, are you sure?
	It's like, I published it, I'm sure.
	That's the okay that I need to retweet.
	We have to have sobriety.
	That's what we're essentially talking about here with Ingeron and Labatt and Brendan Martin.
	These people aren't sober.
	They do not have a sober and judicious mind.
	For example, this is the last thing I'll say.
	If somebody criticizes our work, let's say somebody says, hey, you got something wrong on page 182.
	A sober and judicious mind would...
	Instead of first lashing out and saying, why the F do you think you can correct me and act all high and mighty, we examine their claim first.
	Being sober and judicious is putting the truth above one's own emotions, one's own desire to be right, and to be first.
	And I think that that's what people appreciate about our group is that if we're wrong, and we haven't had to retract anything yet, but when we will inevitably get something wrong, if we're proven to be wrong, we'll address it and apologize and take it down and publish a retraction.
	But so many of our enemies in Garon Labatt, these people aren't sober and judicious people.
	They do not have an incisive mind that can set aside their own biases and look at something objectively.
	I think they don't have a fear of God.
	And it's not that I believe in God, but I do believe there's a camera above me at all times.
	And I have a fear of being thought of as dishonest, intellectually dishonest, or intellectually coward.
	That's profound.
	One more that came in, because people are saying maybe I actually do believe in God, and maybe I do.
	We'll have to deal with that one day.
	My dog Nana just had surgery for her bone cancer.
	This is from White Sparrow.
	On fixed income, need help paying off surgery before she can start.
	Needed chemo.
	Donations needed to Eskridge Vet Clinic, Cannon City, Colorado.
	Please help.
	I have screen grabbed that, and after this show, I will do something.
	I have a soft spot for dogs.
	Okay, this is what we're doing now.
	We're ending on Rumble.
	I'm not going to link out to vivabarneslaw.locals.com anymore because I've done it a lot.
	Thank you all for being here.
	Sunday show is coming up.
	Garrett, for everyone here, thank you very much.
	We'll go take some questions because I'm sure there'll be some...
	Since you like dogs, I'm going to get a picture out of the one we have.
	I'm going to save that for locals people.
	Ending on Rumble, thank you all for being here.
	Garrett, I'll see you in a second.
	See you.
	Okay, and we stay here.
	We got a golden retriever back in September.
	Oh, it's a puppy?
	Yeah, it's a puppy.
	Well then, puppy golden retrievers are the cutest things on earth.
	I know.
	They're even good looking when they get older.
	I love him so much, and I'm even allergic to dog hair.

▲