All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 1, 2023 - Viva & Barnes
01:19:54
Interview with European MP Christine Anderson AND MORE! Viva Frei Live!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
A prime minister who openly admires the Chinese basic dictatorship who tramples on fundamental rights by persecuting and criminalizing his own citizens as terrorists just because they dared to stand up to his perverted concept of democracy should not be allowed to speak in this house at all.
Mr. Trudeau, you are a disgrace for any democracy.
Please spare us your presence.
Thank you.
Ouch.
All right, everybody.
I figured, oh, that was too loud.
I have to refresh everybody's memory.
I'm live, get out.
I have to refresh everybody's memory as to who Christine Anderson is.
For those of you who don't remember, she's been on the channel once before.
I'm live, you have to get out.
Okay, but go ask Mila to help you.
Oh, my goodness.
Okay, I'm alone with the children today who are off school for some reason.
Serenity now.
We're going to have some interruptions, maybe.
Christine Anderson's been on the channel.
It's been a while, and she's coming around.
She's a European member of Parliament.
I'll let her introduce herself.
We had some technical issues, but all is good now.
The speech was amazing.
You have to go watch the entire thing.
I couldn't find the entire thing, but we wouldn't play the entire thing now.
Anyhow, I remember her from before.
That's right.
For those who have been paying attention, Christine Anderson has been around for a while, working her way up the political ladder of European politics.
Amazing stuff.
Okay, without further ado, because we're a little bit behind schedule, I will bring the Christine Anderson in right now.
Christine, you ready?
Thumbs up.
Three, two, one.
Christine, how goes the battle?
We got past the initial tech issues, so now at least we can see each other and we can talk.
All right, well, where do we start?
I will not presume that everybody saw our first...
We did one interview, right?
Not two?
I thought it was two, but I'm not sure.
Well, we won't get it.
We won't redo the entire first one, but 30,000-foot overview for those who may not know who you are.
Who are you?
Well, I'm Christine Andersen, an MEP, elected MEP by the German people to the EU Parliament, and I have made it my mission to...
Actually be a representative of the people.
So I serve in their best interest and I will see to it that the will of the people is actually carried out.
And that's what I stand for.
Look, we did the childhood and everything the last time, but the AFD is the Alternative for Deutschland.
And look, anything with, first of all, jokes aside, anything with German in it gets a bad rap in North America, but it often, if not always, by Western media gets described as a far-right political party with xenophobic views and throw in the laundry list of accusations.
What is the AFD?
What's its origin story and what's its status now in European politics?
Well, it seems that nowadays everything and anything that actually...
Criticizes government.
It's labeled right-wing or right-wing extremist even.
So it's utterly ridiculous.
So looking at my party and when you look at the program, we actually advocate for and stand for those issues and those program points that the former conservative parties in Germany So there's the Christian Democrats and the former Liberal Party.
So it's pretty much what they advocated for, like, what, 15, 20 years ago?
That's in our program now.
But since all of the parties in the political spectrum, at least in Germany, took a huge shift towards the left and even, you know, the green ideology...
Like I said, everything that is, you know, not what they want is considered right-wing extremists.
So I'm used to that.
I don't care.
They can call me whatever they want.
No one gets to define me.
And like I said, my party is just a conservative, liberal party.
Could you flesh it?
I want to ask the totally ignorant question.
You're an MEP, Member of European Parliament, elected by the German, well, How does it work?
Like, what's the interplay between being a country within the European Union politician and how that plays in with the European Union as a whole?
Well, see, that's just the thing.
So I was elected by the German people.
And that, of course, me, I'm paid by the German people.
So that means I have to represent what the German people want.
I was not elected by Italians or the French people or whoever else.
But that is frowned upon if I were to stand up in EU Parliament taking care of the issues that the German citizens have and that the German citizens want to have implemented.
Yeah, the construction in and of itself is faulty.
But that's just what they want.
They want to remove the democratic processes further and further away from the people.
And their next step will be to have so-called transnationalists, meaning that...
Let's say the Italian citizens will have to vote for a list where there's all kinds of candidates on there from Ireland, from France, from Spain, from Poland.
And the thing is, the citizens do not understand.
The people that are supposed to represent them anymore because we speak different languages in all of Europe.
And yeah, you can argue, well, you know, then just learn another language.
But how can you expect an everyday citizen, you know, taking care of his job, feeding a family?
And, you know, how is he supposed to learn another language?
And on top of that, to such a degree that he would be able to intelligently speak, To a representative in a completely different tongue.
It's outrageous.
And it is a gross violation of parliamentary representation.
I mean, how does it practically work?
I mean, is the European Union sort of like a federation of states like America?
No, it's not.
And hopefully it never will be.
But they're trying to bring that about by literally not telling the people, you know, we will become now the United States of Europe or anything, because the people actually don't want that.
They do it underhandedly, you know, kind of like force it, for example, via these transnational lists.
There are so many mechanisms that are in place right now.
And the citizens are being told, you know, this is democracy and, you know, the best democracy we ever lived in.
It has nothing to do with democracy.
If the citizens do not know who they are represented by, and if the citizens do not know what the people that are supposed to represent them actually stand for.
So, no, we are not a federal state, and hopefully we never will be.
But there is a real redistribution of European funds from the producing countries to the non-producing countries, sort of like what we have, the equalization payments in Canada?
Yeah, exactly.
So you have countries that are paying into the European Union.
But they're not getting anything back or, you know, a very small portion of what they paid.
And that became even worse once Great Britain left the EU because they also were the net payers.
So they paid more than they actually got out of it.
And, well, Germany, you know.
As wholly as we are, we pretty much, you know, volunteer to take up, you know, a large portion of what they left us with.
So, yeah, it's absolutely ridiculous.
Now, I'm trying to go back.
It looks like our last stream was nine months ago, give or take.
But I don't think the Nord Stream pipeline issue had happened because I'm certain that if it did, we would have discussed it and I would have remembered having discussed it.
I've got several European friends, French and German in particular, telling me what's going on in Europe in terms of the energy crisis that was predicted for the last winter, which I guess was not as bad as it was predicted.
We had an extremely mild winter.
It was much worse than we were hearing back here, though not as dire as they had predicted.
Hotels were not boiling water after 10 o 'clock.
There was no hot water in some places.
Restaurants were shutting down early.
Subsequent to the Nord Stream pipeline mystery explosion, we'll get into that in a second, what was life like in Europe and how badly was it actually impacted?
Well, you know what, to tell the truth, it wasn't really...
What we had expected.
Because once again, we had an extremely mild winter.
So there was really no...
I mean, had we had temperatures like minus 20 degrees, you know, we would have been toast.
Seriously.
There would have been big issues.
But like I said, an extremely mild winter.
But yeah, it is true.
There's restaurants that, you know...
Pretty much reduce their opening hours just for the energy costs.
There is restaurants that usually, you know, close down their outdoor space because they could no longer afford to run the heating systems that they had installed.
So, yeah, I mean, there was some stuff going on, but it wasn't quite as bad as Well, the impact on everyday life wasn't quite as serious.
So we'll just see what the winner brings this year around.
Now what we're doing, we're going to end this.
It's damaged, yeah.
It's gone.
Okay, we're going to continue this.
I'm going to end on YouTube, everybody, so come on over to Rumble.
It doesn't change anything on our end, but this is where the second part of this question is going to go in terms of public sentiment and what people think happened to the Nord Stream pipeline.
We'll do it on Rumble.
Ending there, the link to Rumble is on the pinned comment, so get your butts on over there for the rest of this discussion.
3, 2, 1, now.
Okay, we're heading into winter number two now.
Nord Stream sabotage.
First question.
Does everybody on the street in Germany know that the U.S. did it or had a hand in it?
Actually, no one knows who did it.
And no one, especially the responsible politicians like government, they don't seem to care to find even out, you know?
And like, I mean, it was like, oops, yeah, something happened.
I don't know what, and we're not going to investigate.
I mean, who cares, you know?
It's...
Done with.
Now it was blown up.
So it's like it was rather interesting to see they did not put in the least amount of effort to question.
Something went on or to even find out.
So it's just kind of this nonchalant attitude.
Well, I guess it's gone now.
Well, you know, what the heck?
Well, we weren't going to, you know, take Russian gas anymore anyway.
So who needs a stupid pipeline like that?
That was kind of like the attitude.
But what is happening is we don't take or we decided not to take the Russian gas anymore because we're the good guys, right?
But we're bound by contract to take it.
But we won't take it, but we have to pay for it.
Bound by contract.
What Putin is doing, he is selling the gas that we refused to take, paid for, but refused to take, and sells it to India.
And then India is selling us the very same gas that we already paid for, again, from them.
It's utterly ridiculous.
So talking about, you know, financing Putin's war machine, yeah, Germany is right up there, top notch.
Yeah, because we pay gas and don't take it.
But the thing is this, we don't know who did it, but it's pretty clear who it could not have been.
I'm pretty sure it wasn't Putin.
I mean, that would be stupid.
So I know that for a fact.
It was not Putin.
But who would, I have no idea.
No clue.
Like I said, the government doesn't care.
Let's unpack this for a second.
There could be an argument made for why Putin did it because now he's still able to sell all that, get paid twice, and then you guys have to buy it from India.
He wouldn't have to do that because we decided prior.
To the pipeline being blown up.
We're not going to take your gas anymore.
That had been going on for a couple of months or a few months already.
So it was clear.
We were not going to take it, but we'll still pay you.
So no need to blow up the pipeline.
It's the Tucker Carlson.
It's like Fox wanted to get rid of Tucker Carlson so badly so that nobody heard what they said.
We'll pay you to be quiet.
Take your money and just we won't give you the platform.
It's sort of inverted here.
We're going to pay you, but we're not taking your dirty...
Your dirty oil.
But here's our money anyhow.
Now go sell it a second time to India.
Is Germany getting from Venezuela, Saudi Arabia as well?
Or is India the closer trade partner?
Well, the Russian gas we refuse to take.
We will take that from India.
But we also have some deals going with Qatar right now.
Very clever.
Because they were deemed more reliable partners.
Rather than Russia, right?
So, yeah, we've got these pretty cool partners, you know, lined up who now, yeah, well, it might actually, we might run into problems once again, ever since Hamas, you know, pulled that stuff in Israel.
So, I don't know what's going to happen, but Qatar doesn't seem to be quite that reliable as our brilliant...
I mean, this is what I said, you know, we suspect America did it.
I happen to believe Seymour Hersh's article in terms of plausibility, whether or not it was America directly or America indirectly through useful entities that carried out.
It's a distinction without a difference.
This is probably one of the most, if not the biggest acts of international Sabotage, if you don't want to use the terrorist word to be inflammatory, sabotage on an ally depending on who did it.
How the hell are Germans and German officials not only interested, but hell-bent on determining who did it?
This is not like just forgive and forget or move on.
How the hell are they not dead set on determining who did this?
Yeah, well, beats me.
I don't know.
And because of the fact that they simply...
Don't show any interest in finding out who it was.
That is a pretty clear indication as to who it was.
And I suspect the United States government had something to do with that.
Now, that would explain at the political level, intelligence level.
We know who did it, so we're not going to look for it like, you know, the cocaine in the White House.
We're not going to look too hard.
But what about at the social population level?
Are German citizens not...
Well, a lot of them are just simply ignorant.
You know, there's so much stuff going on.
So just kind of the discussion about who did it and, you know, is there any investigation going on?
It died down, actually, pretty quickly.
The government didn't speak about it whatsoever.
So it was like, you know, alternative media raising some questions and, you know, coming up with some speculation.
But it was not picked up by mainstream media.
I mean, literally, no one seemed to care about...
It's gone now.
And then there's always some kind of thing going on, you know, whether it's pandemic or, you know, now with anything going on in Israel.
And before that, it was Ukraine and, you know, all of this.
So people are pretty much being kept occupied with other...
Issues and other topics.
And yeah, well, it just kind of died down.
It's unbelievable.
It died down.
It was destroyed and it's never going to be rebuilt or it's never going to be repaired until, I don't know, relations are reestablished.
Well, I think not.
I mean, had there been a will to repair it or restore it or do whatever to it, then there would have been a discussion and they would have started on it by now.
But no, like I said.
They simply don't seem to care.
It's kind of like, well, it got blown up.
It's gone now.
What the heck?
And set aside the energy issues.
Set aside the political conflict issues.
From a world that is interested in environmental impacts, would not one want to know who was responsible for this devastating environmental sabotage, if only potentially to hold them accountable?
Nobody's even asking it from an environmental perspective.
Well, yeah, that too.
You know, no one seems to care.
And as long as you have young people, you know, gluing themselves to a street and, you know, throwing paint and food and paintings, you know, the environment is taken care of.
So, you know, you don't need to bother with, you know, dealing with that issue as far as the pipeline is concerned.
No, no, no.
No, absolutely don't.
They're idiots.
They're complete idiots.
No comments.
I don't want to judge people.
At the individual level, I mean, I say tongue-in-cheek, but too busy with their own lives, too busy paying for their high energy to actually get angry.
No, idiots, I was talking about the government.
Sorry, I didn't actually mean to suggest you weren't either.
At the individual level...
There's the excuse for which the general population are not involved, are not outraged.
It's apathy on the one hand, distraction on the other, and just living their lives and trying to pay the bills that their government keep causing an increase of.
And now, so the latest stuff is just, it's beyond depressing.
Politically speaking, we can go back to 2015, Angela Merkel in Germany.
A decade ago, it was the Syrian refugee crisis.
Angela Merkel, I forget how many she had let in, but I think it was well over...
A million?
2015.
Now, the urban legend, or at least some news outlets have reported that after realizing the error in her ways, Merkel actually paid the Syrian immigrants to go home.
Is that true?
I've never heard of that.
I read an article.
You're right.
You're right.
There was like a desperate attempt to insensitize them to go back home.
So yeah, that was like, what, 2016?
Yeah, 2016.
Something like that.
So we're taking these people in because they were fleeing for whatever reason.
Well, they were supposed to be all Syrian refugees, which they weren't.
There was like...
A lot of refugees out of the African states among them.
They simply said, we no longer controlled.
We no longer checked what country they were from because it was too many.
So we just let them all in.
And all they had to do was claim, well, we're Syrian refugees, right?
And it was like a free pass for anyone to just get in.
Well, a lot of them were highly pigmented.
And so they must have come from other parts of the world.
But anyhow, yeah, so there was like an incentive to get them to go back home voluntarily, which none of them did, obviously, you know.
And the ones that did do that, guess what they did?
They took the money, went back home, and just came back.
Ridiculous.
And it's like, it's almost...
Too politically incorrect to even ask the question, but I'll ask it nonetheless.
What has been the social impact or what has been the state of affairs since that influx of immigrants in 2015, 2016?
Have there been noticeable shifts in policy, noticeable shifts in statistics?
I mean, has there been a noticeable impact on German society as a whole?
Oh, yeah, absolutely.
I mean, you know, we've had, I think, three consecutive years on New Year's Eve, where 1,000, 2,000 of them just showed up at one particular place, and they were sexually abusing and sexually molesting hundreds and hundreds of women.
And, you know, there is a specific term in the Arabic language.
Tara, Magus, something like that.
So it's like this collective ganging up on a woman, you know, and that went on for like three, four consecutive years every New Year's Eve, right?
And the biggest issue that the mainstream media had here, however, was not that incident happening.
No, it was that the police referred to them As NAFRIs, which is short for North Africans, right?
That was racist labeling and, you know, what have you not.
So that was like the biggest issue.
Not that hundreds of women got sexually abused by these men, right?
No.
No problem at all.
So we have security issues, obviously.
We're now discussing to have separate carriages on trains just for women so they would be safe, right?
We're talking about when you have large events going on like Carnival.
I think I would translate into Mardi Gras.
So we have specific places where women can go to if they know So, I mean, seriously, this is what our society turns into now.
Women are no longer safe in public spaces, right?
So, yeah, there is lots of stuff going on.
Crime rate is way up.
Murder is way up.
And, yeah.
Well, what can I say?
No, it'll segue into the next topic or the next subject is...
Like, the demonization of noticing statistical trends, you know, it seems you can't make these observations anymore without running into these standard accusations.
And, you know, you could draw whatever conclusions you want.
Canada is going through the same surge in crime.
You know, Montreal, Toronto, Vancouver, big cities in particular.
Chalk it up to whatever you want, but noticing these things has become an inconvenient truth.
You did a recent tour in Canada.
This was back in...
I remember this now because I was at the Longboat Key studio for Rumble for an event and I remember someone calling me up and they were very upset as to the treatment that you had gotten.
Was it at this point in time when you came to Canada and then got unwelcomed?
Was it in February 2023?
That was in February.
Okay, so you came to Canada back in 2023, early 2023.
What was the purpose of that?
Well, I just, you know, wanted to go and see the Canadian truckers, because I consider them to be the bravest people I know.
What they did is to actually highlight.
What everyone around the planet is going through with, you know, the ostracizing people, labeling people, not allowing them to go to work anymore, forcing them to take an mRNA shot, which they, you know, no one knew at the time what that stuff actually does.
And yeah, I just wanted to meet these people who made this happen.
And because what they did is...
It was such a great service to freedom, democracy and the rule of law around the world because that's part of the game plan is to suggest to people you're completely isolated.
You're all alone if you think that the government is wrong on this by imposing curfews, by imposing mask mandates and wanting you to take that jab and whatever.
You're completely alone in thinking that and Canadian truckers actually.
They said, uh-uh, you're not alone.
And so many people around the world, actually, it was hope.
The Canadian truckers gave the people around the world hope.
And, yeah, it was an inspiration for them to do just the same, to take to the streets and fight this.
So that was my purpose.
I wanted to meet the people that made that happen.
And I brought up the article because this was when I had a bit of a problem.
I remember hearing what Pierre Poilievre was purported to have said, and I said, "This has to be...
It can't be real." And I was waiting for confirmation.
We got independent confirmation.
Look, have you ever met Pierre Poilievre in real life?
No, I haven't.
So you come to Canada.
I mean, I guess some people can say if they want to be snooty, arrogant...
I mean, I guess I could say you're a European member of parliament.
Stick to European politics.
You have no business.
What are you coming around here for?
As if, and we're going to get into this in a bit, as if we're not living through an era of globalization, for lack of a better word, or just, you know, the new world order in real time, as if that's not what we're living through.
And as if we're not all sort of somewhat interconnected by agencies that are unelected and yet seek to govern us.
You come to Canada and then you get thrown under the bus.
Boy Howdy by Pierre Poiliev.
I mean, explain what it feels like to have that happen to you.
And for those who don't know, Pierre Poiliev, I guess through a leak from his cabinet said, you know, she has no business coming here with her vile extremist views.
Stay away.
Racist.
Go home, I think he said.
I mean, how does that feel on a, I mean, I know I've been slighted on the internet and it doesn't feel good.
This is at a whole new level or whole next level.
How does that feel?
Well, actually, you know what?
I'm just used to that.
So it doesn't get to me.
And had that been like, what, 10 years ago or, you know, eight years ago?
Yeah, that might have actually bothered me a lot, but not anymore because I'm really used to that.
So, I mean, if other people, you know...
Feel or see fit to label me with whatever, you know, term.
That is their problem.
It's not my problem.
So I haven't done anything wrong.
I know what I stand for and I know what I am and I know what I'm not.
So and no one, like I said, no one gets to define me.
So that is rather, it's their problem.
Because they don't know what to do with me.
Because I speak up and I will not comply with, you know, the politically desired narrative or whatever.
I will speak up against that.
So they have to attack me, you know, because if they had arguments, actual arguments, they would have presented their arguments.
But apparently they don't have arguments, so they use, you know, the attack ad hominem.
You know, just label the person and attack the person.
But hey, whatever.
What particularly pissed me off about that is that people say it and you expect it from trolls.
You expect it from your outright ideological adversaries.
You would expect it from a liberal, any member of liberal government.
You might expect it from politicians at large, but not from ones who themselves have been...
The objects or the victims of that very smear machine.
And I brought up a bunch of accusations of Poilievre having been accused of racism for things he said about the burqa back in the day, about the citizenship test.
I was like, dude, you get accused of this and now you're turning around and pulling it on someone who you may not agree with everything she says.
I mean, I don't agree with everything I've ever said, depending on when you ask me.
And you use that very same smear tactic.
On someone else that has been used on you.
And by the way, it's been used on him.
It was used on him at the stage barely a month later.
I mean, this is the ultimate irony.
He gets accused of being racist for having used the thin blue line barely a month after he throws you under the bus.
Is there not a special level of betrayal that you feel in particular with some individuals, Pierre being one of them, or do you just write it off all on the same level?
I pretty much just...
Write it off.
No, I'm not particularly mad at him now.
But I've made an observation, and that's actually this.
So if you're confronted with the accusation or the label of being racist, homophobe, xenophobe, the whole shebang, conservatives actually truly believe they could whitewash themselves.
If they found another person who was, you know, further on the right, and then they started accusing that person, thinking, you know, that'll get me off the hook.
Now I'm all good because there is this other person, much worse, much worse.
But it doesn't work this way.
Because, I mean, you know...
If society or, you know, the rogue people accuse you or label you as racist, a Nazi, whatever, you know, all the isms in the book, they are not doing that because they really believe you are those things.
They want to shut you up.
They want to intimidate you and they want to give a message to other people.
Don't even listen to this person because, you know...
Racist, whatever.
It does not work.
If you're being labeled as a Nazi, as a right-wing extremist, as a racist, xenophobe, the whole thing, then you cannot get yourself off the hook by finding someone else who is worse, or you think is worse, or you accuse him of being worse.
It does not work this way.
And it just goes to show, as I said, yeah, only idiots do that.
Well, it's an interesting observation.
It's as though he thought, and in some way I think maybe he's given up on it, that he could earn his way into the good graces of Canadian media by being the good conservative, by going after a naughty conservative.
And another thing that I remember from childhood, have you ever seen the movie Trainspotting?
No.
Oh, it's in Edinburgh.
It's a 1996 movie with Ewan McGregor.
What is it?
Trainspotting?
Trainspotting.
If you have an aversion to drugs and all things related to drugs, it will make you feel sick.
But it's one of, I think, one of the best movies ever made.
But I can take some flack for that.
But it's about drug addiction.
And I used to go watch, I went to see it seven times in the theater.
And I would go to movies alone when I was 16, 17. And I sat next to a psychologist or psychiatrist.
And he says, we start talking.
He says, why do you go to movies alone?
I explained it.
And he says, you know, there's a risk about watching movies like this where you watch other people who you think are worse than you that you could compare your actions to and somehow absolve yourself of your own weaknesses and foibles by comparing yourself to others who are worse.
That's not what Pierre was doing here, but in an iteration of it, as if to say, hey CBC, I'm one of the good ones, go after her, and they'll never forgive you regardless.
And whether or not he agrees or disagrees with what you said in particular, well my goodness, some people can accuse him of having said pretty much the exact same thing a few years earlier.
How did that tour end up going in Canada?
It was great.
So I was there meeting lots of people and it was really fun meeting all those people.
But the thing is this: I was only known to a rather small amount of people in Canada.
But after they pulled that stunt on me, dragging me through the mainstream media, calling me racist and what have you not, and mentioning me even in the Canadian Parliament, making an issue of me.
Canadian Parliament?
Oh my God!
There probably isn't a single person alive in Canada who doesn't know who Christine Anderson is by now.
So, I mean, they added to, yeah, to my celebrity, if you will, you know, and they added to the fact of how known I am.
So, I mean, whatever they were trying to do, well, it didn't work.
I love it.
You're the extremist that the Liberal government and Conservative warns Canada about and then enter the play Jaroslav Juncker and standing ovation in the Parliament.
We don't need to go.
Oh, but you know what?
I was going to say we don't need to relive that because I hammered that for a long time on the internet because nobody should ever forget.
But Christine, you're from Germany.
You're in Europe now.
What was the international reaction?
To that incident in Canadian Parliament?
It was overwhelming.
It really was.
I mean, my social media appearance, you know, got a huge boost and, you know, I went through the roof.
And yeah, it was amazing.
I got so many letters, cards, packages even.
And I had gotten those before, but it was like even more after that, you know.
I remember...
I received a picture of three little children and it had like a little written note.
And you can tell it was written by a little child.
And it said, thank you for fighting for my and my brother's freedom.
And I was like, oh my God.
This is actually, it's up in my office.
So I've gotten so much recognition and so many, you know.
Heartfelt stories.
People just shared with me whatever story they had.
It was really amazing.
Actually, someone in the Rumble chat asked, not sure that I asked you this, but who your biggest influences were, either growing up or in real time, influences, heroes that you look up to, to derive the strength to do what you're doing.
Well, it's a number of people, actually.
So, obviously, my parents, my dad, I mean, he did, you know, he stood up back then and fought for freedom, freedom of speech.
He paid dearly for it, you know, got a 25-year sentence for hard labor.
So, yeah, but after he was released, after five years, luckily he was released.
He still wouldn't shut up.
He just kept going.
And then my mother too.
My mother, she wasn't highly educated.
But she had a street smartness to her.
And she was very resolute.
So she would stand up for herself.
Yeah, and just kind of being tenacious if you really want something.
So it's a combination.
Then, of course, I had teachers that really had an impact on the way I did things, the way I thought, the way I approached problems.
Yeah, and then, yeah, an inspiration for me was also Donald Trump.
This is going to be the most controversial thing ever, Christine.
Sorry, please go on.
But it's true, though.
I mean, you know, just the way he would not give a damn about what the media would write about him, about what, you know, people said about him, you know, just not giving a damn.
And that is actually you have to be at a level of freedom within yourself.
Like Albert Camus said, you have to become so absolutely free.
That your very existence is an act of rebellion, you know?
Just kind of getting to that state of mind, not to care about what people think about you anymore, as long as you know what you're doing is the right thing.
Yeah, in that regard, he was an apt, he was an inspiration for me.
And I'm not ashamed of saying that, because it's just simply true.
Be so free your existence is an act of rebellion.
I am so going to find the full context for that afterwards.
Yeah.
The whole quote is, to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence becomes an act of rebellion.
That's beautiful.
Where is it from?
I mean, it's from Camus, but...
Yeah, Camus.
Which one?
I get mixed up between Camus and Sartre.
La Nausée.
Nanger is Sartre, right?
Right.
It's Albert Camus.
Okay, I'm going to pull that up afterwards.
Now, you're coming back to Canada.
I don't want to forget about the most important part.
You're coming back to Canada for another tour.
When and for what reason?
Well, I'll fly out on November 25th.
So, yeah, pretty much do what I did last time to meet the people, the Canadian truckers, which I really admire.
And like I said, they're the heroes in all of this.
So, yeah, I'm glad to be back and I love to see him again.
We say in Canada, at least our perception is that the reason why Trudeau was so dreadfully embarrassed by the truckers is that it spawned something of an international movement.
Exactly.
What similar acts of revolt or rebellion or protest, to use a less toxic term, Yeah, well, you already mentioned the farmers in the Netherlands.
But, you know, they're not being reported on.
So the average people, they don't even realize that something is going on.
They're being just, you know, cut out of all reporting.
They're quite active, actually.
So then you have in Ireland, there's something going on because they're supposed to slaughter like half of their cattle because they found out that cows burp and fart.
Can you imagine?
You know, I mean, they've been doing that for thousands of years, but now it's threatening our planet.
So they have to just kill them off.
Yeah, right.
Have they pulled that back or is that still a planned farming policy in the Netherlands?
I'm sorry to say again?
Are they still planning on enforcing that?
No, no, no.
They're pushing it.
They are.
That's actually another thing that didn't occur to me up until a few months ago.
How I keep telling people there is all these issues to distract people.
It's kind of like fragmentation of what's going on.
Pandemic was one issue.
Then you had climate.
Then you had, you know, whatever, transgender, of course.
So, but all of these issues, they pretty much lead up to one purpose and one goal, which is to, yeah, enslave all the people around the world, you know.
So, and it didn't occur to me until a couple of months ago.
These various issues, they seem to be pushing it in different countries.
So, in the Netherlands, you have, like, this farmers thing going on with the climate and all of that.
In Great Britain, they are pushing the 15-minute ghettos.
There's other legislation in place that specifically calls for climate lockdowns.
And in Germany, there seems to be that migration crisis, you know, being pushed.
But like I said, it's all...
It all serves one purpose, and that is to abolish freedom, democracy, and the rule of law.
Now, that was one of the questions that we had here.
I'll ask it.
Maybe I'll get in trouble for asking.
Ask her about why there has not been an official investigation into the WEF and Bilderberg anti-human agenda.
What is the WEF's influence in Europe?
I mean, I presume it's the same as what we see of the influence in the West in terms of capturing governments.
What is the level of influence?
What's the level of knowledge of that influence within the general population as a whole?
Well, the influence of WEF is the same in Europe as it is everywhere else in the world.
They're advocating for and pushing for...
All the agendas, a couple of them I just mentioned.
The average people, they actually, that changed in the last three years.
Like three years ago, if you would have asked any person on the street, they would have looked at you.
I've never heard of that.
But in the last three years, that changed.
There is a lot of people now, they know what WEF is, and they have a pretty good understanding of what they're aiming at.
However, there is lots of people, they really think, you know, that WF is just this nice, you know, entity taking care, you know, with their sustainable goals and, you know, the whole thing.
And, you know, it's so colorful that, you know, kind of like a Wheel of Fortune, their logo looks kind of like a Wheel of Fortune, you know.
So they don't really get what's behind that.
So that's the influence over here.
As to why there is no investigations, well, who do you expect to investigate?
I mean, especially in the Western democracies, look at the governments.
They're all puppets.
They're all the puppets of, you know, whoever is running the show, pulling the strings.
And I don't even know who these people are.
I know it's not Klaus Schwab.
I mean, he's hanging his face in the camera.
He's advocating publicly for this nonsense.
I don't know who's running the show and pulling the strings.
So who would you investigate?
There's no push, or is there a political push to...
I'll call it a litmus test, but to basically have a prohibition on members of European Parliament having any involvement whatsoever with the WEF or any unelected globalist entity.
I mean, is there any push to have these be impermissible practices as a politician?
No.
I mean, you know, you kind of contemplate that in parties that are like my party.
You know, we are on that.
But we are not in the majority.
And we don't, in the EU Parliament, we don't have a majority.
So, I mean, if things go really, really well for our spectrum, we would have like, what, 150 votes max, you know, on any given issue.
If things...
Went really well for us, out of 705 MEPs.
So the political will is simply not there.
The ones that are in government now, they don't seem to want to raise any of those issues.
They're probably part of the Young Global Leader Program, whatever, they may benefit.
And then always you have people, they're not directly part of any of that, but they're so...
So happy they belong to the club now, and they don't want to jeopardize that.
So they're quite content, you know, being an MEP, not having to decide anything, you know, or anything like that.
But belonging to the club, that's enough for them, and they would do everything.
Everything, you know, to not jeopardize that.
I tell you this, people may or may not believe me.
I despise being members of clubs in the literal sense and in the metaphoric sense.
I hate it.
I don't think I'd ever want to be a member of the old joke.
I'd never want to be a member of a club that would have me as a member.
But I hate it.
It's like you become, on the one hand, either owned by, indebted to.
But otherwise compromised by virtue of some sort of club affiliation.
I mean, if I did that, that would have meant I would not have been able to become a member of my party because my party, you know, is kind of a club too.
So, I mean, I'm not as against that or as stern on that as you are.
Yeah, but yeah, when I said belonging to the club, it's just kind of like, you know...
Metaphorically speaking.
It's the George Carlin.
It's a big club and most of us are not in it.
European Union is threatening.
I'm not sure how familiar you are with the EU and its fight with Twitter over disinformation.
Have there been any recent developments, any concrete action that the European Union is taking to make sure they're in here?
For those listening on podcast, quote, fight disinformation.
What's going on with that in Europe now?
Well, the last that I heard about that was the commissioner writing a stern letter to Elon Musk and reminding him that, you know, he will have to adhere to, you know, the disinformation, the Media Freedom Act or whatever they call it.
So I just read it and I was laughing loud.
I was like, seriously?
Wow, you showed him now, really?
I don't know what's happening.
I mean, I can still access Twitter.
So I don't know what the commissioner is planning to do about it.
You know, I don't see Elon Musk giving in and complying.
And why should he?
I mean, you know, whatever disinformation.
It's like whatever is against government policy, whatever is against their Vogue ideology, whatever is against WEF's ideology, WHO, I mean, you know, all of that.
Whoever says or comes up with arguments against all of that is labeled disinformation, right?
So, I mean, it's quite obvious what they were trying to do.
They're trying to protect the narrative and nothing else.
Okay, so we are seeing, particularly out of England, and I suspect I'm only seeing these because they're in English and they tend to get shared more, but we're seeing videos of police showing up at people's homes, arresting, fining, literally for social media posts.
I've entered an era where I just, you know, you no longer even know what to believe, even when you see it with your own eyes, but in as much as you can be...
Convinced something is accurate and relatively true.
We're seeing videos of this and we know it's happening in the UK to some extent.
Is it the same level of censorship, police enforcement, restricting free speech in Germany as it is in the UK?
Yes and no.
So what seems to happen in Great Britain, that seems to be another issue that they're really pushing in Great Britain right now, is, yeah, there is police officers showing up at your door because you posted something.
There have been a few incidents here in Germany, especially surrounding the pandemic, now, quote.
Pandemic in quotes.
The pandemic or, you know, initially discussions about ivermectin, you know, all of that.
Doctors, they had their offices raided, you know, but that was all pertaining to the whole COVID madness, right?
So other than that, not to my knowledge at least, There haven't been any reports on people getting raided in their homes for tweets or social media posts on, let's say, transgender or stuff like that.
But, I mean, they are pushing it, obviously.
Yes.
Now you bring it up, actually.
Europe is going through something of a backlash against the support for trans rights, as they're called, child, what do they call it?
Gender affirming care.
I don't know how far Germany ever went along Well, it hasn't had quite that of an impact.
In Germany, let's just speak about Germany for now, as it had in Canada, Great Britain and the United States.
And that was actually one of the benefits of these pandemic-related school closures.
Because parents, for the first time in years, have realized what their kids are being taught at school.
That was actually good.
For that purpose, it was good that the school was closed.
Sorry, jokingly.
There's some fringe benefits to the social devastation.
Yeah, we got to see what teachers were teaching our kids.
Exactly.
I mean, people now know what their kids are being taught and they're, you know, rising up and speaking up against it.
In Germany, I would say there is a majority.
They are not in support of it, but they would never speak up about it.
You know, kind of like, you know, hush hush.
So, but if you were to speak to them in private, oh yeah.
I mean, we don't want that gendered language.
There was actually a poll a couple of months ago where a vast majority, like 85%, something like that, they said they don't want gendered language because they were trying to push that even on, you know, news media shows, you know.
I mean, it's...
So ridiculous.
So you pretty much say every word twice because we have a male and a female ending to the words, right?
So I guess you guys don't have that problem in the English language.
But in languages that have actually these genders in their language, it's a huge issue.
I speak French, and you have masculine and feminine, and they were literally talking about creating gender-neutral...
Exactly.
It's ridiculous.
It's really ridiculous.
So, interesting to note, though, now it's like they go ahead and always mention the female and the male of the word, right?
However, interesting to note, they will only mention the female ending of a word if it is a word that has a positive connotation.
So you would never hear of the word thief being used in both.
That's only male or bank robber.
Right?
So, or, you know, whatever.
So it's only, you know, like scientists.
Yeah, they would say male scientists, female scientists, right?
But they would never say male robber and female robber.
It's interesting.
Anyway, so there was a poll.
The people, vast majority, 85%, something like that, they don't want the gendered language because it's just ridiculous.
And it actually cuts down.
On the ability of communicating.
If you gender that language, you have these huge sentences now, right?
But like I said, the majority, they would not speak up about it publicly.
So someone, Sophronia says, my son learned gender-neutral pronouns in French class this year.
Stunning.
Fantastic.
Some people are asking in the chat, what is your itinerary, if you're able to mention where you're going when you hit America, North America?
Okay, I don't know.
You'll be posting it to social media.
No, it's in some email, but I just haven't gotten around to really take a close look, so honestly, I don't know.
Now I'm going to ask you some questions we got here.
I don't want to abuse too much of your time.
I know you have to go soon.
Does she have any comments on North Dakota GOP exhibiting woke tendencies or how the AFD will avoid such weaknesses?
This is from Tampered from our locals community.
How is the AFD or how does the AFD combat what is typically colloquially referred to as wokeism?
You're cutting out?
No, I'll repeat the question.
How is the AFD, your political party, going to go about avoiding this type of what we call wokeism, compelled speech, social media shaming, cancel culture, all that stuff?
How does the AFD ensure that that doesn't infiltrate the party?
Well, um, To be honest, right now, I don't see a way for ideologies like that being able to get transported into my party.
I mean, we're completely opposed to all of that.
That is part of our DNA.
So, I mean, they would have had to...
If you were trying to take over the party, you really would have to get rid of, like, what, 98% of the people in the party?
The party itself, I guess, is something...
Did that answer your question?
Did I get that right?
Well, I mean, my answer, my anticipation would have been the party itself is something of a filter.
It's like people who believe in that are not going to be joining the AFD because that's what they're trying to avoid.
I'm sorry, but you're really patchy.
I think it might actually...
I think it might be on your...
No, I say not to blame.
Our internet connection has gotten shoddy, but I don't think it's on my end.
It might be the German government has infiltrated.
Christine, okay, well, we're at the hour limit.
I don't know.
Can you still hear me?
Well, I don't know.
Let me put something in the private chat.
I think it's...
Yeah, yeah.
Well, let's see.
While I still have you and while we're clear, like while we can say proper goodbyes, Christine, where can people find you on social media?
Thank you.
Thank you.
Hold on, and I'll say that here.
Social media.
Now, once again, you're coming out.
All right.
Where can you find me on my social media?
Well, on Twitter.
On Twitter, it's AndersonMDEP, for instance, Telegram.
Yeah, but if you just, you know, just Google my name and you'll find it.
I'm all over the place by now.
Christine, if you can still hear me.
If we get to meet up in America, it'll be fantastic.
We'll go for dinner.
We'll be in touch.
But thank you very much for coming on.
I don't know if our internet connection is getting shoddy, but thank you very much, and we will be in touch.
Okay, go for it.
Enjoy the day, or the night, I guess.
Thank you so much for having me.
Once again, it was a pleasure talking to you.
And we'll meet up once I get there.
All right, awesome.
Have a good day.
I think the European Parliament is getting...
She has told him too much.
I don't know why everybody has to have the German accent when they do it.
Oh, it seems that Christine Anderson is fraternizing again with the hinged, fringed Canadian living in Florida.
We must interfere with this broadcast.
That was fantastic.
Now, I think I got to everybody's questions.
I did ask in our locals community to refresh your questions towards the bottom, and I think I got to them, but...
I think also the internet connection was getting sufficiently problematic that it wasn't going to work anyhow.
All right, now, all that to say, by the way, I don't have...
I'm not going to be doing a marathon stream today.
A, because my wife is out.
I've got the kids.
They don't have school for some reason.
I don't know what the heck is going on here.
And I've got to go to the premiere.
Of Dinesh D'Souza's police state at Mar-a-Lago tonight.
And so I'm anticipating that that's going to be phenomenal.
So we're going to talk about a few stories.
I was trying to get Joe Nierman in, but I'm not sure that it's going to work to cover yesterday's hearing of the Donald Trump Colorado horse crap removal of the ballot case.
So I might just give you the 15 minute or at most 10 minute synopsis of the hearing that because most people do not have the time, the patience, the inclination, the They have a sufficient amount of respect for their own body that they would not submit themselves to listening to that trial day in and day out.
It's an absolute outrageous trial.
Now, let me get to the bottom of the chat here.
Oh, see, Lohawk says Bongino's going to be there.
I happen to think that Donald Trump might be there based on some of the...
Actually, I don't want to spread rumors.
I don't know, but I think based on...
There might be an indication.
I don't know.
I'm hoping.
Either way.
It's Dinesh D'Souza's exclusive documentary.
Now it's on Rumble, police state.
It's amazing.
Bongino co-narrates the documentary.
It's got the story of the pro-choice guy who was raided by the FBI.
It goes through all of the most recent examples of how America might have become a police state iteration.
It doesn't look like the same type of police states that we've seen in the past, but it bears some of the earmarks, some of the hallmarks of a police state.
So it's going to be amazing.
There will be no live streaming from the event.
I've been told that, so I might make a short video on my own, but no live streaming.
And it's going to be amazing.
Pavlovsky is going to give an intro speech, from what I understand, with Bongino, Dinesh D'Souza.
There's going to be...
A red carpet type interview section.
We'll see what that looks like.
And then we watch the movie.
Then there's an after sort of cocktail party, but all ahead of home because nothing good happens after 10 o 'clock.
So that's what's on for today.
So I can't stay around for too long.
But to give everybody the synopsis of the day two of the Colorado trial, it's a steaming pile of judicial horse poop is what it is.
Nothing shy of it.
It's the biggest joke you can possibly imagine.
They're in the plaintiff's portion of the evidence of the case and they had an expert on right-wing extremism come up yesterday and testify that Trump's speeches have the rhetoric, the linguistic...
Traits.
What's the word I'm looking for?
The style.
It's like a delivery of right-wing extremism.
It speaks to the ears of right-wing extremists.
And it's the most...
The guy got eviscerated on cross-examination, but I don't think he understands it yet.
He gets up in chief, for anybody who's interested, talking about how Donald Trump uses dog whistles.
How he uses plausible deniability.
How he appeals to right-wing extremist emotions, as if any of this is unique or even exclusive to right-wing extremism, as opposed to, I don't know, sometimes when you just speak the truth.
He says Trump's speech and all of his rhetoric, taken in its context as a whole, is inciting a violence because it plays on people's grievances.
It says you've been wronged and we need to protest that wrong.
He then says, you need to fight, fight, fight.
He said it 21 times in his speech.
He has a history of encouraging violence, like at his protests, where he says, get him out of here, I'll pay your legal bills, all of this stuff.
The guy got eviscerated on cross-examination, but we'll get there.
And so, basically, the thesis of this expert, this sociology expert on right-wing extremism, is that Trump's speech patterns, phraseology, Tactics, style, is that that is intended to incite a violent response from right-wing extremists.
That's it.
It's always contextual.
This guy said fight, and in the broader context of what's being said, would it be heard by right-wing extremists as being an incitement to violence insurrection?
Load of crap.
On cross-examination, it was actually amazing, where the lawyer, I don't know what their names are, So it doesn't really matter.
But the cross-examining lawyer basically says, well, when Hillary Clinton, when Donald Trump denied the legitimacy of the outcome of the election, that was right-wing extremism incitement to violence and encouragement?
Oh, yeah, yeah.
Taken as a whole in its aggregate context of historical terminology and use of words.
Yes.
Okay.
When Hillary Clinton in 2016 said that Trump is an illegitimate president, that the Russians influenced the election, that it wasn't a real, true and honest election.
Was she inciting right-wing extremists to violence?
I mean, the absurdity of the question is so absurd that it actually duped the expert into answering, well, of course not.
I mean, Hillary Clinton's not going to incite right-wing extremists.
And he goes on to give multitudes of examples.
Well, when a Democrat politician says this, is that inciting right-wing extremism?
Well, of course not, because they're Democrats.
Missing the entire point that either this, when it's done by Democrats, is incitement of insurrection and violence to the left, the same way it is when a right does it to the right, or it's never, period.
And it's only contextualizing it with your wordsmithing tools of the devil to turn it into that which it never was.
The cross-examining attorney then also pulls up a bunch of, you know, says, when Trump said to fight, fight like hell.
That was a call to violence that incites right-wing extremism.
Oh, yeah.
Well, taken as a totality of the context and the history of the person speaking it, then I conclude that when Trump said, fight like hell for your country, it was encouragement of insurrection and removal under the 14th Amendment, Section 3. Okay.
When What's-Her-Face said, you know, fight.
When Chuck Schumer says, fight, was that incitement to violence?
Well, I'd have to know more about the context.
This exercise went on forever.
The lawyer played a montage of Chuck Schumer saying, fight, we're going to take it to the Supreme Court and fight like your lives depend on it.
Then they had Maxine Water.
You got to get in their faces and absolutely harass them.
Let them know that they did this for so long.
The guy, the expert, I mean, if he doesn't know that he dug himself into a hole, he never will.
And I suspect he never will because this is a charade of a kangaroo court trial with what I suspect is a foregone conclusion, although may I live to be wrong, That Trump's going to get removed from the ballot because the judge really very much seems like she's on board with all of it.
But it's painful to watch.
The audio sucks.
I think they do it deliberately so that nobody watches this or as few people as possible watch it.
Joe Nierman, good logic.
L-A-W-G-I-C.
There's a reason why I say it like that.
On Twitter, it's the following program is covering it.
So go check him out.
That's the update on the trial.
Now, chat.
Have I talked about...
Did I cover the new maid's medical assistance in dying stats out of Canada?
One, yes I did.
Two, no I didn't.
I know that I've tweeted about it.
I know that I've put it on the menu for a show multiple times and I don't think I got to it yet.
One, yes I have.
Two, no I haven't.
The medical assistance in dying 2022 numbers.
Have I covered it?
Okay.
No.
Good.
Okay.
Let's do this immediately.
We will do it immediately.
No, that's not the right thing.
I want to bring up the article.
The numbers are in.
Spoiler alert.
I don't believe them, but I'll rely on them.
The numbers were 10,064 in 2021.
No.
Close.
The numbers now have increased by, what, 30%, I guess?
Maybe it's 40%.
They went from 10,000 in 2021, 10,064 Canadians euthanized by the government, to 13,241 in 2022.
I don't believe the number as far as I can throw Justin Trudeau, but last, that's the number that they're reporting.
So here we go.
Euthanasia deaths in Canada since 2022, since, ooh, are they fudging things here?
13,241 and rising.
Canada has released its annual euthanasia report from 2022, and it's a bleak business.
More than 13,000 Canadians received lethal jabs last year, representing 4.1% of all deaths in the country.
Can you imagine that?
I think it's the third leading cause of death in Canada.
I'll double-check that.
It was the third leading cause of death in Quebec for a while.
Government-assisted suicide, and in some cases, government-sanctioned murder.
When all the data is considered, medically assisted deaths reported in Canada since the introduction of the federal legislation, 45,000.
There are more than 93,000 doctors in Canada.
Most, thankfully, still do not lethally inject patients, with those who do killing about seven patients each.
Wow.
From the report, the total number of unique practitioners providing MAID during 2022 was 1,800 and change, up 20% from 1,500.
95% of all maid practitioners were physicians, while 5% were nurse practitioners.
How the hell can a nurse practitioner administer death to somebody?
Among physicians, family physicians conduct the majority of maid provisions, two-thirds.
Nurse practitioners are providing an increasing share of maid provisions.
Physicians performed 90% of all medically-assisted deaths procedures during 2022, while nurse practitioners performed nearly 10%.
It's the suffering that caused people to ask for death mostly involved existential despair.
This is going to make you very angry.
In 2022, the most commonly cited source of suffering by individuals requesting medical assistance in dying were the loss of ability to engage in meaningful activities, 86.3%, followed by a loss of ability to perform certain activities of daily living and Inadequate control of pain or concern about controlling pain.
So that's it.
Hold on one second.
I lost the screen here.
So I don't know if when they talk about those numbers, the inability to interact, if it means as a result of illness, if it means as a result of terminal illness.
Existential despair, says Seferdine Squibb.
I have that every day.
No, I don't know if the existential despair is because of the terminal illness, but now that we know that it's by no means limited to people with terminal illnesses whatsoever, people with severe allergies, it was called multiple chemical sensitivity, one woman was euthanized, and I call that state-sanctioned murder.
The woman who they featured in that Simons ad was not terminally ill either, and actually said that she wanted to live, but she felt like she was falling through the cracks.
State-sanctioned murder.
Talking about doing it to the mentally ill, drug addicts.
What is it?
Two-thirds of the Canadian population supported for the homeless?
It's state-sanctioned murder.
And when they say existential despair, I don't think they mean resulting from stage four lung cancer or pancreatic cancer with three months of, you know, nothing but pain and suffering left of your life.
I think they actually might mean a broader sense of existential despair.
So that's what we got there.
Okay, now hold on.
I think what we might have to do, let me see here.
No, we're going to end with this.
Owen Schroyer.
We're going to end with this update on Owen Schroyer.
Cut it a little short.
It's funny.
I only go for an hour and a quarter.
I feel like I'm cutting it too early.
Owen Schroyer has been hauled off to jail for his 60-day sentence for speech.
If anyone read the charges, they'd know that in addition to being accused of having been in a restricted area, although he never entered the Capitol building, he was accused of having chanted 1776, 1776, which...
Apparently was violated of his prior agreement with the government for having interfered with the 2021 congressional hearing or something.
Hauled off to jail for 60 days.
No bond pending appeal.
He's in jail pending his appeal.
A whole lot of nothing that appeal is going to do if it's ever successful after he's served his time, which he's doing right now.
Owen Schroer, love him or hate him?
And if you hate him, you should care more about this than if you love him.
Because if you think that it's okay to let this type of treatment go because you hate somebody, you might be just as bad as the people you think you hate.
They hauled him off to jail 60 days.
He was placed in solitary, confirmed by Human Resources' Jack Posobiec.
He started a Twitter account to document his time in jail now, also because he hasn't been able to get his original account back from Elon Musk's Twitter, who suspended him a while back.
So he started a new Twitter account called Owen Schroyer 1776.
He goes to jail for his 60 days because he was denied bond, pending his appeal, and he was immediately placed into solitary and apparently...
Stop.
Apparently he was in solitary for a week and just got out only to, as we now know, be placed back into solitary and apparently placed back into solitary for this post that he made to Twitter.
through an account Owen Schroyer 1776, which is being managed by other people while he's in jail.
And we're going to listen to this.
Ladies and gentlemen, Owen Schroer here.
This is the first time you are hearing from me since my speech incarceration.
And I really don't want to get into what's going on here on the inside.
I'm much more concerned about what's going on out there.
But I will say I am finally out of my solitary confinement for a week.
And I'm extremely blessed because your prayers have come through.
Some friends helped me get through it with some conversations as well as getting me a digital radio.
So I had some reach with the outside world.
Solitary confinement by what he's saying here for a week.
It wasn't a punishment, people.
It was safety.
COVID protocol safety, allegedly.
Well, he's been thrown back into solitary and the suspicion is it's as a result of having posted this to social media.
And I was also able to follow a bit of the news via some talk shows.
And we have a TV here that I'm able to tune into on the FM dial as well.
And they have newscasts up as well.
And of course, I could sit here and talk about all the Biden crime family corruption that we've seen, the media that is obsessed with war propaganda and all the regular stuff.
But that's not what I want to bring to this message today.
I've just got done reading some of the mail that has been sent to me.
And to try to express how important it is or what it means to me would simply be impossible.
I do somehow plan to show you how grateful I am for that when I do get out of here.
But I've got to say, my shirt has grown.
I have to wear a double XL shirt now because my heart has grown so much from your fan mail.
And also, I'm now wearing double XL pants because, well, I'll just leave that up for your interpretation.
And we'll stop it there.
I don't want to play the whole thing because everybody should go and listen to it on their own.
Link to tweet.
Jack Posobiec is reporting this morning that he's back in solitary.
And the...
Let me just make sure I'm going to go to my Twitter account and make sure I'm not misquoting anything.
Yeah, Jack Posobiec says, tweets, Breaking the feds just threw Owen back in solitary confinement for sending this message from prison and having it posted on X. So that's where we're at.
We'll continue following it.
I mean, obviously.
And when I have more time tomorrow, we'll talk about stuff in greater detail.
Owen Schroyer, 1776.
I first saw it when he was at 4,000 followers on Twitter.
And now he's at 45,000 followers on Twitter.
So go watch the entire video.
Go listen to it.
And how do I do this?
Remove from here.
All right.
Now, I'm going to go do a little Locals Exclusive afterwards.
Maybe take some questions that...
Locals would like me to ask any members of government, any politicians, any celebrities that I see tonight.
So if you want to come over, come on over to locals at vivabarnsla.locals.com.
Come on over.
There was one rumble rant that I missed.
ThinboySlick says maybe they're not counting deaths, just the ones that were fully compliant.
I say the...
My ears did perk up when they referred to Canadians dying because of the death jab.
I think that was an interesting phraseology given there's another type of shot out of Canada that we refer to as the jab and some people refer to it as other terms involving similar terminology.
So I'm going to end it here on Rumble.
Time is short today.
I'm going to go over to Locals for a few minutes, get some questions that anybody wants me to ask specific individuals.
That might be an amazing thing that I'm actually going to do.
I'm going to go to Locals, see who's on the list of attendees tonight.
And then take down some specific questions that anybody has for those individuals.
And maybe I'll put together a montage of a Q&A.
I've got my mic.
I've got my phone fully charged.
Yes, siri, Bob.
And my getting a note that says, everything is good of the children that I have left unattended.
So that is it, everybody.
Thank you all for being here.
I'll see you tomorrow.
Definitely going to go live tomorrow.
There will be news between now and then.
And vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
For the after party.
So, go on.
Let me see here.
We got...
Viva, 5% is the number.
Oh, okay.
Probably...
Let me see what we got here.
Just read a few more chats before we head out while everyone comes over to VivaBarnes.com.
Boom, shakalaka.
Existential despair.
Are we at the bottom here?
We're not at the bottom.
Later Patriots says hyphen...
Let's see here.
Good show, Viva.
Thanks for bringing on Christine.
Cheers.
I like Christine.
You don't have to agree with everything anybody says, people.
Anybody who says you do has a very simplistic view of the world and will turn on you as soon as they no longer like something you said.
Hold on.
WhiteSparrowO says, I know Viva loves animals, so he'd say something if he saw it.
I'll have to try it again next if I manage to catch.
Hold on.
I don't know what that's about.
Okay.
And what do we got here?
Not getting into any religious discussions out here.
AMF.
All have a great day.
AMF.
All have a great day.
Buzzardhead AMF.
That stands for adios, mother effers.
I can't even put that together.
I've never heard that before.
And some more hateful comments, which I will ignore.
All right, everybody on Rumble.
If you're not coming over to Locals, enjoy the day.
I'll see you tomorrow.
If you're coming over to Locals, I'll see you in about five seconds.
Ending transmission.
Five, four, three, two.
Peace out, peeps.
▲
Export Selection