Live from the RNC! Trump Fraud? Vaccine Death Lawsuit! Rumble Under Attack? & MORE!
|
Time
Text
It's noon.
Good afternoon, West Coast.
Good evening, East Coast.
And top of the morning, Ireland.
No.
So we're live on location at the second RNC debate in...
Where are we?
It has the word Hills.
We're in LA.
It's the Reagan Library.
The area has the word Hills in it.
I don't know if you can see it behind us, but it's named properly because there's mountains and rolling hills everywhere.
It's beautiful.
I've been saying this for the last two days.
California is geologically the most beautiful state I've ever seen.
Politically, as I've had people tell me, a mess.
So we're going to have a two-part live stream today.
The first half, you might be asking, who is this fine gentleman sitting next to me?
Who are you, sir?
My name is Matt.
Matt Kors.
I'm a fellow creator on Rumble.
Going to be doing some fun live stream stuff.
Folks, if this is your first time meeting me, hey, I'm on Rumble.
You can find me.
I cover a little bit more of what's going on in the world of finances, so obviously I follow Rumble Stock, ticker symbol RUM, but we also could have a good conversation of the overall market.
I kind of got my going with the whole...
Ape Squeeze, the GameStop, AMC, Craziness, actually the Dumb Money movies coming out right now.
So there's a lot going on in the world of the markets and the craziness and all that.
Now, Matt Kors, it's K-O-H-R-S.
I just saw someone else with the last name Kors and I'm trying to think of what it was in the last day and a half.
Doesn't matter.
So we're going to talk a little bit of finance stuff because I've got questions and then Matt's going to go and then I'm going to start screaming again.
I was on the phone with my dad.
I'm allowed saying this.
I was on the phone with my dad and he says, David, you've been screaming a lot in your live streams lately.
I was like, yeah.
How can you not scream when the world is being flushed down the toilet before your very eyes?
The stuff we'll talk about after Matt takes off.
Dan Hartman, father of Sean Hartman, is suing the Canadian government over the death of his son 33 days after the first Pfizer shot.
There's a story of a...
The prosecutor who just went on something of a stabbing spree on a Florida highway was the prosecutor who was involved in prosecuting some of the January Sixers, including Adam Johnson, the lectern guy.
I'll have some other notes.
We'll get into it.
There's some Canadian madness.
I did a few RT interviews.
Not a few.
A couple this morning.
We'll get into all that fun, rage-inducing stuff after we have a discussion with our guests.
This is the calm before the storm.
This is the calm before the storm, because there will be a storm when I can rage and froth alone, I will.
So back at all, the name of your channel is what, again?
It's just under my name, Matt Kors, K-O-H-R-S.
You're a very young man.
Everybody knows I ask these questions.
I'm going to embarrass you by asking how young you are.
I'm 29. I don't feel that young, you know?
Dude, baby.
We were talking on the way up here, and he's like, when I was a kid and Reagan died, I was like, you were a kid when Reagan died.
I was like, I don't know how old I was, but I don't think I was a kid.
You're history.
People need to hear this, and they need to know this.
You were...
You were in the documentary, Eat the Rich.
Yeah.
So the way, actually, I even came to this chair.
So I've been trading for a long time.
I like the markets.
I like math.
In fact, my last couple semesters of college, I was just degenerately trading in the market.
And my background's in comp size.
So I was like, oh, I'll write programs that trade for me.
I wanted to do that.
And I was actually in New York when the world shut down.
And at that point, I was coding, doing that.
And I always thought it'd be fun to talk about finance and create a channel.
And so I started when the world locked down and I was horrible.
Whatever you think being bad at content was, uh, if you're ever having a bad day, So I did that for about a year, and my friends...
Kind of a rough group of friends.
They basically bullied me into live streaming because I thought I was so horrible at speaking.
So I started live streaming December 31st.
And that's important because a couple weeks later, that's exactly when GameStop started to take off.
December 31st, 2020.
2020.
And then four weeks, five weeks later, that's when GME got really crazy.
And at that point, I remember it.
I mean, at that point, I was streaming to 50, 75 people.
For whatever reason, and we don't really have the exact answers even to this day, but the WallStreetBets subreddit, which is where RoaringKitty, his name is Keith Gill, they took it down.
So I just changed my title of my stream when I was working on speaking like this to WallStreetBets subreddit taken down.
And I think I got like 1,000 concurrent viewers.
And I remember the moment.
It was pure dopamine in my brain.
I was like, I've made it.
I am content.
I am the market.
This is how you do it.
And...
I decided to stream for the remainder of that week.
It was a Wednesday, so I streamed Thursday, Friday, called my boss that weekend, and I was like, you know what?
I'm going to be sick this week.
So I streamed all week.
The numbers were good enough that that very next weekend I quit my job, and I've been streaming the markets ever since.
I was going to say, if your boss finds out that you've been streaming while you were sick, you're getting fired one way or the other.
And we presume everybody knows the GameStop scandal.
Anybody who hasn't seen the movie Eat the Rich or the documentary Netflix three-part, watch it.
I think everybody here is going to be somewhat familiar with the GameStop.
Who is it that initially said GameStop is highly undervalued?
Mix in the short squeeze.
Yeah, his name was Keith Gill.
He's better known as Roaring Kitty.
And then his other name was Deep F 'n Value.
And anyway, actually a whole movie is coming out tomorrow about this craziness.
Well, they've already done the light premiere of it.
But anyway, it's called Dumb Money.
And it's a big Hollywood production.
And it's talking about Citadel and Melvin Capital.
That's the hedge fund that blew up because of it, lost billions and billions of dollars.
And just it obviously for a bit there when we were all locked inside, there was unlimited quantitative easing and people were getting their stimulus checks.
It was a prime condition for like the insanity that we saw.
Explain the, what was it?
Quantitative easity.
Oh, so that's basically when the Federal Reserve, the Chairman Jerome Powell, they act like a drunken sailor and they just make money out of thin air.
And they just hit print, print, print, print, print, print, print over and over again.
And that's also partly why we have roaring inflation right now, which is a big focus of mine.
And obviously they're jacking up interest rates to try to bring it down under control.
But no, inflation, that's what happens when you make fake money out of thin air.
We were talking about this on the drive up.
Gas.
We're just talking about inflation.
In Malibu, I drove out there yesterday, $6.50 a gallon, which is madness.
We were talking about interest rates.
I was comparing the interest rates now to what we had as a mortgage in Canada four times as much, five times as much.
So the GameStop, there was a short squeeze.
People had their money.
They could micro-trade or trade in small amounts, which allowed people to, some call it manipulate or others say make predictions.
We won't get into that entire story, but I did say I was going to ask you this before I made sure it was okay.
Once all of that started happening and people were up on paper, hundreds of thousands, tons of money, and they were part of the movement, which meant that they couldn't just bail out because if they bailed out, if the spokespeople or the lightning rods of the action bail out, that would trigger a cataclysmic reaction, presumably.
And so a lot of people did not cash out and ended up holding a less empty bag.
How much money?
Figure-wise.
No, not specific.
Five, six digits.
Did you end up setting on fire on that table?
Yeah, so...
The way I did it was particularly degenerate because I made decent money on GME and I saw how that was going.
So a couple months later when the same phenomenon was happening in AMC, I was like, well, I saw how this played out before.
Might as well play it bigger and even more degenerate through the derivatives market with options.
And we're not going to get into that, but just all you need to know is it's leveraged at a rate of 101.
It's legalized gambling.
Yeah, it's very degenerate.
And I streamed this whole thing and people were seeing it.
I mean, for me, my net worth on paper, it went...
Up just like it was $500,000, $600,000.
So it went up to that point and then obviously came crashing back down with the stock.
So particularly painful that you've pointed out in my 20s when you have bills and a life ahead of you.
And you're like, oh, wow, that was a lot.
And I'll share my misery story because we discussed it.
I once owned a stock that I got in on at several cents per share years ago.
Held it for...
The better part of a half a decade.
And I thought I was sitting on, you know, a guaranteed thing.
It's like, it's there.
It's been there for five years.
And then poof.
Gone.
And then what you thought was your nest egg, your retirement, you could buy, you know, whatever.
Gone.
Because it's legalized gambling, people.
But I said, if that hadn't happened, maybe we would not be here now.
Had you not had that story of loss and crushing devastation, you might not be here with Rumble.
You would not be who you are today.
So we have to thank, I don't know, the powers that be even for our misfortune.
For sure.
That's who you are.
That's an amazing story.
Can't wait to watch the next documentary.
I'm excited.
There are a number of people in my community.
I own zero Rumble stock.
Not one.
And I own not one because I'm neurotic.
And we live in a world now where you don't even have to have committed a crime to be accused, convicted, and publicly eviscerated.
I do not own one stock.
I don't give medical advice, legal advice, or financial advice.
Some people in my community do.
And they're wondering, what's going on with the stock price of Rumble?
Let me just add another caveat.
I know nothing that is not public.
And I'm fairly certain Matt knows nothing that is not public as well.
So there can't be any accidental disclosures.
Publicly, I forget what the IPO was, but we're now at, what, 60% of the IPO?
Or 60% less?
A little bit, yeah.
First of all, folks, I'm not a financial advisor at all.
I mean, 50% of the time, I'm right.
100% of the time, let's just get that out there.
And I actually am invested in Rum.
I got in as soon as I could with the IPO.
Really, it was a SPAC deal.
So because of that, the SPAC deal is important.
There's three major ways in this day and age for a private company to go public.
You could do a direct listing, you could do an IPO, or you could do a SPAC deal.
And that's what Rumble chose to do.
So basically, there was an entity.
Think of it as it's called a blank check company.
So it's like a pile of money that did all the legal work to be listed, and then they buy an equity stake in a private company, thus giving it exposure to the public market.
And then the deal went through, the pipe deal, blah, blah, blah.
I believe that was actually almost a year ago now, September of, like, that's when it was all finished and all that.
And that was with Cantor Fitzgerald.
But anyway, with SPAC deals, they price it where you start at $10 and...
Obviously not every company is just worth that.
The difference there is the amount of shares.
So that's how you would have different market caps and whatnot.
But anyway...
As of the point we're filming, this Rumble is actually having a pretty solid day.
I think it's up in the realm of 10-ish percent the last time I checked.
But it's currently trading north of $5.
And recently, if you look at the daily chart, it's actually taken a considerable hit.
Now, obviously, there's reason you could look into it.
So there's a lot of insiders who their lock-up period is now over.
And there was a big thesis that a lot of insiders would be selling.
As of now...
That really hasn't come to fruition.
Now, I don't know what anyone's going to choose to do or not do, but we do have commentary from the CEO, Chris Pebloski, who he said he publicly stated in the SEC filing he has no plans to sell whatsoever.
I'm getting attacked by a fly here.
I'm having my Mike Pence moment of a fly landing on the middle of my forehead.
Sorry to drop it.
That's what I was doing.
Now he's coming over to me.
But anyway, there was, I mean, it's all SEC filing.
You can read this.
And on top of it, I don't think it's a secret of what, like, the Russell Brand news and a lot of...
People associate some of the Russell Brand with Rumble, so there might be some connections there.
In my humble opinion, as an investor in Rumble, I don't actively trade it.
I don't tuck options on it the way I did with AMC and Jimmy.
For me, it's a long-term view of just, okay, I see where the revenue's at, and my bet is that there's a lot of value in truly freedom of speech, and I think people will find that over the next couple years, next couple decades.
So for me, I'm a long-term holder on it.
I'm in it, and I'm just, it's a gamble for the next two to three decades that I believe.
People will care about not just being randomly censored for no legal reason whatsoever.
And I think that's just my hedge.
I don't know.
Obviously, my crystal ball is not working right now.
It's, in fact, getting repaired.
So I can't tell you the future.
But for me, I just like the long-term hedge of what the company represents.
I've stopped investing because we were talking about the degenerate gambling.
Once upon a time, it was in 2008 when you would have daily fluctuations in bank stocks.
I would say dabbled in day trading.
It was stupid what I was doing.
I never made a penny.
But I've stopped even paying attention to it.
I have someone who does it because I'm neurotic and obsessive and impulsive.
But I would buy a company that I genuinely believed in the product.
Yep.
For right and for wrong.
Rumble, I think, is definitely a long play.
It's a product that I've dedicated myself to in more committing ways than buying stock.
And if I weren't so neurotic, I would damn well buy some stock.
My goodness.
Do you know it was SPAC?
Is that an acronym?
Yeah, Special Purpose Acquisition Company.
And just to correct myself, it was not an IPO.
They were merging with an already publicly traded company.
The stock price was $10.
That's where all SPACs start.
Explain the lockup period where insiders could not sell.
As a result of having gone public through the SPAC.
Yeah, through the SPAC.
That came up.
When did that come up?
Do you know?
So they had to hold the lockup period lasted for one year.
So just recently, I believe it was September 16th that it officially ended.
And from, I mean, obviously it's tough on depending on when people watch this.
So always check the SEC filings.
But as of now, I mean, Chris, the CEO, who is by far the largest single shareholder.
It's still all there.
He's kept to his word, and no one knows what the future is going to behold, but right now, just from his public commentary on it, it seems like Chris very much stands behind his brand, his product, and really his own promissory notes to the world of, you know, like, he believes in where this is going.
Yeah, and at the risk of repeating what we've already said, Chris has said...
He's there for the long haul.
He's changed everyone else to say who's in for free speech.
Today, the tag that we're to get trending is hashtag support free speech.
The news of Russell Brand came out.
There's some rumors.
I'll talk about it when Matt's not here, but the news of Russell Brand, a Sun article from two days ago suggesting that...
What did they say?
It has been reported that the English or the UK government might take Rumble offline.
I have not seen any meaningful evidence to support that rumor, the rumorings.
But people were afraid that the Russell Brand story would impact the stock.
Have you seen that in the week that you've been following it?
Or is it impacting it, but positively, not negative?
So with it, I mean, of course...
The stock is actively trading Monday through Friday in normal market hours.
So maybe some people are choosing to sell it because of it.
Maybe some people are choosing to buy because of it.
But the thing that really blows my mind in the particular scenario is even for the government or anyone to talk about, it's at least in the U.S., you are innocent until proven guilty.
The fact that any government is asking to do anything, and we were speaking about this because I actually had some legal questions for Vivo.
I don't understand there's other platforms who have chosen to say they're protecting their community by just demonetizing.
And I'm like, well, logically, that doesn't make sense to me because if you're protecting a community, you wouldn't have that person there.
So to me, it's just, it's like very, I don't know, it's virtue signaling, but like it's the most evident form of virtue signaling where they're like, oh, we still want his money, but we're just going to make sure he doesn't get it.
We want to pocket all the money.
It's not hypocrisy.
What it is, is it's political.
Economic opportunism cloaked in benevolence.
I mean, I would say evil and tyranny cloaks itself in benevolence.
They say, we want to protect the community, so we're going to leave his content up, allow him to create more content to the extent that it doesn't, I guess, violate whatever the rules are.
But we're not going to let him make money off of it, but we're going to certainly redirect his 6.6 million awakening wonders elsewhere on our platform, so we'll make money off of it.
While purportedly taking these measures to protect a community that is at absolutely no risk from anything, given the unproven allegations from anonymous accusers of off-platform conduct that has nothing to do with his online content.
It's ridiculous.
It's ridiculous.
Now, the question I had for you.
Yes.
We'll see how long this one takes to answer.
What the hell is Bitcoin, and how the hell does it work?
Another thing that I don't understand it yet.
So, Bitcoin itself, I mean, the TLDR of it, it's another store of value.
So, you look at a US dollar, or a Canadian dollar, whatever, just...
As a populace, we agree it has value.
So maybe I run a little bodega and I give you a soda for $2 and that's whatever.
We agree that we have value in it, so I give you the soda, you give me the $2.
To me, it's just another store of value.
The way people might trade gold, well, a lot of the people just explain Bitcoin as digital gold.
Now, for me specifically, the reason I'm a fan of it, once again, I don't actively trade it, I just have some and I plan on holding on it, is because...
We're, at least in the U.S. system, I don't know how it is in Canada, we're never really taught about central banks and what they do and the influence on this.
So as I've gotten older and I've tried to look into a bit more, talking about quantitative easing during the pandemic period, well, they were printing fake money just like drunken sailors, as I said before.
And right now, instead of doing quantitative easing, they're doing the opposite, quantitative tightening.
To pause you there, literally printing money.
Here's a stimulus check.
We're going to, where does that money come from?
They go to a keyboard and just type in money.
They just create it.
There was a meme, and it says, if the government can just create money, why the hell do we need to pay taxes?
So they literally, in order to help people through the pandemic, Canada was doing it in the order of $2,000.
I want to say $2,000 a month for Canadians, and they basically indebted every Canadian working child in the order of tens of thousands of dollars for generations to come.
So they...
I mean, how does central banking work?
No one's really taught about it.
So the crazy story about in the central bank in like the U.S. of how we have one, it was one of these classic, I believe it was Christmas Eve and it was a classic midnight vote.
So they didn't want people paying attention to it.
And that's how we got ours in the U.S. The populace at that time, they weren't that many generations removed away from what was going on in Europe, and they were familiar with central banks, and that was part of the thing that they really didn't like.
So they let time pass in the U.S. to the classic Christmas Eve vote where no one was paying attention, and then we just randomly started running with one.
And that's the thing.
They're not elected.
They're selected by the president.
And it's just, they have so much control.
Over so many aspects of our lives because finances impact so many aspects of our lives.
Like a lot of our decisions, day to day, it's money driven.
And right now, all inflation is man-made.
There's no such thing as inflation just randomly happening.
I've been told it's Putin's inflation and Putin's gas hike and Putin's this and that.
It was there before that.
We printed $4 trillion.
That's how much the U.S. government made.
Out of thin air, $4 trillion was made during the pandemic period.
They just went to their computer.
I'm like, cool, it's here.
I'm not saying million.
I'm not saying billion.
I'm saying trillion dollars.
I mean, I'm just trying to think.
I think trillion comes after 999 billion.
Yes.
So between the 08-09 period and then also the pandemic, their total printing got up to 8.9 trillion.
We almost hit 9 trillion of just funny money made out of thin air.
So a lot of, back to your original question of like, why Bitcoin?
Why are people interested in it?
Because it's money that governments can't screw with.
There's only 21 million in existence.
That's the theoretical max.
I'm saying theoretical because people lose some of their Bitcoin and USBs and stuff.
So if anything, the numbers at max will be 21, but it will never, ever exceed that.
And what people really like, in my opinion, is the fact that no government is meddling in it.
They're not making more.
They're not taking away.
They're not doing funny trade deals with others.
Bitcoin is itself.
It's perfect math.
It's perfect software code that will never be altered.
There's a finite amount that they cannot issue or print new Bitcoin.
So it's just in the code that it maxes out at $21 million.
So there's halving cycles and it comes up.
So it's a very complex math equation and everyone's racing to solve the math equation.
And whoever does, you're updating the ledger, basically saying, oh, all these transactions, you sent me a Bitcoin, I sent you two Bitcoin.
You're racing to solve a math problem to update who is in control of all the money.
And if you do that, you're basically donating your processing power to solve the math problem.
You get rewarded.
Well, every so often, I believe it's 200, 220,000 blocks, the reward gets cut in half.
So that's originally how it was coming into existence.
And every so often, just less and less is coming into existence.
So right now...
19 million, 18 million are in existence.
But to get to the rest of the 21, it's going to take another 100 years.
Because it just keeps halving.
We just saw one of the candidates there, the North Dakota guy.
What's his name?
Mike.
We just saw one of the candidates.
His name was...
It's a four-letter last name.
I believe there's a K, an R, an S. Who knows?
All I know is he was playing basketball last time and he got hurt.
I also found out today that he's incredibly wealthy.
He's sold various businesses.
He's incredibly successful.
Self-made?
In as much as I've rumored, I don't know.
I didn't deep dive.
A wealthy man who made his own money and now apparently hasn't learned the Donald Trump lesson.
It's if you don't need to get rich, don't go into politics.
Okay, so hold on.
I had one more question about the Bitcoin.
Yeah, well, this might be the last question.
Okay, but Bitcoin always has to be converted into fiat until such time as, I don't know, you can buy things with Bitcoin like pizza, but then you have these fluctuations where the prices can't be predicted.
And so how does that work and how could that possibly be any sort of a feasible alternative to fiat currency?
So with the...
I guess the first part of it right there, there are a lot more merchants just accepting crypto.
So it's not converting back and forth or just keeping it within Bitcoin or Ethereum or whatever it is.
And talking about fluctuations, that actually happens in all currencies because the Forex market is always actively trading.
If you look at the USD versus the Canadian dollar or the yen or all that, or the euro recently has been going crazy.
So on a relative basis, there could always be a lot of volatility.
We don't think about it because we just think in U.S. dollars.
So there is a push by many people just thinking purely just Bitcoin.
Like, how much Bitcoin does this thing cost?
And not talking about the conversions back and forth.
But really, there's volatility in the Forex market all the time.
Okay, very cool.
Yeah, appreciate it.
Matt?
It was great to be here.
Now I start screaming.
I'm joking.
Yep.
Thank you very much.
All right.
We will be talking later.
Have a good one.
Nice to meet everyone.
And just so everybody knows also, I'm going to be doing like a live walk around this place because it's amazing and see who I can run into.
I'm just going to check for some technical stuff.
Do you need to adjust?
Okay.
While they adjust the camera, I've lost my hair elastic.
I'm going to make sure that we're live on Locals because I didn't check that, but I think we are.
Let me see here.
We are live.
That's me.
Oh, that's the microphone.
I was wondering what that necklace around me was, but it's the mic.
Okay, we're good here, and we're good on Rumble as well.
I'm going to go to my notes, because I've taken notes.
I say, like, how much more is there to talk about from yesterday's ranting into the abyss?
I call my dad.
And he says, you've been screaming so much, I had to turn the volume down.
He doesn't talk like that, by the way.
And I said, Dad, how can you not scream at the world?
Between last night and today, there hasn't been much development on the scandal of Canadian history, the standing ovation for an actual Nazi soldier in the Parliament of Canada.
The latest developments were the house speaker is the patsy in this story.
He's wink, wink, nudge, nudge.
Justin Trudeau says, you better take responsibility for that mistake.
And he knows what to do.
Take one for the team.
Okay.
I did two interviews today, one of which is going to come out on Monday.
And the other one, I think, is going to come out tonight on none other than RT News.
Or at least one of them was on RT and one was on a network.
I don't know how it works exactly, but the interview is going to come out next week and I'm going to share like it's nobody's business.
The ultimate irony in all of this, for those who don't know the scandal, as Zelensky comes to America and Canada asking for billions of more dollars to fund the West's proxy war against the villain of the day, Putin, and the villainous Russia of the day, Zelensky goes to Canada.
Goes to the parliament.
He's the honorable invitee.
But they also had another honorable invitee, guest of honor in the crowd, a man named Jaroslav Hunkka.
And if people didn't know his name, which I think 99.9% of Canada didn't, they know it now.
Because they gave a standing ovation to a hero on the basis that this hero, back in World War II, fought the...
Current-day villain, the Russians, none of these buffoons understood that in as much as the Soviets are probably villains of history, and I say probably, in as much as the Soviets are villains of history, they didn't stop for a second to appreciate that the Soviets' villains of history were nonetheless the allies of the West in World War II because...
One villain of history was battling another villain of history, that being Hitler, Mussolini, and Japan, the axis of evil, and the allied forces.
So they invite this guy, and because we have a bunch of idiots in Parliament who don't understand history, who don't understand context, and who don't know the slightest thing about geopolitics, but don't worry, they've got it totally right on this conflict.
They give a standing ovation to a man who fought the villainous Russians, not understanding that the Russians were allies back in the war.
And this guy was SS Galicia, a Nazi soldier in Ukraine.
We don't know of what particular atrocities this individual might have committed in his former life of 80 years ago.
Apparently they did try to look into it and they couldn't find anything specific.
And that's how the man came to live in Canada without being extradited under war crimes to various countries.
So I go on these two networks, one of which is on RT and the other one is somewhere else, and leave it to international media to cover this story in greater detail than any Canadian media in Canada.
Who was it?
I believe it was the RT piece.
No, it wasn't.
It was both.
One of them was in the UAE, United Arab Emirates.
It's going to be on their network there.
I'll share the list when I get it.
It's called Underground.
The name is escaping me now.
I don't mean to be disrespectful.
They say, holy cows, did you guys know that the Hunka family in, I think it's Manitoba or Alberta, they set up a scholarship in 2019 offering, I think it's $30,000 to study Ukrainian history, in particular, to religious figures.
I think they're pastors or priests, one of which also has ties to the SS.
So you leave it to foreign media, media that the Canadian media demonizes as state-funded propaganda, and they're doing a better job covering this international Canadian scandal than Canadian media.
Why is that?
They're all state funded media and one is paid by the government currently sure as hell is not going to be the one to expose and potentially bring down that government in real time.
I know that every time I go on RT, I open myself up to flack.
They say, how can you go on Russian state sponsored media?
First of all, I go on it and I call the Soviets villains of history, despite the fact that they were allies in World War Two to highlight the point that history is so nuanced that you actually were in a reality where you had two murderous dictatorship, villainous regimes fighting each other.
But because we allied with one of them, they became a.
And the other guy was the bad guy when maybe both of them were bad guys.
And our politicians can't seem to appreciate that this might potentially, to some degree, also be true today.
People think that by being objective, by being nuanced on the war in Ukraine, you're somehow a Putin apologist.
I ain't moving to Russia anytime soon either.
Putin doesn't have to be a hero in order for Zelensky potentially to be a potentially corrupt villain.
And they don't even understand the lessons of history that the Soviets were not good in any traditional sense.
They were responsible for the deaths, the killings of 60 some odd million people at best estimates.
They were not the good folks of history.
They were the allies because they were fighting another murderous dictator.
But they can't apply that lesson to current days because their brains don't work like that.
So I did these two interviews and I actually learned even more than what is not being reported in Canadian media.
So stay tuned for those.
But that is the latest coming out of Canada as relates to this scandal.
The House Speaker has resigned.
What's his name?
Anthony Rota.
The fall guy, the Lee Harvey Oswald of this scandal.
I'm a patsy.
I'm a patsy is not what he's saying as he says, I have to resign.
This should take down.
The Justin Trudeau regime, I say, at long last.
I'm not giving a pass to the conservatives because they don't deserve one.
But they're certainly not as culpable as Christopher Freeland, Justin Trudeau, and the liberals who run around calling everybody Nazis.
And then they go ahead and give a standing ovation to an actual Nazi, and then they demand that it not be politicized, the event.
And then they ask that it be deleted from the memory book.
Deleted from...
The records sent down the memory hole.
The bald-faced audacity.
Karina Gould.
Shameless.
You should also resign.
Okay.
There's more coming out of Canada.
I'm going to go get my notes here.
Refresh.
See if there's any rumble rants that I've missed.
I won't be able to get to the rumble rants, people.
They should all resign, says Maple Syrup123.
Yeah.
There was a great guy who writes for the Globe and Mail, Andrew Coyne, C-O-Y-N-E, who I give a hard time to because...
Dude, there are telltale signs when you have pronouns in your bio, when you have a syringe emoji unironically in your bio, when you have a face mask emoji unironically in your bio, when you have a Ukrainian flag unironically in your bio, if you are not of Ukrainian descent.
It's pretty much predictive that that person is going to have some pretty ignorant opinions.
Andrew Coyne said, people shouldn't resign after every scandal.
I mean, that wouldn't be fair.
We'd have no one in media or government.
Dummy.
If you have such a bunch of idiots in media and government that they have to resign when they make egregious mistakes to the point where there'd be no one there, we'd be better off with no one in media and government than the scoundrels that we currently have.
That stupid...
Oh, now I just bashed my elbow.
That hurt.
Oh, God.
That was a really...
Call it the funny bone.
There's nothing funny about it.
So I was going to get to the next story of the day, which is Dan Hartman.
The father of Sean Hartman, who died at 17 years of age, 33 days after his first Pfizer shot, is suing the Canadian government.
Am I optimistic about the suit?
No.
I read the lawsuit.
I know that they say that, you know, someone who...
What do they say?
That the person, the lawyer who has themselves as...
What is it?
Someone who represents themselves has a fool for a client.
If I were representing myself, I would have written that lawsuit a whole heck of a lot more hyperbolically, and maybe to my own detriment.
I've read the lawsuit.
Let's get the backdrop, and then I'm going to pull up the screen grabs on my phone.
Sean Hartman, 17-year-old kid, dies in his sleep 33 days after the first Pfizer shot.
The trolls on the internet are the most, some of them are just genuinely the most awful people on earth.
Like, they exist to feed off the negative energy that they elicit in some of their remarks.
And if you can believe it, there are trolls out there who actually troll Dan Hartman, Sean's father.
Why'd you let your kid get vaccinated?
Blah, blah, blah.
For anybody who knew the story, and, you know, the kid did it unbeknownst to the father.
I had Dan Hartman on for an interview.
Sean did it unbeknownst to his father.
Whether or not there was other family pressure in there, it doesn't matter.
And the amazing thing about Dan Hartman, in his understandable and what's the word?
Righteous rage.
I don't know how anybody, nobody can heal from that type of trauma.
It's enough to actually potentially make good people do bad things.
In his righteous rage.
He was still forgiving, even on his ex-wife, and doesn't want other people living with the guilt of something that is beyond their own control.
His son wanted to play hockey, went out and got the jab, unbeknownst to Dan.
Unbeknownst to Dan, the son was hospitalized with a serious illness, orange bags or brown bags under his eyes, vomiting, went to the hospital, I think it was a few days after the shot.
Dan didn't know.
Found out after his son had died that he was actually hospitalized within an even shorter proximity of the jab than he knew of the death.
The doctors didn't do troponin tests.
They didn't do the other tests to see if there was a stroke or the dissolving of a clot.
Troponin and D-dimer tests.
Doctors didn't do any of that.
Knew the kid had been recently vaccinated.
Didn't do any of those tests.
Send the kid home with some aspirin, Advil, whatever the hell it was, and Sean Hartman dies 33 days later.
The government pretends it had nothing to do with the jab, ignores, and to some extent arguably even demonizes the Hartmans.
They deny that it was caused by the jab.
He's denied an application for the VISP, which is the Vaccine Injury Support Program out of Canada, because they say there's no conclusive evidence that it was correlated to the jab.
He goes out and gets his own expert.
And it...
Oh, jeez, I'm going to forget the doctor's name.
The chat's going to know.
But the doctor confirmed that there were spike proteins in glands that should not have been there.
And that it was, if not the cause, at the very least a contributing factor.
I think he's filed an appeal for his rejection from the Vaccine Injury Support Program.
Well, the dad, through counsel now, has filed suit against the government.
And I shared a couple of screen grabs along with it.
On the interwebs.
And now I'm realizing I actually should share that on locals, which I will.
But just to summarize a little bit of the allegations in the lawsuit.
Get this out of here.
Wow.
And now I'm going to have to show my age.
I'm going to have to get graded bifocals.
Hold on one second.
Let me just...
I can't focus.
They're talking about the studies.
Suing the government on the basis that the government was making warranties and representations that they had no business making that they could not make about safety and efficacy.
We don't have the purchase agreements for Canada yet, but we got the South African purchase agreements, and we now know that while the government was telling its citizens safe and effective, analogize this, by the way, to residential schools and Tuskegee experiments, while the government was telling the citizens safe and effective in their purchase agreements, they were admitting, or sorry, not admitting, rather.
They were acknowledging, as per Pfizer's negotiated terms, that there were no long-term studies on safety and efficacy.
I mean, my brother, Lion Advocacy, on Twitter, highlighted that, and I put that on the blast of all blasts.
Just see here.
I'll take my glasses off again.
So it says here, talking about one study.
This is paragraph 17. It says, It doesn't stipulate the severity of the adverse reaction.
They talk about that later on.
Those are wild numbers.
All the while they know this, all the while they're telling people, safe and effective, not just for vulnerable, obese, elderly people with underlying medical.
Children.
And now they're saying six months and up, if you ask Hochul.
Six months, that's the age.
I know it sounds young, but that's what Pfizer tells me.
No, it's Moderna now.
If anybody hasn't seen, what's her first name?
Starts with a K. Hochul's press conference in New York, rolling out the new vaccine.
Six months and up, go watch it.
It'll make your stomach turn.
Later on, paragraph 22, they talk about the decision summary, which is the decision summary cited study one compared the placebo and they concluded it's wildly effective.
Decision summary further stated inter alia.
A, one limitation of the data at this time is the lack of interallia.
And nonetheless, they pushed it.
Paragraph 35, they say study 2. Show that of the 21,923 individuals, 5,241, 23.9, 24%, had a related adverse event.
And then just to summarize the basis of the lawsuit, it's pretty straightforward.
I'm not optimistic because you can't sue the government because you get qualified immunity, sovereign immunity, whatever that, immunity.
Immunity from their own fraud.
Although they do say that fraud vitiates everything and that you can't...
You can't fraudulently eke your way out of responsibility.
Paragraph 77. Plaintiff pleads that the defendants breached the standard of care and negligently misrepresented the safety of the vaccine and did not disclose the risks associated with the vaccine, which include but not limited to myocarditis and pericarditis, which is what they suspect confirmed by a medical professional who is not necessarily recognized by the mainstream as having been the case in Sean Hartman's death.
The particulars include of their negligence, misrepresentations.
A, failed to disclose that individuals under 40 had an increased risk of myocarditis after receiving the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.
B, failed to disclose that rates of myocarditis were higher in adolescent males.
C, inadequate testing was performed to ensure that the safety and efficacy of the vaccine, to ensure the safety and efficacy of the vaccine.
D, defendants failed to complete post-market surveillance and informed the public of the results.
These are, I mean, they're allegations, so they're unproven.
These are indisputable facts.
I mean, we'll see how they...
Oh, no, we did follow-ups.
You know, that thing, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, VAERS, which we disregarded afterwards because, hell, anybody can file a report.
Oh, remind me of the Hulk.
I'll remind myself of the Hulk in a second.
They failed to complete post-market surveillance and inform the public of results.
E, defendants failed to accurately, candidly, promptly, and truthfully disclose the issues with the COVID-19 vaccine.
F, the defendants failed to identify, implement, and verify that the procedure in place to address post-market surveillance risks were in place to address issues, complaints, and timely notification of concerns.
That it was safe and effective.
Now, Sean's dad, Dan Hartman, is suing the government.
His Twitter handle, which is sometimes, even according to me, wildly suppressed.
His Twitter handle is Answers4, the letter 4, Sean.
Capital A Answers, the number 4. What the hell's my problem?
Capital A Answers4, the number 4, Sean, S-E-A-N.
He's suing the government.
It's going to cost money.
He set up a GoFundMe.
That's the news on that.
I'll be following it.
I'm going to try to have Dan Hartman and the lawyer on to discuss it.
I'm not optimistic, but sometimes there are some battles that you have to fight, even knowing you're going to lose them in the short run, in order to win them in the long run, because public exposure is what this deserves.
And I told Dan...
There can be no justice.
There can be no compensation.
There can be no righting of this wrong.
What there can be is political retribution, and there needs to be.
So that's that.
What's next on my list?
Oh, the Hulk!
I knew I was going to remind myself.
Just so everybody understands, that story that they used to write off the VAERS system.
I had Jessica Rose on.
I mean, I don't know which PhD, how to qualify her scientist.
Wicked smart, as they say in Good Will Hunting.
You know, one of the things we discussed was that the VAERS system, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, was set up as part and parcel of the immunity that was given to vaccine manufacturers so that they could produce products that, in theory, would save humanity.
But at the very least, there would be a system to survey and see, in real time, if there were any, what do they call them, indicators?
Any signals.
Of problems with the vaccine.
As far as I understand, the 1970s swine flu vaccine or whatever it was, they polled after 35 deaths reported.
Do you know how many deaths have been reported in VAERS related to the COVID jab?
I think we're in the hundreds of thousands, if not the millions.
Do you know how many adverse reactions have been reported?
There are some people estimating.
I think it's McCullough.
Not McCullough.
I think it is McCullough.
Tens of millions globally.
I won't make any estimates.
I won't drop any numbers.
They pulled previous vaccines when there were dozens of deaths.
Safe and effective.
And now jack up your six-month-old with the new vaccine, which hasn't even been tested on humans.
The new vaccine, from what I understand, the new vaccine, because, you know, it's just like a Bill Gates Microsoft update.
One of them has not been tested on humans.
I think it was tested on eight mice.
The one that was just approved in Canada.
And I couldn't believe it when I read it.
I see this and I say, I must be misunderstanding something.
Marty, they found us.
I don't know how, but they found us.
A lot of security guards behind us.
In Canada, Health Canada approved the new vaccine after having tested it on 52 people, 51 or 52 people, with a follow-up time of 20 days.
Safe and effective.
My ass.
It might very well be.
I don't think it is.
It might very well be, but they would have no bloody basis to say that because they don't know what the long-term effects are going to be, as Pfizer damn well made them agree to in their purchase contracts.
Oh, and they don't want to release their purchase contracts.
There's nothing shady about that whatsoever.
To drop a little bit of the huh.
Okay, Bob Menendez.
The dude who was just indicted on massive bribery and corruption and Adam Shifty Eyes, Shift for Brains, Liar McGee, Shift comes out and says, I believe in innocent until proven guilty, but Bob Menendez should resign.
And we talked about it Sunday night.
I said, look, I'm so traumatized by the lies coming out of Shifty Eyes, McShift for Brains, Adam Shift.
Is that his name?
Adam Shift.
I only know him by my humorous expletives.
I'm so conditioned that everything he says is a lie, that even when he says something that I would ordinarily agree with, I'm skeptical.
And so I said, look, I knew nothing from a hole in the wall of Bob Menendez, the accusations, the charges, and his history.
I just said, it seems very politically convenient to now say, look how objective and impartial we are.
No one is above the law, albeit he's a Democrat in New Jersey.
Let's take him down, take him out, get another Democrat in New Jersey so that we can now say, look, we went after Menendez, so let's go after Clarence Thomas.
Let's go after Trump.
Let's go after all of his allies.
And so I was skeptical at first.
I then learnt a little bit about Bob Menendez's history, his prior charges of corruption, his prior hung jury on the trial for that indictment of bribery that looks a lot like this.
I've seen how corrupt the judicial system is that it can, um, not, what's the word, not absolve, not, acquit.
A Michael Sussman, dead to rights because of politics, but convict, in 80 minutes, a Jan 6 journalist who was their doctor.
So I've now seen how the system has always been corrupt to the core, but maybe now on steroids and methamphetamines.
So I now know a little bit about Bob Menendez's history, where I say, okay, fine, now I'm inclined to believe the man might be guilty.
That, and I've listened to his defense.
It's something that people don't even do these days.
I'm going to hear his defense.
If his defense is plausible, I will extend a continuation of the benefit of the doubt.
But his defense, as far as I understand, is not plausible.
Mr. Menendez, why is it that you had three one-kilogram gold bars in your home, cash wrapped up, stuffed everywhere?
His answer?
Because Cuban governments, the government in Cuba, Well, that's about the dumbest excuse I've ever heard.
A. Menendez was not born in Cuba.
So what assets he would have in Cuba may be family assets, okay, but not his own.
So the idea of...
Him withdrawing cash and acquiring gold bars so it would be unseizable by the Cuban government and stashing it in America makes zero sense.
So my benefit of the doubt that I was...
Not suspension of disbelief.
My benefit of the doubt is no longer being extended.
Withdrawing the cash and the gold bars so that it's not susceptible of Cuban confiscation and then not depositing it into bank accounts in America, I now believe that Menendez is guilty.
But I'll still wait for a trial and a conviction or a totally politically biased acquittal.
And I'll say if that doesn't make any sense in light of the evidence, I'm going to believe what I believe of that in the same way I believe of the acquittal of Michael Sussman.
Sussman, dead to rights, acquitted in D.C. versus Bannon, convicted.
Oh, jeez, his name was Stephen Horn, the journalist, convicted.
80 minutes.
80 minutes.
Oath keepers convicted.
Seditious conspiracy.
Something I don't think jurors could probably explain as a crime.
Convicted.
So Bob Menendez, I've learned more.
I now no longer give the benefit of the doubt of the innocence.
I think there's been enough out there that I'm inclined to think guilt.
Oh, okay.
And then the other big news.
Trump found guilty.
In the civil suit in New York State, I'm going to say it's the Southern District of New York.
I might have to look that up real quick.
Found guilty.
Fraud.
And the idea there that he fraudulently overvalued his assets so that he could borrow money, finance projects, pay that money back to the bank, and he was found guilty by a judge.
On summary judgment.
And for those of you who don't understand, also just plug vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Robert talked about it a little bit last night.
I've been following it in the news because it's scandalous.
We are watching...
It's communism, whatever you want to call it.
It's full corruption of institutions in real time.
We're watching it.
The judge, in this case, issued a summary judgment on, summary motion, is that the word?
...which is predicated on agreements on facts, which are themselves absolutely disputed.
And one of the most egregious factual findings that the judge came to in order to come to this summary judgment was that Trump's Mar-a-Lago masterpiece of a mansion...
Is actually only worth $18 million, where I think Trump valued it at $480 million, I think, maybe even more.
And the judge, who I'm sure knows a lot about Florida real estate, because I don't even think that judge went to look at vacant properties, said Trump, it's an agreed fact for the purposes of the summary judgment, even though it's actually a contested fact and therefore can't possibly serve as the basis for a summary judgment.
Set that aside.
Mar-a-Lago's worth 18 million bucks.
Now, the aggregate knowledge of the interwebs being what it is, they pulled up some information showing vacant lots.
The lot is, I think, 17 to 20, maybe 23 acres.
Beachfront, on Mar-a-Lago, or on that strip, South Ocean Boulevard, it's...
There is no more real estate there.
This is like the original crypto.
This is the original Bitcoin.
You got 50 Bitcoin and ain't nobody making more of it.
You can't go down there and make more land.
There were empty lots of two acres that apparently...
I asked someone for a link because I'm still skeptical about trusting anything on the interwebs.
Hold on one second.
What is my problem here?
2.2 acres, an empty lot on the market for $150 million.
It's laughable on its face.
And kudos to them, Don Trump Jr. has been going hard at this insanity.
Probably harder than most, but also probably because with the proposed gag orders and everything that Trump does is a crime if he were to talk.
They might, you know, find a way to hold that against him.
Don Trump Jr., Eric Trump going hard to illustrate the absolute patent absurdity of this.
That there's apparently an empty lot of a tenth of the size for over $100 million in that area.
What does the media do?
Because you can't ignore unfortunate facts.
They come in and spin hard.
Now, the Mar-a-Lago is like one of those heritage buildings, so it has certain historic value that it can't be changed in terms of its destination as a club, a country club or something along those lines.
And so, look, in reality, I was looking to buy some real estate in Montreal once upon a time, and there was a beautiful old post office on the corner of Green Avenue and Green Avenue and de Mezonneuve, and then there was the old bank.
For sale on the corner of Green Avenue and St. Catherine.
For anybody who knows what I'm talking about, you'll know what I'm talking about.
They're old historic buildings.
They're heritage buildings.
And you can't change the facade.
So you can't buy it, tear it down, and build a skyscraper.
Although they have found ways of developing it where you can develop it upwards so long as you maintain the facade.
There's ways to get around it.
It is true that some of these heritage designations increase the cost of exploiting a property.
The idea that whatever restrictions are on Mar-a-Lago in terms of destination for future use would reduce its value to $18 million or at least justify a judge coming to the undisputed, factually agreed conclusion that it's only worth $18 million and not several hundred million is patently idiotic on its face, but you would expect no less from the mainstream media.
The decision has been issued.
A finding of fraudulently overvaluing assets in a case, and you have to understand this, in which there is no victim.
Is it Leticia James?
I think she's the district attorney pursuing this one.
There is no victim.
There is no complainant.
The banks have been paid, if not in full, on time, and they're not complaining.
Trump's not complaining.
I presume...
The tax collectors aren't complaining.
So you have an absolute victimless crime, but the state comes in and says he's defrauding the state by overvaluing in the eyes of the state his properties for the purposes of financing his business activities.
Again, people, I'm a...
Quebec-trained attorney, no longer practicing.
I listen to the bigger brains and I come to my own conclusions.
Barnes is of the opinion, this is an obvious overturn on appeal, that the egregiousness of the weaponizing of the political judicial system at all levels is becoming wildly undeniable and, I mean, almost farcical.
Almost farcical for anybody who's paying attention.
The problem is...
As is the case when people get whipped up into their two minutes of hate, or in this case, seven years of hate, they can find a way to justify their injustices to themselves because, as the thought experiment goes, if you genuinely think Trump is the next Hitler, you've got to do everything in your power, lawful or not, to keep him out of power.
But the people that I have discussions with, who have found a way to tolerate and justify what are egregious injustices because they are politically aligned with the end goal, Atrocious.
Now, let me see here.
I'm going to go to do a couple of things here.
We're going to talk about what's happening tonight.
Let me go to Rumble and just see if I can refresh.
Good.
Yeah, he overpaid in taxes, says KWA Global.
I don't know about that, but I do think that there would be tax consequences to overvaluing assets.
I think.
I don't know.
I don't know.
Is he paying property tax on that inflated value?
That's the question I have.
I need to take to social media in order to see if the aggregate losers are going to...
Did I just say aggregate losers?
The aggregate knowledge of the internet.
Because I just read a comment here in Rumble.
It says, how great is the judicial system in Canada where Viva was just like, peace out losers going to Florida.
Dude, I don't know if the judicial system is better anywhere.
The question is going to be, what does the future hold?
Canada is going to hell in a handbasket.
But so is America and so is the world.
And you have...
This is a segue into the Russell Brand.
I touched on it.
The entire world is going to hell in the handbasket.
Where is going to be the last place to have...
A last stand, so to speak.
The last stand and fight for freedom.
Florida's looking damn good.
Texas is looking good, but Texas, man.
Texas has got its problems.
And if the politicians have their way with Texas, open up Texas borders.
You know, create borders so that they can't bring any of those illegal immigrants to New York because New York don't come here.
Keep them in Texas.
Open up the border between Texas and Mexico, but shut the border between Texas and the neighboring states.
Expedite the path to citizenship.
Expedite the path to residency and whatever.
And then bank on the fact that this imported population is going to vote Democrat.
You don't have to convince people of policy to get votes.
You can just import people to get the votes.
And they're doing it in Canada.
I mean, I've talked about this, but they want to double the population of Canada by the end of the century.
Bring the country to 80 million plus people through immigration.
They said Canada had the biggest year of population growth in 2022.
97% of it was immigration.
That's not population growth.
That's open borders.
Now, what the heck was I talking about?
Texas?
Florida?
How bad was it there?
Oh, that's right.
I was in Rumble to see if I could get any Rumble rants.
I can't scroll up.
If I missed any Rumble rants, let me know.
Oh, and then SailorDude2022 says Florida changed the Puerto Ricans.
Oh, no, I thought that was going to be a discussion about open borders.
Unless it's Cubans coming in who tend to be conservative, then they'll enact some strict immigration policy.
Oh.
Devastator said, great question, but now I want to see what that is.
The question is, what will happen after Trump?
What's going to happen in 2024?
Barnes and we've now gone back years.
And Robert says, you know, I can't believe they've gone this crazy.
I can't believe they've gone so crazy that you have states trying to get Trump off the ballot.
To preserve democracy, they are trying to get the leading candidate off a ballot.
I mean, do these people hear themselves?
I don't think they do.
Or they are just villains.
I try not to think that people are evil, and I wait a long time before calling people evil.
I genuinely believe Justin Trudeau is evil, but the people saying, who's the lawyer?
Oh, Lawrence Tribe.
Lawrence Tribe, Harvard professor.
There's a strong argument to keep Trump off the ballot.
It's not.
Because we've taken words, and we've taken steaming dumps on them.
Insurrection no longer means anything.
Nazi.
No longer means anything.
Unless, you know, you're actually saluting one, giving them a standing ovation.
But even then, not really a Nazi.
People can find a way to justify that.
That was a long time ago.
Oh, you know, what would you have done if you were in this Ukrainian man's shoes when he was 16 years old and volunteered for the SS?
What would you have done?
I don't know.
But that sounds like one hell of a relativization of atrocities to the point where the words have no meaning.
Keep Trump off the ballot because insurrection, and they did it with Coy Griffin, and we need to follow that case, and I've got to get Coy Griffin on for an interview.
We don't pay attention to it when they do it to a low-level Coy Griffin, what was it, oh, the word for when it's a municipal, smaller-than-state council-type thing.
We don't pay attention to it, but then they quietly and discreetly set the precedent for their later bigger fish to fry.
So that's it.
You know, Texas is another place where people are fighting back.
But my goodness, it looks like they're doing everything they can politically, lawfully and unlawfully to change Texas to blue.
And like I now see in California, once you go blue, you never go back.
I'm trying to think of a good rhyme here.
Once you go blue, you're done through.
There we go.
We can do that.
Once you go blue, you are done through.
That's not so good.
But that's it.
There's a much bigger pushback in the States from what I can see, and certainly in Florida.
Which brings us to the purpose of the evening.
Do we know who's on the debate stage tonight?
I should have looked this up earlier.
Who's on the debate stage?
I think there was one person who was there the last time that's not going to be there this time.
I know Vivek is going to be there.
I know DeSantis is going to be there.
Is Chris Christie, the war pig, going to be there?
Chris Christie?
Nikki Haley is going to be there?
The North Dakota guy, what's his last name?
Burgum.
Burgum is his name.
It had an R and a G. Okay.
And then who else do we got?
We've got Mike Pence is obviously going to be there.
Tim Scott's going to be there.
All right.
Do we do a little recap of the last one?
And if they're watching, they're going to know what they need to do to improve this time.
Tim Scott has got to loosen up a little bit.
I like Tim Scott.
I like him when he's more natural.
He looked nervous.
He looked rigid.
Tim Scott's got to loosen up.
Mike Pence has to stop talking.
I think if Mike Pence gets up there and actually says nothing the entire evening, he'll do better than if he opens up and exudes the arrogant pomposity that repulsed everyone in the crowd at the last debate.
There was one moment where he said, well, to be perfectly humble, and people guffawed in the crowd.
But anyways, Mike Pence can't help himself, so he'll continue to not open mouth and insert foot.
He's going to continue to be Mike Pence and just repel people, repulse people with the aura of arrogant pomposity that he exudes.
Chris Christie?
Chris Christie is there for only one reason.
I like Patrick Bette-David's analysis.
Chris Christie is there to do the shit-slinging that DeSantis can't do politically against Trump.
I don't know that they have a surreptitious agreement.
I don't know if Chris Christie is slinging the fecal matter, trying to invest in his future at CNN, MSNBC, or as a Fox News senior analyst.
I have a sneaking suspicion that's what he's doing.
It's a lost cause for him.
He is burning the bridges with any support that he had with...
GOP the base.
This is a long-term investment in his career as a political hack analyst when he's done losing this because that's all that I can see in his future after his performance last time.
DeSantis also got to loosen up a little bit and also, you know, maybe...
Take a stand on some positions, even if you think they're unpopular.
You know, the joke, ha ha, I don't know what goes into hush money payments, as if you think that they're not going to do this to you someday if they perceive you as a threat, and if they don't perceive you as a threat, that's going to be a red flag for the base.
You know, impeachment of Abbott in Texas.
Paxton, not Abbott.
Talk about criminal charges against Abbott in Texas.
If you don't think that they're going to do this to anyone they perceive as a threat, You don't understand.
And if they don't perceive you as a threat, some might say you're not doing your job.
So DeSantis, you know, will you pardon Trump?
Maybe don't look around to see.
That wasn't the question, was it?
It was would you still vote for Trump or support Trump if he's the candidate after indictment?
Got to look both ways and see how everyone else is going.
Unlike Vivek, reflexively almost doing it to rub it in the faces of everybody else.
What does Vivek have to do tonight?
He needs to get a little bit more natural and look a little bit less rehearsed.
It's not that he's stiff and it's not that he's nervous.
It looks like it's rehearsed and it looks like it's a little too smooth for school.
So he's got to get more natural.
Nikki Haley?
No opinion.
I mean, she looks like a nice person.
I don't know.
She comes off well, but man, the question is going to be...
It's going to be Trump.
They're going to try to find a way to, like, I don't know.
I actually have a feeling that some of these deep...
Oh, is Asa Hutchison going to be there tonight?
He's not going to be there.
Why not?
Did he fall below the threshold?
Asa Hutchison, man, I'll tell you something.
Deep state.
Like, in as much as Pence exudes arrogant pomposity, Asa Hutchison exudes deep state.
Asa Hutchison is like...
The one who I would think comes in to interrogate you in a room.
So apparently he fell below the threshold.
He's not going to be there.
It's going to be fun.
And what I've got for the rest of the day, I'm going to go...
You can't really see what's going on here.
So you've got your flipping beautiful mountains.
Hold on, let's see if we can do this.
Okay, hold on.
This is what we're going to do.
We're going to go like this.
And then we're going to go like this.
Okay.
It's not working.
Oh god, my legs are so old.
I went for a jog this morning and I didn't stretch afterwards.
If you can't see how beautiful it is, it's flipping beautiful.
California is beautiful.
When the ocean meets mountains, that's like heaven and earth colliding.
I like Florida.
I don't like the geography.
I don't like the perpetual one season.
I don't like not knowing what bloody month it is because I'm still Canadian.
I still gauge month.
I still gauge the months by the season.
I don't know what bloody month.
It's summer.
It's summer, but it's not.
It's September.
So you got some press over there.
I don't know what's going on here, but this is the Ronald Reagan Library.
Apparently Ronald Reagan is buried here with Nancy Reagan.
I think I'm looking for fact-checking there here.
So I'm going to go do a live stream walk-around.
But that's it.
I think that was it for the subject matter of the day, because I'm looking at the chat here.
Let me see here.
We're doing amazing.
7,600 people watching on Rumble.
I'm going to go to Locals and see if there's any tips and get some of the questions, chat from Tips.
Hope this works.
And it does.
Okay.
Let me put it on pause.
Hold on a second.
I can't.
How do I pause?
Okay, whatever.
There we go.
I'm going to see if there's any tippers.
There are tippers on vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
By the way.
Does everybody know who's watching now on Rumble?
If you want to support what we do here, Robert Barnes and myself, you can get merch at VivaFry.
VivaFry.com You could do a tip or the Rumble rant or a super chat when we're on YouTube for the 30 minute intro so that we can make everyone in that platform aware of Rumble.
We have an amazing And I think there's a way to link right to it from the Rumble stream.
And it's seven bucks a month.
Unfortunately, it is an actual.
A cup of coffee is $7.
It's a cup of coffee a month, and you get a discount rate $70 for the whole year if you buy in one shot.
And there's exclusive content for supporters, and then there's members who don't support, no financial support, just an amazing community where we say everyone is above average.
And we've got these things called tips.
It's like a rumble rant, and we've got a $1 tip.
Okay, we got one from a known figure for Insight.
Steve Britton says, once you go blue, you've been completely run through.
Not bad.
Not bad, Steve Britton.
And then we got Tyler underscore Stokes.
Five dollars.
He says, Menendez also has the same lawyer as Hunter Biden.
Same lawyer that got Menendez off the first time.
That is a factually correct statement.
If you want to talk about the incestuous corruption that is the world in which we live, Menendez's attorney...
Is, I just forgot his name, Hunter Biden's attorney.
It's incestuous corruption that you cannot imagine.
Can't fathom.
Is there a Nixon library in California too?
Ginger Ninja, Ginger Ninja, also, Ginger, I don't know if you made this video public, but Ginger Ninja made me a chessboard.
Homemade, the most beautiful chessboard you've ever seen in your life.
Elevated board with like a two-inch perimeter so that when you knock pieces off you can put it there.
And he made it himself with his own two hands.
Because in our community everybody knows I play chess and I have this amazing chess set that I got in Paris in 1999.
It cost like 300 francs at the time.
It was a lot of money.
And it's so beautiful I don't play with it.
Because I've got dogs that chew shit up and kids that break shit up.
So it's always been in a box.
Ginger Ninja made this chess set to fit the pieces, and it's the most beautiful thing ever.
And as I'm talking, I just lost his chat.
Ginger Ninja says, are you going to be in the crowd?
If so, will you boo them when they say they'll continue supporting Ukraine on behalf of us, the Viva Barnes Law board members?
I will try not to make news, but rather just report it.
But I will be in the audience, and I actually think I have become the coolest nephew in the world.
I scored my plus one with my aunt who wanted to come.
And she's coming because she's in California.
My aunt is my dad's sister.
So as much as my dad says, David, why do you scream so much on the internet?
My aunt is going to come and she's going to be so happy.
But we're not going to be sitting together.
But I get to be the coolest nephew on earth for the first time in my life.
And that is it.
I think we're good.
Let me go to YouTube.
Not YouTube.
Twitter.
Oh, yeah.
That'll be it.
I just put out a tweet that's, you know, for all the scandals that's going on in Canada, people don't really appreciate the fact that we don't have an ethics commissioner to fill in for the last one, Mario Dion, who...
We have no ethics commissioner in Canada so we have no one to investigate and enforce the Conflict of Interests Act.
What a convenient thing to have be the political reality in Canada while our government is giving standing ovations to actual Nazis in our House of Parliament.
Yeah, I think that's it.
The article was from a Newsweek article.
Just going back to the Donald Trump.
It says, a nearby vacant lot, 2.3 acres, is for sale on Zillow for $200 million, says John Lefebvre.
Lefebvre.
A former investment banker who created the Goldman Sachs elevator social media account wrote alongside a screen grab of the listing.
Mar-a-Lago sits on 17 acres with waterfront on both sides.
So it's endless corruption through and through.
Full stop.
Period.
Did I talk about the stabbing spree?
The guy on the stabbing...
Oh!
The other news.
We'll end it on this.
Just because I saw in my DMs that the lectern guy put out a tweet.
The lectern guy, Adam Johnson, the one who stole the lectern, which he never stole, you know, took a picture of him moving it, rigorously, rigorously prosecuted by, you know...
A weaponized, politicized prosecution system.
The lectern guy.
You know who he is.
He's the guy smiling, waving as he's holding a lectern.
Charged with stealing a lectern that he moved maybe 20 meters inside the Capitol building.
He put out a tweet this morning, and I had to independently confirm with him that it was true before I actually retweeted it out.
The news of the day.
Hold on.
Cernovich tweeted it.
Let me see here.
I'll go to the Cernovich.
The Cernovich tweet that a prosecutor, one of the January 6th prosecutors, went on something of a stabbing spree on a Florida highway.
Where is it?
Come on, where is it?
Come on, man!
If I can't find it, I'm going to have to go find the article.
A prosecutor stabbed someone on the highway.
One of the January 6th prosecutors.
There was a fender bender.
I don't know.
I don't know the details.
Apparently, somebody fell ill on the highway, came to, crashed his car into this guy who got out, broke the wheel, and then started stepping in the car.
And as other people tried to intervene, tried to stab other people who tried to intervene, the guy was a prosecutor.
The lectern guy comes out and says, that's the guy who partook in the prosecution of me.
And tried to get me to wear an ankle monitor in the prosecution for his non-violent offense.
Why can't I find this story?
And I wouldn't be able to bring it up anyhow.
Google, hold on one second.
Yes, I'm using Google and not DuckDuckGo.
Prosecutor stabbing spree, Tampa, Florida, January 6th.
So let's see here.
Former Tampa U.S. attorney arrested for stabbing man on I-275 bridge.
Patrick Scruggs is one of the prosecutors who prosecuted the lectern guy.
Man accused of stabbing driver who hit his car on Howard Franklin Bridge worked for the U.S. Attorney's Office.
We'll see what his defense is.
Road rage?
Maybe self-defense?
I don't know.
But based on the reporting now, it looks like what it looks like.
I made the joke that this is like...
This is almost as bad as one of the FBI agents in the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot, Fednapping plot, which I'm allowed to say now because five of them were acquitted.
One of the FBI agents, the key one, the star FBI agent, was accused of viciously beating his wife after they got home from a swingers party.
I guess some things don't stay at the swingers party or some things seen cannot be unseen.
But that's it.
Alright, so what I'm going to do now, is Ronald Reagan in...
Is that in the shot, the Ronald Reagan thing behind me?
No, not anymore.
I'm going to go do a live walkie-talkie tour of this thing.
The event starts at 6 o 'clock.
6 o 'clock Pacific time.
So 2 hours, 6 o 'clock to 8 o 'clock Pacific.
That is 9 o 'clock to, I should say the way I do it, 21 hours, 2100 hours to 2300 hours East Coast.
So stay tuned.
And thank you all for being here.
I'm just going to go make sure that I didn't miss anything more in...
Our locals community.
Oh, there is one more.
Ginger Ninja.
It's public on Rumble under the account...
Oh!
So the video of Ginger Ninja, the time-lapse of him making the chessboard, is on his Twitter account.
Not Twitter account.
Rumble account.
And it's GingerNinja1776.
Thank you, Ginger Ninja.
And that'll end it.
I think.
Let me just go one more time to rumble.
And do I announce what the schedule is here?
Who goes live at 2 o 'clock?
Matt Kors is going live at 2 o 'clock for anyone who is interested in the markets.
I got to tell you, though, the biggest relief in my life was giving all of my investments to somebody else to lose my money for me because, I mean, it's not like I was making the money, but I was getting very frustrated.
Now it's just...
Surrendered all responsibility, and at least that part of my life is a little bit less stressful.