Live from Milwaukee! The RNC Debates Tonight AND MORE! Viva Frei Live!
|
Time
Text
Alright, so we're live.
I'm dabbing.
I'm dabbing with my notes.
These are the notes for today's show, people, and it's an outdoor show.
We might have some hair mishaps.
We won't have any nipple mishaps unless things go really wrong or really right.
Good afternoon.
Sorry for the delay.
It's flipping hot.
We're in Milwaukee, like literally downtown Milwaukee.
I can't really see what's going on around there.
There's a place called Tavern Hall right over there.
It looks like it's in an old 1900s building.
In the distance over there, it looks like the top of a church.
It's sweltering.
And quite clearly, the reason why it's so damn hot is because we didn't pay enough taxes.
Because if we had just paid more in carbon taxes in Canada, according to Stephen Gilbo, the former Minister of Heritage...
I forget what he's doing now.
Alright, so it is live from the RNC.
Good afternoon.
It's hot that I mentioned that.
I've got...
We're going until 2 o 'clock, right?
45 minutes, which will be more than enough.
Rumble has the exclusive livestream Internet rights to the RNC first of the primary debates tonight.
And it's an amazing thing where...
I say alternative media, but I no longer think Rumble is alternative.
Rumble right now is the competitor.
They are having the exclusive rights for online streaming.
Fox has the broadcast.
And you realize that legacy media is useless, corrupt.
Dishonest, but above all else, becoming increasingly irrelevant.
I'm walking around here, and you've got these booths that are being set up.
You see the journalists, like mainstream legacy media.
Heavy setups.
Impressive setups.
Expensive setups.
And yet, nobody trusts them.
Everybody knows not to trust them.
There's a hornet.
Okay, the porno just flew away.
Now that would be an outdoor mishap.
Becoming increasingly irrelevant.
And Rumble and the creators on Rumble are making it clear exactly why.
Nobody trusts them.
Nobody goes there to get their news anymore.
There's a reason why YouTube is striking down channels, ramping up the censorship yet again because we're heading into an election cycle yet again.
There's a reason why on the platforms that promote censorship, everything that they recommend is legacy mainstream media.
So this is going to happen tonight, 8 to 10 o 'clock.
It's going to be amazing.
Thus far, I've been walking around, talking to some people on the street, protesters.
I met Marjorie Taylor Greene very briefly as she was walking across the street.
There was a heckler, we'll call him, a protester, shouting some things at her.
I asked him a few questions afterwards.
The environment is amazing, and it's interesting.
I ran into the quartering.
Jeremy ran into Michael Malice, ran into Dave Rubin.
Apparently, Patrick Beddavid is going to be here a little later.
So it's fun.
It's interesting.
But the important thing here is Rumble.
I mean, I remember back in the day, Rumble was a platform on which I put random videos.
I had one viral video on Rumble years ago where I ducked under the swing when I pushed my kid.
Rumble back then was not part of the public discussion.
It is now part of the public discussion.
It's part of the public trading discussion.
It's part of the public censorship discussion.
It's part of the public smear machine discussion.
And Ruhu Nebatu, when you fight corruption, corruption fights back.
I'll say it over and over again.
Corruption is fighting back against Rumble because it's now no longer just part of the discussion.
It's a viable alternative competitor and proving why mainstream media, legacy media, is dead and irrelevant.
Which leads me to one subject that I wanted to talk today.
You all know Jason Levine.
Independent journalist out of Alberta.
Alberta, Manitoba.
I think it's Alberta.
It's Alberta.
I had him on the channel.
He's covering the Coutts 4. Hold on.
Hold on.
We're going to do this.
The wind is a pain in the neck.
I put my hair in a ponytail.
Feel naked.
Jason Levine has been covering the Coutts 4. These are four men who have been locked up now.
It's 500 some odd days.
By the time they have their trial, they're going to be nearing three years in pre-trial detention in remand.
Those are the four individuals accused by the RCMP of conspiring to commit murder against an RCMP officer in Coutts, Alberta.
It was this pretextual arrest that was used as the basis to invoke the Emergencies Act.
under Justin Trudeau.
After the six-week hearing, Commissioner Rouleau relied heavily on the threat that the Coutts four posed to public security to justify invoking the Emergencies Act.
Well, Jason Levine...
was covering another important story going on last week, and it's still going on.
Her name is Gru, G-R-U, an RCMP official who was reprimanded, sanctioned for literally doing her job.
And if it's not, well, hold on, maybe I should go to the chat just to make sure I'm not getting anybody's name wrong.
Her name is Constable Gru, I believe.
If I've forgotten her name, I'll look it up afterwards and get to the chat here.
Look at that.
I can see myself in real time.
556 days in jail, says Maria Ciu.
RCMP officer who was investigating infant deaths, sudden infant death syndrome.
And she was, I guess, investigating more than normal.
And in her investigations, began inquiring about a certain jibby-jab status of the parents of these infants who were suddenly dying in numbers that I think she found shocking.
She was reprimanded.
I don't know the details, so I don't know if she was looking into the vaccination status of some of the parents in manners that were, I don't know, improper, if that can be a word in the context of an RCMP investigation into infant deaths.
She was reprimanded, and they're going through with the hearing on her sanction.
And Jason Levine has been covering this trial.
He had on someone involved in the case and had it on his YouTube channel.
Just like Dat got his third strike and had his YouTube channel nuked.
Taken down.
Nuked out of thin air.
Thank you for the money you've made for us, Jason Levine says YouTube.
Thank you for bringing traffic to our platform.
You're nuked.
And that highlights the importance of Rumble, what it's doing in the world, and the influence that it's having on the public...
Political discourse discussion as we're witnessing in real time right now.
So I tried to, you know, get a social media campaign to put a little pressure on Team YouTube.
But it seems that after thorough review of a few hours, they've confirmed that his channel deserves to be nuked in its entirety.
Oh.
And then speaking of the woes coming out of Canada, before we get into the excitement coming out of America, Jordan Peterson, you may remember him from such re-education camps as the one that the, what is it called?
The Order of Psychiatrists out of Canada reprimanded Jordan Peterson and issued a sanction that he had to basically attend re-education, literal re-education camps.
Some of the tweets that he puts out on the interwebs I'll go to the wording of the...
Court ruling that came down now and ratified, approved of the sanction against Jordan Peterson despite his request for judicial review.
They said, Jordan Peterson, some of your tweets can hurt people.
Some of your tweets are, in our view, unbecoming of the order of psychiatrists.
And as a sanction, we're going to compel you to take a re-education camp.
Internet etiquette.
Learn some etiquette.
You know, when you're talking about...
Paige and the surgeries that a doctor performed on her to remove a double mastectomy on an adult woman to follow through on that person's gender identification.
Full-grown adult.
Paige can do what Paige wants with Paige's own body, and if you find a doctor who thinks that that does not violate the Hippocratic Oath of do no harm, I'm relatively libertarian when it comes to what adults can do with their own bodies.
In full awareness of fact, the question is always going to be, is it a decision that they are making of sound mind?
Whatever.
Jordan Peterson referred to the doctors that did that procedure as criminal doctors and dead-named Ellen Page.
Ellen is how she was, you know, known when she was an actor in the movie Juno.
I don't know how they go back and, like, if anybody wins awards, do they take back the awards and pull off the plaques and put on a new plaque with the new name?
Either way.
Deadnamed Paige and called the doctors criminals, among other things.
I think there was one tweet that Rachel Gilmore, CTV News former journalist, or former CTV News journalist said, someone said to Jordan Peterson, you should reduce your carbon footprint, there should be less humans on this earth, and Jordan Peterson said, you go first.
Tongue-in-cheek sarcasm, which some people said was encouraging self-harm.
There was another one when he was on Rogan and he referred to an overweight woman in particular as, I think, physically unattractive in so many words.
Anyways, these were the tweets that got Jordan Peterson in trouble with his professional body in Canada, the governing body.
And the governing body came down because they regulate the profession and they said, Jordan Peterson, you've had a little too much to think and you need to go to a re-education camp.
And everyone should think about this episode of The Simpsons when they...
When everyone went to the re-education camp and they lobotomized them and Moe's sitting there with a little piece of his brain, he's like, it's not that bad, Homer.
They just go in your nose and they pull out a little piece of your brain.
It's literally like that in real life, but not literally, I guess metaphorically.
Jordan Peterson was ordered to go to re-education to learn internet etiquette and to pay for it himself and he asked for judicial review and the court unanimously, predictably, unanimously came down today with the ruling Just going to read two portions of it.
I'm going off the news because I actually have not read the judgment in its entirety.
The Complaints Committee concluded that some of Peterson's comments...
This is an article from CTV.
Is it CTV News?
Toronto CTV News, yes.
CTV News.
The Complaints Committee concluded that some of Peterson's comments posed, quote, moderate risks to harm to the public, end quote, including, quote, undermining public trust in the profession of psychology, end quote, as well as the college's ability to regulate the profession.
It then ordered social media coaching program.
At Peterson's expense, emphasizing that failure to comply could result in an allegation of professional misconduct.
That's one part of it, and then the other part was, the panel concluded, reasonably, that Dr. Peterson's behavior raised a moderate risk of harm to the public, Shabbos wrote.
I mean, we've lived long enough now that satire has become reality.
The Simpsons have basically predicted everything.
And when they say, you know, if you don't attend the public re-education at your expense, Peterson, it could lead to an out...
They'll take his license away.
And they're going to.
And the court, I mean, the court predictably said we're not getting involved in this.
The governing body is basically regulated to govern its own.
We're not getting involved in how the body regulates itself.
I guess save and accept for egregious discriminatory implementations of policy.
But they've done it.
And Jordan Peterson is now going to have to face re-education or face losing his license, which I think the only reason he's keeping it now is to actually fight this bogus rubbish, because I don't know how much practice he's doing.
So that's the latest out of Canada, people.
We have not hit rock bottom yet, and it's always darkest before the dawn.
I just don't know when the sun is going to rise.
I just got a very important text from my mother.
Wordle.
The Wordle group talking about the Wordle.
Okay, that's Peterson.
That's out of Canada.
What else is going on?
We hear some chanting in the background.
I don't know what it is.
But it is eerily quiet.
I wish people could see what's going on here.
There's some cops on the street over there.
I think they've cordoned off the area a little more broadly than what it was cordoned off before.
Milwaukee, from what I've been told by pretty much everybody, it's described as a rough town.
Statistics are statistics in terms of crime, and it's not doing very well.
In fact, it's doing very badly.
Record numbers of violent crime.
It's a bit of an odd feel.
The restaurants in the downtown core don't open until 11. It feels, I don't know what a city on decline feels like, and I don't have a prior experience to compare it to, but it's got a very odd feel.
The taxi driver who I had a ride with earlier said he wants to, you know, leave.
It's crimes out of control.
People are out of control areas.
You have to avoid at all costs.
I don't know why the RNC is having the debate here, but either way, this area here is magnificent.
Vivek is going to be here.
DeSantis is going to be here.
Nikki Haley is going to be here.
I'm going to forget the other seven.
Someone just blew out their Achilles or something playing basketball this morning.
Chris Christie is going to be here.
And it's going to be amazing.
It's in this venue behind us.
It's a massive venue and we're going to get in and it's going to be phenomenal once it goes down.
But Vivek.
There was this guy.
Oh, I'm going to forget the name.
I forget the name of the guy who did the breakdown.
self-made success market story.
I was just with Matt Kors and he was, he told me the guy's name.
He's got a, he's got a very, a very successful YouTube channel and, It's an interesting analysis because, look, it's mildly accusatory.
It suggests impropriety, but it suggests it in a way that would not result in defamation lawsuits.
But what was described in this video is that Vivek and a close circle of friends and family acquired a drug that had already apparently failed at trials for showing success for treating Alzheimer's.
Bought this drug.
And then according to the analysis, and I'm going to go over it very quickly, but maybe someone will ask Vivek the question on this, and maybe Vivek will come and talk about it because he doesn't seem like one to shy away from discussion, even uncomfortable or hard questions, acquired the rights to a drug that had already allegedly failed in its tests for efficacy treating Alzheimer's.
They reinterpreted the data, and the accusation is they reinterpreted the data to exclude the trial...
Cases that did not fit success, much like what we know Pfizer did in their initial trials for the Jibby Jab.
You know, someone has an adverse reaction, exclude them from the data for whatever the reason.
Oh, they failed at something, or we're going to find a way to get them out of the test so that we don't have to report on the adverse reaction.
Now that's the accusation, drawing a similar analogy, that they reassessed, reanalyzed the data, and that it was Vivek's mother that did this, although she did it in her name, so there's no real issue of lacking transparency, that they reanalyzed the data, said this is very promising, took it public, raised a bunch of money, and then it never went anywhere because it was failed in its first attempt to go around.
And the stock doesn't just flatline, but the stock, you know.
Tanks and then flatlines.
That's the accusation.
So suggesting that there might have been some scheme, even if legal, of questionable ethics, that's one question that I wouldn't mind asking Vivek.
I watched the analysis.
I'm not convinced it is reeking of impropriety to the degree to which the...
The person explaining it, I forget.
Man, I wish I could have access to chat in real time.
Let me see here.
Let's see if anybody knows the name of the guy who did it.
Refresh?
Oh, hold on.
I saw something about Larry Elder.
We'll get there in a second.
Hold on, people.
Let me see if anyone got it.
Okay, no.
Whatever.
I'm not sure if I see the same improprieties there, but that's going around.
That's fueling a lot of the...
The matching anti-Vivek sentiment that seems to be correlating to his rise in the polls.
So we'll see.
As far as the debate, by the way, goes tonight, my prediction, and this is not a question of favoritism or who I want, my prediction is Vivek is going to crush it.
Boy, howdy.
Because I think that Vivek, of all the candidates...
Nikki Haley thinks fast on her feet as well.
But as far as...
Depending on the format of the debate, Vivek thinks fast on his feet.
I don't think he is habituated to using a prompter or notes.
I think he's going to crush it.
But this is the increasing pushback, seemingly to correlate to his rise in popularity, that people are now holding against Vivek, saying that he made his money in ethically questionable manners, suggesting pump and dump, market manipulation, or fraud in market development.
Okay.
We'll see where it goes.
I'm going to go read the comments on that from our locals community, but speaking, little stream of consciousness, speaking of the smear campaign that follows a massive rise in success, oh my goodness, this one's going to get me a little peeved.
Is everybody following the smear campaign that seems to be following Oliver Anthony now?
Oliver Anthony ain't got a dollar.
Is that the name of the song?
Something was shit for a dollar.
A dollar ain't worth shit.
Oliver Anthony...
It's like people have forgotten what viral videos looked like.
Oliver Anthony...
West Virginia?
Richmond.
Richmond, Virginia.
So he's in Virginia.
Had that song.
Explosion.
Wildly popular.
23-25 million views in a week on YouTube.
You know, turned down millions of dollars in lucrative record deals, apparently.
Released his second album.
Put out a Facebook post explaining who he was.
Right from the get-go, people were suggesting fraud.
And I'm like, how do you have fraud?
People were suggesting fraud of Oliver Anthony.
Other people were now going up and digging up posts that he made, accusing him of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.
There was someone on Twitter earlier today, let me see if I can find the name of the person, suggesting that Oliver Anthony's rise in popularity was an astroturf campaign, which means that, like, it's an inorganic, inorganic, basically seeded to some extent.
The guy's Twitter feed is Lucky.
The Maga Hulk.
And...
Basically accuses Oliver Anthony's rise in popularity of being a conservative AstroTurf campaign.
What did he say here?
There was one thing that I love.
He writes, So who wrote the song?
And how did so many big right-wing accounts have the video ready to post simultaneously?
There's the smear to counter someone's political rise in popularity, as we're seeing with Vivek.
And then there's the smear to just to crush what looks like, and until proof to the contrary, an organic, grassroots rise to fame of a man who's gone through a lot, apparently by all accounts, and has written a song that went organically viral because it resonated with the suffering that people are going through now.
and It depicts them in a good light, although if anybody had watched a few of the Oliver Anthony interviews or read some of his posts, the guy's not any more impressed with the GOP side of the aisle than he is with the Democrat side of the aisle.
But now the accusations are digging up posts, suggesting he's an anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist promoter because of a post he made about 9-11 and suggesting that this was some sort of conservative astroturf campaign to make conservatives look like humans, to make conservatives look like they don't actually care about the suffering that Americans are going through now.
Quite funny stuff.
Funny in a way, but not funny in a way.
Does everybody remember Justine Sacco?
And I hate to bring up the name because I know that Justine wants to move on with her life.
Justine Sacco was the woman that had her life.
Destroyed, if only temporarily, although I think that it has left trauma that will never go away.
She's the one who got on a plane going to South Africa and said, going to Africa, hope I don't get AIDS.
JK, just kidding, I'm white.
Tweeted it to her, I think it was 126 followers at the time.
Turns off her phone, and by the time she turns on her phone, landing in South Africa, number one trending worldwide on Twitter.
Anybody think that that was an AstroTurf campaign to make anyone look bad?
You know, some things go viral for good and for bad reasons because they tap into a universal sentiment of mankind.
In Justine Sacco's case, it tapped into the rage click that is the internet sometimes, the bandwagon that people love on the internet anonymously to pounce.
To destroy.
Like that scene out of Fight Club.
Sometimes just to destroy something beautiful just because you can.
Things go viral organically for good and for bad reasons.
Some of you might not even know this.
If this tarp blows off because of the wind, it was nice knowing all of you.
My original rise to internet fame started with a viral video.
The squirrel steals a GoPro.
Google it if you have never seen it.
That's my video.
Squirrel steals GoPro.
Because I had the brilliant idea of taping a piece of bread to a GoPro in Westmount Park in Montreal, where the squirrels are notoriously aggressive in the sense that they come for food.
They're big, fat, strong, juicy squirrels.
And I put a piece of bread on a GoPro, tied it, squirrel took it, carried it up a tree.
I uploaded it to the internet November 12th, 2014.
And within a day it had a million views, and for the next week it was picking up a million views a day.
Things go viral just because they appeal to some common element of humanity, good or bad.
Anthony and Oliver, until proof to the contrary, whether or not there were some big accounts that posted it, the only reason I ever saw that video was because it made it into our online community at vivabarneslaw.locals.com, where everyone is above average.
So enough with the crap.
You're gonna make some bold accusations?
You better have some bold damn evidence.
Speaking of bold evidence, hold on, what time is it here?
1.38.
It's okay, we're good, we're good.
Speaking of bold evidence, following what's going on in Hawaii still, they've jumped off the climate crisis bandwagon for what caused that.
Bad to worse is an understatement.
I'm not going to swear because...
We're...
It's a bloody outrage.
It's a bloody criminal outrage.
And it's becoming increasingly clear that it's gross negligence, at best, criminal negligence.
Nick Sartor is out in Hawaii, you know, doing the work that...
That mainstream media, even if they wanted to do, I'm not sure that they're so inclined in this case, but even if they wanted to do, they're not necessarily able to do because of the embargo's not the word, but cordoning off the area.
You know, there's no free press left anymore in North America.
There's very little free speech left in America, North America, including Canada.
And the freedom of press, well, the press gets to see what the government lets the press see.
The press gets to ask the questions that the government lets the press ask.
And if they don't play ball, they don't answer the questions.
Nick Sartor put out a montage of his work in Hawaii where he's asking, I think it's the governor, I mean, I don't want to make a mistake, it's the governor.
I don't know who it is.
They're not answering the questions and then when the journalists get irritated because they're being stonewalled by elected officials who are there, who were elected to represent and serve the people who elected them, they don't get the answers and then when they get maybe a little irritated, maybe a little frustrated, maybe a little excited, the government officials just shut it all down.
Sorry, I'd like to ask the question, but you guys, you animals are not asking it properly.
I'm just, we're ending this press conference.
It's as though elected government officials have forgotten that they were elected to serve the people and not elected to rule over the people like elite kings.
Over the lowly plebs.
It's not how it works.
And it's not to be ungrateful or to be demanding, like, you represent us, you serve us.
That's what the relationship was supposed to be.
That's how government is supposed to work.
Who was it?
Thomas Jefferson?
When the government fears the people, you have democracy.
When the people fear the government, you have tyranny.
Fact check me.
That might not have been Jefferson.
It has to be Mark Twain.
Or maybe, who's the other one?
Winston Churchill.
Anyhow, but that's the idea.
You know, when the people serve the government, you have a form of tyranny.
When the government serves the people, that's what they're there for.
They're there to answer the questions, account for their negligence, and not cover it up.
But we're left in a world now where it's not just that they do it.
And it's not just that they do it with impunity.
They now have actually gotten the civilians, the citizens, to protect and defend their own corruption.
Oh, we got the same protester who was protesting Marjorie.
Oh, gosh.
Okay, I'm getting Aviva on the street afterwards.
I'm going to go, you know, to see the protester.
The same protester, if you haven't seen the tweet on Twitter, was giving Marjorie Taylor Greene a hard time.
Looks, sounds like he's giving somebody else a hard time.
It's not just that they're doing it with impunity.
No one's above the law.
My...
Hairy butt.
No one is above the law.
Someone tweeted out the other day a picture of Hillary Clinton saying, guess who's not on her fourth indictment?
And I was like, okay, hold on one second.
Let me check the feed on this.
Is this intending to show the double standard?
Or are they intending to praise Hillary Clinton for being a law-abiding politician?
Spoiler alert.
To the extent that liberals and Democrats, is my assessment, lack insight.
And lack the requisite humility and self-deprecating humor to make good memes.
It was someone praising the honesty of Hillary Clinton by virtue of the fact that she has not been indicted four times.
So she's not a criminal.
But show me the man and I'll show you the crime.
Stalin principle.
Well, now we have, look at Trump.
He's been indicted four times.
He has to be bad.
But it's not just that they get away with it with impunity.
They actually get the citizens to defend them.
Out of Canada, citizens and the journalists.
Out of Canada, bouncing around here, this is the best thing ever.
Many of you don't know this.
February, March, April, May, June, July, August.
Six months.
Canada has not had an ethics commissioner.
In six months since the former ethics commissioner resigned purportedly for health reasons.
The ethics commissioner is the one who enforces the Conflict of Interest Act, investigates the government for conflicts of interests and unethical conduct.
Canada has not had one for six months.
It's a little-known fact.
We'll put it on blast.
There's a law.
It's called the...
I think it's called the Conflict of Interest Act or the Ethics...
Whatever it is.
Section...
You can Google it.
It's 82-something or other.
It says the governor and council shall appoint an ethics commissioner.
Shall.
In the canonic legal rules of interpretation, shall is obligatory.
May is discretionary.
The governor and council shall appoint an ethics commissioner.
And Trudeau and his...
The post has been vacant for six months, meaning there is no ethics commissioner right now to investigate the ethics or lack thereof of the current regime in Canada.
Dale underscore journo, or it's journo underscore dale, works for legacy media, I forget which, in Canada and writes for some of the states.
Journo underscore dale says, You can't appoint someone to a position that no one's applying for.
Apparently, nobody's applying for the position of Ethics Commissioner when it's an appointment.
Not an application.
Hey guys, I'll submit my application.
No.
It's a government appointment that the Governor and Council shall make.
And you have journalists out of Canada saying, it's not a problem.
It's not corruption.
It's not lacking transparency.
You can't force someone to take the job that no one's applying for.
Holy horse crap.
Giorno underscore Dale.
If the government cannot make the appointments that they are legally required to make, they can't govern.
Period.
And if the argument is that it's such a terrible position that no one wants to take, or the regime is so bloody corrupt and unethical that nobody wants to take the position because it might get them in trouble, that's hardly a defense to the corruption.
Now I'm looking at the background, I see...
Do you want to come back on?
It's hot as all hell out here, people.
And no, I'm not jumping on the climate crisis bandwagon just yet.
All of that to say, we're living in a world now where the citizens have become subservient to the government and not vice versa, and it doesn't go good places from there.
Oh, now hold on a second.
I had the...
Oh, that's right.
I wrote down the pride flag to remind me...
The story that made the news on Sunday.
Actually, I think the incident occurred on Friday.
A 69-year-old woman in California was shot and killed outside her business in California, apparently over a dispute of her pride flag.
And the individual who shot and killed her went on the run and was then subsequently shot and killed by police.
And the media was running with the story that...
This was a dispute over a pride flag and that it's evidence of hatred towards the LGBTQ community and it's the result of right-wing MAGA rhetoric.
Now, I heard the story and on Sunday I said, I'm predicting there's going to be more to this story than this current narrative, but by the time the truth comes out, if it ever does come out, the narrative will have already served its purpose.
They identified the individual.
Who did it?
And as of yesterday evening, his Twitter feed was still up there.
The individual, half Japanese, I say this only because of the last name, I don't remember exactly what it was, but it was Japanese, and went through the Twitter feed.
But only after another one of the propagandists out there.
No lie with Brian Cohen.
It's literally...
I make a joke, you know, when someone has to call their platform No Lie With or, you know, the People's Democratic Republic of, you know you're dealing with a lie and you know that you're going to be dealing with a party that's not democratic.
A liberation front, you know, liberating some but not others.
No Lie With Brian Cohen puts out a tweet that says this is the direct result of MAGA rhetoric.
I'm not verbatim paraphrasing, but what was in his tweet.
To run this narrative of this is the result of MAGA Republicans.
I went through the individual's Twitter feed.
I mean, it's a Twitter feed that is a timeline of mental illness, mental unwellness.
It's not a question of justifying violence as mental illness.
Some people might have the underlying belief that anybody who's prepared to murder someone...
Murder in the legal sense has mental problems to begin with.
This timeline was a timeline of a mentally ill individual.
A mentally ill individual who hated Trump, accused Trump of being part of the Satanist group, questioned whether or not Trump was also involved in the Epstein cabal along with Clinton and others because of their connection.
This was an individual who was posting at least one anti-white tweet.
At least one anti-Semitic tweet, and quite clearly an individual with serious mental problems, who committed an atrocious act, like full stop, no but, that is going to be weaponized for political purposes.
Truth be damned.
And it's a disservice, as far as I'm concerned, to the victim of the horrendous, unjustifiable...
Treacherous act of violence.
But it's the world in which we live.
It's the world in which we live.
And that's it.
So they've identified this guy.
Crime being on the rise everywhere.
The victims of crime get politicized depending on whether or not it's the type of crime that the political interwebs wants to politicize or wants to ignore.
And thus politicized as well.
But there was a follow-up in it.
Everyone should know the story and everyone should know the latest.
And then I guess we're going to end on...
Let me see here.
Hold on a second.
Yeah, I'm good.
I think I covered all my notes and I'll go to the chat and see what's going on.
The Trump bond.
Oh, this is fantastic.
Sir, how goes it?
You want to pop in and say hi?
Speaking of the Trump bond...
Don Trump Jr.
What's happening, guys?
How you doing?
How goes the battle?
You know, never ending.
Are we framed?
Never ending.
It's an amazing thing.
I meet people in real life who I've never met.
Well, I meet them in real life.
I've met Don Jr. at least once.
Okay, let's make sure everything's going good with this.
That's a truck driver.
In Milwaukee, not everyone's going to be home team, but that's okay.
In Canada, that gets you arrested now.
Honking a horn.
I think that's jailable.
Now, if you go murder innocent Christians, you're probably fine.
It's an alliteration for Hail Hitler.
Everybody knows that.
So, you meet people in real life, and then you understand that they are real people.
Don Jr. is a real person.
This is your dad now.
Yeah.
Facing the brunt.
I say Chuck Schumer.
Was it Chuck Schumer who said the FBI has six ways from Sunday of getting back at you?
I think they've all said that, because it's true.
Yeah, well, Schumer said it a couple years ago and it's come to fruition.
Your dad is feeling the brunt of this in real time.
How's he doing?
How are you doing?
Listen, this is not a normal response, but you have to understand that after sort of seven years of this, right, they tried it with me with Russia, Russia, Russia, where they wanted to, and, you know, the head of the Intelligence Committee, Chuck Schumer.
If you say that, if you say that treason's punishable by death, that gets you yeeted from certain platforms as well.
But they want to go after you for this.
But it is, and they tried doing that.
So after seven years, you actually become accustomed to it.
Right?
It becomes the norm.
Like, I spoke to my dad yesterday.
We're joking around back and forth about what's going to go on.
So, it sounds crazy, but that is what it's become.
And that's what this country's become.
And that's why it's so important to push back against the insanity right now.
Because if we don't, you think if they can do it to Trump, and they will do it to Trump, someone who has the means, who has a platform to fight back, who has strong support, what can they do to someone who has none of those things?
And the answer is anything.
And you've seen that.
In Canada, like, they're just a little bit ahead of the curve.
That's where we're going here in America.
We were talking about it with Barnes.
I mean, we talk about it all the time.
And his theory is that the mistake they made this time was going after someone like Trump, who A, has the means, B, has the following, and C, has now exposed...
They've probably done, you know, they've done this in the criminal justice system to people who don't have the means and nobody knows about it.
They just picked the biggest target on earth, which either shows the brazenness of the escalation...
I mean, I don't even know how to finish the rest of that sentence.
I think it's that.
And it's also a signal to anyone else from outside of that sphere of influence.
It's honestly outside of the uni party, right?
There's a couple Republicans doing some stuff.
We'll have some of them on my show next when we start streaming.
The reality is many of them are silent or they're going through process and this.
They're pretending like they're playing the same game as the Democrats.
The Democrats hear about process and they laugh their asses off.
Bullshit.
Process is for those morons because they're willing to do that.
They'll just go right to jailing their opponents.
Well, Chris Christie goes on Jake Tapper and says, do we really want a four-time indicted person running?
First of all, that is playing as much of the game as those who are doing it.
DeSantis, the first joke that he made, I don't know much about hush porn money payments.
I was like, dude, they're going to come after you for human trafficking if they get away with this.
That's the problem, is that Ron DeSantis, you see that.
Now that you see him on stage, and it's no longer just an online group of paid influencers sort of creating his persona, once you see him on stage, and I know this better than anyone, because in 18, I think I spent three weeks on the road with him, like, on a bus tour around Florida getting him elected.
So, you know, to get to know Ron DeSantis is to not like him, right?
But you see it.
No, no, no.
But, like, in all fairness, I'm going to have a beer with you humans because that's what people do, beer.
Like, it's so fake, and you saw the flip-flop on Ukraine, right, with the Tucker, and then two days later, once the donors got to him, it was an immediate flip-flop towards never-ending wars.
Then you saw the flip-flop on the weaponization of our government entities, of our, the highest forms of federal law enforcement against, you know, that wasn't a real thing, that wasn't really happening.
Two days later, they indict Trump.
You really think this guy, when he gets, you know, it's one thing to be in Florida, and I think he's been a good governor, but you think when the big money and the big boys are playing that he's not going to be their lapdog?
Like, it's clear that he is.
Well, I mean, I agree with you on much of that.
I like DeSantis when he's done to Florida.
I've chosen to make it my home for the next little while.
But yeah, it was not a cop-out.
It's just plain ball to say, well, I don't know much about it.
They'll come after DeSantis for human trafficking.
Get him off the ballot.
By the way, 100%.
They've said that.
And they're also trying to discourage anyone that's an outsider like a Trump.
From ever entering the race, right?
Elon wasn't born in America, so he couldn't run.
But if there's another Elon somewhere down the road that would maybe be someone who's, you know, a true critical thinker for the world and for the future, like, why would that person run?
They're going to leave their life to possibly be jailed over nonsense or framed over this.
Like, they are setting a message, and they're sending it loud and clear that...
No one is to touch the hegemony that they have had over the American people.
This has probably been going for a long time, Viva.
We're just now aware of it because Trump derangement syndrome brought it all out.
Name a metric, a single metric, where we're better off today than we were four years ago.
Now we go back to mask mandates.
Oh God, if that happens.
It's continuing.
Mask mandates and lockdowns and this.
Where are we better off?
Imagine what they would have done to Trump.
You know, if he was overseeing Maui and that was the Republican Party of Hawaii...
He'd be in jail already.
He'd be impeached three times by now and in jail.
We'll end it on this because you're going live in a few minutes.
I'm going live now.
It used to be you run for office, you expect the smear campaigns forever, you expect to have your name dragged through the mud, maybe, you know, you get audited.
It was never you expected to be indicted and jailed.
And that is that they've raised the bar and it's the ultimate deterrent.
I mean, like, I ran for office in Canada.
I know what's going to happen.
I can expect some political blowback.
Now that they've upped it to this level, they've effectively turned the government into, you know, the banana republics, the authoritarian regimes of...
They're laughing at us.
The same people who scream democracy, they're awfully silent about trying to jail their political opponents.
They're very vocal when Putin does it.
They're very vocal when Putin does it, but when anyone else does it in their own country, all of a sudden...
Because when Putin does it, it's wrong.
When Zelensky does it, it's right.
When they do it, it's because he's guilty already.