Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 17, 2023 - Viva & Barnes

01:36:11

The Literal Death of Canada; U.S. Precedent Laundering; AND MORE! Viva Frei Live!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	So I was going to do this speech from that chair in that little studio-looking format, but that's not me.
	Not me at all.
	I'm just going to do it over here and shoot from the hip.
	So you may or may not know me already, but I'm the founder of Rumble, which is now a public company poised to take on big tech.
	As a child in Canada, I always admired...
	America and the First Amendment.
	I grew up in a schoolyard where everyone hurled all kinds of stuff at me, friends, everybody.
	And while it was something we all had to deal with, it made me and made everyone else a stronger person.
	I do remember, once upon a time, the old expression, sticks and stones may break my bones, but words can never harm me.
	Can you imagine?
	This was when I was a kid.
	In 30 years, we've gone from sticks and stones may break my bones, but words can never harm me, to silence is violence.
	Although I can imagine there's some extreme circumstances in which silence is some form of violence.
	Okay, if you don't stand up for injustices, I guess that's one way of bastardizing the expression.
	Okay, hold on.
	I've interrupted Chris.
	Hold on.
	Americans, and even Canadians, never wavered when it came to free expression.
	That's what led to amazing moments in our society for like hundreds of years.
	But now things are changing at an incredible speed.
	FYI, this video was when they went public, so over a year ago now?
	The importance of freedom is being quickly forgotten and it's being sold by big tech agendas.
	One of the motivations for taking Rumble public is something I've kept to myself.
	I feared that the system could prevent it from happening.
	Many critics and even some investors wanted us to stay private, but if we did, we'd lose our fight for freedom.
	I've put years and years, decades of thought on how to take on this system and how to win.
	In a world controlled by massive corporations, you cannot defend freedom from the sidelines.
	You need to fight the system head on.
	You need to be smarter, harder working, and most importantly, you need to catch everyone by surprise.
	No private business can beat trillion-dollar public companies.
	These big tech companies influence information flow, academia, governments, and a vast part of the population.
	That much I think we're currently living through.
	This was not prescient when Chris said it a year ago, but it's damn good for the rumble zeitgeist.
	We're not going to play the entire four minutes.
	I just want to stop after one statement in particular.
	But here's the good news.
	We just surprised the entire world.
	We have created a vehicle for the public to get behind.
	And it is now up to the public on how bad they want to win this fight.
	Because we can't win this alone.
	We need you.
	Every single one of you.
	We now have a chance to grow our market cap to take on big tech.
	This is the only way to win.
	We'll use this market cap to acquire amazing talent that won't be influenced by corporate media or big tech.
	Oh, I can stop it there.
	That's all I wanted to get to.
	That's Chris Pavlovsky, CEO of Rumble, for those of you who don't know.
	For those of you who also don't know, an extremely sincere man, principled, so much so that when France says, take RT off of Rumble, or...
	Hold on.
	What did I just do here?
	Or, you know, do it.
	And he says, no.
	Well, then we're not going to play.
	We're not going to offer a rumble in France if the cost of doing business in France is forsaking our soul.
	All right.
	Now, hold on.
	Before we keep going, let me make sure that we are live.
	Are we live?
	Hold on.
	Okay, good.
	We're live there, so I can see it on Rumble.
	Good.
	Yeah, yeah, we are.
	Okay, I can see it on Rumble.
	Something's weird on StreamYard.
	I'm not getting the same information that I typically get.
	Okay, so we're live on YouTube.
	Yes, good.
	We're live on Rumble.
	And we're live in VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
	Scuba Jim in our Locals community says, I bought a thousand shares the other day.
	Full disclosure, I don't own one share of Rumble because I don't want to even run into...
	Once you see how you don't even have to do anything illegal in order to get indicted in four different jurisdictions on 78 charges, I don't want anyone making any accusations.
	So in as much as I want to buy stock of Rumble, I haven't.
	And if I ever own any, it will be public information regardless.
	But yeah, I got faith in the company.
	I got faith in Chris.
	Period.
	Full stop.
	Okay, so that's it.
	I see the problem now.
	It's not refreshing on Rumble, so I can't see the chat live in Rumble.
	It doesn't really matter.
	So for those of you who are new to the channel and you don't know how this works, I'm Viva Fry, Montreal litigator turned Rumbler.
	Former Montreal litigator turned Rumbler.
	Exclusivity with Rumble.
	Everybody knows that.
	It was announced in the press wire or whatever.
	And so what we do, we start live on YouTube and Rumble.
	And then we go over to Rumble exclusively while maintaining our stream on Locals, vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	And then after the stream is over, we go over to Locals and we have a bit of an after party, take some of the tips there, answer some questions, and talk about other stuff that we don't talk about.
	Not illegal stuff, just anecdotes, life experiences, and we have a discussion with our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community, which is above average.
	I'm not going to see the super chats coming in.
	YouTube, that's interesting.
	Well, hold on a second.
	I'll have to get paranoid right away.
	Okay, no, so it's all on here.
	All right, I can't see the comments, so I'm not going to get the...
	I can't highlight the superchats in StreamYard.
	Okay, I can't do it.
	I see one now.
	Mike Pierce just put in a $10 superchat.
	It says, the problem with Canada is that half of the population speaks French and the other...
	Canada is a beautiful country of the people.
	The government has destroyed it, and we're going to spend a lot of time today discussing exactly how the government has destroyed it.
	I won't be able to highlight the superchats, so that's going to suck.
	For everybody out there, also the standard disclaimers, no medical advice, no legal advice, no election fornification advice.
	YouTube takes 30% of superchats.
	If you don't like that, we're simultaneously streaming on Rumble.
	They have the thing called Rumble Rants.
	Same concept.
	Rumble typically takes 20%, but for the rest of this year, they're taking 0%.
	Best place to support the channel is on vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	But the other best way that I also support the channel, you may have noticed it says this video contains a paid sponsor.
	Because it does today, people.
	Now, full disclosure, it's a product that I don't use because I don't need it just yet in my life.
	But...
	I know that it is a product that some people do use because some people have thinning hair and need to thicken up that thinning hair.
	Provia Hair Thickener.
	And I'll try to stick to the script, but I'm going to go off the script a few times here.
	Are you one of the millions of American men or women dealing with premature thinning of the hair?
	I am not.
	I like to think that even if I were thinning my hair or losing my hair, I'd go like the full Bruce Willis and shave it and own it.
	Some people don't want to.
	Some people don't want to have the hair plug.
	Some people don't want to use nasty chemicals.
	And so they use Provia.
	Natural.
	Doesn't have the, what I'm told are the side effects of like maybe odorous cream or greasy stuff or the chemical side effects of the other stuff.
	It's developed by GenuCell, which we know is a product that we like.
	It's a company that we like.
	Let me just see here.
	I'm going to screw this up.
	It uses something called Procapul.
	Procapul.
	Which is the ingredient that thickens the hair naturally.
	It's from a company that I like their products that I use, the skin stuff, and it works.
	The hair stuff, not only do you not have to worry about it not working, if it doesn't work, 100% money back guarantee.
	So you go to proviahair.com forward slash Viva or promo code Viva.
	You get 50% off the most popular package thing that they have there.
	That's it.
	We'll see if I ever have to use it.
	Maybe I'll see if it can thicken out my already thick mop of a head.
	Go to ProviaHair.
	Let me just make sure I got the website done properly.
	ProviaHair.com forward slash Viva or promo code Viva and you'll get 50% off.
	Trusted folks at GenuCell.
	It's good stuff.
	Link is in the description as well.
	Anybody out there want to thicken your hair?
	Avoid hair loss.
	Prevent it.
	Nothing to lose.
	100% money back guarantee if it doesn't work.
	Okay, good.
	Oh, I feel a little naked not being able to see the chat.
	I like seeing the chat.
	Do I take a chance and refresh and then see what happens?
	I'm going to refresh and see what happens.
	You might lose me for 30 seconds.
	Refresh.
	Reload.
	Dude.
	All right, I'm back.
	Oh, there we go.
	Okay, good.
	You see, it was worth it.
	Chat, let me know that you can see it in here.
	Now, look, I can bring it up.
	The problem with Canada is that half of the population speaks French.
	Okay, Mike Pierce.
	I know this is a joke.
	Half of Canada does not speak French.
	I think Quebec, 8 million, 85% French.
	New Brunswick, 50-50 French.
	Ontario, not quite 50-50.
	And then there's the rest of Canada.
	It might be close to 50% speaking French.
	Okay, good.
	And now I got the chat.
	That's very good.
	Okay.
	Now, speaking of Canada, we're going to do the Canada stuff.
	Then we're going to go over to Rumble and do all the other stuff.
	Okay, good.
	I'm going to just make sure that we're good here.
	We are good here.
	Alrighty.
	All right.
	Voila.
	Boom shakalaka.
	All right, people.
	This is amazing.
	They are in case...
	We're going to say...
	Parentheses, when I try to do AI-generated clips from this, I know where to start now.
	They are incapable of telling the truth.
	They are just incapable of it.
	And the aggregate knowledge of the interwebs calls them out on it.
	Boy, howdy.
	Listen to this.
	We covered the story of Pierre Poilievre, the leader of the Conservative Party, spouting or promoting conspiracy theories of the WEF.
	And I railed hard on everybody who said that that was a conspiracy theory.
	Because it's not.
	And we know it.
	We don't need to go over it again today.
	Now the new media hit piece on Pierre Poiliev.
	And I know some of you out there are going to say it means he's over the target if the media is coming after him this hard.
	Others of you out there are going to say it's controlled opposition.
	This is how the uni party plays the game.
	Look, at some point in time, we're going to be describing the same thing.
	They're coming after Pierre, and they're coming after Pierre hard.
	Now, listen to this.
	This is a question that somebody asked Pierre Poiliev yesterday.
	I don't want to spoil the punchline.
	This was a question somebody asked Pierre Poiliev, and think of him what you will.
	He looks too much like Clark Kent.
	Everybody sees through the charade of taking off the glasses and, you know, looking like a badass, ripped, flexing arms, wearing tight black shirts, whatever.
	One thing that nobody can accuse Pierre Poiliev of is not thinking sufficiently fast on his feet, and he certainly thinks a little faster on his feet than the journalist who asked him this question.
	Listen to this.
	Hello, Mr. Poiliev.
	A number of your own comments and actions have been characterized as dog whistling to the far right.
	Sorry, by who?
	A number of your comments and actions have been characterized as far right, or something like that.
	By whom?
	Who?
	By a number of different...
	By who?
	By a number of different experts.
	Do you hear her voice?
	I feel bad for her.
	Her voice is shaking.
	She's like, holy shit.
	He's asking me to cite my sources?
	A number of people.
	Okay, by who?
	Spoiler alert, she never gets there.
	And a number of different experts.
	Who work in this?
	Well, I think it's been established that this is a concern.
	I think it's been established.
	By whom?
	By you?
	Trying to court the far-right vote.
	Sorry, who are these experts?
	You say that there are experts who are saying this.
	Who are they?
	My question is, are you trying to court the far-right vote?
	I'm sorry.
	Your question seems to be based on a false premise.
	You can't even tell me who these experts are.
	It sounds like it's just a CBC smear job.
	Thank you.
	Wait until you see where this goes.
	But what about the question about whether...
	The answer is that I have a common sense agenda to axe the carbon tax, bring home powerful paychecks, clear the way to build affordable homes, to put people in housing that they can afford.
	That is a common sense, mainstream Canadian agenda.
	And I know that Justin Trudeau's supporters are so desperate to distract from that because his political career is falling apart.
	So we're seeing an attempt here to distract and protect Justin Trudeau from his extremely unpopular carbon taxes and other failing policies, but we won't let him or others distract from that reality.
	So thank you.
	Remember that phrase, but let's see where this goes from now, by the way.
	Okay, hold on, hold on, hold on, hold on, hold on.
	We want to go here.
	The reporter came out.
	And this is the reporter.
	I guess it's the reporter behind the screen.
	But for the fact that she actually put out this tweet, I don't know that many people would have known who the reporter was.
	Teresa Wright.
	Journalist.
	I watch Canadian national politics and policy.
	Alumni of Global News, Canadian Press Poly, Prince Edward Island Guardian.
	Contact.
	Okay, whatever.
	Hold on.
	Okay.
	So she says, she takes to Twitter.
	Apparently she's the victim in all of this.
	I tried to ask Pierre Poiliev whether he is trying to court the far-right vote.
	He could not answer the question.
	Saying my question sounded like a CBC smear job and a distraction from real issues.
	And what does she show to substantiate her claim?
	A photograph.
	A still picture.
	Let's see if we can get any of this here.
	I tried to ask Pierre Poiliev a question.
	Why he's trying to court the far-right.
	He wouldn't answer saying my question.
	And I show you a picture.
	Well, here.
	I showed you the entire video.
	Which I said, by the way, until you see where this goes.
	This is just, it's just glorious.
	Why did you post the picture and not the actual video?
	You said a number of different experts have characterized Pierre Florida's comments and actions as dog whistles to the far right.
	You then embarrassingly could not substantiate that accusation, which served as a basis for your loaded hogwash of a question.
	Pay attention to this, folks.
	Not that everybody watching doesn't already.
	This is what you call defamatory framing.
	When did you stop beating your wife, Mr. Sto-and-so?
	You want me to answer that question?
	I got answers to that question.
	None of them are going to be polite, because your question is infused with a defamatory false premise.
	It's what we call dishonest and defamatory framing, using a false premise to support an accusation framed as a question, and then we watched the entire video.
	Your question was exactly like a CBC smear job.
	Which makes sense because you work for Global News, which is no better.
	It gets even better, if you can imagine, people.
	Hold on.
	Let me get it here.
	Where is it?
	Where is it?
	Oh, see, this is why I need to have the things a little bit more...
	Here we go.
	Look.
	Don't read this part.
	Don't read this part.
	Oh.
	She then went on to say, I don't work for the CBC.
	And the aggregate knowledge of the interwebs being what it is, and I say these people as in these state-funded propagandist hack of journalists, they think we're stupid.
	They think that we're not going to discover that they are pathological liars, and they think that they can treat us as idiots because they think we're idiots.
	She went on, you'll have to just take my word for it because I can't see it here.
	I don't work for the CBC.
	And then this individual right here, hold on, who said this?
	Kelly Charlebois, you've got to give him credit where credit's due, seems to have discovered that her husband does work for the...
	So not only does she work or work for Global News, her husband apparently, look at this, it's like the internet will find the answer.
	This is Teresa Wright, reporter Teresa.
	My husband sent flowers to my office for our anniversary.
	Thanks, Carrie W. Campbell.
	Interesting.
	Carrie W. Campbell and I double-checked this independently afterwards, just to make sure.
	Provincial affairs reporter for the CBC in beautiful PEI.
	Oh, but I'm not a CBC reporter, but my husband is.
	Was he one of the experts who said that Pierre Poilier's comments and actions are courting the far right?
	They are incapable of being honest.
	And the...
	Democratization of the internet and the aggregate knowledge of the internet calling out their lies is exactly why they need their supreme leader, Justin Trudeau, to rein in the interwebs and make sure that Canadians can't discover the truth on their own.
	Oh my goodness, a bunch of corrupt pigeons living off hard-working Canadians.
	Oh, and you see, like, it's just lie after lie after lie.
	I'm going to ask you a question.
	Sorry, I'm going to ask you an accusation framed as a question.
	A number of experts have...
	Which experts?
	I don't know.
	I just made that up and wasn't...
	Are you courting the far right?
	Hey, journalist Teresa, had that been your first and only question?
	Are you courting the far right?
	The follow-up from Pierre might be...
	What do you mean far right?
	Far right in Canada?
	Tell me what you mean by fuck.
	But no!
	You loaded your bullshit question with an accusation based on a fabrication or at the very least maybe there were some experts who said it.
	State funded liberal Trudeau hack experts.
	Maybe your own husband who works at the CBC.
	I love...
	He wouldn't answer the question.
	I just asked him if he's courting and he avoided the answer.
	Here's a picture.
	Oh!
	I'm sorry.
	So I see from the video, you're a hack.
	You made up a statement.
	You couldn't substantiate it.
	You're not the victim.
	You're the aggressor.
	I don't work for the CBC.
	Oh, no.
	You work for Global News and your husband works for the CBC.
	This is independent media in Canada.
	Holy crabapples.
	All right.
	Well, that was the funny story.
	The rest of it is not going to be all that funny.
	Let me just see something here.
	Yeah, let's go with...
	Is this one...
	Is this a just...
	No, that was it.
	Clearly far-right dog whistle here.
	Yes, that's right.
	Okay, hold on.
	So this is also funny.
	This is the absolute state of Canadian journalism.
	Remember when Pierre Boliev in his answer said, you schlocks, you hacks at state media are just looking for any way to distract from Justin Trudeau's...
	Crime regime, corrupt, unethical.
	Crime regime.
	It's my humble opinion, people, although it happens to be substantiated by two ethics violations, allegations of Chinese Communist Party, infiltration, corruption, donations to the...
	Okay.
	When Pierre Poiliev said, you're just trying to distract from Justin Trudeau's failings as a prime minister.
	No, no, no, no, no, no.
	These are hard-hitting journalists.
	I mean, this is Pierre Poiliev going to Prince Edward Island to do press stuff.
	What does the media have to say?
	This is not a joke.
	I thought it was a joke, actually.
	Kate McKenna, I do wonder if she's related to Catherine McKenna, senior parliamentary reporter for CBC News, Prince Edward Islander.
	She works for CBC News.
	This is another one of the hard-hitting journalists who's...
	Holding the Trudeau regime's feet to the fire, holding them to their standards, making sure they're a responsible government.
	No, no, no, no.
	She's complaining that Pierre Poilievre said Saint Edward Island when referring to Prince Edward Island in French.
	Île de Prince-Édouard is the island of the Prince Edward.
	Apparently, he said Île de Saint-Édouard.
	He didn't just say it once, though.
	He said it twice.
	Pierre Poilievre got the name P-E-I wrong in French several times.
	That son of a bitch.
	This is an affront to all PEIers.
	He called it Il de Saint-Edouard, not Il de Prince-Edouard.
	It's Il de Prince-Edouard, Prince-Edouard Island, not Saint-Edouard Island.
	Mic drop, Kate.
	Oh my!
	I said this in a response, but you can't see responses when you're not logged in.
	I said, you deserve a raise, Kate.
	That is some hard-hitting journalism.
	Then I had to add another joke because, damn, it's funny.
	St. Edward.
	I think it was called St. Edward.
	Oh, I'll Google exactly who it was afterwards.
	He was a saint.
	There's a St. Edward school in Florida.
	I didn't know this.
	I just Googled it and said, what would be funny right now?
	I was looking to see if there's a right-wing connection to a St. Edward or if there's something in German.
	I don't know how to say St. Edward in German.
	But no, I discovered that there's a St. Edward school in Florida.
	From the party that smells and hears dog whistles everywhere, I just have to say, this is clearly a far-right dog whistle.
	You see, St. Edward's School is a school in Florida.
	Florida is a racist and bigoted state with extreme MAGA Republican policy.
	When he said St. Edouard, Pierre was obviously signaling his support and admiration for the far-right state of Florida, while also discreetly shouting me out in the secret coded dog whistle.
	Fist pump, Pierre!
	Surprising that you missed that.
	And then the jokes started coming into this, that I deserve a job at the CBC News or Global News.
	There were a lot of jokes that came in afterwards and said, Viva, I work at Global News.
	I'd like to offer you a job.
	That is some hard-hitting investigative journalism.
	These people are idiots.
	That is a journalist who works for CBC News and her...
	Hot scoop of the day is that Pierre Poilièvre, when talking about Île de Prince-Édouard in French, said Île de Saint-Édouard not once, but multiple times.
	Holy crap.
	Impeach him.
	Impeach him.
	Arrest him.
	Indite him.
	Indite him.
	Indite him on hate crimes.
	Because he's undermining the national identity of Prince Edward Islanders by having accidentally said Saint Edward.
	Then my brother, hold on, hold on, hold on.
	Let me get my brother.
	My brother had possibly the best...
	The best response to this.
	And for those of you who don't know, I have siblings, but only one of them is active on Twitter.
	And let me see if I can get it.
	My brother for the win.
	Here it is.
	My brother is actually still a practicing attorney in Ontario.
	Lion Advocacy is his Twitter feed.
	Lion Advocacy.
	In for the win.
	And he says, what's worse, calling PEI St. Edward Islands or calling several million Canadians racist misogynists for not getting vaccinated?
	He ratioed her so hard in her own tweet on a free, democratized internet.
	The truth shall prevail.
	The truth shall set you free.
	And the truth shall shame these pathological gaslighting propagandists into a corner where all they're going to have to say is, We need protection on the interwebs.
	We need to control this non-Canadian content.
	Okay.
	Lion or lion?
	My brother, I'm fairly certain he too is incapable of lying.
	Viva for the new ethics commissioner.
	I don't know, man.
	I think something...
	So Mario Dion used to be the former ethics commissioner, the one who twice convicted Justin Trudeau, or twice found him in violation of the Ethics Act or the Federal Conference of Interest Act, and the third time for the We Charity scandal, miraculously exonerated him, and then shortly thereafter left for health reasons, I think.
	Man, I don't think...
	I don't think it's possible to remain non-corrupted.
	Where there are forces that will do bad things or threaten bad things on you.
	And I was thinking of this.
	I don't think I can be corrupted.
	I might be susceptible of being intimidated, in which case it's not a question of corrupt.
	Here's a million dollars or I'll promise you a position.
	What do you think I want?
	$600,000 an hour for a speaking gig?
	No.
	But people could be intimidated.
	I suspect there must be a difference between being corrupted and being intimidated.
	I look at Mario Dion.
	Magically exonerating Justin Trudeau for what would have been three strikes probably a year out, and then leaving the Ethics Commission, retiring for health reasons, and then lo and behold, Justin Trudeau has yet to even fill that position again.
	So Canada right now doesn't have a, what are they called?
	The commissioner of the ethics commission.
	Um, Thank you.
	So yeah, it all kind of makes sense.
	All right, so what we're going to do now, we're going to go over to...
	We're going to go over to Rumble.
	I'm going to give everybody the link here.
	It's pinned in the top.
	So here we go.
	Link to Rumble.
	We're going to do a little more Canadian stuff.
	We're going to do some American stuff.
	We're going to go over not the full video from Legal Eagle, but we're going to analyze a certain part of it where Legal Eagle is explaining how the, at the very least, the D.C. indictment against Trump has some, you know, jurisprudential, precedential support.
	Or justification.
	That just so happens to be January 6th injustices and Douglas Mackey meme conviction.
	But we'll get there.
	So...
	Let's do it.
	Get on over to...
	Oh, Joe Rogan.
	He roasted Trudeau.
	One day...
	It's going to happen that I'm going to be...
	I jog and I listen to Joe Rogan.
	And he always has a guest on.
	I'm listening to the one this morning.
	Who is it?
	It's...
	Joe Rogan, Mike Baker.
	And for those of you who don't know, what was the info on this?
	Mike Baker.
	I was listening to Mike Baker.
	One day, it's going to happen, and I'm going to be listening to Joe Rogan, and somebody on that show is going to talk about me.
	And then I'm going to have to stop, and I'm going to say, that's it.
	It's happened.
	But whenever he rails against Justin Trudeau, man, oh, have I got the factual goods on Justin Trudeau.
	Oh, we got here.
	R.Y. Davis says, Thank you, Mr. Fry.
	Can't comment over on Rumble yet.
	I have to create an account, but want to thank you for speaking truthfully here, Andrew.
	I am incapable of speaking untruthfully because I'm afraid of being called a liar.
	I'm afraid of being thought of as a liar.
	And so it's a neurosis.
	It's not necessarily even a good thing.
	Sometimes I can't lie when I'm supposed to lie.
	But I mean...
	There is no greater curse.
	Than being a liar and being thought of as a liar.
	So that's it.
	Okay, let's do it.
	Come on over to Rumble.
	We're going to end on YouTube in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1. Boom shakalaka.
	Ah, okay.
	Now let's see what's going on in Rumble.
	Are we good here?
	All right.
	Oh, Finboy, I could have brought these up before we came over, but let's deal with these Rumble rants before we get into the rest of the show.
	Finboy Slick.
	Oh, I'll start from the bottom.
	Finboy Slick.
	Pro-via.
	Needs to make their product smell like Secret.
	And it should only make the party grow in the back.
	Leave it all business in front.
	Sorry, I just had to.
	Dude, Finboy, do you know the story of me and Secret?
	When I was a kid, and anyone who remembers this is going to date themselves, Secret used to come in those blue, like those pastel blue bottles.
	And they were sort of ovular.
	And they had that ball, the roll top ball on the top.
	And it would roll into that white cream of the antiperspirant.
	And I used to wear Secret because I liked the way it smelled.
	This is like when I was 10, 12, 13. And my goodness, thank goodness.
	I'm not a kid today.
	Someone might have told me that I thought I was a girl.
	I used to wear the Secret because I liked the way it smelled.
	It smelled like baby powder.
	And then when I went to camp, I used to rub Secret.
	On my sheets, because my mother wore Secret, and it reminded me of my mother.
	So when I was homesick, I would sniff the sheets.
	And it's not like Secret.
	Okay, now you know.
	But then I stopped using Secret, because it's antiperspirant, and antiperspirant has that aluminum zircola, whatever it has, aluminum zircola.
	It's got some aluminum-type stuff in it, which I think is not good for you, and which I noticed also always left pit stains on white shirts.
	So that's why I stopped using them.
	Stopped using Secret and now I only use deodorant and I use Old Spice because I like the way it smells.
	Thin Boy Slick there.
	Justin Capable.
	Oh!
	Stolen!
	Thin Boy Slick there.
	Justin Capable of telling the truth.
	She did show herself to be a Justin Capable.
	Justin Capable.
	He's on a roll.
	He was like, oh yeah, he knows my...
	Yes, I know your secret secret, Viva.
	Along with you wanting a mullet and bleached hair.
	I'm the local Viva hair expert.
	Well, one day if I can find the picture.
	I'll show you the day that I had pink, bleach pink hair.
	And it was only an experiment because I had streaks in my hair.
	And then I dyed it pink and then cut it the same day.
	All right.
	Thank you very much, Finboy Slick.
	And let me see what I'm missing here.
	Although now everybody else knows the secret of the Viva secret.
	Okay.
	Let's break this out here.
	What do we have next on the news of the day?
	Oh, yeah.
	We're going to...
	Shift a little bit from Canada's a funny joke to Canada is not a funny joke.
	The Pravda of Canada making a mockery of so-called independent free press, that's fine.
	We can laugh at it.
	We can make fun of them.
	What's going on in Canada, and I just discovered this yesterday, Quebec exponentially higher than other provinces.
	Who would have thunk that massively expanding Euthanasia under the Justin Trudonian term, euphemism of medical assistance in dying.
	Made.
	Oh, you're a made man.
	It's a euphemism because once upon a time, another regime called it mercy killings because they went after the exact same, what's the word I'm looking for?
	Vulnerable demographic.
	2016, sometime after the Supreme Court ruled that denying medical assistance in dying To the terminally ill was unconstitutional, Canada passed legislation that authorized medical assistance in dying, euthanasia, mercy killings, depending on the decade in which you were born.
	And during the debate of the policy of this legislation, they said, well, we don't want to deprive the mentally ill of their constitutional right to end their lives.
	We should include a provision that would allow the mentally ill who are, you know, to the legal extent, oftentimes incapable of consent for certain actions requiring valid legal consent because of mental illness.
	We don't want to deny them their constitutional right to end their lives, so we should include that and let the mentally ill avail themselves of medical assistance in dying, euthanasia, mercy killings.
	But as I said, we can't do it just yet.
	We're going to include an exclusion, and that exclusion is going to fade off into the sun, hence the sunset clause, after which time we're going to allow medical assistance in dying to be offered not only to those who are terminally ill with no help, no hope, who choose death, to the mentally ill.
	We're going to open medical assistance in dying to people who are not even terminally ill.
	We're going to expand medical assistance in dying, mercy killings, to minors.
	We're going to expand it.
	To minors who are incapable of consent on their own and thus require parental consent.
	This is where Canada's going.
	And for those of you who don't know, 2016 to 2017 to 2018 to 2021, the number of medical assistants in dying or mercy killing, euthanasia, I don't say doubled year over year.
	It went up exponentially year over year to the point where in 2021, we got to 10,064 deaths in Canada.
	We're state-sanctioned killings.
	It's what it is.
	I'm not saying murder, because, you know, murder has to be the unlawful killing of another human, and I guess it's lawful if they make a law that says you can kill the mentally ill if they ask for it, right?
	I mean, you can't consent.
	Once upon a time, having hysteria delirium was a cause for nullifying contracts, because you can't enter into a contract in full awareness of fact and law if you're suffering from mental illness.
	But no, now it's sufficient to contract your own death.
	Government-sanctioned killing, says Full Send Conservative.
	10,064 Canadians were euthanized in 2021.
	That amounted to over 3% of all death in Canada.
	Let that sink in for a second.
	Justin Trudeau shut down Canada for...
	What was probably a wildly inflated number of 40,000 COVID deaths over two plus years, shut down the country for 40,000 deaths while administering 10,000 deaths, and I'm not saying him personally, the regime, the laws of his regime under which it was passed, 10,000 in one year, 3.3% of all death in Canada, state-sanctioned killings.
	I was outraged when I discovered that.
	Then I don't even know how I missed it.
	An article came out in...
	Just wait.
	I want to get to the date.
	June of this year.
	So June, July.
	I guess it's understandable I was driving back to the land of the insane asylum.
	This is from June 2013.
	Listen to this.
	Quebec becomes the world's euthanasia hotspot.
	7% of all deaths.
	People have to understand this.
	And again, I am absolutely not against euthanasia, full stop.
	Terminally ill people who, in full awareness of fact and law, want to end their endless, inevitable suffering because they have...
	Pancreatic cancer, they've only got another three months left under the best of circumstances.
	If you don't believe in miracles, and I can understand that, even if you do, maybe you don't want to go through the three months.
	I've got three months and it's nothing but agony.
	Please do it peacefully, dignified right now.
	Absolutely.
	That's between an adult who can consent and a doctor who can give proper medical advice.
	We offer that luxury.
	To our most beloved treasures, our pets, our animals, our dogs, where there's no point in having them suffer for no good reason after a long, beautiful, healthy life or even after a short life.
	There's not a question about that.
	It's not normal that it amounts for 7% of the death in a province, and I think it's got to be close to 5% nationally.
	I mean, maybe that might be a high number.
	We'll look at the chart.
	7% of the deaths in Canada.
	Inexplicable.
	And it's inexcusable.
	Okay.
	Seven percent death is lethal injection.
	Officials expand access to Alzheimer's sufferers and force all hospices to offer assisted suicide.
	Cancer sufferer Colette Julien says assisted suicide will help her be at peace.
	No question.
	There's some.
	But disability rights campaign Stephen Lapierre says it's dangerous.
	Canada is on track.
	To record a staggering 13,500 euthanasia deaths in 2022.
	My prediction, snip and clip, put it out there, that number is going to be closer to 20,000.
	I think the number is probably going to be 16,000 to 17,000 if we're just following trends.
	But the trend is going up exponentially.
	A, I don't know why that number is not yet known.
	We are now in the eighth month of the 2023rd year of Anno Domini.
	I don't know why that number is not yet known.
	It's not going to be 13,500.
	It's going to be 16,000 to 17,000 and possibly closer to 20,000.
	Have you had a bad experience with Canadians Canada system?
	What the heck?
	Quebec has emerged as the world's hotspot for euthanasia, where nearly 5,000 people opted for assisted suicides last year as the Canadian province officials make it easier for the terminally ill to end their lives.
	Nearly 8% of all deaths.
	Nearly 8% are doctor-assisted suicides.
	Far higher than Canada's other provinces and even such countries as Belgium and Yadier.
	The new data came as Quebec officials expand access to assisted suicides to those with Alzheimer's disease.
	Are we now in the world where the individual says, I'm ready and fully aware of ending my own life?
	Or are we now in a world where people are like, eh, he's got Alzheimer's.
	He's going to die in a year or two, six months.
	Do it now.
	We'll spend less money caring for this individual in their later years.
	They're not going to remember it anyhow.
	And if any of you think that this doesn't happen in the real world, where you have the next generation who looks at their elderly and says, they're going to die anyhow.
	They've got Alzheimer's.
	What's another year or two?
	We're going to have to pay $5,000 a month for proper health care at a nice facility.
	Euthanize them now.
	It's more inheritance for us.
	If you think this doesn't happen, go practice law for a decade.
	People count their inheritance before people are dead, and people rely on their inheritance for things that you should not be relying on your inheritance for.
	And if you think that's not going to happen and it's not currently happening right now, I've got a bridge to sell you.
	You're very young, you're very naive, and God bless.
	The new dad...
	Okay, fine.
	La Pierre de Marquette, he's disappointed.
	It's dangerous.
	It's almost encouraging people who are exhausted to die.
	That's interesting.
	Look at these numbers, by the way.
	But I don't know why they, it seems that they have the numbers and yet don't have the totals for 2022.
	2,500 in British Columbia, up 24%.
	836 in Alberta, what are we up to now?
	Give or take 3,500, up 40%.
	Saskatchewan's a very small province.
	What do we have?
	Okay, we're still at about, what do we have?
	We'll see, now we can round it up to 3,500.
	Let's say 4,000.
	Ontario up 27%, nearly 4,000.
	We're at 8,000.
	13,000, including Quebec.
	Yeah, it's totally normal.
	Quebec's euthanasia rate jumped a staggering 55%.
	From 3,102 in 2021 to 4,800 last year.
	That means between 7 and 8% of all deaths in the province are assisted suicide, making it a leading cause of death after cancer and heart disease.
	That's amazing.
	I'll give you the entire article.
	I don't think we need to...
	you can raise the arguments for and against, but a society that can't treat its elderly and can't care for its elderly, and instead it chooses not as a last resort, but as a reflexive first resort, killing their elderly, well, my goodness, have you not literally just become hell on earth?
	Thank you.
	Here's the link to the article.
	What was Saskatchewan?
	Someone in the chat says, hold on, let me pull up the article again.
	What was Saskatchewan?
	Let's go back up here.
	I'll say it clearly for the podcast version so those who are listening but not watching can get the stats.
	British Columbia is at 2,515, up 24%.
	Alberta is at 836 for 2022, up 41%.
	Saskatchewan is at 257, up 6%.
	Manitoba looks like it's down 9% at 223.
	Ontario, up 27%.
	Quebec up 55%.
	That supreme leader tyrant Francois Legault not only got re-elected, he got more seats.
	And this is the hell that you have voted in, Quebec.
	And then I don't see what the Maritimes are.
	Alright, but that story broke in June.
	And I guess it caused something of a bit of an outrage.
	So much so that, what do we come back?
	Oh, two months later, Quebec hits brakes on euthanasia and warns doctors not give Warns doctors not give fatal injections to patients eligible and to give them more time to decide if they want to die.
	Oh, that's nice.
	Daily Mail obtains a memo sent to doctors across French-speaking province.
	Quebec saw a 54% kid.
	Look at this.
	Quebec is hitting, this is two months later, after the Daily Mail.
	This is like, this is maybe a bit of a white pill.
	You know, when journalists actually do their job, they can actually potentially save lives.
	Unlike those hack schlocks at the CBC picking on Pierre.
	Pierre Poilier's Ile de Saint-Édouard instead of Ile de Prince-Édouard.
	Do your freaking jobs, journalists.
	You might actually save people.
	Imagine that.
	Quebec is hitting the brakes on its euthanasia program, warning of rising numbers of non-compliant cases.
	Oh!
	Oh, I thought I'll get to that in a second.
	And telling doctors to be more prudent about who gets the lethal injection.
	I'm sorry, did it need an article, an expose in the Daily Mail?
	International shaming?
	So that they can make sure that they don't have non-compliant...
	Can we understand what a non-compliant case is?
	It's murder.
	A non-compliant killing of somebody is murder.
	Warning of a rising number of, quote, non-compliant cases.
	Murder.
	And telling doctors to be more prudent about who gets murdered in the province.
	Dailymail.com has seen an official memo to warn Quebec doctors about fatal jabs that shouldn't have been allowed.
	Murder is what you're actually describing right now is going on in Quebec.
	Get that thing up there.
	And urging them to give patients more time to reconsider a monumental decision.
	It's the final decision.
	A monumental decision.
	I'm not going to give Daily Mail a hard time because they're doing some good work here.
	Quebec saw its number go up.
	We covered that.
	And we saw that same picture.
	A number of these faces here.
	Oh my goodness.
	Doctors should offer them spaced out appointments so they have had more time.
	It also indicated that practitioners were getting lax over getting a second doctor to approve the lethal job.
	Oh, who would have thought that that would have happened?
	It's not like people said, oh, these rules are going to get abused.
	They're not going to get followed properly.
	Especially now that, you know, like in certain provinces, there's a deemed consent for organ transplant.
	Where might this go?
	Yeah, you're close enough to death.
	We don't need to get a second opinion.
	Call the coroner.
	We're going to harvest your organs after we put you down.
	Oh my goodness.
	Shopping around for a favorable second opinion is not an acceptable practice.
	Oh, you mean you don't want to find a doctor who thinks they're doing the Lord's work by doing what ought to be left only to God?
	2021-2022, Quebec found 15 assisted deaths, or 0.4% of the total, did not follow the rules.
	That's called murder.
	I'm sorry.
	You killed someone and you didn't follow your own rules.
	In six of those cases, the person did not have a serious and incurable commission according to the holy, sweet, merciful hell.
	Let me just pull something up here, actually, because...
	I think I have that.
	I think I have that one.
	I have to bring up...
	It's not a tweet for the sake of the tweet.
	It's just where I keep my thoughts in order here.
	Okay, that's not it.
	There was some politician.
	Oh yeah, this guy right here.
	This guy right here.
	Look at this.
	No, that wasn't it.
	Hold on one second.
	There was some politician who tweeted out, oh yeah, the vast, vast majority of these killings are lawful.
	The vast, vast majority.
	Never mind those pesky few cases where it's actually just murder.
	Here we go.
	Look at this.
	It's a never-ending job just to keep people honest.
	It's a never-ending job just to keep calling these bloody animals out.
	And I'm going to use some angry, angry rhetoric.
	You have to understand what these people are doing.
	Emmett McFarlane.
	I've had some fun with him recently.
	A professor of political science, Canadian politics, and constitutional law.
	Author.
	Governing from the bench.
	Well, yeah.
	Constitutional pariah.
	Legislation under the charter.
	Emmett McFarlane.
	McFarlane.
	That's not a Ukrainian last name, as far as I know, who's got the Ukrainian flag in his bio, so you know his opinions are going to be great, but he's got the Ukrainian flag before the Canadian flag.
	He's not a politician, so he doesn't ask the same questions as to where his loyalties lie, but I will ask where his judgment lies, not for long.
	Guys, don't worry about it.
	The vast, vast majority of made deaths, made killings, they're not deaths, they're killings, are people with terminal illnesses who no longer had to suffer to the bitter end in devastating, intolerable pain.
	It's almost like what you're describing, Mr. Ukrainian flag in his bio, Emmett McFarlane, is a mercy killing.
	It's interesting.
	To quote Uncle Buck, do I see a little similarity here?
	It's a mercy killing.
	And you're describing it.
	It's merciful.
	They no longer have to suffer to the bitter end in devastating, intolerable pain.
	I have mercy on them.
	They took the opportunity to choose the timing of their end of their life.
	More made is good news.
	Not bad.
	I mean, this is...
	If I didn't know who Emmett McFarlane was, I don't know him from a hole in the wall except for Twitter.
	This would be like the Onion-level parody.
	More killing is good, not bad.
	Even if it means more killing would necessarily result in more non-compliant killing, i.e.
	murder, it's a good thing.
	Oh, how reassuring, Emmett McFarlane.
	Most of those people were terminally ill.
	Most.
	You do understand what that means.
	The others were state-sanctioned murder.
	How many?
	Do they even know?
	Just Google.
	Do you remember the woman with chemical sensitivities who chose death because she couldn't get better housing?
	The government can't offer her better housing.
	It can ship off billions and billions to Ukraine, and we're going to get there in a second also.
	It can ship off billions to Mr. Ukraine flag in bio, but can't even offer housing to people in Canada who need proper housing for their medical conditions, so they kill them.
	That's just one.
	Do you remember this one?
	The Simons commercial?
	I'm going to have to pull it up.
	She wasn't even terminally ill.
	Bea also not only was not terminally ill, because I thought that was the punchline, the sick, twisted punchline of her story.
	She didn't want to do it either.
	Woman featured in pro-euthanasia commercial wanted to live, stay friends.
	Quote, I feel like I'm falling through the cracks, so if I'm not able to access healthcare, am I then able to access death care?
	Hatch said in a CTV interview, to which Justin Trudeau and his ilk replied, of course.
	It'll save us money.
	Thank you for making the economically responsible decision for country.
	For the love of country, you have made the cost-effective decision.
	Can we harvest your organs too?
	CBC News.
	RCMP called to investigate multiple cases of veterans being offered medically assisted death.
	Oh, they didn't do it.
	Canadian man applies for euthanasia because he can't afford a home, but reconsiders after $60,000 GoFundMe.
	Does everybody remember that video?
	Disgusting.
	Simon's beauty in everything.
	Is that what it's called?
	Simon's.
	Simon's euthanasia.
	Hold on.
	What was it?
	I thought it was called.
	Here we go.
	It's called All is Beauty.
	Last breaths are sacred.
	When I imagine my final days, I see bubbles.
	I see the ocean.
	I see music.
	Even now, as I seek help to end my life, there is still so much beauty.
	But I really want to live.
	I just feel like I'm falling through the cracks.
	So if I can't get the help I need, can I get the death I want?
	It's enough to actually make you upset.
	You just have to be brave enough to see it.
	Was this her?
	Jennifer.
	All is beauty.
	Sponsored to you by Simons.
	Let me just make sure.
	Jennifer.
	Let's just make sure that the...
	Yep.
	Sure.
	Oh.
	No, no, no.
	But Emek McFarlane, he's a political science teacher.
	More maids is good, not bad.
	What is...
	What is...
	What can be said to rationalize with people who actually believe that?
	Or who actually say it?
	I don't know if he believes it.
	So that's what's going on in Canada.
	We're not done yet, though.
	Let me just go to the chat and see what's going on here.
	Yeah, what's the matter?
	Says bring the suicide booth from...
	Oh, because you're actually...
	Hold on a second.
	The suicide pods.
	It's not a joke.
	What's the matter?
	You're right.
	Hold on.
	Google.
	Suicide pods.
	Suicide pods.
	Here we go.
	Maker of suicide...
	Here we go.
	Let's just bring this up here.
	It's not a joke.
	It's Futurama meets real life.
	The maker of a suicide pod plans to launch in Switzerland.
	I'll tell you, satire has met reality because we've entered idiocracy levels of insanity in real life.
	Alright, so that's what's going on in Canada on the not-so-funny front.
	And then on the politically not-so-funny front, three weeks ago, four weeks ago, I had Nathaniel Pavlovsky on, Arthur Pavlovsky's son, who was attending the European Parliament because...
	His father, Artur Pawlowski, who's on restrictive conditions now, pending his sentencing for having been convicted of incitement to mischief, can't travel to Europe to give a speech.
	So Nathaniel Pawlowski, his son, went.
	And then I get notified that apparently a warrant had been issued for Nathaniel Pawlowski's arrest upon return.
	He was notified of this.
	Had him on for an hour.
	We talked about it.
	And then it...
	Apparently it turned out that there was no warrant and people started calling him a liar.
	Oh, he lied about the warrant for his arrest.
	It was a municipal matter.
	Does everybody remember that?
	I hope I described it properly enough without presuming too much knowledge.
	I did the interview with Nathaniel Pavlovsky before Artur.
	He described the entire situation.
	After that interview had been conducted and was live and on the internet, we learned later that day or the next day, apparently no warrant.
	It was a misunderstanding.
	And what do people do?
	They immediately call Nathaniel a liar, an attention seeker.
	They use his public statements to discredit his authenticity, his credibility.
	And some might say it's even part of the game.
	I'm fairly certain I said it at the time.
	Well, it turns out there was, in fact, a warrant, or there is now a warrant for Nathaniel Pawlowski, and he tweeted, I think this was originally his tweet, but this is the video.
	I don't know if you can hear it.
	It might not be.
	So Essence Provincial, just let me guys be aware of it so that you guys can just take There's a provincial warrant.
	He wants them to be aware of it.
	I had this issue in Belgium a couple weeks ago.
	We had the same issue and then we talked with the lawyer and CPS.
	They actually issued a statement on Twitter saying that there's no warrant for this individual.
	If that's the case, like...
	Maybe it's a system error, but...
	Yeah, it's possible that it's still in there.
	Okay.
	For both of us...
	Yeah, that's also...
	I looked them up earlier.
	Okay.
	Because last time, they said it's a bylaw thing, but you're saying it's provincial, so I guess it's something else.
	It's just what I see.
	It's possible that ours isn't updated, because, like, CPS, Calgary Police...
	CPS, Calgary Police Service?
	So, it is possible it just hasn't been updated properly on there.
	Okay, whatever.
	We don't need to go on for it.
	But that's the video.
	And it confirms what Nathaniel Pavlosky had said.
	And what bothers me about it is that this individual police officer right here looks like a nice guy.
	He looks like a sincerely good guy who's just doing his job.
	And we're living in a world right now where everybody says, I'm just doing my job.
	You know, the cops back in 2020 who pepper sprayed the guy in the face because he wasn't wearing a mask, just doing their job.
	And the question becomes, I mean...
	At what point does just doing your job cease being a legitimate justification?
	Certainly not for issuing, what are they called, warrants, because, you know, that's not egregious enough of an act to say, well, it's an injustice to just do your job if doing your job means, well, a warrant has been issued, so now I've got to arrest you.
	But this is how it happens.
	And this is how, you know, you have regulatory capture, you have ideological capture, and then you also just have compliance capture.
	And the way you get compliance capture so that people have no choices but to do what the government tells them is to get them totally dependent on the government, either from employment, for benefits, or out of fear.
	And that's how you get total compliance where everyone's just walking around saying, I'm just doing my job, I'm just doing what I need to do to survive in this life, even if it turns our country into a total living hellhole.
	And I hope that's not too heavy language.
	And then I'm just going to go back here.
	We got, I'm not your buddy, guys.
	Says, I've said it before and I'll say it again.
	You are the carbon they wish to reduce.
	P. Moyer says, Viva, I agree that non-compliant procedures are actually murder.
	But I think that most or all cases of compliant procedures are also murder.
	That's a fair enough point.
	But murder would be the unlawful killing of a human.
	The question would be, can an individual consent to being killed?
	Do you believe in suicide?
	I mean, I know that some people are going to say that suicide is immoral.
	It's sacrilegious.
	Sorry, I didn't mean to actually say that.
	That's just the Homer Simpson.
	It's sacrilegious and people should not even be allowed to take their own lives.
	I appreciate that.
	I do believe, and especially having seen a few people in the end stages of life, if the misery goes on and the suffering goes on for too long, I not only understand that it's something that I would...
	If it's their decision, free and enlightened.
	I've also lived under a circumstance where when my grand...
	There's a lot of people who can look at an old lady and say, well, she's 102 years old.
	We're wasting, I don't know, however, 50,000 bucks a year.
	100,000 bucks a year.
	That's inheritance money.
	I've seen that happen in real life.
	I've actually seen, this is not from family stuff, because my family is a good family.
	My father is...
	A good man, and my mother is a good woman.
	My mother sat there taking care of my grandmother until the last day of her life.
	In the practice, you actually see people having financial considerations with money that's not theirs that they can see in the short-term future.
	And they say, well, you know, why $10,000 a month for a really good place when $3,000 a month would be good enough?
	And that's $7,000 net more for inheritance.
	People think this way.
	Okay.
	I just got myself good and upset there for a second.
	I think that's it for Canada.
	Let me see here.
	Let me see.
	No, it's not it for Canada.
	All right.
	So listen, we start with the happy idiocy.
	We go into the really unhappy madness.
	We're going to end with a bit of a laugh on Canada.
	Let me just make sure that I got to.
	Yeah, we're going to end with this.
	We're going to end with...
	A man who is, as far as I'm concerned, literally a shame of Canada.
	Trudeau is the stain of Canada.
	Jagmeet Singh is the shame of Canada.
	For those of you who don't know what you're looking at, this is a trip down memory lane.
	For those who are watching in podcast format, this is a video of Jagmeet Singh walking down René Lévesque in Montreal for the recent Pride Parade that occurred, I guess, in Montreal.
	Funny enough, that building in the background used to be where my father used to work.
	It's the CIBC Tower.
	And this is Jagmeet Singh, who fancies himself a rock star.
	I mean, give him a violin at least, so like Nero, he can fiddle while the world around him burns.
	He's walking down the street, and I'll describe what he's doing in my golfer's voice for those who are listening and not watching.
	Oh god, that's too loud.
	Let me just go ahead and...
	Bring down the volume a little bit.
	Jagmeet Singh walks down the street, leading a charge.
	Waving his hands at the crowd.
	Fist pumping.
	Yes.
	Oh, he makes a hot...
	It's literally when they make fun of Justin Trudeau and he's in a Nazi uniform that's pink with the armband and he's going...
	Oh no, it's the Joseph Stalin.
	Stalin.
	I think it's Stalin.
	Going like, you know...
	Making the heart figures with his hand.
	Jagmeet Singh literally making the heart figures at a woman who's fawning at...
	She is melting down.
	It's like she's seen Ringo Starr.
	Not Ringo Starr.
	John Lennon.
	Nobody cared about Ringo Starr.
	She is screaming.
	He's looking at her.
	You want to hug me?
	You want to hug me?
	He says, get over here.
	She screams.
	Comes and gives him a hug.
	The man.
	The man who is propping up the regime.
	I'm gonna just...
	I'm going to turn the volume down.
	The man who is propping up the regime that is destroying Canada fancies himself a rock star.
	Oh my god!
	That's shit!
	I got the home truck me sick!
	Oh my goodness.
	Imagine you go into a life of public service and you want to be treated like a rock star.
	You fancy yourself a rock star.
	You think of yourself like a rock star.
	Jagmeet Singh, people.
	I might have to bring up that article.
	Hold up.
	Jagmeet Singh.
	More bikes than a man should have.
	Oyster.
	I know these words come into the article.
	Behind the scenes with Jagmeet Singh.
	For those of you who have been around the channel for long enough, you know that you've seen this article already.
	But for those of you who haven't, what year is this from?
	2018.
	The greatest showman.
	The left has pinned its hopes on Jagmeet Singh.
	A charismatic leader with a taste for flashy suits.
	Yeah, that much we know.
	And a following that should make Justin Trudeau nervous.
	Can you imagine?
	This is how the Toronto life is, right?
	Social media now decides who's a good politician.
	The making of a political superstar.
	Let me see here.
	No, no, no.
	I don't want that whatsoever.
	Here we go.
	I just remembered these words.
	And I'll read it.
	In my British voice, Jagmeet has a taste for dandy luxuries that don't comport with the monkish minimalism of his party.
	That means he's a flagrant hypocrite.
	That's what it means.
	He wears bespoke.
	What the heck does bespoke mean?
	Look up bespoke.
	Made for a particular customer or user.
	A bespoke suit.
	Custom.
	That means custom.
	Is that what it means?
	Bespoke means custom.
	Okay, I guess so.
	He wears bespoke suits in the slim British style.
	His favorite is a brown tweed with a cobalt blue stripe designed by a tailor in New Delhi, which he often pairs with his millennial pink turban.
	In the video we just watched, however, he was wearing his hot orange.
	NDP-colored turban.
	He owns two Rolex watches, an Oyster Perpetual Datejust, and a Submariner.
	Both were gifts, which raises more questions than answers that I'm sure this Toronto Life journalist asked for.
	A crimson BMW coupe and six designer bicycles.
	Quote, Jagmeet Singh says, I have just an absurd number of bikes, he says.
	More than one person should have.
	His kerpan!
	The ceremonial Sikh dagger he wears under his jacket is a steel design by a metal worker outside Boston.
	Since joining Queen's Park in 2011, I have no idea what that is, Singh has become one of the city's most devoted partygoers, a regular at King West nightspots and gala fundraisers at fashion shows and Raptors games.
	My God, dudes live in a better life than 99% of Canadians.
	Hey, it's good to be part of the 1%.
	There's no white privilege.
	There's political privilege.
	And that is painfully clear, made painfully clear by the Jussie Smollett's of the world, by the Jagmeet Singh's.
	It's not white privilege.
	It's political privilege.
	And to be more specific, it's Democrat, liberal, political privilege.
	Because you have a conservative who leads that same lifestyle, wears bespoke suits and has oyster perpetual watches.
	Oh, he'll get chewed out.
	I mean, for goodness sake, he gets chewed out for speaking French in another province and making a mistake on the name of the province.
	God forbid!
	Oh.
	Alright, no, I think we're really done with Canada.
	We're done with Canada for the purposes of this stream.
	I'm not reading.
	Funny how all the WF Young leaders have identical glowing reviews from Billy Boone.
	Okay, some of these comments I'm not reading, but what did he do before politics?
	He can't afford that lifestyle now.
	Or can he?
	That came from Isk We Walk.
	Okay, so that's it.
	That, I think, is it for Canada, at least for today.
	We'll see what happens in the future.
	Okay, moving on to America.
	Well, I guess it's international.
	Y 'all have heard what's going on in Hawaii.
	Stories of...
	How do I get...
	Why can't I bring this back here?
	You've all heard what's going on in Hawaii, Maui.
	Alexa Lavois from Rebel News is there now.
	And she's just arrived and is going to get to Lahania.
	Lahania, the city that's been, one of the cities that's been devastated.
	There are a number of rumors.
	I don't say conspiracy theories, but there are a number of stories going around that sound very suspicious.
	Like the, I forget what his name was, but there was a delay allowing water to be provided to homeowners so they could protect their property.
	And apparently there might have been politics at play.
	In the delay of the water, which resulted in destruction and devastation.
	But don't worry.
	Joe Biden, after ignoring the disaster, and then I guess getting wise to the fact that people were mildly outraged that he's ignoring this disaster that is in Hawaii that may be climate change or incompetence-driven or incompetence-exacerbated.
	He got the memo.
	He's got to pay attention.
	He's got to care.
	Y 'all are getting $700.
	Don't worry.
	Your house is destroyed.
	How many people are they up to now dead?
	Like 50?
	Don't worry.
	We're giving you a one-time payment of $700.
	Someone astutely pointed out an average hotel room in Hawaii is like $350.
	So enjoy your two nights.
	Go back to your rubble afterward.
	People also authorize one-time payments of $700 per household for folks who've been displaced so they can do the immediate things of just taking care of medications and prescriptions that they so badly need.
	FEMA also authorized one-time payments of $700 per household.
	A one-time payment of $700 per household.
	It's not to say that that's chicken scraps.
	Like, was it Nancy Pelosi who said that?
	That is a slap in the face.
	By the way, let's just do the chat.
	Let's take a chat poll.
	There's no polls yet in Rumble.
	But while you answer this question, hit the thumbs up button.
	Does everybody know roughly what USAID, US not Canadian, USAID to Ukraine is up to now?
	Why would I just spoil it?
	Does everybody know what the U.S. aid to Ukraine is up to?
	Take a guess.
	Let me just see in the chat how many people are going to come close because it even blew my mind.
	Let's see here.
	Okay, 1984 today.
	Got it.
	$120 billion.
	Now, sure and true, not to straw man arguments, that aid consists of military weapons, loans, you know, It's not just cash going.
	But there's a lot of cash going.
	120.
	Kennedy.senate.gov.
	So I think this is a good source.
	June 2023.
	This op-ed by Senator John Kennedy, Republican L.A., and Christian Sinema first appeared in USA Today on June 2nd, 2022.
	The Ukraine military is gearing up for a spring offensive.
	This is in June.
	Fueled by two recent allocations from President Joe Biden totaling $675 million.
	We hope this funding will help Ukraine continue to fend off Russia's attacks.
	But as it stands, Americans lack a proper accounting of how our aid has worked thus far.
	That's a good point.
	Since the war began more than a year ago, the United States has given Ukraine more than $113 billion in aid.
	We know it is a lot of money.
	Some say we are investing too much in Ukraine.
	Investing.
	What do you expect in return to make that an investment?
	An investment is something that yields you a profit on your original investment.
	Where are you expecting a profit from here?
	Natural resources?
	Interest on loans?
	Others say it is not enough, but we believe it is worth it.
	Our aid to Ukraine is in charity.
	It's in our national security interest.
	Oh, okay, if you say so.
	And it's not to say it's not in the Ukraine.
	Ukraine's national interest, but it's an interesting statement to make.
	How?
	I thought this wasn't a proxy war.
	I mean, it's in your national interest to fund the war in Ukraine against Russia.
	We don't need to go through this whole thing.
	$113 billion.
	Here's a one-time $700 payment to the decimated island of Hawaii.
	Oh.
	Oh.
	off.
	Thank you.
	Anyway, that was all for that.
	Oh, no, but...
	Don't worry, guys.
	It's not incompetence.
	This is the most...
	81 million votes, the most successful president in the history of America.
	More votes than Obama.
	It's amazing.
	This is from Breaking 9-11.
	I hope it's true.
	I get nervous.
	Breaking 9-11 has been...
	I remember thinking I felt a little bit misled by a headline, but this was reported elsewhere.
	It appears that Karine Jean-Pierre, by the way, I think now, I think, can America say they've had their first black woman, lesbian president?
	I mean, if Karine Jean-Pierre is in fact the president behind the president, this might be a good argument for that thesis.
	She accidentally tweeted from her Twitter account.
	A tweet that was clearly drafted, I presume, by her, which was to be tweeted by the president, as though the president had tweeted it, but we all know that Joe Biden is hardly capable, hold on, hardly capable of formulating a coherent sentence, let alone drafting one on his own, on his mobile device, and tweeting it, Karine Jean-Pierre, at PressSec.
	Investing in America means investing in all of America.
	When I ran for president, holy crap!
	She's the president.
	I made a promise that I would leave no part of the country behind.
	It's classic.
	It's classic.
	Classic incompetence and the trickle-down effect of incompetence from what was hitherto.
	The most powerful nation in the world?
	The freest nation in the world, at least on paper, or at least in theory?
	What's the trickle-down impact of having an incompetent, no longer disputably demented boob at the helm?
	Corrupt to the core at the helm of what was hitherto the most powerful nation in the world?
	What is the trickle-down effect?
	Other nations don't respect them.
	Other nations don't fear them in the good way.
	And other nations no longer feel the need to follow the moral example being set by this corrupt regime.
	That is the Biden regime.
	Millions and millions of dollars taken personally from foreign adversarial nation interests.
	Incompetence, corruption.
	What did the CBC News article say?
	Like, it was either 30 or 70% of the aid was not making it to the end line?
	What's 30% or 70%, depending on which end it was, of $113 billion?
	That's a lot of money going into the wrong hands.
	That's a lot of arms going into the wrong hands.
	That's a lot of military gear going into the wrong hands.
	And speaking of, you know, destroying a nation, destroying a judicial system, destroying a reputation.
	And other nations follow suit.
	As Joe Biden sits there, and Justin Trudeau for that matter, railing against Putin's treatment of his political adversaries, Putin's treatment of journalists.
	You might just for one second understand this.
	Justin Trudeau calls Putin a tyrannical autocrat.
	I think he called him an autocrat.
	Joe Biden and the Western media condemns Putin for jailing his political adversaries, jailing journalists, while Donald Trump gets indicted in Georgia on the most outlandish piece of steaming pile of judicial dog poop you can imagine.
	And they think that they have the moral authority, the legal authority, the reputational authority to judge Russia, who must now be looking at America and saying, My goodness, you guys are making me look like a petty thief.
	You guys are looking like the organized criminals here.
	Oh, but sorry, you're charging Donald Trump with organized crime.
	RICO charges.
	All right.
	I covered the indictment.
	It's a steaming load of judicial dog poop.
	We don't need to go over it, although I'll say it is worth repeating over and over again that one of the acts of unlawful conspiracy in the indictment is Donald Trump literally saying...
	To Raffensperger.
	Whatever the legal, whatever the correct legal remedy is, we'll get there.
	Now, in our local community, someone said, Viva, you've got to go watch Legal Eagle's breakdown.
	And I'm not, this is not a gratuitous pot shot at Legal Eagle.
	Full stop.
	I can actually recognize that Legal Eagle knows more than me.
	I can actually acknowledge that Legal Eagle He has a better understanding of the elements, the technical elements of American law, I think.
	I mean, at least he's got the training.
	So I can recognize that.
	But like I say about intelligence, intelligence without an integrity compass.
	I won't say a moral compass because I'm not saying that...
	I think his name is Devin.
	Legal, legal.
	I'm not saying that he's immoral, period.
	I think he either lacks a compass or he has a wildly biased political compass.
	So intelligence with a wildly biased political compass is not a good thing.
	And he can make sense of the injustice through the legalese as he does.
	But I want to highlight...
	How do I do this?
	I want to highlight this.
	Because what Legal Legal here is offering is not his own opinion.
	It's not of his own doing.
	It's an observation of how the system, in fact, launders bad judicial precedent to justify political persecution.
	The old expression, bad cases make for bad law.
	And you have bad cases that no one pays attention to.
	You get bad law out of them so that they can then justify further bad cases and further bad law, but worse and worse and worse until the system doesn't break down, gets fully weaponized.
	So listen to Legal Eagle's explanation.
	But the second conspiracy is that Trump and his co-conspirators obstructed the January 6th congressional proceeding where the election would be certified in violation of two sections of Section 1512.
	We know that allegation.
	That Trump, when he said, go protest peacefully, when he said, go home, but that video was taken, well, that video was no longer visible because his social media was frozen.
	Or terminated.
	Trump, what was the charge again?
	And his co-conspirators obstructed election certification when he said, you've got to fight like hell to preserve your country.
	Protest peacefully.
	That was obstruction.
	And the obstruction was so terrible.
	It was so insurrection-y that they managed to do it six hours later.
	So we know what the charge is.
	How do you justify...
	Such an outlandish charge against the former president of the United States of America, who also, it's worth noting, did nothing any worse than, say, Stacey Abrams, Hillary Clinton.
	I think this was the result of chicanery.
	Stacey Abrams said she won.
	Hillary Clinton referred to Donald Trump as an illegitimate president.
	Oh, but they didn't.
	Obstruct election certification.
	And Trump, the way he did it, was from what he said.
	But don't worry, this is not about free speech.
	This is about speech that was intended to incite a breach of the law.
	What's the precedent?
	Legal, legal, tell us.
	Proceeding where the election would be certified in violation of two sections of Section 1512.
	And someone else who was charged with this violation is January 6th defendant Alan Hostetter, who was charged with violating Section 1752C2 and 1512K.
	Like Trump was.
	Oh, just like Trump.
	And he raised a defense, but a biased judge in D.C., what did he have to say about his defense?
	Let's hear legal legal.
	Let's hear the basis for this precedent to justify...
	What's the word?
	The unprecedented...
	I guess it is precedented.
	To justify the unprecedented indictment of a former president.
	It's totally different than when Putin does it, though.
	Because they're right, right?
	Because they've got their fabricated, politically motivated precedent that they now get to use.
	This is how precedent laundering works.
	What did the judge say to Hofstetter?
	He tried to raise the First Amendment defense that Trump will rely on.
	But a federal judge rejected this defense.
	explaining the quote, Mr. Hostetter is not being prosecuted for engaging in protected first amendment activity.
	And I am making my decision without regard to his political beliefs, which I believe he holds sincerely, but the first amendment does not give any Bullshit!
	Okay, this precedent occurred in the dead of night.
	It's not in the dead of night, literally.
	Very quietly, very subtly, and placed blame when blame is due without much vocal opposition from GOPs in general.
	Oh, it's just one case.
	It's just this guy.
	It's a one-off, right?
	No, now it's being used as the precedent to justify the speech of the president who says, I think something goes up with this election.
	Set aside the fact that we've now gotten at least some evidence out of Michigan.
	Oh, but that evidence wasn't of votes.
	It was just of tens of thousands of forged fake ballots.
	But they didn't make their way to vote, trust us.
	This precedent happened in the dead of night.
	Enough people were not paying attention to it.
	And now, look what they're doing with it.
	The judge ruled that Hostetter and his co-conspirator, quote, knowingly and intentionally entered into that agreement with the intent of furthering its unlawful goal of disrupting and impeding the Electoral College certification.
	And the third conspiracy is that Trump allegedly interfered with the right to vote and to have one's vote counted in violation of Section 241.
	Oh, what's the precedent for this?
	Oh, I'm just spoiled.
	Remember, they're saying he...
	Interference with the right to vote.
	The argument for that being that when they were determining coming up with the legal theory of presenting an alternate slate of electors because they believed the original slate of electors were the result of fraud in various states, that in so doing that, they were interfering with the right to vote of the people who voted for the original slate of electors.
	That's the legal theory.
	That's the steel man.
	You could make that argument.
	That always was the argument.
	Not that they're saying...
	Those votes, the legitimate votes don't count, but that there were sufficient number of unconstitutional or constitutionally questionable votes such that it's not the proper outcome of the slate of electors.
	But either way, that's the steel man of the indictments argument.
	By coming in with an alternate slate of electors, you are interfering with the right to vote of the people who voted for the original slate of electors.
	Even if we now know what happened in Michigan happened in Michigan.
	Even if we now know, as Time Magazine said, you had a cabal of well-funded people controlling information, suppressing the Hunter Biden story, changing the laws, changing the rules.
	Even if you had that, that original slate of electors has to be respected.
	That's not the result of anything.
	That's not depriving the other people of their vote, the 71 million who, you know...
	Okay, that's the argument.
	What's the precedent?
	And in a January 6th prosecution of Douglas Mackey, a jury instruction explained that the government had to prove, quote, that the defendant knowingly and intentionally joined the conspiracy with the intent to further a specific objective.
	And the Mackey...
	I don't know what legal weight...
	Did he call that a jury instruction, correct?
	...joined the conspiracy with...
	A jury instruction explained that the government had to prove, quote, that the defendant knowingly and intentionally joined the conspiracy with the intent to further a specific objection.
	Prosecution of Douglas Mackey, a jury.
	Jury instruction.
	In order to substantiate the indictment of Donald Trump, they are now relying, as authority, as precedent, as justification, the jury instruction in another case that can only be described as the most wildly politically motivated unjust conviction.
	At least over the last three years.
	I don't want to go too far.
	Last three years.
	By the way, it's interesting.
	The website that he's referring to is the Southern Poverty Law Center.
	Interesting.
	We're going to get into the shitposting.
	Douglas Mackey verdict sinks shitposting defense.
	There are some other people who have some equally similar memes up there.
	Still up on their profiles.
	Not been prosecuted.
	I forget their names, but the chat will know.
	It had to prove, quote, that the defendant knowingly and intentionally joined the conspiracy with the intent to further a specific abortion.
	And the Mackie jury instruction explains how a jury should assess the defendant's criminal intent within the context of this particular section.
	The indictment alleges that the objective of the charged conspiracy was to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate one or more persons in the free exercise and enjoyment of their right to vote.
	The meme in this case, for those of you who don't know, was...
	Save your day.
	Text your vote.
	Stay at home.
	I'll show you the meme afterwards.
	Making sure that everybody knows we're talking about a legal case so that nobody thinks they're going to indict Viva for talking about Douglas Mackey's meme that I think is an absolute preposterous joke that he was convicted for interfering with people's right to vote for a meme that said, save some time, text your vote in Hillary to 4498.
	And I love the highlighting noise.
	It's actually very satisfying.
	The government must therefore prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knowingly and intentionally joined the conspiracy with the intent to further that objective.
	In this case, the government has alleged that the object of the conspiracy was specifically to injure one or more persons in the free exercise and enjoyment of their right to vote.
	Anybody watching in Rumble, if you can remind me of who the other, on the other political side of the aisle, talk about political privilege again, has a meme up there that was exactly the same as Douglas Mackey's.
	Not only was she not convicted, but...
	I don't think she was charged.
	She wasn't charged.
	And the meme, I believe, is still up on the interwebs.
	I instruct you that the statute covers conduct intended to obstruct, hinder, prevent, frustrate, make difficult or impossible, or indirectly rather than directly assault free exercise of the right.
	Or indirectly rather than directly assault free exercise of the right.
	The man put out a meme.
	He got convicted by a politically motivated jury in a politically motivated...
	And now that jury instruction is going to serve as the justification.
	Hey, it's not unprecedented in that wildly politically motivated conviction of Douglas Mackey.
	This is what the judge said in the jury instruction.
	So now we can go indict the president, a former president, during an election cycle, when he's the leading frontrunner for the political adversary of the corrupt crime regime that's currently in office.
	But don't worry, Putin bad, Biden good.
	For example, Hinder is defined as to make slow or difficult the progress of, to hamper, to hold back, to prevent, to check.
	It's crazy.
	And it's difficult not to get a little blackpilled in all of this.
	I'm going to link to tweets.
	But this is how laundering of judicial precedent works.
	And this is why it's a legitimate criticism.
	Back in 2020, when Barnes and I were talking about the 2020 election, and Barnes was highlighting all of this litigation that's going on behind the scenes, the rules and the regulations that are changing, these settlement agreements that political parties were entering into, not known to the public.
	And he was saying the GOP is not ahead of the curve, it's not ahead of the ball, whatever the hell the analogy is.
	And the Democrat election machine...
	Is winning in the court battle.
	The January 6th prosecutions were very important.
	They were important from a human level.
	Having people being wildly punished beyond what is reasonable for the alleged crimes that they were alleged to have committed is one thing.
	Now it's coming to bite you back in the ass hard.
	And this is what happens when you don't pay attention to what's going on around you and you let these...
	Wildly politically motivated precedents be established.
	I don't know what level of appeal Douglas Mackey is at now.
	And now they are being used to justify the unjustified.
	Okay.
	Let me see something here.
	We're going to get ready to go over to the rumbles.
	Let me see this here.
	We got another one from Finboy Slick.
	Are you saying Joe Biden isn't just incapable when it comes to Twitter?
	And then we got Vile Dong.
	Okay, maybe that's your...
	Okay.
	Remember to subtract the money USA has earned from selling weapons to NATO members by making everybody able to pretend Russia wants to invade them from the $130 billion.
	Oy, okay.
	So that's that.
	That's the precedent laundering which we're witnessing in real time.
	People?
	I dare say I think that's it for now.
	Before we go on over to locals.
	Oh, we're going to play something funny in locals.
	I don't know.
	What was it?
	Cornbread.
	I know now what cornbread is.
	A wonderful thing on the internet.
	Okay.
	Precedent laundering is a great term.
	I'll be borrowing, it says.
	Sergeant Hayes won.
	Hashtag it.
	Make a trend.
	Precedent laundering.
	It's like, it's the wrap-up.
	I mean, it gets, it's like, mutatis, mutatis.
	You know, history doesn't rhyme, but it tends, history doesn't repeat, but it tends to rhyme.
	It's the same system.
	Like, it's the wrap-up smear.
	It's precedent laundering.
	It's, what's another one?
	Can't think of any offhand, but yeah.
	Oh.
	And then, B.C. Zoo High.
	But the Republicans are doing an investigation.
	And then Nova 902 says, at Viva Fry, let them set a precedent with Trump, then it can be used against Biden.
	Nova 902, I don't think that's the threat you think it is, because I think they are going to use this precedent against Biden, because I don't think Biden's running in 2020.
	I'm telling you, I said it before Joe Rogan, okay?
	Biden is not going to be the 2024 nominee.
	For the Democrats.
	That's my prediction.
	I know it's a long shot, so if it happens, I get to say I'm smart.
	And if it doesn't happen, I get to say, well, it was a long shot.
	I went out on a limb.
	You're right.
	They are setting this as a precedent with Trump, so they can use it with Biden to get him up because he's clearly demented.
	He's clearly incapable of doing the job.
	And they're going to find a way to get Gavin Newsom in there.
	This sure as hell is not going to be Kamala Harris, but I agree with you.
	And I think that's the long play on Trump as well, and that's why they're slowly leaking out all of this very damning information on Biden.
	They've had it for a long time.
	And like we always say, it's not a question of what people know, it's a question of when they know it, because it's not a question of preventing people from knowing the facts.
	It's a question of disclosing the facts at a politically, strategically convenient time.
	Now we've got B. Rand.
	Let me see if I'm reading that right.
	Or, no, it's B. Errandgear.
	No, it's B. Randgear.
	Says, anyone with more sense than a stone knew January 6th was going to go down like that.
	They've been funding activists and bailing them out.
	That was just another tactic to instill fear in the peasants.
	And then Rich B. 313 says, thanks, Viva.
	On to locals.
	Well, let me remind you, everybody here.
	Come on over to locals.
	Booyakasha, video stopped here.
	Not yet, Vial Dong.
	We're going to play it out with something.
	Oh, we'll play it out with the funny clip.
	And then we'll head on over to thevivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Hold on.
	We've got to end with a good video.
	Something that will make us smile.
	I know I'm sweeter than...
	My voice might be sweeter than cornbread.
	Oh, here we go.
	This is it.
	Okay, first of all, I love it.
	And she reminds me of the character from Rango, which I think took place in the Southwest, so it makes sense.
	This video will make you smile.
	I now have been shamed for not knowing what cornbread was, but I now know what cornbread is.
	Oh, hold on one second.
	I gotta get the...
	Okay, hold on, hold on.
	Let me get the incognito.
	We're gonna end on this.
	Come on over to Locals.
	And Ian Miles Chong asks, do you like the way she talks?
	Oh, am I?
	Dude, one of these days I'll get two computers.
	Okay, here we go.
	We're going to end on Rumble with this.
	Come on over to Locals.
	Link to Locals is there.
	vivabarneslaw.locals.com You get a couple of more chats in here.
	No Bill Clinton says, It won't be easy to throw an election this time.
	Grassroots organizations are making strides in every state, hopefully.
	Nova902 says, can you get Rachel Gilmore's parents on the show and ask them how proud they are of her ethics?
	I don't get involved in family matters.
	And I've actually also muted Rachel Gilmore.
	I think I have to mute Mehdi Hassan.
	I think I have to mute Mike Sington because...
	I can't help but engage with the stupidity of their tweets, and then it just becomes all I see in my Twitter feed.
	So it's a self-fulfilling prophecy.
	Or a vicious circle.
	Or a black hole.
	Okay, here we go.
	We're going to end on this.
	Come on over to Locals.
	And the question Ian Miles Chong asks, do you like the way she talks?
	And I think the answer of most people is going to be, hells to the bells?
	Yeah, but it's fun.
	And if anybody's seen the movie Rango, she's the main character from Rango.
	Who was the actress?
	Christina Ricci?
	I'll figure that out in a second.
	Enjoy this as we play it out on Rumble.
	Come on over to Locals.
	I literally cannot start talking to a guy without one of the first things them saying to me is something like, I'd marry you for your accent.
	Like, honey, yes, I know, I sound sweet like cornbread, but are you also prepared to deal with the fact that I am batshit crazy?
	I don't know if anybody's warned you about us Southern women, but if you piss us off, you better start praying and you better start running.
	Because we'll kick your ass.
	And just so you know, it's a package deal.
	You're getting all of it.
	Are you prepared to deal with that level of crazy just because you like the way I talk?
	Actually, before we go, what does the chat say?
	Yes, I like the way she talks to...
	What the heck is my problem?
	One, yes, I like the way she talks.
	Two, no, I do not like the way she talks.
	And as you do that...
	As you do...
	One, yes, I like the southern accent.
	Two, no, don't like the...
	Well, I don't like the way she talks.
	It's going to be overwhelmingly one because when I hear that accent, young or old, I swear to you, I feel loved.
	I feel like...
	I like it.
	What is it?
	1 plus 2 plus 3?
	What the heck?
	I know a girl from the river that sounds just like that.
	Jones Phones.
	Okay, good enough.
	Cornbread is not sweet.
	Well, I now know what cornbread was and I asked him today.
	Okay, I'm going to end this on Rumble.
	I got to go over here.
	Live streaming.
	Hit the end.
	Thank you all for being here.
	See you tomorrow for sure.
	And then next week, I'm going to be in Milwaukee.
	Exclusive streams for the RNC primary debate.
	There's going to be some good people from Rumble.
	There's going to be some fun people from Rumble.
	And fun people from the platform.
	I don't know who's going to be there.
	I don't know if it's public, so I'm going to be in Milwaukee next week.
	Everybody who's not coming to Locals, vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Enjoy the day.
	Everyone else, see you on vivabarneslaw.locals.com in 3, 2, 1, peace.

▲