Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 18, 2023 - Viva & Barnes

01:39:31

Taco Tuesday! RFK Jr. the "Antisemite"? Family Traitors? Political Prisoners? AND MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	We're here today to raise, once again, the pride flag on Parliament Hill.
	This is something our government proudly did seven years ago.
	We're lifting high our belief that no matter your sexual orientation, your gender identity, or your gender expression, you belong here.
	You have a voice here.
	You are respected and heard and your existence isn't up for debate, not now, not ever.
	Right.
	Right.
	Thank you.
	This isn't actually the first time that the Conservative leader has taken a problematic photograph with the National Anthem.
	Thank you.
	With people.
	And, you know, when politicians stand with people like this, what kind of message does it send?
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Mic check one, two.
	Can you hear me now?
	This is amazing.
	This is amazing.
	I'm not even sweating.
	Let me see.
	I'm going to go to locals.
	It finally works?
	It works.
	Yeah, you can hear me now?
	Well, that's funny.
	Let's start this all over again.
	Did you hear Justin Trudeau in the beginning of this?
	What the heck, man?
	Locals is okay.
	Hold on one second.
	No, but hold on.
	What do I have to do?
	Okay, let me see something.
	We love you, Viva.
	Thank you, but that doesn't answer the question.
	Who heard the first five minutes?
	We heard Trudeau.
	Good.
	Okay, so you heard Trudeau.
	Well, let's start again, people.
	Oh, my goodness.
	We're going to start from scratch.
	Hold on.
	I got to get...
	I gotta get worked up again.
	I'm just going to take myself out and play Trudeau again.
	Thank you.
	Forget it.
	Can't find the Trudeau clip again.
	Is the Trudeau clip still there?
	Let's start from the beginning.
	Take two.
	Okay, hold on.
	No, hold on.
	I gotta refresh my memory of everything I just said.
	You saw the video of Justin Trudeau comparing himself to Pierre Poiliev.
	Because Pierre Poiliev and Alberta Premier...
	Hold on.
	Hold on.
	Start again.
	Okay, hold on.
	We're doing this.
	We're just...
	Delete.
	Pfff.
	Thank you.
	We're here today to raise, once again, the pride flag on Parliament Hill.
	As I said before, I'm sorry to start the show like this.
	This is something our government proudly did seven years ago.
	I'm so very sorry.
	We're lifting high our belief that no matter your sexual orientation, your gender identity, or your gender expression...
	You're all listening to it again.
	You belong here.
	You belong here.
	You have a voice here.
	You have a voice here.
	You are respected and heard, and your existence...
	I have never known if the debate of whomever he's talking about was ever denied.
	And I'll take a controversial position on this.
	People are not entitled to respect.
	They're entitled to not be abused, and they're entitled to dignity.
	I think that's one of the charter rights.
	That does not mean respect.
	Respect is earned.
	A certain dignity as a human is afforded to humans as humans.
	But hold on.
	Justin Trudeau creating the perpetual class of victims.
	What's this victimhood based upon?
	This isn't actually the first time that the Conservative leader has taken a problematic photograph with people.
	And, you know, when politicians stand with people like this, what kind of message does it send?
	Stand with people like this.
	Now, like I said the first time I did this, what is the shirt?
	The shirt says, thank a straight person today for your existence.
	Straight pride.
	It's a problematic shirt.
	Like I said the first time I did this, I have not been able to use the term problematic since having read Scott Adams' Loser Think because the term problematic, as he said in that book, it's a term used by intellectual lightweights who can't exactly explain what is wrong with what they're saying is problematic, and they use an intellectual word to verbalize nothing.
	It's problematic.
	It's problematic to wear a shirt that says straight pride.
	Oh, why is it problematic?
	Let's flesh that out for a second.
	That shirt says straight pride.
	Thank a straight person for your existence today.
	It also used to be known, hear me out here, it also used to be known as Mother's Day and Father's Day.
	Thank you, Father, for bringing me into this world through, you know, depending on the circumstances, a 30-second act of pure romance.
	Thank you, Mom, for having birthed me, either cesarean section or through your, what they call, you know, natural vaginal births.
	It used to be for Mother's and Father's Day.
	Now, admittedly, One can be a mother without having actually given birth to a child.
	You can adopt a kid.
	You can have a C-section.
	One can be a father without having engaged in the 30 seconds of romance and still celebrate Father's Day.
	But that was the essence of Mother's Day and Father's Day.
	Thank you for bringing me into this world.
	Now, it's an act of hatred to wear a shirt that says straight pride.
	Some people in the chats, in the comment sections, to the tweets that I put out, you know, they say...
	Viva, it's an act of antagonism.
	You know damn well it is to sit there and say straight pride in the face of people who say gay pride.
	And I say, well, if that's an act of antagonism, wearing a shirt or flying a banner that says gay pride is also an act of antagonism.
	It's something to stick it to your face and say, I'm proud, and you cannot say that you are proud for the inverse of saying what I'm proud for.
	Other people say, Viva, would you ever wear a shirt like that?
	And the answer to that question is no, because I'm old-fashioned.
	Maybe.
	Maybe it's controversial also to say, I don't take pride in immutable characteristics, immutable traits.
	I don't take pride in being white because it's just a thing.
	I wouldn't take pride in being black if I were black either, or gay for that matter.
	Immutable traits are not things that one should take pride in.
	You take pride in accomplishments.
	I'm not going to wear a shirt that says short pride.
	I'm not going to wear a shirt that says Jewish pride.
	These are things.
	These are things that you are who you are.
	To derive pride out of things that you're born into, culturally, racially, it's a bizarre thing.
	I understand the idea that saying pride was an attempt to say, I'm standing up for the intolerance that we face.
	I'm not going to be ashamed of it.
	I'm going to be proud of it.
	Yada yada.
	I understand the etymology of the concept of insert minority bracket pride here.
	I wouldn't wear the shirt one way or the other.
	That being said, it's ironic.
	White pride, bad.
	Gay pride, good.
	Straight pride, bad.
	Brown pride, you know, who's the UFC fighter who has brown pride on his chest?
	He's the one who got arrested for taking the law into his own hands.
	Oh, geez, what was his name?
	Chat, who's the UFC fighter that has brown pride tattooed across his chest?
	Anyhow, the idea that you could not say, Straight pride, and it's a problematic act of intolerance to stand with people who are wearing that shirt, is to say our shirt, our slogan, is an act of antagonism to which you cannot respond.
	Now, the ironic and funny thing about this, Pierre Poilier, the leader of the so-called opposition.
	Cain Velasquez, thank you.
	Danielle Smith, the Alberta Premier, who took pictures with that guy, came out and said, Ah, we didn't read the shirt before we took a picture with him.
	And, you know, we didn't read it.
	It's not, you know, mea culpa.
	Bull plop.
	Bull plop, Pierre Poiliev, you coward.
	And bull plop, Danielle Smith, you coward.
	Nobody poses for a picture and doesn't instinctively read what's on the shirt.
	Period.
	Nobody has someone who I presumably showed up to an event, a rally or whatever, and doesn't read the shirt before sitting to sit down and take a picture with them.
	Or accidentally read it.
	I mean, who sees someone's shirt with such a distinct graphic and not read it?
	I don't believe it for a second.
	They're cowards who can't simply get up there and say, look, if wearing a shirt that says straight pride is problematic, then wearing a shirt that says gay pride is problematic.
	They can't get up and say that.
	They deserve to lose the political goodwill that they will lose from both sides for being cowards.
	They're not going to regain the trust and the admiration of people who think it's problematic to wear a shirt or pose with someone who's wearing a shirt that says straight pride.
	They're going to lose the support of the people that they're supposed to represent.
	And those are the people who are saying, hey, let's all be proud.
	Let's all be proud.
	Oh no, I'm sorry.
	I can't be proud for my immutable traits because they're not minority traits?
	That's interesting.
	How are we classifying minority?
	On a global scale?
	On an individual scale?
	So sorry we had to start with that.
	But all of this, by the way, is going to...
	All of these subject matter for the day are going to loop into a beautiful circle of insanity.
	Justin Trudeau, straight pride, hateful conduct.
	And Media Matters just put out an article that said these...
	Extremist Rumble-exclusive creators are directing people from YouTube to controversial, misogynist, racist, anti-Semitic content on Rumble.
	Bullshit.
	Ooh, sorry.
	Bullplup.
	But we're gonna start with that article.
	And then we're gonna move to Rumble.
	Hey, Media Matters!
	Oh, I can't say what I...
	We're gonna get into it later because I did swear last night in a few tweets.
	Because we're gonna talk about RFK Jr.
	What he allegedly said, what he didn't say.
	He's got traitorous family members who are now disowning RFK the way Danielle Smith and Pierre Poiliev disowned straight pride shirt wearing, dude.
	But we're going to start with this Media Matters hit piece because it's a thing of beauty.
	It's a thing of actual corrupt beauty.
	Communist beauty.
	The people who are now using YouTube to direct traffic to Rumble.
	To talk about stuff that they can't talk about on YouTube.
	These idiots don't even understand what the problem is.
	That you have things that you cannot talk about on YouTube, apparently, is a problem.
	It's not a premise.
	Okay, let's start with it.
	So we're going to talk about media matters.
	RFK Jr.
	There's so many things in the backdrop here.
	Hold on, let me just see what my footnotes have to say.
	Present, share, let me just see what the thing is.
	Oh, we're going to talk about Trump, but not much.
	We're going to talk about Mark Ruffalo, January 6th.
	All this stuff.
	It all loops together.
	It's beautiful.
	All right.
	But first things first.
	We are going to talk about media matters.
	I think we can call media matters professional defamers.
	They are professional reputation slayers.
	They are professional.
	They're professionals.
	Media matters for America.
	This is an article.
	I saw it 10 minutes before going live, and I was like, add it to the roster, because it's going to be a beautiful segue into the Rumbles-only party, which we're going to have after this.
	And I'm not doing it so that I can talk about stuff that I don't talk about on YouTube.
	I actually post the entire stream to YouTube tomorrow.
	I do it because Rumble is the platform that respects free speech, and YouTube is not.
	But before we even get in there...
	Oh, goodness, I forgot this.
	No sound.
	Freedom for...
	It's like the one time I don't read the Super Chats in the beginning.
	Thank you.
	Little Rock, muted.
	Okay.
	And the first one was from Freedom for Canada.
	And then the last one is Sauerkraus, Viva, no sound.
	Well, ich bin ein Idiot today.
	Standard disclaimers, no medical advice, no election fornification advice, no legal advice, no super chats.
	YouTube takes 30% of them.
	If you don't like that, we're simultaneously streaming on Rumble.
	We should be.
	Oh, God, I hope we're live on Rumble.
	We are.
	Thank goodness.
	Rumble has these things called Rumble Rants.
	Ordinarily, Rumble takes 20% of them, but for the rest of the year, 2023, they're not taking any percent of them.
	And we are also on Locals, where I think the chat was also saying turn on sound.
	Okay, that's it.
	Now I'm never going to not read the chat before we go.
	So we're going to go over to Rumble after we cover this article on Media Matters, but I'm going to post the entire stream.
	And highlights to Viva Fry main channel, Viva Clips, clip channel on YouTube.
	And then we're going to go over to Locals after Rumble, and then we're really going to talk bad stuff.
	Joke.
	Hashtag sarcasm.
	Okay, let's bring this article back up here.
	It's right here.
	Media Matters.
	The partisan political hack defamers are at it again.
	YouTube is allowing fringe streamers.
	Fringe streamers, by the way.
	They include Russell Brand as a fringe streamer to push audiences to harmful content on Rumble and even profiting from it.
	Oh my goodness, won't someone think of the children?
	Harmful content?
	Do you know what's on the internet, Media Matters?
	Do you know what's on YouTube for that?
	Do you know what's on Instagram?
	Yeah.
	Harmful content on Rumble.
	Shows like Fit and Fresh Podcast.
	And stay free with Russell Brand.
	Yeah, he's real fringe, you dumbasses.
	He's only got millions and millions of followers.
	Whether or not he was an A-list Hollywood celebrity, he was a damn good Hollywood celebrity.
	He's fringe.
	Harmful content.
	What is Russell Brand's harmful content on Rumble that I'm fairly certain he posts to YouTube and clips anyhow?
	So does Jimmy Dore?
	The harmful content is talking about Fauci.
	It's talking about Hillary Clinton.
	It's talking about COVID conspiracy theories proven right over the last three years.
	They frequently tell their viewers to switch to Rumble for the remainder of their streams.
	Oh my goodness.
	We need to censor this.
	We need to go after Rumble.
	Because we've operated from the premise that there's things that you should not be allowed to talk about on YouTube, like election issues.
	They can't talk about it elsewhere because we're a bunch of freaking communists that want to control speech, language, and thought itself.
	Then they spout Unmoderated anti-Semitism, racism, misogyny, and conspiracy theories.
	I don't encourage anybody to sue, period, because I don't think suing for defamation is worth it.
	If one were so inclined, I think that there might be an argument for defamation here, because they have named two people specifically, fit and fresh, and stay free with Russell Brand, of having spouted unmoderated anti-Semitism, racism, misogyny.
	And conspiracy theories.
	You see, I think like a lawyer.
	Had they said or conspiracy theories instead of and, well, then they could have gotten away with Russell Brand saying, we didn't say you spouted anti-Semitism, racism, misogyny.
	We meant conspiracy theories for you.
	And is cumulative or is alternative.
	And so when they say anti-Semitism, racism, misogyny, and conspiracy theories, it's all of them.
	And they've basically taken Russell Brand by name, and they've called him, I know they're going to say it's in the statement of opinion, they've called him an anti-Semite, a racist, a misogynist, and a conspiracy theorist.
	Now, I don't think Russell Brand gives a sweet bugger all because Russell Brand is and will always be bigger than these rubbish Media Matters jacquinnies.
	Let's read this real quickly.
	YouTube is allowing right-wing and otherwise controversial, otherwise controversial.
	That's about as vapid a term as problematic.
	Just say problematic, Media Matters.
	Streamers to use its platform to push audiences to their extreme content on Rumble, where they spread hateful rhetoric and misinformation and host extremists who are banned from YouTube.
	Oh my goodness, it's almost like...
	Now YouTube and Media Matters gets to use YouTube's wrongful deplatforming and censorship as a basis to go after people on other platforms who don't operate by such communist tactics.
	Rumble is a video streaming platform that has become the alternative to YouTube.
	Booyah!
	By allowing hateful...
	The platform has recruited a cadre of content creators, many of whom are right-wing male pundits.
	I was a little insulted, Media Matters, that you didn't mention me in this article.
	But had you, had you mentioned me in this article, I would have gone after you for anti-Semitism, Media Matters, because that's how this stupidity works.
	You cannot criticize me.
	If you criticize me, Media Matters, you're anti-Semites.
	That's the way it works.
	Them's the rules.
	Don't make me wear the Jew pride shirt, because I won't do it.
	To post some of their content exclusively on Rumble.
	Streamers, including the Rumble exclusive, often begin the stream on multiple platforms, including YouTube, before airing exclusive content on Rumble.
	Yep, like we're going to do today in Media Matters.
	Some tease that the subsequent Rumble exclusive streams will include discussions of forbidden topics.
	Imagine thinking the problem is not that there are forbidden topics on YouTube.
	The problem is that they're having these forbidden topics discussions elsewhere.
	Seemingly trying to pique the curiosity, yadda yadda.
	Media Matters has also found that some of these YouTube videos are monetized, meaning that the platform is profiting from them.
	Oh my goodness!
	Cancel YouTube!
	Then we go into some examples.
	Who cares about this?
	I don't really care about the examples anyhow.
	Russell Brand and other Rumble-exclusive content creators regularly funnel their audience from YouTube to their more extreme content.
	Russell Brand, who hosts the other show, whatever it goes on, in one video on YouTube, Brand touted his Rumble-exclusive content as full of conspiracy theories.
	I'd like to see the direct quote there, Media Matters.
	Not that you're liars, but you're liars.
	After being suspended from YouTube for letting notorious conspiracy theorist Alex Jones guest host his show, Steven Crowder, another creator contracted with Rumble, declared that he doesn't really want to be on YouTube before saying Rumble is the re-platforming space.
	He's right.
	By the way, I had Alex Jones on multiple times, Media Matters.
	I'm very, I'm very, should I be offended that I've been left out of this?
	This was the best part of the whole thing.
	Glenn Greenwald, a right-wing commentator.
	Remember they accused Russell Brand of misogyny?
	Well, this might be a bit of homophobia here.
	Isn't that how this works?
	And anti-Semitism!
	Oh, they got it.
	Media Matters, you got a double whammy here.
	Right-wing commentator and Rumble exclusive creator who frequently parrots right-wing conspiracy theories, such as, streams roughly 10 minutes of his daily show on YouTube before abruptly, and it's abruptly ending it, and pushing his audience to the rest of the show.
	Oh, we're going to get into RFK.
	And 2024 presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
	And white nationalist, former Fox News.
	Media Matters deserves to get bloody sued.
	What do they call them?
	I'm sorry.
	Prolific vaccine misinformer and 2024 presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and white nationalist former Fox News host Tucker Carlson.
	Media matters.
	You deserve to get sued.
	You deserve to get sued.
	Won't happen.
	I think these people who are far bigger, far better, far smarter than you don't need to waste their time with you petty, disgusting people.
	But you are petty, you are disgusting, and you deserve to get sued.
	Here's the link.
	Oh, yeah, yeah, no, and RFK Jr.
	We're going to get into that because I swore.
	White nationalists.
	It's not a joke, Tweety USA News.
	They called Tucker Carlson a white nationalist.
	I guess he is white.
	And he's from a nation.
	And he believes in borders.
	Jesus, I might be a white nationalist too.
	Clip it, Media Matters.
	Oh my goodness.
	Okay, let me just...
	I got a pillow for my Lombard here.
	Let's go over to Rumble, people.
	Exclusively!
	Where, as I always say, there's nothing I talk about on Rumble that I wouldn't talk about on YouTube.
	But YouTube...
	No longer deserves to be the primary platform for original, intellectual, content-creative thought.
	That's a weird way of putting it.
	Yeah, the room is nice.
	It's beautiful.
	It smells like wood.
	So let's go to Rumble and Media Matters.
	Go to hell.
	Like, seriously.
	You're awful, awful people.
	You exist on this earth to cause strife.
	Okay, so we're doing that.
	We're going to go to Rumble.
	We're going to talk about RFK Jr., the anti-Semite, who said, allegedly, something so bad, his nephew, and is it his sister or his niece?
	The other one there, I forget her name.
	Two family members had to publicly disavow RFK Jr.
	And, you know, just to show you, I'm going to swear on YouTube, and then we're going to get to it.
	On Rumble.
	You have no fucking clue what your uncle actually said, you dipshit.
	Do you?
	In response to that.
	We're going to get there.
	This is to pique your interest of the extreme content.
	I'm going to say the F word a few times this episode.
	Let's do it.
	Come on over to Rumble.
	Ending on YouTube in three.
	How do I do it?
	Why do I forget?
	It's like every time I forget how to end this on YouTube.
	Ending on YouTube.
	Come over to Rumble.
	Three, two, one.
	Remove.
	Okay.
	Let me make sure that we're good here on Rumble.
	We're good on Rumble.
	All right.
	So the hit piece of the day is that RFK Jr. said something anti-Semitic and racist.
	It's so...
	Outrageous.
	And some of you out there are going to say, Viva, you like the New York Post when it posts the Hunter Biden story, and now you're criticizing them when they post an article entitled, RFK Jr. says COVID may have been, quote, ethnically targeted, end quote, to spare Jews.
	I assess most pieces on their merit, but I might go in with a little...
	Bias.
	CNN, I go into it thinking it's a lie.
	New York Post, I go into it thinking it's rubbish media, but they've gotten a few stories right.
	The headline from the New York Post article, which has now been referenced extensively to justify the wrap-up smear of the Mehdi Hassans of the world, of everyone else in the media, is that RFK said something so conspiratorially stupid, anti-Semitic, suggestive, I think, the idea is that...
	It's suggested that it might have been designed by Jews to punish the world but spare Jews, which feeds into some old lore, old tropes.
	RFK Jr. says COVID may have been ethnically targeted to spare Jews.
	Now, I want to hear the video.
	I'm not sure that we're going to hear it here.
	I know that I've got the unedited clip in the backdrop.
	Do we have to sit through ads here?
	I know a lot now about bioweapons because I've been doing a book on it for the past two and a half years.
	Just remember the headline.
	It was, what did he say?
	Ethnically targeted to spare Jews.
	Remember what was in quotes and what was not in quotes.
	And, you know, the technology that we now have, all these micro...
	We have...
	We put hundreds of millions of dollars into ethnically targeted microbes.
	The Chinese have done the same thing.
	In fact, COVID-19...
	We've put hundreds of millions of dollars in ethnically targeted microbes.
	That's where the term ethnically targeted came from.
	COVID-19, there's an argument that it is ethnically targeted.
	COVID-19 attacks certain races.
	Disproportionately.
	COVID-19 attacks certain races disproportionately.
	He says ethnically targeted.
	And then the question is going to be, does that mean its impact or does that mean how it was designed?
	Let's just continue listening.
	The races that are most immune to COVID-19 are because of the structure.
	Genetic differentials on different races.
	Geez, it's almost like some races, some ethnicities, are more susceptible to certain disease.
	It's almost like that.
	Now, does that make sickle cell anemia ethnically targeted, or does it just...
	In fact, come to be that sickle cell anemia results in ethnic targeting in the sense that some races have more propensity to things like sickle cell anemia, Tay-Sex.
	Now that we know that COVID was likely engineered in a lab in China, and we know, because I do believe it's not conspiracy theory, that some races' ethnicities are more susceptible to severe infection or less susceptible to...
	Is it a conspiracy theory, or is RFK Jr. actually just saying something that is factually correct?
	Of the receptors, of the ACE2 receptor, COVID-19 is targeted to attack Caucasians and black people.
	The people who are most immune are Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese.
	We don't know if it was deliberately targeted or not.
	Targeting as a pure matter of result is far different, but still nonetheless equally accurate when compared to targeting as a matter of intent.
	There are papers out there that show the racial and ethnic differential impact to that.
	We do know that the Chinese are spending hundreds of millions of dollars developing ethnic bio-weapons, and we are developing ethnic bio-weapons.
	That's what all those labs in the Ukraine are about.
	They're collecting Russian DNA, they're collecting Chinese DNA, so we can target people by race and black people.
	The people who are most immune are Askenazi Jews and Chinese.
	We don't know whether it was deliberately targeted that or not, but there are...
	We don't know if it was deliberately targeted or not.
	And let's just go back to the headline because I think some of us might have forgotten about it by now.
	And some of us might not have even known about it.
	Get it?
	There it is.
	What does the headline say?
	Let's go back to the headline.
	RFK says COVID may have been, quote, ethnically targeted to spare Jews.
	That seems to imply the specific intent that RFK, in that very video clip, said he's not saying exists.
	But it doesn't matter.
	Post that headline.
	Who the hell's going to even watch the video to take time to hear what RFK Jr. actually said?
	Apparently not his nephew.
	Now, I just want to actually pull up one thing here, because it might be very relevant.
	Ethnically targeted...
	Let's just bring this up, you know, because it's so crazy what he said.
	An ethnic bioweapon or a biogenetic weapon is a hypothetical type of bioweapon which could preferentially target people of specific ethnicities, people of specific genotypes.
	History.
	One of the first modern fictional discussions of ethnic...
	Okay, fictional.
	Sixth column.
	Genetic weapons.
	In 1996, seven.
	U.S. Secretary of Defense William Cohen referred to the concept of an ethnic bioweapon as a possible risk.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	I thought what RFK Jr. just said was conspiracy theory, anti-Semitic racist rubbish.
	In 1998, some biological weapon experts considered such a, quote, genetic weapon, end quote, plausible, and believed the former Soviet Union had undertaken some research on the influence of various substances on human genes.
	In a 2000 policy paper Rebuilding America's Defenses, Think Tank Project for the New American Century, described ethnic bioweapons as a, quote, politically useful tool, end quote, that U.S. adversaries could have incentive to develop and utilize.
	It's amazing.
	Here, hold on.
	Let's go.
	2004.
	The Guardian reported that the British Medical Association considered bioweapons designed to target certain ethnic groups as a possibility and highlighted problems that advances in science for such things as, quote, treatments to Alzheimer's and other debilitating diseases could be used for malign purposes.
	And it goes on.
	Jeez, it almost sounds like RFK Jr. was just talking about something that has been known theoretically or actual research.
	For some time.
	In the video, he specifically says, I don't know if it's deliberate or not, but we know that COVID impacts different races differently because of the way their genes are set up to deal with certain things.
	Okay.
	That sounds like a matter of fact or not that could be debated.
	The hit pieces that came out, one after the other, citing the headline, very few, if any, that I've ever seen playing the actual video.
	Surprise, surprise.
	But look at this.
	Share screen.
	Let me get the tweets.
	Look at this.
	Then the family comes out.
	Remember you saw a number of blue checkmark idiots?
	I think Rob Reiner was one of them.
	RFK Jr. is such a disgusting creature that even his own family members have to disavow him.
	Chris D. Jackson, whose entire Twitter feed is...
	Partisan hackery.
	Writes, let's give it up for at Carrie Kennedy, RFK.
	There's a lot of K's in there.
	Maybe some accusations to be made.
	Carrie Kennedy, RFK.
	Let's give it up for her sister.
	Sorry, I thought it was his niece for a second.
	Robert Kennedy Jr.'s sister, who today showed courage to condemn her brother's recent anti-Semitic conspiracy theory.
	I strongly condemn my brother's deplorable, where'd we hear that word before, and untruthful remark last week's about COVID being engineered for ethnic targeting.
	Oh, I'm sorry, Kerry.
	I don't think you saw the video, you dumbass.
	But if you did see it, you had an audible hallucination.
	His statements do not represent what I believe or what Robert F. Kennedy human rights stands for.
	Who the hell asked you?
	With our 50-plus year track record of protecting rights and standing against racism and all forms of discrimination, what in the name of sweet holy hell are you talking about, Kerry?
	But wait, there's more.
	Joe Kennedy III, who's a sitting member of government, I forget, he's in government somewhere.
	My uncle's comments were hurtful and wrong.
	I unequivocally condemn what he said.
	I started off polite, people.
	Not that I at all in any way believe that I'm actually entitled to any form of an answer when I ask a question on Twitter, but I started off polite.
	What exactly did your uncle say?
	Verbatim.
	Tell me what you think your uncle said, Joe.
	Please tell the world, or do you actually not even know exactly what your uncle said for which you are now apologizing?
	I never got a response to that tweet.
	Not that I'm entitled to one.
	Not that I know that I got one.
	I'm not entitled to it, and I don't think I am.
	But...
	Oh, then I, you know...
	Then I got angry.
	Angry Viva.
	Do I refresh this, and will I see the original tweet above?
	No, I won't.
	You have no fucking clue what your uncle said.
	You dipshit.
	Now, it's to be read with, like...
	You got no fucking clue what you said, dipshit.
	It's to be read with a loving, you know, ha-ha.
	What is it called?
	Ribbing?
	It's to be read with a loving ribbing.
	You got no fucking clue what your uncle said.
	You're a moron.
	And you just went out and proselytized yourself for those sweet, sweet virtue signaling points.
	And you threw family under the bus.
	That's not to say you don't call the cops if your uncle is a convicted murderer instead of housing a criminal.
	This is betrayal of the highest order.
	For virtue signaling points on social media predicated on rampant and rambunctious ignorance.
	Joe Kennedy, what's the other one?
	Kimberly Kennedy, whatever, I forget her name.
	You are shameless, shameful, and you've basically broken the most basic principle of society, which is family allegiance when there's no better reason to not have it.
	And you did it for politics.
	And by the way, everyone on that side of the aisle, they're very happy because what governments like to do, what tyrants like to do, is destroy and break the family bond.
	That's how they isolate.
	That's how they alienate.
	And that's how they indoctrinate people.
	Get them away from family.
	Get them away from their parents.
	Get them away from their schools.
	Tell them who they can talk to.
	Tell them what they can read.
	Alienate, isolate, indoctrinate.
	I like that.
	Just a spat on my computer.
	So, you know, the political party, the party is very happy with you.
	You threw your uncle under the bus.
	I suspect you are both ignorant dipshits and have no idea what your uncle even said.
	Because had you listened to what your uncle said, well, you're apologizing for something that didn't happen.
	But those good donor bucks, I guess the donor bucks, you know, the political...
	The political points, they're too good.
	You feel so good about yourself.
	Like Philip DeFranco coming out and strongly condemning Nicholas Salmon's hatred.
	What's that?
	I'm an idiot and I don't even know what happened?
	Well, I stand by my words.
	I condemn anti-Semitism.
	You know who has to come out and condemn anti-Semitism and racism?
	Anti-Semites and racists.
	You know who has to come out and condemn violence?
	People who condone violence.
	They are the first ones demanding other people condemn violence.
	Because they condone it?
	They are the ones who espouse hateful ideologies, hateful beliefs, which is why they gotta come out and protest this a little too hard and demand that everybody else condemn these things that anybody with a conscience knows you don't need to condemn because they're not things that normal people should believe and they're sure as hell not things that normal people come out and demand condemnation for.
	I hope my mic hasn't been too loud the entire time.
	But we're not done with RFK Jr. yet.
	So you got his nephew.
	Ignorant dipnanny who's apologizing for I think he doesn't even know what or something that he thinks is the case that isn't.
	You got his daughter.
	Who else was out there doing this?
	Oh, Eric Fagelding.
	If you don't follow this guy's Twitter account, if I didn't know better, I'd say this is like the Erica Marsh of the medical community.
	Eric Fagelding, I swear to you, I'm certain I saw the tweet.
	He referenced the increase in anti-Asian hate crimes in America, which statistically, as far as I understand, was being perpetrated by another demographic minority in the United States.
	And he came out and said that that uncomfortable fact is itself the result of white supremacy.
	I haven't been able to retrace that tweet.
	I don't know if it's been permanently deleted.
	Anyone who finds that, please retweet it and tag me on Twitter.
	Eric Fagelding comes out and he says, look at this.
	Who else did we see coming out and throwing out the Jew card for Peter Hotez?
	Mehdi Hassan.
	And to quote the wise words of Viva Frye from...
	It wasn't yesterday.
	Was it Sunday?
	What day is it today?
	It's Wednesday.
	I think it was Monday.
	You know who...
	Never let someone forget that they're Jewish, black, gay, a woman.
	You know who never lets anybody forget about their minority identity politics status?
	Members of that community or those who hate those people.
	You know who never lets you forget that you're black?
	I mean, sometimes the black community, it'll be fraternity within the community and racists.
	We'll never let you forget it.
	You know who never lets you forget that you're a woman that keeps bringing up a Muslim?
	Justin Trudeau does it all the time.
	Members of the community and those who actually have disdain for members of the community.
	Because they look at an individual and they only reduce them to that aspect of their identity.
	We saw Mehdi Hassan do it yesterday.
	Throw the Jew card in.
	And now, if you criticize Peter Hotez, you're anti-Semitic.
	Oh, throw the Jew card in.
	Let everybody know that Peter Hotez is Jewish so that you deliberately spark that type of vitriol.
	You know, when they came out and said...
	The attacks on Merrick Garland are anti-Semitic.
	And I'm like, holy crap, apples.
	Another person I didn't know was Jewish until those complaining about anti-Semitism brought up the fact that the person was Jewish.
	Mehdi Hassan did it for Peter Hotez.
	The mainstream media did it for Merrick Garland.
	Merrick Garland.
	Like, I'm sorry.
	I look at etymology of names.
	Peter Hotez is not a traditionally Jewish last name.
	Garland?
	Merrick?
	I mean, I know Merrick was the guy from The Elephant Man.
	That might have been his last name.
	Doesn't matter.
	Eric Fagelding is the one of the day doing it.
	Total coincidence, RFK Jr. tried to get Dr. Peter Hotez, Jewish-American ancestry, dog whistle, send out the bells, Fagelding.
	Send out the bells, Eric.
	Total coincidence, RFK Jr. tried to get Dr. Peter Hotez, Jew, and me, Chinese.
	Of all scientists to debate him?
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	You think he picked on you because you're Chinese, Eric Fagelding?
	He might have picked on you because I think he sees a good pigeon for a debate.
	Because I think Eric Fagelding, I think RFK Jr. mops the floor with you.
	He's not picking on you because you're Chinese.
	I think he's picking on you because I think he thinks he can mop the floor with you.
	He picked on Dr. Peter Hotez, a Jew.
	I gotta tell you, did I do the poll the last time?
	I can't do polls.
	We're in Rome.
	I don't think most people knew that Peter Hotez was Jewish.
	Certainly never heard him say it.
	I listened to the entire podcast.
	I thought I did.
	Of him on Rogan.
	It never came up.
	Yeah, that's why.
	He picked on Hotez and he picked on you because Hotez is Jewish and you're Chinese and he's an anti-Semite and an anti-Asian racist.
	And not just because you're an idiot.
	I thought that was fun, but okay, so hold on a second.
	Now, I think that might be it for RFK Jr., but it's going to segue us into some other good stuff.
	The internet dog whistles.
	Hold on, actually, before I even carry on, let's just go to the chat and see what's going on in here.
	Bada bing, bada boom.
	I had no idea that Hotez was Jewish.
	I just thought he was evil, says Sky Nebula.
	Well now, and it's an amazing thing.
	By the way, you got me and Joe Nierman on Twitter now calling out the anti-Semites for dropping the Jew card on Peter Hotez.
	Joe Nierman, for those of you who don't know, he's very religious.
	I'm secular.
	I have my family history.
	I enjoy bacon and I love lobster.
	I do not pretend that I would ever be spared in the event.
	Like I say, my history is what it is.
	Is it relevant to supporting any of my opinions or justifying or strengthening my opinions?
	Do I have opinion on anything that I think is more legitimate than anybody else's because I'm Jewish?
	Absolutely not.
	Full stop.
	Do I think that other people out there are not allowed having certain opinions because they're not Jewish?
	Absolutely not.
	Full stop.
	But I am by no means...
	That type of religious.
	Joan Ehrman is, and it's well known.
	And we're out there now, on Twitter, calling out the anti-Semites who have now infused the Jew card into the debate around Peter Hotez, his terrible hypocrisy, and his cowardice in not debating RFK Jr.
	But they've poisoned the well.
	And now any criticism of Hotez is going to be called anti-Semitic.
	Yes, Russ Hanneman says, ham, salami, and bacon.
	I prefer bacon.
	Ham is delicious, but I prefer...
	Yeah, bacon is delicious.
	It says, it's me again, sigh.
	Molten Salt says, you cannot be mean to me because I am Jewish.
	Peter Hotez.
	That's what they've done.
	That's what they've done.
	And then Mehdi Hassan is the one running around calling everyone racist, calling everyone Islamophobes, calling everyone anti-Semites, and he's the one out of thin air.
	Reducing Peter Hotez to the Jewish card.
	As is Eric Feigelding, who also runs around screaming anti-Semitism.
	He also runs around protesting everyone else being a racist anti-Semitic.
	Protesting a little too hard for those sweet, sweet internet virtue signaling points.
	All right.
	Dog whistles.
	Speaking of dog whistles.
	Oh my goodness.
	Is Mark Ruffalo still on Twitter?
	Mark Ruffalo...
	In any sane universe deserves to get yeeted from Twitter.
	I am very much a free speech supporter.
	I don't think there's any such thing as a free speech absolutist because nobody believes you should be allowed to wrongly scream fire in a crowded theater.
	Nobody thinks you should be allowed to use your words to threaten someone's life.
	Nobody thinks you should be allowed to use your words to defraud people or to defame them.
	So anybody who says I'm a free speech absolutist...
	Either thinks defamation should be allowed and you should not be able to sue for it because it's a little restriction on free speech.
	Thinks you should be able to threaten someone's life.
	I don't think anybody is a true free speech absolutist if it comes with a, I'm a free speech absolutist, but you shouldn't be allowed to threaten someone's life, defame people, commit fraud with words, etc.
	Maybe there are some people who say, yep, free speech.
	I'm an absolutist.
	You should be able to verbally harass someone endlessly.
	Okay.
	But I'm also, you know, I'm a proponent of A, the law, and B, terms of service.
	Whether or not I agree with the terms of service, if I use a platform, I'm going to agree to abide by the terms of service.
	And if I don't, I'm not going to complain when I get booted.
	Mark Ruffalo, for those of you who don't know, is a washed-up hack of a Hollywood actor.
	He was in that movie that I just saw recently, Shutter Island.
	It's not a recent movie.
	He's a terrible actor.
	And that I'd say, he's a terrible actor.
	I'm trying to think of...
	I'm thinking of another guy.
	His last name starts with a G. He was in a movie called Buffalo 87 or Buffalo 66. Vincent Gallo.
	I get mixed up between Mark Ruffalo and Vincent Gallo.
	Mark Ruffalo is a hack of an actor turned hack of a political activist on Twitter.
	Yesterday...
	This man puts out this tweet, and this tweet should get him kicked off Twitter, period.
	When your home burns, floods, or is destroyed in an extreme climate weather event, when someone, when, not if, when someone in your family dies from heat waves, or when crops fail and people starve, come for these three people.
	I don't know who they are, I'm not naming them, I don't care to.
	They knew what was coming and did it to you anyway.
	They killed your family.
	Come for these three people.
	Then, he says, sue them, shame them, heckle them, despise them.
	These are choices.
	They are to blame, not society.
	Quote, corporations are people, my friend.
	End quote.
	Mitt Romney.
	I'm going to keep this up just in case I have to come back to it, because there is some, what we call the canons of interpretation.
	I shouldn't treat Mark Ruffalo like he's a legislator, like he abides by any logic.
	But there are some canons of interpretation.
	You don't say something to say nothing.
	In French, we say, le législateur, choke my own tongue here.
	In French, we say, le législateur ne parle pas pour ne rien dire.
	The legislator does not speak to say nothing.
	So when the legislator uses words, the presumption is that they're not intended to be purely redundant.
	When your home burns, floods, or is destroyed in an extreme weather event, it will happen.
	It's not a question of if, but when.
	When someone in your family dies from heatwaves, or when crops fail and people starve, come for these three people, and he names them.
	He then goes on to specify what else you could do to those three people.
	Some people are saying, he's only saying sue them, heckle them, shame them, despise them, all legitimate exercises of free speech.
	To which I would argue, if I were presenting the argument, if that's all he meant to say, he would not have said, come for these three people.
	He would have just said, sue these three people, shame these three people, heckle these three people, despise these three people.
	He says, come for these three people.
	And then he says, here are some other things you can do to them, if one wanted to build that argument.
	Naming specifically.
	Call to action.
	Targeted harassment.
	That's Mark Ruffalo, boys.
	But he does it for the virtuous fight.
	So, you know, he gets to sleep well at night.
	Like C.S. Lewis said, the worst of all the tyrants is the benevolent tyrant.
	Because, you know, the robber baron might sleep.
	He might rest.
	He might just get tired of tormenting you.
	But the people who torment you with the approval of their own conscience will do it forever.
	Mark Ruffalo undoubtedly is the hero in his own twisted story.
	He could do this forever.
	It's a righteous fight that he's doing, so whatever he does makes him the hero in his story and does not allow him to understand he has become the villain.
	Some of you might not care about this story, but too bad because I care about it.
	I put out after this, this tweet is definitively violative of Twitter's terms of service.
	Definitively.
	Elon...
	1,000% specific targeted harassment by name with the call to action come for these three people.
	Hey, my mob of millions of followers, harass them, heckle them, despise them, sue them.
	It's violative of Twitter's terms of service.
	The fact that he hasn't been yeeted yet can only be because of that sweet, sweet, the only true privilege that exists, political privilege.
	Congratulations, Mark.
	Oh, I'm sorry, and I said, and it is also arguably borderline criminal.
	Congratulations, Mark, you have lived long enough to become the villain, but alas, everyone's a hero in their own story.
	And then I show 18 U.S.C.
	Section 373 solicitation to commit a crime of violence.
	I'm not a U.S. attorney.
	I'm a former Montreal litigator turned legal political commentator.
	This is not legal advice, and I reserve the right to be wrong.
	Although...
	Because I'm a lawyer and because I weigh my words, I didn't use the terms arguably and borderline when qualifying criminal by accident.
	It's an argument.
	It's an uphill argument.
	I appreciate that.
	I appreciate the Brandenburg test of a true and direct threat.
	We'll get there, however.
	18 U.S.C.
	Section 373.
	Solicitation to commit a crime of violence.
	Drafted in such a way so that lawyers maintain their monopoly over the practice of law because it's absolutely incoherent.
	But this is what the provision of law says.
	Whoever, with the intent that another person engage in conduct constituting a felony that has an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against property or against the person of another in violation of the laws of the United States,
	and under circumstances strongly corroborative of that intent, So the only question is whether or not Ruffalo is endeavoring to persuade other persons to commit crimes under the U.S. criminal code.
	Hold on.
	Brandenburg test.
	Some people pointing out.
	You know, this doesn't meet the threshold in Brandenburg.
	Remember what Ruffalo said.
	Come for these three people after having named them by name.
	What's the Brandenburg test?
	That's when they...
	Brandenburg test was the group of, I think, KKK members.
	Yes, who were basically threatening Black people.
	The Brandenburg test was established in Brandenburg versus Ohio to determine when inflammatory speech intending to advocate illegal action can be restricted.
	In the case, a KKK leader gave a speech at a rally to his fellow Klansmen, and after listing a number of derogatory racial slurs, acutely missing here is specifically naming a Black individual by name, he then said that, quote, it's possible that there might have to be some vengeance taken, end quote.
	It's possible that there might have to be some vengeance taken.
	End quote.
	Come for these three people.
	The people saying that Mark Ruffalo's threats don't amount to the test established in Brandenburg, you might be right because it might exceed it.
	In Brandenburg, you have a hypothetical.
	It's possible that there might have to be some vengeance taken.
	Not mentioning anybody in particular, an unspecified group of people with no time frame.
	Come for these three people and you know their names.
	The test determined that the government may prohibit speech advocating the use of force or crime if that speech satisfies both elements of the two-part test.
	The speech is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and the speech is likely to incite or produce such action.
	It's arguable that what Ruffalo did...
	Would not actually satisfy the Brandenburg test because it was even more specific, more egregious, and more an absolute call to action than what was even said in Brandenburg v.
	Ohio.
	So I reported that tweet in any event.
	Full transparency.
	I'm not a baby.
	You imagine being the three?
	I don't care if they are public enemy number one.
	Come for these three people.
	Here are their names.
	Harass them.
	What the hell does despise them?
	Anyhow.
	Ruffalo is a scumbag.
	I mean, there's no other way.
	I could swear.
	He's a dipshit.
	He's a scumbag.
	He knows exactly what he's doing.
	He's doing it on purpose.
	And then all of a sudden, the left that would have locked up any one of the January 6th for having said anything comparable to such a threat.
	All of a sudden, free speech.
	But don't come over to Rumble to say, just go to Twitter.
	Hey, Media Matters.
	Why don't you go after Mark Ruffalo?
	Now, I did see some crumble rants, which I missed before.
	I'm going to start chronologically.
	They're on the bottom.
	Oblividan says, I also try not to cuss in my tweets.
	I also do not always succeed.
	You should follow me at DanielRude11 because I'm cool dude.
	Lolz.
	I also, strategically, you're better off not swearing your tweets.
	Because, you know, less likely they're going to get repeated in a news publication.
	Just purely strategically.
	If you want them to be mainstream consumable tweets, you know, don't swear.
	But sometimes, holy crap, you want to act like a dipshit and you want to apologize for things that somebody actually never said, expect to get called out on it.
	And in as much as that's how much I lose my temper, occasionally I swear.
	One time, anecdote, story time.
	With Viva Frye.
	I had that stupid, this metal, what is it called?
	The burr that goes like, it looks like a roadrunner.
	I bought it for my wife for our anniversary in the eastern townships in Venison, Quebec.
	And it was made from recycled scrap metal.
	And its beak, you know, sharp metal like those, like aluminum foil, whatever that's called, on roof.
	Aluminum sheeting on a roof.
	Folded into a beak.
	I knelt down on the ground to pick something up, and the beak hit me right in the freaking forehead.
	The window was open.
	I swore so loud, I swear to you, the entire neighborhood.
	The entire neighborhood.
	The entire neighborhood hurt.
	Another time when I broke my toe, cleaned in half, and it healed the bone totally separate.
	One day I'll expose the world to my pinky.
	Toe that can bend like a full 90 degrees to the left because the bone healed, but healed totally snapped.
	When I kicked that bike pump and snapped my toe in half and I heard it snap, I swore.
	All right, what was I saying here?
	So story time's over.
	Okay, what do we got here?
	We got Rivka the Jade Gamer.
	Technically, I think the Chinese are the descendants of Shem Sem as well.
	Shem Sem.
	I don't know what that means.
	Nike 7. Viva, please have Tony Heller on...
	For a sidebar interview.
	Okay, I'm screen grabbing it.
	It would be an eye-opening interview about the NASA NOA.
	Oh, about climate change.
	Okay.
	And we got PJ Park, JD.
	Today in history, Senator Ted Kennedy killed Mary Jo Copicni forever cementing the American principle that some people are above the law.
	Oh, but we're not supposed to notice which ones.
	Yeah, Ted Kennedy, he's the one who killed her in a car, right?
	He was drunk driving, I think.
	Lord of the Re says, did you see Ian Miles Chud and Vito the...
	Who's Vito the PETA?
	Smearing Rumble on Twitter and getting signal boosted by Elon.
	Oh yeah, I replied to that tweet yesterday.
	That tweet's out there.
	I don't want to talk about it because it's dirty.
	Like I told him in the tweet, Ian Miles Chong takes a screen grab from a Fuentes livestream, which is no longer on Rumble regardless.
	A screen grab of the chat and then says, what's going on on Rumble?
	And Elon, who is now in fact in direct competition with Rumble because Elon and Twitter are having long format videos on Twitter, Elon signal boosts Ian Miles Chong's tweet with two exclamation points knowing damn well what he's doing.
	And I replied to both of them.
	Well, here's a bunch of screen grabs from Ian Miles Chong's Twitter feed with a bunch of anti-Semitic comments.
	What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
	You want to play this bullshit Taylor Lorenz fake news propaganda game?
	We can all play that too.
	Be prepared to live by the sword and die by the sword, Elon and Ian.
	Oh, you're going to judge people based on the stupidity in the chat of a live stream?
	My goodness, you've descended into intellectual dishonesty on par with the Taylor Lorenz's of the world.
	So I saw it.
	It's dirty.
	It's wrong.
	I believe I called them out in as much as it's worth a discussion, and that's where it's going to end.
	Call me biased because I have exclusivity with Rumble.
	I will defend what is right, and I will criticize what is wrong without any, not partisan, but without any tribalistic reflex to defend.
	Lost my words there for a second.
	Now, there was something that I actually wanted to bring up, Totally forgot to bring up, and it's some good Canadian news.
	Some good Canadian news and some bad Canadian news.
	The good Canadian news...
	Hold on, I just lost my screen here.
	Thank you all for the rumble rants, by the way, and we're going to go over to locals afterwards and have our exclusive afterparty there.
	There is some good news in the media today.
	I heard the good news as I was in the car yesterday.
	Here we go.
	Some good news to start the week.
	I had Sheila Lewis, Sheila Annette Lewis on, I guess it was a couple of weeks ago, and she is the Alberta woman, 57-58, who was taken off the organ donor list of Alberta because of her refusal to get the COVID jab.
	I will not call it a vaccine because, at best, it's a therapeutic that causes adverse reactions in 1 in 800 and some odd people.
	That's one hell of a therapeutic.
	My goodness.
	She was taken off the Alberta donor list for a needed organ transplant, which nobody knows what it is because there was a gag order in her various lawsuits.
	And I had her on the channel to explain her entire story.
	57, 58-year-old woman.
	2019, she was diagnosed with a congenital fatal disease.
	I don't know what it was.
	And needed an organ transplant.
	We don't know which organ it was.
	She's put on the list.
	She goes and gets her routine vaccinations as they required.
	COVID hits.
	And then they say, you need to get the jab.
	And she says, no, I can't do it.
	And they say, well, then we're bumping you from priority on the list to zero, not priority on the list.
	And then they took her off altogether.
	She sued for charter violations.
	The Alberta lower court said, no charter violation because this is a medical decision.
	The Alberta court of appeals said, no charter violation because this is a medical decision, so we're not even getting into it.
	But even if it were a charter violation, it wouldn't be, even if it were a charter issue, it would not be a charter violation because it's a decision she made.
	Supreme Court refuses to hear it, thus effectively signing her death sentence, her death ward.
	She then, as explained in our podcast, Said she was going to sue for malpractice.
	She lost the charter violation claim because they said the charter doesn't apply.
	And even if it did, it wouldn't be a violation.
	She was going to sue for malpractice.
	And the news of the day posted to her give, send, go is that there was a resolution.
	I presume it's a gag, confidential...
	Can't name the doctors because people might get mad at the doctors.
	Can't name the hospital because people might get mad at the hospital.
	So you have court proceedings in darkness.
	Democracy dies in darkness.
	So does justice.
	But that's the way Canada's going now.
	Public courts?
	Forget that.
	People might get angry at the people doing the wrongs.
	And they might go out and harass them, criticize them.
	Can't do that.
	Mark Ruffalo can name and shame by name on Twitter.
	That's cool.
	Don't do it either way, by the way, people.
	The update was July 15th, which was three days ago, as many of you heard on Sheila's interview with Viva Frye.
	A few weeks back, Sheila and her lawyer commenced a negligence action against her doctors a few months ago.
	The parties have recently reached a satisfactory settlement in this matter, and all funds raised through your generous donations, I gave a thousand bucks as well, will be going towards Sheila's health care needs moving forward.
	Thank you all for your prayers, support, kind and encouraging words, and your very generous donations.
	And that's it.
	I said that's good news.
	We have to scream bloody murder to prevent the government from imposing murder sentences, death sentences on Canadian citizens.
	We have to sit there and shake our fists into the abyss, do the work that the government is mandated to do for the government because the government has become the aggressors and not the protectors if they ever were the protectors.
	So I don't know anything more than that which is public, and I don't want to know things which are confidential because I don't want to even accidentally say things that are not public that I only know because someone told me.
	They're satisfied.
	She raised a hundred and some odd thousand dollars, which she's going to need going forward.
	Thank everybody for donating.
	Thank everybody for screaming.
	You shake your fist to the sky every now and again something happens.
	And like I say, harassment is not the way.
	Violence is not the way because it's only going to empower them to do what they already want to do.
	Give them the excuse, they will make more laws to shut you up, shut you down, and shut you out.
	Harassment, violence is not the answer.
	Loud public shaming is the answer.
	And raising awareness.
	I was hitting up everybody I know on the American side to talk about this, to talk about Dan Hartman, Sean Hartman's father, who now got his medical confirmation.
	that the jab was a contributing factor, if not a determinant factor in the death of his 17-year-old son, 33 days after having gotten the first COVID jab.
	Raise awareness and scream at the top of your lungs to anybody who will listen.
	Okay, so that was one good news.
	Now, the not-so-good news.
	It's a story that enough people are not talking about in Canada.
	I have been talking about it myself a little bit.
	But not as much as I, not that I would like to, but there's not very much to talk about because it too, if it's not under an overt publication, Ben, it's very difficult to get any information on it.
	Now the, hold on, I want to shout out the person who is raising awareness about it and talking about it, Jason Levine.
	L-A-V-I-G-N-E, like Averill Levine.
	Independent journalist.
	His Twitter feed is...
	His Rumble feed is...
	Independent journalist on Rumble.
	536 followers.
	And he has done a number of podcasts talking about this.
	Jason Levine.
	His Twitter handle is at JasonLevineMP.
	What does MP stand for?
	Hold on a second.
	Member of Parliament countering government overreach firmly against the globalist agenda, independent candidate for MP Yellowhead, Alberta, bearing Alberta, bearing witness.
	He's been talking about it.
	But, Newsweek.
	This is a big amplification, a signal boost of sorts, of the political prisoners that are currently still being held in Canada.
	In jail, pre-trial detention, the Coutts Four.
	Many of you might not have heard about it, but if you've been watching the channel for long enough, you know about it.
	Jeremy McKenzie and I talked about it during at least one, if not several of our live streams.
	Justin Trudeau's political prisoners' opinion.
	Gordon McGill Trucker.
	Listen to this.
	It's been 18 months since Canada's Freedom Convoy rocked the whirlwind.
	Truckers from all corners of Canada descended on Ottawa to protest Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's vindictive punishment.
	Vindictive and punishing vaccine mandates.
	Okay, we're going to just read it quick.
	While the convoy was still hundreds of kilometers from Ottawa, Trudeau's public safety minister, liar liar Marco Mendicino, was planning a media campaign deploying a similar message to the one used in response to the January 6th attacks on Washington, D.C. Remember what I said, people.
	Trudeau so wanted the violence so that he could invoke the Emergencies Act.
	He never got it, but he invoked the Emergencies Act anyhow.
	Had he gotten it, the public opinion...
	Of those who support the truckers could have been swayed to say, look at the violence, he had no choice.
	The reason why the trucker convoy was so internationally embarrassing for Justin Trudeau and wildly effective was because of the absolute absence of violence.
	And the reason why January 6th has been allowed, facilitated to be weaponized was because of the presence of some violence, pocketed violence, and I will dare say...
	Quoting Darren Beattie's Fed Surrection, instigated violence, but set that aside.
	The Freedom Convoy did not deliver any of the manufactured concerns.
	In the three weeks of the protest, not a single act of violence was committed.
	You all know this.
	We're going to skip over this.
	Against such revelry, Trudeau invoked the Emergency Act.
	Fine.
	Let's just see here.
	We've got to get to the Coutts 4. The invocation brought an end to the protests and launched a Kafkaesque nightmare.
	For many who were involved, bank accounts were seized.
	Tamara Lich was arrested.
	Still face it.
	I'm going to get an interview with Tamara Lich, by the way.
	Stay tuned.
	Counseling mischief.
	And four others.
	This is what people do not know.
	Four others.
	Chris Lysak, Chris Carbot, Anthony Tony Oliedek, and Jerry Morin, or Morin, have been held without a trial and without bail for charges related to, quote, conspiracy to commit murder against Canadian police officer at the Coutts-Alberta border crime.
	I happen to think that these charges are bunk.
	I happen to think that these charges are an outright fabrication.
	If for no other reason than I know how much the other charges were an outright fabrication.
	Incitement to mischief for Tamara Lich?
	Incitement to mischief and mischief and obstruction for Pat King?
	I know that those charges were politically motivated.
	Bullshit.
	And so I'm going to learn from past experience.
	That's redundant.
	I'm going to learn from my experience to operate on the starting premise that these charges are also probably bullshit.
	I don't know better.
	They might be legitimate.
	And even if they were legitimate, you remember that dude who tried to murder four protesters by running them over with his car?
	He got bail.
	Still in jail.
	Pre-trial detention with no bail.
	That's not just not Canadian.
	That's, I dare say, communist China, North Korean.
	You want to talk about autocrats and Putin and locking up journalists, Trudeau?
	That's what you got here.
	Four guys are still in pretrial detention, haven't had a trial yet.
	Screw your speedy trial.
	You know, only pedophiles in the East Coast get off for charter violations so they don't have a trial fast enough.
	Look it up if you think I'm joking.
	The pedophiles get off.
	These four guys are still in jail.
	Pre-trial detention, no bail, haven't had a trial yet, and it's near 18 months later.
	These are serious charges which should imply serious evidence presented in an expeditious trial.
	Yet at the time of writing, it has been 515 days since these men were arrested, and no trial has yet taken place.
	Scream loud as hell for the world to hear.
	You know, this I can appreciate might not have the international interest of the vaccine mandate stuff.
	You know, for the United States far-right podcasters, you know, like the Jimmy Doors, the Glenn Greenwalds, this should be of international interest regardless.
	What happens in Canada trickles down to America.
	Worse, the evidence on offer is vague and ambiguous.
	Text messages, testimony from two undercover RCMP officers working the crowd at the Coutts protest site, and a widely circulated photo of allegedly confiscated weapons that provided the main justification for the invocation of the Emergency Act.
	Remember that picture?
	It's got a diagonal patch on one of them.
	Oh my goodness.
	Whatever the charges against them, the denial of bail is an egregious departure from the norm and has been given no explanation.
	As Donald Best, a former detective and 15-year veteran of the Toronto Police Services, pointed out, everybody gets bail in Canada, including a suspect of the accused first-degree murder of a Toronto police officer and, somewhat ironically, the member of the Antifa guy who drove his Jeep into Freedom Convoy protest site in Winnipeg, Manitoba, injuring four people.
	We're going through the whole thing.
	No bail for the Coutts Four.
	Pre-trial hearing was on January 29th, and another isn't scheduled until July 25th, where it's believed the actual trial that will be set for some time in 2024.
	That's not this year.
	It's still 2023.
	These are political prisoners, pure and simple.
	They are being denied basic rights due to even the most violent of criminals because they are on the wrong side of the Trudeau government.
	They are being used as a fig leaf.
	The last shred of Trudeau's legitimacy for invoking the Emergencies Act and the massive overreach of freezing bank accounts and seizing assets.
	How far down?
	This goes on for quite a bit.
	Let's just do this quickly.
	As Jason Levine, an independent journalist in Western Alberta put it, there is an inverted house of cards, Trudeau, Mendicino, Rouleau, all of these people have built, and at the bottom are the Coutts Four.
	If these men are exonerated, Canadians will start demanding answers about a whole lot of other things.
	From your mouth to God's ears, McGill, I don't think you're right.
	I've come back to Canada.
	I've seen it firsthand.
	Fingers in ears.
	Just give me my nice, peaceful life and I'll be happy.
	Using protesters as captives as examples is nothing new in the long history of government.
	But places like Canada and the United States, leaders like Justin Trudeau, President Joe Biden, love to invoke freedom and transparency ad nauseum and publicly hector the leaders of other countries over their treatment of dissidents.
	Yep.
	It's a great article.
	The Coutts Four are the last of Trudeau's political enemies, whom he can punish with impunity.
	They have no power, and they have the full weight of the state against them.
	If his government can allow murderers and terrorists out on bail, he paid them off!
	Ten million bucks to a convicted...
	Yeah, bad, bad.
	Ten million dollars.
	They should extend the same to the men from Coutts and get on with the trial.
	Canada ought not be a nation where the works of Kafka and Camus play out daily.
	And Orwell.
	Don't forget Orwell.
	We don't yet know if these men are innocent or guilty of the charges against them, but it flies in the face of justice that they have not yet faced trial and have been denied bail.
	Locking people up for extended periods like this without a trial is the stuff of banana republics.
	Gordon McGill is a trucker, a writer, a commentary, and can be found at www.autonomoustruckers.substack.com.
	I'm going to give everybody the link to this.
	Please blast it around and scream it as loud as possible.
	It's like a pig here.
	Okay, now I noticed there were some more crumble rants, at least a couple here.
	Where were we?
	Ted Kennedy?
	Did you see Ian Miles?
	Sean, yeah, I got this.
	We got Shem.
	Sem, depending on Nikud usage, was a child of Noah.
	His children would be known as either...
	Oh, Shemites or Semites.
	Making Noah the last real...
	Anti-Semite.
	Well, hold on a second.
	So if we go back down here.
	Technically, I think the Chinese are defendants of the Shem.
	Well, if they're Semites, that might explain a certain genealogy that might make both Jews and Chinese susceptible to, or, I don't know, less susceptible to certain disease.
	I have no knowledge of it.
	Interesting information.
	Thank you very much for it, and I'll look it up afterwards.
	There was a way of looping the last story into the new story.
	Oh, January 6th.
	That's right.
	January 6th.
	Hold on.
	Hold on.
	What was it?
	All right.
	We're going to bring this up.
	I like Justin Hart.
	I don't want anyone thinking this is like infighting.
	I am, however, going to disagree with people, regardless when I disagree with them, when I think they're wrong for what they say.
	Now, Justin Hart, I think...
	Hold on.
	Justin Hart, let me just make sure.
	What was the...
	Justin Hart was on...
	Oh, Gone Viral.
	That's right.
	Gone Viral.
	Great book.
	There's a little not editorializing, but there was some drafting or some wording in the book, Gone Viral, that might too easily allow people to write it off as ideologically motivated.
	Some very...
	What's the word I'm looking for?
	Hyperbolic rhetoric.
	Great book.
	Definitely worth a read.
	He puts out this tweet earlier today.
	We're going to get to the punchline of this.
	Justin Hart, regarding the January 6th events.
	It was a heinous attack on the United States Capitol.
	Like all Americans, I was outraged by the violence, lawlessness, and mayhem.
	They should have immediately deployed the National Guard and federal law enforcement to secure the building and expel the intruders.
	America is and must always be a nation of law and order.
	The demonstrators who infiltrated the Capitol defiled the seat of American democracy.
	To those who engaged in the acts of violence and destruction, to those who engaged in the acts of violence and destruction, do not represent our country, and those who broke the law will pay.
	So I read this tweet from Justin, and I'm like, all right.
	Virtue signaling a little bit.
	The thing is, I didn't even say it at the time.
	I was just thinking, okay.
	I think this opinion is outdated, and why are you tweeting this now?
	Like two plus years later.
	Then I got the punchline.
	And hold on, let me see here.
	So I don't know if this is going...
	So I said, when is this from?
	And who said...
	What did I say?
	I'll see whatever I said.
	Then he says, whoops, I guess I should have posted the source right away.
	That's right.
	Okay, no, I replied after this.
	He then says, whoops, I guess I should have posted the source right away.
	Winky face, meaning...
	I don't call it a troll.
	He's trying to prove a point because people are like, that's a terrible, stupid thing to say.
	Why would you say something like that?
	He says, here, folks, this isn't my quote, nor does it represent my views on January 6th.
	That's taken from Trump himself.
	...who infiltrated the Capitol.
	I'd like to begin by addressing the heinous attack on the United States Capitol.
	Like all Americans, I am outraged by the violence, lawlessness, and mayhem.
	I immediately deployed the National Guard and federal law enforcement to secure the building and expel the intruders.
	America is and must always be a nation of law and order.
	The demonstrators who infiltrated the Capitol have defiled the seat of American democracy.
	To those who engaged in the acts of violence and destruction, you do not represent our country.
	And to those who broke the law, You will pay.
	I'd like to begin by addressing the heinous attack on the United States Capitol.
	All right, so whoop-dee-doo, the point, I guess, was to get people enraged at a very stupid tweet.
	So he could then say, I didn't say it, Trump said it, so if you think it's a stupid tweet and all the criticism you just levied against me, oh, look at that, you actually should harbor it against Trump.
	Here's the problem.
	So I said, when did he say that?
	And lo and behold, let me just get to Real Donald Trump's account.
	If I can find it.
	What the heck is going on here?
	Why can't...
	Oh, here he is.
	At Real Donald Trump.
	When did he say that?
	It's an amazing thing.
	Oh.
	Anybody want to take a guess when he said it?
	The day of?
	The day after?
	Here.
	Looky, looky.
	Look at this.
	It's an amazing thing.
	Donald Trump.
	Here it is.
	Boom shakalaka.
	Oh yeah, he did say it.
	It's on his account.
	I immediately deployed the National Guard and federal law enforcement to secure the building and expel the intruders.
	It's from January 7, 2021.
	It's an amazing thing.
	It's almost like if you say something that might have been contextually appropriate or justified at the time based on the information of the time, but new information has since come out, which would make it...
	No longer as tenable now as it might have been then.
	It's almost like that might be the case, where after two years, we have seen how the January 6th insurrection was actually probably something more along the lines of a fedsurrection, where you had the Proud Boys infiltrated by intelligence.
	You had the Oath Keepers infiltrated by intelligence who were orchestrating or promoting seditious conspiracy.
	Where you have that little thing about Ray Epps, which was known a little more, this guy running around, dancing around the night before saying, we've got to storm the Capitol, where we now have seen how they have weaponized January 6th.
	It's almost like what that statement said was a reasonable thing to say the day after, but might not be quite as reasonable to say now, now that we know how they have weaponized January 6th, and now that we know how it might have actually been allowed to occur.
	I'll get this blind here.
	So, you know, I know, I understand the point, and I understand also that Justin Hart politically is now aligned with DeSantis and I, I think.
	But that doesn't prove the point that you think it proves by showing something which a lot of people were saying at the time, because at the time it did look like it was a protest that got out of hand, people were smashing windows, punching cops, pepper spraying cops, and anybody who does that, you know, in theory, and, you know, In any sane system of justice should get punished.
	They shouldn't get punished harsher than they deserve.
	And people who did not partake in violence should not get punished as though they did.
	But it's almost like that was a reasonable statement to make the day after.
	But it would be less of a reasonable statement to make now.
	Maybe.
	Just a thought.
	Get out of there.
	I don't want to see that anymore.
	Okay.
	Hold on a second.
	This is going to drive me crazy.
	Oh!
	Oh, that's it.
	No, that's not.
	There we go.
	Yeah.
	That might be better.
	Okay.
	I thought I just tripped on a dog.
	So that's it.
	Look, hold on.
	I think we're almost at the end here, but we've got a couple of good stories.
	Oh, yes, we do.
	Yes, we do.
	Yes, we do.
	RFK Jr.
	This is the video.
	Oh, no, everybody here.
	Go share it.
	Share this video around.
	What RFK Jr. actually said.
	Got one more great story.
	Great story.
	It's a terrible story.
	We're going to cover it before we head over to Rumble.
	That's the link for RFK.
	And everybody, this is the link for vivabarnslaw.locals.com.
	Come on over for the after party.
	Let me see how many people we've got there now.
	I can't see anything there.
	Yeah, I'll talk about the cab.
	The cabin's beautiful.
	What's going on here?
	I can't see anything.
	Okay.
	That lighting now is going to drive me crazy.
	I don't know which direction the sun sets.
	Where is the light even coming from?
	It's coming from there.
	One more story.
	It's not funny.
	It's just people do not learn from their mistakes and propagandists are going to propagandize.
	It's another campaign.
	It's almost as orchestrated.
	It's almost as well-timed as the attack on RFK Jr.
	Let me get the tweet here.
	Oh, and we're going to...
	The Donald Trump.
	We'll finish up with Donald Trump.
	Looks like he's going to be indicted again.
	We'll get there before we go over to Rumble.
	Before we go over to locals.
	Okay.
	Here.
	I've got to get to the stream.
	Got to open up the window.
	Forgive the lighting.
	Can't do anything about it right now.
	Here we go.
	Hillary Clinton ordered to push children into the river.
	My God.
	If I may have two observations here, Hillary.
	I don't think you believe in God.
	And second of all, if something sounds too atrocious to be conceivable in any realm of the universe, it might very well be.
	Beto O 'Rourke, I don't think I have Beto O 'Rourke's tweet on this, also tweets out the same thing.
	I don't think these idiots read the article.
	This is now about how...
	Governor Abbott has apparently taken to putting up makeshift barricades, blockades, razor wire to prevent people from illegally crossing the border from Mexico into Texas.
	And allegedly, I mean, Hillary Clinton says, authorities are being told to push women and children back into the river.
	I don't think these idiots even read the article.
	This immediately strikes smacks of that other story when allegedly, Border agents on horses were whipping migrants, which turned out to be bullshit.
	This is from the article.
	They're citing someone quoting in an email.
	It says, In another instance, on June 25, troopers came across a group of 120 people camped out along a fence set up along the river.
	The group included several small children and babies who were nursing.
	The trooper wrote, The entire group was exhausted, hungry and tired, the trooper wrote.
	The shift officer in command ordered the troopers to, quote, push the people back into the water to go to Mexico, end quote, the email says.
	Appreciate that this is probably third party or second party hearsay.
	This is the guy in an email that's being reported on saying his impression of what somebody else told him to do at the time.
	And then Hillary Clinton comes out with a one-liner.
	In a tweet where people are probably never even going to read the article, ordered to push children into the river.
	My God.
	And for those of you who have a short memory, I don't think anyone on this channel does, remember this?
	Remember they said border agents were on a horse whipping migrants?
	Federal investigators said no migrant was struck with a whip.
	Forced to return to Mexico.
	Or denied entry into the U.S. during the approximately 15 minutes that they were forcibly blocked and moved by mounted agents.
	If I'm making a prediction, and it's only because past is prologue, we're going to find out that that story is a load of crap.
	Hillary Clinton continues to be a pathological liar, as does Beto O 'Rourke.
	And by the time the truth sees the light of day, the lie has made its way across the world, the earth.
	Okay.
	Alright, I think that's it.
	Oh, then we have the article here.
	You can go read the article.
	It's someone describing what they...
	An email of someone describing what they say the experience was like someone said to them when they were...
	We'll see.
	If it turns out to be true, it's disgusting.
	If it turns out to be false, guess what?
	It's disgusting as well.
	I won't say more disgusting because you can't qualify certain things.
	Okay, and now, last one of the day, Trump.
	Real quick, like, there's no real news here.
	We knew it was coming.
	Some people were under the impression that, you know, the indictment out of New York was going to be the one and only.
	Just, you know, get one frivolous indictment so they can say, twice impeached, twice acquitted, now federally indicted.
	My theory at the time, that was the floodgates.
	That wasn't going to be the first and only.
	That was going to be the first of many.
	They're going to indict him in New York?
	They did.
	They're going to indict him on those stupid bullshit charges of classified documents?
	They did.
	Now they're going to indict him in Georgia?
	They're going to indict him on insurrection.
	Oh, you think Trump might, his opinion on the insurrection might have evolved or been attenuated somewhat over the last two years?
	Justin Hart, you're not proving the point that you think you're proving.
	But thank you for highlighting the fact that It's a political witch hunt, and it continues now.
	I'll talk about it more on Sunday with Robert also, because I imagine more news will have come up by then, if the news hasn't already come out since the time we started the stream.
	Trump says he's received a target letter, I don't exactly know what that is, from Special Counsel Jack Smith's January 6th investigators.
	It's the clearest sign yet that Trump may soon face his third criminal indictment, this time for his efforts to subvert the 2020 election results.
	Guess what?
	There's going to be a fourth one after that.
	It's going to be Georgia.
	Trump said he expects to be indicted.
	Trump said Tuesday he expects to be indicted by special counsel Jack Smith's grand jury, citing a, quote, target letter he received from investigators on Sunday.
	Such a letter, quote, almost always means an arrest and indictment.
	Trump, who has already been criminally indicted twice in recent months, wrote on Truth Social.
	Trump said the letter, which is prosecutor's typical precursor to a charging decision, offered him a chance to speak to the grand jury.
	Oh, that's what the, what do they call it?
	A target letter.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	Where was I?
	I lost it.
	Which meets the federal court later this week.
	Targets of criminal investigators rarely speak to grand juries, and Trump has not exercised that right in the two other criminal cases in which he's been charged.
	The letter is the clear sign yet he seeks to indict him.
	Surprise.
	While the specific crimes that Trump may be charged with are not clear.
	No shit, Sherlock.
	Smith's team has been eyeing potential obstruction charges related to Trump's actions in the days leading up to January 6th in the day itself, including pressuring his vice president, Mike Pence, to unilaterally block certification of Joe Biden's electoral victory.
	In case anybody hasn't seen the Pence card analysis on vivabarneslaw.locals.com, go watch it.
	Barnes gives a magnificent, glorious breakdown that only someone with a brain like Barnes, a history of understanding like Barnes, and legal expertise like Barnes can give.
	The Pence card is not something as extraordinary and certainly not unlawful like they're portraying it right now.
	But from a political party that vigorously wants to seize and retain power at all costs, even if it means raining over the ashes of the forest they burnt, everything becomes criminal.
	Protest becomes criminal.
	Speech becomes criminal.
	Legal theories become criminal.
	Legal representation becomes criminal.
	Investigators have also examined Trump's consideration of a plan to seize voting machines from the states, his campaign of false claims that the election was stolen, and his role in advancing a plan to assemble a bogus slate of presidential electors to stoke a conflict.
	Everyone, they're going to come after Trump.
	They're going to go after his lawyers.
	They've already gone after his lawyers in any event for ethics breaches.
	It's unclear whether other figures associated with Trump's efforts are also in Smith's sights.
	They all are.
	It's communism.
	Everybody.
	Party over country.
	Power over truth.
	Investigators have introduced dozens of prominent figures in Trump's orbit.
	Trump revealed the target letter as he prepares to fight another front to delay a criminal trial.
	We also talked about that.
	The criminal trial for the obstruction charges or the classified documents.
	Trump is facing an extraordinary array of criminal charges and investigations.
	Yeah, it's almost like it's a bloody banana republic.
	It's almost like it's a banana republic.
	No, it's not.
	It can't be them.
	It's Trump.
	He's the most criminal president America has ever seen.
	In addition to...
	We all know about this.
	Okay.
	All right.
	The panel...
	I hear some screaming outside.
	Anyways, we're going to...
	So that's it.
	It looks like Trump's going to be indicted on...
	He's indicted in New York.
	On what is nothing more than an accounting issue.
	Indicted in DC on the classified documents issue.
	Going to be indicted on this.
	Going to be indicted in Georgia.
	They're making a mockery of the legal system.
	They are turning America into a banana republic.
	Not on par with Russia.
	That arguably exceeds what...
	The same people criticize as being Russian autocracy, Russian weaponized judicial system, Russian tyranny.
	That's it.
	That's our show for today, people.
	Until we go over to locals.
	So with that said, I'm going to play us out with a little video that I just posted.
	Many of you, or some of you might not know, I've got another channel on YouTube called Viva Family, but the Rumble equivalent is Viva Random.
	And I posted, if I dare say it's a good video, of my wife and I going to Morikami Gardens in Florida.
	So it's a bit of a zen moment.
	My content.
	I'll play two minutes just as we...
	I'm going to play the best two minutes.
	I saw an armadillo.
	And we're going to play out with that.
	Come on over to Rumble.
	Sorry, I hear some noise in the background.
	Come on over to Rumble.
	And we're going to have a little after party.
	And then I'm going to go exercise.
	Because...
	Exercise.
	It's a wasted day.
	Thank you all for being here, people.
	Let me see.
	Where's the armadillo?
	The armadillo is here.
	Check this out.
	If you've never seen an armadillo, they're absolutely beautiful creatures, but you cannot or should not touch them because they do carry a virus that causes leprosy.
	So playing it out, I'll give you the link to this as well so you can all go watch and subscribe to Viva Random.
	Thank you all for being here.
	I'll probably go live tomorrow.
	I've set up the studio here, so I don't have to set it up a second time.
	Let's play us out watching this and come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com for the after party.
	If you want to get some merch, go to vivafry.com.
	Everybody needs a shirt, you know, unless you walk around.
	Everybody needs a shirt unless you're Dylan Mulvaney flashing your nipples at an LGBTQIA plus gala.
	Thank you all for being here.
	Thank you for being part of the community.
	Come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com right now, but enjoy if you're not coming.
	I think it's the most beautiful animal that I've seen in a while.
	Armadillo.
	That's an armadillo.
	That's an armadillo right there.
	That's an armadillo.
	There's an armadillo right there.
	Oh.
	My.
	God, intelligent design created this animal.
	Look at this thing.
	Look at this thing.
	It's got the head of a pig, a reticulated shell.
	It's looking for stuff.
	Oh my goodness.
	I don't know if these things are aggressive.
	Someone told me that they carry the bacteria that causes leprosy.
	Does that make sense?
	Oh my.
	Should I touch it?
	He's really getting in there.
	He's getting in there.
	Oh, he's made all these little holes.
	All of these little holes in the grass.
	There, there, there.
	Oh, this has been magical.
	You got an armadillo and an iguana in one scene.
	Armadillo, iguana.
	Amazing.
	If you want to watch the rest of our visit to the Morikami Garden.
	You've got to go to VivaRandom at the link I sent.
	Okay, ending on Rumble, everybody.
	Thank you very much for being here.
	See you all on Locals in about five seconds.
	Five, four, three, two, one.
	Now.
	All right, replays being processed.
	Locals!
	How's it going?
	Let me see.
	I hear screaming outside.

▲