Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 28, 2023 - Viva & Barnes

01:39:19

Joe Biden's Corrupt Pivot; Pedro Gonzalez "Smear"? Canadian Court Death Sentence AND MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Why is that?
	than in other documents.
	Tell us, Anthony.
	It's because these documents were signed at the beginning of a pandemic when everybody was desperate for vaccines, when companies were being told to rush vaccine production, do testing in an unprecedented way in a way they normally don't do it.
	So these companies were exposed to way higher liability, putting their products on the market than they normally would because they didn't do the type of testing that normally takes these drugs years to come to market.
	They did it all in less than a year.
	That's amazing.
	So that's why these companies said, if I'm going to deliver you this product that I haven't tested in my normal way, I want to have different conditions.
	And with countries around the world competing with each other to get these, the countries had less leverage than they normally do.
	For example, if we were entering into flu vaccine contracts or monkeypox contracts or other things that were normally available, this would be a different issue.
	But these are already signed.
	They were signed at a time.
	The government didn't have that leverage in negotiations.
	We just wanted to sign as many vaccine contracts with as many producers as possible because Canadians were desperate for vaccines.
	And in the end, it worked out.
	We got vaccines and we were one of the countries that got the vaccine the fastest.
	I'm going to start this off periodically just so that the world can hear that clip.
	That's Anthony Howe's father.
	He's a member of the Liberal Party for Procurements or some, I don't know, ministry.
	I don't know what his title is.
	I don't really care.
	We can look it up afterwards.
	That's Anthony Housefather, member of Canadian Parliament, explaining eloquently, thoughtfully, in meticulous detail, what the Canadian government did to Canadian citizens and what governments across the world did to their citizens.
	The funny thing about this clip, I've commented on this clip and I've tweeted it out multiple times.
	And I still, for some reason, can't easily seem to find my tweets with this clip in it.
	I wanted to play it once intact, or at least that minute and a half section intact, originally retweeted by True North.
	Everybody has to understand what the hell Anthony Housefather just said right there.
	This is the equivalent of Time Magazine.
	Explaining how they didn't rig the election, they fortified it.
	How they didn't subvert democracy, they preserved it.
	It wasn't election fraud.
	It was a secret cabal of well-funded individuals working across platforms to control the flow of information, change the rules and laws.
	What Time magazine described in its article as election fortification is exactly what most people would consider election rigging.
	What Anthony Housefather has just testified to here is nothing short of explaining how the people were experimented on and how these pharma companies knew the inherent risks of bringing their product to market in the absence of proper production, manufacturing.
	We've seen recall after recall in the absence of proper testing.
	And they said, well, we were so desperate for this vaccine because we had whipped up.
	A population into a frenzy over two-plus years to let them think the only way out of this is with a vaccine.
	Give us anything to shut them up because we've whipped them up into such a frenzy.
	Well, we can't give this to them because we haven't tested it properly.
	We don't really have, I don't know, oversight for production.
	We're not doing it unless you immunize us.
	And that is somehow supposed to explain away as opposed to incriminate the government.
	Let's listen to this one more time.
	And I'm going to snip this, I'm going to clip this, so that everybody can understand exactly what the government knowingly did to the people.
	These agreements require employees of the government and candidates that access these documents to sign confidentiality agreements.
	He's talking about confidentiality agreements signed between government and government employees, so that they would not disclose to the public what they were seeing in the documentation that they would be consulting in the day-to-day of their government employment.
	And why is that?
	Why is that, Anthony?
	Why is there much more redactions, as my colleague said?
	Because when they asked for this documentation under, like, the Canadian equivalent of a FOIA request, it was highly redacted.
	Why is it redacted, Anthony?
	Well, I'll tell you why.
	It's because...
	In these documents and in other documents, it's because these documents were signed at the beginning of a pandemic.
	That's not an explanation for why they were redacted.
	That's just a context.
	But keep going.
	Keep digging your hole, Anthony.
	When everybody was desperate for vaccines.
	Everyone was desperate.
	When companies were being told to rush vaccine production.
	Rush vaccine production.
	Google COVID-19 vaccine recalls.
	AstraZeneca had one.
	I think, I don't want to make a mistake as to which, recalled millions and millions of doses of vaccines.
	Why?
	Because the manufacturing was rushed.
	Not my words.
	Anthony Housefather's words.
	Production was rushed.
	Do testing in an unprecedented way.
	Unprecedented way, meaning not normal testing.
	Hey, oh yeah, no, no, they're not experimental because we've done two years of testing.
	There is no way to rush 10 years of safety data.
	There's no way to rush it.
	Unless you're an idiot and you think there's a way to rush 10 years of safety data.
	In a way they normally don't do it.
	So these companies were exposed to way higher liability, putting their products on the market than they normally would.
	Can you believe?
	Because they didn't do the type of...
	Well, they did years of safety testing in a year.
	Do you understand what he just admitted here?
	They would not bring their products to market because of increased liability due to rushing of every aspect of the development.
	This is a member of Canadian government.
	So, that's why these companies said, if I'm going to deliver you this product that I haven't tested in my normal way...
	Oh no, what did I just do?
	I.e.
	haven't tested.
	These agreements.
	Haven't tested in my normal way.
	Because they didn't do the type of testing that normally takes these drugs years to come to market.
	They did it all in less than a year.
	They did years of testing in a year.
	It's amazing.
	It's amazing.
	No questions.
	So that's why these companies said, if I'm going to deliver you this product that I haven't tested in my normal way.
	In my normal way, meaning the way that has always been traditionally acceptable for vaccines for any medication.
	I want to have different conditions.
	Different conditions.
	Immunity from liability.
	If I'm going to sell you shit, I don't want to be sued when people get sick from my shit that I sold you because I rushed every aspect of this.
	Because you whipped up the population into a frenzy where they were convinced the only thing that was going to get them out of this was a product even if it was improperly tested shit.
	And with companies, all countries around the world competing with each other to get these.
	The countries had less leverage than they normally do, for example, if we were entering into flu vaccine contracts or monkeypox contracts.
	Less leverage.
	Do you know what that is another synonym for?
	Getting exploited.
	Well, I don't have leverage, so I have to accept a shitty bargain because I don't have leverage to negotiate a stronger agreement with you.
	That is this guy right now, Anthony Housefather, saying the government didn't have the leverage.
	To negotiate a good contract for their citizens.
	So what did they do?
	They gave a good goddamn contract to the pharma companies.
	Or other things that were normally available.
	This would be a different issue.
	But these are already signed.
	They were signed at a time the government didn't have that leverage in negotiations.
	We just wanted to sign as many vaccines.
	We just wanted to sign anything.
	Contracts with as many producers as possible.
	Immunizing.
	We just wanted to sign anything.
	Stick it in your arms.
	Roll up your sleeves.
	Because Canadians were desperate for vaccines.
	And in the end, it worked out.
	We got vaccines.
	And we were one of the countries who got the vaccine.
	In the end, it worked out.
	We got something.
	It's criminal, in my humble opinion.
	Nothing shy of it.
	Oh, I wanted to show you something about that tweet.
	So that tweet was in response to somebody criticizing me for saying, Viva, you referred to the jab as an experimental...
	Gene therapy that had not been properly tested.
	And I replied with, yeah.
	Because the NIH on its website refers to it as an experimental vaccine.
	Because Anthony Housefather, Canadian member of parliament, admitted it wasn't properly tested.
	Gene vaccine?
	Gene therapy?
	All right, we'll debate on that.
	Because the fact checks on whether or not the COVID jab is gene therapy say it's not gene therapy because it wasn't designed to modify your genes.
	Didn't say it didn't.
	And I don't really know.
	It didn't say it didn't modify whatever, you know, do whatever it is that gene therapies do.
	It said it's not gene therapy because it wasn't designed to do it.
	Semantics are very important, especially when you're coming from the wordsmiths of the devil fact-checkers.
	I bet you're all wishing that I'd started with a Justin Trudeau clip, eh?
	I should have made sure that we were currently live on all platforms before going that heavily into the intro rant.
	We're live everywhere.
	Good.
	We are on...
	YouTube, we're on Rumble.
	We're on vivabarneslaw.locals.com, and the way everybody should understand this works, if you're new to the channel, welcome.
	I have exclusivity with Rumble, and so what I do is I stay on YouTube and Rumble for a bit, go over to Rumble exclusively with Locals, and then we actually end on Rumbles, and we have a Locals afterparty where I take some of the tips, take some questions in Locals, and we have our wonderful above-average community.
	So that's the order of things.
	For everybody who's wondering, Standard disclaimers, no medical advice, no election fornication advice, no legal advice.
	I don't give election, I don't give any of this advice.
	I lay out what I think is facts, and if I'm wrong, I expect people to say, Viva, you made a mistake here, and Viva being Viva, I'm talking to myself in the third person.
	Me being who I am, I'm more interested in understanding right than being right.
	I will correct myself if ever I make a mistake.
	Informed consent.
	Nothing more to be said.
	Seize the day.
	Good to see you here.
	All right, standard disclaimers.
	No medical advice, no election fortification advice, no legal advice.
	Those wonderful things that you see, those highlighted super chats, YouTube takes 30% of those.
	So for that, a $5, a $10 chat, YouTube takes $3 out of.
	Rumble has these things called Rumble France.
	Rumble ordinarily takes 20%, but for the rest of 2023 is taking 0%, so 100% goes to the creator.
	Afterwards, they'll go back to taking a 20%, but better for the creator, better to support a platform that actually supports free speech.
	You can go to locals, vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	We have a massive, wild, wonderful, above-average community.
	You can support for $7 a month, $70 a year, if you so choose.
	Some people actually choose to support for more than that.
	Not everybody supports.
	We have a massive membership, which is a non-supporting...
	Community of 107,000.
	There's a lot of stuff out there for everybody.
	And then there is some stuff behind a paywall for those who choose to support the channel.
	So there's that.
	VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
	You can go to VivaFry.com and get some merch.
	Okay.
	Let me vent a little bit.
	First of all, everybody in the chat right now.
	Is it better like this?
	Lighting.
	Pay attention.
	Hold on.
	Or like this?
	Let the contrast settle a little bit.
	Better before or better now?
	One for now, two for before.
	Which one's better?
	This is one, two, is this.
	Which one is better?
	One or two?
	Yellow light before.
	The first, first, okay, good.
	Yeah, the headlight coming down from these.
	Flipping.
	What are they called?
	Pod lights?
	They really highlight my nose and forehead.
	All right.
	We'll wait for the jokes later.
	Oh, no.
	It looks evenly split between one and two.
	You know what?
	It doesn't matter.
	If it's not clear-cut, we'll leave it like this.
	It looks a little more natural.
	Okay.
	So we got some stuff to talk about today.
	Hunter Biden.
	Corruption.
	In your face, they don't care.
	It's actually...
	It's a mark of their superiority.
	The degree to which they can knowingly, brazenly rub their corruption in your face.
	The Hunter Biden sweetheart deal.
	You know, like, my grandmother, once upon a time, when my father got pulled over, I won't say for what, he got pulled over.
	And as the cops are giving him a hard time, my grandmother's in the back, and she's like, my son's a good boy, officers.
	Everybody thinks their son is a good child, and, you know, oftentimes they are.
	But that doesn't mean that they haven't done things that are wrong.
	Joe Biden once upon a time said, my son's done nothing wrong.
	Well, unfortunately, now that you've had to plead, even if it's a diversion agreement, you've done something wrong.
	And it's a joke.
	But now it has to go from Biden saying, my son's done nothing wrong.
	He's a good boy.
	Okay, he's done some wrong things, but he's paid his price.
	But when it comes to his business dealings, wait until you see the in-your-face, they are pissing on you and calling it rain, pivot that the government now has to do.
	That Biden has to do.
	Let me see this.
	Okay, here.
	You know, it went from, I've never discussed my son's business dealings, and now it's going to go to, I'm not in business with my son.
	We'll get there.
	Pedro Gonzalez, he was on the channel.
	We had a good sidebar.
	My opinion of Pedro for his intellectual input to the world hasn't changed.
	Breitbart came out with an expose, my goodness, and it's flipping long.
	Apparently...
	Private messages from Telegram groups and whatever were disclosed.
	And they don't make Pedro Gonzalez look very good.
	And then there's some discussion to be had about that, his response, and where this is going to go.
	But first, what we're going to do on both the Rumble and YouTube is we're going to talk about Canada.
	We're going to talk about Canada because tomorrow my guest...
	Let me just make sure that I can not screw up here.
	Hold on.
	Hold on just one second.
	Don't want to make a mistake.
	Yes, tomorrow the guest is Sheila Annette Lewis.
	Coming on at 1 o 'clock Eastern Time.
	Sheila, and I'm going to give everybody this Give, Send, Go, which is her fundraiser.
	Sheila has been denied an organ transplant because she has not complied with Alberta protocol to be COVID jabbed.
	And has therefore been taken off an organ donor list.
	Apparently, there's a gag order on the organ, on the names of the doctors, the names of the hospital, which I couldn't violate if I wanted to because I don't know them.
	The Canadian courts have basically issued this woman a death sentence.
	Now, her give-send-go is here because apparently what they're going to try to do is go to Texas to get this organ transplant, and they need to raise upwards of a million Canadians, so 600,000 US or 700,000 US.
	Apparently it's like $75,000 for the initial test to see if the compatibility will work.
	And then the process, the procedure itself is like upwards of a million bucks.
	I've donated, and I'm not saying that to toot my own horn.
	I'm doing that to say that I'm not sharing this around without having put my own financial skin in the game.
	And I'm going to do everything I can to raise awareness for this absolutely shocking injustice.
	And to raise funds so that at the end of this, so that Sheila may find life in this.
	She's coming on tomorrow at 1 o 'clock.
	We're going to talk about that article.
	In a few minutes.
	But first, into the show now, people.
	Into the show.
	I still don't get used to saying into the show.
	You remember that member of provincial parliament, Joel Harden, who lied about having been the victim of a hate crime at a protest in Ottawa that was live-streamed, basically beginning to end, and nobody saw evidence of Joel Harden getting punched in the face by the anti...
	Trans, right-wing mob.
	And then when it came out that, in fact, we saw video footage of him banging himself in the face with his own bullhorn, he then pivoted and said, no, yeah, I didn't get punched in the face.
	Someone hit my bullhorn, and then it went into my face.
	And he lied.
	City council people lied.
	I forget, Ariel Trotsky or whatever lied.
	They lied.
	They were called out in their lie.
	I did a video breakdown analysis, fleshing out the lies, the backtracking, the video evidence, his interview that he gave on some Toronto daytime show.
	Admitting that he lied and then reaffirming that he got punched in the face.
	No, it was a hit, but it hit my bullhorn and I separated two fighting women pulling each other at the hair and I got in between and I'm six foot one and I stood up and broke them apart like fighting rabid raccoons.
	He's a liar through and through.
	The evidence is out there.
	I did a video breaking it down.
	It was under manual review for monetization for two weeks only to be confirmed not suitable for advertisers.
	Well, Kareem Assad, who has, I don't know if she's become public enemy number one on the left now as well, but the right once upon a time said Kareem is a lefty, you know, don't trust her.
	The left says she's colluding, she's conspiring with the right.
	I think she's probably detested to some extent on both sides.
	I haven't found anything to criticize her about.
	Her cameraman caught up with Joel Harden and he continued to repeat the lie.
	Do you have any comment on Dina Sharif?
	Do you approve?
	Do you approve of...
	She got...
	She got...
	She was dragging some lady's hair and...
	And Dr. Nilly was right there.
	You talking about the fight that I broke up?
	You talking about that?
	I don't think so.
	You talking about the woman grabbing the other one by the hair and I got in the middle of them and this is the woman who punched the megaphone in my face?
	You talking about that?
	A megaphone in my face?
	Do you have a comment?
	There is no video footage!
	Of Joel Harden breaking up a fight between two women pulling each other by the hair.
	There is video evidence of two women fighting, pulling each other by the hair.
	I don't know who they are and I'm not going to name anybody even though I maybe know who they are.
	Doesn't matter.
	There's video evidence of Joel Harden not being present when two women were fighting, pulling each other at the hair.
	He continues to repeat the lie.
	Canadian media has said nothing.
	Absolutely nothing.
	I don't know that Yahoo ever updated their article.
	Their initial article where they repeated as fact that Joel Harden was assaulted, they then said, we're going to follow up this story.
	Never followed up as far as I know.
	Media says nothing.
	Canadian government subsidized media says nothing.
	Had it been an actual incident, you would not have heard the end of it.
	They would have legislated rules about this.
	They would have called it Harden's law.
	They would have called it the Hardin way.
	Oh.
	So that's the intro of Joel Harden.
	The only update?
	He's going to get away with it.
	This is the state of Canadian politics.
	A Canadian member of provincial parliament can get up, lie to your face.
	Other government officials, city councilmen, can repeat the lie, change their story to fit the truth as the truth comes out.
	No repercussions.
	And the government media is just that.
	Government media.
	Propagandist media.
	Who will not call out the lie, but had it been true...
	You would have had Hardin's Law outlawing protests outside or within the vicinity of schools.
	All right.
	People should not forget about that either.
	Now, so that's Joel Hardin.
	He will always be a liar, a confirmed liar.
	And the thing is, I don't even know if he's ashamed of himself.
	Like, I've said before, and I think it's kind of an insightful observation, you cannot be ashamed if you have no pride.
	Like, someone with no pride can feel no shame.
	But then if you feel no pride, you necessarily have to...
	I'm an idiot.
	Forget it.
	Doesn't matter.
	Joel Harden is a liar.
	He should be ashamed of himself.
	He should be called out day in and day out for this.
	Lying to the people.
	He blocked me on Twitter, by the way, but that much I understand.
	And the Canadian propagandist media should be ashamed of themselves for not calling Joel Harden out and giving this story the international light that it deserves.
	All right.
	Enough with Joel Harden.
	Now, the injustice of all injustices, which we're going to explore tomorrow with the actual victim of this injustice.
	Alberta Court of Appeal rejects unvaccinated women's request to get back on transplant list.
	Now, if you were on our Locals community, vivabarneslaw.locals.com, I shared the judgment on our community tab yesterday with this article.
	It's tedious to go through these decisions that review administrative procedures.
	The bottom line to take away from all of this is that a lower court judge agreed with the They said, look, it's not a government entity.
	They're not abiding by government protocol or dictates.
	So somehow the charter doesn't apply.
	I may or may not have a disagreement with that, but whatever.
	You know, the doctors are experts.
	They make up their own criteria.
	You know, I suspect if I should steel man this in the same way, they might not put on...
	For a lung transplant, someone who's still a chronic smoker because, you know, it would waste the lung in theory.
	I don't even know if that's true, but in the same way, I suspect they might say, well, chronic alcoholic not getting any treatment, we're not going to give him another liver.
	He's just going to kill that liver too, so you're not eligible.
	Chronic smoker, harder, you know, I can imagine.
	They're now saying, well, we've decided that being jabbed against the Rona with this jab is a requirement for organ transplants and the courts.
	Have basically said, it's not a charter violation because it's not a government protocol and we're not in a position to second-guess the experts.
	This is from November 8, 2022.
	This is the original appeals decision affirming the lower court's decision and the Supreme Court in signing Sheila's death sentence.
	And I'm saying that hyperbolically because God willing, touch wood, we'll be able to raise the funds.
	She'll be able to get the procedure that she needs in the States.
	I don't want to reveal any more information that I'm not sure I'm allowed to reveal.
	This is the article from back in November 2022.
	Alberta Appeal Court rejects unvaccinated women's request to get back on transplant list.
	The decision upholds a lower court's fine list.
	Imagine, at least they're reporting on it.
	They should be, okay.
	A terminally ill woman's bid to be re-added to a transplant list she was removed from for refusing a COVID-19 vaccine has been rejected by Alberta's highest court.
	You've got the Queen's bench or the King's bench now, but some provinces have the Supreme Court, but that's the lower level.
	Then you've got your Court of Appeals, and then you have your Supreme Court of Canada.
	Alberta transplant doctors have made getting the vaccine mandatory for eligibility, but Annette Lewis refuses to be immunized from COVID-19.
	She refuses.
	There is a court-ordered publication ban that covers the organ Lewis is seeking for a transplant for, the names of the doctors, and the hospital's name and location.
	You won't catch me breaking that ban, which is why I'm pulling stuff from public articles.
	This is one of those cases where I could understand, but I still don't agree with the publication ban.
	This level of inhumane injustice is enough to push good people to do bad things.
	When you understand that we're living in a society where doctors, there's not even a vaccine mandate in the province anymore.
	Knowing that we can have capricious, unscientific...
	Politicized decisions coming from the people who we're supposed to trust with our lives.
	And they could say, get the jab if you want an organ or we're going to let you die.
	They know this.
	She's got whatever degenerative disease.
	She will die without the organ transplant.
	She will die.
	And they are saying, we're going to let you die because you will not abide by what we're saying.
	You will not bend the knee.
	I don't know.
	You will not do as we say.
	We will let you die.
	The lower court said, who are we to intervene?
	The Court of Appeals said, who are we to intervene?
	And the Supreme Court said, we're not intervening.
	Earlier this year, the Court of Kingsbence, Joel Belzel, found that the charter has no application when it comes to COVID-19 requirements.
	Oh.
	In October, Lewis took her case to the Court of Appeals of Alberta.
	Her lawyer argued the appellate court step in, arguing the vaccine requirement was causing Lewis's death by removing the chance for a transplant and the possibility that it would save her life.
	Lawyers for Alberta Health Services.
	This is the same Alberta Health Services that visited Arthur Pobloski's church.
	They've been called other names other than AHS.
	And the doctors argue that the decision has been made by a clinical team that must make determinations about who is most in need, as well as who has the best prospect of survival, citing the nearly 40% death rate of transplant patients who contracted COVID before the vaccines were available.
	Well, that sounds like a wildly outdated statistic.
	And by the way, kicker to all of this, Sheila has natural antibodies indicating a prior infection or at least natural immunity.
	Kicker.
	Doctors.
	The Court of Appeal, the Appeal Court upheld Belzile's original finding, noting that medical decisions about scarce resources, such as organ donors, are difficult but must be made.
	In this case, the Charter does not apply, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, does not apply to the respondents' exercise of clinical judgments in formulating preconditions to organ transplant, including requiring vaccination and COVID-19.
	against COVID-19 in the wake of the pandemic, the appeal judges found.
	Despite deciding that the charter does not apply, in this case, the court decided, for the sake of arguments, to also provide an opinion on what would happen if the charter did apply and found that none of her arguments would prevail.
	It doesn't apply, but even if it did, it wouldn't change anything.
	Go home and die.
	Or, or, just take the shot.
	Just say I love Big Brother.
	Just say that 2 plus 2 equals 5. I lost something here.
	Lewis had asserted that being denied a place on the transplant list, her rights to life, liberty, and security were being violated, as was her freedom of conscience.
	The court denied on all those grounds, noting its rejection of the right to life argument, that while patients have the right to make decisions such as declining a vaccine, but that decision can result in serious risks or consequences.
	You have the freedom to choose to die.
	It is one thing to assert that the state is unlawfully prohibiting one from accessing life-saving treatment.
	It is quite another for Ms. Lewis to selectively choose which treatment criteria she will comply with.
	Oh, really?
	Lewis also argued that she was being discriminated against and urged the court to find that medical status should be protected.
	The court declined to do so, finding that what Lewis was actually arguing for was a finding of discrimination on the basis of COVID-19 vaccination status.
	Ms. Lewis' COVID-19 vaccination status is not who she is, the decision reads.
	It is not an immutable characteristic, nor is it one that is changeable only at unacceptable cost of personal dignity.
	Oh, really?
	Her choice not to get vaccinated against COVID-19 is just that.
	That's our Canadian judicial system, people.
	Publication ban.
	Because they...
	Understand what that publication ban also tacitly admits.
	It tacitly admits that the decision is so fundamentally unjust, so shocking to the conscience, that the people making it are not willing to publicly stand by it.
	That the court acknowledges that so many people would be outraged by this fundamentally disgusting, unscientific, shocking decision that...
	Harassment might ensue for those who are behind this decision-making process.
	The gag order, although protective in nature, is quite clearly protecting against what most people feel to be an egregious injustice.
	And that's that.
	So that's where it stands.
	Supreme Court, let me just see if I, I think I pulled that article up here.
	Supreme Court won't hear the Alberta case.
	This is more recent.
	This is June 9th.
	Annette Lewis, Argues that the charter rights were violated by the policy.
	Supreme Court of Canada will not hear the appeal of an Alberta woman who was unwilling to get vaccinated in order to get a life-saving organ transplant.
	Can you imagine?
	They'll put you to death, but they will not save your life unless you get vaccinated.
	Okay, we got she was diagnosed with a terminal disease in 2018.
	Shoulders who would not survive unless she received an organ transplant.
	2020, she was placed on the list.
	Okay, this is all just...
	Summarize.
	A summary.
	Lewis recently filed a separate legal action against the AHS, an Alberta hospital, and transplant doctors.
	There's a publication ban on the doctor's identities, the organ involved, and the location of the hospital.
	The transplant program.
	Lewis is arguing negligence in the decision to remove her from the high-priority transplant list, saying it amounts to medical malpractice.
	The Justice Center for Constitutional Freedom, JCCF, had them on.
	Awesome people.
	Said Lewis will ask the court at an upcoming injunction hearing to grant an immediate reinstatement of the transplant list pending the...
	I mean, the funny thing is...
	Who the hell would even want these doctors operating on you at the end of the day?
	Okay, we'll do it.
	Imagine compelling these doctors who were ready to let you die perform life-saving surgery on you.
	It might be even past the point of any potential trust to begin with.
	Sheila's coming on tomorrow at 1 o 'clock.
	Did I share the give-send?
	Did I say go fund me before?
	I hope I didn't.
	Go F me.
	Here's her give-send go.
	It's a wild number.
	It's a wild number that she has to raise.
	Okay.
	It's a wild number.
	So share it away if you can afford to give it.
	And this is an amazing thing.
	The government is supposed to do this.
	Sheila has paid into a healthcare system that is supposed to do this.
	Now she's got to rely on the kindness of strangers.
	To save her life.
	Okay.
	That's it.
	That's enough.
	I tell you, I don't cry out of sadness.
	I cry out of frustration when I do.
	Sometimes out of sadness.
	All right.
	Let's mosey on over to the Rumble side.
	Because we're moving on up.
	Oh, hold on.
	I'm going to share the link and I'm just going to see if we have any Rumble rants to read on both platforms before I go over.
	Oh, we got...
	Okay.
	By the way, to my one subscriber on Twitter...
	I set up the subscription, and it was intended to be not something of a joke, like a ridiculous subscription.
	It was just a joke to say, like, come support us at vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	I got one subscriber.
	If you subscribe by accident, I will not be insulted if you unsubscribe.
	All right.
	Let me just read some of these.
	Crumble.
	Sorry.
	I just got my own voice behind them.
	That was confusing.
	All right.
	Let's read some of these.
	Crumble.
	Jesus.
	Okay, here we go, people.
	Starting from the proper bottom-up.
	Ginger Ninja, 1776.
	I watched A Soldier's Journey Home.
	I didn't cry during it.
	Partly because the main character, the soldier, was so damn...
	He did not feel bad for himself.
	That was what...
	I mean, it was like...
	He did not pull or attempt to pull on heartstrings.
	The dude has a spirit that is inspiring.
	Everybody...
	Ginger Ninja, if you remember the name, I forget the name of the exact episode.
	A soldier's journey home.
	They built a house for this wounded veteran in two weeks during COVID.
	Beautiful, inspirational.
	I also supported their work as well.
	Ginger Ninja, 1776.
	It's maddening.
	U.S. non-confrontational folk getting railroaded and bludgeoned for refusing to wear masks and refuse the shot.
	I wasn't allowed.
	At Thanksgiving, fired from my job, one of two, and I'll get to the second one.
	There's two of two, but now they get to live in peace.
	Why should, why they should be publicly, oh, when they should be publicly berated in the same way I was publicly berated.
	But here we are, the nicer guys who are letting them get away with their actions.
	Cod tongues.
	I've never had it.
	I heard they're delicious.
	Hey, Viva, do you allow for a little self-promotion here?
	If yes, a peek at my election fraud picture book.
	Not only, look, I can't control super chats.
	And it has proven to be probably among the most effective marketing tactics of all time.
	Heart Tackle?
	For 10 bucks, you get 5,000 people to see it right now.
	I mean, how amazing is that?
	So, absolutely not.
	Put the link in there.
	I don't know anything about your book.
	I would call it Election Fornification Picture Book.
	What do I know?
	Cod Tongues?
	Go check it out, people.
	The link is there.
	Cod Tongues says, if no, just say the word and I will cease and desist.
	Now, hey.
	I'm not going to read a wildly offensive, insulting Super Chat or Rumble Rants unless I read it by accident before knowing what it says.
	But dude, Super Chats and Rumble Rants, they're a great, cheap way for self-promoting.
	How many people do we have watching now?
	We have 4,700 here and we've got 5,500 people, eyeballs on your product for 10 bucks.
	It's a great way to do it.
	All right.
	We got to that one.
	Sheskos says Putin is losing war in Iraq as per Biden.
	Good to know, right?
	Sheskos says my understanding new protocol in Canada now organs donated unless you officially declare you don't want to donate, which is the reverse of previous.
	This is here now or in the works of being here.
	Sheskos, I talked about that the other day.
	It's two provinces right now, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia that have a presumption of...
	A tissue donation unless you opt out.
	The law just came into effect in Nova Scotia.
	Which one?
	It was Nova Scotia or New Brunswick.
	It was called the Avery's Law.
	Named after a 16-year-old kid or a young kid who died in a car accident.
	The parents wanted to donate his organs, but they didn't have the system in place to do it.
	How this law presuming organ donation responds to that problem?
	Anybody's guess?
	It's a disgusting...
	I sign my organ donor card.
	I support organ donation.
	presumption of donation is wildly shocking and will lend itself to wild abuses.
	And they're not even that hard to see because if you read the law, the person not only can't be dead because from what I understand, you can't really be dead to donate organs because the body produces chemicals in death that make the organ not lacking oxygen, whatever.
	A coroner can decide you're close enough to death and make the decision to harvest your tissues, your organs.
	Homeless people, Elderly people with no family fighting for them in the ER?
	Black markets?
	Or, you know, demand?
	You're close enough to death.
	Mistakes?
	It's so rife with potential abuse, it's inhumane.
	And, I mean, set aside religious objections, it might be selfish for someone to not want to donate their organs in death.
	Okay.
	Presumption of it?
	It's, I mean, it's obscene.
	It's obscene, especially since the law says the coroner.
	Can determine that you're close enough to death to harvest your organs.
	They won't ask if you're unvaccinated when they come to harvest your organs, by the way.
	Guarantee you that.
	All right, so that's that.
	Let's move over to Rumble right now, and we're going to get on to the other good stuff.
	And just so you know, I'm not going to lambaste, or even though some people might want me to, I'm not going to, what's the word?
	Street?
	Gonzalez?
	Dallas?
	Gonzalez?
	I actually would like to have him back on the channel.
	I'd like to talk about it because, you know, we'll get to it.
	We'll get to it.
	This is not a public humiliation in the absence of...
	We're just going to go through and talk about some issues that are actually issues to discuss in the drama.
	All right.
	All that to say, right now, we are ending on YouTube.
	We're going to go over to Rumble.
	And if you want to go over to Locals, you can go to vivaboranslaw.locals.com.
	An above-average live stream and chat is going on there right now.
	We're moving from YouTube in three...
	Two, one.
	Booyah!
	770 some odd people should be moving their way over to Rumble.
	What do we start with now?
	Let's go with Pedro Gonzalez.
	So this is an article in Breitbart.
	And I'll tell you this.
	It's not to say that I have these thoughts and don't share them because I'm nervous about people hacking my email or whatever.
	I draft even DMs.
	As though someday the person receiving that DM might determine that I'm an enemy and might, you know, try to disclose them or use them for blackness.
	Call it neuroses, call it whatever.
	It's maybe a very, very stressful way to live one's life.
	But also, you know, like it's nothing more than a proverbial fear of God.
	Like I try to conduct myself as though my actions will at some point be disclosed to the public for good and for bad.
	And so when I got angry at that old lady who told me to pull on my dog's leash the other night.
	And I didn't flip out and say, go F yourself, get off the sidewalk, you F and B. I just said, no, I'm not pulling on my dog's leash.
	I don't know if I look crazy.
	Whatever.
	Doesn't matter.
	That people have these...
	And then the flip side, just to give the steel man to Pedro Gonzalez, the discussions and the tweets that you have among friends, where you are either being edgy, where you don't have the same filter that you might otherwise have, not in terms of what you say, but rather in terms of the way you say it, because...
	There are ways of saying the exact same thing in a politically acceptable fashion versus one which is unfiltered because you think you're among friends and you don't worry about having to weigh your words in the same way.
	So there's that.
	This is the breaking story.
	And by the way, it's a long freaking story.
	Like whoever did this, there's a lot of pictures, but this is an expose.
	There may be some political motivation to the expose.
	Breitbart might be pro-Trump and Pedro Gonzalez has come out as being wildly...
	Partisan pro-DeSantis, and I couldn't care less.
	I do think it's odd.
	I do find it odd when all objectivity is out the window in the name of partisan support, but set that aside.
	All right, so exclusive rising conservative influencer Pedro Gonzalez regularly espoused racist and anti-Semitic sentiments in private messages.
	Pedro Gonzalez, a rising influencer in politics.
	Oh, regularly in 2019 and 2020 sent racist and anti-Semitic messages Breitbart News can reveal after reviewing months worth of private messages.
	And they really did reveal.
	They revealed all of the damning ones for Pedro Gonzalez.
	It's not clear if they revealed what would otherwise be exculpatory ones or maybe incriminating ones of the interlocutors, because I think this is all results from a leak of the recipients of these texts who might have decided now's the time to make a political move, even if there's, you know, He responded to the Breitbart News investigation after this article was published by claiming he is a target of
	Trump, and that is why these messages became public.
	He did not address any of the content of the messages, but did admit that they were, quote, from a different, dumb season of my life.
	My biggest problem with this is...
	Pedro's response to it, apparently he's going to address it in greater detail today, was from one of his tweets.
	For now, my biggest issue, there would have been a better way to address this than to say it's from a different, dumb season of my life that was barely four years ago, three years ago, and that it's a political smear campaign.
	Because even if it is, that's not much of a defense to some of the tweets.
	Or the DMs, sorry, they were not tweets, they were DMs.
	So I'll just go through some of them.
	We don't need to go through all of this.
	Yeah, like not every Jew is problematic, but the sad fact is that most are, Gonzalez wrote, in a group chat in 2019.
	The only tactical consideration of Jews is screening them for movements, Gonzalez wrote in another group chat message.
	But that is not something for open discussion.
	That's where they're also going to, you know...
	He knew that what he was saying was wildly offensive that couldn't be discussed in public and yet felt comfortable doing it in private.
	I'm at a point where I can respect the Jews as individuals and like them as individuals, but as a group, I see them as problematic, Gonzalez said.
	This is not to steel man this, but there will be people who say, okay.
	So this is actually exculpatory.
	Nothing against any individual.
	But when it comes to groups like, I don't know, the ACLU.
	Is it the ACLU or the ADL?
	Which one is it?
	I keep getting mistaken.
	One of those groups, it's a Jewish organization that goes after defamation.
	And as a group with a stated objective, well, they've done some wildly offensive things that even I criticize.
	Now, am I one of the good ones?
	Who knows?
	Am I a self-hating Jew, as other people have called me?
	Because I don't think laws prohibiting...
	Holocaust denial are a good thing.
	I don't think they quell anti-Semitic sentiment.
	I think they exacerbate it.
	I think they get wildly overused, abused to stifle what would otherwise be legally legitimate discussion about historical atrocities.
	You know, most people don't appreciate, like, when people use the blanket term Holocaust denial, if someone wants to say, well, I don't think the number was 6 million, I think it's 5 million, that's Holocaust denial.
	Arguing over the number, as if to say, like, you know, Five million, okay, that's Holocaust denial.
	So the term gets abused, it gets over-applied blanket-wise to stifle legitimate conversation, and it also gets abused to what I believe is foment anti-Semitic sentiments by preventing people from thinking wrong.
	There are broader laws that outlaw genocide denial.
	But you can understand why some people would be very angry and think that there might be some political double standard when certain laws apply to certain groups, but, you know, you don't even get the international community necessarily to recognize the Armenian genocide.
	Then you got some more, and yet another message.
	Gonzalez shared a clearly anti-Semitic cartoon.
	Clearly anti-Semitic, yeah, cartoon.
	Of Pepe, it's...
	Grabbing the large nose of a Jewish editor-in-chief a newspaper saying Mr. Hebowitz, editor-in-chief, appears on the nameplate of the desk below him while the man declares getting real tired of this shit, Gonzalez, when sharing this cartoon, wrote laughing my ass off.
	Some people might find this funny, sharing edgy, even offensive memes privately.
	Maybe a mountain of a molehill or some of the other stuff might have much more difficult...
	This one's interesting, by the way.
	Where Pedro Gonzalez is...
	It's an interesting sentiment.
	Almost an admission.
	It's an admission that one has to understand as a human.
	Minorities like me see America for what it is.
	A country built by whites that can only survive if whites survive.
	Gonzalez wrote another message.
	And it is my job to make whites wake up.
	Because if they don't, we are all fucked.
	Especially people like me.
	And it goes on.
	This is the one where, you know, some of the stuff, you know, if the defense is I'm making offensive jokes among people, the problem is some of the stuff is going to be very, very, very difficult to justify, or at least to explain away.
	And it goes on, and it goes on, and it goes on.
	And I don't think we need to go into it in any more detail than that.
	I do want to see what the chat has to say about this.
	So it goes on and it goes on and it goes on.
	There's some stuff in there objectively offensive.
	Some people are going to say, well, facts don't care about your feelings.
	And I would say this.
	If Pedro had come out and said, yeah, it's obviously offensive the way I'm talking.
	And I'm not using a filter that I would otherwise use to present these views publicly.
	But here's a more eloquent way that I can explain them.
	You know, that would be one thing.
	To come out and say that this is a Trump smear and that the people that he was texting with at a different point in his life, oh, that's what he said, that they were, he was DMing with Trump supporters.
	And this was from a different, what did he say?
	A different, bizarre period of his life, whatever.
	Three years old.
	To say it's a Trump smear is to divert responsibility from what you have to take responsibility for.
	To say that the people on the receiving ends of your anti-Semitic and your racist messages were Trump supporters when some of the people on the receiving end obviously took issue with them as they did in real time.
	Well, that's as if to say they're racist too.
	Not the best defense.
	They're anti-Semitic too.
	Not the best defense.
	Especially since some of them on the receiving end did find them inappropriate at the time, others unclear.
	That being said, I would like to have Pedro back on the show for a discussion.
	Because whether or not you find Pedro's views offensive and whether or not you find them anti-Semitic, let's just go like this.
	Whether or not they are even anti-Semitic, this is the discussion that I've had with people which shocks their conscience to some extent.
	Let's say it is anti-Semitic.
	I'm not asking everybody to agree with it.
	Let's hypothesize.
	Operate on that assessment.
	It is anti-Semitic.
	All right.
	Is there anything that actually occurs in the real world that could exacerbate anti-Semitic sentiment?
	Well, anti-Semitic sentiment is purely irrational.
	There's nothing you need to talk about it.
	And if you try to look for any underlying influence or exacerbation to anti-Semitic sentiment, you are apologizing for it.
	Bullshit.
	And it goes back to the Holocaust denial legislation.
	If I genuinely believe that legislation that would ban boycotting Israel, if I legitimately believe that will actually exacerbate anti-Semitic sentiment and then legislation like that goes into effect and then you see increases of anti-Semitic rhetoric, you don't need to justify the anti-Semitic rhetoric in order to understand that if your goal is to reduce it, you might want to enact policy that would reduce it.
	So let's just take for granted Pedro Gonzalez is a horrible, incorrigible, unforgivable anti-Semite and racist.
	All right.
	What are some of the things that he invokes to say that his beliefs are justified?
	When you have over-representation in certain areas, people will rightly or wrongly come to certain conclusions.
	And if you prohibit and disallow them from talking about it, you're only going to...
	Solidify in their minds and potentially in the minds of others who might have been on the fence that they are right about it.
	And so you want to address the underlying justifications, if you can use that word.
	You have to talk about it.
	And you have to allow people to talk about it without demonizing them as irrational, not worth discussion in the first place because that's, after all, everything that they did with anybody who, you know, questioned other narratives.
	May have gone off a little meandering thing here.
	You know, in the text messages, in his messages, you know, he's saying it's hogwash to start claiming that the merchant of Venice is anti-Semitic and it shouldn't be taught.
	Oddly enough, you know, when you have Joe Biden referring to Jews as Shylocks, I think he referred to Jews as Shylocks, you know, all is forgiven.
	But different people, different set of standards.
	When you have like...
	It's a little-known fact.
	I mean, once upon a time, they had something...
	They referred to the first impeachment of Donald Trump as the Jew coup.
	They referred to it as the Jew coup because a statistically disproportionate number of the players involved happened to be Jewish.
	And you can't...
	Look, as uncomfortable as it is to acknowledge this, to recognize this, you can't deny it.
	Adam Schiff, Nadler, Vindman, the lawyers, Raskin...
	There was statistical over-representation.
	Now, is that to say that it's anti-Semitic to come to the conclusion that they did this because they were Jews or they were doing this as Jews to promote something of a Jewish ideology?
	I'd argue that that would be anti-Semitic, but I would also argue that that would be ill-founded because although Jewish, in order for them, in order for someone to say they were doing it because they were Jewish, you'd have to say, well, what Jewish policy are they trying to put forward?
	By going after Trump and members of his team who are also Jewish as well.
	Now, so while it might be anti-Semitic to come to the conclusion that this was a Jewish cabal orchestrated impeachment, it would be disingenuous to say, well, I'm going to ignore the fact that a statistical over-representation of the players involved happened to be Jewish.
	Now, that also happens to be true on the other side as well.
	And that's where I think coming to anti-Semitic conclusions becomes problematic and untenable.
	But you can't ignore and just write off what it is that people who you think are vile anti-Semites are invoking as a basis for their vile anti-Semitism.
	So all that to say, Pedro, if you're watching this, you are welcome back on.
	I'm not going to try to pull a Fox News and shout over you.
	I'd like to have the discussion and actually...
	Here, if there's any better underlying justification for this other than it's a Trump smear, the people who I was sending this to were Trump supporters, so that's how bad and racist they are, but there's nothing bad or racist about what I said.
	Mutually incompatible defenses to what has come to light today.
	Whether or not it is a politically motivated smear, my goodness, politics is dirty and the fighting between the DeSantis camp and the Trump's camp is in fact very dirty on both ends.
	So that might be a motivation.
	But to say it's a smear campaign to make me look like an anti-Semitic because you're revealing anti-Semitic and racist messages that I was sharing privately, not thinking anybody was going to see them, not the best defense.
	They're not anti-Semitic and here's my justification for why I said them and I would have said it more eloquently had I known they would become public.
	Better defense.
	Let's see how you make it.
	It's not anti-Semitic, but I was sending them to Trump supporters, so Trump supporters are racist and anti-Semitic.
	Not the best defense either.
	Let me see if there's any discussion in the chat here, because I want to see.
	And then the bottom line is also, I have no doubt that someone like Pedro, someone thinking like Pedro, would apply a similar blanket...
	You know, to other demographics as well.
	So like I said before, I have an underlying theory.
	There is no such thing as an anti-Semite or a racist.
	People are just assholes.
	People will make broad, sweeping generalizations based on certain individual examples, prominent examples.
	And I hear my stupid dog whining and it just distracted me.
	Oh, they'll make broad, sweeping generalizations, not just on race.
	Not just on religion, on physical appearance, on all sorts of things.
	And so people, we use the word like racist.
	I say they're just assholes.
	And in as much as I say that as well, I don't believe that there should be hate crimes.
	I don't think you should distinguish between crimes based on hateful motivation of race, religion.
	I mean, I think if you murder someone, that's a hate crime.
	Acts of violence are hate crimes.
	And to say like, we're going to make it super duper bad.
	To beat someone up because they're black as opposed to beat someone up because they owe you 200 bucks.
	Call me...
	Let me take an example that will involve my ethnicity.
	Beat someone up because they're Jewish versus beat someone up because you want to take their money?
	I'm not sure that I feel that there's a material moral difference between those two things such that one should be called a hate crime with enhancements and the other should just be...
	It's just regular crime.
	Just regular violence, motivated by hatred of a human, but not motivated by hatred of an identity aspect of that human.
	All right.
	That was one heck of a tangent.
	Now, let me see here.
	I'm going to bring up some rants, and then we're going to move off of this subject.
	Shesko says, did I...
	Let me just make sure we're in the right thing we are.
	Okay.
	Shesko says, did I hear Viva say, fear of God?
	LOL, Viva slipping into believing in God.
	You know what the funny thing is?
	I believe in something more than this.
	I hope.
	I would love to just be able to suspend all...
	I would love to be able to put on pause all of my deep concerns of eternal darkness when I die.
	We'll see what happens.
	Who knows?
	I think...
	The funny thing is, I'm coming to the conclusion that in order to believe, you have to want to believe, and that belief is a question of believing in belief.
	Let me make that make sense.
	Shishko says, you can call me Seize the Day, We Friends.
	Oh, okay.
	Seize the Day.
	How are you doing?
	My understanding of new protocol in Canada.
	Okay, good.
	We're done.
	Let me take this out.
	So that's the latest political scandal of the infighting.
	And yes, I do find it interesting that this is just yet another example of political infighting.
	Almost, you know, co-intel pro-ish.
	But look, for the shit that Pedro has been saying against Trumpers, and you can't come out and say this is off limits.
	The tribal warfare between the DeSantis camp and the Trump camp has gotten over...
	Over the top for me.
	And I'm lucky in that I'm disinterested and I like both of them.
	I just don't think that DeSantis is ready for what Trump is currently dealing with.
	And imagine DeSantis having to put up with this lawfare, his wife having survived or been treated for breast cancer.
	Imagine they want to threaten to lock up DeSantis for the rest of his life.
	I don't think DeSantis, not the courage.
	I don't think he has yet had the political life experience to even fathom what Trump has been put through, and I don't think he would be able to survive the onslaught that has been put on Trump.
	But I like DeSantis, even if I disagree with some of his legislation sometimes.
	I like him, and I like what he's done with Florida, as I have voted with my foot.
	All right.
	That's that.
	That's all I have to say about that.
	People's Front of Canada says DeSantis is not ready.
	Yeah, and my hope is that DeSantis hasn't destroyed himself in this pursuit.
	Thank you.
	Okay.
	I'm not getting into the religious discussion in there, in the chat.
	Okay.
	Now, talking about the infighter drama, which we can get away from to get into the actual meaningful...
	In your face, rubbing your face in it like a dog in poop.
	And by the way, that tactic for training dogs has long since been revised, from what I understand.
	You no longer rub a dog's nose, or not rub it in, but put it near the poop to make them ashamed of their own poop.
	I want to bring up Kirby.
	Oh, so hold on.
	This was the tweet.
	Oh, it doesn't matter.
	We talked about this.
	I want to bring up...
	What's his name?
	John Kirby?
	That weasel...
	Disgusting...
	It's funny the thing is, ugly people can become good-looking by virtue of their character, and otherwise decent-looking people can become loathsome creatures by virtue of their loathsome character.
	Let me see where...
	There were two angles to this.
	I think this is one.
	Not now.
	Listen to this, people.
	It's finally starting to hit the fan.
	Journalists are finally now potentially realizing that the money that they...
	The success that they found in Trump...
	24-7 media from 2016 to 2020.
	It's over.
	And it might now...
	They might start finding a little bit of that...
	Oh, I just bit my tongue.
	Material success if they go after Biden the way he deserves to be going after.
	The way he deserves to be gone after.
	This is a question from I don't know whom to Kirby.
	Why Kirby was on the podium, I don't know.
	Listen to this.
	And then I'm going to show you the second angle, which is Kirby's weasley face while he's listening to this question.
	They're finally asking...
	I didn't know about my son's business dealings.
	I'm going to pull up that tweet in a bit.
	Listen to this.
	Documents.
	Their authenticity nowhere challenge.
	That included documents.
	Their authenticity nowhere challenge.
	They're talking about documents that were revealed by the whistleblower.
	That text message, I think, of Hunter Biden with some Chinese oligarch billion, I don't know who it was, saying basically, well, they're going to say, but you're going to give me the money or you're going to give me what I want.
	Otherwise, I'm sitting right here next to my daddy.
	And we're going to make your life have a living hell if you do not respond.
	So this is a text message revealed by some whistleblower, the veracity and authenticity of which has not been denied.
	It's not to say it's true, but if it were not true, you know that they say it's not true.
	I mean, they said Hunter Biden's laptop, which was true, was not true before having to admit it was true.
	So if they're not saying it now, you know damn well it's true.
	Sorry, carry on.
	That included a July 2017 WhatsApp message sent by Hunter Biden.
	to Henry Zhao, a Chinese Communist Party official, which stated in its entirety, and I quote, Listen to this.
	I am sitting here with my father, and we would like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled.
	Tell the director that I would like to resolve this now before it gets out of hand and now means tonight.
	And Z, if I get a call or text from anyone involved in this other than you, Zhang, or the chairman, I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me and every person he knows, And my ability to forever hold a grudge, that you will regret not following my direction.
	I am sitting here waiting for the call with my father, unquote.
	So just a couple of questions about this.
	This is literal gangsterism.
	I mean, this is reminiscent.
	I'm trying to think of what movie this was out of pretty much verbatim.
	I want my money.
	And if I hear anything else, we're coming for you.
	I mean, I just watched Uncut Gems.
	It reminds me of Uncut Gems.
	I just saw Goodfellas on TV.
	Kind of like Goodfellas.
	I don't remember if there's any specific scene like this.
	There's a movie where this is literally cut from.
	I'm sitting here with my dad.
	What the hell's going on, Zhao?
	Give me my money, Zhao.
	And if you don't, we're going to make your life a living hell.
	Do you have anything to say about that, Mr. Kirby?
	First, does this not undermine the president's claim during the 2020 campaign and the reaffirmations?
	Of that claim by his two press secretaries since then, that he never once discussed his son's overseas business dealings with him?
	Oh, hold on one second there.
	He didn't discuss his business dealings with him.
	He was just sitting there while he was texting to the man.
	He didn't discuss it.
	Show me where it says that he discussed it in the telegram message.
	Oh, wait.
	I could be a better liar than Kareem, Jean-Pierre, and Kirby.
	Show me where in that text message it says he discussed anything with his son.
	I dare you.
	Well, it says right here he's sitting there.
	I don't know.
	Joe doesn't know what Hunter's writing.
	His son's a crackhead on drugs.
	He might have been high when he wrote that.
	No, and I'm not going to comment further on this.
	Look at that smug, arrogant, pompous face.
	I do not need to answer your question, pleb.
	James, James, let me just...
	James, James, James, James.
	I'm not answering it, so move on.
	I don't have to.
	Let me save you some...
	Let me save...
	Let me save you some breath.
	Hey, let me save you some breath.
	Let me save all of you some breath.
	I am not answering any questions about this.
	You can ask away.
	I don't have to.
	Can you imagine saying I'm not answering your question on this?
	Oh, Corrine Jean-Pierre had an even better...
	I'm not getting into family affairs.
	Oh, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
	Of course not.
	If you're going to ask about this, I am not addressing...
	I know you do.
	More than I'd like you to have.
	I am not going to address this issue on this podium.
	I'm just not going to do it.
	From this podium.
	Why not?
	I'm not going to do it.
	Why not?
	Run.
	Thanks, guys.
	In your face.
	Suck on it, is what he's basically saying to you.
	Kazeeq, you want to kick us off?
	Suck on it, is basically what he said.
	You are piss ants.
	There's nothing you can do about it.
	Go F yourselves.
	I'm going to go have a martini over lunch.
	That's not confession through projection.
	I only have my martinis at dinner.
	That's what he's saying.
	I'm just...
	Who's sending a subpoena where?
	There seems to be a legal battle in the chat.
	Basically, go screw yourself.
	I'm not answering your questions because there is no good answer.
	But by the way, I wouldn't even do it if they paid me.
	I could have made a more plausible, defensible response to that in real time.
	Where does he say he discussed anything with his dad?
	I'll let POTUS answer for it, but even from your own evidence, Mr. Journalist.
	Nothing in there indicates that Biden talked with Hunter about it.
	The problem is they know it's a freaking lie.
	Oh, but hold on, hold on.
	Let's bring this up.
	Gotta watch his face while he gets asked the question.
	This is almost better.
	I want to show you the journalist.
	Look at his face.
	It's like constipation.
	It's like he is holding in a ton of political SHI tizzle in his butt.
	Don't ask the question!
	House Ways and Means Committee yesterday released documents.
	Oh, God.
	Don't do it.
	Shut your mouth.
	Look into my eyes.
	Stop now.
	He didn't stop.
	Damn it.
	What?
	Sorry, I didn't notice that the first time.
	What?
	Oh, shit.
	They know about the WhatsApp question.
	Sent by Hunter Biden to Henry Zhao, a Chinese Communist Party official.
	Didn't you read the text?
	Didn't you read the message?
	Don't you know what Hunter and Joe do to people who piss them off?
	Which stated in its entirety...
	Look at him smirk.
	He knows damn well what it says.
	Quote, I am sitting here with my father, and we would like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled.
	Where's my fucking money?
	Sorry, I'm swearing a lot.
	Where's my money?
	Where's my money, Zao?
	Get me my money!
	Tell the director that I would like to resolve this now before it gets out of hand and now means tonight.
	And Z, if I get a call or text from anyone involved in this other than you, Zhang, or the chairman, I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me and every person he knows and my ability to forever hold a grudge, that you will regret not following my direction.
	I'm just wondering...
	Is this when he sent the picture of him brandishing his unlawfully procured firearm?
	Just wondering.
	Were there any images in that text?
	And Z, looky what I got me by lying on a firearm application.
	I don't think that's just a joke, people.
	I'm not spreading this information.
	It would be hilarious.
	But yeah, you know, who knows what other pictures he sent Z in the past?
	Maybe he's like, hey Z, look what I got.
	Look what Hunter got over the weekend.
	So just a couple of questions about this.
	First, does this not undermine the president's claim during the 2020 campaign and the reaffirmations of that claim by his two press secretaries since then?
	Do you know who Kirby looks like right now?
	He looks like, I was going to say Jerry Maguire, Tom Cruise in Magnolia when he's staring at the journalist and she's asking the questions and then she asks him the questions and he just sits there staring at her and then...
	She says, what are you doing?
	What are you doing?
	What was his name?
	I'll get his name in a second.
	What are you doing?
	And he says, quietly or silently judging you.
	Right now, if eyes could shoot needles.
	He never once discussed his son's overseas business dealings with him.
	No, and I'm not going to comment further on this.
	James, James, let me just.
	Overseas business.
	That claim by his 2020 campaign and the reaffirmations.
	Does it not undermine me?
	No, and I'm not going to comment further on this.
	No, I'm just going to lie straight to your face, and I'm not going to comment any further on it.
	Don't ask again.
	It's so...
	It's so obscenely in your face.
	So, oh, you've got to watch Karine Jean-Pierre just ducking.
	I'm not asking.
	All right.
	So, we now know.
	Did I even pull up that tweet that I put up?
	In as much as I'm not the smartest person in the world, I'm not the dumbest person in the world.
	Where is it?
	Hold on.
	Let me just get that tweet.
	We now know.
	Again, even I have to steal madness.
	We don't know if Joe was actually in the room when Hunter was saying to Zhao, get me my money or I'm going to get my daddy on you.
	We don't know.
	But we can presume he was because I think he got the money.
	And if it were the case that Biden just didn't know the extortion scheme that his son was up to, I mean, I guess they would allude to that or imply that.
	But again, If Joe Biden really didn't know what Hunter Biden was doing in terms of this apparent, and I'm saying apparent extortion scheme, if he didn't know, it would seem that some certain Justice Department that treats like cases alike would have to be treating this as something potentially criminal.
	Maybe.
	If they do, in fact, treat like things alike.
	The pivot that the White House now has to make, by the way, and notice it.
	It's in real time if you're paying attention to words.
	USA Today, this was from back in the day.
	I should have included the date of this article, but this is from 2020.
	It was from earlier on.
	Former Vice President Joe Biden said Saturday he hasn't spoken to his son, Hunter Biden, about his overseas businesses while forcefully calling again for an investigation into Donald Trump.
	I did nothing wrong.
	Do him.
	It's him.
	It's him.
	Remember that thing about quid pro quo and putting pressure on Ukraine?
	I didn't do it.
	Trump did it.
	Remember that thing about hookers in a hotel?
	Trump did it.
	There's no extortion here.
	Go look at Trump.
	Calling for an investigation to President Donald Trump's phone call with the Ukraine president.
	So this had to be 2020.
	I've never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings, Biden said.
	Here's what I know.
	Trump should be investigated.
	What is he saying now?
	This is from yesterday.
	I included a link to this article.
	ABC News could not immediately verify the WhatsApp message.
	This is the one we just talked about.
	But Republicans say it undercuts President Biden's claim that he never discussed overseas business endeavors with his son.
	Ian Sams.
	Got to see who this guy is.
	Ian Sams, a White House spokesperson, reiterated last Friday that, quote, the president...
	Thank you, Lisa Simpson, for the answer to the question nobody asked.
	There is just a small, minor difference between not having discussed his son's business dealings with him and not having been in business with his son.
	That's just a mild, subtle, wildly radical change of rhetoric.
	That and it's still a demonstrable lie.
	Because we now seem to know that he was, in fact, in business with his son.
	The 10% for the big guy on the computer from the whistleblower really implies that there was something of an involvement of a business.
	The word business in law means people working together for a joined commercial or other purpose.
	Sure as hell sounds like Joe Biden was in business with his son.
	But it's gone from, I've never discussed my business, Hunter Biden's business dealings with him, to, I'm not in business with him.
	Now it's going to go to, I was in business with him, but it wasn't illegal.
	Okay, it was illegal business, but it was within my powers to pardon myself.
	All is forgiven.
	Wild.
	Wild.
	All the while, by the way, all the while pushing forward with the investigation into Trump.
	Now let me just see something here.
	I think that might be all for the massive corruption and the political shift or the shift in narrative now.
	To the Trump investigation.
	Oh, boy.
	Oh, boy.
	Do I pull this one up from...
	Here, I'll pull this one up from CNN.
	Is it from CNN or is it from Fox?
	Oh, this is from Midas Touch.
	A very politically neutral...
	No, hold on one second.
	Before we do that, let's take some rumble rants and see what's going on in the chat.
	Here we go.
	Boom shakalaka.
	Let me see here.
	We got Ginger Ninja 1776.
	CPL, what is that?
	Colonel?
	Colonel.
	Corporal.
	Corporal.
	Corporal Melroy Court agrees with you.
	Racism is ignorance.
	Talks about that.
	Talks about that.
	Talks about it in that video.
	Oh, that's right.
	Yep, that was it.
	This year was my eighth home build.
	But that one was one of my favorites and also the most difficult build.
	Tropical Rocket says, I agree with everything you said, Viva.
	Now tell us where the gold is.
	Is that because I'm short like a leprechaun?
	Is it a leprechaun joke or is there a Jewish joke in there that I'm not getting?
	Tropical Rocket, I don't know if you meant to do this rumble rant twice, but I'm going to read it twice.
	I agree with everything you said, Viva.
	Now tell us where the gold is.
	I'll tell you what.
	The gold is mine.
	Okay.
	So that's that.
	Now, what was I just about to bring up?
	I was going to bring up the Midas Touch, the latest breaking news of the day.
	Son of a gun, did I lose it?
	No, it's right here.
	The audio recording people, so Trump's indictment, you know, in the indictment they talked about him having flashed classified documents to a journalist.
	As Robert Barnes and I astutely observed at the time, there was nothing in the charging documents apparently relating to that, which is why I was saying...
	Even on the face of the four corners of this indictment, it doesn't really make sense to say, oh, he showed classified information that he acknowledges that he could have declassified but didn't, and now he's showing it to a journalist, but somehow he's not getting charged for it in the indictment.
	Yeah, there was something very suspicious about it.
	It doesn't make sense, and it might make a little more sense now, but they've revealed the audio.
	And so this is the audio.
	Now, steal my everything.
	Assume everything is...
	A fake intended to discredit anybody who jumps on it right away.
	I first listened to this audio and I said, look, this could be a deepfake audio.
	I've heard deepfake audios.
	I've heard impersonators that are better than this.
	But the easiest way to deal with these things, especially when they are prejudicial, is just to assume that they are true.
	Assume the audio is bona fide.
	Don't go after any like, well, they shouldn't have had this audio because it's an illegal recording.
	Well, forget that.
	Assume the audio is legit.
	And then we can even say, assume what Trump is saying is legit.
	This is the leaked audio where Trump admits he's showing to a reporter documents that we don't hear.
	I don't have papers here.
	I was going to flap around some papers, but all I got is a Kleenex.
	He's rustling through some papers, yada, yada, yada.
	Listen to this.
	This is it.
	They've got him.
	It's over.
	He's guilty of everything Joe Biden actually did.
	Bad, sick people.
	That was your coup, you know, against you.
	Well, it started right at the beginning.
	Like when Millie's talking about, oh, we're going to try to do a kickoff.
	They were trying to do that before you even were sworn in.
	That's right.
	Trying to overthrow your life.
	Well, with Millie, let me see that.
	I'll show you an example.
	He said that I wanted to attack Iran.
	He did.
	Isn't it amazing?
	I have a big pile of papers.
	This thing just came up.
	Look.
	This was him.
	They presented me this.
	This is off the record.
	They presented me this.
	This was him.
	This was the Defense Department and him.
	We looked at him.
	This was him.
	This wasn't done by me.
	This was him.
	All sorts of stuff.
	Page is wrong.
	Wait a minute.
	Let's see here.
	I just found, isn't that amazing?
	This totally wins my case, you know.
	Except it is, like, highly controversial.
	There's a secret information.
	Look at this.
	Even listening to this, it sounds like it almost might be sarcasm, but let's assume he was being sincere.
	Hillary would put that out all the time.
	She'd send it to Anthony Weiner.
	By the way, isn't that incredible?
	I was just saying, because we were talking about it, and he said, He wanted to attack Iran.
	He's in the face.
	This was done by the military, given to me.
	I think we can probably get it.
	We'll have to see.
	We'll have to try to figure out.
	Since present, I couldn't be less.
	No, I can't.
	Isn't that interesting?
	It's so cool.
	And you probably almost didn't believe me, but now you believe me.
	No, I believe you.
	It's incredible, right?
	Now we have a problem.
	Isn't that interesting?
	Yeah.
	It's so cool.
	And you probably almost didn't believe me, but now you believe me.
	No, I believe you.
	It's incredible, right?
	Bring some coaching, please.
	All right.
	I'm not going to listen to that analysis from them.
	So that's the audio, people.
	Let's assume it's...
	I mean, there's going to be the legal...
	There's too many things.
	There's the legal argument as to whether or not it was already declassified despite what Trump said.
	What I love about all of this, the left has always called Trump a blowhard and a liar.
	He always exaggerates.
	He always makes himself out to be greater than he is.
	He's a narcissist.
	He's a pathological liar.
	Everything he says is a lie, except in that video right there.
	We don't know what papers he was even shuffling.
	We know that he hasn't been charged with anything as relates to those.
	We know that those papers don't form part of the indictment in terms of the charges already brought against him.
	There is discussion as to whether or not he was actually just shuffling around random papers that actually didn't have anything confidential in them.
	But Trump is a pathological liar, a narcissist, a blowhard, always exaggerates, always puffs himself up.
	Except here, he's telling the truth.
	The documents were not declassified.
	He hadn't already declassified them through whatever process he might have already done to declassify them.
	He's telling the truth.
	He's sunk his own battleship.
	Let's hear what Donald Trump has to say to that.
	Not now, and we're going to go here.
	Sorry, I couldn't get anywhere else but Fox News because it was on Fox News.
	Hey, hey, hey, where is it?
	We did absolutely nothing wrong.
	This is just another hoax.
	It's called, I would say, election interference more than anything else.
	It's a disgrace that they can do it.
	Next question.
	But everything was fine.
	We did nothing wrong, and everybody knows it.
	Here's a sample of that newly released audio from two years ago.
	I was just saying, because we were talking about it.
	Son of a gun, I lost it.
	I can't get it out now.
	Darn it.
	This was done by the military, given to me.
	I think we can probably...
	Hold on, people.
	I can't find the link to shut it down.
	With our colleague, Brett Baer, the former president, insisted that document did not exist.
	How do I stop scream?
	Everybody...
	Sorry, hold on a second.
	I lost it in the background, and I still hear it.
	This is annoying.
	Share screen.
	Here.
	Oh, is this it?
	The tape.
	Okay, thank goodness.
	Sorry, guys.
	I got to get that out of the window.
	I'm closing this down.
	Whether or not he was telling the truth.
	He says that.
	Those were random papers.
	I might have been exaggerating that they weren't classified.
	I might not have showed you anything that was, in fact, classified.
	And all of this facilitates ignoring the actual substance of what was going on.
	Here, from the New York Post.
	Trump claims he was lying about having classified Iran attack plans.
	It was bravado.
	Oh, no, no, no.
	Trump is a liar.
	He's always guilty of bravado, unless we want to believe what he says, in which case, he admitted.
	That he did not declassify these documents that even if they were once upon a time classified he had in his possession and so arguably de facto declassified already even if he purported to this journalist to make her feel special that they were still classified and that he couldn't do it anymore even though he might have already done it with those very documents assuming they were even classified documents that he showed that journalist in the first place.
	New York Post.
	Former President Donald Trump now says he was just waving around random sheets of paper when claimed on tape that he had classified documents related to a potential military strike in Iran.
	I would say it was bravado.
	If you want to know the truth, it was bravado.
	Oh no, now he's lying.
	Now he's lying.
	But when he said they were classified, he was telling the truth.
	He told reporters at ABC News, I was talking and just holding up papers and talking about them, but I had no documents.
	I didn't have any documents.
	I'm inclined to believe him because if he did, I suspect he would have already been charged.
	They're charging him with bullshit.
	They're going to probably charge him with something that's actually potentially real.
	77-year-old president says he was lying during a taped conversation while speaking to individuals working on a book for his former chief of staff at his bed.
	Here's another thing, by the way.
	Even if I grant that he's a liar.
	Okay, you're right.
	He's a liar.
	The one thing Trump isn't, despite what you want to say, is stupid.
	And the idea that anybody thinks Trump would not have thought or definitively known that he was being recorded at that point in time, it would be implausible to the point of naivety, to the point of stupidity.
	Yeah, no, no, he has no, no concern that a journalist that he's talking to about a book would be recording the conversation and that he's so stupid that he's going to, knowingly being recorded, confess to a crime.
	Maybe some of you think he's that stupid.
	I would say that anybody who thinks he's that stupid is blinded by partisan hatred.
	The latest explanation from Trump expands on his insistence on Monday that the leaked audio recording of the meeting is actually the exoneration.
	I'm kind of inclined to agree with that.
	A redacted transcript of the recording was included in the special counsel Jack Smith's 37-count indictment against Trump and is presented as a key piece of evidence in the government's case against the former president over accusations that he willfully retained the national defense information after leaving office.
	It's amazing.
	It's an integral part of the indictment and yet not part of the charges of the indictment and yet not part of any other separate charges about it.
	And there's an interesting bait and switch here.
	That those documents that he allegedly, you know, were classified, that he didn't declassify, that he revealed to this journalist, are actually not...
	I'll just make sure that I have to remember this now.
	They are not the basis of the indictment that he was actually charged with.
	Isn't that funny?
	That this video, this audio is being leaked ostensibly to create the impression that it supports the evidence of the current federal charges against him when it's actually not related to it at all.
	It's almost like it's part of a scheme to try to change public opinion, taint a jury pool.
	It's amazing.
	A redacted transcript of the recording was included against Trump.
	It's presented the key evidence.
	I got that.
	Okay.
	Isn't it amazing?
	This totally wins my case.
	We already saw this.
	See, as president, I could have declassified it.
	Now I can't, you know, but it's still a secret.
	What I love is that it seems like his staffer was uncomfortably saying, yeah, we're in trouble now or something.
	Smith noted in the indictment that none of the parties involved in the conversation possessed security clearance.
	All right, that's good.
	What the hell does that have to do with the fact that he wasn't charged for this?
	That this wasn't part of the charges in the indictment?
	Trump on Tuesday claimed the papers that can be heard being shuffled around were not classified and considered of whatever.
	We're not classified and consisted of whatever random papers happened to be on his desk during the meeting.
	I just held up a whole pile of my desk loaded with papers.
	I have papers from 25 different things.
	When asked by a reporter if he regretted how he handled the sensitive material upon leaving the office, Trump responded, no, I have no regrets.
	No regrets, people.
	Here's the totally unset up image.
	From the intelligence agency.
	Trump pleaded not guilty to 31 counts of willful retention of national defense information, one count of expiracy to construct the idea, one count of withholding documents of record, one count of corruptly concealing a document of record, one count of concealing a document in the federal...
	And it goes on.
	Oh, now I hope...
	I don't think I've made a mistake on...
	I don't think I made a mistake on a fact here.
	If I have made a mistake on a fact, please let me know, people.
	So that's the New York Post.
	What is amazing in all of this, by the way, and again, it's distracting by the side scandal to distract from the actual scandal.
	Where was the article?
	Where was the article?
	Here we go.
	I believe it's this.
	Do I have to subscribe to this?
	Oh, cripe.
	Archive.ph.
	Last archive two weeks ago.
	Here we go.
	July 15, 2021.
	From, what's this article?
	The New Yorker.
	You're going to have a fucking war.
	Mark Milley's fight to stop Trump from striking Iran.
	Inside the extraordinary final days conflict between the former president and his chairman of the Joint Chiefs.
	In the months after the 2020 election.
	The subject of Iran was repeatedly raised in White House meetings with Trump, and Mark Milley repeatedly argued against the strike.
	How?
	Isn't it interesting that what Trump is purporting to reveal now contradicts what Milley said was the case back in 2020-2021?
	The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff spoke with President Donald Trump on January 3, 2021.
	The subject of the Sunday afternoon meeting at the White House was Iran's nuclear program.
	For the past several months, Milley had been engaged in an alarmed effort to ensure that Trump did not embark on a military conflict with Iran as part of his quixotic campaign to overturn the results of the 2020 election and remain in power.
	That makes absolutely no sense even as a plan.
	The chairman secretly feared that Trump would insist on launching a strike on Iranian interests that could set off a full-blown war.
	I don't need to read the rest of this article.
	But what the bottom line takeaway is that Milley was lying.
	And it was actually Milley and the wonderfully interested military-industrial complex that seemingly wanted to go to war with Iran.
	And it was Trump.
	That apparently stifled Milley from going ahead with that.
	That is seemingly what is at the issue at the heart of all of this, this disclosure, these documents, that Trump has information that reveals that Milley lied and that Milley was in fact the one who wanted to fight the war with Iran and not Trump, contrary to what Milley said to the public.
	And Posobiec said it, Barnes said it, that the seizure of this classified information that Trump was probably within his rights to retain at his home.
	It was not a seizure of incriminating evidence against Trump.
	It was a seizure of incriminating evidence against the deep state and the military industrial complex.
	And that's why they went for it.
	Thank you.
	It's wild.
	It's wild.
	Let me see.
	There were some other takes on that.
	I think that might be the latest of it.
	Hold on one second.
	Okay, so I got the audio recording but it had no video.
	This is from ZNO.
	This is the audio recording that they are claiming will be extremely damaging to Trump's case.
	LOLs.
	And then it's the same audio, I believe.
	I'm going to play the last 30 seconds of this because this one is 30 seconds longer than the last one, I think.
	I think we can probably What?
	I don't know.
	We'll have to see.
	Yeah.
	I'll try to D-press it.
	Oh, no.
	The The exact same way.
	That's the audio that they think is going to sink Trump.
	A, it reveals the deep state lies.
	The administrative state lies.
	The military-industrial complex lies to the public.
	Trump was the maniac trying to start a war with Iran when it was actually the military planning for it.
	I mean, everybody has to go listen to the videos of post-9-11.
	I forget who it was talking about how they're going to go one country after another in the Middle East.
	Just regime change, regime change, regime change.
	Here's our order of countries to invade.
	They accuse you of doing what they are doing.
	And they try to punish you for their crimes.
	Mm-hmm.
	Okay, I think that's it on that.
	We've got some good ones left here.
	Hold on a second.
	Viva on Twitter.
	No, that's my Twitter feed.
	This is General Milley, the audio.
	No, that is my Twitter feed as well.
	That's the wrong one.
	Oh, hold on.
	Well, it was Jack Posobiec.
	Here's Jake Tapper on CNN pushing the story just days before Trump comments.
	Did Jake speak up when CNN published their exclusive audio?
	Trump's lawyers should subpoena him.
	Jake Tapper saying from SGB, you're going to have a war.
	Okay, so we've covered this.
	Okay, let me get that out of here.
	So that's the latest on that.
	Have I gotten any new?
	Crumble rants before getting into the next subject.
	What's the next subject, people?
	It's a good...
	Oh, I should have started with this.
	We have some small ones.
	No, we're going to do this one right now.
	You know, news articles that just slip under the radar.
	And this will make...
	This will actually piss you off a lot.
	I mean, once you realize the insidious, multi-leveled...
	It's corruption all the way down.
	It's not turtles all the way down, people.
	It's corruption all the way down.
	This is an article from, I think it was February, March, February 2023 of this year.
	It'll put some pieces together for everybody who might have had any lingering doubts.
	After long delay, Moderna, one of the two companies that got the jibby jab rights, a company that never had a product go to market, from what I recall, unless I'm mistaken, but I don't think I am.
	Never had a medical product go to market until the breakthrough with the...
	Totally effective, safe and effective jibby jab.
	After long delay, Moderna pays NIH, National Institute of Health, the governmental agency, NIH, for COVID vaccine technique.
	Moderna has paid $400 million to the government for a chemical technique key to its vaccine.
	They didn't put vaccine in quotes.
	But the parties are still locked down in a high-stakes dispute over a different patent.
	Robert F. Kennedy...
	Put out a video where he said, you know, the NIH owns the patents to some of these pharma things, which is regulatory capture on its face, corruption on its face, and then people are calling him out and calling him a liar.
	I'm like, I just want to know the truth.
	Forget demonizing RFK.
	Is there truth to it?
	I just do a basic, you know, preliminary search.
	I know we've talked about it a lot, so I sort of had a lot of info backed up in my brain.
	Just pulled up this article.
	February.
	Moderna paying $400 million to the NIH.
	Moderna racked up tens of billions of dollars in sales of its coronavirus vaccine.
	The government authorized this.
	The FDA gave them emergency use authorization.
	The government immunized them from liability.
	They rack up tens of billions of dollars.
	And then the government comes in and said, where's my money?
	Hey, dude, we gave you immunity from liability.
	That's good for you.
	And it's also good for us.
	As Moderna racked up tens of billions of dollars in sales on this coronavirus vaccine, the company held off paying for the rights to a chemical technique that scientists said it had borrowed from government-funded research and used in its wildly successful shot.
	Wildly successful shot.
	Can you imagine that level of dishonesty?
	But Moderna and the government have now reached an agreement.
	The company said on Thursday that it had made a $400 million payment for the technique that will be shared by the National Institute of Health and the two American universities where the method was invented.
	The payment, disclosed in Moderna's latest earnings report, I don't know how many people have actually heard about this payment, represented a small victory for the experts and activists who long argued that the company had resisted acknowledging its debt to the government and academic researchers.
	To the government that gave it emergency use authorization, that gave it immunity from liability, that allowed them to print money to the bank.
	Now they're getting their cut.
	If pharmaceutical companies are going to make billions of dollars, it seems reasonable that the scientists who helped generate some of the initial intellectual property and the universities are also sharing some of the gains.
	Jason McKellen, a structural biologist who in 2017 led efforts to devise a technique in question as researcher at the...
	Okay, whatever.
	A lot of that will not be reinvested.
	Will that be reinvested in gain-of-function research in a lab in Wuhan, China?
	Do we understand that now they're funding the same organizations that lied about gain-of-function research that...
	Is it arguable anymore?
	That arguably, that potentially, that reasonably led to this outbreak in the first place so that the very same government engaged in and lying about gain-of-function research that probably led to this pandemic immunizes these companies to experiment on their people, make billions and billions of dollars so that the government that made all of this happen in the first place gets their fair share of the profits.
	I mean, this is...
	Moderna is still locked in a high-stakes dispute with the NIH over who invented the central component of the vaccine, the genetic sequence that helps recipients produce an immune response.
	The NIH said its scientists, some of whom have been collaborating for years with Moderna.
	Hmm.
	Interesting.
	Did Moderna have any knowledge about the gain-of-function research that NIH, NAAID, whatever, that the NIH wasn't funding in lab through its third-party NGOs?
	What was it called?
	What was the third-party NGO that was funding the...
	Game of Function.
	Eco-Eco Alliance, I think?
	Oh, they said they helped the sequence.
	Moderna also received nearly $10 billion in taxpayer funding to develop and test the vaccine and to provide doses to the federal government.
	The company has sold roughly $36 billion worth worldwide.
	Let's see if there's anything more interesting.
	Okay, so they talk about the technique, which we don't care about.
	Moderna has benefited richly from government largesse and does owe a public duty.
	Eh, duty.
	But it's been very begrudging and slow in acknowledging that public duty.
	Eh, duty.
	Chris Ridley, a Moderna spokesperson, said in a statement that the company and the government, quote, have been engaged in productive discussions since 2020 regarding the licensing of certain patents to COVID-19 vaccines.
	My goodness, they had the vaccine developed just in time, people.
	It was always our intention to reach an agreement.
	NIH tends to be uneasy about aggressively asserting legal rights to its work, experts said, a stance that some activists believe hurts taxpayers.
	Okay, I think we're going to skip through that.
	That's it.
	So the government does the research, lies about it, funds it through third-party NGOs, causes the problem, goes and magically has...
	The technique, the patent's already there for the magic vaccine in short order.
	Grants emergency use authorization to these companies for the first time ever using mRNA technology in vaccines.
	Grants them immunity from liability.
	Allows them to make billions of dollars off a product that the safety and efficacy of which has been called into question.
	And then, thankfully, that they made all this money because the government immunized them.
	Now the government says, give us our cuts.
	That is the most insidious level of corruption you can possibly imagine.
	Yeah, that's it.
	Okay.
	Share screen.
	Crumble rants.
	Text 47 says, keep in mind, the minister referred to by Hunter Biden is the minister of the state security, the equivalent of the director of the CIA TX 47. Thank you for the info.
	All right, what do we do now?
	Let me see what's going on in our...
	I think we need to go pay some love.
	Show some love to our Rumbles community.
	Hold on one second here.
	I'm going to refresh this.
	Okay, that's VivaBarnesLaw.
	People, I got a few short stories.
	Let's bring them over to Rumble.
	I'll tell you what's there, so for those who don't want to come, you don't have to come join us at our Above Average group in VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
	Jimmy Kimmel is a scumbag, so that's one you might want to come over and see.
	Oh, and then we're going to end with Bloomberg are idiots.
	And Bloomberg ran a little opinion piece.
	Canada's economy is booming.
	Canada is booming.
	They've just taken in the record amount of immigrants.
	And I'm like, you don't offset the brain drain of mass immigration by bringing in massive amounts of immigration.
	Those are going to be two fun subjects.
	We're going to chit-chat and have some fun in the vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Come on in.
	Say hi.
	You don't have to pay to be there.
	Just come and become a member.
	And if you decide to subscribe later on, you can do it.
	But we should end...
	We should end this on a little bit of a happy note.
	Let me see something here.
	End on a short video.
	Viva Family Fishing.
	Let's just watch some fishing and just clean our pallets.
	Depends our palate.
	No, that one's not going to be good.
	No, that one's going to be too long.
	Okay, we're just...
	You know, we're going to do a little fish rescue.
	That's what we're going to do.
	All right, we're going to play a little bit of it for those who want to come over to...
	Come.
	Look at this.
	We're in the swamp in Venison, Quebec.
	Oh my god, that's me!
	There's a beaver dam up there that has blocked off this water.
	Oh my gosh!
	From the water, there's three dead carp over there, huge ones.
	I'm going to do a transport mission of one of these carp, maybe two, over the tube and into the water, into the open water.
	Okay, that water was extremely, extremely...
	You guys ready?
	This is going to be fast.
	Okay, guys.
	Three.
	I'm gonna get a good grip.
	Three, two, one.
	I can't move my feet.
	I can't move my feet.
	Okay, watch it, guys.
	Oh, gosh.
	Oh, gosh.
	My feet are gone.
	My shoes.
	Someone get my shoe.
	Okay, I'm dropping a second shoe here.
	Drop the shoe down.
	Run, run, run!
	Don't worry, they can survive for quite a few minutes out of water.
	Okay I I I Oh gosh.
	So much back to it.
	See what happens here.
	Okay.
	No, no, no, not yet.
	Okay.
	There you go.
	Okay, it looks good.
	Yep.
	Okay, we're doing number two.
	All right, and then it goes on.
	We're doing number two.
	Clip that out of context.
	All right, everybody.
	So I'm going to end this on Rumble.
	Thank you all for being here.
	So, oh, okay.
	So tomorrow, one o 'clock, Sheila.
	Next week, lectern guy.
	I actually forgot his name.
	I have to make sure I remember his name.
	The guy who held the lectern, who was put through the grinder, the political prosecutorial grinder, is coming on.
	And I think subject to making sure I'm not an idiot, it's Wednesday.
	It's Wednesday.
	Let me just make sure.
	It's going to be Wednesday.
	It's going to be the 5th.
	So whatever day the 5th is at 1 o 'clock Eastern, that's going to be amazing.
	And a number of other phenomenal guests.
	I say phenomenal.
	Unfortunately, some of their phenomenal nature has to do with the tragedy that they're going through.
	So that's it.
	Come on over to vivabarnslaw.locals.com.
	Tune in tomorrow, 1 o 'clock.
	I'll be live Friday as well.
	Next week, Lectern Guy on Wednesday at 1 o 'clock.
	And other great guests are coming up in the pipeline.
	So come in for that.
	And I'm going to end this on Rumble and go over to Locals right now.
	Thank you all for being here.
	Don't lose faith.
	Keep fighting the good fight.
	Do not become the monster you are battling because if in defeating the monster you're battling, you become the monster.
	You have not defeated the monster.
	You have replaced the monster.
	I'm going to go tweet that out and make it a quote.
	See you on Locals right now, ending on Rumble.
	Peace out, peeps.
	Be well.
	All right, Locals!
	People!
	TimeBandit66 has a $5 tip.
	It says, Hey Viva, I know it's off point, but our album broke into the Asian, Indonesian, India, and Brazilian markets.

▲