The Peter Hotez Madness CONTINUES! Drag Story-Time a HUMAN RIGHT? AND MORE! Viva Frei
|
Time
Text
It's not about you.
It's about people you interact with.
And that's the social contract of public health.
We don't even know if the vaccine worked or not at the time.
Yes!
That's what the trials are!
Dude!
That's why these trials...
Are you missing data out there?
But let me ask you a question.
Are we saying only one type of scientists are right?
No!
We're saying that the system in place...
The 16,000 that signed that...
No, no, no.
The system in place to test vaccines...
There's an entire system that's in place.
Look at the hands.
Review boards and all of this.
That's in place.
Now, you can say...
Look at his hands.
I have a better idea than all these review boards and all these agencies and the CDC.
I have a better idea.
Here's what you should do.
And that would have made everything better.
Okay.
You can put forth that idea.
But what I'm saying is, in a case where you can contaminate someone else...
It's not about you.
It's about...
How did that age, Neil deGrasse Tyson?
I don't play the card, hey astrophysicists, stay in your lane.
I don't play that card ever, and I'm not going to start now.
I'm just going to ask, how did that play out, Mr. Astrophysicist?
The collective health.
You're assuming.
You're assuming because somebody can take the vaccine.
Won't get COVID.
Which, by the way, I don't need to play the clips for you to see it where everybody said, hey, if you get it, you're not going to get it.
If you take the vaccine, you're not going to get it.
Rachel Maddow, Joe Biden.
I can give you Fauci.
I can give you...
And you've seen these clips before.
It's not like you've never seen it before.
They were wrong.
Hold on.
So.
Cognitive dissonance.
The strain evolved.
The strain evolved.
I'm going to leave this up here for a reason because we need to get to the...
Tweet that prompted that.
Okay.
I couldn't think of what else to start with.
I was going to start with a clip from my most recent podcast with Pantelis in Montreal.
I might get to that later.
I was going to start with...
What am I going to start with?
It's Friday, people.
Has everyone seen Flatliners?
Remember Flatliners with Kiefer Sutherland?
They put people under, they stop their hearts, they experience death, and right before they go under, they say it's a good day to die.
Fantastic movie, actually.
Now that I'm thinking, I might want to re-watch that one.
I was just going to say it's a good day to die.
It's a good day to cry, people.
Because the world is going bat poop crazy.
I'll try not to swear.
Some people are saying I swore a little too much on Pentelis.
The world's going crazy.
And I try to adhere to the RFK Jr. philosophy.
Try not to impute malice to your adversaries.
Try to not demonize them where you think they are out to destroy you at all costs and therefore you have to act accordingly or defend yourself accordingly.
I try not to.
But at some point in time...
You have to...
At some point, they're proving me wrong.
What movie did I call it?
What did I call it?
I called it Flatliners, right?
What did I call it?
Anyhow, I couldn't think of what else to start with.
Fair warning, people.
I'm very cranky today.
I say this all the time.
I'm not afraid of crying, and I oftentimes cry more out of frustration than out of sadness, although sometimes out of deep sadness as well, at the lamentable state and trajectory of the universe.
Oh my goodness, reading some of the stuff that we're going to cover today, I want to cry.
I'm sitting in my car and I'm saying, this can't be reality.
And then, not the cognitive dissonance, not the trolls, the people on the internet who come out and say, it's not so bad.
You're misinterpreting things.
You should really stay in your lane.
Oh, oh, okay.
But before we get into any of this today, we're live.
Let me make sure that we're live on Rumble.
Looks like we're live on Rumble.
We are live on Rumble.
Okay.
Let's make sure that we're live on Locals.
All good on Locals.
VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
And for those of you who are new to the channel, we start off on YouTube, Rumble, and Locals.
Because I have exclusive agreements.
I have exclusive agreements with the Rumbles.
Because I have an exclusivity agreement with the Rumble.
What I do is we end on YouTube.
We carry on on Rumble.
Not so that we can do things that would be unlawful on YouTube.
I end up posting, if not the entire stream, the highlights back on YouTube, just so that we can actually draw traffic to, attention to, and reward a company that actually rewards free speech, or at least promotes free speech.
Then at the end of Rumble, I go over to Locals, where we have our wonderful community, which is Above Average.
That's going on a shirt.
That's going on a shirt.
I am Above Average.
Remind me, people.
Remind me.
I am above average.
I just put that in the locals.
And then we go to locals.
We have an exclusive locals community stream.
I take the tips over there.
No medical advice.
No election fortification advice.
No legal advice.
There are these things called Super Chats, which you'll see, and Rumble Rants, which you'll see on Rumble.
Ooh, let's...
Hold on a second.
Let's do next week, comma, and I will make the announcement now!
No worries at all, period.
All right, we're going to have Chef Andrew Gruul on.
It was supposed to be this afternoon, but I hadn't heard back, and there might have been some cross-communication.
So Chef Andrew Gruul, if you don't know who he is on Twitter, go follow him.
He's going to be on next week.
We're going to find a good time for all of us.
What the heck was I just saying?
Oh, then we go to locals.
We take all that.
Okay, fine.
Oh, that's right.
Superchats, RumbleRants.
YouTube takes 30% of Superchats.
Rumble ordinarily takes 20% of RumbleRants.
That's RumbleRants.
They take 0% for the rest of this year.
All goes to the creator.
So better for the creator, but better off supporting a platform that supports free speech.
And if you want the best bang for the buck...
VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
You can support us.
You don't have to.
We've got 106,000 members who are not paying members.
It's just a wonderful community.
There is stuff that is exclusive for supporters.
It's the best place.
Seven bucks a month, 70 bucks a year.
Although some people, if you believe it, actually voluntarily pay more than that because they love what we do and they want to support us.
And you can go to VivaFry.com and get merch.
Cheryl Gage, haven't seen you in a while.
Been on vacation.
Good to be back and listen to you calmly explain things.
It's not going to be calm today.
Today it's going to be manic as usual, angry as usual, with a touch of humor in as much as it's humanly possible, given that we are seeing the breakdown of the very fabric of a civil society.
There will be laughter, and there is a funny story.
I have muted Rachel Gilmore, former CTV news journalist, from my Twitter feed, and I have not fully appreciated how much saner and...
More intelligent my Twitter feed has been.
But someone sent me a link from Rachel Gilmore today and we're going to deal with that one on Rumble because it's mind-blowing.
It's mind-melting.
It's mind-numbing.
It's mind-liquifying.
Stupid.
No, Keith, you spam.
And I tell you that if you spam, you're going to get put in a timeout.
I didn't block you.
I just put you in a timeout because you were spamming.
I don't block anybody.
But if you sit there spamming in as much as you can, that is an abuse and it's a distraction to actually my focus.
So don't spam and you won't get blocked or put in a timeout.
Very interesting, blocking.
I haven't blocked anybody, Keith, but you spam and it gets distracting.
All right, what was I saying?
Look at that, now I'm distracted.
All right, what's on the menu for today?
The Peter Hotez drama continues.
He will not let this go.
And when I say, like, try not to impute evil intentions to your ideological adversaries, part of me said, okay, Hotez refuses to debate with RFK Jr.
That's ordinarily where it should end.
But Hotez will not stop drawing attention to himself on Twitter by tweeting about his courage, his honesty, his bravery.
His intellectual fortitude in refusing to debate RFK Jr. on Twitter.
Tweets about it.
I mean, go through his feed.
We're going to scroll through it.
He will not stop tweeting about it day in and day out.
He says, look, we're going to get to that.
And then has the audacity to imply, suggest, or overtly state there's a harassment campaign against the man who will not stop tweeting.
There's a harassment campaign on Twitter against the man who will not stop tweeting and also not stop calling other people's names.
We're going to talk about that.
We're going to get to the Aaron Burnett CNN interview.
I wanted to talk about it yesterday before the stream with Barnes, but my goodness, if you didn't see the stream yesterday with Barnes where we broke down John F. Kennedy's peace speech of 1963, July 1963, in comparison to RFK Jr.'s, what month are we now?
It was June speech of 2023.
Watch it yesterday.
The first half, not to degrade the amazingness of RFK Jr.'s speech, I think we'd all watched RFK Jr.'s speech Tuesday night.
The first half was actually more fascinating because I have never watched JFK's peace speech of the time.
The analysis, the context, the history, fantastic.
And how it explains what might have led to, you know, how it explains that that might have been a factor leading to his assassination.
Mind-blowing.
Must watch, by the way.
Well done, Viva.
Thank you, another slave.
Yeah, that was...
It was amazing.
So we're going to talk about Hotez.
We're going to talk about, oh, these news stories coming out of Canada, which make you think that Soylent Green, the movie, was not a movie.
It was a documentary.
They've passed a new law in Nova Scotia called Avery's Law.
Named after a boy who was in a car accident and his organs could not be donated because they didn't have the facilities in place to do it on such short notice.
The law now presumed consent to donate your organs, your tissues, unless you opt out.
Who gets to decide if they take your organs?
The coroner and the kicker.
And you're going to want to stick around for this because it blows the freaking mind.
You don't even have to be dead.
In fact, from what I understand, if you're dead...
And you've been dead for an extended period of time or the relevant extended period of time.
You can't donate your organs because they're all depleted of oxygen.
So it's for brain death.
The coroner decides if you're close enough to death to harvest your organs based on deemed consent if you have not opted out of it.
And I'll tell you this.
I'm an organ donor, people.
People saying, what, Dirk Diggler?
Just wait.
Just wait for it.
What else?
Apparently, drag story time is a human right.
And if you don't think that grown adults dressing as cross-dressers should not be reading to your children, you're denying a human right.
Only in Canada.
And, you know, the rest of the world to some extent.
All right, and then there's some other stuff.
Rachel Gilmore.
It's going to be great.
We're going to start with Peter Hotez.
There's so many.
I have so many notes in my backdrop.
We're going to start with Peter Hotez.
So I can snip and clip.
And anybody who wants to timestamp, that would be great.
But starting with Peter Hotez and his Twitter feed.
Peter Hotez has 54.5 thousand tweets.
And I think about 50,000 of them have come in the last week.
Just scrolling through his Twitter feed.
48 minutes.
By the way, I don't judge people for tweeting.
I tweet quite a bit.
I use it as an ongoing diary.
I just highlighted that when you're going to claim a harassment campaign on Twitter and you don't stop tweeting.
You invite people to quote, tweet, to comment, tweet, and to criticize your behavior.
It's not called harassment on Twitter.
It's actually called the dialogue in which you are willingly, actively engaging.
All right.
Peter Hotez.
He's in Brazil now for some reason.
Retweeting Eric Fagelding.
And if you haven't seen Eric Fagelding's propagandist Twitter account, you should go check him out a little bit.
Joe Rogan, Elon Musk instigate harassment campaign against vaccine scientists.
A Twitter-wide, very international freakout over Dr. Peter Hotez sharing a link to a Mother Boyd story.
By the way, the freakout Twitter-wide seems to...
One hour ago, a hero...
Getting world support, deservedly so.
For those keeping score, science one.
Fiction zero.
Oh, look at that.
Peter Hotez, retweeting Chris Hayes.
You know who Chris Hayes is?
Propagandist.
Do you know what Dr. Hotez does for a living?
He helps create generic and easily producible vaccines.
A COVID one, for instance, that can be deployed throughout the global south for minimal cost and free those countries from big pharma rent-seeking.
Does he bypass also standard security research protocol?
Testing.
All that stuff.
Peter Hotez retweeting Chris Hayes again.
And Chris Hayes again.
Retweeting Dean Baker.
If the folks screamed about Dr. Hope and actually want to go after Big Pharma, they would push for more than what he...
Peter Hotez retweeting Chelsea Clinton.
I'm reading Chelsea Clinton's tweet right now.
I'll read it in the dramatic voice.
Deeply troubled.
Chelsea Clinton has the blue checkmark, which means that she can tweet for more than 240 characters, but no.
No, I am deeply troubled.
Deeply troubled by the online attacks against Dr. Peter Hodden.
What attacks?
Other than the guy showing up in his house, which I have unequivocally condemned, what other online attacks?
The occasional buffoon making threatening statements?
Yeah, nobody puts up with that.
Nobody tolerates that.
Nobody encourages that.
Period.
Standing in solidarity.
Oh, no, not I am standing.
Standing in solidarity with Peter and all of our public health and medical professionals committed to delivering science-backed health information, particularly about vaccines.
This goes on and on and on.
And if I just scroll, like, a lot and on.
Oh, wait, hold on.
I saw a Ukrainian flag.
I just have to go see what he's retweeting here.
Professor Hotez is reading Trust Science, Trust Facts.
I am sorry that you're having to deal with this purely political harassment.
When you have donated your life to helping people, including the poor and undeserving.
His family does not support...
Here.
Retweeting Mehdi Hassan.
Joe Rogan wants a scientist to debate a vaccine denier.
Turning him down was the right thing to do.
And it goes on and on and on.
But remember, people.
It's a harassment campaign on Twitter to engage in any one of the hundreds of tweets that Peter Hotez has put out over the last week in methinks he doth protesteth too much justification of his refusal to debate R.F.K.
Jr.
And you know what?
I don't like the word debate.
It should just be an online open discussion.
Take questions from the crowd.
Take questions from your interlocutor.
Not a debate.
An exploration of truth.
Let me just see something here.
We're going to get into this, by the way.
So, Professor Hotez.
Did I?
What did he write here?
Joe Rogan wants a scientist to debate it.
I think the thing is, I can't.
Oh, fine.
I wanted to show this ratio.
That's great.
A ratio where I said, all right, you don't want to debate an anti-vaxxer like RFK Jr., who is a competent attorney.
He's an attorney.
He's litigated environmental stuff for the better part of his life.
He's able to ask questions and you should be able to answer them.
You don't want to debate an anti-vaxxer like RFK Jr.
Go ahead and debate Robert Malone, Brett Weinstein, Francis Christian, Harvey Risch, Peter McCullough.
Which ones am I missing, people?
I know I'm missing a ton and I don't want to be disrespectful.
Matheson?
Go debate one of the credentialed experts.
Oh, but they're not an epidemiologist.
Well, Harvey Risch is.
Go debate Harvey Risch.
Oh, but I'm going to listen to an astrophysicist spew nonsense about the jibby jab.
Oh, yeah.
No, no.
You take it for community, but it didn't actually stop transmission.
Dude, that's because it evolved, man.
And the people who are saying you don't vaccinate into a pandemic.
Dude, they're not.
Oh.
I'm just going to have to go...
I'm just going to have to go...
Bring them up one at a time.
Oh, was it here?
Was it here?
Let me see this.
Joe Rogan, Elon Musk, instigate harassment campaign.
All right, we got that one.
That was the...
That's not the right one.
Mehdi Hassan.
Oh, this is so good.
I mean, this is really just...
Zero background in medicine and public health and said COVID would be gone by...
So here's a guy named Mehdi Hasan.
You know who Mehdi Hasan is?
We know Mehdi Hasan.
So he says, noted conspiracy theorist who has zero background in medicine and public health and said COVID would be gone by April 2020 thinks he knows more about vaccines than the world-renowned award-winning scientist who helped create patent-free COVID vaccines for the poor.
Mehdi Hasan is defending for...
Refusal.
to Hotez to not debate RFK does that make sense now here's the crazy part you know Medi Hassan just wrote a book Medi Hassan just wrote a book the art that came out the art of debate I want to say it's very recently This book just came out to give the date.
February 28 of 2023.
The title of the book is The Art of Debating Persuiting and Public Speaking.
The guy writes a book on debating.
No wonder it didn't sell any copies.
You write this book, then you're scared shitless of Peter Hotez's debate.
Refusal.
So let's just say, Mehdi, if you're watching this, since you're such a great debater, which you claim you are, you wrote the book, we don't claim we are that, you're claiming you're this, no problem.
Mehdi, question for you.
You don't think RFK is qualified to debate him?
Hey, Peter McCullough is.
Robert Malone is.
We got a few other people that tell you to have a qualification of doctors.
We can get a lineup of people that would be willing to debate Peter McCullough.
That kind of hurts your argument, doesn't it?
And it kind of hurts your argument to say RFK is not a doctor.
And you know what?
It's pretty wild.
Guys like him, you know probably who his hero was?
You know probably who his hero was?
Who was your favorite American president of all time?
JFK.
John F. Kennedy.
You know what John F. Kennedy did?
He was an anti-establishment president.
What do you think RFK is doing?
He's an anti-establishment figurehead.
So the people you admire, now you don't like that family lineage because they're pushing back on people like you and you just wrote a book on debate, dog.
It's just like horrible on what you're doing, man.
First of all, I think I also love the bass and the tenor in Patrick B. David's voice.
So Patrick B. David puts out this clip.
From Valuetainment.
Valuetainment had just made an offer to...
Ooh, it was...
No, it wasn't Steven Crowder.
It was Tucker Carlson.
Tens of millions.
I think it was...
What was it?
A hundred million, his offer?
It was a massive tens of millions of dollar offer to Tucker Carlson to come onto his network, Valuetainment.
Patrick Bet-David puts out this tweet.
If Mehdi Hassan wrote a book on the art of debating, why discourage Peter Hotez from debating?
What do you fear?
If not Robert F. Kennedy, what if Joe Rogan invites another accomplished doctor to debate Dr. Hotez?
Mehdi Hassan.
And by the way, I'm sure this is one of the strategies in his book.
Insult your interlocutor.
Demean, degrade your interlocutor.
Minimize them.
I have no idea who you are.
This is Mehdi Hassan on Peacock Television and MSNBC propaganda.
Saying, I have no idea who you are.
Prefacing his response with his own ignorance.
I have no idea who you are, but since you're asking and assuming, go actually read the book, especially the chapter Gish Galloping.
Oh, yes, yes, yes.
That seems to be the most popular one and the most favorite of Mehdi Hasan because he uses the tactic all the time.
And then come back to me.
All may become clear to you.
I have no idea who you are.
I just had to go look up some numbers.
Not that numbers make a person or make a platform.
I have to bring it up.
Petty, Mehdi, what a douche.
Yes.
Valuetainment on YouTube alone gets 30 million views a month.
The Patrick but David podcast, where he had on astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson.
I don't know how many millions and millions of views they get on cross-platforms.
30 million a month alone on YouTube.
It's not Rogan numbers, but it's in the ballpark.
I say it's not the same distance, but it's in the same direction.
This is in the same ballpark.
If you don't know who Patrick Bet-David is in Valuetainment, Mediasan, it's because you're an ignorant buffoon who lives in an ideological silo of propaganda.
That's why.
Start off your tweet illustrating your own ignorance.
I looked it up.
I think MSNBC gets like 150 million views a month on all their programs.
If you don't know...
I mean, just imagine saying, I don't know who you are, Joe Rogan, and thinking you look like anything other than idiots.
Patrick Bet-David is not yet Joe Rogan levels, but he's in the ballpark.
But yeah, oh, I have no idea who you are.
And then he replies to another tweet.
Congrats, you paid for your blue checkmark so that you could be top-ranked in the comments.
Good for you.
When Mehdi Hassan also paid for his blue checkmark, and by the way...
It's the best eight bucks a month I've ever spent because it allows you to edit tweets for the first 60 minutes.
Now it gives you extra length in your tweets and it gives you basically unlimited video length.
So that's Mehdi Hassan's take on it.
Peter Hotez is a gaslighting coward and there is no other way to look at it now because if his issue is RFK as an uncredentialed expert, I believe McCullough...
Yes, Peter McCullough came out and said he would debate, have the discussion.
Oh, but Peter McCullough is not a vaccine specialist.
I forget what Peter McCullough's specialty is.
Hold on a second.
Yes, who's this?
Am I almost done?
I just started.
Okay, 60 minutes.
Can you get out of here?
Go up and watch Top Gun.
The kid doesn't appreciate how lucky he has it that I can work in the basement.
All that I need is two hours a day.
All I need is two hours a day.
That's right.
He's a PR.
All I need is two hours a day where I can do this.
And then I spend the rest of the...
Damn kids is right.
Spend the rest of the day with the kid.
All right.
In case anyone had any questions about the history of correctness.
This is an edited clip, everybody.
So it edits out.
Some stuff and highlights the insane wrongness of Peter Hotez.
It's really interesting about the conservative sites is because you really don't know what they're thinking until you know, until you've talked to people.
And for them, you know, one of the big issues has been they create this straw man.
The straw man is around vaccine mandates.
They're obsessed that...
People are just going to...
Again, this comes out of this health freedom, medical freedom nonsense that...
Health freedom, medical freedom nonsense.
And their biggest problem?
They straw men.
You know what that is, Dr. Hotez?
That's a straw man.
Their biggest problem?
They make up bullcrap arguments.
Oh, no.
No, no, no.
But let's just hear how your medical expertise, you vaccine expert, has aged.
Since, what was this, February 26, 2021, assuming that the date of this video from May's is accurate.
Accelerated in 2015.
They're convinced that, you know, either the U.S. government or the National Guard or...
Soldiers in blue helmeted UN helmets are going to hold everybody down and vaccinate them.
Talk about strawmanning, you raging hypocrites.
They don't have to hold you down and vaccinate you.
They can just threaten to take away your job, your livelihood, your kids in some cases.
Oh, no.
But thanks for telling me that the conservative side's biggest problem is strawmanning while you go ahead, Dr. Hotez, and strawman.
Other than Dershowitz, who said they could in theory, you know?
Plunge that needle into your arm.
The concern was not that they were going to hold you down and vaccinate you against your will, although we didn't get far from that.
The concern was that they were going to find other ways to end your life if you decided not to.
Fire you.
Excommunicate you.
Take your kids away from you.
Not allow you visitation rights.
And by the way, Hotez, they did all of those things.
This obsession with mandates.
And I say, look, right now no one's talking about mandates.
These vaccines will stop asymptomatic transmission.
I want to stop that one there.
They will stop asymptomatic transmission.
Neil deGrasse Tyson's way of weaseling out of that was that, dude, it evolved!
We now know that they did not test for transmission.
So Neil deGrasse Tyson's explanation, which would have been a legitimate one, had they even thought that it prevented transmission in the first place, would have been the proper logical weasel way out, but it would have been a weasel way out nonetheless.
They didn't test for transmission.
We know that now from the famous clip.
Of the European parliamentarian, gray hair, not gray hair, blonde hair, asking the British executive, hey, we were, no, we were moving at the speed of science.
We didn't test the transmission.
What did Hotez say this based on?
These vaccines will stop asymptomatic transmission.
They didn't stop symptomatic transmission.
They didn't stop transmission because they weren't tested for it.
So what did Hotez make this statement on?
This is one of the questions I would ask.
I'm not a vaccine specialist.
I'm not even going to ask you about the science.
I'm going to ask you about your logic.
You made a statement.
Did Pfizer tell you that at the time?
Or did they tell you at the time that they didn't test for transmission, in which case you are a liar.
You're either repeating a lie because you didn't look at the underlying research.
You either knew it was a lie, in which case you're repeating it right now, which makes you a double liar.
Protection is not long-lasting with natural infection a lot of the time.
A lot of the time, by the way.
So that's his Weasel.
This time I was wrong, but other times...
It was more with the original SARS back in 2003, but not as much with this one for reasons that we don't understand.
So vaccine immunity is probably going to be better and more durable.
I'm thinking that most people...
I think...
Vaccine acceptance is going to increase as people see the benefits of getting it.
That's a matter of opinion.
That can't be wrong.
Just so everybody appreciates it.
The last one is a matter of opinion.
The other statements were not statements of opinion.
It'll prevent asymptomatic transmission.
They didn't test for transmission, so they lied to you.
And you repeated the lie.
They told you the truth and you made a lie.
And if you know now that they lied to you when they told you it's going to prevent transmission, like Albert Burla did in his April 1st, 2001 tweet, 100% effective, and you now know that they lied to you and you still trust the liars, you're no better than them.
Okay.
What else do we have with this?
What do I have here with Peter Hotez?
Oh, yeah.
So he says, by the way, In defending himself, this is just going to blow your mind.
Jordan Peterson tweets out, it says, If Joe Rogan generously invites you to his massive platform to debate and offers a substantial sum to charity as an accompaniment, then run away, if he does this, and you run away and cast dispersions on his impeccable character while claiming victim status.
Have I summarized your strategy, Peter Hotez?
Peter Hotez writes, he won't debate in person.
He'll just nitpick and choose what he chooses to debate on Twitter.
Well, I think you've nicely summarized the false narrative currently promoted by the conspiracy websites and those who seek to monetize the internet.
Pfizer can monetize their jibby jab.
People can't monetize their expertise and their analytics, their analytical thinking.
That's wrong.
But if you want the real story, just read any one of the...
Oh, read the Vanity Fair link.
Oh my goodness.
But it gets worse, people.
You can go read those.
Rubbish articles.
Or listen to my interviews over the last two days with Outfront, with CNN, Mehdi Hassan.
And I will tell you, I did not see these Pete Dominic and Molly Jong-Fast.
She blocked me, I think.
Let me see.
Molly, I'm fairly certain Molly Jong-Fast has blocked me.
Go watch those interviews.
That suffices for the debate, everybody.
That suffices for the debate.
There was another guy.
I don't have to debate Joe Rogan.
I went on Aaron Burnett, CNN, the liars, the propagandists who pushed a slew of other disinformation campaigns.
I went on with Mehdi Hassan, and he asked me a very, very solid 30-second question.
Vaccines are good.
Are they not?
They prevent infection.
Are they not?
Anyone who says this is wrong.
Are they?
Thank you.
And please defer what I just said.
Oh, yes.
It gets even better, though.
Hold on.
Let me just see here.
Where was it?
Oh, it was Ian Copeland.
Okay, so this one I've got.
Ian, another guy.
I don't know who these people are.
Everyone's coming to Hotez's defense in like...
Oh, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
This is not the right one.
Everyone has come to Hotez's defense in a way that is not suspicious whatsoever.
You got...
You got Mehdi Hassan.
You got LA Times.
You got Vanity Fair.
You got BBC, CNN.
They're all coming to Hotez's defense despite all of his wrongness of the past in that one clip that we just saw in all of the tweets that I put together where he says we need to vaccinate kids to prevent transmission.
We can halt transmission if everyone gets vaccinated.
Everyone should be wearing face masks.
Everything he has said has been wrong at one point in time.
This other guy just...
Oh yeah, here we go.
Jeff Strohrobinski.
Don't know who he is.
He might be a very nice person.
Husband, father, friend, educator, podcaster, news, etc., etc.
Sharp-witted and humorous.
Think nine times and tweet once.
Oh, if I had to guess, I'd say he was British.
He says Peter Hotes on Outfront with Aaron Burnett for nearly seven minutes, people.
He doesn't need a debate.
RFK Jr., he went on the shittiest propagandist network for seven whole minutes.
Oh, sorry.
Nearly seven minutes.
We're going to go through this interview right now.
He went on nearly seven minutes with Aaron Burnett.
Do you know what the kicker is, people?
Peter Hotez spoke for barely three minutes and 15 seconds aggregate, and there was all of 20 seconds addressing the safety and efficacy of the COVID jab.
Half of which consisted of the clips from RFK Jr. and the other 10 seconds, Aaron Burnett saying, this is just wrong, isn't it?
Tell me I'm right.
Listen to this.
NFL superstar Aaron Rodgers attacking one of the nation's top vaccine experts.
Starts off, he's a victim.
Aaron Rodgers, a moronic football player who probably has brain damage.
How dare he criticize one of the top vaccine experts of the country?
Just bear it.
This is a six minute and 49 second clip.
The New York Jets quarterback posting this image of Dr. Peter Hotez on Instagram saying, quote, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. would mop this bum.
I actually believe that would be true as well.
I would love to see a debate where I'm proven wrong and Hotez just comes in and makes RFK look like a total anti-vax conspiracy theorist nuthead that Hotez claims him to be.
I think Aaron Rodgers is right.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., of course, is running for president.
He's a vocal vaccine skeptic.
Roger's post comes after Dr. Hotez criticized RFK Jr. after a podcast he did with Joe Rogan.
In that podcast, he repeatedly pushed unfounded claims about vaccines, and he called out Dr. Hotez by name.
By the way, just so we're clear, we're 34 seconds in.
We haven't even seen Hotez yet.
Nobody will debate me.
For 18 years, nobody will debate me.
I don't want to glamorize RFK too much, but he looks chiseled.
He looks like a statue that has already been carved to a historical figure.
He has many, many times to debate me.
I've debated Hotas on the telephone.
See, we use the word debate and discuss interchangeably.
With kind of a referee.
And, you know, his science is just made up.
Oh, you mean like when he said that the jab would prevent asymptomatic transmission?
Like when he said that?
He cannot stand by it.
He can't cite studies.
All right, Rogan.
Then, after all of this, comes out and tweets at Dr. Hotez.
And he tweets, quote, Peter, if you claim what RFK Jr. is saying is misinformation, I'm offering you $100,000 to the charity of your choice if you're willing to debate him on my show with no time.
Can you imagine, apparently the pool, the charity pool is up to $3,005,000.
$3 million because of other people's pledges and the $5,000 came from me.
I will donate.
I'll contribute $5,000 to this pool to see it happen.
I'm not quite...
One day, may I be in the realm of donating $100,000?
$3,005,000 charity pool for the world-renowned vaccinologist, vaccine scientist, to debate the lowly, presidential-aspiring conspiracy theory anti-vaxxer nut.
And he says no.
That's not just showing you that he has no faith in his ideas.
Because maybe he could say, look, ordinarily I wouldn't.
He doesn't care about poor, impoverished people.
He makes cheap vaccines, yada, yada.
He's turning down an opportunity to raise $3,005,000 for a charity of his choice.
And then Elon Musk jumps in, tweeting, quote, of Hotez.
He's afraid of a public debate because he knows he's wrong.
How could Elon say that?
I mean, we just heard Hotez.
I'm going to bring up my montage of Hotez afterwards.
We just heard Hotez say something that was factually incorrect, scientifically incorrect, and above all else.
He's either fabricated out of whole cloth or dishonest because he knew it wasn't true when he said it.
By the way, we're a minute 23 seconds into the 6 minute 49 second clip.
We haven't even seen Bowtie Man yet.
And Dr. Hotez is now out front.
And doctor, there's a lot I wanted to talk to you about.
There's a lot of layers.
But let me just start with where we are at this moment.
You're now dealing with personal threats.
Shouldn't have to deal with it.
Shouldn't have to deal with it.
How is this situation different than anything you faced before?
We are 1 minute and 39 seconds into a 6 minute and 49 second interview.
We haven't heard a word from Dr. Hotez and it starts off with him being the victim.
I think it has to do with the volume, the intensity, and the fact that now people are coming to my home.
I've been going up against anti-vaccine groups for a couple of decades because I have a daughter with autism and wrote a book, Vaccines Did Not Cause Racial Autism, about my daughter.
But what's happened over the last few years, the movement still continues around autism, but it's shifted to become more of a political movement, and it's better organized, it's better funded, it's politically motivated.
And I think that's what you're seeing now, this play out in a very organized fashion that's really troubling and extremely aggressive and at times pretty scary.
I can only imagine.
I can only imagine, by the way, nobody should be showing up at his door even if they think they're doing street independent journalism, period.
Two minutes and 25 seconds into this interview, Hotez has been talking for 40 seconds and only about what a victim he is in all of this.
And look, the reality of this is, is part of the reason this is in the conversation is that...
You can't stop tweeting about it!
RFK Jr. has been polling around 20% in various polls as a challenger to president Biden.
You can't stop tweeting about it is why it's in the news.
That's why people are so focused on him, right?
And yet he is perhaps, he's done a lot of environmental work in his career, but perhaps best known for what he has chosen to make his central statement, right, which is claims about vaccines.
And here he is on the COVID.
As we all now recognize, the COVID vaccines were neither safe nor effective.
If you got vaccinated, you're more likely to get sick, you're more likely to get severe illness, and you're more likely to die than if you were unvaccinated.
I'm sorry, can Hotez not dignify himself with a debate to challenge that statement?
I've heard that statement, and then I've heard the defense to that statement is, you're more likely to get it, but it's going to be...
Less severe when you do.
One thing is for certain, I know that pretty much everybody who got vaccinated got COVID afterwards.
I'd like to thank the extra protection that was provided to me by my 17th booster.
I thank the vaccines and the protection.
Every single person who got the jab, the most vocal ones, including Hotez himself, got COVID afterwards.
Oh, but there's nothing to debate there.
It's a crazy thing.
I don't even have to dignify that with a response.
Which is why everybody came out with the cut and paste, I'm thankful for having been vaccinated and the boosters and the increased protection that it has offered and my symptoms would have been worse had I not gotten vaccinated.
Those things are not true.
I should just, you know, right, Dr. Hotels?
Those things are simply not true.
Moving on, moving on.
That you wrote about your daughter, right?
She has autism and you wrote a book.
That's the debate on the COVID jab safety and efficacy.
It's simply not true.
Moving on.
This man is a liar.
I try not to impute ill intentions.
This man is a liar.
He's seeking the shelter of fellow liars, Aaron Burnett, Mehdi Hassan, CNN, MSNBC, Vanity Fair, BBC.
We're three minutes and 23 seconds into this six minute, 49 second clip.
Hotis has talked for like a minute, and there's been 20 seconds dedicated to jab efficacy, and that was it.
Explaining why.
Vaccines are not the cause of that.
So this whole debate comes up that Rogan's saying, do this debate, give $100,000 to charity.
And you've had time to think about it.
What's the reason that you don't think that that is worthwhile?
Well, you know, I've had, as Bobby, which is what I would call him when I would be speaking with him, Rightly points out we've had a number of conversations, especially in the year 2017.
We've had a number of conversations, especially in the year 2017, three years before COVID and four years before the COVID jab.
Yep, those are relevant conversations to the question of the COVID jab efficacy.
You liar.
He announced he was going to be appointed to head of special commissioner on vaccines, I hope you rot in hell.
Vaccine scientists harassed after Joe Rogan challenged.
I didn't realize that if you get messages that say, I hope you rot in hell, it's considered harassment.
I can claim harassment status now.
And by the way, notice how many times they recycle this one Chiron, Shiron, whatever the hell it is.
Notice how many times they rerun this, I hope you rot in hell, in the bottom.
If I had a nickel for every time I heard, I hope you rot in hell, go kill yourself.
If I had a nickel for that, I mean, I don't even talk about it.
Again, speaking with him, actually at the request of the National Institutes of Health.
And it was an exercise in frustration because I did cite studies and in-depth studies.
And in fact, I put it all together in the book.
It seems to not cause Rachel's autism.
But, you know, it was frustrating because he would keep on moving the goalposts.
I mean, initially it was about the measles, mumps, rubella vaccine that was said to multiply in the colon, and somehow that led to autism.
And that was debunked with large epidemiological studies.
And then it was shifted to thimerosal preservative.
Do you notice how easy it is to have the debate when your interlocutor is not there?
He says, there's a difference between a moving target and a multi-targeted.
But if I'm predicting confessions through projection as to whether or not RFK is the moving target or it's actually Dr. Hotez, I know what I think already.
And he was a big proponent of that in the 2000s.
Look at Erin.
Yeah, she's smiling.
When that got debunked, it was spacing vaccines too close together.
And they talked about this concept of greening vaccines.
And then it was alemin vaccines.
Did you respond to that?
Does anybody think it's a great idea to get all your shots on one day, given that they do, in fact, trigger immunological responses?
It wasn't even about autism anymore.
It was something called chronic illness.
So it was always kind of this parakem of whack-a-mole or moving the goalposts.
And that's what it would be like if I went on Joe Rogan.
It's not productive.
Oh, it's not productive.
By the way, everything that Hotez just talked about pre-COVID.
Everything is pre-COVID, and he's going to use that as the pretext to say it's equally useless to have a debate as to the safety and efficacy of the COVID jab.
To do it.
And in some ways, it kind of sets the whole field back.
So let me quickly ask you that point, Elon Musk, right?
He said you're afraid to debate RFK Jr. because you know you are wrong.
Now, I should just note that Musk hosted Kennedy for a Twitter Spaces forum.
He has more followers than any other human alive on Twitter, 144 million.
He is the richest person in the world.
People pay attention to him.
And he's, just to state the obvious, an intellectually formidable and successful person.
By the way, how long has Hotez talked in this interview?
Five and a half minutes in?
How impactful is it that he's saying these types of things?
Very.
Well, remember, between RFK Jr., Joe Rogan, and Elon Musk, pretty much that's every follower on Twitter.
And I'm not going to use that opportunity to talk to every follower on Twitter to show them what a goalpost-moving conspiracy theorist anti-vax nut RFK is.
Imagine that.
Imagine saying no to that opportunity.
Woody Allen said 90% of success is answering the phone.
Hotez is letting that phone ring and then saying, stop calling me.
While he complains about being called.
So that's a big space.
Yeah.
And you turned it down.
And 3 million.
And 5,000.
Multiple times to Joe Rogan.
I was on twice on his show.
You were on twice?
And we have questions from that.
But I'll come back anytime.
Just start with RFK.
Especially during that Delta wave when...
That when he was inviting some anti-vaccine activists and I thought that was doing some damage, I said, let me come on, Joe.
I'll talk to you and explain why vaccines are effective, why they're safe, and why they'll save your lives.
But he ignored those emails.
Oh, he ignored them.
He's faulting Joe Rogan for having ignored those emails, allegedly, assuming Joe Rogan even saw those emails back in 2021.
And now he's refusing to do what he's faulting Joe Rogan for allegedly not having done in 2021.
Does that make sense to you?
He didn't respond to my messages when I said I'll come on to discuss this anti-vax movement, which I think is harming the Rona jab.
But I won't do it now when Joe Rogan and the rest of the world is clamoring for it.
That makes sense.
I gotta be a virologist to understand that that's bullshit.
I wrote to him in 2021, 2022, and then I finally gave up.
I finally gave up.
Rogan doesn't get very many emails, Dr. Holtes.
I mean, you should be very certain he saw your email.
I'll come on whatever Twitter format you want to use and have that discussion.
Just not with?
In terms of RFK Jr., I've been there, done that.
I've had multiple discussions with him.
They don't go anywhere.
He doesn't really understand the science behind vaccines and doesn't really understand the science of autism.
And he doesn't really want to listen.
He doesn't really want to listen.
Dr. Hotez, I appreciate your time.
Thank you so much.
He doesn't really want to listen.
Can you believe it?
Can you believe the level of confession through projection?
He doesn't really want to listen, says the guy who doesn't want to listen.
Oh, do I?
Okay, 45 minutes in.
We're going to head over to Rumble soon.
Let me just finish up with...
Oh, let me see here.
Aaron Burnett.
Hold on, I had this here.
Okay, I hear.
This is Aaron Burnett saying, why Dr. Peter Hotez won't debate RFK?
Do you debate someone who speaks for many and growing people's fears when he says that the world is flat?
Or is that giving air to insanity?
Can you imagine Aaron Burnett of CNN and others who are doing it?
This is their new talking point.
Equating, questioning the safety and efficacy of the COVID jab to flat earth.
Can you imagine the level of insincerity and intellectual dishonesty it takes to make that comparison?
I put out a tweet, which I'll read it later.
But let's just, you know, remember, you heard Dr. Hotez.
He's right, everybody.
I'm not going to go through all of these just to, you know, show you the highlights.
Got to change the definition of fully vaccinated because the one jab, the two jabs are not doing the trick.
We need to vaccinate the kids because they're, you know, apparently at risk.
First, halting Delta transmission through vaccination.
Third, we must recognize immunity to infection recovery is not robust.
Oh, looks like I've tested positive for COVID.
Moderate symptoms of fatigue, headache, sore throat, isolating at home.
I'm grateful to have been vaccinated.
Boosted.
May I ask you this, doctor?
I noticed a lot of people saying I'm grateful to have been vaccinated and I've tested positive.
Is there any possible truth to the fact, the argument, the theory, that getting too many shots...
Might have made you more susceptible.
There's a lot of people who believe, a lot of credentialed experts who believe that.
Oh, I'm grateful to have been vaccinated boosted, which certainly prevented more severe illness.
Do you know what it's called by saying something that didn't happen, didn't happen because of what you did?
It's called superstition or borderline obsessive compulsive.
Okay.
That was just, you know, Dr. Peter Hotez not being wrong again in real time.
Okay, and I think we're almost done.
We are done.
All that to say, by the way, so that's it for Hotez.
We're done.
He's a dishonest coward turning down $3,005,000 for charity when he has a, you know...
A proven track record of having been wrong in statements, affirmations that he has made throughout COVID, going on the most propagandist of propaganda news networks to explain to the loving ears of the propagandist news networks why he should not even dignify RFK Jr. with an open discussion while simultaneously ignoring calls to sit down with McCullough, Malone, Weinstein, Reich, and all the others.
Francis Christian, any other doctor who would be more than capable of having a meaningful discussion with him because he's a hero.
Now, just a fun one that I had earlier today with a doctor, Ian Copeland, who put out on Twitter, like, again, people, I'm very, very careful not to make statements that I don't know that I can...
I'm very careful not to go beyond my...
Expertise or my understanding, but it doesn't mean I don't know what questions to ask.
Ian Copeland, PhD.
Geneticist, debunker of nonsense, black excellence.
I haven't read his profile, whatever.
Puts out a tweet that says, the claim is aluminum from vaccines causes autism.
This is all in the context of the debate.
One, aluminum levels from vaccination are not significantly higher than dietary sources.
Let me rephrase that for you.
Aluminum levels from vaccinations are higher than dietary sources.
They're not significantly higher, which means that they're higher, and then the subjective term in that assessment becomes significantly.
The aluminum in vaccination, according to Dr. Copeland, Ph.D., aluminum in vaccination is higher than aluminum from dietary sources.
Okay.
So it starts off higher.
Infants are exposed to aluminum in the womb, mother's diet.
Humans consume three to eight milligrams of aluminum per day.
I think that might be micrograms.
Stop the...
What is that?
Is that a bison?
That looks like an ox shit.
That's not even a bullshit.
That's an ox.
That's an ox or a bison.
Whatever.
So what do we take away from this statement from PhD Copeland?
The aluminum levels in vaccines are higher than dietary.
Okay, that's already a big red flag coming off there.
I asked to Dr. Copeland, let's see if I can find my tweet, because I don't know anything.
I'm just an idiot.
I'm just an idiot lawyer with half a functioning brain.
Is there not a difference between consuming something via digestion versus injecting it into the body?
Bearing in mind, vaccines are not injected intravenously.
They are supposed to be injected intermuscularly.
However, we do know that because the CDC was saying don't aspirate the COVID jab because You know, it might induce vaccine reluctance if people have to spend more time with a needle in their arm than they want to.
Don't aspirate.
It meant that some people were actually having that, what is supposed to be an intramuscular injection injected into blood vessels, which might carry it around the body where it's not supposed to go.
So set that aside.
My question is just, I know that there's a difference between ingesting and injecting.
And I'll get to one case in a second.
It seems you might be confounding equating two very different processes to claim one of them is safe because the other is.
I breathe oxygen.
Doesn't mean it's safe to inject directly into my body.
Might not have been the best analogy.
Whatever.
Copeland replies.
Explain.
What was this here?
Oh, that's right.
So he responds.
Because I didn't know if he was actually making this statement.
He says, his answer to that question, that query, no.
If it ends up in your bloodstream, what's the difference in terms of whether or not it was ingested and the method through which it gets there versus injected?
Look, I'm just going to go ahead and guess this guy's not a vaccine specialist.
And then I had to say, yes, you are in fact an absolute buffoon.
No further answers.
There was a case, because I'm a neurotic...
The hypochondriac.
And I'm old enough to remember those thermometers with the mercury in the thermometer.
And once, I bit it a little too hard.
I bit it a little too hard.
And I thought I was going to die because I didn't even think I got mercury in my mouth.
So in adulthood, I happened to look up these things.
When I was in high school also, if my high school science teacher is watching...
He's going to be pissed.
I once snuck into the science room and I stole, I appropriated, I borrowed for an extended period of time actual mercury, lots of it.
Like it was in a little jar.
I put it in a jar.
It was so magnificently and shockingly heavy.
I took liquid mercury from the science lab at my high school.
I won't say which one.
I don't know what the statute of limitations is on that.
And at one point, you used to play with it in your hand.
It would roll around and it would not stick to anything.
And then I discovered later on in life, it gets absorbed by your skin.
It's mercury.
It's a heavy metal.
It gets absorbed by the skin, whatever.
There was a story of a kid who swallowed 750 grams of elemental mercury.
It was a case study.
I mean, I pulled up the study.
And then the question was, was that a toxic level of acute mercury poisoning?
By and large, by the way, people, this is not medical advice, it's just the way things are.
When you look up the safety on those mercury thermometers, which I don't even think they make anymore, they do say, look, if it unlikely happens, it's not the 750 milligrams, 750 grams for this kid was, I don't know how the hell that happened, but if you swallow a dab because a thermometer broke in your mouth, the scientific consensus or the science behind it is it will be...
It'll be expelled in your poop.
It will go through your body.
It will not get absorbed by your gastro...
What's the word I'm looking for?
It will not get absorbed by your stomach.
By and large, it will get excreted out without absorption and therefore is far different than if you were to inject mercury into your blood.
I'm not making any statements of anything else as relates to the Jibby Jabs or whatever.
It's far different to ingest versus to inject.
And when you have a PhD coming to Twitter to call everybody names for being anti-vaxxer idiots, who equates ingestion of dietary aluminum, whatever it might be in your frosted flakes, with injection of what might also be a different type of aluminum in a vaccine, while acknowledging that it's actually higher levels in the vaccine than in your dietary supplement, you're dealing with buffoons or liars.
And that was the fight that I had this morning.
And it allowed me to bring back memories of whether or not I might have permanently injured myself by playing with that Mercury when I was a kid.
All right.
I think we've done it.
We've done it.
I think we've covered the Peter Hotez, and I'm going to go get to the Rumble Rants in two seconds, right after I give everybody the link here.
Oh, there's Super Chats.
Let me get to the Super Chats.
I haven't done.
Totally crab apples.
Been on vacation.
Good to be back.
Listen to you calmly.
Explain things to Cheryl.
I think I saw that one earlier.
Calmly.
Viva Com.
Ooh, that's not bad either.
As a Texas attorney, he is wrong on medical law.
Okay.
2012 Jameson.
Thank you.
It's a good year for Jameson.
One Thing Books.
I hope you didn't mean to put it in a comment there, but thank you very much.
Yes, I have done compliance work for 20 years, 2012 Jameson.
Ginger Ninja in the house.
Viva, did you have a chance to watch the video I sent you yesterday?
Thoughts?
Ginger, don't be mad at me.
I haven't yet watched it.
But it's still up in my open windows in the back.
It's the soldier's journey about building a home for veterans.
STFU, FFS, which stands for shut the freak up for freak's sake.
Hotez is human monkeypox, which Hotez claims wasn't sexually transmitted.
He's a snake oil salesman who don't know his arse from a hole in the wall.
I just had a visual that I didn't want to have.
And I want to apologize to you for the Rotten Hell tweets.
Don't worry about it.
Hold on, let me think about the Rotten Hell tweets.
Okay, I forget those.
All right, and now before we go over to Rumble, you're not going to want to miss the stories for the Rumble side.
There's three Rumble rants.
I'm going to start from the bottom up.
Andre Tuchulescu, I love it when you get annoyed and talk dirty.
Oh, Audrey, there's your dog.
There's your beautiful dog in your avatar.
Julie O says, after seeing what happened to my dog after vax, I don't trust any.
The Plavix company is who her vaxes were from, and then in two weeks, emergency blood franchisees in because her body killed her red blood cells.
And then we've got the Irishman getter.
20 bucks says, Viva, ask him what happens when you drink one ounce of vodka.
That's the analogy I should have used versus inject one ounce of vodka.
See if he knows.
The guy, is he even a doctor?
I don't know.
One thing I did discover, and I've never done it, so I don't even...
You know what?
I'm not even going to say it because beer enemas.
Someone mentioned that.
I was like, that's crazy.
And then I looked it up, and apparently you actually absorb it faster, a beer enema, than when you drink it, which leads people to have serious, serious problems.
Okay.
So with that said, everybody, let's just see if we're still monetized on YouTube.
Not that it matters for anything except for how YouTube decides to promote your content.
That's the Hotez lowdown.
He's a coward.
He's either wrong and hiding it, which makes him a liar, or he lied and lied about it, which makes him a liar.
And he's refusing to do a public discourse debate, even without RFK with another credentialed expert, if it meant raising $3,005,000 for a charity of his choice.
That is immoral to boot.
But by the way, he tweets all day long, and if you reply or quote tweet or anything, he's the victim of a Twitter harassment campaign.
All right.
Ending it now on...
YouTube, going over to Rumble, then we're going to go over to Locals afterwards.
So, ending on YouTube, three, two, one.
The pinned link to Rumble is in the pinned link.
Zero.
We're off YouTube now.
Oh, yeah.
Okay, good.
Let me just see something here and make sure that we're still good.
I heard the child's heartbreak as I said I would be live for another hour, and he did not appreciate it.
Nonetheless, we went to...
What did we do this morning?
We went to Beaver Lake this morning.
We then went to the Montreal, the Mount Royal Cemetery, which is closed for renovations and it's all fenced off, but we found a way to get in.
The cemeteries in the months that it has not been, you know, what's the word?
Landscaped, catered?
The cemetery is all but grown over.
It's wild.
Wild in a very weird way.
Okay, what are the other stories that we have to talk about?
These are the ones where I'm not going to cry.
Because they're not upsetting like that.
But you're going to be sick.
You will be sick.
If you thought Canada could not have fallen any more than 10,064 Canadians euthanized, state-sanctioned murder, if you ask other people, or maids, medical assistance in dying, 10,064 in 2021.
And I think we still don't know what the numbers are for 2022.
There are going to be more.
We talked about the idea that potentially the government would push people into maids, into euthanasia, what the Nazis used to call mercy killings.
They used to mercy kill the mentally ill, the mentally disabled.
They called it mercy killings.
The Trudeau regime calls it medical assistance in dying, and they want to expand it to the mentally ill.
They want to expand it to minors.
They want to expand it, apparently at least the Canadian population doesn't mind if they expand it to the homeless.
It doesn't matter if you're not actually terminally ill.
If you want to die, the government will happily oblige.
And I said, well, this is going to really open the floodgates to a black market for organs.
It seems that the government's one step ahead of me, one step ahead of the sinister Orwellian dystopian hellscape that I envisioned in my own mind.
This is coming out of Nova Scotia from CBC News.
Avery's Law makes organ tissue donation automatic in New Brunswick.
With some exceptions.
Understand the words that you are reading right now, people.
Organ tissue donation in New Brunswick, it's the second province in Canada, will be automatic, with some exceptions.
Province becomes second in jurisdiction in Canada, after Nova Scotia, to move to this model.
It's called, we're going to find out why it's called Avery's Law, but it's called Avery's Law after a boy named Avery who died in a car accident, and apparently the parents wanted to give his organs, so it's not even a question of deemed consent.
They wanted to give his organs, but apparently the infrastructure wasn't there and it wasn't ready, and they wanted to give his eyes.
It's a terrible thing to actually not be able to even make afterlife use of a young, beautiful boy.
This law now deems consent for organ and tissue harvesting, and you have to understand something, and we're going to get to it.
You not only don't have to be dead for this, you cannot be dead for this.
This happens with...
I think they called it physical death before actual death.
New Brunswick has become the second jurisdiction in Canada to adopt a presumed consent model for organ and tissue donation.
Under amendments to the Human Tissue Gift Act passed last week, most New Brunswickers 19 and older will automatically be presumed to agree to donate their organs and tissues when they die unless they opt out, also known as deemed consent.
When they die.
Just let that float around in your head.
Because what you're going to find out is that they're not dead when this deemed consent is presented and the decision is made by the coroner.
People with an intellectual disability will be exempt, along with anyone who has lived in the province for less than a year.
It's expected to take at least two years before the new system can be implemented.
Under the current system, New Brunswickers, who want to donate their organs and tissues, have to check the appropriate box, like I have done.
On my license.
Very good news, says this doctor.
It's very good news, according to Dr. Rémi Leblanc, head of the intensive care unit of the hospital in Moncton.
He believes it will increase the number of organs available for transplants and significantly decrease the number of people who die waiting.
Of course, if they die waiting because they refuse to transplant because they're not vaccinated, that's fine, because that actually happens in Canada already.
Listen to this.
He thinks it will increase.
No shit Sherlock, medical PhD Sherlock, it will increase the number.
At what cost?
The more potential donors we have, they're not potential donors now.
They're deemed donors.
The more lives we will save.
Except the lives of the donors, but we'll get there.
Because when it says after they die, just let that float around in your head.
It will make a big difference.
No doubt.
65 New Brunden occurs.
Currently on the wait list for transplant.
Across Canada, out of the 4,400 people waiting for organs, 250 people die each year.
What the new law will change on a daily basis is that everyone will be considered a potential donor in the event of a neurological tragedy leading to brain death.
Remember when I said, let this float around in your head?
Where they said when they die, they presumed to agree to donate their organs when they die.
It's a neurological death that they're talking about.
What the new law will change on a daily basis is that everyone will be considered a potential donor in the event of a neurological tragedy leading to brain death and a declaration of physical death according to very rigorous criteria.
It can also affect a neurological trauma without brain death but with a patient in a vegetative state.
We can then have the agreement of the family if the death occurs within a reasonable time.
What happens if they don't have family?
Who then defends for this organ harvesting based on a deemed consent of someone who's neurologically dead?
90% of the citizens are in favor of organ donation, but only 25 to 30% have signed their organ donor card.
Hmm, what's the solution to that problem?
Maybe awareness?
Social awareness.
Maybe 90% are in favor of organ donation, but some have religious reasons for which they don't want to do it.
Others have spiritual reasons.
Others have, I don't know, superstitious reasons.
Maybe if 90% of the population support it, maybe the campaign should be awareness for those people as to how they can do it and not compulsion or deemed consent for everybody except the mentally challenged and people who have lived in the province more than a year.
An organ donor can save the lives of up to eight.
It can save up to eight lives, and the tissue can improve the lives of 75 others, he said.
The bill presented by the liberals received unanimous support in the third reading.
Okay.
Bill 52, the Human Organ Tissue Donation Act, also known as Avery's Law.
Why is it called Avery's Law?
Okay, they suggested the name in honor of Avery Castle, who died in a car crash in Miramichi.
I was actually in Miramichi.
It's a beautiful place.
In 2019, along with three other teens.
That's terrible.
Avery's parents wanted to donate his organs and tissues, including his eyes, but were told no one from the donation team run by Horizon Health was available to retrieve his organs.
Let me ask you this, legislator.
If the purpose of this law was to resolve this issue, which is that the parents wanted to donate their kids' organs...
Not deemed consent, but actual consent, but they couldn't do it because the infrastructure wasn't in place.
How the hell does deemed consent for neurologically dead people resolve, answer that problem?
How?
It doesn't.
It's overreach using the pretext of tragedy as the basis for the overreach.
You know how you resolve the problem of the infrastructure not being there to accommodate willing donors?
Put the infrastructure there for willing donors.
Not create deemed willing donors.
Oh, but it's only by creating deemed willing donors from the mentally, neurologically dead that we can justify the infrastructure.
Horse crap.
It's named after a kid who died whose organs couldn't be used because the government couldn't do its job properly, I presume.
And so the way to resolve that issue, address that issue, is to deem consent...
For everybody in Nova Scotia, New Brunswick.
Oh, okay.
We've come a long way to see this bill finally come to where it stands today, so I'm excited to see this, especially after the last couple of weeks we've had in the House, said Conrad.
I certainly think that everybody can agree it's nice to come together on something for a change.
It's been a long couple of weeks.
Okay, wait until you hear this.
Nova Scotia is the only other jurisdiction in Canada that has adopted a presumed consent organ donation model.
The law change was passed in 2019, took effect in 2021, once supports were put in place to handle anticipated increased donations.
Listen to this.
Hold on one second.
It's going to blow your mind when you read this.
Adults who choose not to register a decision are not exempt and will be...
Oh, let me read this.
Health Minister Bruce Fitch said he expects significant investment will be required to implement the new model in New Brunswick.
Among the changes needed is a new registry where New Brunswickers can register their decision to consent to donate all or some of their organs known as express consent or opt out of donating.
Adults who choose not to register a decision are not exempt.
And are not exempt will be considered potential donors.
Can you imagine the government looking at your body and saying, you look like a potential donor there.
You run races.
You got a nice strong heart in you.
You got a nice strong heart.
I may want that heart, son.
Oh my goodness.
Making the decision.
The legislation sets out that death must be determined by at least two physicians, quote, who have skill and knowledge in conducting these specific medical tests established by the medical profession for determining death.
A physician who has had an association with a proposed organ recipient that might influence a physician's judgment may not take part in the determination of the death of the organ donor.
The chief coroner may allow the removal of organs or tissue of a person, quote, notwithstanding that death has not yet occurred, if in the opinion of the physician, the death of the person is imminent by reason of injury or death.
They don't even have to wait for you to be dead to harvest your organs.
Let that sink in.
And I'll read it again.
The chief coroner may allow the removal of organs or tissue of a person, quote, notwithstanding that they're not dead yet, if in their opinion, you're going to die soon.
I think you're going to die soon by reason of injury or disease.
What can possibly go wrong?
When a person dies in a hospital or circumstances where the coroner would be notified or is close to death, in the opinion of a physician, the hospital or chief coroner must, as soon as possible, provide the organ donation program and tissue bank with the information, such as the person's age, the cause or expected cause of death, the time of death, if the death has occurred, or any other information.
The law prohibits dealing in body parts.
I'm sorry, that sounds exactly like what you're already going to be doing with this.
No person shall buy, sell, or otherwise deal, directly or indirectly, for valuable consideration of any human organ.
They've got all the safety measures in place.
Two doctors.
Two doctors making a decision.
If you're close enough to death, the coroner can come and say, you're close enough, dude.
No miracles for you, baby.
I'm taking your eyes.
They look good.
I know someone who wants them.
Oh, no, they can't know someone who wants them.
Holy hell.
Can that get any worse?
Yeah, we got Finboy Slick who says, qui ne dit mot consent, which says, qui who says nothing consents.
So that's the latest outrageous news coming out of Canada.
But now I think we've waited long enough to get to the actual.
It's a humorous story.
You know, we'll dilute the sickness of Canadian society with more sickness of Canadian society.
Oh, Rachel Gilmore.
Rachel Gilmore, the former CTV news journalist, and I don't say that to mock the fact that she got fired or left, and I think she got fired, and I don't think it was on good terms based on some of the tweets that she put out about CTV news afterwards, but I don't exactly know the terms of her departure from CTV news or global.
Whatever agency she worked at, I'll pull it up to get it afterwards.
She put out a tweet which was so insanely delusional.
I thought it was a joke.
I gave her the benefit of the doubt.
I thought it had to be a joke.
She was award-winning journalist.
Men with podcasts say I'm a lightning rod in Canadian media.
It doesn't say where she used to work.
It doesn't matter.
It's global or CTV.
Rachel Gilmore put out this tweet.
In white nationalist circles, 1488 is a signal.
14 for the 14 words, 88 for the eighth letter of the alphabet, twice.
I guess I'm not part of white national circles because I never heard of such a thing in my entire life.
That's the Heil Hitler.
Given Musk has previously shared he has 24.7 thousand subscribers, why does his profile now say 88, right next to 1445?
Concerning!
I'm not trying to be holier than thou.
I swear to you, I said maybe this was a joke.
I noticed the Twitter feed was a lot less stupid since having muted Rachel Gilmore.
This is a joke, right?
You're attempting to make fun.
There's this thing called gematria.
It's in Hebrew or Judaism where people attribute numbers to letters and you can decipher all sorts of codes from the Talmud and the Bible, whatever.
Gematria.
I thought this was a joke.
I swear to you, I said, even if it's a joke, it's a pretty dumb joke.
It's a joke.
Like, you're attempting to make fun of the people who do this and take it seriously.
Then I noticed she deleted the tweet.
And I said, why did you delete this tweet?
I'm still trying to give good old Rachel Gilmore the benefit of the doubt.
Maybe she meant it as a joke.
People thought it was serious and thought she was being serious, so she deleted it.
It was a sincere question.
I had an answer to that question.
This is Rachel Gilmore saying, I've deleted my previous tweet, not because it was a joke that people took seriously, but because I made a mistake in my psychotic, delusional interpretation of numbers to attribute white nationalist intention to something that does not exist because even according to my own psychotic, delusional rationale...
I was mistaken on the numbers to come to my conclusion because she relied on a number that Elon Musk doesn't control.
It wasn't that it was a joke and that she...
Too many people were taking it seriously and she had to delete it just to let everybody know.
She deleted her previous tweet because I misread subscriptions as subscribers because Elon doesn't control that number.
So even if it said 88, it's not up to him.
And that was dumb.
Yes, that was dumb, but not the dumbest part of your tweet.
The original point still stands.
I was wrong.
I made a mistake.
I was dumb.
I was delusional.
I was fantastical in seeing connections that don't exist.
But my original point still stands.
Elon may be using neo-Nazi dog whistles as a troll.
It's not the first time either.
And she puts an X. I mean, what other word for that is there other than absolutely pathetic, totally delusional, the conspiracy theory, tinfoil hat nonsense that she accuses others of?
I deleted my post because I misread subscriptions as subscribers and that was dumb.
Yes, it was.
But my original point still stands.
It reminds me of the Philip DeFranco apology for the Covington kid, Nicholas Salmon.
Where he comes out and calls him hateful and racist and all this other stuff.
And then when it comes out that they were all wrong, there was no racism involved.
He says, well, I still stand by my condemnation of hatred.
You know what?
Here's the thing.
You don't need to condemn hatred.
I was wrong.
I was factually wrong.
I misread the tweet.
I came to a wildly untenable, delusional conclusion.
That was dumb, but my point still stands.
Elon Musk is a white nationalist.
Congratulations, Rachel.
You played yourself.
All right.
Oh, my gosh.
Oh.
We have two more stories for Canada.
Hold on.
Hold on.
Let me bring up...
Just bring up some...
I think there was a...
Oh, my goodness.
It's going to be a harassment campaign.
Here we go.
Finboy Slick says, In our professional opinion, you'll be dead soon as soon as we harvest your heart.
And then Finboy Slick says, All right.
Two stories out of canon.
I mean, I guess this is going to be it.
Did I talk about this one?
I think I covered it, but I want to cover it again.
If I talked about it, I think I touched on it briefly.
Chat, Rumble, did I talk about this one already?
This is, you know, Doctors Are Baffled.
At the number of...
Where did it just go?
Again, out of Nova Scotia.
WhyStatsCan says Nova Scotia is seeing significant excess mortality.
COVID-19 is one reason, but agency says data is still very incomplete.
I think I did talk about this.
The excess mortality in Nova Scotia is up.
COVID-19 is one of the reasons.
One of the other reasons?
Diseases of the heart.
Statistics Canada singled out diseases of the heart as another factor that may have contributed to excess mortality.
So when people say, if the jab was as unsafe and ineffective as it was, why aren't we seeing more excess deaths?
We are.
Nova Scotia, that's a recent article.
Alberta now has deaths of unknown causes, or it did at least as of last summer.
Deaths of unknown causes as the leading cause of death.
Edward Dowd.
Doing some statistical analysis of actuaries.
Deaths among the age bracket of, like, what is it, 19 to 45, the working age.
Record high spikes.
Determined.
Known by actuaries, insurance companies, underwriters is the word I was looking for.
Oh.
Okay, hold on, hold on.
Hold on.
Did I forget to bring up a tweet?
Oh, yeah, no, this was my...
That was my tweet.
Okay, never mind.
My Twitter feed.
No, what I wanted to bring up was the last article of the day.
Share screen.
If you oppose drag time story hour, you are denying people human rights.
This is from Toronto Star.
Actually, let me just refresh everybody's memory.
Toronto Star anti-vax cover.
Forever, just refresh your memories about the filth, the filth that is the Toronto Star.
How do I do this?
Can I bring this up here like this?
Are we seeing the...
We're not.
Okay, well, the Toronto Star headline right there.
Oh, yeah, fine, I can do that.
I'll just read it.
The Toronto Star.
No, what am I doing here, people?
Oh, God, I'm an idiot.
Okay, sorry.
I'm going to read it anyhow.
Toronto Star.
If an unvaccinated person catches it from someone who is vaccinated, boo-hoo, too bad.
I have no empathy left for the willfully unvaccinated.
Let them die.
I honestly don't care if they die from COVID, not even a little bit.
Unvaccinated patients do not deserve ICU beds at this point.
Simmering divide over who is unvaccinated.
It's a polarizing debate, but patience and understanding for those not getting shots for short supply, yada, yada, yada.
That was the actual cover page of the Toronto Star.
Once upon a time, during COVID.
I don't care about the unvaccinated.
Let him die.
And Jimmy Kimmel was...
Was it Jimmy Kimmel?
I think it was Jimmy Kimmel.
Was more than happy to oblige.
So that's who we're dealing with right now.
Toronto Star.
Human Rights and 2SLGBTQ+.
Still don't know what the plus stands for.
Although some people are making some suggestions as to what the PLUS stands for.
Human rights and 2SLGBTQ education should not be optional.
Human rights are not optional.
That's why they're called human rights.
2SLGBTQ plus education should not be optional.
When school boards permit opting out of human rights education, Such as drag story time, it sends a message that these rights are debatable.
Can you appreciate how they bake in the most hotly disputed, contentious, borderline outrageous affirmation as a human right?
When you opt out of human rights educations, which includes drag story time.
Human rights education.
First of all, I don't know what that means.
In this context, we'll see if we'll clarify in this article.
When you opt out of human rights education, which I presume means teaching about the Armenian genocide, the Holocaust, the Rwandan genocide, where I presume it talks about slavery, human rights education as to when the rights of humans have been egregiously and inhumanely violated.
I presume that's what human rights education means in the truest of senses.
When you deny human rights education, such as drag story time hour, so that you cannot have bearded men dressed up as women for sexual or identity preferences reading to children, it's just disgusting.
Because what you end up doing is bastardizing, diminishing, diluting, desecrating actual human rights discussion.
If you don't let grown men dressed as women, bearded women, read to your kids, you're denying them human rights.
Where does this go?
This goes to, if you deny, what is it called?
Minor attracted persons?
If you deny them their rights, you're denying them human rights.
The Toronto District School Board's decision to allow parents to opt their children out of...
It's not just now that they want the freedom to read to children if the parents consent.
They want to accuse you of denying them human rights for opting out of having a grown bearded man dressed as a woman reading to your child.
The Toronto District School Board's decision to allow parents to opt their children out of drag story time, a common part of family friendly programming during Pride Month and beyond.
Who wrote this?
Who wrote this?
We're going to see this afterwards.
Joy Henderson.
We're going to see that afterwards.
We are queer parents with elementary and secondary-aged schoolchildren in the TD.
Can you imagine, by the way, the same people who say now it's bigoted denial of human rights to not let our bearded women, a man dressed as women, read to your kids, are the same ones saying, take in God we trust off our money, take the Pledge of Allegiance, God out of the Pledge of Allegiance, do not have the Ten Commandments in school.
It's the same people saying separation of church and state.
But your kids are going to sit through an adult bearded man dressed as a woman reading to him.
And if you don't, it's a denial of my human rights.
We are queer parents.
Like many, we are alarmed by a recent report detailing confusion over board policy and disappointed with their position that schools should accommodate parents who want to opt out.
They're coming for your kids, people.
And when you said it, they called you a crazy conspiracy theorist.
Drag story time offers students a representation of diversity in gender expression and identity, which are protected grounds of discrimination.
And by the way, slippery slope?
If you allow this to go into the criminal code, it's going to criminalize speech.
It's going to lead to compelled speech.
You're going to have to call them by their preferred pronouns of the day.
Oh, it's not a slippery slope.
Well, now that it's in the Charter of Human Rights, now that it's in there, if you...
Opt your kid out of me having a bearded man dressed as a woman read to your kid, you're violating my human rights.
Toronto District School Board's decision reverses its previous stance on accommodations of the 2S LGBTQ plus education, communicated in a memorandum in 2002.
In response to a discriminatory declaration of parental and family rights, it affirmed human rights education prevents discrimination and that no student can be exempted from human rights education.
In a...
TDSB.
This is going to turn into PTSD is what it is.
The board further explains that parents may not receive religious accommodations from the discussion of two...
It's not just that they want to have it and allow people who want to be a part of it.
They want to impose it on you and your kids against your consent.
It violates human rights.
Furthermore, this is consistent with the ideal that human rights education is an essential strategy for protecting human rights abuses.
Why did this position change during a moment when queer and trans children are acutely vulnerable?
It is no more acceptable to allow students to opt out of events representing 2SLGBTQ + culture, history, and identities than it is to allow students to opt out of events represented by diversity of race, ancestry, ethnicity, and ability.
The history of modern drag in queer culture is one that, like all discriminated groups, has been subjected to policing and criminalization.
Today we are watching history repeat itself.
In the United States, anti-drag bills are making their way through the courts.
Canada is not immune to the rise of hate.
Now it's hatred if you opt out.
Remember when I said that the Toronto District School Board that just put in gender-neutral bathrooms throughout the school?
And some parents were complaining because little boys were flashing their penises to little girls.
Girls didn't feel comfortable administering tampons within earshot of boys.
We'll just make a gender-specific bathroom for those who want it.
And I was like...
Yeah, good.
Label them a bigot.
Anybody seen them coming out of that?
That's going to be the scarlet letter.
It's exactly what they're doing now.
You want to opt out of having drag adults read to your kids?
You're a bigot.
Here, Dragtime Story, the target of hate-driven protests near schools and libraries.
In response, okay, yada, yada, yada, they've released a communication condemning 2SLGB2Q +, hate, and affirming the right of queer and trans children to not only exist, but also to thrive in schools.
I can't continue reading this.
We have to.
Let's see here.
We read...
We read the TDSB's softening on human rights education as a failure to protect.
You can read it whichever way you want.
Students are, according to their own census, experiencing a disproportionate decline in well-being in schools.
Yeah, especially maybe the girls that are forced to share bathrooms with boys.
When school boards permit opting out of human rights education.
Grown adults dressed in drag reading to children.
That's human rights education.
It sends a message that these rights are debatable.
It also silences educators, staff, and students.
The decision prioritizes the comfort of right-wing ideologues committed to maintaining gender norms.
You see what they're doing?
And you're committed to imposing gender fluidity on kids that don't want to be exposed to it.
They're coming for your kids.
When you said it a while back, you were crazy.
And now if you say it, you're a bigot.
We're not doing it.
Now that we're doing it and you want to opt out of it, you're a bigot.
That's hate.
That's hate.
For you to opt out of my ideology, it's hate.
As a former T Toronto District School Board students, we've written as queer and trans peers who were out relentlessly bullied for their identity.
Never in my life have I seen any trans person bullied for their identity.
people criticizing don't make me use a bathroom with the other sex.
We experienced the struggle of hiding parts of ourselves in a climate of fear and social punishment.
As parents, we demand a better world for our children.
Our children, not yours.
Despite progress, too many students struggle to feel free, represented, and affirmed at school.
Okay.
You thought it couldn't get crazier, but it doesn't stop.
If you don't want grown adults cross-dressing, reading to your kids in school, you're a bigot.
Oh.
GingerNinja says, you better play that Monty Python clip.
Bring out your dead.
But I'm not dead yet.
Oh, yes, you're dead.
No, he's only mostly dead.
Bring in Miracle Max.
You're mostly dead.
Let's put the pillow over your head and take your organs.
All right, people.
I think we're done for the day.
Let me see here.
Yeah, we're going to be done for the day.
Oh, hold on a second.
I said that too quickly.
Thank you all for being here.
I think we've had some laughter, but mostly it's just madness and it's got to stop and I don't know when it stops.
All right, that's it.
So now we're going to go over to locals.
VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com But first, we should end this on something that makes us happy, a video to play us out.
Nah.
Forget it.
Let's just move over to Locals.
VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com.
We've got tips to talk about and a chat to have in our wonderful community.
Peter Hotez is a coward.
That is how we will end this.
All right.
Head on over to Locals, people.
Thank you all for being here.
Enjoy the weekend.
Sunday night's stream is going to be at 4 o 'clock on Sunday, earlier than normal, because Barnes will be in transit.
I may or may not get a stream tomorrow.
I'm going to have to go and be a parent in a few seconds right now.